03/12/1990 - 4964 OFRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL FETING
av ATTENDENCE SHEET
MONDAY MaAch 12 , 1990
7:30 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN
ITEM
PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS NUMBER
i vo l4 LQhe.
— 7-'-t\ o Z
T"cijlv MIcc tiG �-
WILLIAM W. BURNS
CITY MANAGER
COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 12, 1990
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL
I[ARCH 12, 1990 - 7s30 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLBGIl�NCE:
PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION:
Girl Scout Week
March 11 - 17, 1990
APPROVAL OF MINLTTESs �
Council Meeting, December 18, 1989
Council Meeting, February 26, 1990 �
Special Council Meeting, March ?, 1990
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
OPEN FORIIM, VIBITORB:
(Consideration of items not on agenda - 15 minutes)
PDBLIC HEARING:
Public Hearing on an Ordinance
Amending Sections 7.04, 7.05,
7.07, and 7.09 of the Fridley
CityCharter . . . . . . . . .P .
� �
'� �
'�"
�
. . . . 1 - 1D
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL 1dE$TING, MARCH 12, 1990
OLD BIISINEBS:
Variance Request, VAR #89-19,
Front and Side Yard Setback
Requests by Orville and
Jeannine Sachs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2CC
�
-. ,{�
� � �
� � ��l/
_/
NEW BIISINESS:
Approval of Contract for
Canada Goose Control Program
�
� �
�� U
:�
,
Paqe 2
��
�
. . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3N
�
First Reading of an Ordinance ""
Adopting New Chapter 407,
Entitled, "Excavations in
Public Streets, Rights-of-Way
and Easements" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4E
+`�'� - � \ i* ?i
� r�
_� ��`'� ��
�;. �� � ��
, � �
�'�' S � � � ✓ ,
�� � � _ � �r
�
��
Approval of Recommendation �/
for Tax Forfeit Parcel No. 54 . . . . . . . ° , . 5 - 5A
1
��� �
, �' ��'"
FRIDLEY CITY CODNCIL 1�BBTINa, MARCH 12, 1990
NEW BII8INE88 (CONTINITED):
Change Order No. 16 for
Fridley Municipal Center
Improvement Project No. 189 . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6C
i �
t �Iv
� �
Approval of Recommendation
to Award Contract for Repair
of Well No. 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
� ,
��
�� �
Appointment: City Employee . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Claims
Licenses
�
�v"
-n
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
/
J
d
r�
i�!✓
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - l0A
2 v,�
,
/
�
Estimates . . . . . . . . . . .� . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11A
1
�
ADJOURN:
/ .
Paqe 3
♦
GIRL SCOUT WEEK
MARCH 11-17,1990
VYilliam J. Nee
Mayor
Fridley, MN
WHEREAS, Girl Scouts of the United States of America recognizes that ioday's girls will
be tomorrow's leaders; and
WHEREAS, Girl Scouts of the United States of America is the largest voluntary
organization for girls in the world and draws upon a large resource of positive adult role
models; and
WHEREAS, the Girl Scout movement continues to emphasize leadership and personal
and career development for girls; and,
WHEREAS, Fridley and the world will be the direct benefcciaries of the skilled young women
who are Girl Scouts;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT' RESOLVED, that I, William J. Nee, Mayor of the City of
Fridley hereby proclaim March Il -17,1990, as:
GIRL SCOUT WEEK
1 do further call upon all citizens of this communiry to give to the Girl Scouts, now and
through all of 1990, the continued interest, enthusiasm, cooperation, and support
necessary to bring Girl Scouting to every girl in Fridley who wishes to join.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have set my hand and
caused the seal of the City of Fridley to be affi�ed
this 12th day of March,199�0.
WILLIAM 7. NEE, MAYOR
TH$ MINIITSS OF THB FRIDL$Y CITY COII�TCIL KE�TI�G OF
D$CEMBBR 18, 1989
THE MINIITES OF T8E REGIILAR METTING OF TH$ FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL OF
DECEMBER 18, 1989
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:44 p.m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: -
'�iayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
ROLL CALL•
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman
Schneider, Councilman Fitzpatrick and
Councilman Billings
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 4. 1989:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
The following resolution was added to the agenda as part of Item
4: Resolution Authorizing Participation in the Minnesota Rental
Rehabilitation Program.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the agenda with the above
addition. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Ugon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM. VISITORS:
KEN ORTTEL. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES:
Mr. Ken Orttel, representing the League of Minnesota Cities,
presented a check to the City for $61,019 from returned dividends.
He stated three things are taken into consideration in determining
the amount to be returned to cities; the length of time a city has
been in the program, the amount of premiums paid, and the adjusted
losses. He stated about $7,000,000 in dividends is being returned
to all cities participating in the program.
�RIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF DBCEMHER 18, 1989 PAGE 2
o„T.D BUSZNESS :
1. QRDINANCE NO 939 ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
91 90: .
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the readinq and adopt
Ordinance No. 939 on the second reading and order publication.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
�JEW BUSINESS•
2. ADVERTISING FOR BIDS FOR A 1.5 MILLION GALLON ELEVATED WATER
STORAGE TANK•
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director/City Engineer, stated the City
retained the services of HNTB to conduct a study of the entire
water system. He stated as a result of this study, it was
determined the City needed additional elevated water storage. Mr.
Flora stated in comparisons with 14 other cities of our size, it
was found that Fridley ranked last in providing elevated storage.
He stated the City's low, intermediate and high level water
distribution systems were reviewed to determine how to provide
satisfactory water storage.
Mr. Flora stated in evaluating a potential site for an elevated
tank within the three zones, emphasis was given to the availability
of public land, open land, elevation and access to existing major
water lines. He stated three sites were identified in the
intermediate zone, but were eliminated from consideration due to
the type of land use. He stated because an adequate site could not
be found in the high level zone, focus was on a low level area.
Mr. Flora stated three separate areas were evaluated. He stated
one site was adjacent to the Locke Park filtration plant, another
area adjacent to the corporate yard, and an area adjacent to the
NSP transformer site. He stated it was felt the area adjacent to
the filtration plant was too close to neighborhoods and might have
an adverse impact on homes south of the site. He stated the
corporate yard was not close to residential neighborhoods, but the
elevation was a little low. He stated the area adjacent to the NSP
transformer had sufficient elevation and was substantially removed
from residential neighborhoods and close to a water line. He
stated it was determined this would probably be the preferred site
to construct an elevated water tank.
Mr. Flora stated in reviewing the various elevated vessels that are
available, the ellipsoidal, the waterspheroid, and the fluted
tanks, the ellipsoidal would be the most costly and, while the
waterspheroid was the simplest, it was determined that the fluted
tank would probably be the most economical to construct, provide
for a 1.5 MG tank and advertise for bids.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEBTING OF DBC$MBER 18. 1989 PAGE 3
Mr. Flora stated after considerable discussion with the consultant,
IiNTB, and reviewing needs identified in the plan, it is proposed
the City construct a 1.5 MG elevated water storage tank west of
Highway 65 in Locke Park, considering adding one new well for the
system and upgrade its booster pumps to move water from one zone
to another. He stated he believed this tank would provide
sufficient storage to meet the City's needs and the site is
sufficiently removed from the residential neighborhoods and
accessible for easy maintenance. He requested the Council
authorize staff to work with HNTB to prepare plans and
specifications and investigate the site as a location for the tank.
Councilman Fitzpatrick asked why Fridley has a high daily water
usage.
Mr. Flora stated the City has a large industrial base and a greater
need for water than some of the "bedroom type" communities. He
stated the average daily water use is a computed average based on
the total gallons of water pumped per year.
Councilman Schneider stated in reviewing the total gallons of
storage per capita, Fridley is at 166.67, or somewhere in the
middle compared with other cities. He stated, however, in the
percent of daily demand, Fridley is close to the bottom compared
with other cities. He stated he assumes this is based on the daily
average use.
Mr. Flora stated that is an average figure for the year. He stated
the City does not have a very large volume of water available in
a storage vessel to satisfy the daily demand.
Councilman Schneider asked why the tank should be elevated. Mr.
Flora stated it is elevated so that you obtain the necessary head
and pressure.
Mayor Nee stated the City of Coon Rapids has a lot of on-ground
storage and not much in the way of elevated tanks.
Mr. Flora stated Coon Rapids has almost three times as much
elevated storage as Fridley.
Mayor Nee asked the benefits and economic impact of an elevated
tank.
Mr. Flora stated with the additional elevated water storage tank,
equalized pressure would be provided throughout the system and
provide water storage to meet the needs for any major fire that
should occur. He stated if another tank needed repair, water
pressure could still be maintained while it is out of operation.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL 1S8$TINQ OF DBCB�MB$R 18. 1989 B�GE 4
Mr. Flora stated the water rate Btructure is currently being
reviewed as a means of financinq this project as well as the other
projects identified in the five year capital improvement plan.
Mayor Nee questioned the estimated cost for such a storaqe tank.
Mr. Flora Het stated since this is a 1.51million gallon tank n the
storage.
cost would be about $1,300,000.
Mayor Nee stated he was under the impression the City was in good
shape as far as water storage, however, he realizes alot of study
has been done on the City's water distribution system.
Mr. Flora stated the City qets by on a patch and band-aid process.
He stated if two wells were ever down at the same time in the
summer it would be difficult to maintain the water level and
pressure. He stated it is important the City have some elevated
storage to deal with these demands in the summer.
Councilman Schneider stated prior to the drought, the Council but
been assured that the water system was in qreat shape,
eventually some storage would be needed in the northern part of the
City. He stated in reviewinq the charts, it looks like the Council
has been totally irresponsible over the past years. He questioned
if this was the case and if information was intentionally withheld
or if something drastic has surfaced that the Council was not aware
of.
Mr. Flora stated a nulaber of things have happened over the years.
He stated when wells were first installed in the City, they were
deep wells. He stated as the City continued to grow, some shallow
wells were added. Mr. Flora stated since 1976, when the first
water system study was conducted, the need for additional storage
was identified. He stated the City had 13 wells at that time and
was using 8 or 9 million gallons a day so there was adequate
capacity. He stated in the mid-1980's, FMC and Webb Publishing
came on line and are the largest water users. He stated FMC quit
using their wells because of water contamination, and shortly
thereafter, Webb Publishing began operations and their presses
called for a large amount of water. He stated the water demands
were increased substantially to 16 million gallons a day. Mr.
Flora stated the dry summer also increased demand. He stated if
there is a major power outage or failure of two wells, the City
could not meet the demand for water. Therefore, it is important
to have some elevated storage.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated she has a concern about storing water
as she felt it gives the idea there is plenty available. She felt
there should be some conservation measures. She questioned if Webb
Publishing or FMC recycles the water.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF DECEMBER 18. 1989 PAGE 5
Mr. Flora stated Webb Publishing recycles their press water three
times, but he did not know if FMC does any recycling.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated a study of the rate structure began
this week. He stated one of the goals is to produce a rate�system
that encourages conservation. He stated the present system does
not encourage conservation as the rates go down as more water is
used.
Councilman Schneider stated if additional storage is necessary
because of heavy industrial users, it would seem those users should
carry their fair share of the cost.
Mr. Flora stated by implementing a summer sprinkling ban, it would
eliminate excess use during high demand periods.
Councilman Schneider stated the City has required businesses to
install sprinkler systems and he could see where there may be a
problem if they were not allowed to use them.
Mr. Flora stated sprinkling systems can be timed so water is used
during the late evening or early morning hours which does not
impact our demand periods.
Councilman Schneider felt the specifications should be drafted in
such a way to insure there would not be a large number of change
orders.
Mr. Flora stated it should be a fixed cost for the steel and
construction of the tank. He felt the area which may involve some
changes would be in the footings. He stated soil borings are being
done to determine what type of footings are necessary so the design
can be finalized to support the tank.
Councilman Schneider stated his concern was how the City
establishes accountability.
Mr. Flora stated some incentives are being considered as far as
expediting the project. He felt that by bidding the two types of
tanks, the City will get the best possible price. He stated by
taking soil borings, the best type of base to support the structure
can be identified.
Mr. Burns stated this project is more simple than the Municipal
Center project.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, felt the organizational process should
be kept simple and not have an architect, a project manager, and
a multitude of contracts. He felt there was not a direct line of
accountability with the Municipal Center project. Mr. Herrick felt
this should be taken into consideration when the specifications are
drawn and advertised and when the contract is reviewed.
� • 1 �I _ : t • � . 1: " r f :
Mr. Flora requested the Council consider the area adjacent to the
NSP transformer site west of Hiqhway 65 as a priority location, and
to continue soil borings and the preparation of plans and
epecifications for the design, in order to attempt to have this
tank in use by January, 1991. _.
Councilman Schneider stated he would like somethinq highliqhted
along the lines of accountability or incentives.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the preparation of
plans and specifications for the 1.5 MG elevated storaqe tank.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the advertisement of
bids for both a waterspheroid and fluted type tank. Seconded by
Councilman Fitzpatrick.
Mr. Iierrick asked if there would be additional expenses and if
separate plans and specifications are designed for the two
different types of tanks.
Mr. Flora stated the type of soil on the site will be identified
and requirements given for the site, and bidders will be allowed
to bid either type of tank whether it be waterspheroid or fluted.
Mr. Herrick stated he understands then that the design of the tank
and supporting structure comes from the bidders. He stated the
City will not be providing plans and specifications on how it is
constructed, but the bidder will outline how they would construct
it given the site and footings and the type of tank the City
desires. He stated there would not be any additional cost to bid
the two different styles of tanks.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Billings asked the height of the tank. Mr. Flora stated
it is 140 feet above the ground.
Councilman Billings asked how visible it would be from the
residential area.
Mr. Flora stated the NSP power lines are about 100 feet high so
this tank would be 40 feet higher. He stated the closest
residential area is on the south side of Rice Creek.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the City has access to the site.
Mr. Flora stated the City has access and is obtaining an easement
from NSP to put a water line along the north proprty line.
FRZDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 18. 1989 PAGE 7
MOTION by Councilman Billings to consider the area adjacent to the
NSP transformer site west of Highway 65 as the primary location of
this storage tank. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously. -�
3. RECEIVING THE MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
DECEMBER 6, �989:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to receive the minutes of the
Planning Commission meeting of December 6, 1989. Seconded by
Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
4. APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING FOR RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM:
AND
RESOLUTION NO. 97-1989 AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE
MINNESOTA RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated the Rental Rehabilitation
Program is a program sponsored by the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency to allow owners to improve their rental units. She stated
entering into this agreement allows the City to participate in the
program.
Ms. Dacy stated a resolution is also included which authorizes
participation in the Rental Rehabilitation Program.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize the City to enter
into the Memorandum of Understanding for the Rental Rehabilitation
Program for the Fiscal Year 1990. Seconded by Councilwoman
Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 97-1989.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
5. AWARDING CURBSIDE RECYCLING BID AND EXECUTING CONTRACT:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to remove this item from the
table. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Nee stated this item was tabled from the last Council meeting
as there was a question raised regarding the bids.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated he has submitted a written
opinion which is shown on Page 5E of the Council's agenda. He
stated, basically, his conclusion is that the proposed contract
with Super Cycle, Inc. is not inconsistent with the specifications
or advertisement for bids.
FRIDLBY CITY COUI�CZL lL$ETINa O� DBCEKB$R 18. 1989 P�QE 8
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to award the bid for City-wide
curbside collection of residential recyclables to Super Cycle, Inc.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Mr. Don Hinz, Ramsey Recycling, Inc., etated he was not here this
eveninq to convince the Council to chanqe their opinion, but to
try and defend what he feels is an unfair castinq of Ramsey
Recycling as outlined in the staff's memo. Mr. Hinz stated he was
not here to criticize anyone, since Super Cycle provides wonderful
service. He stated that he believes his firm also provides this
type of service.
Mr. Hinz stated it was obvious the City staff �tanted to recommend
Super Cycle for this contract to which he takes no offense. He
stated Super Cycle is the current contractor and has a foot in the
door and they provide good service and, most important, it is
cheaper. He stated those are good reasons why Super Cycle should
retain the contract. He felt, however, Ramsey Recycling was
treated very unjustly.
Mr. Hinz stated that in staff's memo, Ramsey Recycling is referred
to as "a loosely organized consortium of seven refuse haulers
operating in Ramsey County." He stated they have corporate
executive boards and are registered with the State of Minnesota.
He stated his firm has many years of collection experience and is
not loosely knit. Mr. Hinz stated his company was formed because
there was a void by Super Cycle to provide the needed services.
Mr. Hinz stated the memo also states that Ramsey Recycling provides
service to only 5,700 households. He stated they provide service
to 5,700 households in Spring Lake Park and Mounds View. However,
they also service St. Paul, North St. Paul, Lake Elmo, Maplewood,
and Bayport. He stated the total number of households serviced is
probably about 40,000.
Mr. Hinz stated the City staff evaluated Super Cycle and his firm
on the basis of materials that wou2d be collected. He stated
Ramsey Recycling prefers not to collect cardboard because it is
getting to be a contamir►ant. He stated if the City wished this
collected, they would do so. He stated they also collect drain
oil, batteries, and plastic at no increased cost.
Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Hinz if the City staff was aware
they vould collect these items.
Ms. Dacy stated the specifications contained four materials that
are now being collected and did not contain plastics, batteries or
oil. She stated staff's intent was to maintain the current program
and not add any other recyclables at this time.
Councilman Schneider asked if staff was aware that Ramsey Recycling
would include batteries and oil in their collection.
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL ME$TINa OF D$CBMBER 18. 1989 PAG$ 9
Mr. Burns stated staff has only known for a few days that Ramsey
Recycling would collect these items.
Ms. Dacy stated these items were not included in the bid package
and staff was made aware that they would collect these materials
when they met with Ramsey Recycling several days ago.
Mr. Hinz stated as far as weighing the loads, all trucks are
weighed at Waldorf. He stated their weiqhing procedure of
subtracting the tare weight to determine the weight of the other
materials is an acceptable method. He stated if the City wished
some other means of weighing, this could be done.
Mr. Hinz stated in reference to their billing being late, the
requirements for Spring Lake Park were for monthly billings. He
stated the billings could be submitted in a day if the City wished.
Mr. Hinz stated in regard to the reference that staff was unable
to reach them by phone, Ramsey Recycling was formed after the
telephone books were published. He stated they have secretarial
staff and telephone lines to respond to problems at all times. He
stated missed collections are not a problem. He stated by
corporation regulations, trucks call in for any missed stops before
they leave an area. He stated there is a big discrepancy between
a miss and what is a late set out. Mr. Hinz stated because they
are fairly new in the industry, there certainly will be a
transition period. He stated their collection rate has improved
dramatically and in the six months they have been providing service
to Mounds View, they have not missed any pickups.
Mr. Hinz stated Ramsey Recycling does have different trucks because
they are seven different companies, however, only the end result
should be a concern of the City.
Mr. Hinz stated in response to the paper crisis, and the reason
they did not submit any contingencies in their bid, they are
searching out other markets such as using newspaper to make animal
bedding. He stated they are taking steps in the event there is
another newspaper glut by finding other markets.
Mr. Hinz stated he felt Ramsey Recycling was cast in an unfavorable
light and they could offer better service than what was outlined
in staff's memo.
Mr. Burns stated three members of the City staff visited Mr. Hinz's
operation in Newport last week. He stated Mr. Hinz was asked to
name the cities to which Ramsey Recycling provides service. He
stated Mounds View, Spring Lake Park, and District 14 in St. Paul
were the only ones mentioned by Mr. Hinz. Mr. Burns stated Mr.
Hinz was asked if he took exception to any of the items to be
collected and he mentioned cardboard. He stated in regard to the
radios in vehicles, Mr. Hinz was unclear whether they had radios
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF DBCSMBBR 18. 1989 PAGE 10
in all the vehicles. He stated Mr. Hinz never offered infonaation
that his firm collects oil and batteries. He stated staff learned
about this when references were checked.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked Mr. Hinz if Ramsey Recyclinq was
awarded the bid, if someone could be reached at their office over
the weekends.
Mr. Hinz stated probably not, but someone would be in the office
on Monday.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the City could continue with Friday
pickup if Ramsey Recycling received the bid.
Mr. Hinz stated this could be done, but he would prefer to offer
a weekly service.
Councilman Schneider stated he read the staff report and was
comfortable with awarding the bid to Super Cycle. He stated even
though it was not intentional, he felt the memo may have been
misleading.
Mr. Tom Glander, Vice President of Super Cycle, Tnc., stated Super
Cycle has a staff of 24 people and operates out of St. Paul. He
stated they are owned by a firm in Denver, Colorado, RECOMP, Inc.,
which is in the business of waste processing and recycling.
Mr. Glander stated Super Cycle has been collecting in Fridley for
some time and recently completed a re-routing of the City. He
stated they like to operate on the same basis as the postman or
school bus and have regularly scheduled times they pick up
recyclables at various households. He stated they know the problem
areas in the City and deal with this in the best way possible.
Mr. Glander stated Super Cycle, Inc. has met all the requirements
of the bid specifications. He stated every truck and load is
weighed. Mr. Glander stated their quality of service is at 99.8�.
He stated they have no sub-contractors and all their vehicles are
marked and equipped with two-way radios. He stated Super Cycle is
an affirmative action employer. He stated they offer multi-unit
recycling and were instrumental in implementing the Proctor Gamble
disposable diaper project. Mr. Glander stated Super Cycle does
collect cardboard and will collect plastics by July of this year.
He stated, however, they cannot collect plastics at the exact same
fee they proposed. He stated as far as collecting batteries and
oil, they do not collect these materials because of the liability.
He stated they feel it is not a good option to have batteries and
waste oil at the curb and a majority of the gas stations wi17. take
these materials. He felt this was a better option for the City.
Mr. Glander stated with any missed collection, if the call is
received by il a.m., they pick it up the same day. He stated if
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL M$$ INQ OF D$CBMBER 18. 1989 PAGB 11
the call is received after il a.m., they pick it up the following
Monday. He stated they have a phone number dedicated only for
calls from residents. Mr. Glander stated a redemption center is
open on Saturdays to also take phone calls.
Mr. Glander stated they are looking at new markets for newspapers.
He stated in terms of animal bedding, he felt the metropolitan area
should take advantage of the industrial opportunities and let the
outside areas deal with animal bedding.
Councilman Schneider stated if there is no market for paper and the
City stops collecting it, if Super Cycle's fee is renegotiated.
Mr. Herrick stated in talking to staff, it seemed if the City was
paying $3,800/month to pick up paper, aluminum, glass and cardboard
and, for economic reasons, they ceased picking up newspaper, which
is more than half the total tonnage, the City would be overpaying.
He felt, therefore, there should be a clause, if newspaper pickup
would cease, to renegotiate for a lower price.
Councilman Schneider asked if the amounts to be paid Super Cycle
are included in the contract.
Ms. Dacy stated Super Cycle's bid was $84/ton or approximately
$57,456 for the contract period based on 57 tons per month. She
stated the monthly minimum payment is contained in Exhibit A or B
and is, obviously, not attached.
Mr. Herrick stated the Council did not have to vote on the contract
at this time, only on awarding the bid.
Ms. Dacy stated the contract could be included on the Council's
January 8 agenda.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, Councilman
Fitzpatrick, Councilwoman Jargenson, Councilman Billings and Mayor
Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilman Schneider voted
against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a 4
to 1 vote.
6. CHANGE ORDER NO. 15 FOR FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 189•
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director/City Engineer, stated this change
order adds Proposal Requests No. 104 and 113 to the Municipal
Center and Proposal Request No. 103 to the Fire Station. He
stated it also amends Proposal Request No. 97 and Work Order No.
1960 which were previously incorporated in Change Order No. 13.
Mr. Flora stated this change order finalizes the various contracts
with the Municipal Center, Fire Station and Ramp contractors to
identify the final costs associated with the work that has been
completed and the net result being a deduction of $6,565.31.
FRTDiBY CITY eom�tciL MEBTINQ OF DBCEMBER 18. 1989 PAG$ 12
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize Change Order No. 15 for
the Municipal Center Improvement Project No. 189 for a deduction
of $6,565.31. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously. -.
�� �F.SnTTTTTON N0. 98-1989 REOUESTING AN EXTENSION TO THE NINE
MONTH RE UIREMENT TO COMPLETE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 98-1989 and
authorize the Mayor to send the letter to Chairperson Keefe.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
8. RESOLUTION NO. 99-1989 ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS.
SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS THEREOF: STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989 - 1(SANITARY SEWER LINE -
7570 HIGHWAY 65):
Mr. Keith Poppenhaqen, tenant of the building at 7570 Highway 65,
stated he would like to know the City's plans for this property.
He stated he plans to purchase the building and needs direction on
what has to be done and a time frame for completion of the
improvements. Mr. Poppenhagen stated the reason improvements have
not been done was because it was not known who actually owned the
property. He stated he has been turned down for a loan to purchase
the property because improvements are not completed. Mr.
Poppenhagen stated he plans to buy out the contract, but is still
working on the financing.
Mr. Poppenhagen stated he understands that the sewer needs to be
connected by July. He stated he did not feel he could install the
blacktopping by this date.
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated she has talked to Mike
Thompson on the time schedule and about the objective to have the
sewer completed and trailers removed in 1990 and the blacktopping
completed by January 1, 1992.
Mr. Poppenhagen felt he could live with that time schedule. He
stated he could get the taxes paid off and sewer connected by July.
He stated as far as the other improvements, if financing is
obtained, the improvements will be completed. He stated if he is
part of the ownership of this business, he wanted to make sure what
is required.
Councilman Schneider stated the primary concern is the sewer issue.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, asked Mr. Poppenhagen if he understood
that the assessment could be paid off over a period of years.
FRIDL$Y CITY COtTNCIL ME$TING OF D$CBMHER 18. 1989 PAQE 13
Mr. Poppenhagen stated he is aware of this, however, the estimated
cost for the blacktopping is $8,400 and back taxes are $27,000.
Mr. Herrick stated the questions Mr. Poppenhagen has raised were
probably addressed to Mr. Thompson. He felt if Mr. Poppenhagen
wanted these answers in writing, this could be done.
Councilman Schneider asked if Mr. Thompson will still be the
principal owner.
Mr. Poppenhagen stated he would be part of the partnership which
involves four persons. He stated if the ownership is in their
name, a second mortgage could probably be secured for the
improvements.
Mr. Herrick stated he advised Mr. Thompson that from the
investigations he has done, it appears the title is confusing. Ae
stated he would recommend that an attorney be retained for a title
opinion.
Mr. Herrick stated a public hearing would be held in regard to the
sanitary sewer improvements, and the City will attempt to notify
every person whose name appears on the title.
Councilman Billings stated he would encourage Mr. Poppenhagen to
communicate with Ms. Dacy of the City staff as to what improvements
are needed for this business to meet all the City code
requirements.
Mr. Poppenhagen stated he had the City inspectors out to his
business.
Ms. Dacy stated she would confirm what Mr. Thompson was told last
week, in writing, to Mr. Poppenhagen.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 99-1989.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
9. RESOLUTION NO. 100-1989 RECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT AND
CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JANUARY 22. 1990 ON THE
MATTER OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS: STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989 - 1(SANITARY SEWER LINE -
7570 HIGHWAY 65):
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 100-1989.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COQNCIL ME$TINa OF DBCBMB$R 18. 1989 PAQE 1�
10. RESOLUTION NO. 101-1989 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND ADVERTISEMENT
FOR BIDS FOR THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF WELL NO. 5, PROJECT
NO. 198:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 101-�989.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
11. RESOLUTION NO. 102-1989 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND ADVERTISEMENT
FOR BIDS FOR THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF WELL NO. 10,
PROJECT NO. 198:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 102-1989.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
12. RESOLUTION NO. 103-1989 CERTIFYING TAX LEVY RE4UIREMENTS FOR
1990 TO THE COUNTY OF ANOKA FOR COLLECTION:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 103-1989.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
13. RESOLUTION NO. 104-1989 DESIGNATING TIME AND NUMBER OF COUNCIL
�'iEETINGS •
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 104-1989.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
14. CLAIMS•
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize payment of Claims
No. 29727 through 29960. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
15. LICENSES•
MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the licenses as submitted
and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by
Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
16. ESTIMATES:
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the estimates as
submitted:
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL 1dE$TINQ OF DBCEMBER 18, 1989 PAGB 15
Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered
301 Fridley Plaza Office Bldg.
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, 1+IIJ 55432
Services rendered for
October, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8, 222 . 00
Bruce A. Liesch Associates, Inc.
3020 Harbor Lane
Minneapolis, l�i 55447
Water Quality Study
(Hydrogeologic Analyses)
Project No. 195
Estimate No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,910.66
Gammon Bros., Inc.
13845 Northdale Blvd.
Rogers, MN 55374
Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2
Estimate No. 10 . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .$13,851.32
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting
of the Fridley City Council of December 18, 1989 adjourned at 9:38
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secretary to the City Council Mayor
Approved:
T8E I+iZNQTSB OF T8B FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ILEETI�iG OF
FEBRIIl1RY Z 6� 19 9 0
THE MINtJTES OF T8E REGIILAR MEBTING OF THB FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL OF
FEBRIIARY 26. 1990
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:32 p.m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
ROLL CALL•
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman
Schneider, Councilman Fitzpatrick and
Councilman Billings
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATIONS:
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK - MARCH 4- 10, 1990:
Mayor Nee read this proclamation celebrating 94 years of service
by the Volunteers of America to the people of Minnesota and the
nation.
Ms. Joanne Demko, Director of Congregate Dining for Seniors in
Fridley, accepted this proclamation on behalf of the Volunteers of
America.
WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH - MARCH, 1990:
Mayor Nee read this proclamation proclaiming Women's History Month,
March, 1990, and encouraged residents to research their family to
see how women have contributed to the development of the City of
Fridley and the nation.
Ms. Kay Bonner Nee accepted this proclamation and stated there are
many different events going on in the community and schools in
celebration of Women's History Month. She stated there is an art
event in which students from kindergarten through high school will
be asked to depict, in any art form relevant to them, women who
have made the most difference in th�ir lives. Ms. Nee stated this
community has given real warmth, energy, and support and extended
her thanks for this proclamation.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF FEBRIIARY 26, 1990_ PAGE 2
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
COUNCIL MEETING, FEBRUARY 12, 1990:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the minutes as
presented. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
Mayor Nee stated it has been requested that Item 16 be deleted from
the agenda and that the word "Reordering" be changed to "Ordering"
in Item 13.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above
amendments. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS•
VFW POST 363 PRESENTATION:
Mr. Ron Saba, Quartermaster of the Fridley VFW Post 363, presented
a check for $22,500 to the City to be used for a vehicle and
additional training in the Fire Department. He stated it is
possible to provide this donation using funds generated from
charitable gambling. He stated it seems the Legislature wants to
remove any donations for fire, police, and school projects. He
stated he would like the Council's support so that they can
continue their work in providing funds for community service.
Mayor Nee and City Council members extended their thanks to Mr.
Saba for this donation. He was reminded of the caucuses to be held
on February 27 where he could address his concerns on this
charitable gambling issue.
PUBLIC HEARINGS•
1. PUBLIC HEARING FOR NORTHCO PHASE III DEVELOPMENT OF 2.4 ACRE
LOOP-BACK SITE•
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman
Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at
7:44 p.m.
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated Northco is
proposing to purchase and develop this 2.4 acre site for an 18,400
square foot, one story, block commercial and office building. He
stated the developer proposes to begin construction this spring
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEgTINQ OF FEBRIIARY 26. 1990 PAGE 3
with a bank as the anchor tenant and other tenants to include
businesses such as printing, computer sales, and insurance offices.
Mr. Robertson stated because wet soil will have to be removed and
the site backfilled, the cost for the soil correction is estimated
at $70,000 plus an additional $25,000 to elevate the site for
proper drainage. He stated with normal soil conditions, the site
preparation costs would be about $6,000.
Mr. Robertson stated the Housing & Redevelopment Authority has
recommended the Council establish a short term economic development
district for the purposes of assisting this project with a$70,000
pay-as-you-go grant. He stated the qrant would be in the form of
a revenue note for an amatant not to exceed the $70, 000 required for
soil correction. He stated preliminary estimates indicate this
would be approximately the first two years of taxes, therefore,
this district could be retired in three or four years at the
Council's discretion.
Mr. Carlson, Executive Vice President of Northco, stated he was
pleased to report that, at this time, they have sold one eight acre
parcel in their business park to Robert Larsen Partners who will
be developing the multi-tenant building. He stated they have
another seven acre site, under option, and hoped to announce a user
for this parcel in the next several months.
Mr. Carlson stated he would like to give a brief presentation on
the site plan and concept for the small corner parcel. He stated
this parcel is 2.4 acres currently owned by the Soo Line Railroad.
He stated as the owner and developer of the adjacent parcel, they
became concerned when a service station was proposed for this site.
He stated it was felt that if something could be worked out with
the railroad, they would approach the City Council with a
development they felt would be favorable for this site. He stated
their proposal is fo� a 18,400 square foot building for use as a
branch bank facility, with an auto bank facility, and the balance
of the space would be divided into smaller spaces that could be
leased. He stated these spaces, basically, may be used for a
restaurant, computer sales, insurance offices, or travel agencies.
Mr. Carlson stated the site has 124 parking spaces and meets the
City code and they have asked that a riqht turn be allowed off 73rd
Avenue with several driveways along the frontage road. Mr. Carlson
stated the building would be brick with tinted glass windows and
an accentuated roofing system. He stated they are working with Mr.
Robertson on this issue.
Mr. Carlson stated there is a soil problem on the site because a
substantial amount of soil will have to be removed and the
elevation raised in order to make the project function and drain
properly.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL I�E$TING OF F$BRIIARY 26, 1990 PAGE 4
Councilman Schneider stated the market for office space is very
slow and wondered if the developer would be able to lease these
spaces.
Mr. Carlson stated he has had discussions with several potential
users, but until construction is further along, it is difficult to
obtain leasing commitments. He stated the building is fairly small
and different from the general office market in that there is
parking at the front door, accessibility on the first floor level,
and visibility from University Avenue.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked what type of signage is proposed.
Mr. Carlson stated there would be signage primarily on the
building, but they might apply for a pylon sign that would identify
the project.
Mayor Nee asked staff to explain the type of assistance the Housing
& Redevelopment Authority is recommending.
Mr. Robertson stated this would be a short term economic
development district with a pay-as-you-go approach. He stated the
grant would be given to the project over a four year period based
on the taxes received, rather than being given up-front at the time
the project is completed. He stated the tax base does not remain
frozen, but must be inflated at the rate of surrounding property.
He stated the original tax capacity inflates at a rate of about 31
percent which means that by the sixth year, the original tax
capacity rate overtakes the estimated value of this property.
Mr. Robertson introduced Ms. Mary Molzahn, Financial Advisor on
HRA projects, to answer any questions from the Council.
Ms. Molzahn stated the original tax capacity is normally frozen,
in time, at the current value of the parcel of land ($9,695) for
the whole term of the district. She stated an adjustment factor
is required in an economic development district and, in this case,
it is 31 percent which was based on figures over a five year
period. She stated, therefore, every year the tax capacity will
increase by 31 percent and, in 1997, the base will surpass the
estimated value so no tax increment could be generated.
Councilman Billings
capacity.
Ms . Mol z ahn stated t
if a district is not
the estimated tax
$41,250. She stated
is being inflated a
asked Ms. Molzahn to explain original tax
he original tax capacity would remain the same,
created. She stated if a district is created,
capacity upon completion of the project is
beginning in 1992, the estimated tax capacity
t a three percent inflation factor.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TING OF FSHRIIARY 26, 1990 PAGE 5
Councilman Billinqs asked why the inflation factor only qoes up
three percent and the adjustment factor goes up thirty percent.
Ms. Molzahn stated the thirty percent is based on historical
figures and is fairly conservative.
Councilman Billings asked if the Housing & Redevelopment Authority
assisted with this project, if taxes would go up thirty percent a
year.
Ms. Molzahn stated that is not the case and those taxes will
continue to be paid forever on the $9,695 value (original tax
capacity). She stated, however, the total tax liability, once the
building is completed, would be based on the $41,250 figure, the
value of the new project. She stated they would be paying about
97 percent of this figure in taxes.
Councilman Billings stated the taxes generated would be divided
between the City, County, school districts, and other taxing
authorities. He stated if development does not occur on this
parcel, it is reasonable to assume that no new taxes will be
generated for a long time. He stated, on the other hand, if the
Housing & Redevelopment Authority assists with this project, the
taxing authorities gain an immediate benefit because taxes will be
increasing thirty percent a year.
Councilman Billings stated it is confusing that Senator Frank
favors eliminating tax increment financing because he feels it has
a negative impact on the school district, when this shows there is
an immediate positive impact to the school districts. He stated
he would like to know Senator Frank's reasoning why this is not a
good idea.
Ms. Molzahn stated when this terminates in 1997, taxes will be
going to the school districts, City, and County on the increased
value that has accumulated.
Councilman Schneider stated the thirty percent is based on the
historical increase of the land tax value. He stated it seems
fairly clear the property would not increase thirty percent if it
was vacant. He stated as soon as the property is locked into a
development district, a fairly high increase on value is
guaranteed.
Mr. Robertson stated this does not happen in a redevelopment
district where there is a freeze, but, in this case, it would be
an economic development district.
Councilman Schneider questioned what would happen if an economic
development district is created, but plans fall through several
years later.
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL ME$TING OF FEBRIIARY 26, 1990 PAGE 6
Ms. Molzahn stated if nothing happened in the district, it would
probably be de-certified. She stated they re-adjust the adjustment
factor every year.
Mayor Nee stated he understands the developer would be liable if
a district is created and development did not occur.
No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this Northco Phase
III development.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 8:10 p.m.
2. PUBLIC HEARING FOR 1990 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at
8:10 p.m.
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated the City was notified by
Anoka County that $104,000 in Community Development Block Grant
funds is available for 1990. She stated the proposed allocation
of these funds are as follows: $70,000 for the Riverview Heights
Project; $33,291 for Human Services; and $1,000 to the County for
administrative fees.
Ms. Dacy stated a later agenda item requires action by the Council
to submit the City's request for these funds to the County by
February 28, 1990.
Ms. Dacy stated the Planning and Human Resources Commissions have
recommended approval of the allocations as outlined.
No persons in the audience spoke regarding the allocation of these
funds.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 8:12 p.m.
FRIDLSY CITY COIINCIL ME$TINQ OF FBBRIIARY 26, 1990 PAGE 7
OLD BUSINESS•
3. ORDINANCE NO 944 RECODIFYING TiIE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY
AMENDING APPENDIX F TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADJiJSTMENT OF SALARIES
�'OR THE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
2 07 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and adopt
Ordinance No. 944 on second reading and order publication.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
4. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR KEITH'S AUTO BODY. 7570 IiIGHWAY
65 N.E.:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this property is located at
7570 Highway 65 and zoned M-1. She stated there are two existing
buildings on this parcel that contain a variety of industrial uses.
Ms. Dacy stated the Council considered this request on August 28,
1989 and tabled action until identification of the fee owner could
be established and staff was to work with the petitioner on some
code violations.
Ms. Dacy stated in working with the petitioner and City Attorney's
office, it has been determined that American Trustee Life Company
is the owner and they are trying to sell the property to a
partnership. She stated they have refused to sign this request,
however, the City Attorney recommends the City proceed on this
special use permit request because of its unique nature.
Ms. Dacy stated the Council has authorized the sewer improvement
project for this property which was the most significant code
violation.
Ms. Dacy stated it is recommended the special use permit be
approved with seven stipulations which she outlined.
Councilman Schneider asked what improvements were contained in
Darrel Clark's letter of August 30, 1989.
Ms. Dacy stated they basically involved handrails and some
electrical items.
Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Poppenhagen if he understood all the
stipulations.
Mr. Poppenhagen stated he was not aware of the stipulations for the
front of the building.
Ms. Dacy stated these were outlined in a letter to Mike Thompson
and a copy could be furnished to Mr. Poppet�agen.
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF FEHRIIARY 26, 1990 PAGE 8
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, asked if there are any new developments
in the purchase of this property.
Mr. Poppenhagen stated he should know more this week as they have
been waiting for financing. He stated because there was no sewer
service, at this time, no one wanted to provide the financing,
however, he has approached his bank and should be obtaining a loan.
Mr. Herrick stated the ownership of the property is not critical
because the special use permit is given to Mr. Poppenhagen as the
operator of the business.
Mr. Poppenhagen stated if he wished to sell his business, he would
like the special use permit to be transferrable.
Mr. Herrick stated the procedure would be for a potential buyer to
request a transfer and, at that stage, it is reviewed by the
Council. He stated a transfer would not automatically occur.
Mr. Poppenhagen stated he would feel more comfortable if something
could be added to the effect that the special use permit is not
transferrable except by approval of the City Council.
Councilman Schneider stated he felt this wording could be added to
the stipulations.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grant Special Use Permit,
SP #89-08, with the following stipulations: (1) The special use
permit shall be limited to Keith's Auto Body, and is not
transferable to another tenant without City Council approval; (2)
The special use penait shall be reviewed on an annual basis by
staff, with a report to the City Council. Should a hearing by the
City Council be necessary due to lack of compliance by the
petitioner, the item shall be scheduled for City Council
consideration as soon as possible; (3) The connection to City sewer
shall be completed within four months after provision of the
sanitary sewer line to the property; (4) The building code
improvements outlined in Darrel Clark's letter of August 30, 1989
shall be completed by January l, 1991; (5) Trailers in front of the
building shall be removed by July l, 1990, or a special use permit
for exterior storage must be requested and approved prior to July
l, 1990; (6) The storage area for the auto body outdoor storage
must be screened by a six foot opaque fence in compliance with the
City Code within one month of completion of the sanitary sewer
connection work on the property; and (7) The parking lot shall be
hardsurfaced, striped, lined with concrete curb, and landscaping
installed as per the staff recommended plan by January 1, 1992.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCZL MEETINa OF F$BRIIARY 26. 1990 PAQE 9
5. VARIANCE RE4UEST V #89-15 FOR KEITH'S AUTO BODY 7570
HIGHWAY 65 N.E.:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated staff is recommending denial
of this variance on the basis that the petitioner has the
opportunity to place the sign in a position that would not violate
the City Sign Code. She stated the Appeals Commission recommended
approval by 3 to 1 vote with the following two stipulations: (1)
the variance is approved pending approval of the special use
permit; and (2) the variance is approved for this sign, and this
tenant only.
Mr. Poppenhagen stated he felt if the variance is not granted it
would reduce his visibility for persons traveling northbound on
Highway 65. He also stated it would be better to locate the sign
in the area he is proposing because it is not, as yet, blacktopped.
Councilman Schneider stated he felt there was no real hardship
since the petitioner could meet the code requirements.
Mr. Poppenhagen stated if the sign was installed now to meet the
code requirements, it would be in the middle of the parking lot.
Councilman Schneider stated once the driveway was constructed, it
would not be in the middle of the parking lot.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to�deny Variance Request,
VAR #89-15, on the basis that there is no hardship indicated.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the other businesses on the
property wanted exterior signage where it would be located.
Ms. Dacy stated only one pylon sign would be permitted.
Councilwoffian Jorgensan stated if a pylon sign is located towards
Lampert Lumber ancl there were other requests for signs of equal
visibility, it would create a problem in the future.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS•
6. APPROVAL OF RELEASE OF TAX FORFEIT LAND:
Mr. Winson, Assistant Public Works Director, stated notice has been
received from the County that seven parcels of land in Fridley will
become tax forfeit as of September 1, 1990. He stated they have
requested a response from the City by March 16, 1990 regarding
these parcels.
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL ME$TING OF FBBRIIARY 26. 1990 PAGE 10
Mr. Winson stated Parcel No. 48 consists of right-of-way along
Highway 65 north of 73rd Avenue. He stated staff is recommending
this parcel be transferred to the City as fee property, as it would
be useful for the City's Viron Road extension.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with staff's
recommendation for Parcel No. 48 to be transferred to the City as
fee property. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Winson stated the next four Parcels No. 49, 50, 51, and 52 are
condo sites. He stated staff is recommending these parcels be
combined and sold for construction of a single unit as defined in
the Innsbruck Plat.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with staff's
recommendation for Parcels 49 through 52 to combine these parcels
and sold for construction of a single unit. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Councilman Schneider felt the Townhouse Association should be
notified of this action.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Winson stated Parcel 53 is an empty lot on 2nd and 48th
Streets. He stated the parcel is not buildable by itself and
should be combined with Parcels 13 and 14.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to notify Anoka County the City
has no interest in Parcel 53 and that this parcel is unbuildable
by itself. Seconded by Councilman Schneider.
Councilman Fitzpatrick asked about the location of dwellings
adjacent to this parcel and staff stated there is a home on the
property line between Lots 13 and 14.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
Mr. Winson stated Parcel 54 is an empty parcel on Liberty Street
east of Ashton Avenue. He stated the parcel is unbuildable by
itself and should be combined with Parcel 10 or 12.
Councilman Fitzpatrick questioned the location of dwellings
adjacent to this parcel and requested staff to research this
information.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to table action on Parcel 54 for
further information from staff. Seconded by Councilman Schneider.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL lL$$TINQ OF FBBRIIARY 26. 1990 PAGE 11
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
7. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
FEBRUARY 14. 1990:
A. APPROVAL OF 1990 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROPOSAL•
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated the proposed use of the 1990
Community Development Block Grant funds is to allocate $70,000 for
Riverview Heights; $33, 291 for Human Services; and $1, 000 for Anoka
County's administrative fee. She stated the anticipated costs to
relocate the owners of Parcel 5 is $100,000 to $110,000. She
stated in order to make up the difference between the City's
allocation and the projected estimate, two communities in the
County were found that would trade their 1990 funds. She stated
these are Burns Township for $39,400 and Ramsey for $26,000. Ms.
Dacy stated there would then be monies available to consummate the
purchase in 1990. She stated, however, in 1991, those funds would
have to be returned so Parcel 4 could not be purchased until 1992.
Ms. Dacy stated another consideration is that CDBG funds may not
exist in the future.
Councilman Fitzpatrick stated the owners of Parcel 4 are very
interested in the City purchasing their property. He stated the
owner of Parcel 5 has not made it known if he is interested in
selling.
Ms. Dacy stated Parcel 4 could be acquired rather than Parcel 5.
However, staff was recommending Parcel 5 be purchased first because
when the park plat is developed, Parcel 4 is at the corner and
would not be near the middle of proposed activities.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked what would happen to the home if the
City acquires it.
Ms. Dacy stated the ACCAP is interested in relocating the home to
another location.
Councilman Fitzpatrick asked the status of Parcel 6. Ms. Dacy
stated the relocation analysis has been completed and a purchase
agreement is ready to be executed for final action by June.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if there were no CDBG funds next year,
what would happen if the City had traded funds.
Ms. Dacy stated if there were no CDBG funds, the City would not be
held responsible and the funds traded would not have to be repaid.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF F88RIIARY 26, 1990 PAGE 12
Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if the Parks and Recreation Commission
has made a recommendation as to the acquisition of Parcel 4 or
Parcel 5.
Ms. Dacy stated, as of this date, the Commission has taken no
position on this issue.
Ms. Dacy stated the Iverson's want to know the City's ultimate
plans and felt they wanted some direction this year, if possible.
Councilman Fitzpatrick stated some members of the Council may not
have been exposed to the Iverson's problem.
Ms. Dacy stated the action for the Council this evening, however,
is to approve the allocation of the 1990 Community Development
Block Grant funds.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the following
allocations for the 1990 Community Development Block Grant funds:
Riverview Heights, $70,000; Human Services, $33,291; and Anoka
County administrative fee, $1,000. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
The Council received the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting
of February 14, 1990.
8. APPROVAL OF OFFICE PAPER RECYCLING CONTRACT WITH AAGARD
SANITATION•
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated when the Super Cycle
collapse occurred in May, 1989, the City discontinued its office
paper recycling. She stated to begin the office paper recycling
program, Aagard Sanitation can provide weekly pickup of a 1-1/2
cubic yard container at $35.00 per month. She stated this is a
cost of $23.00 per ton and will be reimbursed by the Anoka County
grant.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the City Manager to
execute a contract for service with Aagard Sanitation at a start-
up cost of $72.57 in March and $35.00 per month thereafter for a
total annual cost of $457.57. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCxL MEETINQ OF F88RIIARY 26. 1990 PAGE 13
9. RESOLUTION NO. 17-1990 MODIFYING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO 1 TO REFLECT INCREASED PROJECT COSTS
AND INCREASED GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND MODIFYING THE TAX INCREMENT
�INANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 1
THROUGH NO 9 TO REFLECT INCREASED PROJECT COSTS AND INCREASED
GEOGRAPHIC AREA WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. l: AND
ESTABLISHING PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO 10
AND APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO:
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated staff
recommends the Council consider adoption of this resolution to
establish Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 for Phase III of
the Northco plat. He stated an 18,400 square foot building will
be constructed resulting in approximately 25 new jobs, and the
facility will add over $850,000 of additional market valuation to
the City's tax base.
Mr. Robertson stated in order to proceed with construction of this
building, soil correction is needed and tax increment will assist
with the increased costs to correct these conditions. He stated
without this assistance, development would not be economically
feasible and would not proceed in the near future.
Mayor Nee stated there have been several proposals for development
of this site, however, when the costs were figured for the soil
correction, it was not economically feasible.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 17-1990.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated she understands this will be a short
term tax increment financing project and the property will increase
in value, with inflation as judged over the previous five years,
and will correct itself each year so the school districts and
County will be receiving their appropriate share of the increases
generated by development of that property.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
10. RESOLUTION NO. 18-1990 APPROVING PLAT, P.S. #90-01, NORTHCO
BUSINESS PARK 2ND ADDITION:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this property abuts the
University Avenue service road on the west and 73rd Avenue on the
north. She stated this lot was one of the original lots of the
Northco plat, however, this plat is necessary in order to obtain
financing.
Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission has recommended approval
of the plat with five stipulations attached as Exhibit A to the
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MESTINQ OF FBBRII!!RY 26, 1990 PAGE 14
resolutian of which she outlined. She stated the Planning
Commission stipulation regarding the joint driveway easements was
to resolve the setback issue. She stated because the proposed
joint driveway is located centered on the proposed lot line and
the Building Inspector, City Attorney, and Planning Staff has
concurred that the setback, as proposed, meets the spirit and
intent of the ordinance, it is recommended this stipulation be
eliminated.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 18-1990 with
the stipulations attached as Exhibit A. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated with this development and the one to
the north, there would be a curb cut on 73rd Avenue. She asked if
there would be another curb cut on 73rd Avenue to access the future
development on the north portion of Parcel 2.
Ms. Dacy stated one driveway cut was to be shared and authorized
by the development agreement. She stated in the second phase of
this proposal, there could be a curb cut on to 73rd Avenue, but
that would preclude Lot 1 from having the driveway. Ms. Dacy
stated on the basis of previous plat approval, there is only one
driveway cut on Lot 1 or 2 or shared.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated there was only to be one curb cut on
73rd Avenue to be shared by all three of those properties. She
stated they are now looking at two, possibly three.
Ms. Dacy stated the loop-back was not part of the Northco Business
Plat and was owned separately by the Soo Line Railroad.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated in discussions with the neighbors,
the Council assured them there would only be one curb cut to insure
the residents' access to their properties.
Ms. Dacy stated when the development application is received, the
City could evaluate whether an access would be appropriate.
Councilman Billings stated Councilwoman Jorgenson has raised a very
valid point. He stated he would like to table this item to the
next meeting and request staff to review the stipulations that were
on the original Northco plat and forward them to the Council so
that any that are appropriate can be applied on this plat as well.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this item. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Carlson, Executive Vice President for Northco, stated the issue
whether the plat would be approved does not seem to relate to the
driveway. He stated the one driveway in their plat that is
�RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL 1�E$TING OF FSBRIIARY 26, 1990 PAG$ 15
permitted has already been established. He stated if this item is
tabled, it would delay construction of the project. Mr. Carlson
stated this issue does not relate to the separate development in
which they are involved. He stated it is not a full access
driveway.
Councilman Billings stated he is concerned with the fact that
throughout the discussion on the replatting of this particular lot
of the Northco development, he has not seen the stipulations on the
entire Northco development. He stated he wanted to make sure that
the original stipulations that pertain are made part of the
stipulations of this plat.
Ms. Dacy stated when they evaluated the plat, they did qo through
the development agreement. She stated the development agreement
has been assigned to the Robert Larsen Partnership and the
responsibilities assigned to the new property owners. She stated
the development agreement requires that subsequent purchasers have
to abide by the stipulations.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if there was a time constraint for
beginning construction.
Mr. Doran, representing Robert Larsen Partnership, stated he needed
to start construction shortly.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated the Council will be meeting on
March 7 and asked if the item could be brought to the Council at
that time.
Mr. Doran stated he felt from research of the development
agreement, it states there is only to be one curb cut from those
two lots on 73rd Avenue. He stated they have complied with this
requirement. He stated in the course of the land sale, there is
an easement provision that provides for common access and use for
that curb cut, as well as to the curb cut on the south. He stated
he would propose, in lieu of coming back to the Council, to allow
staff to review this matter to make sure the plat conforms to the
development agreement.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated she is only looking at one curb cut
on 73rd Avenue whether it be with the Northco property or Soo Line
property.
Mr. Robertson stated the loop-back was not part of that plat.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated with the short stacking space, the
timing of the stoplight, and the close access to the adjacent
residential area, she felt there would be a major problem going
east and west. She stated she is concerned about two driveways
that close to the intersection.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF F$BRIIARY 26, 1990 PAQ$ 16
Mr. Robertson stated as he understands, there is a difference in
the congestion when you have a right in and right out and a full
movement driveway.
Mr. Winson, Assistant Public Works Director, stated that is
generally true and with improvements on 73rd Avenue, there probabZy
will be additional median work.
Mr. Doran stated as part of the Planning Commission's
recommendati.on for approval, there was a stipulation for a joint
driveway easement.
Mr. Carlson stated he would have no objection if the Council
reaffirms that there would be only one driveway. He stated there
is no change whatsoever in the manner Larsen Partners are
developing this parcel from the way it was originally presented to
the Council. He stated there would be only one driveway access
between the frontage road and the Carter Day entrance. Mr. Carlson
stated it is contained in the development agreement and he did not
believe it could be changed without coming before the Council.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to reconsider this item and remove
it from the table. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 18-1990 with
the following stipulations, attached as Exhibit A: (1) Storm water
calculations shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building
permit; (2) Joint driveway easements shall be filed against both
parcels prior to issuance of a building permit; (3) A separate
ponding easement(s) shall be dedicated by separate document prior
to the issuance of a building permit; (4) The landscaping plan
shall be revised to include additional screening at the southwest
corner of the site. The revised site plan shall be reviewed and
approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit; and (5)
Payment of park dedication fees prior to issuance of a building
permit. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to amend the stipulations by adding
Stipulation No. 6 to read as follows: "Any driveway access to 73rd
Avenue shall be a joint driveway between Lot 2, Block 2 of the 2nd
Addition and Lot 1, Block 1, of the Northco Business Park plat.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF F$BRIIARY 26, 1990 PAGE 17
11. RESOLUTION NO 19-1990 ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF
PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS• STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO ST 1990 - 1(OVERLAY):
Mr. Winson, Assistant Public Works Director, stated this resolution
orders the improvement, approval of plans, and authorizes
advertisement for bids for this overlay project to include
placement of the final asphalt on several City streets. He stated
funds are available in the City's Street Maintenance Account.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 19-1990.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
12. RESOLUTION NO 20-1990 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: REET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. ST 1990 - 10 lSEALCOAT):
Mr. Winson, Assistant Public Works Director, stated this resolution
orders the improvement, approval of plans, and authorizes
advertisement for bids for the City's sealcoat project. He stated
funds are available in the City's 1990 Street Capital Improvement
Fund.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 20-1990.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
13. RESOLUTION NO 21-1990 ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS:
REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER
AND SIDEWALK - 1990:
Mr. Winson, Assistant Public Works Director, stated this resolution
orders the improvement, approval of plans, and advertisement for
bids for miscellaneous concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk repair
for 1990.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 21-1990.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
14. �tESOLUTION NO 22-1990 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND ADVERTISEMENT
FOR BIDS FOR THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF PHASE II OF THE
3 MG CONCRETE RESERVOIR REPAIR PROJECT NO. 200:
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adopt Resolution No. 22-1990.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLSY CITY CODNCIL MEETINa OF F$BRIIARY 26. 1990 PAGE 18
15. RESOLUTION NO 23-1990 TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR ONE (1)
1250 GPM PUMPER1AERIAL TOWER:
Mr. Larson, Deputy Fire Chief, stated this pumper will replace a
1964 pumper that cannot be refurbished or brought into compliance
with current OSHA requirements. He stated the OSHA requirements
do not permit firefighters to ride on the outside of the apparatus.
Mr. Larson stated the purchase of this unit is in keeping with the
Department's equipment planning that provides a reasonable time
span between purchases of major pieces of apparatus.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 23-1990.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
16. YEAR END ADJUSTMENT. GRANT NO. 8025:
This item was deleted from the agenda.
17. CLAIMS:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize payment of Claims No.
30762 through 30946. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
18. LICENSES•
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the licenses as
submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
19. ESTIMATES•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to
submitted:
JMG Contracting
5141 Abbott Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55410
Phase I- 3 MG Concrete
Repair Project No.
(Contractor)
AMENDED FINAL ESTIMATE .
Reservoir
192
approve the estimates as
. . . . . . . . . . $ 1, 000. 00
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL 1I8ETIHG O� �BBRQl1RY 26 1990 PAGE 19
AEC Engineers & Desiqners
511 - llth Avenue South
Minneapolis, I+IId 55415
Phase I- 3 MG Concrete Reservoir
Repair Project No. 192
(Inspection Services)
Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
HNTB
6700 France Avenue South
Suite 260
Minneapolis, l�I 55435
55.00
Design of 1.5 MG Elevated Reservoir
at Locke Park, Project No. 196
Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $15,600.00
Twin City Testing
662 Cromwell Avenue
St . Paul , I�1 55114
Soil Borings for the 1.5 MG
Elevated Reservoir at Locke
Park, Project No. 196
Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,684.23
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded
by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular
Meeting of the Fridley City Council of February 26, 1990 adjourned
at 9:31 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad
Secretary to the City Council
Approved:
William J. Nee
Mayor
T8B MINOT88 OF T88 8P8CIllL a'RIDLBY CITY COtJ�iCIL 1i88'1'I�tG O!'
ItA�CB 7, 1990
��. ;;;.. � Y : .3 -
_ . ..; . . . , : ,: � _
�} { _ � y; � �. �
� ,,
�' � <•�� '` ,�`"..� '� �, , � � - vf �'`'
„ . ,.
: ,. �r� . _ .. -� -�:� .,
THE MINIITES OF THB SPECIAL MEETING OF THE FRIDLSY CITY COUNCIL OF
MARCH ?, 1990
The Special Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Nee.
ROLL CALL•
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman
Schneider, Councilman Billings and Councilman
Fitzpatrick (arrived at 7:47 p.m.)
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
The purpose of this meeting was to receive the bids and award the
sale of general obligation refunding bonds.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated recent tax increment financing
amendments passed by the Legislature have caused a review by the
City of tax increment bonds. He stated the impact of these
amendments is that no tax increment financing from pre-1979
districts could be used after the year 2001 unless it is needed to
pay debt service on bonds issued before April l, 1990.
Mr. Burns stated in order to accomplish the City's redevelopment
objectives, and comply with the law, it was decided the City should
refinance the existing debt. He stated that on February 12, 1990
the Council adopted a resolution to proceed with the sale of tax
increment refunding bonds.
Mr. Burns stated the purpose of this meeting is to award the sale
of these bonds. He stated information before the Council includes
a resolution accepting the bid for the sale of these bonds; a bond
facsimile; a copy of the Tax Increment Pledge Agreement that will
be considered at the Housing & Redevelopment Authority's meeting
on March 8, 1990; the City Clerk's certificate attesting to the
authenticity and completeness of the minutes of this meeting; a
proposed escrow agreement between the City and First Trust, its
proposed escrow agent; and five exhibits that are to be used by the
escrow agent in the disposal of bond proceeds.
Mr. Burns stated there is a change in the amount of the bonds from
$9,445,000 to $9,485,000 which Mr. Casserly will address. He
stated Mr. O'Meara will also present information regarding Section
26 of House File No. 2209.
Mr. Casserly, Miller & Schroder Financial, Inc., stated the bid
for the sale of these bonds was opened at 11 a.m. today. He stated
the following bids were received:
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARC$ 7, 1990_ PAGE 2
Bidder
Norwest Investment Services, Inc.
Allison Williams Company
FBS Investment Services, Inc.
Merrill Lynch Capital Markets
Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc.
American National Bank of St. Paul
Cronin & Company, Inc.
Robert W. Baird & Company, Inc.
Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Yost, Inc.
John G. Kinnard & Company, Inc.
Marquette Bank Minneapolis, N.A.
Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
Prudential-Bache Capital
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
Tucker, Anthony & R.L. Day, Inc.
Dain Bosworth, Incorporated
Edward D. Jones and Co.
Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc.
Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.
The Northern Trust Company
Park Investment Corporation
Blunt, Ellis & Loewi, Inc.
Clayton Brown & Associates, Inc.
Griffin, Kubik, Stephens and
Thompson, Inc.
Net Interest Cost
6.9587$
($10,397,401.73)
6.9850�
($10,436,681.53)
6.991012$
($10,445,650.42)
7.0218�
($10,491,713.00)
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the above bids.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Casserly stated the difference in interest rates of the top
three bidders is within .04 percent. He stated the bond buyer has
an index of rated bonds and their index was 7.25�, and the coupon
rate on these bonds is 6.86�. He stated this all suggests that
this is a very high quality bond rated AA. Mr. Casserly stated
these bonds are about a half of a percent under the rate of the
bonds which will be replaced.
Mr. Casserly stated the par amount of the bonds is $9,485,000 with
accrued interest from March 1, 1990 to March 28, 1990 of
$48,684.75. He outlined the total uses as follows: underwriter's
discount, $139,195.4I; costs of issuance, $76,888.57; deposit to,
debt service fund, $48,684.75; and deposit to escrow fund,j
$9,268,916.02. i
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL ME$TING OF M1�iRCH 7. 1990 PAGB 3
Mr. Casserly presented the debt service schedule of these bonds.
He stated the average coupon is 6.86� and net interest cost is
6.95$.
At this time, 7:4� p.m., Councilman Fitzpatrick arrived at the
meeting.
Mr. Casserly presented the debt service comparison schedule. He
stated the net present value would be about $24,000-$25,000.
Mr. Casserly stated the bids were close and under the national
average, which is usually the case in Minnesota.
Mr. O'Meara, Briggs and Morgan Law Offices, stated House File
No. 2209 is a bill containing proposed tax increment amendments.
He stated it seems the bill takes a dim view of tax increment
financing and that local officials are not capable of making
intelligent or responsible decisions. He stated the bill is also
somewhat punitive in areas.
Mr. O'Meara stated when the original tax increment law was passed,
the termination date for pre-1979 tax increment districts was 2009.
He stated two years ago, the Legislature made a change and the tax
increment districts were to terminate in the year 2001, the
exception being if increment was needed to pay for bonds which were
issued on or before April 1, 1990. He stated the bonds the Council
is considering utilizes this provision.
Mr. O'Meara stated language contained in House File No. 2209 states
the bonds would have to be outstanding on March 1, 1990 and,
essentially, moves back the effective date. He stated the City
has tax increment districts and can continue to take the tax
increment, but increment from bonds issued between March 1, 1990
and April 1, 1990 has to be used to pay for older bond issues. He
stated current debt service cannot be paid, but the City must
bankroll the funds to pay for debt service by the year 2001. He
stated excess increment could not be used for current project costs
and, in effect, nothing goes beyond the year 2001.
Mayor Nee asked how this impacts the City's redevelopment plans.
Mr. Casserly stated the City probably would not be affected until
after the year 2001, but was not sure how much of an impact it
would mean for Fridley.
Mr. O'Meara stated there would be some adverse effect on the total
benefit, but he did not feel it would be a total renunciation.
Mr. Casserly stated hearings are now being conducted on this
proposed bill. He felt there would be a tax increment bill,
however, it would probably not be anything like the one proposed
as it was an absolutely vicious bill. He stated the bill
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEBTINQ OF MARCH 7. 1990 PAGE 4
eliminates all types of projects and destroys the City's ability
to proceed with projects. He stated it would eliminate projects
like Northco, which the City recently approved. Mr. Casserly
stated it is a punitive measure as it impacts the existing
districts based on their duration. He stated it is the pre-1979
districts where there is a concern and Center City is the only such
district in Fridley. He stated the bill goes against normal
procedures to be accomplished in a redevelopment district.
Mr. Burns stated he understands the bill would eliminate land
writedowns.
Mr. o'Meara stated Mr. Burns is correct and property would have to
be sold at fair market value.
Mr. Casserly stated the City of Minneapolis is in the process of
calculating how this bill wou2d affect their tax increment
districts. He stated he would like to compare this information
with Fridley's tax increment districts. He stated if he can obtain
this information, he would share it with the Council.
Councilman Schneider stated he spoke with Senator Frank and
Representative Simoneau regarding tax increment districts. He
stated Representative Simoneau stated they would not hurt the
little guys. He stated, however, he did not really know if
Representative Simoneau truly understands the impact on cities.
RESOLUTION NO 24-1990 ACCEPTING BID ON SALE OF APPROXIMATELY
S9 485 000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS OF 1990
AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR ISSUANCE:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 24-1990,
accepting the low bid from Norwest Investment Services, Inc. for
the sale of these bonds at a net interest cost of 6.9587�.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adjourn the meeting. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Special Meeting
of the Fridley City Council of March 7, 1990 adjourned at 8:03 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secretary to the City Council Mayor
Approved:
MEMORANDUM
� cie� •� fri�i•y WYliam C. Hunt
_� •1�1 Y�I��r�ity At���• N.E.
F� � e �• r. ��� A� • o�• s � a s: Assistant to the City Mena9er
'Aon• (�12)671-��i0
MBMO TO: IiZLLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY 1+iANAGER :��
L�, -
FROM: WILLIAM C. BQNT, 7i1B8I8TANT TO THE CITY MANAGER ,�'/�
✓
SIIBJECT: AMENDMENTB TO CHARTER BECTIONB 7.04, 7.05, 7.07, AND 7.09
DATE: FEBRIIARY 7� 1990
At its meeting of January 29 the Fridley Charter Commission voted
to recommend certain amendments to Chapter 7 of the Fridley City
Charter which relate to budget schedules and to the matter of
passing the budget. The Charter Commission is recommending that
in light of recent changes in State Law the budget be adopted by
resolution rather than by ordinance. These changes are indicated
in the attached ordinance. Also attached is a January 19, 1990
memo from Sharon Fetting to me outlining the rationale behind the
proposed changes. The only difference is that in Section 7.04 the
Charter Commission chose to retain language about publication even
though they agreed to change the consideration of the budget from
the first to the last regular monthly meeting in August.
At its January 29 meeting the Charter Commission also voted to
expedite this matter to the Council for consideration prior to the
approval of the January 29 minutes at the February 26, 1990 meeting
of the Charter Commission.
Accordingly, I request that you present this ordinance to the
Council at its meeting of February 12, 1990 with the request to set
a public hearing on the proposed changes on the Charter for March
12, 1990.
WCH/jb
cc: Fridley Charter Commission
�
1A
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCB l�MENDING BECTIONB ?.04, T.05�
7.07, l�ND 7.09 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHA1tT$R
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as f�llows:
That the following sections of the Fridley City Charter be amended as
follows:
Section 7.04. PREPARATION OF ANNUAL BUDGET.
1. The City Manager shall prepare the estimates for the annual budget which
shall include any estimated deficit for the current year. The estimates
of expenditures shall be submitted by each department to the City
Manager. Each estimate shall be divided into three (3) major
subdivisions as follows: (a) Salaries and Wages, (b) Ordinary Expenses,
(c) Capital Outlay. Salary detail shall show a list of all salaried
officers and positions with salary allowance and number of persons
holding each. Wages shall be broken down in sufficient detail to
justify the request. Ordinary expenses shall be broken down into such
detail as the City Manager shall direct. Capital Outlay shall be
itemized as to items and amounts. (Ref. Ord. 625)
2. In parallel columns shall be added the amounts expended under similar
headings for the two (2) preceding fiscal years, and, as far as
practicable, the amounts expended and estimated for expenditure during
the current year. In addition to estimates of expenditures, the City
Manager shall prepare a detailed statement of revenues collected for the
two (2) preceding completed fiscal years with amounts estimated to be
collected for the current fiscal year, and an estimate of revenues for
the ensuing fiscal year. The estimates shall be submitted to the
Council at its €�st last regular monthly meeting in August and shall
be published twice in summary in the official publication prior to �e
T��7��c} �^°��~~ November 15. (Ref. Ord. 625)
Section 7.05. PASSAGE OF THE BUDGET.
The budget shall be �e a principal item of business at the €�s.� last
regular monthly meeting of the Council in August, and the Council shall hold
subsequent meetings from time to time until all the estimates have been
considered. The meetings shall be so conducted as to give interested
citizens a reasonable amount of time in which to be heard, and an
opportunity to ask questions. The budget estimates shall be read in full
and the City Manager shall explain the various items thereof as fully as may
be deemed necessary by the Council. The annual budget finally agreed upon
shall set forth in such detail as may be determined by the City Council, the
complete financial plan of the City for the ensuing fiscal year, and shall
be signed by the majority of the Council upon being adopted. It shall
indicate the sums to be raised and from what sources, and the sums to be
spent and for what purposes, according to the plan indicated in Section
7.04. The total sum appropriated shall• not exceed the total estimated
revenue. The Council shall adopt the budget ����g ��e-�Rn�� e€ �e�e�e� �az
■1�:
bv resolution in accordance with State Law. The resolution
shall set forth the total of the budget and the totals of the major
divisions of the budget, according to the plan indicated in Section 7.04.
The budget e�d�-��se resolution as adopted shall be published in the
official publication. (Ref. Ord. 625)
Section 7.07. ALTERATIONS IN THE BUDGET. -.
After the budget shall have been duly adopted, the Council shall not have
power to increase the amounts therein fixed, whether by the insertion of new
items or otherwise, beyond the estimated revenues, unless the actual
receipts shall exceed such estimates, and in that event, not beyond such
actual receipts. The sums fixed in the budget shall be and become
appropriated at the beginning of the fiscal year for the several purposes
named therein, and no other. The Council may at any time, by
resolution passed by a vote of at least four (4) members of the Council,
reduce salaries or the sums appropriated for any purpose by the budget, or
by vote of at least four (4) members of the Council authorize the transfer
of sums from the unexpended balances of the budget to other purposes.
Section 7.09. LEVY AND COLLECTION OF TAXES.
6���� �e€a�e t�e-�� �°��- _-� _•°�^'� � e^a� �•�� In accordance with Minnesota
State Law, the Council shall levy by resolution the taxes necessary to meet
the requirements of the budget for the ensuing fiscal year. The City Clerk
shall transmit to the county auditor annually, not later than the �^*��
date required by Minnesota Law, a statement of all the taxes
levied, and such taxes shall be collected and the payment thereof be
enforced with and in like manner as state and county taxes. No tax shall
be invalid by reason of any informality in the manner of levying the same,
nor because the amount levied shall exceed the amount required to be raised
for the special purpose for which the same is levied, but in that case the
surplus shall go into a suspense fund, and shall be used to reduce the levy
for the ensuing year. (Ref. Ord. 625)
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY
OF , 1990.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
Public Hearing: March 12, 1990
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
1C
T0:
s�ox:
czr�r os s�DLaY
YE�[Oit71�DD1[
RILLZAI[ C. aQfiT, �88Z8T71�iT TO T8E CITY ��10ER
i8l1RO�T lETTI�IG, BTAIrl� �CC0011R'71Z1T ��"
BQHJECT: Civ1PTER dEVE1�I O! TSE CITY CS�IRTER
Dl1TB : J11N�ARY 19 , 3! 9 0
As you are aware, trith the passaqe of the property tax bills in
1988 and durinq the special legislative session last year, certain
sections of Chapter Seven of the City Charter have been rendered
outdated. I have prepared some �uqgested changes for these
sections. I would like to review the specific sections with you
which should be changed to be in conformance with Minnesota State
Law.
Section 7.04, Subdivision 2 requires the budqet estimates to be
"submitted to the Council at its first reqular monthly meeting in
Auqust". I believe this was required to ensure there was enough
time for the public to review the budqet prior to it's adoption in
October. Because State Law now requires that the budget be adopted
in November or December, and, we will not be notified of our levy
limit until I►uqust l, the presentation of the budget at the first
meeting in August seems to be premature. I have chanqed this to
read the "last reqular monthly meeting fn 1►ugust" . This will allow
for presentation of the budget prior to the "proposed tax levy"
being certified by September 1, as now required by I+IId Statutes,
Chapter 275.065, subdivision 1.
Section 7.04 also rec;uires that
prior to the Auqust meeting. ]
the fact all taxpayers will no�
property taxes. This should be
the property tax notices, we
resolution and a summary budget
State Law.
the budqet be published in 6ummary
have deleted this section due to
� receive notice of the proposed
adequate notification. Along with
publish both the final budget
statement as required by Minnesota
Section 7.05 also refers to having the budqet "be the principal
item of business at the first meetinq of the Council in l�uqust."
I chanqed this to also read the last meeting in August.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 275.065, subdivision 6 now requires us
to hold a public hearing between November 15 and December 20 to
adopt our budqet. The law states we must adopt a final budget and
property tax levy at the public hearing and that the final property
tax levy shall be adopted prior to passaqe of the budget. These
new requirements conflict with Section 7.05 of the Charter which
requir�s us to adopt a budget in October by ordinance. As you are
aware, passage of an ordinance r�quires two readings at separate
a�eetinqs. I believe in order to aeet this requirement, ve will have
to pass our Dudget with a r��olution rather than an ordinance. I
have cAanqed thie section to read �adopt the budqet by r�solution."
Other cities sucb as Robbinsdale, Coon Rapids, Blaine, and Brooklyn
C�nter approve their budget6 by resolution. -
Section 7.07 also has been chanqed to refer to alterations in the
budqet beinq passed by a resolution rather than an ordinance.
Section 7.09 requires the Council to levy by resolution a property
tax levy by November 5 of each year and to transmit this to the
County �uditor by November 10. I have changed these �entences to
read "in accordance with lriinnesota State Law".
The above is an overview of the attached sections of Chapter Seven
and their conflict with Kinnesota Statutes. Z would appreciate it
if you would review them with the Charter Commission. I would be
happy to answer any questions or provide any other information that
may be helpful.
cc: william w. Burns, City Hanaqer
Richard D. Pribyl, Finance Director
1D
�
�
unroF
F� ��
C011/tMUNI"['Y DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
M EMO RAN D UM
DATE: March 8, 1990
� �� �
To: William Burns, City Manager�;�'"
,
FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #89-19, Front and Side
Yard Setback Requests by Orville and Jeannine
Sachs
Background
The City Council tabled action on the variance request at 1281
Hathaway Lane N.E. in order for the petitioners to submit a
proposal to use a portion of outlot C for a garage. On September
26, 1989, Mr. and Mrs. Sachs submitted a letter and garage
expansion plan which would require approximately 40 feet of Outlot
C. Under this scenario, the Sachs' would then convert the present
garage into living space for the home.
Since that time, the Sachs' have decided not to pursue this plan
since they would incur additional land acquisition expenses for the
expansion onto Outlot C. Therefore, they have requested that the
City Council act on their variance requests in the front and side
yard setbacks.
Analvsis
Attached is the updated staff report for the three variance
requests which are:
1.
2.
To reduce the front yard setbck from 35 feet to 9.2 feet.
To reduce the side yard setback from 5 feet to 1 foot.
3. To reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.1 feet, to
permit an existing encroachment for the living area for the
house.
Appeals Commission Recommendation
The Appeals Commission on September 5, 1989 recommended denial of
the first two variance requests and approval of the third variance
request for the existing encroachment.
2
Sachs' Variance Request
March 8, 1990
Page 2
�itv Council Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the variance to
reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.1 feet. Another
alternative does exist for the Sachs' to pursue, which is expansion
of the existing garage as part of a two car garage. This would
only necessitate using approximately ten feet of Outlot C.
However, the Sachs' have stated that expanding on the existinq
garage would require them to realign the roof of the existing
garage, and they would incur additional expense. Despite the
existence of this option, the Sachs' have requested that the City
Council take action on the original variance requests.
They have also submitted a site plan which locates the driveway to
the west side of the proposed garage expansion rather than directly
in front of it. This would allow additional area for landscaping
in front of the garage.
Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the Appeals
Commission's recommendation based on the following findings:
1. Another alternative exists to expand the garage to the east
without the necessity of a front or side yard variance.
2. Expansion of the proposed garage into the front yard setback
poses a significant intrusion into the setback, which is
reserved to allow for off-street parking areas, preserve open
space, and permit adequate site lines.
Should the City Council approve the variance reguest, the following
stipulations are recommended:
1. Approval of the vacation request, to vacate the existing six
foot drainage and utility easement along the east lot line.
2. A grading and drainage plan be sulimitted for approval by City
staff.
3. The addition shall be architecturally compatible with the
existing house.
4. The driveway shall be located on the west side of the proposed
expansion so that landscaping can be installed along the front
of the expanded garage, and to allow for cars parked outside
of the building to be parked on the property and not into the
right-of-way.
BD/dn
M-90-166
r��
2B
-
� STAFF REPORT
A�/�.S DATE : September 5, 1989
CITY OF PLAM�VG COM��ISSION DATE
F(Zt DLEY CIl'Y OOI�VCIL DATE September 18 , 19 89 �� �/ dn
REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER
APPLICANT
PROPOSED REQUEST
LOCATION
SITE DATA
SIZE
DENStTY
PRESENT ZONING
ADJACENT LAND USES
�i Z�i�
��$
PARK DEDICATION
ANALYSIS
FNVANC{AL �IIPLICATIONS
CONFORMANCE TO
COMF�E�NE PLAN
t',OMPATBILtTY WITH
ADJACENT USES 8� ZONNG
ENV�ONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
APPEALS RECOMMENDATION
PLANNNG COMMISSION
RECOIVMMENDATION
VAR 4�89-19
Orville Sachs
See public hearing notice
1281 Hathaway Lane I3 .E .
Proposed garage addition - 24' x 24'
N/A
R-I, Single Family Dwelling
R-1 to the north, west and south; vacant lot to the east
zoned R-1
N/A
N/A
NJA
Yes
Yes
N/A
Denial
Denial
Staff Report
VAR #89-19, Orville Sachs
Page 2
A. PUBLIC PURPOSES SERVED BY REQUIREMENT:
�
Section 205.07.03.D.(1) requires a 35 foot front yard setback.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to preserve open
space, allow adequate sight lines and to allow for off-street
parking areas.
Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a) requires a 10 foot side yard
setback for a living space from the side property line.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to ensure that
an overcrowded condition does not exist and to preserve access
to the rear yard for emergency vehicles.
Section 205.07.03.B.(2).(b) requires a 5 foot side yard
setback for an attached accessory use to the side property
line.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to ensure
adequate separation between structures to prevent fire
spreading and to provide adequate space to allow emergency
equipment to have access to the rear yard.
B. STATED HARDSHIP:
"We purchased this house in 1988. Our house is six feet from
the property line and has only a single garage. Our realtor
told us it was 12 feet. We cannot expand enough on our
present garage to make a double garage."
C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
Request
Mr. Orville Sachs is requesting three variances which would allow
him to construct a 24' x 24' attached garage in the front yard on
Lot 8, Block 1, Parkview Oaks First Addition, the same being 1281
Hathaway Lane N.E.
Site
The site is a single family lot at the end of Hathaway Lane, which
is a dead-end street. The site has a somewhat rolling topography
with a steep driveway and to the east of the site is a vacant lot
that is currently owned by the City. The petitioner is proposing
to excavate the slope in front of the existing garage to allow for
the construction of the proposed garage.
2D
Staff Report
VAR #89-19, Orville Sachs
Page 3
Analysis
The proposed garage would allow for storage of several family owned
cars and would allow the Sachs' to renovate the existing garage and
turn it into additional living space. As proposed, the garage
would encroach into a 6 foot drainage and utility easement. The
Sachs' have applied to vacate this drainage and utility easement.
The proposed garage would also encroach into the front yard in such
a way that there would not be adequate room for off-street parking
for additional cars.
The petitioner has three alternatives to the proposed addition.
The petitioner could expand to the rear of the house, using the
existing garage as a drive-through. However, the dining room and
kitchen for the house is located directly behind the existing
garage, and would have to be relocated.
As was stated earlier, the City owns the vacant Outlot C to the
east of this property. This lot measures approximately 7,993
square feet. The Sachs' do have the option, if the City declares
this lot excess property, of bidding for and potentially buying
this vacant lot. Combined with their lot, this would give them
approximately an additional 40 feet in which to expand their
existing garage. However, the excess property process (about two
months) should occur first. The Sachs' would still have to vacate
the existing drainage and utility easement, and reconvey it farther
east to accommodate the electric, telephone and cable lines that
currently run along the east property line. The Sachs' would also
have to relocate these same utility lines to fall within the newly
conveyed easement.
Their third alternative would be to construct a detached garage in
the northwest corner of their lot and move the driveway to the
western property line. This would allow space for an adequate size
two or three car garage for the Sachs' to store their vehicles and
additional tools, equipment, etc. and would allow them to use their
existing garage as living space. However, due to excessive slopes
and mature trees, staff has determined this is not a viable
alternative.
The living space (dining room) of the existing house currently is
9.1 feet from the property line. Staff recommends that the Appeals
Commission grant the variance to the side yard setback from 10 feet
to 9.1 feet to bring the property into compliance.
However, staff recommends that the petitioner pursue the excess
property process in order to avoid constructing the garage in the
front yard. Approving the variance would allow the front of the
garage to be 9.2 feet from the front lot line. Area for off-strest
Staff Report
VAR #89-19, Orville Sachs
Page 4
(outside of the vehicles in the qarage) parking would be
eliminated. Construction of a garage 25 feet into the front yard
setback is a significant encroachment which may establish a
precedent in other cases.
The petitioner has the advantage of being located at the end of the
street; however, given that other alternatives exist, staff
recommends further exploration of the excess property option prior
to final decision by the Appeals Commission. We understand that
the petitioner wants the Appeals Commission to decide on this
matter as they feel it is the most cost effective alternative and
less time consuming. Further, although expanding to the rear may
be more expensive (relocating the dining room), it still remains
as an option for the Appeals Commission and City Council to
consider.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Appeals Commission deny the variance request
for the front yard setback from 35 feet to 9 feet and reduction of
the side yard from 5 feet to 1 foot. Staff recommends that the
Appeals Commission approve the variance from 10 feet to 9.1 feet
for living space to the side lot line which would bring the house
in compliance with the Code. If the Appeals Commission chooses to
approve the variance as proposed for the attached garage, the
following stipulations should be required:
1.
2.
3.
Approval of the variances pending approval of the vacation of
the drainage and utility easement.
A grading and drainage plan be submitted for approval by City
staff.
The addition shall be architecturally compatible with the
existing house.
Appeals Commission Action
The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to approve the variance
request to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.1 feet.
The Commission voted unanimously to deny the variance requests:
1.
2.
To reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 9.2
feet;
To reduce the side yard setback from 5 feet to 1 foot.
2E
2F
Staff Report
VAR #$9-19, Orville Sachs
Page 5
Staff Update
Mr. and Mrs. Sachs have also submitted an alternative site plan
(see site plan "B") which would change the access to the garage
from the south to the west. The garage would still be in the same
location and require the same variances. However, this would allow
landscaping to be placed along the south side of the garage instead
of asphalt. The petitioners created their alternative to respond
to the homeowner's concern of visual impact from across the street.
City Council Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the variance to
reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.1 feet. Another
alternative does exist for the Sachs' to pursue, which is expansion
of the existing garage as part of a two car garage. This would
only necessitate using approximately ten feet of Outlot C.
However, the Sachs' have stated that expanding on the existing
garage would require them to realign the roof of the existing
garage, and they would incur additional expense. Despite the
existence of this option, the Sachs' have requested that the City
Council take action on the original variance requests.
They have also submitted a site plan which locates the driveway to
the west side of the proposed garage expansion rather than directly
in front of it. This would allow additional area for landscaping
in front of the garage.
Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the Appeals
Commission's recommendation based on the following findings:
1. Another alternative exists to expand the garage to the east
without the necessity of a front or side yard variance.
2. Expansion of the proposed garage into the front yard setback
poses a significant intrusion into the setback, which is
reserved to allow for off-street parking areas, preserve open
space, and penait adequate site lines.
Should the City Council approve the variance request, the following
stipulations are recommended:
1. Approval of the vacation request, to vacate the existing six
foot drainage and utility easement along the east lot line.
2. A grading and drainage plan be submitted for approval by City
staf f .
2G
Staff Report
VAR #89-19, Orville Sachs
Page 6
3. The addition shall be architecturally compatible with the
existing house. �
4. The driveway shall be located on the west side of the proposed
expansion so that landscaping can be installed along the front
of the expanded garage, and to allow for cars parked outside
of the building to be parked on the property and not into the
right-of-way.
� ;:.
�
L�
�!y
S//P SEC. 24, T. 30, R. 2
pTr OF FRiDLfr
. . �.. , �- 3 �
�.� �...�
� . �*`-�—�"•'•� � �� . :` ,�p�
.'� .z
� ' �'! •7
� _.� .���� �
� �"' � : � -_ .''�" . �_• _
i � 1��._-.• / t r• -4► ' _ �° ,
!
24 �
�.�. . � � 42
f: M
� ��•�.A'� y � -• » • ���.
: ,:
.. � �.� � � " � �
, � � ' : ,�,,,' �;' __,�,„ =�
. :s ; ti� . • j�=�
� �L • � •,: �
� t .-s. , •�. .��%�- ;.�
Z . � N�9�. .; .����tiQl
"' � �� � � - � ; : ;'���`'�'�i
_- -, 6 � . _ - -_ ;
.�� 1-," • • .
- - � -- - �� - --- - - `� �.�'• i, +.
,;�• � .'t" •. •.
\ -- � ` �e - �-� T�-- � . � � � � , ► • . �.
� • � .�' e�-�, \ ,''��:_ - '—�' ,A �p/3�/ �V� ..
.� _ � ' - _ _• "
1 \ � �
� ._ .c3-r.►.�-- ; . - • .
'. ;` �• � � , ,
-� •
.�°''° �' � --�— 'YFS - - � f • � LSIIC L�� � � .... _ _ '
� E/!GI�fS � " !
�� I� �1 . �� • "
d t Ju� C�rIC /�7i � ���.. R� � � � i
+_ • ,.,,.,�.. � "- - - � •-�� M � . � ! �a
`���_�� � � �n9 � _ ��. ,
���. Y`EaSr,�T --
�t r �
J� � � -�• 6 94 ` ♦
.'i!t� r •. - ' - -- �_ -'� - '
�rw
:�
�
�
►:� %� -
` ' `1g � • �%� �
��' � .�
3, .. � �'C'
i���..�Z�
. /1Ar. 0 � ��
� , � ; . . ���
'�!? _� �'� �
,e-� ' �
'' �a � �: �' , �'' d
r • J �•.� ,�
"�, L►. • . _!ry .+� • �
� � E:�� �•, ••
~ . � : � l • , �
. .� ' , ` If' � f
�� �� ���
,�' � ,r'.'!�
..� ;� �
� _ ��
, 1 � . �� 1 ' � - • ' ' I ' • /
�,.� .r , z � .,_ �
�s,
�1
� , �'
I
43!
LOCATION MAP
2H
CA/NE � ASSOC/ATES
LAND SURVEYORS, /NC.
17720 Hiqhway 65 lV.E. - Ham Lake, Minnesota 55304
434 - 7646
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: Orville Sachs
DESCRIBED AS: Lot 8, Block 1, PARKVIE��1 OAKS FIRST ADDSTION,
accordinq to the rPCOrded nlat thereof, Anoka
Countv, Minnesota.
��
/
O
O
�
�. u
� --
9Z� �i
,-
1
� ��
f
o,
a
o:
N
�
�
�
�
�
Q�.
A
N
�
I
1
7SP/a� - 7¢.87.►.�ws. -- ,�
�� �
=°�-- - - - � � - '
,98Y� `p�i�lil�.2�e �'
o ` : `�
�,. ,,� U>,�i ty Eas�•.
N
,�/� Or I
�
L U 7r 8 �
� ,i
d I
�
:
�
0
�o�•
q5•S
,�� 9
�
�
d
f
�
�. I . �
� �;
.
�lop L T � '` 9.4 ��� 1
_ °-.- -
2 3. 6 - — - -- -.' _ , �
I = �
� 4- Levp/ � 3 �� �
N Fra.+�� Nouse � p o•' I�'� o
43•lo j � � � �
t ^ �Z.q
� 04:� v
�, Ci. '•,, 1 ' 8 I
�, c i� .
� ..
y�4``� �� e , I
8�e iR /
, , _ _ , , �,�-�, /1i0 I_A,,� Q� � / �/ / , Z
x i�''b 1/i J�! 7Yvl.
21
�45en7Pnf F�oor = 97. 4
F��_sd /��C°r = ioi.9
Ga.�y� LIPO/' _ �04.7
������
r/���� f �
7G.�9 p/af- 7��s3,»pos. -
h�,�1 T l-�.� �'V A Y
---�----- - ---_._._..-------- -
94..� L. �1 N �
scacE: � iNCN• 3O FEET.
Q DENOTES //1► /NCN /RON I/oE SfT.
� OfNO�fS FD(IND /ROM AIONUMENf.
IEARiN6S SNOwN �Rf ASSYJMEU.
X�oo.o DENOTES FRiSr/NC FLEV�9rio�.{ �IQStuNED L�VTdM�
E . d�r b•'f. s���Gcr
�o°'O , t
! HEAEBY tEA7/fY TMAT TN/S SflAY£Y� PLAN,
OR REPOI►T WAS P/iEP11/4E0 BY ME O�P GM7EA
AIY O/RECT S(/PERV/S/ON AND THA7 / AM A
DUGY AEG/S�EIiEO LAND SURVEYpA _ UNOER
TNf LAWS OF TNE S�ATE Of AI/NNESOTA.
WTE REG. NO. /?t1/
✓vs ,Ma 8A- 4 4
sEC. 24 � 30 �.24
CA/NE � ASSOC/A TES
L AND SURVE YORS, /NC.
17720 Highway 65 N.E. - Ha►n Lake, Minnesola 55304
434 - 7646
CERTIFICIITE OI' SURVEY FOR: Orville Sachs
DESCRIBED AS: L,ot 8, Block 1, PARKVIE�� O1�KS FIRST ADDITION,
accordinc� to the recorded »lat thereof, Anoka
Countv, Minnesota.
� '` n .
, ,�.,,�. ,u. �.._
n � �,
1�-�-� � � �. � � � •
n ��� ' ,.Q�.� ^'( � � �tta.
r+ d.r•�• � � .�.
��' �_ ii"'r^ � � .. . . � � r
�l , Y r,
�-r
/
�
� .-
- ---- ql b �'
� —
I
��
�
�,
a
a
N
�
�
�
\
�
QV.
A
N
�
I
1
7SP/at - 7¢.87.�.ras. -- �q��
-�, �i
-- — �— — — •— `
�6 �
��'9e �- p� ni��.•r� e �
o., n ,
�,:.,� �.•;:;. ; y L-�s�. I�
�
��,,Q�os I
LUT 8 � �
�
6
� , f
� �
�
� ti �
� �Io; N
Z, V � .
�1°�`� en 0 9.<� '�.
-- - - `_ I
23.6 - � - - � '.�
� d
� 4 - LPVPI � 3 ! `'
n�i Fr�i�nt j��n..se � p m �G.{. o
aa_ 43.Yo � � � I �
* !z•4
0
1°` '� p;i„
�, 1 � A I
�+��.�.
r �
�Jf, `��e
��" �8i �� ,I
ys.3 �-t
�
7�.�9 p71��- 7G s3 MfOj. �
2J
/J�1Sfn7fnf �"�00✓ = 7%7
F��.. � ,tiaa � _ �o i. 9
Ga,.�pc F/oo� s /D4.y
�
i
, F �,,.�
I�v �
o -
SlT� i���
�
��.�7-,N.��. �-'',��, Y
--- —�-- ---
�4� �. �1 N �
�
M
SCALf � / /NCN� 3O FflT.
Q OfMOT[S //z /NCN /RON O/FE SE�
� O[MOT[S fO�NO NION ArvMvl►EMt
SE�RiNGS SNOwN AI►f ASSV/rEU.
X�oo.o DE�/aTFS F+��ST/Nt FLEYNT/d^� CNff��MFO D�OTt/M�
o E� ds.• h.'f. r���'e�o
��� _ . . �
/ MEN£BY CENT/fY TNA7 TN/S SfNiYEY� PLAN�
OR /IE�'ORT WAS PN[/!1l►EO SY Mf d0 fAD[p
AIY DIRE[� SUPEIOV/S/ON AND TNAf / AA/ A
OULY RE6/STENEO LANO SU/JVE1'OA UNOER
�HE LAWS Of TNE S�A�E Oi N/NNf SOTA.
A�rE N�d••rG1 �I9a7REG. NO. /tld/
� �w
✓Oe AKt �^" 7 T a e c. c. T �. � v ^ c. �
� . c � 2K '.
PIAT DRAWING
(T///S /S NOT A SURVEYJ
STfiEET A�DRESS: �� O J �A7�,A �� L N '
L -- � -.��- - '____-_. .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: _` vT � �3�V(k _1. .�K U� QAK�Rh �_%�c�d �T �/v �
At � � .��
If �IV ��n ,r J'C qLi �� ��� �U.i
- I
, -� � � . ;
,
�` � � ��� 1,'� x ,�r4 '„ �
�
�
, Q
. .
�
�
�
��
��
�
�
0
r
1� ' r SP�tt iSir4tf
L � �t � ; �'Rnp�
� i�-
� �
M
��•�°� � .
�A rtul� t � C� N
q � �
�
�
_ �
v �O .
-
-��� :i�
%� �'lL
.. _ . .
__ _
I :i
�
2L
1281 Hathaway Lane N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
September 26, 1989
Ms. Barbara Dacy
Planning Coordinator
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Dear Barbara:
Enclosed is our proposed plan for the extension of our garage unto
a portion of the Outlot C which we would need to purchase. In our
original plans for a double garage, we reserved the use of the
present single garage as living space. We would like to keep this
option. However, instead of adding a 24' x 24' garage unto the
outlot, we would like to add a 36' x 26' three bay garage, since
most of the expenses of purchasing this additional land would be
the same, i.e., moving the utility lines, surveying costs, legal
fees, etc.
We do not want to purchase the frontage along Matterhorn Drive. We
do not want to purchase any of the wooded area. This land would be
best suited as a screen between our property and the neighbors along
Matterhorn. Our thinking is that we would need a maximum of 36'
from our present lot line. This would bring our lot line up to the
western edge of the wooded area. This would give us a six foot
utility easement. These plans will depend on the costs involved in
purchasing this property.
We will develop further working plans with our contractor when we
feel Orville's health permits. At this time we know the approximate
size and location of the garage. Also, the location of the driveway
would be to the south (front) or our property.
Thank you for your help to us in this endeavor.
Sincerely yours,—� n
� G�tJ�.c�
eannine R. Sachs Orville L. Sachs
Enclosure: 1 ��0 �,�
�1ti�C
. �
�.
Vi�
]an
Gr
Da
.�f�
�� � �
��.
2M
,..
�
�
� � q
�� �
� ._
pc,�rw � v
�—�
_��. �yY�t
_ P�--� -
�
�
a
�
_
' M
u
�
�
�
;
, �
.% ��
b
i `'J
� �� �
�
� � �
�
_ . __ �-�?
I
I
o-`
i� � � ,..�
, �
_ _ �:
���
�-�-a�te�� l�.
°u1
0
,
��
�
;
��
- _ - -
�;��{'S !�
�
�I �s�� 1�-�
�O l C'�
�
��
y.o-w ' O �1 � «I ,!� Mj i�
1�-� � � � � ' .'~.8 °r�w r�
` � O�J � Q �j p:
I °` � i , � � v
1 �� �
1 �� N � �44.1�.
1�4. ��,1.1•NC44� ap � � �
��^�~E •�s�►� � ��'=`'
� � � I �.1 r�i �
..� ' � � L v J $ � ' �- -� i
� ,� • .
.? ��l�.V i _ _ 9°,j� 7 �r� �•�!
� � t,
, ,t' �'��L_ - � `- - -119.t4 J�A;1� i �N
MeRTN • KoRTH'
� 34R.00 _ _ �_--- -� �
-----�-"_ R0�
- .. .�. �� A� V � 1nC i
-.ti'� '�: �w �� -
l� :�+� 5 'r�i 1�'1t �►''v'
. ...... r� - v
� � 4 �e�9i
J�► � 3� 33 �
� �
o ; �
� $ �I F ' 0
, ,;p �
( �:a I
iTN - � 1r' IW � L -
i.pp_.� � �' I__
p � � O
5 o I`Z�
r I
��� � � 3� �
•
oo,Ne � '��,
o - �' ���+°' ��°ti �
a` •
1'1�.00�----
. _n2_59 _ --e`
_e
V1/est line c��' �e �u�.E
,-y � �
' i1i�1 '
�
_ =�'�_
- . . � __: �`
:-_ - _. __ - : ;
- _ . - - �--" ---• i
N�._ — . _ . __f...�._ -- -T
- , _,
^ � �,; .
� � ,;i ��+ �
`�� ` ,:1 ,.
. •ts � , ,I�,�
�� ��
c� t�4 �
.�_�-._--=_
r•�•�
. . . ' ' ' - ... .�. r �. "��_. � . . _ �
--�r_"- _ ,� - - __.:.-----`--�-�._� - _ _ ``��`�,
�. .� _.� - -- --
�.. �
i-- . ' =-� ;,--- - ---- ;,�--� - - - ,� _ �) � i�� - �
;n �t,• � i l I - - - - -. _. _,�'�ti . -- -_,1-
1 _ � i , , � ' , _��. �,.-- �------=r-=
�_ "++ , --q 9��-- �'''"' � � , ;
� �; j��' j,�i, ���. � i� ��, i�i' � I��.. �(�
;; , ! ,� w ' .� �; i r . ,� �i � � ' �
-_ � ; . , _ _-_- _ _ =i�;: . -.�_ � , ' _ �__ '� J_� �
. r . - r ,
: � . � .. --- _ . ; �
. , _ - . ; - . . � i
.. _ ' I . . -1 -
. . _ . . . ' ' a. t _ - �. � _ I _�� � � ' . I f � I
k ___--- _ � . _ _ _.- ,
----, ..��-__ � _
, - � �-j _ at-- � t��6 I
�. _ � I ' � - . F ' L � . � I f
�LV � - _ ... �.� .-.....� � _ ,
�— _ ---_ i . ~ , r �' � � -� � 4 r— - ;\ .
1 II
-- - _ _ I ,r . _.� r :_ _ -- _- !T`
' ( � - ,--,-:.
— . ._' � _'__._�. .+.:'_ ._I.i-.._ai_"F� a':.�' —��1-_�_�s- . - � ,= _...
� .. �_ _ � — � � - . _ ._-_._
--_-- - - --- _--- -�=-- - j. -�:---- 1,.1_ ._ _^
. ; �.-,_ ..
�
�
�
�0-,6 . ; �
„ .
�i �: ;�'�
- . %=
. �; ,
�� ` . _
$ � 4; �. ,
- L- " � � � _
f . �, �;:;;' . , . - ,
. � �; � � .. -
� M �� ,
. t� � � � `
N y �p � �,
F � � u°
�► P � � � �, i,
r� y �' �, I
- - -- e � --,�
i: �
f !
,I I
1�
��
i I
i�
• 'i
�i
;�
i�
�r'i
:� I
�� �
� �� !
> ��
'' " � r.
iL
,� a
e ' � �-
Q � .
Q �� o
�� � �
J � � �
i
i� �
� j �
W '_' q
.� ^ �
'� t
r�
�� �
J r
T
� �
� �
�
U
� �
O
� :1
U �
� J
1�
:'
3f
�i
D�
J
.
� �
v pp
�' ; i
�� �
J
� � N
v a �
� V U
� � �
0
.�
.i
�
t� {
;�
� �
�
`!�-
�
�
2P
,
%r � f�
, `�, •
1 ' i�A.
.� � .
.
� '
, � i %
/
I I ' � .
� %� �
� -�� J
zQ
, � � - �, I(1 %,/
i,
, ��/ �' �. � ��/ i� � •� • �,,
�� � ��,,�� ,, .
,� ♦ �
��' �� .� / � //, , � i
• �
� �
' I �' � a• // /�' ' ' �
� I � i' -, - . �'� / � �' .� i�
v ���
.-�--c�0 ,
.�
i�, -� -
%
c
>
� �
G'���
�Z � �
� ) h� f �3 Z
s�� ���
2R
CITY OF litIDLBY
11PPEALB COlQtIBBZOZI l[EETI�iG, BEPTEldBER 5, 1989
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CALL TO ORDER•
Chairperson Barna called the September 5, 1989, Appeals Commission
�eeting to order at 7:45 p.m.
�OLL CALL•
Members Present: Alex Barna, Diane Savage, Larry Kuechle
Members Absent: Renneth Vos, Jerry Sherek
Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
O�rville and Jeannine Sachs, 1281 Hathaway Lane
James and Beverly Wolfe, 1265 Hathaway Lane
Bill and Janice Drigans, 1280 Hathaway Lane
Kenneth Murphy, Fridley Alano Society
Ben Ewers, 5680 Matterhorn Drive
(See attached roster for names of people
who appeared for variance request, VAR #89-
18 by Wayne Dahl)
A�PROVAL OF AUGUST 22 1989 APPEAIS COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Savage, to approve the
August 22, 1989, Appeals Commission minutes as written.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, 11LL VOTZNG 11YE, CSAZRPERBON HlrRNA DECL�RED THE
l�tOTION CARRIED IINANIMODSLY.
Mr. Barna stated that item �1, VAR �89-18, by Wayne Dahl, would be
moved to the end of the aqenda.
1. SONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE VAR l89-19 BY ORVZLLE AND JEANZNE
�ACHS:
l. Pursuant tc Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City
Code to reduce the required front yard setback from 35
feet to 12 feet;
2. Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a) of the Fridley
City Code to reduce the required side yard setback from
10 feet to 9.1 feet;
2S
.,. � . . �_ _ � ��_�_�_ :
si`ciz-1� ' �� � �_ � __ __—
3.
Pursuant to Section Z05.07.03.D.(2).(b) of the Fridley
City Code to reduce the required cide yard setback for
an attached accessory use trom 5 fset to 1 loot,
qaraqe on Lot 8,
same being 1281
To allow the construction of
Block 1, Parkview Oaks First
Hathaway I,ane N.E.
a double car
l�ddition, the
O O by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Ruechle, to open the public
hearing.
IIPON 11 VOICB VOTE, 71LL VOTZi1G 71YE, C871IAPERBON B�RNA DECLARED T8E
PIIBLIC BEARZNG OPEN �T 7t�8 P.I[.
Ms. Dacy stated the property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling,
and is located at the�end of Hathaway Lane. Outlot C separates the
subject property from Katterhorn Drive.
Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner is requesting three variances in
order to construct a 24 it. by 24 ft. garage in front of their
existinq home.
Ms. Dacy etated ctaff outlined other options for the petitioner
and the City to consider in lieu of qrantinq this variance since
the variance request represents a siqnificant encroachment into the
front yard. The front yard setback of all the setbacks is
typically held more important in order to maintain adequate space
between the street and a structure, and to provide adequate area
for off-street parkinq, and to provide a visual site distance for
adjacent properties.
Ms. Dacy stated staff looked at three other options:
1. To build a detached qarage at the rear of the lot, and
construct a rew driveway along the western part of the lot.
Because of the veqetation and the qrade of the lot, this
option vas not leasible.
2. To add on to the back of the existing garaqe toward the rear
of the lot. Staff understands that the petftioner'e dining
room is in back of the qarage, and it would �eean considerable
�ore remodelinq expense; however, in the eyes of the
ordinance, it is still an option.
3. To utilize the City property to the east. The property
aeasures approximately 7,993 sq. it. This is below the square
footage for a buildable lot. The City retained the lot in
order to saintain the deadend turn-around for 8athaway Lane.
Given the property is unbuildable because of lot area and the
slope on the property, staff felt it miqht be prudent to go
throuqh the sale of excess property prxess and have the
2T
- h• ��s. • �- - � i��t-���- - 'T`��`a
_ ,
Council evaluete whether or not to convsy a portion or all of
the outlot to the Sache. This prxess usually antaila a two-
sonth period and a public bsaring befors th� Council before.
final determination. The petftioner would be rasponafble for
relocatinq electric, telephone, and cable lines that now run
along the eastern property line. If the petitioners were to
receive a portion of Outlot, they would have to relocate those
lines probably toward the east. Mr. McPherson met with an NSP
representative on site last Friday. He was to have an
estimate available for this �eetinq, but did not do so.
Ms. Dacy stated staff's recommendatfon on the three variances is
as follows:
1. Approval of the side yard variance trom 10 feet to 9.1 feet
for living space area along the ride lot line.
2. Denial of the front yard setback from 35 feet to 9 feet and
the side yard setback from 5 ieet to 1 ioot, besed on the fact
that the eale of excess property option is available as well
as the option to expand to the rear.
Ms. Dacy stated if the Appeals Commission recommends approval to
the Council, staff recommends three stipulations:
1. Approval of the variances pendinq approval of the vacation of
the drainaqe and utility easement.
2. A grading and drainaqe plan be submitted for approval by City
staff.
3. The addition shall be architecturally compatible with the
existinq house.
Ms. Savaqe asked if there were some trees on Outlot C that would
have to be cut down in order to construct the qaraqe.
Ms. Jeannine Sachs stated there were three mature Oak trees and one
Cottonwood tree that would have to be cut down in order to provide
access for emerqency vehicles such as a fire truck. The trees are
placed in Buch a way that they would all have to be cut down.
14z�. Orville Sachs atated he is not interested in buyinq more
property in order to build a qarage. It was his understandinq that
in order to purchase the property, it would have to qo out for bids
and who knows what the prfce would be.
Irlr. Barna atated he thouqht bids were necessary only on tax forfeit
properties. Since this property has been �aintained as an outlot
and has not been tax forfeit, he believed the City can sell the
2U
_ _. s�� . � �. _ � . ��!-+_s!_ -
property directly to an indivfdual. Thfs would have to be
confirmed by leqal counsel.
lte. Sachs stated that she vas told by Iris. Dacy that the sinimum
value was $5,700 wfth taxes of 5142 a year, unimproved. �
l�ir. Sachs �tated that in addition to that cost would be the �oving
of the overhead power lines. It fs just too expensive.
Mr. Bill Drigans, 1280 Hathaway Lnne, stated they live dizectly
across from Mr. and Mre. Sachs. tiis understandinq of the outlot
is that it continues from the back of the Sachs' lot all the way
across Hathaway Lane adj oininq the Ewers' property ( 5680 Matterhorn
Drive). He believed the $5,700 cost was for the entire outlot.
Ms . Dacy stated the City �issessor looked at the outlot north of
what they would convey to reserve a rfqht-of-way. If they added
that full extra lenqth, which could be 60-80 feet, the value of
that piece alone is $5,700 and added on to the Sachs' existing
value could result in an increase of $150 a year in taxes. Through
the excess property process, the City Council can determine whether
they want to convey all of the outlot or part of ft, depending on
what the Sachs vanted.
Mr. Driqans stated his property has a very steep driveway. In the
wintertime when it is icy, they have literally slid across the
street fnto the Sachs' driveway. They have taken out mailboxes
across the street, their naflbox, and a hedge.
Mr. Driqans stated when he served on the Pippeals Commission and
Planninq Commission, they looked very hard at front yard variances,
and he is eure the City still does when there are other options
available. Since there are other options., he is opposed to the
front yard variance. He felt the Sachs should Beriously look at
the outlot as a solution.
Mr. Sachs stated their house is a repossessed V.A. house. It was
their understandinq at the time that the house was built to Code
with the proper setbacks. i�lhen they looked at the possibility of
building a qarage after one winter, they had a aurveyor survey the
property, and that is when they discovered the house was not built
to Code.
l�Ir. Sachs stated when they first purchased the house, they had
asked if the outlot was for sale, and they were told by someone at
City Hall that the property was not for sale and that it was
unbuildable piece of property.
l�ir. Sachs stated the proposed qaraqe is not goinq to be the same
heiqht as the house. It fs goinq to be down fnto the hill, so the
garaqe will not stick out up in the air. Since there i6 no one on
BID PROPOSALS FOR _
REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE FOR
WELL NO. 3 PROJECT NO. 203
WEDNESDAY� MARCH 8, 1990 11:00 A.M.
BID TOTAL
PLANHOLDER BOND BID COMMENTS
E.H. Renner
15688 Jarvis
Elk River, MN 55330
Layne Minnesota
3147 California
Minneapolis, MN 55418
Mark Traut Wells
151 - 72nd Ave.
St. Cloud, MN 56301
Keys We11 Drilling
413 N. Lexington
St. Paul, MN 55104
Bergerson-Caswell
5155 Industrial
Maple Plain, MN 55359
The Prest
4904 Lincoln Dr.
Edina, MN 55436
Thein Well Co.
P.O. Box 429
Clara City, MN 56222
5$
5%
5$
5%
5$
$ 22,956.00
$ 26,186.00
$ 32,857.00
$ 32,875.00
$ 33,145.50
NO BID
NO BID
2V
�PPE�L8 COI4�II86ION 1[BETZ�a. BEPTEKBR 5. 1�9 p�GE 5
the other side of them, he did not know why anyone would object to
this proposal.
Ms. Savage asked what the petitioners thouqht of the options
suqgested by staff.
Mr. Sachs stated a couple of the options are really not viable
options. There is also another 5 foot drop on the other side of
the property. In the back yard is another 8 foot drop. So, he
would have to drive uphill out of his back yard. Why would he want
to buy some property that would just increase his taxes? This is
not the first proposal of this type. It has been done in Fridley
before, and it was a for a front yard setback in the middle of a
b2ock.
Ms. Sachs stated about three years ago a front yard variance for
a qarage similar to theirs was granted to 1333 Hillwind Road.
Ms. Savage asked Mr. Sachs' response to Mr. Drigans' concern about
sliding across the street into the Sachs' driveway.
Mr. Sachs stated he did not think that was his problem. Mr.
Drigans could correct that problem. If the neighbor slides down
the hill and hits his car, it did not matter whether the car is
parked at the end of the driveway or up by the garage.
Mr. Drigans stated their home is higher than the Sachs' home. From
their kitchen and living room, they look down at the Sachs'
property on a daily basis. His main objection was the front yard
variance. Visually, the qaraqe will just be too close to the
street.
Ms. Dacy stated the variance referred at 1333 Hillwind was variance
request, VAR �86-18, by Gary and Sharon Parker, to reduce the front
yard setback from 35 feet to 28.5 feet and to reduce the side yard
setback from 5 feet to 1 foot to allow the construction,of an
attached accessory building.
Mr. Sachs stated he was just not interested in purchasing any
additional property. He stated he was trying to improve his
property and correct his problem, and this is the most affordable
option for him.
Mr. Drigans stated the Sachs work hard to maintain their property.
He stated they are also maintaining a considerable portion of the
outlot which is unbuildable. The Sachs are trying to improve their
property, and he did not see why the City could not sell the Sachs
a portion of the property for a small monetary amount. It could
be a trade-off for the Sachs maintaininq a portion of the outlot.
It just seemed there are solutions that are not beinq discussed.
2W
.,. �. - . . �_ _ � � ��_ �_ : � -
�� 1 - - -- --
Mr. Barna aqreed wfth l�[r. Driqans, but �tated this i4 something
that is definitely up to the City Council to decide.
Kr. James Wclfe, iZ65 Hathaway Lane, stated he liveB riqht next
door to the Sachs . 8e stated he has no ob j ection to the -Sachs
buildinq the qarage. He stated no �atter where the Sachs build the
qaraqe, there is still goinq to be the hazard of the neiqhbor
directly across the street sliding across the �treet in the
wintert ime .
Ms. Jan Driqans stated che can underetand that their driveway is
not the Sachs' problem. Her �ain concern ie visual. Coming out
Bo far from the house toward the curb fs goinq to be a qreat
inconsistency with the other houses in the neiqhborhood. The City
has defined the front yard setback as 35 feet, and any
inconsistency in that front yard setback impacts a neighborhood.
MOTION by Ms. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Savage, to close the public
hearing.
IIPON 71 VOZCE VOTE, �LI. VOTI�IG 71Y8, CHAIRPER80�T B11RNA DECLl1RED THE
P�BLZC HEARING CLOSED 11T 6:30 P.M.
Ms. Savage stated this is the most difficult front yard variance
they have had to deal with. She assumed the Sachs have a need for
a double car garage. There seems to be a lot of problems with the
options. She thouqht this is a unique lot in that it would be very
difficult to expand in the back yard because of the steep hill.
They are on the end of a lot which does reduce the problem of the
sight line. She is not too concerned about the problem of the
neighbor's driveway, but she is concerned about the neighbors'
difficulty with the visual aspect of the garaqe being fairly close
to the street. However, she did think the plans as presented by
the Sachs seemed very nice. She just did not see any solutions to
the problems involved.
Mr. Kuechle stated he liked the desiqn. It would be attractive;
however, he is very concerned about encroachinq 23 feet into the
front yard. iie is not totally satisfied that the possibility of
buildinq to the side had been completely explored. It would 6eem
that something could be worked out with the City. The trees are
another problem that is difficult to resolve at thfs time. Because
there are so many unanswered questions, he would not be in favor
of the variance request. He would sugqest the petitioner explore
a little more carefully with the City the possibflfty of buyinq
part of the outlot and what the price would be.
Isr. Barna stated he sympathized with th� Sachs and the neiqhbors•
8e has been on the �ppeals Commission for 12 yeare and they have
never allowed a front �ard setback to this deqree under these
circumstances. There really bas to be an established hardship
2X
]1PPEALB COI�4iI88ION 1[EETIId�i. BEPTElIBR S. 1989 � P!�►GB 7
where there are no other alternatives. He stated he is not opposed
to the side yard variance, but he is opposed to the front yard
variance.
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Savaqe, to recomIDend to City
Council approval of variance, VAR #89-19, by Orville and Jeanine
Sachs, pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a) of the Fridley City
Code to reduce the required side yard �etback from 10 feet to 9.1
feet, to allow the construction of a double car garage on Lot 8,
Block 1, Parkview Oaks First Addition, the same being 1281 Hathaway
Lane N.E.
IIPON ]1 VOICE VOTE, 71LL VOTI1dG ]1YE, CB7�ZRPERBON BARNA DECLli►RED THE
1�[OTION Cl1RRIED IINl�NZAtOUBLY.
OTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend to City
council denial of variance, VAR #89-19, by Orville and Jeanine
Sachs:
1. Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City
Code to reduce the required front yard setback from 35
feet to 9.2 feet;
2. Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(b) of the Fridley
City Code to reduce the required side yard setback for
an attached accessory use from 5 feet to 1 foot;
To allow the construction of a double car qarage on Lot 8, Block
1, Parkview Oaks First Addition, the same being 1281 Hathaway Lane
N.E., with the recommendation that the petitioner pursue the
possibility of acquiring all or part of Outlot C from the City.
OPON !► VOICE VOTE, 11LL VOTING 71YE, CSAIRPERBOId Bl�RNA DECI.PIRED THE
liOTION Cl�RRIED IIN�NIMOIISLY.
2. CONSIDERATZON O A V ANC RE U ST VAR 89- 0 BY FRIDL Y
ALANO SOCIETY•
Per Section 205.14.05.0. 5).(a) of the Fridley City Code to
reduce the setback for all arkinq and hard surface areas from
20 feet from any street r ht-of-way to 9 feet, on Lots 18
through 24, Block 13, Ben ett Palmer Addition, generally
located directly north of th �former Zantigo Restaurant.
MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by
hearing.
IIPON ]► VOICE VOTE, 11LI+ VOTZNG ]1YE,
PIIBLIC 8E7�1RING OPEN ]1T 8:45 P.lt.
Ruechle, to open the public
BARNl1 DECL�RED THE
Ms. Dacy stated this property is located jus'� south of 60th Avenue,
east of University Avenue. The University Avenue Service Road runs
2Y
�, iDLEY CITY COCDICIL lLEBTI�G O! 6EPTEKBER 18. 1989 P�GE 6
I►Ir. Burns, City Iianager, asked if staff was required to mit
this request to the Council in three �onths.
Councilman Schneider stated it did ave to be submitted within
the three months or if the S id not contact staff. _.
OPON � VOICE AREN ON THE �►BOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayo eclared the motion carried unanimously.
B. SONSIDERATION OF SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR
OCTOBER 2 1989 FOR THE SALE OF EXCESS PROPERTY.
OUTLOT C INNSBRUCK NORTH ADDITION. ADJACENT
TO 1281 HATHAWAY LANE N.E.:
Mrs. Sachs stated her husband was concerned how the City would
proceed with a sale of Outlot C and if it would be on a bidding
basis.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated bids are not required, but in
cases of buildable sites, the City has, on some occasions,
requested bids. He stated in this case, where it is a non-
buildable site, the property is usually cplit with adjacent
property owners.
Councilman Schneider stated he realizes there are some concerns
with the residents on Matterhorn Drive regarding the sale of this
outlot. He stated the Council should probably not proceed with
setting the public hearinq for this potential sale of Outlot C, but
when the petitioner submits a plan and if it fs appropriate to sell
a portion of this outlot, the hearing could be scheduled at that
time.
Mrs. Sachs asked what restrictions would be placed on the
construction of the garage.
Councilman Schneider stated it would depend on how much property
is acquired.
Councilwoman Jorgenson 6tated there were concerns of neiqhbors if
the bikeway/walkway would be retained if a portion of the outlot
is sold.
Councilman Schneider etated the City is not desperate to sell this
outlot, but may consider it to accommodate the Sachs'. He stated
he could not promise that it would not go out for bid. He stated
there may be others interested in purchasing this outlot in order
to retain the aesthetics of the neiqhborhood. He 6tated in any
case, a public hearinq would be necessary before the property could
be sold.
2Z
lRIDLEY CITY COII1�iCZL ILEETI�G O! SEPTEMBBR 18. 1989 P�GE 7
Mrs. Sachs stated if there is a chance the property would go out
for bids, che would like to see this item tabled.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table this item and instruct
ataff to notify affected persons that the public hearinq has been
tabled. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, l�ayor Nee declared the aotion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to instzuct staff that when the
Sachs contact the City regardinq their qarage construction, staff
should request a plan and work with the petitioner and then prepare
the necessary documentation so that the minimal portion of Outlot
C that would necessary to accommodate the qarage construction be
scheduled for a public hearing as excess property. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Schneider stated a petition has been submitted in
opposition to the City sellinq Outlot C and asked that this be
received into the minutes.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive Petition No. 15-1989 in
opposition to the sale of Outlot C, Innsbruck North. Seconded by
Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
C. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REOUEST. VAR #89-20. TO
REDUCE THE SETBACK FOR ALL PARKING AND HARD SURFACE
�r.L.�e� �.+r�r.v �n t+t�i�en s�nnv n�TV cTDL'L'T DTf'_L7T�AF�L1�V T[1 �
f _1:1Si��
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated t Fridley Alano Society
is constructinq a 7,000 square foot bui ing for their assembly or
meeting place for 1�A activities. S stated they have requested
a variance to reduce the hard surf e setback from the required 20
feet to 10 feet alonq the eervi road.
Ms. Dacy stated
all the City's
but they wish tc
in order to inc
recommended to t
however, the Co
the petit' er has submitted a survey that meets
code re rements as to the parking requirements,
i
h 10 feet into the 20 foot required setback
their parkinq capacity. She stated staff
:als Commission that this variance be denied,
i recommended approval because all the other
i
properties i the area are built to the ten foot setback or, n
some case , to the front lot line. She Btated the l�ppeals
Commiss' 's recommendation was subject to the petitioner
submi ing a landscape plan for staff approval and a six foot
scr ning fence to be constructed along the rear property line.
�iDLEY CITY COIII�CIL �LEBTZNG O! 6EPTE�tBBR 18. 1989 PaGE �
components detailed in the specifications. I+Ir. Pribyl stated the
specifications vere written so that the City could accept all or
part of any bid. He stated it is, therefore, recommended that the
bid for file folders be awarded to Mid-lilsmerica for 56,573.81 a
the bid for labels be awarded to i�riqht-Line for S1,831.00.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contra for file
folders to the low bidder, Mid-America, in the amou of S6,573.81.
Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voic ote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the a�otion carried nimously.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to awar he contract for labels to
the low bidder, Wright-Line, in the ount of 51,831.00. Seconded
by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upo a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared tbe motion rried unanimously.
9.
A.
�
0
MOTION Councilman Billings to set the public hearing on this
vacat' n request for October 2, 1989. Seconded by Councilman
F' patrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
he motion carried unanimously.
10. CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING ITEMS FROM APPEAIS COIrIIriISSION
�lEETING OF SEPTEMBER 5. 1989:
A. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST VAR �89-19, TO
�niirF �r+uF i2FntlTRFn SETBACK FROM 35 �'EET �O 9.2 FEET: TO
REDUCE THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 10 FEET TO 9.1
�EET. TO REDUCE THE RE UIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR AN
�iTTACHED ACCESSORY U�E FROM 5 FEET TO 1 FOOT. TO ALLOW
�'HE CONSTR CTION OF A DOUBLE CAR GARAGE ON LOT 8. BLOCK
ARKVIEW OAKS RST DDITION HE SAME EING 8
jiATHAWAY I1�,NE N.E BY ORVILLE AND JEANN�NE SACHS:
Hs. Dacy, Planninq Coordinator, stated this is a request for
variances to allow the construction of a garage at 1281 Hathaway
Lane. She stated the petitioners, Kr. and Mrs. Sachs, purchased
the property from HUD and were led to believe they had 12 feet
between the qarage and �ot line. She stated they have since had
the property surveyed and found this is not the case.
Ids. Dacy stated the variance requests are a reduction in the side
yard setback from 10 to 9.1 feet; a reduction in the �ide yard
setback for an attached accessory use from 5 feet to 1 foot; and
a reduction in the front yard setback from 35 to 9.2 feet. She
stated the Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variance
for the existing encroachment, but recommended denial of the other
. .
� :
lRZDLEY CITY COIII�ICIL 1LEETI�G O� 8BPT8KHER 18. 1989 p�GE S
two variances to reduce the required
attached accessory use from 5 feet to
front yard setback from 35 to 9.2 feet.
side yard setback for an
1 foot and to reduce the
Ms. Dacy stated it ie recommended the Sachs' pursue the potential
of expanding their existing home to the east on the City's Outlot
C. She stated staff recommends the Council uphold the
recommendation of the �ppeals Commission.
Councilman Schneider asked if there were any other variances of
this maqnitude qranted fn the City. Ms. Dacy stated that there
were none.
Mrs. Sachs, the petitioner, stated the property at 1333 Hillwind
would be two feet closer to the street than what they are
requesting.
Ms. Dacy stated a variance was approved for this property and the
request read that it was to reduce the setback from 35 to 28 feet.
She stated, in actuality, the edge of the garage is approximately
26 feet from the curb line. She stated it could not be determined
where that front property line was located and there was no
certificate of survey on file.
Councilman Schneider asked the petitioner if they had considered
expandinq to the east if property was available.
Mrs. Sachs stated they have not ruled out this possibility. She
stated her husband was not able to attend the meeting this evening
as he is in the hospital recoverinq from a heart attack. She
stated this option has not been fully discussed. Mrs. Sachs stated
they would like to utilize the land they now have, however, they
may consider other options on purchasing additional land.
Councilman Schneider stated he would be reluctant to grant a front
yard variance of this magnitude. He stated if the Sachs' were
willinq to purchase additional property, they probably would not
need the entire outlot. He asked Mrs. Sachs if she wished the
Council to act on the variance request this evening or if she
wished it tabled.
Mrs. Sachs stated she felt this was for the Council to decide, but
stated their plans were not to begin immediately to construct the
qarage.
Councilman Billinqs stated if the City agreed to the sale of a
portion of this outlot, the variance �ay not be needed. He stated
the Council could delay action and qive the petitioner time to
submit some alternatives.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table consideration of this
variance request, VAR #89-19, for three months or until the
petitioner contacts staff. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
. �.�, �_ � . ��--
I�lr. Burns, City l�tanager, asked if staff vas required to re-cubmit
this rsquest to the Council in thr�e sonths.
Councilman Schneider stated it did not have to be sub�itted within
the three �onths or if the Sachs did not contact staff.
UPON 11 VOICE VOTE Tl�►I�N ON THE 11BOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the aotion carried unanimously.
8. �'ONSIDERATION OF SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR
TO 1261 HATHAWAY IJ�NE N.E.:
Mrs. Sachs �tated her husband was concerned how the City would
proceed with a sale of Outlot C and if it voul be on a bidding
basis.
Mr. Herrick, City �►ttorney, stated bids
cases of buildable sites, the City
requested bids. He 6tated in this c
buildable cite, the property is us�
property owners. �
ar not required, but in
, on �ome occasions,
e, where it is a non-
ly cplit with adjacent
Councilman Schneider ctated he re izes there are come concerns
with the residents on Matterhorn ive reqarding the sale of this
outlot. He.stated the Council hould probably not proceed with
setting the public hearing for is potential 6ale of Outlot C, but
when the petitioner submits a an and if it is appropr�ate to sell
a portion of this outlot, hearinq could be scheduled at that
time.
Mrs. Sachs asked what /restrictions would be placed on the
constructior► of the gar��qe .
Councilman Schneider tated it would depend on Aow �ouch property
is acquired.
Councilwoman Jor nson stated there were concerns of neiqhbozs if
the bikeway/wal ay vould be retained if a portion of the outlot
is aold.
Councilman S hneider stated the City is not desperate to sell this
outlot, bu �ay consider it to accommodate the Sachs'. He ctated
ne could ot promise that it would not go out for bid. He stated
there aa be others interested in purchasing this outlot fn order
to ret n the aesthetics of tbe neiqhborhood. He ctated in any
case, public hearing would be necessary before the property could
be s d.
2CC
CITY OF FRIDLEY
Recreation & Natural Resource Departmen
6431 Univs�sity Avenus NE� Frldley MN 55432
.. —
March 7, 1990
�.
h
TO: William W. Burns.,'� �i�
City Manager '
FR: Jack Kirk J��
Director of Recreation & Natural Resources
RE: CANADA GOOSE CONTROL PROGRAM
3
Please find attached a proposed contract between the University of
Minnesota and the City of Fridley for the Canada Goose Control
Program at Moore Lake Beach. This is a four year program
commencing in 1990 and extending through 1993 with a cost of $1,000
per year. Having reviewed the articles of the proposed contract,
I recommend that the City Council authorize entering into the Goose
Control contract with the University of Minnesota.
JK:sj
attachment
FIXED-PRICE CONTRACT
BETWEEN
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
(hereinafter referred to as the UNIVERSITY)
/:�1�
THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
(hereinafter referred to as the SPONSOR)
CONTRACT Title: Canada Goose Population Management and Ecology
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: James A. Cooper
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $4,000
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 15, 1990
EXPIRATION DATE: March 15, 1993
IN WITNESS OF the agreements and covenants contained in this
contract, the authorized representatives of the UNIVERSITY and of
the SPONSOR have hereunto set their hands, each warranting that
he/she is empowered and authorized to execute the same.
REGENTS OF TI� UNIVERSITY
OF MINNESOTA
.�
Mary Lou Weiss
Assistant Director
TITLE: Research Administration
DATE:
SFONSOR
:
TITLE:
DATE:
3A
ARTICLE I- Statement of Work
The UNIVERSITY hereby agrees to exert its best efforts to perform
the work set forth in Appendix A, attached. Any change in the scope
or objective of the work requires prior written approval of the
Principal Investigator and the authorized representative - of the
SPONSOR.
ARTICLE II - Consideration and Payment
Presently, after the authorized representatives of the UNIVERSITY
and SPONSOR have fu11y executed this contract, the UNIVERSITY shall
submit to Mr. Jack Kirk, City of Fridley, 6431 Unversity Ave. NE,
Fridley,. MN 55432, as authorized representative of the SPONSOR, an
invoice for that year's fee as set forth in Appendix B. Said invoice
shall be submitted on or after March 15th of each year. The fee shall
be paid within 60 calendar days to the authorized representative of
the UNIVERSITY, and in full consideration of a11 work to be
performed, as set forth in ARTICLE I, above, and all costs, direct and
indirect, of labor, materials, equipment, supplies, services, and all
other costs of whatever nature to be incurred in the performance
thereof.
ARTICLE III - Budget
Appendix B, attached, contains the approved budget for this contract.
The budget provides for goose management at one location within
the City of Fridley. A location is defined as an area where adult and
young Canada geese concentrated during June. If the SPONSOR, after
reviewing the status of goose populations, requests that management
be done at fewer or more than one location, the budget will be
revised under the provision provided for in Article V.
ARTICLE IV - Reports
A. The Principal Investigator shall submit to the authorized
representative of the SPONSOR program reports as set forth in
Appendix A.
B. The UNIVERSITY shall not submit to the SPONSOR financial
reports for this fixed-price contract.
ARTICLE V - Modi�cations
C�1_��
3C
Any modifications, variations, or waivers of the terms of this
contract, and any change in the amount thereof as set forth on page
1, above, shall become effective only upon being reduced to a written
amendment hereunto, signed by the authorized representatives of
the LJNIVERSITY and of the SPONSOR.
ARTICLE VI - Termination
A. Either the UNIVERSITY or the SPONSOR may terminate this
contract by notifying the authorized representative of the other
thirty (30) days in advance of a specified termination date.
B. Upon receiving a termination notice from the SPONSOR, the
UNIVERSITY shall exercise reasonable diligence to cancel
orders, obligations, and commitments relating to this contract,
and to cancel or redirect commitments for personal services.
C The SPONSOR shall remain liable for all costs incurred by the
UNIVERSITY pursuant to this contract, including uncancelable
orders, obligations, and commitments, made prior to receiving a
termination notice. Upon payment of all such costs, the
Principal Investigator shall deliver to the authorized
representative of the SPONSOR such incomplete Subject Data, in
its extant format, as ARTICLE XI, below, requires.
ARTICLE VII- Records and Inspection
A. The UNIVERSITY shall maintain books, records, and other
evidence of costs incuned and revenues received under this
contract, to document fully all net costs, direct and indirect, of
labor, materials, equipment, supplies, and services, and a11
other costs of whatever nature.
B. At all reasonable times during the retention period, Paragraph
C, below, the SPONSOR, or any authorized audit representative,
shall have access to such pertinent UNIVERSITY books, records,
and other evidence, to audit and examine them.
C The UNIVERSITY shall preserve all such books, records, and
other evidence pertaining to this contract for three (3) years
after the contract period.
3D
D The UNIVERSITY shall retain all materials relating to any
litigation or claim resulting from this contract, or to contract
costs questioned upon inspection or audit, until such litigation,
claim, or question has been settled.
ARTICLE VIII - Subcontracts
A. The UNIVERSITY shall obtain written approval from the
authorized representative of the SPONSOR before
subcontracting any of the work set forth in ARTICLE I, above.
However, this ARTICLE shall not be construed to apply to the
purchase by the UNIVERSITY of materials, supplies, equipment,
and services incidental but necessary to perform the work set
forth in ARTICLE I, above.
B. All subcontracts shall incorporate the pertinent provisions of
this contract, by reference or otherwise.
ARTICLE IX - Assignments
The UNIVERSITY and the SPONSOR each shall obtain written approval
from the authorized representative of the other before assigning this
contract in whole or in part or any monies due or to become due
under this contract, to any third party or parties.
ARTICLE X - Publication
A. The UNIVERSITY and the SPONSOR each may freely publish the
results of the work set forth in ARTICLE I, above, both Subject
Data, as defined in ARTICLE XI, below, and otherwise, so long as
any existing or future copyright of the Subject Data is not
prejudiced thereby. The Principal investigator and the
authorized representative of the SPONSOR each shall submit to
the other, copies of all such manuscripts for review prior to
publication.
B. Publication by either the UNIVERSITY or the SPONSOR shall
credit the other for the cooperative nature of the said work.
Commercial brands or trade names shall not appear in such
publication, except as necessary to describe the said work; nor
shall the names of the LJIVIVERSITY or of the SPONSOR be used
for advertising purposes.
3E
C Prior to publication, either the UNIVERSITY or the SPONSOR
shall obtain written approval from the authorized
representative of the other before publicizing the results of the
said work.
ARTICLE XI - Rights in Data and Copyright
A. The term "Subject Data" as used herein includes research data
and reports, writings, sound recordings, pictorial reproductions,
drawings or other graphical representations, and works of any
similar nature (whether or not copyrighted), which the -
UNIVERSITY shall deliver to the authorized representative of
the SPONSOR pursuant to ARTICLE IV, above. The term does
not include financial reports, and materials, books, records, and
other evidence incidental to contract administration.
B. The UNIVERSITY shall own all copyrights arising from the
Subject Data. However, if the University chooses not to obtain
such copyrights, the SPONSOR may secure them.
C In the event that either the UNIVERSITY or the SPONSOR
secures a copyright pursuant to ((B) above, such party (the
Licensor) hereby grants to the other (the Licensee) a royalty-
free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to publish,
translate, reproduce, deliver, perform, dispose of, ad to
authorize others to do so for the Licensee's use all Subject Data
,
now or hereafter covered by copyright: Provided that with
respect to Subject Data originating outside of this contract but
incorporated into the Subject Data furnished hereunder, such
license shall be only to the extent that the Licensor has, or
prior to the expiration of the contract may acquire, the right to
grant such license without becoming liable to compensate
others solely because of such a grant.
D This ARTICLE shall not
UNIVERSITY employee
in pursuit of scholarly
scholarly or professional
future copyright of the
be construed to Iimit the rights of
s to utilize Subject Data in other formats
activities and to publish Subject Data in
journals, so long as any existing or
Subject Data is not prejudiced thereby.
ARTICLE XII - Jurisdiction
The SPONSOR agrees to abide by the laws of the State of Minnesota in
all matters regarding this contract.
ARTICLE XIII - Patents
3F
Title to all patentable discoveries and patents therefrom, resulting
from the work set forth in ARTICLE I, above, shall vest in the
UNIVERSITY. After an invention has been identified, the authorized
representatives of the SPONSOR and the UNIVERSITY shall negotiate
the nature and scope of the SPONSOR's rights.
ARTICLE XIV - Authorized Representatives
A. The authorized representative of the UNIVERSITY for
notifications and binding approvals shall be:
Mr. Anton R. Potami
Assistant Vice President
�� ;
Ms. Mary Lou Weiss
Assistant Director
•�
Ms. Marilyn Surbey
Assistant Director
�'7
Ms. Win Ann Schumi
Assistant Director
Office of Research and Technology
Transfer Administration
1919 University Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota 55104
U.S.A.
B. The authorized representative of the SPONSOR for notifications
and binding approvals shall be:
Mr. Jack Kirk
City of Fridley
6431 Unversity Ave. NE
Fridley,. NiN 55432
3G
ARTICLE XV - Other Provisions
None.
ARTICLE XVI - Contract Complete
3H
All materials and provisions incorporated into this contract, by
reference or otherwise, must be attached hereunto. This contract,
including all materials and provisions incorporated herein by
reference or otherwise, contains all agreements and covenants
between the UNIVERSITY and the SPONSOR. No other
understandings, provisions, or materials, whether written, oral, or
otherwise, regarding this contract, shall be deemed to exist or to bind
the iJNIVERSITY, the SPONSOR, or both.
APPENDIX A
PROPOSAL
31
Title: Population management of Fridley Canada Geese.
Prepared by: Dr. James A. Cooper, Associate Professor, Department
of Fisheries and Wildlife, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.
(612-624-1223)
Date: 4/23/87
Importance:
Extirpated by market and subsistence hunting over much of its
southern range during settlement, the Canada goose (B ra n ta
canadensis) has been reestablished in the midwest and elsewhere.
This successful wildlife management program resulted from federal,
state, and private efforts (Nelson 1963, Dill and Lee 1970, and Cooper
1978).
Contemporary landscaping and farming practices have greatly
enhanced Canada goose habitat. Lawns, soybeans, small grains, and
pasture sown on lake and wetland shorelines provide a super
abundance of brood-rearing habitat in both rural and urban settings.
These sites and harvested agricultural crops, especially corn and
small grains, are used at other times of the year. This, coupled with
refuges created to protect the birds during establishment and the
expansion of cities where hunting is not permitted, has lead to a
phenomenal population growth in past 20 years.
Because Canada geese are highly social and occur in flocks
during all periods of the year except nesting (Zicus 1981, Schaltz
1983) and graze extensively on grasses, forbs, and crops, goose
flocks, particularly adults with flightless young, began to damage
Minnesota crops in 1980 (Rose 1981). Concentrations of geese and
their droppings in city parks, on golf courses, and goose flights near
airports have lead to a growing number of complaints in urbanized
areas, e. g., Denver, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Toronto, Boston, and
Westchester County in New York (Laycock 1982, Oetting 1983).
While population reductions methods, such as capture and removal
and increased hunting kill, have been used, none have be adequately
3J
tested or documented in the literature. This project will test further
removal and translocation.
Objectives:
1. To assist with development of population objectives, i. e., the
acceptable number of geese at specific sites.
2. To model populations and estimate removal levels needed to
attain and maintain desired population levels.
3. Provide technical expertise and participate in public hearings and
assist with public relations.
4. To coordinate and do goose removal in 1990, 1991, 1992, and
1993 as population control procedures.
5. To monitor population levels from 1990 to 1993 to ascertain
population reduction effectiveness.
Methods:
Model--Much of the data necessary to construct a model have been
gathered from 1973 to 1983 for the Metropolitan Twin Cities Canada
Goose populations (Salyer 1977, Cooper unpubl. data). Parameters
that have been measured include participation in breeding by sex
and age class, age related productivity, effect of re-pairing,
emigration and immigration, gosling, subadult, and adult survival.
Additional data are needed on the effect of density reduction on
breeding participation, dispersal, and survival. These data will
obtained by capturing and neckbanding (Sherwood 1966) flightless,
immature geese, and subsequently capturing and removing the
breeding segment of the population the next summer. Because
Canada geese do not breed until 2 years of age, or older, by
monitoring the breeding participation rate of the marked geese in
the following 2 years and comparing the rate of participation with
existing data (Cooper, unpubl.), the effect of the lowering the density
can be determined. Survival and dispersal of will be ascertained
from neckband reobservation (Cormack 1964; Cooper 1975). The
model will be based on the Jolly method as modified Barry (1977)
3K
except that neckband observations will be employed instead of
legband recaptures.
Removal--The effectiveness of goose removal will be predicted using
the model and evaluated by monitoring population growth.
Population level objectives will be established in consultation with
cooperating city and agency personnel. Selected target populations
will be reduced by capturing and removing young and adults during
the summer flightless period (Martz et al. 1982). Growth in these
populations will be measured by 1) ascertaining nest densities using
methods similar to that of Cooper (1978), 2) by conducting brood
counts prior arrival of migrants in mid-September, and by doing
population counts from August to December.
Chronology of Research Activities:
1988
15 May-5 June--identify brood concentrations, model populations
and estimate goose removal levels; participate in public hearing and
attain permits.
5 June-7 July--coordinate and conduct goose removal.
1 August-31 December--conduct population counts and read markers
at goose concentration sites. '
1989-91
1 January-15 April--summarize data and prepare annual report.
15 April-5 June--conduct nest density surveys and brood counts;
estimate goose removal using population model.
5 June-1 July--coordinate and conduct goose removal.
15 August-31 December--conduct population counts and read
markers at goose concentration sites.
Literature Cited:
3L
Barry, C.T. 1977. The mortality of Yorkshire Canada geese. Wildfowl
28:35-47.
Cooper, J.A. 1975. Estimating Canada goose survival in an urban
environment from neckband observations. 37th Midwesi Fish
and Wildlife Conference, Toronto, Ontario. -
Cooper, J.A. 1978. The history and breeding biology of the Canada
geese of Marshy Point, Manitoba. Wildl. Monogr. 61. 87pp.
Cormack, R. M. 1964. Estimate of survival from sighting of marked
animals. Biometrika 51:429-438.
Dill, H.H. and F.B. Lee (eds.) 1970. Home grown honkers. U.S. Dept.
Int., Fish Wildl. Serv,, Washington, D. C. 154pp.
Laycock, G. 1982. The urban goose. Audubon 84:44-47.
Martz, J., L. Pospichal, and E. Tucker. 1982. Giant Canada geese in
Michigan: experiences with translocations and nuisance
management. i n Johnson, M. A. (Ed.) Transactions of The
Canada Goose Symposium, North Dakota TWS Chapter, 71pp.
Nelson, H.K. 1963. Restoration of breeding Canada goose flocks in
the North Central States. Trans. N. A. Wildl. Conf. 28:133-150.
Oetting, R. 1983. Overview of management of Canada geese and
their recent urbanization. in Johnson, M. A. (Ed.) Transactions
of The Canada Goose Symposium, North Dakota TWS Chapter,
71 pp.
Rose, J. 1981. Fergus Falls goose shortage turns into goose
abundance. Minnesota Out-Of-Doors 27(11):22.
Sayler, R. D. 1977. Breeding ecology of the Twin Cities, Minnesota,
Metropolitan Canada geese. M. S. Thesis, University of
Minnesota, 61 pp.
Schultz, D. F. 1983. FaII flock behavior and harvest of Canada geese
in the vicinity of the Talcot Lake Wildlife Management Area in
southwest Minnesota. M.S. Thesis, University of Minnesota,
72pp.
Sherwood, G.A. 1966. Flexible plastic collars compared to nasal discs
for marking geese. J. Wildl. Manage. 30:853-855.
Zicus, M.C. 1975. Capturing nesting Canada geese with mist nets.
Bird Banding 46:168-169.
Zicus, M.C. 1981. Flock behavior and vulnerability to hunting of
Canada geese nesting at Crex Meadows, Wisconsin. J. Wildl.
Manage. 45:830-841.
3M
... ,� .
: .
COSTS PER CAPTURE SITE*
Salaries (program coordination
and monitoring)
Travel and shipping
Miscellaneous (phone, boots,
etc.)
TOTAL
1990 1991 1992 1993
800 800 800 800
150 150 150 150
50 50 50 50
$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
*The City of Fridley authorizes transfer of funds between
subaccounts.
3N
Enqineermg
s�W<<
w.��t�
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM -
,,
;,� .
� �.,
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager��:'� PW90-94
FROM: John G. Flora', Public Works Director
DATE: March 9, 1990
BIIBJECT: Utility Cut Ordinance
I have prepared a draft Ordinance No. 407 entitled, "Excavations
in Public Street, Rights-of-Way and Easements". The purpose of
this ordinance is to govern the repair of utility cuts made in our
streets by other agencies. Because of poor compaction and adequate
strength in utility cuts in the past, we have e�erienced
depressions and settling in trenches and cuts in our streets. The
ordinance establishes an improved system of patching as well as
recording and minimizing the time of disruption to our travelled
ways.
We have reviewed the costs of the City in regards to staffs time
administering the various requests for work in our rights-of-way
and also the costs of operating and responding to the Gopher State
One-Ca11 System in establishing a$100.00 permit fee.
I have distributed copies of the ordinance to all the utility
companies. Minnegasco and NSP are not too happy with the ordinance
as written and specifically, object to the security portion of the
ordinance which would require a$10,000.00 deposit. I have met
with them and expect the Mirinegasco representative to attend the
Council meeting to suggest that the franchise utility companies be
exempt from providing a security deposit or, in the worse case
scenario, be allowed to extend their $1,000.00 initial security
over the entire year.
Recommend the City Council receive the first reading of this
ordinance. They may consider the position of Minnegasco and NSP
in regards to the security deposit. Any change they desire we can
accomplish prior to the second reading.
JGF/ts
Attachment
4
� •. �
•
.,•u � �• «- .
`7�
•;•�� � r� M' � �• • / I:r" s�•r• • :tl• � :tl :t4�
:r1;lr. � . •: �. � ' 1 : 'l:ri` C:i - •)' ,.�, I� :e�� Gi:r I?I
'Ille City �il of the City of Fridley does hereby oYd,ain as follo�ws:
407.01 P[TRF�OBE
The p�n�ose of this ordin�nve is to gavern excavations within public streets on
public ric�t-of�ways arid easements by utility vc�anies c'ievelapexs oontractors
and ather persons within the City of FYidley.
407 . 02 li'�CfJIATIa[d
In order to prvtec�t Qublic health safety ar�d w�elfare and to preserve the
lic streets utilities and other of the Ci the Direct�or of Public
Works is authorized and direc.-�ted to establish reaulations nertainina to
excavations within public streets on public ric,�t-of�wavs ar�d eas�nts within
the Citv.
407.03 D�'II1ITI�8
Applicant shall mean utility c�anies includina but not limited to Minr�egasco
Inc ; Northern States Pbw�er C�o�npany: all develapers vontractors builders.
praperty vwners or other pe.rsons requesting an excavation ��+;t to do wnrk in
the public streets on public ric,�t-of�ravs and ea.sements within the Citv.
Director shall mean the person holding the offioe of Direc.�tror of Public Works,
or ariy r.�erson assigned bv him to enforoe the te,tms of this ordirs�nce.
407.04 F�lOQ�VATIO�T PERl�IIT
No applicant shall dig ua break excavate tunnel under w�dermine, or in arrv
other manner do excavation n street alle sidewalk bikewa curb
or c�utter driv�way boailevard, or other,public plaoe or make or cause to be
made ariy excavation in or w�dex the surfaoe of said public street on a ric�t-
of the public street, withait obtaining an excavation nermit.
407.05 APPLIC�iTI�T
An application for
the Diractor. The
the Dir�ector.
407.06 ISS@�ii� OF PE[iNIIT
If the Direct.or finds that the applicant has satisfied the rerniire�►ents of this
on3inanoe and if it ar.x�ears that the applicant can oonq�lv with current
regulations established bv the Director then the Director shall issue a written
permit.
. �
O�DII�1�'E I�U.
Page R1�ld
407.07 F�iVATI�T PE[i'NIIT I+EES
or c�rctes relatinq to the prapoeed oo�stniction wr�rk. In addition, the
applicant shall pav to the City for eac� reinspection reyuired after the
oan�le�tion of the constn�ction as prwided in Q�apter 11 of this oode.
407.08 SBCfJRIR'�f F�OR �Z�'1'IOId OF �VATIaId
Upon approval of an apQlication the applicant shall deposit with the Citv cash
in the form of a certified checJc or a oonstruction bond. in the amount of
oonstruction is ooatq�leted ar�d for a neriod of 12 months thereafter to Uuarantee
that the restoration w�rk has been satisfaetorilv con�leted.
After the denosit of the security the applicant may then pr�ooeed with the
within the time specified in the pezmit the City may pY�ooee�d to oonq�lete the
excavation ar�d restoration w�ork ar�d the oost of said w�rk nlus ac�ministrative
oost shall be cleducted frcan the securitv.
If the restoration w�ork done the a licarit needs ir as deteYmined the
DirectAr durirXr the 12 morith guarant� period. the applicant shall do all
r�ece.ssarv repair wnrk In the ever�t the applicant fails or refuses to do the
neoessary repair wurk the City may do said wnrk and the vost of the renair wnrk
plus achninistrative expense shall be deduc.�ted fro�n the securitv. Upon c�o�letion
of the �storation of the site ar�d after the 12 month guarantee t�ex'iod the
security or the balanoe thereof recna;n;� shall be reftu�ded to the avnlicant.
In the event that restoration c�ost shall exc�eed the amaint f the securi
the a�plicant shall be liable for ariy additi�al oosts.
407.09 O�I�'ilald At�ID Affisit�ID0�1�TP � iiORR
Work shall prociress in an expeditiaus manner and shall be vo�leted a000n�ina
to the te.rntis of the application ar�d pennit In the event the work is not beirx�
perfoYmed in avoordar�oe with applicable reaulations, or shall vease or be
ar�d renair the surfaoe In such eve.nt the enti.re oost plus achninistrative
expenses for sixh work sha].1 be the liabilitv of and shall be t�aid bv. the
applicant to whan the permit was issued.
o�un�rx� rx�.
�age �ree
407.10 BT� . PAVII� �t R'BS�ACII�
Zhe City,of FYidley shall qive the utilit� oca�anies reasonable written natioe
of �lans for street itmroveqnent where navinu or resurfacing of a permanent nature
advanae of vonstruction to allvw the ocs�wanies tA make arYy neoessaYy additions
alterations or r�pairs to its faci.lities prior to the sdleduled street
within three ( 3) m�nths after vice��letion of the i.�ro�vement shall reauire an
excavation pexmit a�xi shall be subject to an additional p�xmit c•harae of
51,000.00.
407.11 S� ALTI�1
the e�ne.rgency excavation after the permit has been issued.
4'I• 51' C.:� I�I' '.• � •; 1� ':rl:r:
11.10 Fees
407. F�ccavation in Public Streets,
Ric�ts-of�ray ar�d E�.sements P�ermit Fee. . 100.00
Reinsgection Fee. 25.00+
(C�.sh oertified c3�ec�Jc or �tn�ction
1�FtCfi, 1990.
WILLIAM J. NEE - 1�YOR
ATl'ES'T:
� �r r. . •. « �.
�irst Readilxt• Nlarch 12. 1990
S� R�dinc�
Publish•
4C
Permit No. Actual Completion Date 4�
CZTY OF FRZDLEY
Excavation Permit
Date of Application Date Permit Issued
Applicant's Agency
Applicant's Name Business Phone
Address Emergency Phone
Work Performed By
Start Date Tentative Completion Date
Location of Work Site
Excavation
Type: Open Cut Boring Jacking Tunneling
Description:
Length Width Area Depth Diameter
Roadway Surface: Asphalt Concrete Gravel Other
Purpose: Water Sewer Telephone Electric Gas
Other
Traffic Control
Traffic Control Required? Attach copy of traffic control plan.
Traffic Control Plan approved by:
Comments:
Securitv
Type Amount S`
Date Received Date Released
READ GENERAL PROVISIONS ON REVERSE SIDE BEFORE SIGNING.
Applicant Date
AUTHORIZATION OF PERMIT
Upon payment of penmit fee in the amount of $100.00 plus $25.00 per
subsequent dispatch call and in consideration of the agreement to comply
in all respects with Ordinance No. 407 and the regulations applicable
covering such operations, permission is hereby granted for the work to
be done in accordance with special precautions, as hereby stated:
It is expressly understood that this permit is conditioned upon
replacement of the surface to its proper condition in accordance with
the appropriate rules and regulations and is secured by $1,000.00 bond
or cash.
Approved
Date
Insp.ection Record
Inspection Date By
Comments
General Crovisio�s 4E
1. The City of Fridley does not guarantee the accuracy of utility tocations and elevstions. This data ia for informstion
only snd s�ould be verified •t tAe site.
2. Permittee shatl be responsible tor all persorrxl, materials, construction equip�mcnt, clearx�p snd subcontractors.
3. Permittce sl+all be responsible for estsDlisAing safety measu�es to protect the public f�om any and all harm durin9
construction. Poor visibility or overnight use of barricsdes require lighted barricades. All iraffic control snd safety
precautions shall be i� confora�ance with the Marwal on Unifona Traffic Control Devices and subject to review by the Public
Works Direccor prior to issusr►ce of a permit.
4. A permit siust be obtained at least two (2> �orking days prior to commencert�ent of work. The Engineerin9 Oept. must be
notified one (t) workin9 before Degi ming work.
S. Permit is valid for the dates and extent of ►rork listed. Supplemental permits must be obtained if the time of completion
or extent of �ork chenges from that tisted.
6. The inspector mey require caipaction tests at the expense of *.he permittee and may require nonconforming �asteriels or
construction to be removed snd replsced at the expense of the Permitiee.
T. Permittee shall be responsible for the uork for a period of one year after completion of work pursusnt to the permit.
8. Permittce sgrees to hold the City of Fridley harmless fram any and all claims which might arise fran the construction,
maintensnce and any other activities related to the Permittee's work and facilities.
In accepting this permit the applicant, representing the Permittee, verifies that all the foregoing provisions have been read
and understood. Also, that the applicant has the authority to sign for and bind the Permittee, and that by virtue of the
applicant's signature, the Permittee is bound by and agrees to comply with all City ordinances, state laws and provisions herein
regarding such construction and activities pursuant to this permit.
SAw CUT PAVEMENT EOGE
ExlSiir�G CONCRETE Pavir�G
1 "- 0" - -
(TYP.) � `:_;�:';;:.
-- �:;:
COM?a,CrEO BaC�c�L! �r�� `:
(95% t�tOC�FIED PROCTORj �
_..__.._ ... __ . ...............
.._ .__.
__ . _ .. .. ...
;�
STREET CUT P,EPAIR
(CONCRETE STREET)
SAw CuT PnvEMENT EDGE
EXISTiNC ASPHALT PAVINC
/iiiiri/iG f .
EXISTiNG GRAVEL -o 0 0-0
BASE °'°°°°°°
se�
.,
_� ��� �
� �-0�
�
COMPACTED 8AQ(FlLL —
(957. MODIFIED PROCTOR)
" OF NEW CONCRETE PAVINC
- SAW CUT PAVE►.�ENT EOGE
UNDISTUR6ED SOIL
UTIUTY
6" OF NEW ASPHALT PAVING
r- SAW CUT PAVEMENT EDCE
8" OF NEW CIASS S BASE
(COMPACTED 957. MODIFIED PROCTOR)
- � UNOISTURBED SOIL
's�--UTIUTY
STREET CUT REPAIR
(BITUMINOUS STREET�
Engi�Seenng
sewe�
Water
Parks
Streefs
Ma�ntenance
MEMORANDUM
` � .�.
TO: William W. Burns,, ity Managerq��� PW90-90
W
FROM: Mark A. Winson�sst. Public Works Director
DATE: March 2, 1990
SIIBJECT: Tax Forfeit Parcel No. 54
At the February 26, 1990, meeting, the City Council tabled
discussion on the recommendation to Anoka County regarding
disposition of Parcel No. 54 so that staff could provide more
information on the adjacent lots.
Parcel No. 54 is a vacant parcel (Lot 11, Block 12, Springbrook
Park) on Liberty Street east of Ashton Avenue. The lot and
adjacent lots are zoned M-1, Light Industrial. The staff
recommendation is tha� the tax forfeit parcel be combined with
adjacent parcels. The parcels to the east are currently tax
forfeit and the property to the west (Lots 9 and 10) have the same
owner. The adjacent parcels are vacant.
Recommend the Council approve the staff recommendation
MAw/ts
5
/
�
CfiYOF
FiilIX.k.Y
�- 7 � � - h ,� -
-•�-- � � I � � - _. � � � - � �
5 I 1 -�� � � �
---�-- --�� -- ------�= �
�, . .
, , :.. ,�
N . � • ,�! ^ : � +� A _,�y w ..1...w �..`..= i. � �n �� � ~ N �► �e} ,
�\ w � t � \ i � �' '� � �/� N � . �•
� � � t N l�! � � '^ r � �
� � w
w' • : s � r : ; t [ , � �+ ' �n ,' � �
t � i e t � � !Y' •\ '�` . (~�.
�v ` Q', ` � _ � ��� � v � ` .
w � . �' � � � \ \ �S� � ' �
• : � 3
� � • ; � .I� e �.
i � ,' ' �/� v
*
+ � � h M � �f
� . �,�, .
,�: � � w � � �/ v , ` , � f
� � � I� � � �,�.
�� - • ., .� �w• � „� � .
�� ., � ���N h � • . � � ,I
� & � : ,h � ,,,\ � � � ' , �! 1• :
�j , . � � . • � 1 �' � f• . L
vr � � p a �1 �' -
, , �
� � � � � � � .
v
/� /� , � ; ; � . � • � v v : ii.� � � '1� : ' ' '� . �
� � • � `�
. ; ! ; ;o � . . : W : a c�f _ �► � � + W r v °� i � �Y �1
�eM w � i qv � ' � . � a s ��SL � \: � � ♦ :
rI �,-. � � \, • \ • H�/� � ,�c. S' V/ z �+ �''i� ♦
v � � � � � , V �.� : v! _ � ! t � r . � : . = � e � �
V1 ! ��. �� 1p i i r i �q ► • � V1 � �
i e � • � �' r � r � � ` �.
� ` � � ` � � v^ \ i 'v� � . � U1 r a A a �1 e .
lv 4 s � ! � � �N � � � i� � • ��v ? i • ' !1 I � e
o� � � • � ii • ... '� � � � '�� .�_
v �♦ �'
, 'N '3Ad „. NOlHSd '; � �
o •"' ` . • �. �
* w �� w k 3 ,� � h � w�.. ; '� � � : � w v
� + �� J t, t ,� � � � • . � c � ,.�'� ! � � � . i
s � � : �� , : ; �. i � � - � .r_ : ,
� \ c � � � ♦ � '1 � rt � ' fri► ..
1� ti� c� q� . 3 � � � � � . i_ ti
it � . � ` � h �. � •• r �-:r.
�."' ..r , � � � v v , �.,� :��.� �
a ^ ,,, � � ,� `, .^. "o " ' o. �,,� ^+ ; � ;" ��
�� � �� ", � r � ,. � �9 � �' � ~ t • y . �' �� . � w 1 Q � ,- .' �;i
i
�' � ,� � � t � � � ♦ 0 p � � N �'
� �
a, � \ � ` . , v � . i �' ` u ; � � ��../
Q � i � �� f \ 'q � �l c. P� i �.
� + � � ` � � � \ � q� �./ A m R � � �
I
�� � C � V /� :,�/ •
� , — v
.
� � : � `l' p� � .� `� � : � v� '1 � � � � •�'� �w
a t •� � � ^ +
v Or '� �* r1 y T r\ ' � �' • � e� i!� � I
�� � � �,� ' � .�+ � �1 `l. o ,i . � w f
` • • L1J `�' ' A
o � + ` �• `M � : �! � ' � ^ , , �'' ` v O�T n
V� ► � .� , � . .1 �` Yj � �� ` � � •�� ' '�' ~ O 'e
° '^ r W '+ � •� T J � �c o7 � �. • •� �- �� a \
, �
^ r' ' ! . .w. n, + `\` + _ ° �i• � � � •� � �` �"
w � �. � ,� i e � ^�
� � V • � � � , : � �' �.. 7 S Y � .. �
tY � ti �
`��� 2 '? �°`' V w � w'� ` � � '',?' + � , . .��• q v ^ r/�� 9 �b, .
, rNina •- � - � h. ° � ,J,, .�� a
i33als ,� � •� � ,- 'y .,
�
� � �v , : . " ,�; 4 y 1�
' �� s �' p� k �V � �� � ` N . . : A � � ; �t/ � �� �� O�
� /�y� .�b/ L g � f : i �'1 • �J � � � ^ �, b
M � �,� . N F
4 ` �{I.� /\ �\ . � 1 �'M �% �
� �' a�. 2���.. � � 'a, • • V ` • .�/ h� � ' K ^^ � �
as � � ; '�' m � i ~ � . � �• � g w � , � � \ , 7, � •' d
,�� M � •` j k �. �, i '_. 4• y� � c • t
i � ^ \ � :� ` � Q,
. w 'R� ; Q � � • ,�. ^ R J y , `q • \ ^ � w * v f•
� •S *
�`. 4�r. ew' ; �A ����' ,�� d '�.` � ti ,� � ` �` � :' --1 �
.,, � � � �� _ `� . ' � : v � t ` � � ` � � � •
�. � °T °� N . � _ � , , "� : `+ � �, � j t .
� � 1 �' i �/ ^ It ° . .t �� � rJ � h : � • � � � �I'� IM_R 5
'^� �, ` {� � � 'Y. �nt � � � v ' f
• .� ._ .
_
,. ,;�1 i �. � � 0 : a : f � \
' ~� � �'�l l _ - � i ..� \
.� _ w� i � �v ` , _. . _ ` Q __... __._ .- __ I� .. �
E„�3��,����„��
s� W���
w,��<��
Varks
Strtc t5
Ma�ntctie:�ce
MEMORANDUM -
�r �� .
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager��, PW90-93
FROM: John G. Flora,�Public Works Director
Bob Nordahl, Operations Analyst
DATE: March 6, 1990
SIIBJECT: Fridley Municipal Center Improvement
Project No. 189 - Change Order No. 16
Change Order No. 16 consists of contract adjustments for the
following subcontractor's final billings.
The contract extra to Granote Iron, Inc. for $91�.15 is the final
settlement for extra work called for by Bossardt-Christenson to
complete the outside steel work.
Gammon Brothers, Inc. was a deduct of $632.50 on Change Order No.
15. This was incorrect to process on a change order. By adding
this amount back on Change Order No. 16, it will bring the contract
back to a zero balance. Also, Environ-Con, Inc. deduct of
$1,200.00 on Change Order No. 12 was incorrect. Again, by adding
back this amount on Change Order No. 16, the contract will be a
zero balance.
Change Order No. 16 includes a contract deduct of ($31.00) to
Nardini Fire Equipment to adjust to the correct contract amount.
Also, this change order includes a contract deduct of ($36.00) to
Glewwe Doors to correct sales tax charges to the City.
Recommend the City Council approve Change Order No. 16 to the
Fridley Municipal Center Improvement Project No. 189.
JGF/BN/ts
Attachment
LJ
i-
•. �
•
CITY OF FRIDLEY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
6431 UNIVERSITY AVE., N.E.
FRIDLEY. MN 55432
March 12, 1990 �
Kraus-Anderson C�nst. Co.
525 So. Eighth St.
Minneapolis, MN 55404
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 16 - Structural Steel Extra and Contract Adjustments
Fridley Municipal Center Improvement Project No. 189
Gentlemen:
You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instructed to modify your contract for the
Fridley Municipal Center tmprovement Project No. 189 by adding the foliowing work:
CONTRACT EXTRA:
Granote Iron, Inc.
CORRECTION TO CHANGE ORDER NO. 15:
Gammon Bros., Inc.
CORRECTION TO CHANGE ORDER NO. 12
Environ-Con, inc.
CONTRACT DEDUCT:
Nardini Fire Equipment.
CONTRACT DEDUCT: SALES TAX
Glewwe Doors
917.15
Subtotal
632.50
Subtotai
1,200.00
Subtotat
3{ 1.001
Subtotal
36.00
Subtotat
. �
917.15
632.50
1,200.00
(31.00)
3l s.00)
TOTAL ADDITIONS FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 16. ...... $2,682.65
10-Oct-89
EXPBOTFi
i
�
CITY 8� HRA
BALANCE
19t�5 1986 1987 1988 1989 TOTAL TO FINISH
REVENUES
TRANSFERS
GEN. FUND - ENCUMB 358,304.00 ' r8,�•�
CIVIC CTR BOND FUND 599,044.10 599,044.10
GEN. FUND-FUND BAL. 5250,000.00 �467,452.00 � 5717,452.00
CABLE T.V. 340,967.00 540,967•00
CAP.IMPROVEMENT �250,000.00 31,254,410.00 51,504,410.00
CAP. IMP. - FURN. 5333,091.00 5333,091.00
HRA �297,615.16 a417,110.16 5714,725.32
�
INTEREST EARNINGS S48,800.00 543,594.30 525,502.09 St 17,896.39
CASHED BID BOND 54,000.00 54,000•00
TOTAL REVENUES 5500.000.00 5107.104.00 �'1d2,636.40 ' 52.423.037.25 5417,110.16 53.589.889.81 30.00
EXPENDITURES
a
BOARMAN & ASSOCtATES 5600.00 55,475.73 563,229.79 �257,336.64 �30,384.84 $357,027.00 �
ELECTRONIC INTERIORS 52,550.00 55,114.87 51,158.00 58,822.87 � 5 �� 5/� �.
ELECTROSONIC, INC. 5114,418.22 �t 14,418.22 S40 0 0 �
BOSSARDT CHRISTENSON 549,179.87 349,119.87 � 5 s� 3 r, g5
KRAUS ANDERSON 542,500.00 342,500.00
TEXSCAN MSi CORP 56,980.84 56,980.84
PINK COMPANlES 5396,145.91 5396,145.91 528,000.00
CONST. EXP. INCLUDING
GENERAL EXPENSES 51,380,402.69 51,859,013.50 53,239,416.19 5570,519.20
MISCELLANEOUS
CHA{RS - ROLL CALL
8 MGRS OFFICE ' S10,168.58 510,168.58
CONFERENCE TABLE &
VISUAL BOARD 55,158.00 35,158.00
CHAIRS/ CNCIL CHAMBERS $7,115.55 57,115.55
VERTICAL BLINDS �4,572.00 34,572.00 $508.00
FIRE STATION RECLINERS 51,579.00 51,579.00
TWIN CITY TESTING- RAMP 5506.46 5506.46
CARPET TREAD MAT 5957.00 3957.00
ACCESS CONTROL CARDS 5994.42 5994.42
MiSC. 5299.30 a�9•� .
WATER METER 3304.53 5304.53
PRINT PARIUNG TICKETS 393.98 �93.98
ADVERTISING - PHONES 5193.45 5193.45
TASK LIGHTING 583.19 383.19
INTERIOR SIGNAGE ���5•�
TOTAL EXPEND�TURES < �600.00 475:7 �6,079.09 31.693.353.42 �2.474,94$.12 �4.246.456.36 ' �639.027.20
BALANCE (SHORIFALL) ';499,400.00 3101,628.27 576.559.31 ` !;723,683.83 (52.057.837.96) iS656.566.5Si (S639A27.20)
10-Oct-89
EXPENSE
1985
REVENUES
TRANSFERS
GEN. FUND - ENCUMB
CIVIC CTR BOND FUND
GEN. FUND-FUND BAL. 5250,000.00
CABLE T.V.
CAP.IMPROVEMENT $250,000.00
CAP. IMP. - FURN.
MRA
C(TY SHARE
1986 1987 1988
558�304.00
599,044.10
5467,452.00
540,967.00
51,254,410.00
5333,091.00
BALANCE
1989 TOTAL TO FINISH
S58 �304.00
599,044.10
5717,452.00
340,967.00
� 1,504,410.00
a333,091.00
�0.00
lNTEREST EARNINGS 548,800.00 S43,594.30 525,502.09 St 17,896.39
CASHED BID BOND 54,000.00 54,000.00
TOTAL REVENUES 3500,000.00 �107.104.00 S'142.638.40 52.125.422.09 �0.00 �2.875.164.49 �0.00
EXPENDITURES
BOARMAN & ASSOCIA7ES 3600.00 55,475.73 563,229.79 $217,599:23 327,659.48 a314,564.23
ELECTRONIC INTERIORS 32,550.00 52,530.12 51,158.00 56,238.12
ELECTROSON�C, INC. 5114,418.22 Si 14,418.22 $40,000.00
BOSSARDT CHRISTENSON 549,119.87 549,119.87
KRAUS ANDERSON 542,500.00 542,500.00
TEXSCAN MSI CORP 56,980.84 56,980.84
PINK COMPANIES 5396,145.91 5396,145.91 528,000.00
CONST. EXP. INCLUDING
GENERAL EXPENSES 51,125,109.69 51,444,628.70 52,569,738.39 5341,689.00
MISCELLANEOUS
CHA1R5 - ROLL CALL
8� MGRS OFFICE 310,168.58 310,168.58
CONFERENGE TABLE 8�
VISUAL BOARD 35,158.00 55,158.00
CHAIRS/ CNCIL CHAMBERS $7,115.55 37,115.55
VERTICAL BLINDS 54,572.00 �4.572.00 5508.00
FIRE STATION RECLINERS 31,579.00 51,579.00
TWIN CITY TESTING- RAMP 5506.46 3506.46
CARPET TREAD MAT 5957.00 3957.00
ACCESS COi�fTROL CARDS 5994.42 S994.42
MISC. �299.30 5299.30
WATER METER 5304.53 5304.53
PRINT PARF4NG TICKETS 593.98 393.98
ADVERTISING - PHONES 5193.45 5193.45
TASK LIGFffING 383.19 583.19
1NTERIOR SIGNAGE ���5•�
TOTALDff'ENDfTURES :660(f:0a �475.73 �66,079.09 51.409,738.26 �2.057.837.96 �3.531.731.04 �A10,197.00
__ _
BALANCE (SHORTFALL) �499,400.00 51�1,528.27 376.559.31 ;T23.683.83 (52.057.837.96) tS656.566.5�; (5410.197.00)
� o-oc�-ss
EXPHRA
REVENUES
TRANSFERS
GEN. FUND - ENCUMB
CIVIC CTR BOND FUND
GEN. FUND-FUND BAL.
CABLE T.V.
CAP. {MPROVEMENT
CAP, tMP. - FURN.
HRA
INTEREST EARNINGS
CASHED BID BOND
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENDITURES
BOARMAN 8� ASSOCIATES
ELECTRONIC INTERIORS
ELEC7ROSONIC, INC.
BOSSARDT CHRISTENSON
KRAUS ANDERSON
TEXSCAN MSI CORP
PINK COMPANIES
CONST. EXP. INCLUDING
GENERAL EXPENSES
MISCELLANEOUS
CHAIRS - ROLL CALL
8 MGRS OFFICE
CONFERENCE TABLE 8�
VISUAL BOARD
CHA1RSi CNCIL CHAMBERS
VERTICAL 8L1NDS
FIRE STATION RECUNERS
TWIN CITY TESTING- RAMP
CARPET TREAD MAT
ACCESS CONTROL CARDS
MISC.
WATER METER
PRINT PARIaNG TICKETS
ADVERTISiNG - PHONES
TASK LIGFiTfNG
1985
�0.00
HRA SHARE
1986 1987 1988 1989 TOTAL
ao.00
50.00
50.00
�0.00
50.00
50.00
�297,615.16 5417,110.16 $714,725.32
ao.00
ao.00
50.00 50.00 , 3297.615.16 5417.i10.16 �714,725.32
539.737.a� 52,725.36
$2,584.75
5255,293.00 5414,384.80
BALANCE
TO FiNISH
50.00
$42.462.77
52,584.75
30.00
$0.00
50.00
50.00
so.00
5669,677.80 5228,830.20
30.00
50.00
50.00
30.00
30.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
ao.00
ao.00
ao.00
50.00
30.00
__. _ _ _
TOTAL EXPENDITURES S(i.00 ;50.�0 SO.QO $297.615.16 5417;110.16 �714.725.3� ;<�228.83Q.20
BAL.ANCE (SHORTFALL) 'i0.00 ` 30.00 ' i0.00 (50.00) �0.00 _ '(30.00) ';(5228,830.20)
Tom Sackett
Kraus-Anderson Const. Co.
Change Order No. 16
March 12, 1990
Page Two
TOTAL ORIGINAL CONTRACTS
Contract Adjustments
Park Settlement
Subtotal
Change Order No. 1
Change Order No. 2
Change Order No. 3
Change Order No. 4
Change Order No. 5
Change Order No. 6
Change Order No. 7
Change Order No. 8
Change Order No. 9
Change Order No. 10
Change Order No. 11
Change Order No. 12
Change Order No. 13
Change Order No. 14
Change Order No. 15
Change Order No. 16
TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTS 8 ADJUSTMENTS
: MUNICIPAL
CENTER
2,204,391.00
(8,049.00)
0.00
2,196,342.00
13,374.00
8,834.00
30,700.00
25,000.00
32,597.43
33,673.00
12,817.00
3,323.00
(9,700.00)
580.00
18,820.00
8,896.00
1,182.00
(6,987.31)
2,050.15
$175,159.27
$2,371,501.27
�• :
FIRE
STATION RAMP
226,786.00 712,500.00
580.00 4,846.00
0.00 29.202.Ot3
227,366.00 746,548.OQ
2,596.00
8,793.00
6,000.00
4,319.00
1,784.16
3,375.00
549.00
(2,972.00)
3,170.00
375.00
0.00
$27.989.16
$255,355.16
8,975.00
3,530.00
15,220.00
3,859.00
35.00
41,531.00
1,870.00
(6,071.00)
47.00
632.50
$69,628.50
$816,176.50
Subrr �tted and approved by John G. Fiora, Public Works Director, on the 12th day of March, 1990.
� � \
c'"�_,''�•`�r�( � ? c.� ti �-�.��
P�epared by 'v�
r. ,, .
C � d by � '
V/ �' � ��''��/ZL.
J . Flora, P.E.
Director of Public Works
,•
Tom Sackett
Kraus-Anderson Const. Co.
Change Order No. 16
March 12, 1990
Page Three
sc
Recommend this day of , 1990, by
KRAUS-ANDERSON CONST. CO.
Tom Sackett, Project Manager
Approved and accepted this 12th day of March, 1990.
CITY OF FRIDLEY
William J. Nee, Mayor
William W. Burns, City Manager
IEngineenng
�ISewer
Water
ParkS
Streets
Mainlenance
MEMORANDUM -
�_
��
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager����y PW90-102
FROM: John G. F1ora,�Director of Public Works
DATE: March 8, 1990
SIIBJECT: Recommendation to Award Contract for Repair of
Well No. 3
On Thursday, March 8, 1990, bids were received and opened for
Repair of Well No. 3, Project No. 203.
Five (5) well companies received specifications and bid the Repair
of Well No. 3. (see attached bid tabulation)
The apparent low bid is from E.H. Renner and Sons, Inc., for
$22,956.00.
The bids are currently being reviewed by the Public Works Staff and
the final recommendation to award the contract will be forthcoming
at the Council Meeting on Monday, March 12, 1990.
If you need additional information, please let me know.
JGF/kn
Attachment
7
, ;-
•
•. �
�
'�
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 12, 1990
ELECTRICAL
FMC
4800 East River Road
Fridley, MN 55421
By: John Hartman
GAS SERVICES
Berghorst Plumbing & Heating Co.
10732 Hanson Boulevard N.W.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433 By: Keith Zimmerman
DelMar Furnace Exchange Inc.
4080 - 83rd Avenue North
Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 By: Del Wischmann
HEATING
De1Mar Furnace Exchange Inc.
4080 - 83rd Avenue
Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 By: Del Wischmann
PLUMBING
Berghorst Plumbing & Heating Co.
10732 Hanson Boulevard N.W.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433 By: Keith Zimmerman
FMC
4800 East River Road
Fridley, MN 55421
Swanson & Schiager Plumbing
9809 Logan Avenue South
Bloomington, MN 55431
SIGN ERECTOR
Scenic Sign Corp.
828 South 5th Street
Sauk Rapids, MN 56379
By: Dennis Waisanen
By: Gordon Swanson
By: Bob Gruber
10A
LICE1�i8E8
State of Minn
CLYDE WILEY
Bldg/Meci'i Insp •
Same
CLYDE WILEY
Bldg/Mech Insp•
State of Minn
Same
State of Minn
DARREL CLARK
Chief B�.dg Ofcl
t11
Cat
< F
H IJI
U'1 � >
� � a
U �D ~ (Y
4-+r�0
� A �
F- _
Z : Q12
O O 7 O
U � O F
CJ �0 G <
S U F U
� .1 M
..J .r W �
w n y a
.'1- J U O_
O< �+<
41 �. > .-I
s co c <
i .-, z
W ti
F
2
W
U
U
>
U
J
<
F
0
F
N
Q�
.�
B
�0
�
n
�
N
mmmmmm�m�mmmm�mmmm��mmam
Q1mtf18•�f'If'fQ1{�.f7mY7�DY1�0� V' V'9f'�Ot�mY'1
Q1 ('7mm�0•r.r.yC�l�.-�m�9�'Q�1�01�001@ W Q1
a0 � a N a m m.ti B l� �� a N N �0 /A N!� N•� U'1 N m
Y7 N ti �O �' � •w ! .r ! � .-i IPl .-� N Y7
W(P a aaawa a aa N IIINN/11
� 6� B B m B B B B
� B i B m m m m m A
<� c o. �� a� � � � c�•f � C�+
OC � N = �O � T� •� f') GO N .ti
r� C N� �0 �Yf a N fV U9
� a m� N N (P 11/
i Q1 i
i N �
N
Q� i
ni
W f'f
F < ('I �
.-� x co
U VI CO
N
N
�
2
O a'
i 1 (i� F'1 �
F � C F �
M I F-1 �'
U � 4. F W
i N N
� N
�
i
� N
i �
i
i �
i m
i U f�cl �
i > 2 B
1 M {{� �Q
� C.1 U
� N
i N
O
F
U
<
OC
F
2
O
U
i �
O �
[V+1 F �
G. U �
VI W �
N �
_
�
N
4-
V
<
C
t-
2
O
U
c
m
E
N
�
G
<
9mBm-�6i9m�flmBmmmmmmmmm mQ�B
m m m m m m m m., m m m m m m m m m m m� m a m
TBu'1B.-�.rPlTt�ulB V]Bulf'•-iN V�m V�At�BVS
Q�mC')mmtDN.-�.yI�I�•rN�J0f7 V'�O1�0��DN V'mT
W B l"1 N���•� m J� Y7 � IrI ('7 �0 N aT I� f'I � Y N m
N . u) N .. �II . N . N - UI
tff N .-. W m.r ! .-� .ti W .r .-i N u'1
a �n m tv a in a �n m.. +n m u� �n
N • N
, � „
u� , n � o ��
��D � N � m n
� � � n
i� i� � m �i
� C'1 � B � N a
� N � 0� � T u
i (`7 i 0� � N ��
� B i f� � N n
� � � � � ��
i b i i n
i i f'f � n
i i N i
i � i
i � i
i i � n
�
� m i B i m n
i m i B� m u
i � u
i m ��0 � B n
� tD � �O � N n
i I� i Q� � T u
i . � � N u
i B i m i u
� N � � i n
� N � fL � u
� � N � n
� � i u
•
�
i � i n
i uY � t� � B n
��O � N � m
i � n
� �fl � N � B +t
� V' i v� i m n
� V' i 01 i B n
i N � � � N ��
� � � m � �n ��
� N h �
i . i n
i i (V � n
� i N � n
i i u a.
� B m m B m m m m m i m i W� m u ¢
� m B m B m B � m��D i B u O
�!1 4[A �' m N �D m m m� � T� �!'1 i m u
ca c� m � n c� m u� u�f w cv ��o �_. � m� n
t' m•-� t� /l1 .ti SA 1fl N N f'f � �D � N�••• n
N N N � . � �� _
N.-� (`7 N � m � q) i ii O
W N N N i^� � u7 i �-+
i /11 � fV i �� N
� i N � n Z�+
� � � �� o >
• N �+
� � i u C �
BmmB mmmlf]mmA �mABmBm BTB � U'f i h � m� GJ
Bmmmmmmm.�BmB mBBBmm ma'm i�0 i�p � 9�i G=
Q� B m e.-� .r 01 .� !� •r m �7 I!'! V' Q1 N�O m V� l� N U'1 � �O ��G � m�� <�
Q�mulBm�m.•.��1�-i c9�Om�Ot��O-+ �OY'1Q+ � l� � N� m i� I�
mm-�N�cOhmmClYl�D a'IN�f11RC')t�(� t�0'�m � l� i n i� n�G
IA N�.-i N N�D f� .+ f7 �.-i a.r 119 b N IO .y .y �17 i.�i i m� N�� <..1
U/1� W NUINN N N� NNN i l� � f'') � Y1 u�W
� N N � N� iA � �� x=
1 1 1 11
i � N i � = C�
� N � � O z
� �.' H
i i 4. W
� i i n m
pWC J W
iFa7 C W� O�c � S Z
H
F F iFd t�+7 � tfal � F- �� i J 1- .�i fn <
41 F W OC � � Oc 47 i O td r F i 1-
� F W� Nl- CF J>CY4--� S W
F- W OC �� i� � Y 41 47 < 00. F W i 4] m�
� F WtY � i �� � COF WZ� i O L m
t+7 C � F IA !- < O U 47 N O '+ �+ '9 '9
2C � U WC��4i0.Ui � F� ZCU � T !- < S N
S+i � V ZCOtdOCLi d i7T�� = i O. N tV Q�
Vl � Nr+h+ fnS Or+i�O===SNN < U r� N UI
Z Z.J U C lC i�A F� U O�7 t8 O►+ < N 4] � '+ N z
OOtali=ta1F <C �< fAGflIUJ47r-i= ..i � ry NN
t!f U1►+O�-+SUUIZ O=47N►ti=47Z..t�iU�O 0. O ti t-�h
OC�2t1 1-�W CCO�:mOU�-+ �+�►��'+G►nt�FU 0` ►+ ZZ
wm oaoa •»za<m.-�x�mm<cn < a o mw
�G � F�talO►�W r+F47<�CG4.UW <S �.-7 41 t- NN
zs> wm c szc�ac: r- s mc� r a mm
« zz r m�zw oa-►.�c.�oe-oz< < a m mm
zoozsmt-<..mmmi-x:smsmMMs a � aa
UIVI<��Ot20.JN4iW 47W <.-� O 4]OC Z 41t+1
»CMML�T.i.TiJN .-:�=iUGJTi IM47 �'i C�
«�»=0.4]<'+<S�41i.JOC►+iU141dFJ ..i
�OC�2ii W JC�OCL4i0C�+7 <=O Sai� < �
YYf..1f+1tdC9U' C9U' t9U' YY�C=L2{LfYFNN�i m ••
f�'1 8����8 � ��mU'S�B ti�f�'7•~-�U�'f
V1 f� '+ �0 •r .� Q1 � .� Ifl ! m m•ti m� P'f N N
[� -rN.r�u')0� • h1n1A.r.ti�D•�N W �Dm
��1
_