Loading...
06/18/1990 - 4972FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL 1�IEETING � ATTENDENCE SHEET MONDAY , June 1 �, , J990 7:30 P.M. LEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ITEM RINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS NUMBER � a � U 1� c� - � U - e S � � � � � (,� (..1. l r. �' � i0� /V. �. l` L� zd Q�� r `� � k a� 3�—��� v�� �' ���-� 2� �9o_d ���K �%, ANi f3a --6 �,�� SZe �v 90-0 1-��1 ��/c � ��� /-/ �tr�� � �. ,, � �, z., - F��� � ��'. u � �� S-� %��� D- z � , � �: � �-S -� 7 � � ,2?.�' _ cl�� -oZ � � , � � �� u� �1 �� , �,��1 �j� a�rn� �60� 3z� r�� � ss I- 1� �' ,<, Cs� �fYY/'VV1Ct li! ��dl��/�i' -: :�; : � . T . � s o.r> � / /��c� C°2��K ��2 �i2 t D 90 -d -Y � _ F� a ' �v � � � /mLf o - oy � - '�'s �� ' - % �� . /� .�i.0!_.� d ' d ?� � ,N�3 �t�o�so� �-� �i cQ`7 � �v� n/�. ��,�- `�o- o�, � � p �0�- �`.��t � ��� -1J- � �c� — � �i�•h /- _ a � o �� �� �- , qo- a� uS - S 3�o - '� v� ,vF � o-0 2 � / �f�d� � " � % �U � -�r�� /= if�. F 6l�J - .a - _ � � � _ � � '% (�-� � ,(l� �'.� . 1 �, � - � _ „ , �. , �� � - / Z Yl � � D� . - \ �o-�. �>e�le��.� � `�d.y� �,�, �,e�t l�e�r-� /�'��°�S S �t P►� ; e �����so%� i' �/ �'Yt� N��Gl1�SfJ1� �oxan r� }{e r ����, �'..�-, �w,., 7�-�� y,��,�Z .� �� ��- 7�"��� P r C����'/LS cdV �� �-��.. �e. i� .L_. ►� c� �� 3 �is s , Sf /���— 3 �S �'l;ss s�` �F 3�5 M�ssiss�ppa S� � `C'� �� �� �a- oz z 0� �d -� O Z. �D� �0-� I �a5-1 �9`'� �ve n u� N �� . �. n �oru,m 53�� /'/�vrg ��.c�:�. �/�/aK9 �4,�� Cem. G✓'a/'��B���G�qnn/c 33�f�� # (3 0 9-r� O--r �'�; t ` �m �Nv��T� �� � � � -z- � �' N1��-� �_� � `��.� Li� v'�..� �oU�Eri c_kSOt2 �7 � - � G'`��,� e ��. . �� ,� i� ���o ��� �} �� � �� ��t $ll W �GTy-�� s�o,cv�e� .�l U ! �°�//I�✓�L//���e/►;� CJa� �iS l�/� S��f.�,/ ��. � Lp �o� �• ��- �--�d��, , �,�;�I� Fo�s Z. v �4 � D_ c� ``� /i /� l/ ` ��� `�`G ��'�. �. . �o� 90-0� �� . �.� �- ��- �o - a � �: :� .; ��. �� _a� ; � FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING, JIINE 18, 1990 Paqe 2 PIIBLIC HSARING: Continuation of Public Hearing for a Rezoning Request, ZOA #90-02, by Fridley Town Square Associates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 1J 4 �" � V_ / OLD BIISINESS: � Second Reading of an Ordinance � Under Section 12.06 of the City Charter Declaring Certain Real �'�( Estate to be Surplus and Authorizing the Sale Thereof . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2C � _ r(� 'J�� � Second Reading of an Ordinance Under Section 12.07 of the City �� Charter to Vacate Streets and Alleys and to Amend Appendix C of the City Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3A �� r� ' � � ` NEW BIISINESS: First Reading of an Ordinance ��D Approving a Rezoning, ZOA #90-02, � by Fridley Town Square Associates . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4C � a✓ \ /'� � 1 � � FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING, JIINE 18, 1990 Paqe 3 NEW BIISZNESB (CONTINIIED)i Resolution Providing for Water � Rate Chanqe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5B 6' / �� � Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 30, 1990 . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6NN A. Resolution Approving a Subdivision, Lot Split, ��, L.S. #90-02, to Split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights, in Order to Create Two Buildable Parcels ........... 6F - 6I ........... 6N - 6AA J` �� � ✓ Y`� B. Establish Public Hearing to Amend Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light I 1 Industrial Zoning District), (; and Section 205.18.U3.0 �° ��h � (the M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of the Fridley Zoning Ordiriance ........ 6I - 6J ........ 6BB - 6FF C. Establish Public Hearing to Amend Sections of the Fridley � Zoning Ordinance to Permit I� � Nine Foot Wide Parking Stalls � G�i in Certain Districts, and to I� Require Parking Spaces to � be Double-Striped ............... 6J - 6M ............... 6GG - 6NN FRIDI,EY CITY COIINCIL MSBTIN6� JIINE 18, 1990 Paqe 4 �T$11 BUSINE88 (CONTINIIED) : Approval of Appraisal and Relocation Consultant Contract for Iverson Property in the Riverview Heights Acquisition Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7J � � /¢^ /�'• �x `�S�/ ' A w v� � Approval of Joint Powers Agreement with Anoka County for the Acquisition of Optical Scan Vote Tabulation Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8H _ ��^ �� _ ' �; �/ �� �,; � `%� 1 �,U .� ����+ ��� � � � ��j , / Approval of Change Order No. 2 for °�, Flanery Park Shelter Project No. 206 . A....... 9- 9B �--.� Resolution Approving Plat, P.S. #90-02, Michael Servetus 2nd Addition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - lOD T � /U FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING, JIINE 18, 1990 Paqe 5 NEW BIISINEBS (CONTINIIED): Resolution Ordering Preliminary Plans, 2�„/� Specifications and Estimates of the ��''" Costs Thereof: Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1990 - 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11C i a �� � � Resolution Receivinq the Preliminary Report and Receiving Petitions to Waive the Public Hearing on the Matter of the Construction of Certain /}� Improvements: Street Improvement ��V Project Nol. ST. 1990 - 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12A � C V� � �, Resolution Ordering Improvement and Final Plans and Specifications and Estimates of Costs Thereof: Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1990 - 3 1 ,� ,. � � �� V . . ".� . . . . . . 13 Resolution Ordering Improvement and Approval of Plans and Ordering Advertisement for Bids: Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1990 - 3 . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14A ,�e ,' V FRIDLSY CITY COtJNCIL MEETZNG, JUNE 18, 1990 Paqe 6 NEW BUSINE88 (CONTINUBD): Resolution Orderinq Preliminary Plans, Specifications and Estimates . of the Costs Thereof: Water, Sanitary L Sewer & Storm Sewer Project No. 210 . . . � . . . . . . 15 - 15B a, e�^' B� Resolution Receiving the Preliminary Report and Receiving Petitions and Waiving the Public Hearing on the Matter of the Construction of Certain �� Improvements: Water, Sanitary Sewer & Storm Sewer Project No. 210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16A � ,� c�� J U Resolution Ordering Improvement and Final Plans and Specifications and Estimates of Costs Thereof: Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer •q . Proj ect No . 210 . . . . . . . . . . . _ C� . . . . . . . 17 1 � �, � � �� Resolution Ordering Improvement, Approval of Plans and Ordering Advertisement for Bids: Water, � - Sanitary Sewer & Storm Sewer � Proj ect No . 210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 18A \ I/ / . � U FRiDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, JIINE 18, 1990 pags � NEA BUSINESS iCONTINIIED): � Appointments: City Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 21D Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 ADJOIIRN: ,Fisu av�aia�7vTap�+v vF THp ��rnT aQ I�iTFTTN[` AF THR FR2DLEY CITY COIINCIL OF JIINE 4. 1990 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:3? p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and-audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL' MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Billings, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Schneider and Councilwoman Jorgenson MEMBERS ABSENT: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: GOUNCIL MEETING. MAY 21. 1990: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Mayor Nee requested the following item be added: (3.1) Consideration of Commission Appointments. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above addition. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM. VISITORS: MARY VASECKA - LOCKE LAKE ASSOCIATION: Ms. Vasecka, 6909 Hickory Drive, extended thanks to John Flora for his efforts and communication regarding the Locke Lake problems. She stated that she understands soil borings will take place in the next few weeks. She questioned if any other progress has been made that the residents should be aware of. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that work is continuing with the City Attorney to draft a petition to present to the Rice Creek Watershed District. He stated that there is a Chapter 112, a watershed 509 Plan, and a new 601 Plan that affect the storm water improvement projects. He stated, hopefully, there would be additional information to present to the Council by the June 18 FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE �. 1990 PAGE 2 meeting. He stated that he would continue to keep the residents informed, as Locke Lake is one of the City's high priority projects. Mr. Flora stated that as plans are developed the sedimentation issue will be addressed and a-determination made �if it is marketable. He stated that in regard to the detention pond, it is hoped that the City can work with the District Engineers to incorporate it into their plans. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that he has done some research on the problem and it must be recognized that the project can be completed if there are enough funds to pay for it. He stated that he is trying to figure out how this can be accomplished in the most efficient way and what the administrative and legal complexities involve. He stated that there are some procedures in Chapter 112 involving special assessments and appraisals of damages, but this is very slow and very expensive. Mr. Herrick stated that he is attempting to determine sources of funding in addition to the money the homeowners and the City will pay. He stated that this involves other governmental agencies which, in itself, are slow and sometimes complex. He stated that Chapters 112 and 473 include the original 509 Plan which has been modified by the 601 Plan, and in addition, there is reference to Chapters 106 and 429. He stated that to determine how these provisions interrelate is complex. He stated that more time was needed to research this material and to contact the attorney for the Rice Creek Watershed District. He stated that, hopefully, he would have a written report for the Council at their next meeting. Mr. Burns, City Manager, felt this process would move very slowly as the City is not in control of all the variables. He stated that there are a lot of agencies involved and that some funds have been set aside for at least the initial phase of the project. Ms. Vasecka stated that she realizes it is a slow process, but the Locke Lake Association just wants to make sure the improvements are completed this time. CONNIE METCALF - WEED PROBLEM AT MOORE LAKE: Ms. Metcalf, 860 West Moore Lake Drive, stated the residents living on Moore Lake are concerned about the weed problem. She submitted a sample of the weed she had removed from the lake and stated the entire lake is full of it. She stated these weeds are visible from Highway 65 and produce a green scum. Ms. Metcalf stated she felt that this detracts from the Zake and Fridley's image, as Highway 65 is heavily traveled. She asked that the City consider steps to correct this problem. She stated that other residents living on the lake are also concerned and that she would be willing to have $RIDLSY CITY COIINCIL MESTINQ OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 3 a meeting regarding the problem. She stated that there is alsa another weed with a purple flower that is spreading alonq the east side of the island. Councilman Schneider asked that Btaff identify the weed and submit a report on the west basin of Moore Lake. - SCOTT LUND - '49ER DAY�:_ Mr. Scott Lund thanked all the Fridley organizations involved in the '49er Day Celebration on June 13 - 17, 1990. He invited the Council and all the residents to participate in the activities during this celebration. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. REZONING ZOA #90-02 BY FRIDLEY TOWN SOUP.RE ASSOCIATES. TO REZONE THREE SEPARATE PARCELS AS FOLLOWS: �,OT 9 BLOCK 2 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 1 FROM R-1. SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING TO S-2 REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. THE SAME BEING 355 MISSISS�PPI STREET N.E AND. LOT 12 BLOCK 3 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLP,T 2 FROM R-1. SINGLE ,�'AMILY DWELLING TO S-2 REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT THE SAME BEING 368 - 66TH AVENUE N.E. AND, LOTS 10 11 AND 12 BLOCK 2 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 1, EXCEPT 'r'HE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF �1CCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT �HEREOF ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA AND I,OTS 13 14 15 AND 16. $LOCK 3 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 2. ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF ON FILE AND O RECORD IN THE OF CE O OUNT RECORDER ANO COUNTY INNESOTA ROM R-1 SIN LE FAMILY DWELLING AND C-1 LOCAL BUSINESS TO S-2, REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT THE SAME BEING 6525 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.: MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearinq. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote� all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 7:58 p.m. Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that this rezoning is requested to allow development at the northeast corner of Highway 47 (University Avenue) and Mississippi Street. She stated the developers have completed a similar development in the City of Minneapolis known as Calhoun Village. She stated that there are two petitions that were received by the Planning Commission and a third petition from various business owners in the vicinity of this intersection. She stated that the developer held two neighborhood meetings. FRIDLEY CITY COtJNCIL MEETING OF JQNE 4. 1990 PAGE 4 Ms. Dacy stated that the properties to be rezoned include the 10,000 Auto Parts site as well as single family homes. She stated that the zoning proposed is S-2 which is comparable with a PUD District where the City approves or disapproves the rezoning based on a particular plan or proposal. Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated that the Center City Plan was adopted in 1979 by the HRA and City Council. He stated that this plan included the Holly Center, the Target Northern Operations Building, the Fridley Plaza Office Building and Clinic, and the parking ramp. He stated that the 10,000 Auto Parts site has been a part of this plan and called for a commercial development or mixed uses. Mr. Robertson stated that when the HRA first considered the project, 10,000 Auto Parts was still a viable company. He stated that with their demise, it was feasible to return to the original concept of financing on a pay-as-you-go basis. He stated the developer would need an extra $100,000 for the carrying costs for the pay off of that grant; therefore, the grant would be in the neighborhood of $300,000 for five years or up to $315,000 for six years, depending on the interest rate of the loan at the time of closing. Mr. Robertson stated that the HRA considered this request at their April 18, 1990 meeting and gave conceptual approval to the financing and site plan subject to the neighborhood compatibility and traffic conditions. He stated that the present commercial building, the four vacant residential lots to the north, and the two developed residential lots to the east generate approximately $17,000 to $18,000 in taxes. He stated that with this proposed development, a minimum of about $84, 000 would be paid in taxes. That amounts to a substantial increase in tax revenue to the City and will be available to the school district and the county when the tax increment district is de-certified. Ms. Dacy presented the site plan and stated that the proposal is for a 28, 000 square foot retail facility, one story in height, with a masonry rock face exterior. She stated that not aIl the typical setbacks have been met that are required in a commercial zone. She stated that the setback on University Avenue is 30 feet instead of 35 feet, and along Mississippi and 66th Avenue the setback is 15 feet. She stated that the parking setback is only 15 feet instead of 20 feet. Ms. Dacy stated that the developer has proposed an extensive screening plan to construct a six foot masonry wall along the north lot line abutting 66th Avenue and on the east lot line. She stated that staff recommends the planting of additional trees along the north lot line. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 5 Ms. Dacy stated that, in regard to the Light Rail Transit (LRT) issue, Mr. Yantos has sent a letter regarding this particular proposal. She stated that, basically, it states that if this development is constructed and the LRT is also located along this route, Anoka County recommends University Avenue be the major feeder route and a major pickup at.this site. She stated that this would also act as a bus feeder site for dropping off passengers to use the LRT.system. Ms. Dacy stated that it was requested that the City reserve an easement and, if a park-and-ride system is necessary, the County could consider acquisition of the eight homes between 66th and 67th Avenues for a park-and-ride lot. She stated this would necessitate expansion of the driveway along the east side. Ms. Dacy presented a video of the developers' other business center in Minneapolis, Calhoun Village, and pointed out the building materials that were used. Ms. Dacy also presented a video of the traffic on Mississippi Street between 5th Street and University Avenue that was taken between 3:30 and 4:30 p.m. last Friday, June 1. She stated that she did not observe any stackinq of the vehicles past the 10,000 Auto Parts site. Ms. Dacy stated that the majority of the eastbound traffic on Mississippi Street is in the riqht hand lane and tends to move over to the left hand lane. She felt that this should not be a problem as there would be adequate time to make this lane change. She stated that during this hour of filming, six pedestrians were walking along Mississippi Street, but no one crossed the street. She stated that there were also a number of bicyclists along the north side of Mississippi Street. Ms. Dacy stated the developers' plan is to move the driveway farther to the east. Mr. Dave Koski, Traffic Consultant with Barton-Aschman, stated that a traffic study was conducted for the intersection of Mississippi Street and University Avenue as well as 5th Street and Mississippi Street. He stated that this was compared to a 1987 traffic count conducted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. He stated that, basically, the traffic volumes at the intersection have not changed much between 1987 and now. He stated that they also conducted an analysis of how the proposed development would affect the traffic. Mr. Koski stated that Barton-Aschman has been actively engaged in surveying traffic generated by all types and sizes of developments and utilizes a combination of their observed traffic generations, as well as that produced by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, in determining the amount of traffic this development would qenerate. He stated that for a development of this type the peak retail period is occurring during the peak traffic hours. He stated that this is attributed to the fact that a lot of people are combining FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCZL MEETINQ OF JONE 4. 1990 PAGE 6 a shopping trip with the time they come home from work. He stated that the peak traffic is between 4:30 and 5:30 at University Avenue and Mississippi Street. Mr. Koski stated that a significant amount of traffic, about 50 percent, going into this shoppinq center is already traveling on the street, but he assumed for this study that the traffic generated was all new traffic. - Mr. Koski stated that, basically, they calculated the capacity of the University/Mississippi intersection as it is today with existing traffic, considered the new proposed configuration by the County, and added the additional traffic for the shopping center. He stated it was found that the intersection operates at a D level of service. He stated that this scale is based on A being perfect and F as failing. He stated that D is considered to be an acceptable level of service in an urban area. He also stated that if nothing was changed at the intersection and the improvements were installed, the intersection would operate at a D+ or very close to a C. Mr. Koski stated that it is felt that this shopping center would not change the capacity of traffic generated at this intersection. He stated that the primary reason for the level D service at this intersection is on the west side. He stated that the signal needs re-timing and re-phrasing. Mr. Koski stated that they reviewed the impact of left turns for vehicles eastbound on Mississippi Street and for left turns into the site. He stated that there are sufficient gaps in the ' Mississippi Street westbound traffic to accommodate the demand to turn left into the shopping center. He stated that there is capacity available and the left turn would not have any significant impact on the traffic on Mississippi Street. Mr. Koski stated that the primary delay would be for traffic exiting the shopping center to go eastbound on Mississippi Street but felt there would only be a backup of several cars. Mr. Koski stated that the impact the shopping center may have on 5th Street and Mississippi Street was not significant. He stated that on a very conservative approach and assuming all the traffic generated by the shopping center was new traffic, there would not be a significant impact on the University/Mississippi and 5th Street/Mississippi intersections. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission recommended denial of this rezoning request. She stated that some of the members of the Commission felt that because the site plan did not meet all the setbacks, it was not appropriate. The majority of the members felt that with the potential that some of this area would be used as an LRT park-and-ride, they would prefer the site be used as such rather than for this proposed development. Ms. Dacy stated that staff's recommendation is for approval of the rezoning with several stipulations. �RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 7 Mr. Bob Guzy, attorney for the developers, stated that the developers have been working with City staff and the HRA on their plans for this development. He stated that he felt this was a good project and that it would be another step in the City accomplishinq their goals for the property. He stated that the revitalization of Holly Center has benefitted the City and, with this development, there would be three quadrants that would create the "halo" effect and increase the development potential for the southwest quadrant. Mr. Guzy stated that wherever there is redevelopment there are potential conflicts. He stated that he wanted to ensure the Council and neighborhood that the developer, Urban Commercial Developers, and their anchor tenant, Walgreen's, will be a good neighbor and a good corporate citizen. He stated that the Council has to look at what is there now and what will happen when the development is completed. He stated that the neighbors have talked about this site being an eyesore. Mr. Guzy stated that the developers worked with staff to have a pleasing development for the neighbors and to provide the essential buffer. He stated that there will be no funneling of traffic into the residential area and that the flow of traffic is onto Mississippi Street. Mr. Guzy stated that part of the site is already commercial and that Council made a decision that this be a vital intersection in the City. He stated that the development would also add to the tax base which affects all citizens of Fridley. He stated that the developers are working with the City to put this property back on the tax rolls. He stated that Council has the option of making this into a parking lot or making it a viable retail center that can provide funds and other benefits to the citizens. Mr. Guzy stated that it is essential to utilize the two houses and existing vacant land that abuts 66th Avenue in order to make the project feasible. He noted that a petition was received from businesses in the area and stated that in Columbia Heights there is a Snyder's and a Walqreen's within a block of each other and both and doing good business. Mr. Guzy stated that he is aware that the Planning Commission is concerned about the LRT issue. He stated that, in the future, there probably will be an LRT system on University Avenue. However, the question is if this would in any way prevent this project from proceeding. He stated that the bird in hand theory should not be diverted because of something in the future that could, potentially, occur. He stated that this project fits well with the City's plans, adds to the tax base, and creates jobs. He stated that it would not diminish retail competition but instead increase it. Mr. Reese, the Project Architect, presented a drawinq of the proposed site plan. He stated that the construction materials are FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JQNE �. 1990 PAGE 8 pre-finished masonry units with a metal roof over the front canopy. He stated that the buildinq is designed to fit in with the neighborhood. Mr. Schuette, UCD, stated that the center would be a 28,000 square foot neighborhood convenience center. He stated that there is a demand in Fridley for additional retailers who want to bring new concepts and ideas to the City. He stated that the anchor tenant would be Walgreen's, utilizing 11,000 square feet of the space, with six or seven other shops that would total 17,000 square feet. He stated that, for a comparison, Holly Center is about 75,000 square feet. Mr. Schuette stated that this center would not bring anyone from across town to Fridley. He stated that it is designed for neighborhood use and that it may contain such stores as an insurance office, hair salon, video store, Chinese restaurant, etc. Mr. Schuette reviewed the site plan and stated that the center would be entered by one driveway on the east of the site. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked the location of Walgreen's loading dock. Mr. Schuette stated that it is along the east side of the building. Councilwoman Jorgenson questioned the width of the road. Mr. Schuette stated that it is 23 feet. Ms. Dacy stated on that the on the west side of the building it is 20 feet. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked about snow removal for this site. Mr. Schuette stated that their plans are to have the snow removed from the site. Councilman Schneider asked the approximate value of the center after it is constructed. Mr. Schuette stated that construction costs, including costs of the plan are over $2,000,000, and the perceived val.ue when the center is finished is over $3,000,000. Councilman Schneider stated that he felt the Planning Commissian recommendation was strongly influenced by the LRT issue. He asked Mr. Yantos, from a practical and realistic viewpoint, what would be the earliest LRT would be in operation. Mr. Yantos, representing the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority, stated that the earliest would probably be about seven years. �RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 9 Councilman Schneider asked how soon a decision would be made on the kiss-and-ride at this location. Mr. Yantos stated that a station is being planned for Mississippi Street and University Avenue. . Councilman Schneider stated that there are some options for additional parking, but this may require the acquisition of homes. He questioned when this decision would be made. Mr. Yantos stated that the decision would be made between now and when construction begins five or six years from now. He stated that the homes to the north of this site would seriously be considered for parking. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked why a park-and-ride was not being considered at the Columbia Arena site. Mr. Yantos stated that in looking at station space and movement of people they are trying to keep the stations approximately one mile apart. He stated that they are also considering the east/west access which is important. He stated that it is very expensive and it really does not make sense to construct a station and to have one kiss-and-ride with another just a short distance to the north. Mr. Yantos stated all of the stations, at least north of 37th Avenue, would be park-and-ride. Councilman Schneider asked if kiss-and-ride was not in the planning at this time. Mr. Yantos stated that it is in the plan but, as the planning continues, the need for park-and-ride will certainly be there. Mayor Nee stated that this is a surprise. Mr. Yantos stated that as they continue to work with the various communities they did not want to say they were only going to have a kiss-and-ride or drop-off for buses and cars as the potential for park-and-ride is very strong. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how many park-and-rides were planned for Fridley. Mr. Yantos stated three: one at 57th Avenue, one at Mississippi Street, and one at Osborne Road. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how much land is needed for these sites. Mr. Yantos stated that enough space to accommodate 200 to 300 cars or about a two to three acre site at each of these intersections. _ _ ___ FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4, 1990 PAGE 10 Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the property would be owned by the City or the County. Mr. Yantos stated that it would be owned by the Railroad Authority. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if it would be tax exempt. Mr. Yantos stated that he assumed it would be tax exempt. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if a route has been established south of I-694. Mr. Yantos stated that this has not, as yet, been set. Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Yantos what has led to the change in plans. Mr. Yantos stated that, as various committees have been meeting and focusing on the needs, the ridership is being reviewed, and one concern is to remove traffic from the City streets. He stated that they did not want people parking in front of homes on residential streets. He also stated that the committees have become more serious about park-and-ride. Councilman Billings stated that he finds it very enlightening to be hearing this information since he was not aware of it, and he is the Council's representative to the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority. Mr. Yantos stated that they have reviewed this site in the northeast corner of Mississippi Street and University Avenue and worked with the developers to provide space for a kiss-and-ride along with an easement for potential parking to the north. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how many stations would be required as LRT proceeds south. Mr. Yantos stated that stations would be located at 53rd, 49th, 44th, and 40th Avenues, and St. Anthony Boulevard. Councilwoman asked if these would be park-and-ride facilities or kiss-and-ride. Mr. Yantos stated that they would be park-and-ride. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that Mr. Yantos is talking about major development areas in the City that would be turned into tax exempt property for park-and-ride areas. Mr. Yantos stated that they have thought about having parking beneath office and retail buildings. He stated that there are other alternatives to use the space beneath the office and retail buildings other than just for parking. Councilman Schneider stated that residents in the neighborhood are concerned about traffic. He asked if this was being taken into consideration with park-and-ride. FRIDLEY CITY CO CIL ME TINa OF JIIN$ 4• 1990 PAGB 11 Mr. Douq Moore, Associate with BRW, stated that the parking volume would depend on the size of the particular park-and-ride lot. He stated park-and-ride traffic would still use the entrance into the site. However, it would have to be widened and the Railroad Authority consider acquisition of additional property as well. Councilman Schneider asked if any of these homes were for sale, if the Railroad Authority would consider purchasing them. Mr. Yantos stated that he did not believe they would consider any purchases within the next six months. However, if property was available at the 10, 000 Auto Parts site and it did not conflict with the City's goals, the Railroad Authority probably would consider purchasinq it. Councilman Billings stated that two weeks ago there was discussion about the possibility of constructing a station on the southeast corner of Mississippi Street and University Avenue. Mr. Burns, City Manager, asked if any thought has been given for ingress and egress off University Avenue for this future site. Councilman Billings stated that throughout the planning process it has been his understanding that the Railroad Authority was going to look at a bus and passenger drop-off at this particular location. He stated that once the LRT system was in operation tHe additional 25 spaces along University Avenue may be needed. stated if, in the future, it was found that the ridership has increased, then at that time a deterraination would be made as to the need for additional parking. Mr. Erickson, UCD, stated that this is what he had heard from Mr. Yantos. He stated, basically, the Railroad Authority was going to establish a station and, if and when parking would be needed, would be determined by the demand. He stated that as of now, they have no way to determine whether parking would or would not be required. Councilman Billings stated that even though he serves on an intergovernmental agency committee, it appears the committee is serving no function other than for someone to be able to say the City had input. He stated that it seems the decisions are made elsewhere and the committee is nothing more than a sham. He stated that he gets more fed up all the time. He stated that, recently, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners and Transportation Board decided to begin a bus service for Anoka County except for Columbia Heights and Fridley. He stated that maybe it is time Fridley went back to Ramsey County. Councilman Billings stated that he is totally shocked to get this far in the planning process encouraging the developer to work with the Railroad Authority and then find they have now changed their �RIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JDNE 4. 1990 PAGE 12 philosophy of thinking. He stated that he doubted if this project would have gone this far if the City had been given this information six months ago. Mr. Bill Hogan, 365 Mississippi Street, stated that the driveway to this shopping center site is, in reality, being moved .only about 80 feet east. He stated that �with the improvements to the intersection the center median will be located just below the Marsolek property. Ms. Dacy stated that the existing most easterly driveway is being moved approximately 80 feet to the east, but from the University Avenue curb line, it would be about 360 feet to increase the reaction time. She stated that with the improvement of the intersection there would be dedicated stacking lanes into the shopping center site. Mr. Hogan stated that the original improvement plan for that intersection did not provide left turn lanes because there was no development on this site. Ms. Dacy stated that when the improvement plans were first completed for the intersection, the redevelopment of this site was not contemplated and the County was to locate the median just short of the existing driveway of this site. She stated that with this development proposal there is an advantage to moving the access farther to the east and provide a left turn lane into the site. Mr. Hogan stated that adjustments have been made on the north side of the shopping center to allow more landscaping, but he was concerned about the amount of space on the east side of the development. He stated that most of the drawings do not show the homes next to the proposed wall. However, the wall would be only 13 to 14 feet from his home. He felt that there was not room for landscaping, and if the road was widened for a park and ride lot, he assumed the wall would be located closer to his home. Councilman Billings asked Mr. Hogan what he felt would be a good use of this site. Mr. Hogan stated that he had not given it much thought but has usually thought about some kind of commercial development. He stated this proposed development moves closer to his home. Mr. Thayer, 377 - 66th Avenue, stated that he was opposed to the rezoning. He stated that he believed the site is too small even with acquisition of the two residential lots. He stated that the setbacks would be less than what is normally allowed for this type of development. He stated that another concern is snow storage, and he believed it would be several days before the area could be used if there is a heavy snowfall. Mr. Thayer felt that the single combined entrance and exit is a disaster, and those who want to �RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINS 4. 1990 PAGE 13 proceed eastbound will have a problem exiting. He stated that he believed this would begin destruction of the neighborhood through the domino theory. Mr. Thayer stated that he felt a mistake was made when the existing construction was allowed on this site, and he did not believe the shopping center is the best use of this property. He stated that he believed development in the southwest corner of University Avenue and Mississippi Street and the 100 Twin property should be completed before this site. He stated that Mississippi Street is the main east/west thoroughfare and deliberately addinq traffic without a well thought-out plan would be a terrible mistake. He felt that if the City has any long-range plans, they should let the residents know so they can make their plans accordingly. Councilman Billings stated that he is confused as to how this development impacts the southwest quadrant or the 100 Twin site. Mr. Thayer stated that the "halo" effect would spill over into the southwest corner. He stated that his personal reaction is that if the southwest quadrant is completed it would probably remove this site as a location for this type of shopping center. He felt that something much more viable could be constructed on this site. Councilman Billings asked Mr. Thayer what he would envision for this site. Mr. Thayer stated that his basis for saying it is not a good development is because it is so restrictive in size. He stated that this shopping center would only be located on a little over two acres. He felt that if the size was doubled a viable shopping center could be constructed with better access and sufficient shops. He felt that some type of multi-story building should be considered and a determination made as to what is the best possible use of the land. Councilman Schneider asked if Mr. Thayer felt a multi-story building should be retail or housing. Mr. Thayer stated that there are multi-story buildings where the first level is all parking and felt this would also meet the LRT needs if it becomes a reality. He stated that the rest of the space could be used for different offices. Mayor Nee stated that it is very difficult for the City to spell out exactly what they want on a site and then have it completed. He stated that the market usually dictates what a developer or those financing a project want to construct. He stated that this proposal for the site is the most realistic one that as far as he has seen it is being responsive to the City's concerns. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 1� Mr. Thayer asked if the developer would still proceed with this project if he was not provided with any of the incentives. Mayor Nee felt that no one would remove the existinq building without some incentive. He stated that there has been absolutely no investment in that structure since it was constructed. Mr. Thayer asked if the development would improve the quality of life for adjacent residents. Councilwoman Jorgenson felt that it would, to some degree, and believed it would also benefit the senior citizens living on the east side of University Avenue. Mayor Nee did not believe that there would be any adverse effects for those living further down the block. However, he stated the people immediately across the street may feel uncomfortable with the wall. He also stated that he views the existing building as almost a cancer and the economics are such that no one is going to invest in it. He stated that he is convinced there will not be a park-and-ride at this site. Mr. Thayer stated that his problem is to make sure that what is constructed on this site is the best for him. He expressed disapproval when the existing building was constructed, he also stated that he did not want this to happen again. Ms. Louise Bennethum, 368 - 66th Avenue, stated that they have lived in their home for over thirty years, and this is the best proposal they have seen. She stated that when Red Owl was a tenant of the building, it was not pleasant to live next door as they had rats, noise, smells, etc. She stated that she constantly worried about a fire in the field because it was not mowed. She also felt that the situation would only get worse unless the Council approved this rezoning. Ms. Bennethum felt that the development would provide a much needed improvement over what is now existing on the site. Councilman Billings asked Ms. Bennethum if her property was one that was being acquired to which she answered in the affirmative. Ms. Terry Mau, 7343 Hayes Street, stated that as a homeowner and business owner in Fridley she would like nothing more than to see the southwest corner develop. She stated that she can sympathize with the owners of the property because they do not want to make improvements when there is uncertainty and talk of redevelopment. She felt that homes should be constructed on this site as it is not a good area for a business. Ms. Mau stated that the area is small, and this center would be a large development for this site. She stated that the parking allowed for employees is not sufficient as they have more parking.avail�ble at their Rice Plaza Center, and there still is a parking problem. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 15 Councilman Billinqs asked if the southwest quadrant was redeveloped where Ms. Mau would consider moving her business. Ms. Mau stated that she hoped any redevelopment would allow her to relocate in the same area. Counailman Billings stated that he was surprised that business owners located in Rice Plaza submitted a petition as he felt the development of this site may allow them to relocate to this site which would be in the same vicinity. Ms. Mau stated that she felt there is a problem with access to this site. She stated that Rice Plaza has two entrances and exits where there is not a worse traffic situation in Fridley. Ms. Brenda Tibbets, 421 Mississippi Street, stated that they have a problem entering and exiting their driveway. She felt that the senior citizens would also have problems crossing Mississippi Street. She stated that the existing building is an eyesore but felt the shopping center was too large for the site, and the parking would not be adequate. She questioned why improvements could not be made to the existing building rather than acquiring people's homes. Ms. Marilyn Sullivan, 522 - 66th Avenue, stated that she agrees with the decision of the Planning Commission to table the rezoning at this time. She felt that the LRT issue needs to be resolved before development occurs on this site. She stated that she did not feel the neighborhood would benefit from this development. Ms. Sullivan stated that this site is a prime location for a park-and- ride for the LRT system. She stated that she did not feel the traffic studies provided significant details and that they need to be conducted over several weeks and months. She stated that the impact on the neighborhood deserves priority, and it seems wrong to remove homes and erode the neighborhood. Ms. Sullivan felt the site should be developed to be compatible with park-and-ride. She suggested that perhaps a day care center or a nursing home should be developed. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there is a moratorium on the construction of nursing homes. She stated that as far as a day care center, with the traffic and playground facilities that would be necessary, this site would not be feasible. She stated that in regard to the LRT, the Council was told this would be a kiss-and- ride site, and that people would park at Columbia Arena and be bussed to this site. Mr. George Meissner, 373 Mississippi Street, stated that he did not believe this rezoning would benefit his property. He stated that it is difficult now to access his home, and the situation would only get worse. He belieVed that if a shopping center is constructed it would generate � lot of traffic. He stated that, as it is now, it sometimes takes him tive ofnutes to get out of his FRIDL�Y CITY COUNCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGB 16 driveway. Mr. Meissner stated that the site is relatively small, and even Holly Center, which is much larger, has been hurting for tenants. He felt that the Council also has to take into consideration the possibility of an LRT system and a park-and-ride at this location. He stated that he was opposed to the rezoning. Councilman Billings asked Mr. Meissner why he chanqed his mind about the rezoning since, at one time, he felt the rezoning should cover an even larger area. Mr. Meissner stated that nothing has changed his mind. He stated that the area is quite small and, if there is going to be development, the area needs to be larger. Mayor Nee questioned the effect of a park-and-ride Iot on that site. Mr. Koski stated that when they conducted their study, the LRT issue was discussed with Mr. Yantos and Mr. Moore. He stated, however, there was not a conclusion on the amount of parking or type of traffic. He stated that they reviewed the park-and-ride situation and the parking that might occur for the bus system. He stated it seems that the amount of parking adjacent to Mississippi Street and University Avenue would not have that much impact. Mr. Koski stated that with a park-and-ride the primary activity occurs at different hours than the shopping center's business. He stated that the primary exit for park-and-ride would be between 5:00 and 6: 00 p.m. , and the shopping center would not be open in the morning hours when park-and-ride would have its heaviest use. He stated that the entry/exit roadway would certainly have to be improved to the extent that it was wide enough to accommodate the extra traffic. Mr. Grant Olson, 390 - 67th Avenue, stated that there are a lot of vacancies now for retail space and that most of the traffic using Mississippi Street comes from 7th Street, which was not included in the traffic counts. Mayor Nee stated that as far as vacant retail space the City does not control who builds, but that it is the judgment of the developers and the ones providing the financial backing. Councilman Schneider stated that Mr. Olson makes a very valid point. He stated that with the 100 Twin site the City had wonderful proposals, but nothing has materialized. He stated that it appears with this development that there are committed tenants for this shopping center. Ms. Patricia Anderson, 3667 - 66th Avenue, stated that she was opposed to this development because of the LRT issue. She stated that if one does or does not support the development the FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAQE 17 possibility of removinq homes on 66th and 67th Avenues is something she cannot accept. She stated that to remove homes in an area that is not blighted is not acceptable. Councilman Billings stated that he had several concerns. He stated that he did not receive the traffic study from Barton-Aschman until this evening which did not allow him adequate time for review. He also stated that as he has been following this development project, he was under the assumption that a station for LRT would possibly be located on this corner. He stated, however, the intent was a bus point and passenger drop-off, and he now understands they need a parking lot immediately. He stated that he would like further clarification on the Railroad Authority's thouqhts. Councilman Billings stated that as recently as two weeks ago, the Railroad Authority was investigating if the LRT station could be on the southeast corner of University Avenue and Mississippi Street. He stated that one of the reasons they are looking at this northeast corner is because it is a recommendation of the City's Planning Commission. He stated that if they had not recommended this site the Railroad Authority probably would still have been considering Columbia Arena. He stated that he is sometimes confused as to the Planning Commission's direction. He stated that this site could generate up to $100,000 in property taxes and to have this be used for LRT boggles his mind. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that it is very difficult to have a piece of property in limbo for seven to ten years waiting for a decision on the LRT system. Mr. Yantos stated that it is a difficult situation because they are talking concepts. He stated that the Railroad Authority has looked seriously at this northeast corner, and the concept today is to take 31 parking spots from the south end for a park-and-ride and, in the future, if more parking is needed they will need to acquire eight homes to the north. He stated that they also looked at the possibility for a station in the southeast corner. He stated that each time they meet new information does evolve. He stated that the Council will have the opportunity to review the final plans in four to six months. Councilwoman Jorgenson's concern was what the City is supposed to do in the meantime. She felt that development plans could not be set aside for the sites the Railroad Authority is contemplating to use as this could seriously impact the City financially. Mr. Yantos stated that they are aware of this; however, the process takes a long time. He stated that he can understand the difficulty in planning, but all they can do is provide information they have to date. F�IDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 18 Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that none of the corners the Railroad Authority is contemplating for use of the LRT system is vacant. She asked if they had considered the impact on the owners of the land and if they would be relocated. Mr. Yantos stated that they are reviewing it but do not have any concrete answers. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that the Council would not review the plan for six months and then construction would not begin for seven years. She stated that she was concerned that people would have to put their properties on hold for this period until the Railroad Authority makes a decision. Mr. Yantos stated that planning, development, and change is happening continuously. He stated that people and public bodies need to make changes as they see fit. He stated that he is here to inform them that LRT and park-and-ride is a possibility. He stated that they have looked at kiss-and-ride as a first stage of development, but there is also the potential for a park-and-ride. Councilman Billings stated that he felt he needed clarification on the Railroad Authority's plans for this location before a decision can be made on this development proposal. He stated that he understood the emphasis would be on drop off for the Mississippi station. However, he seems to be hearing something different. He stated that he would like this information in two weeks. Mr. Yantos stated that the Railroad Authority did take action on this piece of property to work with the developer to provide the easement for a drop off or kiss-and-ride. Mayor Nee stated that he envisioned a park-and-ride would be in response to a future demand. Mr. Yantos stated that he apologized for the misunderstanding, but he was only trying to provide the long-term picture of what might happen. MOTION by Councilman Billings to continue the public hearing on this rezoning to June 18, 1990. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Billings stated that information would be received from the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority and, depending on what information is received, the Council may take additional testimony. He stated that if there is no new information, the Council could take action on June 18 or may not take action for another two weeks. He stated that he did not know what would happen until the Council receives this infornaation. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TINQ OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAG$ 19 RECESS• Mayor Nee called a recess at 11:05 p.m. RECONVENED• Mayor Nee reconvened the meeting at 11:19 p.m. All Council members were present. 2. �2EZONING ZOA #90-03 BY BOB'S AMOCO. TO REZONE LOT 1. BLOCK � LAMPERT'S ADDITION FROM M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. TO C-2, GENERAL BUSINESS GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7680 HIGHWAY 65 N.E. jAMOCO OIL SERVICE STATIONI: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 11:20 p.m. Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that this is a request for a rezoning in the southwest corner of Osborne Road and Highway 65 from light industrial to commercial. She stated that the Planning Commission has recommended approval of this rezoning due to the fact that all four corners of this intersection have become commercial. Ms. Dacy stated that in conjunction with this rezoning, the petitioner has filed for a special use permit and variance. She stated that the special use permit is to reconstruct the pump islands in front of the gas station and construct a car wash in the rear. She stated that the variance for the lot size would not be needed if the property is rezoned. Ms. Dacy stated that the other two variances are to reduce the hard surface setback from 20 feet to 10 and 5 feet and reduce the side yard setback from 30 feet to 4 feet. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission and Appeals Commission have recommended approval of these requests for the special use permit and variances with stipulations. No persons in the audience spoke for or against this proposed rezoning. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 11:26 p.m. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 20 OLD BUSINESS• 3. SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE CITY CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE THEREOF: Councilman Billings asked if the two property owners to the north were contacted in regard to the storage shed. Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that they have not been contacted. MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this item. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 3.1 CONSIDERATION OF COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS: RESIGNATION - ALEX BARNA: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to accept, with regret, Mr. Barna's resignation from the Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to nominate Connie Modig for appointment to the Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Billings. There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by Mayor Nee. MOTION by Councilman Billings to cast a unanimous ballot for the appointment of Connie Modig, 1330 Hillcrest Drive, to the at-large Planning Commission seat for the term which expires April 1, 1993. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ENVIRONMENTAL UALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION: MOTION by Councilman Billings to nominate Susan Price for appointment to the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by Mayor Nee. MOTION by Councilman Billings to cast a unanimous ballot for the appointment of Susan Price, 7449 Melody Drive, to the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission to the term expirinq April 1, 1993. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JUNE 4. 1990 PAGB 21 Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. APPEALS COMMISSION: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorqenson to nominate Catherine Smith for appointment to the Appeals Commission. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by Mayor Nee. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to cast a unanimous ballot for the appointment of Catherine Smith, 6548 Clover Place, to the Appeals Commission to the term expiring April 1, 1991. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �_N RESOURCES COMMISSION: MOTION by Councilwoman Seconded by Councilman aye, Mayor Nee declared NEW BUSINESS• Jorgenson to table this appointment. Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting the motion carried unanimously. 4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 16. 1990: A. ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 18 1990 ON A REZONING, ZOA #90-04 BY THE LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE LODGE 38, TO REZONE THE NORTH 95 FEET OF LOTS 14 AND 15 BROOKVIEW ADDITION. EXCEPT THE WEST 22 FEET OF THE NORTH 95 FEET OF LOTS 14 AND 15, BROOKVIEW ADDITION AND ALSO THE SOUTH 95 FEET OF LOTS 14 AND 15 BROOKVIEW ADDITION EXCEPT THE WEST 22 FEET OF THE SOUTH 95 FEET FROM R-3 GENERAL MULTIPLE DWELLING, TO C-2, GENERAL $USINESS GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6875 HIGHWAY 65 N.E.: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this rezoning request, ZOA #90-04, for June 18, 1990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. The Council received the minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 16, 1990. FRIDLSY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 22 5. SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #90-03 BY BOB'S AMOCO PER SECTION 205 14 O1 C(6) OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ALi,OW A MOTOR VEHICLE WASH ESTABLISHMENT ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1. LAMPERT'S ADDITIO�T GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7680 HIGHWAY 65 N E. (AMOCO OIL SERVICE STATION): MOTION by Councilman Schneider to�concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant special use permit, SP #90- 03, with the followir►g stipulations: (1) the petitioner shall submit a landscape plan prior to the issuance of a building permit; (2) approval of the variance request, VAR #90-04; (3) joint driveway/parking easements shall be recorded against both the Amoco and the VFW parcels; (4) a grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit; and (5) the existing mercury light standards shall be replaced with more modern high pressure sodium standards. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. VARIANCE RE UEST VAR #90-04 BY BOB'S AMOCO, TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE A DRIVEWAY IS TO BE PROVIDED FROM 30 FEET TO 4 FEET: TO REDUCE THE LOT AREA RE4UIRED FOR ONE MAIN BUILDING ON PLATS RECORDED BEFORE JANUARY 1. 1993 , FROM THREE- FOURTHS (3/4) ACRE (36 679 S4UARE FEET) TO TWO-THIRDS (2/3) ACRE (29.040 S4UARE FEET): TO REDUCE THE PARKING AND HARD SURFACE SETBACK FROM ANY STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM 20 FEET TO 10 FEET AND 5 FEET; TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED CAR WASH AND NEW PUMP LAYOUT ON LOT 1 BLOCK 1. LAMPERT' S ADDITION. THE SAME BEZNG 7680 HIGHWAY 65 N E.: Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that staff has proposed two alternatives providing for a different angle on the pumps and a detached car wash facility. She stated that the Appeals Commission was convinced it would be better to approve the variance. She stated that staff is recommending the variance be denied as there are other alternatives. Councilman 5chneider asked if staff was comfortable with the Appeals Commission's action. Ms. Dacy stated that the proposal is certainly an improvement as far as the traffic situation. She stated that the proposal certainly will not be a detriment. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant variance request, VAR #90-04, with the following stipulations: (1) the petitioner shall work with City staff and the VFW to resolve building code and traffic issues; (2) approval of the special use permit request; and (3) approval of the rezoning request. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRTDTFY CiTY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 23 7. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA, BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the readinq and approve the ordinance upon first reading subject to approval of the variance application. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12 07 OF THE CITY HARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE• MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 9. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR ONONDAGA STREET STORM SEWER REPAZR PROJECT NO. 209: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the following bids for Project No. 209: Insituform Central, Inc. 6167 North Kent Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53217 538,801.20 Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that a bid for this project was received from the sole producer of the insituform system, Insituform Central, Inc. in the amount of $38,801.20. He stated that $30,000 was allocated, and it is recommended that the contract be awarded and a transfer of $8,801.20 be authorized from the Storm Water Utility Fund to Project. No. 209 in order to complete the project. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for Project No. 209 to Insituform Central, Inc. in the amount of $38,801.20. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the transfer of $8,801.20 from the Storm Water Utility Fund to Storm Sewer Repair Project No. 209. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 24 10. RESOLUTION NO 33-1990 AUTHORIZING REAPPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1990 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO PROVIDE BENEFITS AND COMPARABLE WORTH ADJtJSTMENTS FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES: Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that this resolution would authorize a transfer of $37,015 from the emergency reserve to provide for comparable worth adjustments and benefits for temporary employees. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adopt Resolution No. 33-1990. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. A�PpnTNTMFNT• CITY EMPLOYEE: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick appointment by the City Manager: Starting Name Position ala Mark Public Foster Services Worker Mechanic B Non-exempt to concur with the following Starting ate $13.50 June 18, per hour 1990 $28,188.00 per year Replaces Robert Anderson Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. CLAIMS• MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize payment of Claims No. 32213 through 32379. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 13. LICENSES• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. �STIMATES• MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted: FRIDLSY CZTY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 25 Herrick & Newman 205 Fridley Plaza Office Bldg. 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, 1rIId 55432 Services Rendered as City Attorney � For the Month of May, 1990 .�. . . . . . . . $ 3,528.00 E. H. Renner & Sons 15688 Janis Street N.W. Elk River, igi 55330 Repair and Maintenance of Well No. 3 Project No. 203 FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,632.00 Ganimon Bros . , Inc . 13845 Northdale Boulevard Rogers, MN 55374 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2 Estimate No. 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13, 301. 08 Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Billings stated that when he attacked the Anoka County Board for their adoption of a plan that did not include Fridley and Columbia Heights he wanted to note that Commissioners McCarron and Kordiak are working to include Fridley and Columbia Heights. He stated it was the Regional Transit Board that omitted Fridley and Columbia Heights. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Councilman Billings to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of June 4, 1990 adjourned at 11:43 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secretary to the City Council Mayor Approved: � � cinroF F��� DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: C011IlMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEM�RANDUM June 15, 1990 f William Burns, City Manager Jock Robertson, Community Development Direotor Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Continuation of Public Hearing for a Rezoning Request, ZOA #90-02, Fridley Town Square Associates The City Council at the June 4, 1990 meeting continued the public hearing for the above-referenced request in order to continue testimony about the rezoning. The Anoka County Regional Rail Authority was also to contact the City regarding its policy for a park-and-ride site at the Mississippi Street and University Avenue intersection. At the June 13, 1990 LRT Technical Advisory Committee meeting, alternative locations for the station and park-and-ride lot in the southeast quadrant were discussed. Tim Yantos advised us that Commissioner Paul McCarron will be transmitting a letter to the City late this week regarding the Rail Authority's position on this issue. Yantos stated that if the letter is not available for the preparation of the aqenda packet, it will be delivered to the City Council as soon as possible. Another concern raised at the June 4, 1990 meeting was the traffic impact of both the park-and-ride facility and the proposed shopping center sharing the same access point. We have asked Dave Koski of Barton-Aschman to investigate this issue further. Koski will be available at the June 18, 1990 meeting to present more information about this topic. Two project modifications have been identified as a result of the June 4, 1990 meeting. One modification would be to expand the limits of the Center City redevelopment project area to include acquisition of the two adjacent homes on Mississippi Street and 66th Avenue (365 Mississippi Street and 370 - 66th Avenue). This would create a larger buffer between the proposed shopping center and the existing single family homes. However, the tax increment district should not be extended to include these lots so as to not 1 1A Fridley Town Square Associates June 15, I990 Page 2 increase the base value for the district without a corresponding increase in value to generate additional increment. Further, in addition to acquisition costs, the City would also be responsible for relocation costs (which may total up to $20,000 under the Federal Uniform Relocation Act provisions), demolition costs (which are estimated to be $3,000), house moving costs as well as Iandscaping and restoration costs to provide a buffer in this area. These expenditures are also compounded by a loss of tax revenue from the two homes in the amount of $1,200. Given all of these factors, this alternative is not cost-effective. The second modification would be to reduce the building size in order to provide more area along the east lot line immediately adjacent to 370 - 66th Avenue to increase the buffer between the existing single family home and the development. The home at 370 - 66th Avenue is within 3-feet of the lot line, and is therefore considered nonconforminq. The existing site plan provides a five foot setback which will contain the six foot masonry rock face wall. Reducing the building length by five feet will increase the setback to a ten foot separation only for the house at 370 - 66th Avenue. Because of the jog in the lot line, reducing the building length would not serve as an advantage to the home at 36S Mississippi Street. The driveway and parking areas would have to be significantly realigned. The developer has indicated that he is willing to meet with these property owners and provide additional landscaping in areas where they desire instead of reducing the size of the building. Recommendation Council consideration of first reading of the ordinance approving the rezoning has been scheduled later on this agenda. Recommended stipulations are proposed. BD/dn M-90-416 R�Ot �'�Ms L�ITSt sa�,78crs Engineenna Sewer Water Parhs Streets Ma�ntenanc� MEMORANDUM Willi�aam W. Bt�s� CitY Mar�er Jd'm G. F1o�a,��Pub1iC Wo�ks Direc.'�ta� J'�u�e 14, 1990 Ii�i' Tec�nical Re�iie�1 C�armitteB PW90-230 1B �e xoztheas-t oorric3o� �tu�ical �aevie�r �mitt,ee met an wec'�esaay, Jt.a�s 13, 1990, at tile I�uLicipal C�enter. �e oc��uter mod�el ,-i�,�,ip forec.�st �ras pr�sertted to the C7cnmittee. Ba.sed t�an their analysis a�d ap�oacii to th�e p�nblem, it appeais that by the year 2010, an additioc�al 6, 000 rideis are foreca_st fa� an LRT syst�t. �e 9ra� requested that ridership infonnatioci be p�+wided by station ar�d by the area frcm �ich ti�ey r�une. �is infoYmation will be pmvicied in the future. Zt�e Mississippi ar�d University station was di.�sed foeusiryg an the svutiyeast .. quadrant. It appears that the statian is nat prudent at this lxatian as it wwld r�notie ttye servive ro�cl which prwid�s ir�gl'ess at�d egrr�sss fo� the Fblioe and Fire ve�icles. In additian, we loaked at the vacant lats in front of the Fridley Plaza Clinic. It was felt that this was tflo far r�ov�ed fe� p�er pedestrian aooess to the Cent�r City oor�t. It appears that the c�urent position is to look at a k,iss- � ri-ride oc► the rprth�ast quadrarYt with the optian to const�vct a P�� �P �� T� P�'kiTi9 lat as an extensian to the LRT facility if it �ras neec1ed in the future. A�le for develapnent of the LitT syste�n irr,ludincJ the variu�s Public hearir�gs, env;,�+�*,i-a� ar�d eoornmic analysis styows that we are loak at a 10- year ti.me frame before the first train will nu► based i�on dailY P�'��9 of the I� . A000niux3ly, it would appear. that the IRT in the rostheast quartei i.s scme time beyond 10 yeats. '1'he �3iT am�++.-+rized tt�g meetir�q that the Mettr�olitan �amcil oo[�Y.ted regazdinq lar�d use develapa�t associated with the LKr lit�es in oti�s cities at�d cauntries. ��y w�ere fawrably ;� � with the fa�,t praper plar�inc� ar�d lar�d use revisian will in faat anpliment the LRT system. Zhe ne�ct a�eeting was sd�uled feac �nn�sday, July 19, 1990, at 8:30 a.m. in ths I�Du�icipal C7errter. JGF/ts oc: Jock Robertsan .. •.. � I___. ZOA ��90-02 U.C.D. N 1/2 SEC. /4, T. 30, R. 24 C/TY OF FR/OLEY � �\ � , 21 �� wv. cwlwE� „u SEC./� .f��� rT� 12 g :r " � + � ; 3 ` � � � 3 � 1 •. •/ , � � ' ° � f , i � •' \. a � � .� / _ . � ' s � ` � ` .+�' • . . , ` = > � � . '�c 2 ' ;.. .. � � Rice - ; [` �. 2�4. `2 � �I y� ���'��i i �/ �(� �B ' � � y � �� �' . i � d� ' � �i. � � + + `/�`r •` '� ,E ���j � y � �� '� � �I ,l I .o.. �� W• ,i r3'~ `� ' r �! " �• •� � yI f Y • • i! �L«J ��:�. W � i` � � � U = , � � i 1 �� � '-1_ � ¢ ' i s ' �/ ��� � i� , _� � � i `' u • / � ` � �` � ;./ _ "r' ,.- ` I i i O ��0' �� ��0� � � S F, ' L . � . � \ (v j� w �! ♦ t/ , ' '? � l � � � �! s� i9i . • � - �• r • � .t. ., - � r,, �' ,. '�'• ru , , d� , � � -�+ '° �';,) , " • F . i l� � ':' . , Q'�' W � �' +-:• (v � +y'.. ' � °' ' � -r" : �'. . , i. � f. - ; � ♦ - ., , p� i. , . „ � �. .t�i � � . � � 6 •• � • : � W , ? W � ,, .',, `�, � ,�'. ', ` -��,� ,. . `1 � . j • + '� ` U �/ �r i ' � � � ` • u� , f ` �\� F Q 9 1 Q O< � � �a ,:� r. ''� I . I �\ \�o , � 4 . � 5, •j f y2 i�•� .� • �. ' � , it t�- ; ct 1 '-�� ,'� � �' � • 0 "s�` � � " �` � : 'a • , 1: i � ' �� \ � �I`t., _ et'f 9 � ..,.�j,I � �t� � �'4 ' .� �' �►, - • �/ • - , y . .. k `e �, � �. , M Z ; f ��, � � ,� ,s: �o �� _ * � ,�� , f y y ' •Z . _ z .3� 5 � r . a r,+ � � i� <� �,: �M« / � :�/�Ft► .�� 4� ' 1= ,F.` �Y�...�: p - � Z � � � • � ' � 1►�,. n �c 4/ t •� � � �, � � �� � E,3'� ' , � T�y � 'e ?' . ' -� i • - � ` / `� _�> I��, •�" ' "' '`. 5 �� , ' - .i_ .4,. J � I` '�' t t ''? ` dY` ' -, ` .4� y � ° ' � ' , � � j r E, �r ' �4 ' 2, F � r � '�, •�c'� �F ' .• ,– .:s � ' y I--�--� ----- — n �;� f�. v�, � -�0„ �. � . :�r y . J. "� • St �,�_ i _ � ,:. � ' "' o.. �i ' y ' �s . ,"•' t � J`- r r �•-.. � ='S � - ti s � �' O } 3 �� , 'r � � z s,' r J-"� �, :--u Z . W.~�" � � c f B_ ' �M •� 3�, �i �I I! 2��i _ � i �, S s� � I ;�. + ' -- ` 6 � . .. W ;` o' ; � � s"� �. + � r .«. � '_ r r 0 � • � � . H �•,, , I` �..�... , � y ' . i � ,. `A 'y �' 1 ' - f • �., � ....ar = ` a • " - . �� . f, ur �� � _ � °f I � • ' • y �.�• � , , . ' . '. . ' � �r ; r � W° • e a ��� �� , f i �. c j � � �� � � • H � � � � � 3 , 2 a ' � � � ; i i < � • j � ; i c j � 3 0 ' .. �� � J � I M�— I� � ` �.� '� � 67 AVE. N.E. • � . ` . - iQ � ; : ,. .. � • . . . > : � •, . r ., • � . . ' . � . • . . � � I ' 6' � �j; ' � z � j _ s � _ ��3 � j .c i ai� ,3 � • e �. � �O� � � C � � q s 5 � s j � � '? � � � q � .. ,,,' '�- • � R � • F • .... �"' _ � w �'/���Ci -� � � ��Zt� e� �E 2� �' • i s) e s• � S t MENtp i , � � ,� '.j� 'I •i • ,i' y UU c � ' x � �n66TM °AVE. N.E. : r" �� 3 wr. I 4L�:': o.. .. >. t� � �, �, I✓ w ,• r r • I • r r � r , s •r, '� � �`4 p YES r jC�o � , �4 - a 3� LA� �. � " �. q �� . R,��p _� r----- . , _ , ,. " _" , ': 4 � . .. . �` �-^ _ "' - 1 • s._�,�.�,, . .. 1 _. � •� /� iµ�9 . R El� 3� z' � �„ E�R�C � KL~ P�A�'� -' ..� � � I ! ¢ � j � f / ..•1•`�.;'n�•. s� n I I �r . �� • � G[wieRq � �� SLC • �� 13 24 ��7� LOCATION MAP �' ` : �'� r`` - .> ; � • *� , .`�� '� .� ` � �� � � �� � . .,.. '. .-:� 3 `�� ������F , �P. '.."""T P r �;s�� s, .. ` � �4 A j ��'' -. , � � �� ,�� , � � . , " ." ,� s� "•'� �, _ ,1 � �#, �{ t. ` �<° , -� �` "� '�,,�. `Q .- r F •. r „ ' i y,� _ . / • " ' 11yR . v`T"�ri^n'° t . •. �� ..�i ! -i Z F �,�r � , � �� . �r L `v"�✓y�r '*�� +�� �� �'�' `� •i.r-.� � s� � F�� � ..r a i��� 1�. '-: ' � Q IiU �i� • . � �..i . � � ' �. • }... I �` 1 .�_�._:���`� 4., *.�___.� �; � __ �. t ��, . � r �" i �. � '. F. . . � ,!' .. T � � � :�. ' � �itl�� ' M* t � � �i ¢ ��.,i .�� ti.- i � - .. � \ ., � � .u7 . � �, ��"!ti ., � � . . _� .- � .. �` , yy�-,�Y . , y ��� .� �� L ': � ""; � � '; A � . t�Yti�. .�a - i ; . S ' � �� .�� >���_r, -:�, � � •.��11,� d'.. r�,-�S. `�• �_.r'� 11.���� �,� . :s � �,'yy. � _. _ _ � r..w�.. a. . y . ..,w�-t:.�+. �'7� �'n'rir.r,'r�.�.� .,�..' ' . (�Y 'a[',� . .. . :R. . � . _�,.�... . . ry'nswle•��/s+1���i�. . . ib' � . £T ,��4•� Y�+W ,r�IV s.s. �NV�����pI.w�i.cM,�f.1.`�� � m^�af�yy.�����, ' i - -»+�NY. !R,U� �rr��-Yi�li�68'�.iol�_.�W�+d ... .^�c�. s+rc.:e'�a VFr�-arr<. ...._r. _.•. ..� ..�....� ��. ... .. _ . . . _ . Cd'bq�OrJel� ��� � '` �� :"�,,,,� ��� c �+ir� . .`�►'�`,; �,7�""�+R'�`� �Id Jtl� � r � ` ,• f� � S�`:_ ' �'�-�-� . «� ` ,.{�.� di . � �� � - �?. .; �� v►�' � *_ j '� t .� � . �;=�i l'` � � � ..:_... .:,. � ,� ;���� . , - -. �� .���� ` . .. � � :,��._� f;+'� � �: : �. {i` ��`'i� '� � ` �"�, . r�ft�c � ',r ��;; 1F , �� .F .,_ � ,�. � : �, � i� . � •y � ' #. r �`� '�'� , � �r .! �� ...r�l.�~� �� ��� t , __--- ��_ . � • • .^..,... • �*s�� x�ai� �u .a a � .,._. f_ _.'w . .. . . .. �. r_ ,� �� ��-. . j -. t'd i.. cf � :fi-+rA '�� '��'� � �.� � . a `i{,{i4� .. : . � < � i�`' t! +� �s # �. Lt°a �-S' �.':. • �`� � �_:.� �,r - s � . ' � •�'+� ) .^� ♦ ^ � � .�i i. � p�t� � � }••�r ..s}` ._� : � , t- ,. �� �� �. , � �.. ! ' ; ' � � '� } ._'; a �'t . �u � [� �R .r � ` rt � 1 : ' �s: ��'„ R S`�` _ `+ .; . �`�rt`��, ; . � � �' � � � ���, �=�-� -.�sT R �� A-•� ., . .: 1' ' . ' •�. . . ,. : . . . - . _ � '. . ♦ � �•� � . 1 '�:. � �} � '� R � ' i� I � ; . �'' � -. y �' `�' . c � �, � f���� � j',•� �`� -°►- �\�� } `� �� . � r r���F� � �"'��, � ` � � t- � � ., �., .�. � f " � . , ., `, .p : x � ��. ,�,,' � tiE t ; ' � '� . . , . �'•� t �r- � . M *la.�'� _ . ��sr. _ _ �ff Ff E ' �y �;, F �, _-,, �, . Y4 1' ��;°..��,�Y� � ~� ��� a � �' � � � ♦ . , t .. '+' .. . y�. � . ` • �. � � r,E �. . �.' i• r � � _f � ��� ��� �� ��C E.� F �n.t� �; � � _rr�c„� � _ �•\ .: .r . � �! , ; r.:�� 1M�, �. `l \ • � ,� ,�; i.F; A f i; t' . - _ _.• ► ;y,,x � �,.. � ;\ '+� +� � F ' r t ; �' �� • ' �` '., a�'' . .. � ��^�� 1�� '� r "� , �jT ��:f� ��� , F ` . F'F,t. � . � �, '" n.t . '�% .. \ d �, F . � ..�-'' ' " 9 �. � � 9� � r �� +� ... `' . .� '1 . � ��� � • . �� S � •• _ �iK '7 � `...�,�t.- .. , O T �'�� � .. Y} •v � f �f `\'�� _�� p''"�1�.�.� f � ... t'�t-.�y� -� `✓,�`." - � � � '� �F ~'• Y , � : t. 'I. � ',�:�• . �'� �� Ys � `� � 'T.•.? , y; �. y ��♦r•� - r` •4...z • � �,ti �� .v��;7��i_,� .� . �� �j' ti' � (4 _ � .,. ^'�^i�. �� � � - �+w�: .�r.r�,�� .r �: r ! ' �� �. 'I � ��� .!. ,. - � ' . �� ' . . • ! .� y. `. 2�..� es- : � E =f? �� !� � � .s � � E $�f < < %LY .1' �3'. � i � � p � � � � ' �_ � i7 4 ■ s t s �i� i�s= �i'� �� � • ��6s e; 3� �F a� �-;c �= se I!j�`sw �.�o���l! E ! �iy�e �:l:5�:5E? �;E � a � . ��� �EiI:Ei �Q`E�Eii�i: �§S S 1 i! 1 2 ■�� i i 7 i= i ;`_ � _= i • • C O = ♦ O . a • j � � • � • � r � t � £� ; i " ��� � 1 }ji L'[ 1R i�� .!� �t �C 'zs! �s"�= ���: w..� -p ca :3�x :"-= ";:�- i� �! � =s t • " €;: .fe= :° i� 's-y 3aisc EL - s: - : o��! 3c"s22 �g.-_ 34�e_ ii es z--s—� � . � , i � . .. �' i ! I —I � I � i � � ��:� � � � i s � �I , � b �� � � I _� � : l� � _� � ZOA 1�90-02 U.C.D. i '_; � � � 3�:: �. � - S�j �' i : t.,s E� a r f�== �: � ! '� j :S • j t : C �'�� �� j �_ ��i' �j i 3� zi:� e� _� c :� rir- � :a = •' *�� i�:i i i� 5 ii _ r� i ir e i � z �-'��'�— �� � e� II ' • 1`� �,G�i �� � I j •'i � � � � ( "�°°' ' 3 : _.`� . -.� ` �3 i ��j�f �zit� ■1 S Y ��Ij�E . :3 �s�j-E � Fi l��f # �i �i�'!� 7 jl ��:} •S �:�j�� � �I! t's�sl � �ti� � � iY �f��� �1 E �. �z � T W > ¢ N Y < O � �o m t i3 �E � �. tc-• it� I`s= Y� a- � �. i! � � -.� =i: . ;, r 2y �F w� <S >� e� >'a 3' �� f �� 0 _ : . EXISTING CONDITIONS � � � I I I �I � ; I � ''� i � �� I �+r � — � W �I �� 3� „ I ��i � � ---1 W �I � ! m � IQI'�� ^' I �I � � �--}}+r � �� � i 1 �I � � � � �� � i � � � 1 I �I � ; � �—L + � o j� T � ^ �°v x II � � � �� _ � �; o QF-�•1 � � � d u , i �� i W � � I � 6 J� i a I I�I� ° �I 1 � N � I� � ��!� Y � � � II �{o M N � I N :� y o il _�' I � - �m N � � + � v+ "' = i� � � II �• N II��� N ► ►� N � -- ' I � . . ' - — - — - — - — - — - — - _-__- �N yf1N�/�H A I TC? ZOA ��90-02 � � :� �. � I) 1 I �, 1 � 5I � "s �' � . �I y I� , 1 I� i I II I ���-- I �I I I i I� I I �I I I ,�¢� I _� II � W r�, I w � ��1 � � I �! i N � �� � Itt�� I �� T__ I. I IYI I , �j� I � t I ��x �a: .�. .0 I �� I ��' I � rl—�— — - � I� ' � 1 1 � I � I � � � i N 1 N 3 , N I I � I I � @=� � �:a: ���� � . � !�� (�� :; `$� �E �� s� T� sx :+ _E W aW� �_� o �; N Z �» �y� >�N Wu� J � _ Q�� oc � 1 � � 0 � SITE PLAN F d S�?i� 9g���� °z :��s�i W ������ w ; o � J � RG z i i I I T � t i i) � � i i � � � F.1 � IW�I��i I Z �� � i� --J W II � � ; � al� � � � � � i 1 I �' I � 1� � I � � I� � i I �I � �`. I I� t t ' � ' I I � I =�' � 1 � � �I � 1 :��� �� � ' j i �._�T� � �� � I � j � � 1 �� I �- I II r � � �� � i �_t+, � � , i� i � i� i',�° --�� t z i � � • ----- � ---------------- ------*'`� 3N 3f1N3/�ti �lIS�3�INf1 -- ---------------------------------------- `------ � i ii 1 1� � ZOA I�90-02 U.C.D. 0 9 � I� ,I � a F , �— � ; � t� � ; � �i ; �� � e � . �� � ,� _ , , i � '� a--.I � L , „ �-- � i � I i i I �� I i I � I � i {; I � � T� I , � � � i � r — �-1 � ! I II I I I I � � � � �'��' ' I ' � � � � I ; I I�I I � I1� 1 T I�'T`_.— I � � 1 � � I I I i i r'-i— — - � I�l, 1 �� � '� I I I � � � I I � ,. i i � . � � . . . � i i � i i � "_ i 1G .,__ ,� 0 iii �J � � ! r� � �i� ;� a te�e tit' �i2 j :E b- i'w .£ . Ve� I.�I ,'S;S �:FS 1 �� �i�! �� P r t � s � 1 u ji� 0 IA�N J 1 t G QT� ~ � N HN W u .�. J> Z °�. n 4 {' f � `t_ R� :� DRAINAGE PLAN I 'II � I � I I � �� I Z �I W � --1 i Q i� i � r- �, I ��i i i, I �II � _ �i ' I ) _" W � .) � 1 �� � ��i � � ��i � :� �� 2_�1 i� t� �II – – 1L ZOA �� 90-02 ������ ��;E��� �������� oa.o.• � � � ,-- �, � � � Z `�- � r I' �I � ; i i � 3 �; � � i xl a „ . n j �� i �i b u • � > .i .� I i� i i I 1 � ' I II ' I ' i �t--- I � � �� I i � � i� i i��� i t � �I i ►- �-r�, i w i �'I I Q' � I I � ir i �L__ � �� I > I � �i � 4' .t I� ��.a u u� a I � i� � �' � i i rl-i--- II � �� � i �� i � i i � a � � s � tt i � N � � � N i , , N � � � I I ; � 1--� �- - — ! i � � i � . ii�� �i� � =�� r�_ i' � �=s � _ i�s t � ' ` �'� W � o��� N��� W�� z . 3isi s. oF=` �N J>=� o��` � � r 1 � 0 � r UTILITY PLAN H e i���1, �. �'�� �i_. ��E � i z �. �� � t �� _ �t! ! � !� � :�� � i �� � � � W ( � • � � � _ ��y � . .... - uWi , � � � �_ ! 4� � �e : � < . � W O O Z H 2 J d O a x w ZOA ��90-02 U.C.D. � :•� i t / I Ij t i �� _ i� � 't ±, � � Q; I f, ; ; � ; ` �_ � � : _:� � ,, � , , , , 4:� : � � i , , , , r i;; � '' � � :i ; � � � r-� � � ��; �' ; i t . ! j ' � �, f i ;: _ � � , � — - : i � � - —�-- � i �_-- '� ' I I �- � - I i ' ��,� I � �" - —._ 'i • -- I � ; 1 ii' � ., ' i m i� � �� i���� --�— 4� Y. I �� ��' , — +i , � �--- ' , , i i� - � _ '- �;; �'q; i i i � �;� � � �� i��, — f, I I` I � � � � ��! _ � �'� �?; I � �� I� I _ - T— =T I i �, , I_ - I' t �� - — '� a , � ' � I 1 �� � � -_ . '__"— \ !� � � _.__' • ; , f ' --- �_' - --- � i' � . � �� �1 � 1 I / - .__ __ ___ __. 1 1 � • � •.� ', � �m,.�I• + ,- — � � �.� �, � I � I � 1� , _ ; ' � ' � `pF / --- ` --T' `�Z � `�e�►�P_�.'�w.�.— � �7"� H � — __..__ \ • ; �i� I I I � � i. � -- -- Q \' ' ' I � � - II 1 � __ � �'y �I � � _I_ _ I Ii � �1� I, �/ '_ —` - . �� � � � � �I '.i%� ( '� r{o � i --- - «_ �� . I � y � I i I _ __ +'��. � ' i i �4 _�_ �, � �, � �� � � -- ` .r _ ''1 �,, ; � i� • _ _I'l: -- �� ��I� ; 7 ; ; , ; � � I i ii i��. - - f, �� � y'� Q �� � �j�'= � 1 � i �° . �� � � . , � '� � - - �. � ' � r- - -- ---- � _ — - "_ —__.�' ..� ° i � , \ `7 � ----- '-.� -.-- �r,; :-�r.i3,\': � _:-��±.i'`-�--- ---- --j-�; ;'-- }-�--- — - - =►_ � i � r� �._ ;�, ��; :r �: .- � �! Fij � �� �! � I� I ���i � s r� t� s t, ��i ��i �E� W Q �.i r � = W ���N yN Z o�s n ~�'N NN I Wu= oJ> �� o`c � 1 � f � � , LANDSCAPE PLAN �_,�:;:� : < �gp��Y� 3 � U � � Y= � YSw2��E�"3 � � o i<-� 3� ��` W c.al'�s •uu� Y .��.,�� 0������ T �� ZOA I�90-02 U.�.D. 1J EL��VATION � � c�nroF F� �� DATE: TO: FROM: COl1llMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART1VlENT MEM4RANDUM June 14, 1990 r�William Burns, City Manager� Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator SU&TECT: Second and Final Reading for the Sale of Excess Property; East Six Feet of a Vacated Alley, by Wayne Johnson At the June 4, 1990 meeting, the City Council tabled final action on this item so that the two property owners which are not participating in the proceeding subsequent with Wayne Johnson could be notified about the current status of the east six feet of the vacated alley. Attached are the letters that were sent to these two property owners. Mr. Curry contacted me on Wednesday,,7une 13, 1990 and I confirmed with him the information that was contained in the letter. Staff recomraends the City Council approve the attached ordinance for second and final reading. BD/dn M-90-423 � 2A ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE DNDER BLCTION 12.06 OF THE CITY CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAI+ ESTATE TO BE BIIRPLUB AND AIITHORIZIN6 THE SALE THEREOF SECTION l. The City of Fridley is the fee owner of the tract of land within the City of Fridley, Anoka County, State of Minnesota, described as follows: The east half of that part of the vacated alley which adjoins Lots 5 through 9, Block 5, Hyde Park, lying north of the south line of said Lot 9, extended westerly and south of the north line of said Lot 5, extended westerly according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota. All lying in Section 23, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. SECTION 2. Zt is hereby determined by the City Council that the City no longer has any reason to continue to own said property, and the City Council is hereby authorized to sell or enter into a contract to sell said property. SECTION 3. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the necessary contracts and deeds to affect the sale of the above-described real estate. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: August 14, 1989 First Reading May 21, 1990 Second Reading: Publication: � _ C�N �F FRIDLEY r� -; FRiDLEY ML`NICIPAL CENTER • 6-131 UN3VERSITY AVE. Iv.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FA� 161'_► 571-I'_K7 June il, 1990 David Curry 5125 East Twin Lake Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55429 Dear Mr. Curry: It is my understanding that you do not wish to participate in the "proceeding subsequent" alonq with Wayne Johnson to memorialize your Torrens certificate. As you are aware, the City has passed an ordinance vacating the alley to the rear of your property. The west 6 feet of the alley has accrued to your property. The east 6 feet is now in the City's ownership, as we have received the deed from the State of Minnesota. Should you decide to sell your property in the future, conveyance would not include the east 6 feet of the alley, since it will be in the City's ownership. If you wish to acquire it at some future time, you will need to contact my office to begin those proceedings. Please note that should the City decide to utilize this portion of the alley, any structures or improvements within the City's 6 feet may need to be removed. The cost to replace or relocate such improvements will be at your expense. The portion of the alley abutting the Johnson's, Henrickson's, and Early's property will be conveyed to them in the near future. The City Council will be adopting an ordinance for second and final reading on June 18, 1990 authorizing this conveyance. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Barbara Dacy Planning Coordinator cc: William Burns Gregg Herrick C-90-336 � � CtTYOF FRiDLEY 2V FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1'_87 sune 8, 1990 Jerry Dold 6110 Star Lane N.E. Fridley, IrIN 55432 Dear Mr. Dold: It is my understanding that you do not wish to participate in the "proceeding subsequent" along with Wayne Johnson to memorialize your Torrens certificate. As you are aware, the City has passed an ordinance vacating the alley to the rear of your property. The west 6 feet of the alley has accrued to your property. The east 6 feet is now in the City's ownership, as we have received the deed from the State of Minnesota. Should you decide to sell your property in the future, conveyance would not include the east 6 feet of the alley, since it will be in the City's ownership. If you wish to acquire it at some future time, you will need to contact my office to begin those proceedings. Please note that should the City decide to utilize this portion of the alley, any structures or improvements within the City's 6 feet may need to be removed. The cost to rep2ace or relocate such improvements will be at your expense. The portion of the alley abutting the Johnson's, Henrickson's, and Early's property will be conveyed to them in the near future. The City Council will be adopting an ordinance for second and final reading on June 18, 1990 authorizing this conveyance. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Barbara Dacy Planning Coordinator cc: William Burns Gregg Herrick C-90-336 � � cinr oF F�a� DATE: TO: C0�1/LMUNITY DEVELOPMENT' DEPART'MENT MEMORANDUM June 14, 1990 William Burns, City Manager�� FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Second and Final Reading of an Ordinance Approving a Request for a Vacation, SAV #90- 01, by the Michael Servetus Unitarian Society, Attached is the above-referenced ordinance. The City Council approved the first reading of the ordinance at the June 4, 1990 meeting. Given that the final plat approval for the Michael Servetus 2nd Addition is also scheduled for approval on this agenda, staff recommends the City Council approve for second and final reading the attached ordinance vacating Oakley Drive. BD/dn M-90-418 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE IINDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALL8Y8 AND TO AMEND APPENDI% C OF THE CITY CODB The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. To vacate that part of Oakley Drive as dedicated in the plat of Michael Servetus Addition. Al1 lying in the North Half of Section 13, T-30, R- 24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code shall be so amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: May 21, 1990 First Reading: June 4, 1990 Second Reading: Publication: 3A � � cinroF F� �� DATE: TO: FROM: COlV1MUNi^fY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M EMO R.AN D UM June 15, 1990 William Burns, City Manager� � Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: First Reading of an Ordinance Approving a Rezoning, ZOA #90-02, Fridley Town Square Associates Attached is the ordinance for the above-referenced rezoning. Staff recommends the City Council approve the ordinance for first reading, subject to the following stipulations: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The development shall be constructed in accordance with site plan dated March 8, 1990, as represented in ZOA #90-02. The landscaping plan shall be revised to include: a. six American Lindens along the north lot line; b. c. Honey Locust trees shall be replaced by Hackberry trees; Annabel Hydrangea species shall be replaced with rosa rugose. The petitioner shall pay park dedication fees prior to issuance of the building permit. Storm water management calculations shall be submitted prior to issuance of the building permit. All rooftop equipment shall be screened from view from the public right-of-ways. The petitioner shall obtain development contract approval from the HRA. The petitioner shall execute a maintenance agreement for the landscaping and parking areas. 0 Fridley Town Square; 1st Readinq June 15, 1990 Page 2 4A 8. No automotive service uses, car sales, or other outdoor repair/display uses shall be permitted. 9. The City shall have the right to review each use within the center to determine whether or not it is consistent with the intent of the Center City Redevelopment Plan. 10. The site plan shall be revised to provide one 18 foot entrance lane and two 12 foot exit lanes. 11. Shared parking and access easements shall be provided on the property for LRT kiss-and-ride traffic, and specifically along the east and south lot lines. i2. All lighting shall be shielded such that the glare does not adversely affect residential properties. 13. All parking and driving areas shall be lined with concrete curb. 14. All dumpsters shall be screened in accordance with the City's ordinance. 15. Underground irrigation shall be provided to landscaped areas. 16. A comprehensive sign plan for free-standing and wall signs shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Council. BD/dn M-90-427 . � ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: SECTION l. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicated. Be and is hereby rezoned subject to stipulations adopted at the City Council meeting of , 1990. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: Lot 9, Block 2, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 1 from R-1, Single Family Dwelling, to S-2, Redevelopment District, the same being 355 Mississippi Street N.E.; and Lot 12, Block 3, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 2 from R- 1, Single Family Dwelling, to S-2, Redevelopment District, the same being 368 - 66th Avenue N.E. ; and Lots 10, 11 and 12, Block 2, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 1, except the South 30 feet thereof, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota, and Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16, Block 3, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 2, according to the recorded plat thereof one file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota, from R-1, Single Family Dwelling, and C-1, Local Business, to S-2, Redevelopment District, the same being 6525 University Avenue N.E. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District S- 2 (Redevelopment District). SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tracts or areas to be rezoned from Zoned District R-1 (Single Family Dwelling) and C-1 (Local Business) to S-2 (Redevelopment District). Ordinance No. Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: June 4, 1990 First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: �1� 5 CITY OF FRIDL$Y M L M O R A N D O M r� TO: BILL BURNB, CITY MANAGER � FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCS DIRECTOR SIIBJECT: RESOLIITION MODIFYING WATER RATES DATE: JIINE 13, 1990 The attached resolution will have the effect of increasing the water rates for the City of Fridley. The process has been a long one in regard to the discussions that have previously taken place. As you will recall, the process started out with the need for additional construction and repairs necessary for providing proper supplies of water to the property owners of Fridley. These improvements were outlined in the Capital Improvement Program provided by the Engineering Department. These costs were then used to prepare projections of expenses necessary in the production of water. The City Council reviewed approximately 35 different versions of water rates and decided on a two tier rate structure. This structure will allow for a volume discount for the large users that consume over 5,000,000 gallons per quarter. The water rate that Council will be taking formal action on provides for: 0- 5, 000, 000 gallons to be priced at . 60/1000 gallons over - 5, 000, 000 gallons to be priced at . 55/1000 gallons The city engaged the firm of Springstead Inc. to provide the projections of income from various rate scenarios. The past three years history of water sales were used as a basis for revenue projections. In each rate scenario, two assumptions were made. The first was that the rate to be established would be effective for approximately a five year period. The second was that the operation itself was to only break even during the five years and was strictly to recover the cost of producing the water. The revenue assumptions provided for the rate increase to become effective July 1, 1990. The billing system does not allow us to bill customers using different pricing structures during the same quarter, so the first bill with the new water rates will appear in October. With this brief summary of events, I provide the attached Resolution for Council consideration. RDP/me 5A REBpLUrIQd I�D. - 1990 I•�s_ • � r •�� �� � t '�1• "�, Y:,�' v• Y: �:r� r.: Wt�',AS, Sectioaz 402.13 of the City Code provides that the City Cour�cil shall have authority to set water rates by re^.�olutioa�, and WF�RFAS, the City Cair�cil i�ad ind.icated a desire to provide for major it�ravements to the water ger�satiryg /filtration systeqn, arri Wf�tEAS, these ia�rovanents have been outlined in th�e City's 5-Year C.�pital I�rave�nent Progx'an►. ar�d Wf�tF'AS, these oosts of improv�nerits aust be oa�er�sated �ax�i the rate stnructure cl�arged to the watex' c�, at�d WF�ftEAS, the City C;a�u�cil has reoanm�er�ded that th,e rat� structure be si�lified by reducinq the rnm�ber of vol�une lev�el rates fraa six levels to tw�, ar�d Wf�E'.AS, the rates are to be effective with the October 1 billiriq. NOW, Z�RE, B� IT RE50LUID, that the followirg water rate schedule for all custo�rers exoept those qualifying for the law inoane senior citizen ar�d disabled citizen rate shall be as follcyws: J� Y�: :: 4 .r.l�li_i���i 0- 5, 000, 000 $. 60/1, 000 Gal./M3nim.uu $7. 20 OVII2 - 5,000,000 $.55/1,000 Gal. BE IT FUKI3�2 RESOLUED, that the City �il hereby provides a reduced rate schedule for qualifyir�g law ir�oare senior citizens and disabled citizens as follaws: `���1 • : yYM �► ./_ Y�I: :: M �.I�I�. � 0 - 5,000,000 $.40/1,000 Gal./Min�1[�nm $4.80 The followiryg criteria nn�.st be met in order to qualify for the law inc� senior C1t122ri Y"dt2: 1. The senior citizens must occ��y si.r�gle family or dauble b�angalaw units. 'I3ie senior citizen rate does nat apply to apar�merits, o�rcial, ir�dustrial, institutional,or athex. 2. �e custa�x or peL�son having responsibil.ity for payment of the water ci�arge naust be sixty-two years of age or older and moust provic�e a c�y of a valid Minnesata Driver's Licen.se or ieceipt thereof, or a Minnesata Identificati� Card or a receipt the.reof with current address for proof of ac�e. Resolutiaa�► No. - 1990 Page 2 3. 'Ihe persoiz mu.st oertify that the adjusted gros.s ir�ne is less than the law ir�oane level defined by the Depart�xYt of Hausir�g arid Urban Develc�nent by providir�g a vq7y of the past year's Federal 1040 Tax Form. 'Iiye follawir�q criteria mu.st be met in ordex to qualify for the laa inoame disabled citizen rate: 1. Disabled citizens must pravide a capy of an award letter frcm th�e Social Security Ac�ministration indicating that the individual is or�e hur�x�ed peroent (100t) disabled. 2. �he person must opstify that the adjusted gn�ss ir�ocrne is less than the low irxz�ne level defiried by th�e Deparbment Hausing at�d Urban Develagne.rit by providing a c�o�7y of the past year's Federal 1040 Tax Form. PASSID AND ADOPI� BY Zi� GTI'Y �7[JNCIL OF Zi� C'ITY OF FRIDLEY ZfIIS DAY OF , 1990. WII�SAM J. NEE - Ng1YOR iVy4�•�I�A I�' /� • M M �I' 5B THE MINIITES OF TH8 REGIILAR MEETIN(3 OF T8E FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL OF JUNE 4, 1990 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:37 p.m. by Mayor Nee. �LEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Billings, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Schneider and Councilwoman Jorgenson MEMBERS ABSENT: None AFPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING. MAY 21. 1990: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Mayor Nee requested the following item be added: (3.1) Consideration of Commission Appointments. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above addition. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: MARY VASECKA - LOCKE LAKE ASSOCIATION: Ms. Vasecka, 6909 Hickory Drive, extended thanks to John Flora for his efforts and communication regarding the Locke Lake problems. She stated that she understands soil borings will take place in the next few weeks. She questioned if any other progress has been made that the residents should be aware of. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that work is continuing with the City Attorney to draft a petition to present to the Rice Creek Watershed District. He stated that there is a Chapter 112, a watershed 509 Plan, and a new 601 Plan that affect the storm water improvement projects. He stated, hopefully, there would be additional information to present to the Council by the June 18 FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIIN$ 4, 1990 PAGE 2 meeting. He stated that he would continue to keep the residents informed, as Locke Lake is one of the City's high priority projects. Mr. Flora stated that as plans are developed the sedimentation issue will be addressed and a�determination made if it is marketable. He stated that in regard to the detention pond, it is hoped that the City can work with the District Engineers to incorporate it into their plans. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that he has done some research on the problem and it must be recognized that the project can be completed if there are enough funds to pay for it. He stated that he is trying to figure out how this can be accomplished in the most efficient way and what the administrative and legal complexities involve. He stated that there are some procedures in Chapter 112 involving special assessments and appraisals of damages, but this is very slow and very expensive. Mr. Herrick stated that he is attempting to determine sources of funding in addition to the money the homeowners and the City will pay. He stated that this involves other governmental agencies which, in itself, are slow and sometimes complex. He stated that Chapters 112 and 473 include the original 509 Plan which has been modified by the 601 Plan, and in addition, there is reference to Chapters 106 and 429. He stated that to determine how these provisions interrelate is complex. He stated that more time was needed to research this material and to contact the attorney for the Rice Creek Watershed District. He stated that, hopefully, he would have a written report for the Council at their next meeting. Mr. Burns, City Manager, felt this process would move very slowly as the City is not in control of all the variables. He stated that there are a lot of agencies involved and that some funds have been set aside for at least the initial phase of the project. Ms. Vasecka stated that she realizes it is a slow process, but the Locke Lake Association just wants to make sure the improvements are completed this time. CONNIE METCALF - WEED PROBLEM AT MOORE LAKE: Ms. Metcalf, 860 West Moore Lake Drive, stated the residents living on Moore Lake are concerned about the weed problem. She submitted a sample of the weed she had removed from the lake and stated the entire lake is full of it. She stated these weeds are visible from Hiqhway 65 and produce a green scum. Ms. Metcalf stated she felt that this detracts from the lake and Fridley's image, as Highway 65 is heavily traveled. She asked that the City consider steps to correct this problem. She stated that other residents living on the lake are also concerned and that she would be willing to have FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 3 a meeting regarding the problem. She stated that there is also another weed with a purple flower that is spreading along the east side of the island. Councilman Schneider asked that staff identify the weed and submit a report on the west basin of Moore Lake. SCOTT LUND - '49ER DAYS: Mr. Scott Lund thanked aZl the Fridley organizations involved in the '49er Day Celebration on June 13 - 17, 1990. He invited the Council and all the residents to participate in the activities during this celebration. PUBLIC HEARINGS• 1. REZONING ZOA #90-02 BY FRIDLEY TOWN SOUARE ASSOCIATES, TO �2EZONE THREE SEPARATE PARCELS AS FOLLOWS: LOT 9 BLOCK 2 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 1 FROM R-1. SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING TO S-2 REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, THE SAME BEING 355 MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E. AND. LOT 12 BLOCK 3 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 2 FROM R-1. SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING TO S-2, REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT,THE SAME BEING 368 - 66TH AVENUE N.E. AND, LOTS 10 11 AND 12. BLOCK 2 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 1. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA AND LOTS 13. 14. 15 AND 16. BLOCK 3 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 2 ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA FROM R-1. SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND C-1, LOCAL BUSINESS TO S-2,_ REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT THE SAME BEING 6525 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N�: MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 7:58 p.m. Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that this rezoning is requested to allow development at the northeast corner of Highway 47 (University Avenue) and Mississippi Street. She stated the developers have completed a similar development in the City of Minneapolis known as Calhoun Village. She stated that there are two petitions that were received by the Planning Commission and a third petition from various business owners in the vicinity of this intersection. She stated that the developer held two neighborhood meetings. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL M8$�ING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 4 Ms. Dacy stated that the properties to be rezoned include the 10,000 Auto Parts site as well as single family homes. She stated that the zoning proposed is S-2 which is comparable with a PUD District where the City approves or disapproves the rezoning based on a particular plan or proposal. Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated that the Center City.Plan was adopted in 1979 by the iiRA and City Council. He stated that this plan included the Holly Center, the Target Northern Operations Building, the Fridley Plaza Office Building and Clinic, and the parking ramp. He stated that the 10,000 Auto Parts site has been a part of this plan and called for a commercial development or mixed uses. Mr. Robertson stated that when the HRA first considered the project, 10,000 Auto Parts was still a viable company. He stated that with their demise, it was feasible to return to the original concept of financing on a pay-as-you-go basis. He stated the developer would need an extra $100,000 for the carrying costs for the pay off of that grant; therefore, the grant would be in the neighborhood of $300,000 for five years or up to $315,000 for six years, depending on the interest rate of the loan at the time of closing. Mr. Robertson stated that the HRA considered this request at their April 18, 1990 meeting and gave conceptual approval to the financing and site plan subject to the neighborhood compatibility and traffic conditions. He stated that the present commercial building, the four vacant residential lots to the north, and the two developed residential lots to the east generate approximately $17,000 to $18,000 in taxes. He stated that with this proposed development, a minimum of about $84,000 would be paid in taxes. That amounts to a substantial increase in tax revenue to the City and will be available to the school district and the county when the tax increment district is de-certified. Ms. Dacy presented the site plan and stated that the proposal is for a 28, 000 square foot retail facility, one story in height, with a masonry rock face exterior. She stated that not all the typical setbacks have been met that are required in a commercial zone. She stated that the setback on University Avenue is 30 feet instead of 35 feet, and along Mississippi and 66th Avenue the setback is 15 feet. She stated that the parking setback is only 15 feet instead of 20 fept. Ms. Dacy stated that the developer has proposed an extensive screening plan to construct a six foot masonry wall along the north lot line abutting 66th Avenue and on the east lot line. She stated that staff recommends the planting of additional trees along the north lot line. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAQE 5 Ms. Dacy stated that, in regard to the Light Rail Transit (LRT) issue, Mr. Yantos has sent a letter regarding this particular proposal. She stated that, basically, it states that if this development is constructed and the LRT is also located along this route, Anoka County recommends University Avenue be the major feeder route and a major pickup at this site. She stated that this would also act as a bus feeder site for dropping off passengers to use the LRT.system. Ms. Dacy stated that it was requested that the City reserve an easement and, if a park-and-ride system is necessary, the County could consider acquisition of the eiqht homes between 66th and 67th Avenues for a park-and-ride lot. She stated this would necessitate expansion of the driveway along the east side. Ms. Dacy presented a video of the developers' other business center in Minneapolis, Calhoun Village, and pointed out the building materials that were used. Ms. Dacy also presented a video of the traffic on Mississippi Street between 5th Street and University Avenue that was taken between 3:30 and 4:30 p.m. last Friday, June 1. She stated that she did not observe any stacking of the vehicles past the 10,000 Auto Parts site. Ms. Dacy stated that the majority of the eastbound traffic on Mississippi Street is in the right hand lane and tends to move over to the left hand lane. She felt that this should not be a problem as there would be adequate time to make this lane change. She stated that during this hour of filming, six pedestrians were walking along Mississippi Street, but no one crossed the street. She stated that there were also a number of bicyclists along the north side of Mississippi Street. Ms. Dacy stated the developers' plan is to move the driveway farther to the east. Mr. Dave Koski, Traffic Consultant with Barton-Aschman, stated that a traffic study was conducted for the intersection of Mississippi Street and University Avenue as well as 5th Street and Mississippi Street. He stated that this was compared to a 1987 traffic count conducted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. He stated that, basically, the traffic volumes at the intersection have not changed much between 1987 and now. He stated that they also conducted an analysis of how the proposed development would affect the traffic. Mr. Koski stated that Barton-Aschman has been actively engaged in surveying traffic generated by all types and sizes of developments and utilizes a combination of their observed traffic generations, as we11 as that produced by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, in determining the amount of traffic this development would generate. He stated that for a development of this type the peak retail period is occurring during the peak traffic hours. He stated that this is attributed to the fact that a lot of people are combining FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETINd OF JIINE 4� 1990 PAG$ 6 a shopping trip with the time they come home from work. He stated that the peak traffic is between 4:30 and 5:30 at University Avenue and Mississippi Street. Mr. Roski stated that a significant amount of traffic, about 50 percent, going into this shopping center is already traveling on the street, but he assumed for this study that the traffic generated was all new.traffic. � Mr. Koski stated that, basically, they calculated the capacity of the University/Mississippi intersection as it is today with existing traffic, considered the new proposed configuration by the County, and added the additional traffic for the shopping center. He stated it was found that the intersection operates at a D level of service. He stated that this scale is based on A being perfect and F as failing. He stated that D is considered to be an acceptable level of service in an urban area. He also stated that if nothing was changed at the intersection and the improvements were installed, the intersection would operate at a D+ or very close to a C. Mr. Koski stated that it is felt that this shopping center would not change the capacity of traffic generated at this intersection. He stated that the primary reason for the level D service at this intersection is on the west side. He stated that the signal needs re-timing and re-phrasing. Mr. Koski stated that they reviewed the impact of left turns for vehicles eastbound on Mississippi Street and for left turns into the site. He stated that there are sufficient gaps in the �' Mississippi Street westbound traffic to accommodate the demand to turn left into the shopping center. He stated that there is capacity available and the left turn would not have any significant impact on the traffic on Mississippi Street. Mr. Koski stated that the primary delay would be for traffic exiting the shopping center to go eastbound on Mississippi Street but felt there would only be a backup of several cars. Mr. Koski stated that the impact the shopping center may have on 5th Street and Mississippi Street was not significant. He stated that on a very conservative approach and assuming all the traffic generated by the shopping center was new traffic, there would not be a significant impact on the University/Mississippi and 5th Street/Mississippi intersections. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission recommended denial of this rezoning request. She stated that some of the members of the Commission felt that because the site plan did not meet all the setbacks, it was not appropriate. The majority of the members felt that with the potential that some of this area would be used as an LRT park-and-ride, they would prefer the site be used as such rather than for this proposed development. Ms. Dacy stated that staff's recommendation is for approval of the rezoning with several stipulations. �RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JUNB 4, 1990 PAGE 7 Mr. Bob Guzy, attorney for the developers, stated that the developers have been working with City staff and the HRA on their plans for this development. He stated that he felt this was a good project and that it would be another step in the City accomplishing their goals for the property. He stated that the revitalization of HolZy Center has benefitted the City and, with this development, there would be three quadrants that would create the "halo" effect and increase the development potential for the southwest quadrant. Mr. Guzy stated that wherever there is redevelopment there are potential conflicts. He stated that he wanted to ensure the Council and neighborhood that the developer, Urban Commercial Developers, and their anchor tenar►t, Walgreen's, will be a good neighbor and a qood corporate citizen. He stated that the Council has to look at what is there now and what will happen when the development is completed. He stated that the neighbors have talked about this site being an eyesore. Mr. Guzy stated that the developers worked with staff to have a pleasing development for the neighbors and to provide the essential buffer. He stated that there will be no funneling of traffic into the residential area and that the flow of traffic is onto Mississippi Street. Mr. Guzy stated that part of the site is already commercial and that Council made a decision that this be a vital intersection in the City. He stated that the development would also add to the tax base which affects all citizens of Fridley. He stated that the developers are working with the City to put this property back on the tax rolls. He stated that Council has the option of making this into a parking lot or making it a viable retail center that can provide funds and other benefits to the citizens. Mr. Guzy stated that it is essential to utilize the two houses and existing vacant land that abuts 66th Avenue in order to make the project feasible. He noted that a petition was received from businesses in the area and stated that in Columbia Heights there is a Snyder's and a Walqreen's within a block of each other and both and doing good business. Mr. Guzy stated that he is aware that the Planning Commission is concerned about the LRT issue. He stated that, in the future, there probably will be an LRT system on University Avenue. However, the question is if this would in any way prevent this project from proceeding. He stated that the bird in hand theory should not be diverted because of something in the future that could, potentially, occur. He stated that this project fits well with the City's plans, adds to the tax base, and creates jobs. He stated that it would not diminish retail competition but instead increase it. Mr. Reese, the Project Architect, presented a drawing of the proposed site plan. He_stated that the construction materials are �RIDL$Y CITY COONCIL MEETINa OF JIIN$ 4. 1990 PAGE 8 pre-finished masonry units with a metal roof over the front canopy. He stated that the building is designed to fit in with the neighborhood. Mr. Schuette, UCD, stated that the center would be a 28,000 square foot neighborhood convenience center. He stated that there is a demand in Fridley for additional retailers who want to bring new concepts and ideas to the City. He stated that the anchor tenant would be Walgreen's, utilizing 11,000 square feet of the space, with six or seven other shops that would total 17,000 square feet. He stated that, for a comparison, Holly Center is about 75,000 square feet. Mr. Schuette stated that this center would not bring anyone from across town to Fridley. He stated that it is designed for neighborhood use and that it may contain such stores as an insurance office, hair salon, video store, Chinese restaurant, etc. Mr. Schuette reviewed the site plan and stated that the center would be entered by one driveway on the east.of the site. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked the location of Walgreen's loading dock. Mr. Schuette stated that it is along the east side of the building. Councilwoman Jorgenson questioned the width of the road. Mr. Schuette stated that it is 23 feet. Ms. Dacy stated on that the on the west side of the building it is 20 feet. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked about snow removal for this site. Mr. Schuette stated that their plans are to have the snow removed from the site. Councilman Schneider asked the approximate value of the center after it is constructed. Mr. Schuette stated that construction costs, including costs of the plan are over $2,000,000, and the perceived value when the center is finished is over $3,000,000. Councilman Schneider stated that he felt the Planning Commission recommendation was strongly influenced by the LRT issue. He asked Mr. Yantos, from a practical and realistic viewpoint, what would be the earliest LRT would be in operation. Mr. Yantos, representing the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority, stated that the earliest would probably be about seven years. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGB 9 Councilman Schneider asked how soon a decision would be made on the kiss-and-ride at this location. Mr. Yantos stated that a station is being planned for Mississippi Street and University Avenue. Councilman Schneider stated that there are some options for additional parking, but this may require the acquisition of homes. He questioned when this decision would be made. Mr. Yantos stated that the decision would be made between now and when construction begins five or six years from now. He stated that the homes to the north of this site would seriously be considered for parking. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked why a park-and-ride was not being considered at the Columbia Arena site. Mr. Yantos stated that in looking at station space and movement of people they are trying to keep the stations approximately one mile apart. He stated that they are also considering the east/west access which is important. He stated that it is very expensive and it really does not make sense to construct a station and to have one kiss-and-ride with another just a short distance to the north. Mr. Yantos stated all of the stations, at least north of 37th Avenue, would be park-and-ride. Councilman Schneider asked if kiss-and-ride was not in the planning at this time. Mr. Yantos stated that it is in the plan but, as the planning continues, the need for park-and-ride will certainly be there. Mayor Nee stated that this is a surprise. Mr. Yantos stated that as they continue to work with the various communities they did not want to say they were only going to have a kiss-and-ride or drop-off for buses and cars as the potential for park-and-ride is very strong. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how many park-and-rides were planned for Fridley. Mr. Yantos stated three: one at 57th Avenue, one at Mississippi Street, and one at Osborne Road. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how much land is needed for these sites. Mr. Yantos stated that enough space to accommodate 200 to 300 cars or about a two to three acre site at each of these intersections. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAQE 10 Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the property would be owned by the City or the County. Mr. Yantos stated that it would be owned by the Railroad Authority. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if it would be tax exempt. Mr. Yantos stated that he assumed it would be tax exempt. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if a route has been established south of I-694. Mr. Yantos stated that this has not, as yet, been set. Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Yantos what has led to the change in plans. Mr. Yantos stated that, as various committees have been meeting and focusing on the needs, the ridership is being reviewed, and one concern is to remove traf f ic from the City streets . He stated that they did not want people parking in front of homes on residential streets. He also stated that the committees have become more serious about park-and-ride. Councilman Billings stated that he finds it very enlightening to be hearing this information since he was not aware of it, and he is the Council's representative to the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority. Mr. Yantos stated that they have reviewed this site in the northeast corner of Mississippi Street and University Avenue and worked with the developers to provide space for a kiss-and-ride along with an easement for potential parking to the north. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how many stations would be required as LRT proceeds south. Mr. Yantos stated that stations would be located at 53rd, 49th, 44th, and 40th Avenues, and St. Anthony Boulevard. Councilwoman asked if these would be park-and-ride facilities or kiss-and-ride. Mr. Yantos stated that they would be park-and-ride. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that Mr. Yantos is talking about major development areas in the City that would be turned into tax exempt property for park-and-ride areas. Mr. Yantos stated that they have thought about having parking beneath office and retail buildings. He stated that there are other alternatives to use the space beneath the office and retail buildings other than just for parking. Councilman Schneider stated that residents in the neighborhood are concerned about traffic. He asked if this was being taken into consideration with park-and-ride. FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MBBTING OF JIIN$ 4. 1990 PAGE il Mr. Doug Moore, Associate with BRW, stated that the parking volume would depend on the size of the particular park-and-ride lot. He stated park-and-ride traffic would still use the entrance into the site. However, it would have to be widened and the Railroad Authority consider acquisition of additional property as well. Councilman Schneider asked if.any bf these homes were for sale, if the Railroad Authority would consider purchasing them. Mr. Yantos stated that he did not believe they would consider any purchases within the next six months. However, if property was available at the 10, 000 Auto Parts site and it did not conflict with the City's goals, the Railroad Authority probably would consider purchasing it. Councilman Billings stated that two weeks ago there was discussion about the possibility of constructing a station on the southeast corner of Mississippi Street and University Avenue. Mr. Burns, City Manager, asked if any thought has been given for ingress and egress off University Avenue for this future site. Councilman Billings stated that throughout the planning process it has been his understanding that the Railroad Authority was going to look at a bus and passenger drop-off at this particular location. He stated that once the LRT system was in operation the additional 25 spaces along University Avenue may be needed. He stated if, in the future, it was found that the ridership has increased, then at that time a determination would be made as to the need for additional parking. Mr. Erickson, UCD, stated that this is what he had heard from Mr. Yantos. He stated, basically, the Railroad Authority was going to establish a station and, if and when parking would be needed, would be determined by the demand. He stated that as of now, they have no way to determine whether parking would or would not be required. Councilman Billings stated that even though he serves on an intergovernmental agency committee, it appears the committee is serving no function other than for someone to be able to say the City had input. He stated that it seems the decisions are made elsewhere and the committee is nothing more than a sham. He stated that he gets more fed up all the time. He stated that, recently, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners and Transportation Board decided to begin a bus service for Anoka County except for Columbia Heights and Fridley. He stated that maybe it is time Fridley went back to Ramsey County. Councilman Billings stated that he is totally shocked to get this far in the planning process encouraging the developer to work with the Railroad Authority and then find they have now changed their FRIDL$Y CITY COUNCIL ME$TINa OF JIINB 4. 1990 PAGE 12 philosophy of thinkinq. He stated that he doubted if this project would have gone this far if the City had been qiven this information six months ago. Mr. Bill Hogan, 365 Mississippi Street, stated that the driveway to this shopping center site is, in reality, being moved only about 80 feet east. He stated that with the improvements to the intersection the center median will be located just below the Marsolek property. Ms. Dacy stated that the existing most easterly driveway is being moved approximately 80 feet to the east, but from the University Avenue curb line, it would be about 360 feet to increase the reaction time. She stated that with the improvement of the intersection there would be dedicated stacking lanes into the shopping center site. Mr. Hogan stated that the original improvement plan for that intersection did not provide left turn lanes because there was no development on this site. Ms. Dacy stated that when the improvement plans were first completed for the intersection, the redevelopment of this site was not contemplated and the County was to locate the median just short of the existing driveway of this site. She stated that with this development proposal there is an advantage to moving the access farther to the east and provide a left turn lane into the site. Mr. Hogan stated that adjustments have been made on the north side of the shopping center to allow more landscaping, but he was concerned about the amount of space on the east side of the development. He stated that most of the drawings do not show the homes next to the proposed wall. However, the wall would be only 13 to 14 feet from his home. He felt that there was not room for landscaping, and if the road was widened for a park and ride lot, he assumed the wall would be located closer to his home. Councilman Billings asked Mr. Hogan what he felt would be a good use of this site. Mr. Hogan stated that he had not given it much thought but has usually thought about some kind of commercial development. He stated this proposed development moves closer to his home. Mr. Thayer, 377 - 66th Avenue, stated that he was opposed ta the rezoning. He stated that he believed the site is too small even with acquisition of the two residential lots. He stated that the setbacks would be less than what is normally allowed for this type of development. He stated that another concern is snow storage, and he believed it would be several days before the area could be used if there is a heavy snowfall. Mr. Thayer felt that the single combined entrance and exit is a dfsaster, and those who want to FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 13 proceed eastbound will have a problem exiting. He stated that he believed this would begin destruction of the neighborhood through the domino theory. Mr. Thayer stated that he felt a mistake was made when the existing construction was allowed on this site, and he did not b�elieve the shopping center is the best use of this property. He stated that he believed development in the southwest corner of University Avenue and Mississippi Street and the 100 Twin property should be completed before this site. He stated that Mississippi Street is the main east/west thoroughfare and deliberately addinq traffic without a well thought-out plan would be a terrible mistake. He felt that if the City has any long-range plans, they should let the residents know so they can make their plans accordingly. Councilman Billings stated that he is confused as to how this dev.elopment impacts the southwest quadrant or the 100 Twin site. Mr. Thayer stated that the "halo" effect would spill over into the southwest corner. He stated that his personal reaction is that if the southwest quadrant is completed it would probably remove this site as a location for this type of shopping center. He felt that something much more viable could be constructed on this site. Councilman Billings asked Mr. Thayer what he would envision for this site. Mr. Thayer stated that his basis for saying it is not a good development is because it is so restrictive in size. He stated that this shopping center would only be located on a little over two acres. He felt that if the size was doubled a viable shopping center could be constructed with better access and sufficient shops. He felt that some type of multi-story building should be considered and a determination made as to what is the best possible use of the land. Councilman Schneider asked if Mr. Thayer felt a multi-story building should be retail or housing. Mr. Thayer stated that there are multi-story buildinqs where the first level is all parking and felt this would also meet the LRT needs if it becomes a reality. He stated that the rest of the space could be used for different offices. Mayor Nee stated that it is very difficult for the City to spell out exactly what they want on a site and then have it completed. He stated that the market usually dictates what a developer or those financing a project want to construct. He stated that this proposal for the site is the most realistic one that as far as he has seen it is being responsive to the City's concerns. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCZL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 14 Mr. Thayer asked if the developer would still proceed with this project if he was not provided with any of the incentives. Mayor Nee felt that no one would remove the existing building without some incentive. He stated that there has been absolutely no investment in that structure since it was constructed. Mr. Thayer asked if the development would improve the quality of life for adjacent residents. Councilwoman Jorgenson felt that it would, to some degree, and believed it would also benefit the senior citizens living on the east side of University Avenue. Mayor Nee did not believe that there would be any adverse effects for those living further down the block. However, he stated the people immediately across the street may feel uncomfortable with the wall. He also stated that he views the existing building as almost a cancer and the economics are such that no one is going to invest in it. He stated that he is convinced there will not be a park-and-ride at this site. Mr. Thayer stated that his problem is to make sure that what is constructed on this site is the best for him. He expressed disapproval when the existing building was constructed, he also stated that he did not want this to happen again. Ms. Louise Bennethum, 368 - 66th Avenue, stated that they have lived in their home for over thirty years, and this is the best proposal they have seen. She stated that when Red Owl was a tenant of the building, it was not pleasant to live next door as they had rats, noise, smells, etc. She stated that she constantly worried about a fire in the field because it was not mowed. She also felt that the situation would only get worse unless the Council approved this rezoning. Ms. Bennethum felt that the development would provide a much needed improvement over what is now existing on the site. Councilman Billings asked Ms. Bennethum if her property was one that was being acquired to which she answered in the affirmative. Ms. Terry Mau, 7343 Hayes Street, stated that as a homeowner and business owner in Fridley she would like nothing more than to see the southwest corner develop. She stated that she can sympathize with the owners of the property because they do not want to make improvements when there is uncertainty and talk of redevelopment. She felt that homes should be constructed on this site as it is not a qood area for a business. Ms. Mau stated that the area is small, and this center would be a large development for this site. She stated that the parking allowed for employees is not sufficient as they have more parking.availab2e,at their Rice Plaza Center, and there still is a parking problem. FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGB 15 Councilman Billiags asked if the southwest quadrant was redeveloped where Ms. Mau would consider moving her business. Ms. Mau stated that she hoped any redevelopment would allow her to relocate in the same area. Councilman Billings stated that he was surprised that business owners located in Rice Plaza-submitted a petition as he felt the development of this site may allow them to relocate to this site which would be in the same vicinity. Ms. Mau stated that she felt there is a problem with access to this site. She stated that Rice Plaza has two entrances and exits where there is not a worse traffic situation in Fridley. Ms. Brenda Tibbets, 421 Mississippi Street, stated that they have a problem entering and exiting their driveway. She felt that the senior citizens would also have problems crossing Mississippi Street. She stated that the existing building is an eyesore but felt the shopping center was too large for the site, and the parking would not be adequate. She questioned why improvements could not be made to the existing building rather than acquiring people's homes. Ms. Marilyn Sullivan, 522 - 66th Avenue, stated that she agrees with the decision of the Planning Commission to table the rezoning at this time. She felt that the LRT issue needs to be resolved �- before development occurs on this site. She stated that she did not feel the neighborhood would benefit from this development. Ms. Sullivan stated that this site is a prime location for a park-and- ride for the LRT system. She stated that she did not feel the traffic studies provided significant details and that they need to be conducted over several weeks and months. She stated that the impact on the neighborhood deserves priority, and it seems wrong to remove homes and erode the neighborhood. Ms. Sullivan felt the site should be developed to be compatible with park-and-ride. She suggested that perhaps a day care center or a nursing home should be developed. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there is a moratorium on the construction of nursing homes. She stated that as far as a day care center, with the traffic and playground facilities that would be necessary, this site would not be feasible. She stated that in regard to the LRT, the Council was told this would be a kiss-and- ride site, and that people would park at Columbia Arena and be bussed to this site. Mr. George Meissner, 373 Mississippi Street, stated that he did not believe this rezoning would benefit his property. He stated that it is difficult now to access his home, and the situation would only qet worse. He believed that if a shopping center is constructed it would generate � lot of traffic. He stated that, as it is now, it sometimes takes him five pinutes to get out of his �RIDL$Y CZTY COQNCIL l�EBTING OF JIINE 4, 1990 PAG$ 16 driveway. Mr. Meissner stated that the site is relatively small, and even Holly Center, which is much larger, has been hurting for tenants. He felt that the Council also has to take into consideration the possibility of an LRT system and a park-and-ride at this location. He stated that he was opposed to the rezoning. Councilman Billings asked Mr. Meissner why he changed his mind about the re.zoning since, at one time, he felt the rezoning should cover an even larger area. Mr. Meissner stated that nothing has changed his mind. He stated that the area is quite small and, if there is going to be development, the area needs to be larger. Mayor Nee questioned the effect of a park-and-ride lot on that site. Mr. Koski stated that when they conducted their study, the LRT issue was discussed with Mr. Yantos and Mr. Moore. He stated, however, there was not a conclusion on the amount of parking or type of traffic. He stated that they reviewed the park-and-ride situation and the parking that might occur for the bus system. He stated it seems that the amount of parking adjacent to Mississippi Street and University Avenue would not have that much impact. Mr. Koski stated that with a park-and-ride the primary activity occurs at different hours than the shopping center's business. He stated that the primary exit for park-and-ride would be between 5:00 and 6: 00 p.m. , and the shoppinq center would not be open in the morning hours when park-and-ride would have its heaviest use. He stated that the entryjexit roadway would certainly have to be improved to the extent that it was wide enough to accommodate the extra traffic. Mr. Grant Olson, 390 - 67th Avenue, stated that there are a lot of vacancies now for retail space and that most of the traffic using Mississippi Street comes from 7th Street, which was not included in the traffic counts. Mayor Nee stated that as far as vacant retail space the City does not control who builds, but that it is the judgment of the developers and the ones providing the financial backing. Councilman Schneider stated that Mr. Olson makes a very valid point. He stated that with the 100 Twin site the City had wonderful proposals, but nothing has materialized. He stated that it appears with this development that there are committed tenants for this shopping center. Ms. Patricia Anderson, 3667 - 66th Avenue, stated that she was opposed to this development because of the LRT issue. She stated that if one does or does not support the development the �tIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGB 17 possibility of removing homes on 66th and 67th Avenues is something she cannot accept. She stated that to remove homes in an area that is not blighted is not acceptable. Councilman Billinqs stated that he had several concerns. He stated that he did not receive the traffic study from Barton-Aschman until this evening which did not allow him adequate time for review. He also stated that as he has been following this development project, he was under the assumption that a station for LRT would possibly be located on this corner. He stated, however, the intent was a bus point and passenger drop-off, and he now understands they need a parking lot immediately. He stated that he would like further clarification on the Railroad Authority's thoughts. Councilman Billings stated that as recently as two weeks ago, the Railroad Authority was investigating if the LRT station could be on the southeast corner of University Avenue and Mississippi Street. He stated that one of the reasons they are looking at this northeast corner is because it is a recommendation of the City's Planning Commission. He stated that if they had not recommended this site the Railroad Authority probably would still have been considering Columbia Arena. He stated that he is sometimes confused as to the Planning Commission's direction. He stated that this site could generate up to $100,000 in property taxes and to have this be used for LRT boggles his mind. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that it is very difficult to have a piece of property in limbo for seven to ten years waiting for a decision on the LRT system. Mr. Yantos stated that it is a difficult situation because they are talkinq concepts. He stated that the Railroad Authority has looked seriously at this northeast corner, and the concept today is to take 31 parking spots from the south end for a park-and-ride and, in the future, if more parking is needed they will need to acquire eight homes to the north. He stated that they also looked at the possibi2ity for a station in the southeast corner. He stated that each time they meet new information does evolve. He stated that the Council will have the opportunity to review the final plans in four to six months. Councilwoman Jorgenson's concern was what the City is supposed to do in the meantime. She felt that development plans could not be set aside for the sites the Railroad Authority is contemplating to use as this could seriously impact the City financially. Mr. Yantos stated that they are aware of this; however, the process takes a long time. He stated that he can understand the difficulty in planning, but all they can do is provide information they have to date. �RInT$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETINd OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 18 Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that none of the corners the Railroad Authority is contemplating for use of the LRT system is vacant. She asked if they had considered the impact on the owners of the land and if they would be relocated. Mr. Yantos stated that they are reviewinq it but do not have any concrete answers. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that the Council would not review the plan for six months and then construction would not begin for seven years. She stated that she was concerned that people would have to put their properties on hold for this period until the Railroad Authority makes a decision. Mr. Yantos stated that planning, development, and change is happening continuously. He stated that people and public bodies need to make changes as they see fit. He stated that he is here to inform them that LRT and park-and-ride is a possibility. He stated that they have looked at kiss-and-ride as a first stage of development, but there is also the potential for a park-and-ride. Councilman Billings stated that he felt he needed clarification on the Railroad Authority's plans for this location before a decision can be made on this development proposal. He stated that he understood the emphasis would be on drop off for the Mississippi station. However, he seems to be hearing something different. He stated that he would like this informatian in two weeks. Mr. Yantos stated that the Railroad Authority did take action on this piece of property to work with the developer to provide the easement for a drop off or kiss-and-ride. Mayor Nee stated that he envisioned a park-and-ride would be in response to a future demand. Mr. Yantos stated that he apologized for the misunderstanding, but he was only trying to provide the long-term picture of what might happen. MOTION by Councilman Billings to continue the public hearing on this rezoning to June 18, 1990. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Billings stated that information would be received from the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority and, depending on what information is received, the Council may take additional testimony. He stated that if there is no new information, the Council could take action on June 18 or may not take action for another two weeks. He stated that he did not know what would happen until the Council receives this information. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JQNE 4. 1990 PAQ$ 19 RECESS: Mayor Nee called a recess at 11:05 p.m. RECONVENED• Mayor Nee reconvened the meeti�g at 11:19 p.m. All Council members were present. 2. REZONING ZOA �k90-03 BY BOB'S AMOCO TO REZONE LOT 1. BLOCK 1, LAMFERT'S ADDITION FROM M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. TO C-2, GENERAL BUSINESS GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7680 HIGHWAY 65 N.E. 1p�MnCO oIL SERVICE STATION): MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 11:20 p.m. Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that this is a request for a rezoning in the southwest corner of Osborne Road and Highway 65 from light industrial to commercial. She stated that the Planning Commission has recommended approval of this rezoning due to the fact that all four corners of this intersection have become commercial. Ms. Dacy stated that in conjunction with this rezoning, the petitioner has filed for a special use permit and variance. She stated that the special use permit is to reconstruct the pump islands in front of the gas station and construct a car wash in the rear. She stated that the variance for the lot size would not be needed if the property is rezoned. Ms. Dacy stated that the other two variances are to reduce the hard surface setback from 20 feet to 10 and 5 feet and reduce the side yard setback from 30 feet to 4 f eet . Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission and Appeals Commissian have recommended approval of these requests for the special use permit and variances with stipulations. No persons in the audience spoke for or against this proposed rezoning. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 11:26 p.m. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 20 OLD BUSINESS: 3. SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12 06 OF THE CITY CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND A�UTHORIZING THE SALE THEREOF: Councilman Billinqs asked if the two property owners to tha north were contacted in regard to the storage shed. Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that they have not been contacted. MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this item. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 3.1 CONSIDERATION OF COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS: RESIGNATION - ALEX BARNA: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to accept, with regret, Mr. Barna's resignation from the Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to nominate Connie Modig for appointment to the Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Billings. There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by Mayor Nee. MOTION by Councilman Billings to cast a unanimous ballot for the appointment of Connie Modig, 1330 Hillcrest Drive, to the at-large Planning Commission seat for the term which expires April 1, 1993. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY AND ENERGY COMMI5SION: MOTION by Councilman Billings to nominate Susan Price for appointment to the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by Mayor Nee. MOTION by Councilman Billings to cast a unanimous ballot for the appointment of Susan Price, 7449 Melody Drive, to the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission to the term expiring April 1, 1993. $RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JtJNE 4. 1990 P�GE 21 Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. A��EAIS COMMISSION: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to nominate Catherine Smith for appointment to the Appeals Commission. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by Mayor Nee. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to cast a unanimous ballot for the appointment of Catherine Smith, 6548 Clover Place, to the Appeals Commission to the term expiring April 1, 1991. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �AN RESOURCES COMMISSION: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to table this appointment. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS• 4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 16. 1990• A. �STABLISH PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 18 1990 ON A REZONING, �OA #90-04, BY THE LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE LODGE 38 TO REZONE THE �t��i+v o� rLLm n� rnmc � d nrrn 1�_ RRAATC�7TF.W ADDITION, EXCEPT THE WEST 22 FEET OF THE NORTH 95 FEET OF LOTS 14 AND �5. �ROOKVIEW ADDITION AND ALSO THE SOUTH 95 FEET OF LOTS 14 AND 15 BROOKVIEW ADDITION EXCEPT THE WEST 22 FEET OF THE SOUTH 95 FEET FROM R-3 GENERAL MULTIPLE DWELLING TO C-2, GENERAL BUSINESS GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6875 HIGIiWAY 65 N.E.: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this rezoning request, ZOA #90-04, for June 18, 1990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. The Council received the minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 16, 1990. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JIINB 4, 1990 PAGE 22 5. $PECIAL USE PERMIT SP #90 03 BY BOB'S AMOCO PER SECTION ,�,05 .14 . O1. C� 6) OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ALLOW A MOTOR VEHICLE WASH ESTABLISHMENT ON LOT 1 BLOCK 1 LAMPERT'S ADDITION GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7680 HIGHWAY 65 N E (AMOCO OIL sFRVICE STATION): MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant special use permit, SP #90- 03, with the following stipulations: (1) the petitioner shall submit a landscape plan prior to the issuance of a buildinq permit; (2) approval of the variance request, VAR #90-04; (3) joint driveway/parking easements shall be recorded against both the Amoco and the VFW parcels; (4) a grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit; and (5) the existing mercury light standards shall be replaced with more modern high pressure sodium standards. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. VARIANCE RE UEST. VAR #90-04 BY BOB'S AMOCO. TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE A DRIVEWAY IS TO BE PROVIDED FROM 30 FEET TO 4 FEET; TO REDUCE THE LOT AREA REOUIRED FOR ONE MAIN $UILDING ON PLATS RECORDED BEFORE JANUARY 1. 1993, FROM THREE- FOURTHS L3�4) ACRE (36,679 S4UARE FEET) TO TWO-THIRDS (2/3� ACRE (29 040 S4UARE FEET): TO REDUCE THE PARKING AND HARD SURFACE SETBACK FROM ANY STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM 20 FEET TO �0 FEET AND 5 FEET: TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED CAR WASH AND NEW PUMP LAYOUT ON LOT 1 BLOCK 1 LAMPERT' S �,DDITION THE SAME BEING 7680 HIGHWAY 65 N.E.: Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that staff has proposed two alternatives providing for a different angle on the pumps and a detached car wash facility. She stated that the Appeals Commission was convinced it would be better to approve the variance. She stated that staff is recommending the variance be denied as there are other alternatives. Councilman Schneider asked if staff was comfortable with the Appeals Commission's action. Ms. Dacy stated that the proposal is certainly an improvement as far as the traffic situation. She stated that the proposal certainly will not be a detriment. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant variance request, VAR #90-04, with the following stipulations: (1) the petitioner shall work with City staff and the VFW to resolve building code and traffic issues; (2) approval of the special use permit request; and (3) approval of the rezoning request. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 23 7. �RST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE �ITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA� BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the readinq and approve the ordinance upon first reading subject to approvaZ of the variance application. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. �RS� READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12 07 OF THE CITY �'H.AI2TER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE: MOTION by Councilmaa Billings to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 9. �,tECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR ONONDAGA STREET STORM SFWER REPAIR PROJECT NO 209: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the following bids for Project No. 209: Insituform Central, Inc. 6167 North Kent Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53217 $38,801.20 Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, alI voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that a bid for this project was received from the sole producer of the insituform system, Insituform Central, Inc. in the amount of $38,801.20. He stated that $30,000 was allocated, and it is recommended that the contract be awarded and a transfer of $8,801.20 be authorized from the Storm Water Utility Fund to Project. No. 209 in order to complete the project. MOTION by Councilman Schneider ta award the contract for Project No. 209 to Insituform Central, Inc. in the amount of $38,801.20. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the transfer of $8,801.20 from the Storm Water Utility Fund to Storm Sewer Repair Project No. 209. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COII�TCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4, 1990 PAGE 24 10. ;�SOLUTION NO. 33 1990 AUTHORIZING REAP�RO�RIATIONS IN THE �99Q GENERAL D BUpGET TO PROVIDE BENEFITS AND COMPARABLE �ORTH ADJUSTMENTS FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES: Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that this resolution would authorize a transfer of $37,015 from the emergency reserve to provide for comparable worth adjustments and benefits for temporary employees. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adopt Resolution No. 33-1990. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. APPOINTMENT• CITY EMPLOYEE• MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick appointment by the City Manager: Starting ame osi io alary Mark Public Foster Services Worker Mechanic B Non-exempt to concur with the following Starting Date $13.50 June 18, per hour 1990 $28,188.00 per year Replaces Robert Anderson Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12 . C�►A�MS : MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize payment of Claims No. 32213 through 32379. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 13 . I,ICENSES : MOTiON by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. �STIMATE5: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted: FRZDLEY CITY COIINCZL MEETING OF JIINE �. 1990 PAGE 25 Herrick & Newman 205 Fridley Plaza Office Bldg. 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Services Rendered as City Attorney For the Month of May, 1990 . . . . . . . . . $ 3,528.00 E. H. Renner & Sons 15688 Janis Street N.W. Elk River, MN 55330 Repair and Maintenance of Well No. 3 Project No. 203 FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,632.00 Gammon Bros., Inc. 13845 Northdale Boulevard Rogers, MN 55374 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2 Estimate No. 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,301.08 Secanded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor xee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Billings stated that when he attacked the Anoka County Board for their adoption of a plan that did not include Fridley and Coluiabia Heights he wanted to note that Commissioners McCarron and Kordiak are working to include Fridley and Columbia Heights. He stated it was the Regional Transit Board that omitted Fridley and Columbia Heights. ADJOURNMENT: MOTZON by Councilman Billings to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motian carried unanimously, and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of June 4, 1990 adjourned at 11:43 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secretary to the City Council Mayor Approved: CITY OF FRIDLEY � PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING, MAY 30, 1990 w...... r wr w...r w.....wwr.►.►^.�w..�.w..r.rwww.rw. w. w. w.w.w....w....w.w.w.w.w.�w w. w.ww. wr�rw.►w..rw. rw�r.r�..�..►w.w...w.w. CALL TO ORDER• Vice-Chairperson Kondrick called the May 30, 1990, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek, Paul Dahlberg, Diane Savage Members Absent: Don Betzold Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Bob Bushey, Sears Outlet Store Ms. Pat Bozony, 479 - 79th Way N.E. Doug Erickson, Fridley Focus APPROVAL OF MAY 16, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the May 16, 1990, Planning Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ONANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP �90-06 BY ROBERT BUSHEY FOR SEARS OUTLET STORE: Per Section 205.15.1.C.(8) of the Fridley City Code to allow exterior storage of materials on Lot 1, Block 1, Shorewood Plaza, generally located at 1000 East Moore Lake Drive N.E. MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Saba, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED LTNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32. Ms. McPherson stated this property is located at 1000 East Moore Lake Drive, at the corner of the intersection of East Moore Lake Drive and Highway 65. The entire site is zoned C-3, General Shopping, as is the Northwest Racquet and Swim Club to the east and the old Shorewood Shopping Center to the north. . ` PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 30, i990 __ PAGE 2 Ms . McPherson stated the special use permit request is to allow the outside storage of up to five semi-truck trailers at the rear of the Sears Store. Mr. Robert Bushey, the Sears Outlet Manager, has indicated to staff that the semi-truck trailers are an integral part of his day-to-day operation. Ms. McPherson stated that on October 26, 1989, Mr, Bushey signed a building permit which stipulated that the trailers be removed on or before November 17, 1989. Mr. Steven Barg, Code Enforcement Officer, has been working with Mr. Bushey and Mr. George Applebaum, owner of the parcel, on the removal of the trailers. Mr. Bushey was given the option of either removing the trailers or applying for a special use permit. Ms. McPherson stated Section 205.15.07.D.(5) of the Fridley Zoning Code requires that loading areas be screened from the public right- of-way. As the rear of the Sears building can be seen from the public right-of-way of Highway 65, the code requires that this area be screened. However, since this area also serves as a parking area and a drive-through area for people accessing the site, there is really no efficient way to screen this loading area from the public right-of-way. The location and the way the trailers are arranged on site make it difficult for drivers to negotiate along the rear of the Sears building. Ms. McPherson stated another section of the zoning code, Section 205.15.07.D.(10), does allow for the overnight parking of motor vehicles necessary to the operation of a principle use without screening if they are not readily visible from a public right-of- way. Again, this is not the case, because these trailers are very visible from the public right-of-way; and the code would require that this area be screened. These trailers are also parked overnight consistently, not on a temporary basis. Ms. McPherson stated that in addition to the code noncompliance situation, the storage of these trailers is inconsistent with the goals and objectives for Tax Increment District No. 2, within which this parcel is located. One of the goals of the tax increment district is "to promote sound land use development procedures, including area design standards, landscaping, and lighting standards, architectural review of new developments, and such standards that may be developed that promte sound land resource management". The existence of these storage trailers is inconsistent with the surrounding area, as both the Shorewood Shopping Center and the Sears building have recently received facelifts through architectural refinements and outside improvements. There is also the new shopping center to the east and the racquetbaZl club which are consistent with the redevelopment standards for the district. The semi-truck trailers are a direct contrast; an example of what the redevelopment district strives to remove through the district's goaZs and objectives. �• : PLP,NNING COMMI88ION MEETING. MAY 30, 1990 PAGE 3 Ms. McPherson stated that because of the high visibility of the trailers from the pubic right-of-way and Shorewood Inn, the negative impact on traffic, access, and parking, and no effective method of screening, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend denial of the special use permit request, SP #90-06, to the City Council. Mr. Dahlberg stated that if adequate screening was provided, would the storage of the semi-truck trailers be an acceptable use on this site in terms of the special use permit? Ms. McPherson stated it would be an appropriate use if the loading area is not seen from the public right-of-way. The other seetions of the zoning code do require that lc�ading areas be limited to the side and rear yards of businesses so that they will not be seen from public right-of-ways. Ms. Dacy stated staff would also want to seriously evaluate even the construction of a fence in this area, because they want to project a certain image and architectural styling in this particular area. Staff could take the interpretation that a fence could be just as offensive as the trailers. Mr. Dahlberg stated that if fencing or screening could be . accommodated and was acceptable to staff, then, in effect, parking would be reduced on site. If that happened, wou2d this property then be in noncompliance in terms of the required number of parking spaces on site for this use? Ms. Dacy stated she did not have that information available at this time. Staff would have to check into that. Mr. Saba stated this situation is similar to the Holiday Plus store, and the only thing that separates the two situations is the fact that the Holiday Plus store is not in a tax increment district and does not have the special restrictions imposed on this particular tax increment district. Ms. Dacy stated that is correct. However, the City is also evaZuating the potential of a tax increment district along University Avenue to include the Holiday Plus site. So, the goals would still be the same. Ms. Sherek asked that if the area was walled so that the trailers were not visible from the public right-of-way, is there still enough space to maneuver vehicles behind there and for vehicles to drive around the building? Ms. Dacy stated, yes, there is adequate space to drive around the building. sc PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 30. 1990 _ PAGE 4 Mr. Bushey stated the Sears Outlet store has been in Fridley for 20 years. In those 20 years, they have paid over $1/2 million in taxes. They spent over $700,000 in payroll last year, and a majority of their employees come from the City of Fridley. This is one of the most profitable outlet stores in the 121 outlet store chain. They couldn't do that without the support of the City of Fridley and the people of Fridley. It has to be a relationship that works both ways. Mr. Bushey stated that Sears is going through some tramautic changes right now. They are evolving from a very strong catalog base to more retailing and other facets. As they make that change, there are lot of things involved. The Sears Outlet organization is liquidating its catalog problems. When he applied for the new dock facility at the Sears Outlet store, he did it because their business was growing and with the understanding that in this next year they probably would not have quite as much merchandise to liquidate because of the reduction of the catalog business. The Minneapolis plant where they get most of their business was supposed to close on January 1, 1990, so when he signed the building permit in October, it was his feeling at that time that they would not have any problem in reaching the November deadline ior the removal of the trailers. Mr. Bushey stated, however, that in the process, Sears found they had to get the old merchandise out faster in order to get the new merchandise in. That caused the Sears outlet store to become overwhelmed with trailers. He stated that at this time, it does not look like they will be able to do business without having those trailers. Mr. Bushey stated that, in the meantime, Sears is actively looking at different locations, and one location is the old 100 Twin property at Highway 65/I-694. More recently, they have been looking at using the space across the street where the Hardware Hank store was located until recently. The idea behind that is to eliminate some of the trailer backup. It costs them money to have those trailers parked there, but trailers are also a very integral part of their bttsiness. This space would be used for secondary retail. They plan to use it for a catalog department and furniture and appliances. This merchandise would be received at the original outlet store and then anything that is to go across the street will be loaded and unloaded, so that trailer will not stay. Mr. Bushey stated they hope they can work something out. He stated the trailers do move fairly quickly; however, two trailers are needed for extra storage and he hoped they can work something out to keep those two trailers there. He stated they are willing to do whatever landscaping or fencing that is required. . � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 30, 1990 PAGE 5 Mr. Bushey stated the Sears Outlet store is an important part of this shopping center. They are working together as a group to make it a healthy shopping center. Ms. Sherek stated maybe Sears should consider building some permanent storage space on site or moving to a larger site. Mr. Bushey stated they were told by George Applebaum about 1 1/2 years ago that with the advent of the racquet club, they would not be allowed to put additional selling square feet on this building, because of the parking spaces required by the City. More recently, Mr. Applebaum presented a proposal to Sears about adding warehouse space. Mr. Dahlberg stated the ratio of parking required for retail floor area versus storage is so much different that the number of parking spaces required for storage is going to be signficantly less than the number of spaces required for retail sales floor. So, if warehouse space was added onto the store, would that alleviate the problem of having trailers stored on site, except for the one coming and going? Mr. Bushey stated that was a fair and accurate statement. Mr. Dahlberg asked staff it was possible to add warehouse space relative to site coverage, parking, etc., for this site. Ms. Dacy stated that as far as parking spaces, she believed a warehouse addition is possible. Mr. Dahlberg stated that with the two trailers, that is 240 sq. ft. in storage. A 1,000 sq. ft. addition of warehouse-type space could be constructed at a fairly reasonable cost. Mr. Dahlberg asked if Mr. Bushey had discussed this situation with Shorewood Inn, and was there any objection to the trailers parked there? Mr. Bushey stated he could talk to them, but he thought any problems could be worked out. Mr. Dahlberg stated that if it is possible to put an addition onto the building to alleviate the need for the trailers parked on site, then that should be pursued. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTTNG AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLP,RED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIG HEARING CLOSED AT 8:15 P.M. 6E PLANNING COMMZSSION MEETING. MAY 30. 1990 _ PAGE 6 Mr. Saba stated they are looking at a situation that has been created by the development district, and he did not think it is fair to force the Sears Outlet store out of business because of a development plan created by the City. Right now those trailers are essential to the Sears Outlet business. He thought the Planning Commission should be patient in any action they recommend in giving Mr. Bushey time to look at a warehouse plan and to see the effect of the expanded retail space across the street. Ms. Savage stated that, on the other hand, Mr. Bushey knew that the trailers were supposed to be removed by November 1989 and was put on notice that if he couldn't, he should be considering some other alternatives. Mr. Saba stated he works in an industry that changes monthly. They spend a lot of money on plans and make decisions with the best information available at the time, and that is what Mr. Bushey did. He did not think Mr. Bushey is storing these trailers out of malice. Sears has been a good neighbor and a good merchant in the City of Fridley for a long time. Ms. Savage stated she agreed, but it just seems that Sears should be looking at alternatives, rather than assuming they will be allowed to keep the trailers. And, there does appear to be some alternatives. Ms. Sherek stated she agreed with Mr. Saba. Mr. Bushey has moved trailers off site, and he has tried to lease additional retail space. She agreed that she did not like to look at those trailers; but, on the other hand, there are a lot of worse spots in the City of Fridley. She asked if there is a way to grant a temporary special use permit. Ms. Dacy stated that if the Planning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit, she would recommend that there be specific timetables for accomplishments; or maybe this request should be tabled until Mr. Bushey has an opportunity to look into the possibility of a building addition. Ms. Sherek stated she would like to see a proposal by Sears of what is needed after the additional retail site across the street is open and operating. She would definitely rather see a plan for an addition for continued storage than the continued warehousing of items in the trailers; and she would rather have those trailers sit there another 3-6 months short-term while some long-term solution is being discussed, than to put up fences for screening. She did not think a fence is the answer to the situation, particularly when dealing with truck trailers. Mr. Dahlberg stated he would like the petitioner to discuss with City staff the possibilities of an addition on this site taking PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 30. 1990 PAGE 7 into account the lot area coverage allowable, parking requirements, etc. Mr. Bushey stated he is willing to pursue whatever they need to do. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to table consideration of special use permit request, SP #90-06, by Robert Bushey for Sears Outlet Store until July 25, 1990, in order to give the petitioner time to come up with a new site plan or other alternatives. IIPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. 2. CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT, L S #90-02 BY MILAN BOZONY: To split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights, in order to create the following two parcels: East Parcel: Lot 2, except the East 10 feet thereof, and all of Lot 1, Block 1, Springbrook Park, Anoka County, Minnesota, except for the South 25 feet thereof for 79th Way N.E., and Lot 1 and that part of Lot 2 lying Easterly of the Westerly 10 feet, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview Heights, Anoka, Minnnesota. West Parcel: Lots 3, 4, and 5 and the Westerly 10 feet of Lot 2, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota. Al1 generally located west of 479 - 79th Way N.E. MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Savage, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:25 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner owns not only Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights, but also the three adjacent lots to the east and the three adjacent lots to the west of Lot 2. The site is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the parcels to the north, east, and west. Riverview Heights Park is located to the south. Ms. McPherson stated Mr. Bozony is proposing tc of Lot 2 and combine it with Lots 3, 4, and 5 of one buildable lot. The remaining 15 feet will b� 1 of Block N, Riverview Heights, and also Lots Springbrook Park. split off 10 feet Block N, to create :combined with Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, sF PLANNING COMMZSSION MEETING. MAY 30, 1990 PAGE 8 Ms. McPherson stated Mr. Bozony is proposing to relocate a single family dwelling unit that was constructed by the Fridley High School students to the new lot to the west of his current dwelling unit. The two proposed lots meet all the requirements for lot size, lot width, and access to a public street. There are utilities available for the new dwelling unit. Ms. McPherson stated a portion of the westerly lot is crossed by the flood fringe line that is designated by the National Flood Insurance Program. The lot would then be governed, not only by R- 1 district regulations, but also by the O-1, Overlay District, regulations, for construction within a flood plain. Ms. McPherson stated the zoning code contains four provisions in order for a subdivision to be approved in a flood plain area. In this instance, the two lots will meet all these provisions: 1. No land shall be subdivided which is held unsuitable by the City of Fridley for reason of flooding, inadequate drainage, water supply, or sewer treatment facilities. 2. All lots within the flood plain districts shall contain a building site at or above the Regulatory Food Protection Datus. 3. All subdivisions shall have water and sewer disposal facilities that comply with the provisions of this Chapter and have road access both to the subdivision and to the individual building sites no lower than two (2) feet below the Regulatory Flood Protection Datum. 4. All subdivisions in the flood plain district shall satisfy the requirements of this Chapter. The City shall evaluate the subdivision in accordance with procedures established in this district. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner's surveyor has plotted the 823 foot contour, the elevation at which residences need to be built at or above in order to be constructed within the flood plain. As proposed, this contour does not fall within the area where the dwelling is to be located. Ms. McPherson stated that because the lot split creates lots which conform to the zoning and subdivision codes and because the subdivision meets the flood plain district criteria, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the lot split as proposed to the City Council with the following recommendations (stipulation #1 in the staff report no longer applies, and staff is recommending a new stipulation #1): 1. The first habitable floor elevation of the proposed dwelling unit shall be constructed at an elevation of 6G �6H pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 30, 1990 PAGE 9 824 feet or greater to ensure that the first floor is not within the flood fringe. 2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The petitioner shall apply for a moving and building permit prior to placing the house on the property. Ms. Patricia Bozony stated her husband was called away from the meeting, and she is representing the petition. She stated they want to go forward with this and are willing to do whatever the City recommends. She stated they are very excited about putting a house built by Fridley High School students on this lot. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of lot split request, L.S. #90-02, by Milan Bozony, to split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights, in order to create the following two parcels: East Parcel: Lot 2, except the East 10 feet thereof, and all of Lot 1, Block 1, Springbrook Park, Anoka County, Minnesota, except for the South 25 feet thereof for 79th Way N.E., and Lot 1 and that part of Lot 2 lying Easterly of the Westerly 10 feet, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with - the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview Heights, Anoka, Minnnesota. West Parcel: Lots 3, 4, and 5 and the Westerly 10 feet of Lot 2, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota. All generally located west of 479 - 79th Way N.E. This lot split request is subject to the following stipulations: 1. The lowest habitable floor shall be constructed at an elevation of 824 feet above sea level or higher to ensure that the first floor is not within the flood fringe. 2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The petitioner shall apply for and receive a moving and building permit prior to placing the house on the property. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERBON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. si PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 30. 1990 PAGE 10 Ms. McPherson stated this item will go before the City Council on June 18, 1990. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING SECTION 205.17.03.0 (THE M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT), AND SECTION 205.18.03.0 (THE M-2, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT) OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ADDING THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE REGARDING LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS: (4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of ten percent ( l0� ) of the permitted lot area with a special use permit. In addition to the requirements of this Section and the factors indentified in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the City shall consider the following factors in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage. (a) For existing developed properties, the total amount of existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, including, but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Ms. Savage, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:45 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission's recommendation on the lot coverage amendment was discussed by City Council, and the Council decided they wanted to only amend the industrial districts and require a special use permit to enable either existing developed property or a developer of a new industrial property to petition for an increase in lot coverage up to a maximum of 10� of the lot coverage ratio. The Council asked staff to prepare two standards to help the City evaluate special use permits. Staff did that and developed Standard (a), that if a developer is going to be proposing an increase of up to 10$, staff will take a tatal look at the site and determine whether or not they can achieve an overall net reduction in hard surface areas. Standard (b) came from a reiteration of the existing ordinance requirements. Mr. Dahlberg stated that as was amply stated by Councilmember Steve Bilings at one of the Planning Commission meetings when this was discussed, this may not be as originally recommended by the Planning Commisison, but it is at least a start in terms of looking at appropriate sites and developments in the City that potentially 6J PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 30. 1990 PAGE 11 could be better served if a greater area of lot coverage is allowed. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:55 P.M. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of amending Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light Industrial Zoning District), and Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance, adding the following language regarding lot coverage requirements: (4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of ten percent (10�) of the permitted lot area with a special use permit. In addition to the requirements of this 5ection and the factors indentified in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the City shall consider the following factors in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage. (a) For existing developed properties, the total amount of existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, including, but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT NINE FOOT WIDE PARKING STALLS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS, AND TO REQUIRE PARKING SPACES TO BE DOUBLE-STRIPED: 1. DEFINITIONS 205.03.55. Parking Stall A ten (10) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long area to store one (1) automobile, which has access to a public street or alley and permits ingress and egress of an automobile. Parking stalls mav be nine (9 L feet in width for uses specified elsewhere in this code. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced to eigYiteen (18) feet. Parking stalls shall be 6K PLANNINQ COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 30. 1990 PAGE 12 striped in accordance with the design on file in the office of the City Engineer. 1. R-3 District 205.09.07.A.(3) Parking stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width. 2. M-1 DistriCt 205.17.05.D.(13) Parking stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width for manufacturing uses warehouse and storage uses sneculative industrial buildings and parkina lots for lonQ term emplovee parkinQ. 3. M-2 District 205.18.05.D.S13) ParKl.ng stalls mav Ae nine 17, ��C� 111 W�u��. t�� manufacturing uses warehouse and storage uses speculative industrial buildings and parkina lots for lona term emplovee parkina. 4. 8-2 DistriCt 205.22.6 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Al1 performance standards for uses in this district shall be comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other districts. Parkina space sizes mav be reduced to nine (9) feet in MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. DPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CBAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:53 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission recommended that the parking stall width be reduced to 9 feet for all uses; however, the City Council preferred to reduce the parking stall width to 9 feet only for long term employee parking, industrial uses, and for multiple family developments. The City Council also recommended that all parking spaces, both 9 feet and 10 feet, be double striped. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission might want to consider additional language to the R-3 district to limit the width of the parking stalls to only multiple family developments to avoid a potential conflict with other uses in R-3 district, such as that discussed regarding the recent Moose Lodge rezoning application. �•1 � PLANNING COMMIBSION MEETING, MAY 30, 1990 PAGE 13 Possible language is as follows: "Parking stalls may be 9 feet in width for multiple dwellings and multiple dwelling complexes, including rental and condominium apartments." Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed parking space width amendment with the additional language in R-3 clarifying that the 9 foot wide stalls would only be for multiple family dwelling complexes. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CBAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CL08ED AT 8:57 P.M. MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to recommend to City Council approval of amending the following sections of the Zoning Code to permit nine foot wide parking stalls in certain districts, and to require parking spaces to be double-striped, with the additional language in the R-3 district limiting the width of the parking stalls to only multiple family developments, as recommended by staff: 1. DEFINITIONS 205.03.55. Parking Stall A ten (10) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long area to store one (1) automobile, which has access to a public street or alley and permits ingress and egress of an automobile. sAecified elsewhere in this code. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced to eighteen (18 ) feet. Parking stalls shall be striped in accordance with the design on file in the office of the Citv Encrineer. 1. R-3 District 205.09.07.A.j3) Parkinct stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width. Parking stalls mav be 9 feet in width for multiple dwellincts and multiple dwelling comQlexes including rental and condominium aAartments. 2. M-1 District 205.17.05.D.S13) Parking stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width1for parkinct. 6M PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 30. 1990 PAGE 14 3. M-2 District 205.18.05.D.113) Parking stalls mav be nine {9) feet in width for manufacturinq uses warehouse and storage uses speculative industrial buildings and ,parkinQ lots for long term emplovee parkinQ. 4. 8-2 District 205.22.6 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS All performance standards for uses in this district shall be comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other districts. Parking space sizes mav be reduced to nine (9) feet in width upon approval of a special use nermit. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CBAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 5. RECEIVE MAY 22 1990. APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to receive the May 22, 1990, Appeals Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CBAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to adjourn the meeting. Opon a voice vote, Vice-Chairperson Rondrick declared the May 30, 1990, Planninq Commission meetinq adjourned at 9:02 p.m. Respectfully sub itted, Lynn Saba Recording Secretary � � unroF F��� DATE: TO: COl1I1MUNI"['Y DEVELOPMENT DEPART'MENT' MEMORANDUM June 14, 1990 William Burns, City Manager � � FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Resolution Approving a Lot Split, L.S. #90-02, by Milan Bozony Attached is the above-referenced staff report. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the lot split with the following stipulations: 1. 2. � The elevation of the first habitable floor shall be at 824 or higher. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. The petitioner shall apply for and receive a moving and building permit prior to placing the house on the property. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution for the lot split request. MM/dn M-90-422 � 60 t STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE ���0� pLAJ�NNG COMNMSSION DATE : May 30, 1990 FRIDLEY CRY COI�lqL DATE : June 18, 1990 Au7� �M�dn_ REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST IOCATION SITE DATA SI�E DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES 8► ZONr1G UMES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS flNANCIAL MAF'LICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREF�IVSNE PLAN COMPATBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES 8� ZONNG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION L . S . 4� 90-02 Jake Bozony To split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights in order to create two buildable lots West of 479 - 79th Way N.E. West parcel, 12,145 sq. ft. - East parcel, 14,238 sq. ft. R-1, Single Family Dwelling R-1, Single Family to the East, North, and West; Fridley Park Iand to the South Available to new lot $750.00 at time of building permit Yes Yes Concern with constructing residence in or near flood plain Approval Approval ; - . ' Staff Report L.5. #90-02, Jake Bo2ony Page 2 Request Jake Bozony is proposing to split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights into two parcels; one 10 feet wide, the other 15 feet wide, and combine them with adjacent lots in order to create two buildable lots. Mr. Bozony currently owns Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block N, Riverview Heights and also Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Springbrook Park (see site plan). Lot 2 is located west of 479 - 79th Way N.E. where Mr. Bozony resides. Site The subject parcels are zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the parcels to the north, east, and west. Riverview Heights Park is located to the south. Analysis As Mr. Bozony owns all the lots involved in this lot split/ combination, he could in fact decide to combine Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block N, Riverview Heights, and create a buildable lot for a future dwelling unit. However, Mr. Bozony is proposing to split Lot 2 in order to provide maintenance access for the future owner of 479 - 79th Way N.E. to maintain the bluff line in this location. Mr. Bozony is proposing to relocate a house that was recently constructed by students at Fridley High School to the new vacant lot, and will then sell his existing dwelling. The proposed lots meet all the zoning code requirements for lot size, lot width, and access to a public street. There are utilities available for the future dwelling unit. The westerly portion of the new lot is within the Mississippi River flood fringe. The petitioner's surveyor is currently locating the flood fringe elevation on the property and is preparing a revised survey. The zoning ordinance contains the following four provisions for subdivisions in a flood plain area (Section 205.24.09): 1. No land shall be subdivided which is held unsuitable by the City of Fridley for reason of flooding, inadequate drainage, water supply or sewage treatment facilities. 2. Al1 lots within the flood plain districts shall contain a building site at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Datum. 3. All subdivisions shall have water and sewer disposal facilities that comply with the provisions of this Chapter and have road access both to the subdivision and to the individual . ! Staff Report L.S. #90-02, Jake Bozony Page 3 4. building sites no lower than two (2) feet below the Regulatory Flood Protection Datum. All subdivisions in the flood plain district shall satisfy the requirements of this Chapter. The City shall evaluate the subdivision in accordance with procedures established in this district. The proposed lots meet the above criteria for subdivisions within the CRP-2 Flood Fringe District. The lot is located at the edge of the flood fringe district and can meet the flood proofing requirements of the O-1 District. The site is serviceable by water and sewer. If the lot split is approved, Mr. Bozony may have to apply for a special use permit in order to construct his house within the flood plain should the CRP-2 elevation line fall within the location of the proposed dwelling unit. The code allows construction of residential dwellings within the CRP-2 with a special use permit. Recommendation and Stipulations Because the proposed lot split creates lots which conform to the zoning and subdivision codes, and because the subdivision meets the flood plain district criteria, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the lot split as proposed to the City Council with the following stipulations: 1. Should the CRP-2 flood fringe elevation fall within the area that the dwelling unit is to be located, the petitioner shall apply for a special use permit. 2. 3. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. The petitioner shall apply for a moving and building permit prior to placing the house on the property. �lanning Commission Action Prior to the Planning Commission meeting, staff received information regarding the location of the CRP-2 elevation line. The flood fringe elevation line does not fall within the area where the dwelling is to be placed. The petitioner will not need to apply for a special use permit. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the lot split request to the City Council. The Commission amended the stipulations as follows: Staff Report L.S. #90-02, Jake Bozony Page 4 . � 1. The elevation of the first habitable floor shall be at 824 or higher. 2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The petitioner shall apply for and receive a moving and building permit prior to placing the house on the property. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the lot split request by Mr. Bozony with the stipulations as amended. ss pi��►�"dING COl�iI88ION MEETING, MAY 30. 1990 PAGE 7 into account the lot area coverage allowable, parking requirements; etc. Mr. Bushey stated he is willing to pursue wh er they need to do. OT ON by Ms. Sherek, seconded b . Saba, to table consideration of special use permit re , SP �90-06, by Robert Bushey for Sears Outlet Store u July 25, 1990, in order to give the petitioner time come up with a new site plan or other alternative IIPO A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON 1CONDRICR CLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 2. ONSIDERATION OF A IAT SPLIT L S #90-02 BY MILAN_BOZONY: To split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights, in order to create ..the following two parcels: East Parcel: Lot 2, except the East 10 feet thereof, and all of Lot 1, Block 1, Springbrook Park, Anoka County, Minnesota, except for the South 25 feet thereof for 79th Way N.E., and Lot 1 and that part of Lot 2 lying Easterly of the Westerly l0 feet, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview Heights, Anoka, Minnnesota. West Parcel: Lots 3, 4, and 5 and the Westerly 10 feet of Lot 2, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota. All generally located west of 479 - 79th Way N.E. MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Savage, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERBON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIHLIC BEARING OPEN AT 8:25 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner owns not only Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights, but also the three adjacent lots to the east and the three adjacent lots to the west of Lot 2. The site is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the parcels to the north, east, and west. Riverview Heights Park is located to the south. Ms. McPherson stated Mr. Bozony is proposing to split off 10 feet of Lot 2 and combine it with Lots 3, 4, and 5 of Block N, to create one buildable lot. The remaining 15 feet will be combined with Lot 1 of Block N, Riverview Heights, and also Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Springbrook Park. 6T pLANNING COMMIBSION l�EETING, l�Y 30. 1990 PAGE 8 Ms. McPherson stated Mr. Bozony is proposing to relocate a single family dwelling unit that was constructed by the Fridley High School students to the new lot to the west of his current dwelling unit. The two proposed lots meet all the requirements for lot eize, lot width, and access to a public street. There are utilities available for the new:dwelling unit. I�Is. McPherson stated a portion of the westerly lot is crossed by the flood frinqe line that is designated by the National Flood Insurance Program. The lot would then be goverried, not only by R- 1 district regulations, but also by the O-1, Overlay District, regulations, for construction within a flood plain. Ms. McPherson stated the zoning code contains four provisions in order for a subdivision to be approved in a flood plain area. In this instance, the two lots will meet all these provisions: 1. No land shall be subdivided which is held unsuitable by the City of Fridley for reason of flooding, inadequate drainage, Water supply, or sewer• treatment facilities. 2. All lots within the flood plain districts shall contain a building site at or above the Regulatory Food Protection Datus. 3. All subdivisions shall have water and sewer disposal • facilities that comply with the provisions of this Chapter and have road access both to the subdivision and to the individual building sites no lower than two (2) feet below the Requlatory Flood Protection Datum. 4. All subdivisions in the flood plain district shall satisfy the requirements of this Chapter. The City shall evaluate the subdivision in accordance with procedures established in this district. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner's surveyor has plotted the 823 foot contour, the elevation at which residences need to be built at or above in order to be constructed within the flood plain. As proposed, this contour does not fall within the area where the dwelling is to be located. Ms. McPherson stated that because the lot split creates lots which conform to the zoning and subdivision codes and because the subdivision meets the flood plain district criteria, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the lot split as proposed to the City Council with the following recommendations (stipulation #1 in the staff report no longer applies, and staff is recommending a new stipulation �1): 1. The first habitable floor elevation of the proposed dwelling unit shall be constructed at an elevation of su �LANNING COMMISSION 1dEETING, MAY 30. 1990 �AGE 9 824 feet or greater to ensure that the first floor is not within the flood fringe. 2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The petitioner shall apply for a moving and building - permit prior to placing the house on the property. Ms. Patricia Bozony stated her husband was called away from the meeting, and she is representing the petition. She stated they want to go forward with this and are willing to do whatever the City recommends. She stated they are very excited about putting a house built by Fridley High School students on this lot. O�i TION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of lot split request, L.S. #90-02, by Milan Bozony, to split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights, in order to create the following two parcels: East Parcel: Lat 2, except the East 10 feet thereof, and all of Lot 1, Block 1, Springbrook Park, Anoka County, Minnesota, except for the South 25 feet thereof for ?9th Way N.E., and Lot 1 and that part of Lot 2 lying Easterly of the Westerly 10 feet, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with . the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview Heights, Anoka, Minnnesota. West Parcel: Lots 3, 4, and 5 and the Westerly 10 feet of Lot 2, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota. All generally located west of 479 - 79th Way N.E. This lot split request is subject to the following stipulations: 1. The lowest habitable floor shall be constructed at an elevation of 824 feet above sea level or higher to ensure that the first floor is not within the flood fringe. 2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The petitioner shall apply for and receive a moving and building permit prior to placing the house on the property. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON 1CONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANZMODSLY. sv �I.�►NNING COMMISSION l�EETZNG. !�i!►Y 30. 1990 PAGE 10 Ms. McPherson stated this item will qo before the City Council on June 18, 1990. 3. gUBT�ZC HEARING• CONSIDERATI4N OF AMENDING SECTION 205.17.03.0 (THE M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT), AND SECTION 205.18.03.0 (THE M-2, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT) OF THE FRZDLEY ZONING ORDZNANCE, �Y�ADDING THE FOLI,OWING LANGUAGE - REGARDING LOT COVERAGE R�QUIREMENTS: ' (4) The lot coverage as stated in (1� above may be increased up to a maximum of ten percent (10$ ) of the perm�.tted lot area with a epecial use permit. In addition to the requirements of this Section and the factors,�'indentified in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use"permits, the City shall consider the following factors /`in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage. (a) For existing developed properties, the total amount of existing hard surface areas�shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking cove �ge can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prov� that all other ordinance requirements are met, in�luding, but not limited to, parking, stona water �nagement, and landscaping. � MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Ms. Savage, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and �pen the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, VICE-CHAIRP RSON 1CONDRICIC DECL�RED T8E MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC BEARIN OPEN AT 8:�5 B.M. Ms. Dacy stated the Plann' g Commission's recommendation on the lot coverage amendment w s discussed by City Council, and the Council decided they wan d to only amend the industrial districts and require a special use pezmit to enable either existing developed property or developer of a new industrial property to petition for an incre se in lot coverage up to a maximum of 10� of the lot coverage ra o. The Council asked staff to prepare two standards to help t City evaluate special use permits. Staff did that and develope Standard (a), that if a developer is going to be proposing an i crease of up to 10�, staff will take a total look at the site an determine whether or not they can achieve an overall net re ction in hard surface areas. Standard (b) came from a reiter ion of the existing ordinance requirements. Mr. Dahlber stated that as was amply stated by Councilmember Steve Bilings at one of the Planning Commission meetings when this the discussed this may not be as originally recommended by Planning ommisison, but it is at least a start in terms of looking at appr riate sites and developments in the City that potentially _ _ _ _ _ _ L . S . �� 90-02 Jake Bozony `A, �r S //2 SEC. � cirr oF a 3� �E T ^ :.,. ,', 1 ; ; � ������ � �1» � . ,_ --�� � �. �L,�''� ,k E�S �a«w • � �';,, , � . i ���„A* M' , `. ,`yr � � ^ � n SiR ��r.+' � .�, �. . \ , � ' 1F' Y . J � ♦. r�,�*".iy.C�'��'.X►�, �%'r� , lr �.�y'�, I���� t, �� S� � . W �� 1��,o t� / � !4 � � �Mi��ti'� i� M. �' � �� . ��` i_,� � o� �, .� I. 1t '1 - '�. F►1�MS ...�,'� k� �, . .1� ,.r r�` �E� '�� '� � � � �''t M a ai.i• .{• I . i ,r, E ' , ' � �,.. � ��, , ,q... �+,� i •' • y7� �✓�:.w '�J r' �.; � I A �' � jlb _�, r� ' i� , ELY � H f '� {�� � . ��� �'� r. ii .•/�-%� �`�'"'I. . 'e �r: �.t ,- , , � I . 1�, i I�'�,'� � �� •�� �/1i • - �1 y• Ii��(�i1�(MUi Y a .I ..�. I � ,/ I A 7 M'M.wl�. y,•y /y.� � � r 'r .✓ l: ^ r r.� r � i L'.' � f } ., \ � � �. � ', I ' . .t- _ ' i � �� p 1' y y ^ � ] , � �, . r ... � _ . � � � � 1(it' �1 . � A' '�� 1 � �'ti��` l� i�. _ • ' ..o .s, � '� !'F W �r� . �IY . � , �i,i:. � V �..}� � �1 `�, k�( , , y� � uF �� r \�� - ,�"+� � - a � ;- .i . }L � .�9I'` • ��Ay '. � r � ..t �i'� l l :M. I� I + nl .. `\A� \ " \i[ YA�. I.* � !w,� n' � �-^ ' ,: - A ^ � ����4. �°. LtOERT`f p�. � ���r N � 1 IJ. v \��'' . I "� Y Y � "�I �. :r • �r � ` S, r ; ,�� �+�.IC'�.,'� . `,} .r���{ i�"�,,.� � �.' , !. , t t��, � ,r" �f' "'_ \ •i ' i ' �,�'. A y .', 1 -` � '�'� �� r '4' } •�~ � � .i�� �, .0 y'" r`, _ 7c: 1� ,{r..,. ., il..,�. �,•. _'�- �� , 'r'` '" ,a. ��v:�� � X I \ � ♦ s . � , ,.roti C � ' \ :� ��< ,; "x '" " T - LilNGFELL0IM � • � �`' ` � • y .. ` � � , � M+ � ar � ��r �1- `� . aT 1't .... � `. � •�` .�. V�i� r- Y .i.�� �4"� �• ��\ � � io'� { � ' X �� i r I \ \ - - i'i.. . `' • !, .F i � Iw :�.• �I � • � \� / • .�R . � F �;� �.44 , iN � . � • "'"� I - r , .�_w \ ' . �� �,� �� �( . � -� -i ly� � '� � .-1 x 1 t� . \\ '� • • � � — T- � /� / � (\) 'R \\� V '�� 1 \ q � \ ..//i. �. � �,`C� '�h .,Y., `�� .... ' .iifAr�+ i�`V : I, ,� � �� �. � (ol . (�i �, r�. � P� .n + • \ ' " . � . �9� �1 \ � . � tY': \ � \. � 4.. . 1 � �• i ^ � `(P P�Ot, , n. � QOO . / � � `\` .1w ,,' •o� ): ` / •A .� ••1 Q� ,�,, � • Y y1� y /i; / , ��"\ AF�� "'"a �1� �. 33 � r �� � .• . '� � � `, �O �\' P :,r � . � � �l �� �� ,(�' `i., � • � f'/ - � ��: .s �c� ?�°� ' '� ,� -N. %C� ) � \ �, \r`�,,; " n'��. � , ��p,, A9 J /. � . t^'� � 'S-� � �y - - _ . • �.' „�<, 9,,�` � �:. . �i � p�P �� , �. � -'`�-�.: ��' .+ ��L ar �'O ��' , s .- ` �« 4 q.�,, ��' : a�. ,�'L /� •�\ � �_` ` r r • �0�� � Y ' v . _ 1 � \ � / � < `' � �... �� ".� y �j •♦ •,� `- �' � � �' '~� i � ��. �j N ; '�'� - ., ` � ` ' I Q•, N7 ` ti ���/ � c" � . � � N% 9 Z�� /� � ." Gl � � ' p : � I"— , ,o � � - �� �''% ,,. _ 34 . LOCATfON MAP a L.S. �i90-02 ` Jake Bozony 6X , , J --- , ` 9 : * • '' : i¢ ; �.. � �„ 2 (� 1 �r . v> lY . � • �` 9 � 8 �� P��r , , , t �; 'j• 1� �,�. Q I! , L ��� L19ERTY T. ♦ _ � � � •�� 6 0 � . _ � . Q � �. �� x �� LONG LLOW � � \ � � aR ���, ; � '� > � z . �, • ..� . . . , , � .` y . . .,.,., ,,, .,., .,. , . , � . ' � �J, � •►••', -,. . ,_�.,•; `, � � ti •a-. `� "l: ..�': �....0 R I V E R V�E W \ • . . ��,a� .� � � � e s � � . . . . • FtEIGM t ��' � a s.�.; ' � , :� �.� �•�•� ,•.•.•.'.� �� i ``�� �;. ' , '� °,.� Q � � . � . •� •�•�•� � •�� •�. � , �S' e • � . . . . . . �'( • � .,. � ,� ` ,�, . • � � •.11�ir � \ •` �- ,� � y . �� ;�, . �. �. \\ �,� � .�`' � � y � � � � ! ,� • ., � � �, '''''.+� ' �� � o � � 1 � �1 e �P• ,� •�•�l�T � \ � \ � ' � � `� 0 1� �'.t � �\ o � O� •.�`� ��, ����,�� � �"'� (;;i+ ` 1 , � p� � .��� � ♦ � - � f:- • ti � � i � • \ `e1 �.! , I 1� ' f S • ♦ . . � 15 � � .' • • .� ,�� fl� `' fl. \ � . 1� � ��� • �, � . � � � � � \ t � � � \ � �v �' � 1 1 i � ► • �j ♦ . \ \\ ` �, t , 4° S ► � • � � �, �� �' i' _ ,. i : �� ■:. ZONING MAP X 3 � � � � � f � � � � � L � � � � . L � - Y / • � S� �� Z ��� o � � � � $ R' b a � RE� �� � ����� � ���s� � ����� � ����� � � �� �� �� . �a� � ����� __!, , �.`.. 1 • •w .� �� ♦ � . ` �� i ,� x.ss�sd�?�E� J' - a ; ,• � '; : �� ; � �. �ti , k�;�.• ; � � `� f � i t A • � � � �! �• � � � � ' '��� ! � ;� � � � , •,, r,, .�� � � �� a � % �� ., � S��P ' ; �%� , , � , , ' � �1 � . 1 ' � '1 � ; �;� ; r��" � � , �� � ' � � . � ��R�.:at � � � ► , � � 1 t � � � � ' . � ' , � . � �, e� � , � : � w � '�: � � ; � � , , ; , � - ib. o... � + �tti�, MCA 1 .. �"RwifOlv�l E e N � � � � � a � � � I _�� �_!�� — � �� �o �o� L . S . �� 90-02 S �� � �� a � �� � � � � C � � � � � � � � � � � � , T, ,.. . . .. ���{ 1 _�:r� `� � �f � � r� ��_���� .,.; ,,. .i � . _._.�� `� _ �M'�s'f. 12` ALL,.EY tso-- ._ —'�–r --:�--r .._ � O �M �� �r � � �R � �� O y � J • � �L � � �x � �� o �� . rn � �: �, � C � , 1� s �, � ' � , �� ` � � C'�'� � ! �, � ; ,�v _ �; � • � � � � / �-"-. ��• �• � � � �x �� �,, ; Existing � ;f i � � Dwc I l i ng � .��%C. �S� i •t?! ' o � / �� � , Vi 4 � � �; � + i e� � � i � � , , �� ; �, �. �'; � � � -� r � � � � � i 1'� � � � r � � �' � �= ; ��� � � �� _ � � � j � � � IT 1 Curb ?;9�� . WAY � ��t�T/p r � ��J. N. �. �� m� �m >� �w t � � N . .I SITE PLAN ■1 sz RESOLUTION NO. - 1990 RE50LUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L. S. #90-02 , TO SPLIT LOT 2, BIACK N, RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS, IN ORDER TO CREATE TWO BUILDABLE PARCELS WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at the , 1990 meeting; and the Planning Commission stipulations attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, such approval was to split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights, in order to create the following two parcels: East Parcel: Lot 2, except the East 10 feet thereof, and all of Lot 1, Block 1, Springbrook Park, Anoka County, Minnesota, except for the South 25 feet thereof for 79th Way N.E. , and Lot 1 and that part of Lot 2 lying Easterly of the Westerly 10 feet of said Lot 2, as measured at right angles to and parallel with the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota. West Parcel: Lots 3, 4, and 5, and the Westerly 10 feet of Lot 2, as measured at right angles to and parallel with the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota. All generally located west of 479 -?9th Way N.E. WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey from the owner; and WHEREAS, such approval will create two buildable parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the petitioner to record this lot split at Anoka County within six months of this approval or else such approval shall be null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR � . . EXHIBIT A Resolution No. - 1990 1. The elevation of the first habitable floor shall be at 824 or higher. 2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The petitioner shall apply for and receive a moving and building permit prior to placing the house on the property. � � c�nroF F��� DATE: TO: COl1I1M(�NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM June 13, 1990 William Burns, City Manager� FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Establish Public Hearing for Lot Coverage Zoning Ordinance Amendment Attached is the staff report regarding the above-referenced zoning ordinance amendment. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amendment at the May 30, 1990 meeting. The zoning ordinance requires a public hearing before the City Council for a zoning text change. Staff recommends the City Council establish July 9, 1990 as the public hearing for the zoning ordinance amendment to the lot coverage section of the M-1 and M-2 districts. BD/dn M-90-411 _ _ � PLANNING DIVISION s�� � MEMOR.ANDUM crnr oF FRl DLEY DATE: May 25, 1990 ���iu , �� TO: Planning Commission Members �i c 0- FROM: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Proposed Lot Coverage Ordinance Amendment Attached is the proposed amendment to the M-1 and M-2 Districts, adding an additional section to the Lot Coverage section to permit a special use permit application to exceed the maximum lot coverage, up to a maximum of 10�. The Planning Commission recommended that a special use permit not be permitted; however, the City Council preferred to require a special use permit. The City Council also directed staff to . prepare standards by which the permit could be evaluated. Therefore, two standards have been proposed for the Planning Commission and City Council final action. The Attorney's office is also in the process of reviewing the proposed language. Recommendation 5taff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed ordinance amendment as presented. BD/dn M-90-372 . � � PUBLIC �iEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given Fridley City Council University Avenue N.E. the purpose of: that there will be a Public Hearing of the at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 on Monday, July 9, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. for Consideration of amending Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light Industrial Zoning District) and Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance, by adding the following language regarding lot coverage requirements: (4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of ten percent (l00) of the permitted lot area with a special use permit. In addition to the requirements of this 5ection and the factors identified in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permit requests, the City shall consider the following factors in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage: (a) For existing developed properties, the total amount of existing hardsurface areas shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall-prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, including but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an onnortunitv at the above stated time and place. WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR Publish: June 27, 1990 July 4, 1990 Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. Ms. McPhe stated this item will go before the City Council on June , 1990. 3. pUBLIC HEARiNG: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING SECTION 205.17.03.0 (THE M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DZSTRICT), AND SECTION 205.18.03.0 (THE M-2, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT) OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ADDING THE FOLIAWING LANGUAGE - REGARDING LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS: (4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of ten percent (10�) of the permitted lot area with a special use permit. In addition to the requirements of this Section and the factors indentified in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the City shall consider the following factors in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage. (a) For existing developed properties, the total amount of existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, including, but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Ms. Savage, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:45 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission's recommendation on the lot coverage amendment was discussed by City Council, and the Council decided they wanted to only amend the industrial districts and require a special use permit to enable either existing developed property or a developer of a new industrial property to petition for an increase in lot coverage up to a maximum of 10� of the lot coverage ratio. The Council asked staff to prepare two standards to help the City evaluate special use permits. Staff did that and developed Standard (a), that if a developer is going to be proposing an increase of up to 10�, staff will take a total look at the site and determine whether or not they can achieve an overall net reduction in hard surface areas. Standard (b) came from a reiteration of the existing ordinance requirements. Mr. Dahlberg stated that as was amply stated by Councilmember Steve Bilings at one of the Planning Commission meetings when this was discussed, this may not be as originally recommended by the Planning Commisison, but it is at least a start in terms of looking at appropriate sites and developments in the City that potentially 6EE �LAN�IING COMMISSION MEETING, 1dAY 30. 1990 PAGE 11 could be better served if a qreater area of lot coverage is allowed. OM TION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERBON �ONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PQBLIC BEARING CLOSED AT 8:55 P.M. MOT ON by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of amending Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light Industrial Zoning District), and Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance, adding the following language regarding lot coverage requirements: (4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of ten percent (10�) of the permitted lot area with a special use permit. In addition to the requirements of this Section and the factors indentified in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the City shall consider the following factors in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage. (a) For existing developed properties, the total amount of existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, including, but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL QOTING AYE, VICE-CBAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED tTNANIMOIISLY. 4. 1. �UBLIC HEARING: CONSZDERATIdN OF AMENDING THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMiT NINE,_,F44T WIDE PARKING STALLS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS, AND Tg�-�QUIRE PARKING SPACES TO BE DOUBLE-STRIPED: - � , DEFINITIONS ,% � 205.03.55. Parking Stall A ten (10) foot wide by twenty foot long area to store one (1) automobile, which has acce to a public street or alley and permits ingress and egre of an automobile. Parkina stalls mav - - - ' �' -� -� ----�.....,. ;., �t,; � code. Where a may be reduced '+ g stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length eighteen (18) feet. Parkinq stalls shal.l be sFF � � cinroF F� �� DATE: TO: COAILMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEM�RANDUM June 14, 1990 William Burns, City Manager� 6GG FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Establish Public Hearing for Zoning Ordinance Amendment for Parking Space Width Attached is the staff report for the above-referenced 2oning ordinance amendment. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amendment at the May 30, 1990 meeting. The zoning ordinance requires a public hearing before the City Council for a zoning text change. Staff recommends the City Council establish July 9, 1990 as the public hearing for the zoning ordinance amendment to amend the parking space width. BDjdn M-90-412 � � cinroF fRlDLEY DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING DNISION MEMORANDUM May 25, 1990 Planning Commission Members 6HH � � � ���L � �� Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Proposed Parking Space Width Amendment Attached is the proposed ordinance amendment to various sections of the zoning ordinance, to reduce the width of a parking stall for specific uses. The Planning Commission recommended that the parking stall width be reduced to 9 feet for all uses; however, the City Council preferred to reduce the parking stall width to 9 feet only for long term employee parking, industrial uses, and for multiple family developments. The City Council also recommended that all parking spaces, both 9 feet and 10 feet, be double striped. The Planning Commission may want to consider additional language to the R-3 district, to limit the width of the parking stalls to only multiple family developments to avoid a potential conflict with other uses in the R-3 District, as was discussed regarding the Moose Lodge rezoning application. Possible language is as follows: "Parking stalls may multiple dwelling apartments." Recommendation be 9 feet in width for multiple dwellings and complexes, including rental and condominium The Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed zoning ordinance amendment as presented. BD/dn M-90-373 Notice is hereby given Fridley City Council University Avenue N.E. the purpose of: PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL that there will be a Public Hearing of the at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 on Monday, July 9, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. for Consideration of amending the following Sections of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance to permit nine foot wide parking stalls in certain districts, and to require parking spaces to be double-striped: 1. DEFINITIONS 205.03.55. Parking Stall. A ten (10) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long area to store one (1) automobile, which has access to a public street or alley and permits ingress and egress of an automobile. Parkinct stalls may be nine (9) feet in width for uses specified elsewhere in this code. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced to eighteen (18) feet. Parkina stalls shall be striped in accordance with the desiqn on file in the office of the Cit� Engineer. 1. R-3 District 205.09.07.A. (3) Parkinct stalls may be nine (9) and condominium apartments. 2. M-i District 205.17.05.D.S13) Parkinct stalls mav be nine j9) feet in width for manufacturinct uses, warehouse and storage uses speculative industrial buildincts and parkincr lots for lonct term employee parkina. 3. M-2 DistriCt 205.18.05.D.S13) Parkinct stalls mav be nine f9) feet in width for manufacturinct uses, warehouse and storaae uses speculative industrial buildincts and parkina lots for lonct term employee parkinct. 611 6JJ Parking Stall Size Page 2 4. S-2 DISTRICT 205.22.6. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS All performance standards for uses in this district shall be comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other districts. Parking space sizes mav be reduced to nine (9) feet in width upon approval of a special use ,permit. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR Publish: June 27, 1990 July 9, 1990 Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. 6KK �"dING COMMISSI N M�ETING. 1SAY 30. 1990 PAGE 11 could be better served if a greater area of lot coverage is allowed. OM TION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to close � e public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIA�ERSON 1CONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:55 P.M. �� OTI N by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba�, to recommend to City Council approval of amending Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light Industrial Zoning District), and Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of-the Fridley Zoning Ordinance, adding the following language regarding lot coverage requirements: (4) The lot coverage as ��ated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of �n percent (10�) of the permitted lot area with a spe�Ial use permit. In addition to the requirements of��his Section and the factors indentified in Section 205-�05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the City shall c�nsider the following factors in determining the effect/of the increase in lot coverage. (a) F existing developed properties, the total amount f existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, including, but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. Q N A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VZCE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR CLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMZT NINE FOOT WIDE PARKING STALIS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS, AND TO REQUIRE PARKING SPACES TO BE DOUBLE-STRIPED: 1. DEFINITIONS 205.03.55. Parking Stall A ten (10) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long area to stcre one (1} automobile, which has access to a public street or alley and permits ingress and egress of an automobile. garkinc1 stalls mav be nine (9) �'eet in w�dth for uses specified elsewhere in this code. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced to eighteen (18) feet. �arkinc� stal s shall be s�� gl���"dING COI9�iIBBZON KEETIIdG. 1[I�Y 30. 1990 B�GE 12 gtr�,ped in accordance with the desian on filp in the office of #�e inee . 1. R-3 District 205.09.07.A.s3) Parkinq stalls mav be nine (9) fee� in width. i. x-1 aistrict 205.17.05.D. 3 a'n ta s a e'ne et w'dth or - . - ----- -•........,> >*; �,e parkina. 3. M-2 DistriCt 205.18.05.D.(131 Par?cina stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width for - • ----- -�......i �t,,.e parkina. 4. 8-2 DistriCt 205.22.6 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS _ All performance standards for uses in this district shall be comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other districts. Parkina space sizes mav be reduced to nine (91 feet in w�dth ur�on approval of a s�ecial use oermit. OT ON by Mr. Dahlberg, seaonded by Ms. Sherek, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A oOICE VOTE, li1LL VOTINQ AYE� oICE-CSAIRBERSON 1CONDRICR DECLARED THE l�[OTION CARRIED l�PiD THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN !1T 8:53 p.M. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission recommended that the parking stall width be reduced to 9 feet for all uses; however, the City Council preferred to reduce the parking stall width to 9 feet only for long term employee parking, industrial uses, and for multiple family developments. The City Council also recommended that all parking spaces, both 9 feet and 10 feet, be double striped. Ms. Dacy stated the Planninq Commission might want to consider additional language to the R-3 district to limit the width of the parking stalls to only multiple family developments to avoid a potential conflict with other uses in R-3 district, such as that discussed regarding the recent Moose Lodge rezoning application. pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 30. 1990 PAGE� Possible language is as follows: "Parking stalls may be 9 feet in width for multiple dwellings and multiple dwelling complexes, including rental and condominium apartments." Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed parking space width amendment with the additional language in R-3 clarifying that the 9 foot wide gtalls would only be for multiple family dwelling complexes. MOTION by Mr . Saba , seconded by Ms . Sherek, to close the publ ic hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING 11YE, VICE-CHAIRPERBON 1CONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND T8E PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:57 p.M. OT ON by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to recommend to City Council approval of amending the following sections of the Zoning Code to permit nine foot wide parking stalls in certain districts, and to require parking spaces to be double-striped, with the additional language in the R-3 district limiting the width of the parking stalls to only multiple family developments, as recommended by staff: l. DEFINITIONS 205.03.55. Parking Stall A ten (10) foot wide one (1) automobile, alley and permits by twenty (20) foot long area to store which has access to a public street or ingress and egress of an automobile^ . _ _�ii L�� . iQIi1111 a\.G711� i«w r� .�� �- _ _ specified elsewhere in this code. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced to eighteen (18) feet. Parkinq.stalls shall be stri�ed in_accordance with the design on file in the office of the Citv Encxineer. 1. R-3 District 205.09.07.A. 3 Parkin stalls ma be nine 9 feet 'n w'dth. Parkin stalls ma be 9 feet in width for multi le dwellin s and multi le dwellin com lexes includin rental and condominium apartments. 2. M-1 District 205.17.05.D. 13 Parkin stalls ma be nine 9 fe t'n width or �nanufacturinQ uses warehouse and storaae use�- sneculative 'ndustrial buildin s and parkina lots for lona term employee parkina. 6MM pl,�NplpG CO24SI88ION lIEETING, l�AY 30, 1990 P�GE 14 3. �[-2 District 205.18.05.D.j13) Parkina stalls mav be *+ine (91 feet in widt for _ __ � _�__s..� .,�e� _ �neculative � 4. 8-2 District 205.22.6 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Al1 performance standards for uses in this district shall be comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in et er districts. garkina space sizes may be redu�ed to nine (91 fe in width upon avp oval of a snecial use v�rmit. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, 11LL VOTING 71YE, oICE-CHI�ZRPER80N 1CONDRICR DECLARED THE 1�IOTION CARRIED IINANIMODBLY. 5. gECEIVE MAY 22 1990 APPEALS COMMZSSION M�DI TES: OM TION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Ms. Sherek;�to receive the May 22, 1990, Appeals Commission minutes. �� IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING DECLARED THE MOTION C!►RRIED IINAN �DJOURNMENT: 01�TION by Mr. meeting. Opon a May 30, 1990, P� E, VICE-CHAIRPERSON 1CONDRICR SLY. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to adjourn the vo e vote, Qice-Chairperson 1Condrick declared the ninc Commission meetiaq adjourned at 9:02 p•m• Respectfu y sub itted, Lyn Saba Re ording Secretary 6NN � � cinroF F�a� DATE: TO: COl1/iMUNITY DEVELOPMENT' DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM June 14, 1990 William Burns, City Manager�S(/ FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Lisa Campbell, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Approve Appraisal and Relocation Consultant Contract for Iverson Property; Riverview Heights Acquisition Project We intend to begin acquisition of the Iverson property at 7899 Broad Avenue N.E. As has been done in the past, the City will contract with Federal-State Relocation Consulting Service and CR Pelton and Associates to assist us with relocation consulting assistance and appraisal services. The attached contract is similar in content to past agreements. The cost of the appraisal will be $600.00. The review appraisal by Donald Hennesy will be approximately $125.00, and the relocation consulting services will be approximately $2,405.00. We recommend the City Council approve the attached contract as presented. BD/dn M-90-417 7 . �� � � /�'i � j �. ' \ � c�� � G _ '� � .:�i �1� �M F�' ' � `� ' .� �o� ) �. 5. �{ l• .�t . y �' �� � -Z._• .:a-.� ' Et ; :. �j' � L�NGFELLOW , ., .. `� y F,���d � I , . i ' I � �1 t � t2 r. .-- r1 � � J ' "{�` �J� �s 7/ �J' �-r T < l�r ' � r ' sz �t�:,'L • � , � � -,� � 1�s _•:� �, ti-�. ,-- e • J Y '� .• •• .. — ' � _ O � •r �.` . �. ., p , � , d. 3 ., y �S y� 0 3 � � � / n t� ( fJ . . • F� � 5 .t < i � � � �: •� Z � f t f s �� :. � . _ _ � .. . .� � � �.. „ v — 0 � .f - :.....:.. ��. ,� � : _ „ ; � {„� �. � �� �. �?�:�:�:� r� � , �? ..�. ,.� v i.v � • q ' '"• � � �89d ��� .�' . ; ;' • r�' . ..w. `f //ii .i , : : -.-r r •!' ii• �\` , + •'•'•' . 1 y� . � t f� '�•iJi% �Pi.I/ Oin' ) . �::�: :s ::::� . � � . f'' t..� . �"!� �� � r -i � . � ,y .,� ' . 1r � l f r s � � , � � � � �s�l = ` ��9 7883 � ��� � �"� \ � � � � �892 7g � ���,r _ ��f� ,�^f� � . i , � �� � � \A . � ' r � +0 "'� � �•. � �� \ ,, � P; � � r � � � � , " = • : Q��- .... � ��,, -� � � _- '` ��� � � �� ' � ,�' ' � , ..�.- .�- � t � ,r*� o ` � _ �-.2 E? ,: � . � , . �' �"'� °'. x j , ` y1869� ' � �, ;: ,' .:: ��0� , • � •• , . - ,. ,:� �� �gTy . ""` � •' �� 3 f ' S '�„� '• � �W � � � ' `� �I •'' ; �(� � . t Parcel� 5 � 1991 Propoaed�a � �: " �, � �8G8 • (���P �L� �s� ':r S�! �' . . = � � _ � F �� � ��. -..1e�., J,='�.�. Parcel 4 1990 Pro osed Acquisition � � � � � ��) � ; � . �z .. ,. . P `-� � ��'vf',. �"�, �8G( _.R .�� .Q.� „ , �„� ,� � • ,N� + � � ., �p� '-`�' � �� ,r. � �t,;,r � ��., ?gG0 : ° �_ �. 0�'�'.' �� ' � �.. � :s�;; ' � � �,,� �+ ..'' ��I� ' !'' �81�- � 1 t . .,� e"� ., �w_�►� + . � �C �KEY H � ���� • ` � .�� � �� �esy �� p ' � i \� �� I �,� � �, , � � � � � � Previously Acquirsd Prop�rtr � '' :;� L"; ..,�` �' ��L c+�1 � y � � p r ',, ` ri3 ' �O . �_ � . ��::. � � 763( " � Propos�d Acquisitions / � �� ' �n .�• . = (��) ' � � � City P; ^ ! Scal�: t'=200' � �. �. . . .l •� �„�• ° .s� . � * �a � � � � ., � � � O +E:"�' � �,. \ �Y�'�S � ` :'.� r',r;*' ° � � - � _ J _ \ \•. �� 34 INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL * Ct �ELTON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Appraisers j 8 /Consultants * NATIONWIDE APPFiAISAL SERVICES * PROFESSIONALLII RECOGNI2E0 � � Ysmbsr of Amaiean SocMty W Appr+bers American RigM ol Way Ap'n Institute ot Yalwrs Institute of 8usimss Appraisen N�tional Aswciation of Mvisw Appraiasn CORPORATE OFFICE: 299 NO. SNELLING AVE. ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55104 June 6, 1990 Ms. Barbara Dacy Planning Coordinator City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 RE: Market Value Appraisal Report Iverson Residential Property 7899 Broad Avenue Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Ms. Dacy: � .�.� TELEPHONE (612) 645-9171 Thank you for the opportunity to bid a narrative real estate appraisal of the above captioned property. C. R. Pelton & Associates, Inc., would provide adequate copies of a narrative real estate market value appraisal of 7899 Broad Avenue for the City of Fridley for a fee of $600.Q0. It is my understanding that the work would need to be completed in 60 days or less. This time frame appears to be adequate to fulfull the requirements of the job. Again, thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you in your valuation needs. I look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours, C. R. PELTON & ASSOCIATES, INC. n B. Tessier, A.S.A. S aff Appraiser JBT/pt PHOENIX, ARIZONA • AUSTIN, TEXAS • HOUSTON, TEXAS • MOBILE, ALABAMA • LAS VEGAS RESI DENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUST$I/,�L / �r FEDERAL - STATE RELOCATION CONSULTING SERVICE INC. ?�)9 North Snelling Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 Phone: Ama ('�de - 61 '_'-G45-73''9, 645-9171 June 11, 1990 Barbara Dacy Planning Coordinator City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Re: Relocation Proposal Iverson Property Riverview Height Project Dear Ms. Dacy: Federal State Relocation Consulting Service will provide relocation consulting services to the City of Fridley for the Iverson Property on an actual time basis at the rate of $65.00 per hour with a maxim�un fee not to exceed $2,405.00 Sincerely, ��YI/l,C{,� Thanas Donohue 7D AGREEMENT Agreement for Consulting Services for the Riverview Heights Redevelopment Project, Fridley, Minnesota. This agreement, entered into as of the day of , 1990, by the City of Fridley (hereinafter referred to as Contractor), and Federal-State Relocation Consulting Service, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Consultants). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Contractor desires the provision of certain technical assistance and other services pursuant to the terms of Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.50 et seq., and or the Uniform Relocation and Real Properties Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, whichever is applicable, in connection with the implementation of the Riverview Heights Redevelopment project as heretofore adopted by the Contractor, and WHEREAS, the Contractor desires that the Consultants provide such assistance and services to provide acquisition and relocation assistance in this project, and WHEREAS, the Contractor proposes to acquire certain real property and desires that the Consultant furnish the Contractor certain services with respect to such property, and the Consultant represents that he is fully qualified to perform such services and will furnish such services personally, and WHEREAS, the services to be provided under this Agreement are necessary to achieve the purposes of the Riverview Heights Redevelopment under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1894, Public Law 91-646), hereinafter referred to as the "Act", (CDBG Funding). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: Consultants agree to provide services as set forth below under Section I entitled "Scope of Services" and the Contractor agrees to pay for such services in the amount and the manner as set forth below under Section II entitled "Compensation", and Section III entitled "Method of Payment of Fees". 7E Residential Relocation Services a. The Consultant will distribute an information booklet on residential relocation assistance and all appropriate forms and data to each residential occupant expected to be displayed. At this time the consultant will: Obtain a signed receipt for the informational statement provided by the Contractor in accordance with applicable regulations. Explain the residential relocation program and the displacees responsibilities to receive benefits. Ex�lain how to receive various kinds of assistance in finding new locations. Survev the residential relocation needs and prepare Family Record Card. Provide Notices of Displacement within 30 days after initiation of negotiations. Analyze existing data to determine eligibility of the displacees relocation expenses for compensation. Interview residential displacees to determine housing needs. Identifv and determine the cost of comparable replacement housing, based on City selection. Provide referrals to replacement housing units. Provide other social services, on an as needed basis. Assist the displacee in determining the more advantageous payment alternative to claim for moving expenses and provide further instructions on how to proceed. Issue 90 day notice as necessitated after referral to replacement housing is made. Determine if selected replacement location is decent, safe and sanitary. Assist eligible residential occupant in preparation of claim for Replacement Housing Payment for 180 day homeowners. Assist eligible residential occupant in preparation of claim for Rental Assistance Payment/and or pown Payment Assistance for 90 day occupants. Assemble the appropriate claim forms and documentation for signature and submission for approval. 7F The Consultant will transmit to the Contractor the final claim for its action. Recommendations will include the amount of payment to be made and any special considerations. In completing this Contract, the Consultant does not assume the responsibility for: Preparation of status report. Housing of Last Resort Services. Accounting and record keeping (except as related to the specific claim). Payment for direct loss appraisals, property analyses, and moving cost estimates and/or bids. Work associated with a relocation grievance. II COMPENSATION The Contractor also agrees to make monthly payment to the Consultant in the amount of $65.00 per hour for each and every hour expended. All office overhead, secretarial services, and other supportive services shall be included within such hourly charge. In no case, however, shall the total amount paid exceed $2,405.00 in accordance with the Scope of Services. III METHOD OF PAYMENT OF FEES Monthly requisitions may be made subject to receipt of a statement from the Consultant specifying that it has performed the work under this Contract in conformance with the Contract and that it is entitled to receive the amount requisitioned under the terms of the Contract. The Contractor will make payment on such invoices under receipt; provided, however, that payment shall not be made for any incomplete, inaccurate, or defective work until same is remedied by Consultant without additional cost to the Contractor. Services not described or covered in this contract will be charged at the rate of $65.00 per hour. 7G CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROPERTIES COVERED UNDER THIS CONTRACT 1) Margaret Iverson - SF Dwelling 7899 Broad Avenue N.E. Lots 22-24, Parcel 4 Court Preparation It is understood and agreed that the amount of compensation stated above does not include necessary court preparation and testimony, and that in the event the testimony of the Consultant is required in any legal proceeding in connection with the relocation of occupants for the project: The Consultant agrees to bring its final claim up-to-date, to make the necessary preparations for testimony, and to appear as a witness on behalf of the Contractor on the dates required, and further agrees that the fair and reasonable compensation for its services shall be at the rate of $65.00 per hour. The consultant will be represented by the legal representation of the City in the event of litigation relating to services provided to and for the Contractor; or actions relating to the Contractor's decision. Contract Period The Consultant shall commence performance of this Contract upon Notice to Proceed by the City Manager or upon execution of this Contract and shall complete performance of this Contract no later than sixty (60) days after the last occupant of real property has vacated the project area and all appropriate documentation has been provided by the displacee to the consultant. Interest of Certain Federal Officials No member of or delegate to the Congress of the United States, and no other Federal official, shall be admitted to any share or part of this Contract or to any benefit to arise herefrom. 7H Covenant Against Contingent Fees The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or persons, other than a bonafide employee or technical subcontractor working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Contract, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bonafide employee or technical subcontractor working solely for the Consultant any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of the Contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Contractor shall have the right to annul this Contract without liability. Changes in Contract: The Contractor or the Consultant may, from time to time, request changes in the scope of services to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of the Consultant's campensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the Contractor and the Consultant shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Contract. Termination of Contract The Contractor or the Consultant may terminate this Contract or renegotiate this Contract upon thirty (30) days written notice of such. In the event of termination, all property and finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, and reports purchased or prepared by the Consultant under this Contract shall be disposed of according to Contractor directives and the Consultant shall be entitled to campensation for any un-reimbursed expenses reasonably and necessarily incurred in satisfactory performance of this Contract. Extent of Agreement This Contract represents the between the Consultant and the negotiations, representations oral. This Contractor may be signed by both Consultant and Personnel entire and integrated agreement Contractor and supersedes all prior or agreements, either written or amended only by written instrument Contractor. The Consultant represents that it has or will secure all personnel required in performing the services under this Contract as provided above. All of the services required hereunder will be performed by the Consultant or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized under State and local law to perform such services. 71 Non-Discrimination The Consu�tant will not discriminate against any employee, or applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, sex, national origin, religion, marital status, disability, status in regard to public assistance, or age. The Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that applications are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, sex, national origin, religion, marital status, disability, status in regard to public assistance, or age. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment advertising, layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment notices to be provided by the Contract setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. In addition, the Consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, creed, color, sex, national origin, religion, marital status, disability, status in regard to public assistance, or age. Interest of Members of Contractor . No member of the governing body of the locality in which the project is situated, and no other officer, employee, or agent of the Contractor who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the carrying-out of services to which this Contract pertains, shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Contract. Interest of Consultant The Consultant convenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire throughout the duration of this Contract any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance or services required to be performed under this Contract. The Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Contract no person having such an interest shall be employed. __ _ _ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the Consultant have executed this Contract on or as of the date first above written. gy; ATTEST: Federal-State Relocation Consulting Service, Inc. 299 North Snelling Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104 gy; ATTEST: Mayor William J. Nee City of Fridley By: ATTEST: William W. Burns City Manager City of Fridley 7J C•� CITY OF FRIDLEY M$ M O R A N D II K TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNS, CITY MANAGER (9 � FROM: SBIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERR SIIBJECT: JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITB ANORA COIINTY OPTICAL SCAN VOTING EQIIIPMENT DATEt JIIN$ 12, 1980 The attached joint powers agreement was drawn up by the Anoka County's Attorney's office and includes all of Anoka County. We will be receivinq 24 copies of this agreement in which the Mayor's and City Manager's signatures are required. When all copies have been signed, an original agreement will be sent to the City. A copy of this agreement has been sent to the City Attorney for his review. The agreement states that Anoka County will provide election •- programming for all the municipalities and that the cities and Anoka County will conform to the Secretary of State's rules and regulations and those of the State of Minnesota. Much of the language in this agreement is standard contract language. I recommend approval of this agreement. : ` JOINT POWERS AGRECM�IVT FOR TI-IE ACQUISITION OF OPTICAL SCAN VOTE TABULATION EQUIPMENT THIS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the undersigned units of government, all acting by and through their governing bodies, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.59 providing for the joint exercise of powers. WHER�AS, the undersigned governmental units located within Anoka County desire to use Unisys ES-2000 optical scan vote tabulation equipment beginning with the 1940 state primary and state general elections; and WHEREAS, the Unisys Corporation has submitted to the Minnesota Secretary of State a request for certification of the Unisys ES-2000 optical scan vote tabulation system; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Secretary of State has approved Anoka County's use of the Unisys ES-2000 system on an experimental basis pursuant to Minn. Sta� § 206.81 in the 1990 state primary and state general elections; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreement contained herein, the parties agree as follows: I. PURPOSE The parties �agree that they have joined together for the purpose of acquiring the Unisys FS-2000 optical scan vote tabulation computer hardware and software for county-wide use beginning with the 1990 state primary and state general elections. II. JOIIVT POWERS PARTICIPANTS Anoka County and any municipality located within Anoka Couaty are eligible to participate in this joint powers agreemen� The conditions of this joint powers agreement shall be effective as to an eli�ble participant when the joint powers agreement has been executed by the duly authorizsd representatives of that party. Each party hereby certifies that authority to enter into this Agreement has been established by a duly passed resolution of its respective governing body. III. TERM This agreement shall commence when it has been duly executed by Anoka County and municipalities representing at least 50 (fifty) precinets and shall continue until terminated as provided herein. IV. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTI�S 1. The parties shall abide by the following conditions so long as the Unisys ES- 2000 system is used on an experimental basis pursuant to Minn. Sta� § 206.81: a. Anoka County shall provide the Secretary of State with a list oE each city and township agreeing to the experimental use of the ES-2000 system at the state primary and state general elections; b. Anoka County shall develop and file with the Secretary of State, no later than July 31, 1990, a backup plan for counting ballots in the event of equipment failure ; c. Anoka County shall file, with the Secretary of State, no later than July 13, 1990, a plan describing the procedure for training election judges in the use of the voting system; d. Each municipality shall provide instruction for voters in the use of . the voting system and at least one public demonstration prior to the state primary election; 2. Upon certification of the Unisys ES-2000 system by the Minnesota Secretary of State, the parties' use of that system shali conform to those conditions mandated by the -2- : : laws of the State of Minncsota and any rules established by the Office of the Secrctary of State. 3. Anoka County shall provide elcction pro�ramming �or use by all of the municipalities using the Unisys ES-2000 system. Anoka County shall acquire the hardware and software required to program and integrate with the individual vote tabulators used by the municipalities in each oE their precincts. The municipalities shall provide for the acquisition oE the vote tabulators. V. STRICT ACCOUNTABILTfY A strict accountins shall be made of all funds and report oE all receipts and disbursements shall be made upon request by either party. VI. AUDTT AND RECORDS RETENTION The records and documents relating to all matters which are the subject of this Agreement shall be subject to inspection, review and audit by the parties and State officials so authorized by law during regular business hours. All such records shall be retained for a period of at least three years after termiaation of this agreemen� If any party furnishes a written request during this period requesting retention of records beyond the three year period, records shall be retained for the period requested. VII. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS/DATA PRACTICES The parties shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations in their performance under this AgreemenL All data coqected, created, received, maintained, disseminated, or used for any purpose in the course of performance of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government -3- C•1� Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes � 13.01 et seq. or any other applicable state statutes and any rules adopted to implement the Act, as well as State and Federal laws on data privacy. The parties agree to abide by these statutes, rules, and regulations currently in effect and as they may be amended. VIII. AFFIRMATIVE ACfION In accordance with Anoka County's �rmative Action Policy and the County Commissioners' Policy against discrimination, no person shall illegally be excluded, on the basis of race, creed, color, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, disability, handicap or national origin, from full employment rights in, participation in, be denied the benefits or, or otherwise be subject to discrimination under any program service, or activity which is the subject of the Agreement in accordance with the provisions of any and all applicable federat and state taws against discrimination. IX. INDENINIFICATION The parties mutually agree to indemni£y and hold each other harmless from all claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or character, including the cost oE defense thereof, resulting from the acts or omissions of their respective commissioners, officers, officials, agents and employees relating to activities conducted under this Agreement X. ENTIRE AGREEMENT/REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING � It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and all negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof, as well as any previous agreement presenily in effeci between the parties relating to the subject matter theceoE Any alterations, variations, or -4- [ l �� modifcations of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced in writing and duly signed by the parties herein. XI. WI'TFIDRAWAL manner. Any party shall have the right to withdraw from this Agreement in the following The governing body of the withdrawing party shall pass a resolution declaring its intention to withdraw effective on a speci6ed date, which date shall not be less than thirty days from the date of the resolution, and shall send a copy of the resolution to each party's governing body. Withdrawal by a party shall not result in the discharge of any legal or financial liability incuned by such party before the effective date of withdrawal. XII. TERMINATION This agreement shall continue so long as the Unisys ES-2000 system is used by a majority of precincts in Anoka County or until the parties mutually agree to terminate the Agreement by joint resoiution passed by the parties' governing bodies. -5- �; IN WITNESS WIiEREOF, the parties of this Agreement have hereunto set their hands: COUNTY OF ANOKA BY= Dan Erhart, Chairman Anoka County Board of Commissioners Attest: sy: John "Jay" McLinden Anoka County Administrator CITY OF ANDOVER (4 Precincts) By: James E. Elling, Mayor Attes� By: Victoria Volk, Ciry Clerk CITY OF ANOKA (7 Precincts) By: Stephen M. Halsey, Mayor Attest: By: Mark Nagel, City Manager -6- CI1Y OF BI:THEL (1 Precinct) By: A1 Grant, Mayor Attes� By. Brenda Juneau, City Clerk CITY OF BLAINE (17 Precincts) By: Elwyn Tinklenberg, Mayor Attest By: Doaald G. Poss, City Manager TOWNSHIP OF BURNS (1 Precinct) By: Dennis Berg, Chairman of Board Attest; By: Cathy Wood, Clerk � CITY OF CCNTERVILLE (1 Precinct) By: George Haberman, Mayor Attest: By: Tamara Miltz-Miller, City Clerk CITY OF CIRCLE PINES (2 Precincts) By: James Keinath, City Administrator AttesL By: Peggy Link, Finance Director CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIG%TTS (9 Precincts) sy: Edward M. Carlson, Mayor Attest ay: Robert S. Bocwinski, City Manager TOWNSHIP OF COLUMBUS (1 Precinct) By: Lloyd I�nutson, Chairman of Board Attest: sy: Barb Masteller, Clerk -7- CI1Y OF COON RAI'IDS (23 Precincts) By: Rick Reiter, Mayor Attest: sy: Gary Jackson, City Manager � CITY OF EAST BETHEL (2 Precincts) By: Roger Grams, Mayor Attes� By: Sherri Anderson, City Clerk CITY OF FRIDLEY (13 Precincts) By: William J. Nee, Mayor Attes� Br- William W. Burns, City Manager CTTY OF HAM LAKE (4 Precincts) By: Marilyn Schultz, Mayor Attest: By: Doris Nivala, Ciry Administrator � CITY OF lI1LLT01' (1 Precinct) By: James Shear, Mayor AttesL By: Karen Danz, City Clerk CITY OF LEXINGTON (1 Precinct) sy: Michael Swanson, Mayor Attest: By: Sheila Beyer, City Clerk CITY OF LINO LAKES (2 Precincts) By: Harold L Bisel, Mayor Attest By: Marilyn Anderson, City Clerk CITY OF LINWOOD (1 Precinct) By: Al Nordin, Chairman of Board Attest: By: Marcia Fabricius, Clerk MKD:CONT:EL.ECTION.JPA:90 -8- TOWNSIiIP OF OAK GROVE (1 Prccinct) By: Robert A. Preus.�, Chairman of Board Attest By: Judi Peterson, City Clerk CITY OF RAMSEY (5 Precincts) By: Gary Reimann, Mayor Attest: By: David Hartley, City Administrator CITY OF SPRING LAKE PARK (3 Precincts) By: Harley Wells, Mayor Attes� By: Donald B. Busch, City Clerk CITY OF ST. FRANCIS (1 Precinct) By: James R. Lucas, Mayor Attest By: Sharon Fulkerson, City Clerk C•]_i! TO: FROKs DAT$: SIIBJECT: Eng�ncenny Sewcr Wa�er Parks Streets Ma�n�enancc MEMORANDUM William W. Burns, City Manaqer�� PW90-219 John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director Mark A. Winson, Asst. Public Works Director /�'1�'"� June 11, 1990 Flanery Park Shelter Project No. 206 Change Order No. 2 Based on discussions with the Water Department and Park Department staff's regardinq the water service to the park shelter building, it has been determined that it would be prudent to install a 1-inch service at this time instead of a 3/4-inch service. The lonq length of the service, in excess of 300 feet, has the potential to cause pressure and volume problems in a 3/4-inch line; additionally, there is the potential that the water service would be used in watering the qrounds. A breakdown of costs and funding source is as follows: Base Buildinq Outside drinkinq fountain Water Service Sewer Service Change Order �1 Change Order �2 (Upgrade water service Sewer Availability Charge Electrical Service to Building Gas Service to Building $71,072.00 820.00 2,434.50 2,434.50 2,550.00 300.00 600.00 1,201.00 1,000.35 Recreation Capital Improvement Fund (C.I.F.) Recreation C.I.F. Water Fund Sewer Fund Recreation C.I.F. Water Fund Recreation C.I.F. Recreation C.I.F. Recreation C.I.F. Recommend the City Council approve Change Order No. 2 for Flanery Park Shelter Project No. 206 in the amount of $300.00 to upgrade the size of the water service from 3/4-inch to 1-inch. JGF/MAW/ts Attachment �-J ��.�� CITY OF FRIDLEY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE., N.E. FRIDLEY, l�i 55432 June 18, 1990 Karlen Construction 901 - 125th Ave., N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 SUBJECT: Change Order No. 2, Flanery Park Shelter Project No. 206 Gentlemen: You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instructed to modify your contract for the Flanery Park Shelter Project No. 206 by adding the following work: Additions• 1. IT Change 3/4" copper water service to 1" copper APPROX. OUANTITY 1 PR C Lump Swn TOTAL ADDITIONS - CHANG$ ORDER NO. 2 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS: .�. u • 1:Y �� �� $ 3�•� Original Contract amount. . . . . . . . . . . . $76,761.00 Contract Additions - Change Order No. 1. ... 2,550.00 - Change Order No. 2. ... 300.00 REVISED CONTRACT AMOIINT $79.611.00 Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director, on �.. G. Flora, P.E. 'rector of Public Works 9A Karlen Construction Change Order No. 2 June 18, 1990 !-1 : Approved and accepted this / 3 d'``- day of �-- • 1990, by r ��: . - • / - '. �== -/ .- ,i / Approved and accepted this day of . 1990, by 0 CITY OF FRIDLEY William J. Nee, Mayor William W. Burns, City Manager � � c�nroF F� �� DATE: TO: C011IiMUNI't'Y DEVELOPMENT DEPART'MENT M EMO RAN D UM June 14, 1990 William Burns, City Manager�� FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Resolution Approving a Final Plat, P.S. #90- 02, Michael Servetus 2nd Addition Attached is the final plat for the above-referenced project. The plat has been reviewed and approved by Anoka County. The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. Staff recommends the City Council approve the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to sign the plat and authorize its recording. BD/dn M-90-413 10 10A RESOLUTION NO. - 1990 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAT, P.S. #90-02, MICHAEL SERVETUS 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Plat, P.S. #90-02, on April 25, 1990 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council also conducted a public hearing on the proposed Plat at their May 21, 1990 Council meeting and approved the Plat at their meeting; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby approves the Plat, P.S. #90-02, Michael Servetus 2nd Addition, with the stipulations attached as Exhibit A, and authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Plat as prepared by Lot Surveys Company Inc. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the petitioner is requested to record this Plat at Anoka County within six (6) months or said approval with become null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK , :� Exhibit A Resolution No. - 1990 Page 2 1. A park fee of $1,500 per lot for three residential lots shall be paid at the time of building permit ($4,500 total). 2. The petitioner shall petition for the proposed improvements (67th Avenue extension, water main loop, sewer extension). 3. The vacation request, SAV #90-01, be approved. 4. Documents to be approved by the City Attorney regarding the need for soil correction shall be recorded against Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Michael Servetus 2nd Addition. � P . S . 4� 90-02 �F � Michael Servetus N M CORNEA Z� SEC. /J 'Q �l� y � 2 il.,' \_ �il ' i ; � �/M/ O r �� \a (:f60� _ �. C./� .I i..//� d-�� • ^..;y � �AwI M/�'�/� N l/2 I : G� ;� �-- :i ' I ._ ,'7GR� 1 (j �t,p) i ' J' �N �' s .a 3 � .,� ; r � roa" , py f � SEC. ��TY oF r , N �h a i�--- . � � 1,�Y .1�1.} ♦ 1�) '% 1 M �' *2�� : j � 9 • 0 .. , r�� , r�___�• • �. � '.� � • ' �w '� , 2 ,,,� � � P��� ' ` �3 � � 6 � '•, hrl? � c i» . �r,.�••,r• �.a) tzo) �G j� 2� � b ;"� ,.• q `''. .''� � CE liao) 'N J�> y 3 ,, y�' � ��F . •tEaaA , � �� � _�..,,s. ' �j %g• • ~ .�+ 'r '� . .� ; ,.,� ` ��` 2'• _ '�G CREEK '� z �� +I ; :68 M AVE. RO; �s�'� I � =�- i (y p ' m'j � � :v r-_"' i O~ � f: 4 �' w.� (u1 `i, 'h <., . t�f�0) � Y) � �' \ 0 i ° ? � �.�' ��. M �: ` p) I r1 . � - ' •7r d ' +,.+' �G1 Q � ; %�I . 7 , �o ° • . �j '� . �y �. A'�. b; ��: � J 4 � .,� •. ` �° O \` ,� Si�c, 1 t '�.i ' a► i5I /G / i J"" � '"�" :� � Q''� ' J m ,,, ,� ,y s e : e � . �i . : � N ;; a " � 1 ,i '""w, � 1,- �. O: g t � sCHANNEL ROAO 1—��-- '' , -�.a ' � �. 9 y �,. ��,,, � , ` � . ,r ' /a' ` 'i ; �� � F :ial r� . � � � � � r.,, } �rMe'�. i w k ,-.s� �Py .. . . •� h � , R51A �, „� 1 , , �- ,; �. ., � . 5�--;_�1`��1�p � ,�,,',. � �� 4j ��^ ;I Np ; �io.���.�,;;, �N a7Ja , ,, :_ �� �. „ r � . �, ► p. �e 1 �9 p� 23 �z� ; ��.. 4'�- 1!""uc °3 i3 � i,� , 3 � ;: W y" �" �J io i %� 0' ' � 4 K" � �� ;, �4 � /. � � � � ' - j ,. i .," -. ,4 ' 4 ��� � � � � �', � � /�� � � ' � O � v a s��. Z � � ' -�� •� � � � .. .� ,,,' « � S ..V 2� 4�"' $' ,�\ - . -�69 "-AVE:�=`���-:—�-S,�F.�Ero; > -- �66 ,� T •+� � 16 ; � :� o��':,;� � _�..�� d;,,.�� � ,�d ��' �' _ �" , X ''£ F ' 4 � ,� / � ,.�� a .o �`),,, ! ,,., . �/s,y 1� `,° � �� i� i , ",�;. � � w� 3 � _ ,� 3,�, sE •�� 40 � 4EY I_ _ � �� /S� �:i;'�' �. ��� � 6 't� e 27 "7 '� ,/ .�, ' , Y a.e..c�.+..y� __� ,..o) s .. a`� /O r � j� / �� C', !I� 6' i1 �' "rw t�� y.7% Jn � 4 F�,. � VDaI '� .. ���_ �. � � f � sA 28 .� \ 7: :�, w' g;: � :,.�...,..._ ..... w,'1. � � -rO � ' 4i � �-�- �(I) 6 BBnr y o.w� ��i 4 � �. s .r � .t� � .; vr > W ao � 6 G� ' ; .: //�� ``�. ��.., � ' � l�n c � �" __ "' 6 C �� � 4 0 T�; r soi � ��1�. � �i A� C � j°6'� ` 6 Q �� J e` , r" � J CiD ��� s.. � �r M ,� m ' ' � � +� iQ ,i 3 =� !.'w O 11M 'N �{' '40� � ..�... � tA �, � w 6 �,,,, �.; � q. g ,..� I `�� ' , 4 J B fi1 ;�o: I !A G�'� yil� ` • %G�. ..� ��' �� � � 'Z.�) /� � � ` µ . 4 � . I ., a,t � � �. ..., p � - - - ,, k ia'`'� "'2 'r' ��N Z �. I � gF._.•�� -�" ..�...�� W�„ a w � �-� g 2y� r� i r` � .� . c �e 3 � 3 I � � � :2-8G(4 n �Y Mi • ' ° �+' ' � p '%.i ' �, r � � . �i a�+' i �'0s " z' i•' ,r' � v~f z �� ,znr '� .�1.0 ° � � o�w i Q. .. n� �/` �S W - /OMy S � � � 9A'gC''9� • p --- gg tcs, �+, , a, ,. / T ; � W r' 81 8 H 2 i; ii ie 5 ��9 �r�` � 9� � ri . r� � < <7 y � j !�0 r!J M � yti �.d'��i �e, I �e " "( - - ' FQBdSSFP 1"` ...-- "� - - �i� tw ^ ��� EC. l � \ 1 23 24 LOCATION MAP �~ Z � � �"'� U 0 a Q Y a� � N � �"" w � LL� � r � W J G W � Q `` = o V ,. G U 3� � � • a :ti �"� I i�s � � 3� � s y � � � i '� ��s � �s �� � ti� _ � � , :� 1 n �ti �A� � �� Q � � � �r �3�e "� _� �,�� � s� ' a �� �� � i� � ti y� � �; � �� �� i�; � �ti � i� 3 �� �� ��� � � s� � 5 s!� � �� �� ��! �� �� ��! a g ��� � _I � .:J � \ � 1 r s� � � � t � � � �� � � � �� •• �1 � � � � � : g � � � � ��, � w � � •�_ ��� � �j�. �� ��5 �� ��� �: �Yi � ' '� ti� ��� _� �� w � Z� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � � ��°• ��� � _53� � � � � 1 � � � r � � �� F� . �� .. ._.:--• ... _ _,. ....,.. �. : . M 1.- --3 fi V�.�S ���.�a —! _W'J_�1__ — - — � �------- ; :• � 8 8i � . �� / �� � . 3 �__�.,�..�.�. _� ;� %--- ---, � : �o� � ,� w � �� N � �:F w � � � ' _ • I �s�L.O�A�__� I ••:J � � �� ����� . ��a - y I :i'4 . i i 1, �-- iossi ---- I � ..:�'' � '. I oc : �� � FI � . ,� D •..; � i :,M �� y��� M �� � �Jv �� ; n " l ------^--� L-------�i.M / •1';i--� - �R� �i �i� a -', � � � ° �"�� � i �'_��' t � � �P ����� z 1 J � �� �`� =3� a y� �� t�Jt�� �6 Vpq*� J Yy , �` � Y��V � I" y� 9 �� �i� �^ � � ���� �� C�� 3 ��� �� : g ti i�3 �3� � r� a � ��� �s� � 3 3i� a ! �' 1�A '�� y 9�3� ��„a a �� � ���� � i� � �� ti ;s � � � �3 � oa � 3 A3lN'd0���', :��.8� g. . •., �:' � ':�' �' _ lY 6�O�i_-" --- � �; � �� � �o � �i � p � P � �<�� ��g� ��� ���� �, � ��_`� : � s� � � i � � � � � � � i� 10D Eng�neennq Sewer Water Parks Streets Maintenance. MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager� PW90-232 FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director \ Mark A. Winson, Asst. Public Work Director �►R��✓ DAT$: SIIHJECT: June 14, 1990 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1990 - 3 Attached are four (4) resolutions which create Street Improvement Proj ect No. ST. 1990 - 3 under which the followinq improvements will be constructed: l. 2. 3. Extend 67th Avenue west approximately 280 feet in conjunction with the Michael Servetus 2nd Addition plat. Extend Oakley Drive north approximately 50 feet in conjunction with the Michael Servetus 2nd Additional Plat. Expand and improve the entrance road and parking lot at the Springbrook Nature Center. I am requesting that all four (4) resolutions be considered at one (1) meeting in order to have construction completed this year. The owner of the property that will benefit from the extension of 67th Avenue has waived the right to a public hearing. The engineering estimate and funding source for each portion of the project are: 1. 67th Avenue Extension 2. Oakley Avenue Extension 3. Nature Center Parkinq Lot Improvement Cost $50,000.00 6,000.00 45,000.00 Funding Source Assessment Street Fund Recreation C.I.P. Recommend the City Council consider and approve the attached resolutions at the June 18, 1990, meetinq to create Street Improvement Project No. ST, 1990 - 3. JGF/MAW/ts 11 Attachments fRIDI�Y l � � � I • C�. 1 i ' ( ( i 1 � �.�tl�Of� �,��11(• •�.►��t C0�1��• \ ' N J01 . �� -� _ �� .�..' � . n G � �� � n LOCKE� 1: PARK ;� /� , G ��� . v �i � �'� J J oc.� �... � I� ^ , . �w.6•N � � � � :� C' i? `7 � e� G . G ��� n c� � s s� � G v , G � C C• .� ^ � n v lj �, !? . L � ` . � � �� , c: �s;, �.. �, c� G;,) �'� C V .. � u —�^ . _. .4 �� •�.7 •���f � •��l�7Y�l `f .... ii/L��� s��. � ' �"i ..ea ��a � � �,s��1A1 1 '^ _ � V _ • w A .. Q .•.. t� �; � ('� It J i ���. a �, � , , • • ~- •• 1' V �.i �•,� �' v .' „ t i� , ' . � � o '\ _ _--► I li a � ✓ �� � �, �•- , � V � i+ � .� . ' ww�wr � s.rc■ J °3 � �+ (� n I .. � wc.00+�.Nos rr�c s OAKLEY DRIVE • �� �� ? �� M�T � i � �,• ••� 1 ���! N�• • � ♦ ''�i�}''t � _,� , �' � • 1 � i , ...� . . N �N\ �� h�• �� � �. �� �ytb1�NI, !�• wt�K ���• M�f ' �� � •• / r�ef w� t� � �� t r .� � • • • i ��r � � •.�� =� ����� � � . �� ` �� �` •ee*•o,�c• �.c .�.... •o�a r ` . � w `` ' � M� � �� • • � S .� • •■ � ` • ti � � K� � • � � a � ��t� ! 67TH AVENUE �.. U : , � i ���: . ` r . � Z � = .� � � � •. w ��. . � wa� aMtf Mw�M • � Mt saw�w ` N•��� �r� r � • f J� ' '^' "`- ....,. j ....». 1 ' . z ►� : ;: : .....i.I �... N -� 2 � � � CITY OF C N 11 A PI Ds � �s*M �c ,\ .. �_.. . ..�. - --T—� 13 .�, � � � � r •'� . 4i (,5� •�J ^ , �•. �; !~ � �' � �+ Ci `� ' t v ��� vJ � � � • ,,�' � C� �.� � � � � i`, i ,;� ' ,� • � �' �� � � .,�,, `: ' ' , � � j � ,� ,9 � 3 ,� r • �. �^* � s�`•.�:�f � � � J� � � � ��,<� :��.��, �.. a ���. °� `� �,� � ��, - `, NATURE CENTER� �3� � � �;� � �, � �' PARKING LOT � ^� � � -� � . � '� � � � � .� � � �• �• ;, �j a ,� _'��� ��'�� :� �: �� � �'� =J �„� � c� �� � � `� '� Q� �:, � ��J d SP•tMiGDFO�I� NAT �.iE t F.N ItR 1�••y '•'' �^.i � r �V � � � � `' � .�'jJ.��- \�j �� �_f� �J1,�A �;d1 � � r� i� V� � � �J M � � �:�'.� ��v��?,j ? c9� .:9 3,3 :�� � •3 � � '' � '� .� J v � .+�� Jl�, �'9 � � � � 3 , � � « � � `.� "a � . ,� `�r, � � '� ,� �� `� c� , � ,� w��, :. � .` E:� ,� ' f.� ., j h _ z �, ?� -� ,�� i „3 ., :J ; : �� v�`��y��.. ���',� ��� �,��'� ��`-��, � ��� •� f�, c �i► .' �; . +� ..a .� •� � � ;, - '1 g-�. t� � �� j �.� �� �- �' -� ' ' �y {% � ` � � +� � v . S�� �� � �:t �� ,.. �. ti v.., ►���t �\ A ��� t� \ �.% • \ � �� •�7� ; 1. ` �4t�ih� •�� f�det�E w�.\ ��K \� W '• . ` •` � � �', � �—_ �`� �� � �� 1 :-.cr•, �' . � �; : t ` � �� IIi . .�� .�..., ...,.,. i C ► • ► � • t • 's � ��fT �1h. y e t i _ �Y � w ! � : w. w'•',,' � CITY pf � �. .._._�. ��/1 .� / ! 3 - �MNtMp � tlM1A il s �� 11B , , . SLA1 NE ...•.r.. . .. ,.�. .� I � Z � d H �va •1��00j 1��� � O ekNat •� 11C 1�OI�T1'I�T �UU. - 1990 'I:r�• � • •I'1�'.:�I' � C •'!:A � �■ I• '♦ sM/ Y' • �� :r: � I• :r; •I' �:1: •�-: Y:I;fI'/��1' _ Y'/;i1: � 1"�� • 's I:N • • � rx�, �, s rr x�soLVEU v� the city cau�cii of the City of F�i.dley as follc�ws: 1. �at it appears in tile interests of the City and of the praperty cwr�ers affecked that there be ooru^tnyct�d oertain iaQ�ve�nents to-wit: Street iaQrove�ments, i�ludi�t�g 4radir�4, stabilized base, hot�ix bit�ninous mat, �o�rete cu� arrd gutter, sidewalks, water ar�d sanitaxy sewer services, stoYm sew�er systeqa, ar�d ather facilities located as follaws: �: � ' ;� �11: � �:/� :� .t:il' • 1�: � � � • . • � r:�•.�• r� n•r. s��+ -,+• •'�� c • ZYsat the wdrk involVed in said inp�rwe�xits list.ed abave st�all hereaftQS be de.signated as: S'1ZiEG�p Il�VENff�A' p1i0►TEGT PD. ST. 1990 - 3 2. Zt�at the Public Worl�s Director, John G. Flora, City Hall, Fridley, Mirnesata, is Y�reby authorized and directed to draw the P���YY Plans ar�d specif icatiar�s ar�d to tabulate the results of his estimates of the oosts of said im�r�7ve�nts, includir�q every it� of oost r-rcm ir�oe�tior� to �letior► ar,a au fees and expenses inatrned (or to be irxurY�ed) in �ec,�tion there�►ith, or the f inaT�cir�g thereof � c�7d to make a prel i mi na,v �rt of his f isydings stcztit7q therein whether said imp��avemerYts are feasible and wh�ether ti�y can best be made as Pr�osed. or in aocu�ection with sane o�ther iaQ�ovc�nents (at�d the estimated oost as recamnerxied) , iricludir�g also a desc�ription of the lar�ds or area as may Yeoeive benefits thex�efrc�t ar�d as may be prq�ased to be assessed. 3. Z31at said prel;min�rv re�ort of the Public Works Director shall be fi�nished to th,e City Ca�cil. . _ CiSi� �.• � •• • Y�� �:C M •�'11 M� •i' Y:1: M •I' ' /� �:� = : �: �`� •1: �I I' • � t�1LLY.l1l7 aJ • � � 1'Y'�i� Ai itr71 i � ��� /• • � « « ��� 12 �� �U• - 1990 •�s_• � r •�sa�:a � � �:r. •i:� � n �• •• v:,���i•� � v:,�:,� � � c • � �y. • - �:I: • Il:i :I:,�• • / � •' �:I: r• Y:,1' •1' �:1: •�� �: Y•�1 •�. •i N :rl •.1 V � � / 1 • '� � • � I :H •! :il : � 1 ' '- � ' :r I:N •. • :r • • � �S, Resolution No. -1990 adopt�.ed on the 18th day of Jw�e, 1990, the City Cau�cil, ordered the preliminaiY P�, sF�e�ificatiaris and estimates of the oosts thereof for the improvenents in this project. �. ��ion of oertain inprov�nts is dee�ned to be in the irYt�x�e.st of the City of Fridley arid the pmperty owners affec,-�te� theti,�by. �� �. B� 1'r REeOLVED• by the City �u�ci1 of the City of Fridley as follaws: 1. �at the pl�el.3minaYy re�ort su�altted by Jc�hn G. F1ora, Public Works Direc�tor, is h�y r�eoeived ar�d aoo�t,ed. 2. Zi�at the City C1erk shall act to ascertain the name ar�d addres.s of the �wtrx of eadi p�aroel of larid directly affec.�ted or within the area of larxi.4 as may be pro�o�ed to be ass�ssed for said it��rov�neitts, ar�d calculate esti.mates of as5essments as may be pmapo�ed relative thereto against each of said lands. 3. �at the area proposed to be assessed for said improv�nents ar�d eac�i of the�n as natsd in said r�tioe are all tiye lat�ds and are�.�s as noted in said natioe: All of the same to be asses..sed praporti�ately a000rding to .. the ber�efits reoeived. 4. Z3�at the estimates of ass��„+-� of the Clerk shall be available for � n,'�ection to the aaner of arYy jx�el of lar�d as may be affected th�expl�y at arry public heaririq held relative thex�et,o� as w�11 as at any prior time reas�able and aanvenient. 5. �at all propertY aar�er's wi�ose praperty i.s liable to be as�sed with the makir�g of ti�e in�rave�nents have sigtyed an agreemetzt req�stinq the impravments ar�d cxanstitute 100 peiroetYt of the praperty aai�ers who will benefit frcm the i�rov�x�t and cb wa�� � ric�t to a public hearinq which is allc�w�eci under the r�ormal prooec�ures set forth in Mfinr�ata Statutes C2]�aptet' 429. 6. FL�d.s far the inQrovesaent of the Sprir�r�ocalc Nature Cerrtc�s Parkinq Lo�t have been establistyed in the 1990 City Bu�dget. ; :,:�� �. .. • :,,� �:�: « .. �� «. .�- �:�: « .,: - �. �:. : : �: .� .� �� �- • � ATI'EST: -� n• ,. . . « « �;�, WIILIAM J. N� - 1�YCYt June 12, 1990 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley 6431 University Ave., N.E. Fridley, I�T 55432 PW90-149 12A The Michael Servetus Unitarian Society, beinq the owners of certain property in the northwest quarter of Section 13, Township 30 North, Range 24 West, described as Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 and Outlot A of Michael Servetus Addition in Fridley; hereby requests that the City of Fridley initiate the following improvements to the properties this year: 1. Extend 67th Avenue approximately 280 feet west with a 30-foot wide (face to face) bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter. 2. Extend the existinq sanitary sewer line in 67th Avenue with seven (7) appropriate service connections, approximately 280 feet west. 3. 4. Extend the existing 6-inch waterline in 67th Avenue, with seven (7) appropriate service connections, approximately 250 west. Install storm water drainaqe facilities as necessary. The Michael Servetus Unitarian Society aqrees to the assessment of all costs relatinq to the above improvements against Lots 5, 6, ? and 8, Michael Servetus Addition and Lots l, 2, and 3 of the proposed Michael Servetus 2nd Addition. Each lot to be assessed an equal amount. It is our understandinq that the estimated improvement cost is $116,000.00. Additionally, the Michael Servetus right to a public hearinq on the improvements. � Unitarian Society waives its assessment of the requested for the ��. �� � _ �� � . .r_��.� �-� ,� ��lT �D. - 1990 'IJ: �I � • . •"'1� .i1' �♦ � I' ' � • r I:.r. . � � I. _ � :t' 1M�" V� I• - �� � r� yi: •1' •� _ �:1:�'1:r�1- : 1r'1�/:.�/ � 1• ' • • } 1:,� ' • ' . • 1�8� 1ZeS011$1Q1 NO. - 1990 O�der�ed t'�]B pmeliIDir�aty pl�� specificaticns and esti.mates of tl�e ooBts ti�ereof for the in this p�oject. 1�is, �t�esolutian rto. -1990 reoeivirg the p�e.timi.naiy re�ort azxi reoeivir�q p�titions to waive the public hearir�q an the matter of the oor�x,-�tion of certain inQ�ov�nts fa� this p�oject. NOW �Oi7E, � IT FtF.90LVID, by the City Oalt�cil of t2�e City of Fridley, Anoka Oo�uYtY. Mi�sota as follaas: 1. 'Il�at the follawirg imp�ove�nesYts P�''aposeci bY Oan'�cil Rer�olutirn No. - 2990 are hez'�y oidex�ed to be effec.'ted ar�d o�le�t,ed as soal as reasoc�'lbly possible, to-wit: stre�e�t inProve�ents, includin4 9radi1'�9, stabilized ba�se, hot-mix bit�mminous mat, oo��ret�e cu� ard gutter, sideWalks, water at�d sanitaty sewer sexvices, stoYm s�ew�►r systen, and atiier facilities located as follc�ws: �' ' :N �I: � �:I� :,1 _1:a' ' ��J � � � • '� H:1•.�• - �� �1'C M:N Y:+�' 'l��� f • �t {ic MIViJt lilYVl� � .7OlY l�LWG►Q1�...7 � li.��i � ��++� I�J.G�iKL � C�E?S1CJI13t� a3: gTt�P IIrlpl�VF1��[iTP pl�TECT �D. 8T. 1990 -3 2. Zhat the w�rk to be perfoYmed tu�der thi.s p�oject may be perfozmed w�der ane or more �s as may be cleeoed advisable t�c�n reo�eipt of bids. 3. Zt�at the Public Works Director, Jdm G. Flo�a, City Hall, FYidley► Miru�eso�ta, is hereY�y designated as the Ehgineer far� this iaQ�vv�nent. He shall Prepare fir�al plarLS ar�d snecificatirns for the makinq of a�ch inp�ovements• � ;1:A� ��� � �• ' :M� �:1: M •� 11 M■ •l' �:1: M •t' • ��) " �:/ _ � �: �'� •�` 11 I` ' � WII��AM �7• NEE� MAYC�2 ATPEST: 4rrRr Fv A. i�1?�1PAIA - QTY CLII2K 13 �OI+Ol'IC�T �U. - 1990 'IJ: �I I • . •I'i�';il' � C � I' '�� � J I:r � •.� � �I� �� •1•IV:iI' / � � ` ai•� :i"s I:� '�'• : /!: .� Y'1:+1"N � 1"�•' 's I;r - • � � 14 �S. Resolutia� No. -1990 ordet�ed the preliminarY P��. s�ecificatians ar�d eski.mates of the c�osts thereof for the i.�wen�ents in project. �S, Resolution No. 1990 reoeived the Prelimir�ary �rgineerirrJ R�art ar�d the petitiorLS for the iaQrovements in this pmject. �AB, Resolutioci No. - 1990 ordered the i.�rat�snent ar�d fi.t�al plans ar�d s�ecifications and estiYOatQS of aast foz the imprweqoertts in this project. ��� BE IT RESOLVID, by the City Qau�cil of the City of Fridley, Anaka �Y. �ta as follaws: 1. TY�at th�e followir�g inQY,ov�ents P�o�ed bY C�ow�cil Resolutiori No. - 1990 are here],�y oYd�ered to be effect�ed and �ao�leted as soaz as �ly po5sible, to-wit: Street in�rove�nents, includiriq 9radin4. stabilized base, hat�ix bitwninaas mat, �oncrete curb arid gutter, sidewalks, water and sanitaty sewier setvic�.s, storm se�r sYste�, and other facilities located as follows: �� .:� �i: =i�� �,_r.:�;�• . .�� rnv_ a�:�.�u:�• •,. .,v. That the ranrk involved in said iag�ve�ents as listed abave shall Y�x�eaftex be designated as: �1' II�i�VEN�Tl' P��7ECT �U. 8T. 1990 - 3 2. 2he plans arid specifications prepared by the Public Works De�arbm�t for heretof�o,re��� arid each of thea puYSUant to the Oow�cil resolutior�s a�ted, a oopy of �ich plans and specificati� are hereto attacfieci and a�de a part the,t�eof, are he,t� appiroved at�d st�al.l be filed with City Clerk. The Public Works Director shall a000rdirygly prepare azd cause to be inserted in the offici.al news�aper ' far bids i� the ��q of s�ich unProv�nents wY3er such apQraved plans at�d specificatio�rls. Zt�e advertisement shall be published for (3) three w�eeks (at least 21 days) , ar�d shali specify the work to be done ar�d wi.11 stata ti�e bids will be apex�ed at�d ootZSidet�ed at 11:00 A.M. �1 � 1818 L�IY � JOLY, 1990, in the Cau�cil Ct�ambers of the City Hall ar�d that rn bids will be oonsid�.red unless sealed ani filed with the Public Works Director ani aooa�anied by a cash cle�osit, bid bcr�d, or oertified chec�Jc gayable to the City for five peroerYt (5�) of the amowYt of s�x�t bid. �at the advertisemeat for bids far� S�,T P1�ITDCT I�. ST. 1990 - 3 shall be substarYtially in the standatd form. RE50I�T�IC�i NO. - 1990 PAGE ZWO ''/:�� �� ��• • Y:�� �:IC M •��11 N� •1' �:I_ N •i' ' ��1 � Ir:� : : �: �'� •l" 11 I' ' � WIL� J. I� - NAYCg2 ��4�±� SFIIRLE'Y A. HAAPAIA - CI'I'Y CLERK 14A '�Engineerinc� ISewer Wa�er Parks Streets Mamtenance MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager � PW90-231 FROMs John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director Mark A. Winson, Asst. Public Work DirectorM� DATE: June 14, 1990 SIIHJECT: Water, Sanitary Sewer & Storm Sewer Project No. 210 Attached are four (4) resolutions which create Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Project No. 210 under which the utility work needed for the development of seven (7) residential lots in the Michael Servetus Addition and Michael Servetus 2nd Addition. I am requesting that all four (4) resolutions be considered at one (1) meeting in order to have construction completed this year. The owners of the property that will benefit from these improvements have waived the right to a public hearing. The engineering estimate and fundinq source for each portion of the project are: Improvement Funding Cost ourc Water, Sanitary Sewer & . Storm Sewer - 67th Avenue $66,000.00 Assessment Watermain loop - oakley Dr. 10,000.00 Water Fund Recommend the City Council consider and approve the four (4) attached resolutions at the June 18, 1990, meetinq to create Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Sewer Project No. 210. JGF/MAW/ts Attachments 15 � __ __ _ _ _ . � ' � I � ....... --•--• . .,...... h�• •� K •. . f t����� NN��II�I � � �KOOAI, t�. 1 t�• �,��K ���� � ���� I •• � -- — � NM � � . � � �1 1� " ••.�f . Nl�.\ � • H�Op +t����l• •�.►��• tN���• � � � . . . � �.. � � � � � �� � � .� � =- � � � � L � � . � �. � _ ...�� � ���J � IOCK E Ir PA R K ^ G~ Q n���ia i::.: : � _���'s �• ` � , Q L � `' � :s � � � � �' G � C• ;,� � � J x.� .... . . � �.., e••� j � • � (1 v i :I ;, C� ^ �� � �;. c . � 4 ... � 1 � � � % �' i� � � .e... � � � � ' •�O��OMC1 �K �. , J G i� c C C. A t+ Q "" . �� n V L� tj �, � C? . L � �% t,1 �t � i �'� `vi �' J n �. . , � c � � c ��, � . � :, t,j V � �. •: � � _ - - -• t+- __ --,•;. cS u � �:r ;i �: r ;•� � • C+ % �. , t f ��� -��T• - -�. . . � •� ': i� � +► • 0 ♦� � ��� � ' *wlrf� � • � — � � •o/l� 1 � �M00�� � : a . • ,...�� /y •�. � ' � � ' �� � �K..o. y t�w • . • � � . � i • ; � �.. . • .. � � ' � � � • ac ? � � � �a• . .. ' � s ♦ • . J � � • � •�� ♦ • w � � ��t• � � � -�.t•i..�»f �•s sre � �,,1 ' �, ;'., i��� r 67TH AVENUE .�� $ �4 � �...� . �, ......0 . : . 1 � v _ �.� ��.. d �•/� t � ..�•w � t: V � �+ ' '" s.r�a. � �—=�T'; � _� ��N_ '3�;,�,� n � ` `' _ � . . �� �.y; � �.1 • � • � � . � � "! ♦ � �♦ f/ Mf�00MLNps M11K 3 t � � S �y � ' ' ' � � '' OAKLEY DRIVE ' • � ` � YR ff/� . • �� 1 � �-1 • �..= � _ � � ;. ' �"► • 1 • � • � '� M �a +--' —•-, ... . c.:.,. � � ^ � � _� _�' ` ��� 1 j �' ' � L �w.e .�1��-•�i ''����'.'i � 'I'i� �T�f 1M t C . 15B R'F�OI,VrI�T �U. - 1990 •�:�, • � r •r��::,�• � � v:,� � �� ,. •� • ss�r v� r �� sc � r� :�: •i- �:i: •�: r:��+•,:,�r ,.r• u:�• _•. � u. •a :�s• i:�� •i•. :�s�v:�• •.• � , • � rx�►, �, � rr �soLV� �i tne city va�cii of ti�e City of Fridley as follcyws: 1. �at it appears in the iateres�ts of the city and of the property awners affect,ed that there be oon�stnyctsd oertain imp�we�nents to-wit: Stre�t in�rove�nents, iixludin4 9�v'�4, stabilized b�a�se, hat�tix bitwnir�aus mat, oo�ncr�te curb ar�d gutter, sidewalks, water ar�d sanitary sewpr servioes, stoxm sewer syst�n, ar�d ather facilities located as follcws: 67ZS AVENf� l�II(�ffi. SERVEl'� ADDITI�1 2. �at the PubliC Works Director, Jdui G. Flora, City Hall, FYidley, Minnesata, is hereby authorized and direc.�ted to draw the preliminarY Plans ar�d specifications atYi to tabulate the results of his estimates of the oosts of said improvelnents, includir�g every itan of oost fram inoe.ptiori to va��pletiori and all fees and ex�nses itxnlrred (or to be irxurred) in co�u�ectiort therewith, or the firlaricir�g thereof, arid to mak�e a prelimin�rv report of his firrdings statiryg th�erein whett�er said iag�rwemexrts are feasible arid wheti�er ti�ey can best be a�ade as pr�o�ed, or in c�u�ection witn scme o�tryer i�roveqnents (ar�a the estimatea cost as ), iricludit�q also a cie^�criptioc� of the lat�d.s or area as may reoeive benefits th�erefran and as may be p�roposed to be as.ses.sed. 3. 'IY�at said pl�elimi nar js �prt shall be furnished to txie City oo�u�cil. ' _1�1� �� � � • ' Y:+�� Y:I: M •�'ll M� •I' 1r:1: M •1' ' �� �:� ; : �: �'� •1" 11 I' � WII�.IAM J. NEE;� MAY�2 ���� SHIf2T � A. F�ALA, QTY CCII2R 12�O�IQiT �UU. - 1990 •i:r_ • � • . •�:,�:,i � � e �:�: •�:,� � �� � •a v:,�• ��•� � '1'rN:� ' � t •' i� '.I. r � t �:1� • Il:i :i:t+• ' ■ f • , �:I: I• ✓1' •I" Y:1: ••� �_ Y'il • . •i' M:�I'�V� �. � 1' '�• � ;r I;N ../� Y�' ��. 1 Y� '♦ :1's"1:�1' •1'. 71;n"I:+�' ' • , • � �8, Re�olutian No. -1990 a�3ered the prelimir�arY Plarss, specificatians arid esti.mates of the oosts theseof for the i���ts in thi.s p�oj ect. �2EAS, the ooa�structioci of oertain inQ�rwe�ents is d�ed tfl be in ti�e int�rest of the City of Fridley arxi the property awners affec,-ted thex,eby. �►. �, e� rr RF�oLVED by the city ao�u�cil of the city of Frialey as follvws: 1. Zi�at the preliTMir,ari � sui�itted by the Public Wbrlcs Directflr, is hereby reoeived ar�d aooepted. 2. Zhat the City C1erk shall act to asoertain the na�e and ad�dr�ss of the avt�er of ea�d1 paroel of lat�d directly affected o� within the area of lat�ds as may be pra�osed to be assessed for said improv�ts, ar�d calculate estimates of assessmerits as may be pz�ed rplative ti�ereto aqainst eac3i of said lands. 3. ZlZat the area px�aposed to be asses.sed for said i�rwe�nents ar�d each of them as r�at.ed in said natioe are all the lar�d.s arid areas as r�ated in said riatioe: All of the same t� be asses.Sed propattianately ac�cordiriq to the benefits reoeived. 4. �hat the estimates of assessmerYts of the City Clerk shall be available for inspecticn to the dwner of any paroe,l of lar�d as may be affec�ted thereby. 5. Zi�at all PmpextY aat�ers wiiose pr+ap�x ty is liable to be assessed with the makirg of the in�rweqnents have sigt�ed an aqr+ee�t �tir�cl the i�arovesnents ar�d oanstitute 100 peroe.nt of the P�rtY awr�ers who will benefit frcm the improvement and do waive the ric�t tfl a public hearinq which is a1ldw�ed �u�der tiye r�orn�al Px�ooec�ures set forth in Mitu�ta Statutes Cl�ap�t�r 429. � �1:r� �� � �• ' II;N� Ir:l: M •��11 M� •I' �:C N •I' • ��1 : �:� _ : �: �'� •I' 11 I" • � WILLIAM J. NEE - I�YOIt ATI�:S'I': �rurFV A. HAAPALA - CITY C� 16 16A June 12, 1990 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley 6431 University Ave., N.E. Fridley, I�i 55432 PW90-149 The Michael Servetus Unitarian Society, beinq the owners of certain property in the northwest quarter of Section 13, Township 30 North, Range 24 West, described as Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 and Outlot A of Michael Servetus Addition in Fridley; hereby requests that the City of Fridley initiate the followir►g improvements to the properties this year: 1. Extend 67th Avenue approximately 280 feet west with a 30-foot wide (face to face) bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter. 2. Extend the existing sanitary sewer line in 67th Avenue with •� seven (7) appropriate service connections, approximately 280 feet west. 3. 4. Extend the existinq 6-inch waterline in 67th Avenue, with seven (7j appropriate service connections, approximately 250 west. Install storm water drainage facilities as necessary. The Michael Servetus Unitarian Society aqrees to the assessment of all costs relatinq to the above improvements against Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, Michael Servetus Addition and Lots 1, 2, and 3 of the proposed Michael Servetus 2nd Addition. Each lot to be assessed an equal amount. It is our understandinq that the estimated improvement cost is $116,000.00. Additionally, the Michael Servetus Unitarian Society waives its riqht to a public hearinq on the assessment of the requested improvements. , � for the Unitarian Soc ��� �� _ � � � � � ��� � �� . ,�.r- �. RF�OI�I'IQ�T )D. - 1990 'I:r; • 1 •' •1'U':rl' � t � 1' '-� • :r I:r '�� ' � �• '� � JM�` �+• �'. �� 1� .l; � I• .l: �I� ���; �iIJI�IJ�I. ..� 1i:+1. :�� .1 V� '♦ .I;n"I:�I' i� •1'. :1;r"I il• '�• ' • � �8� ReSOlutiori No. - 1990 o1�clet�ed ti]e prpliminans plaT3s� specifications atxi esti.mates of the vosts th�e.reof for the improveroerYts in this Px'o7�. �,s, �esolution xo. -1990 reoeivirx� the �re�.�mina� r�o�t ar�a reoeivir�g petitior� to waive the public hearinq a► the matter of the �onstnictiaz of oertain i.mprov�ents for thi.s project. �,8, oertain ag�tts reg�estin4 street i�rove�ents, includir�4 9�. stabilized ba.se, hat�.x bit�nnir�aus mat, sewps, water, stoxm sew�er ani other facilities, located as follaas: 6�TH AVII� � «:�� :� _,:�• • - ��_ � .. . , w�ere duly preserited to the Cb�mcil on the 18th day of Jiu�e, 1990; and rx�, �, B8 IT 1�80LVED by the City �rcil of the City of Fridley, Ar�oxa C7auYty, Mi�ata, as follaas: 1. 'Il�e Cau�cil firr3s ar�d c3etermit�es that said agre�m�ents w�ere signed by all c�wners of real praperty abuttir�g t� the street(s) named as the locatioc� of the in�rove�ne,rYt. 2. S�i i�rove�ner�ct is 2�ereby oYdered as prc�osed in the Cau�cil Resoluti�'1 No. -1990 ac�op�ted Jtu�a 18, 1990. 3. John G. Flora is hereby designated as the er�gir�eer for this i.�rov�t. He shall Pre�re Plans and specificatior�s and estimates of oosts thereof for the makir�q of surh inp�rovemer�ts. _ ti�. �� .• •�. r:i: w s• �i wr •i� r:r. w .r - n �:� : : �: .• •i� �i i- • � wrrJT�t J. NEE - I�Y�2 �y►� `1 � P /• • • M M �'J 17 � �1TI�D�T �A. - 1990 '1l' � 1 1 • . • '� � :il � � f / 1' ' � � s I � I � � � • I � � •�'��:A' �,f �•:�I'� _I? I:r "��• : ��: r- Y:AC '�. � V,'� :1=..�i/• •�'�, ]1}'�1:�' ' • " . • � 1�s, �esolutian No. -1990 a�dered the p�+eliminarY Plans, specificatiac� and esti.mates of ti�e oosts thereof fcr the inQ�ovements in p�aject, ar�d �S Itesoluticn No. 1990 reoeiv+ed t2'ie Prel;,n; t,arv g�qj�er�9 g�o�t aad the�pe�titions far th�e i�YVV�tts in this p�oject, at�d 1�8, Iaesa2uticn No. - 1990 a�der+e�d the impz�v�t�t and final plans ar�d specificatiar�s arxi esti.mates of cost fa� the iu�arovements in this p�oject. �711, �, BS 2T REBOLVED by the Oouncil of the City of FYidley, Anal� Qo�uitY, Mirnesata, as follaas: 1. Zhat the following improvem�nts PropoEed bY C�amcil R�olutiar�; are i�erei�y o�dered to be effect,ed ard aatpleted as soori as �soc�ably possible, to-wit: S'tre�et inQrvv�errts, i.naludit�q gzadirx�, stabilized ba.Se, hat�ix bit�inau.s mat, concr�ts airb arid gutter, side�ralks, water arid sanitary sew�.r sexvices, stozm sewer systa�, ani vth�r facilities located as follcws: �: � r ���: . �:► :,� :�:�• � - ��_ .. . �hat the werk involved in said inQxw�ts as listred abwe shall hereafter be designated as: ►:►� :�I• ;,. � y. •, :,_ . :�+• � ,�. ., �1�Y :,J .!�• �-. J • S� 2. TlIE p13I15 3I9�d SPAC1f1Cdt1C[18 jaY12'j�3Y� bj� t2'IL� R]b21C WOZ'kS n�3,-f,�„} for ax3i iaQrvve�esxts arid eac3i of them, pursuant to the Ua�mcil resolutia� heretofore adaptsd, are herP17Y aPPr'w� � sha12 be filed with the City Clerk. Zhe Public Works Direc.-tar st�all a000�d.in�ly pz��e ar�d cause to be insert�ed in the official r�paper fa� bids upoci the makinq of such iaQrove�e.rYts und�s such app�wed pl.ar�s ani specifications. �e adveitis�ent shall be published for three (3) weeks (at least 21 days) , arrl sha11 specifY the wurk to be dor�e ar�d will state that bids will be ap�s�ed ar�d vo�idered at 11:00 a.m. a� tba 18th dap oi Jt�ly, 1990, in ttye Oau�cil ��ra of the City Hall, arid that no bids will be oonsidered unless sealed ar�d filed with the Public Warks Director, at�d acoo�anied by a cash c'i�osit, bid ba�d, ar certified ci�ecJc gayable to the City for five peroent (5$) of the aaro�urt of axii bi.d. �at the advertisanent fo� bids fos 1�lTEEt, S�II'l�t �� 8'1� B�WF�[t PAOJDGT �D. 210 shall be substarYtially in starraard foYm. Re�.,olutian No. - 1990 � � ' ]/:r� �� �• • Y:r� �:C M •� �i M• �I' �:C M •I- • ��1 : �:� _ : �: �•� •1-. �� I' • � WII��AM J. I�E - I�C�2 ATI�T: y ��' /• • M M �'J / : �1 � � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL 71PPOI1dTKENT6 �� . June 18, 1990 me Mary Smith Douglas Himango Bruce Koopmeiners Position Assessment Clerk Grade D Step 2 Non-exempt Public Services Worker A-1 Non-exempt PubliC Services Worker A-1 Non-exempt Startinq Sala�y $1,651.26 per month $19,815.12 per year $9.62 per hour $20,086.56 per year $9.62 per hour $20,086.56 per year Jeffrey Police $1,932.00 Potter Officer per month Partial- $23,184.00 exempt per year Startinq Date Replaces June 19, Ferne 1990 McCarthy June 19, James 1990 Brindley June 20, Chester 1990 Swanson June 19, Robert 1990 Friegang 20 FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL June I8, 1990 �pe of License: B� FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Moore Lake Racquet, Swim Same & He�al th C1 ub 1200.E. Moore Lk.Dr. Fridley, Mn. 55432 FOOD VEHICLE � Mr. H's P1ini Doughnuts Harold Hotchkiss 1055 PJ. Circle N,E. � Fridley, Mn. 55432 GAMBLING Fridley Metro Golden David Gilbert Lions Club 6085 - 7th St. NE, Fridley, Mn, 55432 PEDDLER Matt Milner Sales Gerald B. Johnson 1293 - 52nd Ave. N.E. Fri dl ey, P1n. 55421 PUBLIC DRIPJKING Knights of Columbus John M. Yencho 6831 Hv�y 65 N. E. Fridley,Mn. 55432 CHARITABLE ORGRNIZATION SOCICTOR MPIRG(Mpls. Pub. Interest Group) ,�na Micka 921 Islehart St. St.Paul, P•1n. 55104 Approved By: LICEHSEd Fees: $37.50 $50.00 James P. Hill Asking fees to be Publich Safety waived Director James P. Hill �60.00 Publich Safety Director James P. Hill $300.00 Public Safety Director James P. Hill Asking Fees to Public Safe�v Dir, be waived FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL ELECTRICAL DeVice Electric 1828 Jersey Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55426 Darrell Vice Maple Grove Heating & A/C Inc. 8870 Zea2and Avenue North Brooklyn Park, 1�IIJ 55445 Steve MacDonald Service Electric Inc. 171 Rickard Road N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 EXCAVATIN(i Bruhn Excavations 1698 Belvidere St. Paul, MN 55107 Dennis Wood Kenneth Bruhn GAS SERVICES Economy Gas Installers Inc. 6204 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55410 James Toohey Jake's Service 8465 Center Drive N.E. Spring Lake Park, rIIJ 55432 Jake Pyles Mechanical Building Services Inc. 13355 Staple Street N.E. Ham Lake, MN 55303 Cecil SeaZs GENERAL CONTRACTOR Alcar Builders 5131 Overlook Drive Bloomington, MN 55437 Construct-AlI Corporation 4401 - 85th Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 Albert Carr Terrence Brelje Construction Analysis & Management, Inc. 7401 Central Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55432 Vergil Florhaug Deck Specialist 1238 Wachtler Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 �, Dan Caruso LZC�NBEB STATE OF MINN Same Same DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg Ofcl. CLYDE WILEY Bldg/Mech Insp. Same Same DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg Ofcl Same , Same Same 21A Hanggi Building & Remodelinq 2901 - 85th Avenue N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 Kenneth Hanggi Home Enhancers Inc. � 5460 - 145th Street West Savage, i�IIJ 55378 Mann's Pools 5425 - 165th Street N. Hugo, I�T 55038 Kevin Mann Rain-Lite Inc. 4357 Dunrovin Lane Eagan, MN 55123 Eddy Manthei Jerry Thell Builders 17020 Crocus Street N.W. Anoka, MN 55303 Jerry Thell Wescot Construction & Dev. Inc. 85 East County Road B Little Canada, MN 55117 Scott Wesch HEATING Collova HVAC 3064 Labore Road Little Canada, MN 55109 Carmelo Collova Jakes Service 8465 Center Drive N.E. Spring Lake Park, MN 55432 Jake Pyles Mechanical Building Services Inc. 13355 Staple Street N.E. Ham Lake, MN 55303 Cecil Seals PLIIMBING Aqua City Plumbing Inc. 5428 Nicollet Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55419 DMC Plumbing Services Inc. P.O. Box 41974 Plymouth, NIIJ 55441 Donohue Mechanical Inc. 6115 Sunnyfield Road Mound, MN 55364 ROOFINC3 AWR Inc. 3023 Snelling Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55406 Dave Vogelgesang George Huff Tom Donahue 21B Same Same Same Same Same Same CLYDE WILEY Bldg/Mech Insp. Same Same STATE OF MINN Same Same DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg Ofcl. John Jarvi Construction 240 Longfellow Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 WRECRINti Herbst & Sons 2299 County Raad H Moundsview, MN 55112 John Jarvi Dennis Herbst 21C Same DARREL CLARK Chief Bldq Ofcl. APPROVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION HUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR � ,:,: ,, �Y '� � CIlYOf FRlDLEY FOR CONCIIRRENCE BY THE CITY COIINCIL AEC Engineers & Designers 511 - 11th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 JIINE 18, 1990 EBTIMATEB 1. Phase I- 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 192 (Inspection Services) Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,837.00 2. 1.5 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 193 (53rd Avenue and Johnson Street) (Inspection Services) Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,000.00 Gammon Bros., Inc. 13845 Northdale Boulevard Rogers, MN 55374 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2 Estimate No. 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 34, 347.49 Walbon Lawn Maintenance 3225 Skycroft Drive St. Anthony, MN 55418 Corridor Maintenance Project No. 199 Estimate No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4, 342.86