Loading...
05/17/1993 - 00005031� THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF MAY 17, 1993 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Nee at the Fridley Middle School cafeteria, Mayor Nee stated that the City Council will conduct this public hearing on the proposed Regional Senior Citizens Center and, after the public hearing, adjourn to the Fridley Municipal Center to reconvene the meeting. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT PUBLIC HEARING• Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Billings, Councilman Schneider and Councilman Fitzpatrick None l. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED REGTONAL SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: Mayor Nee opened this public hearing at 7:05 p.m. and welcomed everyone who was in attendance. � Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this proposed Senior Center project originated back in 1988 with a long-range plan to study senior needs in the City. He stated that from this study, it was determined that more space was needed for seniors in the coming years. � Mr. Burns stated that between January and June, 1991, City staff became involved and approached the neighboring cities of New Brighton, Mounds View, and Spring Lake Park to join in a joint effort for a senior center. He stated that in July, 1991, the cit� counciTs of these cities established a Regional Senior Citizen's Center task force comprised of citizens of the Pour communities. He stated that the task force met more than forty times from September, 1991 to March, 1993, and held four public hearings in January, 1993, one in each community, to inform the citizens about this proposed project. Mr. Burns stated that the four city councils met in March, 1993 and determined, after hearing the Task Force's final report, that they would review the needs as individual councils, and on or before June 15 they would decide whether they would support the concept of a Regional Senior Center. He stated that on June 7, the Fridley City Council would decide whether or not to support this concept. Mr. Burns stated that two sites for this proposed Regional Senior Center were selected, a primary site and a secondary site. He FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993 PAGE 2 � stated that the primary site is off 69th Avenue near the intersection of Old Central which is known as the Rice Creek Trail site. He stated that the other site is located near New Market at the Rice Creek Shopping Center in New Brighton. Mr. Burns stated that the proposed building has two levels, the dominating area being a multi-purpose room that would seat 350 people for congregate dining with an adjoining kitchen. He stated that there would also be an arts and crafts room, library, lounge, and an office and conference area on the upper level. He stated that the lower level would contain a game room, fitness room, some lockers, a meeting room, and restrooms. He stated that a portion of the lower level would be unexcavated and available for any future expansion. Mr. Burns stated it is antioipated that this center would be a central point for information and referrals available to seniors, families of seniors, community organizations, and public agencies. He stated that it would also provide direct services and a place where seniors can find support from other seniors, as well as assistance from staff. Mr. Burns stated that the Task Force identified a number of programs relating to nutrition such as congregate dining, � commodities distribution, and monthly pot luck dinners. He stated that there would also be exercise and wellness programs including blood pressure testing, foot care, flu shots, eye screening, weight loss education and support qroups. He stated that there would be a number of drop-in activities including cards and board games, billiards, watching movies, or reading. He stated that the center would also address special interests such as country and western dancing, pet care, quilting, wood carving, ceramics, theater, and music. He stated that seniors provide their own fund raising activities through the sale of arts and crafts, a farmers' market, dances, vending machines, and garage sales. Mr. Burns stated that the Regional Senior Center would be the focal point for social service assistance such as the home maintenance program, companion program for the homebound, respite care, senior outreach, legal aid, tax and fuel assistance, and grief support and education. He stated that the seniors are involved in volunteer programs such as Toys for Tots, the £ood shelf, transportation for seniors, assistance to the Po11ce Department, special tutoring in schools, and publication of a newsletter for seniors. He stated that he felt the most important part of the Regional Senior Center was the variety of programs that would be provided to seniors which include educational programs such as 55 Alive, financial planning, defensive driving, and computer training. � Mr. Burns stated that the Regional Senior Center would be staffed with three full-time personnel, a director, program coordinator, and a secretary/receptionist; and five part-time persons including FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993 PAGE 3 � a volunteer coordinator, Chore Services coordinator, Senior outreach worker, transportation coordinator, and building supervisor. He stated that the total estimated cost for these services in 1992 dollars was $202,701 per year. Mre Burns stated that the cost for constructing a Regional Senior Center would be about $2,000,000, and the debt service on the financing would be about $186,200 per year. He stated that operating costs would be about $411,801 for a total annual cost of $598,001. He stated that it is anticipated that about $75,000 per year would be received from grants, dues, non-resident fees, and various awards from service groups which would reduce this cost to $423,0�0. Mr. Burns stated that the four cities are now spending $126,000 for senior services which would mean an increase of about $297,000. He stated that of this $297,000, $186,000 is for the debt service, and only a fraction is for initial operating costs. Ae stated that the tax impac� on an $80,000 home in Fridley would be about $6 per year and $7 per year on a$90,000 home. Mr. Burns stated that while the city councils have not committed to this proposal, it may be possible for the cities of Fridley and New Brighton to use some fund balances, with Fridley paying sixty � percent and New Brighton paying forty percent of the construction costs. He stated that if this happened, Fridley would be given a credit against its share of the annual operating costs. He stated that the tax impact in 1993 for an $80,000 home in Fridley would then be about 45 cents. Mr. Burns stated that the number of seniors in Fridley will grow dramatically during the next decade. He stated that there were 5,230 seniors in the City in 1990, and it is anticipated by the year 2010 that there will be 13,075 seniors. He stated that the proposed Regional Senior Center would address the real need of a growing senior population. He stated that it makes sense to provide these services jointly with neighboring communities to avoid duplication of facilities, manpower, equipment, and to optimize senior resources for better and more diverse programming. He feels that the Regional Senior Center is an approach towards consolidation of qovernmental services without sacrificing local control. Councilwoman Sorgenson asked how the space the seniors currently use at the Community Education Center would be utilized if a new senior center is constructed. Mr. Burns stated that he understands this space is badly needed for other programs such as the latch key program. � Mrs. Vasecka, 5427 4th Street, asked if the City would guarantee the cost would only be $6 per year. � � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993 PAGE 4 Mr. Burns stated that he believes it would be no greater than $6 per year, but this would have to be ad7usted for inflation beyond 1993. Mr. Leon Hinkle, 50 7Dth Way, felt that the cost of $6 per year may not be realistic because there is the cos� for maintaining the building and gas for the vans which keeps increasing, He also questioned the fee, and stated he did not think there should be one if you were a resident of the community. Mr. Burns stated he felt that the costs had been carefully calculated. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there is a booster association fee at the existing Senior Center where seniors can pay a certain amount to contribute to the Senior Center. She stated that this fee is $7.50 per year. Mr. Peter Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, stated that iP seniors are now paying $7.50 per year, with the additional $6 or $7 increase in taxes, it would bring the cost to about $15 per year< Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that the $7.50 fee goes towards postage to mail the seniors' newsletter. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that if you are not a member, you do not receive a newsletter. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that the newsletter is available at the Senior Center for anyone wanting a copy. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that it may cost $6 this year, but it will probably increase by this amount each year. Mr. Clarence Sauers, 6750 Overton Drive, asked if cost overruns were included in the construction costs, Mr. Burns stated that there is a contingency which also includes furnishings. He stated that the construction costs were figured at $81 per square foot which he felt was accurate. Ms. Jan Marx, 5550 Regis Trail, asked when the construction costs were determined. Mr. Burns stated that this is a 1992 figure obtained between June and August. Ms, Marx stated that she believes lumber has increased by forty percent. Mr. Burns stated that the construction costs were figured very high, and there is a ten to fifteen percent contingency included in this figure. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993 PAGE 5 � Ms. Marx asked if the Council would receive current construction cost figures due to the increase in building materials. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that Council first has to determine if they should proceed with this project. Ms. Joan Olson, 6320 Van Buren Street, stated that construction costs have escalated thirty to forty percent in the last six months, and that is $800,000 on a$2,000,000 pro]ect. She felt that the absolute cap should be specified before any construction would proceed. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that the Council has to review what they are willing to spend for this project. She stated that the project could possibly be reduced in sizea She stated that at this point, it has to be determined if this is a reasonable project and if it is something that is wanted by the community. Councilman Schneider stated that it has to be determined if there is support for a Regional Senior Center, and if this should be a joint venture. Ae stated that if there is not any support the cost is not a concern, but if there is support the Council needs to address the site, the size, and the costs. � Mr. Peter Meade, 7341 3ackson Street, asked what new programs would be offered at the proposed Regional Senior Center that are not available at the existing senior center. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that, basically, there would be no new services. She stated that Fridley has a focal point for senior services; however, the other three communities do not have the services available. She stated that the space currently used by the seniors in Fridley may be used for other programs, She stated that the school district has plans to expand their latch key program, and a lot of space has been given to GED students and an-site day care for those parents obtaining their GED certificates. She stated that a program similar to Head Start is also planned at the Community Education Center, Mr. Meade asked if there would be additional allocations to expand these programs. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that this would be a school districti issue, as they offer community education programming. Ms. Carole Miller, 5784 7th Street, asked if the task force was a cross section of the four communities. Mr. Burns stated that it is not a cross section but proportional � representation. He stated that he believed there were eight representatives from Fridley, six from New Brighton, four from Mounds View, and three from Spring Lake Park. He stated that there � � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993 PAGE 6 were seniors and non-seniors on the Task Force with �oth men and women. He stated that both blue collar and upper and middle income persons were represented on this Task Force, Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that volunteers were requested to serve on this task force, and they were appointed by the individual councils. A lady in the audience questioned why Fridley could not have a 5enior Center by themselves. She also questioned why it had to be so elaborate and wondered if a used building could be purchased and remodeled. She stated that there are a lot of seniors that volunteer and would like to see just Fridley involved in such a oenter, Councilwoman Sorgenson stated that the secondary site was an existing shopping center which would have been remodeled. She stated that it is just as costly to remodel a building as to construct a new building. She stated that the building was kept as simple as possible, and Fridley alone could not afford this size of a building to meet the needs. Mr. Leon Hinkle, 50 70th Way, stated that the City does not have the authority to build at this proposed site. Councilman Sillings stated that he wished to clarify that what is being presented this evening is the recommendation of the Task Force. He stated that he gets the impression that residents feel the City Council wants to build in that park and cannot do it. He stated that this public hearing is to determine if there is interest on the part of residents for the City to participate in a Regional Senior Center project as recommended by the task force. Councilman Billings stated that the Task Force recommended a site that a sub-committee of the Metropolitan Council indicated was not available. He stated that the City Council has not voted or indicated support of the 5enior Center or the proposed location. He stated that the purpose of the public hearing is to gather information for a possible vote by the Council on June 7. Mr. Hinkle felt that there shouldn't be talk about building on this site when it cannot be done. Councilman Schneider stated that the task force held informational hearings in each of the four oommunities. He stated that the purpose of this public hearing is to obtain input from the residents. He feels that it has to be determined if the concept of a Regional Senior Center should be supported and, if so, should it be a joint project? He stated that after this has been determined the other issues of the site and costs can be discussed. � � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993 PAGE 7 Mr. Hinkle stated that the Metropolitan Council stated that something would have to be worked out. He stated that he cannot see any sense discussing this issue if the site is going to be turned down. He asked if union workers would be hired if the center is constructed. Councilman Billings stated that the City passed a resolution which states that on any project where City funds are used and the project costs are more than $30,000, prevailing wages will be paid, He stated that the City is prohibited by Federal and State law to require union employees. He stated that the prevailing wage basically amounts to union wages, so most contractors, if they have to pay union wages, are hiring union workers. Ms. Marguerite Gilbert, 517 67th Avenue, stated that she fully supports the concept of a senior center whether it is one just for Fridley residents or a regional senior center, She stated that she believes a regional senior center could provide more services and would be more economical. She stated that she knows there are those persons who feel each city should have their own center; however, the trend is to combine these services, She stated that she served on the Task Force and worked with people who came up with a plan together. She believed that all citizens in Fridley, New Brighton, Mounds View and Spring Lake Park can do the same and work together. Mr. Clarence Sauers, 6750 Overton Drive, stated that he is neither in favor nor opposed to the Senior Center. He stated that he realizes there is a need for it, and as time goes by, he felt it must come to pass. He stated that as a growing community, other things are also needed. He felt that tnere is a need for additional police officers to combat the crime rate. He felt that there should be a recreational center for wayward youth. He stated that as to the cost of $6 per year, there have been other proposals in the City which only cost several dollars per year, but as time has passed, his taxes have tripled. He felt that this $6 per year should be used for things that are needed. Mr. Sauers referred to the jails which are overflowing, and that criminals are back on 'che streets due to lack of space. He felt that if the Senior Center was built, there should be a day care center included which would be helpful to the community and to the seniors, Ms. Pat Faner, 6716 7th Street, stated she has felt that Fridley is a quality community and is judged by the quality of the facilities it is willing to extend to all its crtizens. She stated that she recently worked on the school referendum in which a large number of seniors were involved to provide quality education for the children. Ms. Faner stated that she is employed as a Senior Outreach Worker at Seniors Place in Minneapolis, which could offer more activities but lacks the space. She felt that with the increasing saniors population, the City should be prepared to offer something o� quality to its seniors. She felt that it was FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17 1993 PAGE 8 � unreasonable thinkinq that a cost of $6 per year or over would break homeowners. Ms. Faner stated that she admired the work of the Task Force in considering all the activities to keep seniors in the community. She stated that there are so many volunteers in the community which assist at Unity Hospital, congregate dininq, and Meals on Wheelse These volunteers have been such a backbone of the community. She felt that the future is with the seniors to bring people out of their homes, contribute to the community, to keep them out of the nursing homes and to continue beinq residents of Fridley. She stated that one way is to provide a senior center where there are recreational services, health care, low cost flu shots, and exercise programs. She stated that she strongly supports a senior center. Ms. Irene Vasecka, 5427 4th Street, stated that the cost of $6 per year would increase in the future. She stated that she is working to keep her home but it is not easy, and she did not appreciate Ms. Faner's comment. Mr. Tom Myhra, 6360 Able Street, stated that questions were raised about the growing programs at the Community Education Center. He stated that the latch key program began with fifteen children but � now it involves two hundred. He stated that in looking at the projected number of seniors in Fridley for the year 2010, he felt a senior center was needed. He felt that residents get the best value for their taxes at the local level, and he did not object to the increase because he felt it was reasonable. Mr. Leonard Lind, 1620 75th Avenue, stated that he did not like being used by professional do gooders. He stated that residents were told they did not need a referendum, and the proposed site is a place where a senior center cannot be located. He stated that he does not like being told what should be done with his money. Ms. Carole Miller, 5784 7th Street, felt that the more information obtained the better it is to make these kinds of decisions. She stated that if people do not have the time or ability to serve on the task force they have to trust those people who serve on this commit�ee. She stated that persons from all four communities have come up with this proposal for a regional senior center. She stated that people seem to stay in Fridley for many years, and there is a continuity of being part of the community. She stated that she supports the regional senior center because it is resourceful to combine the cost with neighboring cities. Ms. Mi11er stated that she has had children in the school district for the last twenty years, and all citizens have paid taxes to � educate her children. She stated that she knows of others that do not have children in the schools, but who continue to pay for good education for the children in Fridley. She stated that '�family" FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1493 PAGE 9 � has a different meaning now, and the community is a family. She £elt that the seniors are a segment of the family that need to have some services, and this is something owed the seniors. Everyone that lives in Fridley is a potential user of this facility. She felt that a senior center would be a good source of pride for the community and a good image builder. It would make her even prouder to live in this community. Mr. Howard Dunphy, 5355 Fillmore Street, referred to the letter of May 5, 1993, and he disputes the projections of 13,000 seniors in the year 201D. He felt that a two-story building was not good for seniors, as there would have to be stairs and elevators. To reduce it ta a one story would not be large enough. He questioned if there would be adequate parking since there would be the metro mobility units and buses coming into the area. Mr. Dunphy stated that he can appreciate the task force's attempt to find a site, but he did not feel that one inch of precious park land should be used for a senior center. He felt that the potential of adding to the existing center should be reviewed. He stated that there is ample space at the Community Education Center for parking, and that the senior center should be kept in Fridley. He stated that he does not feel a joint venture with the other communities is a good idea. He felt that getting to the facility, � if it was constructed at the proposed location, would be a problem for seniors, as it would be located in the northeast quadrant. Ae stated that with an expenditure of this magnitude it is no one°s right to say there should not be a re£erendum. Councilman Schneider stated that he gathers Mr. Dunphy is in gavor of the concept, but he asked if he had any figures on what it may cost to expand the existing center. Mr. Dunphy stated that in looking at the Community Education Center, it is a nice building, but he was told it needs a new roof, He stated that it probably would need air conditioning and parking expansion. He stated that the estimated cost for the new building is $2,000,000, and he £elt that before the pzo7ect was complete the cost probably would be about $3,500,000. Mr. Peter Meade, 7341 Jackson 5treet, stated tha� he probably would never use this center, nut he does support it. He stated that in the last fifteen or twenty years, schools were being built, but now the community is changing. He stated that there is a need for a sanior center whether it is a new building or a remodeled building. He stated that he probably would not be in this community twenty or thirty years from now, so he had nothing to gain by supporting a senior center. He stated that he would support raising a portion of the cost before construction began rather than going lnto debt. � P-Ie stated that it costs as much to remodel a building as it does to construct a new building. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17 1993 PAGE 10 , Mr. Peter Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, stated that when he moved into Fridley in 1980, his taxes were $303, but he now pays over $1,000. He stated that property taxes keep increasing, and he is on a fixed income. He stated that he would never use the senior center, and he felt if there was a referendum, everyone would have the right to decide if they wanted this facility, He stated �hat there are also other locations for such a center and pointed out the site at I-694 and Central Avenue. He also felt that the Communi�y Education Center could be expanded without spending $2,000,000. Councilman Schneider stated he understands that �r. Eisenzimmer does not like the location and the cost, but that he favors the concept of a Senior Center. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that it is getting to the point where he cannot af£ord to live in Fridley. He felt that i£ anything is done, the Community Education Center should be expanded. He cannot see constructinq a new building. He felt that there are a lot of empty buildings in Fridley, and $2,000,000 should not be spent on somethinq that is not needed. Mr. Dave Gilbert, 517 67th Avenue, stated that he has lived in Fridley for 27 years. He felt that the Task Force did a good job � and showed that they could work together with other communities. He stated that he is in favor of a regional senior center, but he did not want to lose the building because of the question of the location. He stated that there is tto way to devise a building that suits everyone, and if the Council wants to change the Task Force's recommendation, that is their privilege. Mr. Harold Malcolm, 7556 Van Buren Street, stated that he has lived in Fridley far 27 years, and he has been very pleased with the way the City has operated in all respects. He stated that he is in favor of a senior center, but wants it to include only Fridley. He felt that they should either add to the Community Education Center or construct a new building, but they should build according to the future needs. Ms. Fern Swanson, 312 Rice Creek Terrace, stated that she has lived in Fridley since 1946. She stated that as a taxpayer and a senior citizen, she has had no input on this proposed regional senior Center. She stated that it is unfair to ask taxpayers to pay for frills they would not use such as the weight lifting equipment or the trees in the walkinq area. Ms. Swanson stated it has been said that Fridley would pay the larqest share, and she was previously told there was no working capital. She questioned if a building this large was needed and � that possibly a smaller building should be considered. She asked why the City now has funds to construct such a large building. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17 1993 PAGE 11 � Councilman Schneider stated that there is not enough funds to build an adequate building on the Cityos own; therefore, the joint venture was considered. He stated that the cost would be split between the four communities. Ms. Swanson felt that the cost could be reduced without all the frills. If Fridley has funds available, she questioned why they could not be used only for Fridley, Ms. Joan Olson, 6320 Van Buren Street, stated that she is not against the senior center. She felt that there is a need, but her concern is with the joint powers agreement. She is worried Fridley would lose control of the finances. She questioned what would happen if some of the cities voted to add to the building and others did not want to go along with it. She felt that a joint powers agreement should be entered into with the school district to expand the Community Education Center. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there seems to be a perception that Fridley does not enter into other joint power agreements. She stated that the City does have other joint power agreements, and they are worked out where one city cannot take control. There are safeguards for everyone concerned. � Mayor Nee asked Mr. Burns what controls would be in this joint powers agreement. Mr. Burns stated that there is no �oint powers agreement as of this date. He stated that if the City Council approves the concept, staff would begin negotiating a joint powers agreement. He stated that the Task Force recommended an outline for such an agreement, but a lot of issues would have to be addressed. He stated that the governing board for the senior center would present a budget to the four city councils every year. He stated that if the budget proposal is greater than the growth in the consumer price index or inflation, then it would take all four city councils �o approve the budget. He stated that if the proposed budget is equal to or less than the consumer price index, then three out of the four city councils could approve the budget. He stated that this provision is just a Task Force recommendation at this point. Ms. Sue Miskowic, 153 Hartman Circle, stated �hat her comments are not meant as criticism of any individuals. She stated that she believes the citizens elect a Mayor and City Council to speak for them, and not all of them are speaking for the citizens tonight. She stated that she has been made to feel like a second class citizen because she is over 65. She stated that there are approximately 5,230 senior citizens living in Fridley, and about two hundred of them use the facilities at the existing senior � center. That is not a good percentage. She questioned how this proposed building that costs $2,000,000 would be filled. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17 1993 PAGE 12 � Ms. Miskowic stated that if you want to be treated like a second class senior citizen in Fridley, follow a senior citizen who has a problem. She stated that City staff's response when she has called them is to laugh at you. She stated that they insist that someone is just doing some interior decorating when they are putting up walls and steps and don't need a building permit. Ms. Miskowic stated that senior citizens were called on the school referendum, but the person in charge of the high schools received a raise that would have taken care of the referendum. Ms, Miskowic stated that there is a great deal of thought put into a lot of projects, but she never saw a project yet that made budget. She felt that a referendum would be necessary. Ms. Regina Tony, 5898 Hackmann Avenue, stated she Pelt that possibly more should be spent on programs for young people. She stated that there are churches and other places that have plenty of room and could be used by senior citizens, but she felt the young people should have a place. Mr, Stan Mack, 1460 Rice Creek Drive, stated that he was here in support of the senior center. He stated that he is the father of young children and is presently Assistant Superintendent, Directoz of Personnel, far the osseo School District and has also been � employed in several ot�er school districts over the years. He stated that all these communities have wonderful active and groductive senior citizen programs. He stated that he believes these activities become the centier of the community and involve young people, as well as making sure the school and senior citizen community is one, He felt that the jaint venture with the other communities was the way to proceed. He felt that a senior center would be supported by young people. Mr. Mack stated that one of the reasons he chose to live in Fridley was because of the mixture of a wide range of ages. He wanted to live in a community that provided opportunities for senior citizens and youngsters to react. He stated that he believes the children need to qrow up livinq with senior citizens. Ms. Connie Bernardy, 6840 Siverts Lane, asked if plans Por a senior center would proceed if the proposed site is not available. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that plans would still proceed looking at other alternatives. Ms. Bernardy stated that she is trying to protect the open space, as she felt these open spaces need to be protected since there is more and more development in the City. She stated that she was ' pleased that the Metropolitan Council had the ioresight to have an Parks Opsn Space Commission which voted 7 to 1 not to let this regional land be destroyed by a regional senior center. She stated � � � that the citizens need to make sure this open space is not destroyed. Mr. Don Findell, 6850 Siverts Lane, stated that when the Rice Creek park site was selected for this proposed senior center, he knew it was the wrong location. He stated that the Metropolitan Council"s Open Space Commission decided it was the wrong site, as they do not believe in destroying open land either. He stated that it is unconscionable that the Task Force and City spent so much money on a site that could not be approved. He stated that the City spent about $18,000 on plans and specifications in addition to $300 to $400 of staff time. He stated that that is an enormous amount to spend on a project that could not get off the ground. He stated that he would like an apology from those who referred to them as 01not in my back yard�� people. He stated that they are ��not in my back yard" people, but strong, dedicated people. Ms. Ione Swanson, 6064 Woody Lane, stated that she was enthusiastic about this proposed regional senior center and about the fact that the four communities are involved. She stated that she liked the sharing of ideas and seniors helping each other, Ms. Marguerite Gilbert, 517 67th Avenue, stated that she wanted to re-emphasize that even though it may not be possible to use the original site, she felt that the plans should proceed for a senior center. Mr. Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, stated that there are two hundred people who use the existing senior center. He opposes spending $2,000,000 for a senior center that is not needed. He stated that it is projected there will be 13,000 seniors by the year 2010, but everyone will not be here forever. He stated that the Blaine Senior Center is a nice facility, but he is still against the proposed regional senior center. Councilwoman Sorgenson stated that there has been reference that there are only about two hundred residents using the existing senior center. She stated that over fifteen hundred individuals use this facility on a monthly basis, and these are not duplicated numbers, Mr. Leon Hinkle, 50 70th Way, stated that plans were drawn up for this location, and if the senior center is not located on this site another whole set of plans will have to be drawn up, Councilman Schneider stated that there were two sets of conceptual drawings for this site and an alternate site. He stated that he did not believe they were construction drawings, Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that the plans are not site specific. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETZNG OF MAY 17 1993 PAGE 14 � Mr. Jim Jorgenson, 5730 Polk Street, stated that he personally is very supportive of this regional senior center. Ae felt that a project like this over the years will not cost anyone a dime, buk actually save money. He stated that the true advantage of a senior center is that it wi11 extend the quality years of the senior population. He stated that in looking at the programs the senior center would offer, it increases the enthusiasm of the senior citizens to participate and grow. Because of this, they will be healthier and en�oy their later years. Ae stated that these seniors will not be in the nursing homes which are subsidized by the taxpayers. He stated that he feels the senior center is an excellent idea, and he supports this quality project. Ms. Beverly Talbot, 509 67th Avenue, stated that she felt the Senior Center would be �ust wonderful for Fridley. She stated that her mother is 75 years o1d and was depressed but is now active and taking part in senior activities. MOTION by Councilman Billings to receive the communications from this past week into the record pertaininq to the Regional Senior Center. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Billings to keep the record open to receive � any additional written comments that may be received. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Billings stated that in the presentation by the City Manaqer, it was noted what activities could take place at this proposed Regional Senior Center. He stated that in the course of conversation this evening, Councilwoman Jorgenson indicated that most of these activities are already available at the existing senior center, and the other three communities are lacking these activities. Mr. Burns stated that he believes that is correct. Councilman Billings stated that looking at the various activities outlined, some are recurring under several of the programs such as the volunteer activities, Chore Services, and wellness. He stated that he would like some comparison as to the amount of time the center would be used for recreational and quasi-recreational programs and also what percentage of time would be used for these programs. Mr. Burns stated thati he would research this information. Councilman Billings also questioned the ratio of 13,000 seniors in � the City by the year 2010. He stated that there could be a situation where sixty percent of the population could be 65 or older. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993 PAGE 15 � Mr. Burns stated that a large percentage of the population are baby boomers, and by the year 2010 they will be senior citizens. Councilman Billings stated that the $186,00o per year debt service for twenty years was projected several years ago. Tn today's market and interest rates that may be less. Counailman Billings stated that in the Parks and Recreation portion of the Five Year Capital Improvements Pian, $150,000 a year is anticipated for park type improvementsa He stated that with the regional senior center, it would be a building project that is going to be equal to about fifty percent of what the City spends on all other capital improvements for parks throughout the City. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that a number of citizens expressed interest in expanding or remodeling the Community Education Center owned by School District No. 14. She stated that she would like to determine if this is possible before the next Council meeting. She stated that she has been told that this is not possible, as a certain amount of green space per student has to be maintaineda She stated that she would like to find out if there is the potential for expansion on that school property. Mr. Burns stated that staff has researched this to some extent. � In conversations with Superintendent Rens, he indicated that it was possible. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that if this is a possibility, she would like to look at a combined program with the school district. She questioned if a seniors program would be as it now exists on the basis of availability of space or if there would be designated space for senior activities. She stated that she would have reservations on expanding this �uilding only to be told it was needed by the school district and that the seniors would have to move. Councilman Schneider stated that if it is possible to expand the Community Education Center, he would like a ballpark cost estimate to expand the facility. He asked the cost factor if all four cities were included. Mr. Burns stated that he would do his best to work with the architect to obtain those figures. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she would also like to know if there is any asbestos material that may have to be removed in the Community Education Center. Approximately one hundred persons were in attendance at this public � hearing. 1 FRIDLEY CITY CdONCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993 PAGE 16 MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to ad7ourn this meeting to the Council Chambers at the Fridley Municipal Center to reconvene in order to consider the other agenda items. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee dealared the motion carried unanimously and the meeting adjourned at 9:32 p.m. to the Fridley Municipal Center. RECONVENED MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL AT THE MUNICIPAL CENTERY Mayor Nee reconvened the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council at 10:05 p.m., after the public hearing held at the Fridley Middle School regarding the proposed Regional Senior Center. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson Councilman Billings, Councilman Schneider and Councilman Fitzpatrick None PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION: PUBLIC WORKS WEEK: MAY 17 - MAY 24, 1993: ' Mr. Burns, City Manager, read a proclamation proclaiming the week of May 17 through May 24, 1993 as Public Works Week. Mayor Nee issued this proclamation and called upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the problems involved in providing our public works, and to recognize the � contributions which public works personnel make every day to our health, safety and comforte Mr. Paul Lawrence, Public Works Superintendent, received this proclamation from Mayor Nee. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING, MAY 3, 1993: Councilman Schneider stated that on Page 11, paragraph 3, line 3, the word "they" should be eliminated. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes with the above correction. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ------------- � � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY li, 1993 PAGE 17 OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Mr. Dave Harris stated that he has a problem with the dumpsters at his property at 250 Commerce Circle South, He stated that people are dumping trash, and his tenants do not have a place to deposit their own items. He stated that because af the code requirements that the dumpster be sareened, it may provide a means for people to use the dumpster. He felt that if the dumpster was more visible there may be less dumping. Mr. Harris stated that there is also a problem with truck traffic on Commerce Circle South. He stated that on Commerce Circle, trucks cannot make their turn so they either go into the wrong lane or drive on the grass at the park. He felt that there should be a sign indicating no truck traffic going south. Ae also stated that on 69th and University, trucks going out to University Avenue to proceed north block the intersection at Rice Creek Boulevard. He felt that this truck trafflc should be oriented to the north where there is a wider road system. He stated that he would like to see a sign indicating tto trucks south of Columbia Arena. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION REOUEST, SAV #93-01, BY MARK AND JEAN SCHWARTZ AND FRANK AND VALLIE LABANDZ, TO VACATE AN ALLEY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN 1356 AND 1372 64TH AVENUE N.E.� MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 10:09 p.m. Ms, Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this is a request for a vacation of an alley generally located between 1356 and 1372 64th Avenue. She stated that there are utilities and a sanitary sewer line located within the alley. Ms. Dacy stated that the alley could potentially provide access to the rear properties fronting on Central Avenue, as the alley extends south to Rice Creek Road. She stated that there is an oppartunity for these properties to be splrt if an additional east/west street is constructed midway between Rice Creek Road and 64th Avenue. She stated that vacating the alley could potentially limit access and possibly eliminate a cross-connection with a potential east/west street. Ms. T]acy stated that staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval of this vacation subject to a street and utility easement in place of the vacated alley and the petitioners executinq and recording a hold-harmless agreement. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993 PAGE 18 � Ms. Dacy stated that the City Attorney was concerned at the last meeting aHout the purpose of vacating the alley based on his interpretation that the current owners have ownership as fee owners, and that the dedication merely gives the City the right to construct the alley. She stated that Mrs. Schwartz has noted her objection to a street easement. Councilman Schneider asked why a street easement would neefl to be retained. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that the problem has to do with the wetlands. Based on new rules dealing with wetlands, plans on how to provide access may be affected. Councilman Schneider stated that he understands staff's concern with providing future access, but he did not feel the street easemettt was essential as additional property would have to be acquired to construct a street at this location. Mr. Flora stated that any north/south street would require additional right-of-way. He stated that if the City retains a utility and street easement, they do not have to renegotiate that property. � Mrs. Schwartz, the petitioner, stated that she has no problem with the utility easement or the hold-harmless agreement. 5he stated that if there was a street constructed, the City would either have to purchase or condemn the property. She stated that it would be more logical to construct a street out to Rice Creek Road. She stated that it does not seem logical to construct a northjsouth street between Rice Creek Road and 64th Avenue when it is only three houses away from Central Avenue. She stated that the alley has been platted for 52 years and has never been used for anything. She stated that they would like to own the land so they could use it as they wish. She stated that they have maintained this property for the last 7-1f2 years. She stated that she would be agreeable to the street easement, if it was absolutely necessary, but did not see the need. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that if the Council feels that there is a need to maintain a street easement, the vacation should probably be denied. He stated that the City has an easement for street purposes of 15 feet now which is referred to as an alley easement which is the same as a street easement. He stated that if the vacation is approved and a street easement is required, this process would vacate a 15 foot easement and create another 15 foot easement which does not accomplish anything. Counoilman Schneider asked about the issue of fee ownership. � Mr. Herrick stated that this alley was created when the plat was filed. That being the case, the fee to the alley belongs to the FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OE MAY 17. 1993 PAGE 19 � properties on each side, one half to each property owner sa they own the alley subjeat to an easement over it which would permit the City to install an a11ey on that 15 feet, as well as the utilities that have already been installed in the eas�ment. He stated that he indicated to Mrs. Schwartz earlier that at the present time they could install a fence down the middle of the alley or plant a garden or shrubs, ss long as they understood that at some future time the Council may decide to install an alley. Mr. Aerrick stated that if the alley is vacated, and no street easement is required, the only difference is the Schwartz's would still own it in fee title, but would not be encumbered with an alley easement. He stated that the logical approach would be to approve the vacation without the street easement or else deny the vacation. Mrs. Schwartz stated that she cannot see how they own fee title now, as it is not on their title. Mr. Herrick asked if she had a Torrens or abstract title. Mrs. 5chwartz stated that it was an abstract title. Mr. Herrick stated that this probably is not included, but the rule is where easements are created by the plat, the fee owner goes to the adjacent properties. The Schwartz's have fee ownership subject � to an easement on that portion of the property. Councilman Schneider stated that it seems there are options for future Councils without the street easement. Councilman Billings questioned the five foot strip on the west side. Ms. Dacy stated that in 1961, the City obtained an easement from the Labandz's property. She stated that she assumes it was for additional space for installation of the sewer or possibly at that time there was some thought given to an alley, Councilman Billinqs stated that if the alley is vacated, the City would end up with a five foot piece of land that has an easement over it for streets and utilities. Ms. Dacy stated that if the Council chose not to require the street easement, there still would have to be a utility easement. Mr. Herrick stated that i£ the alley easement is vacated, the street easement on that five foot portion should also be vacated but the utility easement maintained. � Councilman Schneider asked if this was discussed with the Labandz's. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCTL MEETING OF MAY 17. 1993 PAGE 20 � Ms. Dacy stated that she was sure they would not object to vacating the five foot street easement based on their comments at the Planning Commission meetinq. Councilman Billings stated that before he could vote on this issue, he would like to find out why the City purchased the additional five feet of property. He stated that the City would be giving away sixteen feet and reoeiving no compensation. A future Council may have to negotiate and purcriase this property when the City already has title to it. Mrs. Schwartz stated that the overhead power lines are only three feet from that five foot easement, so it may have been required to install those lines. No other persons in the audienoe spoke regarding this proposed vacation. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 1�:4� p.m. 3. ORDINANCE NO. 1013 AMENDING CHAPTER 113, "SOLID WASTE DISPOSAZ � AND RECYCLING COLLECTION," BY AMENDING SECTIONS 113.01, 113.07, 113.11, 113.13, 113.15, AND CHAPTER 220, "RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROPERTY AND CONDOMINIUM AREA MAINTENANCE," BY AMENDING SECTION 220.09, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 11, "GENERAL PROVISIONS AND FEES FOR SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT PROGRAMMING.°1 BY AMENOING SECTION 113: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading and adopt ordinance No. 1013 on the seoond reading and order publication, Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. A. APPROVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OR FRIDLEY AND NEW BRIGHTON FOR THE DESIGN, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR PHASE FOR THE INTERCONNECTION OF THEIR WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS (TASLED MAY 3, 19931• MOTION by Councilman Billings to remove this item from the table. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Flora, Public Wo�ks Director, stated that the Council received an amended copy of this agreement incorporating the amendments proposed by the Council at the last meeting. He stated that it is recommended that Council approve the agreement. � Councilman Schneider stated that he just received the document this evening. He asked if this is the same document with the amendments, FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17. 1993 PAGE 21 � Mr. Flora stated that the Council's amendments were incorporated into the agreement. Also added were several phrases identifying the remedy the City would have £or any volatile organic carbons or iron or manganese elements within the water. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that he received a copy of the agreement this morning and reviewed the document. He stated tha� all the amendments the Council requested at the last meeting are included, and he did not find any inconsistencies with the amendments. Mr. Flora stated that the Army does not want to proceed until the two cities agree to the TCAAP concept. The agreement is one step in moving forward. Councilman Billings asked if this agreement contains the amendments from the last Council meeting. Mr. Flora stated that it contains the changes and also the added phrases for remedies the City would have for volatile organic carbons or iron or manganese elements within the water. Councilman Schneider stated that the sense of all the amendments are included, but the exact wording is somewhat different. � Mr. Flora stated that the agreement submitted to the Council this evening is the one he and the City Attorney reviewed. Councilman Schneider stated that he did not have a problem with the changes but with the process. He stated that he does not think it is reasonable to have a vote on this because the Council just received it. Mr. Flora stated that New Brighton was to get this agreement to Fridley on Friday. However, this was not done, and it was beyond staff's control. MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the agreement between the cities of Fridley and New Brighton for the design, maintenance and repair phase for the interconnection of the water distribution systems, as amended at the last Council meeting and, as further amended by staff, and presented this evening. Further, to direct the appropriate City officials to execute this agreement. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a roll call vote, Councilman Billings, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Mayor Nee and Councilman Fitzpatrick voted in favor of �he motion. Councilman Schneider voted against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a 4 to 1 vote. � Mayor Nee stated that he shares Councilman Schneider's concerns regarding the late hour this agreement was received. � � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17 1993 PAGE 22 NEW BUSINESS: APPROVE RE9UEST BY ST. PHILIP'S LUTHERAN CHURCH TO WAIVE THE TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT REQUIREMENTS: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this is a request by St. Philip's Church to waive the sign permit fee and deposit requirement, as well as the length of time a sign may be displayed. She stated that they are proposing a free standing temporary sign for a four to six month period, and temporary signs are only permitted for 28 days. MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the temporary sign permit fee and deposit requirement, but enforce the rest of the code for a temporary sign permit. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 7. 1993, ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing for June 7, 1993 on this proposed amendment of Chapter 3 of the Fridley City Charter. Seconded by Councilman Billings, Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1993-10 (SEALCOATI: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the following bids for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1993-10 (Sealcoat): Bidder Caldwell Asphalt Company 24060 175th St. N.E. Hawick, MN 56246 Astech Corp. P.O. Box 1025 St. Cloud, MN 56302 Allied Blacktop T0503 89th Avenue Maple Grove, MN 55369 Bituminous Roadways 2725 Cedar Avenue S. Minneapolis, MN 55407 Total Bid $25,734.02 $30,521.05 $31,768.42 $34,159.10 Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. L_ _I � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993 PAGE 23 Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that four bids were received for this project, and the low bidder was Caldwell Asphalt Company with a total bid of $25,734.02. He stated that it is recommended the contract be awarded ta them. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for Street Improvement Praject No. ST. 1993-10 (Sealcoat) to the low bidder, Caldwell Asphalt Company in the amount of $25,734.02. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER N0. 1, ELECTRICAL CONVERSION OF WELL NOS. 2, 4, 5, 6 AND 7, PROJECT N0. 238: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that during the electrical conversion work of Well Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7, it was discovered lby Killmer Electric Company that the underground existing feeder from well house No. Fi to well house No. 2 does not have an equipment grounding conductor which is required by code. He stated that it would also be advantageous to save future costs to move the variable frequency drive (VFD) motor into well house No. 2 in lieu of the original plans to install it in well house No. 6. He stated that by placing the VFD in the same building as the well motor, it would be running at extremely desirable conditions not only for operations but for safety. Mr. Flora requested that Council approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $12,912.00. MOTiON by Councilman Schneider to authorize Change Order No. T, Electrical Conversion for Well Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7, Project No. 238, with Iiillmer Electric Company in the amount of $12,912.00. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 9. MOTION TO APPROVE ABATEMENT OF PENALTY, INTEREST AND COST FOR DAVID HARI2IS FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 250 COMMERCE CIRCLE SOUTH. PACO INDUSTRIAL PARK: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the Council has received a communication from John McLinden, Anoka County Administrator, regarding a notice of abatement of penalty, interest, and cost for property at 250 Commerce Circle South, Paco Industrial Park, owned by David Harris. He stated that the County Soard of Commissioners wili consider granting the abatement if neither the school district or the municipality do not object. He stated that the total is $22,369.32, and the City's share of the penalty, interest and cost is approximately $3,000. He stated that the City should either object or not object to this abatement. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to not object to the abatement of penalty, interest and cost for the property at 250 Commerce Circle FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17. 1993 PAGE 24 � South, Paco industrial Park, owned by David Harris. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Councilman Schneider stated that he talked to the County Commissioners, the School District, and Dave Harris in regards to this abatement. He stated that he has a conoern that there is a loophole in the State law that provides some substantial relief under certain circumstances for industrial and commercial properties and that a similar process is not available for residential property owners. Councilman Schneider stated that Mr. Harris was in a very awkward financial situation when his bank was taken over by RTC, and they reneged on a commitment to Mr. Harris. Councilman Schneider stated that he is sympathetic to that problem. Councilman Schneider stated that the real problem is that the opportunity for abatement is not available for homeowners, and this seems wrong. He stated that he would vote against this motion for that reason. Perhaps the policy should be reviewede Councilman Schneider stated that in talking with Dr. Huber of the School District, they did not have a formal vote but an informal poll of the School Board. � UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, Councilwoman Jorqenson, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Mayor Nee and Councilman Billings voted in favor of the motion, Councilman Schneider voted against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a 4 to 1 vote. 10. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that there were no informal status reports. 11. CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize payment of Claim Nos. 49257 through 49515. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. LICENSES• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as subrnitted and as on Pile in the License Clerk's O£fice, Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � � � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993 PAGE 25 13. ESTIMATES: MOTION by Councilwoman Sorgenson to approve the estimates as submitted: Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. 400 Northtown Financial Plaza 200 Coon Rapids Blvd Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Statement for Services Rendered as City Attorney for the Month of April, 1993 . . . . . . . . Innovative Irrigation 10006 University Avenue N.W. Coon Rapids, MN 55448 Corridor Maintenance Project No. 243 Estimate No. 1 . . . Jon Isaacson Lawn Care 19910 Dassel Lane Rogers, MN 55374 Lake Pointe Maintenance Project No. 244 Estimate No. 1 . . . . . Gunderson Brothers 2325 Snelling Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55404 Misc. Concrete Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Project No. 245 Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . e e . . Northwest Asphalt 1451 County Road 8 Shakopee, MN 55379 1992 Street Improvement Project No. ST 1992 - 1& 2 Estimate No. 7 . . . . . . $ 7,133.64 $ 3,549.91 $ 3,283.90 . $ 5,595.97 . . . . $ 7,683.20 Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � _� � � ERIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1993 PAGE 26 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of May 17, 1993 adjourned at 11:17 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad Secretary to the City Council Approved: William J. Nee Mayor