Loading...
08/26/1996 - 4861OFFICIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 26, 1996 '� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITYOf i�DL� ATTENDENCE SHEET Monday, Augcus� 26, 1996 7:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN RINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS � �. l� � � �� �^ h � ��f-e �., � �� ` � ..� l � ,F ��� ,>e, �� C� I�(�4 , 1 JI ' '�1 c-�-'�� �: �'l �/L(�N � S �f _� �. , /�S�S���,� 1,, �`_; l'ri� �> ��'�'�'GS � C'�LY ` � �� J �C� '� � �jr�= lY/ L/ ''c�v'` 5�f 1-�,k���..���t i�,�.� /(�!/.�,,� l TTEM NUMBER 3 � E CffY OF FRIDLtY FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 26, 1996 The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, reiigion, national origin, sex, disabiiity, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (T"TD/572-3534) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE• APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of August 12, 1996 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: OLD BUSINESS: Second Reading of an Ordinance to Repeal Ordinance No. 1062 Pertaining to Vacation of a Drainage and Utility Easement (Industrial Equities, 73rd Avenue and Northco Drive) (Ward 1) . . . . . . . ...... 1.01-1.02 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 26, 1996 � OLD BUSINESS: Second Reading of an Ordinance Under Section 12.07 of the City Charter to Vacate Streets and Alleys and to Amend Appendix C of the City Code (Industrial Equities, 73rd Avenue and Northco Drive) (Ward1) ..:.............................. NEW BUSINESS: Page 2 2.01 - 2.03 Variance Request, VAR #96-18, by the City of Fridley, to Reduce the Front Yard Setback from 35 Feet to 25 Feet, and to Reduce the Side Yard Setback on a Corner Lot From 35 Feet to 30 Feet, all in Order to Allow the Expansion of an Existing Wellhouse, Generally Located at 7345 Highway 65 (Ward 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.01 - 3.14 Variance Request, VAR #96-19, by Carl and Margaret Christenson, to Increase the Height of a Fence in the Side Yard From 7 Feet to 8 Feet 3 Inches, Generally Located at 1327 - 66th Avenue N.E. (Ward 2) ............. 4.01 -4.23 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETtNG OF AUGUST 26, 1996 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: Page 3 Variance Request, VAR #96-20, by Murphy Warehouse, to Allow a Sign Painted Directly on a Building, Generally Located at 4850 Main Street N.E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.01 - 5.09 Resolution Ordering the Removal or Repair of a Hazardous Building, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 463, Located Within the City of Fridley, Minnesota (218 - 57th Place N.E.) (Ward 3) . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.01 - 6.16 , SY Approve One-Year Extension of Variance Request, VAR #95-24, by Kenneth Anderson, to Allow Construction of a Porch and Garage, Generally Located at 132 River Edge Way N. E. (Ward 3) ............. 7.01-7.03 Establish a Public Hearing for September 16, 1996, for the Sale of Excess Property Located at 61 st Avenue and 7th Street (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.01 - 8.02 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 1996 PAGE 4 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTlNUED� Establish a Pubiic Hearing for September 16, 1996, for Osborne Road Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1994 - 5 (Ward 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.01 - 9.02 Purchase Agreement between the City of Fridley and CP Rail System for the Property Located at University Avenue and 73rd Avenue (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.01 - 10.13 Claims .................................... 11.01 Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12.01 - 12.05 Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13.01 - 13.07 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 1996 PAGE 5. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: (Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes) .PUBLIC HEARINGS: Application of Main Event for an Intoxicating Liquor License for the Property Located at 7850 University Avenue N.E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.01 - 14.02 Special Use Permit, SP #95-05, by Home Depot, for a Garden Center, Generally Located at 5650 Main Street (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.01 - 15.07 NEW BUSINESS: Variance Request, VAR #96-17, by Michael and Sherry Perreten, to Reduce the Side Corner Setback of an Attached Accessory Structure Facing the Street from 25 Feet to 10 Feet, to Allow the Construction of an 8' x 24' Garage Addition, Generally Located at 5980 Fifth Street N.E. (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.01 - 16.12 . . . FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 1996 PAGE 6 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED�: Resolution Adopting a "Proposed" Budget for the Fiscal Year 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.0'I - 17.03 Resolution Certifying "Proposed" Tax Levy Requirements for 1997 to the County of Anoka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18.01 - 18.02 First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Section 2.06.01 of the Fridley City Charter ..................................... 19.01-19.02 First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 3 of the Fridley City Charter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.01 - 20.06 Resolution Approving a $1,500,000 Loan to the Housing and Redevelopment Authori#y in and for the City of Fridfey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.0'l - 21.10 ADJOURN: F � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 26, 1996 ., ..v-�'�^-��"L"' � �. - t.1 1 1 �F FRIDLEY Tl�e City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearin� impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of August 12, 1996 �' �. � - ;,...�...:�y<.. C•. . �A/l.,-z-.��✓ .�- �" L APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: OLD BUSINESS: Spcond Rea�±�ng of �n c?r�E�?nce Repeal Ordinance No. 1062 Perta to Vacation of a Drainage and Utili Easement (Industrial Equities, 73r Ayenue and Northco Drive) (Ward ?C ;!�'� /`'`'�� C �..�,. Second Reading of an Ordinance Section 12.07 of the Ciry Charter t Vacate Streets and Alleys and to � Appendix C of the City Code (Ind� Equities, 73rd Avenue and Northc (Ward1) ...,.. �`���,��� y,` �l� lL�� C,c.,,�`L`-i �f ng ) . . 1.01 - 1.�2 2 p�- �� �_ � f2���= nend rrial Drive) - . . . . 2.01 - 2.03 �. Variance Request, VAR #96-18, by the Ciry of Fridley, to Reduce the Front Yard Setback from 35 Feet to 25 Feet, and to Reduce the Side Yard Setback on a Corner Lot From 35 Feet to 30 Feet, all in Order to Allow the Expansion of an Existing Welfhouse, Generally Located at _ 7345 Highway 65 (Ward 2) . . . . . . . . . 3.0� �'"�� C��i'�,c,,...,._...� -- � �z� . ,� .��=��J`t'��� Variance Request, VAR #96-19, by /t��`"�' Carl and Margaret Christenson, to !ncrease the Height of a Fence in the Side Yard From 7 Feet to 8 Feet 3' Inches, Generally Located at 1327 - 66th Avenue N.E. (Ward 2) ... 4.01 - 4.2:; �.� ��46y .�.� r.z;�.� �i� -a ��''I�� � ��� � ��� �� ^ ��'� -� Variance Request, VAR #96-20, � Murphy Warehouse, to Allow a S gn ��; Painted Directly on a Building, Generally Located at 4850 Main ,, Street N.E. (Ward 3) ,, . ��`., 5.01 - 5.'J:► f�� •,v L,�N•: . / Resolution Ordering the Removal or Repair of a Hazardous Building, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 463, Located Within the City of Fridley, Minnesota (218 - 57th Place N.E.) (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . 601 - 6.16 ��'= f ,v��..� �� , Approve One-Year Extension of Variance Request, VAR #95-24, by Kenneth Anderson, to Allow Construction of a Porch and Garage, Generally Located at 132 River Edge Way N.E. (Ward 3) .. 7.01 - 7.03 �"�`� — � , . �, APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: PUBLfC HEARINGS: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUEDI: Establish a Public Hearing for September 16, 1996, for the Sale of Excess Property Located at 61 st Avenue and 7th Street (Ward 1) ..... 8.01 - 8.02 ,2�.� Establish a Pubiic Hearing for September 16, 1996, for Osborne Road Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1994 - 5(Ward 2) .... 9.01 - 9.02 ,�� � ' �" %�� ��� Speciai Use Permit, SP #95-05, by Home Depot, for a Garden Center, Generally Located at 5650 Main Street (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . C1? _ � �, / � ` ,� � � NEW BUSINESS: Variance Request, VAR #96-17, by Michael and Sherry Perreten, to Reduce the Side Corner Setback of an Attached Accessory Structure Facing the Street from 25 Feet to 10 Feet, to Allow the Construction of an 8' x 24' Garage Addition, Generally Located at 5980 Fifth Street N.E. (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase Agreement between the � `���_ City of Fridiey and CP Rail System for jv 15.01 - 15.07 16.01 - 16.12 the Property Located at University Avenue and 73rd Avenue (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . 10.01 - :� L�:13 Resolu#ion Adopting a "Proposed" ���-r-�--�- Budget for the Fiscal Year 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.01 - 17.03 _ _._--- f--�-�---� a ;��� � --z�-�-�-�� �� • � Claims . ���;?2: ��-°:9'L-. . . . . 11.01 Licenses . � . �'� :�-L'�"�. . . . . . 12.01 - 12�5 - � ���—�- c�,u.,t.�-l.� � ��� � � ��` `�� �,�"'��,�' - Estimates . . . C . . . . . . 13.01 - 13.07 � Resolution Certifying "Proposed" Tax Levy Requirements for 4997 to the County of Anoka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18.01 - 18.02 i�� ;� `�`"' �,O/��— , First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Section 2.06.01 of the Fridley City Charter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iv�1-�-'C- 19.01 - 19.02 ° �� � �-�- ,�_ ` J S� �� �.,� First Reading of an Ordinanc" e Amending ���L��-�-� Chapter 3 of the Fridley City Charter . . . . . . . . 20.01 �20.�E�" • ADOPTtON OF AGENDA: �2_ �'y�'�L`� �� � ��-- 3- � -s = �� /.>- � �'"� `��` `�` (�esolution Approving a $1 500 000 `�J�3 �� Loan to the Housing and Redevelopment L��Cf.Q � �J% f,,� . �_ �-� ��, OPEN FORUM. VISITORS: �'���„-.- 3j,�uthority in and for the City of Fridley ....... 21.01 - 21.1 t (Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes) �t ���`-�� G�� ' /� Informal Status Reports . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . 22.01 RUBLIC HEARINGS: Application of Main Event for an Intoxicating Liquor License for the Property Located at 7850 University Avenue N.E. (Ward 3) . . . �:�? .'"��. .! . .°. �. :�.�r. . 14.01 - 14.02 �__ �. � � /���-n . ADJOURN: �{� � ,,���--� ��C" �% �---�+--'� / � � oF FRIDLEY Name Eric Hahn Position Interpretive Specialist Exempt APPOINTMENT August 26, 1996 Starting Salary $28,945.76 per year $2,412.15 per month 0 Starting Date Replaces Sept. 3, Scott 1996 Ramsay z THE MINUTES THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 1996 THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 12, 1996 MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF The Regular Meeting o� the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Nee at 7:30 .m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: cil and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance yor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, and uncilman Billings and Councilman Schneider lwoman Bolkcom COLTNCIL MEETING, I JULY 22, 1996: MOTION by Councilwo an Jorgensor to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded b Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. BOY SCOUT TROOP �167: Mayor Nee welcomed Bo Scout Troop #167 to the Council meeting and asked each member of the Troop to introduce themselves. Ms. Schrupp thanked Council for allowing them to attend the meeting. She said t e Boy Scouts believe good citizenship is not just a word, but a de d. The Troop is working on a merit badge. Councilman Schneider �tated that he was glad they could attend the meeting to see how go ernment works. Mayor Nee tl-ianked meeting. PROCLAMATION - Boy Scout Troop for attending the Council )OD NEIGHBOR DAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996: Mayor Nee issued a p oclamation proclaiming September 4, 1996 as Good Neighbor Day. He encouraged all persons who live and do business in the City o take part in Good Neighbor Day as a way of showing respect and c ncern for all in the community. Mr. Pribyl, Acting promoting Good Neighk who, in turn, will expected that a tot stated he understanc promotion on this evE 'ity Manager, stated that Schaaf Floral is r Day by giving away a dozen roses to persons ive the roses to others. He stated it is 1 of 5,000 roses will be distributed. He that Schaaf Floral will be doing a media t. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETTNG OF AUGUST 12, 1996 PAGE 2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: l. ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING FOR AUGUST 26, 1996, TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF MAIN EVENT FOR �1N INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE, 7850 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. (WARD 3): Mr. Pribyl, Acting City Manager, stated that a liquor license has been requested for Main Event at 7850 University Avenue N.E. This is, for the property which was previously the site for T.R. McCoys and Longhorn Grill and Bar. Since a public hearing is required before a license can be issued he requested that Council set the public hearing for August 26, 1996. The Police Department is in the process of conducting a background investigation, and the results will be available for the public hearing. SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR AUGUST 26, 1996 TO CONSIDER AN INTOXIGATING LIQUOR LICENSE FOR MAIN EVENT, 7850 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 51-1996 AUTHORIZING CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE GENERAL FUND, CABLE T.V. FUND, GRANT MANAGEMENT FUND, HRA REIMBURSENlENT FUND, DRUG AND GAMBLING FORFEITURE FUND, HOUSING REVITALIZATION FUND AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR THE YEAR 1995: . Mr. Pribyl, Acting City Manager, stated that this resolution amends the estimated revenues and appropriations to the 1995 budget in accordance with the City Charter. The adjustments have arisen as a result of donations, unforeseen expenditures and items budgeted in the wrong categories. All adjustments have either been informally approved by Council through the Budget Reappropriation Form or made to eliminate negative variances on the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 51-1996. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 52-1996 APPROVING A THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE OF TRUST AND A SECOND AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT REGARDING THE CITY'S COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS (FRIDLEY BUSINESS PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT) AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATING THERETO: Mr. Pribyl, Acting City Manager, stated that this resolution is related to the Fridley Business Plaza Partnership Project. Revenue bonds were initiated in 1986 for this project, and the partnership is using a new letter of credit to secure the original bonds. It is, therefore, necessary to execute a document entitled Letter of Representations and Indemnification, as well as amendments to the original loan agreement between the City and the Fridley Business Plaza Limited Partnership. Mr. Pribyl stated that the documents also contain minor changes that do :�ot affect the City. Jim FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL I�EETING OF AUGUST 12, 1996 PAGE 3 O'Meara, Briggs �& Morgan, has reviewed these documents, and they appear sati factory. ADOPTED RESOLUTI�N NO. 52-1996. 4. RESOLUTION APPOINTING STATEWIDE NO.I 53-1996 DESIGNATING POLLING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE SEPTEME ELECTION: PLACES AND Mr. Pribyl, Act'ng City Manager, stated that this resolution designates both polling places and election judges for the September 10, 1 96 primary election. The judges were picked from lists suppl'ed by both political parties. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 53-1996. ` 5. RESOLUTION NO. REDEVE S FOR TAX - 14 ( WARD 3 ) : i4-1996 MODIFYING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR OJECT N0. 1 AND THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING JCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1-3, 6, 7, Mr. Pribyl, Acting City Manager, stated that this resolution adds a parcel in the Great Northern Industrial Park to Redevelopment P oject Area No. 1 for Wallboard, Inc. Wallboard plans to construct a 30,000 sq�aare foot building which will creat approximately thirty jobs. It is necessary to expand the pr ject area in order to enable the Housing and Redevelopment Au hority to provide a loan to Wallboard. This resolution does not expand the tax increment financing district. ADOPTED RESOLUTI(DN NO. 54-1996. 6. RESOLUTION N0. TO 27-020-18) 5-1996 AUTHORIZING MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS ; ID HIGHWAY (C.S.A.H. 108) OSBORNE ROAD - OLD S INSON BOULEVARD (CP 91-08-108) (S.A.P. �R 2 ) . Mr. Pribyl, Act'ng City Manager, stated that Anoka County Highway Departm nt is proposing to upgrade Osborne Road between Old Cen ral and Stinson Boulevard. The improvement will consist o concrete curb and gutter, storm water improvements, an a sidewalk on the Fridley side of the road. This resolution equests State Aid off-system funding for the City's portion o the improvement costs. ADOPTED RESOLUTI�N NO. 55-1996. 7. RESOLUTION NO. �56-1996 TO APPOINT AN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR FOR THEICITY OF FRIDLEY: Mr. Pribyl, Acting City Manager, stated that Chapter 106 of the Fridley Cit Code provides for the appointment of an FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 1996 PAGE 4 Emergency Management Director, and the City's Emergency Management Plan refers to the Public Safety Director as the Emergency Management Director. This resolution formally appoints the Public Safety Director as the Emergency Management Director. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 56-1996. 8. RESOLUTION N0. 57-1996 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR FURNISHING HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICE: Mr. Pribyl, Acting City Manager, stated that this agreement is with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety to provide chemical assessment team services to various counties in the area. The agreement is in accordance with the rules of.the Minnesota Hazardous Materials Incident Response Act. The City will be reimbursed for all expenses incurred. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 57-1996. 9. CLAIMS: . AUTHORIZED PAYMENT OF CLAIM NOS. 69238 THR.OUGH 695�2. 10. LICENSES: APPROVED THE LICENSES AS SUB�MITTED AND AS ON FILE IN THE LICENSE CLERK'S OFFICE. 11. ESTIMATES: APPROVED THE ESTIMATES, AS FOLI�OWS: Frederic W. Knaak, Esq. Holstad and Larson, P.L.C. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, MN 55110 Services Rendered as City Attorney for the Month of July, 1996. . . . . . . . . $ 5,035.79 Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered 301 Fridley Plaza Office Building 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Services Rendered as City Prosecuting Attorney for the Month of May, 1996. ....$ 15,157.31 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL Schield Construction 13604 Ferris Avenue S Apple Valley, MN 5512 Stonybrook Creek Project No. 246 Estimate No. 6 . Hardrives, Inc. 14475 Quiram Drive Rogers, MN 55374-9461 TING OF AUGUST 12, 1996 PAGE 5 ompany uth Bank Restoration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 36, 754 . 03 Street Improveme t Project No. ST 1995-1 & Estimate No. 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $123, 392.46 No persons in the a agenda items. MOTION by Councilman Seconded by Councilw aye, Mayor Nee decla ADOPTION OF AGEi3DA: ence spoke regarding the proposed consent neider to approve the consent agenda items. � Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilma Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declar d the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Ms. Shirley Arbor, 1 5 79th Way, questioned what was being done about the homes at th corner of East River Road and Osborne Road. She stated that this is a nice area with homes ranging in the $100,000 plus, but the first two homes coming into the area are not attractive and unkept, with parties held there all the time. Councilwoman Jorgenso stated that the City is working with the Police Department and the Code Enforcement Officer. Some citations have been issued. Th City is aware of this situation, and it is being followed closely. NEW BUSINESS: 12. RESOLUTION NO. ADOPTING 1996 58-1996 CONSENTING TO THE HOUSING AND HORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY LEVIES COLLECTIBLE IN 1997: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this resolution gives cons nt to the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) to impose a levy for a tax on all real property in the City. This action is a small portion of a larger issue which involves rehabilitatio of the housing stock. Fridley's population FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 1996 PAGE 6 is declining and aging, and there has not been a lot of new residential housing. The income structure of the households is also changing and declining, and there is an increase in non- traditional households; single adults, single parents, and empty nesters. In essence, Fridley is competing to retain its population and attract new households. Ms. Dacy stated that the City has adopted a housing program to give people a reason to stay or move to Fridley and to create housing opportunities to prevent blight and provide neighborhood stability. Rehabilitation programs using State, Federal, Community Development Block Grants, and HRA funds have been initiated to remove blighted housing. Programs have been initiated for first-time home buyers, 'and a rental inspection program is now in place. Ms. Dacy stated that there needs to be a mechanism to maintain the housing stock, and there will be further demands for rehabilitation. The HRA and the Council will have to evaluate the financial impact of redevelopment projects, as there are scattered pockets of housing that are severely deteriorated. The loan program for rehabilitation is not a solution to all the housirig problems but part of an attempt to prevent blight in the community. Mr. Fernelius, Housing Coordinator, stated that the HRA tax levy is authorized under state la�a. The levy would be used to support the revolving loan program, focusing on single family housing rehabilitation. The levy would be used as capital to create the loan program, and the loan would be repaid through the tax levy payments. Mr. Fernelius stated that the loan to the HRA would be for $1.5 milli�n at ari interest rate of five percent over a fifteen-year period. Al2 property in the City would be assessed for taxes payable in 1997. The levy would generate $168,993 in 1997 or .0441 percent of the total market value in the City. The impact on a single family home using an average value of $88,000 would be an increase in taxes of about $12.00 per year. In terms of industrial property, using a value of $9,500,000, the increa�e in taxes would be about $l, 300 per year. The tax levy has to be approved by the Council on an annual basis. Mr. Fernelius stated that several other suburbs have enacted HRA tax levies. Bloomington collects $643,000, which is used for general administration as well as housing programs, and Brooklyn Center collects $300,000 for economic development. Crystal is banking their tax levy to use the funds for future redevelopment. New Hope's levy is not large but is used for payinq salaries. Richfield's levy would be similar to Fridley's, and South St. Paul has a levy which amounts to $55,000 per year. Mr. Fernelius stated that in regard to the need for a revol�ing loan program, there are a number of factors to be considered. The first is the age and condition of Fridley's housing stock. The FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL N�ETING OF AUGUST 12, 1996 PAGE 7 City has a substanti 1 amount of housing units approaching thirty years of age. Older housing requires more attention and has some marketing implications in comparison with other suburbs in terms of amenities. The 199 study evaluating housing conditions showed that there are a minimum of 900 homes in the City requiring some repair. Mr. Fernelius statec program is that the rehabilitation to thc lack equity in their funding available, ar. to address housing crisis down the road. Mr. Fernelius stated next fifteen years c levy would provide a self-sufficient. Th resolution adopting � adopts this resoluti� the August 26 Council that another factor for a revolving loan rivate sector is not providing financing for �e persons that have higher debt loads or who home. Also, there is not sufficient federal l it is important to access the City's ability ;onditions now rather than responding to a that the HRA fund balances will decline in the ue to other redevelopment activities. This funding source, and the program could become � HRA considered this tax levy and passed a levy for taxes payable in 1997. If Council �n, the loan agreement would be disctzssed at meeting. Councilwoman Jorgens n asked for what purpose the loans would be used. Mr. Fernelius stated that homeowners use the loans for replacing roofs, siding, window , and other repairs and improvements to their homes. Councilman Schneider rehabilitation progr� allow more persons identified as a pric stock. The better p for the community. 7 as the value of ec dollars invested. Mr. Pribyl stated tha consent of the City C stated that the City is now involved in a �. However, this would expand the program and to participate. One issue the City has ity goal is programs to improve the housing �ple feel about their homes, the better it is is seems to be a step in the right direction, ryone's home will increase and offset the the levy is for the HRA but does require the ncil. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 58-1996. Seconded by Council oman Jorgenson. Upon a roll call vote, Councilman Schneider, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Billings and Mayor Nee voted 'n favor of the motion and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried un nimously. 13. INFORMAL STATUS �tEPORTS: Mr. Pribyl, Act�ng City Manager, stated that there were no informal status eports.• FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 1996 PAGE 8 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of August 12, 1996 adjourned at 8:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secretary to the City Council Mayor DATE: TO: MEMOR.ANDUM DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR S► • • . Bums, City Manager,��¢ FROM: arbara Dacy, Community Development Director ott Hickok, Planning Coordinator ichele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: econd Reading of an Ordinance Repeaiing Ordinance No. � . 1 2 Regarding Vacation of a Drainage and Utility � E ement in �Vorthco Business Park, for Industrial Equities; 7 rd Avenue and Northco Drive On January 8, 1996, the Ci Ordinance No. 1�62. The property located near 73rd Anoka County Register of � currently described cannot must be repealed, and a n� must be adopted. The ord the agenda. Council conducted the second and final reading of iinance vacated a drainage and utility easement on renue being developed by Industrial Equities. The es Torrens office determined that the ordinance as : recorded. In order to correct Ordinance No. 1062, it ordinance containing the corrected legal description �nce with the correct legal description appears later in The City Councit conducted �irst reading of the ordinance at its July 22, 1996 meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the ordinance repealing Ordin< MM/dw M-96-345 Council conduct the second reading of the attached No. 1062. 1.01 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO REPEAL ORDINANCE NO. 1062 PERTAINING TO VACATION OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION l. Ordinance No. 1062 contained an erroneous legal description regarding the vacation of a drainage and utility easement. SECTION 2. Because of the erroneous legal description, Ordinance No. 1062 shall be repealed in its entirety. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COL7NCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1996. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR 1.02 0 DATE: TO: MEMURANDUM EVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 22, 1996 Bums, City Manager � FROM: arbara Dacy, Community Development Director ott Hickok, Planning Coordinator ichele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Reading ofi an Ordinance Regarding Vacation of and Alleys for 73rd Avenue and Northco Drive Attached please find an ord nance with the corrected legal description vacating the utility easement located on e Industrial Equities property located at 73rd Avenue and Northco Drive. The ' Council conducted tMe first reading of the ordinance`at its July 22, 1996 meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the with the corrected legal de MM/dw M-96-346 Co.uncil conduct the second reading of the ordinance Z.� y ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. To vacate those particular 20.00 foot drainage and utility easements originally dedicated on the recorded plats of Northco Business Park and Northco Business Park 2nd Addition and now to be vacated which lie within Lot 1, Block l, in said Northco Business Park and Lot 2, Block l, said Northco Business Park 2nd Addition and lying southerly of the northerly 20.00 feet of said lots. The centerline of said 20.00 foot easement is described as follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot l; thence northwesterly, along the southwesterly line of said Lot l, a distance of 62.51 feet, to the . intersection with the westerly line of said Lot 1 (said intersection hereinafter referred to as 19Point A"); thence southeasterly, along a line passing through a point on a southeasterly line of said Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park distant 29.00 feet southwesterly from said most southerly corner, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence northwesterly, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the above referenced "Point A"; thence northerly, along the westerly line of said Lot l, a distance of 379.40 feet and said centerline there terminating, generally located at the southwest corner of 73rd Avenue and Northco Drive. Al1 lying in the South Half of Section 11, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Be and is hereby vacated subject to the stipulation adopted at the City Council meeting of January 8, 1996. SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code shall be so amended. 2.�2 Page 2 - Ordinance No PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 8TH DAY OF JANU Y, 1996. ATTEST: .. WILLIAM A. CHAMPA, Public Hearing: First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR 'I Y CLERK N vember 27, 1995 J ly 22, 1996 2.03 CITY �F FRIDLEY PROJECT SUMMARY CITY WELL HOUS� FRONTYARD SETBACK VARIANCE REQUEST _.. _._ _ _ __ A enda Item; < A licant: Ci of Fridle Case Numlier: vA.R #96-18 _ A licatian Date. Ju1 17,;!199d Staff Reviewer: Sc,�tt J. Hickok' Nleeting Date? August 14� 1996 Au st 26, 1996 e�tv Mana�ez� Authorization; DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: John Flora, Public Works Director, a: yard setbacks along I�'ighway 65 and 73 addition to be constructed, attach proposed, the setback along High ay rec�uired in similar districts. STATEMENT OF AARDSHIP: "The existing well location is a ph si� fle�dbility that the City would have ad, yet to be installed." I ; requested a variance on behalf of the City to allow reduced front 1/2 Avenue. The purpose of the request is to allow a filter plant to the eacisting well house structure serving City Well # 12. As 65 and 73 1/2 Avenue would be 30' and 25', rather than 35' as �1 characteristic of this site that has unfortunately, eliminated the had this been a new well site and all drilling and equipment were SUMMARY OF ISSUES: � Code Section 205.12.8.(D).(8), state, "All perforniance standards for uses in this district shall be comparable to similar uses that are allowed in o districts". The setback for commercial uses in this general vicin�iry is 35'. The setbacks of the pre-exisring well ouse are deficient by toda}�s standards and to attach the new building to the existing structure invariably t� ers the necessity of a variance. Staff considered the elimination of the existing building to eliminate t e pre-e�cisting, non-confornung setback issues. The logistics of the demolitioq removal of the equipmen and adaptation of a new building and equipment to an existing well caused staff to abandon the alternat ve and request a variance. An effort was made to avoid moving the filter building back on the site in order to keep vistas open around the new building and preserve view hed opportunites for a fi,►ture building on the undeveloped site to the north and east. STAFF RECOMMENDATION O THE APPEALS COMMISSION: Staff recommended that the Appeals ommission recommend approval of VAR #9b-18 to the City Council due to the physical characteristic of the well location and lack of alternatives on the site. APPEALS COMM[SSfON ACT ON: The Appeals Commission voted un nimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. C[TY COUNCIL RECOMMEN�AT�ON: Staff recommends that the City Co ncil eoncur with the Appeals Commission action. 3.0 STAFF IiEPORT VAR #96-18 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: Variances to reduce the front yard setback of a filter building structure on the corner of H'ighway 65 and 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: Size: Topography: Ezisting Vegetation: Ezisting Zoning/Ptatting: Availa6ility af Municipal �Ttilities: Vehicula�• Access: Pedestrian Access: 7345 H'ighway 65 Lots 1-3; Block 1, Central �ew Manor 3 5,460 square feet. Flat Urban Landscape P, Public; Central vew Manor Coruiected 73 1/2 Avenue None Site Planning Issues: DEVELOPMENT SITE Engineering Tssues: SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Code Section 205.12.8.(D).(8), states "All perforn�ance standards for uses in this district shall be comparable to similaz uses that are allowed in other districts". The setback for commercial uses in this general vicinity is 35'. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY: T'he property is located at the intersection of H�ighway 65 and 73 1/2 Avenue. Locat�l on the property is a structure housing City Well #12. 3.02 STAFF REPORT VAR #96-18 The property has the following history: 1949: The zoning was design� 1969: City acquired the land t 1969: Zoning reverted to P, P 1970: City built well #12. 1996: A variance is requested ANALYSIS: as C-2S, Commercial. «h foreclosure. allow a reduced setback from H'ighway 65 and 73 1/2 Avenue. In an .effort to dediver the higl�st quaiity ered water available, the City deternuned that a third filtration facility was nceded. After an extensive sysst�ns anal sis by MSA Consulting Engineers, it was determined that this loca.tion was the right location for the filter addition. Options to try to eliminaze the need for a 'ance on the new filter addition were evaluated. However, the setbacks of the pre-ea�ing well house are deficient by toda}�s standards and to attach the new buitding to the existing structure invariabty triggers a variance. Staff considered the elimination of the ' g building to eliminate the pr�-existing, non-confornungsetback issues. Howeve�-, the logisrics of the demolition, removal of the �quipmern and adaptation of a new building and equipment to an exisitng well cause�i staff to aband n the alternative and ask for a variance. Ari effort was made to avoid moving the In doing so, a future building on the unc opportunities. plant back on the site to keep vistas open around the new building. �ped site to the north and east will have greater H'ighway 65 viewshed There aze no realistic alternatives, short �f redrilling and relocating exisiting equipment on this site. WEST: Zoning: SOUTH: Zoning: EAST: Zoning: NORTH: Zoning: Comprehensive Planning Issues: Consistant ADJACENT SITES Mobile Home 1, Light Industrial General Shopping General Shopping 3 3.03 Land Use: Residential Land Use: Rapid Oil Land Use: Vacant Land Use: Vacant STAFF REPORT VAR #96-18 Public Hearing Comments: Nfichael and Alvan Schraeder, owners of the property to the north and east expressed concern over the removal of the service drive. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE APPEALS COMMISSION: Staffrecommended that the Appeals Commission recommend approval of VAR #96-18 to the City Council due to the physical characteristic of the well location and lack of alternatives on the site. APPEALS CONIlVIISSION ACTTON: The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. CITY COUNCII., RECONIlV�NDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission actioa 3.04 ` N VAR #96-18 C ity of Fridley 7345 High�vay 65 �CATI O N MAP , . I --- ___ __ _- - _ � � -- . _ -_ _ � . _ � � - � -,��-- — - -� � � , � �,31 ; r �--�---- ---- _ . ---- � -.' : Y , ,� - � � �_ � ,- -,.: _ � � � - i • �'� �l, �i X � ' � � � � � � � ��- rJ 1 � _ ♦ �� � 1 � ���' . , v;� C � \ � \ 1, � �V V - � -�--- ---------.�� E. � V 1 � -•— — � i, n \ � _., / \\� \` � `�0' `RaCiU� -- CB2 (BEEHIVE) � \ � 93 L.f CLE:i:r,2 i 0 WELL-�' ',:i•. � TOP 889.00 I � 1 � ��,, 889:,, ��� INV. 884.93 TRANSFORMER� � 4" CH �' � �� (SEE E �EC. ^ �" DRAIN `��I-,G \.... ;-. PLANS I � i � SEE �' ll i i ��� ; <_ / � TC 890.8 H2 TC 889.50 1 I \�'r� BACK�• SN � NK 890 T�f ' � - ..__� �' i INV. V ` '�, , ; �%- �. \. �,,,; .. ,.: I N V. � T - '� \�\ � � . TC 890 , ; 1 INV_ 88�5.45 Y ` -'\�', ' ' f`� \\ � '.�� :: '� �� , � ��'�FILTER �ADDITIO� �- � � &6� � � - % FIN\�L LEV. 889.62\�� 6' � 8 � , � �. ,� `� c ' ��� � ST-MH2 . . ' ao � �--'� '.��GL 888.40 ll` 46 1 �-� � � ' � Ex: Cg �. lf��(� 884.19 � � . 1'C 888 � �' :.: �-�':.::: ' � CL.� ; j � � `� � / � �� �' � . .6L•::888 83 � :. .:�`: 5::::: � . , ��, /TC sss.so ^ . `. yq � . /•! � y OQ-� — _ _" _ : AJEQ �t/'�.. y.Ra:' J ,. ' ���.':.:. : ;�,.; , ^ C�., - � ;r,;: �i. , ,. :\•:�:::' ::::::::::: '-' �: _�. , -. , �, � � 1:: _�' :: ��:;� �. . ::•:;:;�:::. � . • � - • ;�::.:i::•:::•:. �::: ;: ... : :,. ; �:. . • . : � � :.: :. .:::•::::::�::::� : : .:: ..:.: ... � '' �'.: <::�:4`co � :::•: � �:i:-:;::..:..:•. :::.: �.:: ::::::. -:�..:.::.. �:: 140 • i �. : �.�..::. � ', : •. . BLi���. .. ' . ..... . � � e$e .:. I . � :•:\:: ..:'::::�.....�:•:. �..:::•:'�:t: ::•. ' _ � . FL. EL � 3 . . 1 , �� •:i:°::i:_:}::�: '� � .. , I -:: TC 8�7.64 ': •:: �::::.:: �'•. :� \: �"_�..�:::• 28 l '� � � � re sas.so ; .:;.::�.��:::-:;: ���:::::=:`::�-' CL:3 `�, 1 �i �-;i i;�%,� . ��: S� 885.76 � ::�i�.�: - �^.�xrrxF_.r �9 � --- ,(NV. 881.67 :::::32'�:�f 7V:.F. s' ,, , , ,> � \ � T ' - ---'- i '_a- r r AFFIC CB � • � I - _ � 1 � iGN i�:: � � TRAfj�t�, � �� � onD ..::C::� � GL � ' � 6' CONC. WALK �� �-- l � � � Slp� !N1 ��rc a87.ss_- -�' � 4� a� .... ......... .. ' � � �:::�: :�.; .�... . _. _ . , - � � :•:tN� S �.EOG. � �, ;tl�Sii . 'o � .> . n : : .... �, `� -�-� � I -o yp R � / - - �% — � ' : � 1 20%4 ; -�-;, - - i �+ TC .887 68 r � �fi.. �JRB :{.:.... ---- - - < - _.. ,\ � -r .f - -- � ' � , :�. __ , i, _T - --- __ - ----- ---=�. }0 �L l _. - " � � Z3 1 /2 _AVE. N:�.- � �� � - -- ----- -! 1 . • , __ , �_ ;; .. _ - --_ , _ . . _ __ � 0" 'v CP -- --�---- . . - � ; � OVE EX. 15" RCP & CB'S � . ` � ` �o vGt' �- -- _ _- �� V -_ _ _ — ------ — -- > ---- -�--- _ ., r. ..- 6'"� � � � -----' , 0 LF. 18 CP CL.3 � 0.32� �I` `� �ii � „ � - - �-_-_ _ , ' - - ,� ; - �\ � — -- - - _ - - _- -. 1 � � � / \L_�—, C� - _ i�� - ' I,� ; 1� � � CONNECT TO EX. MH1 �! ; I i� MH � INV. 881.48 TOP 88 �! � jI INV. N. I� ; i! INV. E- � 2 3 SAWCUT, TACK & MATCH EXIS7ING 3.� 1 CVICTt��n � ��.-�� �T.i � .....T...,.._ . __ -. N ME�ETING. AUGUST 14, 1996 PAGE 7 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MOTiON CARRIED UNANII Ms. McPherson stated the C � �ING AYE, CHAiRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE SLY. Council would consider this request on August 26_ VAR Per Section 205.12.04 o the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 25 feet, nd Per Section 205.12.04 a on a corner lot ftom � weiihouse on Lots 1, 2, 7345 Highway 65 N.E. the Fridiey Zoning Code, to reduce the side yard setback 5 feet to 30 feet to aliow the expansion of an existing and 3, B1ock 1, Central View Manor, generaily located at MOT10N by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to waive the reading of the pubfic hearing notice and to open the pUblic earing. . UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL V T1NG AYE, CHAIRPERSON �UECHLE DECLARED THE MOT10N CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:5� P.M. Mr. Hidcok stated the request is has requ�sted the va�ance oi along Highway 65 and a reduc of the reques# to aliow the con well #12. As praposed, the set 30 feet and along 731/2 Avern Mr. Hickok stated the City aG code is written, property acqui� by City owne�ship and use of Recently, the City Council h: additional filtration facility in tt the facility would be best plaG Mr. Hickok stated a ha�dship equipment is in place. The filtrai wellhouse. The addition extend: of-way. Staff looked at altern, building back_ The issue is not � setback. Staff also evaluated y fhe City of Fridley. Mr. Flora, Director of Public Works, behalf of the City to allow a reduced front yard setback � front yard setback along 73 1/2 Avenue. The purpose nactiori of an additiori to the filter plant stnacture serving ack atong Highway 65 wouid be reduced from 35 feet to : from 35 feet to 25 feet. � �ed this property in 1969 through tax forfeiture. As the I fo� a City purpose reverts to a"P", Public Designation, e land: The existing building was constructed in 1970. grappled with water quality and the necessity for an City. The City hired a consulting firm to analyze whe�e and this site was pinpointed. does exist in that well #12 is drilled and the related on building as designed would be matched to the existing the existing building setback dimensions toward the right- �tives to construction on this site including stepping the new building but the existing building with a substandard :he altemative of demolishing the existing structure and 3.07 APPEALS COMMISSION MEET[NG AUGUST 14 t996 PAGE 8 bring everything into conformance_ It was determined that demolishing the building, drilling a new well and moving all the equipment was fscally impossible for the City. As an altemative, staff looked at stepping the building back on the site, and it was determined that the site line was established by the existing building and that the City would �ot gain by stepping the building back. It may even hinder the property to the rear more having this building set back closer to the propesty. Mr. Hickok stated sfaff believe #hat the alternative that existed to demolish the existing structure which was not realistic. There did not appear to be any othe� options. Staff recommends that the variance request be approved. M�. Saefke from the City of Fridley is present to answer questions. Dr. Vos stated the request is for the existing building and asked if there was a request for the addition. Mr. Hickok stated staff is recognizing the substandard setback for the existing buildi�g. The addition will extend that setback and will need the variance. Dr. Vos state�! there seems to be construction along there aiready. - Mr. Hickoic stated that is coRect. PJIr. Kuechfe asked Mr. Saefke the proposed height of the building. Mr. Saefke stated the building is 16 feer from the grade to the top. It will match the curre�t wellhouse. it wilf be similar to the stnacture at the Commons site. Dr. Vos asked what is to the east of the building. Ms. McPherson stated parking will be to the east. This had been a service roadway ��ed for the wellhouse building and which was removed. Mr. Saefke stated it was his understanding that the City owned three lots side-by-side for the filtration plant. The roadway was removed. Dr. Vos asked how far the addition would be from the no�th p�operty line. Mr_ Saefke stated he #hought they were within the code requirements to the north. To the north is a mobile home court. He did not know who owned the prope�ty to the east. There is a lot between the mobile home court and this site. The io#s to the north and east are vacant. K 1: Mr. Hickok stated it is 65 Mr. Kuechle asked where ;ET[iVG, AUGUST 14. 1996 P to the no�th property line. gain access_ Mr. Hickok stated access is ai ng 73 1/2 Avenue_ The service road ends at the property line to the no�th. There was di cussion of extending that service road which was met with resistance from the tenants at e mobile home park. The idea was eventually abandoned. Dr. Vos asked how access is k�ai Mr. Hickok stated access expand ihe roadway to the Mr. Mike Sch�ade� stated his and directly to ti�e east. to the property to the north and to the east. be from 73 1/2 Avenue. If necessary, the City could to allow that service. is the owner of the parcels immediately to the north Mr. Schrader stated he thoug t it interesting that this is a retro-active variance request. Citizens require approval in ad ance of virork being done. There has been a lot of activity on the property. He provided photos of work being done on the site. Mr. Schrader stated a road� a permanent easement on easements. Mr. Schrader stated they hav improvements snown is a typi utilities. The setbacks and qui drive was the primary entran about 11 years. The street i property owners in 1970. At and connec� to Byron Road. ' who did not want to sell their street improvement project ftor until such time that the Byr conjunction with a developme site. Unfortunately, they were � project. Mr. Schrader stated the City unsuccessful because the propE was intended to be used as was dedicated by easement to the City in 1970. There is �rd that the City took title to the property subject to those owned the�r parcels since th� spring of 9 9"l6. � The street al City street with curb and gutter, storm sewer, 2nd other claim deed were required to allow this drive. The service e for that property when it was used as a sales center for iprovements requested by the City were assessed to the iat time, it was intended that this drive extend to #he no�th iere is one home owner who has a home in that driveway rope�ty. He showed a copy of a report by the staff for the 1990 which stated the right-of-way should not be vacated n Road extension is completed to the no�th and is in t proposal from him and his father for an Auto Mall on the �able to maintain the level of tenants required to build that at one time attempted to acquire an easement but was �rty owners �efused to sell. It basically states this property a City street. He showed infiormation from the street 3.09 APPEALS COMM[SS[ON MEETIN(',, AUGUST 14, 1996 YAGE 10 improvement project for 1970 which shows Mr_ Brooks who owned the prope�y to the no�th did not wish to sell prope�ty for the easement; however, the owner from whom they bought the property did provide the easement. Mr. Schrader showed the legal description of the parcel that is now land locked. Ms. Beaulieu asked if she was co�rect that Mr. Sch�ader had purchased the land in 1976. Mr. Schrader stated the actual petition was pa�t of the 1970 road improvement project. The actual �mprovements were not done until a late� date. The resolution approving it was in 1969, but it was put into the 1970 budget for a service drive, water and utiiity improvements for street purposes. They pu�chased the property in 1976 with the idea that they would operate a retail facility on this location and the road was the primary entrance into the facility. In 1986, they stopped selling there with the intention of developing the parcel for another use. They set out to assemble the 1and. The parcel to the east was owned by Royal Electric. In conversation with the City to purchase those po�tions to the east of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. tt was very clear that they were going to sell this property so they could construct the Auto Ma�l. They had a purchase agreement with the City but it never worked out. They continued to market the prope�ty. They rezoned their parcel alo�g v�vith the City's stated corridor improvements for Highway S5. This i5 also�a tax increment financing redevelopment parcel. Mr. Schrade� stated, in 1994, they completed the rezoning to C-3. !n 1994, they came in with a proposal through the City Council workshop for a mini-storage #acility, and their ward member wanted to keep this area a"high-image" commercial use. Mr. Schrader stated what the City has done is destroy their ability to market this property. They cannot market with a 16-foot building on the frontage and with no access to the property. Mr. Schrader showed a memo indicating the assessment for the City road. They have paid over $13,000 for that road and showed the attachment to the memo along with the assessment history on the property. They have incurreci a significant increase in value this year which is a slap in the face in light of what is going on. What bothers him is that this is about a$2.5 million project that the City has known about for two yea�s. Studies were done, appropriations made in the 1996 budget, but the adjacent prope�ty owners were not notified that they were going to lose their road. He felt this was a violation of due process. He thought there were a lot of damages he�e. He thought the City should make it right. Their position is they are here going through the appeals p�ocess notwithstanding the fact that the p�oject is going to get built. There is no discussion about thai. This is a bit backwards. lt is unfortunate for them becau�e they will likely have to rezone thei� property i�dustrial and try to get what they can #or it and take their losses. 3.10 M�ETING, AUGUST 14, 1996 PA� Mr. Schrader stated their z ning question is with relation to the P zoning which is questionable as well. The Ci zoning maps indicate this is C-3 ali the way through as was the neighboring property. en he picked up a zoning map this week, fhe map had a handwritten circle around the rcel in question and it said P zoning. There is no building or g�ading peRnit on record. 8-foot hole is dug and footings poured. He did not think this could be done without a ermit. A11 the trees have been torn down and are gone. Mr. Schrader stated their pro and no access to the south. l saying, i� we want access to � on our own land, #he owners v� represents a significa�t loss ir this point, consideration of a laughable. He wan#s this to gc must be a policy that cities requirements and he does not Commission not support this v their request for compensat whatever is required to gain � for that. They ask that the reverted badc to them so it c� of asphalt on the eastem part provided, they think the City s a reasonable market rate. T $6/foot for their land. Mr. Schrader stated he and are considering their other they are here tonight to do Mr. Kuechle stated the Appe cannot address the other iss �equest is reasonable and issue of whether the road Commission can deal with. Mr. Schrader asked, if the construction. Mr. Kuechle stated, if the v The City owns the land and erty is now landlocked. They have no access to the north iere is no direct access from Highway 65. Now the City is ur parcel, we have to build our own road again. If we do it II be assessed for it again. They have paid for it once. This square footage if they have to put another roadway in. At �ariance is down t�e road past where everyone is that it is to the City Council with the idea that this is not right. There ;annot do this. As a developer, he is familiar with the �ee this ha�ening here. It is their position that the Appeals riance and to note in the record their complaints, problems, �ry damages paid for in asse�sments with interest, and ccess to this parcel. He feels they should not have #o pay 30 foot right-of-way granted to the City� by easement be i be used again if the�e is no roadway. They have 30 feet >� of their property which they cannot use. If no access is ould purchase the land. They agreed to purchase land at e City wanted $6 a foot. They would be happy to accept fa#her are very angry and upset. They feel betrayed. They ons. Staff asked them to go through the due process and Commission can only deal with the appeals process and The issue for the Commission to address is whether the �ther a sufficient hardship has been demonstrated. The the easement is enforceable is not an issue that this is not granted, would the City be able to continue ce is not granted, the structure would have to be moved. a ce�tain right to use it. The structure still could be built. 3.11 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 14 1996 PAGE 12 Mr. Schrade� stated the City had done studies before and shared with them the options for Lots 2 and 3. With each of those options they demonst�ated that they couid not buiid anything on their portion of land. That is what we feel predicated their willingness to take this roadway and make an aggressive, if not questionable, legal decision #o take the road away. Mr. Kuechle stated, if there is a legal �oute, that is an issue to be addressed with the City. Ms. Beau�i�u stated it seemed that some of the things being asked for are things that only a judge could order in a court of law. Mr. Schrader stated he thought thei� request is very clear. They are asking the variance not be granted and the construction be stopped. If the City has to move the building, then so be it. Ms. Beaulieu stated the City Council will review this �equest regardless of their recommendation. Mr. Kuechle asked, if the building were moved 5 feet, would it heip their si#uation. Mr. Schrader stated no, it woufd not. However, supporting the request allows the project to continue. They would like #o stop the project so they could negotiate with the City in earnest. The City's official position is basically to say tough but we can oppose it if we choose to. He questioned the City attomey on severa! areas of the law and the attorney stated they were under construction. He wants to find a way to resolve. He does not v►�ant to sue the City. Mr. Kuechle stated, unfortunatety, the only issue the Commission can deal with is the variance request. Mr. Alvan Schrader stated he was the owner of the property. He has worked over 20 years with the City Council to resolve what to do along Highway 65. He cannot understand why, when he brought a project to the City, al1 he heard was a high image corridor and the City is now constructing a wellhouse and taking away the service road. Every time they ialk about this piece of property it is too small. The City could not even relocate the people from Central Avenue along the co►ridor. They want to do a relocation and redevelopment prog�am because it did not meet the setbacks. Now when the City wants to build a wellhouse, they dest�oy the street in front of it along wi#h access to his property. He paid $17,800 plus being taxed at the highest vacant comme�cial proper#y rate for 11 years and now he has a road in front of his prope�ty that goes nowhere. He happens to own property on 73 1/2 St�eet but he has no frontage and, if he wants to expand, he then has to do a lot 3.12 PPEALS COMMISSfON M�ET[N PAGE 13 consolidation program. W o is causing this probiem? He has paid taxes at the commercial rate, he has paid ssessments, and he wants to be reimbursed. He thought it was time that those who re on the Commission deny this variance request. This va�iance request did not even me into being until they went to the City and questioned what they were doing. If th y had not done that, there would not even have been a request for a variance. This project would have gone ahead because the City can do whatever it wants behind eve ne's back while the citizens or taxpayer next door has no rights. The City makes its o rules and does what it pleases. If the Commission does not disapprove of this varian �equest, then they just become part of the establishment and fal! in line with the peopl next door. Dr. Vos stated the property er to the north stated that the variance request had started just recently. Is that correct? Mr. Hickok stated there was anlapplication. Neighbors are notified after an application is made. The application was n file when Mr. Schrader came in and the neighbors are notified with sufficient time be ore it comes to the Commission. There is no discrepancy in application times as far as nstruc�ion goes. �The Schraders are correct in that there is construction going on at the site at this time. Dr. Vos asked when construct�on began. Mr. Hickok stated he believed grading is happening on the site at the time they came to speak about the application. Dr. Vos asked if the variance Mr. Hickok stated yes, plus existing and nonconforming Ms. Beaulieu asked if the City built. was for the existing building. the new buitding as weli. The existing building is a pre- a variance in 'i 971 when the existing structure was Mr. Hickok stated the building w s constructed according to the setback requirements that existed at that time. The cade s ates that ali P districts should utilize setback dimensions for similar uses. All of the wellh uses are in residential districts. Therefore, they used that as their standard setback and his would meet those setbacks. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, >nded by Dr. Vos, to close the public hearing. 3.13 APPEALS COMM(SS(Olv MEET[lYG AUGUST 14 199G PAGE 14 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHA{RPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:37 P.M. Dr. Vos stated he was surprised there was construction going on. in other cases where petitioners are in the process, they are not continuing construction. He did not have a way to resolve. The existing is setback at 25 feet and 30 feet. If they move it back, the land owner to the north has no additional advantage but it is more costly to the City. He did not know how to resolve fhis. Mr. Kuechle stated he can understand why the prope�ty owner does not like this project. Yet, the City owns the land and has certain rights to use it. He did not think they were using it adversely. If the road existed legalfy, that is an issue that must be dealt with but it is not a part of the variance request. It seems that there is sufficient hardship in that the building exists already and to ask that the entire building be moved seems out of place and could harm the property owner even more by moving even cioser to thei� pro�erty. He did not see that granting of the variance has an adverse effect. There does look like there is an altemative road so that is not issue here either. Tha# part is not for this Commission to decide. hle would recammend approval.of the request. Ms. Beaulieu stated ihere are fsca! considerations but we are not to take that into consideration for the public. When these are fiscal consideration of the City, that is our pocketbook This is an existing condition and usually we go along with existing conditions. The complaint from the neighbors seems to be mainly that the road is missing and it sounds like the City could do that whether adding on to the wellhouse or not. This may be a legal issue that this Commission canno# deal with. As the reques# stands, she would go along with it and recommend approval. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Dr. Vos, to �ecommend approval of Variance Request, VAR #96-18, by the Ciiy of Fridley, to reduce #he front yard setback from 35 feet to 25 feet, and to reduce the side yard setback on a corner lot from 35 feet to 30 feet to allow the expansion of an existing wellhouse on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Central View Manor, generally located a# 7345 Highway 65 N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5_ PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #96-19 BY CARL & MARGARET CHRISTENSON: Per Section 205.04.06.A.(6) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to increase the height of a fence in the rear yard from 7 feet to 10 feet on Lot 7, Dennis Addition, the same being 1327 - 66th Avenue N_E. 3.14 Case; Number� L 1\�i �' ; CIT� OF FRIDLEY PROJECT SUMMARY : 1327 - 66t Avenue N.E. Fence Hei ht Variance Request ticant. earl8 AR #96-19 Iication Date ; JTchele`McPfi'rson Meetir�g Date P _ _ � thanzatiQn. �.h"�� _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUE: Carl & Margaret Christenson aze fence in the side yard from 7 fe 1327 - 66th Avenue. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Section 205.04.06.A(6) of the shall be no more than 7 feet in is to prevent negative impacts : aesthetic appeal of residential Iul� 18, 1996 igust i;4, 1996 ugust 26, 19�6 questing that a variance be ganted to increase the height of a privacy to 8 feet 3 inches. The request is for a fence on the property line at ey Zoning Code requires that a fence bordering side and rear lot lines ht in any residential district. Public purpose served by this requirement as limited light and view caused by ta11 fences and in order to maintain The p�titioners have submitted unique hardship in that Dr. Christenson suffers from a neurological condition which protu�its the W of clothes or receiving any form of physical coniact. The petitioners c�nstructed a higher fence to p ovide appropriate privacy and eliminate sight lines from the adjacent properiy to the west. The height f the fence was observed by the Building Official upon final inspectian of an addition to the dwelling. STAFF REC0111�VVIEENllATIO The hazdship stated is due to the Staff originally recommended that fence from 7 feet to 8 feet 3 i following stipulation: l. Per S writing that the adjacent propert The Appeals Commission voted i with the stipulation suggested by : supporting the need for additior request. The Commission also r for the life of the fence. ff the fec variance shall be applied for and CITY COUNCIL RECOP Staff recommends that the C two stipulations. AND APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION: lysical hardship of the property owner as opposed to the property. ie Appeals Commission deny the request to increase the height of the ;hes. Regardless of the Commission's action, staff recommended the �ion 213.05 of the City Code, the petitioner shall submit a letter in owner agrees to the location of the fence. rumously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council f The petitioner presented information regarding adjacent sight lines, fence height. Testimony from the neighborhood also supported the �mmended a second stipulation: 2. The variance shall be valid only is ever damaged or removed to greater than 50% of its value, a new f DATION: concur with the Commission's recommendation, subject to the above 4.01 Stafi Report VAR #96-19, 1327 - 66th Avenue N.E. Page 2 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: A variance to increase the height of a fence in a residential district from 7 feet to 8 feet 3 inches. Location of Prnperty: Legal Description of Property: Size: Topogrstphy: Ezisting Vegetation: Ezisting Zoning/Platting: Availability of Municipal Utitities: 1327 - b6th Avenue N.E. Lots 7, Dennis Addition 31,540 square feet (approx.); .72 acres Mostly flat, sloping to creek Typical suburban; grass, shrubs, sod, trees, etc. R 1, Single Family Residential; Demus Addition 1954 Connected Vehicular Access: 66th Avenue Pedestrian Access: N/A Engineering Tssues: N/A 3ite Planning Issues: 4.02 Stafi Report `'AR #96-19, 1327 - 66th Avenue N.E. Page 3 REQUEST Carl & Margaret Christenson are requestin side yard from 7 feet to 8 feet 3 inches. SITE DESCRIPTION/AISTORY The subject parcel is located east of the property is a single family dwelling unit issued since the building's initial construc� 1968 - ..� DEVELOPMENT SIT� ; that a variance be granted to increase the height of a privacy fence in the The request is for 1327 - 66th Avenue. intersection of Central Avenue and 66th Avenue. Located on the subjed which was constructed prior to 1968. Several building permits have been Construction of a I 16 ft. by 22 ft. family room/den addition Internal 1995 - Construction of a 2,391 sq. ft. addition . ANALYSIS Section 205.04.06.A(6) of the Fridley Zo ' g Code requires that a fence bordering side and rear lot lines shall be no more than 7 feet in height in any resid ial district. Public purpose seived by this requirer�ent is to prevent tall fences in order to maintain the attractiveness of a residentiai azea. I Dr. Christenson suffers from a unique ne�rological condition which prohibits physical contact of any kind including clothing. Dr. Christenson, therefore, co pletes many activities without the obstruction of clotlurig. The fence was constructed on the property line at a hei t of 8 feet in order to provide maximum privacy for Dr. Christenson and to eliminate sight lines from the adj t property to the west. This fence allows Mr. Christenson to be outside without clothes. The City has not previously r�viewed re the fence are for fences located in the frc in naiure, 1 foot 3 inches, and does not and varies in height from 6 feet to 8 fee of adjacent site lines into the property to �ests of this nature. Typically, variance requests to increase the hei,ght of yard where the maximum height is 4 feet. This variance request is minimal 3versely impact sight lines from adjacent properties as the fence is stepped Staff, however, does not have adequate information regarding the impact �eirnine if the variance is warranted due to a physical hardship of the land. 4.03 Stati Report VAR #96-19, 1327 - 66th Avenue N.E. Page 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE APPEALS COMIVIISSION: The hardship stated is due to the physical hardship of the property owner as opposed to the property. While the request is unusual in r�ure, staff recommended that the Appeals Commission deny the request to increase the height of the fence from 7 feet to 8 feet 3 inches. If the petitioner desires to present additional information regarding the site lines from the adjacent property, staff recommended that the Appeals Commission table the request. Regazdless of the Commission's action staff recommended the following stipulation: 1. Per Section 213.05 of the City Code, the petitioner shall submit a letter in writing that the adjacent property owner agees to the location of the fence. APPEALS COMIVIISSION ACTION: The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council with the stipulation suggested by staff. The Commission also recommended a second stipulation: 2. The variance shall be valid only for the life of the fence. If the fence is ever damaged or removed to greater than 50% of its value, a new variance shall be applied for and approved. CITY COUNC`II.. RECOIVIl��NDATION: Staff recommends that the Council concur with the Commission's recommendation. WEST: SOUTH: EAST: ADJACENT SITES Zoning: R 1, Single Family Zoning: R l, Single Family Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Residential Land Use: Residential Land Use: Residential NORTH: Zoning: R-1, Single Famiiy Land Use: Residential Comprehensive Planning Tssues: The Zoning and Comprehensive Plans are consistent in this location. Public Hearing Comments: A neighbor spoke in favor of the fence. 4.04 N VAR If96-19 ristenson VAR #96-19 Carl Christenson 13 72 66th Avenue LOCATION MAP 4.05 07i24i96 13:39 FACILITIES ENG 42-SE-a3 a 95711287 • , '.�; �� C�'�I�s..v r-F�nr� P� sP�cuvlr, !S � = e9 ' B.G � VAR �96-1gNC.�49 P002 Carl�Christenson � . �- . r �joUSe� � � • ...Y...�. . —..�.--.�... . ,�.�... . ��.-� . �� �� �L.-f�( 1 � = Za � �O �� C� �'' �-'�`''�` ��~� �. _ 1_ q� ROBERT JOSLIN AIA ARCHITECY 9001 MARINE CIRCIE • STI�LWATER. MJNNESOTA 55�2 16121 439-0218 � � � _1 Q F � � J ll� _ �-" : : 4.V / 1 I 9'4� � � � � a J 1 � -✓ ) -_'' x� A VAR ��96- 19 Carl Christenson � v' i �II 7 I � Y � }. }' U1 oL � Q 1 1 �� � U w � O � � L �L � � Z 1� L, �. �,�j a- cn .J �' �p � Y r � � � �. � Z �.- flL � � � L J��� 1!1 � � 07i24i96 13:39 FACILITIES ENG 42-8E-03 � 95711287 - `� :_ , � l" �' !a � �k �q x q /�KA O — _ti� �� _� ��4�� �!" ��c ��� ��r �` �Q•e VAR �i96-19N0.949 P003 Carl Christenson ! • 'f' �i ! k .f., �I� � � �--e 6 - O _ y C—~--� � t/`�4-� rUlb1 Y¢ " f�'— prr �, 33%4' �' . ��..�.�Oy�'l�ce,y � x g �---� X 4 77viy ' —!X � BaA��S ! X $ '7R►� �X � r'er�" !" f �� � �� �4 r n�•9•eev�D � : � � '� t°p�T'' l X ( �OA�e,ps T�r 8 � C.NQ-�9�77ti-sl/J��/ yAUn� s'rn,�, �� �Lr � 3�� =l � tv �/ 4-i--R<o �2 � L_/�� /�i�lc� �LS AOgERT JOSLIN AIA ARCHITECT 3d01 MARiNE CIRCtF • Si1LLWATER, IMtINNESOTA S.S082 4.08 d6t2� 43.442t8 � 4 i � �� f •e x„4 "T9� ,����r%Y ...: 'r . � ?�K .7. "ir a{ +� rn: � � � �t 1v��x^�� .� e �I . . � ,,r{ t � �� � r. *r �- ;` ; ,� . _ � �.•� F ; r i I�i �c �� � � j�"� � f � '�i' Rs � � R � i� +�►��'' 'h °.,`�+`4r' �% ti.' "' �K 'Eat� r �' � 5�,» : r t � i � � �� _ }�: K .�,� z'Par �t � � s% '��,5� ';{�` �y�' +� r iti �'`t� �r �� ���v Y��: 'r`�' � ,f3;�:. y C e i .. �, �� �� f� � + n � �e�.ic-� • a � � i4: �,.n � � ; � � � a �i� � �^'kf��'# Y �, � S xr ' +, f�t� an �-' a� ;F '`.c � 4 : , } `� r , .� Y r �.�. � .st?� ..�',� t � � � � ". � ��"`�.t y^�`� n;� �.:. �Il �,,,`{; {� ir � o .t�-7 ' r. `. 1� t��4' �f#; h �a� x` _ s . � �t ,�. �'� .. -�>fi � �'�f, t '�� .,,� :`�+{ �i ' I �h . *,�` t1 �s: . .�' � � �,'v t +�,s s � �� ,ry� ��s f ;�,,, � . , ;►. ;.� ; F �` ' , c,` �'�'r"�'1 -.{�"'� `��'` • - � °��� � ? '�,?�`. . � 1 � � �y � ' .�� r� _ . ,� u b � ' t� s ^ � � * � �a.�!' _ +� � . t�� : � y�r dt . �``��».� { ���y �l > � -�iTr s. _ � "!'4.?4 �,t��:'R 1 r"tt�,�� � . ` C' t�� .•r -..;J: � . ! � �i � �`1r' Y �i = � "� �` � ..y .,�,� ,i ,r att' �� , vr €i y ���u�` .., i\ � '4� ,�c.d r 3..•f � } ��H '"�� �'��, dl°� + t . $�t '� ' 8 � � �, r .i�`�. s . t i . '° ��� + � �,-lyr �,'�```'y� �ya�� ��, ` x w..,, b�� � f , .�,,� �r. i v'^r � �� "� .� � t ry'+, ` %t { �� t � ��''- � � '�'=°�tiY�,�s`,'� ���^ ��...�'ri � � . ZY . ' � .,� � k� z �,'CiN3 �t,� '"'.i'! .i:�i� ��� �.:k .,�,,y, �i �� +�,p �+ � y'�� ��� ~��z `�� � {� 4�_.= S .�'�s ��..e „ � `��^ w,��r ' ,as. -��",�y,Tf���Y ��+ `t�!• ."�'� � " G� "'"�s „ . ,3"` � . : , � �t.�` t� '¢ir. s" \' �� i °�'�,,� ,�, '�'�a 4 �.. 'i f 't+i . ' Ts. � i [ •F' Y + r .� ,.;� , pr•p � *�y ��� �� +�� ._ .� . . , .. ,Q �__`� ,�.�� .`' �g / b .1i k il� Mi;1M t y S�. t '!M d` �; y ia. ! ; � Fi, iV . t fi w+ e . ` .� '.,�'' „ � � ,�'' 4^ �r {Y. , :� .:, '� ° w : . '2. ..� y4� . a d -.r�.. � i. ry* * v �� I �„�.f �.k t' � �;.� �� � ' ,.F ��' t'Z, �" ' �` ,. �, ,F '� � 7a � . + ��,. . 4 !t. J� y . :.� . ia �y" `� °s `i.a, . T � � �� � } . . ^ J 3 � :� , . .d 4 z.4 '�'t 'S v 'd S �' . � ��a { . . '�'3� s. q � ;� ��'Y3 ��� a. �� .µ ��� ,�� .al� ��� � `�� t .' y, i"'. �-"� �q, �-j ' y. � , . r� e � � � - . � r. � '� �� .r� r � ,� r � �. w 3 -_ :.'� - �. . . � �g'T, . �l..y�r ��'° 1°y"yq,�.�� ). � 11,.j�k . �n � r � 'i �"'�1u����l.. '� IY f.� ,-�` .At J 5, L. � �. f 3t �✓� �.��7r ,� - . . � a a �.£> : � �aw t �:� "! . �t � �Y �� �s, 1 `4 a � r } °`"�`�" i��'r"��`t�l.*�� �� � ' !�' , • ' � t �� j �, t �pS f�,�5 �,'"`yyU_y ";�,'CR;°t� � . "4 . . .. b :`L .. ���� �, � �� � t �' • . �i4 .. p� � S''�' ,:�'�`i���� t�.. _,� ,,- jl. .. § i Mf�ir��.4 f ���. ° � �,g . w. �.� . s � 1FD � � : Es , r ' " �' . � 4J�,��� � _a �;� t ry :a .. � �r. ��f� :;, 5� �'�t' t � � ��'. � � �' �� � _ � . - �,�t� �'�� 3�i� + ,k "k ..r �° +� s . .� t ;s f� 4 n , � ; � � t ��. _ "� : r A. ��. ,� � . �- , s t- �. ,_ e r � .a � - �.;r. s { �. yf °� p . „_ } � � Y .., �. - � t f �" .�'+a.; _ � � � �` �'��� � S�r s� ! � ��� . �� . r r,+ � . . r, . � - .. , �� - ��' 3 ;:i." �, - � .. .. . • �� .,t� � ` - t . . . .. , t ' � _ 4,: � ' � /-- _ • ��`�sf. .`# :n• � �F � 4� -...y �Y� �,t `.� . _ �S�"` "nla�T�. .�.. . P. „� ,..: �� `� � �$ .b� ��'._ ` ��.yt } . . . _ t l 1 �, �4'R W3W33 �' '� .. Y`; , . if d..K` }.:i . S+,i,�- ; � - � t ��'" �``i�.�a � 7 � r:�a. ,. �lt�_. � b'f*1. �'4 � � � � ,c�r � "� � _� y p �A� : -s ,� .: _ i � }!" . - t' .' t +�P ..��¢ 1w '3 �.'. . � :,, 4. ' . : �. � ��. : � s� :. "�r ",� � /3'd . s. _\ q, "' t ,'n. �' �.. �' � r y w��� 5� 1 �,�. �� � F^ -y. :� � y� � � � 4 � o �'�� .� � d •'° .« . � x �a '"i ,.�`.�,y-y,�, ���' [ s t,. � e ` e� .: � � „�<��:�� ..� _ g._ :y+. .;y`;�" �� ��� ''^`.,- ' q�'.�tici+�' ' � ""� �, � �`' �' �'� :`�� .�j,. �".�,,; �- � � � t���'^*.]4 '�"�� MzF y �' J f '¢e:(� h � '�� �`;`y , �+_ w�j' K�+• � � _ �• �4� • 'f�" i L ��'t. u ,.... .r. .. x s:vx1�.����� ... � `f �.5.• '�ji' � Q ..R � f. . lai y{�� F .!L 0-,i i.*.� �! r. . .. �., i. �: i.: �.T ' `'- �� ��� � �±� � f° / �' i � � �,4��* �, � � ,� , � , �rb � � �..�`- j�� ��`' . . . �-vy ;���{'�"°..:. ,. • �� '�.�,r �' .� � f .-.ry . k�-).._ b��Li: . �..�. � � ��`�".p." �'':f.. .{ y� `.i'.�. � ' � ; � �. P ,.. ��'l . �� "^e^! r: i. 4 � � �� .., w..t ��` .�s z-. � ,�>•' � a : r�� P� '.FK ' � " �i 2r� 4 �i. 'ii i - � '�'illi''•� � .L � iY '_ , r � �.r .°E -% �. k atR .c �� ). ?^ ��- � � t � -r..a4. +. �� , � � c 4' . !. ' .� �. �� i ,�'.h � � � �' F� ? "t' � ,- "�y 3 �.ts`' ;�'t pp,�F� � � �'�J 'M+.���.� i �� ' ;'"�; r. r : � s� ,��,,:. � �' , . �_��.� . � :�f ` • � ,'..(,.';^' I July 10, 1996 Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant City of Fridley Fridley Municipal Center 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Ms. McPherson; This letter is concerning your correspondence dated June 28, 1996, concerning certain sections of the privacy fence on our property at 1327 66th Ave. N.E. Your letter states that sections of said fence appears to be over the maximum of seven feet allowed by code. The reason this fence was built is to related to a rare neurological disease involving my husband's spinal card. This problem has existed sinee 1976 but it has become increasingly severe in the last five years. It was manageable until 1991 when he was forced to retire. The problem is characterized by searing pain that is aggravat�d by any type of touch including clothing. For this reason, we needed a higher fence to obtain appropriate privacy and eliminate direct sight lines from our neighbor's windows. It is unfortunate that this variance was not applied for and obtained before the construction of the fence. We will be pleased to work with you on this matter and if it will add clarification, we would be happy to have one of your staff meet with us. Our telephone number is 574-2620. We are in the process of filling out the forms you sent us and will have those in your office before the July 19, 1996, application deadline. Sincerely, � � � �2� � �� _ �� � Margaret Christenson cc: Appeals Committee 4.10 a , v � JUL 1� "�+�� i=;_ ��F'f 1 Ht,i; . .. _':i. ', _ �� . .. - .- )ulv 3, i996 RE: Dr. Cari Christenso;z 386-30-1 �27 To Whom It I�iay C.oncern: I am writin� reoaz'ding a MN 5�432_ This is the Dr. Christenson is a patient generated by any form of tc F'FiI�J F' . � � �� ��13L�UTT 1c.-�}2"TH;I'��'1 r!:` !.�(?SPI'i��t. �i,rc:r }�c-nny in-tirur� ...i��:`..�>i�1�ri�, •�ii��i : variance on the fenc�ng at 1327 b6th Avenue N.E., Fridley, e of br. and Mrs. Carl Christe�zson. mine who has a neuro�ogical condition in which pain is �, �att�cularly to the s�rin of his leg and torso. Since, due to t��is problem, h wears as little cl.othing as possihle, privacy becomes a major issue. �e�efore, to pr�vent ight �ines d�re�tly intQ the house, high fences were instataetl. 'I'hese fen�es also rnake ;t pos ible for hiztt to go outside. I add my request for this va�i Sii�cerel'y, / r �L` / � ! -�1 f i �� // I /'� � ` f ' J � � r r -` �. l, Miies Belgrade, M.D. Medic� Director of Pain S� Chronic Pain Rehabilitation MB: gsj €or their pritvacy f�nces t� exceecf the 7 foot minim�um. ogram 4.11 07i16i96 16:44 FACILITIES ENG 42-8E-03 � 95711287 N0.764 P002 RC)BERT G. JOSLIN AtA A►F�(rH1TECT 3001 Marine Circle • Stiliwater. Mi��esota 55082 • t6121 439-Q218 July 16, 1996 Scott Hickock, City Alanner City of Fridley 6431 University�Avenue Fridley, MN 55432� . Re: ].327 66th S�. N.E. Dear Mr. Hicl�ock: . I am the architect for this residential project and I understand that the fence on the west side of the property is not in compliance with your plan- . ni ng code .r�aximum height of 7' . To give you the backgrounQ, when we siarted the project there.was an F3' high fence on the east property line so i assumed that this was the acceptable height in this area. We designed it tu start at 6' and step up to 7' a�d then to 8' at a portion of the west side. This was done to give Or, Chris- tenson, the owner, maximum visual privacy on that side because of the prox- imity of the house next door. During the fence-bpilding effort it was raised even higher when we could see the sight lines to the neighboring windows. � Dr. Christenson has a rare medical problem that elevates his body temper- ature so high that he feels most comfortable r�ithout clathes. This was the reason for steppi�ng the fence up to give him the visual privacy. This was only done on a portion of the fence on the west side and not the entire fence. So, we are requesting a VARIA��CE from the 7' max, ht. to allow us to keep the • fence as it is built. • Sincerely, Robert sli cc: Margaret Christenson Ron Danielson .: � . ., 4.12 � 2I3.OI. DEFINITDON . As used herein the term 'fe� partition erected for the p� divide a piece of land into includes an enclosure abo especially an enclosing str� intended to prev�t intrusi< (Ref. 180) 213.02. PRIVAZE NU�SANCE Any fence maliciously ere annaying the awners or occ deaaed a pr'ivate nnisance. either in his or her comf estate by such fence, may sustained hereby and may ha� 213.03. PR�HIBITDON 213. _FII�ICES, (Ref. 180 j DEFI2�lITION e" means and includes a structnre or pose af enclosing a piece of land or to listinct portions. The term "fence" : a field or any other place, and =ure of wood, iron or "other material f ran without or straying f rom wi th in. 213.C�. .ed or maintained for the pnrpose of �V� ��� �ants of adjoining property shali be Any such owner or occupant injured, t or in the enjoyment of his or her ve an action of tort for the damage such nuisance abated. It shall be unlawful for any person to construct and maintain or alivw to be vonstructed or intained upon any property located within the limits of the City of Fridley any barbed wire fence, or any fence of inetal oonstruc�ti n or otherwise� which is �charged or oonnected with an electrical r�t in s� a marjner. as to transnit said current to persoris, imals or things which might oome in contact with same. - - . . . ,, 213.04. I�OT L�1i�S . Whenever a fence is or shall 1 public property, whether the : otherwise, the City may regui; a fence naw exists or is to b� said property through the pla� licensed surveyor and oti�erwi case, no s�vey is necessary � may be issued. on certificate < or she is the vwner of the pre to be located. 213.05. LOCATIJON '�,'�, All fences must be iocated en ��� person, fiim or corporation c � fence to be so constructed property owners may agree � ' located on the division line � ,\ . ..• r � . _ ` IAT LIl�'S e located upon any premises abutting 3me be a street, alley, public way or e the awner of fhe property �pon which iocated to establish lot lines upon ing of permanent stakes located by a_ �e approved by tlie Council. Zn any ad a permit for the same when required � affidavit of t-he applicant that he aises upon which such fence lies or is rely upon the private property of the �structing the sar�e or causing the nd erected, except that adjoining writing that saici fence shall be their sa�_d properties. 4.13 LOCATION 213-1 213.06. suB�T� �s�crla� � ��r �ery fence, whensoever and howsoever constructed, shall be constxucted in a substantial maru�er and of a substantial materiAl, reasonably suitable for the purpose for which the fence is proposed to be used. �ery fence shall be maintained in a condition of reasonable repair and shall not by reason of age, decay, accident or otherwise be allowed to become and renain in a state of disrepair so as to be or tend to be a nuisance to the injury of the public or any abutting property. Any fence which is dangerous by reason of its �onstruction or state of disrepair or is otherwise injurious to puUlic safety, health or welfare is a nuisance; and any such fence which has beoame or t�ds to be a nuisance shal 1 upon order of a competent court be repaired or r�noved as necessary to abate the nuisance caused or tending to be caused thereby. 213.07. PQII�LTIFS Any violation of this Chapter is a misd�eanor and is subject to all penalties provided for such violations under the provisions of Chapter 901 of this Coc3e. '£� 213.07. ,_ •• �� • u � a a �a .�. : _ i�: � , ;'� _� . `. . ..:-.�. 1 � °�� 4.14 213-2 August I2, 1996 Roger Larson 1339 66th Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 To Whom It May Thi's letter is in ref requested by Carl and construct�d a fence a west side of my prope have no obje�tions to Sincerely, Lt�- Roger Larson a ence to the fence variance that is being argaret Christenson. The Christensons a height of 8' rather than 7' b�tween the y and the east side of their property. I t being 8' in height. 4.15 August 12, 1996 Betty �nn Addison 1315 66th Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is in reference to the fence varianc requested by Carl and Margaret Christenson. The question was placed on the boundary line between my property and the west side of the Christenson Christensons's are requesting that a variance be the fence to be at 8" 3" rather than 7'. I have being at 8' 3". ' Sincerely, `1`%� � Betty Ann Addison 4.76 e that is being fence in the east side of property. The granted to allow no objects to it ee :'� _ _ ,�.� ..'�r , � �R �j �1y _ _ ' . . . h���T +' �''' ' . � `` � r 'i'I�. y � �• . :�. . /'� � ;� F�� ��•� . •� : � � - 1.l, � (; '- � g� � e .� � �., w � ��: _ , � .� � . �'� , y.- �. � . .;''S.�' , 1y,,, , ' '� � ~ _;�. . �ft `�` > . t r y'', �� �'� �i'�� �. r' . . .. 4X '��r, ��s- �. „ . �. 3�!��Y�: d,�..j'� . .r �.'� �~�'�_� , ' " $�' .att� .... ` , . �;., y •��1.1. . . ,' . . r� +r. . ' 1 � • 's , . . � ♦ � . , ' . - �• VM�f.; � .r� '' �-,�*-�,4�" . ?I� , � < � . � � ' , � ? -L.� P�•� � � � • �� �i ��: � , A � � 'd•��v . , r�' �V�'�•(' .�4 '_�' +r � a.. - - f:: /M �. ' _ !: ,,. `� ��:, ��L .... �' f� .I � .. . .�•_� F'w' -). # li � .,3 . '� � `va.- � � � .�' L . . . � ` ` + . . , �.., ��� . {. - � - _ .� � � ��r', � i . � , <� r. . , . . - -- . •• * - - •s_. *i-„� .I . . __ `�� . �'�1' _ � !• � . + � . ��:=7 h• ' `� � '��'� ��i, _ � � , :�' _:_ _ J +� ` ��` ��� 1� �y �� i �'--.; � '' ,�,• , ,' •j` r ;, " .: , � � . .-��. ..,. . .- �. . r .:� � , �.: . +. . ,ti, � � � `�r! #�� -• x ''+'''�����'� � . f :t 1 �1 •` � . .:�st �... . .<. ; � � I i � r�- : � � . �:�:�' .: • . � ' ,' � , ; ;,,� . • � �' ,� . , �'t,�, � �•. "t' r `;' ;;, 1' ,, ', ' hj'M' 1 + . �� /��, ; � . � � �';� �'�' � , � � K � � �, . � . 'Y�+�,r' . ���6�� '+�.� j~' �i.'.�A.� ;.�� •R �MG` , r • � . ,i�'��"�"' � ,� , , �`'+w;;, . j• ; ., ... �;r� � � � r•. � o /. / � '` , . ( ��.: . . i �'t� ��� �� �� . , � �:. . F � € i �; ; � ,i 5 � ' � ; 1_ .. � . . ,' 4 � ' � ,.�1 p � ; . + � � i 'v' 9 � Ji � j � �. ?�� �! . �� � v' ' �l 4(��� i`1�� �„. 4 ��k �� �'�.� � F ` , :. , .,� ����r'f� ! ��� . .��^� � �� � � � . . . .. � �+ e� �' y. � �.1- . �f r. �^ . . . , L �w� ! � � • � �. �, . r y . . , ' � .t . '+ � � , '1�'K�•I'i �•' �, . � �1� � * � ..�,, t�i.w� _ � y I I� �.V i, � 1 , . � . .. . ' . . . r.,�� / , � , ' , �i': ,:, � .y � . a � :.y^' , \ �,' ' �— � �i;., - :-i` �,l `, r � ��' � : _ .^t-� ". �:.. !� ��":.'`.,` . . �._� �� I��� s�-.�Ft� � } , � • , ti .�> �+ :c-.. � 7^+�r �:...�d� � � � �': i. � ��. ,,,� � � 't o <=''.` �.c !s - ir, , t.' . , �,. .... -., 3 .� r �i , ,l T,. �.,�}> i ry'- . 1 �� + .� , � T . �!+ C � ' - . . ' 0. . .r � ♦ A � � ., � , � -. I�� �, .. ,� .r � �t, . r. � �� f�'RF�.� f� � fi roy`�+Ct /°�`�c`�*t',�� 4� D��. � r � ' � r °?',*c'�'Y�' f2-•'�"" �'�"" t: .'0�+�`��. •�, r . . . a1"• .. �� . .r K � � . �'+ � . tr�. r . � . . ,:.{ ��.' F;_ ♦ �i � >7 � � �<t 7� ��,���y E r/pJ � iR.'�"�'�' � ¢. � +� •S . �� {��.�;li� � ,n Y ....� M YR f.'�l H� . '���� � � a. J '. � .. 1� � .�.l� Y✓� - I �iC. ...°.�`� t �. . �� . � E ..ga.�:r, � � � ,._ ' 'ti.�„.,; _ , - .:.� s�—.__ r , i �+ 1 f µ� `�t, �� .� ..-�`,;_ i�i . � � � � � � ,: ,', �w � ti t� "' I � ! � • ' t t � ,�` �`� '"� , ,s,' �" � �` `+ . . � � �� �' , l `, � � � \ / M' � '� � , yy, , `��' ::'' � ~ �� • I 1, 4 4 , �� �;c i�d �� '�'� � � �Q '� � t ,; r � ; a �,. _ _ .. - � ;. �. �� r ' �� �.�� ,r; r��r�,� - : �3<v � � '� � --� � , � 1 � r x, � ���yt' ,,'� � �,� ,"�,, `, �� � I � �;+.w,`�' .. ��SF,� M°� �;�� ' �il � �� .. � �� .- � _ : � t t � W ,_ �� s ' ,� � ���� �: � "��►'�� ,� � ' +i�=r.� � � . -� 'n�' � ,�� � �'' � ,, � � � � - = - _ � � ��' - `,� -`:� � : - � - �- � - . � '�' - y � � � �; _� _ � .; '� �, - < .y � •�,;�_ ' . .. .�.,:4 - w, . ' i . _ � _ _. L.. sa.._.1�. 4 .. � �:: r _-. , _ ' � �� !1 u Y.-Y�I . � !� . _ . . C: I � I v t1 '�1� L • I3 � �� � � ��':. .���I ',�t.`S � F i. � � Y� �- �.i. �� �T '���: _ � �_,. �i �� -_�,,._ ' . ' ._ ( 1 � '� • I i' r ,'y'� . . t 1 � I 4� °s � ` _ —_ ,�{ � � � �t: � ;� . � �Jt , �� t� t ` ' 't " �� 1=� S• �," i «3 � � �. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETIIVG AUGUST 14 1996 PAGE 14 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRiED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING GLOSED AT 8:37 P.M. / Or. Vos stated he was surprised there was construction going on. In other case ere petitioners are in the process, they are not continuing construction. He did not h e a way to resolve. The existing is setback at 25 feet and 30 feet. If they move it b k, #he land owner to the no�th has no additional advantage but it is more costly to the ' y. He did not know how to resolve this. Mr. Kuechle stated he can understand why the property owner d s not like this project. Yet, the City owns the land and has certain rights to use it. did not think they were using it adversely. If the road existed legally, that is an iss that must be dealt with but it is not a part of the variance request. It seems that there ' sufficient hardship in that the buifding exists already and to ask that the entire buildin e moved seems out of place and could harm the property owner even more by movin ven clos�r to their property. He did not see that granting of the variance has an adv e effect. There does look like there is an altemative road so that is not issue here her. That part is not for this Commission to decide. He would recommend app�ova f the request. . .. Ms. Beaulieu stated there are fs considerations but we are not to take that into consideration for the public. Wh these are fiscal consideration of the City, that is our podcetbook This is an existing ndition and usually we go along with existing conditior�s. The complaint from the ne' bors seems to be mainly that the road is missing and it sounds like the City could that whether adding on to the wellhouse or not. This may be a lega! issue that this C mission cannot deal with. As the request stands, she would go along with it and re mmend approval. MOTION by . Beaulieu, seconded by Dr. Vos, ta recommend approval of Variance Request, V #96-18, by the City of Fridley, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 25 fe , and to reduce the side yard setback on a corner lot firom 35 feet to 30 f�et to allow e expansion of an existing wellhouse on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Central View Ma r, generally located at 7345 Highway 65 N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. PUBUC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A VARiANCE REQUEST VAR #96-19 BY CARL & MARGARET CHRlSTENSON: Per Section 205.04.06.A.(6) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to increase the height of a fence in the rear yard from 7 feet to 10 feet on Lo# 7, Dennis Addi#ion, the same being 1327 = 66th Avenue N.E. 4.20 APPEALS COMM(SS(OlV M�ETII�G. A PAGE IS MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, sec�nded by Dr_ Vos, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the publiclhearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL �OTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTiON CARRIED AND TH PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:42 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the rec 7 feet to 8 feet 3 inches. T. requested to the height of fe Also unusual about this requE the owner's physical health � form of physical contact due fences. This condition was inspection for a sub�tantial ac #he fence. Ms. McPherson stated the he It does not obstruct the neighl enough information about the E the adjacent praperty into tt�e � City has not received request; hardship related to a physicai of the site. Ms. McPherson stated the request as the stated hard: requested that if the petiti Commission table the requ stipulation: 1. Per Section 213.05 of that the adjacent prop� Dr. Vos stated the staff repo►t fence? �t is to incxease the height of a fence in the side yard from fence request is unusual in that typically variances are �s in the front yard as opposed to the side or rear yard. is that the petitioner has submitted a hardship related to idition which prohibits wearing clothing or receiving any the resulting pain. Building permits are not required for ind by the building inspection department during a final on to the dwelling. Again, the request is for a portion of �ht is not overly excessive from wha# is required by code. �rs site lines in terms of the front yzrd. Staff did not have evation differe�cs ur site line issues from the side yard of bject parcel to determine if the variance is warranted. The of this nature previously. The peti#ioner has requested a :ondition of the owner as opposed to a physical condition uest is unusual; however, staff recommends denial of the is not due to the physical condition of the land. Staff has r has additional information regarding the site lines, the for further staff analysis. Staff recommends the following City Code, the petitioner shall submit a letter in writing owner agrees to the location of the fence. the fence to the east was also 8 feet. Is this a new Ms_ McPherson stated this is n t a new fence. This was noted on the property survey as existing. The fence is on the rope�ty line. She was not sure whose fence it was. Dr. Vos stated, as he understan is because staff were not sure ds, the reason the variance request is from 7 feet to 10 feet of the height. 4.21 APPEALS COMMiSSION MEETING. AUGUST 14, 199G PAGE 16 Ms. McPherson stated that at the time of the notice, staff did not have the exact dimensions of the fence. At that time, staff over estimated the height. The exact height as it is built is 8 feet 3 inches and that is what the variance would be granted #o. Mr. Kuechle asked if the variance request would run for the life of the property or for the life of the fence. Ms. McPherson stated the variance would run for the lifie of the proper#y unless the Commission chose to stipulate othenNise. The variance could be conditioned that, if the fence were ever destroyed or damaged, any subsequent fence would need to meet the code requirement or request a new variance. Ms. Christenson stated she thought the Commission had the background as to why the request is bei�g made. Her husband's situation is unique and has necessitated them to create as much privacy as possible. This site allows privacy to the back. They seek fences to the side also for privacy. Her husband's condition is an extremely rare neurologic condition that does not allow him to sit, walk, stand or lay for any length of time. The house is ac�cessible to meet his needs and txeates a quality of li% for him. The fence is also necessary for the protection of the neignbors. She provided pictures that show the direction from the rooms looking into Ms. Addison's p�ope�ky to the west. She has a siudy and works there at night The neighbor to the west has no objections to the fence nor the neighbor to the east. . Dr. Vos asiced if the fence to the east was the same as to the west prope�ty line. Ms. Ch�is�enson stated the fience was replaced at approximately the same height. It was replaced to compliment the fence io the west_ MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to receive into the public record a letter from Betfiy Ann Addison and a letter from Roge� La�son both dated August 12, 1996. UPON A VO10E VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHtE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Dr. Vos asked if it was fair to say that the fence was not a continuing fence. Ms. Christenson stated, on the west side, yes. Mr. Joslin stated, when he first looked at it, the side fence was 8 feet high so he assumed that was the maximum height. He could �ot keep the height consistent because the land is somewhat sloping. 4.22 APPEA MM[SS[ T �1 T 14, 1996 PA Mr. Kuechle asked, if the Co mission put on a stipulation that this variance is to go with the life of the fence, is that problem. If the fence needs to be replaced or repaired, another variance would need to be requested. Ms. Christenson stated this Mr. Barsness stated he lived of the street and they cannot MOTION by Dr. Vos, acceptabJe. s the street. He talked with the neighbors on his side see the fence. by Ms. Beaulieu, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL �OTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTlON CARRIED A�ID TH PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:55 P.M. Dr. Vos stated he was in the eighborhood. Uniess you walk the fence all the way back to Rice Creek, you would nev r know it was 8 feet. He did not even notice the fence on the east side was 8 feet. He iked the stipulation that there be a lifetime to the variance because it reall�r is not a varian because of the condition� if the site. It is a variance for the owner. He wouid vote in vor with the stipulation. Ms. Beaulieu stated this is a un que hardship fo� the owners of the property. Although she has not heard this before, it is nderstandable. The request is not detrimental and looks att�active. She would approv with the stipulation. Mr. Kuechle agreed. The fen�e is well designed. it does not have a fortress look to it. MOTION by Dr. Vos, second d by Ms. BeauJieu, to recommer�d approval of Variance Request, VAR #96-19, by Carl nd Margaret Christenson to increase the height of a fence in the rear yard from 7 feet to feet 3 inches on Lot 7, Dennis Addition, the same being 1327 - 66th Avenue N.E., with the following stipulation: 1. If the fence needs to b� replaced o� repaired, the owner will need to comply with code requirements or r quest a variance. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MOTION CARRIED UNANII Ms. McPhe�son stated this '!NG AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE SLY. would be considered by the City Council on August 26. 4.23 CfI'Y 0F FRTDLEY PROJECT SUMMARY ' 4850 Main Street Si�n Variance _, .: . _ :. _._ _ __ _ _ _ ___ __ __ _ _ _ _ enda Item: A licant: Mu h''-Warehouse '' �ase Number: �AR #96=20 lication Date: Jul 19;; 1496' Staff Reviewer: Michele NlcPhe son Meeting Date: August 14, 1996 _ _ _ Au�ust 26, 1996 DESCRIPTION OF The petitioner requests that a building. If approved, the petiti the side of the recently constru SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Section 214.04.03 of the code Puhlic purpose served by this r� and to prevent signs which are nce be granted in order to allow a sign to be painted directly on a would paint a 360 sq. ft. company logo for Mutphy Warehouse on 178,000 sq, ft. warehouse building located at 4850 Main Street. any signs painted dire�tly on buildings. �n�nt is to provide improved aestherics from easily maintainable signs maintained on a regular basis. This request is unique in that the building is 693 ft. long and is adjacent te a residential district. It provides a very large mass adjacent o the street. A typical sign would not be in proportion with the size of the structure. The painted sign 'll have less impact on the a�jacent residential property to the east because the sign will not be internall illuminated and glaring at the residents. No variances are requested to increase the size of the sign. This is Murphy Warehause Comp y's second building. In 1995, Murphy Warehouse applied for and received a similar variance for a si to be painted directly on their first building. They are requesting this variance so that the two buildi gs will look the same aesthetically. APPEALS COMMISSION The Appeals Commission voted with the following stipulations: 1. Approval of the variance prE 2. The petitioner shall maintain C[TY COUNCIL RECO Staff recommends that the City TION: to recommend that the City Council approve the request the petitioner from installing a free-standing sign. sign in an attractrve manner. TION: concur with the Appeals Commission's action. 5.01 Staff Report VAR #96-20, 4850 Main Street N.E. Page 2 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: A variance to allow a sign painted directly on a building. Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: Size: Topography: F.gisting Vegetation: Eaisting �oning/Platteng: Availability of Municipal Utilities: Vehicular Access: Pedestrian Access: Engineering Issues: Site Planning Tssues: 4850 Main Street N.E. Lot 2, Block l, Glacier Pazk Addition and Part of Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision #79 10.57 acres Mostly flat, but sloping away from Main Street to the west. Typicai suburban; sod, trees, etc. M-2, Heavy Industrial; Glacier Fark Addition, Auditor's Subdivision #79, 1941 Connected � Main Street Easement obtained for off-street bikeway; however, it has not been constructed. N/A 5.02 Staff Report VAR #96-20, 4850 Main Street N.E. Page 3 DEVELOPMENT SITE: WEST: Zoning: SOLTTH: Zoning: EAST: Zoning: NORTH: PROPERTY ffiSTORY: Zoning I.ocated on the subject parcet is a 256 ft. a lot split was approved by the City Cou currently painted grey and green. ADJACENT SITES M-2, Heavy Industrial M-2, Heavy Industrial R 1, Single Family M-2, Heavy Industrial Land Use: Railroad Yard Land Use: Industrial Land Use: Residential Land Use: Vacant 693 ft. wa.rehouse building. The building was conshucted in 1994 after The building is conskructed of pre-cast concrete tip up panels and is The proposed sign is 10 ft. high by 36 ft. long; 360 sq. ft. in area. The maximum area allowed by code is 394 sq. ft. The sign is proposed to be the Murph Wazehouse logo, that of a forklift with the word "Murphy". The logo will be painted a medium green color. Request Analysis: Prior to the g�ting of a variance �om a the applicant: A That there are exceptional or that do not apply generally to provisions of the sign code, ihe following conditions must be met by �dinary circumstances applicable to the property or to the intendeti use property in the same vicinity in district. The property is zone M-2, Heavy Industrial. The building is 693 ft. long parallel to Main Stieet. The City has a number of ind�strial buildin� in the city. Several are of similar size; however, they vary in design. The structure at 8290 Main Street is ned similarly and has a similar length. However, the use of the building is multi-tenant; therefore, there aze a number of smaller individual tenant signs located on the facade of the building. The facade is also brok up by the individual tenant doors. The structure is not located adjacent to a residential district. The pro does have a free-standing identification sign. A second similaz sized and zoned from the, �ubject pazcel as it is loc via the � of landscaping and fe� �:-c� ;ture is located at 8150 Main Street. Again, that property is different within the heart of the City's industrial district and is heavily screened . The property also has a small free-standing identification sign. The 5.03 Stati Report VAR #96-20, 4850 Main Street N.E. �e 4 subject parcel is unique because of the residential zoning directly to the east which will be impacted by the proposed sign. : C. L7 That the variance is necessary for the presetvation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in this same vicinity and district, but which is denied to the property in question. Denying the variance request would require petitioner to install a typical cabinet sign or individual letters which are either illuminated or non-illuminated. Due to the size of the building, it may be difficult to fabricate such letters to be in proportion with the structure and functionally attach them to the side of the structure. The use of painted supergraphics provides a signage alternative which can be in proportion with the structure and eliminate difficulty of maintaining individual letters or cabinet signs. That the strict application of the chapter would constitute an unnecessary hardship. Strict application of the chapter would not eliminate signage options for the petitioner. The petitioner would have the option of installing other styles of signage. That the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare or detrimental to the property in the vicinity or district in which the property is located. Granting the variance would not be detrimental to adjacent properties. In fact, granting the variance may lessen the impact of the petitione�'s signage on the adjacent residential district to the east. With a painted sign there is no option for illumination; therefore, light will not spill onto the adjacent properties. Should the variance be granted, the Appeals Commission and City Council may want to include a stipulation regarding maintenance of the sign. This is Murphy Warehouse Company's second building. In 1995, Murphy Warehouse applied for and received a similar variance for a sign to be painted directly on their first building. They are requesting this variance so that the two buildings will look the same aesthetically. RECOMMENDATION: The request is for an unusual property, unusual due to its location adjacent to a residential district. Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission's action to approve the request with the following stipulations: l. Approval of the variance precludes the petitioner from installing a free-standing sign. 2. The petitioner shall maintain the sign in an attractive manner. Comprehensive Planning Issues: Public Hearing Comments: The Zonir�g & Comprehensive Plans are consistent in this location. There were no public comments. 5.04 ��:�����\� �; .���, � �•�,,,•, I�, ■ �� Z �a a i�r O � U �. 0 � � z '� ��� a _ �� = .��� � a�� � '� --' • � �, � a�, � � c rn 'v� � � .�: �, -W,-� : (/) _ z _ _ .,���a,� . c.Qfl t!7 M �� " m y Y , � r -S M � � i >''.' � � 5.06 � � �� � � � :�- � VA ��96-20 Mu phy Ware ouse M � � a. � O o ��� I' � � 'I . . . . �.:. " .5(1d0 � � .,_ ,. � . � �.,�....� ti �� ae �S l =�— ✓�.. _ - . ,,;., ,,,�, �:�, ,�,u,�.n:w:: -.;��.,,��v .....ax. ..�,..,.. � ;s i i � }iu I I �__ .=: __ -..:� _; __, E�� -� iy �> �r° guui( :3d s'.!_91IIIIl ' ; J _�.__611111( _ � k!�l 3, � �� � %� � i ---� _ ' f ----=i ; g�; �_ - . ; ���� J'lll l � , (Ill�i II�I , IIIII i �i, 4� a Z o-- — — ; —� _ : � �— � � — �� — - ' o— .._.. —;,� � �. � TF ( , A N e � �� {� ?: �— � ' ` � � — — : � � � � � ^ �� � V— � � t — — �a I � �' '� ; � S � o----: (—� j — =i I t _'_; 1 t �--��' � `�.....�.��.�,�../ I I i � � i I i I i I i I i I i I E I : I � I ' �! b I f �: � i; � �: � �: �: I •. I A � d � �� VAR ��96-20 siiouvn��u �vi��i�K�?hy Warehouse r�os�,����W • Anaie� bV I I 3SflOH3dVM AHdHf1W ,.., , „ „ , y � �v z < � `''a a'� � ��' � � � € �,. 5.07 N � �� J \_ APPEALS COMMISSION MEET[NG, AUGUST 14, 1996 PAGE IS 6. PUBLIC HEARlNG: CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #96-20, BY MURPHY WAREHOUSE COMPANY: Per Section 214.04.03 of the Fridley City Code, to allow a sign painted directly on a building, on all of.Lot 2, Btock 1, Glacier Park Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, generally located at 4850 Main Street iV.E. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VO10E VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECU�RED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:57 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the variance request is by Murphy Warehouse for property at 4850 Main Street which is the north portion of a parcei generally iocated at 49th and Main Street. The Commission reviewed a similar request from the same petitioner last yea►�. This request is to allow a sign painted directly onto the side of the building to allow painting of a 360 square foot company togo for a second warehouse. The building is 693 feet long and has a fairly large presence towards the street. A#ypical sign would not be in proportion to a struc#ure of this size. This varia�ce request has less impact on the acljacent residential properties because it is not an intemally illuminated sign and nat closely adjacent to the public right-of-way. This variar�ce is being requested so the buildings match and are symmetrical to each other and due to the size of the structu�e itself. Ms. McPherson sta#ed staff recommends appraval witn finro stipulations: 1. Approval of the variance precludes the peti#ioner from installing a freestanding sign. 2. The petitioner shall maintain the sign in an attractive manner. Mr. Kuechle asked if this request was the same as the previous request. Ms. McPherson stated yes. Mr. Murphy stated he is the owne� and CEO of Murphy Warehouse. He feit staff presented the information adequately. Dr. Vos asked if he had any concerns about the stipulations. � 5.08 APPEALS COMM[SSiON M�ETING, AUGUST 14. 1996 PAGE Mr. Mu�phy stated he had n concerns. !f this is approved, the two buildings wili look identical. They are sensitive t the fact fhat they have residents across the street and they are trying to maintain the pro erty appropriately. Dr. Vos asked if this was Mr. Murphy stated, yes. Th� They are the only tenants as MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, for their use. is no need for any other signage to be on the building. by Dr. Vos, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL �OTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND TH PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:02 P.M. Dr. Vos stated the request se ms like the same request as last year. It was reasonable then and is reasonable now. t is reasonable for that size of building. NiOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, s conded by Dr. i%s; ta �ecommend approval of Variance Request, �/AR #96-20, by Mu hy Warehouse Company to atlaw a sign painted directly on a building, on a!i of Lot 2, Bl 1, Glacier Park Addition, according tc the recorded plat � thereof, Anoka County, Minn sota, generaliy located at 4850 Main Street N.E., with the foliowing stipulations: 1. Approval of the 2. The petitioner shall precludes the petitioner from installing a freestanding sign. in the sign in an attractive manner. UPON A VO10E VOTE, ALL V�TING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIM USLY. Ms. McPherson stated this 7 C� would be considered by the City Council on U V, BY TIM CHIES: � " Per Section 205.07.03. D).(4).(b) of the Fridley=Zoning Code, to reduce the rear yard setback for an a ssory structuce-�double-fronted lot from 35 feet to 7 feet on Lot 1, Block 2, N gels ood(ands, generally add�essed as 7595 Able Street N.E.; from 3� feet to eet on Lot 2, Block 2, Nagels Woodlands, generally addressed as Ab e Streef N.E.; from 35 feet to 15 feet on Lot 3, Block 2, Nagels odlands, gen rally add�essed as 7565 Able Street N.E.; from 35 feet to eet on Lot 4, Block , Nagels Woodlands, generally addressed as 7553 Able 5.09 DATE: August TO: William FROM: Barbara Grant F� SUBJECT: 218-5 Backaround This property is located on th building was originally constr garage connected to the horr convert the existing structure denied. Since then the propE units. City records indicate tt and the owners have done lit photographs of the property � Current Status In June of this year rental ins of the property as required ur one of the units was found to second unit did not allow the evidence, the Fire Departmer prevent occupancy. On July The Chief Building Official, Ci inspection of the property on , copy of the inspection�`reports MEM�RA,NDUM HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1996 ns, City Manager��� y, Community Development Director ius, Housing Coordinator Ordering Demolition of Hazardous 8uilding at Place N.E. south side of 57th Place, adjacent tb the tire store. The :ted in 1952 as a single family dwelling with a two car by a breezeway. In 1973 the owner attempted to ito office space, however his variance request was y has been partitioned into finro separate rental dwelling t the property has had a long history of code violations � to correct the problems. A map and several ; attached. :ctors from the Fire Department conducted an inspection er the rental maintenance code. During the inspection, e vacant and severely damaged. The tenant in the spectors into his apartment. Based on the inspection declared the building unfit for habitation and posted it to 1996 the building was vacated by the remaining tenant. �de Enforcement Officer and Fire Marshall conducted an )uly 3, 1996, after consulting with the City Attomey. A are attached. In the last severaf weeks the Code s.� � Page 2 Enforcement Officer has ordered the removal of a junk car and numerous bags of garbage which were left on the front porch. Since the owners did not respond, the items were removed and the costs will be assessed against the property. Property Ownershie At this point it is unclear who actually owns the property. The City's records show that the property was sold on a Contract for Deed by Gerald L. Gage of isle, Minnesota to Henry and Ftoselyn Berkholtz, 218 57th Place. None of our attempts to contact either party have been successful. The matter is further complicated by a lien that was filed last year by Siwek Lumber. On October 27, 1995 the property was put up for auction via a sheriff's sale. All parties with an interest in the property will be served with the appropriate legal notices. Hazardous Buildinq Statutes Under State law, the City can order the removal or repair of "hazardous" buildings. The process works as follows: 1) Council adopts resolutio� ordering the demolition ar repair of the property. Resolution identifies the substandard conditions of the property and allows the owner to correct/demolish the structure within 20 days (September 15, 1995). The resolution goes on to describe the actions the Council will take if the owner fails to respond. 2) Owner/s of record are notified of the Council's order. 31 If the owner does not respond by the deadline and take action, the City would have to go court to enforce its order. If the issue is not contested by the owner, the Court can issue an order to enforce the City's resolution. The judge will then set a date upon which time the City can proceed with the demofition. 4) Demolition occurs and costs are then assessed against the property The City Attorney has prepared a resofution ordering the demolition of the building which is attached. Recommendation Staff recommends that the C+ty Council approve the attached resolution ordering the demoJition of 2i8 - 57th Place N.E. M-96-�395 6.�2 OS/22/96 11:46 $16124901580 HOLSTAD A�� LRSN �002/0�6 RESOLUTION ORDERING THE REMOVAL OR REPAIR OF A HAZARDOUS BUIL ING, PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 453, LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Legally described as Lots 5 and 6, Biock 8, City View, Anoka County, as on file and of record in the County Recorder's office of said County. TO: Gerald L. Gag�, Henr� F. and Roselyn BerkhoJz, and any tenants, occupants or any other persons claiming �n interest in the above-described premises 1. Pursuant to M�nnesota Statutes, Section 463.15 to 463.61 the Council of the City of Fridley, havin� duly considered the matter, finds the above-described building to be a hazardous �uilding for the following reasons: Having received nu disrepair and citizen cails and complaints concerning the apparent of the above-described premises, the City of Fridley dispatched to fiha± location the Chief Building Official of the City, who conducted an inspection of th� premises observaiions of the prem reference, and shall be July 3, 1996, and submitted to the City a report of his , which report is attached hereto, incorporated by dered among the fiindings of the City Council in its determination of the matter� In particular, the defects within the premises that were expressly found to violate City, include, but are not lim (a) (b) (c) ��) lnadequa structure. lmproper Stairway ' req u i remE 1) Maxi 2) Minir 3) Minir 4) Minir Improper , provisions of the State Building Code, as adopted by this to the following: or no footings and foundation around the perimeter of the �sts, beams, and footing pads to support the floor. the basement does not meet the minimum building code ts: um rise o�f 8 inches. �m run of 9 inches. am headroom of 80 inches. am widtt� of 36 inches. id unsafe handrail for the basement stairway. 6.03 �8/22/96 11:47 $16124901580 HOLSTAD �ND LRSN � ad�ippg (e) No guardraif on the open sides of the basement stairway - minimum height of 36 inches and a maximum opening between raiis of not more than 4 inches on center. (f) No certification on the two gas furnaces and flu size. (g) No exterior source of combustion air to both furnace rooms. (h) Unsecured gas piping and improper installed gas shut-offs. (i) No gas provided to the dwelfing. (j) No hot water provided. (k) No heating system capable of maintaining a temperature ofi 70 degrees. (l) Building main sew�r system needs repair, and currently results in raw sewage regularly being dumped into the building. (m) Building waste needs to be secured and vented with proper hangers. (n) Damaged plumbing. (o) Broken and damaged windows. (p) Holes in interior walls. (q) lJnclosed openings in the foundation rim joists. (r) Uncaulked exterior openings (siding and soffit). (s) No back flow preventers at laundry tub, and a# other hose connections. (t) Damagec! wiring and light fixtures need repair and wire needs to be secure per code. (u) Expo�ed electric wires. (v) Smoke detectors not provided in each ievel of the dwelling and in every sleeping room. (w) Roof rafters at south end of the building need repair. Roof must s�pport a minimum of 50 pounds per square foot. (x) No building address numbers. (y) Buifding not secure from trespass. (z) Rodents and other vermin are present in the building and need to be exterminated by licensed contractor. (aa) Improper ceiling height in habitable rooms. (bb) Improper storage of and clearance to combustibles from 8-vent through roof, south apartment furnace. (cc) No firestop above light fixture in south apartment. (dd) Improper ceiling insulation in south apartment. 2. The council further orders that unless such corrective action is taken or an answer is served upon the City of Fridley and filed in the office of the Clerk of District Court of Anoka County, Minnesota within 20 days from the date of the service of this order, a motion for summary enforcement of this order will be made to the District �� µ Court of Anoka County. Enforcement of this order shall include, 'sn the C�ty's discretion, the option of razing the s#ructure. The Council orders that al) personal property or 6.04 OS/22/96 11:47 $16124901580 HOLSTAD AND LRSN � 004/006 fixtures that may unreaso ably interfere with the razing and removal of the building shall be removed within 20 days, and if not so removed by the owner, and the City then determines io raze the st cture, thE City of Fridley may remove and sell such personal property or fiixtures at publi auction in accordance with law. 3. The council further orders that if the city is compefled to take any corrective action herein, II necessary costs expended by the city will be assessed against the real estate con erned and collected in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 463.22. 4. The mayor, lerk, city attorney and other officers and employees of the city are authorized and d rected to take such action, prepare, sign and serve such papers as are necessary to comply with this order and to assess the costs thereof against the reaf estaie des ribed above fior collection along with taxes. Adopted by the City Council this � day of , 19 City C1erk 6.05 Mayor ,G �� .,. .. I3UiLDING (NSPEC'CION DIV(SION M�MO MEMO TO: Fiie MEMO FROM: MEMO DATE: REGARDING: Ron Julkowski, July 8, 1996 Chief Building Official 218 57 Place NE (Hazardous Building) On July 3, 1996, an inspection was conducted of the above address to determine whether or not the building meet the minimum building code standards for occupancy. Chapter 1, Section 102, of the 1994 Uniform Building Code, states in part that all unsafe buildings or structures regulated by this Code, that constitute a hazard to the safery, health,- or public welfare by reason of undequate maintenance, dilapidation, fire hazard, damage or abandonment shall be deemed an unsafe structure. AlI such unsafe buildings are hereby declared to be a public nuisance and shall be abated by repair or demoliiion. • The following items must be repaired before occupancy is granted; 1) Provid� foatings and foundation around the perimeter of the structure. 2) Provide proper post, beams, and footing pads to support the floor. . 3) Install a stairway to the basement ihat meets the minimum building code requirements; a) l�ia�cimum rise of S inches. 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) b) Minimum run of 9 inches. • c) Minimum headroom of 80 inches. d) Minimum width of 36 inches. � Provide an approved handrail for the basement stairway. Provide a guardrail on the open sides of the basement stairway - minimum height oi 36 inches and a malcimum opening betyveen rails of not more than 4 inches on center. Obtain certification on the two gas furnaces and flue size. Provide combustion air to both furnace rooms. Secure gas piping and provide proper shut-offs. Provide gas to the dwelling. Provide hot water. Provide a heating system capable of maintaining a temperature of 70 degrees Repair building main sewer system. Secure building waste and vent with proper hangers. Repair all damaged plumbing. Repair or replace all broken and damaged windows_ ;a.�,�epair all ho(es in the interior walls. s.�s Memc� to f�ilc P.e: 218 S7 Place N1� July 8, 1996 17) 18) 19) 20) 21) 22) 23) 24) 25) 26) 27) 28) 29) 30) Close all openings in tt Caulk all exterior open Provide back flow prev Repair all damaged wir Cover exposed electric Provide smoke detector Repair roof rafters at s pounds per square foot. Provide building addres Secure building from tr Extermination of roden � Minimum ceiling heigh Provide 1 inch clearan furnace. Firestop above Iight fix Insulate ceiling in south foundation and rim joist_ ;s (siding and soffit). ters at Iaundry tub, and at other hose connections. ;, light fixtures, and secure wire per code. in each level of the dwelling and in every sleeping room. ith end of the building. Roof must support a minimum of 50 numbers. � by a licensed contractor. of any habitable room shall be 7 feet 6 inches. : to combustibles from B-vent through roof, south apartment ire in south apartment. apartment to a miniinum of R-44. Permits must be obtained befor�commencement of repair work. Building repairs wiIl require building plans to be submitted d a completion date stated. RJ/mh CC: Barbara Dac�, Comm Grant Fernelius, Hoi Fritz Knaak, Fridley Development Direct�r Coordinator Attomey s.�% � DATE: July 9; 1996 TO: FILE 1VV1tEMORAN�UM PLANNING DI'�ISION FROM: Kurt Jensen-Schneider, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Exterior Code Enforcement Viotations at 218 - 57th Piace N.E. A July 3, 1996, site inspection.of 218 - 57th Place N.E. revealed outside storage, junk vehicle, wead, and miscellaneous refuse code vialations. Specifcally, there were materials such as four tires w�th rims, miscepaneous car parts on the ground, refuse % and litter throughout the property, in#erior chairs on the front fawn, 50+ bags of refuse on and around the porch, a broken window with glass on the ground, a junk vehicle = (license 687-LAC), uncut grass (approximately 12 inches hign), dirt driveway, and a 10 ft. by 20 ft. scrap lumber and materials. - - Upon conducting this inspection, the property owner will be notified of: 1. lmproper refuse storage violation 2. Improper outside storage violation 3. Weed ordinance violation 4. Junk vehicle ordinance violation It should also be noted that the building at this time has been posted unfit for human habitation by the Fridley Fire Department Rental lnspection Division. KJS:Is cc: j�rant Fernelius, Housing Coordinator CEM-96-18 � 4 � �� �'� �p ,¢y�, � M'� S�+%�t } Y l �t � �%w'i�r ~ ��+� d" � I { �.sti' "+� fi:;� i � . �, �� � 3�, .v t'`!`�`�r,,,,..�r,�+�.�,. C fit� f 'l : ".,' . �� � �".7.�y1 P4 „r4k� ":jF y�Y. 1 . s`� � Yj�.`i t. r }, �%�. -�`a �r :q�'.t . . � . • ;f <;?�': , . . . � ,} '�1 ���,.q�tir� •'4Y , . Y #' �� ..,�� � " � � '� � h .;,! �. "$ ��� .i1 ��S _ L Y ' F ' � T �1 t �y,. �• S' �� �' � 7 i� ^'ti �y_'jriA 4� A'.� 4 t! .' ��i �''C;�x 5�' �+�F'• r+ _ '�i .. �.5:y�.,- ;'' _ � � � �' � � ; e� ,� � �.;X �, . _ v t � � P' v '� . � .�, ; � x � � ' ,. 't ti, i�. -. q , �.� r,.• '' � , : `�` s tr � . � ,�,�` • r :;,- �x. .� r �?c e _` ' � � . � . � + � � ��`b "�-� �".;� � 3 _ t ' f x � � ,�_ ,� � ' � ( � ., � �` �� � ��� �� �� � � �� � � ;��� � �,_� 'n `°.r =�nA�'' � .. _ '$� +� = '" � , -" �= ` � ., '�„' �� N '. = t� '�F � �" � r . *,p v? a;l`S i*. � '`=� ' �.y` �` � ... � rJ32- � `.'at�`r,� _.$i�.� .. � �.. � �._ �. � - -° . . -�.. _ _ � �� � �� �����' %� _ _ � � = : � � �� � `� ;i`r� �o-..t� �w, t '�.�.+ - 4 - ,. � � ( � � } � t �'°' � � , y �y` T �. ,� '"+� ` q i �Q��`�� .� � , . . ,x� � � � ' � f� k 3 �'F '3 " r '�.L*. � �, � .R 3 s ::.i��� 'i- �' .�rf . � .. � � :, �:c � � f � �., � � c .4 � � � � � �_�. _. r . fy. .s .� y i e I� i ArY � .. Y S •9 . � � . � 1 =� � � � t �q � t � � . . � � � r t ,�,c rf i �� � �di ♦ � � � ` � . , , . i., � '��_ � y � .]� � .�.. �.t.._... y:� �.l7 � ' � , _ � �.,. ; qq�� '� � . -- . _ , . s. f( � g" :� � t `� „x�5 � , .h'„t�'�' � t � � k`.« i � • L .i� ' !''� �� � `� r � � , �' � �tC� a,y -. f S1 . \ 7 � � _� „i 3 s v ,�.j� j : c -q� S .. • � _ � . �s�-. � -�"`}� >% `�� �R,,cr,j' �.d�.. # ` #,.�r�e . J �. �; r .; 'e � r Y �t; �. y - 1 4 4� L �� �:i*LR�4' ��! F � S ' b '� Y � r a' i 4d`rt+ st ,, Y� ' y��"4r x G " .�ih� 5''tcYd��#' �` - � `}`� ; � . ' • -� �..�� 7 p�� 4 �' ,i y� ' i _ , �'� �'-�`; � z�" b � -� � �. ' �` , ���� � � _ 1 i � � �, '+ �'� � ° � i���� �� �,`��`y�?-�°a�' ����' �'t '` �%� * ?s�ti �� �, t ��'� `5��' r �� � � ,��` gy� y;-� � � ..' � � �..P 31�4'a� F� �"'y� y.�,�,Y`_3�'� 1 r � Z,�.•. �,f+'., p 4: �D' � , h . � � � � .'�'i}M� v'Fi � i� ryMi � �1�.�r� �, i!t � } �.�":� � �U�h�i¢�y . KS v s; `;;_"iy � fi f� � Ip � . £�'' � �� t;-; '� y' � �>�&,�,��'�� 1 ,`.�t. �+r . � + � '�c, 5� �, �ta� y�.��.;. 't P�.��J'�^, '' y . .. I �!¢ � � "� , � �,�1' 4 � y :N ` .y. �� �Y ��'.Yp'� }x1i '. 'i� i�' C .��' 2�` '9 � - i +�"'".I L•F � ^ �g._ _ � � =�f � �r t '�� _Y' .� F �T t,,� �..►". �'�"���a�.�� .. �� � �� � r . � � � � y� � �'� ,� ,' <�v,y�, ��0 .w...�.ii.5. . � ► y .. �,.Y� � � � � ';; � � ..�.:,t,:a.ad�.r.�:ir��� ,� �'> x � , t, . , _ ' �. ;� � e R'� � y .,.. x � � `'; ¢ i�, x./�'4' .� . � — Li`'"�� '���� � . � , � _. . r.. _, y�^- „_ _ �t ��� .� t� S�. . � . j i.,- ..''.,��, �� X. i � �'i�� �1 � f � i f��' � �rs ? � _ + _ t,�::s. ' ��'"'Y �,�=�`'?<,- . _�,��, � -� , '�3° ��� �� �r s r -r-?, L '��°� ��'- � � � � �� : � . � ��� � � j �� � � � � ��� ��� � ,r:,,� s� �; k ;,. �,`� ..T'w < �3 �- .��{`� 9!► " , v� +`..�F"#i 'F'�; ��t _ . . f� .. . .. � " ,. �..{ ?t. � . . .... . � . . . . �� F �� ' •., � . # I :s ��'g ���, � . � �. • ' � . .. �* ' � �,; ^ .. ��� .. - ..`�....,.�-... � . �,;�. , � r "`- t ���_ � •� `� _ . . 4�� . � ey r . . . , . 'r"" � 7F '� � � ♦ ` � � �1Y y �� x. f, Ki �9"�, ' ,/ r� t F� ��TY 4� dr ' �.s ` .a +:: ; � �.. t �.„ - P .�t �?;� � �' ?'�r #:. �'"`rv, � t ,'; a:�_' i. � 4 �• . 1s,t.. �+� � '.��� .r ���% �� d�' . �`�` � ;'•-;�,� ry;:�:: �;`-�: ' `�:'' ' �c� ; . d� - . _ �,:' �,."�'�` 1 F ?�,�5� ��F � � A�''ii�".�Y�:� `oo--" ��:��`Y - .'�;'�; . � ri ! � i • +c.,�, r't'.,��,� -�_1 , i t1''i. d !� It: '. . � , i a.pY�-`. `�� . ; � _.. . a �,i .,� � �:t ..�.��` �s ,�j,.3...+sSti 'r"',��i t� T"��i ,:.� - L�.., � ; , � �.. �� n . :,� �� �.Y', ■ A .. f 4 ti � +�• . . . M'',� �i ' . . a � ✓� Y r � .. ;,�/ �ty.. l�A(� f y i . : • • � t A �l�N , 1��A �. t: r �f �cp k . � • I •c`fy`'} �i., � ..� . � �.�� a - , 't`� ' � A i� .� � +tC • ^ a • Y � l( 1 ' �qllj�. . �/ , `� � . , � • ��� •I r�� � `\ � �`'iA\ • . �� � �• !+ / • i -� � �i W � '.� ,,. �� ��( VC �.���y�«�� ; f.��c 1 '�� ' ����' V~- „`�+ia•p���Cl •-l� �r� .� , . i a•�� �- .. _ -�. ._ �.-1-'�-r�+Tfv'^'•'3w'T._ .._. _ . - - ' ������� �..�..r � ' . . , I �t:..t �' v1 •����"�_'�.L:l� � i- �-- � . � __... ,..�-F�--,n 6�_<,.-,• � , / �� C�'e:%.'.::�.:� '� i � _ � ■_—�- ' % I ` ►: .: ' � _ - - c�rca.� � - ' � � � �! w , �� �;�,. _ - ; :, t �: � •c= '� �r� � � _r -: •' ��' � � r - - t ° � L � -I � ti,. ! � � � � c � ` � � .�� � � �K l { : �-� i t ' . � , �� � � � �: ` +; ^m.� . �-�- i �•'4+.r' s . R � . , r ' . ,��y.r� � ...,� � ' . . . �f'�G .-. � "� , . � r . � � , . . � 1 `�:�-+ � . .M � � . . - ����� . " . . . �(�t+• .r - � l� � � . � � y .. _ . � . � .. y _ K.: � '�'�jy� �^�� '� �. � -C'. • . . . ' _�s,. �'Ab-. '� �4.�Y (•_. . � .� � �� " . . +- _ - , ,,,,e _ �,�. `` �`_"��._�,"^_� Y���n-� _lv ` � � ` . ,�' '�zta�is��i-`�+--�'°w_ .r,�'�..�s�,� «'.:*�".� - s 3, �s. � �,�1. � -?!ra�°',`^�° � „� ♦ • ..� .. 1 _ . . . . y: . �. . +a.iti� -ir. � _ .. . . ���i1 ,� �-.�, _ . .. ' . . . _ �. . . . . �. _ _ _ ~ . -'--� . '. ' � . . F. . . -- _ :`� � i�: .. • .. . . . . = `� ijYi�,;� .�,.��"� � � = � �� � _ ..� i t'��� `r,�. � �. - --�, � ; � � . � �� ; . , � �. . ��'� ' a.� � ., ; �_� � _ ` _ •r�._ s,, , , . .�� '�a�� ,; - � . 1r -��-��.__`� � � � , . � � , ;,; _ �'� `•� s:; � ,:, . � — _ � . , `y �" / A � � 'r `J r rt� � � y� 1' •• �:,".,i - �. y y r ��� ' �i - - � • ••��'�i.e �.a!T�ia �r'Qi I' .,.�.-�.. � � � y�� � ',/�p� 't•�,,s��? � ; ' � �e`���,� '��''� �1, . .� w � . s�� i., � �i , i�S t a•. L' � /. � � r -:,.^' � �w � •,,o, �� ti `'. � . . j�l �� • ' , -'�'f .nw. �`a . . ��. � �e ,�. •+ .`.. .�< - - - _�_::..:, _ . � ,�� R• ' , �. � . � 1 � , _ r♦ . � � � � `' � r.. F� � . .. �� .,... �� � 1 P � �::,� • • � . . ��1.` aai� �� �_� . � _ � . - _. _: � , .. ��.. °. r� i �■!�'+ '`� ' �►�' ! , �. `✓� �-''`� � `�`` " _ . • .;: � ? ' `� :�..�� � � ��' � 'r r `� ��t� � �_ _ � ��` ;�` �; � f . . � � ' t°'°^-� .�- '-r�-'' vi�i � . , I � � - , , �. � .r-.�- : �-• . . ,�ti, t;r . `~ " , i^ . ` • \ — ' ,��y "!. ' ��. ' . •�� �.I�J `�, � � ,•\� . I I � � � ,�j'-�" •/•, . � �1 _ � � • • �"'1�. . : � � Y . + 4� ._ . ;'�i . . , . . ,I,�,� .,.�` � • � , ,:it..;"i��`� � ;/ ; ;�y.,, '� - L, r , d�`, ��r'�! �� . . tiVti , �� �� . t �., � � � )��� • . t�/"�Y:� . /,'. ..�,. :. � . ' ..N�\•.�•y..� . —� . . �' . . . _;� , �' . �l ' `.L—� . . . . . . . ., - S S * - � . `'. { .> . ,�{j' � � .,�„' - ,,f*��'�-�b � � � ... R � �w,�1 y. ..�+'- ' `� w, � � =� � � � � . ~'�� � � . / - � - - � � ' " �- r. til� -�Ilfirii �' �'.�_=����,::..t.�J'� � � "��:�a ' ;t: . �� — _ \ _ .., =1 "' i i ' � � �'= ''� ~� ..e� ` � 4-.., � � � _. � z -va� � ° � f �� . �- �i'_ `• � i / A �; �: y �'_ v ' �. �-.� ���� � �i. �.� , ��. � `' � �. t � � �;�� t' � �� r '� ' � .:, , �� " °`�'�'• ` �'� ! � "� ` ': , . t� • ,!,.�.' r � .�, F � .� �� �:,_� - �`� � .�. ,� F=,• ' ' '� -. !- � . n �,� �•�•_. �- . : ,- .�� :� �-�'�'' .s� . '_ •� a .. +s ° `, �� �•. . b . = �:� '� i�.. . . '� � ' ��.r. � . . `. . . . . ' . � �f� ♦• �• t � ,�I l : � �i•,,' .. - . �.. . . .•��". `• ' �.:- ��' , v; l �....�.r:�01i . � l.' �;, V . L-� �. � i • .� ' �- ��.� - [ � � � �� �w •t/ � �✓p�r. , „f4Y'� , �� t . i � _ . "� ' ���1��+'_. a.� � � t — . r�, � . �- � _ � - - �'y►'��'�".. ' - �c: — _ �yu� S [�,�_�l , . ` - - `i \� �' � - — S . } � � � V \�l_;, �� ��� ��� . .., � .!y � A ' _ Js..- �• .. .�� •. i� -� � � �,� � T � j...�� ` �1�.�.: s "{' 7.:s���; �-° �,:�. ,. � „� <fi -.+� �, ""=--'"�. L _ .� ��-T,f��: ���'''�."'F� ' ��-. , . .:'ti. �''�..� +v-� • �a� ��� � ^"�R t�d�� A�sS��•,•�f"-`^f�y-_••�,`�..� >i�- - �' . ' �"fa. }S A � : � -.TT 7't K.::� . .�. .. `� � � � �-d��l� +• �. �� z..�� �:�`�•�.�^di �.�, Y ^ i-�� y G' ye, 1� � .�� - Y .�. Lti/r - 1 i 'fi�.A`"�,� _ .wyi�'�v fY. _�1 e::is—:� _...."':s , ..�t ._ _:� � . .._ �'.-;�+-'L.�...---� . y ±. • ' .' . ' 1 'V ��, . . . ' f K. ..� �i{ ar . , , . . '.j. ,Y', j _ . . `� . ` . - ' �f ! f . . • . . . . S• . . `q' . pr L . - - �.' . r ''�' D - � . . � . . ', . .•; . �.' !'.'. L 1 � :� .�-,� ' `� : . . . y 7 y i .• . - � � �1��.� �.F 11� I � � , � �A• . !� . .. •/ . � � �,/ \' �`{����. ���/ � . . f � ,� . . ♦�:b . r! 1.[" , ,�,, .•i'��,�! s +��., �� �� i � , . ::1• �G��1�4 �' �r:� �'� �C f' �•i v, ' " ` ` - f ,�; �,r�y�t� 'i �`' 3 j ' � � � �; ; ' ,� • . , {t}y • ti . . . .. : . . +► � ��r � Y4 • t . , a / �, .n� q� i r � � �! • � ' f �_ , , t .� ,.t � � � . r 4 1 { '1 � 1 � .� � ' � `�� r �Y (}�� �� (,�i'� r '' ' '�, y 1 ���x��i � 'A� it , � � � •~'��• .��� y•z `;�,�,�� � � , ' - ,( • �y���,�y;r �V t, h�e� � �'� f ��` I' �� `' � ,'k "� �'i 3� : j �t ; rU ' - :'- �y�'J ' ` 1 ' '� ���� � , �,-� , cy .- �t ' �;r*.St�.t� q r4' - . - . . .�y�L...�. �' � '.••�•��� �. � � (r.L . { I . x ' '`"`y` � . � 1.; ,. � . . -- -. � ,,� . - :-..r�:.. � �� � _ � ' � . . - - � _. _ �;.:�. � ,�.�, , ..�.. .��;.: _ . , _ -- �,1 � — - -- � ,,.. ��, .. ' . . — - � s.^ �.�` , - . _ .•`` . . . � � � . i ' , � J. • \.IL1 �'+ r, / � •��•��,���,,^� ?y,• •'�'� r""v�}.�ti�:5�-?9�r' 7 . � � . . . � � •,�� , � � M �,� . r . �,�ti���• .. �•�i 1�' 1,� r=Ci�V' r{����^5�l \� ��I �i � .:� �� t �� ��j�r,tit t'it'�� ♦ � . '�. ��� �!�R,y. �� �� ��s1 � /� � . .., ' .;!J ° /�y�tiJ'��t..v ��7� . , ',,.'�''•�� ; .,'l�..' ti�`.��'�:h,�} �;C `...'�'�:��`,M • '/• , �T),.'t);•,}..•..,�,r.,.. ,.?''z±q.!�?�.7 - .� � . .�` � r �F f % _'�l 1 � \ � `✓',>>� ' .. _y,,., .,P'� '1� • • I �� r, i �~ . , Y �?.. • _�„�,.,�,'- � ►, 3i .�'= t , ,•, ..o - � l+ " � �I �� �, . �I.4 �'�' ,`1 i + -- ��'�/ � � r l�� i'� � ��1� �' �*' ' ' �,', � °1`' , _ �ys �^ `�� �jl�:t;?�. !��jy� ,.` � - � -�., r �� !: • i,.,�:i� , . . �:.«I '`�`� / , A ' .. .,. „��._� ur• � c �yt .' ��i'� . . i � j� ..c••�� ���twv- -- r`a..y ���`� f ��-,- : - ,si �,�::, , � . E,;,� � <!^�, `�i.,;��it�L.� � ,. _ ,.. � � ,y > r � . '`� � 1 ;� , t ;'�-���l,y �T . } f �iA �Y' �� E -;� rr ' ,:` . . , i'� ��..\ / .. . "�I' �T�•�' �[S'.�.��_:.. - � . i C R� 1y � � ' . . . .� � S. � . ' , -_i - 'r y`Ti-?�'+.� . .. . , ' . ' ' �.� ✓ -� - . . . ' . � . � � '.^�.�,o.�. _ . �. - . � . . • . i . . .�y,i�"r- i . ' ' ' . , . .. �. - . . . . . - . ,_.�.,..s`.�:�-'t � ��, j. �,- � :, �. r� . _ - �- � ..- . . � .. _ . - . .. ' '.'� . . \� ,. . ' ._' - ' . . .. . . . . ___ "' . . ' . � ' ' .. . " . - ' . . . . ..,.. . . . Jv ' . - \ , . ,. . . .. .. ' - � _. . , ' .::3 � � . i. _ . . .. � . . . .d � ' . � \ —� -- . � . - . _.. .. �' _' ... _ .. _ . . - _' � \ _ . . � . . .. . , . '. -'�' � . . - - . ... . . ,�i . � . � . " . . . ... . . � � . . . � • , �� : . � �� ��= -i � :. -. _---- � -=-►=`� ���� _ ;�. : ; . y. � � _ f'.' ;.. _, - r:�� ►s ; .,. � `- '_+._�,'�":. !r�z�`a Cis1� �� � ....�.s ,;; . �. ��� � � 5,�• �: � , � E�� � ���� � � �- � J � � . . . � ,F" M.• { - - "^: Y ��j�.�;r.•��•.- ..�t � �/u:si.+i:?'��� ' ��� � : ��i [ �;t �� � '�.i'� �'�i�i,'} � e �'. `'y y' -+!`�-�. � , . ... 1M�a �� • ����.'� �� � :N �r r � i"' ••i !`.��. t:.i��.7.�� .1 «,'�.��y� 7,�' ,2✓ ` ` �� �j���y �t t . ��.� _ _ _ • �.: ; : K� - - --- _ — 1_ _ ___ _ .�,.�.__ __ � __�' �/ _ _— _' _� �: �f� �— ~� `�� �� . . -- ...r _ , i� -_4�. ; y! � . . � _.�.----�-v.; • _ _ - . ---------._ __ - � � `- - ; ' _ r��," _�- rri :: i = �� "�,,.="`�=�.�;�.� z�-�-�-.- � . ; � "'�,"' � ; .� �.. .�., -�-' .-�._..._._ a��.=.`y `�`� - -- �- __ ------ - �; ��. �, . ; � : �L ' � ��� �' � ;< �; ���" `,*. . .r T✓, .r. %� .^� � . _ ,� a _ � �. �Z�, . ' ' .1�Y J � ., zs . . ._ ... ,�" �` „,� _i ,�,� f ` r � � .� ��i .. , :� '.c�f � ^ � '� ��.�1� -�.'o.'�� ,�,�.;�„�,�, . . �. � �. . . + ��►et - { _ : - - � :,.: ,i ���� . ,,2.� � � + . - ' ' , ; �` r �_g r,_ .. . ; • . 3,� •' �' ,`�:; .. . .. . � t ' :�� . . ��� �i ' �� ' , v��: �� ' . - . , z ��� x � _ .� ?��'' �_ �—�4 h'X � +�� �` _ " ' ' / � Z � \ �_—_"'�_ � . ��� � -/ ' ui�,sv�� � . %�/,.,. °�_---�_—__--�_�_ :. _}_�__""_ -..-` _- J�D�r Ytt.. �p/ �'� . �'�_ _'_'�--- — ^��.� � 9�/ Ir "r \ ��� . . � -�_ , _ `� �r�� �i'�% 7��� �{ . ` i --��-- _ — �=�_-��'��>= �� � i i �'•� �s� - � , • i � =-•�'��% ' ^�: j,j � �-.;� _' r: . �.� s� ' ' ��.= - - . -- --- -_ . . .,-��' �, _ --- �: . ._.� L . . . ..:� -�.i _ .: , _- _. . `'. ' .._-- . - - � .�.� _�� ' -• • -. : � ..' � � "_' --_:.� —..�...: ' . ' . .' " ' _, __. - ��a s-=— '__ _ r --- � 'j, ' __ .- __ —=.- -�' . . �_-J �. . �tr �� ��� ; � �:�: ._ , HOLSI�'AD AND LARSON, P.L.C. WAYNE B. HOLSTAD RUSSELL L.C. LARSOtJ KAREN HILL FJELD't' JOHN L. LINDELL LA.RRY S. MOUNTAtN 't REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST August 22, 1996 Mr. Grant Fernelius Department of Communiry Gity of Fridley 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 RE: 2i 8 57th Place N.E.: Ocder Dear Grant: ATTORNEYS AT LAW i35 VADNAlS CENTER DRlVE Surr� 130 SAINT PAUL, MN 551 10 =LEPHONE 612/490-9078 Acs�M��E 6� 2�49a� 5so ent Removal or Repair OF COUMSEL: FRFOERIC W. KNAAK' �AL50 UCENSED IN WISCONSIN AND COLORADO I have sent to you under sep rate cover the resolution language necessary to begin the process of either requiring the wner of the above-described parcel to correct the problems at that site or raze the building. - As we discussed, Minnesota Statutes Sections 463.15 to 463.261 provide the procedure for dealing with this sort of problem within the City. The process begins with the type of resolution I have drafted for you here. Es entially, the Order represents a finding by the City, through its Council, that a hazardous condit on exists and is a formal demand by the City to the land owner to remedy the problem found. uch like a Summons in other civil proceedings involving land, the City would ordinarily file a n tice of !is pendens with the County Recorder's office notifying any prospective purchasers or o her interested parties of the action the City has taken affecting this particular parcet. The landowner has 20 days to either comply with the owner, to the city's satisfaction, or to answer the City, in much the sa e manner as in a lawsuit. An Answer would occur in instances in which the owner either factua ly disputed the City's finding, or would be seeking to otherwise delay the implementation of the rder. If there is no response from the Order and thereafter, to set a option the City has in a default the necessary repairs with its ov� hazardous condition. �wner, the City is entitled, on the 21 st day after the date of the �earing in District Court and have the Order enforced. One �ituation is to simply raze the building. Another is to conduct � employees, or contract out the work necessary to remedy the 6.15 Mr. Grant Fernelius August 20, 1996 Page Two In all cases, the City may then, by following an assessment procedure provided for in the statutes, assess the costs it has incurred (e.g. labor and machinery rental costs involved in razing the building) to the property by following the procedures outlined in that statute. You can note that the assessment does not, in this instance, involve the ordinarily required determination of benefit to the affected parcel, but can represent the full value of the costs to the City, irrespective of whether the amount expended to remove the hazard benefited the property by the same amount. I should note that what I have just outlined to you describes situations in which the owners have either abandoned the property or are otherwise determined to fight the City's order. In a case where an owner does answer the order, it is possible for the matter to end up in a full trial on the merits of the City's findings. A more usual scenario, however, is that an owner, on receiving a city's order in this kind of case, will either enter int.o an agreement with the city on repair and improvement, or will agree to waive its rights to oppose the razing of the structure and come to an a�reement with the City on allocation of costs, abandonment, or similar arrangements. � Not surprisingly, given the unique character of real estate, as well as the different kinds of people that own it, how a particular proceeding of this sort wiil play out is well nigh impossible to predict. None of the City's options can come into play, however, absent passage of a resolution beginning the proceedings like the one 1 have just forwarded to you. I will, of course, be avaifable on Monday night to answer any questions the Council may have about this at the meeting. In the meantime, do not hesitate to call me if you have any other questions or I can be of additional assistance to you in this matter. Sincerely, � Frederic W. Knaak Fridley City Attorney cc: V1l. Burns B. Dacy v� 6.16 DATE: TO: MEMORANDUM EVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ... Bums, City Manager��#� FROM: B rbara Dacy, Community Development Director S tt Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: One Year Extension for Variance Request, VAR by Kenneth Anderson; 132 River Edge Way N.E. On August �, 1996, staff in rmed Mr. Anderson that. his variance virould expire on September 12, 1996. Mr. A erson has,requested,;:a one year e�dension.of his ..: .; ` variance'apProval to allow nstruction�`of a`por+cli and garage'on �fiis property. `.� Mr: Anderson has hired a con ctor who is not yet ready to start construction, but intends to start this Fall, w ther permitting. Staff� recommends #hat the year extension. MM/dw M-96-387 Council approve Mr. Ande�rson's request for a one 7.� � � � -, ; �� _ �' ��-�{•_� � ��_ j_,'„�; ',<;.�� _ CI�IYOF F(Z! DLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-345p • FAX (612) 571-12K7 APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Kenneth Anderson 132 River Edge Way NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Anderson: September 14, 1995 On September 12, 1995, the Fridley Appeals Commiss�ion officially approved your request for a variance, VAR 95-2 to reduce the required rear yard setback from 25 feet to eet, to allow the construction of a porch and garage on Lot 20, Block 1, River Edge Way N.E. Approval of this variance request is contingent upon the following stipulations: 1. 2. The petitioner shall provide a hardsurface driveway by October 1, 1996. The existing garage shall be removed within 60 days of the proposed garage's final inspection. You have one year from the date of Appeals Commission action to initiate construction. If you caxuiot begin construction in time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3593. ,. Sincereiy, � �' ���✓" ��' v�r.�-� ��e"c�'t°,�`---_' , � . �� Michele McPherson, BLA Planning Assistant MM/dw Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Depa�tment by September 28, 1995. Concur with action taken. %.�2 FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 August 1, 1996 Kenneth Anderson 132 Rivers Edge Way N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Anderson: On September 9 2, 1995, tl request for a variance to a Typically, petitioners have initiate construction. We � antieipate that you wil! be i please submit to me in wrii that your request may be � If you have any questions Sincerely, �, ��� �� Michele McPherson Plar�ning Assistant MM:Is C-96-169 ul �U�..� �.���,�c 'C'n �f/d�lF # �7� - _ _ CtTYOF FRI DLEY VERSITY AVE. iV.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55�132 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612> 571-12t�7 Fridley Appeals Commission officiaNy approved your �w construction of a porch and garage on your property. ie year from the date of the Appeals Commission action to � soon coming upon the one year deadline. If. you able to begin construction prior to September 12, 1996, g a letter requesting an extension !�y August 19, 1996, so ced on the August 26, 1996, City Council agenda. " this letter, please contact me at 572-3593. R`-:G�UL"� l�. �Z M 6,1Z'�} �c.,iC���N - 9 Z 7.03 �. � J�. �.. -9C� DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: August 22, 1996 William Burns, Barbara Dacy, Scott H'ickok, Michele McPh IVIEMORA.NDUM PLANNING DIVISION Manager ,��� Development Director ng Coordinator Planning Assistant Establish a Public� Hearing for the Sale of Excess Property Located at 7th Street and 61 st Avenue I In conjunction with the recent Ir to be transferred between the Ci of land defined by 7th Street on the east, and unimproved 60th A dispose of excsss property, Stat� recommends that the City Couni MM/ M-96-391 iependent School District #14 piat and vacation requests, land is y and the School District. The City will be transferring the block he west, 61st Avenue on the north, West Moore Lake Drive on renue on the south (see attached map). In order for the City to Statute requires the City to conduct a public hearing. Staff il establish September 16, 1996 as the date of the public hearing. 8.01 —---� ti��i �����a :�, .�� ._ 111 ..� IL� ��� .�� �I�_rrr�� ��►r�r_�� TO: William W. Bum FROM: John G. F1ora�uP �= Jon Wilczek, l�is: for_. DATE: August 26, 1996 SUBJECT: Public Hearing City of Fridley �� City Manager � lic Works Director Public Works Director PW96-176 the County Improvement Project on Osbome Road We have received the plans d a Joint Powers Agreement for the proposed County improvement of Osbome Road ( R 108) from Old Central (CSAH 3S) to Stinson Boulevard This project calls for wideni of the street, installation of • concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk/bikeway and storm ater improvements. " Storm water improvements system with the ultimate � Avenue southward to Rice for the temporary connection to the existing storm water ection to a storm water line to be constructed in Central �k scheduled for I 997. The County project is estimate at $517,400. The City's share of the project is estimated at $104,077.17. The City inte to use off-system Municipai State Aid funds to pay for the improvement. Included i that is the bike path on the north side of Osbome Road through the City owned park d a sidewalk with concrete curb and gutter on the south side of Osborne Road It has been the Cit�s policy to projects which do not have co� is $11 per front foot. To facilitate this improvement, public hearing for the assessme fronting on Osborne Road for S JGF:cz Attachment s for the concrete curb and gutter on all improvement curb and gutter. The current rate we have been using �commend the City Council approve the plans and set a t of the concrete curb and gutter to the Fridley properties emb�r 16, 1996. 9.01 CITY OF FRIDLEY NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1994 - 5 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka county, Minnesota, has deemed it expedient to receive evidence pertaining to the improvements hereinafter described. NOW, THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT on the 16th Day of September, 1996, at 7:30 pm, the City Council will meet at the Fridley Municipal Center Council Chambers, 6431 University Avenue NE, F+Sridley, MN, and will at said time and place hear all parties interested in said improvements in whole or in part. CONSTRUCTION ITEM Street improvements, including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, bikeway, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer, landscaping, and other facilities located as follows: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST 1994 - 5 Partially Assessed Osborne Road fronting properties between Central Avenue and Stinson Boulevard for concrete curb and gutter at a cost not-to-exceed $11.00 per front foot. All of the land abutting upon said street named above and all lands within, adjacent and abutting thereto. All of said land to be assessed proportionately according to the bene�ts received by such improvement. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with d�sabilities who require auxiliary aids, should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than 9 September 1996. PUBLISHED: FRIDLEY FO US August 29, 1996 September 5, 1996 September i2, 1996 9,02 � � CffY OF FRIDLEY TO: The Honorable FROM: William W. Bu DATE: August 23, 199 SUBJECT: Purchase Agre� Located at Uni� I am requesting that the City was entered into with CP Ra establish one of the contingen was made. Page 5 of the agri purchase agreement, we can € agreement or the zoning for tl I recommend that you deny your cooperation. WWB:rsc Attachment EMORANDUM and City Council City Manager ,�� nt for CP Rail System Property itv Avenue and 73rd Avenue William W. Burns City Manager 'ouncil officially deny the attached purchase agreement that System in 1995. The purpose of my request is to officially es that enabled us to retrieve the $2,500 earnest payment that ment indicates that if the City Council does not approve the � our money back. Stnce we have not acted on the purchase properly, we need to do one or the other and probably both. purchase agreement with CP Rail System. Tha.nk you for 10.01 �I�ri-State (,and C<ii��J�anv c/c� Cf' 1Zail Systcin i'.O. Qox S30 Minneapolis, Minnesota _55440 Attn: Senior Mana�er, Land Marketing 1. BUYER AND SELLER: The City of Fridley, Minnesota (Buyer) offers to purchase certain Property (as defined in paragraph 3) from Tri-State Land Company (Seller). 2. ACCEPTANCE: This affer shall be void ifnot accepted by Seller within 90 days of its date. The accepted offer is sometimes referred to as "this agreement." 3. PROPERTY: The Property consists of the land shown in approximation on Exhibit A(the Land) and the improvements thereon (the Improvements); provided, however, that the Improvements do not inc(ude those improvemerns which are excluded from the purchase by other provisions of this offer_ The legal description of the Land is as follows: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 78, files of the Registrar of Titles of Anoka County, Minnesota. 4. DEED; RES�RVAT�QNS A.1�ID COVF,I�LA - BILL OF SALE• The Property wili be conveyed at the closing by quitclaim deed. Upon wYiiten nufice fram Buyer requesting same, given at ieast 10 da.ys in advance of the closmg, Seller �1 deliver at the closing a quitclaim bill of sale for any personal propeity included in the purchase. �'he following reservations and covenants will be included in the dsed {'m these reservations and coveriants, Setler is referred to as Grantor, Buyer is referred to as Grantee, and the Property is refened to as the real property): none 5. [not applicable] 6. [not applicable] 7. PURCHASE PRICE: The purchase price of the Property is $350,000, net to Seller. g. CLOSING: Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 9, this transaction shall close at a mutually agreeable time and place no later June i 5, l 995. 9. [not applicable) 10. ESCKOV�': Should the parties agree t�o eiose in escrow, f3uyer �vill p�y all iecs and char�es in connection with the escrow. CNr of FrSdta�� - .1 -1- 10.02 1 I. ULPOSt"I', PAY in the forn� ofa certiiied check or ��ithout interest, if tt�is of�'er is not to the purchase price. The balan� certified or cashier's check oavab! 1' 1'URC�IASE 1'RI('F;: 13uyer- enclnscs $2,500 {thc De�otiit) �shier's check payable ta Selicr. Seller shall refund the Deposii, mely accepted by Sel(er; othen�vise, tl�e Deposit shall be applied of the purchase price shall be paid to Seller at the closing by a to Seller. 12_ ENCUMBRANCES: e Property wili be conveyeti subject to facts which would be disclosed by a comprehensive surv y, rights and clairr�s of parties in possession, rights of the public, and easements, leases, licenses, d permits. Buyer may object to the marketability of Seller's titte on the basis of such matters. 13. JUDGMENT LIENS: against the Property shall be se� nnappealalile, and Seller shall v either of them as a result of Sel Buyer may object to the market 14. 15. [not applicableJ jnot applicableJ 16. RIGHT OF ENTRY: l (and its employee.s, agents, and eff.ectuate the purpose.s of this � the Property being refe,cred to, .+ tests and environmernal tests, s� {a) Buyer shall give S entry and the natu� each such date and y judgment against Seller which may appear of record as a lien and satisfied by Seller within 30 days after it becomes final arid nnify Buyer, and Buyer's title insurer, for any loss sustained by failure to have any such judgment lien so settled and satisfied. ty, of Seller's tit(e on the basis of such matters. ; th� first 45 days afte,r Sellei's acceptance of this offi�, Bu�er �ctors) may enter the Property and, to the extent necessary to �pl� Selle,�'s land in the vicinity of the Property (such land and iYeiy, as the Site), for the purpose of condud'mg geoPhysicai " to the following condirions: � ler advance notic� of the da.te and time of each of the activities to be conducted on the Site at (b} Seller may etect to pre�sent during the conduct of such activities and to monitor same. uch monitoring shall not relieve Buyer of any liability under this p ph 16_ (c) Prior to entering th Property, Buyer shali secure the pernussion of any tenant then in p ssession of same. (d) . Upon the completio of its activities on the Site, Buyer shall remove any debris resulting om such activities and shall restore the Site to the condition it was i prior to the commencement of such activities. (e) Buyer shall inder� against al( claims, C,Ny of F'rfd{ey - 3 and defend the. Indemnitees (as defined belo�v) ands, actions�, suits, judgments, losses, dama�es _`L_ 10.03 (including. but n<�t Grnited to, actiial, c�mpen,at<�ry, direct, ec�nsecauential, j�unitive, and exe�>>plary dat»a�,es), e���cn�es, ;�cnalties, tines, sanctions, court costs, litigation costs, environmental response and remediation costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees (collectively, Claims) arising out of or relating to any loss of (or damage to) any property or business or any injury to (or death o� any person, where such loss, damage, injury, or death actually or allegedly arises (��vhether directly or indirectly, wholly or in part) from: (a) any action or omission of Buyer (or its employees, agents, or contractors) whi(e on the Site pursuant to this para��raph lb; or (b) the exercise by Buyer {or its employees, agerrts, or cormacfors) of the permission granted by th�s paragraph 16; or (c) the escape or release of any pollutant, contaminant, or hazardous substance resulting (direcfly or indirectty, wholly or in part) from any action or omission of Buyer (or its emptoyees, agents, or contractors) while on the Site pursuant to this paragraph 16. Indemnitees mea.ns the following companies and their directors, officers, employees, and agents: Soo Line Corporation, Soo Line Railroad Company, Tri-State Land Company, Tri-State Management Company, The Niilwaukce Motor Transportation Company, H�iawatha Transfer Compazry, Canadian Parr,iffic Limited, CP Ra31 System, and their subsidiaries, affiliated companies, and parent companies. (� Buyer {and its emploYces, agents, and contractors) shall comply with alt applicabie la.ws while on the Site. (g) Buyer wi11 provide Seller with complete copies of the test data and test reports as soon as they are available to Buyer. (h) The cost of any test or survey will be borne solely by Buyer_ (i) Test holes shall be located no doser than 10 feet from the n°arest rail of any railroad track located on or adjacent to the Site. Dril�ing equipment and reiated equipment shal( nvt be placed closer than 10 feet from the nearest rail of any such track. (j) While on fhe Site, Buyer {and its emp(oyees, agents, and contractors) shall comply with Se(ler's safety rules, including any requirement regarding the use of fla�nen_ All costs associated with compliance with such rules shall be borne by Buyer. If Seller shall incur any costs in connection therewith, Buyer shall reimburse Seller «�ithin 30 days after- receipt c�f Seller's invoice. CN�� d k'�-Idky - 3 -3- 10.04 (�) Unlcss discl��surc iti rcquircd by co«r7 or-dcr c�r at���lic�il�lc la�+�, I3uvcr tihali inaintain, and sliall causc iis ei��ployccs, a����nt�, ai�d cc�ntr<ict<>rs to maintain, the on#ideniiality of all information per7ainin� to am� environmenta( test perforn�ed on the Site. (1} [f any mechanics or materialmens lien, or similar lien, is asserted against the Site, t e Property, or any other property of Seller or the Indemnitees as a re ult of the exercise of the pennission granted in this paragraph 16, Buy r shall immediate(y satisfy and/or obtain the release of such lien, all at Buyer's expense, and Buyer shall indemnify and defend the Indemn tees from and against all Claims arising out of or connected with su h lien. 17. CONTINGENCIES: Thf is Agreement is contingent upon the following matters: (a) <'I�y af t'(idtcy - S "1'1TLE MATTE : Seller makes no warranty or representation with respect to the marketability or q'ty of its title and is not under any obligation to furnish abstracts of title, title reports, or title insurance policies in respect of the Property. Buyer shall have 45 days after er's acceptance of this offer in which to r'ais° objections #o the marketability of S ller's #itle. If Buyer objects to Selle�'s title, it must give Selier notice within such ' specifying the precise naiure of the alleg� tit�e defects. The notice must be ' by evide.nce of the alleged defects, in the form of a copy of an abstract of e or a title compar�'s title commitm�� ff Buyer fails to give propei- or timely no 'c� it si�all be dee�ned to have waived its right to object (�cept that defects whic� ' subsequexit to the 45-day paiod shall not be deemed waived unless Buyer f�7s o give Seller notice of same prompfly after it learns, or iri the exercise of reason le diligence shouid have learne�, of them); furthermore, even if Buyer gives proper and timely notic�, it shall be dcemed to have waived its right to object on the basis of then-existing defects not specified in the notice. Seller sha11 ha.ve 45 da.ys or unti the closing, wlnchev� is less (the Cure Periodj, in which it ma.y, if it sfl chooses, att t to aue any defect specified in a time�y ana otherwise proper notice. Seller has n obligation or responsibility whatsoever to cure (or attempt to cure) any tide def . If Seller shall undertake to cure or attempt to cure any title defect, it may with raw from such undertaking at any time without penaliy; such undertalang shall n t create, nor shall it under any circumstance be construed to create, any obligati n whatsoever on the part of Seller to cure any such defect. If Seller is unable or nwilling to cure any specified defect, Buyer may terminate this agreement by givin Selier notice of termination at any time prior to the aetual delivery and accept nce of the deed, which notice shall state that this agreement is being terminated by reason of Seiler's failure to cure title defects. If I3uyer gives proper and timely otice of terminatioa, Se11er shai( refund the Deposit, without interest, and sha(I r imburse Eiuyer for the actlial amount paid by Buycr for thc abstract of title or t�tle commitment, provided that the abstract or commitment is � 10.05 dclivLred and ��,si�,ned to Seiler. Ry acce��ting deliver�' <�f thc quitclaim deecl, [3uyer s(a<il! 1?� decincd tc� «��ivc �iny and a�j uncured title defecls. � (b) CHANGE tN !ON(NG: At any time prior to closin�, [3uyer may terminate this agrcement if I3uyer is unab(e to secure a zoning change frorn the current zoning, M 1, to the desired zoning of C2, as speci6ed in the City of Fridley zonin� code. Seiler will cooperate with Buyer in Buyer's atternpts to seek the rezoning. In the event of termination of this agreement under this provision, Seller shall refund the Deposit, without interest. (c) CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL• -'This agreement is subject to the approval of the Fridley City Council. Buyer shall make a good faith effort to secure such approval prior to closing. In the event Buyer is unable to secure such City Council Approval, Buyer may terminate this agreement at atry time prior to closing. In the event of termination of this agreement under this provision, Seller shalt refund the Deposit, without interest. 18• REAL ESTATE TAXES• The total real estate tax bill payable in the year of the sale will be prorated on a per diem basis as of the closing, using the most receni tax bill; such proration shall be final and binding on Seller and Buyer and there shall be no post-closina adjustment. There will be no proration to the ex#ent the paymeat of such t�es has 1� assumed by a Iessee under a lease that will b� assigned to Buyer r�r merged into the purchase_ 19. TRANSFER TAXES AND FEES: Buyer will purchasey affx, a�d cancei any and all documentary stamps in the amount prescribed by statute, and will pay any and all transfer taxes, �X� �es, Sales ta�ces, use taxes, and fees incidental to the transfer of the Property or the recordation or filing of the deed_ 20. SPECLAI. ASSESSMENTS- Buyer will assume respons�'bility for paying any special assessment (or installment thereo fl where the due date for payment is on or after the date of this offer, irrespective of the da.te of the improvement. 21. NOTICES: Notices permitted or required by this agreement must be in writing and shall be deemed given when delivered in legible form to the business address of the party to whom addressed. If delivered at the closing, a notice shall be deeme� given when hand-delivered to the party's representative at the ctosing. The business addresses of the parties are as follows: Seller -- mailing address_ P.O. Box 530 Minneapolis, MN 5 �440 Attn: Senior Manager, Land Marketing Ciry ot Frldky - 3 _5 _ 10.06 delivery address facsimile_ Buyer -- mailinb address: cielivery addcess: facsimile: 13 0 Soo Line Buildin� ! 0_ Soutl� Sth Strcct � 14i neapolis, MN _55402 �tt : Senior Nlanager, Land Marketin� (61�) 347-8170 Att � Senior Manager, Land Marketinb y of Fridley 1 Universitv Av William W. Burns � WiL7 � am w Burn � 7\ 571 _7 9527 N.E. ti�� Wi7� igm W RtirnG - Notices nat given in the manner or 'thin the time limits set farth in this agreement are of no effect and may be disregarded by the p to whom they are directed. 22. REAL ESTATE BROKEn or agent in connection with this tra� claim for commission or other com; or other compensation shall be paid 23. [not applicab(e] 24. [not applicable] 25. BILLBOARDS: Regardle; on the Land will be excepted from t <'tIy d Fridiq� - J �S- Sella' represents that it has not retained any real estate broker isaction. If atry real estate broker or agent can establish a valid �ensation in connection with this transaction, such commission by Buyer. s of any provision to the contrary �erein, al1 billboards tocated �e purchase, and Seller wi(! reserve to itself, and its successoTs -6- 1 �.�7 and a;si<�ns, a�>erii�anc��t cascrncnt (a "13illlx�ard f:ascn�cnt") c,��cr that l��riion ��f the l�.and Ic�cated �r�itl�in tcn (10) icet <�1�eac1� sucl� hillboaru, lur the o��erali<�n, naaini��nar�ce, repair,� alteration, rene�v_,i, re��lacen�enl, and remova) of suct� biNboard, together �vith a permancnt easement of sutiicient width tor �edestrian and vehicuiar acccss (an "Access Gasement") to and from each such biliboard_ Each [3illboard Easement and its appurtenant Access Easement will be ai►tomatically extinguished if Seller, or its successors or assign, physically removes the biliboard �vhich is the subject of such Qiliboard Easernent and fails to replace it within one hundred ei�hty ( i 80) days with another billboard. Se((er wil! also reserve to itself, and its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement of sufficient width for the installation, operation, maintenance, repair, renewal, replacement, and removat of eiectrical cabie, or any other public uti(ity, and ancillary facilities needed to provide electrical power or other services. to ea.ch such biliboard; said easement shall terminate thirty (30) days after the termination of the Billboacd Easement for such bi(Iboard. 26. NO REPRESENTATION BY SELLER- AS IS WHERE IS: Seller makes no representation or wananty of any kind with respect to the Property (including, but not limited to, express or implied warranties of title, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose). The sale of the Property is strictly on an "as is, where is" basis. By closing this transactioq Buyer will be deemed to represent and wamant that it is satisfied with the condirion of the Property and that it wilt take full responsibility for the Property from and after the closing. Wrthout limiting the foregoing, Buyer represents and warrants that it has not relied upon nor been inrluced by any statements or regresentations of any person in respect of th� physical condition of the Propetty, including the environmerrtal conditions present on the Property, or of any other matter affecting or relating to the physical condition of the Property. By closing this transa,ctiori, Buyer shatl be deemed to represent and wam�nt that, as respects the environmental and physical condition of the property, it has relied solely on such imresfiigations, �amina.tions, and inspections as Buyer has made or will make prior to the closing. By closing this riansactior�, Buyer shall be deemed to represent that it has been af�orded the opportunity for rull and compiete investigations, examinations, and inspections of the Property. Wit�out limiting the generality of this paragraph; the parties specifically intend that this paragraph shall bar all Claims that Buyer {and its successors, assigns, graniees, and vendeesj might otherwise have against the Indemnitees relating to the environmenta! condition of the Property, including (but not limited to) Claims brought pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 198Q as amended, (commonly known as the Federal Superfund Act) and ana,logous state statues_ Buyer shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Indemnitees against a(1 such Claims_ 27. ENVIRONMENTAL- PARTIES' RIGHT TO TERMINATE: Either party may te�minate this agreement at any time prior to the deiivery of the deed if it determines, �n the exercise of its discretion, that circumstances reiated to hazardous or toxic substances, hazardous wastes, poliution, or environmental contamination (colleclively, Contaminatioti) render the sale inadvisabie. in t}ie event of such terrnination, Seller wil! refund the De�osit, without interest. The closin� of the s�le, if�it occurs, is not; and shafl noi l�e construed as, an acti�al or im�a3ied representatic>n or ��azrant�� !,v Selier as to tiie condition of the, Property or the absence o#�Contari�ination_ c'n. ..� r,�aky - s -7- � 0.0 V 2S. L.l'1'{GA"i`1ON t��XPN:N: prcvailin� j�a�-ty shall b���ci�titic� costs, disbursen�ents, ti�itncss i 29. T(ME ON' TH 30. LIpU1DA"�' perform any of the terms or co�< retain the Deposit as agr-ced Iipui� may have this agreement specifi or conditions of this agreement terminated {in which event Se a.greement specifically enforced. ' intended to be cumulative to all o� agreement, at law, in equity, or ot or remedy shall not preclude it f E5: In any aclion brou�l�t in connccti��n ���iii� tl�is a�rccment, thc rcc;c�vcr iis liti�ati<�n cxpen�cs, includin�;, hut ia��t limi;cd lc�, cc�urt �, experts' fees, and attorncys, fees. _ Time is of the essence af�this a�reement. �S ANU SPEC�FIC PERFORMANCE• !f Buyer fails to ns of this agreement within the specified time limiis, Seller may d damages and may declare this agreement terminated, or Seller � enforced_ Likewise, if Seller fails to per#'orm any of the terms hin the specifi�d time limits, Buyer may declare this agreement shall �efund the Deposit, without interest) or may have this tights and remedies granted to the parties in this paragraph are rights and remedies available to the parties (whether under this vise); accordingly, the exercise by either party of any such right exercising any other such right or remedy. 31. COMPUTATION OF V�: For the purpose of compuring the time periods specified in this agreement, Saturdays, Sunda � and legal holidays sha11 be counted. However, where the last day for perfornung any act falls o a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, that act may be performed on the ne�ct succeeding day wluch is not a Saturda.y, Sunday, or legal holiday_ �� 32. ENTI1tE AGIt�EMEN paraes wrth respect to the sale and or representa,tions by Seller exce� _'This agreement constitutes the entire agrcement between the urcha.se of the Property. Buyer has not retied on a�+ staternents as are set forth in this agreement: 33_ NON-ASSIGNABILITY; Buyer may not assign its rights under this agreement without the advance written consent of Seller. 34. SURVIVAL OF TE S AND CONDITIONS: The terms and conditions of this agreement shal! survive the delive of the deed. 35_ provisions of this agrcement shali �6. APPLICABLE LAW: with, the laws of the Sfate in w -� 7- [not applicable] �_ T'he indenu�ification, litigation expense, and confidentiality ive its ternunation. � agreement shali be governed by, and construed in accordance the Land is iocated. ��- W�t.,[;AND SEWA(;N; T h;A'1'MH;N'I'SYSTFM UIS('LOS(�Rf�:ti: Se11cr certifies thai t�� thc l�est of Seller's knvwledge the e are no wells on tfae Yroperty�. Seller states that to thc bcst ot� (�n� of F�1Ale� . S -x- 10.09 Selicr's knowled�c thc��e is no individua) sewage treat�aie�it systena, as defined in Chapter 63 7 oi'thc Minnesota Statuies, on or scr-vin� tl�c 1>roperiy. � � 39. HEAD[NGS: The paragraph headings used in this agreement are used solely for the purpase of convenience. They are not intended to, and do not, modify or limit the wordin� of the paragraphs to which they are aQpended, and they shail not be used or canstrued as guides to the interpretation of said paragraphs. 40. OFFER DATE: This offer is dated Anril 21 , 19�. CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA OFFER ACCEPTED By �l_•�i _ - - - �,�1 William W. Burns ItS City ManaQer (title) ('9�� ot f'.tak.. _ ! . -9- 10.10 TRI T�1TE L f�OMPANy � � �� : s �� ayne _ Serkland its President and CEO Date �R� S /�`l�S— , v _ � �--�i � �_� ��� , ` , � i—%3RQ- -��-i�j.�--� - �---- -- Nr1'-v':�'W A5� -3� . .... �„ . � � r�� =� "' O � W49�TM�a �no1 W -� ��•�' ... • � r �". �._ 41� ^� af.'..1'W O �-IM'o4�.N t Lo.� ; 1 �' �_ -� � �� `y�w�;4i "' � , Z , �. ��.C�..__'- a `391nL N9S�v6e--� ---LII.f.o--- J - � � b `` 3 1 � I �� �N t /�A "p � . � � T`.r b �.,�`� . . , - ,r > � o � 1 "��-.�• tU ' � • � a '"'� �S� � �7 �' ``� -,.,; ` - a a ' ,�.. " + ' •:..� �- s �� Arj' �q°' a a .� , . �a..f , '_ � : ,� ....Y.. , . , � r � N a d' ,,� � r � �� r J a i�.� i 1 ; j _�� �, • :� ' � /smt7J • Z � ` .a � _ � .►h - « - .. J . , �.... _ !I� � . v %:«.. , /� -- � y ,. ; ,i' a • K /� �A r� � j� , � r%�� REGlSTERED 6 •�(� �� i� : ti � � „ u � i M� � w � � � LAND r' , � � ti �- � �.,r< <w...v W : � � � T � a � -�` � �' � � ��;_ '• � � suRVEY �� i w � .* �" 3 z � ; l� 9� p� � ;a. � <, � � � .:. � : �i�. 78 � � `/!J = 8 e = " ,.o_•t 1�� i � Y ..y „ . „s p s� _� ; ° •RCE� CIRCLE �SQ � %�. ' � -- � � p �. ,.» , �..� . � ' •; t ��� � ' ��� � 7r � sfJ � � rb ` ' ' i I ? • �— — `,_f Y � ��_� � � ` 1,_ r , ,»--�-� ' � .. �'f/I wf/�+4 � ��- ts ..._.: ---.__----- -- _=----.., -� TRACT � ,q . . _'''--..SJ�� ..w--.,. ._ .� •- � .�.. TRAC'T.... P�ap ` : � �. - v � Y� Y - ' ' --------10�---------- --�,a.. �°' � � � ,� li , � r. . ( � ;- (RACT (9 p � � ' � ', � .,_.,, - �� � �L ___-�_ _ _ ' .. ��! �� � �� •. � ��� . • � - S- --f - ��� 1 S �� f � �'��/'�•�i ��. � � 8 --- f �'-_ 7- +{H'ts�i w-- �:� � � _ =.r,._. _.. ' -�--' ` �' � i� . v,�; �! � ,Z �! C � COLUM8IA ARENA .: �' I /�i li) }. vil �j .r a.� G,I !.`��,�:o�j, a ; •� � .� : : , EXHIBIT A CP RAIL SYSTEM PROPERTIES POTENTIAL SALE OF TRi-STATE LAN� COMPANY PROPERTY TO THE C1TY OF FRIDLEY FRiDLEY, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA March G, 1995 No Scale 10.11 >OS Srndh Slh S7re�1 13o.r 530 Minnealinlis MN ,,.9�90 �;311 F<ix� ju 12) :747-8170 �,1�L � 1 "� . �... �. r��=��';�'���' ��".������ %�eal Estate Marketing (US) .iuly 30, 199G Mr. William W. Burns City Manager . City of Fridley Fridley Municipal Center 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 RE: Property at University Avenue and 73rd Avenue Dear Mr. Burns: E�closed please find a check in the amount of $2,500.00 for earnest money the City of Fridley sent Tri-Sta.te Land Company that you requested be returned. This will confirm fliat the agree- ment is cancelled. - We have enjoyed doing business with you and hope this satisfactorily concludes this matter. Sincerely, { � �.' /%� �� John P. Nail JPN/by Enc(osure 10.12 � 0 � w ,^ N WT V I ^ �--1 ��rn a � � ' m °s t � c � �c� � rn ��"=� `� m`��j � ��2m� � L {L��£2 � �� .�. 1'� . . � Z Q � o v Q � � � U � Q n z Z � � Q [O cA J (� O Q �"" °- w Q z F�- z � � � � � � 0 0 Ul � 69 � � a 0 O O � � '�.' � .,..� G-1 `� � � O E�-+ E � � a Ir � i z o a z � t9 ' _ O :, :: in V ¢ : o � 0 U Z w x 3 r O 0 a, i N W � z U � .-t�i � M 7y f� �y tSl a) -� +� �n rl U -.-i �3 •.� [!l -r-I � �-I Cx � � � W � � � oa�av . --I r--I ���� +� -.� r� •f-I -.1 � v� 7-� U C:_, � CZ, . Q ..T O � PIJ � L� _' ti ti � � � � Q� O A rL c� Q" .-a � 0 ' i HF,~O �� O i o� t � ; •Y � a � O Y i F�Y � w�� 1 m�a a ; ��� > N i =p� � f �ZL 3 " ZY� 1 F�� � i ''" � o rcZO � °mz • � Z-r W � V=t J ! Woo � �Ii a � k� � F i' �o uz f� >- Z a a � 0 U � z a � 4 r � rc � 10.13 � CffY OF FRIDLEY CLAIMS AUGUST 26, 1996 cc�iMs 695�3 - 69�17 1 y.0i � � � of FRIDLEY Tv�e of License• AUCTION Michael Servetus Unitarian Society 6565 Oakley Dr NE Fridley, MN 55432 America's Future 3851 Central Ave Columbia Hts., 55421 LIC�NSES August 26, 1996 By: B. Hughes M. O'Neal Tina Martin Approved B�: Fees• Dave SalZman Exempt Public Service Director " " Exempt TREE REMOVAL . Triple T.Tree Service� Duane Turck ' �� 15782 Hershey Ct Apple Valley, MN 55124 12.01 n $40.00 � ;,..:7 � � LICENSES CffY OF FRIDLEY ELECTRICAL Thriftway Electric 3981 Wisconsin Ave N New Hope MN 55427 Kelly Johnson GAS SERVICES Advanced Heating & Cooling 8881 Autumn Oaks Dr Rockford MN 55373 Joel Rissell Fireplace Showroom 225 Co Rd 81 Osseo MN 55369 Harlan Hill O'Keefe Mechanical Inc 7251 Washington f�ve S Golden Valley MN 55427-3126 Tiffany Sellner Rouse Mechanical Inc Po Box 899 Minneapolis MN 55440-0899 Gary Danzeisen GENERAL CONTRACTOR-COMII�RCIAL Benson J Construction 7020 Walker St St Louis Park MN 55426 Gary Jensen Kranz D J Co Inc 2Q33 W Broadway Minneapolis MN 55411-1883 Lawrence Elsen Lindstrom's 9621 10 Ave N Plymouth MN 55441 Gary Jennen Maertens-Brenny Construction Co 8251 Main St NE Fridley MN 55432 Joe Maertens 12.02 STATE OF MINN RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofcl Same Same i Same RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofcl Same Same Same Authentic Construction (5210; 2047 Grand Ave St Paul MN 55105 Benson J Construction (4740) 7020 Walker St St Louis Park MN 55426 Bremar Company (20064213) 740 Northwood Dr Delano MN 55328 ' D & D Contractors Inc (6898; 5279 Greenfield Ave Mounds View MN 55112 Fireplace Showroom(2006205' 225 Co Rd 81 Osseo MN 55369 Garlock-Franch Roofing(1423) 2309 Snelling Ave. Minneapolis MN 55404 Hendricks Roofmg Co (20032: 2521 Jones Place W Bloomington MN 55431-2837 Keefe's Remodeling c� Repair 5625 James Ave S Minneapolis MN 55419 Ken's Handyman Service (708! 3028 Edgerton St Little Canada MN 55117 L & M Roofmg (6341) 593 Berwood Ave Vadnais Heights MN 55127 Norberg Robert F Construction 325 Evans Ave NW #104 Elk River MN 55330 Steve Sater Gary Jensen Brett Nesenson Dennis Dumoulin Harlan Hill Ron Lund - 6) Mark Hendricks 3298) Byrne Keefe ,� Ken Barrieuu Lyle Nelson (4121) Robert Norberg 12.03 STATE OF MINN Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same North Central Builders (3763) 7401 42 Ave N New Hope Mn 55427 Prestige Pools 3 E Little Canada Rd St Paul MN 55117 Quality Contracting (7035) 11412 W River Rd Champlin MN 55316 Schweich David Construction (3607) 17160 Hamilton Dr Lakeville MN 55044 Top Gun Roofing (3388) 5014 Parrish Ave NE Rogers MN 55374-9009 HEATING Advanced Heating & Cooling 8881 t�utumn Oaks Dr Rockford MN 55373 O'Keefe Mechanical Inc 7251 Washington Ave S Edina MN 55439-2403 Rouse Mechanical Inc PO Box 899 Minneapolis MN 55440-0899 MASONRY Jack Pixley Sweeps 4179 149 Ave NW Andover MN 55304 PLUMBING Minnesota Plumbing & Htg Inc 1420 W 3 Ave Shakopee MN 55379 Spartan Mechanical Inc 9801 Valley View Rd Eden Prairie MN 55344 Larry Kraatz Pat Henry Kenneth Welton Dave Schweich Bryan Shiltz Joel Rissell Gary O'Keefe Gary Danzeisen Jack Pixley Paul Sullwold Same Same Same Same Same RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofc1 Same Same RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofcl STATE OF MINN Dennis Edwards Same 12,04 SIGN ERECTOR Signs With Dimension 7707 147 St W Apple Valley MN 55124 WRECKING Frattalone FM Excavating 3066 Spruce St St Paul MN 55117 Ken Matheson Jon Ekeroth 12.05 RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofcl RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofcl � � CfIY OF FRIDLEY Visu-Sewer Clean & Se I, Inc. 3940 Louisiana Avenue outh St. Louis Park, NtN 5542 Sanitary and Storn Project No. 292 FINAL ESTIMATE �. ESTIMATES AUGUST 26,1996 Sewer Repair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 72, 934.80 13.01 CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DFPAR'rMENT ENGINEEItING DIVISION 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 5�432 July 22, 1996 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley c/o William W. Burns, City Manager 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Council Members: �ERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER We hereby submit the Final Estimate for Sanita.ry and Storm Sewer Repair Project Na 292, for �su-Sewer Clean and Seal, Inc., 3940 Louisiana Ave So., St. Louis Park, MN 55426. We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of sanitary and storm sewer repair Project No292 and find that the same is substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents. I recommend that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body and that the one year contractual maintenance bond commence on July 17, 1996. Respectfully submitted, —� —� " John G. Flora Director of Public Works JT:cz Prepared b� Checked bv 13.02 July 22, 1996 To: Public Works Director City of Fridley CITY OF FRIDLEY We, the undersigned, have i spected the above-mentioned project and find that the work required by the contract is substantially complete in conformity with the plans and specifications of the proj ct. AlI deficiencies have been c City feels the contraci-.ar shc contractor. So, therefore, we rec�mmen ESTINIATE for the contractor day of the final inspection th; cted by the contractor. - Also, the work for which the receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the l to you that the City approve the attached FINAL �nd the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the t being Jul�i7, 1996. � Q n, Inspector ��� Representative, (Title) 13.03 July 22, 1996 City of Fridley SANITARY AND STORM SEWER REPAIR PROJECT NO. 292 CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certified herein have been actually furnished and done £or the above-mentioned projects in accordance with the plans and specifications heretofore approved. The �nal contract cost is $151,400.90 and the final payment of $72,934.80 for the improveirient project would cover in full, the contxactor's claims against the City for all labor, materials and other work down by the contractor under this project. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. VISU-SEWER CLEAN & SEAL, INC. Dean Korts, Project Coordinator 13.04 July 22, 1996 City of Fridley SANITARY AND STORM �EWER REPAIR PROJECT NO. 292 This is to certify that Visu Wage Provisions as specified Anoka County. � I declare under the penalties VISU-SEW�R CLEAN & Sl Dean Korts, Project Coordi Clean & Seal, Inc. has abided b3- the Prevailing the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for of perjury that this statement is just and correct. INC. 13.05 CITY OF FRIDIEY PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 FROM: City of Fridley Engineering Division TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley 6431 University Ave, NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dated: July 22, 1996 � ! Sanitary Sewer lining (15 in. CMP) ! � Mobitization Base Bid Sanitary Sewer Lining (15 in. CMP) (altemate bid) . 7th Street Storm Sewer 36 in. RCP RE: Estimate No. 2 (FINAL) Period Ending: July 17, 1995 FOR: Visu—Sewer Clean & Seal Inc. 3940 Louisiana Ave S St �ouis Park MN 55426 JOS CODE NO. 602-6000-415-4530-6007 SANiTARY SEWER REPAIR (7TH STREET) PROJECT NO. 292 STATEMENT OF WOflK i Quantity Tota Fctimatari � I lni� Thi�hic 1,316.00 � LF 1.00 LS 330.00 1..F 417.001 LF 49.9 1,316.00 ( 65,668.40 1,316.00 65,668.40 i 1,500.00 1.00 1,500.00 1.00 1,500.00 46.75 330.00 15,427.50 330.00 i 5,427.50 165.00 � 4 i 7.00 � 68,805.00 � 417.00 � 58,805.00 ' ' I, � � I ; �-- -- -- _ _.____ - _ -- -J - TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE 13.06 I � i � ; i _ ,_ ___ � i 51 ,400.90 TOTAL AMOUNT $151,400.90 Vfsu—Sewer Ciean & Seal, Inc. ESTIMATE NO. 2 (FINAL) SUMMARY Original Contract Amount Contract additions C.O.# 1 Co�tract deductions — Revised contract amount Value Completed To Date ;Amount Retained (0%) �ess Amount Paid Previously OUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE TlFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR he�eby certify that the work performed and the or this project, and all authorized changes then $151,400.90 151,400.90 151,400.90 0.00 78,466.10 $72,934.80 terials supplied to date under the terms of the contract have an actual value under the contract of the amounts estimate (and the final quantities n the final estimate are correct), and that this estimate is just d no part of the °Amourrt Due This Estimate" has been received. Contracto�'s Authorized Representative CERTlFICATE OF THE ENGINEER hereby certiiy that I have prepared o� examined this estimate, and that the contractor is entitled to payment f this estimate under the contract for reference rojeci. . OF FRIDLEY, INSPECTOR y � fiecked By ���— Date: / "��' 9�0 Respectfully submitted, � / / v" /r � Joh .ffora, PE Di � of Public Works 13.07 PAGE 2 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: WILLIAM W. RICHARD D. WILLIAM A. PUBLIC HEA LICENSE AOGUST 21, CITY OF FRIDLEY M E M O R A N D II M �� f8, CITY MANAGER � tYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR [PA, CITY CLERR FOR MAIN EVENT FOR AN INTOBICATING LIQIIOR 96 On the August 26 Ci y Council agenda is a public hearing to consider granting an intoxicating liquor license to Main Event, located at 7850.Univ rsity Avenue Northeast. A Public Hearing Notice is attached fo your review. Pursuant to Ghapter 6 3 Section .07 of the Fridley City Code, we are required to hold a public hearing before issuing this license. The Police Departmen has performed� the required background investigation on Main ent and Public Safety Director Sallman has approved the applicat'on. 14.01 CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will hold a public hearing at the City Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue Northeast on August 26, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. on the question of issuing an ' Intoxicating Lic�uor License to �Main Event for the property located at 7850 University Avenue N�rtheast. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than August 23, I996. Anyone having an interest in this matter should make their interest known at this public hearing. William A. Champa City Clerk Publish: August 22, 1996 14.02 DATE: August 22, 1996 TO: William Burns, C FROM: Barbara Dacy, G Scott J. H'ickok, : SUBJECT: Special Use Pern INTRODUCTiON On July 24, 1995 the City Cout; gard� c�enter at Home Depot. compliance with 6 stipulations. �: outdoor storage and display. In revocation of Home Depot's garc MEMOR�.NDUM PLANNING DIVISION Manag���r anity Development Director an� Eoordinator . For a Gard� Center at Home Depot, Fridley Addition approvoed a spacial use pernut to allow t;oastruction of a 27,972 he City Council's approval of the special use perniit required � ie Depot has violated spec.ific garde,n centea- stipulations rEgarding �onse, the Ciry Council scheduled a public heazing to consider center speciai use percnit. ISSITES . State law provides the City with th ability to re�roke a special use pennit if evidence is produced which shows non-compliance with pernu stipulations. In mid-April Home Depot o rts doors for busine.ss. Within 3 days of the store opening, staff requested a meeting with the store er to discuss outdoor storage and display violations. On April 19, 199b, Kurt Iensen-S eider issued a formal co�on notice. A follow-up inspection occurred on May 4. Violatior�s ntinued. A follow-up letter was sent to the store manager and ultimately a citation was issued. pies of the letters and photographs have been provided to illustrate the nature of the violations. Home Depot's Store Manager ori to guilty. Judge Quinn handed down a ser for 12 months pending no same occurs, Judge Quinn niled that Manager. plead "not guilty" to the charges, but later changed the verdict ice of a$300.00 fine and 30-day jail term. The sentence is stayed similar violations during that period. If a same or similar violation me Depot's President will serve the 30-day jail temi, not the Store 15.01 Home Depot August 22, 1996 PAGE 2 Prior to the revised plea of "guilty", Home Depot introduced 3 contact people to resolve issues that arise. These people are: W. Andrew McKenna, President, M'idwest Division, Thomas S. Mageis, Real Estate Manager, 11�idwest Store Support, Nfichael R Folio, Director of Real Estate, M'idwest. The three representatives ha.ve committed to resolving remaining issues with the Fridley Home Depot store. The site is now in compliance. A before and after video will be available for the City Council's review on Monday evening. RECOMNIENDATIO�t: Staff recommends opening the revocation public hearing and receiving comment. Because the site is now in compliance, no action is recommended unle.ss testimony is received to the contrary. Routine staff inspections will be conducted. ff future violations occur, revocation proceedings will be initiated as well as court proceedings. Note: On a separate, related issue, Home Depot has comm:tted to complering the 57'�` Ave./Main Street ta affic study (to be compl�ed on August 26, 1996). Staff will review the study as soon as possible and report on its findings. • 15.02 Home Depot USI� Inc. August 21, 1995 Page 3 ♦ On July 24, 1995, approved your requ to ailow garden ce display or storage estabZishments of offering goods or waiting in parked to their�vehicles � while on the premi Survey #130, gener River Road, and we Approval of the upon the follow 1. 2- � 3. 4. 5. 6. Approval of approval of The architect consistent wi st�ucture. There shall pestieides, There shall center. the Fridley City Council officially �st for a special use permit, SP #95-05, lters or nurseries which require outside of inerchandise, and to allow �he "drive-in" type, selling, serving, or �ervices directly to customers either notor vehicles or to customers who return =o consume or use the goods or services �es, iocated on Tract A, Registered Land illy iocated north of I-694, east of East �t of Main Street. � ial use permit request is contingent #95-05 shall be contingent upon prior �95-04. 1 detail of the g�rden center shall be the architectural detail of the primary no outdoor sales af fertilizer, other potential pollutants. no off-season storage within the garden The developer shall provide sufficient on-site parking to accommodat garden center patron parking demands.� There shall b� no outdoor plant sales (outside of the confines of t e garden center walls). ♦ On July 24, 1995, he Fridley City �ounci3 officially approved your requ st for a P1at,�P.S. #95-02, to replat Tract A, Registere Land Survey �130 into three separate parcels, generally located nor� of I-694, east of East River Road, and we t of Main15treet. 4 r' �� , Approval of this p�at requ`est is contingent upon the following stipulat ons: ; 1. Approval of P S.,.�95-02 shall require prior approval of ZOA #95-04. ��' r 2. The petitione �shall comply with all requirements of the Anoka Cqci ty Engineering Department. 15.03 _ CITYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLGY MUNICIPAL CENTGR • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIULEY, MN SSAi� •(61?) 571-345� • FAX (612) 571-1287 May 9, 1996 CERTIFIED MAIL Steve Carass The Home Depot 5650 Main Street N.�. Fridley, MN 55432 RE: Final Notice of Noncompliance of the Fridley City Code at 5650 Main Street N. E. Dear Mr. Carass: A second inspection of the property at 5650 Main Street N.E. confirmed that the following items still do not comply with City Code: Disco�tinue outside s#orage of alt flatbed carts, afl bundled wood posts, all fence sections, hot tubs, docks, an assembled deck, 11 riding iawnmowers, two log splitters, a utility #railer, assembled jungle gym, 5 table%hair sets, shed display, pallets of landscape rock, al! outdoor planting materials, and any other improperly stored a�d displayed materials in the front of the store. (Many of these materials are encroaching o� the designated fire {ane.) A final inspection to determine complian�e wilt be conducted or� or about May 15, 1996. You should arrange to complete an app�oved plan for compliance before that date. Shouid this inspection confirm that this defiiciency siill exists, legal action will be approved. If corrective action cannot be comple#ed by this time, contact me to coordinate a schedule to complete this requirement. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at the Fridley Municipal Center, 572-3595. Sincerely, Ku�t Jensen-Schneider Code Enfo�cement Officer KJS:Is CE'-96-139 15.04 �, 3 (=RIDLL'l' MUNICIVAL CENTER • 6-�� 1 l Apri( 19, 1996 I Steve Carrass The Home Depot " � 5650 Main Street N. E. Fridley, �MN 55432 RE: First Notice of N Dear Mr. Carrass: � i.�"�° i,.5''r ��?'.i^':;�F ti: .. j �.i..Z • , ;NIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRlDLEY. �1\ »-t?� •+61'� 571-34i0 • FAX (612) 571-1287 nce at 5650 Main Street N.E. The City of Fridtey has est blished a City Code for the purpose of promoting a pleasant -and attractive suburban e vironment. A recent inspection of the property at 5650 Main Street N.E. revealed that no all Code requireme�ts are presently being met. Listed befow . are items which do not co ply with the City Code: � 1. Discontinue the i prope� storage of � all maferials including fence sections, whirlpools, planting materials, shopping carts, etc., located in front of the Fridley store. Your prompt attention in c Fridley a better place to f 1996, to determine comp; If you have questions or v 3595. Thank you for your Sincerely, Kurt Jensen-Schneider Code Enforcement Officer KJS:Is CE-96-127 :,ting this situation would great(y assisf us in he(ping make An inspection will be conducted on or shortly after May 4, Id fike to discuss this violation, please contact me at 572- 15.05 � E "� �� : d:�l 1 . �i � r� ; �5..: * { �� : �l � , �� I �, L� � � � ��; � t�. �� .�. �� � -� a �. �, _ � . f � a r � �" �, �; ' `� . � ,� . � � ' Tt^t frs � � r•�. rt `�T '� t �. � �� . �� a'. I �� K~ ' S. � .: i �j �� y �. ; t, � iy `S,i 4 i �� 1 �` M t �: .� � 'I > �� L� 4 ,� � `�i . } �= i _l_. _ ; ,�� , ;. ' F�i .� � os; - � � - f ,; s � '�'"�. 3 r�,._ �:i:? F �' - �i � ,. t �. �w i sli , ::, � 4 � t�� t:i; � . _..__ A: ��_ —'A . � � , -, r. µ ,t3. • .=n� z� �— g�, ' � _--_ s° . �_ � �_��� . ry �— C � � �., —� � �+�� ,� _�a . . . _ -. "''�" _�,;_ ,, �;- ._ _, , __,� _ � � ,�. _ _, _ �' � � �! � � ,� - � r..� . 1== ; �'`#i . •". �� ' � �,�{�i:#; �, �E �� ' i ��: �y �'-� ...s� � . � , . _ -. r . . . G: _. � � I l.�'�,y ' � � "` t ... , .- ..� . . �'. . � r .��� �y _ + � t � � � _-=_%_ �� � `rp , �� ?.a�f �- ., s� _—�n � �.i . __,�='���p d�r,�� „ s�?...--- - ',�,y <"*"�-"--"�trR�� .' �G� ... ` ...'�d�"' . "..r�r �_�:i 1r _ .. � � \^* ----- �- 1.,_ i� .� �� " .. t- � ' r s � " -"�—�"""` - q � . , ... � ., � f`, _ _�„���' r _ �. , :µ , .. � . ` -�...�... , --. — `._._. "---��. _ ��---`"`=-� .. � y � �y � f . ',LA„ 4 -„�'",$'.s�i0►' t"'-"' ,.� . �*�—.� _ _ „�--.� .. 9 ±� �' � � • _- -r-'�'. . �� � , � �^f�qjt `� �Y_ .. � .. ; . �` 4A .. .. � _ �. I ►: .�`tii•r.-��. � ���1-+..� ' '.��s'l�.n+' �� � , �� '•rf+ li'. ! 4)4 � � � _ ,,� .1' �� M�/y�, .�-- C�a �� J_-r'`� , :r A'`. �1 i ^ � t :� .-*lt r;�!�T' ♦ . ' , r►�� � � @�. �, _ . , � , ���,��, , ,,,... �-,.� ��'��,��-���--�� � � - �` � .�,.� -' `�: . : �� � � m _°`. r - � �: �' .,-„ � ,. � � y � , � � ---��� --_-- �., _ ..•►� 1 � � �� , —1 , � +� �. �� , �, � > 4 � , -�,' ��I�' � ' __ . ,y , I ��- � � �y F .� ;� -�,: _ { r; F 1 �� : � SY .� ' � ;;�` .. ; ' , �=-+ �'A `, i`-:. �.i�)� .� , � ,� x ��> �+ • , ' �. �,,,,�., „r, - - ✓" !'.".?'r � ` I .. . _ I�1 � �'�- �y 't - � �i " �:: � ' 1 : � � ► � � ���,, .s�r �rr +' � � i � ,,�, �, t. , : �� -:� .. ',� _ - ' -�l5�1 _ ? ., ..._� � �� r . . y a� ��:� .��; - y � � ... '�: �.�.._: ._ � ei � #' ` �� t� ���� �. I " t e ° r�;:.' .. �.(r'�>��_: . ... : ���a„� .r,�,-�:' � �...��...�.�rf. .., , - :: ; .. �_' _, ,. : �..� . ' I�-'� 1 i � . . � �� f�. �i p-'r �i�I I � s� . ,: r t � � t �-� 1 1 ,� ,�� � ; �:� �, ' � ,�� � i �Yi �. . _ _ �� �r �� . �. �� ��n ` _._.,� ` � --------.. n ` �-�� ;�.�� _:.�.��` � �� 1 t:s.b.�.,:iT". �, � � �.. �. � : .�.�.W� ,,._ �' , ; � �� �� __ j� i�f ,' .., ���. t; �' -�� . ��.. ,�«-• . - � ; :.gc. -�� '� � r - � � ;.� �� .-,�,,� ►, - � � f ,_.. _._...�r�,�:^. � : � c.�/ :�. �� � j� �� ���5, 1 -. _._.._ � !d � r � -_. '�� • .� _ ..___.. _ _ . � . . < .1 , ` . _ . . /� � � � . —., � ;'� �, •-- _. - . . - � / ' ��. � . � . .�� dr. :� � _ � . ' � . .r . � • (� ,� � .. . �_. �� . ' ,' i, � �Y � s.:'.. �:s�'�'j- �''[..�.�'.: ,::'�.y � r • . , -��� ;, � �;_:: �. : � - _��` L- -- - ��F ��4 ` � i��� � � ` �- �{ y� _ `�� r`� � M�,�� , � ,. . , �� ': .. . �...f�" "'���� J�a`�"�"���A � `� �g�''+ -_.�� .. . ... �_�_ , � . _. � , ` .. - � --___"' .M�.�� �� ..�r/ . .:_.-.__. ' � _ . ' � _ � '�, i,:.. �„ .,t ' - , _ --i'...L� - � . . . �+.. + - - :I5%' %' , � '� , . , ` . �yc",.��'' - � � .- _ " - . ' � . _ ' `—__ �-------- � � � . . . rrv'� — �,` � _.� -- . -.. - _ t. � . . - � 8`A` � - _� �, '!� �.,. . C . . �. . .. - - _ , .. . "�:. . , . �,i• _� �•� � � ... � , . . .. ��q ��y ` -�"°, ... � �N- r'��y�.,,�.��..� . ' , ., �� - �'. '""+.. -».A:,.1Y�, �.• 1 .'.,: : ?.�;,n� �C'X" �j, Y � � _ � ��' e.�:,,.u� �:°t...�'D-.'. ' sIR����: . � � � ' ... , �-.. ... . R�. 'V .� �+r� .. : . . _ . rnr!;� �. �"�$���y.5� r.. .. �'�'' . '� ¢� � at ii' _.... . ' .. - . ....nn . . . . . . . . , - .CTI' PERRETEN- : A�enda Ttem: )F FRIDLEY PROJECT SUMMARY STH STREET N.E. VARIANCE ,pPlicant 1Vrchael & `C� itilan er Autfior�zation . :, � DESCRII'"ITON OF REQUEST• Michael and Sherry Perreten have requested a variance to allow an 8' X 24' garage e�ansion. The property is located at the corner of 5 Street N.E. and 60th Avenue N.E. The setback of the existing home and garage is 10' along the 60th A enue property line. HARDSHIP STATEMENT: SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Code Section 205.07.03.(D), states, ' than seventcen and one-half (17.5) fe building which opens on the side st side strceY'. The Perreteds request the street side. The eadsting attache A 1965 reconsauction of a tornado a garage expansion today.. Accordi yards were required. No addition state: Garages with doors not op� (rather than 25'). The layout of the west end of the new garage. This � to expand their gazage to two cars, The request is then also within ran body of text) he side yard width on a street side with a corner lot shall not be less ". Code corninu�s by stating, "Any attached or unattached accessory et, shall be at least twenty-five (25) feet from the property line of a ;lates to the 25' setback requirement because the garage opens on garage is a singie car design that opens onto 60th Avenue N.E. maged home (on this substandard sized lot) has left few options for to the setback requirements in effect at that time, two 10 foot side setback was required for a corner lot. Cunent Code requirements Zg onto the side street can be as close to the right-of-way as 17.5' ;rreten site is such that the overhead door could be relocated to the uld minimize the size of variance required and allow the Penetens ule decreasing the impact of cars backing directly onto the street. of previously granted variances. The Perretens have indicated that ti�e staff recommended alternative is not one they would favor, as they were hoping to utilize their existingl drive with little or no modification. RECOMMENDED CITY COU CIL ACTIONS: Staff recommends approval of VAR #96-17 with the following stipulations: 1) The garage be reoriented to allow access through a relocated verhead door on the west end of the garage, 2) A new hard surface driveway shall be installed within 1 y of City Council approval of this variance, 3) The existing driveway sha11 be removed and replaced with sod or landscape plantings. APPEALS COMMISSION A�ON: The Appeals Commission recom ended approval of VAR #96-17, without the staff recommended stipulations. Staff Report VAR #96-U PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: A variance to reduce the side corner setback of an attached accessory structure from 25' to 10' to allow construction of a 8' x 24' garage addition. Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: Size: Topography: Ezisting Vegetation: Ezisting Zoning/Piatting: Availability of Municipal Utilities: Vehicular Access: Pedestrian Access: • Engineering Issues: Site Planning Issues: 5980 Sth Street N.E. Lot 1, Block 14, Hyde Park 5415.75 square feet Relatively flat Urban landscape R 1, Single Family, Hyde Park Available SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Sth Street N.E. to 60th Avenue N.E. NA DEVELOPMENT SITE HISTORY: May 6, 1965 - Numerpµs homes damaged or totally demolished by tornado. Home at 5980 Sih Street N.E. was damaged beyond repair. 16.02 �: f' �d.+_: Stafl' Report VAR #96-17 May 26, 1965 - The property owner from 5980 Sth Street N.E. stood before the Appeals mmission requesting a variance to rebuild the home demolished by the tornado. June 21, 965 - The City Council approved a variance to allow a side yard variance of 2.5' all ' a 7.5' side yard. At that time the Council also approved a front yard variance t 10'. October July 15, garage. Elsewher 1990 - T side stree 1965 - A building permit was issued for a house and gatage. - A va�iance was requested to allow expansion of the existir►g single car in the City... City granted a side yard variance ta 15', for a garage that open onto the 1995 - T e City approved reconstruction �f a garage 6" from an unimproved side street. In instance, the garage did n.ot open onto the side street right-of-way and the City ' cited the unimproved right-of-way as the umque features that supported their approval. Code n 205.07.03.(D), states, "The side yard width oti a strcet side with a corner lot shall at be less than seventeen and one-half (17.5) feet". Code contiriues by . stating, " attached or unattached accessory building which opens on the side street, shall be least twenty-five (25) feet from the property line of a side street". The P have indicated that their reason for requesting a variance is due to two physical c eristics. As stated: [A] "Narrow corner lot" [and as conshucted, the] "house is ideways" [on the lot]. A 1965 r options fc at thai tin for a corc be reloca� expand t� onto the onstruc�ion of a tornado damagedon this substandard sized lot) has left few a garage expansion today. According to the setback requirements in effect , two 10 foot side yards were required. No additional setback was required - lot. However, the iayout of the site is such that the overhead door can i to the west end of the new garage. This would allow the Perretens to r garage to two cars, while decreasing the impact of cars backing directly 3 � s.o3 Stati Report VAR #96-i7 WEST: SOUTH: EAST: NORTH: Comprehensive Planning Issues: Public Hearing Comments: Though existing mature shade trees are present in the west yard, a driveway can be situated to minimize damage or removal of those trees. Moving the overhead door to the west end of the new e�cpanded garage will also minimize the size of variance required. Crarages with doors not opening onto the side street can be as dose to the right-of-way as 17.5' (rather than 25'). The request is then also within previously granted variance allowances. Zoning: R 1 Zoning: R 1 Zoning: R 1 Zoning:' R 1 Corisistent To be taken RECOMN�NDED ACTTONS: ADJACENT SITES Land Use: Single Family Residerrtial Land Use: Single Family Residential Land Use: Single Family Residential Land Use: Single Farnily Residential >. Staff recommends approval of VAR #96-17 with the following stipulations: 1) The garage be reoriented to allow access through a relocated overhead door on the west end of the garage; 2) A new ha.rd surface driveway shall be installed within 1 year of City Council approval of this variance; 3) The existing, driveway shall be remove�i and replaced with sod or landscape plantings. 4 1$.04 �-�.�-��� u �1 n y � -�1'�`� � �� � �r`���� -.��-�l� � 1"� . � �� � �'- y� , � �/, :�a�- I ��� �� , �`oPosc� � �T � �� � � . � � �� � � � 1� �_ � !,,� �I��„��1�1`'wISG ✓�U ��(.� /�� 7 u �l , �- _�....J ���2 `-� D ��-�,.. � G�� � �� �/) .� C� /1`'CC'�C�� '/�✓ y �%/L `%��� ' .; � ��� ��� �� � � t�Y:�� ���K �- � ��c��� — f-/vn� � .�j1��Q - �. L o Y.1� �� I�� ��� c��J��i�/S ic� i� - �a Z ��� NL� Cr� I (�r� L� /� ��ic��tTS /��j � ���--� � �f� / ��� . � G� r J ' � �� �=��� �� � ������ �� v v l_.r� //�� { � � Si F ' 4 GC �l ��� �G�� v �� � 7� ��+/1, �L� �C.Y a �:. ���� . �-L.`7 � [/L,.X �jj'l-�J� � � � 16.05 L%��� �„� ( `I/_ 7/ � � l I '.. � j N _ _ - - � - - - - - - -- -- VAR #�6-17 Michael Perreten 5980 Sth Street CATI O N MAP .1 ` � \ .,` \y _ . � � ��; �� � �� '� ,; �. i_ � v , �� , � �,� _ _� �.� -� `-� � �� � '�I � � � � ��� `` ?\ \ `.� �� �. �1 t� (� �� _'� �1�, � �� � . �..: � `J , �, aC 5`?,-�' �a ..��w3`: W _ ���� A� v-y� � ---:_ � � � . � � �� r ..i ,-ti 1 �:v � �..._i -� -..._. �� --__ ; , -�� �_ti' i� , `� i y' � ��v� � �� : �; �--� .� U i J�'� � 4, ..�� `' - �' `i �`� �b � �' � � �� , � j �,� `A '��',' � . � ` � IU� V1 � � 't1 __ `�C n � � __„_.`_I �__1 ..._,_( _. � `�; � � �-_ >i � I�: � . � ' l , � � . � � i „ ; v /° 11 �-,; � 111 �?,�I,� .r � r�� � 16.07 __ __ _.__--_-__ ___ � ;, -, y f,,-- l , �r� ,-__ , � � � ,.; > � �� � � � APPEALS COMMISS[ON MEET[IYG AUGUST 14 1996 PAGE 4 Mr. Kuechle stated suggested this request be discussed at the end of the agenda. 3. PUBLIC HEARlNG: CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #96-17 BY MICHAEL & SHERRY PERRETEN: Per Seetion 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((3)) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the side corner setbadc of an attached accessory structure facing the street from 25 feet to 10 feet to allow the construction of an 8 foot by 24 foot garage addition, on Lot 1, Biock 14, the same being 5980 - 5th Street N.E. MOTION t�y Ms. Beaulieu, seoonded by Dr. Vos, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOlCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARlNG OPEN AT 7:40 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the subject parcel is located at the oomer of 60th Avenue and 5th Street. The request is to a(low the expansion of a garage and a expansion of the existing setback which is 'f 0 feet from the existing right-of-way along the 60th Avenue property 1ine. The petitioner is proposing to add an 8-foot x 24foat addition to the westem face of the existing garage and to rework the garage structurally to accommodate 2 vehicles. In looking at the �equest, staff {ooked at the code sections that apply to seibacks o� comer lots and noted that the setbadc requirement for a garage on a comer when the garage door faces the street is 25 feet. If the garage were positioned so it was no# facing the street, it could be as close as '17.5 feet to the street right-of-way. Mr. Hickok stated the home constructed prior to 'i 965. A different home was on the site at that time which was damaged beyond repair in a tornado. The property ovimers requested and received a variance to allow the home to be constructed in this manner. The varianoe allowed a 7.5 foot setback along the south side of #he property and allowed the street side setback of 10 feet that exists today. The building permit was is�ued and the house constructed with a single stall garage. Mr. Hickok stated staff �ecommends bringing the variance request within previously gfanted variances and to approve the variance to the setback with the following stipulations: The garage be reoriented to allow access through a refocated ovefiead door on the west end of the garage. 2. A new hard surface driveway shall be installed within 1 year of City Council approval of this variance. 16.08 MMfSSiON M�ETiNG, AUGUST t4, 199G PAGE 5 3. The existing driveway plantings. Mr. Perreten stated he was shall be removed and replaced with sod or landscape to see the recommendation to alter the plan. He would like to see the original lan app�oved or disapproved. Moving the garage door to the west side does not change he cost of the structure very much but moving the driveway around to the west side increa es the cost of removing the old driveway and constructing a new driveway. He would al have a longer driveway to clear of snow in the winter. He would probably have to back out onto 60th Avenue anyway. He does not see what he would gain by moving the door o the west side. The house in 10 feet back from the right- of-way. No use is being mad of that right-of-way today. There are two large oak trees by the end of the west side of t e driveway that people would have to come through if the driveway were changed. He uspects there will not be a sidewalk in front of the house. Parking cars in the driveway is not blocking anything being used by the public. Their intention was to widen the gar ge and replace the asphalt driveway with concrete. That allows them to park the cars ff the street as they have done for the last 23 years. Qr. Vos asked the petitioner, if �hey are goi�g 8 feet to the west, how ciose witl they get to '� the I�rge irees. I Mr. Perreten stated he did n t understand moving the driveway in order to expand the existing garage. The existing riveway is wide enough for a car to park to the side of the existing garage door. The exi ting driveway is wide enough to serve a two-car garage. Dr. Vos stated a stipulation of a variance. If the garage less. to put the door on the west side so you.wouid need less is placed on the no�th side, the redu�tion required is then Mr. PeReten stated he is not m ving anything closer to the street than it was before. It is the same distance from the str et as it has always been. He did not think there were other ways to expand the garage for e same amount of money o� with the same convenience. He wants to add one siall to is garage for convenience and make the driveway more permanent. This will make the dwelling more pleasant and hopefully increase the resale value of the home_ To him, it ounded like an improvement. Mr. Kuechle stated the probl�m is the code requires and what should the Commission allow in the variance. Mr. Perreten stated the origin, same distance as requested , �, variance was approved to 10 feet and this request is the The physical distance between the cu�b and the 16.09 APPEALS COMMISSIOIV MEETING, AUGUST 14, 1996 PAGE 6 house is 26 feet. He has been parking his car in front of the garage for years with space feft over on the end. Dr. Vos stated the only neighbors affected is the one to the south and to the west. Have there been any comments from the neighbors? Mr. Perreten stated he has not heard anything from the neighbor to the west. The neighbor to the south has another garage at the end of their house. MOTlON by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAlRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:53 P.M. Dr. Vos asked if this request would automatically go to the City Council because there was a staff difference. Mr. Hickoic stated yes, this request would go before the City Council. Ms. Beaulieu stated she thought there was a hardship because this is a 41-foot lot. With a 41 foot tot, the�r options are not as open as with a targer lot. The !ot is narrow and that in itself could be considered a hardship. She did not see this as a det�iment. Mr. Kuechle stateci he concurred. It is somewhat of a hardship in that the City allowed the first variance in 1�5 and is now saying they cannot. He can understand the code requirement and the City has a right to dernand a variance be requested. He cannot see that there is any purpose served by moving the driveway to the west except to meet the code but the p�titioner would still need a variance although to a lesser degree. He would recommend approval. Dr. Vos stated, in looking at the suggested driveway, the petitioner would lose more yard. He did not see any advantage to changing the driveway. The request seemed reasonable considering the narrow lot. He would recommend approval. MOT10N by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Dr. Vos, to recommend approval of Variance Request, VAR #96-17, by Michael and Sherry Perreten to reduce the side corner setback of an attached accessory structure facing the s#reet from 25 feet to 10 feet to allow the construction of an 8 foot by 24 foot ga�age addition, on Lot 1, Block 14, the same being 5980 - 5th Street N. E 16.10 P �r UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MOTION CARRIED UNANII Ms. McPherson s#ated the C 0 C►1 PAGE 7 1NG AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECH�E DECLARED THE SLY. Council wouid consider this request on August 26. ��l Per Section 205.12.04 f the Frid(ey Zoning Code, to reduce the front yard se ack from 35 feet to 25 feet, and Per Section 205.12.04 the Fridtey Zoning Code, to reduce fhe side ard seiback on a corner lot from 5 feet to 30 feet to allow the expansio of an existing wellhouse on Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Central View Manor, erally located at 7345 Highway 65 N.E. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seoond�by Ms. Beaulieu, to waive the re ing of the public hearing notice and to open the pubtic earing. UPON A VO�CE VOTE, ALL V�TING AYE, CHA►IRP�=g�BION KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTiON CARRiED AND TH PUBLtC HEARI(VG ',�PEN AT 7:58 P.iVI. Mr. Hidcok stated the request has requested the variance along Highway 65 and a red� of the request to allow the G well #12. As proposed, the s 30 feet and along 73 1/2 Ave by the City of F' ley. Mr. Flora, Director ofi Public Works, � behatf of City to atiow a reduced front yard setback ed front y d setback along 73 112 Avenue. The purpose �tructi of an addition to the filte� plant stnacture serving ba tong Highway 65 wouid be reduced from 35 feet to a rom 35 feet to 25 feet. Mr. Hidcok stated the City uired this property in 9969 th�ough tax forfeiture. As the code is written, property ui ed for a City purpose reverts to a"P", Public Designation, by City ownership an use of the iand. The existing building was construcied in 1970. Recently, the City ouncil h s grappled with waier quality and the necessity for an additional filtrati facility in t e City. The City hired a consulting firm to analyze where the facility wo d be best plac d and this site was pinpointed. Mr. Hic stated a hardshi does exist in that well #12 is drilled and the related equip nt is in place_ The filtr tion building as designed would be matched to the existing wel ouse. The addition exten s the existing building setback dimensions toward the right- -way. Staff looked at alter atives to construction on this site including stepping the building back. The issue is not new building but the existing building with a substanda�d setback. Staff also evaluate the alternative of demolishing the existing structure and 16.11 �:: ,_., � �: ;� �. ;�:� �. �:;� �'#��.���i�t����.� � � = ?r � , ti }�� ,�, : :; � � .,� r = � ;� J�4 � ^�=�: . .... s- "."�"c�i,n. ; ..._._ .. � -T; i� �3i �s� r ? r�.� 'C "� +� "` � .�FXSy'��''a�Z�3'F �'� s,/�`x, r+�-i"kl' 'r� -r� - `t'3,i � �.e:� r v3. � . -y�" .�y�'fr+`a �i "F _ _ ..�^` �, - � � } ' tS'�' - t x : �.. `� ti5m;., . '{� ' i^ i°° t'r,y�: : �3� t �,-£ S �e9' ��= r������ t � s �#� - �,,, _ -, � .� : � � ��,r . ;t r: , � t .`a��b �y���� � re �� �..• ��� ^�� ��\ r�y ��'i�� �,i .' ',�.' �+' �'� ja 4�' 4 � 'c_.�-, .� - � � �, � 1 r � ,� �"�, t""�f-� _ �.._ t 3-- �r ` r ;.y �-�•+`� :'s.��� � r- a -e : � �' � . . ,� �. ' F � � �, u s h . x ^�o �s �� �'s.L. +P'�7.SE• �f �..3 5^^S+ C'' Z�'� �_ a . . � � .�^-.s� _ f ' S�. � � +� i a .,�.. .' ' �"� �. S t �( '' f �. � r �. �..�'^*a ' �y ,r i�•"`�P' �,�_.,.`� . � �' .:.� t..� � t � t � ' s � - - � .. � t�'- � ,r..M � Z. E , � c �` ' � k p�.q � { � o �- � -- _' _ � . �"�; [� t_ . j', � � 1 ! > �.. .Ci � � � �s � _���x � � �e.� `! .._ . f• �: 1.� ` � .�`"�,3 �� � >. r '-_- ^� _ . . ' � . ��r•. . F � ��+*� � �� `�. � v . _' � 4`.r�..-. ', '°E.-+Ha, .r.. t � '� �� \ ` 1. � �":. ` ' ; F`� L ,1 - iy �' N}'���� ` "i . �C3'� l.t'��n V � C' '� �� � i �� E��'a,l j , . , i � �.�� r �, L�_J.< , C' $'�4" � ,) ' + . � ��� � �� � �; '�. �'+ e � .: a ; i N ,� ° r '��� fi.,7 ( . � t i _ _ � ':. � � � . Y;' _ d� ' . �. S �,� ,�.,b- 3'- ` ��i� +s _ f � ; �; /1 e i 1 �'" 'I �' �r � �th„- �?aw .i ,�.,,ds(tr r _ �'Q c ..�'��"� y � �e• � � �i r � t. "� �r`.�iJ�"�� . ( �� O . . ��.. � 'i 3.:r �... - '.3,.1. � .� 3- �-`- Y � `ti �.—,� "iE�. , �r ' j � �V-- .., 1 �, . 4, 1 '„ - , t ,��: - - C . ��:: �,� . G `:'` ki� ` t r � r� � r� S t. 1" f ti r�•` � � y.�.� � .:z-�. � "`� -a- 'v� . � iv -.� -� i �r -:r,,� i�„ y.�c �°}k 4 F � l 3�°'7 ��. _ �•'i .F'�' �r� �' � �r3�Y Y�� }�?t �i" �. S, - S c �,. Y~' F f.- � � a 1'" r 'j hJd'^ �. v�ri�M � , k� � A . I y:•; ' +3�+ t � \ _ ,� Y �, ` � �� �X �� � t _ ' : ' _ �J � '�, '� i !. t 3 67 , .1` : . '�" � ���cy' � S' ,- 2 c 't�.'s�? { ` �� ti '" ' \ - �" u �e ; a *,s �t.' �fi_ � � 1 . 3` � � , - � F(„SJ F- J � �ffi i„y4 ��s.�Y.a 4�f��`A? y' - ;� '' Y = fJ.. y� S C . Y ' ,� 4� `, . �`S . � r ;" t ,3 � i F� ..! � ��j � . - . ., � � " � . t �f �. : .- � ^ � � �, 2 j r. �} `' �'c�" � � -�, � t � ` 'r'�a � w i �' - dt � � a '��. �ry, f r . ' .r z -'�`'�; Y �"t �.�' ,F,a°i�rF �h �.�.� e� . ~ 3 � � . -� � � e '�� ,�,'���'�',' � � �i` r • S. s �.` .5` C-�'a .R- "�.-��•3�f�ibr'� „s- Y` a .�. �., p � � � t � �Y1�. .-r- v = ��, d;y, x. i`xt{- � ST~ .�•x:� xl�h.r�. .^i 'L .� � y,_. �r ..,nF . i n.� ,t���y�{y~, r�. y a (�,t :�:' a '� ^�' _ . , . ""� r� �,. -r, " r �:T`� +� - . �« tdt.� �._.1 .� � r , ip,rs y „I ' ap,�i ky t (�� S _ 1.. � ' .i Y .r�� '.���e�y� "i � Y � �-..��. 't '��5 .� �.' ��9• . ...4=j ♦..-.. Ri,'w�-'��±� �� ^' ��,> .�y...�s' ^ ti i�E,� � _�a -i? �r.'.� � F � ts � . '� � �.:���Y > � y X ���ir� � , x 3 . :` ^hi `. .11° � i'�.�F.?�:^ �{' 7. � kµ� s +� � ,�... �� . ..=�4- r}�'..�'��{4�-.'.�...iky � �� . si:�r,' ._c*..r� .!�F..:�'`..ls .._`��` o_.�: . t ..� ��.e� .�. •- f°�'��'R' : .✓R� '1 ��.�.+1, r_i� �wy�E•�2�. J: �Ji �.� ���,�€,if'Aetia'i,'�' �c ;�p� i ' F ':+......,.�� ,' �jr� ;;' ` "'� �� '�.°.Y"; �'�'.F ry , t- ( j� �. .:{' ' ' •t'. ��,(�,a�,,,�c�.'t �y7� r,�-f`thj X:�v ���,�R �C �h' Yry 'r� L �,PiAy��,ft� q a - � _ i ������ r # Z f:' � v .y , � .,,c! <w1 r 4?r � il' % "�'"` .� . .�:. �"r� 'k:,� Ee �..�G�?�.�lt , G'4y„r� �"�k�t'� :� t��5`r�i '�:��� R � �C' a�.; � ; =y �a�.��y _ �,� - .. ,r� ;x ;�.��5: t�r}.,,y�'.7,4��"���:Y.. ' �.I%� s���..n�y iw- ... . r`. � .% y 1!�•��.f �� .` «� i�5��it s'� • �...� s .'Gf 1 r +.� s o.f � . c �. .� �J'3 y �5-!� . s +I . , 3Y:I �' � "1�ei M'` � � � RIf -i�i ����'� �'�a:�-. v.�, -, � :� y . `Y �� �� ��� � t, x +.� �r� s `. � t ,_J ., .:ii�`��t . _ ,1' TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM _ � ' �ir� HARD D. PRIBYL; WILL W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ��la RIC D D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR PAUL . NANSEN, STAFF ACCOUNTANT RESO UTION ADOPTING A"PROPOSED" BUDGET FOR THE FISC YEAR 1997 DATE: August 22, 1996 In conformance with Chapt r 275, Section 065 of the Minnesota Statutes, attached is the "proposed" 1997 Prelimina Draft Budget. Chapter 275 requires the Ci to certify a"proposed" budget to the County Auditor prior to September 15. � We request the City Budget. RDP/ph Attachment pass the attached resolution and adopt the 1997 "Proposed" � RESOLUTION NO. - 1996 A RESOLUTiON ADOPTING A"PROPOSED" BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1997 WHEREAS, Chapter 7, Section 7.04 of the City Charter provides that the City Manager shall prepare an annua! budget; and WHEREAS, Chapter 275, Section 065 of Minnesota Statutes requires that the City shall adopt a proposed budget before September i 5; and WHEREAS, Chapter 275, Section 065 of Minnesota Statutes requires that such "proposed• budget be certfied to the County Auditor; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following "proposed" budget be adopted and approved: GENERAL FUND , axes an peciai Assessments: Current Ad Valorem Delinqueni, Penafties, Forteited Special Assessments Licenses and Permits: Licenses Permits Intergovernmental: Federal State - Homestead and Agricufture Credit Aid Local Government Aid Local Pertormance Aid All Other Charges for Services HRA Water Fund Sewer Fund Storm Water Fund Liquor Fund Cable N Fund Construction Funds Fines and Forfeits Interest on Investments Miscellaneous Revenues Other Financing Sources: Sales of General Fixed Assets Closed Debt Service Fund Liquor Fund TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Fund Balance: General Fund Reserve ESl7MATED REVENUE $3.688.736 119,613 1,890 150,01 P 387,790 4,g47 1,039,739 1,626,516 31,801 482,873 291,796 244,737 153,032 147,449 81,962 58,556 22,303 63,027 188,460 350,000 149,292 15,977 145,821 75, 000 9.521.229 508, 476 Legislative: City Council Planning Commissions Other Commissions Ciry Management: General Management . Personnel Legal Finance: Elections Accounting Assessing MIS City Clerk/Records Police: Police Civil Defense Fire: Fire Rental Housing Inspections Public Works: Municipal Center Engineering Lighting Park Maintenance Street Maintenance Recreation: Recreation Natu�alist Community Development: Building Inspection Planning Reserve: Emergency Nondepartmental: APPROPRIATIONS $94.091 2,032 12.289 284,604 93,596 245,000 0 566.263 119,575 1 T0,346 109,517 3,195,146 9,850 741,937 96,089 195,265 450,271 192,700 690,738 1,182,067 602,638 219,509 217,534 369.021 100,000 69.827 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $10,029,705 s10.029,705 i 7.02 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Cabie Fund Grant Management Fund Solid Waste Abatement Fund Housing Revitalization Fund Fund Balance TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Capital Improvement Fund Taxes — Current Ad Valorerr Interest on Investments Donations State Aid Construction Fund Balance TOTAL, CAPITAL PROJECTS AGENCY FUND Six Cities Watershed Fund Taxes — Current Ad Valorem TOTAI. AGENCY FUND TOTAL . PASSED AND ADOPTED BY A.UGUST, 1996 ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY $114,750 205,946 240,125 250,000 78,376 UNDS $889.197 $85,550 General Capital Improvement 265,925 Streets Capital Improvement 10,000 Parks Capital Improvement 500,000 507.665 51.369.140 $3, 911 $3,911 512.291.955 $140,486 205,946 292,765 250,000 5889,197 $97.000 992,540 279,600 _ :1.369.140 $3.911 53.911 512.291.953 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 26TH DAY OF 17.03 WILUAM J. NEE - MAYOR MEMORANDUM � s FINANCE DEPARTMENT CITY OF FRIDLEY ' �w� TO: FROM: SUBJECT; DATE: RICHARD D. PRIBYL FIIV.�VCE DIRECTOR WILLI M W. BURIVS, CITY MANAGER��1� RICH RD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR PAUL . HANSEN, STAFF ACCOUNTANT RESO UTION CERTIFYING "PROPOSED" TAX LEVY REQU REMENTS FOR 1997 TO THE COUNTY OF ANOKA FOR C LLECTION August �22, 1996 In conformance with Chapter 75, Section 065 of the Minnesota Statutes, attached is a resolution certifying "proposed" tax levy quirements to the Anoka County Auditor. Chapter 275 requires the City t certify its "proposed" tax levy requirements prior to September 15. The 1997 "proposed" tax levy f$3,882,712 represents a decrease of $14,917 over the 1996 certified levy. This is the result of an' crease in HACA of $14,917 and no increase in the tax levy. We request the City Council pass the attached resolution to certify the "pmposed" tax levy requirements. RDP/ph Attachment 18.0 7 RE80LUTION NO. - 1996 A RESOLIITION CBRTIFYING ��PROPOSgD�� TA% LEVY REQIIIREMENTS FOR 1997 TO THE COONTY OF ANORA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Chapter 275, Section 065 requires the City to certify its "proposed" tax levy requirements to the County Auditor; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley certify to the County Auditor of the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, the following "proposed" tax levy to be levied in 1996 for the year 1997. GENERAL FUND General Fund CAPITAL PROJECT FUND Capital Improvement Fund - Parks Division AGENCY FUND Six Cities Watershed Management Organization TOTAL ALL FUNDS $3,806,948 $ 72,689 � 3.075 �3,882.712 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF AUGUST, 1996. ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 18.02 F TO: FROM: �x7iT T T A Aii A.!''i7A Aif r ��� WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER��C� WILLIAM A. HAMPA, CITY CHARTER STAFF LIAISON SUBJEC�: FIRST REAII�TG OF AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 2.06.01 OF THE FRIDLEY CI'l�Y CHARTER DATE: AUGUST 22, At the July 22, 1996 meeti g of the Fridley City Council a public hearing was held on amendments to Sectio 2.06.01 of the Fridley City Charter which have been proposed by the Fridley ome Rule Charter Commission. Th� next step is to submit the amendm�nts fo approval by ordinarice. ' Minnesota Statutes, Chapt r 410.12, Subd. 7. Amendment by ordinance begins as follows: "Upon recomme dation of the charter commission the city council may enact a charter amendmen by ordinance. Such an ordinance, if enacted, shall be adopted by the council b an affirmative vote of all its members after a public hearing upon two weeks' ublished notice containing the text of the proposed amendment and shall be a proved by the mayor and published as in the case of other ordinances." (Emph sis added.) , . Subject to these considera Fridley City Council for a of August 26, 1996. Attachment c: Don Mittelstadt, , I request that you present these amendments to the reading of the amending ordinance at their meeting irperson, Fridley Charter Commission ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.06.01 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: That the following sections of the Fridley City Charter be amended as follows: CHAPTER 2 CITY COUNCIL ORGANIZATION Section 2.06. VACANCIES IN THE COUNCIL. 1. A vacancy in the Council shall be deemed to exist in case of the failure of any person elected thereto to qualify on or before the date of the second regular meeting of the new Council, or by reason of the death, resignation, removal from office, removal from the Gity, removal of a ward councilmember from that ward, continuous absence from the City for more than three (3) months, or conv�.ction of a felony of any such person whether before or after their qualification, or by reason of the failure of any councilmefiber to perform any of the duties of inembership in.the Council for a period of three (3) months. In each such case, within thirty (30) days the Council shall by resolution declare a vacancy to exist. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1996. ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: July 22, 1996 First Reading: Second Reading:;. Publication: 19.02 TO: FROM: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER��� ���►,,C- � WILLIAM A. HAMPA, CITY CHARTER STAFF LIAISON SUBJEC�: FIRST READ FRIDLEY CI7 DATE: AUGUST 22, G OF AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 3 OF THE CHARTER At the July 22, 1996 meeti g of the Fridley City Council a public hearing was held on amendments to Chapter 3 of the Fridley City Charter which have been proposed by the Fridley Home Rule Charter Commission. The next step is to submit the amendments for approval y ordinance. • Minnesota Statutes, Chapt� follows: "Upon recommen enact a charter amendmen adopted by the council � hearing upon two weeks' amendment and shall be a other ordinances." (Emuh; r 410.12, Subd. 7. Amendment by ordinance begins as lation of the charter comm.ission the city council may by ordinance. Such an ordinance, if enacted, shall be an affirma�tive vote of all its members after a public . �ublished notice containing the te�rt of the proposed proved by the mayor and published as in the case of �is added.) � Subject to these considerati ns, I request that you present these amendments to the Fridley City Council for a rst reading of the amending ordinance at their meeting of August 26, 1996: Attachment c: Don Mittelstadt, Ch�irperson, Fridley Charter Commission 2�.� � ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: That the following sections of the Fridley City Charter be amended as follows: CHAPTER 3 PROCEDURE OF COUNCIL Section 3.01. COUNCIL MEETINGS. 1. � . "�-'-�-T�i��-; The Council shall hold the first regular meetinq of the year on or before the ninth day of January. At this meetina �e anv newly elected members of the Council shall assume their duties. Thereafter, the Council shall ��-�� ► �w.... ..�...,, _...,.... ..� .. �,.. ..�. ,� .��.. ----j @�2RE 2i6�E89—�z:azr azz�-�r�zr-u�vn-arsr hold reaular meetings at a fixed time at least` once each month as prescribed by resolution. A regular meeting is one that is scheduled by resolution, at which formal action is taken and for which minutes are recorded. 2. A sAecial meetinq of the Council may be called as needed by �the Mayor OY' any }�� __ " � tW0 � Z i _.._-''=_ _ =f tho r^*4:?:.� � ... " �-i `^l ee�-�gs e�t-�i�� ^-•----" Councilmembers upon compliance with the notification requirements in Minnesota statutes and upon at least twelve (12) hours' notice to each member of the Council. Such notice s�� must be a�„-,�v�a communicated personally to each member or pe—�e`�—aL t-� � �ae�e-e` -- ��a--�� �.�'-'� to a person of suitable age and discretion �e� residing '--��i at the member's usual '� L..... {-L. C L. .. l l L... F� place of residence, or ��n notice �ree=-sr���e-� ���•�a '-���� of the meeting must be transmitted to the member's residence. The presence of any member of the Council at a special meeting shall constitute a waiver of any formal notice unless the member appears for the spe�ei-a-� purpose of obj ecting to the holding of s�te� the meeting. Formal action is taken at a special meeting, and minutes are recorded. m'-� ^�••-�" ���t-�e--���e-�a�rc e-e-€-ab �-e��e�.-=-T 2�.�2 �I 3. 4. tt All meetings of 1 s�ecified bv law reasonable times federal law. � {-�}�� ( Re f . Section 3.02. The Council shall Secretary shall #ee}� p: The Secretary shall al; s�e� other duties as m the Council. The Counc the City, except the � act as Secretary of tY e Council shall be public unless otherwise ��Any person shall have access to � � minutes a� or records '��= at all unless access is restricted by state or Special Election 4/12/60, Ord. 857) OF COUNCIL. se a Secretary �a-s�e�ro-t�r�� �F�' � "a �ee�es�sa� to serve at its meetings . The epare the journai of minutes of proceedings_ o prepare ---�� other records and perform ,y be required by this Charter or by vote of .l may designate any official or employee of ity Manager or a member of the Council, to : Council. Section 3.03. RUL�S CjF QUORUM AND PROCEDURE . '' �Councilmembers s�� constitute a quorum to do business, but a le ser number may adjourn from time to time. The Council shall dete�nine its own rules and order of business and shalZ keep a journal qf its proceedings. Section 3.04. ORDI Except as otherwise prc be by ordinance. Ever� in writing and read administrative busines the vote on ordinances shall be recorded un � members of the C all ordinances, � provided in this C ma�oritv vote of the Section 3.05. PROCE The enacting clause of be in the words, "Tt ordinance other than e�r readings in full�� between the first re , RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS. �ided in this Charter, all legislation shall ordinance and resolution shall be presented in full at a Council meeting. All may be transacted by ordinary motion. Upon motions, and resolutions the ayes and noes ess the vote is declared unanimous. � �e An affirmative vote of at least three cil s`���'��e is required for the passage of }s, ��a -esa���e�rs except as otherwise ter. Resolutions and motions require a ON ORDINANCES. all ordinances passed by the Council shall e City of Fridley does ordain." Every ergency ordinances shall have two (2) public with at least seven (7) days s'���TP-7=��se �ding and the second reading. � Any 20.03 legislation prescribing a penalty for its violation }���oz shall be enacted in the form of an ordinance�. Section 3.06. EMERGENCY ORDINANCES. l. An emergency ordinance is an ordinance necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, morals, safety or welfare in which the emergency is defined and declared, and which is passed by a vote of at least three (3) members of the Council, as recorded by ayes and noes. ���—t-� �e��-a�r���� ee�--��3-��e�-��-,i-es s—�re � , e�'-�e�a-t-}��-e��g e��-�o�e3-a��e�--t-�e�ee=-e�a� 2. No person(s), firm or corporation charaed with violation of the emeraency ordinance shall be �rosecuted unless• a1� the person(s), firm or corporation has had notice of the � passage of the ordinance; or � � ,b� the ordinance has been filed with the City Clerk posted in three conspicuous places in the City, and twenty-four (24) hours after the filing and postincr have elapsed; or c� the ordinance has been published. 3. No grant of any franchise shall ever be made by an emergency ordiriance. � Section 3.07. SIGNING, PUBLICATION AND RETENTION OF ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS. 1. Every ordinance passed by the Council shall be signed by the Mayor, or by three (3) other members of the Council, and attested by the City Clerk, published and recorded. 2. Every ordinance shall be pubiished at least once in the official newspaper of the City. If the publication of the title and a summary description of an ordinance clearly informs the public of its intents and effect, the Council may by €a�--{-�} three (3) affirmative votes of its members direct the City Manager to publish only the title of the ordinance together with a summary, with an added notice that a printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and at any other location designated by the Council. Prior to the publication of the title and summary, the Council �'•I1�iZ] shall approve a public of the publishing of th all legal requi ���. ext of the summary that clearly informs the ntent and effect of the ordinance. The title and summary shall be deemed to fulfill r€—��re—e��e--e��a�e-e--na-�'��r �ments �-.�— 3. Every ordinance hall be recorded in its entirety by the City Clerk in a book k pt for that purpose, within twenty (20) days after publicatio of the ordinance or of its title and summary. Proof f the publication shall be attached to and filed with the o dinance. 4. Al1 resolutions nd motions duly passed at each meeting of the Council may, at the discretion of the Council, be published in fu11 or in part in the official newspaper of the City. In the ase of partial publication, it shall be indicated in wha respect they are incomplete. 5. Any administrati� State of Minneso State of Minneso regulations pre circulation and ordinance by ref a ��t it for refez Clerk. The pubi: as fully satisf� material had bee Ord. 767, Ord. 7 Section 3.08. WiiEN Emergency ordinances, Chapter, and ordinan� money, determining t improvements and asse their passage. � E s-�ra3-� takes effect fi publication, unless a A3-� resolution� s�� Section 3.09. No ordinance or secti or repealed except by refer to the ordinan section number or : ordinance shall be �� The amending or subsection as requirement shall e rule or regulation of any department of the .a affecting the City or any statute of the a, or any published code, specifications'or �ared by an organization for general ase may be adopted and incorporated in an :rence `-«a and by marking copv of it as "official cop�y" and filing :nce and inspection in the office of the City �ation requirements of this Charter shall be �d �.-�—s�--�-e�a�ses by this method as if the set forth in the ordinance in full. (Ref. 0) AND RESOLUTIONS TAKE EFFECT. except as provided in Section 3.06 of this es making the annual tax levy, disbursing ie annual budget and providing for local :sments��= take effect immediately upon ery other ordinance� enacted by the Council 'teen (15) days after the date of �� its Later effective date is fixed ��� in it. takes effect upon �e� its passage. AND REPEAL OF ORDINANCES. �n ��� of an ordinance shall be amended ordinance. Every repealing ordinance shall :e repealed by title, date of passage and ers. No ordinance or section ���� of an am nded by reference to its title alone,—_ � ord nance shall set forth in full each section not �nded, , , �This apply to amendments to zoning ordinances. 2�.� 'S Section 3.10. �d�Sz�'.�n CODIFICATION OF ORDINANCES. The ordinances of the City sha11L �-�a���-e�e�rr�—�l���e~��a at intervals �-�r���of not more than five (5) years, be i-��=s��; rearranged and codified with such additions and deletions as may be deemed necessary by the Council. � The codification shall be published in book or continuously revised loose-leaf form or stored by electronic means such as a computer. a�-eCopies ���r of the Code of CitY Ordinances or any portion of it shall be made available by the Council at the office of the City Clerk for general distribution to the public at a reasonable charge. Each copv shall contain a printed certificate , attested to by the City Clerk, that the publication is correct�, and ••�'� ���'� each cot�v so published shall be received in evidence in all courts for the purpose of providing the ordinances �`��n contained in it, the same as �etr�} if the original ordinances were produced in court. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1996. ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: July 22, 1996 First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: 2�.�6 TO: I� W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER��r FROM: RICHAI�D D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: RESOL�JTION APPROVING A$1,500,000 LOAN TO THE HRA DATE: August 2�2, 1996 Attached you will find the r lution from our Attorney providing the legal authority for the loan from the City to the H . This resolution provides the legislation required for the loan from the City to the H . As you will recall, at the last Council meeting Grant Fernelius furnished an ove 'ew of the need for a revolving loan program for housing rehabilitation funded by this oan. I have attached Grant's ou ' to this memo as a resource, in case there are any questions that relate to the issue of the revolving loan program. The resolution provides a$1, OO,OOO loan to HRA. This loan will be treated as a General ObIigation Note of the HRA or a terni of 15 years at 5% interest. At the next HRA meeting an her resolution will be required authorizing the issuance, and providing for the repayment f the note. RDP/me Attachment 21.01 RESOLUTION NO. — 1996 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A$1,500,000 LOAN TO THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY IN AND FOR TH� CITY OF FRIDLEY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Fridley, Minnesota (the "City") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.041 provides that a City may make loans to its housing and redevelopment authority for redevelopment projects. 1.02. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley {the "Authority") has requested that the City loan the Authority the sum of $1,500,000 to defray certain redevelopment costs. Section 2. Approval and Authorization. 2.01. A Loan ta the Authority in the amount of $1,500,000 is hereby approved. The City's Finance Officer is hereby authorized to loan and shall loan to the Authority, on or before February 1, 1997, the sum of $1,500,000 upon receipt of the Authority's executed and registered � General Obligation Tax Increment Note (Series 1997) (the "Note") attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. . The loan is to be repaid in accordance with the terms described.in the Note. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 199 . WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 21.�2 EXHIBIT A �� $1,500,Q00 ITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA HOUSIN AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY In and For THE CITY OF FRIDLEY The Housing and Fridley, Minnesota {t be indebted and, for of the City of Fridle registered assigns (t extent and in the man of this Note, being O ($1,500,000.00} (the• thereon from February the dates {the "Sched Schedule attached as thereon (the "Schedul semiannual installmen lst day of February a: February 1, 2012. (SERIES 1997) .ed�velopment Authority in and for the City of .e "Authority"), hereby acknowledges itself to �alue received, promises to pay to the order �, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, or its .e "Owner") solely from the source, to the er hereinafter provided, the principal amount e Million Five Hundred Thousand Doll�rs Principal Amount"), together with interest 1, 1997 at a rate of five percent (5.0%), on led Payment Dates") set forth on the Payment xhibit A hereto and in the amounts stated d Payments"). This note shall be payable in s commencing on August 1, 1997, and on the d August thereafter until and including Upon 30 days' pr or written notice from the Authority to the Owner, the Principal ount is subject to prepayment at the option of the Authority in w ole or in part on any Scheduled Payment Date. Each payment on his Note is payable in any coin or currency of the United States f America which on the date of such payment is legal tender for p blic and private debts and shall be made by check or draft made p yable to the Registered Owner and mailed to the Registered Owner t its postal address within the United States which shall be design ted from time to time by the Registered Owner. The Note is a ge eral obligation of the Authority, which has been issued by the Au hority pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, S ction 469.178, Subdivision 3, to aid in financing a"project", as therein defined, of the Authority consisting generally f defraying certain public redevelopment costs incurred and to be incurred by the Authority within and for the benefit of its Re evelopment Project No. 1(the "Program"). 21.03 The Note is not a general obligation of the City of Fridley, Minnesota (the "City") or the State of Minnesota (the "State"), and neither the City, the State nor any political subdivision thereof shall be liable on the Note, nor shall the Note be payable out of any funds or properties other than funds and property of the Authority and from tax increment resulting from increases in taxable valuation of real property in the Authority's Tax Increment Financing Districts as set forth in the Resolution, authorizing the issuance of the Note, to which reference is made for a full statement of rights and powers thereby confined. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions, and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to have happened, and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Note have been done, have happened, and have been performed in regular and due form, time, and manner as required by law; and that this Note, together with all other indebtedness of the Authority outstanding on the date hereof and on the date of its actual issuance and delivery, does not cause the indebtedness of the Authority to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation thereon. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Authority has caused this Note to be executed by the manual signatures of its Chairman and Executive Director and has caused this Note ta be dated , 199 Chairman Executive Direetor This instrument was drafted by: Casserly Law Office, P.A. Suite 1100 Southpoint Office Center 1650 West 82nd Street Minneapolis, MN 55431 21.04 It is hereby cerl issued on the name of the City < and that, at the requE undersigned has this c interest on the Note : registration blank be: such purposes. Name of Registered Owner City of Fridley, Minnesota ified that the foregoing Note, as originally , 199 , was on said date registered in f Fridley, a Minnesota municipal corporation, st of said Owner of this Note, the ay registered this Note as to principal and n the name of such Owner, as indicated in the ow, on the books kept by the undersigned for Date of Registration 21.05 , 199, Signature of Executive Director EXHIBIT A PAYMENT SCHEDULE SCHEDULED PAYMENT DATES August l, 1997 February I, 1998 August l, 1998 February l, 1999 August 1, '1999 February 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 February 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 February 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 February 1, 2003 August l, 2003 February 1, 2004 August 1, 2004 February 1, 2005 August 1, 2005 February l, 2006 August 1, 2006 February 1, 2007 August 1, 200'� February 1, 2008 August l, 2008 February 1, 2009 �,ugust l, 2009 February 1, 2010 August l, 2010 February 1, 2011 August 1, 2011 February 1, 2012 21.06 SCHEDULED PAYMENTS $71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 72, 666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.4Fi �1,666.46 71,666.46 71,66b.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,b66.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 71,666.46 1. 2. * OAN AGREEMENT CITY OF FRIDLEY TO FRIDLEY HRA Provide initial capita! for revolving loan progra which will fund single family housinq rehabilitation. * Loan ar�ount is $1.5 rr�i�l�on � 5% inte est rate * 15 year term * Repaid Loar� must b the Council. 3. H RA at its � consider a million loan pledge its r loan. via tax levy. e approved by a majoritjr vote of ptember 12, 1996 meeting will solution to formally approve $1.5 ote/agreement with City and also �enues for repayment of the City's 21.07 Loan Ag reem ent with H RA - Pag e 2 4. Need for Revolvina Loan Proaram o-- a) Age and Condition of Housing 5'I�ock Age of House Units % 27 - 36 years 37 - 46 years 47 - 56 years 2, 774 3, 954 550 7,278 24% 34% 4% 62% 1994 housing condition study indicated that there are approx. 900 homes requiring some form of repair b� Meeting OUeeds of an Unserved Market HRA's programs focus on households which are unable to qualify for other private financing. � - Higher debt load - Lack of equity 21.08 Loan Agreement with HF�A - Page 3 c) /nsuffici�nt Federal Funding Federal funds are insufficient to meet needs and gre ter competition at State and County evel for funds. Shows commit ent to local housing needs. 5. Financial A� a) Proacti� � Means today r� futu re. b) HRA Fu HRA fun years d � Levy allc loans ov Response f addressin� housing condit�ons rher than responding to crisis in the Ba/ances � balances will decline over next 15 e to other development activities. ws H RA to m ake 750+ (p ro jected ) er 20 years. 21.09 Loan Agreement with HRA - Page 4 � 7. HRA Recommendation At its June 13, 1996 meeting, the HRA gave conceptual approval of the City loan proposai. At its July 11, 1996 meeting the Revolving Loan Program the City loan documents. Staff Recommendation the HRA authorized and execution of Approve the loan agreement a� prepared by the City Aito rn ey. � 27.10 � L � oF FRIDLEY FRI sN Y CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 26,1996 c sfAfus R�aRfs 22.0 �