The URL can be used to link to this page

10/02/1989 - 5330� FRIDLEY CITY COQNCIL MEETINa uno� � F�D1-� ATTENDENCE SHEET MONDAY OCTOBER 2 , 19 8 9 7:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ITEM «�PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS NUMBER � �"' �' � — - �5[� `,n�,.�c�, �,t � - C_. � �1,r.,. �11.�.��., _ � I � � i / r , _ _ �ii . � '% i ,r .��a_.Jl ' I� a � I � / � � � � ' � L � s�- /(o'�c L �rt y � vs �1�� - � � �v SZ� �iv�� __�_�� 'r — ►il!/!�� I � i� /13J ?�,�Il , �� J �/ ( 6 �� T �G/J�- .�V, -�✓3e. ,- l '-, S, p (z. i � r� O� �� -� - II � - � i � �_ /I 0 �; � � ,;,a OCTOBER 2, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. The following are the "ACTION5 TAKEN" your information. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION: by the administration for German-American Day, October 6, 1989 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Council Meeting, September 18, 1989 Approved. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Adopted as submitted. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: (Consideration of items not on agenda - 15 minutes) Elaine Vangerud introduced Cathy Wiedmann a Senior Outreach Worker. PIIBLIC HEARING: Public Hearing on a vacation, 5AV #89-04, to vacate the west 27 feet of a 57.5 foot existing east/west easement on Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Onaway Addition, generally located at 7890 Hickory Street N.E., by David Larson. . . . . . . . . . . 1-1H Opened at 7:52 and Closed at 7:58. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: Proceeding as authorized. i I Gouncil Meeting, October 2, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. Page 2 NEW BUSINE88: Consideration of Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of September 13, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . 2-2AA A. Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #89-14, to allow enterprises having merchandise in the open and not within an enclosed structure; to allow exterior storage of materials and equipment, located at 7191 Highway 65 N.E., by Ted Haines and Diane Jorgenson for City Sports ...................2E-2I ...................2M-2Y Approved with 6 stipulations. Stipulation #4 as amended. COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: Notified petitioner of Council approval with 6 stipulations. B. Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Approving a Vacation, SAV #89-04, to vacate the west 27 feet of a 57.5 foot existing east/west easement on Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Onaway Addition, generally located at 7890 Hickory Street N.E., by David Larson ..................2I-2J ..................2Z-2AA First Reading. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: October 23 Council meeting. NEW BIISINESS (CONTINIILD): Second reading set for Council Meeting, October 2, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. Page 3 � Consideration of Items from the Minutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of September 19, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3EEE A. Consideration of a Variance, CAR #89-21, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 29 feet; to reduce the side yard setback from a living area from 10 feet to 7 feet 10 inches, to allow the construction of additional living space on Lots 37 and 38, Block E, Riverview Heights, the same being 590 Kimball Street N.E., by Robert Franzen.......3-3M Approved variance for side yard setback and front yard setback. COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: of Council approval. Consideration of Items from the Minutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of September 19, 1989 (continued): Notified petitioner B. Consideration of a Variance, VAR #89-22, to reduce the side yard setback on a corner lot from 17.5 feet to 11.1 feet, to allow the construction of an addition on Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, Florence Park Addition, the same being 6370 Van Buren Street N.E., by Vera A. Phillips...........3N-3CC Approved. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: of Council approval. NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED?: Notified petitioner � Council Meeting, October 2, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. Page 4 C. Consideration of a Variance, VAR #89-23, to reduce the side yard setback for an accessory building on a corner lot from 30 feet to 20 feet, to allow the construction of a single family home and attached garage on Lot 15, Block 2, Riverwood Park, the same being 7100 Riverwood Drive N.E., by O. B. Zachmann ......................3DD-35S Approved. COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: Notified petitioner of Council approval. D. Consideration of a Variance, VAR #89-24, to increase the total square footage of signage from 80 square feet to 220 square feet (2 price signs at 110 square feet each) on Lot 1, Block 1, Commerce Park, the same being 7600 University Avenue N.E., by Conoco, Inc..........3TT-3EEE Tabled until October 23 Council meeting. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: Set for the October 23 Council meeting. Consideration to Close Project #629, Crime Prevention, and Return Unused CDBG Funds to Anoka County. . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Approved. COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: Returned unused CDBG Funds to County. NE�P BIISINE88 (CONTINOED): Consideration to Approve Contract for Council Meeting, October 2, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. Page 5 Tire Recycling Day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5E Approved. COMMONITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: Will use the money Council allotted for Household Hazardous Waste if the VFW or Fridley Lions doesn't participate in the Tire Recycling Day. Proceed staff to draft agreement with Maust Fiber Fuels for Tire Recycling Day. Consideration of a Resolution Certifying Certain Delinquent Water and Sewer Charges to the County Auditor for Collection with the 1990 taxes. . . . . . . . . . 6-6G Adopted Resolution No. 81-1989. FINANCE DEPARTMENT--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded as authorized. Consideration of a Resolution Certifying Charges to the County Auditor to be levied against Certain Properties for Collection with Taxes Payable in 1990. (Weeds) . . . . . . . 7-7A Adopted Resolution No. 82-1989. FINANCE DEPARTMENT--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded as authorized. Consideration of a Resolution Designating Polling Places and Appointing Election Judges for the November 7, 1989 General Election . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-8C Adopted Resolution No. 83-1989. FINANCE DEPARTMENT--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded as authorized. NE�i BUSINESS (CONTINIIED): Consideration of Resolution No. 84-1989 approving and authorizing signing an agreement establishing Council Meeting, October 2, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. Page 6 working conditions, wages and hours of employees of the City of Fridley Fire Department for the years 2989 and 1990 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-9R Adopted Resolution 84-1989. CITY MANAGER�S DEPARTMENT--ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized. Consideration of Change Order No. 5 for Technical System (Electronic Systems, Inc. ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-lOB Approved. CITY MANAGER�B DEPARTMENT--ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized. Consideration of Change Order No. 2 Consultant Contract for Technical System (Electronic Interiors) . . . . . . . . . . 11-liB Tabled. CITY MANAGER'S DEPARTMENT--ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Advertising for Bids, Firearms Range Ventilation Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12-12B Adopted Resolution No. 85-1989. POLICE DEPARTMENT--ACTION TAREN: Bids advertised. NEW BU$INE88 (CONTINQED): Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Advertising for Bids, Indoor Firearms Range Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13-13A , Council Meeting, October 2, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. Page 7 Adopted Resolution No. 86-1989. POLICE DEPARTMENT--ACTI4N TAREN: Bids advertised. Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 Approved. FTNANCE DEPARTMENT--ACTION TAREN: Paid claims. Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15-15E Approved. FINANCB DEPARTMENT--ACTION TAREN: Issued licenses. Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-16A Approved. FINANCE DEPARTMENT--ACTION TARENs Adjourn: 9:15 p.m. Paid estimates. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 2, 1989 - 7530 P.M. PLEDGE OF PiLL$GIANCE: PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION: German-American Day, October 6, 1989 APPROVAL OF MZNIITEB: Council Meeting, September 18, 1989 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: OPEN FORIIM, VISITORB: (Consideration of items not on agenda - 15 minutes) PIIBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a vacation, 6AV #89-04, to vacate the west 27 feet of a 57.5 foot existing east/west easement �rn Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Onaway Addition, generally located at 7890 Hickory Street N.E., by David Larsor� ..... � ; . . . . . 1-1H CITY COIINCIL 1dE8TING OCTOBBR 2, 1989 NEW BOBINEBS: Consideration of Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of September 13, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . 2-2AA A. Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP �89-14, to allow �� enterprises having merchandise in the open and not within an enclosed structure; to allow exterior storaqe c�f materials and equipment, located at 7191 Highway 65 N.E., by Ted Haines `` and Diane Jorgenson for CitySports ...................2E-2I ...................2M-2Y B. Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Approving a vacatior�, SAV #89-04, to vacate the west 27 feet of a 57.5 foot existing east/west � easement"�on Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Onaway Addition, generally located at 7890 Hickory Street N.E., by David Larsori ..................2I-2J ..................2Z-2AA i .� �� ✓ � Consideration of Items from the Minutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of September 19, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3EEE A. Consideration of a Variance, CAR #89-21, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 29=feet; to reduce the side yard setback from a living area from 10 fe�t to 7 feet�l0 inches, to allow the construction of additional � living space on Lots 37 and t/� 38, Block E, Riverview Heights, ✓ the same being 5�0 Ri�ball Street N . E . , by Robert " �`�aln�eif . . . . . . . 3 -3M PAGE 2 CITY COIINCIL l[$ETINa OCTOB$R 2� 1989 �iTEW BDBINE86 (COIdTZNOED) : Consideration of Items from the Minutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of September 19, 1989 (contined): B. Consideration of a Variance, VAR #89-22, to reduce the side yard setback on a corner lot frQm 17.5 feet ' p to il.i feet, to allow Y the construction of an addition on Lots 1 and 2, n�/ Block 5, Florence Park �! � Addition, the same being 6370 Van Buren Street N.E., by Vera A. Phillips.:.........3N-3CC C. Consideration of a Variance, VAR #89-23, to reduce the eide yard setback'for an accessory building on a corner lot trom 30 feet � to 20 feet, to allow the construction of a single � family home and attached garage on Lot 15, Block 2, Riverwood Park, the same being 7100 Riverwood Drive N.E., by O. B. Zs+�hrita'�i�1t . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 DD- 3 S S D. Consideration of a Variance, VAR #89-24, to increase the total square footage of signage from 80 square fee� to 220 equare feet �2 price signs at 110 square feet each) on Lot 1, Block l, Commerce Park, the same being 7600 University Avenue N.E., by Conoco, I�c..........3TT-3EEE PAGE 3 CITY COO1dCIL lL88TING OCTOBER 2� 1989 NEW BIISINESS (COIdTZNII$D): Consideration to Close Project #629, Crime Prevention, and Return Unused CDBG Funds to Anoka County. .. .. l� ; �� Consideration to Approve Contract for Tire Recycling Day. . . . . . . . . , 'A � ' V- / � . . . . . . 4 � . . . . . . 5-5E Consideration of a Resolution Certifying Certain Delinquent Water and Sewer Charges to the County Auditor for Collection with the 1990 taxes. ..... 1 T "" V r . . . . 6-6G Consideration of a Resolution Certifying Charges to the Caunty Auditor to be levied against Certain Properties for Collection with Taxes Payable in 1990. (Weeds) .... Consideration of a Resolution Designating Polling Places and Appointing Election Judges for the November 7, 1989 General Election . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q�� I Y" . . . 7-7A � 'f� � . . . . 8-8C PAGE 4 � U� " f NBW BIISINESS CONTINIIED: Consideration of Labor Agreement for Firef ighters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � / V Consideration of Change Order No. for Technical System (Electronic Systems, Inc. ) . . . . . . . . . . I Consideration of Change Order No. Consultant Contract for Technical System (Electronic Interiors) . . 5 F� � �� . . . . 9-9R � �/ . . . . . 10-108 n ��f'' f�_/ . . . . . . . 11-11B Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Advertising for Bids, Firearms Range Ventilation Construction. . . . . . . . . / U � . . . . 12-12B � Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing � Advertising for Bids, Indoor Firearms Range Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13-13A / �V � NEW HOSINE86 CONTINIIED: Claims . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . .14 Licenses . . . . . Estimates . . . . . Adj ourn : . . . . . . . . . 15-15E . . . . . . . . 16-16A • German-American Day October 6,1989 William J. Nee Meyor Fridley. MN WHEREAS, it was on October 6, 1683 that rhe firsr Germa»s arrived in rhe United States; and WHEREAS, today, more that 60 million Americans trace at least a part of their ancest►y to Germany; and WHEREAS, the sons and daughters of Germarry have served this city and this country steadfastly over the years in all fields; and WHEREAS, 1980 census figures show more Fridley residents trace their ancestry to Germany than to any other foreign country; and WHEREAS, Fridley residents of German ancestry have served with distinction on the Ciry Council, on City Convnissions, and as Ciry employees; and WHEREAS, The United States Conference of Mayors in covperation with the German Association of Cities and The Federal Republic of Ge»nany have joined in a co�operative e,�`'ort to commemorate the invaluable contributions of Americans of Germans ancestry, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the I William 1. Nee Mayor of Fridley, proclaim October 6,1989 as : German-American Day in the Ciry of Frid ley, and call upon all citizenr to recognize the vital role Gernean-Americans have played in the development of our city and notion. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my harul a�d caused the seal of the City of Fridley to be a,�xed this 2nd day of Octob�er,1989. WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR THE KINIITES OF THE REGIILPiR l�E$TING OF T8E FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL OF BEPTEMBER 18, 1989 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Councilman Billings MEMBERS ABSENT: None � APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING. SEPTEMBER 11. 1989: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt the agenda with the deletion of item 13. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM. VISZTORS: There was no response from the audience under this item of business. OLD BUSINESS• 1. ORDINANCE NO 931 RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE CHAPTER iO4 ENTITLED "TREE DZSEASE" BY RENAMING CHAPTER TO "DISEASED TREES" AND BY AMENDING SECTIONS 104.02. 104.04. 104.06. 104.08 AND 104.09: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the changes in this ordinance include identification of the Superintendent of Public Works as the City Forester; identification of the City Manager as the Director and Controller of the program; extends the response date for tree removal from 10 to 30 days; allows the property owner to have a private diseased tree removed and assessed to the lRIDLBY CITY CODNCIL ltBBTINa O� BEPTEKHBR_�8. 1989 P��E 2 property for a period of five years; defines a boulevard tree; and identifies the City's responsibility for removal of boulevard trees and the replacement of bare root trees on the owner's property. He stated there has also been the addition of Section 104.04 (5) since the first reading of this proposed ordinance. IrIOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 931 and adopt it on second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to amend the ordinance by adding Section 104.04 (5) to read as follows: "Any diseased tree, dead tree, or part thereof, includinq loqs, branches, stumps, firewood, or other wooden material which has been determined to present a condition which endangers the safety or health of the public and has not been treated accordinq to the prescription of the City Forester." Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to amend the ordinance by adding the following words under Section 104.08 (2), second line, after the word "right-of-way": "or a street easement that has been acquired for an existing street". Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAI�N ON THE MAZN MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 2. ORDINANCE NO. 932 RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 602. ENTITLED "BEER LICENSING" BY AMENDING SECTION 602.09.1, LICENSES REOUIRED: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 932 and adopt it on second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 3. ORDINANCE NO. 933 RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE. CHAPTER 603. ENTITLED "INTOXICATING LIQUOR" BY AMENOING SECTION 603.11.1. HOURS OF OPERATION: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 933 and adopt it on Becond reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, I�Iayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 4. ORDINANCE NO. 934 RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, CHAPTER g05. ENTITLED "INTOXICATING LIQUOR--CLUBS" BY AMENDING SECTION 605.13.1. 605.13.2. RESTRICTIONS: �RIDLEY CITY COIIAiCIL 1SESTZNG OF BBPTEIdBER 18. 1989 P�GE 3 MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the Becond reading of Ordinance No. 934 and adopt it on second readinq and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 5. ORDINANCE NO. 935 RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE. CHAPTER 606, ENTITLED "INTOXICATING LIQUORS. CONGRESSIONALLY CHARTERED VETERANS' ORGANZZATIONS" BY AMENDING SECTION 606.11.1, HOURS OF OPERATION• MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the second readinq of Ordinance No. 935 and adopt it on second readinq and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS• 6. �ONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO CHAPTER 6 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE ENTITLED "COMMISSIONS" SECTIONS 6.01. COA'II�'IISSION TITLES; 6.03, PLANNING COMMISSION: 6.08, ENERGY COMMISSION: 6.05, ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY COMMISSION: AND CHAPTER 205. ZONING, SECTIONS 205.13.3.B. 205.14.3.B, 205.15.3.B, 205.16.3.C, 205.17.3.C, AND 205.18.3.C: Mayor Nee stated the proposed chanqe to the code regarding the Commissions covers the restructurinq of the Energy Commission and Environmental Quality Commission. Councilman Billinqs stated the other proposed change is to increase the square footage coverage in commercial and industrial zones. MOTION by Councilman Billings to receive these proposed changes and refer to the staff for review and processing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. RESOLUTION NO. 79-1989 AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTZNG QF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON SECTION 12, PART OF SE 1/4. PARCEL 7210 fPIN NO. 12-30-24-41-0001): MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 79-1989. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS AND AWARDING OF CONTRACTS FOR F��E FOLDERS TO MID-AMERICA AND FOR LABELS TO WRIGHT-LINE: Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated on August 14, 1989, the Council received bids for the central file system. He stated no bidder met the entire specifications, but two bidders met certain �RZDLBY CITY COIINCIL ltEBTING OF BEPTBKHBR 18, 1989 P�GE 4 components detailed in the specifications. Mr. Pribyl stated the specifications were written so that the City could accept all or part of any bid. He Btated it is, therefore, recommended that the bid for file folders be awarded to Mid-America for $6,573.81 and the bid for labels be awarded to Wriqht-Line for $1,831.00. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for file folders to the low bidder, Mid-America, in the amount of $6,573.81. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for labels to the low bidder, Wriqht-Line, in the amount of $1,831.00. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 9. CONSIDERATION O RECEIVING TEMS FROM PLANNING COMMISSION �+iEETING OF SEPTE BER 13. 1989: A. �ONSIDERATION OF SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR OCTOBER 2. ,�989 FOR A VACATION. SAV #89-04. BY DAVID LARSON: MOTION by Councilman Billings to set the public hearing on this vacation request for October 2, 1989. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 10. CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING ITEMS FROM APPEAIS COMMZSSION �EETING OF SEPTEMBER 5. 1989: A. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE RE4UEST, VAR #89-19. TO jtEDUCE THE RE4UIRED SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 9.2 FEET:_TO gEDUCE THE RE4UIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 10 FEET TO 9.1 �EET; TO REDUCE THE REQUZRED SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR AN �iTTACHED ACCESSORY USE FROM 5 FEET TO 1 FOOT, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DOUBLE CAR GARAGE ON LOT 8. BLOCK l, PARKVIEW OAKS FIRST ADDITION, THE SAME SEING 1281 HATHAWAY ?�ANE N.E., BY ORVILLE AND JEANNINE SACHS: Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this is a request for variances to allow the construction of a qarage at 1281 Hathaway Lane. She stated the petitioners, Mr. and Mrs. Sachs, purchased the property from HUD and were led to believe they had 12 feet between the garage and lot line. She stated they have since had the property surveyed and found this is not the case. Iis. Dacy etated the variance requests are a reduction in the side yard setback from 10 to 9.1 feet; a reduction in the 6ide yard setback for an attached accessory use from 5 feet to 1 foot; and a reduction in the front yard setback from 35 to 9.2 feet. She stated the Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variance for the existinq encroachment, but recommended denial of the other FRZDLEY CITY COIINCIL l[$BTING OF 8$PTBKHER 18. 1989 PAGE S two variances to reduce the required side yard setback for an attached accessory use from 5 feet to 1 foot and to reduce the front yard setback from 35 to 9.2 feet. Ks. Dacy stated it is recommended the Sachs' pursue the potential of expandinq their existinq home to the east on the City's Outlot C. She stated staff recommends the Council uphold the recommendation of the Appeals Commission. Councilman Schneider asked if there were any other variances of this maqnitude qranted in the City. Ms. Dacy stated that there were none. Mrs. Sachs, the petitioner, stated the property at 1333 Hillwind would be two feet closer to the street than what they are requesting. Ms. Dacy stated a variance was approved for this property and the request read that it was to reduce the setback from 35 to 28 feet. She stated, in actuality, the edge of the garage is approximately 26 feet from the curb line. She stated it could not be determined where that front property line was located and there was no certificate of survey on file. Councilman Schneider asked the petitioner if they had considered expanding to the east if property was available. Mrs. Sachs stated they have not ruled out this possibility. She stated her husband was not able to attend the meetinq this evening as he is in the hospital recoverinq from a heart attack. She stated this option has not been fully discussed. Mrs. Sachs stated they would like to utilize the land they now have, however, they may consider other options on purchasing additional land. Councilman Schneider stated he would be reluctant to grant a front yard variance of this magnitude. He stated if the Sachs' were willing to purchase additional property, they probably would not need the entire outlot. He asked Mrs. Sachs if she wished the Council to act on the variance request this evening or if she wished it tabled. Mrs. Sachs stated she felt this was for the Council to decide, but stated their plans were not to begin immediately to construct the qaraqe. Councilman Billinqs etated if the City agreed to the sale of a portion of this outlot, the variance may not be needed. He stated the Council could delay action and give the petitioner time to submit some alternatives. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table consideration of this variance request, VAR #89-19, for three months or until the petitioner contacts staff. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. �►�tIDLBY CITY COONCIL l[BBTI�TG Ol� BBPTEMB�R 18. 1989 P!►GE 6 Mr. Burns, City Irtanaqer, asked if staff was required to re-submit this request to the Council in three months. Councilman Schneider stated it did not have to be submitted within the three months or if the Sachs did not contact etaff. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAI�N ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. B. �ON5IDERATION OF SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR OCTOBER 2. 1989 FOR THE SALE OF EXCESS PROPERTY. :, OUTLOT C, INNSBRUCK NORTH ADDITION, ADJACENT TO 1281 HATHAWAY LANE N.E.: Mrs. Sachs stated her husband was concerned how the City would proceed with a sale of Outlot C and if it would be on a bidding basis. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, Btated bids are not required, but in cases of buildable sites, the City has, on some occasions, requested bids. He stated in this case, where it is a non- buildable site, the� property is usually split with adjacent property owners. Councilman Schneider stated he realizes there are some concerns with the residents on Matterhorn Drive regarding the sale of this outlot. He stated the Council should probably not proceed with setting the public hearing for this potential sale of Outlot C, but when the petitioner submits a plan and if it is appropriate to sell a portion of this outlot, the hearing could be scheduled at that time. Mrs. Sachs asked what restrictions vould be placed on the construction of the qaraqe. Councilman Schneider gtated it would depend on how much property is acquired. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated there were concerns of neighbors if the bikeway/walkway would be retained if a portion of the outlot is sold. Councilman Schneider stated the City is not desperate to sell this outlot, but may consider it to accommodate the Sachs'. He stated he could not promise that it would not qo out for bid. He stated there may be others interested in purchasing this outlot in order to retain the aesthetics of the neiqhborhood. He stated in any case, a public hearing would be necessary before the �roperty could be sold. �RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL ltEET2Na O� BEPTE�IBER 18. 1989 P�GE 7 Mrs. Sachs stated if there is a chance the property would qo out for bids, she would like to see this item tabled. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table this item and instruct staff to notify affected persons that the public hearinq has been tabled. Seconded by Councilman Billinqs. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the �otion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to instruct staff that when the Sachs contact the City reqardinq their qarage construction, staff should request a plan and work with the petitioner and then prepare the necessary documentation so that the minimal portion of Outlot C that would necessary to accommodate the qaraqe construction be scheduled for a public hearing as excess property. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Schneider stated a petition has been submitted in opposition to the City sellinq Outlot C and asked that this be received into the minutes. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive Petition No. 15-1989 in opposition to the sale of Outlot C, Innsbruck North. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. C. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE RE UEST. VAR �89-20. TO ItEDUCE THE SETBACK FOR ALL PARKING AND HARD SURFACE At�EAS__�'ROM 20 FEET FROM ANY STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY TO �0 FEET, ON LOTS 18 THROUGH 24. BLOCK 13. BENNETT �ALMER ADDITION. GENERALLY LOCATED DIRECTLY NORTH OF FORMER 2ANTIGO RESTAURANT, BY FRIDLEY ALANO 80CIETY: Ms. Dacy, Planninq Coordinator, Btated the Fridley Alano Society is constructing a 7,000 square foot buildinq for their assembly or meeting place for AA activities. She stated they have requested a variance to reduce the hard surface Betback from the required 20 feet to 10 feet along the service road. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner has submitted a survey that meets all the City's code requirements as to the parkinq requirements, but they wish to encroach 10 feet into the 20 foot required setback in order to increase their parking capacity. She stated staff recommended to the Appeals Commission that this variance be denied, however, the Commission recommended approval because all the other properties in the area are built to the ten foot setback or, in some cases, to the front lot line. She stated the Appeals Commission's recommendation was eubject to the petitioner submittinq a landscape plan for staff approval and a six foot screeninq fence to be constructed along the rear property line. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ltEBTING O� BBPTBKBBR 8. 1989 P�GE 8 Mr. Ken Murphy, representing the Alano Society, stated they have been located in Koon Plaza for 22 years. He stated the Fridley �lano Society Berves between 1,600 to 2,000 persons per week. He stated they have a new druq proqram and have also added a program for children of alcoholics. He stated they have 502 members who pay dues and all of their financing comes from recovering alcoholics. Mr. Murphy stated they have always had a problem with parking and �anted to be sure there was ample parking for anyone who wished to attend their meetings. He stated he had met with persons representing the handicapped and some parkinq will be lost as they did not take into consideration the ramps on the vans to lower wheelchairs. He stated, therefore, the handicapped parking will have to be wider than originally anticipated. Mr. Murphy stated the property to the north of their new building is owned by AA peop�e, but not the Fridley Alano Society. He stated there may be the possibility of purchasinq this property at a future date, if funds are available. Mayor Nee stated he is impressed with their success and can see where the parking is needed. Mr. Murphy stated if the variance is qranted, it would give them about eight more parking stalls. Councilman Billings asked if there was any way for the other properties to conform to the 20 foot setback. He stated he did not wish to perpetuate a problem if there is a solution in getting other businesses to meet this setback in a reasonable time period. Ms. Dacy stated if any of the businesses applied for building permits, it would be possible to obtain compliance with the code at that time. She stated, however, she did not anticipate these businesses expandinq. Mr. Murphy stated they plan to approach the owners of Zantiqo's and try and obtain a lease for parking on their site. Ms. Dacy stated she discussed this matter vith the City Attorney and if the variance is qranted, there would not be an adverse impact. She stated, however, with any future development to the north, the Council could probably expect a similar variance request. Councilwoman Jorgenson questioned the drainage and if it would impact the residential properties to the east. Ms. Dacy stated the property would drain to the north and felt this issue was addressed in the issuance of the building permit. lRIDLEY CITY COIII�iCZL M8$TZNG O� 68PTE?I88R 18. 1989 P�GS 9 KoTION by Councilman Billings to qrant variance request, VAR �89- 20, with the followinq Btipulations: (1� the petitioner shall submit a landscape plan for staff approval; and (2) a eix foot screening fence shall be constructed along the rear property line. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. SONSIDERATION OF A RE UEST BY DONALO DICKISON OF CUSTOMER MECHANICAL TO EXTEND THE INSTALLATION DATES OF OUTSIDE �MPROVEMENTS AS STIPULATED BY SP #88-12 AND VAR #88-22: Ms. Dacy, Planninq Coordinator, stated a request has been received by Mr. Dickison to extend the completion dates for outside improvements for the property at 5973 3rd Street. She stated Mr. Dickison is requesting a one year extension to September 1, 1990 to complete the curbing, parking lot improvements, and landscaping as stipulated in his special use permit and variance. She stated due to financial constraints, Mr. Dickison has not been able to complete these improvements. Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending extension of the completion date subject to the letter of credit also being extended until September 1, 1990. MOTION by Councilman Billings to extend the completion dates for improvements under SP �88-12 and VAR #88-22 for one year or until September 1, 1990, subject to the letter of credit being extended to September l, 1990. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. �ONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE CABLE TELEVISION COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 17, 1989: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Cable Television Commission neetinq of Auqust 17, 1989. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 13. CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989 - 1& 2: This item was deleted from the agenda. 14. CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 FOR FRZDLEY MUNIC�PAL �ENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 189: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this chanqe order consists of three proposal requests and three work orders for the Municipal Center totalinq $3,637. He stated it also amends Proposal Request No. 51 for the employees restrooms to include additional hardware ��IDLBY CITY COIINCIL 1[BETING O! BBPTSKBER 18, 1989 P�GE 10 and three contract amendments for netal lockers for the Police Department, a change in euppliers and a contract amendment for a deduction in finishing. He etated the total amount of this change order is $8,896.00. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize Change Order No. 13 for the Fridley Municipal Center Improvement Project No. 189. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Kayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 15. �pNSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER NO 4 FOR CONTRACT FOR TECHNICAL $YSTEM FOR THE FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this change order is for the speakers and screen in the Council Chambers for a total of $1,051.27. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize Change Order No. 4 with Electrosonic Systems, Inc. for the Technical System for the Fridley Municipal Center in the amount of $1,051.17. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 16. �,ESOLUTION N0. 80-19$9 CERTIFYING "PROPOSED" TAX LEVY �[�i1TRF.MF.NTS F�R 199� T� THE COUNTY OF ANOKA FOR COLLECTION: AND CONSIDERATION OF SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR 1990 BUDGET PROPERTY TAX LEVY: Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated in June, 1989, the Department of Revenue issued guidelines to cities to aid in complying with the truth in taxation requirements. He stated per the guidelines, the City is required to certify to the County Auditor the proposed property tax levy by October 1, 1989. He stated the resolution before the Council certifies the maximum levy possible and must be submitted to the County by October 1, 1989. He stated this is only a proposed levy, however, the levy cannot be raised beyond this limit. Mr. Pribyl stated, at this time, all the information is not available to determine the affects of the levy on the taxpayers or what may happen should a special leqislative session be called. Councilman Billings stated if the Leqislature decides to cut local qovernment aid and raises the levy limits to compensate for the cuts, he questioned where this would leave the City if the maximum levy limit was already certified to the County. Mr. Pribyl felt the Legislature would allow the City to raise the levy limits. He stated he would hope if there is a cut in local qovernment aid, the Legislature has the wisdom to review the overall impact to the taxinq jurisdictions and raise the levy �RIDLBY CITY COIIIICIL lI�BTI�G O� BBPTBliBER 18, 1989 P�GB 11 limits if necessary. He stated November 9, 1989 is the final certification to the County and more than likely the tax levy would be changed from the time of the proposed levy to the final certification date. Iie stated, however, in order to �eet State zequirements, this resolution certifying the "proposed" tax levy has to be submitted to the County by October 1, 1989. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 80-1989 and hand deliver to the County on October 2, 1989. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the aotion carried unanimously. Mr. Pribyl stated the Department of Revenue has also set restrictions on how the public hearinq dates are to be set. He stated it is recommended, therefore, that the public hearing on the 1990 Budget be held on October 30, 1989 and also the first reading of the ordinance on that date and a reconvening date for the publ ic hearing be set for November 6, 1989 and second reading and passage of the budget ordinance. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the 1990 Budqet public hearing date for October 30, 1989 and the reconveninq public hearing date for November 6, 1989. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 17. CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize payment of Claims No. 28382 through 28507. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 18. LICENSES: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the license as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Billinqs. MoTION by Councilman Schneider to amend the motion with a correction on Paqe 18A under Greqory Lawrence, change the unit number of the dwelling to No. 354, instead of Nos. 164, 215, 278, 332, 339, and 344. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAREN ON THE lSAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and Kayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL KBETING OF BEPTBKBER 18. 1989 P�GE 12 19. ESTIMATES• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the estimates as submitted: Allied Blacktop 30503 89th Avenue N. Kaple Grove, MN 55369 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 10 (Sealcoat) FINAL BBTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,949.86 Gammon Brothers 13845 Northdale Blvd. Rogers, 1�1 55374 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2 Estimate No. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $40, 034 . 99 J. T. Noonan 3601 48th Avenue N. Brooklyn Center, 1rW 55429 Corridor Maintenance Project No. 190 Estimate No. 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,980.72 Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meetinq. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of September 18, 1989 adjourned at 9:03 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad Secretary to the City Council Approved: William J. Nee Mayor � � GNOF fRIDLEY C011IiMl.1NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: September 26, 1989 T0: William Burns, City Manager '�`� � FROM: SUBJECT: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Public Hearing on Vacation Request, SAV #89- 04, by David Larson Attached is the staff report for the vacation request, SAV �89-04, by David Larson. The Planning Commission voted to unanimously recommend approval of the request to the City Council. First reading of the ordinance authorizing the vacation is scheduled later in the agenda. NII�I/ dn M-89-564 1 � 1A � STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE ��' p�A�� C,p�� pq� : September �3, 1989 FIV�LLi CITY OOl�1qL DAl'E : October 2, 1989 AUT�Oq ��dn_ REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZON�IG ADJACENT LAND USES 8i Z�i� ��S PARK DEDICATlON ANALYSIS FMdANCIAL NMPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREF�NE PLAN COMPATBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES E� ZONNG ENVIRONMENTAL C.ONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATiON PLANN�IG COMMISSION REC�OMNAENDATiON SAV ��89-04 David Larson To vacate the west 27 feet of an east/west drainage and utility easement. 7890 Hickory Street N.E. N/A N/A M-2, Heavy Industrial M-2 to the north, east and south; Burlington Northern Railroad tracks to the west On site N/A N/A Yes Yes No Approval with stipulations. Approval with stipulations. 1_L'� Sta�'f Report SAV #89-04, David Larson Page 2 REQUEST David Larson, owner of Minnegold Inc., is requesting that 27 feet of an east/west drainage and utility easement be vacated in order to construct a 7,300 square foot addition to his existing business located on Lots 1 through 12, Block 4, Onaway Addition, the same being 7890 Hickory Street N.E. SITE The site is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial, with additional M-2 zoning located on the north, east and south of the site. The Burlington Northern Railroad runs north/south along the west property line. The area within which the addition will occur has not been landscaped due to the proposed future expansion. .ANALYSIS Mr. Larson is planning to construct a 7,300 square foot addition south of his existing building. A drainage and utility easement extends into the area of the proposed addition. The drainage and utility easement extends into the property approximately 57.5 feet. The Engineering Department has stated that this easement was dedicated at the time Hickory Street was vacated. After Hickory Street had been vacated, a decision was made to actually construct Hickory Street and the easement has existed since that time. Within the easement exists a sewer line and a manhole to service it. The sewer line dead-ends approximately 24 feet into Mr. Larson's property. The manhole exists to allow City sewer workers to access the sewer line for maintenance and cleaninq purposes. The Engineering staff has stated that they do not foresee a future need to further extend this sewer line. After the 27 feet of the easement is vacated, 30 feet will still exist allowing the City to have access to the manhole and the sewer line. There will remain approximately 11 feet between the manhole and the building, which should allow adequate access for City and/or private machinery to access the manhole and sewer line. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commissian approve the vacation request, SAV #$9-04, with the following stipulations: 1. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for Engineering staff's approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. A landscape plan should be submitted for staff approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 1C Staff Report SAV #89-04, David Larson Page 3 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission voted to unanimously recommend approval of the request, SAV #89-04, by David Larson, to vacate a drainage and utility easement to the City Council. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission action and approve the request, SAV #89-04, subject to two stipulations: 1. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for Engineerrng staff's approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. A landscape plan should be submitted for staff approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 1D PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Fridley City Council at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Monday, October 2, 1989 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a vacation, SAV #89-04, by David Larson, to vacate the west 27 feet of a 57.5 foot existing east/west easement on Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Onaway Addition, generally located at 7890 Hickory Street N.E. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR Publish: September 20, 1989 September 27, 1989 Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. 1E pLANNING COIrII+II88ION I�I$ETING. B$PTBMBER 13. 1989 - PAGE 10 4. The petitioner shall submit a landscap' plan to include the installation of ivy plantings ong the chain link fence line exposed to 72nd Ave and trees and shrubs to replace any dead or dyin eqetation alonq the 72nd Avenue boulevard and to ovide additional screening along the street. 5. The parking space along the south side of the building shall be five et from the building. ' 6. Permissio to display up to four snowmobiles, personal waterc ft, and ATV's. This does not include cars, bo , or recreational vehicles. Ms. Dac stated this item will go to City Council on October 2, 1989. 4. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION SAV �k89-04. BY DAVID LARSON: To vacate the west 27 feet of a 57.5 foot existing east/west easement on Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Onaway Addition, generally located a 7890 Hickory Street N.E. +Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner, David Larson, is the owner of Minnegold, Inc., located on Hickory Street N.E. next to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. The property is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. Approximately midway through the parcel there exists a 30 ft. drainage/utility easement that extends into the parcel 57.5 ft. This easement was dedicated when Hickory Street was vacated to ensure there would be adequate sewer service to adjacent properties. Within the easement there is a sewer line. The sewer line deadends on Mr. Larson's property. Ms. McPherson stated Mr. Larson is proposing to vacate 27 feet of the 57.5 feet which would allow approximately ll feet between the building and the manhole for service vehicles' access to the sewer line. Ms. McPherson stated staff has discussed this vacation with the Engineering Department, and they do not foresee any need for the extension of the sewer line farther into the site and, therefore, had no objection to the vacation of the easement. Ms. McPherson stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission recommend approval of the vacation, SAV #89-04, by David Larson, with the following two stipulations: l. A gradinq and drainage plan shall be submitted for Engineering staff's approval prior to issuance of a buildinq permit. 1F �LP►,NNING COMMISSION �IEETIZIG. SBPTEIdB$R 13. 1989 — PliGE 11 2. A landscape plan should be submitted for staff approval prior to issuance of a buildinq permit. Mr. David Larson stated he has no problem t�tith the two etipulations. There already is a retention pond on site, and it will be engineered. The landscaping will be done nicely. He stated he did not know the vacation process was euch a lengthy process. He would like to construct the addition yet this fall. If he cannot build this year, he does not know if he will do it. He asked if there was any way this process could be speeded up. Ms. Dacy stated staff has discussed this with Mr. Larson. She told him that on Monday, September 18, staff is asking the Council to go ahead of schedule and establish the public hearing for October 2, and also schedule the first reading of the ordinance on October 2. The second and final reading will be on October 23, 1989. Typically, the Council holds a public hearing and does not read the first reading until two weeks after the public hearing. In the past, the City has allowed a land alteration permit and grading to occur prior to the second and final reading at the applicant's risk. OM TION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to recommend to City Council approval of vacation, SAV #89-04, by David Larson, to vacate the west 27 feet of a 57.5 foot existing east/west easement on Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Onaway Addition, generally located a 7890 Hickory Street N.E., with the following two stipulations: 1. A qrading and drainage plan shall be submitted for Engineering staff's approval prior to issuance of a buildinq permit. 2. A landscape plan should be submitted for staff approval prior to issuance of a buildinq permit. The Planning Commission also recommends that staff expedite this vacation request as quickly as possible. IIPON !1 VOICE VOTE, 71LL VOTIIdG 71YE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECI.�IRED T8E KOTION Cl�RRIED IINANIlrlODBLY. 5. To vacate the south easement in Lot 20, Hartman Circle N.E. ACAT ON Av t3 y— u 7 �► s r e+n � five (5) feet of en (10) foot utility Block l, S�n urst, the same being 177 Mr. Betzold stated this ' will be republished and the neiqhbors renotified. SAV 4�89-04 David Larson 1 G 3 T. 30, R. 2 4 �� ' �°�"'�' °` `� �� ,i.....r...v ns .■oc. c«.�r, a�cts �rfEnwc ►w �. siow, ns ar.rr+c a ►o �r rarc . : -:a ersatNCr h+w�esr�o rrn cou.r*. FR /O L E Y a�.o► .��. w. �Mr •- � cu..ars �n aw+�. — 41 53903 5 � =, - , — _ - � ,,. �o,��. :«, ;: .- �,; .� _. �. � ; . - - , _ .. �� :_�.;.�.�-_=�===�- =_ �- - - - _ _ - - I M �M itri w �.. ,r'� 'f �7 �r� J..�. y�. ' �J s �7 � �' i �`� I� . �1�: �+ r • Ilis��t-y � - � �i . �i',r r y�- .r •l � � � I �' p �, � • STRE l f :� i ' .]. I ,., . r •�. r' n ' • a� ; +;;--.'t � ' �� .•.v�• ..�u.•r� ✓.. wwr. r�'� � �^"'��•�i'WC•�r.at ' . _ � .. . �. -M .}- +Irl ,.r�. 'ri�1 �',,,� M � ' � 7 �.� . � �. ;� ;r.. � .. W .. . . I .. �.� � � . .~; �`. , .�t� .i . . . ' a► ►1 �.ISr = » ?IC eF ;!w �. V� � .*I F �y+F�►�+1'��• � - � � � _ ' � 'Li, �e�jt✓ . JM �� V • �'� � 'J '^• I. �. _____ __ _ _ _ .. � , w , • �,. � � - _ a' •1 � j-�' , + �� +�• _ ' , — :v--� �----- '�I ' J STREET ��r� 1 � ...L------------J7 , � � �rr ,Y r. .,r' �.' :��r Ir! , Q r/: Mr�.. �� W'+ M �.d.�~— �------------_ "t 1 � �� ... � .Fwi�� ^ �. � µ�T r�w..n.r... �j . � l+ 'M�l.. �', - Np a.� - � � t 'q� .� . . � . J� ' �� 4+ L� � �+ a►� �t� M 7r w � ;'! � � I"' '�t � ` i ri r # 44'}�F , r � � .r • . �. (. � , r I �. � �1 ;'+ . � '} h I't• �. .�. (/: /; .r. . �i.. . � pSTREET � � ', �-• - . � �; . ' � � ; .' �? �'�" l iY��l'� 1� � '.'i.' < .. �v.r'1i'� ��Y�'r>: �s�r� �\ �. �1 � 'N I i-� . �. •S'--t';."- • � ,. �}? M. IN m' ca an t1r pr � �.. , 1:�."Ni 'N � (. ,, 'y :! -y- �.t/1.s "i�/.iy�' "��—• � i(� �_,~t-� .._ � ... . I> ,\ � 79 TM � �i•% - . Y ,qRS'pp�- � /ST -_ � ` ,, r ' .� � % � � 5':" AIEi �.►r - � � '�r.` ✓ p �� • .., e ' ' .� .� FS i' .;° � '` , �� ,- . 1��i' •X. n �+ y � ,� '� • � � • 1� • R7. P •,� , •� e . :; ; , i c, �' ., .c' ' �� ' •�,� �' !� .� .� fbn�ICI � , �� .�, � V i . i i � � t�� . ....,.�-,. . ' ,1�� 'I : i T"� � , ��' i� I � �I � _ rt! . � ______�� `__�__� ��_—__J I - -�•. —� � � \ 1 ` ��. RU , � \_ �: \ /ST ; � � �`. , ' � , PL�iO� r.' � � . . . . , � �,. J �,� N } � J� �w r" 43 ADD: __ ;_,.�: �'—. � � ,, ��, �.. ZNO ,, � �400. ►� • 1 r W /� � � W W 'i ' W t �9 I � ~ Tt S Y � M � �.� �.� � �� . �ie �� !E� � �! s[�iD ■m� �E!s ■� �IDa � /�� a �m� �I� � i�l �� 9 m .*�:��1 Pi!� F�,+l� 7/F.�3 Bi+1� . . � '•.��i� yfd#' �$'1 � i� � �a�x� ti�a � . =N1� .m e� � _ :t��!! RiG:� ■�; m:0 �'1�.��.�? �`�S �`'�: l�s0 �:�3.:i��!►3� �� '� .�,. ..�:�. �: _, I 9 V �M e • .: S': r.�.,�. . = TT �_ �_.� +��t44 _f a W i �°�� 1 _ sa _ � �/f� Sf��,p � : .:. ... .. ..:T ♦. . 4 . . � � i.'�i%i: ~ • �6. �. . a �,►• •. �•��. LOCATION MAP ; I 1� i r � I i � � � i } , , , �, '� .�..�r...,. -----i=-�=---------^ `— —co►s,. � � ,� : � �� :r f�.i � _ . . F�i i! �f Si 's- :tt:: � '�s " -s-:: i = �° i� �Y}!' sf��i i �f i� i: �'�jt t :.'.. ��_? � ' ' /i=ii i SAV �t89-04 David Larson � W (�� 'J ' po�rlo►.t oF ED6El�-tE1•�T"' "ia �PiE �/hGACTE°D �c O � � v � �' f 7 ;�, �`,--' :� SITE PLAN 1H 2 CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING CO1�II88ION MEETING, 88PTEMBER 13, 1989 -----------------------------------------------------�----------- �LL TO ORDER: Chairperson Betzold called the September 13, 1989, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Donald Betzold, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek, Alex Barna, Paul Dahlberg Members Absent: None Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Jerry Brill, Ashland Oil Jack Lemley, Ashland Oil Darrell Olson, City Sports Mark Langer, City Sports David Larson, 7890 Hickory Street N.E. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 30 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to approve the August 30, 1989, Planning Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, _$P #89-12. BY ASHLAND OIL CO. (RAPID OIL�: Per Section 205.14.O1.C.5 of the Fridley City Code to allow a motor vehicle fuel and oil dispensing service on Lots 1 through 3, Block 6, City View Addition, the same being 5701 University Avenue N.E. OM TION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to waive the reading +af the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMODSLY AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7 s 36 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated Ashland Oil, who owns the parcel in question, is proposing to demolish the existing Rapid Oil facility located at 5701 University Avenue N.E. The parcel is zoned C-2, General 2A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 13. 1989 - PAGE 2 Business. The existing building sits on the eastern portion of the lot with the asphalt area toward the University Avenue frontage. The petitioner currently owns Lots 1- 7 of this particular area. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner recently applied for two variances, one for lot area and one for building setback to University Avenue. After reading staff's recommendation for the variance request, the petitioner withdrew that request and is in the process of rezoning Lot 4, which is currently vacant and is zoned R-2, Two Family Dwelling, to C-2, General Business. The rezoning will allow Ashland Oil to combine Lot 4 with Lots 1, 2, and 3 and create a building site which will conform with the current Zoning Code. For the rezoninq, the petitioner has submitted a revised site plan which shows the alignment of the building which conforms to all the required setbacks, as do all hard surface areas. , Ms. McPherson stated staff realizes that the initial application was for Lots 1, 2, and 3 of Block 6, and staff is recommending the Planning Commission recommend approval of Special Use Permit, SP #89-12, by Rapid Oil, contingent upon the approval of the rezoning of Lot 4. She stated staff is recommending the following stipulations: 1. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted to be approved by the Engineering staff prior to issuance of a �uilding permit. 2. Ashland Oil shall record the easement and restrictive covenant required from the previous special use permit process for the site at 75rd Avenue and Highway 65. 3. The petitioner shall combine Lots 1, 2, and 3 with Lot 4 into one tax parcel. 4. Approval of the special use permit shall be contingent upon the approval of the rezoning application of Lot 4. 5. No building permit shall be issued until the contamination clean-up has been completed and has satisfied MPCA standards. Mr. Betzold stated the Commission members had received a copy of a memo dealing with soil contamination on this site. Ms. McPherson stated soil testing and water testing is being done, both on this site, and on the Hardees Restaurant site. Staff is recommending five stipulations with the recommendation of approval. Of the five, one stipulation is that Ashland Oil will not be issued �� -: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BEPTEMBER 13, 1989 - PAGE 3 a building permit for their new building until the contamination clean-up work has been completed and satisfies MPCA standards. Mr. Betzold stated another issue is that this particular area of University Avenue is being looked at as a possible corridor for light rail transit. Has staff had any input from the County as far as a"park and ride" facility at this location? Ms. Dacy stated the Anoka County Reqional Railroad Authority is still in their design process. The Committee has identified the intersection of 57th as being a potential target for a park and ' ride site. The Authority has also considered some of the Planning Commission's recommendations about possible park and ride facilities at the vacant property on Osborne Road and the Immanuel Christian Center's parking lot. However, there has not been any formal review by the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority regarding Rapid Oil's site plan. They are still investigating various locations. Mr. Dahlberg asked if staff has discussed with the petitioner some of the issues the Planning Commission discussed regarding light rail transit for this particular site. Ms. Dacy stated that in a conversation with Bob Mikulak at the time of Ashland Oil's application about 1/2 month ago, she made them aware that Anoka County is considering University Avenue as a light rail corridor, but she did not discuss specifics. Mr. Jerry Brill, attorney representing Ashland Oil, stated they have never been aware of a consideration of light rail transit for this area. This was the first they haei heard about it. Mr. Dahlberg stated that in initial discussions with the Anoka County Regional Rai1 Authority, they had illustrated that there would be several options available relative to where parking areas could be located near this intersection. They had suggested there could be some on the west side of University Avenue and pedestrian traffic across University Avenue to get to the LRT stop. The Planning Commission's discussion suggested they would rather see the park and ride facilities on the same side of University Avenue as the stop (east side of University Avenue). The Commission suggested that the site at 57th and University might be an appropriate location for a park and ride facility. Mr. Brill stated that regarding the property, he had raised the question to Ms. Dacy about the need for a special use permit. They initially started with a request for a variance, and it turned into a request for a special use permit. There had been a direct service station on this property for quite a number of years before it turned into a Rapid Oil Change facility. Staff cannot find any records that there has ever been a special use permit issued for 2C PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING. SEPTEMBER 13. 1989 - PAGE 4 either the direct service station or the Rapid Oil Change. If that is the case, it becomes a nonconforming use. Staff has suggested that the special use permit procedure was added to the ordinance after the use was already there. He questioned whether they really needed a special use permit or if they can just continue the same use. If it is a nonconforming use, they might not be able to expand without a special use permit, and this might be considered an expansion. Mr. Betzold stated the City Attorney could look at this issue before this item goes to City Council. However, the City Attorney's position might be that even though it is the same service, by the fact that the facility is going to be torn down and rebuilt, the City wants the property to be legal nonconforming. Ms. Dacy stated she did discuss this issue with the City Attorney, and that is another part of the analysis. She wanted to clarify that there has always been a request for a special use permit. It did not originate as a variance and turn into a special use permit. There has always been a variance and special use permit, and the variance has turned into a rezoning. Mr. Brill stated they want to improve the use of the property. They are losing customers because the facility is old and out of style. Mr. Kondrick asked if the petitioner has any problems with the five stipulations recommended by staff. Mr. Brill stated they are in agreement with the stipulations. Mr. Betzold stated the fact that Ashland Oil wants to improve the site is very much appreciated. He stated by Ashland Oil bringing in this request, it is going to force other governmental entities to make some decisions regarding the long range plans for this site. Mr. Jack Lemley, Ashland Oil, stated Ashland Oil is losing money with this old Rapid oil facility. The facility does not look good, and people are going elsewhere. They have seen an increase in business at their new 73rd Avenue/Highway 65 Rapid Oil facility. They want to get rid of the eyesore and get a new facility in there that they and the City can be proud of and appreciate. Mr. Kondrick stated he was just real concerned that the petitioner understand that light rail transit might be going in. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Barna, to close the public hearing. $LANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 13. 1989 - PAGE 5 IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN(� AYE, CHAIRP$RBON BETZOLD DECLARED THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:50 P.M. Mr. Betzold asked if this special use permit request should be called to the attention of the Anoka County Regional Rail Authority. Mr. Dahlberg stated he would suggest that before Ashland Oil would elect to proceed with any potential development on the remaining property they own east of the subject site, they contact the County to discuss their options at that time. Mr. Dahlberg stated that regarding stipulation #2, that Ashland Oil record the easement and restrictive covenant required from the previous use permit for the site at 73rd and Highway 65, he did not think that issue should be tied to this request, even though it should definitely be done by Ashland Oil. Ms. Dacy stated she respected that opinion. Staff wanted to alert Ashland Oil that this item has not been done. Mr. Lemley stated he was not aware this had not been done, and stated he will make sure the easement and restrictive covenant for the 73rd and Highway 65 site are recorded at the County. The Commission members agreed to delete stipulation #2 from the recommended stipulations with the assurance from Mr. Lemley that this will be taken care of by Ashland Oil. MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to recommend to City Council approval of Special Use Permit, SP #89-12, by Ashland Oil Company (Rapid Oil), per Section 205.14.O1.C.5 of the Fridley City Code to allow a motor vehicle fuel and oil dispensing service on Lots 1 through 3, Block 6, City View Addition, the same being 5701 University Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations: l. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted to be approved by the Engineering staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. 3. 4. The petitioner shall combine Lots l, 2, and 3 with Lot 4 into one tax parcel. Approval of the special use permit shall be contingent upon the approval of the rezoning application of Lot 4. No building permit shall be issued until the contamination clean-up has been completed and has satisfied MPCA standards. 2D 2E PLANNING COMMISSZON MEETING. SEPTEMBER 13. 1989 - PAGE 6 IIPON A VOICE VOTE, l�LL VOTING l�iYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission will hear the rezoning request by Ashland Oil on September 27. At the petitioner's request, the special use permit will be held until both the special use permit and rezoning can be heard at the City Council at the same time. 2. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #89-13, BY WAYNE DAHL: Per Section 205.07.O1.C.1 of the Fridley City Code to allow a second accessory building to exceed 240 square feet on Lot 20, Block 1, Sandhurst, the same being 177 Hartman Circle N.E. Mr. Betzold stated the petitioner, Wayne Dahl, has requested that the special use permit and vacation applications for a second accessory building be tabled. He stated that since this item will be republished and the neighbors renotified, there was no need to open the public hearing. 3. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP �89-14 BY TED HAINES AND DIANE JORGENSON FOR CITY SPORTS: Per Section 205.14.O1.C.3 to allow enterprises having merchandise in the open and not within an enclosed structure; per Section 205.14.O1.C.8, to allow exterior storage of materials and equipment, located at 7191 Highway 65 N.E. OM TION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED QNANZMODSLY, AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:03 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission considered a rezoning on the subject property at their June 21, 1989, meeting. On July 24, 1989, the property was rezoned from R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, to C-2, General Business. Originally, as a stipulation of the rezoning, the Planning Commission recommended a stipulation regarding no outdoor storage or outdoor sales. After the Planning Commission meeting, the petitioner requested an opinion from the City Attorney as to whether or not that stipulation could be imposed. Included in the agenda packet was a memo from Mr. Herrick dated June 29, 1989, in which Mr. Herrick stated that the Code for the C-2 District does authorize the outside storage of recreational vehicles, boats, etc., upon obtaining a special use permit. Mr. Herrick stated: "It is my opinion that because the Code provides for outside storage, either with a special use permit or if the stored materials are screened, a prohibition against all exterior storage would subject the City to a claim that this property was 2F �LANNING COMMISSION MEETING, 8$PTEMBER 13. 1989 - PAGE 7 being singled out for more restrictive treatment than other C-2 property." Ms. Dacy stated the proposed exterior storage is to be located at the rear of the building and in the parking lot. The area for exterior storage behind the building will be for vehicles that are waiting to be serviced. The area to the rear of the lot will be used for water toys, snowmobiles, and trailers. Ms. Dacy stated the second request is for permission to display up to four ��units" or vehicles in front of the building at the southwest corner. The petitioners' intent is to display either four snowmobiles, four personal watercraft items, or four all terrain vehicles (ATV's). The petitioners are proposinq to add another four foot section of the sidewalk to provide extra room for the overhang of parked cars as well as to make room for the four vehicles to be displayed. The vehicles are to be confined to the sidewalk area immediately adjacent to the curb island at the southwest corner of the building. The petitioner wants to display these vehicles during business hours, 9:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. Ms. Dacy stated that in evaluating this request, staff looked at past applications in the City of Fridley as well as existing conditions of the character of the area. Typically, the policy has been to try to restrict outdoor storage and outdoor display so that it does not cause a severe visual impact. Given that some of the existing uses to the north (SuperAmerica) and south of the site (All Season's Mobile Home Sales) did receive approval for outdoor storage and outdoor display, what is being proposed, in staff's opinion, would not cause a serious visual impact along the corridor. As far as outdoor display is concerned, the proposal is limited to four vehicles during business hours only and will not occur overnight. As far as the outdoor storage area, the building acts as effective screening of the storage area behind the building. There are existing mature trees between the proposed storage area and 72nd Avenue. Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission recommend approval of SP #89-14 with the following stipulations: 1. The display vehicles shall be located at the southwest corner of the building on the sidewalk. 2. The storage areas sha11 be screened with an eight foot chain link fence with slats. 3. The materials to be stored shall not exceed the height of the fence. 2G PLANNZNG COMMISSION MEETING, 8$PTEMBER 13, 1989 - PAGE 8 4. The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan to include the installation of ivy plantings along the chain link fence line exposed to 72nd Avenue and trees and shrubs to replace any dead or dying vegetation along the 72nd Avenue boulevard and to provide additional screening along the street. 5. The parking spaces along the south side of the building shall be five feet from the building. 6. Permission to display four vehicles does not include cars, boats, or recreational vehicles. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioners contacted her prior to the Planning Commission meeting to clarify the intent of stipulation #6. The intent of this stipul�tion is to state that the primary merchandise is snowmobiles, personal watercraft, and ATV's, smaller vehicles, and staff's recommendation is not to allow the larger vehicle that would impose more of a visual impact. Recreational vehicles could include mobile homes, campers, etc. Mr. Darrell Olson, representing City Sports, stated they are also requesting barbed wire for security purposes. Ms. Dacy stated the City has, in other applications, restricted the use of barbed wire. However, as pointed out by the petitioners, some of the junkyards just two blocks north do use barbed wire as a security measure. It is staff's recommendation to not permit the barbed wire, because it is one more item on the fence that would not give it a clean appearance. Mr. Barna stated that regarding stipulation #6, the Commission needs to define what the four "vehicles" are so there is a limitation on the size of those vehicles. Mr. olson stated he is in agreement with the stipulations including the restriction of the space. They would still like to have barbed wire on the fence. Customers' snowmobiles are stored in the area behind the building and anyone could climb the fence and steal parts off the snowmobiles. They need the security that barbed wire can give them. Mr. Olson stated that regarding stipulation #6, he would have no problem with specifying what the vehicles are as suggested by Mr. Barna. Mr. Betzold stated he could appreciate the petitioners' need for security. He did not know how they could prohibit the use of barbed wire. 2H PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, 88PTEMBER 13, 1989 - PAGE 9 Ms. Sherek asked if the petitioners had explored any other alternatives for security such as an alarm. Mr. Olson stated they intend to put an alarm on the fence in addition to the barbed wire. Ms. Sherek stated she also could appreciate the petitioners' need for security. Ms. Sherek asked if the rear storage area was for the petitioners' , stock in trade or customers' vehicles. Mr. Olson stated it will be their stock. They do not intend to rent space and store customers' property. Ms. Sherek stated that regarding stipulation #1, she would like it to be more specific to limit the display vehicles to the sidewalk area only so that vehicles do not end up being displayed out on the right-of-way. Mr. Dahlberg stated that regarding stipulation #3, were the materials to be stored to not exceed the height of the fence at 8 ft. or the top of the barbed wire? Ms. Dacy stated the materials should not exceed the height of the fence at 8 ft. Mr. Dahlberg stated the height should be defined in stipulation #3. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED T8E PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 P.M. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of Special Use Permit, SP #89-14, by Ted Haines and Diane Jorgenson for City Sports, per Section 205.14.O1.C.3 to allow enterprises having merchandise in the open and not within an enclosed structure; per Section 205.14.O1.C.8, to allow exterior storage of materials and equipment, located at 7191 Highway 65 N.E., with the following stipulations: l. The display vehicles shall be confined to the sidewalk at the southwest corner of the building. 2. The storage areas shall be screened with an eight foot chain link fence with slats. 3. The materials to be stored shall not exceed the 8 foot height of the fence. 21 PLANNING COMMISSZON MEETING, SEPT$MBER 13, 1989 - PAGE 10 4. The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan to include the installation of ivy plantings along the chain link fence line exposed to 72nd Avenue and trees and shrubs to replace any dead or dying vegetation alonq the 72nd Avenue boulevard and to provide additional screening along the street. 5. The parking spaces along the south side of the building shall be five ieet from the buildinq. 6. Permission to display up to four snowmobiles, personal watercraft, and ATV's. This does not include cars, boats, or recreational vehicles. Ms. Dacy stated this item will go to City Council on October 2, 1989. 4. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION SAV #89-04, BY DAVID LARSON: To vacate the west 27 feet of a 57.5 foot existing east/west easement on Lots ? and 8, Block 4, Onaway Addition, generally located a 7890 Hickory Street N.E. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner, David Larson, is the owner of Minnegold, Inc., located on Hickory Street N.E. next to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. The property is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. Approximately midway through the parcel there exists a 30 ft. drainage/utility easement that extends into the parcel 57.5 ft. This easement was dedicated when Hickory Street was vacated to ensure there would be adequate sewer service to adjacent properties. Within the easement there is a sewer line. The sewer line deadends on Mr. Larson's property. Ms. McPherson stated Mr. Larson is proposing to vacate 27 feet of the 57.5 feet which would allow approximately 11 feet between the building and the manhole for service vehicles' access to the sewer line. Ms. McPherson stated staff has discussed this vacation with the Engineering Department, and they do not foresee any need for the extension of the sewer line farther into the site and, therefore, had no objection to the vacation of the easement. Ms. McPherson stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission recommend approval of the vacation, SAV #89-04, by David Larson, with the follawing two stipulations: 1. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for Engineering staff's approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 2J PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. SEPTEMBER 13, 1989 - PAGE 11 2. A landscape plan should be submitted for staff approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Mr. David Larson stated he has no problem with the two stipulations. There already is a retention pond on site, and it will be engineered. The landscaping will be done nicely. He stated he did not know the vacation process was such a lengthy process. He would like to construct the addition yet this fall. If he cannot build this year, he does not know if he will do it. He asked if there was any way this process could be speeded up. Ms. Dacy stated staff has discussed this with Mr. Larson. She told him that on Monday, September 18, staff is asking the Council to go ahead of schedule and establish the public hearing for October 2, and also schedule the first reading of the ordinance on October 2. The second and final reading will be on October 23, 1989. Typically, the Council holds a public hearing and does not read the first reading until two weeks after the public hearing. In the past, the City has allowed a land alteration permit and qrading to occur prior to the second and final reading at the applicant's risk. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to recommend to City Council approval of vacation, SAV #89-04, by David Larson, to vacate the west 27 feet of a 57.5 foot existing east/west easement on Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Onaway Addition, generally located a 7890 Hickory Street N.E., with the following two stipulations: 1. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for Engineering staff's approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. A landscape plan should be submitted for staff approval prior to issuance of a building permit. The Planning Commission also recommends that staff expedite this vacation request as quickly as possible. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. 5. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION SAV #89-05, BY WAYNE DAHL: To vacate the south five (5) feet of a ten (10) foot utility easement in Lot 20, Block 1, Sandhurst, the same being 177 Hartman Circle N.E. Mr. Betzold stated this item will be republished and the neighbors renotified. 2K PLANNING COMMIBBION MEETING, BEPTEMBER 13. 1989 - PAGE �2 6. RECEIVE THE AUGUST 10 1989 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: OM TION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the August 10, 1989, Housing and Redevelopment Authority minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. " Mr. Dahlberg referred to Item 10-a of the Auqust 10, 1989, Housing and Redevelopment Authority minutes on SBF Development Corporation, in which Mr. Robertson stated: "SBF Development Corporation is proposing the redevelopment of the old Cub Foods Store site on the southwest corner of University Avenue/Osborne Road. Contrary to their expectations and their reassurance to the City Council that they would be able to secure total financing for the project, they are asking the City to underwrite about 10� of what is represented as a $5 million project." Mr. Dahlberg stated the City has been very cooperative in granting them a rezoning, a plat, a vacation, and variances to allow them to go ahead with this development. If the City is going to be participating in another manner financially, then the City should be able to re-review and reconsider some of the variances, etc., the developer requested. Personally, he still did not think this was a very efficient or appropriate site development. Every indication he had received earlier was that because SBF Development was not asking the City for any financial assistance, the City was willing to let them have the variances because it was a project the City wanted to have happen. Mr. Dahlberg stated Councilmember Billings was at the meeting to hear this discussion, and he would like the HRA to be made aware of this also. The Commission members concurred with Mr. Dahlberg's comments. MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to direct staff to express to the HRA the Planning Commission's feelings regarding the financial assistance being requested by SBF Development Corporation. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE l�OTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. 7. RECEIVE THE AUGUST 22 1989 APPEALS COMMZSSION M�NUTES: MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to receive the August 22, 1989, Appeals Commission minutes. $LANNING COMMISSZON MEETING. BEPTEMBER 13, 1989 - PAGE 13 IIPON A VOICE VOTE, lILL VOTIN(i AY$, CHAIRPBRBON BBTZOLD DBCLARED THE 1�OTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. ADJOURNMENT• OM TION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to adjourn the meeting. IIpon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Chairperson Betzold declared the 8eptember 13, 1989, Planninq Commission meetinq adjourned at 9:2o p.m. Respectfully submitted, ti �.� , �� yn e Saba Recoaa ing Secretary 2L � � cinroF F�� DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: C011/IMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM September 26, 2989 �� . William Burns, City Manager�• Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Special Use Permit, SP #89-14, by Ted Haines and Diane Jorgenson Attached is the staff report for the special use permit request for outdoor display of no more than four vehicles, and the exterior storage of materials by the owners of City Sports at 7191 Highway 65 N.E. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the special use permit request, subject to six stipulations. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Planning Commission recommendation. BD/dn M-89-581 _� 2M � 2N t STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE ��N QF PLAPNVC C,OIu��SSION DATE : Septembe r� 3, 1989 f[ZIDLEY CtTY COl�1Cll. DAl'E ; 0 c t o b e r 2, 1 9 8 9 �Hpq BD/dn REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZ E DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES � Z�%::� •:mRE$ PARK DEDICATION ANALYSlS FNANCIAL IMPLICATlONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREI-ENSNE PLAN COMPATBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES � ZONNG ENV�ONMENTAL CON.SIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMEADATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNNVG COMMISSION REGOIuNAENDATION � 0 SP 4189-14 Ted Haines and Diane ,3orgenson To allow outdoor display and exterior storage 7191 Highway 65 N.E. 1 .4 acres N/A C-2, General Business M-1 to the north and south; R-3 to the east; Highway 65 and=Target=Warehouse to the west Available to the site N/A N/A Yes Yes Property owner has complied with MPCA requirements regarding hazardous waste clean up on the site in 1984. Approval with stipulations. Staff Report SP #89-14, Ted Haines Page 2 20 BACKGROUND The subject property was rezoned to C-2, General Business, on July 24, 1989. The Planning Commission considered the rezoning request on June 21, 1989. The Planning Commission's recommendation included a stipulation there be no outdoor storage or outdoor display of materials. After the Planning Commission meeting, the petitioner requested an opinion from the City as to whether or not that stipulation could be imposed on the rezoning request. The City Attorney (see attached memorandum) analyzed the Planning Commission minutes and determined that the recommendation prohibiting outdoor display and outdoor storage was not proper. Because the zoning ordinance permits these uses as a special use, the Attorney stated that the petitioner had the right to apply for a special use permit for these uses. REQUEST The petitioner is requesting approval for outdoor display of up to four "units" or vehicles during store hours, and for exterior storage of materials. ANALYSIS outdoor Display The petitioner is proposing to locate four vehicles (snowmobiles or jet skis, depending on the season) at the southwest corner of the building. The petitioner is proposing to extend the sidewalk in front of the building four feet to provide extra room for the overhang of parked cars as well as to make room for the four vehicles to be displayed. The petitioner has indicated that the vehicles will be confined to the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the curb island at the southwest corner of the building. The petitioner wants to display these vehicles during store hours. Store hours will be from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9:00 to 5:00 p.m. Saturday. The curb island contains two Ash trees and arborvitae shrubs. The commercial districts require a special use permit for a variety of uses involving outdoor display: car dealerships, recreational vehicle sales, outdoor display of inerchandise affiliated with automotive service stations and mobile home sales. The SuperAmerica use, just north of the subject property, exemplifies the display of inerchandise affiliated with a service station (and SuperAmerica also displays products immediately adjacent to the building). All Seasons Mobile Home Sales displays four mobile homes just south of the subject property. Viking Chevrolet is located within one mile of the site to the north. The City r� � Staff Report SP #89-14, Ted Haines Page 3 approved a special use permit in 1984 for a boat and patio display area for The Lift at 6319 Highway 65 N.E.; however, the petitioner did not pursue the display of inerchandise as permitted. Given that the character of the area has more intensive display uses, the display of four vehicles as proposed should not have an adverse impact to the appearance of the corridor. Outdoor display activities can pose a visual and aesthetic nuisance. The City should pursue a policy of improving the appearance along a major arterial such as Highway 65. However, this request should not detract from the area. The front of the building will be remodeled and the existing landscaping will be maintained. Exterior Storage The petitioner is proposing to create two storage areas at the rear of the building. These areas will be contained by an eight foot chain link fence with vinyl slats. The petitioner has also indicated that he would like to install two strands of barbed wire along the top of the chain link fence for security. The storage area at the rear of the building will enclose snowmobiles waiting for repair. The storage area at the rear of the lot, or to the east, will be for trailer and water toy storage. The building serves as an effective screen of the storage area immediately behind the building from Highway 65. A six foot wood fence is currently in place along the north lot line at the rear of the building to the curb opening from 72nd Avenue. The storage area at the rear of the lot will be partially screened by the building, given the sight lines traveling northbound on Highway 65. The chain link fence and the slats will serve to screen the storage yards from the public right-of-way along 72nd Avenue as well as the sight lines as one travels south on Highway 65. Mature Oak trees exist along 72nd Avenue; however, there is a 20'- 30' distance along 72nd Avenue which should be filled with additional landscaping. A landscaping plan should be submitted to address this gap. Some of the vegetation along the 72nd Avenue boulevard appears to be dead or dying. Engelman ivy should be planted along the north fence line which is exposed to 72nd Avenue. While staff understands the necessity to have the barbed wire for security purposes, the appearance of the barbed wire does not add to the image of the area. Staff recommends that the barbed wire not be permitted. Staff Report SP #89-14, Ted Haines Page 4 Site Plan 2Q The creation of the storage areas will reduce the amount of parking spaces from 51 to 45 spaces. Given the amount of display and office area, the amount of remaining spaces exceeds the amount of required parking (21 versus 45). If the building is reused, the storage area at the rear can be removed. The angle parking on the south side of the building must be five feet from the building (Section 205.14.05.D.5.(d)). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of a special use permit, SP #89-14, for outdoor display of no more than four vehicles, and the exterior storage of materials, subject to the following stipulations: 1. The display vehicles shall be located at the southwest corner of the building on the sidewalk. 2. The storage areas shall be screened with an eight foot chain link fence with slats. 3. The materials to be stored shall not exceed the height of the fence. 4. The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan to include the installation of ivy plantings along the chain link fence line exposed to 72nd Avenue, and trees and shrubs to replace any dead or dying vegetation along the 72nd Avenue boulevard and to provide additional screening along the street. 5. The parking spaces along the south side of the building shall be five feet from the building. 6. Permission to display four vehicles does not include cars, boats or recreational vehicles. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the special use permit, SP #89-14, for outdoor display of no more than four vehicles, and the exterior storage of materials, subject to Planning staff's recommended stipulations with the following amendments: 1. The display vehicles shall be confined at the southwest corner of the building on the sidewalk. ,� Staff Report SP #$9-14, Ted Haines Page 5 3. The materials to be stored shall not exceed the oot height of the fence. 6. Permission to display � to four snowmobiles, personal watercraft and all terrain vehicles. STAFF UPDATE The petitioner has advised staff that in order to accommodate arrival of inerchandise, they have begun construction of the fence immediately to the rear of the existing building. Because this area is secluded from view of Highway 65, staff permitted the petitioner to begin construction of the fence. The petitioner advised that there was not adequate room within the building to store the merchandise. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the special use permit ' request, SP #89-14, for outdoor display of no more than four vehicles, and the exterior storage of materials, subject to the following stipulations: 1. The display vehicles shall be confined at the southwest corner of the building on the sidewalk. 2. The storage areas shall be screened with an eight foot chain link fence with slats. 3. The materials to be stored shall not exceed the 8 foot height of the fence. 4. The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan to include the installation of ivy plantings along the chain link fence line exposed to 72nd Avenue, and trees and shrubs to replace any dead or dying vegetation along the 72nd Avenue boulevard and to provide additional screening along the street. 5. The parking spaces along the south side of the building shall be five feet from the building. 6. Permission to display up to four snowmobiles, personal watercraft and all terrain vehicles. 2S PL�►NNING CO1rD+�I88ZON I�EETZ1dG, BBPTBIdBER 13, 1989 - PliGE 6 IIPON A VOICB VOTE, ]1LL VOTI�IG ]1YB, CHPiIItPBR80N BSTSOLD DEC D THE ItOTION Cl�RRIED IINANZMODSLY. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission wil ear the rezoninq request by Ashland Oil on September 27. t the petitioner's request, the special use permit will be he until both the special use permit and rezcninq can be heard the City Council at the same time. 2. 67-1s tsY WAYNE D. Per Section 205.07 a second accesso 20, Block 1, S dhu ".C.1 of the Fridley City Code to allow ilding to exceed 240 square feet on Lot :, the same being 177 Hartman Circle N.E. Mr. Betzold s ted the petitioner, Wayne Dahl, has requested that the speci use permit and vacation applications for a second accesso building be tabled. He stated that since this item will be r blished and the neighbors renotified, there was no need to o the public hearing. 3. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP �89-14. BY TED HAINES AND DIANE JORGENSON FOR CITY SPORTS Per Section 205.14.O1.C.3 to allow enterprises having merchandise in the open and not within an enclosed structure; per Section 205.14.O1.C.8, to allow exterior storage of materials and equipment, located at 7191 Highway 65 N.E. OTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to waive the reading of the public hearinq notice and open the public hearinq. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, l�LL pOTING AYE, CHAIRPERBON BETZOLD DECLPiRED THE KOTION CliRRIED DNANZMOIIBLY, ]1ND T$E PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:03 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission considered a rezoning on the subject property at their June 21, 1989, meetinq. On July 24, 1989, the property was rezoned from R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, to C-2, General Business. Originally, as a stipulation of the rezoning, the Planning Commission recommended a stipulation regarding no outdoor storage or outdoor sales. After the Planning Commission meeting, the petitioner requested an opinion from the City Attorney as to whether or not that stipulation could be imposed. Included Yn the agenda packet was a memo from Mr. Herrick dated June 29, 1989, in which Mr. Herrick stated that the Code for the C-2 District does authorize the outside storage of recreational vehicles, boats, etc., upon obtaining a special use permit. Mr. Herrick stated: "It is my opinion that because the Code provides for outside storage, either with a special use permit cr if the stored materials are screened, a prohibition aqainst all exterior storage wauld subject the City to a claim that this property was 2T pI.�NNING COI+IIdI88ION lIBETING. 6BPT8iIHER 13. 1989 - P!►G$ 7 being singled out for more restrictive treatment than other C-2 property . " Ms. Dacy stated the proposed exterior storaqe is to be located at the rear of the building and in the parking lot. The area for exterior storage behind the building will be for vehicles that are waiting to be serviced. The area to the rear of the lot will be used for water toys, snowmobiles, and tra`.1ers. Ms. Dacy stated the second request is for permission to display up to four "units" or vehicles in front of the building at the southwest corner. The petitioners' intent is to display either four snowmobiles, four personal watercraft items, or four all terrain vehicles (ATV's). The petitianers are proposing to add another four foot section of the sidewalk to provide extra room for the overhang of parked cars as well as to make room for the four vehicles to be displayed. The vehicles are to be confined to the sidewalk area immediately adjacent to the curb island at the southwest corner of the building. The petitioner wants to display these vehicles during business hours, 9:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. Ms. Dacy stated that in evaluating this request, staff looked at past applications in the City of Fridley as well as existing conditions of the character of the area. Typically, the policy has been to try to restrict outdoor storage and outdoor display so that it does not cause a severe visual impact. Given that some of the existing uses to the north (SuperAmerica) and south of the site (All Season's Mobile Home Sales) did receive approval for outdoor storage and outdoor display, what is being proposed, in staff's opinion, would not cause a serious visual impact along the corridor. As far as outdoor display is concerned, the proposal is limited to four vehicles during business hours only and will not occur overnight. As far as the outdoor storage area, the building acts as effective screening of the storage area behind the building. There are existing mature trees between the proposed storage area and 72nd Avenue. Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending the Planninq Commission recommend approval of SP �89-14 with the following stipulations: l. The display vehicles shall be located at the southwest corner of the building on the sidewalk. 2. The storage areas shall be screened with an eiqht foot chain link fence with slats. 3. The materials to be stored shall not exceed the heiqht of the fence. zu PLANNING COMMI88ION ISEETING, BEPTEMBER 13. 1989 - PP►GE 8 4. The petitioner shall submit a landscapinq plan to include the installation of ivy plantings alonq the chain link fence line exposed to 72nd Avenue and trees and shrubs to replace any dead or dying vegetation alonq the 72nd Avenue boulevard and to provide additional screening along the street. 5. The parking spaces along the south side of the building sha11 be five feet from the buildinq. 6. Permission to display four vehicles does not include cars, boats, or recreational vehicles. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioners contacted her prior to the Planning Commission meeting to clarify the intent of stipulation �6. The intent of this stipulation is to state that the primary merchandise i� snowmobiles, personal watercraft, and ATV's, smaller vehicles, and staff's recommendation is not to allow the larger vehicle that would impose more of a visual impact. Recreational vehicles could include mobile homes, campers, etc. Mr. Darrell Olson, representing City Sports, stated they are also requesting barbed wire for security purposes. Ms. Dacy stated the City has, in other applications, restricted the use of barbed wire. However, as pointed out by the petitioners, some of the junkyards just two blocks north do use barbed wire as a security measure. It is staff's recommendation to not permit the barbed wire, because it is one more item on the fence that would not give it a clean appearance. Mr. Barna stated that reqardinq stipulation �6, the Commission needs to define what the four "vehicles" are so there is a limitation on the size of those vehicles. Mr. Olson stated he is in agreement with the stipulations including the restriction of the space. They would still like to have barbed wire on the fence. Customers' snowmobiles are stored in the area behind the building and anyone could climb the fence and steal parts off the snowmobiles. They need the security that barbed wire can qive them. Mr. Olson stated that regardinq stipulation �6, he would have no problem with specifying what the vehicles are as suqgested by Mr. Barna. Mr. Betzold stated he could appreciate the petitioners' need for security. He did not know how they could prohibit the use of barbed wire. 2V pI.!►NNIZIG COI+IMISSION !i8$TZ1�1C�. BBPTBIriH$R 13. 1989 - PP►GE 9 Ms. Sherek asked if the petitioners had explored any other alternatives for security such as an alarm. Mr. Olson stated they intend to put an alarm on the fence in addition to the barbed wire. Ks. Sherek stated she also could appreciate the petitioners' need for security. Ms. Sherek asked if the rear storage area was for the petitioners' stock in trade or customers' vehicles. Mr. Olson stated it will be their stock. They do not intend to rent space and store customers' property. Ms. Sherek stated that regarding stipulation �1, she would like it to be more specific to limit the display vehicles to the sidewalk area only so that vehicles do not end up being displayed out on the right-of-way. Mr. Dahlberg stated that regarding stipulation #3, were the materials to be stored to not exceed the height of the fence at 8 ft. or the top of the barbed wire? Ms. Dacy stated the materials should not exceed the height of the fence at 8 ft. Mr. Dahlberg stated the heiqht should be defined in stipulation �3. OM TION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to close the public hearing. IIPON !r VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHlrIRPER80N BETZOLD DECLJIRED THE • PIIBLIC HEARING CLOBED AT 8:20 P.M. OTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of Special Use Permit, SP �89-14, by Ted Haines and Diane Jorgenson for City Sports, per Section 205.14.O1.C.3 to allow enterprises havinq merchandise in the open and not within an enclosed structure; per Section 205.14.O1.C.8, to allow exterior storage of materials and equipment, located at 7191 Highway 65 N.E., with the following stipulations: l. The display vehicles shall be confined to the sidewalk at the southwest corner of the buildinq. 2. The storage areas shall be screened with an eiqht foot chain link fence with slats. 3. The materials to be stored shall not exceed the 8 foot height of the fence. 2W BLANNING COI�4�iZ88ION I�iEETING, 6EPTEKBER 13. 1989 - PAGE 10 4. The petitioner shall submit a Iandscapinq plan to include the installation of ivy plantings along the chain link fence 2ine exposed to 72nd Avenue and trees and shrubs to replace any dead or dying vegetation along the 72nd Avenue boulevard and to provide additional screening along the street. 5. 6. The'parking spaces along the south side of the building shall be five feet from the building. Permission to display up to four snowmobiles, personal watercraft, and ATV's. This does not include cars, boats, or recreational vehicles. Ms. Dacy stated this item will go to City Council on October 2, 1989. 4. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION SAV �89-04, BY DAVID LARSON: To vacate the west 27 feet of a 57.5 foot existing east/w t easement on Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Onaway Addition, gene lly located a 7890 Hickory Street N.E. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner, David Larson, is t owner of Minnegold, Inc., located on Hickory Street N.E. ext to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. The propert is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. Approximately midway through e parcel there exists a 30 ft. drainage/utility easement th extends into the parcel 57.5 ft. This easement was dedicate when Hickory Street was vacated to ensure there would be ade ate sewer service to adjacent properties. Within the easeme there is a sewer line. The sewer line deadends on Mr. Larson' property. Ms. McPherson stated Mr. Larson i proposing to vacate 27 feet of the 57.5 feet which would allow pproximately 11 feet between the building and the manhole for s ice vehicles' access to the sewer line. Ms. McPherson stated st ff has discussed this vacation with the Engineering Departmen , and they do not foresee any need for the extension of the sew line farther into the site and, therefore, had no objection t the vacation of the easement. 1Ks . McPherson recommend apF with the folX _✓ated staff is recommendinq the Planning Commission val of the vacation, SAV �89-04, by David Larson, ing two stipulations: � 1. A qradinq and drainaqe plan shall be �ubmitted for Enqineering staff's approval prior to fBSUance of a building permit. SP ��89-14 Haines & Jorgenson A v G A �,/� C/TY M[� ) � ,b 32 i i , � Q:c— Kf— t ` �ii�— 'Y._-- i -��' ' • . � .. . ;::r t � ..:�. � � .• � ! �.r. � 0 � � .: :' 0 ; � : f� ��'. � • L '�� ' ; �I I � r �1• ,� r�rr� • � Y V t � ""' " �� Q � M yr i �"` . \ ` I w v�' e � a , � e�.. . � � � -, „� ;. , Qi . � ; _ ._ ......,. _ . y ,,; " - � a� � wv ,...., ;- _._. - 0.riN � � • r�r I�� 2 �.v Ny.� 8 � A Jy ` ,.., ,:, -:,. O {�y • .r.r 4 , �� , � e �r �� A. � �. // �� w ,—i�i �.w 1C " � � — ,F .... � � • d�- . . . . . 1 � r.�� --�1-- _ . i ' 1 � ' •J!7 l��r — ' !' ' � e ' - � • v • ' � Z '�'�;�.� _ Ov � � Z � ..;-+•. _ � � � � � � �� ., 2 ,., i a.,�. , � � : , _' ------- � � , ..:. -' , . � _. �� ,,, ... � � w� n�in � � �� LOC�tf � W 8i < PO/� ,- � � ; a, i ;nn .. ..,�.. R. L. S � yrY KII / , � i � !.y' _ _ � ' .� ��I o ._ __ -_ _�� i� 1 ! i... �....r s �. .. . i .. �� . .. -� � � � :-:: ::.. 31 SEC. /2 OF �2 ��. :n. �t . � , L E-� •7^� L �-- f1 .' ,.-I ' 34 f N COAiKR C d !4 LOCATION MAP .� �_ ,. , � c *- C N � T 1 1 ,• � � � v � � I� � II � G � � � � $ o � � T s v � z ti � � � �_ u � � - :ii%//, � �� w ~ � v � �� ~ � M O � ti rt i . y � _� / � � /� � � q� � � U Z � �>a �� 3 � Y • p � p �� r % SP �t89-14 Haines & Jorgenson ., 2Y �� Z� .. � 3 5r��i-K- .+ 3 � t o � � �o �•- � y � M � � � � �` � : i * n • L � • � v � � C C \ C+ � S ) . � � L � : a ! c ^ � °y�` . � �1 ° L ' 0 y � w � � l'� ' " y � w i� < ` C v � � + L M � > > � , � � � � w s � `' � � .� r - N �� y O ; 1 �) r�q i C'i��\�N� �-�jt^� i WlJ(� �v`"'' � � �� /�i8��1� ��7Za Cf�.�'D�C�(4 � � SITE PLAN � � unroF F�� DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: C011�IMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM September 27, 1989 William Burns, City Manager Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant First Reading of an Ordinance Vacating a Por�tion of a Drainage and Utility Easement Attached is the ordinance vacating 27 feet of a drainage and utility easement. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the vacation request, SAV #89-04, by David Larson. Staff also recommends that the City Council hold the first reading of the attached ordinance. MM/dn M-89-590 �^ 2Z ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: , SECTION 1. To vacate the west 27 feet of a 57.5 foot existing east/west easement on Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Onaway Addition, generally located at 7890 Hickory Street N.E. All lying in the South HaZf of Section 3, T-30, R- 24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code shall be so amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS � DAY OF , 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: October 2, 1989 First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: 2aA � � U7Y OF FRI DLEY DATE: TO: FROI�i : BOBJECT: C011ILMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMOR.ANDUM September 21, 1989 � William Burns, City Manager�j�� Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Variance Request, VAR #89-21, by Robert Franzen Attached is the staff report for variance request, VAR �89-21, by Robert Franzen. The Appeals Commission voted to reconunend approval of the two variances to the City Council. Staff recommends that the City Council deny the request to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 29 feet, but to approve the side yard variance in order to bring the structure into conformance with the ordinance. I�IIr! :1 s M-89-575 � � C�� FR! DLEY REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZ E DENSITY PRESENT ZONN�IG ADJACENT LAND USES � ZONNG UTLJfES PARK OEDlCAT10N ANALYSlS F�VANCIAL N�APLlCATIONS STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE September 19 , 19 89 PLAI�Nd(' COMMSSION DATE qTY OOI�JCIL DATE oct�ober 2, 19E9 CONFORMANCE TO COMPFiEF'EIVSII/E PLMI COMPATBIL.RY WITH ADJACENT USES E� ZONNG ENVIRONMENTAL C.ONSDERATION.S STAFF RECOMME�ATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNNVG COMMtSSION RECONNAENDATiON AUTHOR P�.?/ls VAR #89-21 Robert Franzen To reduoe the required front yard setbacJc fmn 35 ft. to 29 ft. 590 �Cimball Street N.E. N/A N/A i�l, Single F�nily Residential ?�1, Single F�nily Residential On site ri/A "lone Yes Yes None Denial ,�. . 3A _- 3B Staff Report VAR #89-21, 590 Kimball Street N.E. Page 2 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.07.03.D.(1) requires a front yard setback of not less than 35 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off- street parking without encroaching on the public riqht-of-way and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the building "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. Bection 205.07.03.D.(2).(a) requires a side yard setback between any living area and side property line of 10 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of 20 feet between living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet between garages and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce the possibility of fire. It is also to allow for aesthetically pleasing open areas around residential structures. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Small living room with no front entry and closet space, very small living conditions." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Reguest The petitioner, Robert Franzen, is requesting that a variance be granted to reduce the required front yard setback from the 35 feet to 29 feet. This will allow him to construct a 27 ft. x 7 ft. living room and porch addition to the front of his house on Lots 37 and 38, Block E, Riverview Heiqhts Addition, the same being 590 Kimball Street N.E. Site Combined, Lots 37 and 38 total approximately 5,800 sq. ft. This is below the standard set forth in the zoning code for lots platted before 1955 which requires a lot area of 7,500 sq. ft. (Section 205.07.03.A.(2)). In addition to the addition, Mr. Franzen is also planning an 18 foot x 24 foot garage in the southeast corner of the lot. With all the construction plans, Mr. Franzen will be close to his maximum square footage for lot coverage of 1,450 sq. ft. (1,371 sq. ft. ) . 3C Staff Report VAR #89-21, 590 Kimball Street N.E. Page 3 Analysis As was stated earlier, Mr. Franzen's lot at 5,800 sq. ft. is below the zoning code requirement of 7,500 sq. ft. With the proposed addition, Mr. Franzen will be encroaching into the front yard area by approximately 6 feet. This will reduce the sight lines from both his neighbor to the east and to the west. Mr. Franzen has two options which would allow him to construct additional living space, but it would not be related to the existing living room. Mr. Franzen's first option would be to construct an addition between the rear of the house and the proposed garage. His second option would be to move the garage toward the front of the lot, attaching the garage to the existing house along the kitchen and utility room areas. This would, of course, reduce the garage to 10 feet in width; however, Mr. Franzen still has the opportunity to construct a deeper garage and would then have adequate space to construct an addition off the rear of his house. Again, this would not be related to the living room space as is stated in his hardship. However, it would still offer him an opportunity to have additional living area and preserve open space in the rear of the lot. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission deny the variance request, VAR #89-21, on the basis that the petitioner has two other alternatives which would allow him to enlarge his existing house without violating the Zoning Code. If the Appeals Commission approves the request, the following stipulation is recommended: 1. The petitioner shall install a hard surface driveway by September 1, 1990. Ap�eals Commission Recommendation The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend to the City Council approval of the side yard setback variance from 10 feet to 7 feet ZO inches. This will allow the structure to be in confonaance with today's Zoning Code. The Commission also voted 3-1 to recommend approval to the City Council of the front yard setback variance from 35 feet to 29 feet with the stipulation as recommended by staff. 3D Staff Report VAR #89-21, 590 Kimball Street N.E. Page 4 City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council deny the variance request to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 29 feet. The petitioner has other alternatives which would allow him to construct additional living space without violating code. The City Council should, however, approve the side yard variance to bring the parcel up to code. If the Council approves the variance, the hard surface driveway should be stipulated. 3E �PPEALS COMMI6BION I�IEETING. BEPTEKBER 19, 1989 - P�GE 2 OPOI�I !1 VOICE VOTE, 71LL VOTING 71YE, CS�IRBERSOii 1lOTION C!►RRIED IIZi�A1 1. �ONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REOUEST VAR #89-21 BY ROBERT FRANZEN• 1. Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 29 feet; 2. Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a) of the Fridley �� City Code to reduce the side yard setback from a living area from 20 feet to 7 feet 30 inches, To allow the construction of additional living space on Lots 37 and 38, Block E, Riverview Heights, the same being 590 Kimball Street N.E. OTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Dr. Vos, to open the public hearing. IIPON !� VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIIJG 71YE, CHAIRpER80Pl 871RN71 DECIJIRED THE PDBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7s42 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, and is surrounded by R-1, Single Family Dwelling. The petitioner is requesting a variance in order to construct an addition that will encroach approximately 6 feet into the front yard. The second variance is to bring the existing house into conformance. Currently, part of the house encroaches approximately 3 feet into the side yard setback. Code requires a 10 foot side yard setback. Ms. McPherson stated Lots 37 and 38 combined tota2 approximate2y 5,800 sq. ft. The City Code requires a minimum lot size of 9,000 sq. ft. Staff realizes that the house is quite small and that the petitioner wishes to construct ndditional livinq space; however, there are other alternatives that could accommodate the petitioner's need for more living space. Ms. McPherson stated the existing living room is to the front of the house, and there are two bedrooms to the rear of the house, plus a utility room and a furnace room. The garage located on the site p2an currently does not exist, so there is additional space to the rear of the lot off the utility room and bedrooms where the petitioner could build additional livinq space. l�Is. licPherson stated another alternative would require that the qarage be brought forward on the lot and be attached to the existing house. There is some question as to whether or not any kitchen windows would be affected by this Qecond a2ternative. Bringing the qarage forward would also decrease the width of the 3F 11PPEALB COI4�I88ION �IEETII�IG. BSPTElIBBR 19. 1989 - P�GE 3 qarage, but the petitioner has the option to build a garage longer than it is �►ide to accommodate any storaqe needs he aiqht have. Ms. McPherson stated staff is recommendinq the l�ppeals Commission deny the variance for the front yard setback, on the basis that the petitioner does have two alternatives which would allow him to construct additional living space. Staff does, however, recommend the Appeals Commission approve the second variance to bring the house into conformance with today's zoninq code. Ms. McPherson stated if the Appeals Commission does choose to approve the variance request, staff is recommending one stipulation: (1) The petitioner shall install a hard surface driveway by September 1, 1990. Mr. Robert Franzen, 590 Kimball Street, stated by the time he builds a double car garage to the rear of the house, there will be very little space to construct living area to the rear. He stated his house is a slab on qrade. If he attached the garage to the house with frost footings, if frost gets under the house, the house can buckle and cause a lot of problems with the roof. The cost would be very high and pretty unfeasible. By adding onto the front of the house, he will be at 29 ft. The front of the house has no insulation in the walls. It was built in 1950, and it does need some improvements. Right now, he has a building permit for a vestibule that he can encroach 5 feet into the front yard, and he is only asking for an additional 2 feet. Mr. Franzen stated he has a list of neighbors directly affected by the front yard setback who have siqned a paper stating they do not object to his proposed construction plans or the variance. oM TION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Savage, to receive the statement from the neighbors who have no objection to Mr. Franzen's variance request. The statement was signed by George and Kay Olson, 612 Lafayette Street; Jerry LaPlante, 604 Lafayette Street; Pat Hamre, 601 Kimball Street; Marie Streich, 8295 Broad Avenue; and Sequendino Martin, 580 Kimball Street. IIPON � VOICE VOTE, I1LL VOTING �YE, CHAZRPERBON Bl�RNl1 DECL�►RED THE MOTION C]�►RRIED IINANIMODSLY. Ms. Savage asked Mr. Franzen to address in a little more detail the two alternatives being recommended by �taff. Mr. Franzen stated by the time he puts in a qaraqe, he will have little yard space in the rear. If the addition was constructed to the rear, he would have no yard space t�rhatsoever. 1►ttaching the garage to the house is very costly, because his home is built on a slab, and it could.cause a lot of problems. Also, be has dininq room and kitchen windows on that side, and those windows would have to be eliminated if the qarage was attached. 3G 71PPEli►LB COI4sIB8ION 1[EETII�IG, B�PTS!ffiER 19. 1989 — Pl1GE � Mr. John Kuusisto stated he lives directly behind Kr. Franzen at 585 Jnnesville Street N.E.. He stated there are two neighbors who ere opposed to the variance and Mr. Franzen's construction. The lots in this area have smaller homes, and what I�Ir. Franzen is proposing is not goinq to look riqht aesthetically. The "newness" of the home is not goinq to fit in with the older �omes. Mr. Franzen is proposing a garage in the rear yard. There is a�etback in the back yard for a well for all the neighbors to use, and there are some problems with that right now. Mr. Franzen stated there is a real mixture of different sized and different priced homes in the neiqhborhood. He is updatinq the house with decorative brick and sidinq, and he cannot see how it would not fit into the neighborhood. The improvement is going to help the older homes in the area. Mr. Kuusisto stated�the homes all have the same front yard setbacks, and he objected to a 6 ft. front yard variance. OM TION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, lILL VOTING ]1YE, Ciil�►IRPERBOId 8l1RNA DECI.�RED T8E pOBLIC HEARING CLOSED 11T 8:00 P.M. Dr. Vos stated his biggest concern is the amount of square footage the petitioner has to work with. It seems this proposal with the addition and the double car garage is really filling up the lot. He stated he does not see any hardship and he would vcte against the variance. Ms. Savage stated two neighbors feel very strongly about how the proposal would fit in with the homes in the neighbonc�od. At this time, she did not have enough information to support the variance request. Mr. Kuechle stated he would certainly approve the sfde yard setback to bring the house into conformance with the Code. He felt the best place to add onto the house is ta the front. l�►s pointed out by the petitioner, attaching the garage to the house would be very difficult and would cause a lot of problems, plus the fact that he really only has 10 ft. for the width of the qarage. He was concerned that the front sight lines would be fmpacted; however, he was inclined to recommend approval. I�ir. Barna stated he lives in this neighborhood. 8e felt any improvement to these older homes helps improve the whole neighborhood. There are other homes in the area that have similar additions. As far as the extension into the front yard, there is a hcuse at Kimball Street and East River Road 3 feet irom the curb. Farther down cn Rimball Street, there is a house 10 feet from the curb. There are several jogs in front yard 6etbacks throuqhout the �PPEALS COMMISSION I�IEETING, BEPTEKBER 19, 1989 - P�GE 5 whole Riverview Heights area. He saw as a hardship the fact that it is a previously existing structure, the lack of square footage to work with, the improvement of the north wall, and the addition of insulation to the north wall. He stated he would recommend approval of the variance. Ms. Savage stated she appreciated the information qiven by Mr. Barna who lives in this area. After hearing Mr. Barna's statements, sh�e would be inclined to change her vote to recommend approval of the variance. OTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend to City Council approval of VAR #89-21 by Robert Franzen, pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 29 feet, to allow the construction of additional living space on Lots 37 and 38, Block E, Riverview Heights,�the same being 590 Kimball Street N.E., with the stipulation that: 1. The petitioner shall install a hard surface driveway by September 1, 1990. OPON A VOICE VOTE, BARNA, BAVAGE� �ND 1CIIECHLE VOTING AYE, VOS VOTING NAY, CFiAZRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE I�SOTION CARRIED BY J1 VOTE OF 3-1. Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to the City Council on October 2, 1989. 2. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE RE UEST VAR 89-2z Y v�:xA A. PHILLIPS: Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).(1) of e Fridley City Code to reduce the side yard setback on a rner lot from 17.5 feet to 11.1 feet, to allow the const tion of an addition on Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, Florence P Addition, the same being 6370 Van Buren Street N.E. OM TION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Dr. Vo to open the public hearing. � �PON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� ZRPERBON Hl�RNA DECLl�RED THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN !rT 8:10 P.K Ms. Dacy stated this pro ty is located on the southwest corner of 64th Avenue and Van ren Street N.E. The property is zoned R- 1, Single Family Dw ing, and is surrounded on all sides by R-1, Single Family. Ms. Dacy ted the home was constructed in 1961. !�t that time, the Cit s ordinance regardinq setbacks on corner lots for single fami homes was that a home and qarage could be built 5 ft. from street side yard. In this case, that would be 64th �venue. The 3H �i . MM :ONMfA •',\ � zvs s[t � � : � - f.�. . �y!� —/i _ __ r�'a� _ L _ _ � �� •A'T:T�'�� •f \ '~ f ��— REVISED • AUDITORS = v _�__� 3 a JQ .. � � , , . �. .. ..�: j �• ^� � N :� �, v ��., !••eI. ''� -' C T ' - I ... , j r, , i .s + .i • .. ,`, ir'� J ; "•. `� r o % ��•� �� , ` .'�^� ~AVE. � . W, z �'. S ' " . �w � � . • ~� d : ^,I . , H� '94tN.•��."i;�..��/��' i; ,,' '. `v� �- ' rs ,:. ' " e�� ..�P�� . ♦Q.� � ` w � � � b �p� - �. �/ , ,�.� , I �•V ' � �w � 1: � Y • �< Ma . ', i ' � � �. /1 � t �, ��+�, ' n '=° „ �, ,; - ;� : � . J h _i •�� ' (�(��^��i� I ~ ' � � � y � 4 i> �% '� �i. N S � � ' � �_ .?� �n.�� =� 3 ' � ' � ;', ' , ,� ,� C y'�.I , .:.„ ., . : ." '�;.�' -�\\ �. r=_. _� ::' � ` _ -�� _ /-- J • "-�-' ' ..�. ��''�" m� �� T �� z .� �-M _ - � , „ .;r . o � ,;, , �, „ .. .. -�� . - � � �' � '� ` '�. � . . z , � • `.,.5 r Q� 4 3 � ` y ��` . � � j� .•, , � , � � ,� " ,y. 'v'-�rl ..ti � 'ISSISSIVA�,f�r-----vc,:�— --- ---' i� � ' " ' ,,�wy:�v_.t�Y;'ti'ai• ��Y : . : �� - /� ' �� `• : '� i �•� ,�; •�.;~� � ri ! e i _ . � ..� ' }3�7'f ' .�:N i• ,y •j: . .� s,' � ... ; � , s„ , ��.:/ '/ ' � Q��S ,� _ � � - y 10 ( ' • M•. • � �; • � . . � �� °' .;,"s^ ' ,•,:%� � '�' ', `' `- <� .•�,,,,,.� .. , i � ` y ,,, :�,� . ,ry .,; :; � �, � . �� ..✓°°•-, ��,,. :� ... . . ..,� — -:,, :,;.�: � x. . . .. •', a'.. � auoF Su� 14 , e�"'"'- � �i �� "' VAR #89-21 Robert Franzen v' � , Q� �� J� ., v � . � � � � —f� �i_ .___'.'"__'__ ' -r O �i � � � �Q 0 ��_: � - - �� p � ' '�• o� � Z\ � - \� - . �e _. .,. ` d\ C � SUB. N0. t03 a 6 i : � - _ _�_•.3��_ •dn, �'� � , ._w t�"'':�' _ �. CITY OF N0: IO�S�IrJRQV.';,t± *' .Y �r.�.a'.�',,d+"`-'-?+� .w �»%� .-,', COON RAPIDS ... _ +` --•- r�0�0w '• �,{: ,�+••� . �' .... " ,, . . �G-':=- NiJ i "� J '� ' ' • . ,' ,row�.(i`�,�. �.. .... T-� r — � '��s �' ��' e, EiG�PS' �� • �} L,, •�'.j , • CITY •OF - : � .. ,'� • n'��.•� �� , ,. �.�•" r .. Y � ...n a�' �RIOLEY �EV. AUQ.� SU� ��-� 'I1�1�:"_;��., ♦.. yM�� p .�!�.-r'yN�n �T -' '� - --- � � �•, �� .. :+� y I � � � � � r:n; . sac � � � ��,�w,«,n,.�.n^" , � �p ...��,�,+'.�r�N Y. S ,. -}!,,.i� a w ';.., � _ S r ... _ �,, `� �`� ; . �•,,, �-�'-' , ,,,� a ;' .. ' ';,,•°�•~ ',:� t _ : R ID _ � �, '.';� �. �h�1 21 22 232425a 2 ,�`' A��. �� u,�w' n � �.'� . v' rti.i� �.: '` !' 1^.r�i'a` i , •' .n� �'.~� �i• .'�a,w�Ad�. �� ' w � R��'�� . �,• y� �� ♦ .1 r�.t� � ,_ •• " � y '"� � ' d, � �'� - 4 y,, 'r.^� �"•• - , IIIOI�T�M � 9TR ET . . ` � �i�'�,. . , �r:' '�r►'•' +r Sf: ^ � • :: ;X - T � :'� �� ' H RWAL `� s ' . ',i ' .✓'�: , ", r " .« w�--' � CNOUlNA�9 � . �, � � � � +r` �S'' r �� p. ''v� f ..r . . �.,f�►� 'n-� �t 0 i••9 i' � � y� � � � ' '. • ADO/ 7/t7� � i w . YN � � � N � . •�.N �,�vl'- , �J� ! � ... i. � % E '� . .' � . !" � -.�+�.. r • �y; +v. rr�� ,U�- w " `� � � �_ � _��:. i �.� �:. �N�y»,,yr,�,r � � r � �� . ~'� ��.. ��r� Vl.r.w �X l� ' � '*` F ; ?i` +�:s'..��•..�Fisii�rlaraCt.rr+wanr�a»:..�s �.~w.v+.r i � w..��.>'� ,��-+�A�^�`w.ti r _ �: � ' • I _. ..�. � • . ^ .,.�.• '� � � y �A � _ " i � i •..�. �� . i �' Ii X�i . � '�� r ..� N ri� � A . ,a `M' � i�� Is 'i.�n.�i.�... •.n•..�ntiv ,•� ^�n��.• n .wur�n � ��_yr �j�eEr`.t �t� .i � �jj,1 � � _i � � ✓ • • K . . ��4 �y'"P� �, � > • ' ! � y�� . ri.r'� b . s. o � " : � � y ,• ' �. • Y �,w� � . •J ,, � . , ,�"'i. r, �' �.o� �; ' , � ,, ;� "' .,. 3 ,� 1 � �. ,� ��sr.� ) . r �* � ' _ � r+n� � a , �+1 {�,.`;�„jNi� � P� r ,�, �}�'7� A �� '�.�.w j � ✓• ,� '1r / ., pV , . : �'," H . 'n,. �y;r„' =d- t.V A"„r:w+`i e � •t •.�,,;`- ,,R :• FA1 MON rn' � y_ r ' �a, ++ � . n �, ;N'^t � S � �: �Y S • � ' � �w' � R ♦ "3'�� ,'�/. '�� .' !�y" ' . -..rl ~%'�.• :a •••°t/r'I~� ' �.• h �- .�,1 ' w►� ,. • ... ; j G ! . � � i. � y y� . % , ' i —� r � —i � ,,�' � • •r,�+�, • �• _ � „� ►��. ,t.rr�,++"�',.-;,`w k;.:�l � �; r M� . ,'k �. __` I��, �J=l'L' .�'t Kq �vE�� ,�� . � y �„ rW�;"'� .. ; w a�p� 1 1 •Ar � ': 1- . M � +, )� . !r 7 ^'„�n'� . aM: r�� . '"` . / � ''': ' ;I' -ar►- ' •�f ��,�, , ,,� r` ' ♦ N�,.P►�v� '�;"� ,�. �o. �CIRCLE. .,�8 ~ ��. �.', , `�:'+n'°:%y:',. � • y`�n �'F` * . SSitE� ,�• i � •CiRCLE i ' i • , . • • s ti : sr. .. pA r- "r„ ' �.� ,r'y � •�..t '^1'�`.� �� Cj � � •.'s,.�"'�'�k t: « -�' '•• e_• w �[' � •�, '�'�T�YJiJ,r • .:. ' .�i �I � � +� � � y �• . �T �3_' • �� L �• � 'J�r1F„�":+�"r --�t-' , , . � ,�y -_ Y. �D�t ��.�.+N' � �,. r ' a.1»i��1tt ... .. � ,�.ri' :A� �,1�' , . ' � �MIr' JN" \. � � � I f ► � 1i'��•�-r' f QN� ' ��"' 1 .�� L -� "7� M��~ � �•�' ,..,^'r`n� �.� / . nw LOCATION MAP � �3 i i I I CITY 3J �, ZONING MAP ., : ., No�k�, �T P�.AN .E 1 = IC�O' .� So 3K �y�A�� i E�o� FR�a�JZ.E,t�l 590 KIMBAL AVE. FR�O�E.Y • �: �� ► aMwu n SITE PLAN •I• VAR ��89-21 Robert Frazen � _. . � . . _ . . , - - - � • �__1 � � �� I I � ' I �v �• � ` ; ; - ' � O ;v � � -�,_1 .. _ . ' � I i f I L � � -1 l t � ; � , � - - -1-�-;- �--{--�-; - - - - -,- ; -;- -� � ; , : � �- - _ ; - - �- , y � -1--1-�-- _ - -� : -�-�-< ; -� , � -� � � ' -� -----,+ ' � i �� ; , i i , , -, I � �--i-�- � ' P •�--------1-- - -- . - �- - � �- �—T-l--t—� ,--•--- - - - - �---- — _ _. . . . � 1 � _1. r � . ' ; _, �- - - � -�� -- � ' - - •.--.i � � _� '�� - � -- ' � � ; ' - _ : ; ' \ , -� - � - -�, , � i . . - . � ' � � � � � i i i � ' - ; � , , � � � - - - �--�_ ._.. -- - - , -�- -- -1-. _ i i � , � - - --;--• __- ,_ : - - � ' - --- �--i---; � � � i � � , ,'� -- _—�Lt___.. . ._ : --- -` • ----1- - --- � .._ _ � ' � ' . - ' + . _ . _ - --� - --T-i - - �i-----i--�— � —� � � r-�—`- - � I �- •- - • — --- --- -- . --- -- -� - -- --r-�--J- � - - � � , . ; � � i ! i i I , .: � � -�-- - 7-- - • ----Q _ I ' � �- . -"---- • `Q ` ' ! � � � �_�I ' ' _ l^ _1___1_ !_� � .� '`.� - -� ,-- -- '-� 4 - ' � i - i ; - -'-,-' ��.: , - -_ � � ,-. _ --- -• -- � - � -� -- -I- -- i � I ' ; ' I� ! ' � __ 1 ._ !_...,. ... J L— T._ _ a� � ' - ' '-F` - -� ` � ' - - -- - - - r - -�li: ` ' --- � � -r__ ; . . i_ -1 , �- -+ --. _. _ ' _:� - - - -�. . --.� . -- - � � •� a-�-��-• ° � � , ?-- L ' - -i . -' --_.i_1_=_..--+- �-'- - - - - �� - �� •-�-I--•--�--- � , � i � 1 i � - � ' I� ' i � . � i J i i � i , —v ; � � I— � . ' __ . 1 . . __.1-._.�'��_ ____ _ '._t."" _ "'�1_. i �' .. .._. ' � i I � I �" ` . � � � ! - �.— . _; _ _ ._.L�.i _ I i ♦ � � � � �. _' � _ _ ' . _ _\`—_ _�� ' +��.'��` _ ' — 1 I . �' � _��.�__".�_' � � � � j � i i j � I . _ � _ � - _ _ _ L -_. _ t � J_ _ ' _ _ � -�. .- _ �_ ' _" _ _ _J_ . ( _'- . _ _ r. � ; ; �- � i � . . . -�t-� , � � - ,- -.-_ -; - - -- . - - . ;-�--- � i � -- - -i - ' -�---; - --� 1 L:��. _ - - - - _ ��-- - - - --- ' - � ' � ' "' �- !--' _� � } ; � � �'-�-�-T- ; � � ��_�-l-- ' ..-.. _ --'----�-- -- _ ' \.`: .-�--� --i � ' r ��- -` -- - i '�".�6- , -i--I ---�--.. ' - ' ^�_ - � i 1 � � � �-- '- � - ;- � • t ' � ( • •-- • . . —. . � — - --'_.i.. .r . "� . . _-�1_ ; _.� . : ; . : — , -1- ,---. (. —. �.... "' .'_'� _ ' 1 • , ��\ `_I�"'�+ . ' �'_ '_ ' . �l. _. . � O. _, ��\--. _ l _ . ! _I- ' —i _ c _ .._ .— t _ 1: ' � ' ` r � � 1 � I � , + � i � �" '' I � • { ' . . . � � I ' , " 1 � � � f ' . � _ i _ � � . I . . . ' � . i _ ` __L��- 1•_ -�-� '- I ' . : 1 � I . . . 1 i ' t � ! ' � _ " _ '�' ' ' _�\ . _�� _ ti " _' ' �_ '.."+--1� 1. _�.- +. , . � ' �' _.I . a__ i ' _L _.- i_"_'�.�_ _L_ ' �' . � . 1 . ._ ' . I ' . . . . . : i . � ' � 1 I _ \ I —i' i i . • i i ( I . . . ,-------- a-- • - - -- - - � -'-j --�--�- -�- -t F ' ' ; . � � _.. :�.�.L� : .�_ � ' ' - - - -- --- � � � - . - - --�� : ,+-� -�-- � . � � � � . �_ . +=Y=;-=?_ --- ; � -_ y� -� -L � ----- -- - -*---J-,.• t' �_'' , - � �-- � �—j— - � � . � i � I r 1 i _ ��—.1 - �n __.s. _�%r_-L.. � � I�.;..1. 1 _+.. ��• _J_ ��r .� _ � �f.`.l_��' � 3 _i_"�• • - � - -t - -- , -' - -- --L-! --i- ' ' I ._ _i_. _ ._ r_. _ ( - ; . ' ' -- � - � ----i - -- - - 1 �- --1- - -- � --- � �- 1 -1—.J- - _..~� -�; _.; , _ 1 ._ _ �-1 -1 -- � ' -�--=- �- - =-- ,- � : I . �� , t..;:I- -i�-.� j;� _'`_i_:._. . i ; . i , � � � �� , -_. . . _ i � .�.��:��. � • . ' ' i + � { � � . . : . : . � . . .a. � -r . . .- ' ' � ' ' I � � .i �_[, L.. . _. _.. ._-. . . i ! , . 1 I . . . ( � � I � i ! . , . ELEVATtON � � unroF F�� CO1ViMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M EMO RAN D UM DATE: September 26, 1989 p�,. , .{ v To: William Burns, City Manager� FROM: SUBJECT: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Variance Request, VAR #89-22, by Vera A. Phillips, 6370 Van Buren Street N.E. Attached is the staff report for the side corner yard setback variance request from 17.5 feet to 11.1 feet to allow the construction of an addition to an existing home at 6370 Van Buren Street N.E. The Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variance request. Staff recommends the City Council deny the request as another option exists to meet the intent of the ordinance; however, should the City Council approve the request, there are no recommended stipulations. BD:ls M-89-582 Jlr I 30 � � STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE sept,er.�ber 19, 1939 CITY OF PLANVNG CONruNSS10N DATE FRt DLEY CITY COI�VqL DATE ��p�' 2, 19 39 ,wT�, sD/Ls REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSEO REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA : SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES 8� ZONNVG UTiJTES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FNVANCIAL MAPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREIfNSNE PLAN ' COMPATBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES 8� Z�ONNG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATK�tS STAFF RECOMMEI�ATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNNVG COMMISSION RECOMMMENDATION VAR #89-22 Uera Phillips 'Po reduce ;lze sic?e carr.er yard setback frun 17.5 feet 11.1 ieet 6370 Van 3u:en Street N.E. 7,782 sq. ft. N/A �2 1, Single Family Residential I�1, Single Family Residential zoning and uses surrounding the site N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes None D�enial Approval 3P Staff Report VAR #8g-22, 6370 Van Buren Street N.E. Page 2 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).(1) requires a side yard width on a street side of a corner lot to be not less than 17.5 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a higher degree of traffic visibility and to reduce the "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "To move it over would be to cover up two basement windows. We need air for downstairs laundry and toilet." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request The petitioner, Vera Phillips, proposes to construct a three season porch at the rear of the home located at Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, Florence Park Addition, the same being 6370 Van Buren Street N.E. In order to construct the proposed addition, the petitioner is requesting a 6 foot variance from the side yard corner lot setback from 17.5 feet to 11.1 feet. Site The site is located at 6370 Van Buren Street and is zoned�R- 1, Single Family Residential. It is surrounded on all sides by single family zoning and uses. The home was originally constructed in 1961. At that time, the City Zoning Ordinance permitted garages to be located on corner lots 5 feet from the lot line along the side street yard. Analysis The proposed addition is to be located just south of the north wall of the existing garage. The proposed addition will extend south to the north edge of the existing kitchen window (18 feet). The basement window is located just below it. The dimensions of the proposed addition are 14 feet x 18 feet. The addition is to be constructed in similar materials as the existing building with prefinished siding and a 4:12 roof pitch. Staff Report VAR #89-22, 6370 Van Buren Street N.E. Page 3 Options 3Q The proposed addition would not be able to be shifted 6 feet to the south since the kitchen window and basement window would be covered. Reducing the width of the addition would probably.dictate a different pitch on the roof; however, the area lost could be made up by constructing a longer addition of 12 ft. x 24 ft. Recommendation The home was built in accordance with the ordinance in 1961; however, due to the change in the ordinance, the structure has become a legal nonconforming structure. The proposal must be considered under the current ordinance. Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission recommend denial of the variance request, because another option exists to meet the intent of the ordinance. Appeals Commission Recommendation The Appeals Commission unanimously recommended approval of the variance request since the proposed addition would not cause an encroachment that would go beyond the existing line of the building wall and, hence, would not cause a further encroachment into the side corner yard setback. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council deny the variance request since another option exists to meet the intent of the ordinance; however, should the City Council approve the variance request, there are no recommended stipulations. m 3R �PPEALB COMMI88ION MEETING, BEPTEMBER 19, 1989 - P�GE 5 whole Riverview Heights area. He saw as a hardship the fact that it is a previously existing structure, the lack of square foot e to work with, the improvement of the north wall, and the ad ' ion of insulation to the north wall. He stated he would r ommend approval of the variance. Ms. Savage stated she appreciated the informatio Barna who lives in this area. After hea 'nq statements, sl�e would be inclined to change h vote approval of the variance. O ION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Council approval of VAR #89-21 by o� Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the F idley front yard setback from 35 eet to construction of additional 1' ing space E, Riverview Heights, the me being 590 the stipulation that: l. DPON A VOTZNG OF 3-1, qiven by Mr. Mr. Barna's to recommend �aqe, to recommend to City :rt Franzen, pursuant to City Code to reduce the 29 feet, to allow the on Lots 37 and 38, Block Kimball Street N.E., with The peti 'oner shall install a hard surface driveway by Septem r 1, 1990. VOI VOTE, BARNA, SAVAGE, !►ND 1CIIECHLE VOTING lrYE, VOS fA , CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED BY !� VOTE McPherson stated this item will go to the City Council on ber 2, 1989. 2. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REOUEST VAR �89-22, BY VERA A. PHILLIPS: Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).(1) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the side yard setback on a corner lot from 17.5 feet to 11.1 feet, to allow the construction of an addition on Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, Florence Park Addition, the same beinq 6370 Van Buren Street N.E. OTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Dr. Vos, to open the public hearing. OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING 11YE, CBAZRPERSON Hl�R1�Tl� DECI.�IRED THE PIIBLIC BEARING OPEN AT 8:10 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated this property is located on the southwest corner of 64th Avenue and Van Buren Street N.E. The property is zoned R- 1, Single Family Dwelling, and is surrvunded on all sides by R-1, Single Family. Ms. Dacy stated the home uras constructed in 1961. At that time, the City's ordinance regarding set7�acks on corner lots for sinqle family homes was that a home and qarage could be built 5 ft. from the street side yard. In this case, that would be 64th �►venue. The m �pPEALB COMMISSION MEETING, BEPTEMBER 19. 1989 - p�►GE � front of the lot is the frontage which abuts Van Buren Street N.E. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner is requesting a 6 ft. variance into the current 17.5 ft. code requirement from a side yard corner lot in order to construct a 14 ft. x 18 ft. addition to the rear of the home. The proposed addition wi12 extend south to the north edge of the existing kitchen window. A basement window is located just below the kitchen window. A new qarage door will be constructed on the north side of the proposed addition. Ms. Dacy stated that in evaluating the variance request, staff looked to see if there were any options that would meet the code requirement. There is no option to shift the addition to the south. As pointed out by the petitioner, that would cover up two windows. The only option would be to shorten the addition from 14 ft. x 18 ft. to a 12 ft. x I4 ft. addition, or to construct a longer addition of 12 ft. x 24 ft. r Ms. Dacy stated the home was constructed in conformance with the ordinance in effect �n 1961. The one sole option is to construct a smaller addition. Based on that option a2one, staff has to recommend denial. However, if the Appeals Commission approves the variance, staff has no recommended stipulations. Mr. Barna stated if this was not a corner lot, this addition could be constructed without any variances. Mr. Dacy stated that is correct. Ms. Vera Phillips stated she has letters from three neighbors stating they have no objection to the variance. OTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Savage, to receive into the record letters from Shirley Switzer, 6405 Van Buren Street N.E.; Pat Saba, 6360 Van Buren Street N.E.; and Laura and Richard Carlson, 6400 Van Buren Street N.E. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, 1�lLL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERBON BARNA DECI.ARED THE I+IOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. Mr. Jim Frye stated he is the builder for this addition. He stated one problem with extending the addition to 24 ft. is there is a large pine tree in the rear yard that would have to be removed. The 12 ft. width, along with a vaulted ceiling, makes the addition look like a long hallway. He stated that because the addition would be within the existing building Ifnes, they were quite surprised to find out a variance was needed. He stated he thought ft shou2d be qrandfathered in with the old code. The 12 ft. x 24 ft. addition is an odd shape. In workinq with the petitioner, they. felt an 18 ft. x 14 ft. addition would be well balanced and fit in nicely with the existinq house. 3S 3T APPEALS COMMISSION �iEETING, BEPTEMBER 19, 1989 - P7�►GE 7 Ms. Savage asked Ms. Phillips to better define her hardship. Ms. Phillips stated the addition cannot be moved over because of the kitchen window and basement windows. Directly below the kitchen is a bathroom and laundry room, and she feels they need an outside opening for those two rooms. She stated they like the outdoors, and they would utilize this porch addition. A 12 ft. x 14 ft. addition is quite small. OTION by Mr. �tuechle, seconded by Ms. Savage, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING l�YE, CHAIRPERSON Bl�RNA DECLARED THE PDBLIC HEARZNG CLOSED AT 8:30 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated he is in favoz of the variance. The garage is already closer to the street, and the lines of the addition would be inside the garage lines. The hardship is not very strong; however, the purpose of the ordinance is to provide clearance and visibility around corners for traffic, and this has absolutely no impact on that. Ms. Savage agreed. She felt the public purpose and spirit of the code will be met by the addition. Under the old code at the time the house was built, no variance would have been needed. It seems like a reasonable variance request, and she would vote in favor of it. Dr. Vos stated he felt the hardship is the fact that this is a corner lot, the original placement of the house on the Iot, and that the house met all code requirements when it was built. He would vote in favor of the variance. Mr. Barna also agreed. He stated the spirit of the code is being met. The hardship is the existing placement of the house. OT ON by Ms. Savage, seconded by Dr. Vos, to recommend to City Council approval of variance request, VAR #89-22, by Vera A. Phillips, pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).(1) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the side yard setback on a corner lot from 17.5 feet to 11.1 feet, to allow the construction of an addition on Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, Florence Park Addition, the same beinq 6370 Van Buren Street N.E. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� C8�►IRPERBON BPiRNA DECI.ARED T8E ![OTZON CARRIED IINANIMODSLY. Ms. Dacy stated this item will go to City Council on October 2, 1989. I� T. 30 R. 24 1 ' FR/OL EY VAR 4�89-22 Vera Phillips Tws �s • coMn�.r�oN or �c�o�ns •� fNE1' A►/EAR �N rnf �r�0�. ',.,,.N*� , QiFKES AfiEC��NG /MF �R/ � SK�wA i MK DR�wiNG �S �O !f USF� G�i ` �A� � RE�fRENCE ►UROOSEi �ND tnE CWN� T� IS �'�Ot RES�ON51/lE �OR ANY �N� •CCUR�GES NEREu+ COwiAiNED. 539/4 3U � � L 41 Ew� ��'A *-N9.6 • ' r - • STREEj - �---. - ,.� � ' , � � � i .• � :� 1 .� , ` ' - • n I • � �O, . . �' �° ' r�l ��,F �, ; �1 • y � � n . � r, i 4pM: �, . Fi, ,.' r '', r .. .-. � „� .�7 % ��✓�' � i � y � , , , : y . . ., . :1, . p ,�� f ; --a►. ^ �' i . �. I ' � .� , v� - •' BENNETT DRIVE � . / .��. r N '� * . , . �. • : � . �,�' � :, . � , j ' : / � - •� •r, �r. .r�' �' � i i ' � f- r . . F � r � F • ;.f .�� , � ',�• - � I � i � _ � all y , � f/l ' � ' + " . • _. . 1+ � �� I � i � , f / i I . •, • � . r . , s� .r � . . a �7' :m. -a� .� � �� .r:. t ,•. + '.� �, .;.�+ � . _ • 64 •A E 'NE • ; i . ,r„ , . ., I -.�. �• . •+, - .f •i al. .� � • - : , • - i . . t + +.. �- :;� � .�� ' . � � . P•- _ . • . ' . e ! � - . t , ' i I a � ' _ "_ _ � 1 .` '�' _ ' �• r7� _�_ ►- � p '� ' ,yT� y i ' �fi`i y��•: .= f ,�f'I :� • Dj r'� ,,♦. rY,- � ...�.�. :�`.i. '�'��'j , ��. � � • � � p � r�`i � ~~ `r. � f � � � O � � . r j� .� � , ♦ : + , ; �• . � . _ � �' - ' � , t f . 1 -Y �!. .0 , � � Y�--� ; ,. , , :. . . ,. , . .... . „ . . _. . . .. , . . . • ;, � ...... ';•. , ; ' _ o r�» 63 R.0. . AVENUE N.E �- -- _ ` r�.s: .�o .`... �I '�+' �� r<I ,� � f ♦I �� +') s�l �,i�'�� J' ,�1� _ !, ..� .>_ ,��,, `�� 'V WJ O < 0 ia►, �■� .___' �� ■ a��s�� ;d �� I��J�i ;p 0� � ■��7'� ��1� i0 ��t� �� ■ Aj� �� '� �:�i !:a's� !b!'!�i� ..a ��:� �z � �� . �a; � a�� : �, • �� rs ;, �■�a�� ;ia � � '; � �o . s � �d' ��rs � � t!�!a� E1f�. ;,�!� .� i � ,Q, p.. .. .. L �� SEL N • :�' .i .>✓• s.' : %� t " LOCATION MAP �� •:;.�: V >_. :�. b�'� ;: _ ,y-�,. ��f 4 :�� - �,,� e ;.,.., . .:,:C7:, • . . 9 .. .,... �:-;.:�:?" . . . C) r; .' �'�� io ,•: % . .et n � �=�' �. . , S,9 e,. �2 • : . . �3 ..�:`• • • • • C•; �,�: ��• • 14 — . . .r. �5 .... � I�000Q�oo�� ao� p�mommbommm�� aod �a�mio mio . � �. ITmeR�s_�s �I �y W - � � V , �, � �: �, � , �� •; � �� ; �; �, � � � �� ,�• �� '` � �� '�.+i L.� t J � � ` r , � Y"'j �A � �V � € � �� ,:�^� � r..�•_ __ -` L:::� ,� VAR 4689-22 Vera PhiZlips „ ,o FR��LEr MID�LE SCMOOL � �. � /• -- ..... '.�: ..._ .... .,� ,��.� . �. Cr'� ,, •� , �., � . � .� _ ��. s •� � �`t._ �''��, ��. _�. ��,/� %�' , - ,� ,, �_�! �1!!. � ZONING MAP Q VAR ��a9-22 Vera Phillips 1 ' . . � � �1 � �• ,�=y■ � � R � 6 SITE PLAN � � �� , � i �� i�� . � I _� � �� - ' �o�s. �+� � � �� , s : �� l� � � : � I � - -- �� Z� I �/� _ �--� �O - - � --- - --�� d . 1 �� -�'_?___. � � � t r� �r�� ' . _�.` _ _ ;.�N � j i � �. +� �� , � �, . f �, , �� ` �� L� � 1� , r � �� b � VAR ��89-22 Vera Phillips „°�� _o , , t � ,.� I � . �a�t �. -- I ' s �•r''�� - , . , � ,,r� �� ;► �. � �: . � ; �; , ,. �- ; ; �s � �: � � � �� 0 �;= � � � �`� ; � i I � y� ______.t__ �; --'�-:- - --�- �� -- =�--� -- --..� . , �f �: --_-- _-T-�-- Y , _.. __ � . . _ _ �. ,�_ 4 Y .... ' � 4; �l O � f �� --=�=_-=�-- - - - -_-� � � , :� a � , ; � - �, ; � , � � _° 1-� ,,=- i : �1 ", i i ; ' _ O , _ !� , ; i' I� , -' i vz'; , _� � � ; f 1 � � � } ,�- � , , ; ; � � - -. t� - - -_ �-� -- �. i . E . � _ -- -- _-- -- - _--- � � - �------ - � - ♦ ' y� � � ' �,/ • N ri�y �' ��ri� �N� - � 1) ;---_ _ +, ; � i 1 � ��'% i � �� i! ; - 1!i ( � � ( I FLOOR PLAN I■ � � � � i � � � /� O � _ u �� . --- � t., �� 1\ i\� �- � f � �r i ! VAR �89-22 .,___ .,�_„ � .�«. �..�a��Y� �I � o� r� ; • 1� �I ; � i � � ? � , � �� ,, ;� � ,�__ � ; � � ,' �i rV , � � � � � i � , � � •' ! — I� �� 3p1 ' � �.�' � � i; - \ � l `i rk � .� .�... �z V ' � � _ _ t f _ 1 I �'� , � � � �� `� � � � � � \ �) � � �� `. � '� � I �. . ._�_ � �� ; ; i � . { � � i 7 f � � L ,,��--- fi ' . _ _. � _, , ;; � , I� I � _. -- ! I , ;��i. � .. '' ' � i -. � ; � -f1; . ��'''�\ , � � � � � i :,.�+, � � � � �;�! . , . �t.� � f �i � . _. .. , ; . _. � � I dW � � — — � � �i. � � � � � �r.T r-- — � �;V '• _.4._..__--� � �i �I . � :� � - - -- �, � : : �, � : �� N� � � ' � J � _r� 1 �. � : i �� 3 ` ' ' L_ ""�__ ' '"_ . 1 1 I � � .r � � 1"� / ".��.�. �.�� i � � V � �; : e �i , � ' � � ;i-- -� � , � �l � � LL� I � ; ; ,. EL�VATION � � �� n � i�� Z Z �i � � �� : �. � � : , :,� � ��. � � _ � � � � � ; _ �� Z� �v � � I � ; : _ ___... , =, - � ._ �_ _. _ . . ,;, . I i I�; �I� �;��, � , , . , _ , .� � - r-----._. _. � ,� , � :� ( i 1 �� , I� � i ;1- - -- ; , � ,, I --- ,� . �. -- ; - � : �.� � ;�' s ' �� ' - ---- -t.� I i Z �� * = � ,� t � � �� , : ,f VAR 4�89-22 ��,,,.., ��,; i i ;,,� _ 0 _, ,� ��- Z v � � F— � � � � � � EC��VATtON Sept.. 9,1989 3AA To the Appeala Commiesion, I do not object to the Phillipe �utting on a 3 season porch at 6370 Van Buren St. NE Fridley, HN I live on the SouLh Side next door to them.. ,'�� r' � � �, .�; / :� I 1 ��* r T � � � (�-��.�, ,�,�'`YY,�.�.. C��.c.��,�.,�,. �, - UJ� li.e�-�,b..� �fl..� - �,; �� -.,�,.,�, �. � "�i'?�-```-� =" �-C`-»t..►c:..�.,...[.��...: l:��''��' -/��Z�E:.�l:Q-�..-i-=�e'/ Z��— ,� / � , % .�t,� , � . 4 l �-��. j ,-1�.�c'�. �.l-�.� �..� ��/��-.. -�- �%r.fv�i .�./�.r1. . ��% ��-! �,�i 7'..�?`' �r-�} � .t�l�-n s�-f- � � /�; �e',��c�.J �./..�'--�--y`/ �"-�-�-��.,�-�- �y�� .. �...� ,�' r�. � �.,�.�,�,.. yy,,.y.� . Sti_ y� � �� : : 3CC . �ept. 18, 1985 Ci�y of Fridley Variance Committee To Whom It May Concern: I have no objection to Vera Phillips, 6370 Van Buren St. building a three season porch on the back of her house in accordance with her original plans. Thank you. / , � ��. Shirley witzer 6405 Van Buren S. NE � � cinr oF FRI DLEY C011/IMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: , TO: M EMO RAN D UM September 26, 1989 � �. William Burns, City Managery� FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #89-23, by O. B. Zachmann Attached is the staff report for the variance request to reduce the rear yard setback from 30 feet to 20 feet at 7100 Riverwood Drive N.E. The Appeals Commission recommended denial of the variance request. Staff recommends the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission recommendation. BD/dn M-89-586 m 3DD � 3EE t STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE september 19 , 19 89 C�TY OF PLAIWNG COMNSSION DATE FIZtDLEY C(TY COI�lCIL DATE : october 2, 1989 �� R*/�� REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES & ZON�IG i11UTES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS F�VANCIAL IMPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPf�t�NE PLAN COMPATBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES � ZONIVG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMEt�ATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION P�ANNNVG COMMISSION RECON�AENDATION VAR #89-�23 0. B . Zacrunann Zb reduce the rear yard setback frcan 30 ft. to 20 ft. 7100 Rivezwood Drive N.E. 10,000 sq. ft. N/A I�1, Single F�nily F 1, Single F�nily, zoning and uses surrounding the site N/A Must be paid at time of building pennit N/A Yes Yes N�e Denial Denial 3GG Staff Report VAR #89-23, 7100 Riverwood Drive N.E. Page 3 Analysis Included in the attachments is the site plan for the previous variance application. That proposal included a longer rambler style bnilding. The front of the lot is defined as the shortest dimension, which in this case would be Riverwood Drive. The rear of the lot is then the western property line. The previous approval granted variances to the front and the rear to encroach to 17.5 feet. The current proposal maintains the front yard setback from Riverwood Drive at 35 feet, as well as the required side yard setback from the north lot line at 10 feet and also the side corner setback along 71st Way. Included in the the required se previous case, buildable area; the buildable a the garage can This would mean house to the no it so that the � packet is a copy of the current proposal with tbacks marked on the lot. As opposed to the the petitioner is making more use of the however, there does exist adequate area within :-ea to rearrange the structure design so that be fully placed within the buildable area. moving the 15 foot extension from the proposed �th and relocating the garage to the south of ntire structure is within the buildable area. Unfortunately, until amendments to the City Code regarding corner lots are made, the current interpretation of the Code should be maintained. Recommendation Staff recommends the Appeals Commission recommend denial of the request, VAR #89-23, by O. B. Zachmann, as there are other options to meet the intent of the Code. Appeals Commission Action The Appeals Commission unanimously recommended denial of the request based on the fact that other alternatives exist to arrange the home within the buildable area of the lot. Staff Update The adjacent property owners inquired as to the City's policy regarding the grade differential between the subject property and the existing developed lots. The Assistant City Engineer and Planning staff revisited the site. There appears to be at this time a five foot difference in elevation between the finished floor elevation of the property to the north and the subject property. When the subject property is developed, 3HH Staff Report VAR #89-23, 7100 Riverwood Drive N.E. Page 4 approximately two feet of fill at minimum will probably be placed on the property. The petitioner has not determined the amount of fill that will be placed on the property. However, there will not be a severe change in elevation between the two properties. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council adopt the Appeals Commission recommendation. 31t ]1PPEALB COiIMI8SI0I�l MEETIt�IG. BEPTEMBER 19. 1989 - P74GE 8 3. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REOUEST. VAR /89-23, BY O. B. �ACHMANN• Pursuant�to Section 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) of the Fridley City Ccde to reduce the rear yard setback for an accessory building on a corner lot from 30 feet to 20 feet, to allow the construction of a single family home and attached garage on Lot 15, Block 2, Riverwood Park, the same beinq 7100 Riverwood Drive N.E. O ON by Ms. Savage, seconded by Dr. Vos, to open the public hearing. IIPON !� VOICE VOTE, 11LL VOTING 11YE, CH�IRPER80N B�RI�TA DECI.�►RED T8E POBLIC HEARING OPEN !1T 8:35 P.lt. Ms. Dacy stated this property is located in the northwest corner of the intersection of Riverwood Drive and 71st Avenue. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, and is surrounded by R-1, Single Family. This site vas the subject of a variance in 1986 where the Appeals Commission and City Council approved a front yard setback variance from Riverwood Drive from 35 ft. to 17. 5 ft. , and a rear yard setback variance from 30 ft. to 17.5 ft. In the previous application, the house was much larger and faced 71st Way, rather than Riverwood Drive. That variance lapsed because the house was not constructed within the one year timeframe. Ms. Dacy stated the current petitioner's request fs for a 10 ft. rear yard variance from 30 ft. to 20 ft. The petitioner, in contrast to the original application in 1986, has conformed to a majority of the building setbacks except for 10 ft. of the garage. There could be some rearrangement in the house desiqn so the entire garage could be within the buildable area. The portion of the structure between the garage and main part of the house is the family room. The design of the structure fs very similar to the current petitioner's home (copy of petitioner's home in agenda). Ms. Dacy stated that because there are available areas on the lot to meet the ordinance requirement, etaff fs recommending denial of the variance request. Ms. Dacy stated that one of the stipulations on the 1986 variance �ras that the home to the north of this lot be constructed 20 ft. from the north lot line. Because the variance application lapsed, a permit has been issued for a home on the lot to the north that meets the current 10 ft. setback. Staff feels the 10 ft. setback on the petitioner's lot plus the remaining 10 ft. on the lot to the north still maintains a 20 ft. separation between the two buildings. It is staff's interpretation that the issue irom 1986 has been resolved. Mr. O. B. Zachmann stated he has looked for a lot in Frfdley for about five years. He was very happy to find this lot. He stated 3JJ ��PEALB CO?QiI6SION KEETII�IG. BEPTEKBER 19 1l89 - pl1GE 9 that as far as changing the desiqn, the extension between the main part of the home and the qaraqe is the fami2y room. If it is placed any other place fn the home, he vill lose the cross ventilation and exposure to 71st Way, and will lose 75t of their living area. He would be lookinq at �omebody else's back yard. He would like to brinq the house closer to 71st i�Tay vithout a variance. Mr. LeRoy Schreifels, 7102 Riverwood Drive, ctated he objects to this variance. It will be the only house on the block that will extend beyond the other houses. When they come out of the back of their house, they will be looking at the back of the petitioner's garage instead of a nice view down the block. He 6tated his house is one year old, and they have invested a considerable amount of money into their house. He stated he never would have built here if he had known this kind of variance Would be considered, and he would never have bui�t if a home had been built with the 1986 variances. He state he suspected the reason the house was not rearranged differently to fit the lot was because of a clump of trees. He stated while it is a shame to zuin nice trees, it is also a shame to build a home beyond established setbacks. This is a new and fine subdivision, and there is no reason to qrant variances when it is possible to build a house without a variance. He felt it will also reduce the value of the other new homes in the neighborhood. He also stated he did not think the 1986 variance had anything to do with this request. Mr. Barna stated if this was a detached qarage, where could it be placed in the rear yard without a variance? Ms. Dacy stated if the garage was detached from the principal buildinq, the only major requirement would be a 25 ft. setback from 71st Way. The garage could be located 3 ft. from the north and rear lot lines. Mr. Schreifels stated , it was unfortunate that the homes in this subdivision were not built with some private restrictions. This home will be the only one that will not conform with the other homes. Mr. Larry Besser, 7104 Riverwood Drive, stated this corner lot has been badly mutilated. The contour of the lot is a depression. The lot immediately to the north is at one level, and there is perhaps a 10 ft. drop to Mr. Zachmann's lot. If a house is constructed on the lot as it exists today, the contour of the land would be very erratic and very unpleasinq to look at. Irlr. Besser �tated the buildings in this area are pretty expensive homes. He would urge for the maintenance of homes with property values equal to the homes in the area. Mr. 8esser stated that regarding the rear yard setback, be feels the proposed garage is going to be detrimental to the atmospheze 3KK �PPEl�LB COlSMI88IOId ![EETING, BEPTEI�IBER 19. 1989 - P!►GE 10 of the neighborhood. There are three existing houses all with the same rear yard setbacks, and he thought this pzoposed qaraqe would not look pleasing at all. He stated lsr. Zachmann has been very good to explain his proposal to the neighbors, and he respected him for that; however, they object to the proposed plan. The 1lppeals Commission and City Council should bear in mind that the nature of the area is that of expensive homes of a certain sty2e, and they �hould try to have all new homes conform. Mr. Zachmann stated he is aware of the land contour, and he has made plans for some kind of retaining wall to make it look better. The home he is building will conform with all the homes on 71st Way. Mr. Besser stated the lot should be filled and brought up to the grade of the other yards. A retaininq wall is not a good solution. Mr. Schreifels stated�that vith a retaining wall, Mr. Zachmann's house will have a height of halfway up the first story of their two-story homes. Ms. Dacy stated the major eoncern is to ensure that drainage from both properties is taken care of properly. The petitioner will have to submit soil reports to ensure the subsoil will 6upport a foundation. If the Appeals Commission recommends approval of this variance, staff recommends a stipulation that a detailed drainage plan be submitted to ensure that drainage between the two properties is taken care of. As far as the height of the proposed house, it will be within the required buildinq heiqhts. Mr. Schreifels stated it is his understanding that the lot is low because at the time of the 1986 variance, the lot was excavated for a basement. When the house was not constructed, the City never required the owner to restore the lot to its oriqinal heiqht. Ms. Dacy stated"that can be 2ooked at and evaluated no matter what action is taken at this meetinq. She would like the Building Inspector and someone from the Engineering Degartment to make an inspection and work with the petitioner and the builder on the best qrade and final elevation of the structure. O ION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to close the public hearing. IIPON !1 VOICE VOTE, 1►LL VOTZI�iG 11YE, C87�IAPERBON 811RNl1 DECLl�RED THE POBLIC HEARI1dG CLOSED I►T 9:05 P.I+I. Mr. Barna stated he voted i�' favor of the oriqinal variance in 1986, because it was a new plat and they had put a�tipulation on future development on the lot to the north. However, in this particular instance, he did not agree with the rear yard varfance because there are other altematives where the house and qarage 3LL �PPEALS COMMISSION l�EETING. BEPTEKBER 19. 1989 - P�GE II can be constructed without any variances. E�en with the proposed house plan, the garage could be detached, and there would be no need for a variance. Also, because of the history of the development in the area, he would have to vote aqainst this variance. Dr. Vos stated he is also opposed to the variance. There are quite a few different ways the house and garage �ould fit on the lot that could satisfy the petitioner and the neiqhbors. He did not see any hardship that made it necessary to encroach 10 ft. into the rear yard setback. Ms. Savage agreed with Mr. Barna and Dr. Vos. She hoped the petitioner and the neighbors can work together and find a solution. Mr. Kuechle stated he is also in general aqreement with what has been said. A variance should not be needed in a new plat like this. He was sympathetic to the petitioner; however, he felt there is someway the house can fit on the lot without a variance. He would vote against the variance. OM TION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend to City Council denial of variance request, VAR #89-23, by O. 8. Zachmann, pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the rear yard setback for an accessory building on a corner lot from 30 feet to 20 feet, to allow the construction of a single family home and attached garage on Lot 15, Block 2, Riverwood Park, the same being 7100 Riverwood Drive N.E. �PON A VOICE VOTE, !►LL VOTING 11YE, CHPiZRPER80N Bl1RNli1 DECI.!►RED T8E MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. Mr. Barna stated this item will qo to City Council on October 2, 1989. 4. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE RE UEST V R 9- 4 Y ONO �NC• Pursuant to Section 214.11.02.(b) of the Fridley C' Code to increase the total square footage of siqnage m 80 sq. ft. to 220 sq. ft. (2 price siqns at 110 sq. f each), on Lot 1, Block 1, Commerce Park, the same being 0 Univer6ity Avenue N.E. MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded r. Ruechle, to open the public hearing. IIPON � VOICE VOTE, VOTING �YE, C'Sl1IRPER80N BlIRI�il1 DECLARED T8E PQHLZC HEI+RZI�IG AT 9:13 P.ZI. Ms. McPh on stated the old Jet Mart Station is beinq refurbished by C co, Inc. The property is zoned C-2, General Busfness. The imum allowable square footage for a free-standing sign is 80 sq. ' SEC. �O, T 30, R 2 4 C/TY OF FR/OLEr \ � J `/ I ` ` � � � � VAR 4t89-23 fl _ R _ Rarhmann � 41 8 ,• , I ! , �r N f) ! � r ( /i1 ' � _ 4 -' . ��,�ll .�s.I:i. ; - -, •. ..... 1 � . - r - - � ..... r � }: . /� �� «� ,' �fj;1 rl � � � � � I � , y �' i R •, r ' � ; , : � �_` • ,�: _ r G � � . . :1� : " ii; '•�- " LOGAN ' ~ PI(WY. h W . � - , �I� �' .. ., �_ � a , . i , , . i � r •� i i �' P� ��'�� 10 � ~ . � !J � jI I f � u � t} •� ` ' .�W �.. ' .� � i'f �• :; . � � ` � :I ,v.• � c - }/f �. '^p• � Qi �, 7 'I ' �YJ M � �J .S � .S 7 . / � � ,? � � {t y . _ K' � � 1 I t 1 �� {', '` ' ' . � , • • 'i i ,� �1 ; . _ (//'- � � • kuGr.yq•" �_ � r i� j :1 � �,�� • ± ' ; :'., ,�, `.. � •s. •J� ?r: � � � .� �.� .fA � -f w � • ' /""�! �' �� ,'� , ' ,, t �ti � I ,. � y�' �-�c-�T`: t �'- � . , • - . w lr . ♦ � �' � . 'r � _ v � . R/yE �; �? ' ;�, � . � .. ' 0 1 � :.,: _, , Q .� •�. . A o0o t � ,�, �. - �.:.. . .. � '� . i = W , 2 �.__� x� � `.� - ` '. _ . . : . ` _..,�., . � : J ; �w .� � : . p�. . �ji�R/�EF- � -'/Y►M •. ,.�'i � C � � ;: o !; � / : r• � ,�,�'' �� : : : ,, .i.� � ; z: � �. � � .' .:+;' -` ' � ti WQ D y' VERWOOD � � ° :� � . - � �. i" .f.. W I .:,•• ,. �� s' . � . 2 :� � •1:�y,i1: �J � _. � i �MAN " � • a�'rt �: �• /Y.' F h . � , c .. � �„�_ � Q c J: . � ; � � � � _ , , ,, . W � ^j��=j'-'r ,� w. • '�' , -1 �' � K � � _ �.� ��.1 � r I• s � ro � r�` , � � ..�� ,ly�= .. ,� �-� ► � � • ' ~;s ` ••y - � - �'l ,�' .E.� � .�� ' � , �14/1 R ON's RiV�qWOOD , � AiAMO�, �.-_ �_�� __ 1 , � • � • � '�' i .� � (�Q 3 1 } 2 1 9" -oy . tr �> ,�� .s� �� ^ . � �`�' � + � F �' TERRACE� • �' - " • ^ - r .< <,� , ('."��. �, . +I�i`_�;.___�ec • ° � r � _ - - - -- �► � , . ;: � � � R�tr1S£D- — _ _•":__. - .• y _ � : . � C 1__. A.11011'QR� � ��+--_...� ti_..r—fi -- '�' ,,,� �.�. ,1 • . . ' + �' 2 -� -- - �'- - --• ..�L-' � '_ ..y_i�- �,. ., f.• �,U _�.'�.� r � ti - � —.-y.�--._�r,. _�.�___ .. �h p�� .��.;•�•• -._ O,Sr7� �•� , �' � +a _ �Y � C�S(�_ ' - ~i / � . . .a c r f�r, n . / ;""" ` y� °- u ' ' i f-- � `--' � � � � • � r'_! __�'- _-y _ si{F-�Z -.. '__ '� � y � � -~ ► i� I .;�,i%"�� '� ;�i Q __ _— t�__" �__� .. � . . lr� y� . ~%r•,. • f �f� � �.. ' ` - ,�. 1I4Y • N �.-�� .. ,i u y""' -"."__'_',• "_.�T'^_'_' �Sr u �.�' � P. � � ' -�� -��----_- /• � G r ° -' .� < ' • j ` ---+ r-f--- -----y �..,��y` � � : � �°��1 � �, �. •�}��, 'I C _ �. ; - ` �O �t � . (..� �-_��----- � ; , ; _, •• .•�., o � ' -� ..�_ � . ' y... • w____ l � �' �i,` � �D_. � u f , <� . �, ----�,------ � .�H ;• - _ .. , ..�_�.., ��-1►'u a___�y \11/.� j� .}�ti-Y �, tY.� �N, �.�� I ' • • �. � �' �: .-� ..=-r'r P�,� , i ' ---~. r=-'----�— -�- ' i< .� . d ' �" ' ,,. 'y,� '.:��`•' ' � ---- --��-^'��f_S�� . ��/r \ �,� �. . � � CF � • r� � � _-� �_.__i . '. � ` ,'�: • � '� �* �'�� • C� t.l �_-—� -'`_ „� � I •�•{2�1 � ,, - �r _ �'�l'�, "��e ��• r�T � ' �_ � �_i-� '• # .�� \ __ � . Rw- T . . �-. . Y C S �f! tM: �M/ N� � � .. ".a . � �Iy � r�, �-i' "�.:i ^+. _ � , � `,� • � 8 \ 43 44 . . .. LOCATION MAF� � n� � O' , �� / �� i f� '� w � E � � �� ZONING MAP VAR 4189-23 0. A_ Zachmann SITE PLAN CERTIFICATE OF F4R �-AN � IMERE�11 CERTIfT TNAT TNIt f1MVEr�KAM.01111E►ORT MMf MEMAC� •� ME OR YMpEq Mr WRECT fNKR1AS10N AND TNAT 1 AM A OYI.Y EREO 1A1t0 !YR EY YMDER T L I TM sTATE O► YINMEfOTA. MINNESOTA REGISTR N NO. �� '3 0 �� — — � � l�a�; �U�tL-.�, n.l � a �SO �O f � _ '�i' I�16 �. � , 3�Z 46GlE �� TpP CURO % ""' �`,"(,E'I�p /- ��ep�.�. .9 .�a �o �� ' � o 'z : �-t. 3 � IS � I I � � � M 10 3 � Z.-( SURVEY 3Pp KURTH SURVEYING INC. •002 JEffERSON STREET N.E. CO�.UMBIA HEIGNTS MINNESOTA Sb421 i12�1��•!7i! �. �_� OATE � SCALE I"� . -�, O � IRON MONUMENT � �=�Od . � X_ L,o.T K :__� =RELET�[L- E.LE�l. � � �� 0 } � � C � ,�,�� ..- � �, `� S� W' � � � , , � � 1��.Y i ,� � C i�,0 � ti�7 � B �....0 C� � �Z��! �TZW 00� ��R1� � �01�A CO� ;_ �.N. � . � � io � � �O ( M _� �� t'o �J : � ? 9 : 2:- ,ca,,y�� '. �`�- �� •� f� � {� U � _ � ��--\ .� � �. - , �_ , �9 2 , , , - -- . �. i i 3QQ � �,�ZC �cc.�,.��n�z = � ,�� s - .t �'--- _ _ � _ � 1 I \ ` � � i _ I �: � ` 1 1 `l � � ._ � hl ' _ � I , I , � r. � ' ¢ - ,1 i ` � ; i ! 3�j � � � � �Dl�� +� � a'� �o ' �� . �� , � , � �� '�I _ � o " � �' � � > . � � � � � _ � � � �.� i , r ,y �.� � � _r C N � i - r �` U � � \� � i �'` --- � tq,l � �".M � ^�9- �/ i � Q f � . �i N 1 � �� , � � I V � _�� t- � _� N ,°'��o- 0 � / �! � � ��N � � �l _, -_ :1 1 2 �.u,�,�� ., / j,�� 1 Wc the undersigned, adjacent residents to 71st & Fiverwood, have reviewed O.B. Zachnann's plans for a home on this site. Which requires his gar�ge to be 20� frcm thc west lot line, instead of the required 35'. Iv0 OBJEC:I0.1 hAME ADDRE^'' PHOL�E � . . hG` ^C` � r/�` / �� l J� 'Vr / � S �� -�j ( � .�.. �� %%% 5,�,��n�� _ ; !��. �")�c�-� 7'� �� v� . � �'-�G�z.s/ � t,s.�, �/ /L�G' t t �.t,C� � j,� : � l - � � � �� ? �,�-f- w�Y � a� i�� „� -�. �� / ✓ e.C. v � P �.r -f e�� n-. Q ,�i �/,!- c � � o � 7/ o.� c�.� ��- c. -,�- � �� c A,3 �• � r "� -�' ,. '� �� / L � J G.t� c.� Q C J N � O.d� Q c / t✓.� i v tJ v" „ OBJECTIO;. P:A"1E ADDP.ES S PHOt�E 3SS I, Q.B. Zachmznn, intend to meintain a quality reaidence, as proof I of:er these plctures of my present residence for the past 15 years, located et ��29 Oliver .t7. �` . _ _ -- -- — �—' -- - -- _ � � uNOF Fr�tx�r CC�11/1MUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM D1►TE: September 21, 1989 /� i TO: William Burns, City Manager�� FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planninq Assistant SIIBJECT: Variance Request, VAR �89-24, by Conoco, Inc. The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of the variance request to increase the maximum allowable square footage for a free-standing sign from 80 sq. ft. to 220 sq. ft. The 220 sq. ft. would be divided between two free-standing signs. Staff recommends the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission�s action and deny the variance request. IrII�I :1 s M-89-573 3 � 3UU � STAFF REPQRT APPEALS DATE Septgnber 19, 1989 CITY OF PLAM�VG CON��S� DATE fIZiDLEY C�CY OOl�1CiL DATE October 2, 1989 �� REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER � APPLICANT PROPt�SED REQUEST LOCATION SiTE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES � ZONNG UTLlifS PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FNANCtAL MPLlCATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREF�11lE PL/1N COMPATBILfrY WRH ADJACENT USES � ZONIVG ENVIRONMENTAL CON�'.�DERATIONS STAFF RECOMMEi�AT10N APPEI�LS RECOMMENDATiON PLANIJxVG COMMISSION RECONMAENDATION . 3VV Staff Report VAR #89-24, 7600 University Ave. N.E. (Conoco, Inc.) Page 2 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE OF REQUIREMENT: Bection 214.11.02.(B) requires a maximum size of 80 sq. ft. in area of signage per development. Public purpose served by this requirement is to control visual pollution and excessive use of signs in commercial areas. B. STATED HARDSHIP: No stated hardship. C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request Conoco, owner of the Jet Mart Station located on Lot l, Block 1, Commerce Park, the same being 7600 University Avenue N.E., is requesting a variance to the sign ordinance for an increase in allowable sign area from 80 sq. ft. to 220 sq. ft. The 220 sq, ft. will be divided between two free-standing signs, one located on the University Avenue frontage and one located on the Osborne Avenue frontage. Site The site is located on a loop-back parcel on the corner of Osborne Road and University Avenue and is the site of what was the old Jet Mart Station south of and across from the University Station Restaurant and Bob's Produce. Conoco is proposing to replace the existing yellow facade with the Conoco colors. Conoco is also refurbishing the pump island canopies and the gas dispensing pumps. Analysis Conoco is requesting an increase in the allowable sign area from 80 sq. ft. to 220 sq. ft. Their standard free-standing pricing signs contain four areas for gas prices and also contain the Conoco sign logo. This combination of signage for each free standing sign totals 110 sq. ft. This is 30 sq. ft. 2arger than the 80 sq. ft. currently allowed by the City Siqn Code. Conoco is requesting that the City grant a variance to allow them to place two of these 110 sq. ft. signs on their parcel. As stated earlier, they are redoing the facade on the building, and there will be no signage or lettering placed on this facade. During the canopy remodeling, Conoco will replace the existinq diesel signs with the Conoco logo. 3WW Staff Report VAR #89-24, Conoco Page 3 Section 214.21.03 of the City Sign Code sets forth four conditions which the applicant must prove in order for the Commission to qrant a variance to the City Sign Code. The following analysis will analyze each of the four conditions: Condition A: "That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and district." As was stated earlier, the property in question is not an exceptional circumstance. The City has several loopback properties which occur at many of the intersections along the major corridors in the City. These parcels typically are surrounded on all sides by street frontages, and many of these loopback parcels contain automobile, motor fuel and oil dispensing stations. Other properties similar to this have been restricted to one free-standing sign to advertise prices and company logos, so restricting Conoco to one 80 sq. ft. sign would not be atypical. Condition B: "That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and district, but which is denied to the property in question." The petitioner can still install 80 sq. ft. of signage on the free-standing sign, and the petitioner has the option of wall signage. By denying the variance, the staff is not denying the petitioner�s right to have signage. Condition C: "That the strict application of the chapter would constitute an unnecessary hardship." The strict application of the Fridley Sign Ordinance would not create an undue hardship for the petitioner. As was stated earlier, currently Conoco does not plan any signage for the facade of the building. Under the Code, Conoco is allowed to have wall signage equal to 15 times the square root of the length of the wall. Conoco could place some of its additional signage on the facade of the building, especially on the west wall of the building which would alert the drivers who are driving east on Osborne to the pricing that Conoco has for its products. Condition D: "That the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or detrimental to the property in the vicinity or district in which the property is located." 3XX Staff Report VAR #89-24, Conoco Page 4 Granting a variance would not necessarily be detrimental to the health and safety of the general public. However, granting the sign variance for two pylon signs of 110 sq. ft. each would contribute to the amount of visual congestion a driver would see as he travels through the Osborne and University Avenue intersection. Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the variance request, VAR #89-24, by Conoco to increase the allowable square footage of signage for a development from 80 sq. ft. to 220 sq. ft., to be divided over two free-standing signs, on the basis that the petitioner does not meet all of the criteria for variances as listed in the Sign Ordinance. The petitioner can install an 80 sq. ft. sign which is �equired of other establishments in the general vicinity of the Conoco site. The petitioner also has the option of using the walls of the building in which to place additional signage. A eals Commission Action The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of the variance request, VAR #89-24, to the City Council. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission's action and also deny the variance request. 3YY �PEALS COI+IIdI88ION I�IEETII�TG, BEPTEI�IBER 19. 1989 - p71GE 11 can be constructed without any variances. Ewen with the proposed house plan, the garage could be detached, and there would be n need for a variance. Also, because of the hi6tory of e development in the area, he would have to vote aqainst his vnriance. Dr. Vos stated he is also opposed to the variance. Ther are quite a few different ways the house and qarage could fit o he lot that could satisfy the petitioner and the neiqhbors. He id not see any hardship that made it necessary to encroach 10 . into the rear yard setback. ' Ms. Savage agreed with Mr. Barna and Dr Vos. She hoped the petitioner and the neighbors can work tog her and find a solution. Mr. Kuechle stated he is also in qe ral agreement with what has been said. A varianc�e should no be needed in a new plat like this. He was sympathetic to the titioner; however, he felt there is someway the house can fit the lot without a variance. He would vote against the vari ce. OM TION by Dr. Vos, seco ed by Ms. Savage, to recommend to City Council denial of vari ce request, VAR #89-23, by O. B. Zachmann, pursuant to Section 05.07.03.D.(3).(a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the rea yard setback for an accessory building on a corner lot from 0 feet to 20 feet, to allow the construction of a single fami home and attached garage on Lot 15, Block 2, Riverwood P , the same being 7100 Riverwood Drive N.E. IIPON !r V CE VOTE, !►LL VOTIIJG 7►YE� CHl1IRPER80N 8l�RNP► DECLl�RED THE MOTIO ARRIED ONANIMOi1SLY. ,! Barna stated this item will qo to City Council on October 2, 89. 4. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST. VAR l89-24. BY CONOCO. NC. Pursuant to Section 214.11.02.(b) of the Fridley City Code to increase the total square footage of siqnage from 80 sq. ft. to 220 sq. ft. (2 price siqns at 110 sq. ft. each), on Lot 1, Block 1, Commerce Park, the same being 7600 University Avenue N.E. MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to open the public hearinq. QPON ]1 VOICE VOTE, 11LL VOTING 71YE, CSl�ZRPERBON BARN7� DECI.�IRED THE PIIBLZC HEARING OPEN AT 9:13 P.lt. Ms. McPherson stated the old Jet Mart Station is beinq refurbished by Conoco, Inc. The property is zoned C-2, General Business. The maximum allowable square footaqe for a free-standing sign is 80 sq. 3ZZ apPE�LB COIrUlI88ION IIEETING. BEPTEMBER 19. 1989 - P�aE 12 ft. Conoco, Inc., is requesting an increase in the allowable siqn area for two free-standinq siqns, one on the University �venue frontage and one on the Osborne Road frontage, at 110 sq. ft. each. I�Is. McPherson stated the petitioner is also proposing to replace the existing diesel signs with the Conoco logo on the canopies over the pump islands. That �s not a part of the variance. In addition, they are remodeling and repainting the exterior of the existing building. Conoco has removed the existing facia, and at this point, do not have any plans to utilize that wall space for additional signage. Staff states that the petitioner could use this wall space for additional square footage of siqnaqe, and that ! this particular parcel is similar to other loopback parcels in the City that have similar uses, are zoned similarly, and have been limited to the one 80 sq. ft. sign. In staff's opinion, the petitioner does not any special condition that creates a hardship for the petitioner as they have other alternatives to place signage �n the building as allowed under the Sign Code. For that reason, staff is recommending denial of this variance. Ms. Connie Lutton, District Manaqer for Conoco, Inc., stated she represents the Fridley area. She stated Conoco, in its reimaging program, has eliminated the bright yellow color and has restricted all signage on the facia. Unfortunately, Fridley's sign code varies from Conoco's new image. She stated there will be one Conoco emblem per canopy. Ms. Lutton stated that when they are completely done with the remodeling, the station will lose some of its recognition because it will not stand out as it did with the bright yellow. Because of that, they will lose some of their customer base. She stated they need two signs so that they will be visible to traffic on both University Avenue and Osborne Road. There is no way of angling one sign so that the logo and price of gas can be visible from both roadways. Ms. McPherson stated staff has discussed with the petitioner that they must modify the existing site plan to allow the sign to meet the required 10 ft. setback from Osborne Road. They will be addinq additional green area and movinq the siqn to comply with the 10 ft. setback from Osborne Road. OTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by I+Ir. Ruechle, to close the public hearing. OPON � VOICE oOTE, l�LL VOTIIdG 11YE, CH�►IRPERSOId SARIdA DECIJIRED THE PIIBLIC HEARIIdG CLOSED 11T 9 i 2 6 P.lI. Ms. Savage stated she is qlad to hear that the yellow color is going. She thought that yellow station vas one of the worst eyesores on University Avenue. She stated she feels very strongly about signs, and that excessive siqns, like billboards, are visual 3AAA �PpE�LB COI9�IBSION lIEETIH4. 6EPTEKBLR 19. 1l89 - PaGE 13 pollutants. There is no hardship. �pparently, the Amoco station across the street does not have a variance ior its siqn. She is opposed to even one 6ign that would exceed the 80 �q. tt. allowed, and certainly would be opposed to two of them. She would vote aqainst the variance request. Mr. Kuechle stated he is in aqreement. If they have not allowed other stations and businesses fn 6imilar situations to have variances, it vould be very difficult to approve it fn this case. Dr. Vos stated he certainly did not see the need for two siqns. Even one sign at 110 sq. ft. is a 40� increase over what is allowed which seems excessive. Since there are "quick stop" stations along University Avenue and Highway 65 which seem to do quite well, he felt fairly confident Conoco could compete in the market with an 80 sq. ft. sign. Mr. Barna stated the Amoco station on the northeast corner of Osborne/University is completely within the siqn code. The car wash and station at 73rd/University Avenue was given no sign variance, and the SuperAmerica on East River Road/University was given no sign variance, so in this surrounding area, everyone seems to be doing alright vith 80 sq. ft. Conoco can alvays put signage on the building even though they do not �►ant to. He stated he would also be opposed to any variance in increasing the allowable square footage for signage. OTiON by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to reccmmend to City Council denial of variance request, VAR #89-24, by Conoco, Inc., pursuant to Section 214.11.02.(b) of the Fridley City Code to increase the total square footage of siqnage from 80 sq. ft. to 220 sq. ft. (2 price siqns at 110 sq. ft. each), on Lot 1, Block 1, Commerce Park, the same beinq 7600 University P►venue N.E. IIPON ]► VOICE VOTE, 11LL VOTING ]1YE, CS!►IRPERBON BARNA DECLARED THE I�tOTION CARRZED IINl�NZMOUBLY. 5. CONSIDERATION OF A VARZANCE REOUEST, VAR l89- SANDBLASTING SERVICE. INC.: 1. Pursuant to Section 205.16.03.A of the Fridl City Code to reduce the required lot area from 65 0 sq. ft. to 14,�68 sq. ft.; 2. Pursuant to Section 205.18.03 of the Fridley City Code to reduce the required 1 width from 150 feet to 104 feet; 3. Pursuant to Se on 205.18.03.D.(2) of the Fridley City Code to re ce the required side yard setback from 20 feet t feet; .,+ � � VAR 4189-24 Conoco, Inc. � � . , � � : � �� 0 ' Y � O t �' �j � � . ; �� ;�1 0 � � � � t a r. Q � j Z a J d W h- � SiTE PLAN � �� ! �:� � ��; d � �� . ; � :� ji � � �� 9 �. �� d�� R� e e��oa�p�5 �. .��1�,. ��` �,� t �b� ! � � �� F�� j � �Q ��° ��e �S �d:�i �ii ��ry ' � r ii . E� �r�E�� q o �� i: � E�ri . � • �� !8 �� , E. � ( r:�e ��Eg'�a��9ti4 yz�'� b�� y,��rj�g��p��•��e ��` �� f� ��KE�� 3� e e i��E� �Et�� s ` e 2 EE � E �" _ rQe�� Ee° .eF, �; E��•� p � �qi�� :_ _ ��i'�6� �a�!! �� !�� ^��-�� i �4�i'� �� B��56��[B�SEe�� .� ��ro��er�si6c ��A� :a �ww:f�.��L�90S O! . .. � � . � �r w . �:.T I ` , '� . � s. � ':�tl i�_ 3 'a:k _ � r 8 !� �55 � �'S d�� :� t .1 = tS �� 1 . b :�a • Q �� - �y , a4 �b � �� Sae 4� w��€ g� ��= �� • 4� E�� d� ��i� � � � \ s �� 11: p� ' � � � ��@ �:g 1 G�� L 4�p � _6� � .�' E �S '�� :�: �� 6 t a 4 f i � I � � � 1� i�:` � }� '�� 0� f.. ��t�� `��i• i�:�i \ _3 � ( . � �: �$ t a VAR �t89-24 Conoco, Inc. 3 �m 0 U o ^ m z° < :' � O J U V a w Z � td � �i � . . = :�E:-:�E::;; � ' .: : ;- ti � �� L � ii �� 7� --------=1� * �Q � rs � �: �I �1 \ � } . � � i ' �j � � . � i� , o� �� t � ' °Q � i �� %� I Q� ;� e5 r � j � �5� � �� 1 . L � � r � � . ` i� S a ELEVATI4N f e � i p 6�: �pQ �� 1 6�E �e� i D �i a i�0 VAR ��89-24 Conoco, Inc. �� • �� . _ �� ! �:_ �� i� ��e_ � ' 2. �� op�:� � :� eiee �E �� s� '� ��;'� ��e�� 3�; Eit �: �R�� a ��E[e �E� l�eR� : ,, �� E �� _� iE°� �� ;�� : , g�,, �� 6 � �� ; �_�-;--1 tr; t� a� ��q .$ .:�� I� � �1� t t t �� - -� � = �-��r _ �^ �� r �Esri �3�� el93� �a � � ; s�s€ gF �� E! . ., �� .� ;� _._ __.___._ : : ___...__ _______._ : o ; :� ;� � :� � :oo; �_oo ��; °r�� :a; ;� �� ; L:..o. h.'� �J L... 'J h--- -i r�J �b: �b: -O: O; . ; � . . , . , , , � � � � � � � � �' i : i i i i i i V��J V�� V��J V��J � � r. '�'� �' �� „ ��' 1 � ..� '�' '�« "' 1 1 � � � � � � � �, ' � � � � ' � i � i i �' ' � � O � � �j�� i i ,I/� ryQ/� �L�►/7�/Q►/�� ,i/+ i - y' LJ LJLI� 7// ' � �' � a`�� ; , . , . , ,. , ,. , � � ��: .�/y . LC�. ; �9 � �C�i 9� � o ; ""'J l"""'J L"""'J L""'..J � �_ 6� �Sf �f �� \ � �r � r � � J'= �� t g! � C � i .iE _� � � �!� ` � �� . �E� �' 1 � �!---- .7" -IT- ELEVATION � ' s � � i � �! e 0p E a ! � 6�E r' �� r. � �� • �pE VAR 4189-24 Conoco, Inc. 3EEE � -- ` .r�; �."s[: - =., J . ii��r. . - EL`�VATION � � UTYOF fRlDLEY DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: �Ol1/iMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM September 27, 1989 William Burns Cit Mana er '� � , Y 9 � , Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Lisa Campbell, Planning Associate Return Unused 1986 CDBG Funds to Anoka County � Zn 1986, the Fridley Police Department received $15,500 of CDBG funds to conduct a security program for low and moderate income households. Anoka County has advised us that $1,023.73 remains in the account. The deadline has passed to use these funds. Tim Turnbull has advised us that the remaining funds were for administration and advertising fees, and that the crime prevention project has been completed. Anoka County requested City Council action in order to officially close the account. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council authorize staff to notify Anoka County that the Crime Prevention Project �629 authorized in 1986 is completed and that the unused monies be returned to Anoka County. BD/dn M-89-585 0 � � UTYOf fRlDLEY DI�TE : TO: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM September 28, 1989 � William Burns, City Manager� � lROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, planninq Coordinator Lisa Campbel�',Planninq Associate ,� � - 80aTECT: Tire Recyc2ing Update As per your request, staff has begun to implement the one-day tire collection on Saturday, October 28, 1989. ite Jack Kirk, Director of Parks and Natural Resources, has approved the use of the Community Park on October 28, 1989, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Tire Transfer and Disposal/Collection Day Needs ' Staff has obtained twc phone quotes. liaust Fiber Fuels of Savage, Minnesota, came in with the lowest bid of S1,000 per trailer + S12.50 an hour for a monitor to receive the tires. Service under this rate includes second trailer availability within two (2) hours from the time ordered, the acceptance of all tires including tzuck, passenger, motorcycle, and the acceptance of rimmed tires. A second trailer will cost an additional S1,000. Estimated cost to receive and transfer the tires is $2,090. Maust Fiber Fuels is a State licensed transporter and processor of tires. Lfsa Campbell will be cn site to monitor appropriate use of the drop-off. Additional City staff and volunteers will be needed to receive cash payments from Fridley residents, direct traffic, and assist as needed. Service Limits Staff consulted with Rick Pawtra of Dakota County, who has coordinated several tire collection days. Accordinq toldr. Pawtra, the biggest abuse of collection days is private companies coming to drop truckloads of tires nt a residential tire drop-off. He suggested charginq $1.00 per tire for all the tires dropped off by residents or limitinq the number of tires to be dropped off free to "household amounts" which is considered to be ten (10j oz 2ess. 5A Tire Recycling Update September 2a, 1989 Page 2 Staff recommends limiting the number of tires per Fridley household of six and requiring payment of $1.00 per tire over six tires. Funders The status of the financial backing for the tire recycling has become increasingly unclear since our September 21, 1989, memo. Staff issued written requests to the Fridley Lions Club and the Fridley VFW for permission to use the previous Household Hazardous Waste Day donations for a tire day. In response to this request, the Fridley Lions have requested a refund of their $2,000 donation. The City's most recent request will require a separate Board action. Bob Rehard, President of the Fridley Lions, stated that he was not very hopeful that the Board would approve this request. Todd Nessman, President of the Fridley VFW, had no problem with the City's request to use their $5,000 donation for the tire collection, but was unsure whether the second request needed a separate Board action. If it does, their Board will not take action on the request until October 9, 1989. The Jaycees pulled their funding when the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) denied the City's request. The City Council previously committed $10,000 to the Household Hazardous Waste Day. The total estimated cost of the Tire Collection is $7,100. If all other funders back out, the City's contribution to this effort should cover anticipated costs. F1 er A second draft copy of the flyer that is to be mailed to all Fridley residents' households is attached (Exhibit A). Please advise us of any changes you would like to make on the flyer. Please note it might be necessary to change specifics regarding collection day after the flyer is reviewed by the Council. The flyer must be mailed no later than October 13, 1989, to reach residents before October 28, 1989. As was directed by the City Council, the flyer will be made available at the City Open House and press releases will be made to the Fridley Focus. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Council take action to commit the City's 10,000 donation to the tire collection day immediately. This will allow staff to proceed with the direct mailing and other activities required to conduct a successful tire collection. � Tire Recycling Update September 28, 1989 Page 3 Maust Fibers has submitted a written proposal (Exhibit B), a certificate of insurance, and a copy of their State license. Staff requests permission to direct the City Attorney to draft a letter of agreement with Maust Fibers to be signed by the IYlayor and City Manager. As per Council's request, staff has reduced the number of tires to be accepted at no cost from the ten tires to six. LC:ls M-89-593 9BBZ '�N �!�d MN '�!1��!W aldd 3Jtf1SOd 'S'fl 31bFi N1f19 1HOS-lki-l�/0 DATE: TtME: EXHIBIT A 5C ��oss�� ssoa •gH anuand �isia�iu�n i £b9 /�.�. !QlU� �O/�i.�� _ r � � ire o ec lon a PLACE: All Fridley residents are cordially invited to drop off all their old tires. Six tires will be accepted at no cost. Over six, only one dollar each. Saturday, October 28, 1989 : Ii . � • � il � �� Community Park 7000 University Avenue How it works. This program is for FRIDLEY RESIDENTS ONLY. Sorry no commercial tires will be received. A photo I.D. is required. SIX tires from each household will be accepted at NO cost. Each tire over six will cost $1 to drop off. A11 types of tires will be accepted; car, truck, van, trailer. Tires still mounted on rims will also be accepted. Sponsored by: Fridley VFW Post # 363 Fridley Lions Club Fridley City Council Mayor William Nee Councilmembers Nancy Jorgenson - At-Large Steve Billings - Ward I Dennis Schneider - Ward II Ed Fitzpatrick - Ward III 571-7595 571-8328 571-5457 571-7059 572-9615 Call your Fridley Ciry Councilmember if you have any comments about the program. If residents have questions, call Lisa Campbell at 572-3594 during City office work hours. If you lose or forget your caupon at home, don't worry. You may still drop off six tires at no cost. —�---- ----�.��--��--�---��--�� —�---- FREET �FREE Coupon to dispose of 6 tires at no cost. ($1 per tire over 6) Fridley Households only Name: Address: __ EXHIBIT B _. �� / - Maust Fiber Fuels, Inc. Hwy. 52 8 16 North • Preston, Minnesota 55965 September 21, 1989 Ms Lisn Cambell City of l�ridley 6431 Univ�si55432enue N.E. Fridlcy, Dear Lisa: Maust Fiber Fuels� Inc. will be delivering a 48' 13'-6" semi trailer on Friday afternoon, October 27� 1989 for tire cleanup in your city. The trailer ��ill be nicked up again on Monday morning, October 30. The cost for the trailer will be $1,000.00. Please notify us two hours in advance if you need additional trailers at 507-765-2188 or 612-894-5280. For each additional trailer it will cost $1,000.00. If you wish to have one of our men help, there will be a charge of $12.50 per hour. JM/kq Sincerely, `vll��rv�.t.J. IC . i/ il�GZ��'' J' James R. Maust Manager, Savage Tire Plant Manufacturers of Cozylogs� and Briquettes • A Resource Recovery Facility (507) 1fi5-2168 CITY OF FRIDLEY M E M O R!l N D II M ��. TO: WILLIAM W. BORNS, CITY MANAGER �� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SIIBJECT: CERTIFICATION OF DELINQIIENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOIINTB TO THE COIINTY FOR COLLECTION DATE: SEPTEMBER 28� 1989 0 Attached is a resolution for the purpose of certifying delinquent water and sewer accounts to the County for collection with the taxes in the year 1990. All property owners have been notified of the fact that the utility bills are being certified to the County and have been given an opportunity to pay the bill. The penalty shown on this resolution is in addition to the regular penalties that accrue on the utility bills. This year we have approximately the same number of accounts to be certified as last year. It appears that the growth we have seen in delinquent water and sewer bills have apparently leveled off at this number. RESOLIITION NO. RESOLIITION CERTIFYING CBRTAIN D$LINQIIENT UATER 11ND BEWER CHAR(3E8 TO THE COIINTY 7�IIDITOR FOR COLLECTIONS WITH TH8 1990 T!i%EB WHEREAS, certain water and sewer charges for the City of Fridley are delinquent in payment, and WHEREAS, Chapter 402, Water and Sewer Administration, of the City Code, and Section 1.02 of the City Charter provides for the certifying of delinquent charges to the County Auditor for Collection with the taxes, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify the following charges to the County Auditor for collection with the 1990 taxes due and payable in the year 1990, to wit: All these noted in E�ibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 2ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK . � • = DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS CERTIFIED TO COUNTY - 1989 PIN NO. 26-30-24-32-0064 26-30-24-32-0042 23-30-24-23-0095 23-30-24-22-0056 26-30-24-32-0079 26-30-24-32-0033 26-30-24-32-0032 23-30-24-23-0113 23-34-24-23-0064 23-30-24-23-0078 23-30-24-23-0073 23-30-24-22-0041 26-30-24-33-0081 26-30-24-32-0099 23-30-24-22-0111 23-30-24-23-0030 23-30-24-23-0022 �5-30-2a-a3-0093 15-30-24-44-0012 15-30-24-44-0003 15-30-24-43-0023 23-30-24-33-0091 23-30-24-33-0097 15-30-24-14-0051 26-30-24-22-0072 26-30-24-23-0031 26-30-24-23-0026 23-30-24-33-0031 27-30-24-44-0008 26-30-24-33-0122 23-30-24-23-0136 23-30-24-22-0084 14-30-24-23-0080 26-30-24-23-0049 26-30-24-23-0043 15-30-24-43-0076 15-30-24-43-0048 15-30-24-43-0072 15-30-24-42-0060 15-30-24-42-0086 15-30-24-41-0048 15-30-24-41-0054 14-30-24-32-0038 CITY CODE 1-001-4724-4-0 1-001-4861-7-0 1-001-5800-8-0 1-001-6012-0-0 1-002-4744-9-0 1-002-4832-2-0 1-002-4844-8-0 1-002-5770-3-0 1-002-5813-2-0 1-002-5834-7-0 1-002-5849-0-0 1-002-6004-9-0 1-003-4537-9-0 1-003-4700-0-0 1-003-5900-5-0 1-020-0218-2-0 1-020-0262-7-0 1-031-0140-2-0 1-032-0030-4-0 1-033-0070-4-0 1-033-0182-9-0 1-039-5357-1-0 1-039-54y7-9-0 1-040-6699-3-0 1-045-5060-1-0 1-060-0113-9-0 1-060-0173-6-0 1-065-0169-7-0 1-080-4500-8-0 1-080-4551-6-0 1-080-5775-3-0 1-080-5981-3-0 1-084-0203-2-0 1-095-0101-2-0 1-095-0173-5-0 1-101-0172-8-0 1-101-0185-3-0 1-101-0188-0-0 1-102-6320-5-0 1-102-6440-0-0 1-107-0114-3-0 1-121-0120-7-0 1-121-0221-5-0 ADDRESS 4724 2ND STREET NE 4861 2ND STREET NE 5800 2ND STREET NE 6012 2ND STREET NE 4744 2 1/2 STREET NE 4832 2 1/2 STREET NE 4844 2 1/2 STREET NE 5770 2 1/2 STREET NE 5813 2 1/2 STREET NE 5834 2 1/2 STREET NE 5849 2 1/2 STREET NE 6004 2 1/2 STREET NE 4537 3RD STREET NE 4700 3RD STREEET NE 5900 3RD STREET NE 218 57TH PLACE NE 262 57TH PLACE NE 140 62ND WAY NE 30 62 1/2 WAY N E 70 63RD WAY NE 182 63RD WAY NE 5357 ALTURA ROAD NE 5417 ALTURA ROAD NE 6699 ASHTON AVENUE NE 5060 CLEARVIEW STREEET NE 113 GIBRALTER ROAD NE 173 GIBRALTER ROAD NE 169 HORIZON CIRCLE NE. 4500 MAIN STREET NE 4551 MAIN STREET NE 5775 MAIN STREET NE 5981 QUINCY STREET NE 203 MISSISSIPPI STREET NE 101 PILOT AVENUE NE 173 PtLOT AVENUE NE 172 RIVERSEDGE WAY NE 185 RIVERSEDGE WAY NE 188 RIVERSEDGE WAY NE 6320 RIVERVIEW TERRACE NE 6440 RIVERVIEW TERRACE NE 114 SATELLITE LANE NE 120 SYLVAN LANE NE 221 SYLVAN LANE NE AMOUNT 244.87 265.81 210.69 205.14 211.18 290.29 229.96 613.39 221.41 92.98 207.00 83.70 272.60 167.92 473.83 307.96 250.00 78.03 176.84 102.10 254.73 241.46 350.99 83.65 228.19 255.28 109.01 258.95 616.70 259.04 215.55 170.35 199.81 68.08 2Q8.78 245.07 182.63 105.52 325.07 245.08 270.35 259.27 239.22 PENALTY 24.49 26.58 21.07 20.51 21.12 29.03 23.00 61.34 22.14 9.30 20.70 8.37 27.26 16.79 47.38 30.80 25.00 7.80 17.68 10.21 25.47 24.15 35.10 8.37 22.82 25.53 10.90 25.90 61.67 25.90 21.56 17.04 19.98 6.81 20.88 24.51 18.26 10.55 32.51 24.51 27.04 25.93 23.92 TOTAL 269.36 292.39 231.76 225.65 232.30 319.32 252.96 674.73 243.55 102.28 227.70 92.07 299.86 184.71 521.21 338.76 275.00 85.83 194.52 112.31 280.20 265.61 386.09 92.02 251.01 280.81 119.91 284.85 678.37 284.94 237.11 187.39 219.79 74.89 229.66 269.58 200.89 116.07 357.58 269.59 297.39 285.20 263.14 6C DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS CERTIFIED TO COUNTY - 1989 PIN NO 14-30-24-33-0069 15-30-14-44-0046 15-30-24-41-0071 15-30-24-42-0094 15-30-24-42-0096 15-30-24-13-0004 15-30-24-13-0004 14-30-24-23-0098 �23-30-24-34-0053 23-30-24-31-0055 23-30-24-31-0055 23-30-24-31-0052 23-30-24-24-0032 23-30-24-24-0037 23-30-24-21-0118 23-30-24-21-0116 23-30-24-21-OOd7 23-30-24-21-0105 23-30-24-34-0067 23-30-24-34-0068 23-30-24-31-0019 23-30-24-31-0008 23-30-24-31-0091 14-30-24-12-0091 23-30-24-42-0019 23-30-24-24-0076 23-30-24-24-0076 23-30-24-24-0106 23-30-24-14-0054 24-30-24-11-0063 13-30-24-44-0051 14-30-24-14-0072 13-30-24-13-0031 14-30-24-13-0027 14-30-24-13-0026 13-30-24-23-0052 13-30-24-14-0119 13-30-24-13-0002 13-30-24-14-0120 12-30-24-14-0122 25-30-24-21-0034 24-30-24-i1-0002 13-30-24-43-0006 cirir cooE 1-126-6141-4-0 1-126-6160-0-0 1-135-6305-5-0 1-135-6409-�-0 1-135-6431-2-0 1-135-6654-2-0 1-135-6654-2-2 1-136-6530-1-1 2-331-5323-5-0 2-331-5604-5-0 2-331-5606-3-1 2-331-5614-3-0 2-331-5801-6-0 2-331-5851-5-0 2-331-5968-5-0 2-331-5978-3-0 2-331-6001-2-0 2-331-6020-9-1 2-332-5329-8-0 2-332-5331-4-1 2-334-5612-2-0 2-334-5631-9-0 2-335-5546-2-0 2-335-6862-6-0 2-343-0660-3-0 2-344-0353-4-0 2-344-0353-4-1 2-344-038Q-1-0 2-346-0731-5-0 2-348-1511-7-0 2-349-1621-3-0 2-354-0860-7-0 2-354-1375-3-0 2-355-0565-4-1 2-355-0575-2-0 2-356-1000-4-0 2-372-6650-6-0 2-377-6536-1-0 2-377-6655-6-0 2-sn-ss�s-s-o 2-378-5260-4-0 2-382-5961-0-0 2-388-6271-7-0 ADDRESS 6141 TRINITY DRIVE NE 6160 TRINITY DRIVE NE 6305 EAST RIVER ROAD NE 6409 EAST RIVER ROAD NE 6431 EAST RIVER ROAD NE 6654 EAST RIVER ROAD NE 6654 EAST RIVER ROAD NE 6530 UNIVERSITY AVE NE 5323 4TH STREET NE 5604 4TH STREET NE 5606 4TH STREET NE 5614 4TH STREET NE 5801 4TH STREET NE 5851 4TH STREET NE 5968 4TH STREET NE 5978 4TH STREET NE 6001 4TH STREET NE 6020 4TH STREET NE 5329 STH STREET NE 5331 STH STREET NE 5612 6TH STREET NE 5631 6TH STREET NE 5546 7TH STREET NE 6862 7TH STREET NE 660 STTH AVENUE NE 353 STTH PLACE NE 353 57TH PLACE NE 380 S7TH PLACE NE 731 58TH AVENUE NE 1511 60TH AVENUE NE 1621 61ST AVENUE NE 860 66TH AVENUE NE 1375 66TH AVENUE NE 565 67TH AVENUE NE 575 67TH AVENUE NE 1000 68TH AVENUE NE 6650 ANOKA STREET NE 6536 ARTHUR STREET NE 6655 ARTHUR STREET NE 6679 ARTHUR STREET NE 5260 BUCHANAN STREET NE 5961 BENJAMIN STREET NE 6271 CENTRAL AVENUE NE AMOUNT 254.68 233.72 78.60 216.87 260.99 66.99 99.03 219.43 202.19 257.49 33.01 181.05 91.86 227.80 247.43 231.43 179.55 250.17 227.59 80.00 175.42 74.98 380.18 212.20 268.79 138.26 60.49 524.27 148.60 185.18 288.05 267.36 202.79 37.01 233.47 271.$1 242.74 233.01 266.90 246.64 188.20 171.35 185.80 PENALTY 25.47 23.37 7.86 21.69 26.10 6.70 9.90 21.94 20.22 25.75 3.30 18.11 9.19 22.78 24.74 23.14 17.96 25.02 22.76 8.00 17.54 7.50 38.02 21.22 26.88 13.83 6.05 52.43 14.86 18.52 28.81 26.74 20.28 3.70 23.35 27.18 24.27 23.30 26.69 24.66 18.82 17.14 18.58 TOTAL 280.15 257.09 86.46 238.56 287.09 73.69 108.93 241.37 222.41 283.24 36.31 199.16 101.05 250.58 272.17 254.57 197.51 275.19 250.35 88.Q0 192.96 82.48 418.20 233.42 295.67 152.09 66.54 576.70 163.46 203.70 316.86 294.10 223.07 40.71 256.82 298.99 267.01 256.31 293.59 271.30 207.02 188.49 204.38 . � DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS CERTIFIED TO COUNTY - 1989 PIN NO. 13-30-24-42-0046 13-30-24-13-0052 13-30-24-24-0111 13-30-24-21-0038 24-30-24-44-0231 24-30-24-44-0228 24-30-24-44-0190 24-30-24-44-0273 13-30-24-31-0066 24-30-24-41-0102 24-30-24-41-0094 24-30-24-33-0014 13-30-24-14-0049 24-30-24-12-0015 24-30-24-11-0071 24-30-24-12-0045 24-30-24-12-0030 13-30-24-33-0034 13-30-24-33-0009 13-30-24-32-0069 23-30-24-41-0011 14-30-24-14-0019 13-30-24-43-0036 25-30-24-21-0065 25-30-24-21-0005 24-30-24-32-0033 13-30-24-14-0034 14-30-24-42-0098 24-30-24-42-0051 24-30-24-42-0049 14-30-24-24-0006 14-30-24-24-0004 14-30-24-24-0003 14-30-24-24-0003 14-30-24-42-0008 13-30-24-13-0044 13-30-24-14-0014 14-30-24-11-0063 24-30-24-42-0006 24-30-24-41-0238 14-30-24-11-0040 14-30-24-14-0096 13-30-24-31-0040 CITY CODE 2-388-6391-2-0 2-388-6537-7-0 2-392-6610-t-0 2-392-6854-6-0 2-401-5431-9-1 2-401-5441-7-1 2-401-5473-8-0 2-401-5484-5-0 2-402-6378-1-0 2-403-5526-3-1 2-403-5539-8-0 2-408-5300-0-0 2-409-6631-7-0 2-412-1423-5-0 2-412-1561-7-0 2-427-1330-0-0 2-427-1360-3-0 2-432-6304-4-0 2-447-6300-1-0 2-447-6301-0-0 2-462-5705-4-0 2-462-6700-7-0 2-465-1431-1-0 2-470-5197-9-0 2-470-5297-8-0 2-474-1061-7-1 2-an-ss2�-s-o 2-478-6311-0-0 2-480-5500-9-0 2-480-5530-3-1 2-482-0401-8-0 2-482-0421-4-0 2-482-0431-2-1 2-482-0431-2-2 2-482-0620-3-0 2-482-1427-6-0 2-482-1645-2-0 2-487-6856-0-0 2-489-5601-8-0 2-490-5600-6-0 2-515-0920-1-0 2-515-6740-6-0 2-517-6436-3-0 ADDRESS 6391 CENTRAL AVENUE NE 6537 CENTRAL AVENUE NE 6610 CHANNEL ROAD NE 6854 CHANNEL ROAD NE 5431 EAST BRENNER PASS NE 5441 EAST BRENNER PASS NE 5473 EAST BRENNER PASS NE 5484 EAST BRENNER PASS NE 6378 DELLWOOD DRIVE NE 5526 EAST BAVARIAN PASS NE 5539 EAST BAVARIAN PASS NE 5300 FILLMORE STREET NE 6631 FRIDLEY STREET NE 1423 GARDENA AVENUE NE 1561 GARDENA AVENUE NE 1330 HILLCREST DRIVE NE 1360 HILLCREST DRIVE NE 6304 HIGHWAY �65 NE 6300 BAKER AVENUE NE 6301 BAKER AVENUE NE 5705 JACKSON STREET NE 6700 JACKSON STREET NE 1431 KERRY CIRCLE NE 5197 LINCOLN STREET NE 5297 LINCOLN STREET NE 1061 LYNDE DRIVE NE 6621 MCKINLEY STREET NE 6311 MADISON STREET NE 5500 MATTERHORN DRIVE NE 5530 MATTERHORN DRIVE NE 401 MISSISSIPPI STREET NE 421 MISSISSIPPI STREET NE 431 MISSISSIPPI STREET NE 431 MISSISSIPPI STREET NE 620 MISSISSIPPI STREET NE 1427 MISSISSIPPI STREET NE 1645 MISSISSIPPI STREET NE 6856 MONROE STREET NE 5601 NORTH DANUBE ROAD NE 5600 N INNSBRUCK COURT NE 920 OVERTON DRIVE NE 6740 OVERTON DRIVE NE 6436 PIERCE STREET NE AMOUNT 227.41 224.36 179.98 210.00 97.08 81.82 202.25 196.92 362.40 9.32 112.26 216.23 231.41 190.99 239.04 236.75 134.79 489.57 206.22 217.72 111.80 115.63 170.90 274.81 189.46 17.03 194.96 236.86 301.06 27.17 213.96 210.72 166.05 95.79 309.45 174.57 134.79 196.93 253.60 99.00 224.78 222.28 246.20 PENALTY 22.74 22.44 18.00 21.00 9.71 8.18 20.23 19.69 36.24 0.93 11.23 21.62 23.14 19.10 23.90 23.68 13.48 48.96 20.62 2�.n 11.18 11.56 17.09 27.48 18.95 1.70 19.50 23.69 30.11 2.72 21.40 21.07 16.61 9.58 30.95 17.46 13.48 19.69 25.36 9.90 22.48 22.23 24.82 _ _ __ _ TOTAL 250.15 246.80 197.98 231.00 106.79 90.00 222.48 216.61 398.64 10.25 123.49 237.85 254.55 210.09 262.94 260.43 148.27 538.53 226.84 239.49 122.98 127.19 187.99 302.29 208.41 18.73 214.46 260.55 331.17 29.89 235.36 231.79 182.66 105.37 340.40 192.03 148.27 216.62 278.96 108.90 247.26 244.51 273.02 6E DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS CERTIFIED TO COUNTY - 1989 PIN NO. 14-30-24-41-0017 14-30-24-41-0013 13-30-24-41-0006 13-30-24-22-0006 24-30-24-44-0113 24-30-24-34-0028 24-30-24-34-0043 13-30-24-41-0059 24-30-24-24-0039 14-30-24-41-0104 14-30-24-34-0004 14-30-24-34-0004 24-30-24-41-0024 24-30-24-44-0093 23-30-24-t4-0061 24-30-24-43-0018 24-30-24-43-0046 24-30-24-44-0174 12-30-24-23-0023 12-30-24-23-0017 12-30-24-23-0017 12-30-24-23-0012 12-30-24-23-0012 12-30-24-23-0010 12-30-24-22-0024 12-30-24-22-0022 12-30-24-22-0021 12-30-24-22-0019 12-30-24-22-0018 12-30-24-22-0018 10-30-24-42-0007 12-30-24-12-0037 10-30-24-41-0033 10-30-24-41-0030 12-30-24-12-0051 11-30-24-21-0054 14-30-24-22-0022 12-30-24-13-0035 11-30-24-24-0009 11-30-24-24-0075 11-30-24-24-0006 12-30-24-13-0076 12-30-24-13-0079 CITY CODE 2-522-6330-3-0 2-522-6370-4-0 2-527-1631-5-2 2-532-1021-6-0 2-535-1566-4-0 2-536-1371-8-0 2-536-1390-5-0 2-539-6450-8-0 2-547-5800-7-0 2-548-6301-8-1 2-549-6215-2-0 2-549-6225-0-0 2-550-5562-9-0 2-551-1565-4-0 2-552-5724-2-0 2-554-1485-8-0 2-555-1418-9-0 2-556-5401-8-1 3-645-7315-0-0 3-645-7401-5-0 3-645-7403-3-0 3-645-7479-2-0 3-645-7481-8-0 3-645-7501-4-1 3-645-7513-0-0 3-645-7541-6-0 3-645-7553-1-0 3-645-7579-1-0 3-645-7595-1-0 3-645-7597-9-0 3-646-0125-4-0 3-648-7676-0-0 3-649-7115-8-0 3-649-7125-6-0 3-650-7689-0-0 3-658-7566-0-1 3-660-0280-6-0 3-675-1461-8-0 3-676-0351-2-0 3-676-0370-9-1 3-676-0389-8-0 3-677-1310-9-0 3-677-1350-0-1 ADDRESS 6330 CIUINCY STREET NE 6370 QUINCY STREET NE 1631 RICE CREEK ROAD NE 1021 RICE CREEK TERRACE NE 1566 SO BAVARIAN PASS NE 1371 SKYWOOD LANE NE 1390 SKYWOOD LANE NE 6450 SGlUIRE DRIVE NE 5800 TENNISON DRIVE NE 6301 VAN BUREN STREET NE 6215 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE 6225 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE 5562 WALDECK CROSSING NE 1565 WEST BAVARIAN COURT N 5724 W MOORE LAKE DRIVE NE 1485 WINDEMERE DRIVE NE 1418 WEST DANUBE ROAD NE 5401 WEST BRENNER PASS NE 7315 ABLE STREET NE 7401 ABLE STREET NE 7403 ABLE STREET NE 7479 ABLE STREET NE 7481 ABLE STREET NE 7501 ABLE STREET NE 7513 ABLE STREET NE 7541 ABLE STREET NE 7553 ABLE STREET NE 7579 ABLE STREET NE 7595 ABLE STREET NE 7597 ABLE STREET NE 125 ALDEN CIRCLE NE 7676 ARTHUR STREET NE 7115 ASHTON AVENUE NE 7125 ASHTON AVENUE NE 7689 BACON DRIVE NE 7566 - 4TH STREET NE 280 - 69TH AVENUE NE 1461 - 73RD AVENUE NE 351 CENTRAL AVENUE NE 370 CENTRAL AVENUE NE 389 CENTRAL AVENUE NE 1310 - 75TH AVENUE NE 1350 - 75TH AVENUE NE AMOUNT 237.41 221.60 124.02 302.60 88.47 252.49 212.70 177.48 191.10 126.91 113.53 624.96 99.03 183.78 237.75 289.11 138.10 139.85 146.04 224.75 209.92 144.85 206.93 64.36 85.25 150.78 172.53 225.44 74.39 238.09 360.89 335.88 92.47 200.73 76.88 133.26 293.97 339.46 728.21 47.35 1,849.99 140.40 ss.oa PENALTY 23.74 22.16 12.40 30.26 8.85 25.25 21.27 17.75 19.11 12.69 11.35 62.50 9.90 18.38 23.78 28.91 13.81 13.99 14.60 22.48 20.99 14.49 20.69 6.44 8.53 15.08 17.25 22.54 7.44 23.81 36.09 33.59 9.25 20.07 7.69 13.33 29.40 33.95 72.82 4.74 185.00 14.04 s.so TOTAL 261.15 243.76 136.42 332.86 97.32 277.74 233.97 195.23 210.21 139.60 124.88 687.46 108.93 202.16 261.53 318.02 151.91 153.84 160.64 247.23 230.91 159.34 227.62 70.80 93.78 165.86 189.78 247.98 81.83 261.90 396.98 369.47 101.72 220.80 84.57 146.59 323.37 373.41 801.03 52.09 2,034.99 154.44 105.64 �� DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS CERTIFIED TO COUNTY - 1989 PIN NO. 12-30-24-11-0063 12-30-24-14-0031 12-30-24-12-0120 12-30-24-12-0105 03-30-24-31-0025 12-30-24-12-0001 03-30-24-32-0136 03-30-24-32-0110 11-30-24-13-0029 11-30-24-14-0026 10-30-24-12-0044 03-30-24-32-0019 03-30-24-32-0020 03-30-24-32-0092 03-30-24-32-0119 15-30-24-12-0013 15-30-24-12-0015 10-30-24-43-0011 10-30-24-41-0024 10-30-24-41-0013 10-30-24-11-0014 10-30-24-11-0013 03-30-24-24-0126 03-30-24-24-001p 03-30-24-22-0085 03-30-24-44-0070 03-30-24-44-0071 03-30-24-44-0017 03-30-24-42-0088 03-30-24-32-0005 12-30-24-13-0017 03-30-24-43-0014 03-30-24-24-0120 03-30-24-23-0067 03-30-24-23-0110 03-30-24-23-0070 03-30-24-23-0075 03-30-24-23-0099 03-30-24-23-0170 10-30-24-43-0019 10-30-24-44-0052 03-30-24-24-0085 03-30-24-24-0081 CITY CODE 3-677-1571-3-0 3-677-1640-0-0 3-679-1334-9-0 3-679-1415-1-0 3-683-0371-9-0 3-684-7561-3-0 3-685-0614-4-0 3-685-0627-9-0 3-686-7360-4-0 3-686-7440-8-0 3-689-0097-6-0 3-692-0541-3-0 3-692-0591-2-0 3-692-0625-2-0 3-692-0640-3-0 3-697-6819-0-1 3-697-6827-0-0 3-697-6921-5-0 3-697-7181-8-0 3-697-7235-4-0 3-697-7509-3-2 3-697-7513-7-0 3-697-8154-9-0 3-697-8253-9-0 3-697-8316-4-0 3-700-7715-8-0 3-700-7751-3-0 3-700-7801-3-0 3-702-0200-3-0 3-702-0563-4-0 3-708-1370-9-0 3-709-7851-3-0 3-717-0499-6-0 3-T17-0501-2-0 3-717-0520-9-0 3-7t7-0533-4-0 3-717-0565-5-0 3-717-0574-4-2 3-717-0629-9-0 3-722-6906-3-0 3-722-6950-8-0 3-732-0340-8-0 3-732-0360-3-0 ADDRESS 1571 - 75TH AVENUE NE 1640 - 75TH AVENUE NE 1334 - 76TH AVENUE NE 1415 - 76TH AVENUE NE 371 - 79TH WAY NE 7561 CENTRAL AVENUE NE 614 CHERYL STREET NE 627 CHERYL STREET NE 7360 CONCERTO CURVE NE 7440 CONCERTO CURVE NE 97 CRAIGWAY NE 541 DOVER STREET NE 591 DOVER STREET NE 625 DOVER STREET NE 640 DOVER S7REET NE 6819 EAST RIVER ROAD 6827 EAST RIVER ROAD 6821 EAST RIVER ROAD 7181 EAST RIVER ROAD 7235 EAST RIVER ROAD 7509 EAST RIVER ROAD 7513 EAST RIVER ROAD 8154 EAST RIVER ROAD 8253 EAST RIVER ROAD 8316 EAST RIVER ROAD 7715 ELM STREET NE 7751 ELM STREET NE 7801 ELM STREET NE 200 ELY STREET NE 563 ELY STREET NE 1374 FIRSIDE DRIVE NE 7851 FIRWOOD WAY NE 499 GLENCOE STREET NE 501 GLENCOE STREET NE 520 GLENCOE STREET NE 533 GIENCOE STREET NE 565 GLENCOE STREET NE 574 GLENCOE STREET NE 629 GLENCOE STREET NE 6906 HICKORY DRiVE NE 6950 HICKORY DRIVE NE 340 HUGO STREET NE 360 HUGO STREET NE AMOUNT 221.62 127.86 267.74 265.71 272.13 221.29 181.14 185.38 159.95 250.65 236.63 174.56 207.76 189.48 189.25 176.78 292.16 183.24 293.93 72.04 33.60 263.57 170.97 214.70 115.71 177.22 362.86 207.66 2�s.so 100.88 174.87 125.83 156.25 153.23 258.13 193.01 195.64 148.08 212.53 166.83 184.91 224.51 227.48 PENALTY 22.16 12.79 2s.n 26.57 27.21 22.13 18.11 18.54 16.00 25.07 23.66 17.46 20.78 18.95 18.93 17.68 29.22 18.32 29.39 7.20 3.36 26.36 17.10 21.47 11.57 17.72 36.29 20.77 21.66 10.09 17.49 12.58 15.63 15.32 25.81 19.30 19.56 14.81 21.25 16.68 18.49 22.45 22.75 TOTAL 243.78 140.65 294.51 292.28 299.34 243.42 199.25 203.92 175.95 275.72 260.29 192.02 228.54 208.43 208.18 194.46 321.38 201.56 323.32 79.24 36.96 289.93 188.07 236.17 127.28 194.94 399.15 228.43 238.26 110.97 192.36 138.41 171.88 168.55 283.94 212.31 215.20 162.89 233.78 183.51 203.40 246.96 250.23 6G DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS CERTIFIED TO COUNTY - 1989 PIN NO. 03-30-24-24-0072 03-30-24-24-0063 03-30-24-23-0066 11-30-24-14-0047 03-30-24-23-0003 03-30-24-23-0008 03-30-24-23-0009 �3-30-24-23-0120 03-30-24-22-0071 15-30-24-12-0024 03-30-24-42-0030 03-30-24-�1-0064 12-30-24-12-0091 12-30-24-12-0088 12-30-24-12-0067 12-30-24-12-0086 i�-30-2a-�3-o00a 13-30-24-11-0008 12-30-24-31-0021 12-30-24-31-0022 10-30-24-14-0025 10-30-24-14-0024 12-30-24-22-0013 14-30-24-22-0043 14-30-24-21-0005 10-30-24-12-0031 10-30-24-12-0008 03-30-24-32-0101 12-30-24-14-0012 10-30-24-14-0038 10-30-24-13-0012 10-30-24-13-0021 13-30-24-11-0033 14-30-24-22-0021 11-30-24-24-0092 11-30-24-24-0095 11-30-24-21-0036 02-30-24-33-0001 CITY CODE 3-737-0314-5-0 3-737-0420-6-0 3-737-0510-7-0 3-740-7380-4-0 3-742-0533-3-1 3-742-0575-2-0 3-742-0585-0-0 3-742-0641-2-0 3-752-0583-9-0 3-756-0044-8-0 3-759-0134-6-0 3-759-0437-0-0 3-764-1362-0-0 3-764-1402-2-0 3-764-1425-5-1 3-764-1430-8-0 3-765-7331-4-0 3-767-1521-5-0 3-768-1285-0-2 3-768-1297-6-1 3-772-0031-3-0 3-772-0041-1-1 3-772-0940-3-0 3-774-0290-7-0 3-774-0550-2-0 3-775-0116-8-0 3-775-0161-2-0 3-776-8031-2-0 3-778-7340-8-0 3-781-0048-3-0 3-781-0130-2-0 3-781-0180-1-0 3-783-1503-7-0 3-785-6890-5-0 3-785-7337-4-0 3-785-7373-9-0 3-785-7573-7-0 3-785-7890-3-0 ADDRESS 314 IRONTON STREET NE 420 IRONTON STREET NE 510 IRONTON STREET NE 7380 JACKSON STREET NE 533 JANESVILLE STREET NE 575 JANESVILLE STREET NE 585 JANESViLLE STREET NE 641 JANESVILLE STREET NE 583 LAFAYETTE STREET NE 44 LOCKE LAKE ROAD NE 134 LONGFELLOW STREET NE 437 LONGFELLOW STREET NE 1362 MEADOWMOOR DRIVE NE 1402 MEADOWMOOR DRIVE NE 1425 MEADOWMOOR DRIVE NE 1430 MEADOWMOOR DRIVE NE 7331 MEMORY LANE NE 1521 TIMBER RIDGE NE 1285 NORTON AVENUE NE 1297 NORTON AVENUE NE 31 OSBORNE WAY NE 41 OSBORNE WAY NE 940 OSBORNE ROAD NE 290 RICE CREEK BLVD NE 550 RICE CREEK BLVD NE 116 RICKARD ROAD NE 161 RICKARD ROAD NE 8031 RIVERVIEW TERRACE NE 7340 STINSON BLVD NE 48 TALMADGE WAY NE 130 TALMADGE WAY NE 180 TALMADGE WAY NE 1503 SOUTH TIMBER RIDGE NE 6890 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE 7337 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE 7373 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE 7573 UNIVERSITY AYENUE NE 7890 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE AMOUNT PENALTY TOTAL 215.89 21.59 237.48 262.00 26.20 288.20 225.96 22.60 248.56 92.00 9.20 101.20 34.40 3.44 37.84 120.19 12.02 132.21 280.25 28.03 308.28 84.15 8.42 92.57 190.81 19.08 209.89 295.67 29.57 325.24 330.92 33.09 364.01 197.84 19.78 217.62 279.75 27.98 307.73 258.26 25.83 284.09 164.48 16.45 180.93 238.54 23.85 262.39 227.34 22.73 250.07 186.53 18.65 205.18 73.89 7.39 81.28 105.94 10.59 116.53 188.88 18.89 207.77 192.76 19.28 212.Oa 234.46 23.45 257.91 240.93 24.09 265.02 183.52 18.35 201.87 196.26 19.63 215.89 255.32 25.53 280.85 188.08 18.81 206.89 214.19 21.42 235.61 138.10 13.81 151.91 185.34 18.53 203.87 146.30 14.63 160.93 188.71 18.87 207.58 258.93 25.89 284.82 109.20 10.92 120.12 82.55 8.26 90.81 200.T1 20.07 220.78 441.97 44.20 486.17 �53,363.32 35,336.33 �58,699.65 CITY OF FRIDLEY 1[$l[ORl�iNDIIM �` � TO: WILLIAK 1i. BIIRNB, CITY lIANAGER � FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCB DIRECTOR BIIBJECT: STATE AIIDITOR�B FINANCIAL HEALTH PROFILE DATE: BEPTEMBER 28, 1989 7 I was in contact with the State Auditor's office this past week regarding the City of Fridley's financial health profile. The discussion was very lengthy because they seemed genuinely concerned over our comments. We debated the report itself and the conclusions that one can draw from the report. We were told that the State Legislature has required the State Auditor's office to produce this report in an attempt to help cities remain solvent. I told them that both the Mayor and the City Manager would like to have a discussion with the State Auditor and the people responsible for preparing the report. They seemed very open to a meeting to discuss concerns regarding the report. I will set up a meeting with them at a time that is convenient for both you and the Mayor. RESOLIITION N0. - 1989 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING CHARGES TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR TO BE LEVIED AGAINST CERTAIN PROPERTIES FOR COLLECTION WITH THE TAXES PAYABLE IN 1990 (WEEDS) WHEREAS, a nuisance condition has been found to exist on the lots listed below; and WHEREAS, the owner of such property was given notice to abate such nuisance; and WHEREAS, the owner of such property did not abate such nuisance and the City of Fridley, under authority of section 145.23 Minnesota State Statutes of 1953, did therefore abate the nuisance at a total of $1,954.06. Pin Number 03 30 24 32 0120 11 30 24 24 0010 12 30 24 12 0120 12 30 24 21 0024 12 30 24 21 0026 14 30 24 14 0096 14 30 24 31 0033 23 30 24 21 0124 23 30 24 21 0125 23 30 24 23 0004 24 30 24 24 0039 24 30 24 32 0013 24 30 24 32 0019 24 30 24 32 0020 27 30 24 44 0011 Plat Parcel 57593 56808 400 56796 120 56790 54157 260 56303 6345 56303 6460 55401 57274 1100 54155 54155 1700 54155 1850 54160 32&33/W Riverview Hts 11/1 Melody Manor 5/2 Meadowmoor Ter 2nd 3/1 A & R 2nd 3 A&R, 4 A&R 2nd 9/2 Meadowlands 2nd Aud Sub #59 18-20,29&30/13 Hyde Pk 21-26/13 Hyde Park S&6/1 City View 8/2 Parkview Hts Pt 6 Aud Sub #25 Pt 8&9, Aud Sub #25 Pt 9, Aud Sub #25 Tract B, RLS #102 97.74 183.42 97.74 98.04 184.58 97.74 158.70 92.28 92.28 97.74 249.54 234.02 79.92 79.92 110.40 $1,954.06 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITif COUNCIL OF THE CITiC OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1989 VILLIAH J . NEE - 1�AYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPAIA - CITY CLERK 0 7A �:3 � CITY OF FRIDI.$Y xsxoxl��TDIIK . �� TO. 1/ILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER �j� FROM: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERR SIIBJECT: $LECTION JUDC�ES FOR GENERAL ELECTION DATE: 88PTEMBER 26, 1989 The attached resolution appoints election judges for the November 7, 1989 General Election. The lists of judges were provided by the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party and the Independent-Republican Party. The judges have been selected from both the DFL and IR lists in accordance with State Statutes. The cities usually do not receive lists of judges from the parties when there are no State or Federal offices on the ballot as it is not required by State Statute. We use the lists received from the parties in previous years. If you have any questions concerning this resolution, please give me a call. 8A fi880LIITION NO. - 1989 RESOLIITION D$SIaN�TING POLLING PLACES ADTD 7�ppOZ�TTING BLECTION JIIDC388 FOR THg lTOpglrlggR 7, 1989 G$NERPIL BLBCTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, at a regular meeting on October 2, 1989. SECTION l. SECTION 2. SECTION 3. That on the 7th day of November 1989, there shall be an election for the purpose of voting on the following: MAYOR AND COUNCII,MEMBER-AT-LARGE That the polling places for said election shall be as follows: Ward 1 Precinct 1 Ward 1 Precinct 2 Ward 1 Precinct 3 Ward 1 Precinct 4 Ward 1 Precinct 5 Ward 2 Precinct 1 Ward 2 Precinct 2 Ward 2 Precinct 3 Ward 2 Precinct 4 Ward 3 Precinct 1 Ward 3 Precinct 2 Ward 3 Precinct 3 Ward 3 Precinct 4 Grace Evangelical Free Church Hayes Elementary School Fridley Public Library Fridley Covenant Church Fridley Senior High School Woodcrest Elementary School Knights of Columbus St. Philip�s Lutheran church North Park Elementary School Springbrook Nature Center Redeemer Lutheran church Stevenson Elementary School Rosyln Park Wesleyan Church That the polling place will be open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. SECTION 4. That the following people are hereby appointed to act as Judges for said election except that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to appoint qualified substitutes as set forth in Chapter 4, Section 4.05 of the City Charter. WARD 1 PRECINCT 1 *Carolyn Holmen Gay Gronlund Marion Ertl WARD 1 PRECINCT 2 *Alice Anderson Carolyn Bethel Carolyn Doyle WARD 1 PRECINCT 3 *Bernadette Bovy Doris Benek Sandy Gorman Marjorie Rosin Doris Nord Angeline Westman Marlys Johnson Irma Kelly Dee Truehl Carrie Bakken Page 2- Resolution No. - 1989 WARD 1 PRECINCT 4 *Alice Mol Jane Hosman Ruth Whitman WARD 1 PRECINCT 5 *Judy Engelbretson Marlys Lisowski WARD 2 PRECINCT 1 *Jean Forster Jackie Larson WARD 2 PRECINCT 2 *Pat Anderson Karen Bjorgo WARD 2 PRECINCT 3 *Doris Reiners Darlene Rusch WARD 2 PRECINCT 4 *Delores Mellum Jean Wagar WARD 3 PRECINCT 1 *Betty Bonine Janet Kothman Myrtle Morphew WARD 3 PRECINCT 2 *Jordis Mittlestadt Marlys Hinsverk Connie Samuelson WARD 3 PRECINCT 3 *Irene Maertens Darlene Vallin WARD 3 PRECINCT 4 *Betty Nelson Gerry Wolsfeld *HEAD JIIDQE Dorothy Veres Nina Landt Muriel Pomeroy Muriel Littlejohn Terry Johnson Alice Henderson Jo Ann Cederholm Joyce Swanson Dolores Lynch Lee Carlson Naida Kruger Dorine Newland Kathy Tingelstad Ray Olson Barbara Friedhoff Carol Johnson Laurie Harris Barbara Enroth Peggy Newland Laverne Roseth Joanne Ranem : � 8C R n Page 3, Resolution No. - 1989 HEALTH CARE CENTER Lavonne Avery Bernadette Bovy SECTION 5. That the following judges are appointed to act as chairmen of the Election Board for the precincts designated and shall have the duties set forth in Section 204B.20 of Minnesota Statutes. � Ward 1 Precinct 1 Carolyn Holmen Ward 1 Precinct 2 Alice Anderson Ward 1 Precinct 3 Bernadette Bovy Ward 1 Precinct 4 Alice Mol Ward 1 Precinct 5 Judy Engelbretson Ward 2 Precinct 1 Jeane Forster Ward 2 Precinct 2 Pat Anderson Ward 2 Precinct 3 Doris Reiners Ward 2 Precinct 4 Delores Mellum Ward 3 Precinct 1 Betty Bonine Ward 3 Precinct 2 Jordis Mittlestadt Ward 3 Precinct 3 Irene Maertens Ward 3 Precinct 4 Betty Nelson SECTION 6. Compensation for said Judges will be paid at the rate of $4.00 per hour for regular Judges and $5.00 for the Chairperson of the Election Board. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK MEMORANDUM � c�cy et Fridl�y _ A4�1 Unl��r�ity A��no• N.E. Frldl�r. Ylne��ots a6432 rho�• �e�s�s»-saao �IO TO: 1fILLIl11+I w. BIIRNS, CITY l[l1NAGERB William C. Hunt Assisiant to the City Menager �ROM: 1/ILLIl�M C. BIINT, ]188I8Tl�NT TO THE CITY MAPTAG$R� �� 6QBJECT: FIREFZGHTERB � L�IBOR 71GREEDIENT �OR 1989 AND 2990 DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 Attached is the labor agreement and accompanying resolution setting forth terms and conditions of employment for the firefiqhters in 1989 and 1990. Apart from changes relatinq to dates the following are the differences between the 1989-90 contract and the 1988 contract: 1. An increase in base wages of 4$ for 1989 over 1988 and of 5$ for 1990 over 1989. 2. The employer's contribution toward hospitalization, life insurance, dental insurance, etc., will be $210.00 per month for 1989. For 1990 the employer's contribution will be the same amount authorized by the City Council for non-union, non-administrative employees of the City of Fridley for 1990. 3. The uniform allowance for 1989 will stay at $325.00. For 1990 it will increase to $375.00 4. The new contract for 1989-90 guarantees eleven hours of overtime pay per three week pay period regardless of whether or not it is required by the provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act. 5. The new contract increases the probationary period from six (6) months to twelve (12) months. . It is understood that Resolution No. 108-1986 relating to the Employees Separation Benefit Plan and Resolution No. 97-1987 relating to the Flexible Benefit Plan remain in force for employees representated by the International Association of Firefighters, Local No. 1986. I request that you present this contract to the City Council for action at their meeting of October 2, 1989. WCH/jb � RE80LOTION �TO. - 1989 RE80L�TIOId l�PPROVZNG ]1ND 110THORIZZNG BIGNING 711d !►aREEKENT ESTABLISHIIdG RORICING CONDITIONB, �l1GE8 71ND HOQRS OF EKPLOYEEB OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FIRE DBPl1RTMENT !OR THE YEl1R8 198 9 l�ND 19 9 0 WiiEREAS, the International Association of Firefighters Local No. 1986, as bargaining representative for the Firefighters of the City of Fridley Fire Department, has presented to the City of Fridley various requests relatinq to the working conditions, wages and hours of employees of the Fire Department of the City of Fridley; and WHEREAS, the Union and to and hours of Fridley; and City of Fridley has presented various offers to the the employees relating to working conditions, wages employees of the Fire Department of the City of WHEREAS, representatives of the Union and the City have met and negotiated regarding the requests of the Union and the City; and WHEREAS, agreement has now been reached between representatives of the two parties on the proposed changes to the existing aqreement between the City and the Union; NOW, THEREFORE, BE ZT RESOLVED by the City of Fridley that such agreement is hereby ratified and that the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the attached Agreement relating to working conditions, wages and hours of Firefighters of the City of Fridley Fire Department. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST : SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK . . LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY AND THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL NO. 1986 1989-1990 . � 1rIREFIGHTERB LOCliL �i0. 1986 CO�i'TRACT 1rOR 1989 71ND 1990 Tl1BL8 OF COli'PBl�iTB �,RTI CLE I II III ZV V VI VII VZZI IX X XI XII XIII XIV XV XVI XVII XVIII XIX XX XXI XXZI XXIII XXIV XXV XXVI XXVII AGE PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 RECOGNITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 DEFINITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 EMPIAYER SEC[JRITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 EMPLOYER AUTHORITY . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . 3 iJNION SECCTRITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRZEVANCE PROCEDURE. . . • • • • • 4 SAVINGSCLAUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 � 6 SENIORITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DISCIPLINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 WORK SCHEDULES . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • � ANNUALLEAVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 SHORT TERM DISABILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 PAY FOR CALL BACK AND DRILLS . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 EMPLOYEE EDUCATION PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 HOLIDAYS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 PROBATIONARY PERIODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 FUNERALPAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 JURYPAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 UNIFORMALLOWANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 INSURANCE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 RATESOF PAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ADDITIONAL INCENTIVE PAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 COLLEGECREDITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 SEVERANCEPAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 WAZVER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' 14 DURATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 9C I.7�►BOR l�GRBBKBI�1'P BBTIIB$�T CZTY O? FRIDLSY 71I�D IIiTERNATZOZTl�I+ li880CIliTZON OF FZREFIGHTERB LOCPiL NO. 1986 71RTICI.$ I PIIRPOSE OF ]1aRE81d8NT This AGREEMENT is entered into as of October 2, 1989 between the CITY OF FRIDLEY, hereinafter called the EMPLOYER, ar►d the INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL NO. 1986, hereinafter called the UNION. It is the intent and purpose of the AGREEMENT to: 1.1 Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning this AGREEMENT'S interpretation and/or application; and 1.2 Place in written form the parties' agreement upon terms and conditions of employment for the duration of this AGREEMENT. ARTICLS II RECOGNITION The EMPLOYER recognizes the UNiON as the exclusive representative, under Minnesota Statutes, Section 179.71, Subdivision 3, for all personnel in the follow�ng job classifications: l. Firefiqhters 2. Fire Captain l�RTZCLE III DEFIIdITIONB 3.1 Union The International Association of Firefighters Local No. 1986. 3.2 Union Member A member of the International Association of Firefighters Local No. 1986. 3.3 Emplovee A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit. 3.4 Department The City of Fridley Fire Department 3.5 Emgloyer The City of Fridley 1 . � 3.6 Chief The Chief of the Fire Department of the City of Fridley. 3.7 Union Officer Officer elected or appointed by the International Association of Firefiqhters Local No. 1986. 3.8 Qvertime Work performed at the express authorization of the EMPLOYER in access of the number of hours in a work period specified by the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. 3.9 Scheduled Shift A consecutive work period including two rest breaks and a lunch break. 3.10 Rest Breaks Two periods during employee remains on assigned duties. 3.11 Lunch Break the SCHEDULED SHIFT during which the continual duty and is responsible for A period during the SCHEDULED SHIFT during which the employee remains on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.12 Strike Concerted action in failing to report for duty, the willful absence from one's position, the stoppage of work, slow-down, or abstinence in whole or in part from the full, faithful and proper performance of the duties of employment for the purposes of inducing, influencing or coercing a change in the conditions or compensation or the rights, privileges or obligations of employment. 3.13 �ase Rate of Pav The Employee's hourly rate of pay exclusive of longevity or any other special allowance. 3.14 Comgensatory Time Time off durinq the employee�s regularly scheduled work schedule equal in time to 1.5 times overtime worked. 3.15 Severance Pay Payment made to an employee upon honorable separation of employment. � 9E � i 3.16 a a A f ixed payment at regular intervals for services as set forth and aqreed to in this contract. 3.17 Compensation Salary reduced by those amounts as required by law and/or authorized by the employee. ARTICLE IV E1�IPLOYER BECIIRITY The UNION aqrees that durinq the life of this AGREEMENT it will not cause, encourage, participate in or support any strike, slow-down or other interruption of or interferences with the normal functions of the EMPLOYER. l�RTICLB V EldPLOYER ADTHORITY 5.1 The EMPLOYER retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all manpower, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to select, direct, and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules, and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited by this AGREEMENT. 5.2 Any term and condition of employment not specifically established or modified by this AGREEMENT shall remain solely within the discretion of the EMPLOYER to modify, establish, or eliminate. 11RTICLE VZ IINION SECiIRZTY 6.1 The EMPLOYER shall deduct from the wages of employees who authorize such a deduction in writinq an amount necessary to cover monthly UNION dues. Such monies shall be remitted as directed by the UNION. 6.2 The UNION may designate employees from the bargaining unit to act as a steward and an alternate and shall inform the EMPLOYER in writing of such choice and changes in the position of steward and/or alternate. 6.3 The EMPLOYER shall make space available on the employee bulletin board for posting UNION notice(s) and announcement(s). 6.4 The UNION aqrees to indemnify and hold the EMPLOYER harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders, or judgments brought or issued against the EMPLOYER as a result of any action taken or not taken by the EMPLOYER under the provisions of this Article. 3 9F l�RTICLB VII ffidPLOYBB itIGHTB-GRISVl�iCS PAOCBDQRE 7.1 Definition of a Grievance A grievance is defined as a dispute or disaqreement as to the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT. 7.2 Union Representatives The EMPLOYER will recoqnize REPRESENTATIVES designated by the UNION as the qrievance representatives of the barqaininq unit having the duties and responsibilities established by this Article. The UNION shall notify the EMPLOYER in writing of the names of such UNION REPRESENTATIVES and of their successors when so designated as provided by Section 6.2 of this AGREEMENT. 7.3 Processinq of a Grievance It is recognized and accepted by the UNION and the EMPLOYER that the processing of grievances as hereinafter provided is limited by the job duties and responsibilities �of the EMPLOYEES and shall therefore be accomplished during normal working hours only when consistent with such EMPLOYEE duties and responsibilities. The aqqrieved EMPLOYEE and a UNION REPRESENTATIVE shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time without loss in pay when a grievance is investiqated and presented to the EMPLOYER during normal working hours provided that the EMPLOYEE and the UNION REPRESENTATIVE have not�fied and received the approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work proqrams of the EMPLOYER. �.4 Procedure Grievances, as defined by Section 7.1, shall be resolved in conformance with the following procedure: Steg 1. An EMPLOYEE claiminq a violation concerning the interpretation or application of this AGREEMENT shall, within twenty-one (21) calendar days after such alleged violation has occurred, present such grievance to the EMPLOYEE'S supervisor as designated by the EMPLOYER. The EMPLOYER-designated representative will discuss and qive an answer to such Step 1 grievance within ten (10j calendar days after receipts. A grievance not resolved in Step 1 and appealed to Step 2 shall be placed in writinq settinq forth the nature of the grievance, the facts on which it is based, the provision or provisions of the AGREEMENT alleqedly violated, the remedy requested, and shall be appealed to Step 2 within ten (10) calendar days after the EMPLOYER-desiqnated representative's final answer in Step l. Any qrievance not appealed in writinq to Step 2 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. 4 9G 7.5 S,tep 2. If appealed, the written qrievance shall be presented by the UNION and discussed with the EMPLOYER-desiqnated Step 2 representative. The EMPIAYER-designated zepresentative shall qive the UNION the EMPLOYER'S Step 2 answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 2 qrievance. A qrievance npt resolved in Step 2 may be appealed to Step 3 within ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER- desiqnated representative's final Step 2 answer. Any qrievance not appealed in writinq to Step 3 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. �tep 3. If appealed, the written qrievance shall be presented by the UNION and discussed with the EMPLOYER-designated Step 3 representative. The EMPLOYER-designated representative shall qive the UNION the EMPLOYER'S answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 3 qrievance. A qrievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4 within ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER- designated representative's final answer in Step 3. Any qrievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 and appealed to Step 4 by the UNION shall be submitted to arbitration subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the "Rules Governing the Arbitration of Grievances" as established by the Public Employment Labor Relations Board. Arbitrator's Authoritv a. The arbitrator shall have no riqht to amend, modify, nullify, iqnore, add to, or subtract from the terms and conditions of this J►GREEMENT. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the EMPLOYER and the UNION, a�nd shall have no authority to make a decision on any other issue not so submitted. b. The arbitrator shall be without power to make decisions contrary to, or in consistent with, or modifying or varying in any way the application of laws, rules,or zegulations having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be Bubmitted in writing within thirty (30) days following close of the hearing or the submission of briefs by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties aqree to an extension. The decision shall be bindinq on both the EMPLOYER and the UNION and shall be based solely on the arbitrator's interpretation or application of the express terms of this AGREEMENT and to the facts of the qrievance presented. 5 9H c. The feea and expenses for the arbitrator's services an� g� proceedinqs shall be borne equally by the EMPLOYER and the UNION provided that each party shall be responsible for compensating its own representatives and witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim record of the proceedinqs, it may cause such a record to be made, providinq it pays for the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedinqs the cost shall be shared equally. 7.6 Waiver If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered "waived". If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the specified time limit or any aqreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the EMPLOYER'S last answer. If the EMPLOYER does not answer a qrievance or an appeal thereof within the specified time limits, the UNION may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal the qrievance to the next step. The time limit in each step may be extended by mutual written aqreement of the EMPLOYER and the UNION in each step. 7.7 Choice of Remedv If, as a result of the written EMPLOYER response in Step 3, the grievance remains unresolved, and if the grievance involves the suspension, demotion, or discharge of an employee who has completed the required probationary period, the qrievance may be appealed either to Step 4 of Article VII or a procedure such as: Civil Service, Veteran's Preference, or Fair Employment. If appealed to any procedure other than Step 4 of Article VII, the grievance is not subject to the arbitration procedure as provided in Step 4 of Article VII. The aggrieved employee shall indicate in writing which procedure is to be utilized (Step 4 of Article VII or another appeal procedure) and shall siqn a statement to the effect that the choice of any other hearinq precludes the aggrieved employee from makinq a subsequent appeal throuqh Step 4 of Article VII. l�RTICLE VIZI 8l�VI1IG8 CL�►�88 This AGREEMENT is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota and the City of Fridley. In the event any provision of this AGREEMENT shall be held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judqment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provisions shall be voided. All other provisions of the AGREEMENT shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provision may be renegotiated at the written request of either party. l�RTICLE IZ BBNIORITY 9.1 Seniority shall be determined by the employee's lenqth of continuous employment with the Fire Department and posted in 6 an appropriate location. Seniority rosters may be maintained .9J by he FIRE CHIEF on the basir of time in qrade and time within specific classifications. 9.2 Durinq the probationary period, a newly hired or rehired employee may be discharqed at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. During the probationary period a promoted or reassiqned employee may be replaced in the employee's previous position at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. 9.3 A reduction of work force will be accomplished on the basis of seniority. Employees shall be recalled from layoff on the basis of seniority. An employee on layoff shall have an opportunity to return to work within two years of the time of that layoff before any new employee is hired. 9.4 Vacation periods to a maximum of two (2) weeks shall be selected on the basis of seniority until May lst of each calendar year. l�RTZCLE Z DIBCIPLINE 10.1 The EMPLOYER will discipline employees for just cause and disciplinary action may be in one or more of the followinq forms: a. oral reprimand; b. written reprimand; c. suspension; d. demotion; or e. discharge. 10.2 Suspensions, demotions and discharges will be written form. 10.3 Written reprimands, notices of suspension, and notices of discharge which are to become part of an employee's personnel file shall be read and acknowledged by signature of the employee. Employees will receive a copy of such reprimands and/or notices. 10.4 Employees may examine their own individual personnel files at reasonable times under the direct supervision of the EMPLOYER. utTic� z= woR1C BCHEDIILEB 11.1 The normal work schedule for the employees of the Fire Department shall consist of a 56.67 hour work week. a. hours worked on assigned shifts; b. holidays; c. authorized leave time. The Depart�ent Head is responsible for echedulinq and assigninq the weekly work schedule. 11.2 Employees of the Fire Department shall be paid 11.00 hours per three week work period at the overtime rate for hours actually worked on assigned shifts, holidays taken, or authorized leave time taken. 7 11.3 The City claims the authority to schedule employee's duty 9K schedule. A normal work schedule for the employees will be a combination of shifts comprised of twelve (12) hours between 8:00 P.M. Sunday and 8:00 A.M. Friday and ten (10) hours between 7:00 A.M. Monday and 5:00 P.M. Friday. 11.4 It is recoqnized by the parties that service to the public may require the establishment of reqular shifts for some employees on a daily, weekly, seasonal, or annual basis, other than the regularly scheduled hours. The employer will qive advance notice to the employees affected by the establishment of work days different than the normal employee's work day. 11.5 In the event that work is required because cf unusual circumstances such as (but not limited to) fire, flood, snow, sleet, breakdown of municipal equipment or facilities, no advance notice to the employees need be qiven. It is not required that an employee working other than the normal workday be scheduled to work more than the scheduled hours; however, each employee has an obliqation to work overtime if requested, unless unusual circumstances prevent the employee from doing so. � 11.6 It is also recognized by the parties that service to the public may require the establishment of regular work weeks that schedule work on Saturdays and/or Sundays. Employees who are regularly scheduled to be on duty Saturday and/or Sunday will be granted two consecutive days off in lieu of Saturday and/or Sunday. . ARTICLE ZII l�NNIIl�L LEAVB 12.1 Each employee shall be entitled to annual leave away from employment with pay. Annual leave pay shall be computed at the regular rate of pay to which such an employee is entitled. 12.2 A beqinninq employee shall accrue annual leave at the rate of eighteen (18) days per year for the first seven (7) years (84 successive months). An employee who has worked seven (7) years (84 successive months) shall accrue annual leave at the rate of twenty-four (24) days per year, beqinninq with the eiqhty-fifth (85th) month of successive employment. An employee who has worked fifteen (15) years (180 successive months) shall accrue annual leave at the rate of twenty-six (26) days per year, beginning with the one hundred eiqhty-first (181st) month of consecutive employment. 12.3 For an employee hired on or after January 1, 1984: The maximum total accumulation of annual leave at the end of any qiven year shall be thirty (30) days. Once a year, at a time desiqnated by the City, an employee who has completed seven (7) years of Bervice with the City will have the opportunity to exchanqe up to three (3) days of accumulated annual leave for cash. At the same time, an 8 employee who has completed fifteen (15) years of service with 9L the city will have the opportunity to exchange up to 5 days of accumulated annual leave for cash. 12.4 For an employee hired prior to January 1, 1984: Vacation accrued but unused as of December 31, 1983 shall be converted to annual leave at the rate of one (1) day of annual leave for one (1) day of vacation. Accrued but unused sick leave as of December 31, 1983 shall be converted to annual leave accordinq to the following schedule: a. ist 45 days @ 1 day of annual leave for 1 day of sick leave b. 2nd 45 days @ 1 day of annual leave for 2 days of sick leave , c. Remainder @ 1 day of annual leave for 3 days of sick leave The total amount of annual leave credited to the employee's balance as of January l, 1984 shall be equal to accrued but unused vacation plus accrued but unused sick leave converted according to the formula above. If upon conversion to the annual leave plan an employee's accumulation of annual leave exceeds thirty (30) days, that amount shall be the maximum total accumulation (cap) for that employee at the end of any subsequent year. Once a year, at a time designated by the City, an employee will have the opportunity to exchange up to five (5) days of accumulated annual leave for cash. In addition, once a year at a time designated by the City, an employee with an accumulation of annual leave in excess of thirty (30) days will have the opportunity to exchange up to five (5) days of annual leave for cash. Such an exchanqe shall reduce the maximum total accumulation (cap) of an employee by an equal amount. 12.5 Upon separation from employment with the City, an employee will be paid one (1) day's salary for each day of accrued annual leave remaininq in the employee's balance. l�RTICLB ZIIZ BHORT TBRI�t DIBABILITY 13.1 Each employee who has successfully completed the employee's probationary period shall be eligible for short term disability benefit. Such an employee shall be entitled to full pay commencinq on the twenty-first (21st) consecutive workinq day on which the employee is absent due to a physician-certified illness or injury, whether on or off the job, and continuinq until the employee returns to work able to carry out the full duties and responsibilities of the employee's position or throuqh the one hundred and tenth (110th) workinq day of absence, whichever occurs first; provided, however, that the amount of any compensation shall 9 be reduced by any payment received by the disabled employee 9M from workers' compensation insurance, Public Employees Retirement Association disability insurance, or Social Security disability insurance. Payment of short term disability benefit by the City to an employee shall not exceed ninety (90) working days for any sinqle illness or injury, reqardless of the number and spacing of episodes. The annual leave balance of an employee receivinq short term disability benefits shall not be reduced, nor shall such employee accrue annual leave durinq that period. 13.2 Before any short term disability payments are made by the City to an employee, the City may request and is entitled to receive from any employee who has been absent more than twenty (20) workinq days in succession a certificate signed by a competent physician or other medical attendant certifyinq to the fact that the entire absence was, in fact, due to the illness or injury and not otherwise. The City also reserves the right to have an examination made at any time of any employee claiming payment under the short term disability benefit. Such examination may be made on behalf of the City by any competent person desiqnated by the City when the City deems the same to be reasonably necessary to verify the illness or injury claimed. 13.3 If an employee hired before January 1, 1984 has received payments under the injury-on-duty provisions of previous contracts, the number of days for which payment was received will be deducted from the number of days of eligibility for coverage under short term disability for that same injury. 13.4 If any employee's non casually related injury or illness exceeds 110 working days, the employee shall be entitled to draw from the employee's remaining annual leave. 13.5 If an employee's causally related illness or injury exceeds 110 working days, the employee may draw from the employee's remaininq annual leave in addition to those benefits to which the employee receives in accordance with the workman's compensation provisions. 13.6 When an employee exceeds the 110 workinq days disability and commences to draw on annual leave, he shall again accrue benefits in accordance with accepted City policy. ARTICLE ZIV PAY �OR CliLL B!►C� A1�D DRILLB 14.1 A firefighter respondinq to a fire call before or after regularly scheduled work hours or on a day off shall be compensated in an amount equal to a minimum of one (ij hour at one and one half (1 1/2) times the hourly rate calculated in accordance with the provisions of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. If the fire call lasts for more than one (ij hour the firefighter shall be compensated at the above rate of pay for each additional fffteen (15j mfnute period or fraction thereof. 10 14.2 To calculate the time worked on call back, time shall be 9N considered to have started at the time of the alarm as recorded and ehall end when the officer in charge has terminated said alarm. In the event of a simultaneous or subsequent alarm occurrinq prior to the termination of the alazm for which the firefiqhter was called back, the firefighter's time worked shall be calculated as continuous from the time of the first alarm until the officer in charge has terminated all alarms. 14.3 Employees who participate in drills before or after regularly scheduled work hours or on a day off shall be compensated at the overtime rate of pay for their respective classifications. 71RTICLE ZV EIrIPLOYB$ EDIICl1TION PR�GR7�►I�IB 15.1 The City will pay certain expenses for certain education courses based on the following criteria. a. The training course must have relevance to the Employee's present or anticipated career responsibilities. Attendance shall be at a City approved institution. The course must be approved by the Department Head. b. Financial assistance will be extended only to courses offered by an accredited institution. This includes vocational schools, Minnesota School of Business, etc. 15.2 Employee Education Programs Financial Policy Financial assistance will be extended to aover only the cost of tuition. Charges for books, student union membership, student health coverage and other charges for which the student receives some item or services other than actual instruction will not be paid. The City will pay 50$ of the cost of tuition in advance of the employee's actual participation in the course and the employee shall pay 50� of the cost. Upon successful completion of the course an employee will be required to present a certification of satisfactory work to the department head. Satisfactory work is defined as follows: a. In courses issuing a letter qrade, a C or above is required. b. In courses issuing a numerical qrade, 70$ or above is required. c. In courses not issuing a qrade, a certification from the institution that the 6tudent satisfactorily participated in the activities of the courses is required. 15.3 If the employee satisfactorily completes the course, the employee trill be reimbursed for the additional 50$ of the tuition cost incurred. If the employee fails to 11 eatisfactorily complete the course, the City will not 9O reimburse the remaininq 50$. 15.4 The program will not reimburse the employee for the hours he Bpends fn class, only for the tuition. 15.5 Expenses for which the employee is compensated under some other educational or assistance proqram, such as the GI bill, will not be covered. 15.6 The City will not pay tuition or other costs for those courses which are used to make the employee eligible for additional ealary. 11RTICLB ZVI 80LZDAYB 16.1 Holidays include New Year's Day, January 1; Martin Luther Kinq Day, the third Monday in January; Washinqton and Lincoln's Birthday, the third Monday in February; Memorial Day, the last Monday in May; Independence Day, July 4; Labor Day, the first Monday in September; Veteran`s Day, November 11; Thanksgiving Day, the fourth Thursday in November; and Christmas Day, December 25; provided, When New Year's Day, January l; or Independence Day, July 4; or Veteran's Day, November 11; or Christmas Day, December 25; falls on Sunday the following day shall be a holiday, and provided, when New Year's Day, January 1; or Independence Day, July 4; or Veteran's Day, November il; or Christmas Day, December 25; falls on Saturday, the preceding day shall be a holiday. 16.2 In addition to the holidays listed above, employees covered by this contract shall be entitled to two (2) additional paid holidays desiqnated by the City Council for a total of eleven (11) paid holidays per year. ARTICLB ZVII PROBfiTIONARY PBRIODS 17.1 All newly hired or rehired employees will serve a twelve (12) month probationary period. ARTICLB ZVIII lIINERAL P�Y 18.1 In case of death occurring in the immediate family of an employee, such an employee may be excused from work for up to three days with additional time off granted by the City Manager if additional time is needed. This time off ahall not subject the emplopee to loss of pay. For this purpose, members of the immediate family of the employee are considered to be the following; spouse, child (natural or adopted), parent, qrandparent, brother, sister, mother-in-law or father- in-law. 11RTICI.$ ZIZ �TIIRY PAY 19.1 It shall be understood and agreed that the Cit reqular full time employees serving on any jury in salary between jury pay and the employee�s or pay while in such Bervice. � 12 y shall pay all the difference reqular salary ARTICLE ZZ ONIFORM 11LLORAli1CS 20.1 The City shall provide a uniform clothing allowance for Fire Fighters, said allowance to be paid in cash in January of each year. The allowance shall be $325.00 for 1989 and $375.00 for 1990. 11RTICLE ZZZ I�TBIIRANCE 21.1 The EMPLOYER will contribute up to a maximum of $210.00 per month per employee for group life and health insurance including dependent coverage for calendar year 1989. 21.2 For calendar year 1990 the EMPLOYER will contribute up to a maximum amount equal to that paid by the EMPLOYER to non- union, non-administrative employees of the City of Fridley for qroup life and health insurance including dependent coverage. 21.3 Effective January 1, 1988 each employee may use up to fifteen dollars ($15.00) per month of health insurance dollars in 21.1 and 21.2 for group dental insurance offered through the City. 21.4 Individual emplo�ees may provide for an increased EMPLOYER contribution for insurance over that amount stipulated in 21.1 and 21.2 by lowering their compensation from the rates stipulated in Articles XXII, XXIII, and XXIV to provide for an increased EMPLOYER contribution which will fully pay for the employee's health insurance and dental insurance, including dependent coverage, and life insurance. !►RTICLE ZBII RATEB OF PAY 22.1 Firefighters First six months After six months After 1 1/2 years After 2 1/2 years After 3 1/2 years 22.2 Fire Captain 1989 $ 9.0081 per hour S 9.4584 per hour $ 9.9314 per hour $10.4279 per hour $10.9492 per hour $11.6611 per hour ARTICLB ZEIZI ADDITIONAL INCENTIVE P�Y 1990 $ 9.4585 per hour $ 9.9313 per hour $10.4280 per hour $10.9493 per hour $11.4967 per hour $12.2442 per hour 23.1 Incentive pay will be paid over and above the standard base rate or qoing rate for Employees hired prior to January 1, 1974 according to the followinq schedule, provided employees have made demonstratable progress towards improving their proficiency for their particular job title or job assignment. After 5 years of service After 10 years of service After 15 years of service 13 $24 $48 $72 . . ARTICLE ZZIV COLLE�iB CitBDZTB 24.1 For Firefighters hired after January 1, 1974 the City will pay for education credits earned at an accredited institution of higher learning at the rate of $.40 per quarter credit etartinq with the ninety-first (91st) quarter credit up to a maximum of one hundred eiqhty (180) credits or a�aximum of $36.00 per month. Al1 courses taken must be approved by the Employer. No Firefighter hired after January 1, 1974 will be eliqible for payments under ARTICLE XXIII. No Firefiqhter will draw both additional incentive pay under ARTICLE XXIV, and pay for education credit. Employees will not be eligible for education credits durinq their twelve (12) month probationary period. A determination of the number of credits an employee is eliqible for will be made on December 1 of the previous year. Credits earned during the year will not be counted until the succeedinq year. The City will not pay tuition for courses that the Employer will later be paid for as noted above. ARTICLE ZZV BBVERANCB PAY r 25.1 For all employees hired prior to January 1, 1978, the severance pay policy shall be as follows: Any Employee with forty-eight (48) or more consecutive months of employment will receive �everance pay in cash based on one- and-one-half (1 1/2) days for each twelve (12) consecutive months worked, but not to exceed thirty (30) days of the same. ]�RTICLE ZZVI w!►IVER 26.1 Any and all prior aqreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules and regulations regardinq terms and conditions of employment, to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this AGREEMENT, are hereby superseded. 26.2 The parties mutually acknowledqe that during the negotiations which resulted in this AGREEI�NT, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any term or condition of employment not removed by law from bargaining. All agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth in writing in this AGREEMENT for the stipulated duration of this AGREEMENT. The EMPIAYER and the UNION each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to meet and negotiate regarding any and all terms and conditions of employment referred to or covered in this AGREEMENT or with respect to any term or condition of employment not specifically referred to or covered by this AGREEMENT, even though such terms or conditions may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either or both of the parties at the time this contract was neqotiated or executed. 14 • ! �RTICLE ZZVZI DIIR�TIOZI . . This AGREEMENT shall be effective as of January 1, 1989, except as herein noted, and shall remain in full force and effect until the thirty-first day of December, 1990. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this �►GREEMENT on this 2nd day of October, 1989. CITY OF FRIDLEY MAYOR - WILLIAM J.NEE � CITY MANAGER - WILLIAM W. BURNS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL NO. 1986 '"�L� / ' ',�C H. SIMONSON E. DENNIS M. OTTEM I hereby recommend to the City Council approval of this aqreement. , �� :G�/�'i v . �,.. i C. HUNT - SISTANT TO TIiE CITY MANAGER ' �, D. ALDRICH - CHIEF, FIRE DEPARTMENT 15 MEMORANDUM �I citr e� F.�ei•r WiWam C. Hunt _ asa� Unlv�r�ity �.•n�• N.E. F r 1 d I� y� r i n �•. o t• s s s s z Assistant to the City Manager �Aon• (01ZIaTt-i4a0 ��. MEMO TO: 11ILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY l�i�IdAGER � FROM: WZLLIAM C. HIINT, l�SSIBTANT TO THE CITY 1�iNAGER ��'� SIIBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 FOR TECHNZCAL SYBTEM DATE: SEPTEMHER 2?, 1989 Due to modifications of the design of the Council Bench it will be necessary to add a microphone at the Council Secretary's position, and a plate and microphone near the light table. Due to a miscommuni�ation of our intent an A/B switch was not designed for the City Manager's position at the Council Bench, and one needs to be added. Also, it seems desirable to provide tally lights for the studio cameras used for cablecasting Council meetings and for other productions. This will provide a red light which enables the camera person to know that the camera is live. A light on the front of the camera can also be activated for productions where it is important for the talent to know which camera is live. Finally, the F1.5 teleconverter (lens) on the fixed camera does not function properly. It is recommended that an F2.0 teleconverter be substituted at no change in cost. I request that you present Change Order No. 5 for the technical system to the City Council for consideration at their meeting of October 2, 1989. WCH/jb � �� CITY OF FRIDLEY EIdGINEERING DEPARTKENT 6431 QNIVERSITY 11VENUE, Id.E. FRIDLEY, IQt 55432 October 2, 1989 Electrosonic Systems, Inc. 6505 City West Parkway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55344 Subject: Change Order No. 5, Contract for Technical System for the Fridley Municipal Center Gentlemen: You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instructed to modify your contract for the Technical System for the Fridley Municipal Center by adding the following work: �fdditions • ITEM 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Add microphone at southwest position of Council bench . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Add microphone and plate at northwest position of Council bench. . . . . . . . . . Add monitor/program (A/B) switch at City Manager's position of Council bench. .... Install and connect tally lights on studio camera . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COST 340.00 465.00 360.00 290.00 Delete F 1.5 teleconverter and add F 2.0 teleconverter for fixed camera behind Council bench . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.00 TOTAL lrDDITIONB . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.455.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS: Original contract amount . . . . . . . . . . Addendum No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Addendum No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contract Additions--Change Order No. 1... Contract Additions--Chanqe Order No. 2... Contract Additions--Change Order No. 3... Contract Additions--Change Order No. 4... Contract Additions--Change Order No. 5... $107,138.49 5,188.31 1�,099.98 11,533.00 10,338.00 1,300.00 1,051.17 1,455.00 REVISED COI�TTRACT PRICE . . . . . . . . . S155,103.95 10A 0 Electrosonic Systems, Inc. Change Order No. 5 Page Two October 2, 1989 Submitted and approved by William C. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manaser, on tiyis 27th day of September, 1989. v�� . . by � .�'It� � . .•t' William C. Hun Assistant to the City Manager i Approved and accepted this day of , 1989, by ELECTROSONIC BYSTEM6, INC. Richard King, Regional Sales Manager Approved and accepted this day of , 1989, by CZTY OF FRIDLEY William J. Nee, Mayor William W. Burns, City Manager �_�"l� � MEMORANDUM � c�ey e� F.�a�•y WWiem C Hunt _I aa�1 unl�•r•Ity A�•na• N.E. ' F � i a i• y, � i � �•. o e. s s a a z Assistant to the City Meneger 'hon• (dt2)671-�460 .� ` � iiEMO TO: WILLIAM 1/. BIIRNB, CITY KANAGER �. FROM: WILLIAM C. HONT, A88ISTANT TO THE CITY MANAC�ER��/ BDBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR CONBIILTANT CONTRACT FOR TECHNICAL SYSTEM FOR TSE FRIDLEY KIINZCIPAL CENTER DATE: BEPTEMBER 27, 1989 In a meeting to review progress on the installation and testing of the technical system we discovered that no provision has been made for the CATV headend for the home run system connecting 21 external �onitor locations. The CATV headend would distribute a signal from the VCR, from one channel, or from all CATV channels to the various external monitor locations. It is my understanding that the full range of CATV channels would be made available to the three external monitor locations in the Fire Department and to the external monitor location in the Emergency Operations Center. This change order is for design only. Another change order would be required for purchase and installation of equipment. I request that you present Change Order No. 2 to the City Council for consideration at their meeting of October 2, 1989. WCH/jb 1 CITY OF FRIDLEY ENGINEERZNG DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE., N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 October 2, 1989 Electronic Znteriors 40 MacKubin Street St. Paul, I�I 55102 SUBJECT: Change Order No. 2, Consultant Contract for Technical System for the Fridley Municipal Center Ladies and/or Gentlemen: You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instructed to modify your contract for administering the Technical System for the Fridley Municipal Center by adding the following work: Addition• 1. Design CATV head end for external monitors TOTAL fiDDITIONB Original Contract Price . Change Order No. 1 . . . Chanqe Order No. 2 . . . � �� $ 2,200.00 . . $14,555.00 . . 600.00 . . 2,200.00 REVZSED CONTRACT PRZCE . . . . . . . . $17,355.00 Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director, on the 27th day of Sep�ember, 1989. �� , ^ ared by , ^ i��G �� / ` �. ,>rL r �r� illiam C. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager 11A 0 Page Two Electronic Znteriors Change Order No. 2 October 2, 1989 l�1-; Approved and accepted this day of , 1989, by ELECTRONIC INTERIORS Katherine O'Reilly Approved and accepted this day of , 1989, by CITY OF FRIDLEY William J. Nee, Mayor William W. Burns, City Manager � `�,os,, ` POLICE DEPARTMENT l '�,, '. Ci�y of Fridlsy �a" ` �' Minnssota � DATE SEPTEMBER 28, 1989 � FROM PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR, J.P. SUBJECT INDOOR FIRF,ARMS RANGE REQUEST FOR ADVERTISEMENT OF BIDS r� �- `u r w 1 1 MEAAORANDUM TO BILL BURNS , �ACTI The City Council approved the construction of an Indoor Firearms Range in the 1989 Capital Tmprovements Program by budgeting $67,539 for that project. � The Fridley Police Department is now prepared to advertise for bids on the project. The range is to be constructed in the open room on the east end of the building which houses the garages used by the Police Department. The project has been divided into two resolutions: (1) the ventilation system for the range, and (2) the actual range equipment. The ventilation •system has been designed and specifications prepared by the engineering firm of Chasney Associates, Inc. The ventilation system will be bid as a project separate from the firearms range equipment. The firearms range equipment specifications have been prepared by Police Department staff. It is our desire to request permission to bid at the Council meeting on October 2, 1989. JPH/sa 12 INFO X INDOOR FIREARMS VENTILATION CONSTRUCTION PROJECT RESOLUTIODi NO. - 1989 !1 RE80LIITZOIJ ORDERIIdG ZI�IPR09EI+�NT, �1PP1tOVAL OF PL�iNB 11IdD ORDERIIdG 11DVERTIBE?IENT FOR BZDB: 1►IREARMB RANGE VBNTII.�ITION CO1d8TROCTION. lIBEREl�B, the City Council of the City of Fridley has approved construction of an Indoor Firearms Range, 11HERE�B, the Public Safety Director has submitted a plan showing the Indoor Firearms Range, NOW, TSEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the Indoor Firearms Ranqe Ventilation recommended for construction by the Police Department be constructed and the work involved in said improvement shall hereafter be designated as: FIREARMB RANGE VENTIL1�iTION COI�TSTRDCTION 2. The plans and specifications prepared by the Chasney Associates, Inc. for such improvement and each of them, pursuant to the Council action heretofore, are hereby approved and shall be filed with the City Clerk. 3. The work to be performed under FIREl�RMS RANGE VENTILATION CONSTROCTION be performed under one contract. The Public Safety Director shall accordingly prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for two (2) weeks (at least 10 days), and shall specify the work to be done and will state that bids will be opened at 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 25, 1989, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Public Safety Director and accompanied by a cash deposit, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City of Fridley for five percent (5$) of the amount of such bid. That the advertisement for bids for the INDOOR FIREARMB Rl�NGE VEt�iTZ1.�TION CONBTR�CTION shall be substantially standard in form. PASSED �ND l�DOpTED BY T8$ CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 2ND DfiY OF OCTOBER, 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA -CITY CLERK 12A li� -� NOTICE TO BIDDERS CONTRACTOR'S BID PROPOSALS FOR INSTALLATION OF THE FIRING RANGE VENTILATION SYSTEM AT THE FRIDLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, WILL BE RECEIVED AT THE FRIDLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT. BID PROPOSAIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY CHASNEY ASSOCIATES, INC., WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL 2:00 P.M. LOCAL TIME, OCTOBER 25, 1989. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE ON OR AFTER THURSDAY, OCTOBER 5TH, 1989 AT THE OFFICER OF: CHASNEY ASSOCIATES, INC., 4979 OISON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55422. TELEPHONE NO.: 612/546-3355. BIDS WILL BE OPENED PROMPTLY AT THE TIME INDICATED ABOVE AND READ ALOUD AT THE FRIDLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT. ALL PROPOSALS SHALL BE MADE IN DUPLICATE ON THE PROPOSAL FORMS INSERTED UNBOUND IN THE SPECIFZCATIONS. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS CAN BE EXAMINED IN THE OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER AND IN THE OFFICE OF THE OWNER, THE FRIDLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND WILL ALSO BE ON FILE AT THE MINNEAPOLIS BUILDERS EXCHANGE, ST. PAUL BUILDERS EXCHANGE AND THE DODGE PLAN ROOM. CONTRACTORS DESIRING TO SUBMIT PROPOSAZS MAY OBTAIN A SET OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS BY APPLICATION TO THE ENGINEER. A DEPOSIT OF $25.00 IS REQUIRED FOR EACH SET OF COMPLETE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. tHE DEPOSIT WILL BE REFUNDED TO THE BIDDER UPON RECEIPT OF A BONA FIDE BID AND THE RETURN OF THE DOCUMENTS IN GOOD CONDITION WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS OF THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF BIDS. NO BIDDER MAY WITHDRAW HIS BID FOR AT LEAST THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF BIDS. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS REQUIRE THE FILING OF A BIDDER'S BOND OR CERTIFIED CHECK EQUAL TO FIVE PERCENT (5$) OF THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPOSAL, AND MADE PAYABLE TO THE OWNER, SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE IF THE BIDDER REFUSES TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE OWNER UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. A PERFORMANCE BOND IN THE FULL AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT SUM WILL BE REQUIRED OF THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS AND TO WAIVE INFORMALITIES THEREIN. Published: Fridley Focus Dates: October 4th, 1989 October Zlth, 2989 October 18th, 1989 Construction Bulletin October 6th, 1989 October 13th, 1989 October 20th, 1989 13 RESOLIITION NO. - 1989 R$SOLIITION TO ADVERTIB$ FOR BIDS INDOOR FIREARMS RANGE $QIIIPMENT BE IT REBOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, as follows: 1. That the City Council of the City of Fridley has approved construction of an Indoor Firearms Range. 2. That it is in the interest of the City to award bid contracts for the following items or materials. INDOOR FIREARMS RANGE EQIIIPMENT 1 3. A copy of the specifications for the above-described items and materials have been presented to the Council by the Public Safety Director to be required by the City with respect to the acquisition of said items and materials. 4. The purchase of said items and materials as described above shall be effected by sealed bids to be received and opened by the Fridley Police Department on the 25th of October 1989. The Public Safety Director is directed and authorized to advertise for the purchase of said items and materials by sealed bid proposals under notice as provided by law and the Charter of the City of Fridley, the notice to be substantially inform as that shown by Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of by reference. Said notice shall be published at least twice in the official newspaper of the City of Fridley. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 2ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK 13A NOTIC$ TO HIDD$RB INDOOR FZREARI�IB Rl�NGB Sealed bids will be received and publicly opened by the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, at the Fridley Police Department of the City of Fridley, 64431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432, (Tel. 612-572-3629) on the 25th dap of October, 1989 at 2:00 p.m. for the furnishing of work and materials for the following work for the City of Fridley INDOOR FIREARMS RANGE PROJECT. The Indoor Firearms Range Project consists of providing equipment and installation of a small arms range in an existing building. All in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by David H. Sallman, Deputy Public Safety Director, Fridley City Hall, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 (Tel. 612-572-3637). Plans and specifications may be examined at the office of the Deputy Public Safety Director and copies may be obtained for the contractor�s individual use by applying to the Deputy Public Safety Director. A deposit of $25.00 is required for each set of complete contract documents. Bids must be made on the basis of cash payment for work, and accompanied by a cash deposit, certified check (on a responsible bank in the State of Minnesota) or a bidder's bond made payable without condition to the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in an amount of not less than five percent (5�) of the total amount of the bid. The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informalities in any bids received without explanation. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of thirty (30) days. By order of the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota. Dated this 2nd day of October, 1989. James P. Hill Public Safety Director Published: Fridley Focus October 4, 1989 October li, 1989 October 18, 1989 15 FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCZL OCTOBER 2, 1989 GAS SERVICES Air One Mechanical Company 6317 Welcome Avenue North, #6N Brooklyn Park, MN 55429 By:Sam Breno Loop Belden Porter, Inc. , 315 Royalston Avenue North � Minneapolis, NIId 55405 By: Douglas Hayes GENERAL CONTRACTOR B.B.A. Enterprises Inc. 5750 Jefferson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Brunn Construction Co. Inc. 1209 Old Highway #8 New Brighton, MN 55112 Inter-City Builders 773 Torchwood Drive New Brighton, MN 55112 Paul Johnson Construction 1809 Mississippi Blvd N.W. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 By: Roger Leffler By: Norman Brunn By: Joseph Shun By: Paul Johnson Jorgenson Construction, Inc. 1617 - 93rd Lane N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 By: Stanley Jorgenson K-D Remodelers 9272 Yucca Lane Maple Grove, NII�1 55369 By: Kevin Graczyk Mar-Len Development Corp. P.O. Box 76, 2209 Phelps Road Hugo, MN 55038 By: Leonard Vanasse Marsnik Construction 2647 McKinley Street N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55418 Patio Enclosures 6319 Cambridge Street St. Louis Park, MN 55416 By: Paul Marsnik By: Jim Wilkerson 15A LICEPi8E8 CLYDE WILEY Bldg/Mec�'i Insp. Same DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg Ofcl Same Same Same Same Same • Same Same Same Richgels Brothers Construction 1310 Kendon Lane St. Paul, MN 55120 By: Lavern Richgels D.E. Selger Construction Inc. 13224 Kenyon Street N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 By: Donald E. Selger Straitline Construction 3409 Northeast McKinley Street Minneapolis, MN 55418 By: James Burnevik Western Remodelers 2520 West Larpenteur St. Paul, MN 55I13 By: Sheldon Go2dman Witcher Construction Co. 3601 Minnesota Drive, Suite 650 Minneapolis, MN 55435 By: Ken Styrlund HEATING Air One Mechanical Company 6317 Welcome Avenue North, #6N Brooklyn Park, MN 55429 By: Sam Breno Commercial Air Conditioning Inc. 2200 Niagara Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 By: Stephen Quade Gilbert Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 3012 Clinton Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55408 By: P. Dan Gilbert Loop Belden Porter, Inc. 315 Royalston Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55405 Preferred Sheet Metal, Inc. 90 West Woodlyn Avenue St. Paul, MN 55117 United Sheet Metal 520 Front Avenue St. Paul, MN 55117 By: Douglas Hayes By: Jack McGrath By: James Doody PLIIMBING City View Plumbing & Heating Inc. 1880 1/2 West Wayzata Blvd Long Lake, MN 55356 By: Carl Milow ROOFING AWR Inc. 3023 Snelling Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55406 By: George Herot 15B Same Same Same Same Same CLYDE WILEY Blc�g/M� Insp. Same Same Same Same Same STATE OF MINN DA�2EL G. CLARK Chief Bldg Ofcl The Quimby Company 1132 Stinson Blvd Minneapolis, MN 55413 BIGN ERECTOR Attracta Sign, Inc. 7420 West Lake Street St. Louis Park, MN 55426 Cragg Signs Incorporated 7150 Madison Avenue West Golden Valley, mN 55427 By: Paul Hoover By: Louise Sterner By: Mike/Bill Cragg Crosstown Sign Inc. 10166 Central Avenue N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 By: Rick Fox Schad-Tracy Signs Inc.� 325 Minnesota Avenue N., P.O. #364 Oronoco, MN 55960 By: Connie Schad 15C Same I�i�RREL G. CLARK Qiief Bldg Ofcl Same Same Same � UTY OF FRl DLEY OWNER FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL October 2, 1989 Canadi� Financial Housing Corp./Fridley Apartinents 1117 Marquette Ave. #200 N�ls, NIDI 55403 . (same as abave) (same as above) (same as abave) (same as above) (same as above) (same as abave) (same as above) (same as above) (same as �bove) (same as abave) (same as above) Judith Rickoff 6001 2nd St. �idley, NIl�1 55432 Naeem Qureshi 4506 Orchard Ave. N. Mpls, NII�i 55422 Holmquist Enterprises 3608 Ac�niral Lane Mpls, NNIl�I 55429 (same as abave) LOCATION OF BUILDING 460 Mississippi St. 6303-6305 5th St. 6311-6329 5th St. 6337-6339 5th St. 6347-6365 5th St. 6401-6403 5th St. 6409-6427 5th St. 6431-6433 5th St. 6437-6455 5th St. 6459-6461 5th St. 6465-6483 5th St. 6487-6489 5th St. 6008 2ryd St. 5600 4th St. 450 75th Ave. #1�2r3r6�9 476 75th Ave. #1,2,3,4,8,9 LICENSES P. 1 UNITS FEE 103 231.00 2 16 2 16 2 16 2 16 2 16 2 4 24.00 57.00 24.00 57.00 24.00 57.00 24.00 57.00 24.00 57.00 24.00 36.00 4 36.00 5 36.00 6 36.00 �'•.�'PROVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR 15 �:PPROVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR N W E- < _ rr N m � .Ni m 1-� u ('! U � < C �D C O 1- .i t _ .� a U U O w ti � ar � � d G �. U O i0 +ti L' 0. O 4i > C G M � � F 2 � U u � M U � � i O �� t- � i 1 i < i < d � � N = 1 � 4.' � d � 1 !+ f- U n� � � � .� i i � �i n� t'f � 0 ssm::s�s��sssmssssass ��vi�ri�iririm�i��ooio�;ra+o+mrioo+ iff �' .r �' O+ N N Yf r� �0 t'� P� a0 m T m Q� YY •-+ [�=Q��.r�l11)•tiPl��l��•alAO�f7• � Y'f YY �' Pl •-i N 1'f !.-i w!'l �' ! �ff f7 N•y Y'f ` •••••w•• •w•�••••• B i � 1 N � � (7 1 Y"1 ., + u Qf � M � 1 , �, i � 1 � � � � F < � � M S � U N m � i N i p i �� O � {� F�- m N N • � � N N C m �� n i r?-� {�A N 6.) U • � � � w � � �� + � r • � � m • N �`1 � �,,. � e � � � �i: 1 . 1 • 1 M 1 r'1 1 1 01 11 � � � � ■ � _ � � n . � � i ■ � � t � i B ■ 1 1 1 (� M � � � r� . , � � w . i � c0 i r 1 1 � 1 M � � � r � 1 1 M 1 1 1 ■ � 1 1 Y 1 1 1 � N � � � � � N M 1 . 1 1 N 1 (7 f � 1 (7 N � N � .ti i � r � 1 t M t� � B � � N 1�V 1 n 1 N � • � �p � w t � p � M ■ � � � M smssmmm�s��s:smasssmss; P1mY7lIANUIYYmN��Dm�O•yl�NQ�ml�m0� � Y'1�'.��QINNJYM�'�OP YCl�Bf7�BYYa•y � n�m�o•,o�n t�n•, +��••u�mvm � � B� Y9 � f'1 •-i N Pl .r p.i ! f' Ifl f7 N Y'1 i N� • O O • • • • • M a O • • • i �� s �s amm� Q� h Ifl �' • tl'f f t� N m� N = P O� M� r � M • • � � � � � � � � O � � � � � � B B � � (� � r1 0� MY !� Y7 IA �V �O �Q �Q C'1 Iff P� P T Y9�'f7�GQ1mNY'f ! w ['ir�f�mifl U1 �+ i��mQ� .Y�I{9 Pf .4 r'�Ol�+Y7 �m = m � fV f7 N I'1 .-i •i r' N f'f f7 N YY � • • • P • • • M = Y M Y • � � r% � � M , , , � � � � � � t� � � � �0 � � � � .� � !� � .� i � � N � � � p � �' � M � � N � � � Y � � m � � � � i , ., � ti � � i � i Yf � m � � � m�o+�n� o� � c� � �i � • � N � � � � N � � i � i � � i �!1 � rf � nl i � � � � � ' 1 1 (� 1 �0 � N � i � � r CD i � � T . � � .� � � ' � � � � � �~�'"�r � �N� i � M � � � � ` � w M � '� � y .�i N 41 N ~ ~ � _ � O`=t•<i� O�e F Y = � Q1 N M� ��. <<<. Z M O M i� t- � 1- < J s s� � F t- fL O U 7 s 1- < S V� t� F< C k10 <W =J►rt�0 O < d N e�< 41N6. W N0. 41tYO iF-r+flf �ii �+ L1 �"� � � pp y� C OCf ..ICt7��t)t�U0eN�10 (-N ►+ N = = 1 i. � V ��.i �.Ti M �..i M in ifi 'i. 0.' i% <'s M � M d � iL c�i � � ca+�°s°<�migesn �ozmut-i��o'ess�e s > � � G GC � F p F r� F F- id t� = W 4i O Y►r N� [O � G ii=Up � >iitl�f�4. WO = i i! !� OC � 4i <004700rY OZS W 7eUt-7>0�00 < d td , o-. c�c�F- zr-s..00am m<xF-oc�v d c� � N N �+N O<t!f �C W 41zN<J<t+i� S 1 �J � S� Z Z�. M M►y � T. i S.-7 V i l-� Y Y � n s�iaic»�+<ma>ax�sso...�zvims � 1 0 �". �'. �"' d' 0'. � M i. Z�. 4i .�i � V: 7� M Y � M � < �C<!«mC9UG4/41YYYY�U' ==140. � i � s s m a p i o.r..�mQ��1Y7�1�)tl7�� •sN� �� OiM i SNNYf,I'�ff��llYYQ�t�r�S1�f1B�O�N117 �+ �p dU � •yt�P0lqm�OPl�•��0�•�•aN.� Q�Y7.r('10� N fd � N � 16A