The URL can be used to link to this page

11/13/1995 - 4886OFFICIAL CITY COUNCIL AGBNDA COIINCIL MBETING NOVEMBER 13, 1995 ;�: / i .:, '_ �;, anror fRIDLfY FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING ATTENDENCE SHEET Manday, Nvvembe�c. 13, 1995 7:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER �. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF � a,�, oF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 FRIDLEY The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Heazing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: PRESENTATIONS: '49er Days Parade Float Award Nationai Night Out Award PROCLAMATION: Home Care Month: November, 1995 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of October 23, 1995 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Page 2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 18, 1995 ........ 1.01 - 1.12 Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 1, 1995 ....... 2.01 - 2.06 Establish a Public Hearing for November 27; 1995, for a Vacation Request, SAV #95-04, by Gary Hedman, to Vacate a Utility Easement Generally Located at 60 - 70th Way N. E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.01 - 3.02 Establish a Public Hearing for November 27, 1995, for a Vacation Request, SAV #95-05, by Industrial Equities, to Vacate Drainage and Utility Easements Originally Dedicated on the Recorded Plats of Northco Business Park and Northco Business Park 2nd Addition, Generally Located at the Southwest Corner of 73rd Avenue and Northco Drive (Ward 1) ............................ ..... 4.01 -4.03 :� � � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Page 3 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: Resolution to Establish a Public Hearing for November 27, 1995, to Amend Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 and to Create Tax Increment Financing District No.14 ................................... 5.01-5.07 Resolution Approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, CPA #95-02, by the � City of Fridley for Minco Products, Inc., to Amend the Current Land Use Designation from Commercial to Industrial, Generally Located at 7321 Commerce Lane N.E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.01 - 6.07 Resolution Approving a Subdivision, Lot Split, L.S. #95-02, by the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority, to Split Property Generally Located at 533 Janesville Street N.E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Variance Request, VAR #95-27, by Lindstrom Metric, Inc., to Reduce the Setback of a Sign from the Property Line from 10 Feet to 5 Feet to Allow Construction of a 32 Square Foot Monument Sign, Generally Located at 8101 Ashton Avenue N.E. (V11ard 3) .. 7.01 - 7.11 . . . . . . . . . 8.01 - 8.'I 'I FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Page 4 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: Variance Request, VAR #95-28, by Murphy Warehouse, to Allow a Sign Painted Directly on a Building, Generally Located at 4700 Main Street N.E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.01 - 9.06 Extension of Variance, VAR #93-29, by St. Phillip's Lutheran Church, to Increase the Size of an Institutional Sign from 32 Square Feet to 70 Square Feet, to Allow the Existence of Two Signs on the Property, Generally Located at 6180 Highway 65 N.E. (Ward 2) ................................ v� 10.01 - 10 2 � Resolution Electing a Qualifying Contribution to Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.01 - 11.07 Motion to Waive $1,000 Security Bond Requirement for Repair Work Made by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division (Between Hickory Place and their Junction Box West of the - Burlington Norkhern Raiiroad Tracks) (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12.01 - 12.03 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Page 5 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: Approve Change Order No. 1 to Washington Street Watermain Repair Project No. 272 (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13.01 - 13.03 Resolution Authorizing Municipa! State Aid Funds to County State Aid Highway (C.S.A.H.) East River Road - Hartman Circle to Glen Creek Road (S.P. 02-601-36) (S.A. P. 127-020-13 Addendum No. 1) (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.01 - 14.02 Resolution in Support of an Application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premises Permit to Fridley American Legion Post 303 (Ward 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.01 - 15.02 Receive the 1996 Budget of the North Metro Convention and Visitors Bureau . . . . . . . . . . 16.01 - 16.05 FRIDLEY CiTY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Page 6 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: Resolution Designating Time and Number of Council Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.01 - 17.03 Claims ................................... 18.01 Licenses ................................. 19.01-19.04 Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.01 - 20.08 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: (Consideration of items not on Agenda -15 Minutes) FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Page 7 PUBLIC HEARING: Modification of Chapter 216 of the Fridley City Code, Entitled "Storm Water Drainage Utility�� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.01 - 21.03 Assessment for Street Improvement Project No. Street 1992 - 2(Tabled October 23, 1995) . . . . . . . . . . . . . OLD BUSINESS: ................. 22.01-22.05 Resolution Confirming Assessment for Street Improvement Project No. Street 1992 - 2(Tabled October 23, 1995) ..................................... 23.01-23.03 NEW BUSINESS: Six Month Review of Sharx Club Intoxicating Liquor License (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.01 - 24.03 , � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Page 8 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED� Approve a Water Conservation and Emergency Plan Amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Authorize Staff to Submit it to the M�tropolitan Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.01 - 25.09 . Approve Schedule for Stonybrook Creek Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26.01 - 26.04 Informal Status Reports ADJOURN: .......................... 27.01 ., � i cmr oF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activiries because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals widi disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (T"I'D/572-3534) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: PRESENTATIONS: '49er Days Parade Float Award , �-�.x�_��._ �:=� �.� z-� C� National Night Out Award �?� �-�.�� PROCLAMATION: Home Care Month: November, 1995 � �� APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of October 23, 199� � G�-�a`Z � y-� � �—� ,� /�-.��,� ; FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Page 2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 18, 1995 ....... l/`�r t� � �iSQi�iF� Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 1, 1995 ....... 2.01 - 2.06 �� Establish a Public Hearing for November 27, 1995, for a Vacation Request, SAV #95-04, by Gary Hedman, to Vacate a Utility Easement Generally Located at 60 - 70th Way N. E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �-� � :�� `�.- �i�Z � _ � Establish a Public Hearing for November 27, 1995, for a Vacation Request, SAV #95-05, by Industrial Equities, to Vacate Drainage and Utility Easements Originally Dedicated on the Recorded Plats of Northco Business Park and Northco Business Park 2nd Addition, Generally Located at the Southwest Corner of 73rd Avenue and Northco Drive (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �� -�-"'P' �-y� ��z�. � 3.01 - 3.02 . 4.01 - 4.03 � s FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Page 3 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: Resolution to Establish a Public Hearing for November 27, 1995, to Amend Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 and to Create Tax Increment Financing District No.14 ................................. , _ c�--� 1��1. � �- Resolution Approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, CPA #95-02, by the City of Fridley for Minco Products, Inc., to Amend the Current Land Use Designation from Commercial to Industrial, Generally Located at 7321 Commerce Lane N.E. (Ward 3) - • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �-L -� � '' .�- °�L � ciC�� Resolution /�pproving a Subdivision, Lot Split, L.S. #95-02, by the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority, to Split Property Generally Located at 533 . 5.01 - 5.07 ...... 6.01 -6.07 Janesville Street N.E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.01 - 7.11 �.-�-��.-- ��--� i�� Variance Request, VAR #95-27, by Lindstrom Metric, Inc., to Reduce the Setback of a Sign from the Property Line from 10 Feet to 5 Feet to Allow Construction of a 32 Square Foot Monument Sign, Generally Located at 8101 Ashton Avenue N.E. (Ward 3) . .......... 8.01-8.11 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Page 4 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: Variance Request, VAR #95-28, by Murphy Warehouse, to Aliow a Sign - Painted Directly on a Building, Generally Located at 4700 Main Street N. E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.01 - 9.06 G�� Extension of Variance, VAR #93-29, by St. Phillip's Lutheran Church, to Increase the Size of an Institutional Sign from 32 Square Feet to 70 Square � Feet, to Allow the Existence of Two Signs on the Property, Generally Located at 6180 Highway 65 N.E. (Ward 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.01 - 10.02 ��- ��,,-�-� � Resolution Electing a Qualifying Contribution to Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 . . . . . . . . . . . .��. :-� : %^. . � �� ..:� . 11.01 - 11.07 �_-_._ Q-.�,�-C- � �_ Motion to Waive $1,000 Security Bond Requirement for Repair Work Made by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division (Between Hickory Place and their Junction Box West of the Burlington Northern Railroad Tracks) (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . �'� j�:�:�� . . . . . . . . . 12.01 - 12.03 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Page 5 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: Approve Change Order No. 1 to Washington Street Watermain Repair Project No. 272 - (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13.01 - 13.03 �`�,�" -�--m.�.— Resolution Authorizing Municipal State Aid Funds to County State Aid Highway (C. S.A. H. ) East River Road - Hartman Circle to Glen Creek Road (S.P. 02-601-36) (S.A.P. 127-020-13 Addendum No. 1) (Ward 3) ................................ �C 24� .e_o t` �-�_ _ . 14.01 - 14.02 Resolution in Support of a� Application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premises Permit to Fridley American Legion Post 303 (Ward 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.01 - 15.02 �� `�-� = ��-- Receive the 1996 Budget of the North Metro Convention and Visitors Bureau � � �� , .......... 16.01-16.05 � • FG , � � . �, � � . . - FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: Resolution Designating Time and Number of Council Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lL ti �?.�%�� e� , Claims . . ��' `��`.�-�. .— . :... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 6 17.01 - 17.03 .� �� Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19.01 - 19.04 �� 20.01 - 20.08 Estimates .. ...." ................. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: �.��C / � c��-u„i� ��-'�_�,....�-- ._. cr�..�=�y� ��L. � � (Y �.( (�. �T � �. � �.�� - �� sZ - � � `_ OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: � �� .yy�-�- � �-z- �� -,C.�- � � � ��,r--��, �c,�'eC �e ,c,..��c (Consideration of Items not on Agenda -�5 Mir�ites) ��-°�� ``'� � w r �� '� . ` . � � a FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Page 8 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUEDI Approve a Water Conservation and Emergency Plan Amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Authorize Staff to Submit it to the � Metropolitan Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.01 - 25.09 �-�C � �y��`" �_ �i`�i�i�— �u- ,, �/- �,� ,� �t�'Z/r'�l� Approve Schedule for Stonybrook Creek Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26.01 - 26.04 %`6�,,�C .��- ��r�� ;�-� P`� /�� - . �^ �� 7 � " .�-�-�. � C�.�. �y.z...�� . ��o ��___- ��r�--� _ ,Z /1��, ,. �" r �� `v� J?'�-`'-��'" `� ��.-�.�i ��%"O`��—� G-�s�.c Informal Status Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27.01 � e�� ti�.�� T�,t---� ��' �y-�-~� �� ,�°-,� � -- � �-�.-�--.� ��-�,-�- � �� ---�- : �.�...�.�.:Y-� � e , � e��-�---�-- ��.-�.�-�--=_. . �,v� s"-i � c.�� — ADJOURN: . � �'' � � �-� - - - . , � , . . R FRIDLEY C1TY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER �3, 1995 PUBLIC HEARING: Page 7 Modification of Chapter 216 of the Fridley City Code, Entitled "Storm Water Drainage Utility„ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.01 - 21.03 � - � ,'� S� , ,� - � � - �''.`� 7 ��. Assessment for Street Improvement Project No. Street 1992 - 2(Tabled October 23, 1995) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C� _ � � � 7 .� �. � -- �� '� / � �' �,-t--. OLD BUSINESS: .......... 22.01 -22.05 Resolution Confirming Assessment for Street )mprovement Project No. Street 1992 - 2(Tabled October 23, 1995) ..................................... 23.01-23.03 �= �L-��L' �2.�� NEW BUSINESS: Six Month Review of Sharx Club tntoxicating Liquor License (Ward 3) . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 24.01 - 24.03 /'� �--�E' - 5�� i . M . � �� . z 0 THE MINOTES OF TS8 FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MELTING OF OCTOBER 23, 1995 i f � � THE MINIITES OF THE REGIILAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF OCTOBER 23, 1995 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:37 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Billings, Councilman Schneider and Councilwoman Bolkcom MEMBERS ABSENT: None PROCLAMATION• FOURMIES-FRIDLEY FRIENDSHIP DAYS, OCTOBER 21-31, 1995: Mr. Burns, City Manaqer, read a proclamation proclaiming October 21 through 31, 1995 as Fourmies-Fridley Friendship Days. Mayor Nee issued the proclamation, and the members of the Fourmies Swim Club were made honorary citizens of Fridley. He stated that the City Council joins all citizens in extending hospitality to the members of the Fourmies Swim Club during their stay in Fridley. Mayor Nee presenteci this proclamation to M�. Diane Ferry. Ms. Ferry thanked the City and the staff for all their help to make this exchange such a success. She introduced Fridley's swim coach, Nancy Zinter, and the members oF the Fourmies Swim Club along with their host families. The Fridley VFW presented the members of the Swim Club with flags of the United States. INDIVIDUALS WHO HELPED CREATE "THE ZONE" RECREATION DROP-IN CENTER FOR HIGH SCHOdL STUDENTS: Ms. Debi Campobasso, Recreation Program Specialist, introduced Julie Corcoran and Jeff Shoeberl, Youth Workers for Project Safety Net, who work closely with The Zone Youth Council. She introduced the following individuals who helped create "The Zone�' recreation drop-in center: Stephanie Brown, Mikilia Carrol, Annie Myles, and Kathy Sandoz. She stated that Bryn Grofnitz was not able to attend this evening. Ms. Brown thanked the City Council for funding this project and presented them with T-shirts. Ms. Myles outlined some of the FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MSETING OF OCTOB�R 23, 1995 PAGE 2 activities at "The Zone" and thanked the City Council for their support. She stated that students from Columbia Heights, Spring Lake Park, and Fridley participate in the activities at "The Zone." Mayor Nee presented plaques to these individuals who helped create "The Zone." Councilman Schneider stated that the students should feel proud of their accomplishments for a drop-in center. MEMBERS OF FRIDLEY PRIDE-CITY-WIDE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Mayor Nee presented a plaque to Ms. Lonni McCauley in appreciation for her work with the Fridley Pride City-Wide Advisory Committee. Ms. McCauley stated that she enjoyed working with Fridley. She said that the Advisory Committee was hard working and did an outstanding job. She stated that the City Council backed them all the way, and she thanked the Council for the plaque. Mayor Nee presented certificates of appreciation to m�mbers of the Fridley Pride City-Wide Advisory Committee who consisted of Melvin Bolin, Ann Bolkcom, Mary Bowen, Clem Coverston, Duane Knealing, Scott Lund, Woody Neison, Jeanne Olson, Marvin Platt, Susan Price, Dean Saba, Karen Schaub, Marla Stratton, and Jack Velin. Mr. Dean Saba stated that the Advisory Coxnmittee had tremendous support from the City Council and from City staff. He stated that the community really came together for this event. Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that it was a pleasure working with the Committee, and she felt that the hard work pa�d off. BUSINESS BEAUTIFICATION AWARDS: Ms. McCauley stated that the Advisory Committee and Chamber of Commerce invited the business community to take part in the clean- up project. She stated that Council supported the concept of business beautification awards by provi�ing cash payments for improvements done by businesses in the community. She presented awards to three businesses who participated. The recipients of the awards were Fridley Auto Parts, East River Road Apartmehts, and Dealers Manufacturing. Ms. Warren, of the Fridley Chamber of Commerce, read a letter from Dealers Manufacturing thanking the City Council for the opportunity to participate in this program and for recognition of their efforts. Mayor Nee stated that it has been a great night of cammunity recog- nition for which the City Council is proud. - FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEBTING OF OCTOBBR 23. 1995 PAGE 3 Councilman Schneider stated that there was a lot of community involvement to make the community a better place. APPROUAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING. OCTOBER 2, 1995: MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: OLD BUSINESS• l. RECONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REOUEST, VAR #95-23, BY JAMES KIEWEL, TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF A FIRST ACCESSORY STRUC'I'URE FROM 1,000 S4UARE FEET TO I,392 SOUARE FEET. AND TO ALLOW AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO EXCEED THE FIRST FLOOR AREA OF A DWELLING UNIT IN ORDER TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTiON OF A 24 X 34 FOOT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING GARAGE GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1631 RICE CREEK ROAD N.E. �WARD 2)• Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the original variance request was to expand the maximum size of a first accessory structure from 1,000 square feet to 2,064 square feet. He stated that this created a problem, as the square footage of the accessory structure exceeded the first floor ar.ea of the dwelling. Mr. Burns stated that since the October 2 Council meeting when the variance was deni.ed, the petitioner has agreed to block in the exterior entrance to the lower level of the existing garage and reduce the size of the garage addition from 24 by 38 feet to 24 by 34 feet. He stated that this reduces the size of the accessory structure from 2,064 square feet to 1,392 square feet, but it is still 42 square feet larger than the first floor area of the petitioner's dwelling. Mr. Burns stated that if Council reconsiders and approves the variance, it is recommended a hard surface drive be con- structed from Rice Creek Road to the new garage entrance within one year of approval of the variance. THIS ITEM AAS REMOVED FROM THL CONSENT AGENDA AND PLACED ON THE REGULAR AGENDA. NEW BUSINESS• 2. RESOLIITION NO. 66-1995 APPROVING AND ADOPTING A HOUSING REPLACEMENT DISTRICT PLAN AND CREATING HOUSING REPLACEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1� Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that a public hearing was held on this item on October 2, and there were no adverse comments. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEBTING OF OCTOBER 23, 1995 PAGE 4 He stated that under special legislation passed for Fridley, Crystal and Minneapolis during the Minnesota legislative session, the HRA may acquire a maximum of fifty parcels over a ten year period. He stated that the first phase of the proposed plan applies to eight properties that have already been acquired by the Fridley HRA. He statad that the plan also identifies a variety of factors related to these properties including estimated project cost, estimated tax increment, and a stipulation that the increment for the eight properties may vnly be collected for fifteen years. ADOPTED RESOLIITION NO. 66-1995. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 67-1995 ELECTING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLiTAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the purpose of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act is to create affordable housing for all age groups, clean up polluted sites for businesses and jobs, and encourage compact development where there is linkage between housing, jobs and transportation. He stated that three incentive programs are provided: tax base revitalization account; livable communities demonstra- tion account; and local hou�ing incentives accounts. Mr. Burns stated that citiss must pass a resolution annually supporting six principles in order to be eligible for the three incentive accounts. He stated that if Council endorses the six principle�, the City will meet with the Metropolitan Council to establish affordable housing goals that fall within bench marks established for the City. He stated that goals are to be adopted by December 14, 1995, and an implementation plan must be in place by June 30, 1996. Mr. Burns stated that although the program is voluntary, there are penalties as well as incentives. He stated that while staff objects to the mandate aspect of this legislation, it is also recognized that the mandate does give the City access to three new sources of funding for the City's various housing programs. He stated that the purposes of the program are consistent with the City's past effort to make affordable and life cycle housing a priority and to impr�ve the livability and c�uality of our neighborhoods. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 67-1995. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 68-1995 AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR SEVERANCE BENEFITS: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that due to 1996 budget constraints, it has become necessary to discontinue or FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 23, 1995 PAGE 5 c�nsolidate about five full-time positions. He stated that in order to assist these employees in the transition to other employment, it is recommended that a severance expenditure of up to $2,700 for each full-time employee for out-placement services. He stated that contingent upon the employee's signing a release of claims against the City, it is recommended that one week of salary for each full year of service be paid to full-time employees up to a maximum of 26 weeks, and one week of salary for each two years of service be paid to part-time employees up to a maximum of thirteen weeks. He stated it is requested that Council designate up to $40,000 from the City's emergency reserve to accommodate this severance program. ADOPTED RESOLIITION N0. 68-1995. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 69-1995 REOUESTING A VARIANCE FROM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RULES REGARDING HORIZONTAL CURVES (SECTION 8820.9935, GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS• URBAN) CHERI LANE AT FTLLMORE STREET (WARD 1): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that in conjunction with the 1993 Cheri Lane street improvement project, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (ASnDOT) required the install�tion of stop signs at the intersection of Cheri Lane and Fillmore Street as a condition far receiving State aid. He stated that in response to neighborhood requests and because the alignment of the street has functioned well for over 25 years without stop signs, the City is formally requesting MnDOT to waive their rules in a manner that will allow the City to avoid the use of the stop signs and receive State aid reimbursement for the work performed on this street. ADOPTED RESOLIITION NO. 69-1995. 6. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD WELL REPAIR PROJECT NO. 288 (WARD 1): Mr. Burns, City Manager, sta�ed it is recommended that Council receive the bids and award the contract to Keys Well Drilling at a cost of $34,370 for Project No. 288. He stated that this amount is within the 1995 Capital Improvements budget. He stated that Traut Wells did not submit a bid bond as required in the specifications. Keys Well Drilling has received previous contracts with the City and has completed these in a professional and timely manner. The following bids were received for Well Repair Project No. 288: Mark Traut Wells, $33,195.50; Keys Well Drilling, $34,370.00; Bergerson-Caswell, $35,029.00; and E. H. Renner, $41,006.50. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 23, 1995 PAGE 6 RECEIVED THE BIDS AND AWARDED THE CONTRACT FOR WELL REPAIR PROJECT NO. 288 TO REYS i�ELL DRII�LING COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,3?0.00. 7. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR 53RD AVENUE WATER BOOSTER STATION REHABILITATION �WARD 1): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this project includes repl.acement of the existing booster pumps with new variable speed pumps. It also includes installation of new controls, connection to SCADA, insulation, heating and air conditioning, and exterior structural upgrade of the building. He stated it is recommended that Council receive the bids and award the contract to Richmar Construction in the amount of $177,220. The following bids were received for the 53rd Avenue Water Booster Station Rehabilitation: Richmar Construction, $177,220.00; Municipal Builders, $184,950.00; New Mech, Inc., $192,700.00; and Mills Concrete Restoration, $209,464.00. RECEIVED THE BIDS AND AWARDED THE CONTRACT FOR THE 53RD AVENUE WATER BOOSTER STATION REHABILITATION TO RICHMAR CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOIIIJT OF $177�220.00. 8. APPROVE DISPOSITION OF TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY• Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated th�� the City has received notice from Anoka County that seven parcels wiil become tax forfeit. He stated it is recommended that all seven of these properties be removed from the County's list in anticipation of using the properties for streets and other municipal purposes. APPROVED THE REMOVAL OF THESE SEVEN TAX FORFEIT PROPERTIES FROM THE COUNTY�S LIST. 9. ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING FOR NOVEMBER 13 1995 TO CHANGE THE ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE STORM WATER DRAINAG� UTILITY FEE• Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that in view of the projected 1996 deficit, staff is recommending that the City increase the storm water utility fae from $1.75 per household per quarter to $2.80 per household per quarter. He requested that Council establish a public hearing for November 13, 1995 relating to the increase in fees. SET A PIIBLIC HEARING FOR NOVEMBER 13, 1995 RELATING TO THE STORM WATER DRAINAGE UTILITY FEE. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TING OF OCTOBER 23 1995 PAGE 7 10. RESOLUTION NO. 70-1995 PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $4,090,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TEMPORARY TAX INCREMENT BONDS SERIES 1995A• Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the bonds were originally issued by the Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) for purchase of the Lake Pointe property in December,, 1992. He stated that staff is recommending another temporary three-year issue. When Lake Pointe is developed, the bonds will be retired in favor of more permanent financing. Mr. Burns stated that the bids were as follows: Norwest Investment Services, Inc., 4.3153 percent interest rate; Dain Bosworth, Inc., 4.3256 percent interest rate; Raymond James & Associates, 4.3409 percent interest rate; and Cronin & Company, Inc., 4.3942 percent interest rate. He stated that staff recommends that Council receive the bids and award the contract to Norwest at a true interest rate of 4.3153 percent. Mr. Burns stated that although the debt is officially HRA debt, Council's approval is needed to provide the City's full faith and credit pledge to support this general obligation bond issue. RECEIVED THE ABOVE BIDS AND ADOPTED RESOLIITION NO. 70-1995. 11. RESOLUTION NO. 71-1995 CERTIFYING CERTAIN DELINQUENT UTILITY SERVICES TO THE GOUNTY AIJDITOR FOR COLLECTIONS WITH THE 1996 TAXES: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that there are 261 delinquent utility accounts. All property owners have been notified that these utility bills are being certified to the County. ADOPTED RESOLIITION NO. 71-1995. 12. RESOLUTION NO. 72-1995 PROVIDING FOR WATER RATE CHANGE• Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that a rate increase is proposed to cover actual and projected operating losses. He stated that the amount of Ioss projected for 1996 is $511,359.00. Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the current water rate is 60 cents/1,000 gallons for those using less than 500,000 gallons per quarter and 55 cents/1, 000 gallons for those using more than 500,000 gallons per quarter. He stated that the proposed rate is 90 cents/1,000 gallons for those using less than 500,000 gallons per quarter and 95 cents/1,000 gallons for those using more than 500, 000 gallons per quarter. He stated that the average monthly cost is based on usage of 6,000 gallons per month at a current rate of $3.60 per month FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 23 1995 PAGE 8 and a proposed rate of $5.40 per month. He stated that the average for 151 Minnesota cities is $11.13 per �onth. Mr. Burns stated that the new rates are to be effective with the January billings, and reduced rates are available for low income senior citizens and disabled citizens. ADOPTED ItE80LIITION NO. 72-1995. 13. RESOLUTION NO. 73-1995 PROVIDING FOR SEWER RATE INCREASES: Mr. Burns, City Manager, s�ated that the rate increase is proposed to cover actual and projected operating losses. He stated that the loss projected for 1996 is $1,030,456. He stated that the current rate is $1.83/1,000 gallons of water usage, and the proposed rate is $2.50/1,000 gallons of water usage. He stated that the average monthly cost is based on usage of 6,000 gallons of water per month and the current charge is $10.98 and the proposed charge w�uld be $15.00. He �tated that the average for 151 Minnesota cities is $14.70 per month. ADOPTED RESOLII'1"ION NO. 73-1995. 14. RESOLUTIaN ?d0. 74-1995 IN SUPPORT OF AN APPL1CATION FOR A MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT TO FRIDLEY V.F.W. POST 363 (WARD 2): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this resolution is in support of an applacation for a lawful gambling �remises permit for the Fridley V.F.W. Post 363. ADOPTED RESOLIITION NO. 74-1995. 15. RESOLUTION NO. 75-1995 IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT TO LIONS CLUB OF FRIDLEY (JOE DIMAGGIO'S RESTAURANT) {WARD 2): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this resolution is in support of an application for a lawful gambling premises permit for the Lions Club at Joe DiMaggio'� Restaurant. ADOPTED RESOLIITION NO. 75-1995. 16. RESOLUTION NO. 76-1995 IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT TO LIONS CLUB OF FRIDLEY (LONGHORN GRILL & BAR) (WARD 3): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that �his resolution is in support of an application for a lawful gambling premises permit for the Lions Club at the Longhorn c�rill and Bar. ADOPTED RESOLIITION NO. 76-1995. FRIDLEY CITY COQNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 23, 1995 PAGE 9 17. RESOLUTION NO. 77-1995 IN SUPPORT OF A MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING APPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM LAWFUL GAMBLING LICENSE TO THE CHURCH OF ST. WILLIAM (WARD 1) : Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this resolution is in support of an application for an exemption from the lawful gambling license for St. William's Church. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 77-1995. 18. CLAIMS• AIITHORIZED PAYMENT OF CLAIM NO3. 64498 THROIIGH 64859. 19. LICENSES: APPROVED THE LICENSES AS SIIBMITTED AND AS ON FILE IN THE LICENSE CLERR�S OFFICE. 20. ESTIMATES• APPROVED THE ESTIMATES A8 BIIBMITTED: Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. 400 Northtown Financial Plaza 200 Coon Rapids Boulevard, N.W. Coon Rapids, MN 55435-5489 Services Rendered as City Attorney for the Months of September/October, � 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3, 726.91 There were no comments from the audience regarding the proposed consent agenda items. Councilman Schneider requested that Item 1 be placed on the regular agenda. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the consent agenda items, with the deletion of Item 1. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the addition of Item 1 from the consent agenda. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 23. 1995 PAGE 10 OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: There was no response from the audience under this item of business. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 21. PUBLIC HEARING ON 1995 SERVICE CONNECTION: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:28 p.m. Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that there was only one service connection for 1995 at 4795 3rd Street. He stated that the improvement is in the amount of $1,877.48 and can be spread over a fifteen year period at an interest rate of 6-1/2 percent. No persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed assessment. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 8:29 p.m. 22. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PR�JECT NO. ST. 1992-2: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Council- woman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:29 p.m. Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that this assessment includes three properties that were left off the original assessment roll. He stated that the total cost of this project was $1,256,255.08 and covered improvements an Hathaway Lane from Hackman to Regis Drive. He statad that the major portion was assessed last year, and the assessment would be spread over a ten-year period at an interest rate of 6-1/2 percent. Councilman Schneider requested clarification on the front foot charge whether it was $8.00 per lineal foot or $9.50. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to continue this public hearing for clarification from staff on the front foot charge for this improvement. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 23, 1995 PAGE i1 23. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1993-7: MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:32 p.m. Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that this assessment included properties located on Stinson Boulevard between 73rd Avenue and Osborne Road. He stated that the total cost of the project was $277,631.30 with $15,430.96 being assessed against the affected property owners. He stated that the assessment will be for a ten- year period at an interest rate of six percent. No persons in the audience spoke regarding this prop�sed assessment. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 8:33 p.m. 24. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 64TH AVENUE STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 260• MOTION by CounciZman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:33 p.m. Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that two properties were left off the original assessment roll, as the owners were disputing the assessment. He stated that these properties are at 1372 and 1384 64th Avenue. He stated that the assessment would be for fifteen years at an interest rate of 6-1/2 percent. He stated that a letter has been received from Mark and Jean Schwartz and from Lucille Dahlberg stating that they were appealing this ass�ssment. MOTiON by Councilman Schneider to receive the letter from Mark and Jean Schwartz and from Lucille Dahlberg indicating that they are appealing the assessment of $1,000 each on their properties at 1372 and 1384 64th Avenue. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that the property owners did not believe the improvement benefitted their properties. He stated that the City retained an outside engineering firm to evaluate the improvement. This firm indicated that the $1,000 assessment was appropriate, and the improvements that were completed had no negative impact on those properties. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL M$STING OF OCTOBER 23. 1995 PAGE 12 Mr. Burns stated that the property owners felt the project limited the capacity of the ditch to hold water. He stated that this was monitored, and it was determined that the ditch was holding the water�and did not overflow its banks. Councilman Schneider asked if an appeal would be made through the courts. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that in order for the property owners to be eligible to appeal, they have to give the City Council written notice of their objection. They have done that in this letter. Mr. Herrick asked if the study completed by Advance Engineering is part of the official records as far as this project is concerned. Mr. Flora stated that he was not sure if it was officially received, but copies were provided to Council. Mr. Herrick felt that it should be received into the record if the Council had received a copy. Councilman Schneider stated that Council received a copy, and he reviewed it extensively at the time. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive this report from Advance Engineering into the public hearing record. Seconded by Council- woman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Herrick asked Mr. Flora if it was his testimony that he concurred with the report of Advance Engineering that the two properties in question received benefits that would at least equal, if not exceed, the amount of the proposed assessment. Mr. Flora stated that it was correct. Mr. Herrick asked if the ditch monitoring was part of the file and record as far as this assessment is concerned. Mr. Flora stated that it is part of the project file and that reports have been submitted to Council. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the file includes information on the soil that was removed. Mr. Flora stated that the soil was removed as part of the project, and the consultant stated that there was no impact on the proper- ties because of the soil removal. Mr. Mark Schwartz, 1372 64th Avenue, stated that his property did not benefit from the impravement, but it has proved detrimental as FRIDLSY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF OCTOB$R 23 1995 PAGE 13 he has substantially more water in his yard that may remain for weeks at a time. He stated that part of their woods is under water, and they will start losing trees. He stated that the water to the north of 64th Avenue has been shifted to the south side of 64th Avenue. Mr. Schwartz stated that even if flooding occurs on his property, the benefit is in the front in the form of concrete curb and gutter which was not to be assessed. He stated that the rear portion of their property has been declared a wetland. He stated that accor- ding to Michele McPherson of City staff, it has been determined that wetlands may exist somewhere in the area, but no definite determination has been made on his or the property at 1384 64th Avenue. Mr. Schwartz stated that if the assessment is approved, he will file an appeal to the court and will seek damages for devaluation of his property because of the excess water. Ms. Lucille Dahlberg, 1384 64th Avenue, stated that since the improvement, she has three times tl�e amount of water. She felt that the independent survey did not prove anything. Councilman Schneider stated that Advance Engineering was hired as an outside consultant and was acceptable to all parties. He stated that he believed the Schwartzs and Ms. Dahlberg were consulted, but there seems to be a discrepancy of the facts. Mrs. Schwartz stated that the consultant's letter did not address why the water would stay for weeks and weeks and why the sinkhole on their property was dry. She stated that what the consultant stated is exactly opposite of his letter. Mr. Schwartz stated that the project was suppose to benefit a lot of properties on 64th Avenue but it did not. It helped the three residents on Central Avenue. He stated that the properties on Central Avenue had a problem with water coming down Mississippi Street and through their yards. He stated all that water is piped behind their home, so they now get more water. Mrs . Schwartz stated that 64th Avenue did not have a water problem, but Central Avenue had a problem. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the Schwartzs had water on their property from the front of 64th Avenue. Mr. Schwartz stated that they did not. It ran down 64th Avenue to the open ditch on Central Avenue and to the ditch in back. He stated that the problem was adding all the water from north of 64th Avenue between 64th Avenue and Mississippi Street. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 23, 1995 PAGE 14 Mr. Burns stated that Advance Engineering confirmed that the design was creditable and the elevations were reasonably accurate. He stated that the report concluded that the project did benefit the properties in question. He stated that the City did as much as they could to provide a neutral judge in this matter. He stated that there was no interaction between the City's Engineering Department and the individual from Advance Engineering who prepared the report. Mrs. Schwartz stated that the report lists the major benefit such as the concrete curb and gutter which is irrelevant to this project. She stated that the rear of their property is substan- tially worse than it was before the project. She stated that Advance Engineering's. letter stated that they could not conclusively rule out that overflow exists. Mr. Herrick felt it would be beneficial both to the property owners and the City to resolve this issue. He suggested that the public hearing be continued. He stated that it would cost the City more than the assessment to go to court, and even mediation would be relatively expensive considering the amount of money involved. He felt there should be discussion by staff and the property owners to see if an agreement could be reached. Councilman Schneider felt that Council needed all the information. He stated that the notice received by the property owner is different than what is contained in the assessment hearing information. Mr. Pribyl stated that the notice in the assessment hearing is an affidavit of mailing and is not exactly the same notice sent to the property owners. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to continue this public hearing to the next meeting and direct staff to submit all information related to this project. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 25. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ASSESSMENT FOR TREE ABATEMENT: MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 9:08 p.m. Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that this assessment is for tree abatement on one property located at 627 Cheryl Street. He stated that the assessment is for $661.90 and assessed over a five- year period at an interest rate of 6-1/2 percent. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 23 1995 PAGE 15 No persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed assessment. MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 9:09 p.m. OLD BUSINESS• 1. RECONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE RE4UEST, VAR #95-23, BY JAMES KIEWEL, TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF A FIRST ACCESSORY STRUCTURE FROM 1,000 S4UARE FEET TO 1,392 SQUARE FEET, AND TO ALLOW AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO EXCEED THE FIRST FLOOR AREA OF A DWELLING UNIT IN ORDER TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 24 X 34 FOOT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING GARAGE GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1631 RICE CREEK ROAD N.E. (WARD 2): MOTTON by Councilman Schneider to reconsider Variance Request, VAR #95-23. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that Council denied this variance request at their October 2, 1995 meeting, and staff was to meet with the petitioner to discuss alternatives. He stated that the petitioner, Mr. Kiewel, has revised his plans and will keep the 576 square feet upper level garage as a garage, block-in the Iower level of the existing garage to be utilized as interior dwelling space (this modification would eliminate 576 square feet of accessory structure), and reduce the original request for a rear yard attached garag� from 24 by 38 feet to 24 by 34 feet. He stated that this modified request represents a reduction in the size of the accessory structure from 2,064 square feet to 1,392 square feet. Councilman Schneider stated that for an attached accessory building, the maximum variance the City has previously allowed was 1,270 square feet, as opposed to this request for 1,392 square feet. He asked if there was anything in the code that ties in the square footage of a lot to the size of an accessory structure. Mr. Kiewel stated that it would be impractical for him to build anything less than a 24 by 34 square foot structure. He stated that he has the space, and there was no objection from his neighbors. Councilman Schneider stated that he would like to refer this issue to staff to determine if the size of the garage should be tied to the size of the lot. He felt that Mr. KieweZ has the space, but his concern is that someone else may not have the space and it would set a precedent. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 23, 1995 PAGE 16 Mr. Kiewel stated that there is not a critical need to build the garage at this time. He stated that he would still like this size structure and would be open to staff reviewing Councilman Schneider's suggestion. He stated that if he could obtain this variance, it would help him a great deal to have the extra storage space. Councilman Schneider felt that staff should have several months to study this issue to determine if there should be a change in the ordinance. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table action on Variance Request, VAR #95-23 and request staff to research the idea of relating the maximum square footage of an accessory building to overall lot size, green space, and principal structures, and submit recommen- dations to Council by the first meeting in February, 1996. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS 26. RESOLUTION NO. 78-1995 CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FpR 1995 SERVICE CONNECTION• MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 78-1995. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 27. RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1992-2: MoTION by Councilman Schneider to table this item. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 28. RESOLUTION NO. 79-1995 CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1993-7: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 79-1995. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 29. RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSES5MENT FOR 64TH AVENUE STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 260: MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this item. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEBTING OF OCTOBER 23, 1995 PAGE 17 30. RESOLUTION NO. 80-1995 CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR TREE ABATEMENT: MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to adopt Resolution No. 80-1995. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 31. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the items to be discussed in the conference session were: Stonybrook Creek; Locke Lake; and the Northco Project. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of October 23, 1995 adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secretary to the City Council Mayor CITY OF FRIDLBY PLANNINa COIdMI88IO�T M8$TINa, OCTOBLEt 18, 1995 CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Newraan called the October 18, 1995, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Dave Newman, Dave Rondrick, LeRoy Oquist, Dean Saba, Brad Sielaff Diane Savage, Connie Modiq Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planninq Assistant Karl & Margaret Schurr, Minco Products, Inc. MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the agenda. UPON A VOZCE �OTS � AI+L 90TIN�i lilYS � CHAIRPERSO�i NSAMAld DLCLl�1RgD THE MOTION CARRISD IINANIMOIISLY. APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 20. 1995, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the September 20, 1995, Planninq Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICl3 VOTB� ALL VOTINQ AYS, CSAIRPBRSO�i �1S11M�i DRCLARI:D THE MOTIOW CARRIED Q�IMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A WATER CONSERVATION AND EMERGENCY PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY�S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: This amendment is required by Minnesota Statute and will be reviewed and approved by the Department of Natural Resources. This amendment details the City's water � resources, identifies shortcomings in the water delivery system, and identifies procedures for conservation of water resources during declared emergencies. MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to open the public hearing. IIPON A VOIC$ 90'1'$� ALL VOTING LYR� CBAIRP$�tSOM DBCLARBD THB MOTION CARRIED A1dD TH8 PIIBLIC HEARIN�i OP$N AT 7 s 34 P.l[. Mr. Hickok stated the Water Conservation and Emergency Plan amendment is being presented for comments throuqh the public 1.01 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 18. 1995 PAG$ 2 hearing process in order to make modifications to the plan and bring it to the City Council on November 13. Mr. Hickok stated the plan is to reduce water demand and develop an emergency program that can be easily implemented in the event of a condition that threatens the water supply. The Water Conservation Plan is required by the State and is intended to reduce the demand for water, improve efficiency in use, and reduce the losses in waste water. Emergency response procedures must include short-term water conservation measures to reduce water demands when supplies are limited. Long-term conservation measures are an important part of water resource management and utility managers efforts to satisfy the ever increasing demands being placed on water resources. Water conservation programs can be cost effective when compared to the generally higher cost of developing and expanding waste water treatment plant capacities. Mr. Hickok stated, in 1993, the State required all communities with public water supplies implement and demand reduction measures for water conservation. our suppliers were encouraged to evaluate conservation as a potential alternative to developing supplemental water sources during peak demands and non-essential water uses. The directive to cities was that plans must include a description of the role conservation has in managing community water demands and supplies, identify specific quantifiable conservation goals and describe how the achievement of these goals would be measured and monitored, water conservation potential must be assessed for each customer category using information abaut demands, an evaluation of seasonal demands, and a description of short-term conservation measures that are available in the event of an emergency. Mr. Hickok stated the Water Emergency Plan is based on priority. In the evant of a water emergency, the first priority is to protect the domestic water supply, excludinq industrial and commercial uses of the municipal water supply and use for power production that meets contingency requirements. The second priority would be water uses involving consumption of less than 10,000 gallons per day. The third priority would be agricultural irrigation and processing of agricultural plants. The fourth priority is power production in excess of the use provided for in the contingency plan. The fifth priority is uses other than agricultural irrigation, processing of agricultural products, and power production. The sixth priority would include non-essential uses defined by State statute. Mr. Hickok stated staff prepared this plan in response to the 1993 request by the State mandate that the City put together a plan to address the water conservation in an emergency in the community. The first portion of the plan talks about inventory and what we have in the community in terms of existing wells, 1.02 PLANNINa COMMI88ION MBETING, OCTOBER 18. 1995 PAGB 3 pumping information, etc. This plan pulls all the in-house information into one document. Mr. Hickok stated the Environmental Quality & Energy Commission (EQE) reviewed the plan and the changes made since the last discussion. They also had a presentation on wellhead protection. This Water Conservation Plan does not have a wellhead protection element, but identifies that a wellhead protection plan will be included at the time it becomes available. Mr. Hickok reviewed the comments and responses included in tiie Addendum to his memo of October 12, 1995, which was included in the agenda packet. Mr. Hickok reviewed the expected dates of completion for various parts of the plan. The collection of water use data by customer categories is to be completed by September 1997 on the plan. For all practical purposes, this is done. Water use information collected by customer category on a quarterly or annual basis to determine trends is to be completed by September 1997 on the plan. Recent advances in the in-house reportinq has allowed staff to do some of this analysis already. Data collection and analysis of data to determine demand reduction during the summer months could be done soon and will be done annually. Automation of the meter reading system is expected to be in place by December, 2000. Development of a water audit proqram to assist in analyzing unaccounted for water losses and anticipate lonq range water main replacements is something the City has begun and will be done annually. Development of an ordinance restrictinq water use for conservation purposes is anticipated to be completed in December, 1998, but staff beZieve there will a be public hearing on this ordinance mid-year, 1996. Development of an education proqran� to assist in the implementation of the ordinance aimed at water conservation benefits is anticipated to be completed December, 1998. Determination of level of water filtration facilities is anticipated to be completed June, 1996. Resolution of preferred remediation mettiod of well water contamination is anticipated to be completed January 2000. Development of a water rate schedule that will promote water conservation efforts is anticipated to be completed January 1996. A.financial study to support this recommendation has been done and the Council is considerinq the rate schedul� at this time. Mr. Hickok stated the EQE made some additional comments. The definition of water quality emergency should be included in the document. The best place to add this is in the front of the water conservation plan and also in the definition section of the ordinance. There was a comment at the EQE meeting that the Council take a look at a senior rate structure that is not tied to income but rather to age. Staff will forward that comment to the Council for consideration when they discuss the water rate 1.03 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 18. 1995 PAG$ 4 structure. Mr. Hickok stated the plan will also include a map which shows water locations. Several other.maps are also included in the plan. Staff will refine those maps. Mr. Hickok stated staff is requesting the Planning Commission, if they are comfortable with the plan, recommend approval to the City Council. If there are any changes, these can be discussed and the changes made. If the Planning Commission is comfortable in doing so, staff will make the revisions and forward the final copy to the Council. Mr. Sielaff asked if the block billinq was applied during peak use. He understood this was to encourage water conservation and the rates would be higher for greater volumes, so this would not be just during peak use. Mr. Hickok stated this was correct. This refers to the rate that would recognizing lawn sprinkling, etc., and actually encourage conservation based on the rate schedule. Mr. Newman stated, with this schedule, the more water you use the higher the per gallon rate. Mr. Hickok stated this is correct. The proposed rate schedule is contrary to what is currently in place. Mr. Kondrick stated he had heard on the radio an interview with a person knowledgeable about water quality and problems with the water supplies. The most common form of water treatment is chlorine. One of the biggest problems in treating water with chlorine is that the microbes and other organisms in the water are becoming resistant to chlorine. It is a concern that these types of organisms will present a serious health hazard to the water supplies. He wondered if something should be included to be sure staff are aware of these things in order to protect the water supplies. Mr. Saba stated the reports he has heard are not consistent with that. Those reports state water is pure and drinkable. Mr. Kondrick stated this person had said this is the data being put out to the public but is not necessarily accurate. There are problems on the east cost with the quality of the drinking water. He thought this merits lookinq into. Mr. Sielaff referred to Water Supply Policies, Objectives and Standards for Utility Operations, page 21, the second paragraph, and recommended this paragraph read, "The municipal water system service will provide the highest quality water possible that will 1.04 PLANNING COMMI8820N MEETING, OCTOBER 18. 1995 PA�$ 5 not negatively impact the natural water resources of the community or region.n Mr. Sielaff stated the EQE discussed the Emergency Ordinance Provisions, page 42. Mr. Hickok stated water quality provisions would be included in the ordinance. The items on page 42, B, are all water quantity related. He and the Commission members agreed that water quality should also be included in those provisions. Mr. Saba stated he was not sure where water quality should be',but agreed it should be specifically stated that a water emergency can be quality related and not necessarily quantity related. It will be in the emergency ordinance and should also be in the plan. MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Rondrick, to close the public hearing. , IIPON A VOICB VOTL, ALL VOTIN(i AYE, CHAIRPI3RSON NBWMAN D$CLARED THE MOTION CARRIl3D AND T8L PIIBLIC HEARIN(� CLOSED AT 7II58 P.M. MOT ON by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend approval of the Water Conservation and Emergency Plan Amendment to the City�s Comprehensive Plan subject to the corrections as suggested. IIPON A VOICL VOTE� ALL VOTINti AYE� CBAIRP8R80N NSWMAN DECLARSD THE MOTION CARRIBD DNANIMOIISLY. i 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. CPA #95-02. BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FOR MINCO PRODUCTS, INC.: In accordance with State Statute 462.355, Subdivision 2,' Procedure for Plan Adoption and Amendment, the proposal ' would amend the current land use designation from commeraial to industrial on Lots 16, 17, and 18, Block 2, Commerce ' Park, generaZly located at 7321 Commerce Lane N.E. MOT ON by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICL VOTL, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON IdEWMAN DBCLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND TH$ PIIBLIC 81:ARINQ OPSN AT 8.00 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the application is by the City on behalf of Minco Products, Inc. Recently, the City approved a rezoning for the property adjacent to the plant at 7321 Commerce Lane. Staff is now asking the Metropolitan Council to change the land use' designation from commercial to industrial. It would add 2.19 acres back into the City's industrial land base. The City 1.05 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOB$R 18. 1995 PAGS 6 converted 14.5 acres from industrial to commercial for Home Depot. There are no adverse impact to the metropolitan systems. Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of this change to the City Council. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICS VOTL, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NBIPMAN DECLARED TH8 MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8504 P.M. OTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, CPA #95-02, by the City of Fridley for Minco Products, Inc., to amend the current land use designation from commercial to industrial on Lots 16, 17, and 18, Block 2, Commerce Park, generally located at 7321 Commerce Lane N.E. IIPON A VOICB VOT$, ALL VOTINQ AYE, CBAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THL MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. Ms. McPherson stated the City Council will consider this item on November 13. 3. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION REOUEST. SAV #95-04. BY GARY HEDMAN: To vacate the East 10 feet, except the Southerly 5 feet, of a utility easement located on Lot 9, Block 4, Ostman's Third Addition, generally located at 60 - 70th Way N.E. Ms. McPherson stated this request is to vacate a 10-foot utility easement. The dwelling is built on top of the easement. The title company, when the petitioner recently sold the house, discovered this error and has requested the easement be vacated in order to convey clear title to the new owners. The easement was dedicated on the easterly 10 feet of Lot 9. When four lots were combined to create one buildable lot, the words "utility easement" were located in the most westerly 10 feet on the site plan; however, the lines marking the easement aatually go over the east 10 feet. Staff has determined that there are no public utilities located in this easement. The Engineering Department has no objections to the vacation request; although they have requested that we retain a 10-foot easement adjacent to the dwelling for any potential future use by the City. The survey presented at the meeting is not a verifying survey. Staff is requesting a verifying survey be submitted by the petitioner to determine the exact width of the new easement and to verify the distance of the house from the westerly lot line. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends approval of the request to the City Council with the following stipulations: 1.06 l. The petitioner shall dedicate a new utility easement adjacent to the westerly lot line of the subject parcel. ' 2. A verifying survey shall be submitted by the petitioner, ' which shall determine the width of the new easement betwe+en the dwelling and the westerly lot line. In all other are�s along the west lot line, the easement shall be 10 feet an{d shall be indicated on said survey. In no case will the I easement be required to be wider than 10 feet on this ' property . There being no questions of staff, Mr. Newman asked for a moti�On to recommend approval of the request. , MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend i approval of a Vacation Request, SAV �95-01, by Gary Hedman, ta vacate the East 10 feet, except the SoutherZy 5 feet, of a utility easement lxated on Lot 9, Block 4, Ostman's Third , Addition, generally located at 60 - 70th Way N.E., with the , following stipulations: ' 1. The petitioner shall dedicate a new utility easement adjacent to the westerly lot line of the subject parcel. 2. A verifying survey shall be submitted by the petitioner,,' which shall determine the width of the new easement betwe�en the dwelling and the westerly lot line. In all other are�as along the west lot line, the easement sha12 be 10 feet ar�d shall be indicated on said survey. In no case will the ' easement be required to be wider than 10 feet on this i property. ; IIPON A VOICL VOTL, ALL VOTING AYS, CBAIRPLRSOI� NS11I� DSCLARBI� TH8 MOTION CARRISD DNANIMOIISL'Y. 4. FRIDLEY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: ' To take Lots 15, 16, and 17, and the Southeasterly 20 fe�t of Lots 52 and 53, and the Southerly 15 feet of Lot 54, Block E, Riverview Heights, and split it into three sepa�cate parcels (Parcels A- C), as follows: ', Parcel A: Lots 15, 16, and 17, Block E, Riverview Heigh�s Parcel B: The Southeasterly 20 feet of Lots 52 and 53, ; Block E, Riverview Heights �� Parcel C: The Southerly 15 feet of Lot 54, Block E, Riverview Heights 1.07 PLANNING COMMISSION MFETING. OCTOBER 18. 1995 PAGS 8 This property is generally located at 533 Janesville Street N.E. Ms. McPherson stated the request is for 533 Janesville which is located in the northwest corner of the community. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are all the surrounding parcels. This lot split affects three parcels - 533 Janesville, 538 Kimball and 528 Kimball. Ms. McPherson stated this subdivision was platted in 1922. However, prior to 1922, a house was constructed at 533 Janesville. This house encroached over the lines as platted. The platting was done around the existing farmstead. The Fridley HRA recently acquired this property through its scattered site acquisition program, the house has been removed, and the petitioner is in the process of marketing this lot for sale. The lot split would split off two small parcels and convey them to the adjacent property owners of 538 and 528 Rimball. This would straighten out the lot lines and eliminate the odd lot configuration. One adverse impact is that it reduces the lot area of 533 Janesville below the 9,000 square foot minimum. The lot area would be 8,250 square feet. If the request is approved, the Planning Commission should recognize this deficiency. Ms. McPherson stated the City has granted lot area variances for residential districts down to 5,500 square feet and the zoning code does permit lot areas of 7,500 square feet for lot splits and plats prior to December 29, 1955. It is not unusual to find lot areas below the 9,000 square foot minimum in this neighborhood. If there is concern about the marketability of this size lot, Mr. Fernelius has recently sold a lot on Hugo Street which is the exact dimension of the lot in question. In fact, a new house was built on that lot and sold. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends approval of the request with the following stipulations: 1. The adjacent property owners shall combine the new parcels with their existing parcels into one tax parcel. 2. The HRA shall conduct a public hearing as required by law prior to the sale of the property. 3. The Planning Commission recognizes that the lot area of 533 Janesville Street N.E. is less than the 9,000 square feet required by City Code. Mr. Oquist asked if any of the property owners had objections. 1.08 PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEBTINa, OCTOBBR 18, 1995 PAQ� 9 Ms. McPherson stated they do not object. The HRA is preparing a11 the legal documents which the property owners will siqn at! the time of the sale, and staff will be responsible for recording all the deeds. The property owners contacted Mr. Fernelius to'. proceed with this lot split. Mr. Newman asked if a variance would be required. Ms. McPherson stated a variance would not be required because " Section 211.05 of the Subdivision code allows the Planninq j Commission and City Council to recognize variations in the lot� from what is required by the code. � Mr. Newman suggested stipulation #2 be deleted and make this m�re of a protocol. He thought we should asswne that the HRA would, comply with the law. ' MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approve a Lo� Split Request, L.S. #95-02, by the Fridley Housing & � Redevelopment Authority to take Lots 15, 16, and 17, and the Southeasterly 20 feet of Lots 52 and 53, and the Southerly 15 � feet of Lot 54, Block E, Riverview Heiqhts, and split it into � three separate parcels (Parcels A- C), as folZows: Parcel A: Lots 15, 16, and 17, Block E, Riverview Height's Parcel Bs The Southeasterly 20 feet of Lots 52 and 53, i Block E, Riverview Heights ' Parcel C: The Southerly 15 feet of Lot 54, Block E, , Riverview Heights This praperty is generally located at 533 Janesville Street N.!E., with the following stipulations: ' 1. The adjacent property owners shall combine the new parce]ls with their existing parcels into one tax parcel. 2. The Planriinq Commission recognizes that the lot area of �33 Janesville Street N.E. is less than the 9,000 square feet� required by City Code. j QPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINGS AYE, CBAIRP$RSON NS'WMA�i DBCLARRI� THE MOTION CARRILD IINANIMOIIBI�Y. ' 5. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL UALITY & ENERGX COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 15. 1995 ' i MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the minutes of the Environmental Quality & Energy Commission meet�.ng of August 15, 1995. , ` 1.09 '' � �� PLANNING COMMISSION_MSSTING, OCTOB$R 18. 1995 PAG$ 10 IIPON A VOICS 90TB, ALL VOTING AYF� CHAIRPERSON NSWMAN DECLARL'rD THS MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. 6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSiON MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 7, 1995 MO ION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the minutes of the Human Resources Commission meeting of September 7, 1995. OPON A VOICS VOT$, AI,L VOTING A7i8, CHAIRPTRSON NSWMAN DECLARED T88 MOTION CARRIED DNANIMOIISLY. 7. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 12. 1995 MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to receive the minutes of the Appeals Commission meeting of September 12, 1995. IIPON A VOICB VOTB, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPSRSON NSWMAN D$CLARL'�'D THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOOSLY. 8. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 14� 1995 MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the minutes of the Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting of September 14, 1995. IIPON A VOICL VOTL� ALL VOTINQ AYS, CHAIRPLRSON NEWMA�T DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 9. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 26, 1995 MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the minutes of the Appeals Commission meeting of September 26, 1995. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, lII�L VOTIN(; AYS, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DLCLARL�D THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. 10. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL 4UALITY & ENERGY COMMISSiON MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 26� 1995 MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the minutes of the Environmental Quality & Energy Commission meeting of September 26, 1995. OPON A VOICL VOTL, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEIPMAN DLCLARED THB MOTION CARRIED IINANZMOIISLY. y.10 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBSR 18. 1995 PAG$111 11. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Hickok provided an update on Council actions. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to adjourn the; meeting. ; IIPON A VOIC$ VOT$, ALL VOTINa AYS, CBAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARLD'I THL MOTION CARRIED AND THE OCTOBER 18, 1995, PLANNIN(� COMMISSIpN MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:25 P.M. ! Respectfully submitted, � � � , �.��(�`�� ,� Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary 1.11 � S I G N— IN S H E E T PLANNING COMMISSION.MEETING, Wednesday,_ October 18, 1995 Name Address/Business ' � - � � � .� A � 7 lUL �' . l'� �U�J ��i� cti �n �� v �.12 CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMI$SION MEBTING, NOVBMBER 1, 1995 CALL TO ORDER• ' , Chairperson Newman called the November 1, 1995, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL• I Members Present: Members Absent: Dave Newman, Dave Kondrick, Diane Savage, LeRoy Oquist, Dean Saba, Connie Modig Brad Sielaff Others Present: Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Dennis Zylla, Northco A1 Quam, 399 - 73rd Avenue N.E. Jim Holmen, 7310 Tempo Terrace John Allen, Industrial Equities APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 18, 1995. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: Mr. Newman requested the following additions to the minutes: ' i Page 5, after the second paragraph, add the statement, "No on� from the public appeared for this item." , Page 6, after the first paragraph, add the appeared other than the petitioner who was questions." statement, pNo onei, available to answe� MoTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to approve th� October 18, 1995, Planning Commission minutes as amended. j UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING A7t$, CHAIRPBRSON NEWMAN Dl:CLPiR$m THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. ! 1. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION RE4UEST. SAV #95-05. BY INDUSTRIAL EQUITIES: To vacate those particular 20.00 foot drainage and utili�y easements originally dedicated on the recorded plats of Northco Business Park and Northco Business Park 2nd Addi�ion and now to be vacated which lie within Lots 1 and 2, Blo�k 1, in said Northco Business Park and Lot 2, Block l, sai�l Northco Business Park 2nd Addition and lying southerly of the northerly 20.00 feet of said lots. The centerline o� said 20.00 foot easement is described as follows: � Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot 1; ' thence northwesterly, along the southwesterly line of sa�d Lot 1, a distance of 62.51 feet, to the intersection wit� the westerly line of said Lot 1(said intersection. ' 2.01 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVSMBBR 1, 1995 PAt3E 2 hereinafter referred to as "Point A"); thence southeasterly, along a line passing through a point on a southeasterly line of said Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park distant 29.00 feet southwesterly from said most southerly corner, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence northwesterly, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the above referenced "Point A"; thence northerly, along the westerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 379.40 feet and said centerline there terminating, generally loaated at the southwest corner of 73rd Avenue and Northco Drive. Ms. McPherson stated an informal hearing is being held to consider a vacation request by Industrial Equities. The location of the request is at the intersection of 73rd Avenue and the East University Avenue service drive. The property spans two legally described lots. The petitioner is requesting that the City approve the vacation of a 20.00 foot drainage and utility easement which runs in a north/south direction through the middle . of the subject parcel. The purpose of the vacation request is to allow construction of an 87,000 square foot multi-tenant speculative industrial building. The building is 600 feet fronting ?3rd Avenue and 160 feet in the north/south direction. Currently located in the utility easement, which is 20.00 feet wide (10.00 feet on either side of the lot line), is a 24-inch storm sewer line which connects with the storm water system from Northco Drive to 73rd Avenue. The petitioner has developed plans to voluntarily relocate this storm sewer line in such a manner as the water will go through a drainage pond, through a pipe across the southwesterly right-of-way into another pond along the west side of the site, and finally connecting via another pipe into the storm water system on 73rd Avenue. The Engineering Department has no objections to the proposed plan by the petitioner. The request does not adversely impact the storm water system for the City. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner _ system from th the parking lo of 73rd Avenue shall maintain the storm water drainage e manhole located in the southeast corner of t and the outlet located at the intersection and the East University Avenue Service Road. 2. The petitioner shall execute and record aqainst the property a storm water pond maintenance agreement. • Ms. McPherson stated, as presented, the site plan does meet the requirements of the M-2, Heavy Industrial District, with the exception of the loading docks which face Northco Drive. The _ petitioner will be processing a variance request, which-will be 2.�2 PLANNINC� COMMI88ION MEETING. NOVBMBER 1, 1995 PAGL 3 reviewed by the Appeals Commission next week, regardinq the location of the loading docks. Ms. Savage asked if a recommendation for approval would need a stipulation contingent upon that approval. Ms. McPherson stated no. The petitioner could redesign the building so that there were no loading docks facing the riqht-of- way. Mr. Newman asked if the two lots would be combined into one tax parcel and if that needed to be part of this approval process. Ms. McPherson stated yes, the lots would be combined into one tax parcel. This can be done as part of the administrative process. The petitioner is seeking tax increment financing for some soil correction. The combining of the parcels would be handled through that process. Mr. Zylla stated represented the Fridley Business Center partnership, which is the seller of the land. They also had to sign a petition in support of the vacation. He is attendinq the meeting to express the partnership's support of what the petitioner is proposing. They are prepared to answer whatever questions he can as part of this process. They are not directly tied into the appliaation for planning approval, but they are aware of the need for a variance. The storm sewer is a situation that no one foresaw when the property was platted. With the market being what it is, the petitioner is more interested in developing a more linear, high bay building and the storm sewer is basically in the way. He received a copy of the meeting minutes of the Rice Creek Watershed District, which supports the request. There is no adverse watershed impact. What the petitioner is proposing is probably somewhat of an enhancement to the sedimentation issue that typically watershed districts are concerned about. The proposed system would provide more filtration of the water through the system of ponds. He did not see any adverse environmental impact. The vacation is primarily a convenience for the development of the property for intended use. Mr. Newman asked if the closing had taken place. Mr. Zylla stated no. Mr. Newman asked if there was any reason the Planning Commission would need to make the vacation contingent upon any events. Mr. Zylla stated, between now and the City Council meetinq, they may have a closing. If that does not occur, they would want the actual publication of the meetinq notice of official action be 2.03 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBLR 1, 1995 PAGE 4 postponed until closing occurs. He did not want to complicate this proceeding because they are confident that this will happen. Mr. Newman asked staff if this should be included as a stipulation. Ms. McPherson suggested making note of the concern. She will talk with Ms. Dacy, Mr. Zylla and the petitioner, and schedule the ordinance publication accordingly. A formal public hearing still needs to be established before the City Council. At their meeting of November 13, the Council would establish a public hearing for November 27. The first reading of the ordinance would not occur until December and the second reading in January. Officially, the publication of the ordinance would not occur until perhaps the second week in January which should give the petitioner ample time to resolve the issues regarding closing. Mr. Zylla stated they will be closing or the petitioner will be escrowing funds in anticipation of starting some of the work suc� as footings and foundation or providing some assurance that he will close. He does not see a problem in putting on a condition that approval is subject.to closing. Mr. Quam asked for an explanation of the process and a review of the dates. Mr. Newman reviewed the process in detail, the date for establishing a public hearing and the date of the actual public hearing. Mr. Quam stated he was here to object. He sees two variance requests for this. If the Commission were to recommend approval, he would hope that it would,be contingent upon the setback of the project. Several of us in Melody Manor who live right across the street would spend the rest of our lives looking at this. Al1 the properties along 73rd Avenue were developed with a good setback and with ample screening, and this property is not. Mr. Newman asked staff if the variances would be heard by the City Council at the same time. Ms. McPherson stated the variance does not require a public hearing before the Council. If the Council is looking at an item and there are people present who wish to speak at the meeting, this would probably not occur until the December meeting. Assuming staff recommends approval of an ordinance to vacate this easement, then the variance would be brought before the Council at that time. Only one variance has been requested which will be considered by the Appeals Commission on November 7. 2.04 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. NOVEMBER 1, 1995 PAGB 5 Mr. Al1en stated he was the developer of this property. There is a variance requested for the trnck side facing Northco Drive. It is a rather unique ordinance in the City in considering that side of the building the front drive. Because of the calculations on square footage and distance, they probably need a variance to make sure they are safe in that regard. They have screened the trucks from 73rd. With regard to the vacation of the storm sewer, they are proposing to vacate the easement that goes under the building currently. They are proposing to take the water that comes off of the public street through a pond, through a second pond, and then to the storm water system. From the standpoint of water quality, he felt they were doing something that does not currently exist and enhancing the quality of the water going into the retention area. Mr. Allen stated the building complies with the setback requirements. It complies with every.aspect of the development that was signed with the City of Fridley and Northco Development. The only variance being requested is for the truck dock area. They intend to keep the trucks in the back of the building. They are trying to project a first class campus image and attract good tenants. They do a good job with landscaping and berming. They have similar projects in the area for which they are willing to provide addresses. They are very conscientious of the residents and will work with residents. Mr. Holman stated he had concerns about the width of the berm and the bike path. Mr. Allen stated, because these were not part of the discussion for the vacation request, he would respond to Mr. Holman's questions at a later time. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend approval of a Vacation Request, SAV #95-05, by Industrial Equities, to vacate those particular 20.00 foot drainage and utility easements originally dedicated on the recorded plats of Northco Business Park and Northco Business Park 2nd Addition and now to be vacated which lie within Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, in said Northco business Park and Lat 2, Block 1, said Northco Business Park 2nd Addition and lying southerly of the northerly 20.00 feet of said lots. The centerline of said 20.00 foot easement is described as Follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot 1; thence northwesterly, along the southwesterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 62.51 feet, to the intersection with the westerly line of said Lot 1(said intersection hereinafter referred to as "Point A"); thence southeasterly, along a line passing through a point on a southeasterly line of said Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park distant 29.00 feet southwesterly from said most southerly corner, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence 2.05 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 1. 1995 PAGg 6 northwesterly, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the above referenced "Point A"; thence northerly, along the westerly line of said Lot l, a distance of 379.40 feet and said centerline there terminating, generally located at the southwest corner of 73rd Avenue and Northco Drive, with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall maintain the storYa water drainage system from the manhole located in the southeast corner of the parking lot and the outlet located at the intersection of 73rd Avenue and the East University Avenue Service Road. 2. The petitioner sha11 execute and record against the property a storm water pond maintenance agreement. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Mr. Newman stated the Appeals Commission would address the issue of a variance request on November 7; and the City Council will conduct a public hearing on the vacation request on November 27. 2. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMIS5ION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11. 1995 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of September 11, 1995. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the meeting. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRP$RSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE NOVEMBER 1, 1995, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOIIRNED AT 7:55 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary 2.�6 � _ � . Community Development Department PLANN][NG DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: November 9, 1995 TO: William Burns, City Manager /�y� � FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Establish a Public Hearing for a Vacation Request, SAV #95-04, by Gary Hedman, to Vacate a Utility Easement Generally Located at 60 - 70th Way N.E. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing regardinq the vacation request at its October 18, 1995 meeting. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council with two stipulations. The City Charter hearing regarding the City Council public hearing. MM/dw M-95-569 requires the City Council to conduct a public the vacation request. Staff recommends that establish November 27, 1995 as the date of the 3.01 JHV if y �-U4 Gary Hedman � 7099 �u� � 14 j . Hickory Drive t�� , �� c �� '�� c ,� � . � � �� . �'�'6' �'0�' c�' � �� c'�, c�' c�o°� � � � , ` �' �,' " t"�� c�, c, ' i � t�� ' I�) l�) l�) A � 70th Ray N.E. t� � ��o� � ��, � c�, � � c�� , c�� c�°� � c�� t> > c'�° �., t "�� ! a, c�°, � � 6A'Nd6 � t�� 2 � ( ) t f '�"7- I t ) �� t u�l ( tf-) � u'!9� t 1 Hickorp Drive ��, �'r�;� c�� t �"'� t�'� � - ��, t u� �� t�) t�l �`�,l c�� ) � �� -- --- � . � 3.02 N ; ----� -- _ _ _ _._ ._ _._. . � .-- _ _ _ . __ , �.00ATION MAP � _ � � DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Community Development Department PLAIV�TING DIVISION City of Fridley November 9, 1995 � William Burns, City Manager �� Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Establish Public Hearing for Vacation Request, SAV #95-05, by Industrial Equities The Planning Commission conducted an informal hearing regardinq the vacation request at its November 1, 1995 meeting. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. The City Charter requires the City Council to conduct a public hearing regarding all vacation requests. Staff recommends that the City Couricil establish November 27, 1995 as the date of the public hearing. 1�II�I/dw M-95-556 � 4.01 � SAV ��95-05 Industrial Equities 73rd Avenue N.� � N . ..:-.�.� .....:.. � 4 . __ +{ -w-.a _ .. _��0 2� ........... _ _ -ra....�.._..._.._..-.-.-..�,. . _ � .. � ..�,r--�„ _�• .'-"11 . . . . . .. �.. _ .'.�.�..::,�. :..,...�'_ ___....... _.._,.:__....:.::a..� �. :-- -`�i.00ATION MAP � ,. ,. I�j � _ �• SAV �� 95-05 �."-� � Li J a Industrial Equitie � �� ,�; - C =_� �i f ` 00 � �i�,Qa � J ^`1 � � > � - ,1 � �L I J 1J:i � * � �— �.� 1 ; J �a :.� I� �� F �� r :� b _ E�- ` � ' � -- � ''; _ �� l� ' �-- - t V b � � � ( ' . O � . : �� ~ � .- 'L�— . . � ' � �-as s wn �s srr wr a�► ao s�w� :� I �_J � � • �::. , �.i i'L° ts�0 ' "_� r'as ao M�s sues �r� as�a �� I „_� __ p.� � �•.�. s�s..s.o� 4 � 1� • 1{7� . '�� 1 �\ � a� �� • o� � "�:° iti f' S �. � q - � �.� . � . � �'� �,�' ...,� ♦ i j , �-� �•'y � . ... • - . . �,� , `. ; �i�M �J(M� • �� t� UJ � V . ± . . a � � ' � � �.�� . �j� . - . J�� ._ � - . � � . JI � � s - � ! � � �/\ . 1 �i L� � � •� �� t f/ �r { . � �..P.� \;� ._ r . . . , � � . . I i � � p � � � [T . �, � $ � �.y % � �� ` � �' . . ' � � �'' �'� ,J • � I 1 � q� � � ` � J . Kr� � O j � � '"�'1 I fi 1 y' - �. t�+�' �' �- � '� ! ' � � . � ' �� i� .. � � � '�► i ` � � I . ' .. � ' �� •, -sfeM �.M.M►ai F ,.._/ � � � � , � � � � �. F^� } � J� : i � . � '' �`''•� " �s .. °''� . °' .. . s O - I � ; >""'` ., �a ' G � - � � .: / � . . � _ : ! � � � . �� . � ..e��,� : � � I � � _ . __ a �� . ;, .; _ � �,`, . --,. 1.a. R,•q•wo. ; ^ � � 1 � d± �, � -� �' - I J ^ � '' i, �� L�� +.o.. r : i` „� � �� ,i' ! \ O. � . � w.w.«ws � � I.n� � 1 � � f..� iZ ; � • . � � � �� . � _� . �, �. .�».� ki � � �� , �, & �} a �� \ / . � . w . I � . � � � - .. _. -. . ; • ' 3 �t� � � ' � . ��l� � ^ '�00 1�1 LH� �� .. . _� _' .� `�*�aYMqY � � AMINIbD�MMiN I " � �� o� o� �%►rawacOM `�aw�ww� I � �e , � ° oow► i j �'t-' W �+ ---��"' . �,-J . E , 1 ' - �' �toottir�t -9 0�� ,1r.!l.oN � ---- , . � , -�� . .: � �' / `'-7 'q r - 7 •� P � -7 �1 +-,i i / i �'� � � -� � � A / / l � . � _ i. _3 iV_ _7//�V_�/�� i',J_iJ��_�/�/iVi i i � /.�� %'� � i i I-,� 4�' l� I'� `.J '� / l� i/ / 1 i �--i i �� ; �_� .��v �:✓i��r;.l�r� ��v, i:�1_ =:1: ✓� �: � . . . •- , 4.03 ~,• � �� F � �� y �� 3 '� �_ � i �t e� � � '� �� x �� o • � � � 3 � � I I � I r � � c t .- � I _ � Community Development Department PLAIVNING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: November 9, 1995 p./ �f� TO: William Burns, City Manager� FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Resolution to Establish Public Hearing to Amend Redevelopment Project Area #1 and to Create Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 . John Allen of Industrial Equities Development Investments has filed an application For tax increment financing assistance from the Housing & Redevelopment Authority. In order to provide the assistance, a tax increment financing district needs to be created. The subject property is currently in a redevelopment project area. The subject property is located south of 73rd Avenue and just east of University Avenue. The proposed project is an 88,000 square foot building approximatinq $3,500,000 in pro�ect costs. The building will be a one-story industrial business center for industrial uses such as printing companies, electronic and high- tech industries, and those industries that need storage space. The Planning Commission recently reviewed a vacation request to vacate a drainage and utility easement that bisects the site. The Appeals Commission recently considered a variance request to have loading docks at the rear of the building facing a public right-of-way. Both commissions have recommended approval. State Statute requires hearing when considering financing district. An proposed. Recommendation the City Council to conduct a public establishment of a tax increment economic development district is Staff recommends the City Council establish November 27, 1995 as the public hearing date, and adopt the attached resolution. BD/dw M-95-567 5.01 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MODIFICATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 AND THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 AND 13 TO REFLECT INCREASED PROJECT COSTS WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 14 AND THE APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council'�) of the City of Fridley, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section l. Public Hearina. 1.01. This Council shall meet on Monday, November 27, 1995 commencing at 7:30 o'clock p.m. at City Hall, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, to hold a public hearing on the following matters: (a) the modification of the Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 to reflect increased project costs, pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to time; (b) the modification of the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax increment Financing Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 (the "Existing TIF Districts�� ) to reflect increased project costs within Redevelopment Project No. l, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to time; and, (c) the establishment of proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 and the approval and adoption of the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to time. Section 2. Notice of Hearina; Filina of Plans. 2.01. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the public hearing, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be published as required by law, to place a copy of the Modified Redevelopment Plan, the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan (collectively the "Plans") on file in the City Clerk's office and to make such Plans available for inspection by the public. 5.02 Page 2 - Resolution No. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1995. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM CHAMPA - CITY CLERK CERTIFICATION I, William Champa, the duly qualified Clerk of the City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the City Council on the 13th day of November, 1995. WILLIAM CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 5.03 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given Fridley City Council a University Avenue N.E. for the purpose of: that there will be a public hearing t the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 on Monday, November 27, 1995 at 7:30 of the Consideration of the approval and adoption of a Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 to reflect increased project costs, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.074, inclusive. The hearing is also relative to the approval and adoption of Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts NOS. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, arid 13 t0 refleCt increased project costs within Redevelopment Project No. 1, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive. The hearing is further relative to the approval and adoption of a prvposed Tax Increment Financing Plan and the creation of proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 14, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive. Copies of the documentation relating to the above proposed actions will be on file and available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office. The property proposed to be Increment Financing District illustrated on the attached TIF District No. 14 PIN 11-30-24-31-0008 PIN 11-30-24-31-0018 included in the Tax is described below and map: Hearing impaired persans planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than November 20, 1995. p.m. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department at 572-3599. Publish: November 16, 1995 November 23, 1995 5.04 WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR !'�.... �'.-:..':�':'. �:"=:::'.; ...''' �..:�:�:. -:��._� . i' :, `, f.:�.:_..`- - �-. INDUSTRIAL EQUITIES L.L.P. Development and Investments TEL 612 591 0892 1660 South Highway 100, Suite 536W, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 FAX 612 591 1383 October 19, 1995 Ms. Barb Dacy Comm�nity Development Director City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 �-. :. � As you know, Industrial Equities has a preliminary interest-in developing the 6.8 acre Northco Business Center. site that is located at 73rd, and University. with a speculative multi tenanf 88,000 _ . .. . square foot business center.: Because this site has .significant soil correction and utility ielocation issues our current and future intereats must be contingent upon establishing��a reasonable tax increment and financing district . that is consistent with . the plans that have been discussed between Northco, James Casserly and the City. Without soil conection and utility relocatioa assistance this project, like others considered before it, cannot ' Proceed, and the future development is quite unlikely. Based on our discussions and your previous discussions with Northco, it appears that the HRA and the City Council will favorably consider establishing a tax increment finance disirict for this site. Accordingly, I have developed preliminary project designs and made the required ..applirations:.to the-�ity aad.Rice.Street Watershed<Distact.to:allow for the sites preparation and con�ection. As I understand it, the Distdct cannot be formally established prior to I�cember 12, 1995. However, assuming the City would support this proposat, Industrial Equities would like to do preliminary site preparation prior to that date so as to allow for construction through the winter. This site preparation would include.o� tree removal and generat site grading that would allow for specific soil correction and preparation for the importing of the required select material to conect and raise the elevation of the site after the approval is granted. Unfortunately, if this early access is not possible, site grading must be delayed until late April of 1996, and construction completion will be delayed by over five months. Barb, if T.I.F. is not going to be available on this project we cleazly do not want to get out in front. of the headlights and invest any more time or money. . However, if the City supports this project, we would like to talce the allowable steps which would bring this project on line in the Spring of 1996. ; 5.06 Ms. Barb Dacy October 19, 1995 Page 2 Industrial Equities is enthusiastic about the possibility of developing this project in Fridley because businesses like doing business in Fridley. The City works for both the employees and the employers. You have virtually no vacancy but you have no expansion space to expand your existing companies much less attract desirable new employers. Industrial Equities believes a high quality energy efficient business center could fill this void for both Fridley and businesses in the City. I look forward to discussing in greater detail with you the HRA and City Council's response to this request. . If., ou. ha��e any -que..�ns, �d�; �o� not hesitatP•to 2d�_ .. - Yours very truly, �� /U C�c��j � John N. Allen JNA/gw 5.07 DESCRIPTION OF REQUESf: The G�ity requests that the land use designation in the Comprehensrve Plan be changed fi+am Commercial to industri�I �r ProperlY recently rezoned to M-1, Iight Industrial. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Minvo, Inc is praposing an addition to their Plant 2, located at 7321 Commerce Lane. TLe C�ity Counc� appraved a rezoning to allaw this addition This addition w�11 add another 60,000 square feet of manufac�uring, research and development, and office spaoe to the industrial supply of the City: The G'�ity's industrial im+entory was recently reduced by 14S acres by a change from Industrial to Commercial. The proposed amendment would retwn 2.19 acres to the C�ityis inventory of industrially zoned property. RECOMIVV�NDID ACI'IONS: Staff reoommended apprwal of the rezoning request. The proposed change in land use designation poses no adverse impacts to the Metropolitan Systems, therefore, staff recommends that the City Counc� approve of the request. PLANNING CONIIVIISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to revommend appmval of the request to the C�ty Counc�7. 6.01 Staff Report CPA #95-02, by City of Fridley for Minco Products Page 2 Petition Fo� Location of Property: Legal De.scriiption of Property: Siz� Topography: Faristing Vegetation: Existing Zoting/Plat�n� Availability of Muticipal Utilities: Vehicular Access: Pedestrian Access: Engineering Issues: Site Planning Issues: PROJECT DETAILS Change in land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan from Commercial to Industrial. 7321 Commerce Lane Lots 16-18, Block 2, Commerce Park Addition 2.19 acres F1at Grass, some scrub trees Commerce Park Addition, 1965, recently zoned to M-1, Light Industrial Connected University West Service Road West University Avenue Bikeway/Walkway None DEVELOPMENT SITE 6.�2 Staff Report _ CPA #95-02, by CCitty of Fridley for Minoo Produds Page 3 Property HIstory Minvo 5rst oocupied the PraperiY at 7321 Commeroe Lane in 1972�. TLey aLso oocupy a building at ?300 Commerce Lane and are rurrently oonshvding a third plant at 7290 Commen�e C�rcle West. 'Ifie Comprehens�ive Plan designates the subject parcel as Commercial. Praperiy to the north, south, and east is also d�signated as Commemaal. Property to the west is designated Industrial. This request woiild be an extension of the land use designation to the west. Impact on Metropolitan Systems The follawing criteria are based on criteria used by the Metropolitan Counca� to evaluate plan amendments. - Changes to Urban Service Boundary The City of Fridley is a first ring suburb that is entirely within the Urban SeYVice Boundaries as D�eefined . by the Metropolitan Iand Planning Act (Minn. Stats. 4?3.851-4?3.$?2). Impacts to the boundary do not apply to this proposal. Changes to Timing and Staging of Urban Service Area Staging of the Urban Servioe area does not apply to this proposal since the area is within the eldsting wban service area. Waste�vate�r Ti�eatment There w�l be no increase in the amount of wastewater treatment as a result of changing the land use from Commercial to Industrial. Dischargae to More lfian One Metropolitan Interoeptor The flaw from this amended area goes to 4NS-S21 in a000rdance with regional plans. The 8vws w�l not be diverted from one interceptor to another. Translwrtation System The traffic generated by the addition is not anticipated to adversely impact the adjacent roadways. The adjacent roads are designed to accommodate industrial traffic. Minco currently has appro�mately b80 employees. The proposed addition w� have appro�mately 160 additional parking spaces. 6.03 Staff Report CPA #95-02, by City of Fridley for Minco Products Page 4 Aviation The proposed development is not anticipated to have avy impact on the Metropolitan airport. The development w�l not be detrimentally impacted iyy airport noise. Recr�tion Open Space There w�l be no impact to the local or regional open space system. Housing This amendment wi71 not impact the City's housing plan (long �rm or short term goals). Employment It is anticipated, based on Minoo's past grvwth patterns, that approximately 150 employees w�l be added to the emplayment base over the next 5 years. Stipuiations and Recommendation lfiere is no impact to the Metropolitan Systems by this request to change the land use designation from Commercial to Industrial. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission reoommend appmval of the request to the City Counci7 WFST: Zoning: SOIJTH: Zoning: FAS'T: Zoning: NORTH: Zoning: Comprehensive Planning Issue� Public Hearing Comments: ADJACENT SITES M-1, Iight Industrial M-1, Iight Industrial G2, General Business G2, General Business s.o4 Land Use: Industrial Land Use: Multi Tenant Indi�ial Land Use: CaYwash Iand Use: Office RE80LIITION NO. - 1995 ZtE80LQ'PIO�T APPROVIN�i 71 CO�LPRS88�T8I�E PLA�T AMBND�i8D1T, CPA �95-02, BY THB CITY O� BRIDI.EY �'O�t MINCO PRODUCTB, INC. , TO �ND T88 CIIItR8�1T LAND II8B DBSI(�TION pRO�i COi�IIYIERCIAL TO INDUBTRIAL� aB�TERALLY LOCATBD AT 7321 COMMERCB LANI� N. B. WHEREAS, the Plar�ning Commission held a public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, CPA �95-02, on October 18, 1995 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council also conducted public review of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment at their , 1995 City Council meeting and approved the Amendment at their , 1995 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minn. Stat. 473.851 - 473.872j requires that local qovernment units prepare and submit minor amendments to their land use plans to the Metropolitan Council; and W�iEREAS, a minor amendment is defined as changes to the future land use p2an where the affected area is small or where the proposed future land use will result in minor changes in metropolitan service demand; chanqes in the urban service area involvinq less than 40 acres; change to plan goals and policies that do not change the overall thrust of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Gity has determined this to be a minor amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby approves the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, CPA #95-02. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1995. ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERR s.o5 � � � �� fi a ►f1 �' �'i�i�i�i� �i'i`i�i I � � �i !� t �i�i'i{ ��i'i•i� A �/ •� �� r�i!�i= ! ��!�!�� I 1` � � r '�� . :'�li: f ' ,> �; s N t� , .: ;}t�� z ��,. : 5 : r' x;iSl'k, st�.�va _ .5, r .Y � ,5 :ti ,� �.F, j��. �,;�t.}+� _. �. � � .Sff'.�� ry¢ ` . . v'7'��555 :$:��.�, s "E � � :, :. '. � . �. ,. : r, , ::� , :� :....:: � :' :.:.::�. .;: . . .�� u��,�X �'�,•`+$^•�''��;;,� f �j � . . . . " �. � f�� 'Si'.'3�353�,i � � � �:. J2 .� . t5Y !, $ t ; .,1 � .5 �'..X � > �,?'i9S3 3 �$ lf"�5!t,,f `�,`„ sp 3 . i.` �l r.�i. 'S„� + . ..��,� � � �. !�� ,,.A�`� .is... . {�"' ��i�5- �'$' � �C�r,� � �j�;1�� +J$,$ . G $ $ '� . � �W ��,- �"� S .�i , � S £�., `�'bi't; ' .t "� t{ sa:' h � �j ' r� t� r��t�� t, . :' f� F i>,Y`�� ;�:.� ..f ... . �l'Y{�a��'9��:" � _ .._ ' - .. _\��11_�� .`� �.`�:�.�� DESCRIPTION OF REQUESI: The Fridley HItA request� that a lot split be appraved to allaw the sale of properiy to adjacent properties. The sale of the property w�l "straighten" the alignment of lot lines. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: The Fridiey HRA acquired 533 Janesv�Ie in 1995 through its scattered site aoquisition program. The dwelling on the property was oonstructed prior to the pIatting of Riverview Heights in 1922. As a result, the lots were created azound the dwelling unit Two pazcels w�l be created; one 20' x 50', the other 15' x 25'. These two parcels w�l be sold to the properties to the north of the svbject parcel. Once split, the subject parcel w�l not meet the minimum 9,000 square feet required for lot area The resutting lot area w�t be 8,250 square feet The Planning Commission w�l need to acknawledge this deficiency as permitted in Section 211.05 of the Fridley City Code if it approves the lot split request. RECOMII�NDED ACTIONS: Staff recammends that the City Counc� apprave the request with the follawing stipulations: 1. 'Ifie adjacent properiy awners shall oombine the new parcels with their existing parcels into one t� parceL 2. The Planning Commission reoognizes that the lot area of 533 Janesv7le Street NE is less than the 9,000 square feet required by City Code. PLANNING COMIVQSSION ACTION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend apprwal of the request. 7.01 Staff Report L.S. #95-02, by Fridley HRA Page 2 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For. I.ot split for sale of land to adjacent properiy awners. Location of Property: Legal D�ption of Propeity: Siz� Topograph3. Eadsting Vegeta�ion: Fa�isting Zoning/Plattin� Availability of Municipal Utilitie� Vehicular Acces� Pedestrian Acces� Engineering Issues: Site Planning Issues: 533 Janesville Street Lots 15-17, Block E, Riveiview Heights, the Southeasterly 24 feet of Lofs 52 and 53, Biock E, and the Southerly 15 feet of Lnt 54, Block E, Riverview HeigLts. 9,625 square feet F1at Typical suburban, sod, trees, shrubs, etc. Riverview Heights Park, 1922; R-1, Single Fam�y Dwelling Connected Janesv�le Street N/A None DEVELOPMENT STTE 7.�2 , Staff Report L.S. #95-02, by Fridley HRA Page 3 Property �iistories 533 Janesville The Fridley HRA acx�uired the properiy in 1995. The dwelling, oonstructed prior to 1922, and the detached garage, constructed in 1977, were demolisLed in August 1995. 538 Kimball Street T1zis parcel is located northwest of the subject parcel and w�l purchase the 20' x 50' paroel. Located on the pazcel is a 24' x 36' dwelling vonstructed in 1968 and a 20' x 22' detached garage constivcted in 1969. 528 Kimball Street This parcel is located northeast of the subject parcel and w�l purchase the 15' x 25' pazcel. L,ocated on the parcel is a 24' x 40' dwelling constructed in 1967. A 20' x 22' detached garage was constructed in 1971 on that same lo� A variance was granted in 1971 to reduce the distance between the garage and the living space on 533 Janesv�le from 15 feet to 11 fee� Request Analysis The intent of the lot split is to realign the northerly lot line of 533 Janesv�7le with the remainder of the platted lots to the east and west. The proposed lot w� meet the 75 foot lot width minim�m required by code. The lot is currently 9,625 square feet in area. If approved, the lot split would reduce the lot area to 8,250 square feet, 750 square feet less than required by code. Section 205.07.03.A.(2) of the Zoning Code does permit lot areas of 7,500 square feet on subdivisions or plats reoorded prior to December 29, 1955. This lot would exceed that requirement In this neighborhood, reduced lot areas are not uncommon. 1fie City has permitted construction of dwellings on lots as small as 5,500 square feet (537 Fairmont Street). Section 211.05 of the Fridley City Code permits the Planning Commission and City Counc� to apprave subdivisions with variations from the requirements of the ordinance. The reasons why they are neGessary shall be noted in the minutes. The parcels to be created by the lot split will need to be oombine with the e�sting parcels of 538 and 528 Kimball Street in order to ensure that they become one tax parcel. The HRA is required by law to conduct a public hearing prior to the sale of the parcels. This is scheduled for the Navember HRA meeting. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission rec�ommend approval of the request to the City Counc� with the foll�ving stipulations: 7.03 Staff Report _ L.S. #95-02, by Fridley HRA Page 4 1. The adjaoent property awners shall combine the new parcels with their existing pan;eLs into one tax parcel. 2. The HRA shall conduct a public hearing as required by law prior to the sale of the property. 3. The Planning Commission recognizes that the lot area of 533 Janesv�le Street NE is less than the 9,000 square feet required by City Code. WFST: SOUTH: EAS'I': ' NORTH: Comprehensive Planning Issue� Public HearIng Comments: ADJACENT SITE.S Zoning: R-1, Single Fam�y Zoning: R-1, Single Fanu'ly Zoning: R-1, Single Fa,m�'lyr Zoning. R-1, Single Faiw'ly 7.04 Land Use: Residential Land Use: Residential Land Use: Residential Land Use: Residential RESOLIITION NO. - 1995 RLSOLIITION APPItOVINt3 A SIIBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L.B. �95-02� BY T8E BRIDLBY HODSINa i� REDLVELOPMENT ADTHORITY, TO BPLIT PROPERTY GENEKALLY LOCATED AT 533 JAN]38VILLE STREBT N.B. WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at the , 1995 meeting, and stipulations attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, such approval was to take Lots 15, 16, and 17, and the Southeasterly 20 feet of Lots 52 and 53, and the southerly 15 feet of Lot 54, Block E, Riverview Heights, and split it into three separate parcels (Parcels A- C), as follows: Parcel A: Lots 15, 16, and 17, Block E, Riverview Heights Parael H: The Southeasterly 20 feet of Lots 52 and 53, . Block E, Riverview Heights � Parcel C: The Southerly 15 feet of Lot 54, Block E, Riverview Heights This property is generally located at 533 Janesville Street NE. wHEREAS, the City has reaeived the required Certificate of Survey from the owner; and WHEREAS, such approvaZ wiZl split the property into three separate lots. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the petitioner to record this lot split at Anoka County within six months of this approval or else such approval shall be null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY GOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1995. ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 7.05 EXHIBIT A Resolution No. - 1995 1. The adjacent property owners shall combine the new parcels with their existing parcels into one tax parcel. 2. The Planninq Commission recognizes that the lot area of 533 Janesville Street NE is less than the 9,000 square feet required by City Code. 7.�6 Background Information The subject property consists of three (3) platted 25� x 110� lots, plus a portion of two adjoining lots (the southerly 20' of Lots 52 and 53 and the southerly 15' of Lot 54) in the Riverview Heights Addition. The lot currently is 9,625 square feet in size. The odd lot configuration is the result of a home which was located on the site and constructed prior t.o the original plat in 1922. In recent years the home fell into disrepair, was foreclosed upon by a bank, became vacant and had deteriorated to the point where rehabilitation was no longer economically feasible. In May 1995 the HRA acquired the site from HUD and the house was demolished in early September 1995. The plan for the site is to sell the vacant lot to a private party for construction of a new single family home under the HRA's Housing Replacement Program. At the request of two adjoining property owners, the HRA would like to sell the 20' x 50' piece on Lots 52 and 53 and the 15' x 25' piece of Lot 54. The HRA would like to complete the transaction prior to reselling the subject property this fall. Hardship Statement The Fridley HRA is requesting a lot area variance which would reduce the current lot size from 9,625 s.f. to 8,250 s.f. The lot area variance would be necessary for the HRA to sell the site as a buildable lot. The proposed conveyance, would return all of the lot boundaries (528 and 538 Kimball St. and 533 Janesville St.) to the original plat lines. Although, it reduces the Janesville St. site somewhat, it increases the Kimball St. sites and enlarges the rear yard areas. In addition, it would correct a boundary line problem, clarify the legal descriptions, and enhance the appearance of the area. If approved, the revised Janesville St. lot would still be attractive to the private market. In fact, the HRA sold a 75� x 110' vacant lot at 677 Hugo St. in August of this year to a builder who will start construction this fall. 7.�7 t�) ` � lT�� i , t '� 646 _ / � i f c��_ I (�� 7.os �L.S. f�95-02 Fridley HRA ` .'�' � �le�� 8155 t�) ` � l� % c �°� �: (M� t i� ; �� T N LOCATION MAP CERT I F I CAiE OF SURVEI�.S. ��95-�T�E 9:2�-zO� FOR F�,�L�-y K.�.A, Fridley H�,RINGSNAREN NEAN ! MENEBY [E9JIFY TW►7 7»!S SURYEY. PIAN OR NEPORi KURTH SURVEY I NG. I NC. • ASSUMEQ DATU►I. YAS P0.EPMNED BY 11E�OR UNDER W OIRECT SUPENYISION 4002 JEFFERSON ST. N.E. �_ �R.oM MoN'r FoJND �wo lw�l ��w � DUI.Y a GISi ED Su1lvEY0R UNDER TNE , COIU►181A HEIGHTS. MN. 55421 �o�� ts oFAi,,,�ES ,,. l612) 788-9769 fAX (612) 768-7602 -a�--�-�-= cw4�N uNK. F�N�� il l " =WonD PR�VQt.�( FG-NL� MIMNESOTA REGISTRATION N0.2oL?D 1G � 1`'� � � � L_.. S`�c . I�l. �. . (�o� �{.,.,� -- �5�0--- _ --- `15,c�— � _ I � � � 1 0 0 � i� T 1 � 4 �� s � -r-r-� ` �! �p � � �, o -# o . ; � r , \r/ .i �: " Y' O p.a` / �S �� /� 1 � . a. � , ��q4 �, � . l .z,8� � 1 �� ' � r � �� _ � �^ �� , i i . � ti\ ✓� , ; i'^'� �' � ` '. rn�_ , 1 a G� � S (J r �9 ' ' � / J��I=.�J�� 7'V —��, �,�.• �"�� `�`�� C �R�PO�ji�17 M��►o� `�ut'�TJ��11`��o�t �t-1.'. �oT j 15 - l-1 �°S\-S(o� Y� Z�vC��V"w bIC�L-��-1�`�� CITy CX= f-R�OL.�:�l� COvN ��N�\LA�1'1�NN6'�OTA. s�.� �KCC. � z o,= zsE��.E-cs �o� LCC�AI, bG�C-t �P"�'1o1�15 `�h{C�;T � oF Z �t{G�C"S . . � . . . . - . . � � 9 . . . . , . _ . . ' . :,.. °;_ -., �., ,,: ,_ . { . _ L . S . �E 95-02 . , . : . . . _. I " . •-.. . � Fridley HRA • ��, , ... � Lond Flonn;nq ., _ 68?'S-�l�hiroy. �G'S �E. _ Lond Surveyin9 . . . Mmr�vPv�s32, �-so,��rst�� ENG�i�NEER:�NG,��+[,NC.. ��f4 -� ; . = . :� � : -� �ri� �'R�,n�tipql . - S[/nsef Q 6Q66 . . . . � ;• , _ � cx ., .- =�f , � fE,�� ; � �-- ;�n ineers ��' � � Sur ve�ors w . � � ' . µ" '" ; � ,,. ,� , - ` . �* z � # - ;' � �r � � T F : . �. ;. . . ' � '. .. .. � � ": . .:. ' : ; � .. : . : :._ : �'. � � � . �`,i ��`�'Z�.1�✓ �� 0 ''. . /. �O�lG°%'� .f�.. �J+G'C..� C?'!�'l�` .��'�'`' i` ;'` ' ,, . � . i :' �Ju�� ,. � O lf i t , _ :� � � ti _ .��,_ sr � � �:.: . _ - _ ��(�' � � � . . ''�`�' r �l �� r-. � .i..' '4. � � .� —' .. i . � .. - I . ,_z ��, � �j � �: t � � �. . �- � .. � . j :.>� : - ..�. . � _ . � .':• . ' . , f - . . . {. ..� _ � � � . Q � r r. .�. ; . . ' r,- � • : y. Ji�T � � . ' �' � � ..� • - k < t � '�' �' - 1 �� , ' •" f ` �q� ,' " � / . � ` �� t�° ¢' . � 6 ,;; - tv� - � . ° Y� t f�_ .�f � � ,, �. � . r �� " '' �~ ' , t f�. `��., � � � l r' �� a _ � - - - !1; - "r�aa '�, � = S(,�� L � # _ �� _ ` .z9 �.-,,, - t , _,, �,:: Y� ,T� : � � e I3 EiJd 7'� 5 . 1 �� . ` 1.. ,� ' ' _ _ } . -� - � o - - ' ` '� '� i . _ � � ' + � �t ; r -'� °`� c„ ` - r ^3 " _ � . _ ' . � �1�� . � � O`ti . .r1 � ;.. ` , i . . ' � y�• tv_s/ t `°� `�. � . -:.�. f, . , :.:. :: � . �� k � _ f.., � � �1 . � �!a , _ , . �: tu� ;� . - 3.£� >- , ti �. - }� : : . �� , . . _ , . . . � . � . < „ ., . ._: . ; � :.� � - �, ' . � " . :.. . :: � _ ':,..� � ` � � - _ '4' �E �''.�„R� � ,�:1 'zd� � # �+ �. , � �� s �, _ �� ; � _ �° ' �M `� e�"� ^ �a. �tr�y � �3 .� ' � ti �� °��s ✓r�j -'rz � ' �. 4 . ' ry -�,o � _ , �-�-'F:�- � � � t � � � �,•� � � . � ,.. . . . :� . :; � �. �. � ; : . . � ,� _ _ - N�G�: . 7 �_ _ -- � . . � � _ �9// ��,��.;t` .�'1 �� :E a�d r`��`��.�,r`o.�,�o�`s .�� Q.r��:�"3 �'��;� �;', ` „ � f . .> ,. . , : � ._ � �' . - � � �'�';-�,�'�ieti� ��/,�%.� /f.�,r��' �l'`dr��`f�,��.sf`c�r%r ,��=fe�� ,.�'��«��rs�`��-/.� � �� : .:. _; _ :,. ��e�°1� f��r�o� ., . '. � :': � . : : `. , . `` . .. . , . ; , �,? �'�fr',� � I�UyT'1' . � l hei�eby ur.fr�iJ fhqf �his: is o five a�d �cf `ep,r�esen�ofiavr o�'q surwey y�'fl ic 6�v�dorres "qf'flie alAe� ahsc�6�sd /a�4, o�id ; nF'ilx !�, o�'al! lwtlQin9s,`ffi,�rean , an�d oll ris�b/t t�wavorhmenfs ; il'o,xf; �'izm ar atsoial /a�l. As surveyed by me �hrs �� cbt, . ..� �/. - �;.--. A�D �¢: .r � . .. . . , . . . .. ' .. . . � .. � . �� - . SU8 URBAN ENG/NEE2llVG , INC, - , ln0� eers 8�' �S,urrreJo/'s , ,� ��1r�� - c �r ,,' _' %� .' � ,_.,____ _, 7.10 �;, .�: :T ��; . , . . 1,.�. �rs�—�� Fridley HRA � C�RT I F�I CA�� OF SCIRVEY �Rtt��.Gy ��,p„ p��OS`-� KURTH SURVEYING, 1NC. F O R �001 JEFFERSON ST. N.E. I HEREHY CERTI FY TFIAT 'iFll t tURVEY. PLAN Oq REPORT M) N � R JAQ PREPMFA 8Y 1dY Ofl l�OER AIY 0) RECT BURVERV ( Q I ON COLU�AB I A NE I pi7 S. bW . 35 � Z 1 At� 'MAT 1 NA A QULY RE0IZTERED LMq itJftVEyQR l�ppi �u�p1�,SiO _ r (Bi1i 700•070p F/1X t0121 706'7001 LAY�i OF tit E INVE A. �y ��2(�- s SN�G C' Z �� Z St-�4 CTS DATE 1 NNESO A REG STRA I ON N0.2.o z�� scn� �•- .T O • IRON MONUMEM' LEGAL DCSCRIPTION - TRACT A(Existin�; John Olson Propertv) - Lot Area = 7230 Sq Et Lot 51 and that part of Lots 52 and 53, lying northwesterly of the southeasterly 20.00 feet thereof. All ui Block E, RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS, Anoka County, Mnmesota. LEGAL DESCRIPT[QN - TItACT B tExistin� Jolin Koehler Pr�erty) - Lot Area = 7875 Sq Ft Lots 55 and 56 and that part of Lot 54, lyin� northerly of the southerly 15.00 feet thereof. All in Block E, RIVERVIEW f-iEIGHTS, Anoka County, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCR[PTION - TRACT C(Existin� H R A Property) - Lot Area = 9625 Sq Ft Lots 15, !b, 17, the southeasterly 20 feet of Lots 52 ana 53, and the southerly 15.00 f�t of Lot 54. All ni Block E, RIVERVIEW HE[GHTS, Anoka County, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION - TRACT D(To be added to Tract A- Olson Propert�) - Lot Area = 1000 Sc,� Ft The southeasterly 20 feet of Lots 52 and S3, Block E, RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS, Anoka County, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION - TRACT E o be added to Tra.ct B- Kcehler Pro ert - Lot Area = 375 S. Ft. The soutlieasterly 15 feet of Lot 54, Block E, RIVERVIEW HEICHTS, Anoka County, �Mumesota. PKOPOSED TRACT A fTract A& D combined) - Lot Area = 8250 Sq Ft Lots 51, 52 and 53, Block E, RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS, Anoka Couiity, Minnesota. PROPOSED TRACT B(Tract B& E combined) - Lot Area = 8250 Sq Ft Lots 54, 55 and 56, Block E, RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS, Anoka County, Minnesota. PROPOSED TitACT C(Remainingparcel after splits� Lot Area = 8250 Sq Ft Lots 15, 16 and 17, Block E, RIVERVIEW HE[GHTS, Anoka County, Minnesota: 7.11� DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The petitioner requests that a variance be granted to reduce the required setback of a sign from the prope�ty line from 14 f�eet to 5 feet. ff approved, the petitioner would install a 32 square foot mornunerrt sign. SUMMARY OF LSSUES: Section 214.12.02.E of the City Code requires a 10 foot se�tback from any property line or driveway for all freestanding signs. The purpose of this section is to provide consistant setback dimensions for signs the.reby eliminating visual clutter, unsafe distraction and consistant open space. Stated Hardship: "The variance r�uest is for a S foot rather than a 10 foot set-back from the street side lot line. This would position the sign 15 fcet from the street curb and 7-1/2 feez from the parking tot c�rb, r�ther than an unsafe 2-1/2 feet from the curb which would pose a problem for snow plowing and vehicles backing into the sign". `The peritioner can meet the setback requirement with the sign perpendicular to the road or tilted slightty from the road (see alternative on aeiial photogcaph). However, if approved the vari�ance would not adversely impact adjacent properties or snow storage capacity for the City. RECOMII�NDED ACTIONS: While the p�itioner has not met all four conditions of the Code require�i for approval of a variance, the request is within previously granted variances. Staff therefore, has no recommendation regarding the request. APPEALS COMIVIISSION ACTION: The Appeals Comcnission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Councii. $.� � PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: A variance to reduce the setback of a sign from the property line from 10' to S'. Location Legal Description of Property: Size: Topography: Eaisting Vegetation: Ezisting Zoning/Platting: Availab�7ity of Municipal Utilities: Vehicular Access: 8101 Ashton Avenue Lot 1, Block 1 Arnal Additicm Approximately 98,000 square feet Flat Urban LandscaPe (Grass, some tree,$) Arnal Addition 1977 M 1, Light Industrial Connected Ashton Aven�ue Pedestrian Accesss N/A Engineeriqg Tssues: N/A Compre6ensive Planning Issues: PubGc Hearing Comments: Site Planning Tssues: DEVELOPMENT STTE - 2 - 8.�2 Description of Rec�uest The petitioner requests that a variance be grurted to reduce the requir�ed setback of a sign from the property line from 10 feet to 5 feet. If approved, the petition� would install a 32 square foot monument sign. Pr�Ry Descri,ption and I�istory The subject parcel is locate� at 8101 Ashton Avenue, south of JTT Powder Coat, and east of Ruth Circle Park. The original building (68'x108� was originally owned by Berkely Pump; date of origtn unknown. In 1977, the City granted a variance to reduce the froirt yard setback from 100 £cet to 73 feeet to allow a 100'x145' addition to the building. In 1993, another variance was grarned, this time to Lindstrom Metric, to reduce the rear yard setback from 25 feet to 15 feet, to allow conshuction of a 100'x100' addition Analysis of Reauest Located on the building is a 32 square foot sign identif�ring �om Metric. It is coc�uded of rt�al and plastic. It is not lit. The p�itioner proposes to constnuct a morn�m�t sign 4 feet high and eight feet long. It w�i be constructed of concrete block similar to the materials of the building. The letters will be plastic. Section 214.12.02.E of the City Code requires a 10 foot setback from artty property line or drive�way for all fre�standing signs. Public Purpose selved by this requirement is to ensure ade�uate vis�'b�7ity for motor vehicles and to provide adequate area for geen space, snow storage, etc. Prior to the City grarrting a variance to the literal provisions of the sign code, the following conditions must be met: A That there are exc�eptional or extraordinuy circumstances applicable to the property or to the �ed use that do nat apply g�y to other propeaty in the same viciruty and district. The pmperty is z�oned M 1, Light Industrial, and is located in an area that is predominantly residerrtiaL The �uope�tY, however, is not unique when compared to other ProP�� Y zoned, except for its location vvithin a residential area. The petitioner is requesting the variance in orde�' to locate the sign in the highest vis��le location in ordex to direct huck tra�c to the facility. By reducing the sexback, it "centers" the sign within the P�g �� Pro�B the visi'bility, as stated by the petition�. The petitioner could locate the sign at the 10 foot setbacl� but "t�t" the sign at a 30 or 45 degee angie toward the street (see attached plan) and still comply with the ordinance and have a highly visible siga Since most of the traffic is requined to anive from the south, this poses no problem for having signage on the north side of the sign. - 3 - 8.03 B• That the variazx�e is neoessary f� the presetvation and enjoyment of a substantial property right pos.sessed by other property in the same vicinity and district, but , whic� is denied the P�P�Y � ��ioa The petitioner has the ability to locate the si�n in compliance with the requirements. This would leave a s�back of 2.5 fcet from the edge of the sign to the edge of the curb of the parldng lo� 1'he petitioner acpressed a concem wwith the possa'bility of employces backing irno the sign as they bacic out of the adjacent paridng spaces. However, in looldng at the parldng layout, a driver would nced to twn while backing out in order to leave the pazking space. This manuevex would practically eliminate azry occurance of a driver bacldng urto the sign. C. That the strict application of the Chapte,r would constitute an unnecessary hardship. Strict applic�tion of �e Chapter would require the sign to be placed 10 feet from the property line. It would not prevern the p�itioner from erecting a s�gn. The petitioner also has the option of using wall signage diff� from that which cwrently earists on the building. D. Tha�t the gcmrting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public health, saf�etY, or welf�re or det�imartal to the propaty in the vicsnity or distrid in which the ProPert}' is located. Located acxoss the street from the subject parcel is Ruth Circle Park. C�ranting the variance would not adve�lY �P� �Y reside,ntial homes, especiallY smce the sign is well within the m�aim allowable square footage of 80 square feet as well as being unlit. The request will not impact the ava�able snaw storage for street plowing by the City. The request is also within previouslY 8�� N�• Recommendation While the petitioner has not me� all faar conditions of the Cod� the request is within previously granted variances. .Staff therefor� has no recommendation regarding the request. ADJACENT STTES WEST: Zoning: P, Public SOIJTH: Zoning: M 1, Light L�dusaial EAST: Zoning: M 2, Heavy Industrial NORTH: Zoning: M 1, Light Industrial - 4 - : 1 � Land Use: Park Land Use: Industrial Land Use: Corni�ctor Storage Yard Land Use: Industrial � � m' 8101 ASHTON AVENUE N.E. •�RiDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 (612) 780-4200 • 1-800-328-2430 • FAX: (612) 780-0554 SALESI DISTRIBUTION CENTERS MINNEAPOLIS • ATLANTA • DALLAS • GREENVILLE • LAREDO September 8, 1995 City of Fridley: Municipal Center 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley MN 55432 Attention: Michel McPherson, B.L.A. Dear Michel: As discussed, I have provided you with the variance request application form for a boulevard-located headquarters sign. At the present, we have a 4 foot by 8 foot sign attached to the front wall of the building. This sign does not add to the appear- ance of the building, but rather detracts from the same. The present sign is not visible until you are directly in front of the facility. The proposed sign, constructed of masonry with plexiglass letters will greatly enhance the building appearance in addition to providing a clear visible company identification for trucks delivering to our facility. The variance request is for a 5 foot rather than the required 10 foot set-back from the street side lot line. This would position the sign 15 feet from the street curb and 7 1/2 feet from the parking lot curb, rather than an unsafe 2 1/2 feet from the lot curb which would pose a problem for snow plowing and vehicles backing into the sign. Thank you for your consideration. VWL/k Regard , . � Virgil . Lindstrom President - METRIC F�I��(�S FOR INDUSTRY - . u� �� I i � � � , , � __ _....__.._. ... _ - - . ....___ .� . _. VAR ��95-27 Virgil Lindstrom , --_. ,� . ;: _,.. .... __ .. _. _ .. _. _ ._._. __.____ ._ .._ _ _,.___._v_�._ • . s . ��-��`�a� M��. .,. . ``-� � ; �� .• \� 1v �� . L`Y � l� 5�� Q��A ��e� . �"= sa' � 8.�7 VAR �195-27 Virgil Lindstrom -r� r. _ / � � 1_ � �v � s�e..a, t� I�T R�1 � �1c51 �ls��TotJ Ati�fE. F0., n�.v M N . � 1'HiLE'�� ! ura5lk:l�i� l I0N �� No .612-� 5a-0�82 � � 3� � � LE.YApt� �� G��t r' __'.' .S� li'�4h1.dN�C /71CC�t1ES�r-' �'k�sr�u� ��i.��u�, . / _� �,� �..�_..- .�� , � • ,,, , i . 1. • E?�' y'� I� t' ..... ---• - -�j .. ,' :. i• \ �'i _g '��i� , ., e p r; -i 5 1 �� :? 2 I'J 0.(.� Cl j!-• . 0_ VAR ��95-27 Virgil Lindstrom i�r��k iN�� . .. � , � � � f F 10' Se ack 1 1 � � . I' �� r � � � � c- � o ation � �. � A1te � . , �� '..A -� — j �"' . 1 ' _ _ , �--� c . � . �`v�,f . � A > � -� . ' - . z, �- � � -��oTds� `n �.� . 1 � � � .� i i � �/' � � �4 �- i�.` � �� . � ' Y i `� � J Sf TE �CA I�.f � / �'�� _SCAL_E !"=�.Q, /' �pi / s►� � i � � � 1��1�' . _ �- � . ��c'� � � / . , - __.----�-�- .- . -- � i L_i nt� S�" i��, r�J� J4tE.7�t tf.. i AfC. . 8.�8 fl i n � d� u ��v�� a��F . t�x tt.�/.[=.`i Mt�l. � ;4:s�. � � � � 4� .] � , � A1 .i . _.-- - l� •. �- ; / � ti /J �l� �� J �. - h , �_rt'-��1 � � � V G '` � . �_ ..�: c: � �? ,� ,- r� . a � ,.� .�� .,,�~�' .l � �) � Y s � `� ' =� �f i ��. . y y�l� ., \I � ' � ', �� ' ;•� • � � l � i a• �Q � � � �� : �y � ^� � � -`1 . f! � ' � . ', I x J � i : � `� � i . ! . � I � � ``' � � � (� ; i ' � �ti �__�. .. .-::-J � `� � _ � _ , �- . � 1'�'�.,t . ` � — �.l � � �� ,,, � �, , ��w � �� a� � ��` w �; � a �� `>a� �� ,�;��.� � i r� -I 1 n �� a �a :; � > � <� ,, � ,. . . .� . . , . � f� �� .._ �---- � = °. � � �a i� �� o � � � � � � _... , � =, �� , �� ,�. j � �w f �' � f �•� .�� '��. r�� I� � �� -- ��.,., I s �a I = '�....""'� ......_ ._�..... ,� � �. �- .� ---- `� M �t � � �iiii� � � � �w�� . _ ` — � s �� - � ' , � , . . � . • • ' • • � .' d \cf0 � W � � � a .. -- � � : � a '1 �v � . �� DHILE'r` COP�I5TRUCTION TEL No .612-754-0982 � � � �E_Ya�U a, �,�r .�� Y'�4h/.4N�C �CC��1�S�r-� .�kr S 7-! NG �3t1 �1_..L� ��l l, ,.� � - - - �.-�1 �. , � ' ; , � . � �. . � �x y��!' .__ --_ ..-j ,� � .. .. 1 , �ti � 11��'• s \ -,� . Sep 6,95 17:2� PJo.001 P.G�: VAR ��95-27 Virgil Lindstrom � . ��r��re �N�> ,� � � � � -- i A� .� ,� . � `��" '� 1 . �i--.,..� Ac�.:. _� 1 nS�� (� '� s � � �- � -Y�pZ �, . t ' � ./ i . � � � � i ~ i-��` � �� .. � �- ._... - �• � ^ / i �`�� J �"' �p-C / � � /• � , '� _� j� / / � �c �-�G'\ � r � � j S�rE �th1 _zcAl.E� 1'�_� �, � . � -- --_--------- - - - -- �.f r.t � S T f2C, r.1� ME'T� i �.. i tJC . i . Ain� b�u r{w A�� . � i�x,t:.r.r-.v t�t�t. �;�t:s�. 8.10 ._- -- � . ; ;t .� � _ ' ;: ` � � �'� �` �i � � � � <,s�, "� . s � �'� w #a , �.,, �, �-� y � •` x . . - � °d�`' �.,, -s r � _. . y c: c�4"�,,k-��' � e dk � y�` � �� ,,;�� ! �� _ � Srt s. � t�„�a- "� "� ..r � c �` '" s��"� s � ", �: . '�h':* ta �-�.sk�r. ..�-"�.. .'� "�`1 „} � M. "-� �i el�r�r"`� '� ,.�e' . , , i � � t "' e +� ��i+ � -.;,� .-`�`�``eC.'�r`#�``ro""- i'' ..� � `�y�,,�' !'.� '., { � .�r_ .!k °5�`'�g �, _ ��_ ��.', k;,,`*, " �� . 'ki�'�� ; � - . � �� ;��.��,'". ��.., � , za � �.� � , �� g . � ��- r , �� 4'� ;�'�� _ � � »� . � I} ,,� 4 °�'s� � . ' �r.r,A � ,. �� ; �,�, �, � ��K � �3 ��^6 y� x�,. i '� �:� '�� ' i�"�. i Y p� h�� .'�. r °��'�+, ... # 's `;:. �" ��` �'h�' ^�� y1�x� � � � �`im �, 'F:� S �'"'``?� ' w *s' a °� .c <'=.'"F ,stpi .. ''. n +� � � ��"�'� �`�9, � X ��'�3a�p�� i i i �,� � , , ,� z, �I�� '�� r +±T�., 2 � �3_. ,� : ,t rt - „,F ; ,�. ?Q' - � �b � � I� � e?r� �9. t.z�`, s , x. '##'�w +� � ,eYa* t y % •a% ; ..� � I , � vb � :4A�w- Y� - t: �a.,�,; _ ip � _ . _ � . � ��. i ��an,, �'� � �3ro ^^`w� x,.r Y° i '�Y , � 0 � i / �, . $�`�� t tr � ^ �'� � � . r a .. � � �� 3 . a f 4�y �: . 1�� (,.i ' I �' ry��+ t �� j`� � : � ��''ih�s,x� d +� 'j,.,�� . a�� ;� �� '� � � - .:a ,�� .,�r � t . S` � < '4Y �- � d`y�� . 9`` � y .P`>q '"f �`t �� . °stw^ �� 1`� E� � * �� °'` y� .ya,;.�- r,ta . . 4 ° � ' �- � � � � ,�h��` � �h �,�'�� .(y .s , . i � . . , �.. �, �`�°° . � i,zr ' 1 . i � � '? . � ¢ e, � �m � , . � � r �., �. r.x �- � • - . `, 1......� �:. _;� � � � r � ,� �. a'`#'�. � ,. � a '�� ,r '. �s':� s.P' �t��` + rx �,s. ,�e � i� " °�� «� �+r <�" x "•�Y�+�'�� .�"s�v�^`�» �� ,�`�k`�,iL�u�d�`�`s'� ��y,+ ��,'� ��y. ��-�� . �e� � X � �z," •� � y�, , � . � ,� € , . .,�, � < � '„ �"�^" ts. ;n ^v � �,�a' �� , Ly � d6� "��v�y�.` , _, `�� T�� <#'�'� , 4# � �,. � ,.: � ` �'; +, ,:;33+�}.it��r:+ . .. z . "� � '� ��I �.. �� ,.`�S _,�� .4"�+..� 5 `.� -. i�'; � �� . Y �.. h�., �•, it. ' � �t " ++r. i: 's ..�< ,, - .,.�, ��1r t �� t�+� { �" "` � � _" t��'`'yi-�-.�___� _..._ r- - "� ��,i.�tr�. _'f� . _ . . . _. _._, . � 3y_. . "�x� � =;5 y..�r 3 n � °: _..0 ._ � : � 'Cw.°a�-. �_ � G• Y �" k Y ,4� �'. . ..o . . . DESCRIPITON OF REQUEST: The petitioner requests that a variance be granted in order to allow a sign to be painted directly on a twilding. If approved, the petition� would paint a 360 sq. ft. company logo for Murphy Warehouse on the side of the recendy constructed 266,000 sq. ft. warehouse building located at 4700 Main Street. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Section 214.04.03 of the code protu'bits any signs painted directly on buildings. Public purpose se�ved by this r��quire�ne�rt is to provid�e in�prov�ed a�cs from easily maintainable signs and to prevent signs which are not maintained on a regular basis. This request is unique in that the building is 602 ft. long and is adjacent to a residential district. It provides a vay large mass adjacent to the st�et. A typical sign would not be in proportion with the size of the structure. The painted sign will have less impact on the adjacent residential pmperty to the east because the sign w�l not be icrte�nally illluminated and glaiing at the residerrts. No variances are requested to increase the size of the sign. RECONIlV�NDED AGTIONS: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the request with the following stipulations: 1. Approval of the variance precludes the petitioner from installing a freestanding sign. 2. The petitioner shall maintain the sign in an attractive manner. APPEAIS COMNIISSION ACTION: The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recomme,nd approval of the request to the City Council. PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: A variance to allow a sign pairned dire�tly on a building. Location of Prnperly: 4700 Main Street Legal Description of Property: The south 1,025 feet of lot 2, Audito�'s Subdivision #79. Size: 15.5 Acres Topography: Mostly 9at, but sloping away from Main Street to the west. Eaisting Vegetadon: Typical suburban; sod, trees, etc. Ezisting Zoning/Platting: M 2, Heavy Indust�ial; Audito�'s Subdivision 79, 1941 Ava�7ab�ity � of Municipal Connecte� Utilities: Vehicular Access: � Main Strcet Pedestrian Access: Fase�nern obtained for off-� bikeway, however, it has not been const�ucte�. Engineering �ssues: N/A Site Planning �ssues: 2 9.02 WEST: Zoning: SOUTH: Zoning: EAST: Zoning: NORTH: Zoning PROPERTY ffiSTORY: DEVELOPMENT STTE AD7ACENT STTES M 2, Heavy Industrial M 2, Heavy Industrial R 1, Single Fa�uly M 2, Heavy Industrial Land Use: Railroad Yard Land Use: Lidustrial Land Use: Resideimal Land Use: Vacant Located on the subject paroel is a 442 ft. by 602 ft. warehouse building. The btu7ding was constnu�ed in 1994 after a lot split was approved by the City Council. The lx,u7ding is can� of pre-�t concxete tip up panels and is cunently painted grey and green. The proposed sign is 10 $. high by 36 ft. lon� 360 sq. ft. in area. The maximum area allowed by code is 368 sq. ft. The sign is proposed to be the Murphy Warehouse logo, that of a forldi8 with the word "Murphy". The logo will be painted a medium geen color. Request Analysis: Prior to the gc�ing of a vananoe fr�n a literal provisions of the sign cod�, the following co�itions mus� be met by the applicant: A That there are exceptional or extraordinary arc�mstanoe.s applicable to the proper�y or to the itrteaded use that do not aPP1Y B��Y to other prope�ty in tt�e same vic.inity in distrid. The property is zone M 2, Heavy Indus�ial. The twilding is 602 &. long pffiallel to Main Stroet. The City has a munber of industrial b�n� in the city. Seve�al are of si�n'lar siz�, howevex the,y vary in desiga The strucfwe at 8290 Main Street is zoned sinrilarly and has a sunilar length. How�ver, t1� use of the building is multi-tenant, thesefore thea ee are a r�umber of smaller individual te�ant signs locate� on the facade of the b�n�dit�g. The facade is also broken up t� the i�ividual te,nant doors. The structure is not loeated adjacent to a residential district. The property does have a free standing ide�tific�tion s�gn. A second similar siz�d and zoned structure is bcated at 8150 Msin Street. Again, that property is differ�t fiom tt� subject parcel as it is located within tt� heazt of the Cit�s industrial distrid and is heav�y scxe�d via the use of landscaping and fe�x�ng. The property aLso has a small fi�ee sta�ing id�on siga. The subjed parcel is wuque irecause of the c�esid�tial zorring directly to tt� east which will be im�ad�ed by the proposed sign. � 9.03 B. That the variance is necessary for the preseavation and enjoyment of a s�bstarnial property right possessed by othe� property in this same vicinity and district, but which is dexued to the properl.y in questioa Denying the vaiiance request would require petitioner to install a typical cabinet sign or individual non or illuminated letters. Due to the size of the building, it may be difficult to fabricate such letters to be in proportion with the saucture and functionally attach them to the side of the strucxure. The use of painted supergraphics provides a signage altemative which can be in proportion with the structure and eliminate difficulty of n►aintaining i�ividual letters or cabinet signs. C. That the strict applic�tion of the chapter would constitute an unnecessary hardship. Strict applic�tion of the chapter would not eliminate signage options for the petitioner. The petitioner would have the option of installing othex styles of signage. D. That the granting of the vaziance would not be maferially detcime�rtal to the public health, safety, or general welfare or detrimerrtal to the property in the vicimty or district in which the property is located. Gr�ing �e vaiia�x�e would not be detranernal to adJ� 1�1�� , 8�8 the variance may lessen the imp� of the pet�orre�s signage on the adjacent residential district to the e,ast. With a pairned sign there is no option for illumination, therefore, light will not spill oirto the adjacent properties. The Appeals Comrnission and City C� may warit to include a stipulation regarding maintenance of the sign should the variance be granted. RECOMIV�NDATION: The request is for an uca�sual �operty, uc�usual due to it's loc�tioq adjac�rt to a reside�rtial district. Staff recommends that the AppeaLS Commission recommend approvai of the request to the City Counc�7. Comprehensive Planning Issues: Pubtic Hearing Comments: 4 9.04 Opus Corporation �` � 0��. 800 Opus Center Mailing Address 9900 Bren Road East P.O. Box 150 Minnetonka, Mi�nesota 55343 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440-0150 612-936-4444 Fax 612-936-4529 October 23, 1995 Michele McPherson, Pianning Department City of Fridley 6431 Universiry Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 RE; Murphy Warehouse Facility 4700 Main Street NE Dear Michele: On behalf of Murphy Warehouse Company and Opus Corporation, I offer you a list of reasons we are requesting a variance from the City of Fridley to complete the painted graphics on Murphy's new facility: 1. The company logo graphic is a way for Murphy Warehouse Company to identify ownership of the buildmg as an integral part of the overall graphics design for the facility. They did not waczt a"sign" on the building, but yet wanted to convey ownership. The logo is not designed to attract drive by trafiic as in retail or commercial operations. Drivers know their desrination and aze given directional signage on site. The logo is integrated with the colored bands - and therefore does not attract the attention that a conventional sign would. 2. Murphy did not request a monument sign for the reasons list above. 3. We felt this logo was an appropriate scale to break up the banding on the long building facade and is designed within the guidelines of the ordinance. 4. Murphy maintains its facilities very well and would not allow any of the painted graphics to become unsightly. Paint and stain products used on this facility penetrate. the concrete and bond to the surface. The insulated walls and low humidity environment of the wazehouse will prevent impact on the painted graphics from moisture through the walls. We appreciate your consideration in this matter and look forward to your approval. Feel free to contact us should you have any questions. Sincerely, OPUS CORPORATION �--�--� �� "��' Thomas E. Wacholz Project Manager cc: Grant Peterson Dave Bangasser Richard Murhpy, Jr. 9.05 Opus Corporation is an affiliate of tlie Opus group of companies—Architects, Caitractots, Developers Chicago, Columbus, Oallas, Denver, ft Lauderdale, Milwaukee, Minneapo�is, Orlando, Pensacola, Phcenix, Sacramento, San kancisco, Seattle, Tampa, Washingron D.C. � OPUS� September 25, 1995 Opus Co�poratioa 800 Opus Center 9900 Bren Road East Minnetonka. Minnesota 55343-9600 612-936-4444 City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 ��r� � Michele McPherson Murphy Warehouse Facility 4700 Main Street NE Dear Michele: Ma+lmg Address P.O. Box 150 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55440-0150 Fax 612-936-4529 As you know, on behalf of Murphy Wazehouse Company, we are requesting a variance from the City of Fridley to complete the painted graphics on their new facility. Enclosed please find the following documents concerning this issue: 1. 2. 3. 4. City of Fridley Sign Permit Application Variance Application Form Check in the amount of $180.00 to cover the $80.00 permit fee and the $100.00 variance fee. Colored Signage Plan, dated September, 1994, showing the graphics size and location. Note that we are requesting a variance from code section 214.04, subparagraph 3. which prohibits signs painted directly on buildings. We appreciate your immediate attention to this matter and please contact us with the schedule for variance review. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, OPUS CORPORATION ��-� y-� Thomas E. Wacholz Project Manager cc: Grant Peterson Dave Bangasser Richard Murhpy, Jr. 9.06 Opus Corporation is an affiliate of the Opui group of companies —Architects. Contractors. Developers Chicago. Columbus. Oallas. Demrer. Milwaukee, Minneapolis. Oslando. Pensacda. Phoenix. Seattle. Tampa � _ � . DATE: TO: Community Development Department Novernber 9, 1995 PLAIVIVING DIVISION City of Fridley William Bums, City Manager �� n�� FROM: Barbaza Dacy, Community Development Director Scott I�'ickok, Planning Coordinator 1Vfichele McPhersoq Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Extension of Variance Request VAR 93-29, by St. Phillips Church, 6180 H'ighway 65 In 1993, the City Council granted a variance to increase the size of an institutional sign and to permit two signs on the subject property. Granting the variance allowed the church to continue to use a sign of more "temporary" materials to allow advertising of church service times. As condition of approval, the Council stipulated that the variance would expire in December, 1995. We have received the attached letter from St. Phillips requesting additional time to comply with the variance approvat. They have requested aa additional two years to provide for planning and budgeting of the new sign. This seems to be a reasonable length of time for a request of tlus nature. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the request for an extension of VAR 93-29 to December, 1997. M-95-568 1VIlV1/ 10.0_1 11/E�8i 1995 15: 39 'o d � a 612��;78434 HE�GEN � HELuEN P.A. FAGE 02 6l80 ��IIGHU✓/aY 65 NORTH FAST •�RIDLE,Y, MlNNESOT/� 5��32 • TEIFPHONE 612l;7{-IS00 St.P ` '�a's �.iut��raar�. Ch�urc�t Ms. Michele McPherson Planning Assistant City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. �ridley, MN 55432 Re: Sign V�riar�ce Dear Ms. McPherson: Novembec 8, � 995 ' iull � ': St. Philip's Lutheran Church hereby reguests that the Fridley City Council extend the varianco currently in effect for twa more years to and includin$ December l, I997. The reason we $re asking for anoth:et' two yests is to give our church time to fully evatuate the isse�os presented. As you know, our ohurch has been active in the �r►dley comtnunity and has been invoaved in developing many innovative progcams, including the "Hangout" after schoal program for yoath. To data, however, we have not y�t made any decision as to tiie long-term goal for a sign or signs in the area, in question. I qcpoct that I wiU be appt�irKi�g a comtttittee to deal with this issue shartly, but we will not pxobably be �n a position to'make'any decision for -" another year or two. We are just in the process of formulati�g our 1996 budget and it is unlikety y that we would b� able to deat with this issue until the 1997 or 1998 budget_ It is my understar�ding that you will place our requeat for pctension of our variance on the C�ty Cvu�ncil agenda for Manday, November 13. I would appreciate if you could call my o�icc number, 338�201, on l�anday, November 13, to advise me as to what time I need to appear at the t�teetit►g 'X'ha�k you for your cooperation. If these are arty further c�uestio�as, please contact me. Very truly yours, / ' Hpwacd P. Helgen President All�n ). $choonvvcr, Conntie M. i�leing,�rtn�r. )r.fTry A. t.ervik • p�sstors 7hPlma Nash, administrator • Ct►ris f�.�hiberg. child'nood edutation 10.02 �.�� !� • � • �5.. S � Ct�IY OF FRI DLEY FR[DLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6�31 UNIVERS[TY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 � �� _.,: CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE December 3, 1993 St. Philips Lutheran Church Jennifer Prasek 6180 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Ms. Prasek: On December 1, 1993 � � Council officially approved your request for a � �� to increase the maximum square footage of an institutional sign from 32 square feet to 70 square feet, on outlots 1 and 2, Block 2, Moore Lake Highlands 4th Addition, generally located at 6180 Highway 65 N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. The�length of the variance is for two years. At the end of the two year period, the petitioner shall comply with the ordinance requirements or apply for a new'variance. 2 The petitioner shall apply for a sign permit for a permanent . sign as required by the City Code. This includes paying the $60.OQ permit fee.. I f �you have me a�i 572 �r � / questions regarding the above action, please call Barbara Dacy, AICP �� Community Development Director BD/dn PZease review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by December 17, 1993. 10.03 Concur with action taken I _ � Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: November 9, 1995 � To: William Burns, City Manager_�r�� /4' FROM: SUBJECT: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Resolution Electing a Qualifyinq Contribution to Tax Increment Financing District #13 During the 1995 leqislative session, the tax increment financing law was amended to provide cities with the option of making a local contribution rather than sustaining the traditional LGA/HACA loss for tax increment financinq districts certified after June 30, 1994. The only district in Fridley affected by this law change at this point is Tax Increment Financing District #13, Satellite Lane Apartments. For tax increment financing districts approved subsequent to July l, 1995, the choice is to be made in the TIF plan, and for TIF districts approved prior to J'uly 1, 1995, the choice must be made by a resolution by the governing body no later than December 31, 1995. The local contribution means that payment must be made on an annual basis from "unrestricted monies of either the authority or the city'�. This means general funds, property tax levies, or federal or state grant and aid which may be spent for general government purposes. The payments cannot be made directly or indirectly from tax increments or developer payments. The local contribution must be used to pay "project costsp and cannot be used for general government purposes or for improvements or costs the authority or the city plan to incur whether or not the project proceeded or not. The local contribution for this district must equate to 7.5� of the tax increment generated. Casserly compared the 7.5� payment versus the LGA/HACA deduction. The amount of the 7.5$ contribution until 2012 equals $118,785. This compares favorably with the LGA/HACA deduction of $344,948. The "local contribution" in the case of Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 can be made from unrestricted revenue which the authority collects, such as sales from real estate at fair market value, standard special assessment payments, and lease payments at fair market value. For example, the payment to�be made by 11.01 TIF #13 November 9, 1995 Page 2 Rottlund Homes to the HRA as part of the redevelopment project would be unrestricted money because the property is being sold for its fair market value. The Authority would simply identify these types of funds as the source of its payment to the State. The City would have to submit a report by March 15th of each year to the Commissioner of Revenue confirming the amount of the contribution. If the City does not elect to make the 7.5� local contribution, the LGA/HACA deduction is automatic. Recommendation Because unrestricted funds are available and since the HRA will be making contributions in excess of the tax increment generated and since the contributions will qualify as a local contribution. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution electing the 7.5� local contribution for Tax Increment Financing District No. 13. BD/dw M-95-570 11.02 Casserly Molzahn & Associates, Inc. Suite 1100 Southpoint Office Center • 1650 West 82nd Street • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431-1447 Office (612) 885-1298 • Fax (612) 885-1299 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City of Fridley Attention: Barbara Dacy FROM: James R. Casserly Mary E. Molzahn RE: Election of Local Contribution or LGA/HACA Reduction DATE: November 2, 1995 As you are aware, the 1995 Legislature provided Authorities with the option of making a local contribution rather than sustaining the traditional LGA/HACA loss for TIF Districts in which certification was requested after June 30, 1994. For TIF Districts approved subsequent to July 1, 1995 the election is made in the TIF Plan and for TIF Districts approved�prior to July 1st the election must be made by resolution no later than December 31, 1995. After reviewing the City's Redevelopment Project No. 1, it appears that this option applies only to TIF District No. 13, the Rottlund project. Enclosed you will find an analysis comparing the potential local contribution and the potential LGA/HACA loss. All assumptions used for this analysis are the same as for the TIF Plan with the exception of the term. For this analysis we assumed the maximum term of 25 years of tax increment. This assumption is based on the possibility that the City may maintain the TIF District after the Revenue Note has been paid. As you can see on the enclosed analysis, over the 25 year period potential aid reduction approximates $344,948, while the potential local contribution approximates $118,785. The difference is significant and we recommend that the City elect the local contribution. Based on these assumptions, approximately $158,380 will be generated in admin fees over the life of the TIF District and may be taken by the City for its eligible admin expenses. Payment for these expenses are deposited in the City's general fund. 11.03 If the City elects to make a local contribution it must be made from unrestricted monies of either the Authority or the City, such as general funds, property tax levies, or federal or state grant-in-aid which may be spent for general government purposes. It may not be made, directly or indirectly, with tax increments or developer payments. The local contribution must be used to pay project costs and cannot be used for general government purposes or for improvements or costs the Authority or the City planned to incur whether the project proceeded or not. If the Authority or City requests a contribution from other local government entities that will benefit from the TIF District's activities, these contributions will reduce the local contribution. Additionally, if the state contributes to the project costs through a direct grant or similar incentive, the required local contribution is reduced by one-half of the dollar amount of the state grant or other incentive. The City must qualify annually for this exemption. Both of the following activities are required for a TIF District, in this instance a Redevelopment TIF District, to remain exempt from the aid reduction provisions. 1. make a local contribution of 7.5% of the tax increment generated; and 2. submit a report, by March 15 to the Commissioner of Revenue confirming the amount of the contribution made in the preceding year and the TIF District for which the contribution applies If the City elects not to make a local contribution, the reduction in LGA/HACA is automatic. If it elects to make the contribution, a resolution is required for City Council approval, which we will need to prepare and file. After you have had an opportunity to review the analysis and discuss the options, please advise how we should proceed. 11.04 SAT1 CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA LGA/HACA: CITY CONTRIBUTION VS. REDUCTION IN AID Estimated [ City Contribution j Captured j Aid Reduction j Tax Semi Annual Cumulative Tax Semi Mnual Cumulative Increment Balance Balance Capacity Balance Balance 06/d 1/95 0 0 0 0 0 0 12/01 /95 0 0 0 0 0 0 06/01 /96 0 0 0 0 0 0 12/01 /96 0 0 0 0 0 0 06/01 /97 0 0 0 0 0 0 12/01 /97 0 0 0 0 0 0 06/01 /98 16,161 1,212 1,212 28,215 0 0 12/01/98 16,161 1,212 2,424 28,215 0 0 06/01/99 32,323 2,424 4,848 56,430 0 0 12/01/99 32,323 2,424 7,273 56,430 0 0 06/01 /2000 32,323 2,424 9,697 56,430 695 695 12J01/2000 32,323 2,424 12,121 56,430 695 1,391 06/01 /2001 32,323 2,424 14,545 56,430 1,391 2,782 12/01/2001 32,323 2,424 16,969 56,430 1,391 4,173 06/01/2002 32,323 2,424 19,394 56,430 2,086 6,259 12/01 /2002 32,323 2,424 21,818 56,430 2,086 8,346 06/01 /2003 32,323 2,424 24,242 56,430 2,782 11,127 12/01 /2003 32,323 2,424 26,666 56,430 2,782 13,909 06/01 /2004 32,323 2,424 29,090 56,430 3,477 17,387 12/0�/2004 32,323 2,424 31,514 56,430 3,477 20,864 06/01/2005 32,323 2,424 33,939 56,430 4,173 25,037 12/01/2005 32,323 2,424 36,363 56,430 4,173 29,209 �6/01 /2006 32,323 2,424 38,787 56,430 4,868 34,078 12/01 /2006 32,323 2,424 41,211 56,430 4,868 38,946 06/01 /2007 32,323 2,424 43,635 56,430 5,564 44,509 12/01 /2007 32,323 2,424 46,060 56,430 5,564 50,073 06/01 /2008 32,323 2,424 48,484 56,430 6,259 56,332 12/Ot/2008 32,323 2,424 50,908 56,430 6,259 62,591 06/01 /2009 32,323 2,424 53,332 56,430 6,955 69,546 12/01 /2009 32,323 2,424 55,756 56,430 6,955 76,501 06/01J2010 32,323 2,424 58,181 56,430 7,650 84,151 12/01/2010 32,323 2,424 60,605 56,430 7,650 91,801 06/01/2011 32,323 2,424 63,029 56,430 8,346 100,146 '12/0�/2011 32,323 2,424 65,453 56,430 8,346 108,492 06/01 /2012 32,323 2,424 67,877 56,430 9,041 117,533 12/01 /2012 32,323 2,424 70,302 56,430 9,041 126,574 06/Oi/2011 32,323 2,424 72,726 56,430 9,736 936,310 12/01/2011 32,323 2,424 75,150 56,430 9,736 146,047 06/01/2012 32,323 2,424 77,574 56,430 10,432 156,479 12/01/2012 32,323 2,424 79,998 56,430 10,432 t66,910 06/01 /2011 32,323 2,424 82,422 56,430 11,127 178,038 12/01/2011 32,323 2,424 84,847 56,430 11,127 189,165 06/01 /2012 32,323 2,424 87,271 56,430 11,127 200,293 12/01 /2012 32,323 2,424 89,695 56,430 11,127 211,420 06/01/2011 32,323 2,424 92,119 56,430 11,127 222,547 12/01 /2011 32,323 2,424 94,543 56,430 11,127 233,675 06/01 J2012 32,323 2,424 96,968 56,430 11,127 244,802 't2/01/2012 32,323 2,424 99,392 56,430 11,127 255,929 06/01 /2011 32,323 2,424 101,816 56,430 11,127 267,057 12/01/2011 32,323 2,424 104,240 56,430 11,127 278,184 06/Oi/2012 32,323 2,424 106.664 56,430 11,127 289,3!) 12/Ot/2012 32,323 2,424 109,089 56,430 11,127 300,439 06/01 /2011 32,323 2,424 111,513 56,430 11,127 311,566 12/01 /2011 32,323 2,424 113,937 56,430 11, 9 27 322,693 06/01/2012 32,323 2,424 116,361 56,430 11,127 333,821 12/01/2012 32,323 2,424 118,785 56,430 11,127 344,948 1,583,804 118,785 118,785 344,948 344,948 City Contribution 7.500% I.S.D. # 14 Sales Ratio I.S.D. # 14 Total Rate PREPARED BY CASSERLY MOI7AHN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 11.05 99.60 39.28 22-Sep-9 RESOLIITION NO. A RESOLUTION ELECTING A QUALIFYING CONTRIBIITION TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 13 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Fridle�r, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section l. Recitals. 1.01. The Council has created Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 (the "TIF District") on February 13, 1995, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to time. 1.02. The Council has investigated the application of the provisions of 1995 Laws of Minnesota, Chapter 264, Article 5 which provides for a local contribution to a TIF District in lieu of a reduction in its Local Government Aid ("LGA") and Homestead and Agriculture Credit Aid ("HACA"). 1.03. The Council hereby determines that it is necessary and in the best interests of the City, at this time, to elect the payment of a qualifying local contribution to the TIF District in lieu of a reduction in its LGA/HACA payments, pursuant to 1995 Laws of Minnesota, Chapter 264, Article 5, Section 6. Section 2 . Findincrs . 2.01. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that TIF District No. 13 is qualified as a Redevelopment TIF District. 2.02. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the qualifying local contribution for TIF District No. 13 is equal to 7.5 percent of the tax increment generated from the TIF District. 2.03. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the City elects to make a qualifying local contribution to the TIF District in lieu of a reduction in its LGA/HACA payments. Section 3. Election of Qualifying Local Contribution. 3.01. The election to make a qualifying local contribution to the TIF District in lieu of a reduction of the City's LGA/HACA payments is hereby approved and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley. 11.06 Page 2 - Resolution No. Section 4. Filing of Plans. 4.01. Upon approval and adoption of the Resolution, the City shal� cause said resolution to be filed with the Commissioner of Revenue. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY THIS DAY OF . 1995. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 11.07 En9ineering Sewer Water Paiks Slreets Mainten�nce .�I I �: � I �� I'� . �� \ 11� t � .� I TO: William W. Burns, City Manager r�� PW95-306 � � FROM: John G. Flora, Public Works Director DATE: November 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Waiver of MCES Bond Requirement for Interceptor Repair The Metropolitan CounciPs Environmental Services Division (MCES) is proposing to reline their force main between Hickory Place and the Burlington Northem railroad tracks this month It appears that the twin barre142-inch force main pipes require immediate repair vPOrk consisting of relining or slip forming the existing line between Hickory Place and their junction box just west of the Burlington Northem railroad tracks. To accomplish the work, they will have to initiate a utility cut on Hickory Drive for insertion of the repair material. The MCES has provided us with a utility cut fee of $200 but requests waiver of the bond requirement in accordance with our utility cut ordinance. As they will be doing this work on an emergency basis and the contract calls for appropriate bond and protection, I recommend the City Council approve the waiver of the $1,000 security bond requirements for this repair work. JGF:cz Rttachment 12.01 �� •u •. .,�, � Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the FY�ture Environmental Services October 18, 1995 City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Attn: John Flora, Public Works Director Subject: Project No. 900161 Brooklyn Park Connection (MSB 70U2) Interceptor Rehabilitation Dear Mr. Flora: Enclosed with this letter is the completed excavation permit and $200 fee for work associated with the above captioned project. Included with the pemut application are the plans and specifications for the project. The contract documents require that the successfiul contractor provide performance and payment bonds for the penal sums equal to the contract price. The actual contract price will be determined when bids for the project are received, but is estimated at approximately $390,000. The MCES is requesting that the $1000 bond (check) seeurity requirement be wa�ved for this project since the street work covered by the permit is included in the work covered by the performance and payment bonds. This project will be advertised on October 27, 1995. Your efforts to expedite the pernut approval will be appreciated. Sincerely, � ��--� � E. Scott Dentz Project Manager ESD/bw flora.118 Enclosure 12.02 230 East FYfth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1633 (612) 222-8423 An Equnl OppomoNty Employer Fax 229-2183 TDD/TIY 229-3760 , � 4 � � �r i �. \ ! � ''�......�.� , �. � �� a�� . '�� ..�L.....d t r � �� , � � . �� a � � � �.�.�� '�` � w , . � � � l � , �� L.....��..�'� 12.03 ,4 j �� d a Ca OC O .w �D 0 0 � � a � ��: W �S � � 0 Z o� �� v z J � � � .ai. �R�JECT 1 � EXIST. 78° RCP INTERCEPTOR � � . � � EXIST. 72• RCP INTERCEPI � �� EXlST. 96' RCP lNTERCEPTOR �- � � � � l. , - � ,; � � � e r � � . 3 . � �.,.� Engineenng Sewer Watcr IParks Streets �'Maintenancc TO: William W. Bums, City Manager � t� PW9S-311 �/ � FROM: John G. Flora, Public Works Director DATE: November 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1 to Washington Street Watermain Repair Project No. 272 In repairing the watermain line on Washington Street we found an inordinate amount o# a blue clay material which probably resulted in the failure of the waterline in that area as well as being identified as a poor base for the road surface. The attached Change Order covers the additional fill material necessary to rebuild the base for the street as well as installation of a hydrant which vPe installed to red.uce the amount of properties that received less water during the construction period Recommend the City Council approve the attached Change Order No. 1 to Washington Street Watermain Repair Project No. 272 for $4,251. JGF:cz Attachment � 3.01 � I ;�� •. -.. , CITY OF FR.IDLEY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FR.IDLEY, MN 55432 November 13, 1995 Penn Contracting, Inc. 169? Peltier Lake Drive Centerville, MN 5�058 SUBJECT: Charige Order No. 1, Washington Street Watermain R.epair Project No. 272 Gentlemen: You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instructed to modify your contract for the Washington Street Watermain Repair Project No. 272 by adding the following work: • .. .. Item * •C _►J �4 - _�•--' 1. Soil correction 1 LS 2,116.00 2,116.00 2. 6 in. x 6 in. x 6 in. Tee _ 1 Each 160.fl0 160.00 3. Furnish and install hydrant with GV and Box l. Each 1,975.00 _�.,975.00 TOTAL ADDITIONS . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . $4,251.00 ��C�1�►s��:��Ce�3�� ' Original Contract Amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $39,765.00 Contract Additions - Change 4rder No.l ....................................$4,251.00 �L 1 • �YMt_ • : � • J�fl � :�T�7 13.02 Penn Contracting, Inc. Change Order No. 1 Page 2 Submitted and approved by Ja�i G. Flora, Public Works Director, on the 13th day of November, 1995. Prepared yJ �G� � o . Flora, .E. � � irector of Public Works Approved and accepted this day of , 1995 by PENN CONTRACTING, INC. � � Wesley Cr or Project Coordinator . Approved and accepted this day of , 1995 by CITY OF FRIDLEY William J. Nee, Mayor William W. Burn.s, City Manager 13.03 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Engineerirtg Sewer Water Parks Streets Maintenance William W. Bums, City Manager ��" � John G. Flora,�rublic i�Vorks Director November 13, 1995 East River Road Bike Path PW9S-305 To obtain State Rid reimbursement for the East River Road bike path, the City needs to execute an addendum to our original request. In the original request we identified only the bike path located within the County improvement project from Hartman Circle to Glen Creek Road. We are now extending the bike path from Rice Creek Way to Hartman Circle and from Glen Creek Road to Osbome Road Rccordingly, an addendum needs to be submitted requesting release of those funds for the improvement project. Recommend the City Council approve the attached resolution amending our original request for off-system funding of the East River Road bike path. JGF:cz Attachment 14.01 iV ,,, •. ... � RE90LTiI'I@T 1�U. - 1995 RE90I,iT1'iC�i AUIIiJRIZII� �CIP�1L S'1'AT� AZD Ff�ID6 TD QOiAJ1R 87�1TE AID HIGHWAY (C.S.A.H. j F�ST RIVER ROAD — i�LT�T CIliCLE Z�0 GLII�i QtEER ROAD (3.P. 02-601-36) (S.A.P. 127-020-13 ADiDE.�IDLAK 1�U. 1) WI�REAS, it has been deeined advisable aryd nec�eessary for Anoka County to reoons�tnaat tY�e s�fac�e of East River Fio�d betwaen iiartman Circle and Glen Cxeek, Road includinc! 9radincl. Class V, bit�nninaus, concrete curb and gutter, channelization, signal i�resv�xnents, irrternally illt�t-+ated street name signs, EVP, storm sewer, sanitary se�x, sidewalk ar�d misc�llanea�as impravements, and WI�REAS, the City previously Y+equested off-system MSAS funds for the City's participat�ng cost (Resolution No. 28-1994) in the amount of $295,000, and �, said im�rovement project (City St-x�t Im�rovement Project No. 1994-3) inclwdes the ext�nsion of the 8-foot bit�miinaas sidewalk on the northerly and southerly er�ds froan Glen C�reek Rpad to Osborne R,oad, and Hai tinan Circle to Mississip�i Street, anr� �S, said c�stn�tion project is being sukxnitted to tl�e Miru�e.sata Deparbment of Transportati� State Aid Offioe and id�entified in its reco�r7s as S.A.P. 127- 020-13/S.P. 02-601-36. Zhe bit�n.ino�u.s side�ralk extensions plan is bei.ng sul�nitted as S.A.P. 127-020-13 Ac3del�dtutt 1. NOW, T�ORE, HE IT 12E.90LVID T�T, th+e City Cauncil of the City of Fridley., Anoka G�aulty, Mint�ota, that an ap�..ropriatioai f�n the Mtmicipal State Aid F1u�ds in the aam�t of $15, 000 be m�e tA apply to tl�e canstruction of said bitumirxxa.s sidewalk exte.nsions (S.A.P. 127-020-13 Adder�dtnn No. 1) and request the C�¢t�issioner of the Minnesota Deparbment of Transportation to approve this additional appropriation. PF�S.S� ADID ADOPl'ID BY '!� CI'I'Y OOt�IL �' '� CZiR OF FRIDI�Y 7�IIS nAY OF , 1995. . YF�y�i WILLIAM A. CHANIPA - CITY CIERK 14.02 WIIZIAM J. NEE - MAYOR � R � ,� CITY OF FRIDLSY MSI�ORA�TDIIM TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB� CITY MANAGER �{' �� G�` FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRBCTOR WILI�IAM A. CHAMPA, CITY CLERR SIIBJECT: MINNESOTA LAWFIIL GAMBLIDTG PREMI8E8 PERMIT R8N8WAL APPLICATION FOR FRIDL$Y AMERICAN LEGION POST 303 DATl3: NOVEMBER 8, 1995 Attached is a resolution approving the renewal application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premises Permit for Fridley American Legion Post 303, 7365 Central Avenue Northeast. The Minnesota Gambling Control Board requires the adoption of a resolution approving or denying this premises permit renewal application. This application expires every two years. 15.01 RESOLUTION N0. - 1995 RESOLUTION IN SIIPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT TO FRIDLEY AMi:RICAN LEGION POST 303 WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has been served with a copy of a Renewal Application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit for Fridley American Legion Post 303; and WHEREAS, the location of the Premise Permit is for Fridley American Legion Post 303, 7365 Central Avenue Northeast; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has not found any reason to restrict the location for the charitable gambling operation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley approves the Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit to Fridley American Legion Post 303. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1995. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY' CLERK 15.02 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR _ � _ �� F FR(DLEY MEMORANDUM Municipal Center 6431 Unive�sity Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 (612) 572-3507 FAX: (612) 571-1287 William C. Hunt Assistant to the City Manager Memo to: William W. Burns, City Manager.��" From: William C. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager � Subject: Date: 1996 Budget for the North Metro Convention and Visitors Bureau November 8, 1995 In accordance with the agreements with the four member cities, the North Metro Convention and Visitors Bureau is required to submit its 1996 budget to each city prior to the last day of September 1995. Submission of the budget is for information only with no action necessary by the Fridley City Council other than to receive the document. I am enclosing a copy of the 1996 budget for the Bureau which was approved at the September 13, 1995 meeting of the Board of Directors. I request that you present it to the Fridley City Council for a motion to receive at their November 13, 1995 meeting. WCHljb Attachment 16.01 , , . 1 ' �� ' 1 CONYEM1TIOM1' G Vi5170R5 BUREAU September 20, 1995 Mr. William Burns City Manager City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Burns: �� 5 Enclosed, in compliance with owr by-laws, is a copy of the 1996 operating budget for the North Metro Convention & Visitors Bureau. This is for your information only and no action is required. November of 1996 will mark the l Oth Anniversary of this Bureau. I'm please to say that the development of urban tourism,has been steady and successful. As the Destination Marketing Organization for these northern suburbs, ou"r objective � continues to be to attract new dollars into our economies through visitor spending. Sincerely, ' G� _ ��1''c'('<'`' Julie Doth Executive Director 6205 Earie Brown Dr., Suite 100 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 � 612/566-7722 800/541-4364 FAX 612/569-6320 � Serving the Communities of: Fridley, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Maple Grove , Members MACVB/IACVB 1 s:o2 NORTH METRO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU 62Q5 EARLE BROWN DRIVE, SUITE 100 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1996 BUDGET INCOME Lodging tax Transfer from Reserves MOT Partnership Interest TOTAL INCOME EXPENDITURES I. Administration II. Marketing III. Sales and Promotion N. Memberships V. Public Relations TOTAL EXPENDITURES 16.03 $511,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 1,700.00 $550,700.00 $251,604.40 $214,000.00 $ 16,800.00 $ 11,595.00 $ 40,000.00 $533,995.00 NORTH METRO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU 1996 BUDGET I. ADMINISTRA.TION Salaries Payroll taxes Unemployment taxes Off ce rent Office equipment Maintenance & service agreements Office supplies Telephone Postage/courier/UPS Auto mileage/parking Printing/stationary Temporary help Insurance - Workers Comp Insurance - Offices & Directors Insurance - General Liability Audit/tax preparation Professional accounting fees Board of Directors Conferences and Schools American Express Memberships Legal Counsel Miscellaneous TOTAL ADMINISTRATI(?N II. MARKETING Standard collateral Reference materials Local advertising & promotion Meeting & Conventions Tour & Travel 5ports Leisure Consumer (Tourism) Special promotions Marketing Services & fees Contingency National Sports Center TOTAL MARKETING 16.04 $167,000.00 13,500.00 2,500.00 19,325.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 7,000.00 3,500.00 4,000.00 3,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 750.00 2,500.00 3,200.00 1,600.00 7,000.00 250.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 $251,600.00 $ 9,000.00 600.00 3,000.00 46,500.00 25,700.00 20,000.00 67,500.00 5,000.00 11,700.00 3,000.00 22,000.00 $214,000.00 0 NORTH METRO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU 1996 BUDGET IIL SALES AND PROMOTION Airfare Hotel - travel Meals - travel Entertainment - travel Meals - local Entertainment - local Mileage/parking/taxi - travel Car rental Travel advance $ 5,000.00 5,000.00 Z,000.00 500.00 1,800.00 500.00 1,000.00 l,OQ0.00 TOTAL SALES & PROMOTION S 16,800.00 IV. MEMBERSHIPS Metro Assn. of CVB's $ MN Assn. of CVB's MN Society of Assn. Executives (MSAE) North Hennepin Chamber Brooklyn Center Chamber Fridley Chamber Hospitality Sales & Marketing (HSMA) Meeting Professionals, Inc. (MPI) Chicago Society of Assn. Executives (CSAE) Twin Cities Tourism Attractions Assn. Tour Managers Assn. (TMA) MN Festival & Events Religious Conference Managers Assn. (RCMA) InYI Assn. of Convention & Visitor Bureaus National Tour Assn. (NTA) American Bus Assn. {f.BA) TOTAL MEMBERSI�PS V PUBLIC RELATIONS Public Relations campaign Special events & promotions Local festivals Contingency TOTAL PUBLIC RELATIONS 16.05 6,000.00 350.00 500.00 250.00 250.00 200.00 200.00 520.00 275.00 450.00 300.00 125.00 100.04 1,200.00 475.00 400.00 $ 11,595.00 $ 25,000.00 2,000.00 8,000.00 5,000.00 $ 40,000.00 / � CITYOF FRIDLEY TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM Municipai Center 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridiey, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 The Honorable Mayor and City Council William W. Burns, City Manager ,�1' � November 7, 1995 Office of ihe City Manager Wiliiam W. Burns SUBJECT: 1996 City Council Meetings and Holiday Schedule Attached is the 1996 calendar which indicates City Council meetings and holidays. With the exception of the months of March, May, September, November and December, City Council meetings were scheduled on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. Conference meetings were scheduled during the months of January, April, May, July, August, October and November. Only one City Council meeting was scheduled during the month of December. Budget work sessions were scheduled for June 3, 18 and 25. StafFrecommends that Council approve the attached resolution and the 1996 calendaz of City Council meetings and holidays. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. WWB:rsc Attachment 17.0 RESOLIITION NO. RESOLiTTION DESIGNATING TIN� AND NUMBER OF COUNCIL MEBTINGS WHEREAS, Section 3.01 of the Charter of the City of Fridley requires that the City Council meet at a fixed time not less than once each month; and WHEREAS, Section 3.01 of the Charter of the City of Fridley requires that the Council shall meet at such times as may be prescribed by resolution; and wHEREAS, it is the intent of the Council to comply with the open meeting provisions contained in Minnesota Statutes 471.705 as interpreted by the courts; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridle�r that: 1. The Council will hold regular meetings in the Council Chambers of the Fridley Municipal Center, commencing at 7:30 p.m. on the following Mondays in 1996: January 8, January 22, February 12, February 26, March 4, March 18, April 8, April 22, May 6, May 20, June 10, June 24, July 8, July 22, August 12, August 26, September 16, September 30, October 14, October 28, November 4, November 25, and December 16. 2. The Council will hold conference meetings at the Fridley Municipal Center, at which time matters are discussed but no formal action is taken, commencing at 7:30 p.m. on the following Mondays in 1996: January 29, April 15, May 13, July 15, August 19, October 21, and November 18. 3. On the dates of regular Council meetings, conference meetings will be held in the Fridley Municipal Center at 7:00 p.m. and following adjournment of each regular meeting. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1995. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 1 7.�2 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR � . CfTY OF FRIDtEY S M T W T F S �� 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 �j!{ tb 17 18 19 20 21 � 23 24 25 26 27 28 9 30 31 S M T W T F S 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I1 � 13 I4 IS 16 17 �s �sC zo Zi 22 23 za 25 � 27 28 29 I S M T W T F S 3 5 6 � 8 13 l4 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 S M T W T F S 7 9 IO ll i2 i3 I 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 S MT W T F S I 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 IS 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 � 28 29 30 31 June S M T W T F S, i 2 s 9 }5 16 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 1996 City of Fridley January 1 New Yea�'s Day g City Council Meeting j rj Martin Luther King, Jr. 22 City Council Meeting 29 Conference Meeting February 12 City Council Meeting 19 presidenr�s nay 2C City Council Meeting March 4 Ciry Council Meeting 9 - 12 NLC Cong. Cities Conf. (Washington D.C.) 18 City Council Meeting aP�i g City Councit Meeting i s Conference Meeting 22 City Council Meeting May ( City Council Meeting 13 �nference Meeting 20 City Council Meeting Z'f Memorial Day June 3 Budget Work Session 10 City Counci! Meeting l i - 14 LMC Annua( Conference (Rochester) 18 Budget Work Session 24 City Council Meeting 25 Budget Work Session July 4 I»dependence Day rj Friday after Independence Day 8 City Council Meeting 15 Conference Meeting 22 City Council Meeting August 12 City Council Meeting 19 �dference Meeting Z( City Council Mee6ng September 2 Labor Day g -12 ICMA Conference (Washington, D.C.) 1C Ciry Council Meeting 30 City Co�u►cil Meeting OCtOI�er 14 City Council Meeting 21 Conference Meeting 28 City Council Meeting November 4 City Council Meeting 11 v��nay j g Conference Meeting 25 City Council Meeting 28 Thanksgiving Z(� Friday aJter Thanksgiving December '] - 10 NLC Congress of Cities (San Antonio) 16 City Courtcil Meeting 25 Christmas � � qTY OF FRIDLEY S M T W T F S' 9 8 9]0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 2� 28 29 30 31 August S M T W T F S 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ti 13 l4 15 16 17 18 1 20 2l 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 31 S M T W T F S �6-7 13 14 IS l7 18 19 20 2l 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 � S M T W T F S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 l3 15 16 17 18 19 20 2 22 23 24 ZS 26 27 29 30 31 S M T W T F S 3� 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 I3 I4 15 16 I 17 I 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 �( � 30 S M T W T F S 8 9 10 tl 12 13 14 IS 17 IS 19 20 2l 22 23 24 �( 26 27 28 29 30 31 X- HOL/DAy O- COUMCI[ MFET/NG ❑- CpNFFRFNCB M�T/NG d- 8UOGFl WORK SFSSION 1//07/9S 17.03 � � Cf1Y OF FRIDLFf ELE�TRICAL All Phase Electrical Contractors 8865 Jeff�rson Hwv Osseo MN 55369 F�ICENS�� NOVEMBER 13,1995 GAS SERVICES Backdahl & �lsan Plb� & HX� Co 3157 Chica�o Ave S Minneapolis MN 55447 Burnsville Hea�ing & AC Inc 124$1 Rhod� Island Ave S Sava�e MN 55378 Dou� Fili�er Rich Olson Debby Dathe GENERAL C4NTRACTOR-�OMMERCIAL Maiertens BrennY Construction C� 8251 Main St NE Fridlev MN SS432-1$49 Joseph Maertens R J Marc� Gonstructi�n G� $Q Minne�ta Avenue Little Canac�? MN 55117 Paul N�la�n GENERAL CONTRACTOR-RESIDENTIAL _ Allstar Constructi�n (3247) 3315 N Hwy 100 Minne��lis MN 5542244-2032 Dave Whi�ier Arness Inc (20(�4$26) . 3Gf� S Sn�llin� St Paul MN SS1pS � Richard Smith Cardel Builders t51G1) 1715 169� Ave NE ' An�ka MN 55304 .� Delbert Halsin� � 19.02 STATE (�F MINN RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bld� Ofcl Sam� RQN JLTLKQWSKI Chief Bld� Of�l Sam� STATE QF MINN Sam� Same Gedar Graft (6�57) 2720 Ma�lewtx� Dr Mat�l�wood MN SS lp9 Elk Riv�r Exteri�rs (44�7) 825 Main St Elk Riv�r MN SS330 Kastle C� Inc (24029530) . 7Q44 Elli�t Av� S Richfielci MN 5�423 Renewa�l i�� Andersen (.20040G30) lOp4Av�N B��rt MN SSU03-1096 Teakwood Homes Inc {9185) 16150 Bass Lake Rd Maple Gr�ve MN 55369 Vinyl Seal {79g5) 2828 Hvcry 10 MQUnds View MN SS112 Zahorski Construction (8902) b49 Summer St NE Minne�polis MN 55413 HEATING Burnsville Heating & AC Inc 12481 Rhode Island Ave S Savage MN 55378 SBS Mechanical Inc 7160 Madison Ave W Golden Valley MN 554273602 MASONRY Kamick Masonry Inc 10356 530 St Ruch City MN 55069 PLUMBING Al's Master Plumbing 900 Red Oak Lane Mound, MN 55364 Clyde ��dman Ja�k Gra�ik R�t�ert �huller Jeff Solsvig Norman Ratzlow Jeff Wolfcauer 7ames Zahorski Debby Dathe Gunvant Bhatt Deborah Karnick Alfons Foschiatti i 9.03 Same Same S�me Same Same S�ne Same RQN JULKOWSKI Cluef Bld� Ofcl Same RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bldg �fcl STATE 4F MINN lst Choice Plumbing 29948 Hwy 47 Isanti MN 55040 Ryan Plumbing 811 University Ave St Paul MN 55104. Stepaniak Construcdon Co 2839 196 Ave NE East Bethel MN 55011 Randy Gifford Greg Ryan Jerry Stepaniak 19.04 Same Same Same � � - ESTIMATES C(TY OF FRIDLEY NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Standard Sidewalk, Inc. 29635 Neaf Avenue Lindstrom, MN 55045 Misce!laneous Concrete Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Project No. 279 FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,802.68 Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered 301 Fridley Plaza Office Building 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Services Rendered as City Prosecuting Attomey for the Month of September, 1995 Penn Contracting, lnc. 1697 Peltier Lake Drive Centerville, MN 55058 . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 12,600.00 Washington Street Watermain Repair Project No. 272 Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 35,833.05 Hardrives, Inc. 9724 Tenth Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 1995 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1995 - 1& 2 Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $193,552.29 20.01 CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 November 13, 1995 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley c/o �William W. Burns, City Manager 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 5�432 Council Members: ; _ �_ • � � ��N _ _ � We hereby submit the Final Estimate for Miscellaneous Concrete Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Project No. 279, for Standard Sidewalk, 29635 Neal Avenue, Lindstrom, MN 55045. We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of Miscellaneous Concrete Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Project No. 279 and find that the same is substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents. I recommend�that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body and that the one year contractual maintenance bond commence on November 13, 1995. Respectfully submitted, �, John G. Flora Director of Public Works JT:cz Prepared b Checked b3 2�.�2 November 13, 1995 To: Public Works Director City of Fridley . • i � � � _ 4 ' � • ' � �_ _�'�1 -*- • � � � J_� : _ �M � �--�� a ; _ �_ . . � � � , We, the undersigned, have inspected the above-mentioned project and find that the work required by the contract is substantially complete in conformity with the plans and specifications of the project. A11 de�ciencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the work for which the City feels the contractor should receive a reduced price has been a�reed upon by the contractor. So, therefore, we recommend to you that the City approve the attached FINAL ESTIMATE for the contracior and the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the day af the �nal inspection that being November 13, 1995. D�'� n pson, Constructio Inspector �J J ome Doerr, President 20.03 November 13, 1995 City of Fridley NIISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE CUR.B, GUTTER AND SIDEWALII PROJECT NO. 279 . � �� .* �. This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certi�ed herein have been actually furnished and done for the above-mentioned projects in accordance with the plans and specifications heretofore approved. The final contract cost is $49,906.40 and the �nal payment of $4,802.68 for the improvement project would cover in full, the contractor's claims against the City for all labor, materials and other work down by the contractor under this project. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. STANDAR.D SIDEWALK, INC. ✓� Je me Doerr, President 20.04 November 13, 1995 City of Fridley NIISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE CURB, GUTTEK AND SIDEWALII PROJECT NO. 279 .. ; _ /_ �_� * �� This is to certify that Standard Sidewalk, Inc, has abided by the Prevailing Wage Provisions as specified by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for Anoka County. I declare under ihe penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. STANDAR.D SIDEWALS, INC. J ome Doerr, President 20.05 CITY OF FRIDI.EY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN. 55432 To: HONORABLE MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL ESTIMATE NO. 6(FINAL) CiTY OF FR{D1.EY . 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. DATE: November 13,1995 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 FOR: STANDARD SIDEWALK 29635 NEAL AVE LINDSTROM MN 55045 1995 Miscetlaneous Conc�ete Cucb, Guttef 8� Sidewalk Project No. 279 Quantity Total Fstimated Unit this This Total Total Contract Item Quantity Price Unit Fstimate Fstimate Quantiry Amount 1. Remove and Replace Concre 2,500 13.00 LF 44 572.00 1,878 24,414.00 G�rb & Gutter 2. Remove and Replace Concre 150 13.00 LF 0 0.00 0 0.00 Gl�rb & Gutter (less than 85 lineal feet) . 3. Construct S ft wide (4" — 2,000 . 2.20 Sq. Ft 844 1,856.80 3,812 8,386.40 thick sidewalk) 4. Insta1130 in. x 6 in. Concrete 120 9.00 LF 0 0.00 110 990.00 Valley Gutter Sp�7lways 5. Remove and Replace Includ' SOQ 34.OQ Sq. Yd. 0 0.00 474 16,116.00 Fxcavation for 8—in. Concrete Apron With Wire Mesh TOTAL COMPL�TED TO DATE 428.80 $49 906.40 ESTIMATE SUMMARY: Original Contract Amount Contract Additions Contract Deductions Revised Contract Amount Value Completed To Date Amount Retained (0%) Amount Paid To Date AMOUNT DUE THIS F.STIMATE 20.�6 a56,930.00 0.00 0.00 56,930.00 49,906.40 0.00 45,103.72 54,802.68 STANDARD SIDEWALK ESTIMATE NO. 6 (FINAL) PAGE 2 CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR I hereby certify that the work performed and the materials supplied to date under terms of the contrad for the referenced project, and all authorized changes thereto, have an actual value under the contract of the amounts shown on this estunate (and the ' fmal quantities of the Snal estimate are corred� and that this estimate is just and cornecc;t and no part of the "AMOUNT DUE THIS FSTIMA'I'E" has been recieved. , By �Q�V►�i. O Date � � ` / � 9 -S ractor's Authorized Representative (Tide) CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINRFR I hereby certify that I have prepared or examined this estunate, and that the contrador is entided to payment of this estunate under the contract for referenced project CTTY OF FRIDLEY, i� By. �--�- 9s 2�.�7 Date�= � xe�iy sw �a, ,� By . F]ora, P.E tor of Public Works FSTIMATE WORKSHEEI' FOR: 1995 MISCELi_ANEOUS CONCREI'E CURB GUTI'ER & SIDEWALK - PROJECT NO. 279 CITY OF FRIDLEY �NGIN�ERING DEPARTMFNT 6431 UNNERSTTY AVENUE N.E. FItIDLEY, MN. 55432 ESTIMATE NO. 6 (FINAL) DATE: November 13, 1995 STANDARD SIDGWALK 29635 NEAL AVE LINDSTROM MN 55045 Contract Itern Street Water Sewer Other Fscmw FT FI' FT FT FI' Parks HRA Total $ S S S S S S S 1. Remove and Replace Concre C1irb & Gutter Quantity this Estimate 0.00 0.00 22.00 0.00 22.00 0.00 44.00 Arnount this Fstunate 0.00 0.00 286.00 0.00 286.00 0.00 0.00 572.00 Total Quantity 1,106.00 247.00 31200 112.00 101.00 0.00 1,878.00 Total 14,378.00 3,211.00 4,056.00 1,456.00 1,313.00 0.00 0.00 24,414.00 2. Remove and Replace Concre G1irb & Gutter (less than 85 lineal feet) Quantity this Fstimate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Amount this Fstunate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Quantity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3. Construct 5 ft wide (4" thick) Sidewalk Quantity this Estimate 844.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 844.00 Amount this Fstunate 1,856.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,856.80 Total Quantity 1,767.00 177.00 1,000.00 868.00 0.00 0.00 3,812.00 Total 3,887.40 389.40 2,200.00 1,909.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,386.40 4. Construct Valley Crutter Quantity this Fstimate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Amount this Fstimate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Quantity 27.00 30.00 0.00 53.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 Total 243.00 270.00 0.00 477.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 990.00 5. Remove & Replaoe Including E�ccavation for 8-in. Concrete Apmn with Wire Mesh Quantity this Estimate 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 Amount this Fstimate 0.00 0.00 0.00 476.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 476.00 Total Quantity 0.00 0.00 0.00 474.00 0.00 0.00 474.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,116.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,116.00 <.: :::>:..>: ,>; .:::.>;�;;;;::,.: ,�:.:.:.:;. . .: :,;;:: -:. ,� :.::.;;�: �: �;: :<:::,;::..;.;::...:.::.:.>�:::, ::>�:;:,::; ...:::::. ..:::.:� ..: :.:::;.;�::.�:: :.:. :.:.: ;:.�:. ::::,.:.. TOT ;: � ......... AL .... : �. �::. .:: �>;:;:.:: ;:;;:::. :;,;:: . •: . .. ::::;:. . : :::: .: : .: :.: :;: ,:;. .:;:;;>:: . :;. . > .:: ;:;::>::>;:::>::::> ' ; »�»:»::>:::>. .. . :::.:,::;;;:,;,..:;;:.;:.;;;;:,:.::: ;;:<;.:$18 :Q8;40: ::�� 87b;tFQ: ;>:<::�b� .6.�0: >::::<:::�3.9 ..58:6U: ;:«:»:;::,�.1 :13,�0 .. :::::::::::.:.�O,fl4�: :::.�.�::::::$�1.t�!:. «$4�:9�6:40:i THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS ARE TO BE CHARGED TO EACH ACCOUNT FOR THIS ESTIMATE: Street (101-06-68-435-4340-6351) Water (601-73-00-415-4:i40) Sewer (602-78-00-415-4340) Fire Dept Slab (408-00-00-415-45:i0-4Q19) Escrow (501-00-00-415-4340) Park (408-00-07-415-4530-4091) HRA (236-37-00-415-4330) a4,230.68 0.00 286.00 0.00 286.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 54,802.68 20.08 � TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER �� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR MODIFICATION OF CHAPTER 216 OF THE CITY ORDINANCE, "STORM WATER DRAINAGE UTILITY" DATE: November 8, 1995 At the October 23rd City Council Meeting a public hearing was set for the November 13th Council Meeting to consider a change in the Storm Water Drainage Utility Ordinance. The attached Ordinance deals only with the way that the rate per quarter is set. Currentiy the Ordinance requires that the rate be stipulated within the Ordinance, as compared to the two other utilities being set by Resolution. To keep all the utility rate setting consistent, as �ar as the process, it would seem a natural change to modify this section of Chapter 216 to keep it similar with the two other utiIities. RDP/me 21.01 CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will hold a public hearing at the City Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue Northeast on November l3, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. on the question of changing the storm water drainage utility fee. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than November 8, 1995. Anyone having an interest in this matter should make their interest known at this public hearing. William A. Champa City Clerk Publish: November 2, 1995 0 21.02 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE CHAPTER 216, E;NTITI.ED "STORM WATER DRAINAGE UTILITY" BY AMENDING SECTION 216.04. The City Council of the City of Fridley dces ordain as follows: 216.04. STORM VVATER DRAINAGE FEE For the purpose of calculating storm water drainage fees, all developed one family and duplex parcels shall be considered to have an acreage of one-third (1/3) acre. The quarterly storm water drainage rate . . shall be set � Council Resolution. PASSED AN ADOPT'ED BY THE CTTY COUNCII. FOR THE CTTY OF F.RIDLEY THIS DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1995. ATTFST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CI'TY CLERK Public Hearing: First reading: Second Reading: Publication: 21.03 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER�� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: (TABLED) PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR S1'REET IlVIPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992-2. DATE: November 8, 1995 Attached you will find the Public Hearing Notice that appeared in the Fridley Focus on September 28,1995 and October 5,1995 and the non-parcel specified notice that was mailed to each homeowner. At the Counc� Meeting of October 23, 1995, the original Assessment Roll included a page that had an incorrect assessment amount The page identified an assessment for the three property owners at $9.50 per foot, wLen in fact the assessment was $7.70 per foot. As was indicated at the meeting of October 23rd, the tluee properties in this assessment are the remaining three from the 1992-2 project that was certified last year. RDP/me Attachment(s) 22.01 City of Fridfey ANOKA COUNTY, IMitAiESOTA NOi10E OF HEARING ON ASSESS6AENT FOH S7AEET IMPpOVEMEN7 PRWECTNO. 199¢-2 Notica h haneby piven tl�tl tla CauncY o1 tl�a Gly ol Fridey w�l Raat at fha Friclay Municipel 1995, tl � � -�1. b � � upon dl oblactioo . H mn, io tlw proposad esso��rtwot� in rospact to 1M tolbwi�p improwtiianta.lo-�it STREET IMIPHOVEMElR PtiWBCi NO. 1992 — 4 T1w proposed easassrn�nt roll tor oaeh o( seid imp�ovameats in Iha total �mount of S125s_?SS_OB a aow on flo and opai b pua � �P�. bY � P�� d. in Ua offica d tla Clwk ot mid C4y Tiw ge�w�al nafira d Y�a i�nawnwnb m�d oach of them is dw co�struetion d siroat irtWrovw+wnb ir�cN�fing gtedng, oonaota anb and guriar, dass S baao mat�rid, asphafl Pevarta+h. stortn drainaga, aignia0. �P��G e�� a1d �alaNd appurtaaencoa Hdh�wq SI—H�law�nb Rpi� Ot �b�aach of ff�am b a/ rie� lend banefited b�r seid improvaiw�b w oaeh ot tlam and lyrp wi1M the yat�ara! ataa abow. Seid improvaranb w�l ba aaswsed against 1he properGas witlim fw abaw"oated saas in MA�de of in Pert pnpor6onalayr b Mtfi d fw lends tlareln cantainad �ooa�d�p b tN bNw= Gls reoei�ted. Al seid t�eerirg tla Cow�d W oomidx vKil� mw�trio�a��seid �l� app�al maY ba fak�an aa b ri� airouN d any i�nridud a�.txiass a wdp�n objae- f�ad vn� M�i�� aQkaewd piop�tly owM� �s nno.lo fn apasamant �� b t�6 prvs�dnp a(fioar u A prooertv ownar maV +oo�d an auaas- meM b 1fw�datic! bourt br saerinp��oioa d tlw aPPad upan tw Maynt a�y Clatk wi1M �Y��P�dMas�ss- ment and .f�inp wch no6c� wAA M d'istrict oau! «�taoC (�1�0�j tteg� a�r �avio� apon Ya N1e�Of 14ih 1� an F�a�bruery��96,,�wlaiip b. �n. dow� a �a.i �. �o► � .arior e�a.nw. ti».pg�awa�a:�iaap�- dsl aaasaqwrib oaui�AN a Mrd�. 71a da�rt �tt ita piop� rt�at h�oi�aawed propany, aad tha owao� mM 6� a loast � i� Y�i d-ag� a ddr, and in iha . cese d husbend and wil�, on a�6�t tant . meet tl�is aga raqtqraiie�q, . - Tha appfi�aSon 1or seid dai�rtal lnwt ba rt�edo witl�in tla iryt lhirlY (30� dgrs dw tla edopGon of 1ho tind � wt br tlw s CAY Couoal. liw ow�w� w11 a�elr appica5on tor da(ened. pa�rohes on 1c�s p� y Ow Molad CoiaKjr /CudAa , er�d wi a�eloa appfi- cation b tlw Gty af fiiday aa ioa�w pwidad bY 11a Gy. ii�a (xy Carrci vr7 conaidar �seh appiea- fon oa ae in6vidual basi� IioMww� ta ywiw- d poficy is b gra�q sa�ior c�n Iwd�hp apa- cial assesamen! dolarreds �Ma� pN annwl PaYawnt for 1ha specid a�al �oawad� aw (1) pw.aau,d 1ta acSusfad pro�s iaari�a of tha ow�wrs. u datam�iaad b�r tlN moat reoeat Fadard I�oortw Tax ANan, a N tlw housahold iocortw is babw Ma Vory 1.ow Ineortw 1f�sFaW at de6aed b�r /w Fidarel k�corta L.irtub tor 1fa Comn�r Dawlopaqtq 8bdc Grani progmrtw, Tlw defertal wiU ba tormieetad aod dl beoortw diw .when �� . heppar� tla daetl� ol tla:ow�nay proridad �+d 1� ��ada. Mm+�N4 ar s�ub�-' aion d ttw WoPaAY a�Y P� �k bas ot � homasiead siatus lot any r� flw�Cily Coundl dotemwws riat Urtlwt dakeal i� not in tlie pub4c IMerest. OA7E0 7HtS 18iH OAY OF S�IEM9�i, 1996 BY OHDER OF 7HE dTY COUNCIL OF 7HE CIiY OF FiMOIEY. WIWAN J. NEE—MAYOA ATTEST 1MW/W C. CHAMPA—qiY fX�NC Fecu(� (Vav� 2B 6 Oebb�r 5,,09�n F�y 2 L CITY OF FRIDLEY ANORA COIINTY, MINNESOTA NOTICB OF HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJ$CT NO. 1992 - 2 Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the Fridley Municipal Center in said City on the 13th day of November, 1995, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the proposed assessment in respect to the following improvements, to wit: BTREET IMPROVEMF.NT PROJECT NO. 1992 - 2 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements in the total amount of S 1,256,255.08 is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction of street improvements including grading, concrete curb and gutter, class 5 base material, asphalt pavement, storm drainage, signing, striping and landscaping and relate appurtenances located as follows: Hathaway St - Hackman ta Reqis nr. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to benefits received. At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any individual assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the residing officer at the public hearing. A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. 22.03 Page 2- Notice of Hearing on Assessment Street Improvement Project No. Street 1992 - 2 The City of Fridley adopted Resolution No. 14 - 1995 on February 13, 1995, relating to the deferral of special assessments for certain senior citizens where the payment of said special assessments constitutes a hardship. The following factors will govern the granting of the deferments: The property must be homestead property, and the owner must be at least sixty-five (65) years of age or older, and in the case of husband and wife, one member must meet this age requirement. The application for said deferral must be made within the first thirty (30) days after the adoption of the final assessment roll by the City Council. The owner will make application for deferred payments on forms prescribed by the Anoka County Auditor, and will make application to the City of Fridley on forms provided by the City. The City Council will consider each application on an individual basis; however, the general policy is to grant senior citizen hardship special assessment deferrals when the annual payment for the special assessment exceeds on (1) per cent of the adjusted gross income of the owners as deternained by the most recent Federal Income Tax Return, or if the household income is below the Very Low Income threshold as defined by the Federal Income Limits for the Community Development Block Grant programs. The deferral will be terminated and all amounts accumulated plus applicable interest shall became due when any of the following happen: the death of the owner, provided that the surviving spouse is not otherwise eligible for the deferral; the sale, transfer, or subdivision of the property or any part thereof; loss of homestead status for any reason; the City Council determines that further deferral is not in the public interest. The Assessment roll as presently calculated shows an assessment of $ Pin No. under STREET 1992 - 2 to be assessed over TEN (10� years at siu a�d one half (6 1�2�) per cent interest. The property owner may pay the total special assessment to the City of Fridley within thirty (30) days of adoption of the assessment with no addition of any interest. If the entire special assessment is not paid within the thirty (30) day period, but is paid before December 15tb in the year in which the roll is adopted, interest is charge from the date of the adoption of the assessment to the date on which the assessment is paid. 22.04 Page - 3 Notice of Hearing on Assessment Street Improvement Project No. Street 1992 - 2 Partial payment of an assessment which is not less than one-half thereof, provided that such partial payment shall in any event be in a sum of at least One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) , may be made within thirty (30) days of adoptions of the assessment. If a partial payment is made, the original assessment will be reduced by this amount, and the remaining balance shall be certified for collection as a part of the original assessment roll. If the assessment is not paid by December 15th in the year adopted, the first payment of principal and interest will be included on the following year's tax statement. To the first payment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the adoption of the new assessment through December 31st of the following year. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on the balance of unpaid principal. The entire remaining balance of an assessment subsequent to the current year's payment may be paid at any time the first year, but the payment on the yearly tax statement doest include interest to December 31, of that year. 22.05 �� TO: WTLLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER �� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR HOWARD ROOLICK, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR WALTER COLE, ACCOUNTING/DATA PROCESSING CLERK SUBJECT: RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992 - 2 DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1995 Attached you will find the resolution confirming the assessment for Street Improvement Project No. 1992 -2. This project was certified in 1994 with three properties on Hathaway Street not on the roll. During the Public Hearing on October 23, 1995 a mistake was made in the calculation of the proper amount to be assessed to each property. This was corrected to reflect $ 7.70 per front foot which is under the estimated amount of $ 8.00 per front foot. Each property has front footage of 76 feet and results in an assessment of $ 585.20 per property. The total costs of this project is $ 1,256,255.08 with $ 825,731.99 being paid from the Capital Improvement Fund, Street Division and $ 87,952.29 being paid from the Capital Improvement Fund, Parks Division with the balance of $ 342,570.80 being assessed against the property owners for Ten (10) years at six and one half (6 1/2) percent. RDP/whc 23.01 RESOLIITION NO. - 1995 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992 - 2 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992 - 2 in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would meet in regular session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have been filed, except 4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: 5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially benefited by the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992 - 2 in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. 23.02 Page 2- Resolution No. - 1995 6. Such proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected is affirmed, adopted and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected, with the changes and alterations herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land respectively. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, shall be certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992 - 2 8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereto until the same have been paid at the rate of six and one half (6 1/2 �) per cent per annum. 9. Such assessment shall be payable in Ten (10) annual installments payable on the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1996, and continuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each installment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the County Auditor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the first day of January in each year. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF � 1995 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM C. CHAMPA - CITY CLERR 23.03 CITY OF FRIDLEY M L M O R A N D II M TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRN8, CITY MANAGEIt �� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR WILLIAM A. CHAMPA, CITY CLERR SUBJECTs SI% MONTH REVIEW OF SHARR CLIIB INTO$ICATING LIQIIOR LICENSE DATL: NOVEMBER 8, 1995 At the April 24, 1995 Council meeting, November 13 was established for the six month review of Sharx Club intoxicating liquor license. When the initial license was granted, Sharx was not serving food. One of the stipulations placed on Sharx was that they begin serving food and comply with the food to liquor ratio by August 1. Sharx began serving food in August and opened their restaurant sometime in September. Sharx has provided us with eopies of the Minnesota Sales Tax Rate Form ST-1 and additional food and liquor breakdowns. The attached sheet summarizes their food to liquor ratio for the months of August, September and October. Rich DeFoe, owner of Sharx, has requested that we keep specific sales figures private for security reasons. If possible, he does not want revenues publicized during the Council meeting. In addition to the food to liquor ratio, we have included a status report from Dave Sallman, Public Safety Director. 24.01 s'�'�x ' �?�'�� ,s' z�� _ , , , ,,, , , , , , August September October Food 3°10 27% � 32% Liquor 97% 73% 68% SHARXRAT.XLS Page 1 11/8/95 24.02 POLICE DEPARTMENT City of Fridley MEMUI�:ANDUM Minnesota TO: William W. Burns, Bill Champa FROM: Dave Sallman � SUBJECT: Sharx � DATE: November 6, 1995 In preparation for the November 13th, review of Sha� Liquor License, I have been asked to prepare a summary of police reports to that location. There were 65 police calls for service from November 6th, 1994 to November 6th, 1995. They are listed by category below. 9 Assaults 1 Narcotics 9 Disturbing the Peace 3 Damage to Property 11 Theft 30 Other (traffic, accidents, medicais, etc.) The only issue that I see for concern is that Sharg has not been open full time during this period. The management seems to handle the security prnblems well. They contact us when they should. We have conducted several checks on entry process and there appears to be a good job of carding those attempting to enter to assure age compliance. Sharx has been a busy establishment and the clientele is on the young side, so it is to be expected that we will receive a fair number of calls there. The strongest issue is how the establishment is dealing with the problems that occur. To date they seem to be keeping the establishment under reasonable control. 24.03 r � � � Community Development Department PLA►��1VING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: November 8, 1995 � TO: William W. Burns, City Manager ;�r�� FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott J. Hickok, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Water Conservation and E�nergency Plan The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) mandates that all communities with municipal water supplies are now obligated to have a Water Conservation and Emergency Water Plan. These plans are intended to serve as an integral part of a community's Comprehensive Plan. All plans are to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council no later than January 1, 1996. I am pleased to report that our draft document is ready for review by the City Council. Though the 45 page plan may appear cumbersome, review of the plan can be simplified by recognition-of the four basic elements: 1. 2. 3. An inventory of our water supply system eZements, and water supply demands (basic data about our community). A water conservation plan A water emergency plan 4. A water supply conservation and emergency plan implementation strategy. A staff committee was formed consisting of inembers of the Police, Fire, Finance, Engineering/Public Works, and Community Development Departments to prepare Fridley's plan. To assist staff with document preparation, the City Council approved hiring Short Elliott Hendrickson (SEH). A draft plan was prepared and has been reviewed and commented on by both the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission and Planning Commission. A public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on October 18, 1995. 25.01 CWSEC Plan November 8, 1995 PAGE 2 PLAN IMPACTS Fridley's current water supply system will accommodate future growth and redevelopment activities that occur in the city, beyond the year 2010. This projection assumes that there will be no additional contamination problems without suitable supply treatment or replacement procedures. According to state plan mandates, an operational work plan with completion dates must be ia�plemented by each city with a municipal water supply. Our draft plan's implementation schedule has been summarized for you in Exhibit A(attached). It is important for you to know that the implementation schedule is essentially a contract �commitment to make these improvements. Seven out of the thirteen implementation strategies were already considered by the City for evaluation or implementation. Of the remaining six items, a minor amount of cost will be incurred and will primarily affect documentation procedures for the finance department staff. Outside funding sources will be sought (when possible) to fund the water conservation education program. POTENTIAL MONETARY IMPACTS OF WATER CONSERVATION: A customer water use scenario has been provided (Exhibit B) to show water revenue stream impacts of a 2.5$, 5$, and 7.5$ reduction in Fridley's residential water use, due to conservation efforts. The scenario only shows the residential water use sector. The Water Conservation and Emergency Plan shows that residential water use makes up only 50� of the total water used in the City. Other souraes of water use are: commercial/industrial, institutional, unaccounted for uses. Similar revenue stream impacts may be experienced through conservation efforts in the commercial, industrial and institutional sectors of the community. It is important to remember that these impacts (even 2.5� overall) assume a high level of community participation. It is also important to remember that, though conservation is the proper message to send to water users, our system relies on a certain level of use to assure water system repiacement funds. The cost of our basic water delivery to the customer is somewhat constant. Some savings will be recognized by lower peak water demands and therefore lower filtration costs, etc. The City should however, continue to monitor impacts of water conservation efforts in order to determine if an increase in water rates is warranted. If necessary, the increased water rates would assure that adequate water infrastructure replacement reserves are available in the future. 25.02 CWSEC Plan November 8, 1995 PAGL 3 PHYSICAL CRANGES TO THE CITY�B WATBR BYSTEM You'l1 note that the last 3 items listed in Exhibit A are physical changes to the City's water system. These improvements were required elements of the plan order to meet state water quality and fire protection mandates. Fortunately, the City anticipated these expenditures and would have made the improvements anyway. PLAN COSTB: New costs to City shown on Exhibit A (not including unknown cost of future conservation ' education program) $7720.00 SEH Consultation Fees $5250.00 Publication Costs $ 120.00 Staff time $2720.00 Total $15,810.00 PLANNING COMMISSION Rl;COMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the plan as submitted with the addition of a water quality emergency definition. CONCLIISION�RRCOMMENDATION: staff recommends that the City Council conditionally approve the docwment with the noted changes and authorize staff to submit the plan to the Metropolitan Council. Once the Metropolitan Council and Department of Natural Resources have reviewed the document, their endorsement or suggested modifications will be brought back to the City Council, for final approval. 25.03 IlVIPLEMENTATION ANTICIPATED OVERALL COST COMII�NTS STRATEGY COMPLETION DATE Collection of water use September 1997 $1,600.00 data by expanded customer categories Collection of water use September 1997 $3,840.00 on a quarterly basis to determine trends Collection of data to Annually No Additional Cost determine demand reduction in summer Evaluation of ineter Annually No Additional Cost Item would have been completed accuracy w/o plan Development of water Annually No Additional Cost Item would have been completed audit program to w/o plan determine losses Adoption of an ordinance December 1998 $2,280.00 restricting water use Development of water December 1998 Cost to be Outside funding sources will be conservation education deternvned after identified. program program is developed. Evaluation of water June 1996 $8,000.00 Nearly completed w/o plan filtration facilities Deternunation of January 2000 Cost to be Item would have been completed prefened contanunated determined w/o plan; other funding sources water remediation need to be deter�uned Development of a water January 1998 No Additional Cost conserving water rate Continuation of water On-going $25,000.00 budgeted Item wouid have been completed main looping annually in CIP wlo plan Installation of Marion July 1996 $225,000.00 �tem would have been completd Hills booster station w/o plan Replacement of Well No. January 1998 $300,000.00 Item would have been completed 1 r in 1 EXHIBIT A 25.04 RESI DENTIAL WATER USE CUSTOMER SCENARIO NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS: TYPICAL HOUSEHOLD CUSTOMER WATER USE: COST PER 1,000 GALLONS: QUARTERLY HOUSEHOLD COST: ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD COST: APPROXIMATE ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD REVENUE BASED ON LISTED ASSUMPTIONS: POST CONSERVATION HOUSEHOLD REVENUE: 7,s�o 18,000 - 20,000 GALLONS PER QUARTER 90 CENTS 19,0� GALLONS (AVERAGE� x $.90 PER 1,000 = $17.10 $17.10 PER QUARTER x FOUR QUARTERS = $68.40 $534,204 2.5% SAVlNGS 5% SAVINGS 7.5% SAVINGS ($ � 3,355.10) ($ 26,710.20) ($ 40,Ofi5.30) EXHIBIT B � � 25.05 $520,848.90 $507,493.80 $494,138.70 EXHIBIT C On May 3, 1995, the Fridley Planning Commission and Environmental Quality and Energy Commission held a joint meeting to discuss the City's Water Conservation and Emergency Plan. A draft plan was circulated and comments were made by the Commission Members. I have included the minutes from our EQE/Planning Commission discussion. The (paraphrased) comments included: Comment - What about wellhead protection and the City's implementation of interim strategies prior to the finalized version of the State's wellhead protection rules? Response - The City has prepared a preliminary inventory of well information and is committed to dovetailing the State's Wellhead Protection Plan into this plan as soon as the final document becomes available. In the interim, the City will continue to protect our wellheads through the zoning and building code standards established to protect the environment. The City will also investigate and likely pursue a grant to further the cause of wellhead protection. Comment - Is "emergency" defined anywhere? Response - The language on Page 40 has been enhanced to include natural hazards, human caused disasters and contamination. Contamination hazards are now and would continue to be monitored by City staff. The Water Emergency Conditions Ordinance that will be required as an implementation element of this plan can be drafted with very specific language to address the contamination response procedures. Comment - In the Emergency Ordinance Provisions on page 42 the restriction of restaurants serving water on a voluntary or mandatory basis is a concern. Drinking water is essential and restaurants should not be restricted from serving it. Response - The Water Emergency Conditions Ordinance that will be required as an implementation element of this plan can be drafted with very specific language to address the restaurant water service restriction. The plan language still 25.06 needs a minor revision so that we are not restricted fro� serving water in restaurants entirely during water emergencies. Comment - Is it necessary to test the City's drinking water daily? Response - Yes, the water is tested for fluoride daily. Every Wednesday the State requires tests for drinking water quality. These tests would identify certain characteristics of the water and assure that the standards of the safe drinking water act are met. Rigorous testing for traces of TCE is done on a monthly schedule when well or wells are in use. Well #9 is tested semi-annually. The implementation plan inc7.udes a date certain requirement for a resolution of preferred mediation method for well water contamination. Comment - Have we considered having large water users do water conservation plans to be submitted to the City? Response - Yes, if the City elects to do so, our Water Emergency Conditions Ordinance can be drafted with very specific language to address large user, conservation plan implementation. 25.07 EBBIBIT D Environmental Quality and Energy Commission comments were taken on October 17,1995. After a general discussion of the document the EQE sent forth two recommendations. These recommendations were: RECONIl�ENDATION 1. Include a water quality emergency definition in the plan. Without this addition, the EQE members believed the document would only cover water quantity emergency conditions. RESPONSE: A definition has been added RECONIl�IEENDATION 2. Allow senior rate discount pricing that applies to all seniors. RESPONSE: The most recent amendment to the Cities water rate structure included special senior provisions. 25.08 E%HIBIT E The Planning Commission held its public hearing Conservation and Emergency Plan on October 18, 1995. Commission echoed the concern of the EQE with a definition of a water quality emergency definition. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: on the Water The Planning request for a The Planning Commission recommended approval of the plan as submitted with the addition of a water quality emergency definition. 25.09 Eng�neenng Sewer Water Parks Slreets Maintenancc TO: William W. Bums, City Managerr i�� f� PW95-316 `y �'� FROM: John G. Flora, Pubhc Works Director DATE: November 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Stonybrook Creek Meeting On Wednesday, November 8, 1995 at 7:00 p.m in Meeting Room No. 1 of the Municipal Center, I held a public meeting with the Stonybrook Creek residents. In addition to Councilwoman Bolkcom, 18 residents were in attendance representing 10 properties. At the meeting I explained both the 3/4 and full length pipe options. I also identified the concept of putting in the pipe through the back yards, backfilling the yards, restoring the ditch and answering various questions from the members. As a result, the 3/4 pipe; ie., burying the pipe in the first five lots and keeping an open channel on the remaining three lots, was supported At the meeting, all of the easements were executed with the exception of three from properties that were not present and a question by Mary Martin regarding the area of her easement. I will attempt to contact the three residents and obtain signatures of the easements for the project. I also have scheduled a meeting with Mazy Martin for Friday, November 17, to verify the amount of area necessary for installation of the pipe and restoration of her property. All of the release agreements for the open channel were signed except two of the properties not present. These agreements are not essential as the creek and pipe are not within their property. I believe it is helpful to obtain these easements, if possible, to prove that the residents were aware of the action and supported the decision of the neighborhood As a result of the meeting, I will attempt to walk a petition through the neighborhood to obtain the remaining seven signatures necessary to obtain 1009�o participation in the pzoject. Through this process we will be able to eliminate the need for a public hearing. If this is not possible, we would need to schedule a public hearing on the $2,000 assessment for each of the properties, preferably on November 27, 1995. � 26.01 � November 9, 1995 Page 3 Associated with the public hearing notices is a requirement to schedule a meeting with the sub-watershed properties to identify the ad valorem assessment which is to be established for that atea. To keep this project on a fast track, this should also be scheduled for the November 27 meeting. If the Council desires, a preliminary sub- watershed informational meeting can be scheduled before that time. Based upon this schedule, we would hope to have project approval and authorization for project advertisement at the December 11 meeting. This would allow bids to go on the street in January and hopefully an award so that the project could commence in February 1996. This would then provide us two months of winter with low flows to install the pipe and remove the necessary fill material from Locke Lake. If the Council supports this schedule, recommend that we advertise the public hearing notices for November 27. JGF:cz 26.�2 STONYBROOK CREEK STABILIZATION PROJECT NO. 246 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8.1995 @ 7:00 P.M. S 3 O F- �. ) �P� � 3 � / \ � � � w � o � \ ° x ci � �'P / � z z \ �� ° � � � �� W � 3�N /� \ o �P,S W p,,,�' iz � �� c� roR. ��_ W.. Q il J�, �^ �i�� Ww � . . . . . G/ � „� u�o i \ . � � °� u z \ � i <:h// �� W, gzWa \ W�/ � <l�b � � .'�dW;�`J�(u. \ / � � �. z / /� � � u�i W \ u:�� < � / \ � � W N J O U �i � �� o ,^� � n o � . ti � \ ` '' � o � � ` . � / � ��' .� � ��=5� ;°,i,I m o 5 i � vc��o ,� ��,� � �� N � ,�,�, o� a i Q � o� � ' \ a��o~u�i v� � 4 w cLL�'i / �U � 1 d.��~WU O � I /� WO 2\\ � ('�` � \ nN6�SF O I �'f`�b\ Fm�wo� � � � \¢�°� �� ou�°oc=iv�iw I . / \ �//�` � � ° � � \ � N ' � I� , � � � � �i �,�� \�� i � �� . / �� ' � / 4 (�, /, � ) � \ / � �J� �a � � � /�� t � � 'i� �. ,� �P� \ � 5�- � � � Q � �� Z �." � � � \ �. �` � � � � --- -- \ \� \�� \� � —�� •�\� \\ \ �./ W� d� � ; j� �� °� � _ � � \ <.: \ � \ � / QN /' / \ �� \ /�20 \ �\ t \ �� \ � �( 4 Y � � �� ,�/ � , � ° � / '� � .�0 3y %\ . \ W � `� � / <C� \` � O <��< 1k � \ \ � ``C�/ / � / �J4 \ V \ � \ j' / �/ i�— /� ar�°�� 4 ' a� / /% \� wi i� � \ " Nq � / \ \ \ WV '/ Z\ � �/ W \ \ � � N \ ,,z � S�3/ W � , �5 c��(\ _ � O_ / \ � � J . _ �.,. . . F� �[ � � \\�� N /% � // � � � z / . w4d ,0� � � � . (,��\ /%�/ / � � � � / � � � � ; �\ �v�"vi / �<,R�� i � \\ / �"" Q\\� � � . \ � /�� ` � / �e�`2' w \ \ / �' � �Y ��;;� / //�%/ / / \ � ��o� ��' � / / ry� � II M °n°� _ \ .% y c \ / y\/ N > 6 � \� `°IY\ /a / r O �� 1��G0�/ -��°��y/ tl Y � .�� m ' � ��G0 0 � o � \\ //� � ' �� /y��S\ � � � // i/ / � �_� / � � � . S � o. / / .. � i � 1 � � , / \1 + \ / � � \\ � �``\ .. � \ N j \\ � � W=�,� m `\ �GC� \ // 1 � / \ �� N � \ S / \ � j � \ o 26.04 \, ', ��