The URL can be used to link to this page

09/18/1995 - 4882OFFICIAL CITY COIINCIL AGENDA COIINCIL MEETING SEPTEM88R 18� 1995 '`�_:� ' ana fRlDLkY FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING ATTENDENCE SHEET M�nday, Sey��embe�c. 18, 1995 7:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER /`� � Mz��a ,�Ny�p� ,� ,.� T.s��tif � .� . '°�t1 �� -�U �J � l' ,4 � 9 J .fu /�'l � - S�� / �P��.l- � ; 1 e �� z �� t s� �� C �--� �s ��- � Grz�� - �� , i��-�. � �: }:g i I i 'p Y� � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF � cmr oF SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 FRIDLEY The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabiliries to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Heazing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of September 11, 1995 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the City Code of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, by Making a Change in Zoning Districts (Rezoning Request, ZOA #95-05, by Karl and Margaret Schurr for Minco Products, 7321 Commerce Lane N. E. ) (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.01 - 1.03 � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 Page 2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSfNESS (CONTINUED�. First Reading of an Ordinance Under Section 12.07 of the City Charter to Vacate Streets and Aileys and to Amend Appendix C of the City Code (Vacation Request, SAV #95-03, by Karl and Margaret Schurr for Minco Products, 7321 Commerce Lane N. E. ) (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.01 - 2.04 i`'{;Z1±`i�i � t# ;9�=��-@�- 9fl - �It'� �iC@ Approving Official Title and Summary of Ordinance No. 1056, Creating Floodplain Regulations .............. 3.01-3.02 Receive the Minutes of the Planning - Commission Meeting of September 6, 1995 ..................................... 4.01-4.06 Resolution Approving a Subdivision, Lot Split, L.S. #95-01, to Take Property and Split it into Five Separate Parcels (Parcels A- E), Generally Located at 520 Dover Street N.E. (Ward 3) ..... ......... 5.01-5.09 � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18,1995 Page 3 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED� Motion to Advertise for Bids for the 53rd Avenue Booster Station Renovation Proiect No. 280 (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.01 - 6.03 Approve 1996 School Referendum Levy Return Agreements (School District Nos. 11, 13, 14 and 16) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.01 - 7.33 Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll for 1995 Tree Abatement (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.01 - 8.02 Resolution Directing Publication of Hearing on Proposed Assessment Roll for the 1995 Tree Abatement (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.01 - 9.04 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 Page 4 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED� Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll for 1995 Service Connection (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.01 - 10.02 Resolution Directing Publication of Hearing on Proposed Assessment Roll for the 1995 Service Connection (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.01 - 11.04 Resolution Directing Preparation of - Assessment Roll for Street Improvement Project No. Street 1993 - 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12.01 -12.02 Resolution Directing Publication of Hearing on Proposed Assessment Roll for Street Improvement Project No. Street 1993 - 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13.01 - 13.04 � . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . � - . . � . � �. FR� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCiL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 Page 5 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED): Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll for Street Improvement Project No. Street 1992 - 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.01 - 14.02 Resolution Directing Publication of Hearing on Proposed Assessment _ Roll for Street Improvement Project No. Street 1992 - 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.01 -15.04 Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll for the 64th Avenue Storm Water Improvement Project No.260 .................................. 16.01-16.02 Resolution Directing Publication of Hearing on Proposed Assessment Roll for the 64th Avenue Storm Water Improvement Project No. 260 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.01 - 17.04 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 9995 Page 6 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED� Appointment - City Employee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18.01 Claims ................................... 19.01 _ Licenses ................................. 20.01 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: (Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes) FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 Page 7 PUBLIC HEARING: Revocation/Suspension of Intoxicating Liquor License for Sharx Club, Generally Located at 3720 East River Road (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . 21.01 - 21.02 ; � NEW BUSINESS: Receive Bids, Award Contract and Approve Change Order No. 1 for '1995 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1995 - 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.01 - 22.07 Informal Status Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23.01 ADJOURN: , � . � � - ;'�.� f G�" 6 FR/D[FY CITY CaUNC/L MFFiING 0►1�SFpiFMBFR 1S, l995 � The City of Fridley wi11 not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, � �Y or empioyment in its services, progranis, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, � disability, age, marital status, sexual orientatioa or siat�s with regard to public assistance_ Upon request, accommodation wi11 be provided to atlow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridtey's services, progruns, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an inteipreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta CoWns at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (1TD/572-3534) PLEOGE OF ALLEGIANCE- APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of September � 1, i995 L-�� j."� ' f �,"�,.....,�.� ('��,./ APPROVAL OF PROPOSEO CONSENT AGENOA- NEW BUSINESS- First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the Cify Code of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, by Making a Change in Zoning Districts (Rezoning Request, ZOA #95-05, by Kati and Margaret Schu�r for Minco Products, 7321 Comm�ce tane N.E.) (VI/ard 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'l.01 -'1.03 . � �e�µ'G �� J f�i��K U . First Reading of an Ondinance Under Secfion 12A7 of the City Cha�ter to Vacate Streets and Alleys and to Amend Appendix C of the City Code (Vacation Requsst, SAV #95-03, by Kari and Marga�et Schurr for Minco Praducts, 7321 Commerce LaneN.E)(Ward3) --------..__ 2.09-2.04 /a�i�-:C� -��-3t�-� �.Nlaf;o� _ Approving Of�iCial Tiittee and Summary of Ordi�a�ce No.1056, Creatipg Floodplain Regutations ... 3.01- 3.02 � �� t � : ��'• NEIAI BUSINESS (CONTINUEDZ Receive the Minutes of the Planning � Commission Meeting of Septsmber 6, 1995 _ ....... ._......---. 4.01-4.06 �. � �� Resolution Approvi�g a Subdivision, Lot SpC�, LS. #95-01, to Take Property and Spfit it into Froe Separate Parcels {Paroels A - �, Generally Located at 520 Dover Street N.E. (Ward 3) ... 5.01 - 5.09 ��-��,.��c ,� � Motion to Adver6se for Bids fo� the 53rd Avenue Booster S#ation Rer�ova6on Project No. 280 " (Ward1) ..._....-•-•--_.._... 6.01-6.03 IL�J. � �,�.,--�--� i� Approve 1996 Schooi Referendum Levy Retum Agreements (School District Nos. 19, 13, 14 and 16) ..._ 7.01 - 7_33 G�/ �� Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Rol! for 1995 Tree Abatement (Ward 3) . . . . - - - - - . _ . 8.0'1 - 8.02 , � � �G�--�� , �c�' � Resoluution Oireccting Publicatio� of �-�� I e � Hearn�g o� Proposed Assessme�t � �/�'� ___ RoN f� the 1995 Tree Abatement, __ �_ (Ward31 ---------------- 9.0�-9_04 APPROVAL OF PROPOSEO CONSENT AGENOA• NEW BUSINESS (CONTiNUEO� Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll for 1995 Service Connection (V11ard 3) . . . . . . . . . . . _ 90.01 - '10.02 ; � G�....0 � �� , Resolution Oirecting Publ'�cation of Hearing on P�oposed Assessme�t Roil fo� the 9995 Service Connection (1IVa�d3j .............•-----.. 1'1.01-19.D4 C��1`�.�L ,�C'�� . Resotution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll for Street 1mp�ovement Project No. Street 1993 - 7 . . . . . . . . 12.01-12.02 Ca...{-��, ,�� : . Resolution Directing PubCx�ion of Hearing o� Proposed AsseSSment Roll fo� Street Improvemeni Project No. Street 'I 993 - 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13.01-13.04 �.4��"'�" v�� Resolution Oirecting Preparabion of Assessment Roii fo� Street lmproveme�t Project No. Street 9992 -2 . . . _ . . . . 94.01 -14_02 , Cc GL c�- �t Resolution Directing Pub!'�cation of Hearing on Proposed Assessme� Roll for Streei improvement Project No.Street1992-2 _____________ 15.01-15.04 �,��--� �� : Resolution Oirecting Preparation of � Assessment Rol1 fo� the 64th Avenue Stonn Wate� Improvement Project � �-� No. 260 . . . _ . . . . . 16.01-16.02 LL 2 �.�`� v�� , . NEW BUSiNESS (CONTINUEDI- Resolution Directing Publication of Hearing on P�oposed Assessment Roll for the 64th Avenue Storm Water Improvement Project No. 260 . . _ . _ 17_01 - �7.04 � �--y�w�� ,i v� y ,- Appointment - Cii�r Employee . . . _ . 18.01 Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19.01 ucenses . _ -��1''.�'''�''.� . _ 20.01 0 ADOPTION OF AGENOA- �,��'-�� 'u`.`�- �-- OPEN FORUM. VISlTORS: �i�_/� .� - �i� • r� ` (Considera6on of items not on Agenda - 95 Minutesl / �" �`.�''`" � . QUBLIC HEARiNG: RevocationlSuspension of Intoxicating Liquor License for Shaa Club, Genera(ly Located at 3720 East River Road (V1/ard 3) . 21.01- 21.02 � �- 7��-�-� - � G�--� � .� NEW BUSINESS: Receive Bids, Award Contract and Approve Change Otder No. 1 for 9995 Street Improvemenf Projec# No.ST.1995-2 ...--•---•----........ 22_09-22.07• �� ,�� lnfomial Status Repo�ts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23.01 , ��c Gv`7�.• �L��.i+� �" . �� `"� � ��.;.i T�z-�-� ��l,e�r.� _ `�. .G"-C��..-- �- L�,/�-�-�°✓ : � ,- AOJO RN: _ _._ ; _ �' �S� � �i _ -- - . THE MINIITES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MLETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 � THE MINUTES OF THE REGIILAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Co�zncil was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Billings, Councilman Schneider and Councilwoman Bolkcom MEMBERS ABSENT: None PROCLAMATION• VALUES FIRST WEEK, SEPTEMBER 17 - 23, 1995: Mayor Nee read and issued a proclamation proclaiming the-week of September 17 through 23 as Values First Week. He encouraged all residents to actively participate in the Values First program. He stated that the community values are respect, integrity, caring, responsibility, self-control, non-violence, and citizenship. Mayor Nee stated that, in his opinion, the primary energizer for this values program was Commissioner Jim Kordiak. He presented the proclamation to Commissioner Kordiak and stated that he appreciated the leadership he has provided for this program. Commissioner Kordiak stated that he was pleased to accept the proclamation on behalf of the Values First Committee. He stated that this committee had a great amount of support, as the citizens selected the core values. He stated that nine committees are working to develop a program with the core of values. He stated that he is attending a meeting of the business community to deter- mine what can be done to promote these values. Commissioner Kordiak outlined the activities planned for the week of September 17 - 23. He stated that on Tuesday, September 19, Dr. David Walsh will be speaking at the Fridley High School Auditorium and on Thursday, SepteYnber 21, Ms. Judith Rice will be speaking at Murzyn Hall in Columbia Heights. He stated that on Saturday, September 23, there will be an ice cream social at the athletic field west of Fridley High School. He thanked the Mayor and the City Council for this proclamation. Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that the Values First Committee is looking for volunteers and trying to raise funds to give everyone in the schools a tee-shirt. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11. 1995 PAGE 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING, AUGUST 28, 1995: MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the �inutes as presented. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: 1. ORDINANCE NO. 1056 RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 205, ENTITLED "ZONING," BY AMENDING SECTION 205.25.8.C, AND REPEALING SECTION 205.24 AIJD ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 205.24 CREATING FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated°that this ordinance was first adopted in 1977 to limit development in the floodway and permit development that meets standards in the flood fringe district. He stated that the amendments provide for the creation of a third district, "General Floodplain District" that includes both floodway and flood fringe districts. He stated that there are no changes to the ordinance as it relates to floodway and flood fringe districts and no changes to the boundaries of this district. Mr. Burns stated that the amendment also provides additional standards for manufactured homes, manufactured home parks, and placement of travel trailers on travel vehicles. He stated that since Fridley does not permit manufactured homes or travel trailers in floodway or flood fringe districts, this amendment will have no affect on the City's residents. Mr. Burns stated that Council requested removal of the special use permit requirement to build in the flood fringe district, and this has been dorie. He stated that the changes in the ordinance were requested by the Federal Emergency Management Association and the Department of Natural Resources. WAIVED THS READING AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 1056 ON THE SECOND READING AND ORDERED PIIBLICATION. NEW BUSINESS• 2. RESOLUTION NO. 51-1995 ADOPTING A PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1996: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this preliminary draft budget is submitted in conformance with the State Statutes and must be certified to the County Auditor by September 15, 1995. He stated that this budget is used as a basis for establishing the levy. He stated that the levy can be reduced but not increased. He stated that this levy does include $182,000 to FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 PAGE 3 address the gap between revenues and expenditures. He stated that most funds are less than last year, but capital project funds are greater. ADOPTED RESOLIITION NO. 51-1995. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 52-1995 CERTIFYING PROPOSED TAX LEVY RE4UIRE- MENTS FOR 1996 TO THE COUNTY OF ANOKA: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this 1996 proposed tax levy of $3,897,629 represents a 6.2 percent increase over the 1995 certified levy. He stated that this is a result of a four percent increase in the property tax levy and a four percent decrease in the Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 52-1995. 4. EXTENSION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #94-10, BY DAVID AND PATRICIA YOUNKIN, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A SECOND ACCESSORY STRUCTURE OVER 240 54UARE FEET, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5401 MATTERHORN DRIVE N.E. (WARD 2�: Mr. Burns, City Manger, stated that the petitioners, David and Patricia Younkin, have requested a one-year extension of their special use permit which was originally approved on September 19, 1994. He stated that this special use permit was to aZlow construction of a second accessory building over 240 square feet. APPROVED A ONE YEAR E%TENSION OF SPECIAL IISE PERMIT, SP #94-10, WITH THE SAME 3TIPULATIONS. 5. EXTENSION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #94-12 , BY MONTE AND MICHELLE MAHER, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY HOME IN THE FLOOD FRINGE DISTRICT GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7965 RIVERVIEW TERRACE N.E. (WARD 3): AND EXTENSION OF A VARIANCE RE4UEST, VAR #94-20, BY MONTE AND MICHELLE MAHER, TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 40 FEET TO 30 FEET, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7965 RIVERVIEW TERRACE N.E. (WARD 3): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the petitioners, Monte and Michelle Maher, have requested a one-year extension of their special use permit and variance request. He stated.that the special use permit was approved by the City Council on October 3, 1994. The variance approval was unanimous by the Appeals Commission and Council action was not necessary. APPR(.1VED A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL IISE PERMIT� SP #94-12, WIT$ THE SAME STIPOLATIONB, AND A ONE-YEAR EBTENSION OF VARIANCE REQOEST, VAR #94-20. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 PAGE 4 6. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR WASHINGTON STREET WATER MAIN REPAIR PROJECT NO. 272: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that bids were received to replace 400 feet of eight inch water main for Washington Street. He stated that the existing pipe is worn by elements in the soil and has been the subject of numerous water main breaks. Mr. Burns stated that the bids were higher than anticipated, and the low bidder was Penn Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $39,765. He stated that there are savings from other projects to cover this overage. RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 272: Bidder Penn Contracting, Inc. Centerville, MN 55038 Bonine Excavating, Inc. Elk River, NIN 55330 Volk Sewer & Water Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 H & M Asphalt Company Elk River, MN 55330 Northdale Construction Rogers, MN 53374 Total Bid $39,765 $48,546 $60,564 $61,b60 $72,797 AWARDED THE CONTRACT TO THE LOW BIDDER, PENN CONTRACTING, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $39,T65. 7. CLAIMS• APPROVED CLAIM NOS. 63891 THROIIGH 64143. 8. LICENSES: APPROVED THE LICENSES AS SOBMITTED AND AS ON FILE IN THE LICENSE CLERIC�S OFFICE. 9. ESTIMATES• APPROVED THE FOLLOWING ESTIMATE: ASTECH Corporation P. O. BoX 1025 St. Cloud, MN 56302 1995 Street Improvement (Sealcoat) Project No. ST. 1995-10 Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $47,548.53 FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 PAGE 5 There were no comments from the audience regarding the consent agenda items. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the consent agenda items. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by CounciZman Billings to adopt the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Mr. Pete Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Street, questioned why apartment buildings were being constructed in the southwest quadrant of Mississippi Street and University Avenue. He felt that the City was closing businesses, and this area should be developed for business and not housing. He stated that many businesses were closed or moved because of the redevelopment for housing. He also questioned if there would be an increase in crime with all the different types of housing. Mayor Nee stated that the Southwest Quadrant has been available and promoted for commercial development for many years, but the market was not good. He stated that grocery stores, as well as other businesses, that tried to locate in this area had problems. He stated that the City then looked at other options and community needs and found there was a need for a special mix of housing for mainly middle and modest income persons. Mayor Nee stated that after a great deal of study, the City and the HRA felt that housing was probably a better use of this property than for commercial. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that the businesses in Holly Center are suffering because of the median. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that Mississippi Street is a County road. She stated that the County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation have more control than the City. Mr. Eisenzimmer felt that it should have been voted on by the people. He stated that Country Club Market suffered the same fate when the access from Highway 65 was closed off. Councilman Billings stated that Country Club Markets filed bank- ruptcy and closed all their stores in Minnesota. He stated that this had nothing to do with closing the median. He stated that Council did object to that closing, but the Minnesota Department of Transportation felt it would be in the best interests of the populous to close off that access. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 PAGE 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS: 10. PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONING RE4UEST, ZOA #95-05, BY KARL AND MARGARET SCHURR FOR MINCO PRODUCTS TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM C-2, GENERAL BUSINESS TO M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7321 COMMERCE LANE N.E. jWARD 3): AND PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION REOUEST, SAV #95-03, BY KARL AND MARGARET SCHURR FOR MINCO PRUDUCTS. TO VACATE A 30 FOOT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT. GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7321 COMMERCE LANE N.E. (WARD 3): MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to waive the reading of the public hearing notices and open the public hearings. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearings opened at 8:02 p.m. Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that this rezoning request is for approximately 5.4 acres to be rezoned from C-2 to M-1.along the University Avenue frontage road north of 73rd Avenue. He stated that the Planning Commission reviewed this rezoning request and recommended approval. He stated that this request meets the criteria in that it is compatible with the proposed zoning district and with the surrounding uses and zoning, and it meets the require- ments of the proposed district. He stated that three stipulations were recommended, which he outlined. Mr. Hickok stated that the purpose of the rezoning is to allow the construction of a third facility for Minco Products and to provide for expansion of the parking for one of Minco's other facilities. Mr. Hickok stated that, in conjunction with this rezoning, there is a vacation request to vacate a 30 foot utility easement. He stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of this request with two stipulations, which he outlined. Councilman Billings stated that he is very excited about this project. He stated that Mr. and Mrs. Schurr have been residents of Fridley for a long time and are taking this opportunity to expand their business in Fridley unlike some of the businesses that have gone north. He stated that he is very proud to have the Schurr's both as residents and as business owners in the City of Fridley. Mayor Nee stated that he shares Councilman Billings' views. He also said that the City Council was very proud of the Minco Company and the Schurrs' great contribution to the City. Mr. Schurr thanked Council for their compliments. He stated that this Fridley site was one of the better sites available at the time they wished to expand. He stated that he did not anticipate they FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 PAGE 7 would expand beyond the first plant; however, he did obtain another plant, and the new facility will be their third plant. He stated that it is fortunate they can expand on the land they obtained over the years. No other persons in the audience spoke for or against these rezoning and vacation requests. MOTION by Counciiwoman Bolkcom to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearings closed at 8:14 p.m. NEW BUSINESS• 11. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS: CLEAN-UP WEEK UPDATE: . Ms. Dacy presented a short video on the Clean-Up Week kickoff. She stated that there were fifteen to twenty valunteers who helped homeowners move brush to the curb for collection. Ms. Dacy stated that there has been an overwhelming response for appliance pickup �nd over 1,200 appliances will be collected. She stated that there is a handout for other disposal options, and this can be made available to residents. Ms. Dacy stated that ACCAP was scheduled to collect a number of useable household items. She stated that they have arranged for additional trucks and will make up to two hundred stops; however, they are unable to continue to schedule any additional collections. She stated that they may be abie to conduct additional collections in November. Ms. Dacy stated that they are in the process of recruiting addi- tional volunteers to assist persons in getting items to the curb. Ms. Dacy stated that after the first day of brush pickup the crews are a little behind. She stated that the monitoring crews report that the contractor is doing a good job of cleaning up after the brush is removed. She stated that there is a handout advising people where they can take trees and shrubs if they were unable to get their brush out in time. Councilman Schneider asked when the recycling center was open, as this was not clear to him. Ms. Dacy stated that the recycling hours are the same as usual and will be open this weekend. She stated that the yard waste site will also be open to accept grass clippings and yard waste. FRIDLEY CITY COONCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 PAGE 8 Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that there will be a party at Columbia Arena on Saturday evening starting at 7:00 p.m. to celebrate the clean-up. She stated that volunteers will eat free and this is another incentive to volunteer. Mr. Eisenzimmer asked where small branches and twigs that are shorter than two feet can be disposed of. Ms. Dacy stated that the contractor will take some of the smaller items. She stated that the concern is for items larger than were outlined in the brochure. Mr. Eisenzimmer asked where concrete and asphalt could be taken. Ms. Dacy stated that concrete and asphalt can be dropped off at Columbia Arena on Saturday. Ms. Dacy stated that scrap wood cannot be picked up at the curb but should be taken to the drop off site at Columbia Arena on Saturday morning. Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that there are several items to be discussed informally after this meeting and they are: location of the commemorative memorial; re-naming of two softball fields for John Gargaro; of budget adjustments; review of a Water Conservation Plan; review Flood Hazard Conservation Grant; and assessment for the storm water line on 64th Avenue. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meting of the Fridley City Council of September 11, 1995 adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secretary to the City Council Mayor r � � i DATE: TO: Community Development Department PLA►NNING DIVISION City of Fridley September 14, 1995 City Manager ��" � William Burns, FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinatar Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: First Readinq of an Ordinance Approving,a Rezoning Request, ZOA #95-05, by Karl and Margaret Schurr for Minco Products; 7321 Commerce Lane N.E. The City Council conducted a public hearing regarding the rezoning request at its September 11, 1995 meeting. There were no comments or concerns raised during the public hearing regarding the rezoning request. Staff has prepared the attached ordinance for first reading by the City Council changing the zoning on Lots 16, 17, and 18, Block 2, Commerce Park from C-2, General Business to M-1, Light Industrial. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the first reading of the attached ordinance, with the following stipulations: 1. A minor amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan shall be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The petitioner shall comply with the comments in Jon , Wilczek's memo dated August 10, 1995 prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The petitioner shall submit a landscape plan the require�aents of the M-1, Light Industrial to the issuance of a building permit. l�t/dw M-95-493 1.01 complying with district prior ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLSY, MINNESOTA BY MARING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicated. Be and is hereby rezoned,.subject to stipulations adopted at the City Council meeting of , 1995. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: Lots 16, 17, and 18, Block 2, Commerce Park, generally located at 7321 Conimerce Lane N.E. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District M-1 (Light Industrial). SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area to be rezoned from Zoned District C-2 (General Business) to M-1 (Light Industrial). PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1995. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: September 11, 1995 First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: 1.02 N M-2, HEAV�( INDUSTRIAL M-1 ZOA ��95-US and SAV ��95-03 Karl Schurr � C-2 W Minc � . z * Minco 1 � Q e �' � _ M-y, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL � � * Min o 3 W w � > — z a � W z w C7 A T 1.03 � � _ � DATE: TO: FROM: Community Development Department PLA►�VNING DIVISION City of Fridley September 14, 1995 � William Burns, City Manager�►� Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: First Reading of an Ordinance Approving,a Vacation Request, SAV #95-03, by Karl and Margaret Schurr for Minco Products; 7321 Commerce Lane N.E. The City Council conducted a public hearing regarding the vacation of a 30 foot drainage and utility easement over Lots 16 through 21, Block 2, Commerce Park at its September il, 1995 meeting. No comments or concerns were raised at the public hearing regarding the vacation request. The petitioner is required to relocate the sanitary sewer line located within the easement area. Staff has identified the following options in order of preference to be considered by the petitioner: _ A. Route the sanitary sewer line west along the property line between Lots 19 and 20, and then north along Commerce Lane to connect with the line that crosses Commerce Lane_north of the McGlynn's facility. An easement from the property owner at 7341 Commerce Lane would be required. B, Route the sanitary sewer line south to 73rd Avenue and east across University Avenue to connect with the sewer line flowing south along the east side of University Avenue. C. Route the sanitary sewer line east and then south along the West University Service Road, connecting to the existing pipe servicing the two car washes at the corner of University Avenue. A lift station would be required for which the petitioners would be responsible for long-term maintenance. At this time, the petitioner has not determined whicli option he will pursue. Staff recommends that the City Councii approve the first reading of the attached ordinance approving the vacation of a drainage .:2.01 SAV #95-03, by Minco Products September 14, 1995 Page 2 and utility easement, with two stipulations: 1. Relocating the sanitary sewer line via one of three ways identified above. 2. Obtaining or granting any easements associated with the chosen option. NIlK/dw M-95-494 2.�2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THB CITY CIiARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIB C OF T$E CITY CODE The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION l. To vacate a 30 foot drainage and utility easement which is 15 feet on each side of common Lot lines 16 and 21, 17 and 20, plus the southwest property line of Lot 17, the northwest property line of Lot 18, the north property line of Lots 18 and 19, and the south property line of Lot 20, all in Block 2, Commerce Park, generally iocated at 7321 Commerce Lane N.E. All lying in the South Half of Section 11, T-30, R- 24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Be and is hereby vacated, subject to the stipuZations adopted at the City Council meeting of , 1995. SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code shall be so amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1995. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA, CITY CLERK Public Hearing: September 11, 1995 First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: 2.03 � ^v . ., \� ,� � ''� � . ��G M �i � � < � f 4� \ � .• �,,� ; . f �� ' ; . _ ; I.': �,�' ��r' SAV ��95-03 Y �� \�-`/�..�,+�/^.� . r� • � �� '��Ig�� >��_ Minco Products , � � � - �1 r'^`1' �'�0°"� �"y�F ' �. � ti �,i.,��,,�� ,c^`�sM � — �� .- � ,..,�� r�e �� a��'1 �� M1� �� ^\ 1'� f"� g � as ,,,.,, _ n� �,;, -�. n � � .� � �` � s' `� ,e �e., "'a ` g � . � � � � a � in�3 "`_ -- .- � �� :�-� , . �� .. ..�: �� •♦ ......� �--..... '• /:Y f..... IlK�..... . rsf..... - p�y . �. ; _��_��_— — �[��j �,i c� i=------- 'i-T�Ti��fo� -�' -- ---- � A, p 776: � _. � - � E I 9Yr � O:O . - � I froo• +=e - � !!'li�/Fb�Yd'B'i ' -. � r% � ° ii�' � . "a96� _ ,` � < . . _ �' � a' � 0. I , _' i � �� 7i-ll-�f'-Sf'Tfl..::ti: ....fi.q�1�..-... •""• �( a�' _ � _ � :C Iv3�1112�35 fi� - .°: " , .. T� � �. _� � R F , � �4 .�'�, q b -� O,t ia a sa�ra o• i r' r g°. �'.�.� ��. � �,tp _ II vr,�r�v.s/i tr,HO.'� : '�" �, l+ ��` b � ` I . i� � ?� '� C � � . � ' I� O D O O O O O � � � x 4 �� ` '�tl I DO 4 h�� AN_ ;n!n. �C' w�h. O�O'` ��. - � � � 0 .o � � .. ,. --- ' 2.04 �� :� � , 3 M N � 1 t , I _ _ DATE: TO: Community Development Department PLA►NNING DIVISION City of Fridley September 14, 1995 � William Burns, City Manager �? FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Approve Official Title and Summary for Ordinance No. 1056 Regarding Section 205.24, Flooclplain Regulations In order to reduce the cost to publish the recently adopted Ordinance No. 1056 regarding the floodplain requirements, staff has prepared the attached official Title and Summary for publication. In the past, when adopting new zoning code sections, the City Council has typically approved publication of an official Title and Summary. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached official Title and Summary for publication. MM/dw M-95-492 3.01 ORDINANCE NO. 1056 OFFICIAL TITL13 AND SIIMMARY I. Title An ordinance recodifying the Fridley City Code, Chapter 205, entitled "Zoning", by amending Section 205.25.8.C, and repealing Section 205.24 and adopting a new Section 205.24, creating floodplain regulations. II. Summarv The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: The proposed ordinance promotes the health, safety, and general welfare and minimize losses in the flood plain and flood fringe areas in the City as defined by the City's National Flood Insurance Study. The ordinance provides standards for construction of permitted and special uses in the flood plain and flood fringe areas to minimize losses by periodic flooding. III. Notice This Title and Summary have been published to clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the City of Fridley�s ordinance requirements for flood plains and flood fringes. A copy of the ordinance, in its entirety, is available for inspection by any person during regular business hours at the offices of the City Clerk of the City of Fridley, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THE DAY OF � , 1995. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: August 14, 1995 First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: 3.02 CITY OF FRIDI,EY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 6, 1995 CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Newman calied the September 6, 1995, Planning . Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Dave Newman, Dave Rondrick, LeRoy Oquist, Brad Sielaff Members Absent: Diane Savage, Dean Saba, Connie Modig Others Present: $cott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Roger Geis, 515 Cloverleaf Pkway, Blaine, l�i Michael Geis, 520 Dover Street, Fridley, MN APPROVAL OF AUGUST 16, 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to approve the August 16, 1995, Planning Commission minutes as written. IIPON A VOICB VOT$� Ai�L VOTING AYS� CHAIRPERS�N NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISI,Y. - 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT RE4IIEST. L.S. #95-01, BY CLAUDIA AND MICHAEL GEIS OF 520 DOVER STREET_ N.E. To take property owned by Roger C. Geis and split it into five separate parcels (Parcels A- E) as follows: Parcel A: Lot 27, Block L, Riverview Heights (This parcel will be combined with Irvin and Harriet Lindstrom's property, 540 Dover Street N.E.) Parcel B: LOtS 1� 2� 3� 4� 5� 6� 7� 8� 9� 8rid 28� BlOCk Ly Riverview Heights Parcel C: Lot 29, Block L, Riverview Heights Parcel D: Lots 32 and 33, Block L, Riverview Heights (This parcel will be combined with Lavern and Dianne Haldorson's property , 514 Dover Street N.E.) � PBrC@1 E: LOtS 1� 2� 3� 25� 26� 27� 28� 29� 30� 31 and 32, . Block M, Riverview Heights MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. 4.01 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTBMBER 6, 1995 PAGE 2 IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYB, CBAIRPERSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the request is to subdivide the property of Claudia and Michael Geis at 520 Dover Street N.E. The property is located west of East River Road. The plan looks different on paper than in the field. While this is a beautiful site, the streets do not match up. The site has interesting topography and site conditions. Mr. Hickok stated the request is to allow a subdivision of the land to sell a 25 foot x 126 foot lot to the L'indstroms, a property owner to the northwest of the subject parcel, and to sell a 50 foot x 109.26 foot lot to the Haldorsons, owner o.f the property to the northeast. Mr. Hickok stated, as part of the subdivision process, this must be approved by the Planning Commission and City Council before the County will allow a subdivision such as this to be recorded. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall stipulate in the conditions of sale that the adjacent neighbors, the Haldorsons and the Lindstroms, combine the split�parcels with their parcels to create single tax records. , Mr. Hickok stated the City is concerned about substandard residential lots. Staff would not be interested in supporting the subdivision if it would be creating a substandard lot. The idea is to create a larger lot by combining the tax parcels. 2. A private easement allowing maintenance, repair or replacement of the utility services shall be executed and recorded against Lot 33, Block L, Riverview Heights. Mr. Hickok stated the parcei being sold to the Haldorsons would require a utility easement because the utilities for the Geis home comes across Lot 33. He understands the Haldorsons are in agreement with this stipulation. Mr. Kondrick asked the petitioner if he understood the stipulations and if the petitioner agreed with the stipulations. Mr. Geis stated he agreed and understood the stipulations. He has talked to the neighbors and had them sign a docwnent about combining the lots. Mr. Kondrick asked if the petitioner had those documents. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner did submit documents stating the 4.02 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 6 1995 PAGE 3 neighbors are interested in the subdivision and would comply with the conditions. Mr. Oquist asked what would happen to the Lot Split if the property is not sold. Mr. Hickok stated it is staff's intent by putting the stipulation on the condition of sale that it be combined with the lots to the north. We needed the full cooperation of the neighbors before the City would agree to the split. If the neighbors do not buy, staff would not agree. Mr. Geis stated he and the neighbors are all in agreement. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPBRSON NSWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:38 P.M. MOTION by Mr. Rondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend approval of Lot Split Request, L.S. �95-01, by Claudia and Michael Geis, 520 Dover Street, N.E., to take property owned by Roger C. Geis and split it into five separate parcels (Parcels A - E) as follows: Parcel A: Lot 27, Block L, Riverview Heights (This parcel will be combined with Irvin and Harriet Lindstrom's property, 540 Dover Street N.E.) Parcel B: Lots 1� 2� 3� 4� 5� 6� 7� 8� 9� Srid 28� B1oCk L� Riverview Heights � � Parcel C: Lot 29, Block L, Riverview Heights Parcel D: Lots 32 and 33, Block L, Riverview Heights (This parcel will be combined with Lavern and Dianne Haldorson's property , 514 Dover Street N.E.j Parcel E: LOts 1� 2� 3� 25� 26� 27� 28� 29� 30� 31 8rid 32� Block M, Riverview Heights; with the following stipulations: l. The petitioner shall stipulate in the conditions of sale that the adjacent neighbors, the Haldorsons and the Lindstroms, combine the split parcels with their parcels to create single tax records. 4.03 PLANNiNG COMMISSION MBETING, SEPTEMB$R 6. 1995 PAGE 4 2. A private easement allowing maintenance, repair or replacement of the utility services shall be executed and recorded against Lot 33, Block L, Riverview Heights. IIPON A VOICE VOTB� A?,L VOTING AYE� CSAIRPERSON NEWMAN DBCLARED THE MOTION CARRISD UrIl�NIMOQBLY. Mr. Hickok stated the City Couricil would consider this request on October 2, 1995. 2. WATER CONSERVATION AND EMERGENCY PLAN Mr. Hickok stated the Commission has,before them the revised draft of the Water Canservation and Emergency Plan. The action requested is to consider setting a public hearing for October 4. The law requires that, as of January 1, 1996, we are to have a water conservation emergency plan in place. In an effort to meet that deadline, we started early this year to accomplish this. A consultant did a draft which was completed in March. This draft was presented to the Planning Commissian and Environmental Quality and Energy (EQE) Commission members in April. In the staff summary, he has attempted to outline the comments and responses to those comments. In many cases, the document refers to the emergency conditions ordinance. This is an ordinance staff would like to have before the Commission as a draft before the public hearing. Mr. Hickok stated staff is asking the Commission to establish a public hearing for October 4. Staff will also ask the EQE to have this on their agenda for September 26. The City Council would give preliminary approval to submit the plan to the Metropolitan Council on October 23. Mr. Hickok stated he was asked to provide to members only the changes. He has submitted the entire plan because there were format changes. Between now and the public hearing, staff will meet with the internai committee to determine the implementation dates. He is confident that staff wi.11 have this completed for the October 4 agenda. There is also a map that is in the plan that the GiS staff will work to refine. There are also internal staff comments which will be included as well. These additions will be underlined in the new text. Mr. Sielaff asked if inembers would be sent another draft or will members comment based on what they have received thus far. Mr. Hickok stated members would comment on the draft received and staff will bring underlined changes for the public hearing. This is the most recent draft based on the comments. 4.04 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 6, 1995 PAG$ 5 MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to establish a public hearing for October 4, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. to review the Water Conservation and Emergency Plan. IIPON A VOICL VOTB, ALL VOTING AYL, CBAIRPERSON NEWMAN DSCI�ARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 3. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING OF AIIGUST 10, 1995 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the minutes of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority meetinq of August 10, 1995. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CSAIRPERSON N$WMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 15, I995 MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the minutes of the Appeals Commission meeting of August 15, 1995. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON rfEWMAN DBCLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISI�Y. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to adjourn the meeting. IIPON A VOICE VOTS, ALL VOTING AYB, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DBCLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE SEPT�ER 5, 1995� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOIIRNFD AT 7:47 P.M. Respectfully submitted, + W vonn Cooper Recording Secretary 4.05 S I G N— IN S H E E T PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, Wednesday, September 6, 1995 Name Address/Business � �o�G2 �Eis 5-is ��o vE�ecE� �Ky �s��vE �� G.�/s� S�c� D� �,��1 s� �,P��E . 4.OG l DESCRIPTION OF REGIUEST: - The petitioner proposes to spfd off Lof 27, Block L, Riverview Heights, a 25' x 110' parcel, and seQ it to the westeriy neighbor, the Lindstrom's. The petitioner also proposes to spfd off Lots 32 and 33, Block L, Riverview Heights, and sell it to the easterly neighbor, the Haldorson's. The purpose of the lot split is to consolidate and dispose of lots owned by the petitioner, and provide for potentiai iuture subdivision to the south of ihe single family dwelling unit located at 520 Dover Street NE SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Currently, the petitioner receives 11 tax statements annuaily. In a recent evaluation af land holdings, the petitioner determined that the land north of the e�asting homestead and west a� their driveway is excess and w�uld better serve adjacent owners. As a resul� the petitioners and adjacent homeowners agreed to terms. The City requires a minimum of 9,000 square feet for a standard �esidentiai lot The sale of this property �s intended to enhance the open space around the e�dsting dwellings. To assure that the land does not become an independent, substandard bt, staff recommends a tax parcel consolidation on both the Vndstrom and Haldorson parcels. Lot 33, Block L, is proposed to be sold to fhe Haldorson family. This bt, however, contains the uutility services for the petitioner's home. A private util'�ty easement agreement wiQ be requi�ed betwee� the petitioner and iuture owner. A preliminary discussion of the potential iuture subdivision of the petitioner's property occurred between staff and the petitioner. A summary of luture isstres has been prepared arid can be found in ihe body of this text PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission recommended approval of LS. #95-01, with the foAowing stipulatio�: 1. The petitioner shall stipulate in the conditions of sale that the adjacent neighbors, the Haldorson's and the Lindstrom's, combine the spl'd parcels with their parcets to create single tax records. 2. A private easement allowing maintenance, repair, or replacement of utiliiy services shall be executed and recorded against Lot 33, Block L, Riverview Heights. ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Comm'ission recommendation. . ,. ..,. . ...� Lot Split Request, L.S. #95-01 Claudia and Michael Geis Page 2 CEIS LOT SPLIT PROJECT DETAILS: Petition For. To split off property for purchase by adjacent property owners. Location of Property: 520 Dover Street NE Legal Descrip#ion of Lots 1- 9, 27 - 29, and 32 and 33, Block L, and Lots 1- 3 and Lots 25 - Property: 32, Block M, Riverview Heights Size: 72,581 square feet (1.66 acres) Topography: Mostly flat, slopes to the southeast, toward the creek Existing Vegetation: Trees, evergreen and deciduous, shrubs, sod E�cisting Zoning/Ptatting: Riverview Heights/1922 Available of Municipal Utilities: Connected Vehicular Access: Pedestrian Access: Engineering Issues: Site Planning Issues: Dover Street N/A Future access for further subdivision; connection of utilities DEVELOPMENT S1TE ANALYSIS: Adjacent Sites � West: South Zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling Land Use: Residentia{ Zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling Land Use: Residential East: Zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling Land Use: Residential North: Zoned R-1, Singie Family Dwelling Land Use: Residential ' S.02 Lot Split Request, L.S. #95-01 Claudia and Michael Geis Page 3 Description of Request The petitioner proposes to split off Lot 27, Block L, Riverview Heights, a 25' x 110' parcel, and sell it to the wester(y neighbor, the Lindstrom's. The petitioner atso proposes to split off Lots 32 and 33, Block L, Riverview Heights, and sell it to the easterly neighbor, the Haldorson's. The purpose of the lot split is to consolidate and dispose of lots owned by the petitioner, and provide for potential future subdivision to the south of the single family dwelling unit located at 520 Dover Street NE. Parcel History Located on the subject parcel is a single family dwelling unit, a 26' x 36' detached garage, and a 12' x 26' storage shed. The date of the dwelling is unknown. The following permits were issued to the property: 1. 1958 - construction of a 20' x 20' garage 2. 1965 - construction of an 8' x 14' pigeon loft for housing of carrier pigeons 3. 1981 - wrecking permit to demolish 20' x 20' garage 4. 1981 - construction of a 26' x 36' garage 5. 1989 - construction of a 12' x 16' shed 6. 1991 - construction of a 14' x 19' deck onto the dwelling The subject parcel is the originai Geis family homestead purchased by Roger Geis, father of the petitioner. Request The petitioner has obtained agreement from the Lindstrom's and the Haidorson's to combine the parcels to be split with their respective parcels. This eliminates the concern that the lot split would create substandard below the minimum 9,000 square foot lot area. ***Stipulation*** The petitioner shall stipulate in the conditions of sale that the adjacent neighbors, the Haldorson's and the Lindstrom's, combine the split parcels with their parcels to create single tax records. 5.03 Lot Split Request, L.S. #95-01 Claudia and Michael Geis Page 4 The utility senrices for the Geis dwelling at 520 Dover Street NE are located in Lot 33, Block L, Riverview Heights. This lot is one of two being sold to the Haldorson's. A private easement beiween the Geis' and the Haldorsons' should be executed and recorded to allow maintenance, repair, or replacement of these utility services by the Geis' on the Haldorson's property. The utilities should be located and a specific easement area identified as part of the easement document. ***Stipulation*** A private easement allowing maintenance, repair, or replacement of utility services shall be executed and recorded against Lot 33, Block L, Riverview Heights. Future Subdivision The petitioner has indicated that a possible future subdivision could oecur on the remnant parcel under the Geis ownership. The remnant parcel is approximately 62,000 square feet in� area, however, a large portion ot this parcel is covered by Springbrook Creek. There is, however� adequate room #o provide at least one additional single family lot of 9,000 square feet with a 75 foot lot width south of the existing Geis home. Prior to a future subdivision, the following issues should be addressed: 1. In reviewing the existing utilities provided in Dover Street, the Engineering Departmerrt has � determined that utitity cor�nections will need to be brought from the west through the Cheryl Street right-of-way from Broad Avenue. This is d�e to the inadequate amount of slope from Dover Street. Any sanitary sewer connection to Dover Street would not have adequate cover and would potentially freeze during the winter. 2. Access to the existing lot at 520 Dover Street, and any potential future lot, must have a minimum of 25 feet along the street, while the remainder of #he lot meets the 75 foot lot width requirement. However, if three or more parcels are created as a result of any lot split or plat request, the subdivider witl be required to provide a typical residential street with a 50 foot right- of-way. As proposed, Lots 28 and 29, Block L, if combined, would provide the minimum 50 foot right-of-way necessary for a residential street. This residential street would require construction of a cul-de-sac. 3. Prior to any subdivision or replatting of the remnant parcel, Cheryl Street woutd also need to be vacated. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission recommended approval of L.S. #95-01, with the following stipulations: � 5.04 Lot Split Request, L.S. #95-01 Claudia and Michael Geis Page 5 The petitioner shall stipulate in the conditions of sale that the adjacent neighbors, the Haldorson's and the Lindstrom's, combine the split parcels with their parcels to create single tax records. 2. A private easement atlowing maintenance, repair, or replacement of utility services shall be executed and recorded against Lot 33, Block L, Riverview Heights. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commissio� recommendation. 5.05 RESOLIITION NO. - 1995 RESOLIITION APPROVING A SUBDIVIBION� LOT SPLIT L.8.�95-01� TO TARE PROPERTY AND SPLIT IT INTO FIVE SEPARATE PARCEL3 (Parcels A- E), GENERALLY LOCATED AT 520 DOVER STREBT N.E. WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at the , 1995 meeting, with stipulations attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, such approval was to split a parcel as follows: Parcel A: Parcel B: Parcel C: Parcel D: Parcel E: Lot 27, Block L, Riverview Heights - LOts l� 2� 3� 4� 5� 6� 7� 8� 9� arid 28� Block L, Riverview Heights Lot 29, Block L, Riverview Heights Lots 32 and 33, Block L, Riverview Heights LOtS 1, 2, 3, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 32, Block M, Riverview Heights WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey from the owner; and WHEREAS, such approval will split the property into five separate parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE50LVED, that the City Council directs the petitioner to record this lot split at Anoka County within six months of this approval or else such approval shall be null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1995. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 5.06 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR EXHIBIT A Resolution No. - 1995 1. The petitioner shall stipulate in the conditions of sale that the adjacent neighbors, the Haldorson's and the Lindstrom's, combine the split parcels with their parcels to create single tax records. 2. A private easement allowing maintenance, repair, or replacement of utility services shall be executed and recorded against Lot 33, Block L, Riverview Heights. 5.07 __"".,_.......�.�...._ -.....t�-_. ...-::.:�a�.r. :'�t.�4c�:.w..". 1:'d+::1SlR�,�4:. .. .�,_. ;., L.S. ��95-01 "" Claudia/Michael Geis �' S //2 SE�. ,3 T. ,3p . �C/TY OF FR/DLEY � 31 � '� �:. . Y,Y � ;, � ��, � �:,�: - _- � �'� --:�; s ��` :.�� .��,.� y,. 9 .� S ,�� :.., ''� � � � \�` \ \�. \ C� ' I `�' i �, 33 ,p �; ,, -o �, � / / � `�O 1.\ _\ •\ . '� ;'" _ , ��,�:, (sa� "y �,y [�;., �,, � \ � \'` � �'e�e " C� ' ' (W ° � ' "Cp2 . r;� 4 ��' ', I � \' \, \� � � �"•; a_i F.I q! r<.l" �. CA 9t,�- �2 �`�r�� , �..\ `_ �� - z-_ 4 ,I (+%' f'�2 ,� `. `� � � � .._.. � � F'% Cy1 r C� � � (n)� , �' ;. ., c-� ...\\ � t�� r � �• .1 1 ,"� �.: f �.�P��'4' ��> � o � � . L � 9.. �' �, � ,�. : , , J � � :� � � � • N�' c� ; , o G , \,� , b. s o , � �j,, .� ��, � yF ��, p -; � f ,�.�, 0e , �.�. � �- � �� . ` \ ' , ',�. `� , ` �,�: , \.� � \� , w bg ' t + %°; • �� d LQQ ��' / . � bD. . � !r � �� -___ �i _ � (� x �� ±�' 7, CN \`\` �� . �`` • • �. f' , I ��'.. � . - • � •. � ro , S /N CbRMER �i�) f . \� SfC.J � 4 � !•.. 34 . _ 5 8 .08 _ -1 �-�1t�AT1�'11► K ; � � -- ! . ; f � . ov �R J N,. � D , � . � N,��°11�'''�N�� 1'1`'s��3�O � •'•�Ad '' �� , K . � ' ji' � �'�yt t � { , , � { ' �.. #. � �► # , � �,�v � .` N � � �, u�. ��',.a��, �ITGo , _ � �"'r� +� er X N ,: c'� �. , y1 °�� ° � }�� F' �,�}'� .:, �, i � � _ � i ':: ,� `� t . t � � t � ��; • h� �` t � t.�,s �j� � . '}?� 'i` '� 1 � ��;i ��' �1 \ r� � � :� �� , 1 � ' � �� y F ' 1 � � '�' '� a �; �� '. �; � ��. . _ � � ��Y � � �� 9 i � . \ ` ��O �+ ��,�,i� �y��. �3 S��•�1�� i� N� 3 j� �, �, � ;3�� *: V�� u � a ° I � �� Y: I I �`� \ m� O , �� I� ��• 1 � r � ! �� '� �i �' �� , � � • ; ,,�� i . • �� i ` � ,�1� V� ' .y/ � ' �� n � � KEY 3 ' ��` ' A � � r. � _ , ��,� � Q, , � �� i �� L � ' ��: . S � � � �� ' � � ,� ;. L � � , `� �< <.: �� ' � � �� I` Q OWNED BY �� ` ��1 � � �� a� � j �� :�. �rial�a��'i��t v py � ��`l :i ��'��* !� a ��ta12b; ��p � - OWNF.p o ■ CE� � 7�bE SOLD 1� � , --- g 1��3 . � OWI�D BY �F,AM�Y I TO BF�Sd�q t0 LN�STROM�FAMLY � , � � , � � 3 � . 'C � I �, L` ,,v,,, •� � � � v � / � J , _ . ..—._... . ! � .'�� 1�i � �- �� . � �n � � , ',v, � =�— • `5: L.S. 1195-01 Claudia/Michael Geis o �,�6��, -- N ��6?��-" � .' �'' � .. '� : � > � � _ I, 1� � �� 7t •-- B ia ^ =3 N �� ' � ; !! � � TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Engineenng Sewer Water Parks Slreels ti7aintenvncc William W. Burns, City Manager �� i � John G. Flora, Public Works Director September 18, 1995 53rd Avenue Boostei Station Renovation PW95-280 Maier Stewart &�ssociates (MSA) have completed the plans and specifiCations for upgrading the booster pumps at the S3rd Avenue booster station, as well as rehabilitating the structure itself to provide for code satisfaction and building appearance. The estimated cost for the improvement project is $180�000. The amount identified in our 1996 budget is $300,000. To provide lead time for pump and pipe manufacturing and to provide for an early spring conversion of the booster station, it would be appropriate for the Council fo authorize the advertisement of bids so that the project can be awarded in October, work commencing during the winter to allow for the booster plant completion in April and the final building construction by July 1996. JGF:cz s.� 1 ��I � � i �S ' . [' ' , . . , . .' - : s . .. , . r � . � I ' . ! . CAPITAL tMPROVEMENT PROGRAN! P ROJ ECT AREA � - . jl,.; January 30,1995 /�.�:..�•: }i: •.. �:p:-�.:: . . t�aC Q L .':•',•,� . `.�'�R.��a.vv��..ia.,�� iia. i\......a�v' � i WATER .,��. � zY `'� ��" }` � i 995 WATERMAIN AT 68TH & WASHINGTON WATER UTILITY (94 ENCUMBERED) DESIGN TRAGVAC SYSTEM WATER UTILITY {94 ENCUMBERED) AT COMMONS - _ REPIACE TRAGVAC SYSTEM AT COMMONS WATER UTILITY DEStGN 53RD 8� JOHNSON BOOSTER STA. WATER UTiLITY -ELIMiNATE DEAD END UNE AT HAYES � TO GARFIELD � WATER UTILITY WELL REPAIR- NO'S 3& 11 � WATER UTILITY - TOTAL PROJECT FOR ' •lYi�' `'`��V:'�`�'�:�:�" 1996 - � . REBUILD & UPGRADE 53RD & JOHNSON � . BOOSTER STATION UPGRADE -. WATER UTILITY ' � DESIGN PUMP HOUSE NO.1 AND �� - � '� - WELL N0.1 BOOSTER REPLACEMENT WATER UTILITY _ WEL� REPAIR - 4, & 9 WATER UTILITY INSPECT 8� REPAIR 3 MG RESERVOiR (EXTERIOR) WATER UTILITY 'NIROP IMPACT FI�TER PLANT WELLHO WATER UTILITY � CAPITA� IMRROVEMENT PROGRAM .�.,.:: -..�.:/�y..�,'��:;y::�.��: - ,'1,��!r{�);�}4fy'r, . - 1997 REBUILD PUMP HOUSE N0.1 AND WELL NO. 1 BOOSTER REPLACEMENT WATER UTlLITY . ELiMiNATE DEAD END LWE AT ARTHUR TO ANOKA ST � WATER UTILITY WELL REPAIR- � 0, 12 AND 13 WATER UTILITY REPIACE CHEMICAI ROOM EQUIPMENT AT WELLS 12 � 13 WATER UTILITY . iNSPECT & REPAIR'/ AND 1? MG TOWERS WATER UTIWTY " - TOTAL PROJECT �OR :, ti.�2 25,000.00 12.000.00 60,000.00 30,000.00 15;000.00 75,000.00 �180.-OOO.OQ 300,000.00 � 30,OOQ.OQ 50,000.00 75,000.00 100.000.00 �555 .000.00 250,000.00 � S,OOU.00 75,000.00 25,000.00 SU.00Q.00 $49 5,000.00 _.� �. t�tiSULTI�G ENGIA'E�ItS � 326 Er�ergy Park Drive St. Paul, AAN 55108 September 12, 1995 File: 685-012-20 Mr. John G. Flora Director of Public Works City of Fridley Civic Center 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 612•644-4389 1-800-888•2923 �� SCHEDULE AND CONSTRUCT'ION COST ESTIlVIATE Fax: 612-644-9446 53RD AVENUE WATER BOOSTER STATION REHABII.TTATION CITY OF FRIDLEY CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMfNTAI MUNKIPAi e�n�iNc souo wastE sr�ucruwu suRVenNc TRAFFIC TRANSPORTATION ELECTRICAL/MECHANICAI ENGINEERING: HVAC POWER DISTRIBUTION $CADA SYSTEM COMROLS Dear Mr. Flora: We are currenfly in the process of finalizing the plans and specificafions for the subject project. I have prepared a project construction schedule and a construction cost estimate, which appear below: (':��11 •► II: �IY�► .1 � 1 September 21, 1995 September 22, 1995 October 18, 1995 October 23, 1995 Apri130, 1996 June 30, 1996 Advertise in official City publication Advertise in Construction Bulletin Open bids City Council award contract for construction Substantial Completion of project construction Final Completion of project construction . i.� : . r�U : r • • ► r: y� • � � r. Civil and Process Items Electrical Items Archit�ectural Items Mechanical Items Subtotal Contingencies (20%) TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 65,000 $ 45,000 $ 25,000 $ 15,�QQ 1 �11 , � �.�.� $180,000 Please contact me, or Tom Roushar, if you have any questions regarding these items. Sincerely, OFFICES 1N: MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS MlNNEAPO!!S '--�— PRIOR IAKE ST. PAUL Bryan DeSmet, P:E. w�E� BcD:Paio��-�z�..� 6.03 � TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER �� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR CRAIG A. ELLESTAD, ACCOUNTANT SUBJECT: 1996 SCHOOL REFERENDUM LEVY RETURN AGREEMENTS DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1995 Attached are the 1996 School District Referendum Levy Return Agreements to be piaced on the City's agenda for Monday, September 18th. These annual agreements have been approved by the HRA Commission and they have agreed to return the full amount of the tax increment for payable 1996. After approva! and the appropriate signatures have been obtained on all documents, please return them to me so I can forward to the School Districts to obtain their signatures. The estimated total levy return for 1996 before delinquents is $3i0,941. This is the same as the calculated amount for 1995. In 1996, no TIF Districts/County ID's terminate and we feei their will be no significant changes in the overatl market values o� any major settlements. ` The table below breaks the referendum levy return down by school district : School Calculated Estimated Percent District 1995 1996 Change 11 $16,416 $16,416 0.0°�6 13 $2,648 $2.648 0.0°�6 14 $232,531 $232,53i 0.0°� 16 $59,345 $59,345 0.096 Total : 10 940 10 940 0.0 ATfACHMENTS Flle : \123DATA\HRA�TIFISCH96EST.WK1 , �.0 ♦ 1 t ' AGREEMENT This Agreement is dated as of January 2, 1996, is by and between the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and Independent School District No. 11, and provides as follows: 299140.2 1. Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms have the following meanings, respectively: "Citv" means the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "Proiect" means Redevelopment Project No. 1 established and operated by the HR.A pursuant . to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047. "1985 Revenue Bonds" means the HRA's $4,070,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 1985, dated May l, 1985. "Limited Revenue Note" means the HR.A's $5,603,755.80 Limited Revenue Capital Appreciation Tax Increment Note, dated December 20, 1985. !'1985 G.O. Bonds" means the City�s $11,550,000 Variable Rate Demand General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985, dated December 30, 1985. "1986 G.O. Bonds° means the City�s $10,045,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1986, dated as of August 1, 1986. "1990 G.O. Bonds" means the City�s $9,485,OOQ General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds of i990, dated March 1, 1990. ��1992 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $4,030,000 General Obligation Temporary Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1992C, dated December 1, 1992. 7.�2 SCHOOL DISTRiCT NO. 11' 299140.2 "Tax Increment Obliaations" means the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the 1990 G.O. Bonds, the 1992 G.O. Bonds, and any other contractual obligations of the HRA or the City which were entered into prior to the date of this Agreement and which commit the use of any tax increments from the TIF Districts for specified purposes, projects, or parties. "Tax Increment Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179. "TIF Districts" means Tax Increment Financing District Nos. 1 through 13 within the Project. The attached Exhibit A contains certification dates and other information on the TIF Districts. "School District" means Independent School District No. 11, the Anoka School District. "Subdivision" means Minnesota Statutes Section 469.177, Subdivision 10 (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B). 2. Recitals. (a) In certain cases, the Subdivision either requires or allows by agreement certain tax increments attributable to school district referendum tax levies to be paid to school districts. (b) A portion of TIF District No. 3 is located within the boundaries of the School District. (c) None of the property within TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, S, 9, 10, 11,. 12 and 13 is located within the boundaries of the School District. (d) It is the purpose of this Agreement to provide for payment of certain tax increments to the School District pursuant to 7.�.3 r ' 294140.2 and in accordance with the provision of the Subdivision. (e) Nothing in this Agreement is intended to violate the covenants and agreements heretofore. made respecting the application of tax increments from the TIF Districts pursuant to the Tax Increment Obligations. 3. Representations of the City. (a) The Tax Increment Obligations were issued to finance various activities of the HR.A within the Project. (b) The 1985 Revenue Bonds are not general obligations of the City or the HR.A. Tax increments from TIF District Nos. 1 through 5 are pledged to the payment of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, and there are no other sources of funds pledged to the payment thereof. The final scheduled principal maturity of the 1985 Revenue Bonds is February 1, 1999. (c) The Limited Revenue Note is not a general obligation of the City or the HRA and is payable solely from tax increments pledged for such purposes from TIF District No. 6. (d) The 1985 G.O. Bonds were payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds was February 1, 2000. However, on February 1, 1990, the City discharged the 1985 G.O. Bonds by paying all then outstanding principal thereof and interest thereon. (e) The 1986 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is February 1, 2000. However, the City has advance refunded the 1986 G.O. Bonds via the issuance of the 1990 G.O. Bonds, and the City expects pursuant to said refunding that all of the principal of and interest on-the 1986 G.O. Bonds will have been paid on or before February 1, 1994. `7:�� . • 299140.2 (f) The 1990 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is August 1, 2009. (g) The 1992 G.O. Bonds are payable, to the extent permitted by applicable law, from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 12, and the final scheduled maturity of those Bonds is December 1, 1995. (h) Portions of the principal of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, and the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the 1990 G.O. Bonds, and the 1992 G.O. Bonds were outstanding on May 1, 2988, and/or are outstanding on the date of this Agreement. 4. Representations of the School District. (a) On October 5, 1982, the electorate of the School District approved a continuous 6.0 mill levy first effective for the 1982 payable 1983 property taxes. This levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1982 Levy". (b) On October 6, 1987, the electorate of the School District approved a 6.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1987 payable 1988 property taxes. This Ievy is hereinafter referred to as the °1987 Levy". (c) According to the Minnesota Department of Education, for purposea of the above-mentioned referendum levies the tax capacity rate equivalent of 6 mills is .06999697. 5. Payment_ of Tax Increments to School District. The City and the School District hereby agree that, except as otherwise provided pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement, tax. incrementa shall be paid to the School District by the HRA as and to the extent received by the HRA, with respect to the tax increments relating to the 1995 payable 1996 property taxes, as follows: TIF District No. 3. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 3 which is attributable to the 1982 Levy and the 1987 Levy shall be paid to the School District. 7.�5 6. Further Agreements. Nothing in this Agreement is intended or shall be applied in such a manner as to violate the obligations and covenants made by the City or the HRA in connection with the Tax Increment Obligations, and to the extent but only to the extent that the application of the terms of this Agreement would give rise to a violation of said obligations and covenants, including without limitation, the default in the timely and full payment of the Tax Increment Obligations, the applicable tax increments shall be applied instead in the manner, but only to the extent necessary, to avoid such default or other violation of said covenants or obligations. Nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the City or the HR.A in the exercise of �he powers which they may have relating to the Project or the TIF Districts. In addition, the City and the School District agree that the provisions of paragraph 5 providing for payment of tax increment to the School District shall be limited to and shall apply only to such tax increment attributable to the 1995 payable 1996 real estate property taxes, and at the conclusion of said period, the City and the School District agree ta review the circumstances and to attempt to negotiate in good faith such further agreement or agreements as may be permitted by law and which are acceptable to both Che City and School District with respect to discretionary payments of such applicable tax increment to the School District. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the School District have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Mayor City Manager INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 11 School Board Chair Superintendent 299140.2 r 7.06 EXHIBIT A Schedule of Tax Increment Financing Districts Within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 of the Fridley HRA TIF District 1 2 K7 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IZ 13 299140.2 Name Center City Moore Lake North Area Johnson Printing/ Skywood Mall Paschke Lake Pointe Winfield Shorewood Onan/Old Central Northco Phase III Osborne Crossings McGlynn Bakeries Satellite Lane Apts. `' 7.�7 Certification Date 5/11/79 7/31/81 5/19/82 1/20/84 3/15/84 12/24/85 10/22/86 10/24/86 9/7/89 4/10/90 1/31/92 3/5/92 6/20/95 Independent School District No. 14 13/14 11/16 13/14 16 13 16 14 16 16 16 14/16 14 Exhibit B Subd. 10. Pa}�ment to school for referendum leti��. (a) The pro��isions of this subdi�'i- sion apply to tax increment financing discricts and projects for which certification w�as requested before �tay 1, 1933, that are located in a school district i� Nhich th� ��oters have appro�•ed new• local ta.� ratrs or an incr�ase in local tax rates after the tax incre- ment financing district u•as certified. (b)(i) If there are no outstanding bonds on �ta�• 1, 1933, to �hich increment from the district is pledged, or if the referendum is appro��ed afier I�tay l, 1988, and there are no bonds outstanding at the time the referendum is appro��ed, that µ•ere issued before T4ay 1, 1985, the authority must annually pay to the schooi district an amount of increment equal to the increment that is attributable to the increast in the local tax rate under the referendum. (2) If clause (1) does not apply, upon appro�•al by a majority �-ote of the eo�•erning body of the municipality and the sehool board, tho authority must pay to the school district an amount of increment equal to the iricrement that is attributabie to the increase in the local tax rate under the referendum. (c) The amounts of these increments ma}• be expended and must be treated by the school district in the same manner as pro��ided for the re�•enues deri��ed from the refer- endum le�y appro�•ed b�� the �•oters. The pro��;sions of this subdivision appl,v to projects for w•hich certification w�as requested betore, on, and after August l, 1979. 7.�8� AGREEMENT This Agreement is dated as of January 2, 1996, is by and between the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and Independent School District No. 13, and provides as follows: 299139.2 1. Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms have the following meanings, respectively: "Citv° means the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "HR.A" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "Project" means Redevelopment Project No. 1 established and operated by the HRA pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047. "1985 Revenue Bonds" means the HRA's $4,070,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 1985, dated May 1, 1985. "Limited Revenue Note" means the HRA's $5,603,755.80 Limited Revenue Capital Appreciation Tax Increment Note, dated December 20, 1985. "1985 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $11,550,000 Variable Rate Demand General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985, dated December 30, 1985. "1986 G.O: Bonds" means the City's $10,045,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1986, dated as of August 1, 1986. "1990 G.O. Bonds° means the City's $9,485,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds of I990, dated March 1, 1990. "1992 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $4,030,000 General Obligation Temporary Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1992C, dated December 1, 1992. � 7.09 � SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 13 299139.2 "Tax Increment Obligations" means the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the 1990 G.O. Bonds, the 1992 G.O. Bonds, and any other contractual obligations of the HRA or the City which were entered into prior to the date of this Agreement and which commit the use of any tax increments from the TIF Districts for specified purposes, projects, or parties. "Tax Increment Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179. "TiF Districts" means Tax Increment Financing District Nos. 1 through 13 within the Project. The attached Exhibit A contains certification dates and other information on the TIF Districts. "School District° means Independent School District No. 13, the Columbia Aeights School District. "Subdivision" means Minnesota Statutes Section 469.177, Subdivision 10 (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B). 2. Recitals. (a) In certain cases, the Subdivision either requires or allows by agreement certain tax increments attributable to school district referendum tax levies to be paid to school districts. (b) TIF District No. 6 is located entirely within the boundaries of the School District, and a portion of TIF District Nos. 2 and 4 are located within the�boundaries of the School District. 2 7.10 299139.2 (c) None af the property within TIF District Nos. l, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 is located within the baundaries of the School District. (d) It is the purpose of this Agreement to provide for payment of certain tax increments tQ the School District pursuant to and in accordance with the provision of the Subdivision. (e) Nothing in this Agreement is intended to violate the covenants and agreements heretofore made respecting the application of tax increments from the TIF Districts pursuant to the Tax Increment Obligations. 3. Representations of the City. (a) The Tax Increment Obligations were issued to finance various activities of the HR.A within the Project. (b1 The 1985 Revenue Bonds are not general obligations of the City or the HRA. Tax increments from TIF District Nos. 1 through 5 are pledged to the payment of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, and there are no other sources of funds pledged to the payment thereof. The final scheduled principal maturity of the 1985 Revenue Bonds is February 1, 1999. (c) The Limited Revenue Note is not a general obligation of the City or the HRA and is payable solely from tax increments pledged for such purposes from TIF�District No. 6. (d) The 1985 G.O. Bonds were payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds was February 1, 2000. However, on February 1, 1990, the City discharged the 1985 G.O. Bonds by paying alI then outstanding principal thereof and interest thereon. 3 7.11 � 299139.2 (e) The 1986 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is February 1, 2000. However, the City has advance refunded the 1986 G.O. Bonds via the issuance of the 1990 G.O. Bonds, and the City expects pursuant to said refunding that all of the principal of and interest on the 1986 G.O. Bonds will have been paid on or before February 1, 1994. (f) The 1990 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is August 1, 2009. (g) The 1992 G.O. Bonds are payable, to the extent permitted by applicable law, from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 12, and the final scheduled maturity of those Bonds is December 1, 1995. (h) Portions of the principal of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, and the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the 1990 G.O. Bonds, and the 1992 G.O.. Bands were outstanding on May 1, 1988, and/or are outstanding on the date of this Agreement. 4. Representations of the School District. (a) On October 5, 1981, the electorate of the School District approved a 5.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1981 payable 1982 property taxes. This levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1981 Levy°. (b) On September 23, 1986, the electorate of the School District approved a 7.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1986 payable 1.987 property taxes. This levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1986 Levy". (c) According to the Minnesota Department of Education, for purposes of the above-mentioned referendum levies the tax capacity rate equivalents of 5 mills and 7 � 7.12 299139.2 mills are .06162496 and .07875910, respectively. (d) On November 6, 1990, the electorate of the School District approved a.08 tax capacity rate levy authorized for 7 years and first effective for the 1990 payable 1991 property taxes. This Ievy is hereinafter referred to as the "1990 Levy". 5. Pavment of Tax Increments to School District. The City and the School District hereby agree that, except as otherwise provided pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement, tax increments shall be paid to the School District by the HRA as and to the extent received by the HRA, with respect to the tax increments relating to the 1995 payable 1996 property taxes, as follows: (a) TIF District No. 6. Since the 1981 Levy was approved before the date of certification of TIF District No. 6, the Subdivision does not apply to that Levy with respect to this Distr�.ct, and no :tax increments attributable to said Levy from .this District are payable to the School District. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 6 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy and the 1990 Levy shall be paid to the School District. (b) TIF District No. 4. Since the 1981 Levy was approved prior to the date of certification of TIF District No. 4, the Subdivision does not apply to that Levy with respect to this District. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 4 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy and the 1990 Levy shall be paid to the School District. (c) TIF District No. 2. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 2 which is attributable to the 1981 Levy, the I986 Levy, and the 1990 Levy shall be paid to the School District. F� 7.13 6. Further Aqreements. Nothing in this Agreement is intended or shall be applied in such a manner as to violate the obligations and covenants made by the City or the HRA in connection with the Tax Increment Obligations, and to the extent but only to the extent that the application of the terms of this Agreement would give rise to a violation of said obligations and covenants, including without limitation, the default in the timely and full payment of the Tax Increment Obligations, the applicable tax increments shall be applied instead in the manner, but only to the extent necessary, to avoid such default or other violation of said covenants or obligations. Nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the City or the HRA in the exercise of the powers which they may have relating to the Project or the TIF Districts. In addition; the City and the School District agree that the provisions of paragraph 5 providing for payment of tax increment to the School District shall be limited to arid shall apply only to such tax increment attributable to the 1995 payable 1996 real estate property taxes, and at the conclusion of said period, the City and the School District agree to review the circumstances and to attempt to negotiate in good faith such further agreement or agreements as may be permitted by law and which are acceptable to both the City and School District with respect to discretionarlr payments of such applicable tax increment to the School District. IN wITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the School District have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Mayor City Manager INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 13 School Board Chair Superintendent Z99139.2 6 7.14 � � � EXHIBIT A Schedule of Tax Increment Financing Districts Within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 of the Fridley HRA TIF District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 299139.2 Name Center City Moore Lake North Area Johnson Printing/ Skywood Ma1.1 Paschke Lake Pointe Winfield Shorewood Onan/Old Central Northco Phase III Osborne Crossings McGlynn Bakeries Satellite Lane Apts. 7 7.15 Certification Date 5/11/79 7/31/81 5/19/82 i/2o/a4 3/15/84 12/24/85 10/22/86 ZO/24/86 9/7/89 4/10/90 1/31/92 3/5/92 6/20/95 � Independent School District No. I4 13/14 11/Z6 13/14 16 13 16 14 16 16 16 14/1_6 I4 Exhibit B Subd. 10. Pa}�ment to school for referendum le�}�. (a) The pro��isions of this subdi��i- sion apply� to tax increment financing districts and projects for ��hich certification ��'as requested before �tay 1, 1933, that are lucated in a school district in «�hich the voters ha��e appro��ed new• local tax rates or an incr�asz in local tax races afcer the tac incre- ment financing district ��as certified. (b)(1) If there are no outstanding bonds on `fa�� I, 1953, to t.hich increment from the district is pledged, or if the reterendum is appro��ed after I�fay !, 1985, and there are no bonds outstanding at the time the referendum is appro��ed, that ��ere issued before T4ay 1, 1988, the authority must annually pay to the school district an amount of increment equ21 to the inerement that is attributable to the increase in the local tax rate under the referendum. (2) lfdause (1) does not apply, upon appro�•al by a majority �-ote ofthe go�•erning body of the municipaiity and the school board, the authority must pay to the school district an amount of increment equal to the icicrement that is attributable to the increase in the local tax rate under the referendum. (c) The amounts of these increments may be expended and must be treated by the school district in ihe same manner as pro�•ided for the re��enues deri��ed from the refer- endum le�y appro��ed by the �'oters. The pro�•;sions of this subdi�•ision apply to projects for which cenification �•as requested before, on, and after August I, 1979. 7.16� AGREEMENT This Agreement is dated as of January 2, 1996, is by and between the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and Independent School District No. 14, and provides as follows: 299736.z 1. Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms have the following meanings, respectively: "Citv" means the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "Proiect" means Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 established and operated by the HRA pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047. "1985 Revenue Bonds" meana the HRA's $4,070,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 1985, dated May 1, 1985. "Limited Revenue Not�" means the HRA's $5,603,755.80 Limited Revenue Capital Appreciation Tax Increment Note, dated December 20, 1985. "19 5 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $11,550,000 Variable Rate Demand General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985, dated December 30, 1985. "1986 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $10,045,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1986, dated as of August 1, 1986. "1990 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $9,485,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds of 1990, dated March 1, 1990. "1992 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $4,030,000 General Obligation Temporary Tax 7.17 SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14 � z��.z Increment Bonds, Series 1992C, dated December 1, 1992. "Tax Increment Obligations" means the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the 1990 G.O. Bonds, the 1992 G.O. Bonds, and any other contractual obligations of the HR.A or the City which were entered into prior to the date of this Agreement and which commit the use of any tax increments from the TIF Districts for specified purposes, projects, or parties. "Tax Increment Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179. "TIF Districts° means Tax Increment Financing District Nos. 1 through 13 within the Project. The attached Exhibit A contains certification dates and other information on the TIF Districts. "School District" means Independent School District No. 14, the Fridley School District. "Subdivision" means Minnesota Statutes Section 469.177, Subdivision 10 (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit,B). 2. Recitals. (a) In certain cases, the Subdivision either requires or allows by agreement certain tax increments attributable to school district referendum tax levies to be paid to school districts. (b) TIF District Nos. 1, 8 and 13 are located entirely within the boundaries of the School District, and a portion of TIF District Nos. 2, 4, and 12 are located within the boundaries of the School District. � 7.18 299t36.2 (c) None of the property within TIF District Nos. 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11 is located within the boundaries of the School District. (d) It is the purpose of this Agreement to provide for payment of certain tax increments to the School District pursuant to and in accordance with the provision of the Subdivision. (e) Nothing in this Agreement is intended to violate the covenants and agreements heretofore made respecting the application of tax increments from the TIF Districts pursuant to the Tax Increment Obligations. 3. Representations of the City. (a) The Tax Increment Obligations were issued to finance various activities of the HRA within the Project. (b) The 1985 Revenue Bonds are not general obligations of the City or the HRA. Tax increments from TIF District Nos. 1 through S are pledged to the payment of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, and there are no other sources of funds pledged to the paytnent thereof. The final scheduled principal maturity of the 1985 Revenue Bonds is February 1, 1999. (c) The Limited Revenue Note is not a general obligation of the City or the HRA and is payable solely from tax increments pledged for such purposes from TIF District No. 6. (d) The 1985 G.O. Bonds were payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the fznal scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds was February l, 2000. However, on February 1, 1990, the City discharged the 1985 G.O. Bonds by paying all then outstanding principal thereof and interest thereon. 3 7.'19 � 299136.2 (e) The 1986 G.O. Sonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is February 1, 2000. However, the City has advance refunded the 1986 G.O. Bonds via the issuance of the 1990 G.O. Bonds, and the City expects pursuant to said refunding that all of the principal of and interest on the 1986 G.O. Bonds will have been paid on or before February 1, 1994. (f) The 1990 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is August 1, 2009. (g) The 1992 G.O. Bonds are payable, to the extent permitted by applicable law, from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 12, and the final scheduled maturity of those Bonds is December 1, 1995. (h) Portions of the principal of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, and the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the 1990 G.O. Bonds, and the 1992 G.O. Bonds were outstanding on May 1, 1988, andjor are outstanding on the date of this Agreement. 4. Representations of the School District. (a) On September 23, 1986, the electorate of the School District approved a 2.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1986 payable 198.7 property taxes. This levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1986 LE�T}/" . (b) On September 29, 1987, the electorate of the School District approved (i) a 7.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1987 payable 1988 property taxes and (ii) a continuous additional 6.5 mill levy first effective for the 1988 payable 1989 property taxes. These levies are hereinafter collectively referred to as the '�1987 Levies". 4 7.2� € � � z��.z (c) According to the Minnesota Department of Education, for purposes of the above-mentioned referendum levies the tax capacity rate equivalents of 2 mills and 13.5 mills are .02261395 and .15264411, respectively. (d) On November 3, 1992, the electorate of the School District approved a levy increase of $203.51 per actual pupil unit, effective for the five years ending with the taxes payable in 1997, unless earlier reduced or revoked; however, since the proceeds of this levy are paid directly to the School District by the applicable County taxing authori.ties�, it is not necessary or appropriate to include said levy or its proceeds under this Agreement. 5. Payment of Tax Increments to School District. The City and the School District hereby agree that, except as otherwise provided pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement, tax increments shall be paid to the Schooi District by the HRA as and to the extent received by the HRA, with respect to the tax increments relating to the 1995 payable 1996 property taxes, as follows: (a) TIF District Nos. 12 and 13. Since TIF District Nos. 12 and 13 were requested for certification after May 1, 1988, the Subdivision does not apply to those Districts, and no tax increments from those Districts attributable to the 1986 Levy or the 1987 Levies are payable to the School District. (b) TIF District No. 8. Since the 1987 Levies were approved after the date of certification of TIF District No. 8, and since on May 1, 1988, there were no bonds outstanding to which increment from TIF District No. 8 was pledged, the tax increments from TIF District No. S which are attributabTe to the I987 Levies are automatically payable and shall be paid to the School District pursuant to clause b(1) of the Subdivision. Since the 1986 Levy was approved prior to the date of certification of TIF District No. 8, the Subdivision does not apply to that Levy with respect to this District, and no tax �� 7.21 299136.2 increments attributable to said Levy from this District are payable to the School District. (c) TIF District No. 4. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 4 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy and the 1987 Levies shall be paid to the School District. (d) TIF District No. 2. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 2 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy and the 1987 Levies shall be paid to the School District. (e) TIF District No. 1. Pursuant to clause b(2? of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 1 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy and the 198'7 Levies shall be paid to the School District. 6. Further Aareements. Nothing in this Agreement is intended or shall be applied in such a manner as to violate the obligations and covenants made by the City or the HR.A in connection with the Tax Increment Obligations, and to the extent but only to the extent that the application of the terms of this Agreement would give rise to a violation of said obligations and covenants, including without limitation, the default in the timely and full payment af the Tax Increment Obligations, the applicable tax increments shall be applied instead in the manner, but only to the e�ctent necessary, to avoid such default or other violation of said covenants or obligations. Nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the City or the HRA in the exercise of the powers which they may have relating to the Project or the TIF Districts. In addition, the City and the School District agree that, except in each case described in� paragraph 5 of this Agreement where payment of tax increment to the School District is mandatory pursuant to clause b(1) of the Subdivision, all other provisions of said paragraph 5 providing for payment of tax i�crement to the School District shall be limited to and shall apply only to such tax increment attributable to the 1995"'payable 1996 real estate property taxes, and at the conclusion of said period, the City and the School District agree to review the circumstances and to attempt to negotiate in good faith such further agreement or agreements as may be permitted by law and which are acceptable to both the City and School District with respect to discretionary payments of such applicable tax increment to the School District. 0 7.22 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the School District have caused �this Agreement to be executed by their duly �uthorized representatives. CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Mayor City Manager INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14 School Board Chair Superintendent 299136.2 7 ; 7.23 - � c EXHIBIT A Schedule of Tax Increment Financing Districts Within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 of the Fridley HRA TIF District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 299136.2 Name Center City Moore Lake North Area Johnson Printing/ Skywood Mall Paschke Lake Pointe Winfield Shorewood Onan/Old Central Northco Phase III Osborne Crossings McGl� Bakeries Satellite Lane Apts. 8 ; 7.24 Certification Date 5/11/79 7/31/81 5/19f82 1/20/84 3/15/84 12/24/85 10/22/86 10/24/86 9/7/89 4/10/90 1/31/92 3/5/92 6/20/95 Independent School District No. 14 13/14 11/16 13/14 16 13 16 14 16 16 16 14/16 14 � Exhibit B Subd. 10. Pa}•ment to schoot for relerendum le«�. (a) The pro�'isions ofthis subditi�i- sion appl}• to tax increment financing districts and projects for «�hich certification was requested before etifay i, 1933, that are ]ocated in a schoo! district in u•hich the �oten ha�-e appro��ed new• local tax rates or an increase in local tax rates after the tax incre- ment financing district w•as certified. (b)( I) If there are no outstanding bonds on �fay� l, 1988, to tt�hich incremenc from the district is pledged, or if ihe reterendum is appro��ed after �fay i, 1988, and there are no bonds outstanding at the time the referendum is appro�•ed, that were issued before T4ay 1, 19fi8, the auihority must annually pay to the school district an amount of increment equal to the increment that is attributable to the increase in the loeal tax rate under the referendum. (2) If clause (1) does not apply, upon approval by a majorit� vote of the go��erning body of the municipality and the school board, the authority must pay to the school district an amount of increment equal to the iricrement that is attributable to the increase in the locai tax rate under the referendum. (c) The amounts of these increments may be expended and must be treated by the school district in the same manner as pro�•ided for the re�•enues derived from the refer- endum le�y appro��ed by the voters. The pro�•isions of this subdi��ision apply to projects for w•hich certification Was requested before, on, and after August 1, 1979. 7.25 -� t � This Agreement by and between the School District No. 299137.2 AGREEMENT is dated as of January 2, 1996, is City of Fridley, Minnesota, and 2ndependent 16, and provides as follows: l. Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms have the following meanings, respectively: "CItY" means the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "Project" means Redevelopment Project No. 1 established and operated by the HRA pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047. "1985 Revenue Bonds" means the HRA's $4,070,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 1985, dated May 1, 1985. "Limited Revenue Note" means the HR.A�s $5,603,755.80 Limited Revenue Capital Appreciation Tax Increment Note, dated December 20, 1985. "1985 G.O. Bonds" means tihe City's $11,550,000 Variable Rate Demand General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985, dated December 30, 1985. "1986 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $10,045,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1986, dated as of August l, 1986. "1990 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $9,485,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds of 1990, dated March 1, 1990. "1992 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $4,030,000 General Obligation Temporary Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1992C, dated December l, 1992. 7.L6 SCHOOL DiSTRiCT NO. 16 299137.2 "Tax Increment ObliQations" means the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the 1990 G.O. Bonds, the 1992 G.O. Bonds, and any other contractual obligations of the HR.A or the City which were entered into prior to the date of this Agreement and which commit the use of any tax increments from the TIF Districts for specified purposes, projects, or parties. ��Tax Increment Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.Z79. ��TIF Districts" means Tax Increment Financing D�istrict Nos. 1 through 13 within the Project. The attached Exhibit A contains certification dates and other information on the TIF Districts. "School District" means Independent School District No. 16, the Spring Lake Park School District. ` �°Subdivision" means Minnesota Statutes Section 469.177, Subdivision 10 (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B). 2. Recitals. (a) In certain cases, the Subdivision either requires or allows by agreement certain tax increments attributable to school district referendum tax levies to be paid to school districts. {b) TIF District Nos. 5, 7, 9, 10, and 11 are located entirely within the boundaries of the School District, and a portion of TIF District Nos. 3 and 12 is located within the boundaries of the School District. 2 7.27 {c) None of the property within TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 13 is located within the boundaries of the School District. (d) It is the purpose of this Agreement to provide for payment of certain tax increments to the School District pursuant to and in accordance with the provision of the Subdivision. (e) Nothing in this Agreement is intended to violate the covenants and agreements heretofore made respecting the application of tax increments from the TIF Districts pursuant to the Tax Increment Obligations. 3. Re�resentations of the City. (a) The Tax Increment Obligations were issued to finance various activities of the HRA within the Project. (b) The 1985 Revenue Bonds are not general obligations of the City or the HR.A. Tax increments from TIF District Nos. 1 through 5 are pledged to the payment of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, and there are no other sources of funds pledged to the payment thereof. The final scheduled principal maturity of the 1985 Revenue Bonds is February 1, 1999. (c) The Limited Revenue Note is not a general obligation of the City or the HRA and is payable solely from tax increments pledged for such purposes from TIF District No. 6. (d) The 1985 G.O. Bonds were payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds was February 1, 2000. However, on February 1, 1990, the City discharged the 1985 G.O. Bonds by paying all then outstanding principal thereof and interest thereon. ( e) The 19 8 6 G. O. Bonds are payable f rom tax increments derived from TTF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal 299t37.2 3 7.28 maturity of those Bonds is February 1, 2000. However, the City has advance refunded the 1986 G.O. Bonds via the issuance of the 1990 G.O. Bonds, and the City expects pursuant to said refunding that all of the principal of and interest on the 1986 G.O. Bonds will have been paid on or before February 1, 1994. (f) The 1990 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is August 1, 2009. (g) The 1992 G.O. Bonds are payable, to the extent permitted by applicable law, from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 12, and the final scheduled maturity of those Bonds is December 1, 1995. (h) Portions of the principal of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, and the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the 1990 G.O. Bonds, and the 1992 G.O. Bonds were outstanding on May 2, 1988, and/or are outstanding on the date of this Agreement. 4. Representations of the School District. (a) On October 8, 1981, the electorate of the School District approved a 5.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1981 payable 1982 property taxes. This levy is hereinafter referred to as the °1981 Levy". (b) On February 27, 1986, the electorate of the School District approved a 6.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1986 payable 1987 property taxes. This levy is hereinafter referred to as the °1986 Levy". (c) According to the Minnesota Department of Education, for purposes of the above-mentioned referendum levies the tax capacity rate equivalents of 5 mills and 6 mills are .05226653 and .06271984, respectively. 299137.2 4 7.29� 299137.2 5. Pavment of Tax Increments to School District. The City and the School District hereby agree that, except as otherwise provided pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement, tax increments shall be paid to the School District by the HRA as and to the extent received by the HRA, with respect to the tax increments relating to the 1995 payable 1996 property taxes, as follows: (a) TIF District Nos. 9. 10, 11, and 12. Since TIF District Nos. 9, 10, 11, and 12 were requested for certification after May 1, 1988, the Subdivision does not apply to those Districts, and no tax increments attributable to the 1981 Levy or the 1986 Levy from those Districts are payable to the School District. (b) TIF District No. 7. Since the 1981 Levy and the 1986 Levy were approved prior to the date of certification of TIF District No. 7, the Subdivision does not apply to tihose Levies with respect to this District, and no tax increments attributable to said Levies from this District are payable to the School District. (c) TIF District No. 5. Since the 1981 Levy was approved prior to the date of cert- ification of TIF District No. 5, the Subdi- vision does not apply to the 1981 Levy, and no tax increments attributable to said Levy from this District are payable to the School District. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 5 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy shall be paid to the School District. (d) TIF District No. 3. Since the 1981 Levy was approved prior to the date of certification of TIF District No. 3, the Subdivision does not apply to the 1981 Levy, and no tax increments attributable to said Levy from this District are payable to the School District. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 3 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy shall be paid to the School District. 5 7�:30 6. Further Asreements. Nothing in this Agreement is intended or shall be applied in such a manner as to violate the obligations and covenants made by the City or the HRA in connection with the Tax Increment Obligations, and to the extent but only to the extent that the application of the terms of this Agreement would give rise to a violation of said obligations and covenants, including without limitation, the default in the timely and full payment of the Tax Increment Obligations, the applicable tax increments shall be applied instead in the manner, but only to the extent necessary, to avoid such default or other violation of said covenants or obligations. Nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the City or the HRA in the exercise of the powers which they may have relating to the Project or the TIF Districts. In addition, the City and the School District agree that the provisions of paragraph 5 providing for paymen� of tax increment to the School District shall be limited to and shall apply only to such tax increment attributable to the 1995 payable 1996 real estate property taxes, and at the conclusion of said period, the City and the School District agree to review the circumstances and to attempt to negotiate in good faith such further agreement or agreements as may be permitted by law and which are acceptable to both the City and School District with respect to discretionary payments of such applicable tax increment to the School District. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the School District have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Mayor City Manager INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 16 School Board Chair Superintendent 29913T.2 6 7.31 � , . , :. . >> . ;�, �, . . EXHIBIT A Schedule of Tax Increment Financing Districts Within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 of the Fridley HRA TIF District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 299137.2 Name Center City Moore Lake North Area Johnson Printing/ Skywood Mall Paschke Lake Pointe Winfield Shorewood < Onan/Old Central Northco Phase III Osborne Crossings McGlynn Bakeries Satellite Lane Apts. 7.32 Certification Date 5/11/79 7/31/81 5/19/82 ilao/s4 3f15/84 12/24/s5 10/22/86 10/24/86 9/7/89 4/10/90 1/31/92 3/5/92 6/20/95 Independent School District No. 14 13 /14 llf 16 13/14 16 13 16 14 16 16 16 14/16 14 Exhibit B Subd. 10. Pa��ment to school for referendum le��. (a) The pro��isions of this subdivi- sion appl�� to tax i�cremznt financin; districts and projects for «�hich certification was requested before \tay 1, 1933, that are located in a school district in «�hich tht �'oters have appro��ed new local tax rates or an increase in locai tax rates after the tac incre- ment financing district K�as ceni6ed. (b)(1) If there are no outstanding bonds on �ta�� I. 1933. to �t hich increment from the district is pledged, or if the referendum is appro��ed after �fay I, 1983, and there are no bonds ouistanding at the time the referendum is appro��ed, that ��ere issued before TQay l, 1958, the authoritp must annualiy pay to the school district an amount of increment equal to the increment that is attributable to the increase in the lacal tax rate under the referendum. (2) If clause (1) does not 2pply, upon appro��al by a majority �-ote of the go�'erning body of ihe municipxlity and the school board, the authority must pay to the school district an amount of increment equal to the iricrement that is attributable to the increase in the local tax rate under the referendum. (c) The amounts of these increments may be expended and must be treated by the schooi district in the same m2nner as pro�-ided for the re��enues deri��ed from the refer- endum le�y appro��ed b�• the �-oters. The pro�•isions of this subdi�°ision apply to projects tor w�hich cenification ��as requested before, on, and after August 1, 19 i9. 7.33 � TO: WILI�IAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER �� FROM: RICBARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR HOWARD ROOLICR, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR WALTER COLE, ACCOIINTING/DATA PROCESSING CLERR SIIBJECT: RESOLIITION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR 1995 TREE ABATEMFNT DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 - Attached you will find the Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll for the 1995 Tree Abatement. This abatement was on the property located at 627 Cheryl St. RDP/whc Attachment 8.01 RESOLIITION NO. -1995 RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR 1995 TREE ABATEMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley,-Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that the assessable cost of construction with respect to the following named improvement, to wit: 1995 TREE ABATEMENT including all incidental expenses thereto is estimated at $ 661.90. 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amounts to be specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by said improvement according to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1995. ATTEST: WILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERR ' 1 i WILI,IAM J . NEE - MAYOR TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNS, CITY MANAGER �� FROM: RICIiARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR HOWARD ROOLICR, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR WALTER COLE, ACCOIINTING/DATA PROCESSING CLERIC BUHJECTL RESOLIITTON DIRECTING PIIBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 1995 TREB ABATEMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 11� 1995 ' Attached you will find the Resolution Directing Publication of Hearing on Proposed Assessment Roll for the 1995 Tree Abatement. This abatement was on the property located at 627 Cheryl St. The Public Hearing Notice will be published in the Focus on September 28 and October 5, 1995 as required by State Statute. RDP/whc Attachment 9.01 RESOLUTION NO. - 1995 - RESOLIITION DIRECTING PIIBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROP03ED A3SES3MENT ROLL FOR THE 1995 TREE ABATEMENT WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on , 1995, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of tree removal; and - WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment roll has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council shall meet at the Fridley Muni.cipal Center in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, on the 23rd day of October, 1995, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. to pass upon the proposed assessment for: 1995 TREE ABATEMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL 2. The City clerk shall publish notices of the time and place of the meeting in the official newspaper of the City a lease two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY T�I3 DAY OF , 1995 ATTEST: WILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR 9.02 CITY OF FRIDLEY ANORA COIINTY� MINNESOTA NOTICS OF HEARING ON ASSE83MENT FOR 1995 TREE ABATEMENT Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the Fridley Municipal Center in said City on the 23rd day of October, 1995, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon all objection , if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: 1995 TREE ABATEMENT The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements in the total amount of $ 661.90 is now on file and open to public inspection, by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the removal of trees: 627 CHERYL ST NE The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. At said hearing the Council objections to the proposed improvements. No appeal may be individual assessment unless a affected property owner is filed assessment hearing or presented public hearing. will consider written or �oral assessment for each of said taken as to the amount of any written objection signed by the with the City Clerk prior to the to the presiding officer at the A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) day after service upon the Mayor of City Clerk. 9.03 Page 2- Notice of Hearinq on Assessment of 1995 TREE ABATEMENT The City of Fridley adopted Resolution No. 14 - 1995 on February 13, 1995, relating to the deferral of special assessments for certain senior citizens where the payment of said special assessments constitutes a hardship. The following factors will govern the granting of the deferments: The property must be homestead property, and the owner must be a least sixty-five (65) years of age or older, and in the case of husband and wife, on �ember must meet this age requirement. The application for said deferral must be made within the first thirty (30) days after the adoption of the final assessment roll by the City Council. The owner will make application for deferred payments on forms prescribed by the Anoka County Auditor, and will make application to the City of Fridley on forms provided by the City. - The City Council will consider each application on an individual basis; however, the general policy is to grant senior citizen hardship special assessment deferrals when the annual payment for the special assessment exceeds one (1) per cent of the adjusted gross income of the owners as determined by the most recent Federal Income Tax Return, or if the household income is below the Very Low Income threshold as defined by the Federal Income Limits for the Community Development Block Grant programs. The deferral will be terminated and all amounts accumulated plus applicable interest shall become due when any of the following happen: the death of the owner, provided that the surviving spouse is not otherwise eligible for the deferral; the sale, transfer, or subdivision o� the property or any part thereof; loss of homestead status for any reason; the City Council determines that further deferral is not in the public interest. DATED THIS DAY OF , 1995 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. AILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERR Publish: Fridley Focus on September 28 & October 5, 1995 9.04 _ • DRNS CITY MANAGER �� TO. WILLIAM W. B � a ��- FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR HOWARD ROOLICR, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR WALTER COLE, ACCOIINTING/DATA PROCESSING CLERR SIIBJECT: RESOLIITION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 1995 SERVICE CONNECTIONS DATE: BEPTEMBER 11, 1995 Attached you will find the following Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll'For the 1995 Service Connection: This connection was on the property located at 4795 3rd St. RDP/whc Attachment 1 � RESOLIITION NO. -1995 RESOLIITION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR 1995 3ERVICE CONNECTIONS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley,-Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that the assessable cost of construction with respect to the following named improvement, to wit: 1995 SERVICE CONNECTIONS including all incidental expenses thereto is estimated at $ 1,877.48. 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amounts to be specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by said improvement according to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1995. ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR WILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERR � �.02 � TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER � � FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCL DIRECTOR HOWARD ROOLICR, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRLCTOR 1PALTER COLE, ACCOIINTIN(�/DATA PROCESSING CLBRR SIIBJECT: RESOLIITION DIRECTING PIIBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMBNT ROLI� FOR THE 1995 SERVICE CONNECTIONS _ DATE: SEPTEMBER 11� 1995 Attached you will find the following Resolution Directing Publication of Hearing on Proposed Assessemtn Roll For the 1995 Service Connection: • This connection was on the property located at 4795 3rd St. The Public Hearing Notice will be published in the Focus on September 28 and October 5, 1995 as required by State Statute. RDP/whC Attachment 11.01 RESOLUTION NO. - 1995 RESOLIITION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROP03ED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 1995 SERVICE CONNECTION WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on , 1995, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of sewer laterals, water laterals, and �ervice connections; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment roll has been completed and filed in his office for _ public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council shall meet at the Fridley Municipal Center in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, on the 23rd day of October, 1995, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. to pass upon the proposed assessment for: 1995 SERVICE CONNECTION ASSESSMENT ROLL 2. The City clerk shall publish notices of t�e time and place of the meeting in the official newspaper of the City a lease two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COiJNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1995 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: AILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERR 11.02 CITY OF FRIDLEY ANORA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR 1995 SERVICE CONNECTIONS Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the Fridley Municipal Center in said City on the 23rd day of October, 1995, at 7:30 o'cZock P.M., to hear and pass upon all objection , if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: i995 SERVICE CONNECTIONS The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements in the total amount of $ 1.877.48, is now on file and open to public inspection, b� all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the connection of sewer laterals, water laterals, and service connections: � 4795 3RD ST NS The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole �or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. At said hearing the Council objectzons to the proposed improvements. No appeal may be individual assessment unless a affected property owner is filed assessment hearing or presented public hearing. will consider written or oral assessment for each of said taken as to the amount of any written objection signed by the with the City Clerk prior to the to the presiding officer at the A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) day after service upon the Mayor of City Clerk. 11.03 Paqe 2- Notice of Hearinq on Assessment of 1995 SERVICE CONNECTION3 The City of Fridley adopted Resolution No. 14 - 1995 on February 13, 1995, relating to the deferral of speciai assessments for certain senior citizens where the payment of said special assessments constitutes a hardship. The following factors will govern the granting of the deferments: The property must be homestead property, and the owner must be a least sixty-five (65j years of age or older, and in the case of husband and wife, on member must meet this age requirement. The application for said deferral must be made within the first thirty (30) days after the adoption of the final assessment roll by the City Council. The owner will make application for deferred payments on forms prescribed by the Anoka County Auditor, and will make application to the City of Fridley on forms provided by the City. - The City Council will consider each application on an individual basis; however, the general policy is ta grant senior citizen hardship special assessment deferrals when the annual payment for the special assessment exceeds one (1) per cent of the adjusted gross income of the owners as determined by the most recent Federal Income Tax Return, or if the household income is below the Very Low Income threshold as defined by the Federal Income Limits for the Community Development Block Grant programs. _ The deferral will be terminated and all amounts accumulated plus applicable interest shall become due when any of the following happen: the death of the owner, provided that the surviving spouse is not otherwise eligible for the deferral; the sale, transfer, or subdivision of the property or any part thereof; loss of homestead status for any reason; the City Council determines that further deferral is not in the public interest. DATED THIS DAY OF � 1995 BY ORDER OF THS CITY COITNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERR Publish: Fridley Focus on September 28 & October 5, 1995 11.04 A� � TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER �!/ FROM: RICBARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCS DIRECTOR HOWARD ROOLICR� ASSISTANT FINANCL DIRECTOR WALTER COLE� ACCOUNTING/DATA PROCESSING CLERR SIIBJECT: RESOLIITION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STREET 1993 - 7 DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 Attached you will find the Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll for Street Improvement Project No. 1993 -7. This project included improvements on Stinson Blvd, 73rd Ave to Osborne Rd. RDP/whc Attachment 12.01 RESOLIITION NO. - 1995 RESOLIITION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSBSSMENT ROLI, FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STREET 1993 - 7 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that the assessable cost of construction with respect to the following named improvement, to-wit: � STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STREET 1993 - 7 including all incidental expenses thereto is estlmated at. $ 277,631.30. 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amounts to be specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by said improvement according to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCII, OF THE CITY OF FRIDI�EY THIS DAY OF , 1995. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM C. CiiAMPA - CITY CLERK �:12.02� AILLIAM W. BDRNB, CITY MANAGBR � TO: � FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR HOWARD ROOLICR, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR WALTER COLl;� ACCOIINTING/DATA PROCESSING CLERR SUBJECT: RE80LIITION DIRECTING PIIBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STRBLT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STREET 1993 - 7 DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 Attached you will find the following the Resolution Directinq Publication of Hearing On Proposed Assessment Roll for Street Improvement Project No. 1993 - 7. This project included improvements on Stinson Blvd, 73rd Ave to Osborne Rd. The Public Hearing Notice will be published in the Focus on September 28 and October 5, 1995 as required by State Statute. RDP/whC Attachment 13.01 RESOLIITION NO. - 1995 RESOLIITION DIRECTING PIIBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROI�L FOR STREET IMROVEMLNT PROJECT NO. STREET 1993 - 7 WHEREAS, by resolution passed by the Council on , 1995, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of installation of concrete curb and gutter, a new asphalt driving surface and all associated striping, signi�g, and landscaping, and related appurtenances; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment roll has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the C'1ty Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council shall meet at the Fridley Municipal Center in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, on the 23rd day of October, 1995, at 7:30 o'clock P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. BTREET 1993 - 7 2. The City Clerk shall publish notices of the time and place of meeting in the official newspaper of the City at lease two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF � 1995 AILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: S�ILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERR 13.02 CITY OF FRIDLEY ANORA COIINTY, MINNEf NOTICE OF iiEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1993 - 7 Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the Fridley Municipal Center in said City on the 23rd day of October, 1995, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon all objection , if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1993 - 7 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements in the total amount of $ 277.631.30 is now on file and open to public inspection, by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the removal of existing asphalt surface, the installation of Class 5 base, concrete curb and gutter, a new asphalt driving surface, storm drain piping, and all associated striping, signing and landscaping and located as follows: Stinson Bou2evard 73rd Avenue To Osborne Road The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. At said hearing the Council objections to the proposed improvements. No appeal may be individual assessment unless a affected property owner is filed assessment hearing or presented public hearing. will consider written or oral assessment for each of said taken as to the amount of any written objection signed by the with the City Clerk prior to the to the presiding officer at the A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) day after service upon the Mayor of City Clerk. 13.03 Paqe 2- Notice of Hearinq on Assessment of STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STREET 1993 - 7 The City of Fridley adopted Resolution No. 14 - 1995 on February 13, 1995, relating to the deferral of special assessments for certain senior citizens where the payment of said special assessments constitutes a hardship. The following factors will govern the granting of the deferments: The property must be homestead property, and the owner must be a least sixty-five (65) years of age or older, and in the case of husband and wife, on member must meet this age requirement. The application for said deferral must be made within the first thirty (30) days after the adoption of the final assessment roll by the City Council. The owner will make application for deferred payments on forms prescribed by the Anoka County Auditor, and will make application to the City of Fridley on forms provided by the City. The City Council will consider each application on an individual basis; however, the general policy is to grant senior citizen hardship•special assessment deferrals when the annual payment for the special assessment exceeds one (1) per cent of the adjusted gross income of the owners as determined by the most recent Federal Income Tax Return, or if the household income is below the Very Low Income threshold as defined by the Federal Income Limits for the Community Development Block Grant programs. The deferral will be terminated and all amounts accumulated plus applicable interest shall become due when any of the following happen: the death of the owner, provided that the surviving spouse is not otherwise eligible for the deferral; the sale, transfer, or subdivision of the property or any part thereof; loss of homestead status for any reason; the City Council determines that further deferral is not in the public interest. DATED THIS DAY OF , 1995 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERR Publish: Fridiey Focus on September 28 & October 5, 3995 13.04 !i WILLIAM W. BORNB, CITY MANAGER �� TOS � FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR HOWARD ROOLICR, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR WALTER COLE, ACCOQNTING/DATA�PROCESSING CLERR SIIBJECT: RESOLIITION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STREET 1992 - 2 DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 � Attached you will find the following the Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll for Street Improvement Project No. 1992 - 2. This project included improvements on 1040, 1050 and 1060 Hathaway Lane NE. RDP/whc Attachment 14.01 � RESOLUTION NO. - 1995 RESOLIITION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF A88ESSMENT ROLL FOR 8TRE13T IMPROVEMLNT PR�TLCT NO. BTRLET 1992 - 2 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that the assessable cost of construction with respect to the following named improvement, to-wit: - BTREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STRBBT 1992 - 2 including all incidental e�enses thereto is estimated at $ 1,256,255.08. 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amounts to be specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by said improvement according to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY T8E CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLLY THIS DAY OF � 1995. AILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERR 14.02 � TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNS� CITY MANAGER �7P� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR HOWARD ROOLICR, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR WALTER COLE, ACCOIINTING/DATA PROCESSING CLERK SUBJECT: RESOLIITION DIRECTING PQBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STREET 1992 - 2 DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 Attached you will find the following the Resolution Directing Publication of Hearing on Proposed Assessment Roll for Street Improvement Project No. 1992 - 2. . This project included improvements on 1040, 1050 and 1060 Hathaway Lane NE. The Public Hearing Notice will be published in the Focus on September 28 and October 5, 1995 as required by State Statute. RDP/whc Attachment 15.01 RESOLIITION NO. - 1995 RE80LIITION DIRECTING PIIBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STREET 1992 - 2 WHEREAS, by resolution passed by the Council on , 1995, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of installation of concrete curb and gutter, a new asphalt driving surface and all associated striping, signing, and landscaping, and related appurtenances; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment roll has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council shall meet at the Fridley Municipal Genter in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, on the 23rd day of October, 1995, at 7:30 o'clock P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STREET 1992 - 2 2. The City Clerk shall publish notices of the time and place of meeting in the official newspaper of the City at lease two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1995 ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR AILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 15.02 CITY OF FRIDLEY ANORA COIINTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992 - 2 Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the Fridley Municipal Center in said City on the 23rd day of October, 1995, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon all objection , if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: � STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992 - 2 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements in the total amount of $ 1,256,255.08 is now on file and open to public inspection, by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction of street improvements including grading, concrete curb and gutter, class 5 base material, asphalt pavement, storm drainage, signing, striping and landscaping and related appurtenances located as follows: Hathaway 8t - Hackman to Reqis Dr. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. At said hearing the Council objections to the proposed improvements. No appeal may be individual assessment unless a affected property owner is filed assessment hearing or presented public hearing. will consider written or oral assessment for each of said taken as to the amount of any written objection signed by the with the City Clerk prior to the to the presiding officer at the A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) day after service upon the Mayor of City Clerk. 15.03 Paqe 2- Notice of Hearinq on Assessment of STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STREET 1992 - 2 The City of Fridley adopted Resolution No. 14 - 1995 on February 13, 1995, relating to the deferral of special assessments for certain senior citizens where the payment of said special assessments constitutes a hardship. The following factors will govern the granting of the deferments: The property must be homestead property, and the owner must be a least sixty-five (65) years of age or older, and in the case of husband and wife, on member must meet this age requirement. The application for said deferral must be made within the first thirty (30) days after the adoption of the final assessment roll by the City Council. The owner will make application for deferred payments on forms prescribed by the Anoka County Auditor, and will make application to the City of Fridley on forms provided by the City. The City Council will consider each application on an individual basis; however, the general policy is to grant senior citizen hardship special assessment deferrals when the annual payment for the special assessment exceeds one (1) per cent of the adjusted gross income of the owners as determined by the most recent Federal Income Tax Return, or if the household income is below the Very Low Income threshold as defined by the Federal Income Limits for the Community Development Block Grant programs. The deferral will be terminated and all amounts accumulated plus applicable interest shall become due when any of the following happen: the death of the owner, provided that the surviving spouse is not otherwise eligible for the deferral; the sale, transfer, or subdivision of the property or any part thereof; loss of homestead status for any reason; the City Council determines that further deferral is not in the public interest. DATED THIS DAY OF , 1995 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: AILLIAM C. CIiAMPA - CITY CLERR Publish: Fridley Focus on September 28 & October 5, 1995 15.04 TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER j �� `�- FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR HOWARD ROOLICR, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR WALTER COI,S, ACCOIINTING/DATA PROCESSING CLERR SIIBJECT: RESOLIITION DIRECTING PRSPARATION OF ABSE88MENT ROLL FOR THE 64TH AoENIIE STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 260 i DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 Attached you will find the following the Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll for The 64th Avenue Storm Water Improvement Project No. 260. This project included improvements on Z372 and 1384 64th Avenue. RDP/whc Attachment 16.01 RESOLIITION NO. -1995 RESOLIITION DIRECTING PREPARP,TION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 64TH AVENEUE STORM WATER IMPROVEMSNT PROJECT NO. 260 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that the assessable cost of construction with respect to the following named improvement, to wit: 64TIi AVENIIE STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 260 including all incidental expenses thereto is estimated at $ 173,105.08. 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amounts to be specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by said improvement according to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS ' DAY OF , 1995. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERR � 6.�2 TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNS, CITY MANAGER �� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANC$ DIRECTOR HOAARD ROOLICR, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR WALTER COLB, ACCOIINTING/DATA PROCESSING CLERR SIIBJECT: RESOLIITION DIRECTING PIIBLICATION OF HEARIN(� ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLI� FOR THE 64TH AVENIIB BTORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 260 DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 Attached you will find the following the Resolution Directing Publication of Hearing On Proposed Assessment Roll for The 64th Avenue Storm Water Improvement Project No. 260. This project included improvements on 1372 and 1384 64th Avenue. The Public Hearing Notice will be published in the Focus on September 28 and October 5, 1995 as required by State Statute. RDP/whc Attachment 17.01 RESOLIITION NO. - 1995 RESOLOTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR 64TH AVENOE STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 260 WHEREAS, by resolution passed by the Council on , 1995, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of installation of concrete curb and gutter, a new asphalt driving surface and all associated striping, signing, and landscaping, and related appurtenances; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment roll has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council shall meet at the Fridley Municipal Center in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, on the 23rd day of October, 1995, at 7:30 o'clock P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for: 64TH AVENEIIE STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 260 2. The City Clerk shall publish notices oi the time and place of meeting in the official newspaper of the City at lease two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1995 ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR WILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERR 17.02 CITY OF FRIDLEY ANORA COIINTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HBARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR 64TH AVENIIE $TORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 260 Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the Fridley Municipal Center in said City on the 23rd day of October, 1995, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon all objection , if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: 64T$ AVENIIE STORM AATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 260 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements in the total amount of $ 2,000.00 is now on file and open to public inspection, by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction of concrete storm water pipe and related appurtenances as follows: 1372 64th Avenue 1384 64th Avenue The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. At said hearing the Council objections to the proposed improvements. No appeal may be individual assessment unless a affected property owner is filed assessment hearing or presented public hearing. will consider written or oral assessment for each of said taken as to the amount af any written objection signed by the with the City Clerk prior to the to the pres iding of f icer at the A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) day after service upon the Mayor of City Clerk. 17.03 Page 2- Notice of Hearinq on Assessment of 64th AVENtJE STORM WATER IMPROVENEMT PROJECT NO. 260 The City of Fridley adopted Resolution No. 14 - 1995 on February 13, 1995, relating to the deferral of special assessments for certain senior citizens where the payment of said special assessments constitutes a hardship. The following factors will govern the granting of the deferments: The property must be homestead property, and the owner must be a least sixty-five (65) years of age or older, and in the case of husband and wife, on member must meet this age requirement. The application for said deferral must be made within the first thirty (30) days after the adoption of the final assessment roll by the City Council. The owner will make application for deferred payments on forms prescribed by the Anoka County Auditor, and will make application to the City of Fridley on forms provided by the City. The City Council will consider each application on an individual basis; however, the general policy is to grant senior citizen hardship special assessment deferrals when the annual payment for the special assessment exceeds one (1) per cent of the adjusted gross income of the owners as determined by the most recent Federal Income Tax Return, or if the household income is below the Very Low Income threshold as defined by the Federal Income Limits for the Community Development Block Grant programs. The deferral will be terminated and all amounts accumulated plus applicable interest shall become due when any of the following happen: the death of the owner, provided that the surviving spouse is not otherwise eligible for the deferral; the sale, transfer, or subdivision of the property or any part thereof; loss of homestead status for any reason; the City Council determines that further deferral is not in the public interest. DATED THIB DAY OF � 1995 BY ORDSR OF THE CITY COITNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. AILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: AILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERR Publish: Fridley Focus on September 28 & October 5, 1995 17.04 CITY OF FRIDLEY M E M O R A N D U M TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER � �� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR WILLIAM A. CHAMPA, CITY CLERK SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR REVOCATION/SUSPENSION OF SHARX CLUB INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1995 On the September 18 City Council agenda is a public hearing to consider the suspension or revocation of the intoxicating liquor license for Sharx Club, located at 3720 East River Road. A Public Hearing Notice is attached for your review. Since the public hearing was established, Sharx has complied with the two outstanding stipulations: 1. On September 8, 1995, a Certificate of Occupancy was issued for the entire business, including the Sports Bar/Restaurant portion. 2. As soon as the Certificate of Occupancy was approved, Anoka County issued a food license for the entire premises at Sharx. Given Sharx' compliance with these stipulations, staff recommends that the public hearing be removed from the agenda. Review of the intoxicating liquor license and adherence to the 40� food requirement is scheduled for a November meeting, as originally discussed. 21.01 CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will hold a public hearing at the City Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue Northeast on September 18, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. on the question of consideration of suspension or revocation of the Intoxica�ing Liquor License for Sharx Club for the property located at 3720 East River Road. The reason for the proposed suspension or revocation is that Fridley City Code 603.10.18 states that in order for a restaurant to be eligible for an on-sale license, 40% of its total business of serving food and intoxicating liquor must be from the sale.of food. Since the issuance of the existing license, the kitchen at Sharx Club has not been operational. The license holder is in violation of the Fridley code, including 603.10.18 referenced above. Anyone having an interest in this matter should make their interest known at this public hearing. William A. Champa City Clerk ' 21�:02 • En9�neenn9 Vy Se:wer � Y W��r � � O Parks 03 S�rcets ►' V hlaintenancc U_ W —� � m � _ a �� _� �� a►1!> �� TO: William W. Bums, City Manager FROM: John G. Flora,�ublic Works Director jon Wilczek, Assistant Public Works Director DATE: SUBJECT: September 18, 1995 1995 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1995 - 1&2 � PW95-252 Bids were opened on Wednesday, September 13, 1995, for the 199S Street Improvement Project No. ST. 199S - 1&2. Five planholders submitted bids. The Hardrives, Inc. Of Plymouth, MN, submitted the lov�r bid in the amount of $573,282.80. We have run an analysis of the bids and feel that tYus bid is acceptable and falls within the range of the estimate. -: _ The 1995 street improvements include: - - a. b. c. d. e: f. 67th Avenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Monroe to Brookview Arthur St . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6�th to Mississippi 69th Ave . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . Central to Stinson University Ave slipoff Rice Creek townhouse parking lot _ 1995 street overlays - • We �propose to selectively cut expansion joints in the asphalt pavement to control future cracking. The cost for this extra work is estimated at $7,000.00 . We have prepared a change order for this additional work and will submit this to the Council at the September 18 meeting.. In 1995 we had budgeted $500,000 for the 1995 street construction p�ojects, and $90,000 for the 1995 overlay construction for a total of $590,000. Recommend the City Council receive the bids and award the 1995 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1995 - 1&2 to Hardrives, Inc: in the amount of �573,282.80, and approve change order No. 1, contingent on approval of the project by the Municipal State Aid office. , Jw/JGF:cz Attachment 22.� 1 �� .� ., �. . . BID FOR PROPOSALS 199� STREET IMPROVEMENT, PROJECT NO. ST. 1992 - 1&2 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1995, 10:00 A.M. ...... . ........................ ............. ::::�::::::::'::::::::::::<:><::;;:::> ��::>:€>::>:.>:::::>::::::>:_::<: �;:: � :_::<:>`:;::,;:>_<:::< ::: :.:::::::::: :::>:;>::::;>: ::>::>: »::»:>:;:>::>:.;>;;::;.;:: ::::::<:>::::>::>:_»>:;»::>:::>::::�:;;:::.::.::�:::::::::»:::::»>::>::>::>::»::>::>:<:::»::>::: ,;::;:..;�:::>:::.:.:;::. ::::..:::::::. ::: ...... ::>`>,.;:>_»: ��:::::::::<::«::<:::> <:;:PU�N�Q ::: :. .: ;. <:>:::::':> ::: ....... .. ::<::::>:<:;::>:::: �; , .: .. . : ; .:::: :::::::�::::� ................. . ............ 1..�ER::::.::.:,::::::,:::::: ::::::.:::,.�ta:..��tt�!<:::::>::>�::<::::::::::<:>::.:::�::�TAt�::Bt#3�.;:::::.;:.::.;:.:;.;:.��31�M�:.:..�:<:.;: .... ..... ... ............ ... . . ............................ ...........................1�.1.�"...:::. � . Hardrives Inc 5% Pee�iess $573,282.80 9724 10th Ave N PI mouth MN 55441 Valley Paving Inc 5% Uni $578,397.83 4105 85th Ave N Building B Suife 103 Brookl n Park MN 55443 H&M Asphalt Company 5% United States $582,391.95 - 6701 Noms Lake Rd NW Elk River MN 55330 C S McCrossa� Construction Inc 5% St Paul F/M $614,476.60 7865 Jefferson Hwy Ma le Grove MN 55311-6240 Midwest Asphalt 5% Hartford $661.211.40 P O Box 5477 Ho kins MN 55343 Driveway Design NO BID 4810 W Medicine Lake Dr PI mouth MN 55442 Forest Lake Contracting Inc NO BID 14777 Lake Drive Forest Lake MN 55025-9469 Master Asphalt Company - NO BID 10939 89th Ave N Ma le Grove MN 55369 PPM Precision Pavement Maricing NO BID 4754 Lyndale Ave N Minneapolis MN 55430 Thomas & Sons Contracfing !nc NO B1D P O Box 303 22.02 � Project Location Map W z W > J � � z W U � � O „ � C '� i z J 66th AVENUE CREEK PA ISSIS�IPPI fREE �� E"� � 64th AVENUE�-I � 1995 STREET I[�ROVEI�NT PROJECT NO. ST. 1995 - 1&2 � � � � 22�3 �� \ 1 ��a t� ��+ � 1 t ►� ` I' � ► ► �� !- , > 0 � O • � H V � � a J o � � J � � m (� � Z � , �O W � cz O O � � � H � U . � � � .� � � N Project Location Map , s 1995 STREET IN�ROVEl�NT PROJECT NO. ST. 1995 - 1&2 - PROJL CT LO�A T�ON � J �RICE CREEK TERRACE w w � � PANDORA DRIVE � w 0 � OVERTON ORNE � KENNASTON DRIVE 68t ►� UW W l/�N��\J� � � � �� C� cn �' O � Y U a � _4 22.04 N W � W Q. w J w �� c�i� Z w LLi Y V a 67th AVENUE j � I i Project Location Map .IL �� w w� �� - . , - . � I' 1995 STREET I1�ROVEfu�IV'T PROJECT NO. ST. 1995 - 1&2 I � I � I f � �N � � - PROJECT LOCA-T/ON - � ��J �� . U � � � 1s � � / rr . . ��I a :' . �. � �. � E�. ' � uu uu � 9th AVENUE , - � 22505 �' �� W � �. �' � 4 Q ' \ v 9 / � _ t , sx waY xE :- � ; � ce.s�s �m a� xs � u.na sr n � s � �� 44 � � ' _ � - �'I � - I I . ! �ATg �G�AY 694 �� '4p � n� �iy � � �,�y� � - � ,�� ; W z _ � �gY � � e � x _ �, sz uaY xs � x � � a W � � � 51 1►AY NE � _ - � \� � � � � � � � . . ,, , � : : , . , _ - , ;- 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BUDGET 1995 City of Fridley State of Minnesota _ - � Streets Capital Improvements , � 1995 Beginning Balance $4,738,202 Revenues _ Interest tncome _ 189,528 Minnesota State Aid — Construction 650,000 Total Revenues 839,528 Funds.Available , 5,577,730 Prolects 1 s95 Overlay Program -�•-��. 90,000 _ 1995 Sealcoat Program 140,000 _ 1995 Street Reconstruction Project ----� 500,000 Signal (EVP) Improvements 36,000 Total Projects - - 766,000 Ending Balance $4.811.730 �" 1996 Beginning Balance � $4,811,730 Revenues � � Interest Income � � 192,469 - Minnesota State Aid — Constn�ction 650,000 "Total Revenues 842,469 Funds Available - . 5,654,199 ' Froiects - . East RiVer Road Median Upgrade 55,000 1996 Overlay Program � 100,000 _ 1996 Sealcoat Program 146,000 _ 1996 Street Recor�ruction Program - 500,000 _ Signal .(EVP)lmprovements � - 40,000 Total Projects . 841,000 Ending Balance - . . $4.813.199 1997 _ Beginning Balance , $4,813,199 Revenues Interest Income 192,528 Minnesota State Aid — Constniction : 555,000 - ` - Total Revenues .s _ . 747,528 Funds Available � 5,560,727 � Proiects � . • a 997 Sealcoat Program . 160.000 . 1997 Street Reconstruction Project - 500,000 - Signal (EVP) lmprovements 48,000 . I _ Total Projects _ . 708.000 22.�7 Ending Balance 54.852.727 `202