The URL can be used to link to this page

04/28/1997 - 4783\ � OFFICIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA COUNCIL MEETTNG AL�RIL 28, 1997 ' CINOF FRIDIEY FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING ATTENDENCE SHEET Monday, Ap�c.i.2 28, 1997 7:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER �, ��.,, � �� c� { ` Page 1 �� FBiDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETiNG OF FRIOLEY APBII. 28,1997 The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race; color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regazd to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's serv�ices, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auaciliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PROCLAMATION• Days of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust May 4 - 11, 1997 BOARD DF REVIEW MEETING • Continuation of the Board of Review : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.01 CITY COUNCIL MEET/NG • APPROVAL OF MINUTES- City Council Meeting of April 14, 1997 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 1997 Paqe 2 , "'• , • •�•-• � • e� , NEW BUSINESS: Resolution modifying Redevelopment Project No. 1 and TIF Districts Nos. 1-3, 6, 7 and 9-14, and Creation of TIF District No. 15 (Minnesota Commercial Railway Company) (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.01 - 2.19 First Reading of an Ordinance Extending Industrial Lots Moratorium to July 26, 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.01 - 3.03 Resolution Approving a Final Plat, P.S. #97-01 by Steiner Development to Replat Property Generally Located at 193 - 223 Osborne Road, N. E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.01 - 4.03 Receive Bids and Award Contract for Central Avenue Bikeway/Walkway, Project No. ST. 1994-9 (Ward 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.01 - � � Consideration of Compensation and Benefit Package for Assistant Finance Director ......... ..........................6.01 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCiL MEETING OF APRIL 28,1997 Page 3 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED�. Resolution Awarding Sale of $9,575.00 G. O. Tax I ncrement Bonds, Series 1997-H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.01 - 7.24 Claims....................................8.01 Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.01 - 9.49 Esti m ates: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.01 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: �- (Consideration of items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes) PUBLIC HEARINGS: Public Hearing for an Off-Sale Beer License to Kwik Stop-n-Shop Inc. 315 Osborne Road, N.E. (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.01 - 11.02 FRIDLEY CITY COUNClL MEETING OF APRIL 28,1997 OLD BUSINESS• (None. ) ��L�� = First Reading of an Ordinance Amending the Zoning Code, Chapter 205, entitled "Zoning," by amending Sections 205.17.05.D.(6), 205.18.05. D. (6), 205.19.05. D.(6), adding Section 205.20 (M-4 Manufacturing Only), and Renumbering Consecutive Sections . . . . . Page 4 . 12.01 - 12.21 Resolution Modifying R�evelopment Project No. 1 And TIF Districts Nos. , 6, 7, and 9-15, and Crea#ion of TlF District No. 16 (57th Avenue district; Linn Project). (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13.01 - 13.19 . Consider_ation of Variance -Request, VAR #9�-03, by Steve L-inn, to Reduce the Building Setback from the Public Rig�t-of�Way from 35 #eet to 16 #eet; to Reduce the Required. Number of Parking StaHs from 54 to 48; to Reduce the Hardsurface Setback from the Public Right-of-Way From 20 feet to 3 feet; to Reduce the Hardsurface Setback from the ,Building from 5 feet to 0 feet; to-Reduce the Two-Way Drive Aisle Width From 25 feet to-24.feef; to Reduce the One-Way Drive Aisle Width from from 18 feet to 13 feet; all to A11ow #he Construction of an $,000 squar.e:foot Retail Center, Generally Located at 218 - 57th Place N: E. (Ward 3) ., ....... 14.01 -14.54 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRlL 28, 1997 Page 5 NEW BUSINESS (CONTIUED� Consideration of Change Order No. 1 for Water Treatment Plant No. 3 Project No. 293 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.01 - 15.04 Consideration of Renewal (Extension) of a Liquor License for Sharx Club and Consideration of Establishing a Public Hearing on Revocation of a Liquor License for Sharx Club (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.01 Informal Status Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.01 ADJOURN: \,\ A � ' �1 ,/ �1 !f i �" � x. � FKIDLEY CfTY COUNCII,11�E1��(G p� Ap�L Zg� 1997 :,� . . . 'Iiie City of Fridley will aot discriminate against � harass anyone in the a�nission or access to, or trratrnent, or employment in its services, pro�rarns, or activities bacause of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexua) orientatiort or status �vith regard to public a�s'�stance. Upon �equest, accommodation will be prov�ded to allow individuals with disabilities to paRicipate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activitics_ Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Robe�2: !'o}lins at 572-3500 at least one week in advancc. (TTD/572-3534) PLEOGE OF ALLEGIANCE ;.:OCLAMATION: Days of Remembrance of the Vi�tims of the Holocaust May 4 - 11, 1997 C�'" " �� "`-� �'�" BOARD OF REV/EW MEETING- :�ontinuation of the Board of Review : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.01 :=� _ ``�,,�,..,... � ' . � �'-3 � GITY COUNC/L M NG- ,; . : • s �� . City Counci! Meeting of Apnl 14, i997 ,,,�_. ... . , , � _ � ,r,..,R.,.a�..,...�,,, �� _ , �_._,y..�...� �°�- � NEW BUSINESS: Resolution Approving a Finai Plat, P.S. #97-01 by Stei�er Development to Replat Prope�ty Generally Located at 193 - 223 Osborne Road, N_E_{Ward3) --------------••---•4_01-4_03 � T t.'r��(�re {f "`d�'�k"_"� . t.�' � , r,�°, �° Receive Bids and Award Cont�act for Central Avenue Bikeway/Walkway, Project No. ST. 1994-9 (Ward 2) ...... 5.09 - 5.02 �. e,. .,e� �. -t,��✓C-� a'"' �:� ,a ,, p ,. ...�..�,w," . C�^ ` �;f°.:. .�y� �,�,,..._.e,:� , a.,...��..� �,,� , �.. --�°��,.,r,,,.. =�r �/, e S- �' j 0 Consideration of Compensatior� a�d ' Benefit Package #or Ass+sta�t Fnance r. �lf�Of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.�� y , �,..� . t..,p f_. �.,:'l.�.,: i�` � �s. ., s , �, Resolution modifying Redevelopment Project No_ 1 and T1F Dist�icts Nos. 9-3, 6, 7 and 9-14, and C�eation of TIF District No. 15 (Minnesota Commercial Railway Company) (Wa�d 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.01 - 2_ 19 �, .,�- � ��.r a •� ��-�:' /''��- .:,..�- � �''° Fi�st Reading of an Ordinance Extending Indust�a! �ots Mo�atorium to July 26, 1997 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3.01 - 3_03 '� �,,r�_ k'�" ,�-,�.�t� ,,_ - . G�. Resoiution Awarding Sale of $9,575_00 G. O�, Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1997-,�. . 7.01 - 7.24 f .. , ., �a,� �� s,. � � s.�.-,r _ ..�: � , �� ,. �� >. Gt�°•. ;�-�� Claims s��=...-, .,:. _. .. �...r_ --•---....8.01 � ` ��.,,,:� Licenses f� P�--`" ",: K. ` -"-,!-.�`.`.' ... �. ��/` ��9..,/.(a�1�9 - 9.49 f 't'/ f .!' � l�; � 'g °...'4.-'- y C �ri�`G' �� , .�:��'� � .�.!�',�' � Estimates: ��% '%.�--��J `-`'�-- _ . 10.01 -._...�..._.._...._ r � �OPTION OF AGENDA C�,��"'� �� F< :-� w�3� � � f �"�..' ' �°-' s..'� ' PEN FORUM. VISITORS: �, 7�, .. ��..�z.a. ��-�"�. � �'`�, �;� �' �, . .. (Conside�ation of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes�:,,,,� �.,�: , � PUBLIC HEARINGS: �t-r��-' �blic Hea�ing #or an Off-Sale Beer License to Nik Stop-n-Shop Inc_ 315 Osborne Road, N.E. Va�d1) .........................11_01-11.02 � F � �t 7 � �e ra ._. �, ', l c� � ��W BUSINESS: =irst Reading of an Ordinance Amending he Zoning Code, Chapter 205, entitled Zoning," by amending Sections 205.17.05.D_(6), :05.18.05.D.(6), 205.19.05.D.(6), adding �ection 205.20 (M-4 Manufacturing Only), rnd Renumbering Consecutive Sections ...... 12.01 - 12.21 / _, � �-' � r' �i � ;esolution Modifying R de. elopment Project No. 1 . ,nd T!F Districts Nos. 4��, 7, and 9-15, and ;reation of T1F District No_ 16 (57tfi Avenue c��tr��-t- i�n Project). (Vi/ard 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 13.01 - 13.19 t �,`.°"__ _ ., . ,,s �>� �... r. .,�� w. �r d� s*' t...a'-'�_ - onsideration of Variance Request, VAR #97-03, by teve Lin�, to Reduce the Building Setback frorn the ublic Right-of-Way from 35 feet to 16 feet; to Reduce ie Required Number of Parking Stalls from 54 to 48; � Reduce the Hardsurface Setback from the Public ight-of-Way From 20 feet to 3 feet; to Reduce the ardsurface Setback from the Buildi�g from 5 feet to feet; to Reduce the Two-Way Drive Aisle Width From i feet to 24 fee#; to Reduce the One-Way Orive Ais1e ►idth from from 18 feei to 13 feet; atl to AI1ow the onsin�ction of an 8,000 squa�e foot Retai! Center, eneratly Located at 218 - 57th Place N.E. (Ward 3) �4_p) -14.54 „� .� �<� f/,r��-c..� , G ... , � . ` � _: ,,.,,..� . _ . F � - �,,. . �,-.. .+ c � , ° t 2, _ , ,� ; ... . • s r,.. , ,,,. _ ., ; . , ,f ` - ,:s�^�,,.,,...� .... `r . NEW BUSINESS (CONTIUEOj� Consideration of Change O�der No. 1 for Water T�eatment . Plant No_ 3 Project No. 293 . . . . . . . . _ . . . 15.01 - 15.04 ��,:�� .� . � .� c.� Consideration of Renewal (Extension) of a Liquor License for Sharx Club and Consideration of Establishing a Public Neari�g on Revocation of a Liquor License for Sharx Ctub (Ward3) ..............�--�-�--�-�-�6-01 �G..:. ��.. +`l� �M».f,,,:..' �� „��,/".�' y�.,, � 6. 1 �-ey,,.� �,f' .� � �� -, ,,�'��.., � . �.. � �.� ��,��'9,� , informal Status Reports . . . . . _ . . . . . . 17.01 �,• A : , � � � .�-� '�4a.. ��!,. , /'-�"'3,.�,q ,� ,a ��.,�,w�' �_' � � :!_.<„ C�-=�-;�'`�..4f . . � r- . ��';.c.�'.. ...�� .� � �,.:4.: a��.! ;'!. e,y�. - , AOJOURN: ' �� j`� r':� !f DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE OF THE YICTIMS OF THE HOLOCAUST Ma� 4- Ma� 11, 1997 WHEREAS, the Ho%caust was the state-sponsored, systematic persecution and annihilation of European Jewry by Nazi Germany and its collaborators from 1933 to 1945. Jews were the primary victims—six million were murdered; Gypsies, the handicapped and Poles were also targeted for destruction or decimation for racial, ethnic or national reasons. Millions more, including homosexuals, Jehovah's Witnesses, Soviet prisoners of war and political dissidents also suffered grievous oppression and death under Nazi tyranny; and WHEREAS, the United States became the homeland to many thousands of Holocaust survivors who, having deep appreciation for the freedom and opportunities afforded by this nation, greatly contributed to the culture and strength of their adopted homeland; and WHEREAS, we the people of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, should always remember the terrible events of the Holocaust and should remain vigilant against bigofry and tyranny; and WHEREAS, we the people of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, shouid continually rededicate ourselves to the principles of equality and justice for all; and WHEREAS, the Days of Remembrance have been set aside for the people of the City of Fiidley, Minnesota, to remember the inhumanity of those who perpetrated the Holocaust, as well as to reflect upon our own humanity and the need for respect of all peoples; and WHEREAS, pursuant to an Act of Congress (Pubiic Law 96-388, October 7, 9980), the United States Ho%caust Memorial Center designates the Days of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust to be Sunday, May 4 through Sunday, May 11, 1997, including the intemational Day of Remembrance as Yom Hashoah, May 4; NOW, THEREFORE, BE lT RESOLVED that l, Nancy J. Jorgenson, Mayor of the City of Fridley, do hereby proclaim the week of Sunday, May 4 through Sunday May 19, 1997, as: DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE OF THE YICTIMS OF THE HOLOCAUST in the City of Fridley, in memory of the victims, the survivors and their liberators, and further proclaim that we, as citizens of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, should strive to overcome intolerance and indifference through leaming and remembrance. lN WITNESS WHEREOF, l have set my hand and caused the sea! of the City of Fridiey to be a�xed this 28th day of April, 1997. Nancy J. Jorgenson, Mayor � THE MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 � #� THE MINUTES OF THE REGUI�AR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF APRIL 14, 1997 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Jorgenson at 7:34 p.m. PLEDGE OF AI,LEGIANCE: Mayor Jorgenson led the City Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: PROCLAMATION: Mayor Jorgenson, Councilman Billings, Councilwoman Bolkcom None Councilman Barnette, Councilman Schneider, and FRIDLEY FLOOD CONTROL APPRECIATION WEEK - APRIL 20-26, 1997: Mayor Jorgenson read and issued a proclamation proclaiming the week of April 20 through 26, 1997 as Flood Control Appreciation Week in the City. Many individuals, businesses, groups, organizations, and other cities provided food, flood control materials, and hours of labor filling sandbags for the building of a dike along 79th Way and Riverview Terrace when this area was threatened with flooding by the Mississippi River. Mayor Jorgenson stated that she and the Councii wished to commend the Public Works, Police and Fire Department employees of the City for their many hours of hard work, including cold, all night vigils, and for the effectiveness of staff and all the volunteers in fighting the spring floods. Mayor Jorgenson stated that it was heartwarming to see all the citizens and students who participated in filling sandbags. The dike did hold and there was only some minor damage. Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that it was amazing how everyone helped during these rather cold days. Some volunteers came as far as Alexandria and St. Cloud. She and the neighborhood appreciated all the efforts and felt that staff was to be commended in their planning. 1. BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING: Mayor Jorgenson stated that Council would conduct the Board of Review Meeting to allow citizens an opportunity to discuss the market value placed on their property. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 2 Mr. Hervin, City Assessor, stated that the purpose of the Board of Review is to review and correct assessments of the City. The City Council, acting as the Board of Review, has the authority to change the value of individual properties. The ratio is set by the County, and the market value should be within 94 to 95 percent of the selling price. Mr. Hervin stated that basic residential structure values ranged from three to six percent, with an overall average of about four percent. Councilman Billings stated that he wished to clarify what authority the legislature has given the City in regard to the market values. This value as of January 2, 1997 will be used to determine the taxes payable in 1998. The City has the authority to review the actual value placed on a property that will be used in the calculation of the taxes. However, the actual taxes will be set by the County, school districts, the City, and various other taxing jurisdictions. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to open the Board of Review meeting. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. DIRK SCHINDEL, 6270 RIVERVIEW TERRACE: Mr. Schindel, 6270 Riverview Terrace, requested that Council reconsider the value placed on his property. The building value increased by 3.2 percent, other improvements by 3.7 percent, and the land value increased by 22.8 percent. It is his contention, and those of his neighbors, that the City did not employ reasonable foresight by raising the land values over 22 percent when the typical increase was four percent. He requested that the value of his property be reduced. Mr. Schindel stated that he is also speaking for his neighbors at 6290 and 6300 Riverview Terrace who were unable to attend the meeting this evening. Mr. Hervin stated that in reviewing the Mississippi River properties, it was found that values were not even close to the selling prices of these properties several years ago. The value of all river properties was raised by $18,000. Mr. Schindel stated that his concern was the erratic nature of the assessment process. He would have no complaint if property values were raised at a consistent level over a period of time. His value for several years remained the same and even decreased with an average increase of 1.87 percent a year. Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Schindel if he was in agreement with the value placed on his property. Mr. Schindel stated that there really is not enough data to support this value. His complaint and request is for relief of this large increase in one year. If the properties were undervalued there is a weakness in the system, and the property owners should not suffer because of it. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 3 Councilman Billings stated that if the value is correct then Mr. Schindel has been paying less taxes aver the last several years. Mr. Schindel stated that he does not totally agree with the value placed on the property. There were years when the value went down or held steady. He questioned if other properties on creeks or marshes were treated in the same manner. Councilman Barnette stated that the properties on Locke Lake are also unique. He questioned how those properties would be affected by the restoration of the lake. Mr. Hervin stated that several years ago the values were reduced because of the condition of the lake, but there will be an increase once the lake is restored. Councilwoman Bolkcom suggested that perhaps Mr. Schindel may want to contact a realtor regarding the value of his property. She stated that even though the increase in value has not been gradual, the $18,000 increase is over a six-year period. Mayor Jorgenson stated that she wished to point out that the City Council cannot take any action on those properties at 6290 and 6300 Riverview Terrace for which Mr. Schindel was speaking. These property owners would have to file an appeal. Mr. Knaak, City Attorney, stated that the purpose of this meeting is to determine the actual value of property for purposes of taxation. There are certain methods used in making this determination; however, the bottom line is what the property is worth. If Mr. Schindel objects to that figure there is recourse, and he may submit evidence to contradict the assessor's value. He believed Mr. Schindel did not contest the value;.as such, but was opposed to the large increase in value. Mr. Schindel stated that he would like the opportunity to have the property appraised, and he would like to work with Mr. Hervin. MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to continue this item to the meeting on April 28, 1997. 5econded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. BRUCE & DIANN FYKSEN, 7518 STINSON BOULEVARD: Mr. Hervin, City Assessor, stated that he conducted an actual comparison of this property with other similar properties. There were substantial improvements to the property with the addition of a new roof and siding. He felt that $105,400 is the true market value of this property. Mr. Fyksen stated that the value is being increased from $95,000 to over $105,000. The value in 1987 was $76,500 which is over a $28,000 increase from 1987. The kitchen was remodeled over ten years ago, and he felt this value was previously taken into FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14 1997 PAGE 4 consideration. He questioned how many times this improvement is considered in determining the value. He also felt that the increase in value for the new roof and siding was too high. The increase amounts to 38 percen-t in the ten years he has owned the property. Mr. Hervin stated that a 38 percent increase over a ten-year period is typical or an average of about three percent a year. Councilman Schneider stated that if a three percent increase was applied to this property, the value would increase from $95,000 to about $98,000. Mr. Fyksen stated that a list of home sales in his neighborhood averaged about $94,025. There are two small homes adjacent to his property, and he doubted that he could sell his home for $105,000, as the smaller homes would probably have some effect on the value of his property. Mr. Hervin stated that he did not feel the neighborhood was an impediment. Mr. Fyksen stated that he was not in agreement with the value placed on his property, and he felt he was being assessed twice for the kitchen improvement. Mr. Hervin stated that there was not a value placed on the improvement when it was originally completed, and this has not been done now. Councilman Schneider stated that Mr. Fyksen could be given some additional time to bring further information to support his request for a reduction in value. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to continue this item to the meeting on April 28, 1997. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. BARBARA & NEIL SORENSON, 1455 N. DANUBE: Mr. Sorenson stated that he purchased his home in December, 1996 for $205,000, and the value has increased to $225,000. Mr. Hervin, City Assessor, stated that the home was built in 1981, and he would recommend reducing the value to $205,000, the actual selling price of the home in 1996. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjust the market value of the property at 1455 North Danube to $205,OQ0 based on the 1996 selling price. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 5 PATRICK & JULIE DELANEY, 6250 RIVERVIEW TERRACE: Mr. Hervin, City Assessor, stated that the value of this river property was raised for the same reason as Mr. Schindel's. The value increased from $138,000 to $154,700. The property owner was not present to speak on his/her behalf. MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to continue this item to the meeting on April 28, 1997. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Hervin stated that Mr. Al Barck, representing the County, was present to answer any questions on commercial properties. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to continue the Board of Review meeting to �pril 28, 1997. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COLTNCIL MEETING, MARCH 31, 1997: MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. APPROVF,L OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: 2. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF `THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 19, 1997: RECEIVED THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING CO�NIlrIISSION MEETING OF MP.RCH 19, 1997. 3. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 2, 1997: RECEIVED THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNiNG CONd�2ISSION MEETING OF APRIL 2, 1997. 4. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #97-01, BY LEASE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., TO ALLOW AGENCIES SELLING OR DISPLAYING NEW AND OR USED VEHICLES, RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, OR BOATS, SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS OF RECORD, GENERA.LLY LOCATED AT 7011 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. (WARD 1): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the City received similar requests approved in 1993 and 1994 for Friendly Chevrolet. There were no complaints, and the Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve this special use permit with thirteen stipulations. The sale will be held on May l6 and 17, and the display vehicles located in the north parking lot. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 6 GFtANTED SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #97-01, WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: (1) THE VEHICLE SALES AILL OCCUR NO MORE THAN TWICE PER YEAR; (2) THE USE OF STREAMERS, PENNANTS, AND FLAGS IS PROHIBITED; (3j THE PETITIONER SHALL COMPLY WITH THE TEMPORp.RY SIGN ORDINANCE FOR ALL TEMPORARY SIGNS ON THE PROPERTY; (4) THE PETITIONER SHALL OBTAIN A TEMPORARY BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL C�LY WITH ARTICLE 32 OF THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE; (5) PORTABLE TOILETS SHAI�L BE HANDICAPpED ACCESSIBLE; (6) THE PETITIONER SHAI�L PROVIDE A TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PERSON TO PROPERLY CONTROL TRAFFIC ON-SITE, TO PREVENT PROBLEMS OCCURRING ON 69TH AVENUE AT THE UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRONTAGE ROAD, AND TO DIRECT UNNECESSARY TRAFFIC AWAY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD; (7) THE PARTICIPATING DEALERSHIPS SHALL APPLY FOR AND RECEIVE THE APPROPRIATE CITY LICENSES; (8) THERE SHALL BE NO TEST DRIVING OF CARS IN THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD IACATED SOUTH OF 69TH AVENUE AND IN I�OCKE pARK; (9) BARRICADES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD ON 69TH AVENUE AND ON 71ST AVENUE. THE BARRICADE AT 69TH AVENUE SHALL INCLUDE A SIGN WITH THE I�ANGUAGE "RESIDENTIAL AREA - NO EXIT"; (10) THE CAR.S FOR THE SALE SHALL BE STREET OPERABLE AND SHALL NOT BE LEAKING FLUID; (11) THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PRIOR TO THE NEXT SALE; (12) A SECOND SALE WILL NOT BE HELD FOR AT LEAST 90 DAYS AFTER CONIlHENCEMENT OF THE FIRST SALE TO ELIMINP.TE THE APPEARANCE AND IMPACTS OF A PERPETUAL AUTO SALE IN THIS IACATION; AND (13) THE PETITIONER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRASH CONTAIND�NT AND CLEAN-UP. 5. APPROVE COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN FOR OSBORNE COMMERCE CENTER, 223 OSBORNE ROAD N.E. (WARD 3): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this sign plan is submitted for the building occupied by Gazda Moving and Storage. Steiner Development proposes the following sign criteria: {1) each tenant is allowed one 4 x 10 foot sign, (2) tenant signs are wall mounted, single faced pan signs, non- illuminated; (3) signs are constructed of 1.25 gauge aluminum which has been anodized to dark bronze in color; and (4) each tenant is allowed their own color for tenant logo and letters. APPROVED COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN FOR OSBORNE COP�RCE CENTER WITH THE ABOVE SIGN CRITERIA. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 31-1997 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING STGNING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY TO PROCEED WITH THE SPRINGBROOK SUBWATERSHED RESOURCE INVESTIGATION PROJECT: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency notified the City of approval of the grant application for the Springbrook Subwatershed Resources Investigation Project. This grant was for $29,745 and will be matched by the cities of Fridley, Spring Lake Park and Blaine. Fridiey's contribution is $1,500 in cash and $11,340 in iri- kind contributions. Mr. Burns stated that the objective of the joint partnership FRTDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 7 is to investigate the water quality and quantity and land use changes in Springbrook subwatershed; model current and projected water quality and quantity with emphasis on flows entering into Springbrook Nature Center; identify the primary sources of non-point source pollution that may be causing the degradation of Springbrook Nature Center; and identify the best management practices that may reverse the current trend of degradation. Mr. Burns stated that staff expects grant that would provide additional of corrective water quality/quantity P.DOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 31-1997. to apply for a Phase II funds for implementation measures. 7. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACTS FOR PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT UPGRADES, PROJECT NOS. 306A, 306B, 306C, AND 306D: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that bids for the playground equipment were opened on March 26, and the proposals reviewed for three different park locations. The Parks and Recreation Commission, as well as the surrounding neighborhoods, were given the opportunity to review the proposals. RECEIVED THE FOLIAWING BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 306: ALTURA PARK, PROJECT 306A: MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES, 3NC., $30,000; MN/WI PLAYGROUNDS, INC., $30,000; EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC., $30,000; AND FLANAGAN SALES, INC., $30,000. COMNIONS PARK, PROJECT 306B: MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES, INC., $75,000; MN/WI PLAYGROUNDS, INC., $75,000; EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC., $75,000; AND FLANAGAN SALES, INC., $75,000. MOORE LAKE PARK, PROJECT 306C: MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES, INC., $35,000; MN/WI PLAYGROUND, INC., $35,000; EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC., $35,000; P,ND FLANAGAN SALES, INC., $35,000. STEVENSON ELEMENTARY, PROJECT 306D: MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES, 3NC., $38,000; MN/WI PLAYGROtTND, INC., $38,000; EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC., $38,000; AND FLANAG�N SALES, INC., $38, 000. AWARDED THE BIDS AS RECOI��NDED BY STAFF, AS FOLIAWS: Altura Park, Project 306A, to Flanagan Sales, Inc. in the amount of $30,000; Commoris Park, Project 306B, to Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground, Inc. in the amount of $75,000; Moore Lake Park, Project 306C, to Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground, Inc., in the amount of $35,000; and Stevenson Elementary School, Project 306D, to Earl F. Andersen, Inc. in the amount of $38,000. 8. ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING FOR APRIL 28, 1997, FOR AN OFF-SALE BEER LICENSE TO KWIK STOP-N-SHOP, INC.: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the location for this off-sale beer license is at 315 Osborne Road and is under new ownership. The Police Department has conducted the required background investigation and found no reason to deny the application. The proposed hearing date for this license is �pril 28, 1997. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 8 SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS OFF-SALE BEER LICENSE TO KWIK STOP-N-SHOP, INC. FOR APRIL 28, 1997. 9. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: Mr. Burns, City Manager, requested that this item be deleted from the agenda. 10. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING � SECONDARY CITY OF FRIDLEY CHECKING ACCOUNT: Mr. Burns, City Manager, requested that this item be deleted from the agenda. 11. RESOLUTION N0. 32-1997 OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, APPROVING THE ABATEMENT OF CERTAIN NON-IMPROVEMENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR A RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 4680 SECOND STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA (WARD 3): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that on October 26, 1996, public nuisance costs associated with 4680 Second Street were certified to the County for collection with the 1997 real estate taxes. In June of 1996, the property was sold by HUD to Mr. Thomas Ryan. Prior to closing the title company asked the City to run a search for special assessments against the property. Since nuisance abatement charges were not included in the special assessment file, but in the "billing" file, they were not discovered at the time of the search. Consequently, they were not paid by HUD at the time of the closing. Mr. Burns stated that Mr. Ryan• contacted the City after learning that the nuisance abatement charges of $1,934 had be�en charged against his taxes. Staff contacted HUD and asked them to consider reimbursement for the nuisance abatement charges, and they agreed to reimburse the City for half the expenses, leaving a balance of $967.08. Staff is recommending that the entire assessment be abated and that the HUD reimbursement be credited to the proper fund. In the future, nuisance abatement charges will be noted on the special assessment system. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 32-1997. 12. APPOINTMENT: CITY EMPLOYEE: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated it is recommended that James Mork be appointed to the position of Patrol Officer which is vacant as the result of Officer Fraser's retirement. Mr. Mork is a graduate of Patrick Henry High School, attended Northwestern College, and received a BA Degree from Bethel College. He has also received a certificate of law enforce- ment from Metropolitan State College and was employed as a Security Supervisor at Gittleman Management Company. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF P,PRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 9 Name James Mork CONCURFtED WITH THE FOLIAWING P,PPOINTMENT BY THE CITY MANAGER: Position Patrol Officer Partially Exempt 13. CLAIMS: Starting Starting Salary Date $13.78 April 21, per hour 1997 Replaces David Fraser AUTHORIZED PAYMENT OF CLAIM NOS. 73531 THROUGH 73974. 14. LICENSES: APPROVED THE' LICENSES AS SUBMITTED AND AS ON FILE IN THE LICENSE CLERK'S OFFICE. 15. ESTIMATES: APPROVED THE ESTIMATES, AS FOLIAWS: Richmar Construction, Inc. 7776 Alden Way, N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Water Treatment Plant No. 3 Project No. 293 Estimate No. 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $183, 240.70 No persons in the audience spoke regarding the proposed consent agenda items. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to approve the consent agenda items, with the deletion of Items 9 and 10. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: FLOOD CONTROL EFFORTS: Mr. Mike LaFave, 640 Dover Street, thanked the City for their efforts in fighting the flood waters. He appreciated the fact that the Mayor and various Councilmembers were there. The Police and Fire Departments kept people out of the neighborhood and kept the residents informed. He wanted to thank the Public Works employees who were out in miserable weather. They were very patient, and he appreciated all their efforts. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS• 16. PUBLIC HEARING TO MODIFY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 1 AND CREATE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 15 (MINNESOTA COMMERCIAL RAILWAY COMPANY) (WARD 1): MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 9:00 p.m. Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that the public hearing is requested in order to establish a economic development district for Minnesota Commercial Railway Company. The project, known as Commercial Transload of Minnesota (CTM), consists of a 57,890 square foot building on a four-acre site located south of Northco Drive and north of the Columbia Arena parking lot. CTM will extend the rail spur into the building to transfer steel to trucks. The cost of the project is $2,525,474 plus $360,000 for extension of the spur and the crane. Ms. Dacy stated that the requested amount of assistance, $250,000 is to be provided through a grant of $125, 000 and a ten-year loan of $125,000. The assistance is to be used to remove poor soil, site clearanee, and building substantial foundations to support the crane in order to transfer the steel. The developer will be required to obtain a certificate of completion prior to delivery of the assistance, and the development contract will also require the developer to agree to pay a minimum amount of taxes t$92,000). Ms. Dacy stated that because the site will be valued based on State Statute regarding railway facilities, payment of a minimum amount of taxes will be proposed in the development contract as opposed to a minimum assessment agreement. Four to six employees will be hired the first year. Ms. Dacy stated that the County and school district were notified, and no comments have been received as of this date. There will be no LGA/HACA loss to the City as the result of this district. The legislature amended the TIF laws in 1995 to provide a"local contribution" option for cities instead of a LGA/HACA deduction. The contribution must be made from "unrestricted monies" of either the HRA or City and is equal to ten percent of the increment which would be a maximum of $40,000 over the entire life of the district. The HRA has adequate unrestricted monies to provide the contribution. Ms. Dacy presented a drawing of�the site plan. There is no outdoor storage and only one loading dock. This facility would provide steel to several businesses in Fridley, including Onan and Kurt Manufacturing. Truck traffic would be reduced as one rail car is equal to three or four trucks. Ms. Dacy stated that the maximum duration of this economic development district is nine years from the date of receipt of the FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 11 first payment of tax increment or 2007. The district will expire in 2007 and is estimated to generate approximately $364,552 of tax increment. Ms. Dacy stated that the HRA recommended approval of this district at their April 10 meeting. Councilman Barnette stated that he lives in the neighborhood to the south. He questioned if there would be any noise from the railroad cars. Mr. John Gohmann, President of Minnesota Gommercial Railway Company, stated that there would be no additional noise beyond what exists there today with the train. The rail cars would be switched inside the building, and it is virtually silent. There would be no manufacturing or machines. No other pe�sons spoke regarding the creation of this tax increment financing district. MOTION by Councilman Billings to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 9:10 p.m. 17. PUBLI uFn,Rrur_ Tn t�rnnTF'v RFnFVFLnPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 1 AND tiVLL11VC�J MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 9:10 p.m. Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this public hearing is requested in order to establish a tax increment financing district and to add a 1.5-acre site to the City's redevelopment program. The developer is proposing to construct an 8,000 square foot retail mall and to refurbish the former Dick's Wheel and Tire building into a Goodyear Service Center at the northeast corner of 57th Avenue and Main Street. The TIF district. would include five parcels proposed for redevelopment across from Holiday Plus. Ms. Dacy stated it is also proposed that the modification of the project area include the existing and the proposed right-of-way for 57th Avenue from Main Street to approximately 300 feet east of University Avenue. The purpose of the expansion of the projeet area is to enable the HRA to contribute toward the 57th Avenue reconstruction plan. At this time, it is contemplated that the HRA would contribute fifty percent of the street lighting and landscaping/irrigation costs for the project. Ms. Dacy stated that the total cost of the project is $1,566,200. The estimated market value of the Goodyear Service Center is FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 12 $432,000, and the new strip mall's market value is estimated to be $518,700. Ms. Dacy stated that the County and the school district have been notified, and there have been no comments to date. The developer conducted a neighborhood meeting, and the plan was well received. The Appeals Commission has recommended approval of several variances. There would be no LGA/HACA loss to the City as a result of creating the district. The proposed tax increment financing plan elects the "local contribution" instead of the LGA/HACA loss. Ms. Dacy stated that the assistance provided would be a pay-as-you- go revenue note of $175,000 to be repaid over a twelve-year period. The HRA approved the resolution to modify the project area and to create the district. A motion to prepare the development contract failed on a tie vote. The developer intends to bring this issue back to the HRA for their reconsideration. The dissenters on the motion for the development contract were concerned about the policy and expenditure of funds for a commercial rehabilitation project that would entail an existing building. There have been requests in the past for improvements of tenant buildings which have been denied, and the HRA was concerned that a policy may be set for existing buildings. Ms. Dacy stated that this is a redevelopment project, and the renovation of the tire center is part of the redevelopment.. Jim McFarland was absent from the April HRA meeting, and this issue will again be submitted to the HRA at their May meeting when all members are present. Councilman Billings felt that this was an HRA issue. However, the developer's costs do include some costs for the building that exists. There may be the question if the City would be subsidizing current property owners who are not taking care of their property by stepping in and rewarding the owner so he can get top dollar for his property. He questioned if the building meets code requirements. Ms. Dacy stated that the building is not condemnable. If the owner decided to lease it this could be done if the nature of the business remains the same. The petitioner is proposing to significantly improve and modify the building. Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that this issue also pertains to other types of property where owners do not take care of their buildings. These are sold to someone who receives assistance to repair them. Councilman Schneider stated that the greater good is that this may solve neighborhood problems. Mr. Linn stated that it seems the concentration is on the tire center that exists. Basically, only the outer walls would be used on the existing tire center, and everything else would be replaced including interior walls, plumbing, electrical, landscaping, fencing, etc. His application for TIF money was for redevelopment FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 13 of the homes to the west, and the tire center became part of a larger focus. Mr. Linn presented a drawing of the proposed strip mall to the west of the existing tire center. He stated that he has worked with staff and received a lot of feedback from the residents. He felt that this was a very good project which would improve the area. The economics would not work without TIF assistance. Mayor Jorgenson felt that there was overwhelming support by the neighborhood for this project. It is an exciting development for that corner, and she applauded Mr. Linn for his efforts. Mr. Linn stated that he wanted to create a positive in the area and has worked with staff and the neighborhood. In regard to the traffic and access, he felt there was agreement, and he hoped this project could proceed. Mr. Casserly, advisor to the HRA, stated that he really believes this project needs some assistance because of the redevelopment nature. He reviewed the land costs. If assistance is not provided, the result will not be what the City wants to achieve for this area. It seems that the returns involved would justify the investment. No other persons in the audience spoke regarding the creation of this tax increment financing district. MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 9:37 p.m. 18. PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 205, ENTITLED "ZONING," BY AMENDING SECTIONS 205.17.05.D (6), 205.18.05.D (6), 205.19.05.D (6), ADDING SECTION 205.20 (M-4 MANIJFACTURING ONLY), AND RENUMBERING CONSECUTIVE SECTIONS: MOTION by Councilman Barnette to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 9:38 p.m. Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that this ordinance amendment applies to the industrial zoning districts regarding distribution and warehouse facilities. In recent months the City has experienced 500,000 square feet of industrial warehouse development. Mr. Hickok stated that with this development there has been an increase of trucks traveling through neighborhoods idling near homes adding noise and fumes. Complaints have increased from residents due to impacts of these developments. Another impact is FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 14 the unsightliness of overhead doors/dock doors, trucks, and industrial implements facinq residential properties. Mr. Hickok stated that the goal of this ordinance amendment would be to reduce the impact of warehouse and distribution facilities on residential properties by controlling their iocation in the City; to encourage uses which provide a significant amount of job opportunities and which require more complex building systems; promote clean uses which do not produce fumes, odors, or require outside operations which may cause noise; and eliminate uses which require significant amounts of outdoor storage, display, or are already permitted in other zoning districts. Mr. Hickok stated that the suggested amendment in order to meet these goals is to amend the existing industrial zoning districts M-1, M-2, and M-3 to prohibit loading docks facing the public right-of-way on corner lots located across from residential uses, to establish a new industrial district entitled "M-4 Manufacturing Only," and rezone some of the remaining vacant sites to an M-4 designation to encourage manufacturing uses. Mr. Hickok stated that the City was divided into three districts to evaluate vacant industrial parcels. The criteria used was (1) is the property adjacent to or across the street from a residential use; (2) would the property meet the minimum requirements of the proposed M-4 zoning district; (3) would it be possible to develop a distribution or warehouse facility in excess of ten loading docks; and (4) is there a distribution warehouse facility already in the area. If there was an affirmative answer to any of these questions, the land was proposed for M-4 consideration. The eight properties evaluated were: {1) a site on Northco Drive owned by Northco Real Estate Services; (2) a site on Commerce Lane owned by McGlynn Bakeries; (3) a site owned by Kurt Manufacturing on Central Avenue; (4) a site owned by Friendly Chevrolet/Geo on Central Avenue; (5) a site owned by RRI on Ashton; (6) a site on Osborne Road and Old Central owned by Anderson Trueking; (7) a site on 61st Avenue and Main Street owned by Commercial Property Investment; and (8) a site on Osborne Road owned by Coachman Companies. Mr. Hickok stated that the Planning Commission conducted public hearings, and approved the ordinance language to amend the M-1, M-2; and M-3 zoning districts and create the M-4 zoning district. Mr. Tim Nelson, Everest Development representing Commercial Property Investment, stated that they are the owners of the 10.67 acre parcel of property at 61st Avenue and Main Street. It is felt that the rezoning is unfair and subjective, and he was surprised about the rezoning moratorium and proposal for an M-4 zoning district. Mr. Nelson stated that they are opposed to the M-4 rezoning on the property, the unilateral rezoning of the site, and restrictions on a corner lot adjacent to residential. They believe the current screening rules are adequate and sufficient to protect the public from view of truck docks. They were the only owners who had a significant warehouse project that was proposed when the moratorium FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 15 was enforced. There was no warning that the moratorium was coming or under consideration. There was no expression of regret when they lost a tenant and no indication that the City would compensate the owner for the lost of opportunity on this site. Mr. Nelson stated that he would refer Council to the correspondence and tape of the Planning Commission meeting where this issue was discussed. Mr. Nelson stated that he is not here to talk about legal claims but to suggest a course of action. He assumes the City will proceed as recommended by staff and the Planning Commission to establish the M-4 zoning district. The owner's preference would be to leave the zoning as it is and allow him to develop the proj ect that was proposed for the site. The next option would be to market the site for the remainder of the year for manufacturing uses, have the City make up the difference from the sale price of the property and $4 per square foot for the site, or the City or HRA buy the property outright at $4 a square foot. If these options are not acceptable, the owner would donate the property to a charitable organization. Mr. Nelson stated that they have contacted Sunlight Church, and the Pastor is here to discuss his interest in the property. He understands that the use of the property for a church would require rezoning or a special use permit. If that was not achievable they would explore other options for charitable opportunities. Mr. Nelson requested that Council provide feedback, a response on their preference for the options outlined, and submit a reply to them. He realized that this is short notice, but they received no notice on the moratorium when they had plans for development of the site. Councilman Billings stated that from his own perspective the purpose of the public hearing is to gather information to help make his decision. When he has the information, he would then make a decision, and this may not be until the time a vote is taken. Pastor Steve Hoffman stated that they were contacted by Everest Corporation regarding this site. Since they sold their facilities in Spring Lake Park this site would be wonderful for a church, as they serve many families in Spring Lake Park and Fridley. They would be willing to receive the property and not only build a church, but recreational facilities and make it a beautiful site for the City. Councilman Schneider asked the square footage of this site and the market value of the property. Ms. Dacy stated that it is 465,000 square feet, and the 1995 market value was $460,000. Councilman Schneider stated that at an asking price of $4.00 a square foot, the property would cost over $1.6 million dollars. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 16 Ms. Dacy stated that churches are not permitted in an industrial zone, so the property would have to be rezoned for this use. Councilman Schneider stated that he has read the minutes of the Planning Commission meetinqs. Clearly, there is a disagreement as to whether or not an action such as this would detract from the property value. Mr. Knaak, City Attorney, stated that there is no right to a certain gain or increase as the result of zoning clarification. He did not hear any argument as to a decrease in the value of the property. However, appraisals can be done to determine the value. Councilman Schneider stated that what he is hearing regarding the consideration of an M-4 zoning district that this really should not be a factor one way or the other. Mr. Knaak answered in the affirmative. MOTION by Councilman Billings to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 10:00 p.m. OLD BUSINESS: 19. SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, ADOPTING THE PREVAILING HOURS OF LABOR AND PREVAILING WAGE RATE ON CERTAIN PROJECTS FOR OR WITHIN THE CITY: Councilman Billings stated that this ordinance was reviewed by the HRA last Thursday evening. Several questions arose from the HRA meeting as well as from staff and the attorney. In order to allow adequate time to research these concerns he would request this item be tabled. MOTION by Councilman Biilings to table this item. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: 20. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, FOR THE ADOPTION OF A POLICY AND CONTRACT LANGUAGE IMPLIIKENTING THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE N0. , PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF PREVAILING WAGES ON CERTAIN PROJECTS AND CONTRACT5 WITHIN THE CITY: MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this item. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE i7 21. APPROVE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: AND APPOINT REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATE TO SERVE ON THE AUTHORITY: Councilman Billings stated several months ago, there was a presentation from Tim Yantos, Assistant County Administrator, regarding the Northstar Corridor. The Northstar Corridor is comprised of the Burlington Northern and Trunk Highway 10 corridors from downtown Minneapolis to St. Cloud and possibly to Sartell. The idea was to provide a task force comprised of representatives from municipalities, counties, and affected governmental entities along this route, to conduct a study and apply for a grant from the Federal government under the Intermodal Service Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) legislation. Councilman Billings stated that he was appointed to this task force, as well as a staff inember from the Anoka County and Sherburne County Attorneys offices. A joint powers agreement has been drafted, reviewed, and the final version is presented for Council's approval. As part of the joint powers agreement, the group is seeking funding from the Federal government. Any local funding would be coming from the counties or railroad authorities. There is no commitment on the part of the City. A future budget would be set up under the joint powers agreement, and the cities may,be asked to participate. The City could get out of the joint powers agreement if the funding impacted on the City. Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the City Attorney has reviewed this joint powers agreement and reported that there was nothing in the agreement to cause concern. Mr. Knaak stated that this joint powers agreement would impose no immediate financial obligation on the City other than sending a representative. Councilman Barnette asked Councilman Billings if everyone seemed willing to participate. Councilman Billings stated that he felt everyone at the meeting wished to participate. Mayor Jorgenson asked Councilman Billings if he was interested in continuing as the representative. Councilman Billings stated that he would be the representative if Council so desired. However, an alternate also needs to be appointed. Mayor Jorgenson asked Mr. Burns for a recommendation on a staff member to serve as an alternate. Mr. Burns recommended Jon Haukaas, Assistant Public Works Director. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 18 MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the joint powers agreement establishing the Northstar Corridor Development Authority and authorize the appropriate City officials to execute same and submit it to Anoka County. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to appoint Councilman Billings as the Council's representative to the Northstar� Corridor Developtnent Authority and Jon Haukaas, Assistant Public Works Director, as the alternate. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. 22. INFOtZMAL STATUS REPv�T�: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the items to be discussed during the conference session are consideration of �etractable basketball nets on the side walls of the Hayes gymnasium, and a change order that will be necessary. The retractable basketball nets would allow two courts to be used for both basketball and volleyball. The other issue is for a 1997 contribution for playground upgrades �� Ha��u�na��r� Par}�:_ � Councilwoman Bolkcom asked for an update on the reeycling program. Mr. Hickok stated that, in general, it has been positive. There have been some concerns about the time of day when the materials are picked up, especially on busier streets when traffic is heavier. All in all, the program is working well, and residents are getting acclimated to the new schedules. Once drivers are used to their routes they can make some adjustments in the timing. Councilman Barnette asked what would be done with the sandbags that were filled to prevent flooding. Mr. Burns stated that the plan is to use the sand at the Moore Lake beach. Councilman Barnette stated that he has heard nothing but excellent comments on the manner in which the flood control was handled. The students from the high schools were happy they could participate. A plaque could possibly be prepared for the schools. Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that a c�entleman in the Riverview Heights area stated that it seemed all everyone heard was bad about the youth, but he said the way the students helped sure changed his thinking. There were people of all ages helping out. Councilman Barnette stated that a special reward should go to Ann Bolkcom who was out working hard every day. Mayor ,Torgenson thanked Councilman Barnette for organizing the student effort. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1997 PAGE 19 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of April 14, 1997 adjourned at 10:21 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad Nancy J. Jorgenson Secretary to the City Council Mayor � !!1 � i:�!� � TO: WILLIAMW. BURNS, CITYMANAGER .��Id" FROM.• RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT.• BOARD OF REVIEyY DATE: APRIL 25, 1997 Monday evening will be the follow up Board of Review meeting. As a result of the last Board of Review Meeting three homeowners indicated a desire to be heard at the follow- up meeting. At this point we are only aware of one and possibly two homeowners that might be back to attempt to support their concern for a reduced market value. The three property owners that were present at the first meeting were: l. Schindel @ 6270 Riverview Tenace 2. Fyksen @ 7518 Stinson Blvd. 3. Delany @ 6250 Riverview Terrace At this time it appeaxs that only the Fyksens and or Denlanys might be present. c. c. Ed Hervin Mary Smith 1.01 NiEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT DIRE�TOR DATE: April 23, 1997 TO: Wiiliam Bums, Cit Mana er � Y 9 � FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Resolution Modifying Redevelopmen# Project Area No. 1 and Creating Tax Increment Financing District No. 15, Minnesota Commercial Railway Company Background The City Council held a p�blic hearing on April 14, 1997 regarding Minnesota Commercial Railway's request to create a new tax increment financing distric� There were no comments against the proposal. The HRA, at its April 10, 1997 meeting, approved a resolution recommending the addition of the four acre site to the project area, and creation of TIF District No. 15. The project, to be known as Commercial Transload of Minnesota (CTM), is a 57,890 square foot industrial building. CTM provides "single bill of lading" just in time service for steel processors. Rolled steel is to be received from a rail spur on the Minnesota Commercial Railway line which runs east/west through Fridley, just north of 715t Avenue (Willamette has a spur from this rail line). The rail spur would be extended along the north side of 71S` Avenue and would be extended directly into the CTM building. The steel will be transferred f�om the rail cars to semi trucks who in turn deliver the steel to a variety of steel processors in the metro area. Economic Development District The proposed district to be created is an economic development district. Tfie proposed site consists of two parcels and will be the only parcels in the district. The maximum duration of the district is nine years from the date of receive of the first payment of tax increment, or 2007. The district will expire in 2007 and is estimated to generate approximately $364,552 0# available tax inc�ement. 2.01 Resolu#ion for TI� #15 April 23, 1997 Page 2 The project cost is $2,525,474, exclusive of a$200,000 crane and $160,000 to extend the rail spur. The requested amount of assistance, $250,000, is to be provided through a grant ($125,000) and a ten year loan ($125,000). The assistance is to be used for removing poor soil, site clearance, and building substantial foundations to support the crane to transfer the steel. The developer will be required to obtain a certificate of completion prior to delivery of the assistance. The development contract will also require that the developer agree to pay a minimum amount of taxes {$92,000). Because the site will be valued based on State Statute regarding railway facilities, payment of a minimum amount of taxes will be proposed in the development contract as opposed to a minimum assessment agreement. Four to six employees will be hired the first year. The Eounty and School District were properly notified, and no comments have been received as of this date. TIF districts #4, #5, and #8 have expired, so this district is the twelfth active district. There will be no I.GA/HACA loss to the City as a result of this district. The legislature amended the TIF laws in 1995.#o pcovide a"local contribution" option for cities instead of a.LGA/HACA deduction. The contribution must be made from "unrestricted monies" of either the Authority or ifie City. The. contribution is equal to 10% of the increment, which would be a maximum of $40,000 over the entire life of the district. The�HRA has adequate unrestricted monies to provide the contribution. Recc�mmendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing modification of the redevelopment project area and creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. 15. :� . � . . :. 2.�2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION iSODIFYING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 AND THE TAX ZNCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 AND 14 TO REFLECT INCREASED PROJECT COSTS WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, AND CREATING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 15 AND ADOPTING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING TIiERETO BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Cour�cil") of the City of Fridley, Minnesota (Lhe "City"), as follows: � Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. It has been proposEd by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority") that the Council modify, approve and adopt a Modified Redevelopment Plan relating to Redevelopment " Project No. l to reflect increased project costs, pursuant to and in accordance,with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to time. 1.02. It.has been further proposed by the Authority that the Council modify, approve and adopt Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6,7, 9, 10; 11, 12, 13 and.14 {the "Existing TIF Districts°) to reflect increased project costs within Redevelopment Froject No. 1, pursuant to Minnesota .Statutes, Section 469.174 through 469.179,_ inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to time. 1.03. It has been further proposed by the Authority that the Council create proposed Tax Increment Financing District No.�lS and - approve and adopt a proposed Tax Increment Financing P1an relating thereto, pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive; as amended and supplemented from time to time. 1.04. The Authority has caused to be pr�pared, and this Council has investigated the facts with respect thereto, a Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 and Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Existing TIF Districts to reflect increased project costs within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and a proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 15, defining more precisely the property to _be included, the public costs to be incurred, and other.matters relating thereto. 1.05: The Council has performed all actions required by law.to be performed prior to the modification, approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan, the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan. 2.03 Page 2 - Resolution No. 1.06. The Council hereby determines that it is necessary and in the best iriterests of the City and the Authority at this time to modify, approve and adopt the Modified Redevelopment Plan and the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans to reflect increased project costs within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and to create proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 and to approve and adopt the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto. Section 2. Findinas. 2.01. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the assistance to be provided through the adoption and implementation of the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan are necessary to assure the development and redevelopment of Redevelopment Project No. 1. 2.02. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan conform to the general plan for the development and redevelopment of the City as a whole in that they are consistent with the City's comprehensive plan.. 2.03. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound ne.eds of t.he City as a whole for the development arid redevelopment of Redevelopment Project No. 1 by private enterprise and it is contemplated that the development and redevelopment thereof will be carried out pursuant to redevelopment contracts with private developers. � 2.04. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. l, the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Existing TIF Districts and the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 15, by the City is intended and, in the judgement of this Council, its effect will be to promote the purposes and objectives specified in this Section 2 and otherwise promote certain public purposes and accomplish certain objectives as specified in the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing P1ans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan. 2.05. The Council hereby finds, determin�s and declares that proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 constitutes a"tax increment financing district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 9, a�nd further constitutes a type of "economic development district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 12. - 2.04 Page 3 - Resolution No. 2.06. The Cour�cil hereby finds, determines and declares that the proposed devel�pment or redevelopment in proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 15, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. 2.07. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the City made the above findings stated in this Section 2 and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in the Modified Redevelopment Plan, the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans, the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan and Exhibit A of this Resolution. Section 3. Modification, Approval and Adoption of Modified Redevelopment Plan. 3.01. The modification to the Redevelopment Plan relating to Redevelopment Project No. 1 reflecting increased project costs is hereby approved and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley. Section 4. Modification, Approval and Adoption of Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans. 4.01. The modifications to the Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Existing TIF Districts reflecting increased project costs within Redevelopment Project No. 1 are hereby approved and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley. Section 5. Creation of Tax Increment Financinq District and Adoption of Tax Increment Financina Plan. 5.01. The creation of proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 within Redevelopment Project No_ 1 and the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto are hereby approved and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley. Section 6. Election of Citv Contribution. 6.01. The Council hereby e�ects to make a qualifying local contribution equal to 10.000 of the tax increment generated from Tax Increment Financing District No. 15, as set forth in Minnesota Statutes 273.1399. Sec�ion 7. Filing of Plans. 7.01. Upon approval and adoption of the Modified Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and increment Financing Plan (collectively the "Plans"}, cause said Plans to be filed with the Commissioner 2.05 Redevelopment proposed Tax the City shall of Revenue. v Page 4 - Resolution No. PASSE,D AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY THIS DAY OF , 199 . NANCY JORGENSON - MAYOR ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 2.�6 Page 5 - Resolution �o. EXHZBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the Tax Increment Einancing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 (the "TIF District") as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3, are as follows: 1. Finding that the TIF District is an "economic development district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes. The TIF District consists of two parcels of land which qualify as an "economic development district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 12. 2. Finding that the proposed development or redevelopment, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, , the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The redevelopment project consists af the acquisition and site preparation for the construction of a warehousing and transloading facility. Because of the substantial costs of acquisition, public improvements, soil correction and preparation of the site far unusual weight bearing supports, it would not be economically feasible for the redeveloper to proceed with this project without the Authority's assistance. City staff has determined that the increased market value realized from a project receiving no TTF , Assistance would be considerably less than the increased market value (less the present value of tax increment receipts) from a project utilizing TIF Assistance. (see attached Schedule). 3. Finding that the TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The Authority and Council have reviewed the TIF Plan and determined that it conforms to the future land use plan of the City. 4.. Finding that the TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development or redevelopment of Redevelopment Project.No. l by private enterprise. The project to be developed (an approximate 57,980 square foot warehousing and transloading facility) is located within the proposed TIF District and is estimated to provide approximately 24 new employment opportunities within five years. In addition, the project will increase the City's tax base by �approximately $854,700. 2.�7 Page 6 - Resolu�ion No. I II SCHEDULE 1 TO EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. REDEVELOPMENT WITHOUT TIF ASSISTANCE: With 25a coverage of land by building, an approximate 43,560 square foot building could be constructed. Estimated Market Value for Sales Transaction @ $35.00/square foot Original Market Value Increased Market Value REDEVELOPMENT WITH TIF ASSISTANCE: With 33% coverage of land by building, an approximate 57,980 square foot building could be constructed_ Because the tax increment assistance will finance extensive site corrections, a larger building can be constructed. . Estimated Market Value for Sales Transaction @ $35.00/square foot Original Market Value Increased Market Value Less Present Value of the Tax Increment Generated at 8.So, 9 tax increment years (see attached Exhibit 1) Net Increased Market Value 2ao V $ 1,524,600 $ 304,900 $ 1,291,700 $ 2,029,300 $ 304,900 $ 1,724,400 $ 256,874 $ 1,467,526 EXHIBIT 1 70 SCHEDULE 1 SEMI ANNUAL PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS Original Estimated Captured Estima#ed 8.500%0 Tax Tax Tax Tax SemiAnnual Date Capacity Capacity Capacity Increment Present Value 06/01 /97 12/01 /97 06/01 /98 12/01 /98 06/01 /99 12/01 /99 06/01 /2000 12/01 /2000 06/01 /2001 12/01 /2001 06/01 /2002 12/01 /2002 06/01 /2003 12/01 /2003 06/01 /2004 12/01 /2004 06/01 /2005 12/01 /2005 06/01 /2006 12/01 /2006 06/01/2007 12/01 /2007 14,025 14,025 14,025 14,025 14, 025 '14,025 14,025 14,025 14, 025 14, 025 14,025 14,025 14,025 14, 025 14,025 14,025 14,025 14,025 14,025 14,025 14,025 14,025 14,025 14,025 53, 342 53, 342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53, 342 53, 342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53, 342 53,342 53,342 53, 342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53,342 RA1 LWAY 1 2.�9 0 0 0 0 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39, 316 39,316 0 0 0 0 22, 503 22, 503 22, 503 22, 503 22,�03 22, 503 22,503 22, 503 22, 503 22, 503 22, 503 22, 503 22, 503 22, 503 22, 503 22,503 22,503 22,503 0 0 0 0 19, 862 19,052 18,275 17, 530 16,816 16,130 15,472 14, 842 14,237 13,656 13,100 12,565 12,053 11,562 11,091 10,638 10,205 9,789 405,058 256,874 SECTION XVI TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 15 {MINNESOTA COMMERCIAL R.AILWAY CO. PROJECT) Subsection 16.1. Statement of Obiectives Subsection 1.5. Statement of Objectives. See Section I, Subsection 16.2. Mod_ ified Redevelopment Plan. See Section I, Subsections 1.2. through 1.15. Subsection 16.3. Parcels to be Included. The boundaries of Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 are described on the attached Exhibit XVI-A and illustrated on Exhibit XVI-g, Subsection 16.4. Pa_ in„Acctuisition publicly acguire and reconvey any or all of the parcelshin1TaXmay Increment Financing District No. 15 identified on the attached Exhibit XVI-A. The following are conditions under which properties not designated to be acquired may be acquired at a future date: (1) The City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from wi.11ing sellers in order to achieve the objectives of the Tax Increment Financing Plan; and (2) Such acquisition will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. Subsection 16.5. Development Act_ 1_'vity for which Contracts have been Sianed_ As of the date of adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan, the City intends to enter into a Development Agreement with Minnesota Commercial Railway Company for the activities discussed below_ Subsection 16.6. Spei Development E At this time it is anticipated that an approximateed7t980�square foot warehousing and transloading facility with an estimated market value of $1,159,600, calculated pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 270.80, will be constructed in 1997. Subsection 16.7. Prior Planned Imnrovemen�s The Authority shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of district enlargement with a 3isting of all properties within Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 for wh�ch building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18j months immediatel approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan by thePAuthority, 16 - 1 2.10 The county Auditor shall increase the original tax capacity of Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 by the tax capacity of each improvement for which the buiiding permit was issued. If said listing does not accompany the''aforementioned request or notice, the absence of such listing shall indicate to the County Auditor that no building permits were issued in the eighteen (18) months prior to the Authority's approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Subsection 16.8. Fiscal Dis arities. The Council hereby elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, clause (a) if and when commercial/industrial development occurs with Tax Increment Financing District No. 15. Subsection 16.9. Estimated Public Improvement Costs. The estimated costs associated with Redevelopment Project No. 1 are listed in Section I, Subsections 1.9 and 1.10. Subsection 16.10. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness. � It is anticipated that $480,000 of bonded indebtedness could be incurred with.respect to this portion of Redevelopment Project No. l. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, Subdivision 1, Generai Obli�ation Tax Increment Bonds may be used as required to amortize the costs identified in Section I, Subsections 1.9 and 1.10. The City reserves the right to pay for all or part of the activities listed in Section I, Subsections 1.9. and 1.10. relating to Redevelopment Project No. 1 as tax increments are generated and become available. Subsection 16.11. Sources of Revenue. The costs outlined in Section I, Subsection 1.9. will be financed through the annual collection of tax increments. Subsection 16..12. Estimated Oriqirial and Captured Tax Capacities. The tax capacity of all taxable property in Tax Increment Financing District No. 15, as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota on January 2, 1996, is estimated to be �14,025. The estimated captured tax capacity of Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 upon completion of the proposed improvements on January 2, 1998 is estimated to be $39,317. Subsection 16.13. Tax Increment. Tax increment has been calculated at approximately $45,007 upon completion of the improvements assuming a static tax capacity rate and a valuation increase of zero percent (0%) compounded annually. Subsection 16.14. Tax CapacitZ• Rate_ The estimated 1996/1997 total tax capacity rate is estimated at 114.47300_ 16 - 2 2.11 Subsection 16.15. Tyqe of Tax Increment Financinq District. Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 is, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 12, an Economic Development District. � Subsection 16_16. Duration of Tax Increment Financinq District. The duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 is expected to be nine (9) years from date of receipt of the first tax increment or eleven (11) years from approval of the TIF plan, whichever is less. The date of receipt of the first tax increment is estimated to be July, 1999. Thus, it is estimated that Tax Increment Financing District No. 15, including any modifications for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate in the year 2007. Subsection 16.17. Estimated Impact on Other Taxinq Jurisdictions The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes construction would have occurred without the creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. 15. If the construction is a result of tax increment financing, the impact is $O to other entities. Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal impact on the other taxing jurisdictions is $0 due to the fact that the financing would not have occurred without the assistance of the City, the attached Exhibit XVI-E reflects the estimated impact of Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 if the "but for" test was not met. Subsection 16.18. Election of C_itv Contribution. The Council hereby elects a qualifying local contribution equal to ten percent (10.000}. of the tax increment generated from Tax Increment Financing District No. 15, as set forth in Minnesota Statutes 273.1399. Subsection 16.19. Modification of Tax Increment Financinq District and or Tax Increment Financinq Plan. On April 28, 1997, no modifications to Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 or the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefore has been made, said date being the date of initial approval and adoption thereof by the City Council. \FRIDLEY\TIF\TIFPI,AN.DpC 16 - 3 2.�2 EXHIBIT XVI-A PARCELS TO`BE INCLUDED IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO_ 15 AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED APRIL 28, 1997 ' PIN 11-30-24-31-0011 PIN 11-30-24-31-0012 XVI-A-1 2.13 c-a � . � � � c� y ' -� �, � _�. c�.. • c� _� . �. � � tz� - �s � �T � - Narthco �ri�e " � � �n� � � ( II � �xxiBZ� xcrr-s Boundary ilap 73rd Avenue N.� ■ t � .� 2.14 r�-rst t�� {u� �o c�� c� � tu� EXHIBlT XVI - C ASSUMPTIONS Original Market Value 1992 M1ct 1996 Mkt P�N Sq. Ft. Vatue Value PINS: 91-30-24-31-0011 87,120 174,200 174,200 11-30-2431-0012 87,120 9 30, 700 130, 700 174,240 304,900 304,900 Economic Inflator Original Tax Capacity Estimated Market Value Estimated Tax Capacity Estimated Taxes , 1997 Tax Rate Administrative Fees inflation P.V. Rate Construction Valuation Taxes Payable 1997 1998 1999 4.600% . 57,980 Sq. Ft. 20.00 per Sq. Ft. 57.980 Sq. Ft. ' 1_60 per Sq. Ft. 1 _ 144730 10.000% 0.000% 7_500% RAILWAY1 E; : �i�'15 - C - 1 304,900 1.00 14,025 1,159, 600 53,342 61,062 06/01 /97 12/01 /97 06/01 /98 12/01/98 06/01 /99 12/01 /99 06/01 /2000 12/01 /2000 06/01 /2001 12/01 /2001' 06/01 /2002 12/01 J2002 06/01 /2003 12/01 /2003 06/01 /2004 12/01 /2004 06/01 /2005 12/01 /2005 06/01 /2006 12/01 /2006 06/01/2007 12/01 /2007 EXHIBIT XVI - C CASH FLOW ANA�YSIS Original Estimated Captu�ed Estimated Less: Available Tax Tax Tax Tax Admin. Tax Capacity Capacity Capacity Increment Fees Increment 14, 025 14, 025 14,025 14,025 14,025 14,025 14, 025 14, 025 14, 025 14, 025 14,025 14,025 14, 025 14, 025 14, 025 14, 025 14,025 14, 025 14,025 14, 025 14,025 14,025 14,025 14,025 53,342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53, 342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53, 342 53,342 53,342 53,342 53,342 �� G 39,31 39,31 39,31 39,31 39,31 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 39,316 0 � � 0 � � 0 � � 0 0 0 0 0 6 22,503 2,250 20,253 6 22,503 2,250 20,253 6 22,503 2,250 20,253 6 22,503 2,250 20,253 6 22, 503 2, 250 20,253 22,503 2,250 20,253 22, 503 2, 250 20, 253 22,503 2,250 20,253 22,503 2,250 20,253 22;503 2,250 20,253 22,503 2,250 20,253 22,503 2,250 20,253 22,503 2,250 20,253 22,503 2,250 20,253 22,503 2,250 20,253 22,503 2,250 20,253 22,503 2,250 20,253 22,503 2,250 20,253 405,058 40 506 364 552 RAILWAY1 E'' �2.1s• _ C _ 2 �: EXHIBIT XVI-D °1 gUT FOR" 'ANALYS I S The redevelopment project consists of the acquisition of two (2) parcels and site preparation for the construction of a warehousing and transloading faci�ity. The redevelc�pment pro�ect could potentially increase employment opportunities at the project site by approximately twenty-four (24) people over a five (S) year period_ In addition, upon completion of the project, the City's tax base will increase by approximately $854,700_ Because of the substantial costs of�acquisition, public improvements, soil correction and preparation of the site for unusual weight bearing supports, the redeveloper could not proceed with this project without the Authority's assistance. �fRIDLEY\TIF\TZFPLu,N.EXF. XVI-D-1 2.17 EXHIBIT XVI-E ESTIMATED IMPACT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 15 IMPACT ON TAX BASE ORIGINAL ESTIMATED CAPTURED DISTRICT TAX TAX TAX TAX AS °/a ENTITY BASE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY OF TOTAL City of Fridley 29,228,679 14,025 53,342 39,317 0.135% County of Anoka 181,018,245 14,025 53,342 39,317 0.022% ISD #14 26,069,493 14,025 53,342 39,317 0.151 % IMPACT ON TAX RATE TAX % OF TAX TAX RATE ENTITY RATE TOTAL INCREMENT INCREASE C ity of Fridley 0_ 15693 13.71 % 6,170 0.021 % County of Anoka 0.30542 26.68% 12,008 0.007% ISD #14 ' 0.61268 53.52% 24,089 0.093% Other 0.06970 6.09% 2,740 1.14473 100_00% 45,007 * Assumes construction would have occurred without the creation of a Tax Increment Financing District. If construction is a result of Tax Increment Financing, the impact is $0. 2.18 0 AS MODIFIED APRIL 28, 1997 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 15 (MINNESOTA CONIP+IERCiAL RAILWAY CO • i Acquisition Soil Correction and Site Work, including Site Preparation for unusual weight bearing supports Public Improvements Administration $150,000 150,000 50,000 50,000 $400,000 Total * $480,000 Maximum Estimated Bonded Indebtedness * This amount includes capitalized interest in,ssuemuntilstheldatet to pay interest on the bonds from the date o 1 of collection of sufficie�s Whenldueement revenues to meet scheduled interest paymen \FRIDLEY�TIF�REDEPLAN•DOC 1 - 21 2.19 DATE: TO: April 24, 1997 MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION William W. Burns, City Manager �� FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott J. Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant RE: First Reading of an Ordinance Extending #he Moratorium on Multi- Bay Warehouse or Similar Trucking Based Product Distribution Facilities in lndustrial Zoning Districts INTRODUCTION On �aA�ary 27, 1897 the City Cou�cil establist�ed a 120 day �ratori�rrx on . warehouse facilities with rr�ore thar� #en (14) docks. The moratorium was adopted to allow time to review the number and location c�# existing warehouse and distribution facilities to determine if the zoning on remaining vacant land should be amended or changed #o another zo�ing classFfication. �he puFpose of this memorandum is to recommend that the City Council extend the moratorium 60 days, to July 26, 1997. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission wili be reviewing 8 inct�strial sites to be considered for rezoning to the new M-4, Manufacturing Only District. The following calendar has been established: • Planning Commission Public Hearing for specific M-4 sites • City Councii Public Hearing for specific M-4 sites . • First Reading of Ordinance for sites • Second Reading of Ordinance for sites • Publication 3.01 May 7, 1997 May 19, 1997 May 19, 1997 June 9, 1997 June 26, 1997 William W. Burns April 24, 1997 PAGE 2 • Effective Date of Ordinance July 11, 1997 • End of Moratorium July 26, 1997 COUNCIL ACTION Approve first reading of the attached ordinance to extend the Industrial Land Moratorium. �,�2 ORDINANCE NO. SSTABLISHING BY INTi3RIM ORDINANC$ DND$R THB PROVISIONS OF MINNLSOTA STATUTES SECTION 462.355, AN EXTENSION TO A PRSVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED MORATORIUM, WITHIN THE CITY OF FRIDL$Y ON CONSTRUCTION OR FXPANSION OF MULTI-BAY WAREHOUSS OR SIMILAR TRUCKING-BASED PRODIICT DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES IT IS HEREBY ORDANED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA: That the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, finds that truck traffic in areas surrounding large facilities in the City used for warehousing or similar purposes can and has created a substantial potential for and actual hazard to the health and safety of the citizens of the City. That the City Council has found that a study is necessary in order ' to determine whether such uses should continue to be permitted in industrial zones in the City, particularly in instances in which there is close proximity to residential areas and, if so, under what conditions or limitations that would adequately protect the citizens of the City. That the City Council has determined that additional time shall be required to complete the study and associated ordinance amendments. THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED: That the duration of the previously established 120 day moratorium herein declared be extended 60 days, terminating on July 26, 1997 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF ,1997 ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: 3.03 NANCY J. JORGENSON - MAYOR MEMORANDUl�i DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: April 24, 1997 � TO: Wiiliam Burns, City Manager �� FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, f'lanning Assistant SUBJECT: Approve Resolution Approving Final Plat, P.S. #97-01, by Steiner Development The City Council on March 3a, 1997 approved the prelFminary pla# request �y Steiner Development. The preliminary plat replatted property generalty located at tF�e intersection of Osbome Road and Main Street to create two industrial lots. Staff has not received the final mylars for the City Council to sign; however, the County surveyor has submitted the attached letter indicating that they have c�r�ceptually approved the - preliminary plat. Final mylars should be prepared and ready for the City Council to sign � within the next week. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution approving the final plat entitled "Osborne Commerce Center". MM/dw M-97-192 4.01 RESOLUTION NO. - 1997 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLAT, P.S. #97-01, OSBORNE CO2�RCE CENTER WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the preliminary plat, P.S. #97-01, on March 5, 1997 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat at their March 31, 1997 meeting; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby approves the Plat, P.S. #97-01, Osborne Commerce Center, and authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Plat as prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the petitioner is requested to record this Plat at Anoka County within six (6) months or said approval will become null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1997. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 4.02 NANCY J. JORGENSON - MAYOR ��s�s €� �#�� p ` � y ��al\ sa . �g j��f 32S�AR�� t a � �� f�• � �d �R �y e �, � ��j�i� f � ' x S o - - ��IJ�@�� , �i3 � ` R � .�ja�� A ` l�4 � wp � ♦� �j� ,\� � ' \� � �i, "� � . ' � � ��` : i � :� �� i�f�y% `.� � � `� �� •'�`�� , �` �t`\ w\'�, � _ .l.'i`' _ . / 1y .. dl �. \ ``` : / �`ti �t ��,� / y� . �•':: � . ! � � , r ��, {`P �.',, = i i .' � a � � i i / �'�;' `� � � i . , � � � � `� '�� /' 1 's � � � _ -- -- " '�v' � q ��'` � � Et.� ..� I _ ye�J.;`:.,.: I M Y `:. 1 � � r . � ��- jI � : ,� . =-;' � . . ��.;...:_'=` c� � i `� ..�````':�` ,,.�* :•'r ' ( h��.::�� . �`r`. - � � i . ,�.''+"`P� � � M� sa•s� 4 � I w i- '; :"iEd". '�a 1 Z • o-y.o�"�� I � `� �d ��/� ��/ _,,.�-�� i < ,. , � '� , � � r "` ',,,,�.�- Jj`� i �, � �'t' :� .�� , �� ,; ,,,. .f� �,,,.� � wh � � _ � , -- , „ i ` � , ,. i � �:. � � � � � ( . � f � � � � !I i� I � ;i i � � i _..� �i i ,� i � si / i � ,, .� y ,,,, � �� I I � �� I I �,i' � � - I � f,'.,.�'^ � � � � - � � r �� J�� _ iy�� _ _ 1�1 _ I I _ ' I . ' i .� � � � � l i � � �� H a! P.S. ��97-�;1 Steiner Development �°.s 3; '{t��.is �; ��f �;i��7�{ j; ="�j;� i��iA $ .� :s � i�ti� i � ��j�c tt °i4�R�� 3 1 : ;��i �� s(��gp�= � � x _�€��i �� i:;�i;��' ��##s(�;� :��;ji�i,�� '��i�� 3�� t�?��r�1�1;i�� t-�s�i��'�,'`�� 8 � �23t�;i� $ : i=�i ;' �rF - -li�j° ., Ylfe�i= ;- 3� }��t ��iA'I( � ��j, •'i {��l;�=�� j!i�"�t1�i:��ai�Y�� €��}i� �� ?�� ;1�'t� ��g�i •t��t�#�(��!iFi {� �1 _ 1't �� 3� _•�'i `��E�"�•, I °' �I �tjcj -��,i��.��} � � ;,� ° ; I`�tt�i� � ��: j��;��l,i;ji; :l�i��g �! �f�_�� +��ii��'{ � ;1;��f}��';#��•��._ �3�ts,{�t �� 'Si�,-�� a�.�jf� Eji(��{�l#F��!�� x ia��l!�3itfj�3=iz�t;A��(� i3di1�� 3 �a ��if[�Iii� �3A�1!'�i3i�aF � t�E��i�{f��:l� 8.t��'�8d ��, �!d � \� ; S� \ �;`► �� ` � 9 il � . �'� � a�\�� \ .�_ �33 `. � � ..,.. ' '��..-: � �� ` �.� � a� � �a �`` \ i �. � , / �`, c�c� �`�' . \� � � R�"° r _ _. `.� �\`. \♦ � ' � ', _�f� i : —n� i �` ' _--" 'f� G° __-- '•�%±. _ -"i.� i _�' - . --�.'=P ' i� .?�� v • - . � _ .� .�; � _ — � � i : , i�� r� 8V�'�NGj� 4.03 \� � .�'�;��ss�� \ �� ```(1\♦ \ 1� . �� \ � /sp, . \ ��, ��.�� •� a � � `��` ;�`,`. L'' ~ . �� ;: ,�,�> ��, , yy� w .� i��i � �� . � � m W o � , �Z N oW � U r °� g� a� _ } � � Q � W �O a w wz � � �� ao N m 0 H 0 � z z � r w 0 � � Ft S � z W � a 0 0 � � - - ��t�� ; r :�� R� �� # �� -- „!,_ E .� � � I _ c @ tF! , � s�� 6 GI�s �L ��; � ��L e� �F j o ! Iw � �� [i�y�nrcrriq N 'l•wl•I � Y W�tcr 2 � O Par�s O 3 Sucets VU MAIIIII��IAIICG• � Q m 0 ' a MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager „� �� PW97-109 ��. FRQM: Jon H. Haukaas, Assistant Director Public Works John G. Flora, Director Public Works � DATE: April23, 1997 �SUBJECT: Central Avenue Bituminous Sidewalk Project No. 1994-9 On Wednesday, April 23, 1997, at 10:00 am bids were opened for the Central Avenue Bituminous Sidewalk Project No. 1994-9. Plans and Specifi�ations were sent to 13 prime contractors, and 2 subcontractors. Ten bids were received . The low bid was submitted by Harddrives Inc. ofRogers,MN, in the amount of $241,058.50. The cost for the walk bridge ovec Rice Creek is $44,357.00 from Continental Bridge�of Alexandcia, MN. The estimated cost for design and installation of the bridge abutments and setting the bridge is approximately $25,000. The total cost of the project is then approximately $310,500. In 1995 the low bid amount was $349,352.90. There currently is $265,000 encumbered since 1995 for this project. '�here is an additional $173,000 from the 1996 reconstruction program which was unused and turned back to the street capital improvement fund, part of which could be used to cover the balance. Recommend the City Council receive the bids and award the contract for the Central Avenue bituminous Sidewalk Project No. 1994-9 to Harddrives, Inc. in the amount of $241,058.50 and authorize the costs to purchase and install the bridge over Rice Creek. �1:1:1 5.01 � �11 � �. � � .� TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITYMANAGER �� FROM.• RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT.• MODIFICATION OF COMPENSATIONAND ACCRUED LEAVE FOR SUSAN LEMIEUX DATE: APRIL 23, 1997 On the Council meeting of February 24, 1997 Susan Lemieux was formally appointed to her position as Assistant Finance Director. In her short term of employment thus far, she has shown me that she is a very capable and knowledgable employee. Susan's past employment as a Finance Director for a city that had a diverse number of activities requiring a broad background and knowledge of Governmental Accounting Standards has provided her with outstanding skills. Staff is requesting that a motion be made to modify the Assistant Finance Director's salary within the same grade but moving her from stepl to step 4. The salary of $55,540.80, would be effective on Apri128, 1997 and in addition, a pool of 18 days annual leave be added to her cunent accrual effective on the same day. s.� � i� �'��a TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITYMANAGER �� FROM.• RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: RESOLUTIONAWARDING THE SALE OF THE CITY'S $9,575,000 GENERAL OBLIGA�'ION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDIIVG BONDS, SERIES 1997A DATE: MARCH 28, 1997 Attached you will find the resolution provided to us by Jim O'Meara with Briggs and Morgan. This resolution will provide the appropriate legislation for the award and sale of the bonds. The resolution is in a blank form, the bid reca.p will be presented on Monday evening identifying the winning bank, broker or syndicate. This bond issue is classified as a current refunding issue that will replace the current G.O. Tax Increment Refunding Bonds Seiies � 99Q. It was estimated on March 26, 1997 that we would have a net savings of approxirn�a#e�y $1,404,000 over the remaining life of the issue by proceeding forward with the sale of the new bond. 7.01 RESOLUTION NO. -1997 RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF THE CITY'S $9,575,000 GENERP.L OBLIGP.TION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1997A AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR ISSUANCE A. WHEREAS, the Council believes it to be in the City's best interest to consider a refunding of the callable bonds of the City's General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds of 1990, dated March l, 1990 {the "Prior Bonds"); and B. WHEREAS, it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1997A (the "Bonds"), to provide moneys for a current refunding of the Prior Bonds (which Prior Bonds to be refunded are referred to herein as the "Refunded Bonds"): NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Fridley, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: 1. Acceptance of Offer. (a) The offer of (the "Purchaser") to purchase the City's $9,575,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1997A (the "Bonds", or individually a"Bond"), at the rates of interest and upon the other terms set forth in this Resolution, and to pay therefor the sum of $ plus interest accrued to settlement, is hereby accepted. (b) Book Entry Only System. The Depository Trust Company, in New York, New York, pursuant to a certain Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations to be executed by the City and accepted by said Trust Company (as the same may be supplemented or superseded, and including all provisions thereof and rules, procedures or practices referenced therein, the "Letter of Representations"), or any of its successors to its functions hereunder (the "Depository"), will act as securities depository for the Bonds, and to this end: {i) The Bonds shall be initially issued and, so long as they remain in book entry form only (the "Book Entry Orily Period"), shall at all times be in the form of a separate single fully registered Bond for each maturity of the Bonds; and authorized denominations for each maturity of Bonds shall be deemed to be limited during the Book Entry Only Period to the outstanding principal amount of that maturity. While in such book entry form, the Bonds are sometimes hereinafter referred to as being in "Book Entry Only Form." 7.�2 (ii) Upon initial issuance, ownership of the Bonds shall be registered in a bond register maintained by the Bond Registrar d�scribed in this Resolution in the name of CEDE & CO. , as the nominee ( it or any nominee of the existing or a successor Depository, the "Nominee"). {iii) With respect to the Bonds, neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall have any responsibility or obligation to any broker, dealer, bank, or any other financial institution for which the Depository holds Bonds as securities depository (the "Participant") or to the person for which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds shown on the books and records of the Participant (the "Beneficial Owner"). Without limiting the immediately preceding sentence, neither the City, nor the Bond Registrar, shall have any such responsibility or obligation with respect to (A) the accuracy of the records of the Depository, the .Nominee or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, or (B) the delivery to any Participant, any Beneficial Owner or any other person, other than the Depository, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (C) the payment to any Participant, any Beneficial Owner or any other person, other than the Depository, of any amount with respect to the p.rincipal of or premi�, if any, or interest on the Bonds, or {D) the consent given or other action taken b� the Depository as tl�e registered owner of any Bonds (the "Holder"). For purposes of securing the vote or consent of any Holder under this Resolution, the City may, however, rely upon an omnibus proxy under which the Depository assign� its consenting or voting rights to certain Participants to whose accounts the Bonds are credited on the record datE identified in a listing attached to the omnibus proxy. (iv) The City ar�d the Bond Registrar may treat as and deem the Depository to be the absolute owner of the Bonds for the purpose of payment of the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, for the purpose of giving notices of redemption and other matters with respect to the Bonds, for the purpose of obtaining any consent or other action to be taken by Holders for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bonds, and for all purpose whatsoever. 2 7.03 The Bond Registrar, as paying agent hereunder, shall pay all principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the Holder or the Holders of the Bonds, as shown on the Bond Registrar's bond register, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (v) Upon delivery by the Depository to the Bond Registrar of written notice to the effect that the Depository has determined to substitute a new Nominee in place of the existing Nominee, and subject to the transfer provisions applicable to the Bonds, references to the Nominee hereunder shall refer to such new Nominee. (vi) So long as any Bond is registered in the name of a Nominee, all payments with respect to the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on such Bond and all notices with respect to such Bond shall be made and given, respectively, by the Bond Registrar or the City, as the case may be, to the Depository as provided in the Letter of Representations. (vii) All transfers of beneficial ownership interests in each Bond issued in book-entry form shall be limited in principal amount to authorized denominations and shall be effected by the Depository with the Participants for recording and transferring the ownership of beneficial interests in such Bonds. (viii) In connection with any notice or other communication to be provided to the Holders pursuant to this Resolution by the City or the Bond Registrar with respect to any consent or other action to be taken by Holders, the Depository shall consider the date of receipt of notice requesting such consent or other action as the record date for such consent or other action; provided, that the City or the Bond Registrar may establish a special record date for such consent or other action. The City or the Bond Registrar shall, to the extent possible, give the Depository notice of such special record date not less than 15 calendar days in advance thereof to the extent possible. 3 7.04 (ix) Any successor Bond Registrar, in its written acceptance of its duties under this Resolution and any paying agency regis�rar agreement, shall agree to take any actions necessary from time to time to comply with the requirements of the Letter of Representations. (x) In the case of a partial prepayment of a Bond, the Holder may, in lieu of surrendering the Bond for a Bond of a lesser denomination, make a notation of the reduction in principal amount on the panel provided on the Bond stating the amount so redeemed. (c) Termination of Book-Entry Only System. Discontinuance of the Depository's services and termination of the book-entry only system may be effected as follows: (i) The Depository may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving written notice to the City and discharqing its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. The City may terminate the serv.i.ces of the Depository with respect to the Bonds if the City determines that the Depository is no longer able to carry out its function� as securities depository or the continuation of the system of book-entry transfers through the Depository is not in the best interests of the City. (ii) Upon termination of the services of the Depository as provided in t�e prececling paragraph, and if no substitute se�urities depository i� willing to undertake the functions of the Depository hereunder can be found which, in the opinion of the City, i� willing anci able to assume such functions upon reasonable or customary terms, or if the City determines that it is in the best interests of the City that the Beneficial Owners be issued certificates for the Bonds, the Bonds shall no longer be registered in the name of the Nominee, but may be registered in whatever name or names the Holder of the Bonds shall designate at that time, in accordance with paragraph ll hereof. To the extent that the Beneficial Owners are designated as the transferee by the Holders, the Bonds will be delivered to the Beneficial Owners. (d) Letter of Representations. The provisions in the Letter of Representations (the execution and delivery of which by the City being hereby authorized) are incorporated herein by reference and made fully a part of this Resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full herein, and if and to the 0 7.05 extent that any provisions of this Resolution or the Bonds are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of the Letter of Representations, the provisions in the Letter of Representations shall control. 2. Title; Original Issue Date; Maturities; Denominations. The Bonds shall be titled "General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1997A," shall be dated June l, 1997, as the date of original issue, and shall be issued forthwith on or after such date as fully registered bonds. The Bonds shall be numbered from R-1 upward in the denominatlon of $5,000 each or in any integral multiple thereof of a single maturity. The Bonds shall mature on August 1 in the following years and amounts, respectively: Year Amount 1999 $ 75,000 2000 75,000 2001 875,000 2002 925,000 2003 950,000 2004 1,000,000 Year Amount 2005 $l, 050, 000 2006 1,100,000 2007 1,150,000 2008 1, 200, 000 2009 1, 175, 000 3. Purpose; Refunding Findings. The Bonds shall provide moneys for a current refunding of the City's Refunded Bonds. It is hereby found, determined and declared that such refunding is necessary or desirable for the reduction of debt service cost to the City and/or the adjustment of the maturities of the Prior Bonds in relation to the sources for their repayment and will result in a reduction of debt service cost to the City. Al1 of the proceeds, including all investment earnings thereon, of the Prior Bonds have heretofore been expended by the City for the uses and purposes for which the City issued said Prior Bonds. The balance in the debt service account heretofore established by the City for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Prior Bonds has been taken into account in appropriately sizing the Bonds, and some monies therein are expected to be combined as of August l, 1997, to the extent necessary, with the available proceeds of the Bonds in order to obtain a sum sufficient to accomplish the refunding and to pay the regularly scheduled debt service due on the Prior Bonds on said date; otherwise, the current and anticipated balances in said debt service account do not exceed and are not expected to exceed the aggregate amount of regularly scheduled debt service on the Prior Bonds which is payable on or before August l, 1997, except only insofar as may be necessary to provide sufficient funds, together with the other monies available for such purposes, to provide for the payment of the debt service first coming due on the Bonds. The City has observed and complied with all of its obligations and covenants made by the City in connection with the issuance of the Prior Bonds. � 7.�6 4. Interest. The Bonds shall bear interest payable semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year (each, an "Interest Payment Date"), commencing February 1, 1998, calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months, at the respective r:ates per annum set forth opposite the maturity years as follows-: Matu�ity Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Interest Rate 0 MaturityInterest Year Rate 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 % 5. Redemption. All Bonds maturing after August 1, 2005, shall be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City on said date and on any date thereafter at a price of par plus accrued interest. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the City shall determine the amount of Bonds of each maturity to be prepaid; and if only a part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment, the specific Bonds to be prepaid shall be chosen by lot by the Bond Registrar. Bonds or portions thereof called for r�demptior� shall be due and pa�able on the redemptio� date, and interest thereon shall cease to acc�ue from and after the r�demption date. Published notice of redemption shall �e give� 3f and to the extent required by applicable law, and mailed notice of redemption shall be given to the paying agent and to each affected registered owner of the Bonds. To effect a partial redemption of Bonds having a common maturity date, the Bond Registrar prior to giving notice of redemption shall assign to each Bond having a common maturity date a distinctive number for each $5,000 of the principal amount of such Bond. The Bond Registrar shall then select by lot, using such method of selection as it shall deem proper in its discretion, from the numbers so assigned to such Bonds, as many numbers as, at $5,000 for each number, shall equal the principal amount of such Bonds to be redeemed. The Bonds to be redeemed shall be the Bonds to which were assigned numbers so selected; provided, however, that only so much of the principal amount of each such Bond of a denomination of more than $5,000 shali be redeemed as shall equal $5,000 for each number assigned to it and so selected. If a Bond is to be redeemed only in part, it shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar (with, if the City or Bond Registrar so requires, a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the City and Bond Registrar duly executed by the registered owner thereof or C 7.�7 his, her or its attorney duly authorized in writing) and the City shall execute (if necessary) and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver to the registered owner of such Bond, without service charge, a new Bond or Bonds of the same series having the same stated maturity and interest rate and of any authorized denomination or denominations, as requested by such registered owner, in aggregate principal amount equal to and in exchange for the unredeemed portion of the principal of the Bond so surrendered. 6. Bond Registrar. , in , � is appointed to act as bond registrar and transfer agent with respect to the Bonds (as used in this Resolution, the "Bond Registrar"), and shall do so unless and until a successor Bond Registrar is duly appointed, all pursuant to any contract the City and Bond Registrar shall execute which is consistent with this Resolution. The Bond Registrar shall also serve as paying agent unless and until a successor paying agent is duly appointed. Principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be paid to the registered owners of the Bonds in the manner set forth in the form of Bond and paragraph 12 of this Resolution. 7. Form of Bond. The Bonds, together with the Bond Registrar's Certificate of Authentication, the form of Assignment and the registration information thereon, shall be in substantially the following form: 7 %.�8 I� UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF FRIDLEY GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BOND, SERIES 1997A INTEREST MATURITY DATE OF RATE DATE ORIGINAL ISSUE CUSIP REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: DOLLARS KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS that the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota (the "City"), acknowledges that it is indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the registered owner specified above, or registered assigns, in the manner hereinafter set forth, the principal amount specified above on the maturity date specified above, unless called for earlier redemption, and to pay interest thereon semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year (each, an "Interest Payment Date"), commencing February 1, 1998, at the per annum rate of intere�t specified above (ealculated on the basis of a 360 day year consisting of twelve 30 day mc�nths) until the principal sum is paid or has been provided for. This Bond will bear interest from the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or, if no interest has been paid, from the date of original issue hereof. The principal of this Bond is payable upon presentation and surrender hereof at the principal office of , in , (the "Bond Registrar"), acting as paying agent, or any successor paying agent duly appointed by the City. interest on this Bond will be paid on each Interest Payment Date by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name this Bond is registered (the "Holder" or "Bondholder") on the registration books of the City maintained by the Bond Registrar and at the address appearing thereon at the close of business on the fifteenth day of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date (the "Regular Record Date"). Any interest not so timely paid s�all cease to be payable to the person who is the Holder hereof as of the Regular Record Date and shall instead be payable to the person that is the Holder hereof at the close of business on a date (the "Special Record Date") fixed by the Bond Registrar whenever money becomes available for payment of the defaulted interest. Notice of : 7.09 the Special Record Date shall be given to Bondholders not less than ten days prior to the Special Record Date. The principal of and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO THE FURTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS BOND SET FORTH ON THE REVERSE HEREOF, WHICH PROVISIONS SHALL FOR ALL PURPOSES HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS IF SET FORTH HERE. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota and the Home Rule Charter of the City (the "Charter") to be done, to have happened and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have been done, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form, time and manner as required by law, and that this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the City outstanding on the date of original issue hereof and on the date of its actual issuance and delivery to the original purchaser, does not exceed any constitutional, statutory or Charter limitation of indebtedness. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile signatures of its Mayor and City Manager; has caused the official seal of the City to be intentionally omitted herefrom, as permitted by law; and has caused this Bond to be executed manually by the Bond Registrar, acting as the City's duly appointed authenticating agent for the Bonds. Date of Registration: Bond Registrar'S CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the Resolution mentioned within. , Bond Registrar By Authorized Signature Registrable by: Payable at: CITY OF FRIDLEY, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA /s/ Facsimile Mayor /s/ Facsimile City Manager %.� � ON REVERSE OF BOND Redemption. All Bonds maturing after August 1, 2005, are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City on said date and on any date thereafter at a price of par plus accrued interest. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the City shall determine the amount of Bonds of each maturity to be prepaid; and if only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment, the specific Bonds to be prepaid shall be chosen by lot by the Bond Registrar. Bonds or portions thereof called for redemption shall be due and payable on the redemption date, and interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and after the redemption date. Published notice of redemption shall be given if and to the extent required by.applicable law, and mailed notice of redemption shall be given to the paying agent and to each affected Holder of the Bonds. Selec�ion of Bonds for Redemption; Partial Redemption. To effect a partial redemption of Bonds having a common maturity date, the Bond Registrar shall assign to each Bond having a common maturity date a distinctive number for each $5,000 of the principal amount of such Bond. The Bond Registrar shall then select by lot, using such method of selection as it shall deem proper in its discretion, from the numbers assigned to the Bonds, as many numb�rs as, at $5,000 for each number, shall equal the principal arnount of such Bonds to be redeemed. The Bonds to be redeemed shall be the Bonds to which were assigried numbers so selected; provitled, however, that only �o much o� the principal amount of such Bond flf a de�omination of mo�� than $�, 000 shall be redeemed as shall ec-�rx�.l $5,000 for each number assigned to it and so selected. If a Bond is to be redeemed only in part, it shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar (with, if the City or Bond Registrar so requires; a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the City and Bond Registrar duly execu�ed by the Holder thereof or the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing), and the City shall execute and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver to the Holder of such Bond, without service charge, a new Bond or Bonds of the same series having the same stated maturity and interest rate and of any authorized denomination or denominations, as requested by such Holder, in aggregate principal amount equal to and in exchange for the unredeemed portion of the principal of the Bond so surrendered. Issuance; Purpose; General Obligation. This Bond is one of an issue in the total principal amount of $9,575,000, all of like date of original issue and tenor, except as to registration number, maturity, interest rate, denomination and redemption privilege, which Bonds have been issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 475:67, and pursuant to a resolution 10 %. � 1 adopted by the City Council, the governing body of the City, on April 28, 1997 (the "Resolution"), for the primary purpose of providing moneys, together with other available funds of the City, sufficient to prepay the City's General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds of 1990, dated March l, 1990. This Bond constitutes a general obligation of the City, and to provide moneys for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on all of the Bonds, when the same become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. Each capitalized term which is used but not otherwise defined in this Bond shall have the meaning given to that term in the Resolution. [For Bonds in Book Entry Only Form, the following paragraph shall be added, and this Bond form (1) may be rearranged so that the signature blocks hereof appear at the end of the main text of this form or (2) may otherwise be amended to conform to book entry requirements and the Letter of Representations.] Book Entry Only Form; Letter of Representations. Pursuant to the Resolution, the Bonds may be issued in Book Entry Only Form, and during any period in which Bonds are in such form, the provisions applicable to the Bonds pursuant to the Letter of Representations (as defined in the Resolution) shall apply, notwithstanding any contrary or inconsistent provision herein or in the Resolution. Denominations; Exchange; Resolution. The Bonds are issuable solely as fully registered bonds in the denominations of $5,000 and integral multiples thereof of a single maturity and are exchangeable for fully registered Bonds of other authorized denominations of $5,000 and integral multiples thereof of a single maturity and are exchangeable for fully registered Bonds of other authorized denominations in equal aggregate principal amounts at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, but only in the manner and subject to the limitations provided in the Resolution. Reference is hereby made to the Resolution for a description of the rights and duties of the Bond Registrar. Copies of the Resolution are on file in the principal office of the Bond Registrar. Transfer. This Bond is transferable by the Holder in person or by the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing at the principal office of the Bond Registrar upon presentation and surrender hereof to the Bond Registrar, all subject to the terms and conditions provided in the Resolution and to reasonable regulations of the City contained in any agreement with the Bond Registrar. Thereupon the City shall execute, and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in exchange for this Bond, one or more new fully registered Bonds in the name of the transferee {but not registered in blank or to "bearer" or similar designation), of an authorized denomination or denominations, in 11 %.12 aggregate principal amount equal to the principal amount of this Bond, of the same maturity and bearing interest at the same rate. Fees upon Transfer or Loss. The Bond Registrar may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with the transfer or exchange of this Bond and any legal or unusual costs regarding transfers and lost Bonds. Treatment of Registered Owners. The City and Bond Registrar may treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment as herein provided (except as otherwise provided on the reverse side hereof with respect to the Record Date) and for all other purposes, whether or not this Bond shall be overdue, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by notice to the contrary. Authentication. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security unless the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been manually executed by the Bond Registrar. Designation of Bond as Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligation. This Bond has been designated by the City as a"qualified tax-exempt obligation" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 12 7.13 � ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM - as tenants in common TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UTMA - as custodian for (Cust) (Minor) under the Uniform (State) Transfers to Minors Act Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 13 7.14 � � ASSIGNMENT For value received, the u�dersigned hereby sells, assigns ancl transfers unto the within Bond and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint as attorney to transfer the Bond on the books kept for the registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Notice: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature Guaranteed: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a national bank or trust company, by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges or by any other "Eligible Guarantor Institution" as defined in 17 CFR 240.17 Ad-15(a)(2). The Bond €teg�strar will not effect trar�sfer of this Bond r�less the i��o�na�ior� eemcerning �he transferee requested beiow is provided. Name and Address: (Include information for all joint owners if the Bond is held by joint account.) 14 7.15 8. Execution; Temporary Bonds. The Bonds shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of its Mayor and City Manager, and the official seal of the City may be omitted from the Bonds, as permitted by law; provided that such signatures and said seal may be printed facsimiles. In the event of disability or resignation or other absence of any such officer, the Bonds may be signed by the manual or facsimile siqnature of that officer who may act on behalf of such absent or disabled officer. In case any such officer whose signature or facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Bonds, such signature or facsimile shall neverthe- less be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he or she had remained in office until delivery. The City may elect to deliver, in lieu of printed definitive bonds, one or more type- written temporary bonds in substantially the form set forth above, with such changes as may be necessary to reflect more than one maturity in a single temporary bond. Such temporary bonds may be executed with photocopied facsimile or manual signatures of the Mayor and City Manager. Such temporary bonds shall, upon the printing of the definitive bonds and the execution thereof, be exchanged therefor and cancelled. 9. Authentication. No Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless a Certificate of Authentication on such Bond, substantially in the form hereinabove set forth, shall have been duly and manually executed by an authorized representative of the Bond Registrar. Certificates of Authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same person. The Bond Registrar shall authenticate the signatures of officers of the City on each Bond by execution of the Certificate of Authentication on the Bond and by inserting as the date of registration in the space provided the date on which the Bond is authenticated, except that for purposes of delivering the original Bonds to the Purchaser, the Bond Registrar shall insert as a date of registration the date of original issue, which date is June 1, 1997. The Certificate of Authentication so executed on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. 10. Registration; Transfer; Exchange. The City will cause to be kept at the principal office of the Bond Registrar a bond register in which, subject to such reasonable regulations as the Bond Registrar may prescribe, the Bond Registrar shall provide for the registration of Bonds and the registration of transfers of Bonds entitled to be registered or transferred as herein provided. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, the City shall execute (if necessary), and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate, insert the date of registration of (as provided in paragraph 9) and deliver, 15 7.�6 in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of any authorized denomination or denominations of a like aggregate principal amount, having the same stated maturity and interest rate, as requested by the transferor; provided, however, that no Bond may be registered in blank or in the name of "bearer" or similar designation. At the option of the registered owner, Bonds may be exchanged for Bonds of any authorized denomination or denominations of a like aggregate principal amount and stated maturity, upon surrender of the Bonds to be exchanged at the principal office of the Bond Registrar. Whenever any Bonds are so surrendered for exchange, the City shall execute (if necessary), and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate, insert the date of registration of, and deliver the Bonds which the registered owner making the exchange is entitled to receive. All Bonds surrendered upon any exchange or transfer provided for in this Resolution shall be promptly cancelled by the Bond Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. All Bonds delivered in exchange for or upon transfer of Bonds shall be valid obligations of the City evidencing the same debt and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution as the Bonds surrendered for such exchange or transfer. Every Bond presented or surrendered for transfer or exchange shall be duly endorsed or be accompanied by a written instru�e�t o� transfer, in form satisfactory to the Bond Registra�, dui� executed by the regi�tered owner thereof or the registered owne-r's attornep duly authorized in writing. The Bond Registrar may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with the transfer or exchange of any Bond and any legal or unusual costs regarding transfers and lost Bonds. Transfers shall also be subject to reasonable regulations of. the City contained in any agreement with the Bond Registrar, including regulations which permit the Bond Registrar to close its transfer books between record dates and payment dates. 11. Rights Upon Transfer or Exchange. Each Bond delivered upon transfer of or in exchange for or in lieu of any other Bond shall carry all the rights to interest accrued and unpaid, and to accrue, which were carried by such other Bond. 16 7.17 12. Interest Payment; Record Date. Interest on any Bond shall be paid on each Interest Payment Date by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name the Bond is registered (the "Holder") on the registration books of the City maintained by the Bond Registrar and at the address appearing thereon at the close of business on the fifteenth (15th) day of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date (the "Regular Record Date"). Any such interest not so timely paid shall cease to be payable to the person that is the Holder thereof as of the Regular Record Date and shall be payable to the person that is the Holder thereof at the close of business on a date (the "Special Record Date") fixed by the Bond Registrar whenever money becomes available for payment of the defaulted interest. Notice of the Special Record Date shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the Holders not less than ten (10) days prior to the Special Record Date. 13. Treatment of Registered Owner. The City and Bond Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is registered as the owner of such Bond for the purpose of receiving payment of principal of and interest (subject to the payment provisions in paragraph 12 above) on such Bond and for all other purposes whatsoever, whether or not such Bond shall be overdue, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by notice to the contrary. 14. Delivery; Application of Proceeds. The Bonds when so prepared and executed shall be delivered by the City Finance Director to the Purchaser upon receipt of the purchase price, and the Purchaser shall not be obliged to see to the proper application thereof. 15. Ftiind and Accounts. For the convenience and proper administration of the moneys to be borrowed and repaid on the Bonds and the Refunded Bonds, and to make adequate and specific security to the Purchaser and registered owners from time to time of the Bonds and the Refunded Bonds, there is hereby created a special fund to be designated the General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1997A, Fund" (the "Ftiind") to be administered and maintained by the City Finance Director as a bookkeeping account separate and apart from all other funds maintained in the official financial records of the City. The Fund shall be maintained in the manner herein specified until all of the Refunded Bonds and the Bonds herein authorized and the interest thereon shall have been fully paid. There shall be maintained in the Fund two separate accounts, to be designated the "Refunding Account" and the "Debt Service Account," respectively. (i) Refunding Account. The proceeds of the sale of the Bonds, less such proceeds of the Bonds (if any) as may be used to pay issuance expenses or hereinafter directed for deposit into the Debt Service Account, plus any other available 17 7.18 municipal funds ("Other Funds"), if any, as may be required to adequately fund the Refunding Account to accomplish its purposes, together with all investment earnings on funds held in the Refunding Account, are hereby pledged and appropriated and shall be credited to the Refunding Account. The Refunding Account may be invested only in securities maturing or callable on such dates and bearing interest at such rates as shall be required to provide funds sufficient, together with any ca�h or other funds retained in the Refunding Account, and together with monies made available from the debt service account for the Prior Bonds, to pay all principal and interest due on the Prior Bonds on August 1, 1997, whether due thereon by virtue of regularly scheduled debt service or prior redemption. The moneys in the Refunding Account shall be used solely for the purposes herein set forth and for no other purpose, except that any surplus in the Refunding Account shall be remitted to the City. Such Other Funds, if any, as may be required to fully fund the Refunding Account as described above are hereby appropriated for said purpose. (ii) Debt Service Account. To the Debt Service Account there are hereby pledged and irrevocably appropriated and there shall be credited: (1) all accrued interest and unused discount received upon delivery of the Bonds which is not then deposited into the Refunding Account; (2) any balance remaining on August l, 1997, after payment thereon of all of the principal of and interest on all of the Prior Bonds, in the debt service account created for and allocated to the Prior Bonds pursuant to paragraph 15 of the Council's resolutio� adopted on March 7, 19�0, in conneetion with the issuance of the Prior Bonds; (3) the tax increments derived by the City from the Tax Increment Pledge Agreement described in paragraph 26 of this Resolution, but only in such amounts as shall be necessary, together with other monies in the Debt Service Account and availabie for such purposes, to pay, when due, the princ.:ipal of and interest on the Bonds; (4) all collections of any ad valorem taxes hereafter levied for the payment of the Bonds; (5) all investment earnings on funds held in the Debt Service Account; and (6) any amounts received by the City upon termination of the Refunding Account. The foregoing funds are hereby pledged to the Debt Service Account, but only in such amounts and at such times as may be necessary, together with other available funds therein (and the same shall be used solely), to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds, when due. No portion of the proceeds of the Bonds shall be used directly or indirectly to acquire higher yielding investments or to replace funds which were used directly or indirectly to acquire higher yielding investments, except for an available and reasonable "temporary period" until such proceeds are needed for the purpose i :� 7.19 for which the Bonds were issued, and for any available "minor portion." To this effect, any proceeds of the Bonds and any sums from time to time held in the Refunding Account and Debt Service Account (or any other City account which will be used to pay principal and interest to beeome due on the Bonds) in excess of amounts which under then-applicable federal arbitrage regulations may be invested without regard to yield shall not be invested at a yield in excess of the applicable yield restrictions imposed by the arbitrage regulations on such investments after taking into account any applicable "temporary periods" or "minor portion" made available under the federal arbitrage regulations. In addition, the proceeds of the Bonds and money in the Fund shall not be invested in obligations or deposits issued by, guaranteed by or insured by the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof if and to the extent that such investment would cause the Bonds to be "federally guaranteed" within the meaning of Section 149(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and regulations, rulings and decisions thereunder (the "Code"). 16. Coverage Test; Certificate of Registration. It is hereby found and determined that the revenues pledged herein for the payment of, the Bonds will be available in amounts sufficient to produce at least five percent (5%) in excess of the amount needed to meet, when due, the principal and interest payments on the Bonds. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the office of the Anoka County Property Records & Taxation and to obtain the certificate of said office required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.63. 17. General Obligation Pledge. For the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds, as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. If the balance in the Debt Service Account is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on the Bonds, the deficiency shall be promptly paid out of any other funds of the City which are available for such purpose, and such other funds may be reimbursed with or without interest from the Debt Service Account when a sufficient balance is available therein. To the extent that it shall ever be necessary to provide full and timely payment of the debt service on the Bonds, the City shall levy an ad valorem tax upon all taxable property within the City sufficient for such purposes. 18. Prior Bonds; Security. Until retirement and full payment of the Prior Bonds, all provisions heretofore made for the security thereof shall be observed by the City. 19. Redemption of Refunded Bonds. The outstanding Prior 19 7.2� Bonds shall be redeemed and prepaid on August l, 1997, and prior to said date, the paying agent/registrar for the Prior Bonds is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of said redemption to be published and to be given to the owners of the Prior Bonds in such manner as may be required by law and by the terms of the Prior Bonds. 20. Records and Certificates. The officers of the City ar� hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser, and to the attorneys approving the legality of the issuance of the Bonds, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as are required to show the facts relating to the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 21. Negative Covenant as to Use of Proceeds and Improvements. The City hereby represents that it has not used, and hereby covenants that it will not use, and that it has not permitted and will not permit any such uses, the proceeds of the Bonds or the improvements (the "Improvements") financed by (or the proceeds of) the Prior Bonds in such a manner as to cause the Bonds or the Prior Bonds to be "private activity bonds" under Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. In particular, but without limitation, the City covenants to forebear the impl�mentation, effectuation or enforcement of any and all contracts or other agreements respecting the Improvements or any property benefitted thereby or assessed with respect thereto, which the City may now or in the future have with developers, contractors, owners or any other person or parties to the extent that such implementation, effectuation or enforcement would (individually or in the aggregate) cause the Bonds or the Prior Bonds to become such "private activity bonds," and to said limited extent the City would and hereby does {solely for the benefit of the owners of the Bondsj disavow any and all such provisions, entitlements and enforcements. 22. Tax-Exempt Status of the Bonds; Rebate. The City shall comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income under Section 103 of the Code of the interest on the Bonds, including without limitation (1) requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, (2) limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Bonds, and (3) the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States if the Bonds, if and as applicable. �i 7.21 The City does not expect to qualify for the $5,000,000 "small issuer" exception to arbitrage rebate requirements for calendar. year 1997. 23. Designation of Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations. The City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code (except that, as hereinafter provided, the City is treating $9,485,000 of the principal amount of the Bonds as "deemed designated" pursuant to Section 265(b)(3)(D)(ii) of the Code) and represents that: (a) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds, treating qualified 501(c)(3) bonds as not being private activity bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all entities subordinate to, or treated as one issuer with, the City) during calendar year 1997 is not reasonably anticipated to exceed $10,000,000; and (b) not more than $10,000,000 of obliqations issued by the City (or any entity subordinate to, or treated as one issuer with, the City) during calendar year 1997 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. The City shall use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designation made by this paragraph. The City is treating $9,485,000 of the principal amount of the Bonds as "deemed designated" pursuant to the advice of Bond Counsel and the provisions of Section 265(b)(3){D)(ii) of the Code by virtue of the facts (1) that the Prior Bonds were designated by the City as qualified tax-exempt obligations pursuant to Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (2) that said $9,485,000 portion of the Bonds, being current refunding obligations, is not taken into account for purposes of the 1997 $10,000,000 limit, (3) the average maturity of the Bonds is less than the average maturity of the Prior Bonds; and t4) that no Bond has a maturity date which is more than 30 years after the date that the original qualified tax-exempt obligations (being the Prior Bonds) were issued. With respect to the remaining $90,000 of the Bonds which are not "deemed designated" as hereinabove described, the City is hereby designating said remaining portion of the Bonds as qualified tax- exempt obligations and is counting said amount of the Bonds for purposes of determining the City's overall $10,000,000 limitation for 1997. 24. Defeasance. When any obligation of a Bond has been discharged as provided in this paragraph, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this Resolution to the registered owner 21 7.22 ,� ■ of that Bond (with respect to the obligation thereof so defeased) shall, to the extent permitted by law, cease. The City may at any time discharge any or all of such obligation(s) with respect to any Bond, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing or regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a suitable institution qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States of America, bearing interest payable at such times and at such rates and maturing on such dates and in such amounts as shall be required and sufficient, subject to sale and/or reinvestment in like securities, to pay said obligation(s), which may include any interest payment on such Bond and/or principal amount due thereon at a stated maturity (or if irrevocable provision shall have been made for permitted prior redemption of such principal amount, at such earlier redemption date ) . 25. Continuing Disclosure Undertaking. The Council hereby acknowledges that the Bonds are subject to continuing disclosure requirements under Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) (the "Rule") of the Securities and Exchanqe Commission. Consequently, on the date of actual issuance and delivery of the Bonds, the City will execute and deliver a Continuing Disclosure Undertaking (the "Undertaking") whereunder the City will covenant to provide, or cause to be provided, annual financial information, including audited financial statements of the City, and notices of certain material events, as specified in the Undertaking. The proposed form of the Undertaking which has been submitted to the City for the Council's consideration is hereby approved, and the officers of the City are hereby a�.thoriEed to execute and �eliver that Undertaking in �l�e proposed form or in such final form thereof reflecting such modifications thereof as are consi5tent with the Rule, requested by the original purchaser of the Bonds and acceptable to the City officials who shall execute the Undertaking (which consent shall be conclusively evidenced by their execution and delivery thereof). The Undertaking, as so executed and delivered by the City, shall be as much a part of this Resolution as if set forth in full herein and shall be for the benefit of the owners from time to time of the Bonds. 26. Tax Increment Pledge Agreement. The Council hereby approves and authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute that certain Tax Increment Pledge Aqreement, dated as of June 1, 1997, respecting the Bonds, which Agreement is between the City and the Fridley HRA and has been presented for the Council's consideration, with such modifications, if any, as such officers shall approve, as evidenced by their execution and delivery thereof. 22 7.23 27. Severability. If any section, paragraph or provision of this Resolution shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this Resolution.28. PASSES AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS ZBTH DAY OF APRIL, 1997. Attest: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 23 7.24 NANCY J. JORGENSON / � cmr oF PRIDLEY BLACKTOPPING Asphalt Driveway Co 1211 E Hwy 36 N St Paul MN 55909-2091 Minnesota Roadways Co 147 N Jonathan Blvd #9 Chaska MN 55318-1399 Northern Asphalt Const Inc 11064 Raddison Rd NE Blaine MN 55449-5339 Northwest Asphalt Inc 1451 Co Rd 18 Shakopee MN 55379-2797 El�f �TRI_GAL Abel Electrical Contractors 17701 149 Ave N Dayton MN 55327-9515 Advanced Electric Co Inc 4407 Loretta Ln Minnetonka MN 55345-0731 Aid Electric Service Inc 7101 Hwy 65 NE Fridley MN 55432-3302 American Eagle Electric Inc 18475 Rum River Blvd NW Anoka MN 55303-8970 Anderson Claude M Electric Co 1551 Payne Ave St Paul MN 55101-3218 LICENSES APPLICANT Scott Smith Jack Mueller Jeannette Larson Sheila Geib� Tom Demers Ronald Leidali Gerald Koskiniemi Bill Masloski John Schroepfer 9-01 APPROVED BY RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bidg Ofcl Same Same Same STATE OF MWN Same Same Same Same Bacons Electric Co 7731 Main Street NE Fridley MN 55432 Bassing Electric Inc 1354 McKay Dr Ham Lake MN 55304-6128 Berndt Electric Service Inc 6528 W Lake St STE G Minneapolis MN 55426 Blaine Heating A/C & Elec Inc 13562 Central Ave NE Anoka MN 55304-6920 Boft Electric Inc 7344 Cedar Ave S Richfield MN . 55423 Braastad Electric Inc 17620 Hwy 65 NE Soderville MN 55304-4303 Cities Electric Inc 3100 225 St W Farmington MN 55024 City View Electric Inc 1145 Snelling Ave N St Paul MN 55108 Collins Electrical Systems ColliSys 4990 N Hwy 169 New Hope MN 55428-4026 Comm-Tech Electrical Contr Inc 14216 23 Ave N Plymouth MN 55447-4910 Commonwealth Electric of MN Inc 554 Broadway St Paul MN 55101-2441 Richard Paddock Richard Bassing Richard Berndt Kenneth Chouinard Marilyn Anderson Rick Braastad Steve Sowieja �°i��hy HurEE��€t Richard Boe Michael Schmitt Terry Towey 9.02 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same �ame Same Same Same Donnelly Electric inc 1 126 Rice St St Paul MN 551 17-4923 Dymanyk Electric Inc 1915 NE Broadway St NE Minneapolis MN 55413-1758 Egan-McKay Efectrical Contr Inc 7100 Medicine Lake Rd Minneapolis MN 55427-3673 Electric Repair & Construction Co Inc 4024 Washington Ave N Minneapolis MN 55412-1790 Electric Service Co of Mpls 160.9 Chicago Ave S Minneapolis MN 55404-1697 Electric Systems of Anoka Inc 6314 Hwy 10 NW Anoka MN 55303 Gitbert Mechanicai Contrs Inc 4451 W 76 �t Edina MN 55435 Gunnar Electric Company 7960 Eden Prairie Rd Eden Prairie MN 55347-7157 Harrison Electric Inc 2525 Nevada Ave N #301 Golden Valley MN 55427-.3643 Heights Electric Inc 704 40 Ave N E Columbia Heights MN 55421 Highland Electric Inc 2030 St Clair Ave St Paul MN 551 05-1 1 00 Edward Sobanski Debra Hrbek James Rivard Donald Cole James Peterson Terry Lehn P t)an Gilbert Lois V�lal��rs Mi�hael Harrison Steven Nelson William LaLonde 9.03 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Sa�ne Same Same Hilite Electric inc 1953 Shawnee Rd Eagan MN 55122 Industrial Electric Co 600 S 9 St Minneapolis MN 55404 JNK Electric Inc 321 Quincy St NE Minneapolis MN 55413 J T Electric Service Inc Box 476 Albany MN 56307 Killmer Electric Co Inc 9702 85 Ave N Maple Grove MN 55369-4537 King Electric Inc PO Box 296 Circle Pines MN 55014 Lakeview Electric Co 8116 Pillsbury Ave S Bloomington MN 55420-1107 Life Safety Systems Inc 3700 74 Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 5544� Lindell Electric Inc 1366 108 Ave NE Blaine MN 55434 Mayer Electric Corp 5128 Hanson Ct Minneapolis MN 55429-3182 Mertz Tom Electric Inc 700 Hamel Rd Hamel MN 55340 Dave Banaszewski Gary Novak John Kouri Terry Oehrlein Duane Palmer Gerald Gannucci Rob McCoy Mike lClein Romy Dokter Cherie Holm Thomas Mertz 9.04 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same � Same Same Same 0 Mik-Lyn Electric Co Inc 12358 Business Park Blvd N Champfin MN 55316 Muska Electric Company 1985 Oakcrest Ave Roseville MN 55113-2686 North Side Electric Co 1405 44 Ave No Minneapolis MN 55412-1343 Olympic Electric Co Inc 7103 Amundson Ave S Edina MN 55439-2020 Parsons Electric Co 5960 Main St NE Fridley MN 55432-5480 Petes Repair Inc 8835 Xylon Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55445-1829 Phasor Electric Co � 3809 Industrial Park �Ivd Plymouth MN 55441-3746 Positively Electric Inc 23060 Oakdale Dr Rogers MN 55374 Prairie Electric Co Inc 6595 Edenvale Blvd #120 Eder� Prairie MN 55346-2567 Pro-Tec Design Inc 2950 Xenium Ln #136 Minneapolis MN 55441 R& O Elevator Co Inc 8324 Pillsbury Ave S Bloomington MN 55420 Michael Belko Same Mahlon Christensen Same James Stumpfa Paul Kosmides William Olson Pete Perusse Kirk Herman ��°ry VVe�iger Ronald Oswald Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Michael Danielson Same Lee Arnold 9.05 Same ' _ _ : Residential Electric Inc 2356 Charles Ave St Paul MN 55114-1622 Richmond & Sons 5182 W Broadway Crystal MN 55429-3591 Ries Electric Company 777 N Concord So St Paul MN 55075-1195 Rivard Electric Co Inc 7087 Progress Rd Centerville MN 55038 Royalton Heating & Cooling 4120 85 Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55443 Service Electric Inc 232 Shorewood Cir Rush City MN 55069-2747 Shortstop Electric Inc 16481 Flintwood St NW Andover MN 55304 Snyder Electric Co 6112 Excelsior Blvd St Louis Park MN 55416-2766 South Side Electric Inc 9201 E Bloomington Freeway Ste H Bloomington MN 55420-3494 Star Electric Inc 8910 23 Ave N Golden Valley MN 55427 Tele-Tech Communications 3851 Central Ave NE Columbia Heights MN 55421-3980 John Heinen Scott Follese John Ries Donald Rivard Tom Stewart Dennis Wood Bob Boyum Je��y Snyder David Wintheiser Gerald De Gidio Morris Fraenkel 9.06 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Three Phase Electric Inc 2705 Fox Ridge Blaine MN 55449-5902 Thriftway Electric 3981 Wisconsin Ave N New Hope MN 55427 Total Electric Inc 1537 92 Ln NE Blaine MN 55449-4398 Weber Electric Inc 577 Shoreview Park Rd Shoreview MN 55126-7014 West Star Electric Inc 6324 Lakeland Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55428-2309 Wiring By Weir Inc 410 Ensign Ave N Golden Valley MN 55427 X-L Electric Inc 10873 � 75 Ave NiN Elk River MN 55330-7033 EXCAVATING . Bolander Carl & Sons Co 251 Starkey St St Paul MN 55107-0216 Frattalone F M Excavating & Grading Inc 3066 Spruee St St Paul MN 55117 United Water & Sewer Co 11666 Wayzata Blvd Minnetonka MN 55305-2009 GAS SERVICES A-abc Appliance & Heating 2638 Lyndale Ave S Minneapolis MN 55408-9890 Gary Hennings Kelly Johnson James LeVoir Steve Weber James Houg John Weir Joe Kirkeide Dominique Najjar Susan Kees James Spetz Linda Dodd 9.07 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same RONJULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofcl Same Same RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofcl Air & Furnace Care 8733 Humboldt Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55444 Air Mechanical inc 16411 Aberdeen St NE Ham Lake MN 55304 Airco Heating & Air Cond 4020 Central Ave NE Columbia Heights MN 55421 Blaine Htg A/C & Elec Inc 13562 Central Ave NE Anoka MN 55304-6920 Carbonic Machines Inc 2900 5 Ave S Minneapolis MN 55408-2484 Centraire Heating & AC Co 7402 Washington Ave S Eden Prairie MN 55344 Cool Air Mechanical Inc 1441 Rice St St Paul MN 551 17-3899 DelMar Furnace Exchange Inc 4080 83 Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55443-2500 Diamond Power Mechanical Inc 8375 Sunset Rd Spring Lake Park MN 55432 E.L.K. Mechanical HVAC � 15940 Radium St NW Ramsey MN 55303 Egan Mechanical Contractors Inc 7100 Medicine l.ake Rd Minneapolis MN 55427-3671 Richard Bidler Ross Erickson George Rogstad Kenneth Chouinard Steven Kelly Leroy Seurer Chuck Worms Del WischEnann Kipp Knuteson Bill Kerns Gerald Egan . � • Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Fireside Corner 2700 N Fairview Ave Roseville MN 55113 Flare Heating & Air Inc 9303 Plymouth Ave N Golden Valley MN 55427 Fletcher Heating/Heatco Inc PO Box 5 North Branch MN 55056-0005 G R Mechanical 12055 Tilton Trl Rogers MN 55374 Gilbert Mechanical Contractors Inc 4451 W 76 St Edina MN 55435 Golden Valley Heating & A/C 5182 W Broadway Crystal MN 55429-3591 Home Energy Center 9 5�00 Z5 Ave N#128 Plyrriouth M�I 55447 Horwitz Inc 8825 Xylon Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55445 Kath Heating & AC 3096 Rice St Little Canada MN 55113-5338 Kleve Heating & AC 13075 Pioneer Trl Eden Prairie MN 55347 Knott Mechanical Services Co 5941 142 Ave NW Ramsey MN 55303-5645 Kirk Sorenso� Richard Guerre Curt Ferrie Gordon Reinking P Dan Gilbert S Follese Torni flAeyer WVrn �eKoskey Jeffrey Larson Dale Kleve Debra Knott ' 9.09 Same Same Same Same Same Same Sa�e �ame Same Same Same Lakeland North Heating & AC Inc 16041 Kangaroo St NW Anoka MN 55303 M& D Piumbing & Heating Inc 11050 26 St NE St Michael MN 55376 Maple Grove Heating & AC Inc 401 Co Rd 81 Osseo MN 55369-1647 Master Mechanical 901 E 79 St Bloomington MN 55420 Master Mobile Home Service 1486 Cloud Dr NE Blaine MN 55449 Metropolitan Mech Contrs Inc 7340 Washington Ave S Eden Prairie MN 55344-3582 Minnegasco 700 W Linden Avenue Minneapolis MN 55403 NewMech Companies Inc 1633 Eustis St St Paul MN 55108-1288 Owens Services Corp 930 E 80 St Bloomington MN 55420-1499 P& H Services Co Inc 1601 67 Ave N Brooklyn Center MN 55430-1743 Petes Repair Inc 8835 Xylon Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55445-1829 Jim Nelson Melvin Daleiden Steve MacDonald Gordon Peters Barry Fassett Robert Kaczke Ray Knoblauch Larry Jordan John Owens David Steffens Pete Perusse 9.10 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same -1 Preferred Mechanical Services 7643 Logan Ave S Richfield MN 55423 Riccar Corp 2387 136 Ave NW Andover MN 55304 Ron's Mechanical Jnc 12011 Old Brick Yard Rd Shakopee MN 55379-2942 Royalton Heating & Cooling 4120 85 Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55443 St Cloud Refrigeration Inc 604 Lincoln Ave NE St Cloud MN 56304 Sharp Heating & AC Inc 4854 Central Ave NE Minneapolis MN 55421-1950 South Town Refrigeration Inc 5610 �IN 36 �t St Louis Park MN 55416 Standard Heating & Air Cond 410 West Lake St Minneapolis MN 55408-2998 Steinkraus Plbg Inc 1800 Lake Lucy Rd Excelsior MN 55331 Sun Mechanical Inc PO Box 398 Rogers MN 55374 Superior Contractors Inc 6121 42 Ave N Minneapolis MN 55422-1601 Wayne Johnson Jeff Arent Ron Coster Tom Stewart Joe Lyon Kevin Hanson lutike Thieter� Dave Mel�ick Merle SteiRkraus Clark Grotte Do�ald Hoglund 9.11 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Sarne Same Same 0 Thermex Corporation 3529 Raleigh Ave S St Louis Park MN 55416 Twin City Furance 1464 Selby Ave St Paul, MN 55104 Vogt Heating & AC 3260 Gorham Ave St Louis Park MN 55426-4189 Welter Ray N Heating Co 4637 Chicago Ave S Minneapolis MN 55407-3592 GENERAL CONTRACTOR-COMMERCIAL Allstar Construction 3315 N Hwy 100 Minneapolis MN 55422 Anderson Brent Associates Inc 7610 Hwy 65 NE Fridley MN 55432-3553 Befair Builders 2200 Old Hwy 8 New Brighton MN 55112 Cave & Associates LTD 2489 Rice St #40 Roseville MN 55113-3723 : Custom Tile Service 3411 Tyler St NE Minneapolis MN 55418 Dalco Roofing & Sheet Metal Inc 15525 32 Ave N Plymouth MN 55447-1494 Design 7 of fdina LTD 9973 Valley View Rd Eden Prairie MN 55344-3526 Curtis Brekke David Zandlo Don Bell Ray Welter Robert Vassallo Brent Anderson John Stenglein Craig Ankrum Dennis Johnson Richard Trumble Rober# Davis 9.12 Same Same Same Same RONJULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofcl Same Same Same Same Same Same Elder-Jones Inc 1120 E 80 St #211 Bioomington MN 55420 Fluor Daniel !nc 9 701 E 79 St STE 19 Bloomington MN 55425 Haglin C F& Sons Co 4005 W 65 St Edina MN 55435-1768 Hall Enterprises Inc 56 66 1/2 Way NE Fridley MN 55432 Kraus-Anderson Construction 525 S 8 Street Minneapolis MN 55404-1077 A1so: PO Box 158 Circle Pines MN 55014 McGough Constr�ction Co Inc 2737 N Fairview Ave �t F'�aul MN 55113-1372 Maertens Brenny Construction Co 8251 Main St NE Fridley MN 55432-9 849 Midwest Restoration & Construction 1628 Hwy 10 NE Spring Lake Park MN 55432-2171 Minco Products Inc 7300 Commerce Lane Nf Fridley MN 55432 NE Commercial Service 6525 Central Ave NE Fridley MN 55432 Robert Kanne Alan Crider Thomas Roberts Norman Hall Susan Hedstrom John Huenink Ne�2uisha Adams Joseph Maertens Gary V1/ruck David Schmidt Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same James Grabowske Same , 9.13 i 0 Northwest Racquet, Swim & Health Clubs 5525 Ceda� Lake Rd St Louis Park MN 55416 Opus Corporation 9900 Bren Rd E #800 Minnetonka MN 55343 Paschke Properties PO Box 308 Rogers MN 55374 Petes Repair Inc 8835 Xylon Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55445-1829 Rutledge Construction Co 1409 S 7 St Hopkins MN 55343 Shaw-Lundquist Associates Inc 2805 Dodd Rd Eagan MN 55121 Stahl Construction Co 5900 Rowland Rd Minnetonka MN 55343 Steiner Development Inc 3610 S Hwy 101 Wayzata MN 55345 , Steves Woodworking 15208 62 Ave Milaca MN 56353 Stiglich Construction Inc 1260 Helmo Ave N Oakdale MN 55128 Stock Roofing Inc 289 Liberty St NE Fridley MN 55432 Tom Willoughby John McKenzie Gerald Paschke Pete Perusse Thomas Rutledge Fred Shaw Sharon O'Brien Galen Tongen Steve Hoskin Robert Stiglich Warren Stock 9.14 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Stone Construction 1nc 2181 107 Ln NE Biaine MN 55449-5237 Timbercraft Enterprises Inc 215 SW Old Hwy 8 New Brighton MN 55112 Timco Construction Inc 9421 West River Rd Brooklyn Park MN 55444-1141 Westbrook Development Inc 1564 West University Ave St Paul MN 55104 Zeman Construction Co � 2246 Edgewood Ave St Louis Park MN 55426 Jerome Stone Pete Muslowski Timothy McKee Thomas Bina David Zeman GENERAL CONTRACTOR-RESIDENTIAL Addition & Remodeling Spec (1109) 2618 Coon Rapids Blvd NW Coon Rapids MN 55433-3962 Roger Harju Advance Compa�ries af MN Inc (4423) 6400 Central Ave NE Fridley MN 55432 �rank Kifiterman Advance Home Products Ine {2332) 3770 West Broadway Robbinsdale MN 55422 Advent Construction Co Inc (1025) 350 Little Canada Rd E St Paul MN 55117 Allstar Construction (3247) 3315 N Hwy 100 Minneapolis MN 55422 Mark Silverstein George Rossez Robert Vassallo Automatic Garage Door & Fireplace (1990) 220 77 Ave NE Minneapolis MN 55432 ' C. VanHatten Jr 9.15 Same Same Same Same Same STATE OF M1(��N Same Same Same Same Same Belair Builders (1238) 2200 Old Hwy 8 New Brighton MN 55112 Berwald Roofing Co Inc 2440 N Charles St North St Paul MN 55109-3080 Brekken Wayne Construction (4978) 3836 Harriet S Minneapolis MN 55409 Builders & Remodelers Inc (11001 3517 Hennepin Ave S Minneapolis MN 55408 Calgary Stove & Chimney (7793) - 1 166 Main St Lino Lakes MN 55014 John Stenglein Eugene Berwaid Wayne Brekken Dean VanDerWerf Raoul Anderson Century 21 Siding & Windows (20091044) 8585 N Stemmons #800 Dallas TX 75247-3805 Leslie Hawkins Cities Home Improvement (20076414) 6148 Olson Memorial Hwy Golden Valley MN 55422 Carey Lifson Columbus Exteriors Inc (3509) 2731 111 Ln Coon Rapids MN 55433 Coronado Enterprises (7950) 8282 Arthur St Spring Lake Park MN 55432 Country Concrete & Const Inc (2675) 16214 Xenia St NW Andover MN 55304-2352 Custom Remodelers Inc (1748) 474 Apollo Dr Lino Lakes MN 55014 Larry Columbus Ardeen Brever Wayne Knudson Chad Carpenter 9.16 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same � D& D Home Improvement inc (4840) 11773 Magnolia St NW Coon Rapids MN 55448 Donavan Oison Daco Inc f3180) 14510 45 St NE Rogers MN 55374 Jerry Zachman DuAll Service Contr Inc(3178) 636 39 Ave NE Columbia Heights MN 55421 Gary Dooner Elk River Exteriors (4457) 825 Main St Elk River MN 55330 Jack Gracik Felix Construction LLC(8682) 4410 379 St North Branch MN 55056 Paul Felix Fireside Corner Inc (1068) 2700 N Fairview Ave Roseville MN 551 13-1306 Kirk Sorensen Franzen Const Co (2744) 42�05StNE Columbia Heights �1/IN 554�`1 Fiobert Franz�n Full Deck (20006700) 1420 Marigold Cir Victoria MN 553£36 Bill Johnson Gladstone's Window & Door (2110) 1870 English St Maplewood MN 55109 Robert �Long Hastings Richard Contr (4051) 6331 Riverview Ter NE Fridley MN 55432-4846 Richard Hastings Hendricks Roofing & Remodeling Co (20032276) 2521 Jones Place W Bloomington MN 55431-2837 Mark Hendricks 9.17 Same Same Same Sarne Same Same Sanae Same Same Same Same Home Enhancers Inc f 1949) 8609 Lyndale Ave S #201 Bloomington MN 55420 Imperial Homes Inc(20014230) 4196 Lexington Ave N Shoreview MN 55126 Jansick Inc (8618) 6480 Squire Dr NE Fridley MN 55432-5243 Johnson George B (1016) 5410 Girard Ave N Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Johnson, Milton Co (2083) 525 Lowry Ave NE Minneapolis MN 55418-2868 Jones Les Roofing Inc (6560) 941 W 80 St Bloomington MN 55420 Justus Lumber Co (2780) 330 11 Ave S Hopkins MN 55343 Kastle Co Corp(20029530) 7044 Elliot Ave S Richfield MN 55423-1831 Kirk Construction (5839) 423 E Wyoming St St Paul MN 55�07-3119 LaMere Concrete & Masonry Inc (3588) 714 18 1/2 Ave NE Minneapolis MN 55418 Lindstrom Cleaning & Const f 1087) 9621 Tenth Ave N Plymouth MN 55441-5098 Jim Wiebusch Same Richard Riemersma Same Gary Jansick George Johnson Bruce Erickson Les Jones Gary Dass Robert Schuller Charles Kirk Bruce LaMere Robert Hennen 9.18 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same _ Lloyds Home Improvements Inc (1798) 1012 42 1/2 Ave NE Columbia Heights MN 55421-3159 Marinaro Construction (20023644) 719 Paul Parkway Blaine MN 55434 Marquis inc (8439) 1556 McClung Dr Arden Hills MN 55112-1950 Master Remodeling Inc (20012916) 32 10 Ave S Hopkins MN 55343 Mat-Con (7533) 9783 4 St NE Hanover MN 55341 Merit Siding Inc (20056896) 4044 6 St N E Columbia Heights MN 55421 Me#ro Suilding Co i(5944) 473$ 42 Ave N Minneapolis MN 55422 Metro Siding Inc (4861) 2750 Niagara Ln N Plymouth MN 55447 Midwest Restoration & Const(5267) 1628 Hwy 10 NE Spring Lake Park MN 55432-2171 Midwest Window Co (2130) 3739 Minnehaha Ave S Minneapolis MN 55406-2630 Minnesota Exteriors Inc (2877) PO Box 266 Osseo MN 55369-0266 Lloyd Graczyk James Marinaro Mark Pignatello Pehr Komstadius Steve Matson Tim Eastman �d Jacobson Mich�e� �� Gary Wruck Gary Hartke Jerry Brenhofer 9.19 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same 5ame Same Same Same Modeen Company (3867) 6572 Meadowlark Ln Maple Grove MN 55369 Ken Modeen Same Mon-Ray Inc (5111) 8224 Olson Memorial Hwy Golden Valley MN 55427-4713 Greg Murtha Same Netko Dan Exteriors Inc (20060494) 71 18 Riverdale Rd Brookiyn Center MN 55430-1318 Dan Netko Same � North Central Builders (3763) 7401 42 Ave N New Hope MN 55427-1219 Larry Kraatz Same Northland Siding & Insulation (41581 - 2158 Main St NW Coon Rapids MN 55448-2504 Donald Kiphuth Same Northstar Home Improvement Inc (5336) 6121 Excelsior Blvd #207 St Louis Park MN 55416 Jim Nash Same Olson Gary Construction Inc(20046602) RR2 Box 186 Braham MN 55006 Gary Olson Same PEM Millwork Of MN Inc (20070628) 5671 International Pkwy New Hope MN 55428 Glen Hoover Same Panelcraft of MN (2179) 3118 Snelling Ave S Minneapolis MN 55406 Gary Robideau Same Plumbline Builders Inc (2939) (Comp. from 841 Kennaston 9/96) 79AveN Hopkins MN 55343 Roger Sirany Same Preferred Home Improvement (6641) 3601 85 Ave N #B Brooklyn Park MN 55443 Mark Gessell Same 9.20 . Quarve Contracting (6016) 8427 Center Dr NE Spring Lake Park MN 55432 R & M Associates (4391) 3482 Auger Ave White Bear Lake MN 55110 Regal Builders & Remodelers (1168) 1840 English St Maplewood MN 55109-4315 Right Way Roofing Inc (3999) 16475 45 Ave N Plymouth MN 55446 Patrictc Quarve Ray Palme Michael Williams Scott Voves Rite Way Mobile Home Repair Inc(8201) ' 1 175 73 1/2 Ave NE Fridley MN 55432 Scott Lund Roncor Construction (2337) 10740 Lyndale Ave S Bloomington MN 55420 Roo# Design Partners LLC {20004817� �d�6 7 �t NE Columbia Heights MN 55421 Rottlund Homes (1335) 2681 Long Lake Rd Roseville MN 55113 SMA Inc (20042927� 810 Lilac Drive Golden Vafley MN 55422 Sela Roofing & Remodeling Inc { 1050) 4100 Excelsior Blvd St Louis Park MN 55416-4727 Siding Sales & Service (20075652) 3555 116 Ln NW Coon Rapids MN 55433 Ron Baker Steven Lutz . Michael Swanson Steve Arreil Paz Sela Terry Shonblom 9.21 Same Same Same Same Same Sarne Same Same Same Same Same Skyway Quality Homes Inc (3005) 8025 Garfield St NE Spring Lake Park MN 55432 Solomon & Sons (20055664) 1221 1 Olive St NW Coon Rapids MN 55448 Stock Roofing Inc (3112) 289 Liberty St NE Fridley MN 55432-1746 Suburban Exteriors (4289) 2425 W Industrial Blvd #7 Long Lake MN 55356 Sussel Corporation (1934) 1852 Como Ave St Paul MN 55108 TimberCraft Enterprises Inc (2624) 215 Old Hwy 8 SW New Brighton MN 55112 Rob Shimanski Brian Solomon Warren Stock John Entrikin Alf Wiik Peter Murlowski Top Gun Roofing (33881 5014 Parrish Ave NE Rogers MN 55374-9009 Bryan Shiltz Town & Country Roofing & Siding (2009128) 9403 Minnesota Ln N Maple Grove MN 55369 John Harty Twin City Exteriors Co Inc (2535) 9060 Zachary Ln N #108 Maple Grove MN 55369-4083 Claudia Sundseth Up Top Construction {7712) 2203 N Ferry St Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Anoka MN 55303 David Archambault Same Walker Roofing (4229) 2701 36 Ave S Minneapolis MN 55406 Nathan Reese Same 9.22 i Williams Ron Construction (2350) 600 Janesvilie St Fridley MN 55432-1639 Woodland Stoves & Fireplaces t2558) 1203 Washington Ave S Minneapolis MN 55415 Wren Builders Inc 9218 11 Ave S Bloomington MN 55420 HEATING A-abc Appliance & Heating Inc 2638 Lyndale Ave S Minneapolis MN 5540$-9890 Air & Furnace Care Inc 8733 Humboldt Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55444 Air Mechanical Inc 16411 Aberdeen St NE Ham Lake MN 55304-5427 Airco Heating & AC 4020 Central Ave NE Cotumbia Heights MN 5�421 Albers Sheetmetal 8c Verrt fnc 200 W Plato Blvd St Paul MN 55107 Blaine Heating A/C & Elec Inc 13562 Ce�tral Ave ,NE Anoka MN 55304-6920 Carbonic Machines lnc 2900 5 Ave S Minneapolis MN 55408-2484 Centraire Inc 7402 Washington Ave S Eden Prairie MN 55344-3799 Ronatd Williams Peter Solac Harold Wren Gary Katz Richard Bidler Ross Er�ckson George Rogstad Daniel Schadegg Same Same Same RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofcl Same Same Same Same Kenneth Chouinard Same Steven Kel1y LeRoy Seurer 9.23 Same Same Cool Air Mechanical Inc 1441 Rice St St Paul MN 551 17-3899 Daves Appiiance Htg & AC 1601 37 Ave NE Columbia Heights MN 55421 Diamond Power Mech Inc 8375 Sunset Rd Spring Lake Park MN 55432 Doody Mechanical Inc 520 Front Ave St Paul MN 551 17 E.L.K. Mechanical HVAC 15940 Radium St NW Ramsey MN 55303 Egan Mechanical Contractors Inc 7100 Medicine Lake Rd Minneapolis MN 55427-3671 Flare Heating & AC 9303 Plymouth Ave N Golden Valley MN 55427 Fletcher Heating/Heatco Inc Box 5 North Branch MN 55056-0005 Gilbert Mech Contr Inc 4451 W 76th St Edina MN 55435-51 11 Golden Valley Heating & A/C 5182 West Broadway Crystal MN 55429-3591 Home Energy Center 15200 25 Ave N #128 Plymouth MN 55447- Chuck Worms David Roberts Kipp Knuteson James Doody Bill Kerns Gerald Egan Richard Guerre Curt Ferrie P Dan Gilbert S Follese Tom Meyer 9.24 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Horwitz Inc 8825 Xylon Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55445 Kath Heating & AC 3096 Rice St Little Canada MN 55113 Kleve Heating & AC Inc 13075 Pioneer Trt Eden Prairie MN 55347 Knott Mechanical Services Co 5941 142 Ave NW Ramsey MN 55303-5645 Lakeland North Heating & AC 16041 ICangaroo St NW Anoka MN 55303 M& D Plbg & Htg Inc 1 1050 26 St NE St Michael MN 55376 Maple Grove Heating & A!C �01 Co Rd 8'1 Osseo MN 55369-1647 Master Mechanical lnc 901 E 79 St � Bloomington MN 55420 Master Mobile Home Service 1486 Cloud Dr NE Blaine MN 55449 Metropolitan Mech Contr Inc 7340 Washington Ave S Eden Prairie MN 55344-3582 Minnegasco 700 W Linden Ave Minneapolis MN 55403 Wm McKoskey Jeffrey Larson Dale Kleve Debra Knott Jim Nelson Melvin Daleiden Steve MacDonaid Gordon Peters Barry Fassett Robert Kaczke Ray Knoblauch 9.25 Same Same Same Sarne Same Same 6�� Same Same Same Same NewMech Companies Inc 1633 Eustis St St Paul MN 55108-1288 Owens Services Corporation 930 E 80 St Bloomington MN 55420-1499 P& H Services Co Inc 1601 67 Ave N Brooklyn Center MN 55430-1743 Petes Repair Inc 8835 Xylon Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55445-1829 Preferred Mechanical Services Inc 7643 Logan Ave S Richfield MN 55423 Riccar Corp 2387 136 Ave NW Andover MN 55304 Rons Mechanical Inc 12011 Old Brick Ya�d Rd Shakopee MN 55379-2942 Royalton Heating & Cooling 4120 85 Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55443 St Cloud Refrigeration 604 Lincoln Ave NE St Cloud MN 56304 Sharp Heating & AC 4854 Central Ave NE Minneapolis MN 55421-1950 Standard Heating & A/C Co 410 W Lake St Minneapolis MN 55408-2998 Larry Jordan John Owens David Steffens Pete Perusse Wayne Johnson Jeff Arent Ron Coster Tom Stewart Joe Lyon Kevin Hanson Dave Melnick 9.26 Same Same Same Same Same Same , Same Same Same Same Same Steinkraus Pibg inc 1800 Lake Lucy Rd Excelsior MN 55331 Sun Mechanical Inc PO Box 398 Rogers MN 55374 Superior Contractors Inc 6121 42 Ave N Minneapolis MN 55422-1601 Thermex Corporation 3529 Raleigh Ave S St Louis Park MN 55416 Twin City Furnace Co 1464 Se1by Ave St Paul MN 55104 Vogt Heating & AC 3260 Gorham Ave St Louis Park MN 5542fi-4189 Welter Ray N Heating Co �637 Cfiicago Ave S Minneapolis MN 55407-3592 Yale Incorporated 9649 Girard Ave S Bloomington MN 55431-261 J MASONRY Norsk Concrete Construction Inc 1115 Osborne Rd Mf Minneapolis MN 55432 MOBILE HOME INSTALLERS Rite Way Mobile Home Repai� tnc (9351) 1175 73 1/2 Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 Superior Mobile Home Service 5459 Pine Lane North Branch MN 55056 James Turpin Clark Grotte Donald Hoglund Curt Brekke David Zandlo Donald BeN Ray Weiter Johr� C3�E�f�n James Jackson Scott Lund Jack Narow 9.27 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same RON .ilJtKO'W�K1 Chief 61dg Ofcl STATE OF M1NN Same MOVERS Dale Movers Inc 7816 Centrat Ave NE Spring Lake Park MN 55432 Ernst Machinery & Housemovers Corp. 9400 85 Ave N Minneapolis, MN 55445-2198 OIL SERVICES Egan Mechanical Contractors inc 7100 Medicine Lake Rd Minneapolis MN 55427-3671 PLUMBING AAA-Abbott Plumbing and Htg Inc 11262StNE Minneapolis MN 5541 3-1 1 28 ARE Plumbing 6139 172 Ln Ramsey MN 55303-7309 Barnes Plumbing Co Inc 3923 Washington Ave N Minneapolis MN 55412-2143 Beaver Plumbing 20425 Jackson St NE Cedar MN 55011 Bobs Circle Plumbing - 52 East Rd Circle Pines MN 55014-1 fi44 Boedeker Plumbing & Heating 2905 Garfield Ave S Minneapolis MN 55408-2107 Bonfe's Plbg Service & Rep 1310 Sibley Mem Hwy Mendota MN 55150-0798 Dale Peterson Judy Slavicek Gerald Egan Gary Stelton Michael Muske William Barnes Bob Pautno Robert Schneider Chester Boedeker Walter Bonfe 9.28 STATE OF MINN Same RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofcl STATE OF MINN Same Same Same Same Same , Same Bredahl Plumbing Inc 7916 73 Ave N Brookiyn Park MN 55428 Central Plumbing Inc 2800 Freeway Blvd #200 Minneapolis MN 55430-1751 Century Plumbing Inc 444 Maple St Mahtomedi MN 55115-1957 Delson Plumbing Inc 1308 42 1/2 Ave NE Columbia Hgts MN 55421-3165 Dinius Plumbing Co 7816 Stillwater Blvd Oakdale MN 55128-4018 Doran Enterprises Inc 1440 Kelly Dr Golden Valley MN 55427 Egan Mechanical Contracto�s inc 7100 Medicine Lake Rd Minneapolis MN 55427-36�'� Engberg Plumbing 3030 Co Rd J Mounds View MN 55112 Foremost Mechanical Inc 501 W Lawson St Paul MN 551 17 G R Mechanical 12055 Tilton Trl Rogers MN 55374-9520 Garin, Robert Plumbing 2770 174 Ln Andover MN 55304 Larry Bredahl David Green Jim Blasena David Olsan George Dinius Tom Doran Gerald Fgan John Engberg .John McQuillan Gordon Reinking Rob Garir� 9.29 Same Same Same Same Same Same S�me Same Same Same Same i I . _; , Gateway Mechanical Inc 742 Beaver Traii Lino Lakes MN 55014 Gavic & Sons Plumbing 12725 Nightengafe St NW Coon Rapids MN 55448-7054 Gilbert Mech Contr Inc 4451 W 76 St Edina MN 55435-3810 Gopher Mechanical Contractors 3025 Randolph St NE Minneapolis MN 55418-1824 Hauck Plumbing 16413 Jasper St NW Ramsey MN 55303 Hedler S M Plumbing Inc 2519 4th Street NE Minneapolis MN 55418-3436 Jerry's Plumbing 1838 Northdale Blvd Coon Rapids MN 55448-3059 Johnson R A & Son 25 Crescent St Big Lake MN 55309 Kal's Plumbing 7101 W Palmer Lake Dr Brooklyn Center MN 55369 Klamm Mechanical Contractors Inc 12409 Co Rd #11 Burnsville MN 55337 Kramer Mechanical Inc 5500 Stacy Tr! Stacy MN 55079-9322 Gene Beijer Paul Gavic P Dan Gilbert Lee Watkins Steve Hauck Sylvester Hedler Gerald Thrall Richard Johnson Rick Kaliszewski Robert Klamm Edward Kramer 9.30 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same LBP Mechanical Inc 315 Royalston Ave N Minneapolis MN 55405-1535 Lane Randy & Sons Pibg & Htg 1501 W Broadway Minneapolis MN 55411-2407 Lindman Plumbing Co 12000 53 Ave N Plymouth MN 55442-1834 M& D Plbg & Htg Inc 11050 26 St IVE St Michael MN 55376 McQuillan Bros 452 Selby Ave St Paul Mn 551 12 Mr Rooter of Anoka County 6250 Industry Ave NW #114 Ramsey MN 55303 Metropolitan Mech Co�tis Inc 7340 Wa�hington Ave S Eden Prairie MN 55344=�5$2 Mid City Mechanical Corp 9107 Davenport St RFE Blaine MN 55449 Miller R J Plbg & Htg Inc 834 40 Ave NE MFnneapolis MN 55421-2905 Minnesota Plbg & Htg Inc 1420 W 3 Ave Shakopee MN 55379 Murr Jim Plumbing 925 Southview Blvd S St Paul MN 55075-2221 Walter White Randy Lane Gary Lindman Melvin Daleiden John McQuillan Mark Boeshans Rabert Kraczke James Poser Robert Miller Paul Sullwold Jim Murr 9.31 Same Same Same Same Same Same �� Same Same Same Same Nasseff Piumbing & Htg Inc 671240StN Oakdale MN 55128-3104 NewMech Companies inc 1633 Eustis St St Paul MN 55108-1288 Norblom Plumbing Co 2905 Garfield Ave S Minneapolis MN 55408-2173 North Anoka Plumbing Inc 4218 Viking Blvd NW Anoka MN 55303-8981 Northridge Plumbing Co 6960 Madison Ave W #10 Golden Valley MN 55427-3627 Overacker, Terry Plumbing 1088 Hackmann Cir NE Fridley MN 55432 Piperight Plumbing 4029 Penrod Ln NE St Anthony MN 55421 Plumm Inc 5526 Malibu Dr Edina Mn 55436 Pride Mechanical Inc 1600 Broadway St NE Minneapolis MN 55413-2617 Richfield Plumbing Co 509 W 77 St Richfield MN 55423 Roseville Plbg & Htg Co 65 S Owasso Blvd St Paul MN 55117-1092 Mickey Nasseff Jerry Poser Jeff Norblom Bill Jansen Darwin Baack Terry Overacker Gene Tomas Leonard Hovde Richard Hjelm Robert Adelmann Greg Deeb 9.32 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Roys Plumbing 17420 Iguana St NW Ramsey MN 55303-5587 Schader Hole Pushing & Pibg 4426 Hodgson Rd Shoreview MN 55126 Schulties Plumbing Inc 1521 - 94 Ln NE Blaine MN 55449-4322 Seitz Bros Inc 8600 Xylon Ave N #108 Brooklyn Park MN 55445 Sorensen, Dale Company 150W88St Bloomington MN 55420-2800 Southtown Plumbing Inc 6636 Penn Ave S Richfield MN 55423-209i Spriggs Plbg & Htg 124 Eva St St Paul MN 55107-� 499 State Mechanical Inc 50�50 W 2�0 St Farmington MN 55024-9625 Steinkraus Plbg Inc 1800 Lake Lucy Rd Excelsior MN 5533� Sun Mechanical Inc PO Box 398 Rogers MN 55374 Surge Water Conditioning 8881 Excelsior Blvd Hopkins MN 55343 Eiroy Haselius Louis Schader Doug Jones Sherry Akridge Dale Sorensen LaVern Veit 1A/ayne Pk�urde Marv Heintz Merle Steinkraus Clark Grotte Gary Capone 9.33 Same Same Same Same Same Same Sar�e Same Same Same Same i Thompson Plumbing Corp 15001 Minnetonka Industrial Rd Minnetonka MN 55345 United Water & Sewer Co 11666 Wayzata Blvd Minnetonka MN 55305-2009 Valiey Plumbing Co Inc 860 Quaker Ave Jordan MN 55352-1096 Valley Rich Co Inc 7167 Shady Oak Rd Eden Prairie MN 55344 Voson Plumbing Inc 1515A 5 St S Hopkins MN 55343 Walsh Plumbing Inc 971 1 6 St NE Blaine MN 55434-1309 Welter & Blaylock Inc 1509 E Hwy i 3 Burnsville MN 55337-2917 ROOFING AWR Inc 3023 Snelling Ave S Minneapolis MN 55406-1910 Local Roofing Co Inc 2645 Harlem St Eau Claire WI 54701-4506 McPhillips Bros Roofing Co 2590 Centennial Dr St Paul MN 55109-3017 SIGN ERECTOR Arrow Sign & Awning Inc 13735 Aberdeen St NE Ham Lake MN 55304 Ken Gause James Spetz Daniel Morris Tom Denison Don Voss Dave Walsh William Yetzer Ken Sorensen Gene Hanson John McPhillips Kenneth Stewart 9,34 Same Same Same Same Same Same Same RONJULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofcl Same Same RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofcl Crosstown Sign 10166 Central Ave Blaine MN 55434 Lawrence Sign 945 Pierce Butler Rte St Paul MN 55104-1595 Leroy Signs Inc 6325 Welcome Ave N Brooklyn Park MN 55429 Nordquist Sign Co Inc 312 W Lake St Minneapolis MN 55408-3099 Sign Source Inc 7801 Park Dr Chanhassen MN 55317 Speedy Sign A Rama 2216WCoRdD Roseville MN 55112-7500 Suburban Lighting Inc 6(3�7 Lake Elma �►ve N Stillwater MN 55082-93�5 Twin Cities 9ign Images 10550 Co Rd 81 #116 Maple Grove MN 55369 Visual Impact Signs Inc 310 Johnson St NE Mfnr-�apolis MN 55413-2544 WRECKING Bolander Carl & Sons Co 251 Starkey St St Paul MN 55107-0216 TRAILER Friendly Chevrolet 7501 Hwy 65 NE Fridley MN 55432 Betsy Jensen Dan Ginkel Ruth Miller Richard Nordquist Randy Herman Kim Geissert Ray :Roerr�mich Mark Rakhe Terry Verdictc Dominique Najjar 7501 Hwy 65 NE 9.35 Same Same Same Same Same Same Sar�ne Same Same RON JULKOWSKI Chief Bldg Ofcl Expires 12/31 /97 Onan Corporation 1400 73 Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 PUBLIC SWIMMING POOLS US Swim & Fitness 4801 W 8�1 St Bloomington MN 55437 Black Forest Condominium 1601 N Innsbruck Dr NE Fridley MN 55432 Edric Associates 5024 Normandale Ct Edina MN 55436 Hughes Properties 4410 Douglas Ave S Golden Valley MN 55416 River Pointe LTD Partnership 7855 East River Rd NE Fridley MN 55432 Harold D. Morrow 50 Glendale River Falls WI 54022 Independent School Dist. #14 6000 West Moore Lk Dr NE Fridley MN 55432 Innsbruck North Townhouse Assn c/o Bailey Enterprises Inc 484 Wabasha St St Paul MN 55102 Kelly Fridley Ventures 2600 N Louise Ave Sioux Falls SD 57107 ELLEN/STEVE KLOS 3010 Hennepin Ave S #72 Minneapolis MN 55408 1400 73 Avenue Used as Offices 7200 University Ave 3 Pools 1601 N Innsbruck Dr 1 Pool 1200- 72nd Ave NE 1 Pool 6670-90 Lucia Ln NE 1 Pool 7855 East River Rd 5430 - 7th Street 2 Pools 1 Pool 6100 W Moore Lk Dr 1 Pool 5506 Meister Rd 1 Pool 5201 Central Avenue 1 Pool 5460 - 7th St NE 9.3f 1 Pool Kesri Jain 478 N Hazel St #101 St Paul MN 55119 Maurice Filister 5750 East River Rd NE Fridley MN 55432 Northwest Racquet/Swim/Health Club 5525 Cedar Lake Rd St Louis Pk MN 55416 KCS Property Management 8100 12 Ave S #200 Bloomington MN 55425 Belgarde Property Services 7841 Wayzata Blvd Minneapolis, MN 55426 1120 - 52 Ave NE 5750 East River Rd 1200 E Moore Lk Dr 6540 East River Rd 111 - $3rd Ave NE 9.37 1 Pool 3 Pools 4 Pools 1 Pool 4 Pools � LICENSES � - � oF FRIDLEY April 28, 1997 TYPE OF LICENSE: BY: APPROVED BY: F00D EST�IBLIS�FiP1EiV�S Brownberry Outlet Store D. Hanson R.Jull:owski 1(l51 E, Moore Lk;Dr, Building Inspector Fridley, MN 55432 Burger King No,Mn.Franchise " " " 255 57th Ave. N.E. ° " "` Fri dl ey, P9N 55�32 �1n. Gym Gear P� Coffee Bar Bob Jul iano " ° "' 6525 University Ave. N.E Fridley, P1N 55432 Domino's Pizza Wm.B. Graves ° " " 751� University Ave.N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley A R� W Wiles Enterp�� Ltd, " " 7429 E. River Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley Rice Bowl Oliver Yui Yum Tam "� " 116(l Fireside Dr. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 : Godfather Pizza #245(ll , Godfather�s Pizza Inc,. �"' " 7910 University Ave.N.E Fridley, MN 55432 Gourmet Village Gourmet Village, Inc. �s. �� 7890 University Ave.N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Gr of Mn. dba Ground Round GR of Minn. Inc� '"� " 5277 Central Ave. N,E, Fridley, MN 55421 Hardee's of Fridley Hardee's Food Systems " " 289 57th AvetN.E: Fridley, MN 55432 il�,. 1➢... 1{ Hong Kong Kitchen In,c. Karen Kwan . 6562 Uni,Vers�ty �ve� N�E,' ' - Fr7d.ley,`MN 55432 Joe DiMaggio's Sports Bar Geo. Vespa "� ° 1298 E. Moore Lk Dr. N.E. Fri d l ey, P1N 55432 9.3$ FEES : �45,�� 5.�� $45.0� ?45.�0 $45.�0 $45.�0 $45.�0 $45,(l0 " $45.�0 " �45F0� �45,0� " $45 . (1(l � LICENSES � CTTY OF FRIDLEY April 28, 1997 Page 2 McDonalds Mark Wheeldon " " " $45:�0 25� 57th Ave, N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 McDonald's " " " " $45.�� 845(l University Ave.N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 McDonald's " `� " ' " $45.(1(1 81(1� University Ave.N.E. � Fridley, MN 5543� McGlynn Bakeries Marcaa Wahlstrom " " $45.�� 735(1 Commerce Ln. Fridley, MN 55432 MN King Seafood & Groc. MN King Seafood & Groc. " " $45.�� 6566 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, h1N 55432 Oriental House Mguyen Anh " " " $45.0� 5865 University Ave.N.E, Fri dl ey, P1N 55432 Perk�ns Fat�ity Rest. R Bakery Perkirrs �est..Oper. Cc�. " " $45.OQ 7520 University P.ve.N,E.' Fridley, MN 55432 Pizza Flame . Pizza Flame Inct ;' " " $45.�0 317 Osboren Rd� N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Seoul Foods SungSoo Ghoi ° " " $45.0(l 1Q95 E. Moore Lkt Dr, Fridley, MN 55432 Shorewood Inn James Nicklow " " " $45.00 6161 Hwy 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Subway at Moore Lk. Kathleen J. Zuehlke " " $45.00 1Q91 E. Moore Lk.Dr, Fridley, MN 55432 Sunshine Place Rest. Sunshine P1. Rest.Inc, " " $45.00 52�1 Central Ave.N.E. � Fridley, MN 55421 Target Dist. Center Target Dist. Center � " "." $45.�0 1�9� 73rd Ave,N.E. Fridley, MN 55�t32 e �e = LICENSES ClTY OF FRIDLEY April 28; 1997 Target Stores Dayton Hudson Corp�� '' 755 53rd Ave.N.E, Fridley, MN 55432 University Station Rest. Class Inc. " 761� University Ave.N,E, Fri 1 dl ey, �1N 55432 Wong'•s Gourmet Wong's Gourmet Inc. `� 1254 E< Moore Lk. Dr. ' Fri d 1 ey, P1N 55432 University Billiards Greg Asproth " 7178 University Ave.N,E. Fridley, MN 5543� � Holiday Foods Sidco Food Co. '� 246 57th Ave: N,E. ` ` Fridley,MN 55432 Johnson Automotive Sherwood Johnson " 629� Htvy 65 N, E, Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley V, F,W, P4ost 363 Floyd Pul ju �'' 1040 Osborne Rd� N�EE Fridley, MN-55432 Ashland Station . Totem.Foods I:nc�i 't� 53��.Central:'AveiN�Et ` . . , Fridley, MN 55423 Freedom Valu Center Erickson Oil ProdE� ". 7600 University Ave;N,E; � Fridley, MN 55432 SuperAmerica , Marth Evans " 5667 University Ave�N,E; Fridley, MN 55432 Total � James P. Hill " 6101 University Ave;N.E, Fri dl ey, h1N 55432 Snyders Drug Store #,18 Snyder��s Drug Store Inc; 6582 Un9,versity Ave.N,E,' ` - � Fridley� MN 55432 Sandee'•�s Braam Invest� Inc � �'�< 6490 Central AYe.N,E�� Fridley, MN 55432 � � � Page 3 �� . ,� �, ,, �,, �,, �45 . (1� $45.00 $45 . fl� " $45.�0 ��. �, $45 . �� ''` '` �45,��1 «, �� $45Q(l0 � i`� `� $45 4 0(l '`, " $45 E 00 `,, " $45.00 �``, �` $a5.0O �.e; �, $45�00 �� A45.00 � CfTY OF FRIDLEY April 28, 1997 Main Event 782� University Ave,Pl.E, Fridley, MN 55432 Texas Foods, Inc< 1301 Mississippi St.N,E, Fridley, MN 55432 Twin Cities Stores Inc, 7298 Hwy. 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 �Sportspree Fun Park 1001 E. Moore Lk.Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 �B I L�L I��RDS University Billiards. 7178 University Ave�N.E� Fridley, P1N 55432 llniversity Bi1liards 7178 Univer�ity Ave� N.E. Frdidl�y, MN 55432 Fridley V.F,W, Post 363 1040 Os�orne Rd, N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 t�lain Event 782Q University Ave.N.E, Fridley, MN 55432 Sportsree Ltd, 1�01 E. Moore Lk.Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 ENTERTAINMENT Fridley V.F.W. Post 363 1�4� Osborne Rd.N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Sportspree Fun Center 1001 E. Moore LkQ Dr, Fridley, MN 55432 . Am, Legion Post 303 7365 Central Ave.N,E, Fridley, MN 55432 � LICENSES P�g� 4 Main Event of Fridley "' "' Raymond Jedneak Glenn S�Keller ,� �� «. „ iVat� . Development Serv `'� •" $45 , (1(l " �45.�� "' $45.0� ", $45,�0 Greg Asproth •flavid Sallr��n '� �3�'��f10 Public Safety Director Am, �lmuse�nent Arcades ° " " $7n.{}() ��y,� Pt�l ju 4� �, ,a $4�. (}0 � Main Event of Fridley " "� $70,�0 Norman Pink " Floyd Rulju " Nat. Devel, Service Inc. Madeleine G, Saltness II YI. ��,�� e i.11! �� 85 . fl� �, F� $85 . Q(l �� „ $85.�� - CfTY OF FRIDLtY April 28, 1997 FI RERRh� SLanton 0. Berg 6�25 Gar-Pna Ln. Fridley, MPJ 55432 GAMBLING PER�+IIT ��aple Lanes Rest. 631(l Hwy, 65 N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Sandee's 649� Central Ave.N,E, Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley Alano Society 5925 University Ave.N,E� Fridley, MN 55432 HOTEL=MGTfL Budget Host Inn 6881 Hwy 65 N,E, Fridley, MN 55432 flFF �SALE� BEER Mike`s Gas & Grocery 6485 E, River Rd, Fridley, MN 55432 Holiday Foods 246 57th Ave,N,E, Fridley, MN 55432 SuperAmerica #4207 7449 E, River Rd, Fridley, MN 55432 SuperAmerica #4199 7299 Hwy. 65 N,E, Fridley, MN 55432 SuperAmerica #4175 5667 University Ave.N,E. Fridley, MN 66543 East River Rd< Texaco 8100 E, River Rd, Fridley, MN 55432 LICENSES Same " Toti no-�Grace " Gary Braam '� Diana Novak " Warren Pauison " Michael J! Deconcini " Sidco Food Co, ° � SuperAmerica Group " �� „ �� Oonald Kisch � " Page 5 �� $25.00 �� . $30Q. �0 �� $3�n. �� 25.�0 �i `�. $ 24t3 , 00 �w� ,,. $6� t �� . �� $6�.00 �� $60. �0 �� $60.00 �� $6Q; 0� �� $60.0(l � LICENSES � CffY OF FRIDIEY April 28, 1997 Paqe 6 Texas Foods Raymond Jedneak David Sallman $6�.�(l 13�1 Mississippi St,N,E, Public Safety Director Fridley, MN 55432 Freedom Vale Center Erickson Oil Prod. " " " $6�.(l� 76�� N.E. University Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 uN SALE BEER University Station Rest. Class Inc. 7610 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 u Godfather Pizza Godfather Pizza Inc. " 7910 University Ave,N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Pizza Flame Pizza Flame Fridley Inc. 317 Osborne Rd, N.E, Fridley, MN 55432 ON SALE CLUB toyal Order of Moose'Lodge #38 �ouc� K�utson 8298 University Ave4N,E, Fridley, MN 55432 Nortii Ai r Home Assoc x r S�me 6831 Hwy, 65 N,E, Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley V,F,W. Social Club 363 Floyd A* Pulju 1040 Osborne Rd. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 American Legion Post 3()3 Madeline G, Saltness 7365 Central Ave,N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 PEDDLERS PERNFiT Greenpeace Jason Jordan 212 3rd Ave,No,#350 Mpls. MN 55413 . PRIVATE G�IS. PUMP Unity Nospital David Galrelch 55� Osborne RdF N,E, " " $325.0(1 � ��. �� , �� `� $325. �� „ " $325. �fl r�. �� $65�.�(1 ° $85() t{l(l �� ,� $650, 00 �� , �� 500 � O(l "' " Exempt Richard Larsor� $30.OQ fire Inspector' i = LICENSES CfTY OF FRIDLEY April 28, 1997 Page 7 Park Const, Co. Same Richard Larson 79(l(l Beech St. N,E. Fire Inspector Fridley, MN 55432 Determan Welding R� Tank Serv, Jim Determan " �� 1241 72nd Ave.N,E, Fridley, MN 55432 PAWN SHOP $3�.�� $3�.�� Cash-N-Pawn Cash-N-Pawn of MN LTD David Sallman $1(3:5��.�� 58(l7 Univers�ty Ave,N.E. Fridley MN 55432 Pawn America Pawn Am.Mn L.L.0 " " 1027 E, Moore Lk.Dr. Fridley, N1N 55432 REFUSE HAULER Aagard Sarritati�on, Anders Stone Richard Larson 3291 Terminal Dr. Fire Inspector Eagan, MN 55121 Ace Solid Waste' Ace'Solid Waste Inct, '° '� �� 3118 162nd Lane Andover, MN 55304 Aspen Waste Systems ,Robt4 E, Kircher 11 " �i 2523 Wabash Ave. - St,Pau1,MN 55114 BFI/Woodlake Sanitary Serv, Same °: �i� 8661 Rendova St< Circle Pines, MN 55�14 Keith Klupenny & Son Disposal Keith Klupenny '" " ��; 1214 Ha11 Ve. AveE W,St.Pau1,MN 55118 Larry's Quality Sanitation Larry Saba " �� 1721� Driscoll St,N,�l. Ramsey, MN 553�3 Pretzel's Sanitation Larry Plessel " �� ; 15323 Ramsey Blvd. N,W Anoka, MN 55303 Randy's Sanitation Inc4 Randall Roskowiak '" '� �� 4351 U,S. Hwy. 12 S,E: ` Delano, "P1N 55328 p w� $9�7��.�� $60:n� $75�00 $135.�� "� $195 . (l0 $6�.�0 �` �90. O0 $9o�no $1�5.�0 � � CfiY OF FRIDLEY April 28, 1997 Waste Management-Blaine 1�Q50 Naples St.N,E, Blaine, MN 55449 Twin City Sanitation Inc. 95 W Ivy St.Paul, MN 55117 RETAIL GASOLINE Freedom Valu Center #58 760� University Ave.N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 SuperAmerica 5667 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Texas Foods Inc. 1301 Missjssippi Ave.N.E, Fridley, MN 55432 Ashland Station. 53�0 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Twin Cities Stores Inc. 7298 Hwy. 65 N,E. Fridley „ MN 55432 University Sinclair b�71 University AVe.N.E, Fridley, MN 55432 STREET VENDING TNT Ice Cream 618 47th Ave.N,E. Col, Hgts.,MN 55421 TREE REMOVAL Allstate Tree Service 751� Jackson St,N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Bullseye Tree Service 18519 Cleveland St. Elk Ri�er, MN 5533(1 LICENSES Page 8 �eroy Christen Richard Larson Fire Inspector Same " " $�25.�� $6� . tl� Erickson Oil Prod. Inc. " " " $6(l.i)0 Martha Evans " " " $6�.�(l Raymor�d Jedneak " " " $6�.�(1 Totem Foods inc . " " " $6(l . �Q Gl e�an �K�e91 er �� $6(l . �Q Michae� `Johnson � " " " $6(l �Q Eugene W. Tollifson Ron Julkowski $5(l.�(l Building Inspector Donald R. Ley Brian Heacock 9.45 Paul Lawrence Pub.Works Supt. �� $4�.�� $4�.�0 � LICENSES � CTfY OF FAIDLEY April 28, 1997 Rainbow Tree Co.Inc. John W. Powell 51�5 W 35th St. . St.Louis Pk.,MN 55416 Reliabel Tree Service Peter Vagovich 66(l0 Brookview Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Rite-Way Tree & Lan�,Co- Inc. Terry Roemhildt 22�1� Redwood St. N.W. Cedar, MN 55011 Shorewood Tree Service Steve Walberg Box 145 Rt.l St,Peter, MN 56082 Statewide Tree �x Land. Tim Hayes Rt.l Box 99A. Pierz, MN 56364 TOBACCO PRODI�CTS �(Ci�arette) . -� . Page 9 Paul Lawrence �4�.�� Public Works Supt. �� $4(1.0� „ ,� � �, �� " $40.00 �� $4� . �0 �� 40,�� Freedom Valu.Center,,#58 Erickson Oi1 Prod; DaVid Shclman '', $12�.�0 7600 University AvetN�E; ` Pu61ic Safety Director Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley V.F<W. Post 363 Floyd Pulju " ", n< $125��0 1040 Osborne Rd N E' ' � - -- Fridley, MN 55432� Holiday Foods Sidco Food:Cot� 246 57th Ave.N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 il M Joe Dih1aggio�s Sports, Bar �lendota. Valley Amus; '", 1298 E, Moore t kE Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Johnson Automotive Sherwood Johnson "` 629Q Hwy, 65 N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 . Main Event , Main Event of Fridley 782� University AvetN,E; Fridley, MN 55432 � Sandee's Braam InvesttTnc� ° 6490 Central Ave.N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 �, � . ,�, ��, ��; �r, ��< �,, �, �125 � (�0 $125.0� $125.0� " �125�Q0 " $125=0(.l � . � CtTY OF FRIDLEY April 28, 1997 Shorewood Inn 6161 Hwy. 65 N.E, Fridley, MP1 55432 Snyder's Drug �tore #18 6582 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 SuperAmerica #4175 5667 lJniversity Ave.N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Texas Foods Inc. 13�1 Mississippi St.N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 To ta 1 61�1 University Av.N.E, Fridly, MN 55432 t�shland Station 530n Central Ave.N,E, Fridley, Mf� 55432 Twin Cities Stores Inc. 729� Hwy 65 N.E. Fr�dley, MN 55432 llniversity Bi ��1 iards 7178 University Ave..N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 University Sinclair 6�71 University Ave, N.E. fridley, MN 55432 USED MOTOR VEHICLE Lease Mgt.Group 7Q11 University Ave.N,E, Fridley, MN 55432 Pomaville's Motor V.alet 5649 University Ave, N,E: Fridley, A1N 55432 � Fridley Chevrolet 7501 Hwy, 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 LICENSE� Page 1� Am. Amusement David Sallman $125.�0 Public Safety Director Snyder's Drug Store Inc. " " " $125.�� Martha Evans Raymond Jedneak James P. :Hill �� , „ � Totem Foods Inc. " G]er�� S. Ke71er ,� Am, Amuseme�lt A�cades Michael Johr�son Kirby D. Lowe James Pomaville Roger J, Moody 9.47 �� „ „ k p �� $125. (l� " $125.On „ $125. (3� $i25,�10 $1��.�Q " $125.(� $125.�0 ��. ,!, �� $150.00 ��. ��; t�, $150�0� �,, ��. <<•. $15� . �0 � � Cf1Y OF FRIDIEY April 28, 1997 Awaijane Enterprises Inc. 990 Osborne Rd.N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 VEHICLE BODY REPAIR Christensen Auto Body Inc. 65�1 E. River Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley Chevrolet Geo.Inc. 75�1 Hwy 65 N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Sam's Auto Body 757� Hwy 65 N.E, Fridley,MN 55432 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Ashland Station 53(l0 Central Ave.N,E. Fridley,MN 55432 - ON SALE I�NTOXI�ATING ��IQl10R Fireside Rice Bowl 116(l Fireside Dr. N,E, Fridley, MN 55432 Ground Round 5277 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Joe DiMaggio's 1298 E. Moore Lk.Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Main Event 782� University Ave, N,E, Fridley, MN 55432 Maple Lanes Restaurant 6310 Nwy, 65 N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Sandee's 649� Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 LICENSES Page 11 Sam Awaisane David Sallman $15(1.�� Public Safety Director Carol Christensen Kurt Schneider $15�.�(l Community Development Ronald E. Stelter " " " $15�.(l� Damir Awaijane Totem Foods Inc. m 11 li �� m �15�,�Q $15f1, (1� Oliver Yui Yum Tam David Sallman $7,O�r.l.�r.l Public Safety Director GR of Mn . , I nc , " " " $8 , �Q(l . O0 Joe DiMaggio's Ince " Main Event of Fridley " Maple Lanes Rest= Inc. " Braam Invest. Inc. " . , . ir; as: $7annn.�n ,r. �� $8, 00. (l0 ,� �� 6,0�0.(l(1 �� $6,��.0(l CITY OF FRIDLEY M E M O R A N D II M TO: AILLIAM W. BIIRNS, CITY MANAGSR � � FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DiRECTOR WILLIAM A. CHAMPA, CITY CLERK SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR RWIR g�pp-N-SHOP, INC. FOR AN OFF-SALE BEER LICEN3E DATE: APRIL 24, 1997 On the April 28 City Council agenda is a public hearing to conside� the approval of an off-sale beer license for Kwik Stop-n-Shop, Inc., located at 315 Osborne Road Northeast. A Public Hearing Notice is attached for your review. Pursuant to Chapter 602 Section .05 of the Fridley City Code, we are required to hold a public hearing before issuing this iicense. The Police Departme�t has �erformed ti�e reguired 3�ackg�.ound investigation on K�ik ��op a�d �ub1�,e Sa�et� ��.�ctor 5ailman has not found any reasan tfl d�n� ��i�s reqc�est. 11.01 CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will hold a public hearing at the City Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue Northeast on April 28, 1997 at 7:30 p.m. on the question of issuing a Beer License to Kwik Stop-n-Shop, Inc. for the property located at 315 Osborne Road Northeast. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than April 24, 1997. Anyone having an interest in this matter should make their interest known at this public hearing. William A. Champa City Clerk Publish: April 17, 1997 11.02 ►� 1�► �1 ; :�►�lii�►� DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: Apri124, 1997 TO: William Burns, City Manager �N� � FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: First Reading of an Ordinance Amending the Zoning Code Chapter 205, Entitled "Zoning" , by Amending Seetions 205.17.05.�D.(6), 205.18.05.D.(6), 205.19.05.D.(6j, Adding Sectian 205.20 (11A-� Manu#act�r�ng Or�ly), and R�nur�t�eririg Con�ecutive Sec�or�s • The City Council conducted a public hea�ing regarding the propc�sed ord'mance at �e�r April 14, 1997 meeting. The �roposed ordinance amendment would create stricter : standards for ir�du�trial lots loeated an comer�ots across from residential ctistricts or uses, and would also create a new district entitled M-4, Manufacturing Only. , During the public hearing, Councilmember Schneider directed staff to compare the $4.00 per foot price for the 11 acre site owned by Commercial Property Investments versus the assessed value of the property. The properties were sold to Commercial Property Investments via auction at $.48 per square foot in 1992. The 1993 court ordered value of the properties was calculated to be $514,290 for the three parcels ($1.10 per square foot). Prior to the sale of the land at auction and the court-ordered valuation, the previous owners, the Giacier Park Company, reduced the squa�e foot price from $2.25 per square foot to $1.50 per square foot. The current assessed value is $1.00 per square foot. Recent land sales for industriai lots have:ranged from $1.50 to $2.25. Commercial Property Investments will charge a lower price if they act as the contractor and complete the constn.�ction as a"build to suit° project. 12.01 First Reading of M-4 Ordinance April 23, 1997 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council conduct first reading of the attached ordinance amending the industriai zoning districts. MM/dw M-97-189 12.02 ORDINANCS NO. AN ORDINANCi3 RECODIFYING THS FRIDLEY CITY CODS, CHAPT$R 205, LNTITLSA °ZONING", BY AMBNDING SSCTIONS 205.17.OS.D.(6), 2U5.18.OS.D.(6), 205.19.OS.D.(6), ADDING SECTION 205.20 (M-4 MANIIFACTIIRING ONLY), AND R�SRING CON3SCIITIVS SBCTIONS The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: 205.17 M-1, Light Industrial District Regulation 5. Parking Requirements D. Design Requirements (6) Loading Docks: (a) Outside loading docks shall be located in the rear or side yard and be properly screened. (b) The space needed for the loading docks must be adequate to handle the loading and unloading needs, without obstructing the public right of way. •.t • _4! " • • e.�i - e ' s _ � s :_ • a • � • � • :. e . - � - a o • � • _ � 205.18 M-2, Heavy Industriai District Regu�ation 5. Parking Requirements D. Design Requirements (6) i,oading Docks: (a) Outside loading docks shall be located in the rear or side yard and be properly screened. (b) The space needed for the loading docks must be adequate to handle the loading and unloading needs, without obstructing the public right of way. •� •_ �- . _ . • _ s�� . - .-� -' •_ _ �• ._._�. so ... .�.. - �- e . • 205.19 M-3, Outdoor Intensive, Heavy Industrial District Regulation 5. Parking Requirements D. Design Requirements 12.03 (6) Loading Docks: (a) Outside loading docks shall be located in the rear or side yard and be properly screened. (b) The space needed for the loading docks must be adequate to handle the loading and unloading needs, without obstructing the public right of way. (c) On corner lots across from a residential district no loadina docks shall face the public right of way 205.20 M-4 MANUFACTIIRING ONLY DISTRICT REGIILATIONS 1. IISES PSRMITTED A. Principal Uses The followinQ are principal uses in M-4 Districts ManufacturinQ uses which will not be dangerous or otherwise detrimental to nersons residing or working in the vicinity and will not imAair the use or value of any property but not including any uses excluded hereinafter. B. Accessory Uses. The followinQ are accessory uses in M-1 Distri s _(1) Off-streer park�ng fac��ities. S2) Off-street loading facilities (3) BusinesG signs for uses pe�-�+itted (4) Reta� 1 sales or servicing of 8rod ��-r mantfa�r, ired (5) Offices associat d with th ��ncipal use (6) Warehousing or distribution activities asso ia wi h a principal use.: (7) Solar enercxv devices as an in Pgral part of the principal structure. C Uses Permitted With A Spec�a� Use Permit. '�he followina are u�g�permitte� with a pP�i�l Use Permit in M 4 Districts- 11) Radio transmitters and microwave tow r 12.04 • • - • u ° ' �-+S �TSTI! �SSS i i�2 S �� • - ! 0 � • � ' _ • • � ° � � _ � � • "' ' • • • • (. � .. • � _ (a) Motor vehicle storage is conducted as provided in Section 205.20.07.D.(5).• • - - t. • - -_ . -.� . - - -e � . : �. . - -- -. . . . .- . - . _ - _.-�----- = ' ' -- - - - ' --' (ii1 a residential use or distric across a put�lic rigit- af-way from the use or (iii)a public park adjacent to the use or (iv) a public right-of-way adjacent to the use (c) Materials motor v h��les and equipment stored outside do not exceed fi n(15) fe t in he�ght; (d) Screening materials are provided as in Section 205.17.06 G tl) (a) - __ ._ -�_ -. . _ .- - .- -. . -•� _ -. � -� " __ • f- _� ' •�- -Y_= • -��'e � _ . }. � _ . / �{{j. � � ^ 1 . • . ) � � ::. _ �.^ 11�". � V ' �.Y � � _ 6 � ' '!i� '_ - G ^ � �jl{� y " ° - ! � - • � � � � ' � 6 . _ � • • e ' _ _ _ _ _ - �.:� - • ' • � - .�. a ! • ' ! . • .. - ' �l . ' lt - � - - . t ' _� . • •. � • � ' _ i _ � • _ c � � . -.f . ! • - -. � } • - _ � . • - . - . _ • � � . _ . � - • - - - 4 • 1 - t • _ • • - • _ • • • • • • � . � • • - • • � - 2. IISES BXCLIIDSD ` - . -. . - _.-. � .� • - . _� - .- . . -. _�.- -_ '-xu -. . _ . - .-. � = - s . - .- v_�•- . e . - - f ° rl - �.' ❑ ". t - • • - _ - s 4 . - • _ � • • • . � . . }. � - .. � � - ' • o • � - ` �. -. ' - • llc ..11f - _ - - - � • tll'.� • ' e _ . } � s � - • "i _�' � - �• - • � �. •�- •� -�l. - _!.- • •�• • - • - - _ • • - } _ - _ s - �! . � ll - 3 � • .. � • - • • � e • • • • - _ _ • • - - • - �� _ • - 12.05 3. LOT REOIIIREMENTS AND SBTBACKS A. Lot Area. A lot area of not less than one and one half (1-1/2) acres is required for one (1) main building. B. Lot width. A lot width of 100 feet is required at the required front setback. C. Lot Coveraqe. (1) The maximum percent of the area of a lot allowed to be covered by the main building and all accessor� buildings is as follows: (a) One (1) Story - forty percent (40�) maximum• fifty Aercent (50�) with a special use �ermit as provided in (4) below. (b) Two (2) Story - thirty-five percent (35�) maximum; forty- five percent (45�) with a special use permit as �rovided in (4) below. (c) Three (3) Story - thirty nercent (30�) maximum• forty percent t40�) with a s�ecial use permit as provided in (4) below. (d) Four (4) Storv - twenty-five percent (25�) maximum; t irty-five percent (35�) with a sgecial use 8ermit in (4) below. fP) Five (5) Storv - twenty Aercent (20�) maximum: thirty gPr�pnr (30�) with a�pecial use nermit as 8rovided in (4) below. ' ff) Six (6) Storv - fifteen percent (i5�) maximum• twenty-five perrpn* (25�1 with a special use permit in (4) below. �2) The above lot coverage will be subiect to other considerations including narking and qpen s�ace recduirements use of facilities and proximity to other districts which may decrease the maximum lot coveracre. «� The lot coverage may be reduced by the City if and when there is provision for underground �arking within the main structure provided that the lot coverage shall not be more than forty percent (40�). (4) The lot cover�ge as stated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of ten gercent (10�) of the lot area upon �hra;n;ng a special use �ermit In add�t�on to the recauirements of this Section and the factors identified in Section 205 05 04 to evaluate special use g�rmit reguests the City shall consider 12.06 •- . . .. --------- — - - - - --s�sse..i�r�sss:.t�i��.!�.5�3�9�inZ�M_.I�.iie_TiiiT-S:TT� • • ' . � - (a) The D(?YitinnPr sha�l prove that all o h r ordinan reauirements ar �met in 1� ing but not limi to parking �torm water management, and lands a ina. � D Setba ks. (1) Front Yard: A front vard deDth of not less than thirty five (35) feet is reauired for al� permittP3 buildings and uses (2) Side Yard• Two (2) side vards are require� each with a width of no 1 ss than fifteen (15) feet exc nt: 1a) Where a driv way is to be provided in the side yard the minimum recruired side yard increases to thirty (30) feet. (b) Where a s�de yard abuts a street of a corn r lot the sid yard reauirement increas to a m�nimum o thirty five (35) feet. . _ .- _ . -.i -. - - . . . . .-. .- -- . al_ _ . �. - - - - - � ,�t • .!- . �,. .o�- • '_ _ • • ' � '! • g • ' f • I - � ' _ ' ! - • ..} . � _ � � • � . • q ' • • • _ _ ... � • - i • • - � � _ • ' ' • • • . _� ! � ' • }_ • ' , _ ' � � �_ • � . - • " • ! . � ' ' ' - 1 _ �. t _ m _ ' - . - • ' � • • . • • _ � � - � • •' _SSS_ '• • � �� _ � . _ . - _ _ - ' - � • • • - • . � • • •.• _ • �. - • - ' _' ' . �.. • • •. ' • •- • - • _ ' ' • � � _ _�.' .• �• o-f • � � - ' - • _ � ' ' - • � - - • • ' - .4' �- • � 1 - • _ - • - • • �.� - � _ t - • . � • � - • �, • - _ • � - • • _. �. ! .-. � }. - s -- - - • - R ' • • , - 12.07 4. BIIILDING R$OIIIRSMENTS A. Height. Building height shall be a maximum of six (6) $tories not exceedinq sixty five (65) feet provided that no building shall be erected to a height exceedinq forty-five (45) feet within fifty (50) feet of any R 1 or R 2 residential use or district unless one (1) additional foot of setback can be provided for each one (1) foot of building he;qht or portion thereof exceeding forty-five (45) feet. B. Exterior Materials. The type of buildina materials used on exterior walls shall be face brick natural stone s�ecifically designed precast concrete factory fabricated and finished metal frame paneling, glass or other materials approved bX the Citv. 5. PARRING RSOIIIREMENTS A. Reduction Of Parkinq. Reduction of parking stalls m� be allowed when the �rovision of space required for parking stalls due to the Aarticular nature of the �roposed use or other considerations would be an unnecessary hardship. Adequate open space shall be �rovided to satisfy the total number of required parking stalls. B. Additional ParkinQ. When the provisions for parkina s�ace recau.ired for specif�c district »G s is inadec,�xate the City mav reQUire that additional off-street parking be provided. C_ Parking Ratio. . . - - . -. .�- . _ -- .. . �• -'- " -�- .- . . .-. . - � _.i.__ - -- . . - _.. - - . - - - . - ._ -- ._ . .- - �- .- . . .-. . - � .i . - -- . - ._ - - • �. - - . - . -- •_ . ._ - .- . . .-. . - �� _.i. - -- . �_ • •. - - . - . - . . ..- - - .�- . -- � . � • � . - _ .� . • - � • • � • • - _ � 1 1 { �� _ - � - • •. - - • • - ' • • • - - • ' • - - � � • � . - _ � . • - � • • - • • - _ } 1 1 �� _ - - - • _ • � _ - • • • • ' • - • • - �. - 12.08 16) For speculative building use at least ane (1) off stre t parking space sha17 be provided for each 700 s�uare feet of floor area on lots af less than one one-half (3-1/2) acres (7) The speculative parking ratio will be used for all mixed uses unless the owner agrees to enter into a written agreement in recordable form with the C' y in which the owner represents to the City what the ratio of all uses in the bLilding will,j�e. �pon this happening the parking ratio for the building will be determined on a pro-rata basis by the parking ratio per the number of scruare feet for each type of use which th:e owner �presents will be located in the buiiding After execution of this agreement any chanqes to the specified uses will require a special use �ermit from the Citv (8) At least one (1) handicap off-street parking space shall be provided for each fifty (50) spaces or fraction thereof. D Design Reauirements: (1) Drainage: All driveways and parking areas except those for less than four (4) vehicles shall be graded according to a drainage plan which has been approved by the City. (2) Lightinq: 8i�y�3,ght;ng Lsed to illumi��te an off street a��ki�g area shali iie shaded or di�fLSed to reflect the light away f-rom the adjoinincr �roperty and traff?c. (3) CurbinQ• �he entire perimeter of all 8arking areas in excess of four (4) �ral�s ac dr'veways truck loading spaces or other hard surface ��eas that handle mot�r v h' 1 tra � shall b curbed kiith a poured six (6) inch high concrete cur� and gutter. - . . .- -.i_ -. . . - _.. . . . . . �- . ...-. �_ .- -. -.i -. . - . . �- .- � ._v.� - . . •- _ •� • - _ .- . �- - - . . . �- - s- .. . �• . . - _. .- _. - � . - �. f- _.- . - .._�_�• � . - - �_4� �� _�-f - - - ... . -. - - .. . 12.09 (4) Driveway Re�uirements: (a) A maximum driveway width of thirty-two (32) feet at the curb opening excluding the entrance radii can be constructed. !b) The.parkiny aisle shall be a minimum of twenty-five (251 feet in width for two-way traffic and eighteen (18) feet in width for one-way traffic. (c) The ed�e of the curb opening shall not be closer to the nearest portion of a street right-of-way intersection than seventy-five (75) feet or two-thirds (2/3) of the lot width whichever is smaller. (d) Where a"T" intersection exists, a drive may be located ��osite the end of the intercepted street. (e) The minimum driveway angle to the street shall be sixty (60) degrees. (5) All parking and hard surface areas shall be: (a) No closer than twentv (20) feet from any street right-of-wav. (b) No closer than five (5) feet from any side lot line except for a common drive approved by the adioining �roperty owners and the City. ��) No closer than five (5) feet from any rear lot line unless adjacent to an alley then the setback shall be increased to fifteen (15) feet. (d) No closer than five (5) feet from the main building (e) Curbed with minimum drivew�y access radii of ten 110) feet to match the existing street curb. (6) Loading Docks: (a) Outside loading docks shall be located in the rear or side yard and be properly screened. (b) The space needed for the loading docks must be a�rxuate to handle the loading and unloading needs, without obstructing the gublic right-of-waX. (�1 On corner lots across from a residential use or ��strict no loading docks shall face the public right of wax (7) Off-street parking shall be grovided for all vehicles concerned with any use on the lot. 12.10 18) Parkina lots with more than four (4) parking stal7s shall b�e striped. (9) Suffic�ent concre P area may be required for motorcyc3P parking in addit�on to the required vehicle park�ng stalls. (10)Bike racks may be rec�uirP� by the City in an area that is convenient to each major b ild�n� entrance and will not d'�r,�nt p�destrian or veh��»>ar tra f�� or fire lanes. (�1)Safety signs markings and traff�� control devices may be required to promote vehicular and pedestrian safetv. 112)Parkin4 stalls may be nine (9) f in wid h for manufa t�r�n� uses warehouse and storage uses spec��ative industri�t � buildinas and parking lots for long term employee parking. _�Ref. Ord. 952. 9601 6. LANDSCAPB REOIIIREMENTS s ..- Al1 open areas of any site except for areas used for parking driveways or storage shall be landscaped and incorporated in a landscape plan. ' - • - - • p � � - �� • . • a � • • - � - _ _ • a _ I _ - - rt - - �. . ° ! " • f - _ � ° • -� s +ill �. � _ :. p � • lUc � � .. _ �1.. - �. ... • • �._. - •� ._ ri.° • iLm ".. F .. y- . � ... i° =.�o -� - ' . � - _ if -: s . e . _ •.. � a '- .�� - }. - 0 }. e = _ ' _ - • ' �_ � •_ _ - ' �- - • :�• •�: �. •• • - • - - � - - • • • L • . � • .. .. " - • 1 ' . ! � � .. - -. �.l. - • - .. � _ - _ � �_ }- �_ _�.• - til_- •- -:1�-��..-� � - e • � •� ■ • • •• • • • �• •• • • _ . i. . _ • • �' f _ _ 1 • ° � - - • • � _ • lt � . - � - . .}_q • • - � ' � �. _ - • - • 7 _ � . •. • � _ - • - - 4i . .1 - � • �." - �- • - • '• ' .1. " _ ' �� _ - ' �_ • �. _ - • _ t > 4 • • ' - �� - • • � • �. • . ' - • �. . �. �. • • � • ._ _ _ . _ . ._ " �' ' a ' •. � • • } • � ' " �2.y 1 B. Bonding Requirement The City shall retain a performance bond cash or letter of credit, as required in Section 205.05.06.A.(3) of the zoning code for one growing season after the installation of landscape materials is completed. C. Plan Submission and Approval. (1) A landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City prior to issuance of a building permit or prior to approval of outside improvements not related to building im�rovements. A plan shall not be required for routine re�lacement of existina materials or the installation of new materials when not associated with a buildin� project. (2) The following items shall appear on the landscape plan: (a) General ((1)) Name and address of owner/developer ((2)1 Name and address of architect/designer ((3)) Date of �lan preparation ((4)) Dates and description of all revisions ((S11 Name of project or development ((6]� Scale of plan (engineering scale only) at no smaller than 1 inch e�uals 50 feet ((7)) North point indication (b) Landscape Data ((1)? Planting schedule (table) containing- ((a)) Symbols ((b)) Ouantities ((c)) Common names ((d)) Botanical names ((e)) Sizes of �lant material at time of planting ((f)) Root specification (B.R., B& B, potted, etc.) ((q,)) Special planting instructions 12.12 ((2)) Existing tree and shrubbery locations common names and apgroximate size ((3)) Planting detail (show all species to scale at normal �ature crown diameter or spread for local hardiness zone) ((41) Typical sections in detail of fences tie walls, pl�a�ter bexes to� lo�� pic�ie areas bern►s a�d other similar features. ((5)) TXpical sections of landscape islands and planter beds with identification of materials used. �(6)) Details of plantinq beds and foundation plantings. ((7)) Note indicating how disturbed soil areas will be restored through the use of sodding seeding or other technigues. ((8)) Delineation of both sodded and seeded areas with total areas provided in square feet and slope information. ((9)) Coverage plan for underground irrigation system, if anv. (('�0)) Statement or sv[a�ols to describe exterior - - -- ----- �; gh ; ng p� �n_ concen!- . (c) S�ecial Conditions: Where landscape or man-made materials are used to provide re�uired screening from adjacent and neighboring properties a cross-section shall be�rovided throuah the ��te and adjacent Broctert�es to show,property elevation, existing build�ngs and screen�ng in scale. D Landscaping Materials• Definitions. Al1 plant materials shall be living �lants Artificial nlants are prohibited. (1) Grass and ground cover. . �• . - e- . _.� -. �- . . - - _�_ -. ...-_ .� - . - .��.. . . - - • - ..- - - • � - . �. � •�- - • • •� • . . � - .• -� .- •• -� .� • s ��_ .-. - . _� t• - - . •- t . -. -- • • - . • • • - 12.13 (b) Accepte ground covers are sod, seed, or other organic material. The use of rock and bark mulch shall be limited to areas around other veaetation (i.e. shrubsl and shall be contained by edging. (2) Trees. (a) Over-story Deciduous. ((1)) A woody plant which at maturity is thirty (30) feet or more in height, with a single trunk un-branched for several feet above the ground, having a defined crown which loQSes leaves annuallx. ((2)) Such trees shall have a 2 1/2 inch caliper minimum at plantinq. (b) Ornamental. ((1)) A woody �lant, which at maturity is less than thirty (30) feet in height, with a single trunk un- branched for several feet above the ground, having a defined crown which looses leaves annuallv. ((2)) Such trees shall have a 1 1/2 inch caliper minimum at plantinq. _-_• ... . - �_ � -- . . - - . � _ �• - s_�� • �-. . �- . . . e_ �. . ..- .� - . -u. .. .� • the branches year-round. (t2)) Such trees shall be six (6) feet in height at planting. (3) Shrubs. (a) Deciduous or evergreen plant material, which at maturity is fifteen (15) feet in height or less. Such materials may be used for the formation of hedges. Such materials shall meet the following minimum standards at time of planting: ((1)) Dwarf deciduous shrubs shall be eighteen (18) inches tall. 1(2)) Deciduous shrubs shall be twenty-four (24) inches tall, except as in Section D below. ((3)) Evergreen shrubs shall be of the eighteen (18) inch classification. 1�.14 t4) Vines. Vines shall be at least twelve (12) inches high at planting and are generally used in conjunction with walls or fences. (5) Slopes and Berms. (a) Final slope grades steeper than 3•1 will not be permitted w;rhout special approval or treatment such as terracing or retaining walls. (b) Earth berm screening oarking lots and other �en areas shall not have slopes exceeding 3•1 A minimum three (3) foot berm is required. E. Perimeter Landscaping; Standards. (1) In order to achieve landscapina which is appronriate in scale with the size of a building and sitie the minimum standards d�A1V: (a) One (1) tree for ever� one thousand (1 000) sguare feet of total building floor area or one (1) tree for every fifty (50) feet of site perimeter whichever is greater A minimum of rhirty (30) percent of the trees required will be coniferous. e • • -� -- •- • -• • - - e - • . - • � •° _� _e . �.�- -- �. �• - • M4. % li _ 9 . _ . _. ,. ii � " • 1 s ' _ �q. n . 9 ' '. �l. _ _ ' • 4 .tt_�- _ • _ ��! < �.s s � � � • - _ - 0 � ' � . s � • . � e_ •� ' _ , �.: e' ._ �"� ..� . i+-. • •. �!• li-�_t-_ •� � • �. • � .� S►- ' LL-�_ • �..'_ __ � 1- •� - �. Il-. • �_-_.� . �• • • � q _• - ! •- iSl � • �' . �.• ' ' - -!• - l 4_ tl..11 • �_" " � _ � • • �. • • ' � �i ! � - - �. � • " -- o • • --�..i. } - -• - • _ � • � _ 4 •. . • . � • . � � ., • � . _ i . � • - • � _ � _ � • • - • � - __p � _ - 0 1 1 _ � • - 4 � . - • , g � . _ • - • .. } � v � . • _ • • • - • � • • • � - • . _ } s e • - . i � � - ' �• i.. ' • �. - • ' . � • : • - • - .! � _ • - •_ • •-• - - y • .� �� . -� { - - • _ • - • uninterrupted parking stalls. 12.15 t2) Al1 landscaped islands shall contain a minimum of one hundred eighty (180) square feet with a minimum width of five (5) feet and shall be provided with deciduous shade trees or ornamental or evergreen trees plus grotind cover mulch and/or shrubbery in addition to the minimum landscapg requirements of this ordinance Parking area landscaping shall be contained in planting beds bordered by a six t6) inch raised concrete curb. 13) Trees shall be provided at the rate of one t ee for each fifteen (15) surface parking spaces �rovided or a fraction ther of. G Screening and Buffering Standards (1) where the parcel abuts park or residentially zoned property there shall be provided a landscaped buffer which shall be constructed in the following manner: (a) A screening fence or wall shall be constructed within a five (5) foot strip along the property line(s) abuttina the park or residentially zoned property Said fence or wall shall be constructed of attractive permanent finished materials compatible with those used in he principal structure, and shall be a minimum of six (6) feet high and a maximum of eight (8) feet high. Chain link fences shall have non-wooden slats when used for screening purposes; or � � ._.s �• --� -- .- .� s_ -. _ --� _ .. _ . .�. ,. .� . �- � �._•_ • _� - -a. .- •- .�-• . . . .- - • . •._.�-�-__ . - . :r .- -� �- �- • - . . - �. .- • - - . • _ � - - �- -.�__ -. --�_�• ._� �. --� i- .- t�- �-. r �_-_ -�• �-_ �_ ._. .� �-.. - - . .- . . . -. -. �- - �. .... _.�_ �- . � . - - . •- - . ._�. . . - .. - -- - .. . . -- _.. . -. . - - .- _ . -. . . ._ . �- -- • -�. - . . . . -- (2) Al1 loading docks must be located in the rear or s�� yards and be screened with a six (6) foot high minimum solid screen�ng fence if visible from a pub��c right-of-way or if within thirty (30) feet of a residential use or districts. - - ... . . - - - - . . . . . .- . . - - -- -. .�, - . . - - - . . . . - .- . ..- - . _. -s -- - -. - .. �12.16`` H. Credit for Large Trees - • _ � .{��° • -e� . -• • - e_� -- � s •- -• -o e • - - - • - � - • - • • - - - _ � • .� .. � - - • • - _ � • ' - • - - - ' ' �.' • • � ' o • - - • _ • ' - • �. • - ' • � - �_- ' e • • - • ' � . _ - e - - • - • � s ° • -�� -• I. Credit for Existinq Trees The total number of required new over-story trees may be reduced bv the retention of xist'ng over-story trees provided that the following conditions are sa � fied 11) Such trees are four (4) inches or greater in caliper measured six (6) inches from soil lev l. (2) For each existing treP meeting the rec�uirement two trees as required in section D above may be deleted. - (3) Proper precautions to protect trees during development shall be indicated on grading plans submitted for plan review Such precautions are outlined in section J These orecautions shall be included in the landscape surety. J. Irrigation. • ' • • s • . � n� q e � . _ r.� . �.+� . .. ' • e ._ � . �. .._�_� e •-• ee - .. • •: - �t+ • - . • ' �" }_ o � . . _� - • • .. � • ' ' � � . .. � ' ' S. - _ • ' tl - .� - � _ � - - . ! • �. - ' ��_ ._ ' • . � � _ . � . � • - � lt -- - - � . • ' • - • • • • • - ' � � : • - ' e _ - • • -��_ -.� --_�._�• • • - • �_ •- • . -• •� .1.' • • � - • • � - - • • • • - • •- -- -• • -- • • • - • •- • _ -• • • • • � • • � � ' • ' • � • � - • ' - • • --�'• _ - _ .�• o' -• • a ' '.� - • _ _ � � • • ti. � _. 4 � - � _ • - - • . i ' ' _ } . a - • • - • • • ' � - • • - 1 ' - �.. �."" • • � - • • ' ' �_ • � . •_� • � - • • 12.17 (f) Plantinas shall no be placed so a to obGrruct lin of �iqht at street corn s and driveways. (Q) No nlant materials r aching a mature h ight of twen y 20) feet or more shall be planted within a twenty-five (25) foot lineal �ath of the cent rline of an overhead power line. (2) The ano�icant sha11 in�r�ll all land �pe matPr;alc Wi h;n on year: but shall have hr (3) years within which to ins all the recruired landscaning if the following minimum standards are me : (a) First year ((1)) Al1 arading �s completed including installation of berms. _((21) The reauired irrigation system is installed. ((3)) Areas to be seeded and/or odd � are installed 1(4)) Screenina for adjacent residential areas is installed, if required. ((5)) Twenty-five (25) percent of the reuuir � over- �tory trees are installed. ((6)) Twenty-five (25) per�P.,t of the perimeter landscap�'�,rg �c ;n�ra1�P.� . - . . - Itl)) The remainder o th p�rimeter lands aping �� nsta��?d. ��r��c ��c�»r��r.�v.s-ti sf-r-:r--:�-rsx��rr� ss � 1 •' '_� • ' '� . _�� _• • ' • � - - - - • (cl Third year Anv remainina landGra�ing shall be installed. L. Maintenance. s- . ..- . - .- - .. . - . -. - - . .-_. --_ ._ ._. . . - . ... . • - - . �-. . -. -. . ..- . - _ - .. _ - . �_ _ �. � � _ a- . • • - . . -. - _. - .- . - �- - • -. - . ._ s. - .a• - �- . ..- . - . - -. - --. . .- -. -. .- - . _.- - . - - . - _ 12.18 • - • • - .� . L�. - • - - • - • • ' �� - • • �_ _ ' • � } - ' � • ' . • � c �. l� - (2) Screen fence� and wall whi h a in disrepair shall be r�paired. ' . . .. - .- . ..- � -. ._.- -- . - .�• �� - • . .� 7. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS A. Parking Facilit�es. Al1 driveway�_par inq ar�as and load�ng docks shall be surfaced with blacktop concrete or other hard surfa e material approved by the CitX. B. Exterior StoraQe. The exterior storage of materials motor vehicles and eq�ipment shail comAly with Section 205 17 O1 C(11) (Ref Ord 995) C. Refuse. Al1 waste materials refuse or garbage shall be contained in closed containers as required under the chapter entitled "Waste Disposal" of the Fridley ity Code. D. �creenincr. _ --� 1• • s -- •_ �o =4..�. �.. i-Qi. �l-• • � i � 6 . ' - f i. � � � . - . � � - �SO i' � • i e � E � i.�. �_ - • • � � • - � • • � � � ! • � � � _ �.� • � � - � • � • � • � • . • ! u . � - _ • ' � . . ' • � � � • • _ } • - �(_ . � � - � i • _ � _ � � - . � _ .. • _ _ _�j� •. . _�_ � • • O' • • ' • • � ' - � � _ _ u . • � ' � • � . � 0 • ' ' ..�. � �. • _ - � - � - � � -. � • � . � • ' � �1 " 1 � 2 • ` • �_ ' ! � ' _! � ' " �! _ ' �.' . � _ • � • ' - . �.- .. � - � _ _ _ . ' ' 4 • • e __ -.� _ o e m • _ - • • - _ • � ' - �t _ - o • - � ' • ' ' 4 - � • • - • t - ' • � - � _ • � • - - ` � � - � • • • - � ! ! - 1_� . • • � - 12.19 (3) Al1 trash or garbage storage receptacles must be located 'n the rear or side y�rds and be totally screened from view from any nublic right-of-way Provisions must be taken to protect �creening from vehicle damaQe. (4) All raw materials supplies finished or semi-finished products and equipment not including motor vehicles shall be stored within an enclosed building or be screened on all sides from view from a publ�c right-of-way or an adjoining nroperty of a different district by a fence or other a�proved screen which extends two (2) feet above the highest item to be stored with the height of the fence not to exceed eight (8) feet exc�t where materials and equipment are being used for construction on the premises. (5) Motor vehicles necessary to the operation of the principal use, may be stored without screening only in the permitted rear vard area if they are not readily visible from a Dublic right of way adjacent residential use or district a residential use or district across a public right of way or a public park (Ref Ord. 995 (6) All roof equipment except alternate energy devices must be screened from public view unless the equipment is designed as an integral part of the building and is compatible with the lines of the building as determined by the City (Ref Ord 960 E Drainage And Grade Recauirements - -. . . ..- _ .- -_ _• -. � �� . . . _ __ _ - . - - _ �--' _ . . ._�. . . .-. - . . . � - _.. - - t� � ��_� - - _ . . _�_ �-. . _.- �_ . .- - .�- . s � � - .- �. .� .. . - .. - -. . . . _.- (2) The City may specify a minimum finished ground grade for any structures in order to allow proper drainage and corLnection to Citv utilities. F. Maintenance. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to ensure that -� - - . . ._ . . .. . . . . - .- - .�.. - . - �- •� . ..- . .. . _ .- -. � .... - . � - - . -.. - . .- � �-. -- . - - - . .. ._ . . - . - . . - . .- -_ . -. . -_ . . ... . . �- - . - - .- - . . . -. - ! 2.20 (2) The protective surface on exterior walls of a building shall be maintained in good repair and provide a sufficient covering and protection of the structural surface against its deterioration. Without limiting the generality of this Section, a protective surface of a building shall be deemed to be out of repair if- (a) More than twenty-five percent (25�) of the area of anX plane or wall on which the protective surface is paint is blistered, cracked, flaked, scaled or chalked away, or Lb) More than twenty-five percent (25�) of the pointing of anx brick or stone wall is loose or has fallen out. (3) Every yard and all structures, walls, fences, walks, steps, driveways, landscaping and other exterior development shall be maintained in an attractive, well kept condition. 14) The boulevard area of a premises shall be properlx maintained. groomed and cared for by the abutting oropertv owner. G. Essential Services. (1) Connection is required on each lot served by City sanitarx sewer. �2) Connection is re�uired on each lot served by a City water line. (Ref. Ord. 960) PASSSD AND ADOPTSD BY TFIE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TIiIS DAY OF , 1997. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: 12.21 NANCY J. JORGENSON - MAYOR MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: April 23, 1997 � TO: William Bums, City Manager�'� FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Resolution Modifying Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 and Cceat�g Tax Increment Financing Distric# No. 16, Linn Property Hc�ldings BACKGROUND The City Gouneil kteld a pub{ic bea�ng on �►pril 14, 1997 regarding a request by Stev� Linn of Linn Property F�c�l�iit�gs �v ct�eate �#ax ir�cremer�t �in�nang district and add a 1.� acre site to th� City's redevsloprn�t program. The developer is proposing to constntd an 8,000 square foot retaii r�au and nefurbish the forr�er Dick's iNheel ar�d Tire bu�ding iR�o a Goodyear $ervi�e C�Rter at the naFthea�t comer of 57�' Avenue and Main �bree�t. The� HRA at its April 10, 1997 meeting approved a resolution recommending the modification to the redevelopment program and creation of T1F District #16; however, the motion to authorize staff to prepare a development contract failed on a tie vote. The item will be discussed again at the HRA's May 8, 1997 meeting when all members will be in attendance. REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The proposed district is a redevelopment district which has a maximum duration of 25 years. The TIF district would indude the five parcels proposed for redevelopment. it is also proposed that the modi�cation to the project area include the existing and proposed right-of-way for 57�' Av�;nue from.Main Street to approximateiy 300 feet east of University Avenue. 13.01 Resolution for TIF #16 April 23, 1997 Page 2 The purpose of the expansion of the project area is to enable the HRA to contribute toward the 57'h Avenue reconstruction plan. At this time, i# is contemplated that the HRA would contribute 50% of the street light and landscaping/irrigation costs for the project. The TIF plan estimates that $513,000 of increment will be generated over 20 years. About $25,000 per year of increment is estimated. The total project cost estimated by the developer is $1,566,200. The estimated market value of the Goodyear Service Center is $432,000 (versus the existing $293,000), and the new strip mall's market value is estimated to be $518,700. The County and the School District have been properly notified, and there have been no comments made to-date. The Appeals Commission at its April 9, 1997 meeting recommended approval of several variances subject to several stipulations. The variance and the resolution authorizing creation of the district and modification to the redevelopment project area will be on the April 28, 1997 City Councif agenda. There will be no LGA/HACA loss to the City as a result of creating the district. The proposed tax increment financing plan elects the "local contribution" instead of the LGA/HACA loss. The local contribution equais 5% of the tax increment generated from the district. It is estimated that about $513,000 of increment would be generated over 20 years. The 5% contribution, or approximately $25,000, would come from unrestricted monies from the City or the HRA. The HRA has adequate unrestric#ed funds to provide the local contribution. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the modification to the redevelopment area and creation of TIF District No. 16. B D/dw M-97-191 13.02 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 AND TiiE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, lp, 11, 12, 13, 14 AND 15 TO REFLECT INCREASED PROJECT AREA AND INCREASED PROJECT COSTS WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, AND CREATING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 16 AND ADOPTING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Fridley, Minnesota {the "City"), as follows: Section l. Recitals. 1.01. It has been proposed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority") that the Council modify, approve and adopt a Modified Redevelopment Plan relating to Redevelopment Project No. 1 to reflect increased project area and increased project costs, pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to time. 1.02. It has been further proposed by the Authority that the Council modify, approve and adop� �iodified Tax ia�crernent F3nancing Plans for Tax Increcnent Financing Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6,7, 9, 10, 11, 32, 13, 14 and 15 {the °Existing Ti�'Districts") to reflect increased project area and increased project cests within Redevelopment Project No. �, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 througl� �469.179, inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to titne. 1.03. It has been further proposed by the Authority that the Council create proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 and approve and adopt a proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto, pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended and supplem�nted from time to time. 1.04. The Authority has caused to be prepared, and this Council has investigated the facts with respect thereto, a Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 and Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Existing TIF Districts to xeflect increased project area and increased project costs within Redevelopinent Project No. 1 and a proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 16, defining more precisely the property to be inclueled, trie public costs to be incurred, and other matters relating thereto. 1.05. The Council has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the modification, approval and adoption of the 13.03 Page 2 - Resolution No. Modified Redevelopment Plan, the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan. 1.06. The Council hereby determines that it is necessary and in the best interests of the City and the Authority at this time to modify, approve and adopt the Modified Redevelopment Plan and the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans to reflect increased project area and increased project costs within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and to create proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 and to approve and adopt the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto. Section 2. Findinqs. 2.01. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the assistance to be provided through the adoption and implementation of the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan are necessary to assure the development and redevelopment of Redevelopment Project No. 1. 2.02. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan conform to the general plan for the development and redevelopment of the City as a whole in that they are consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. 2.03. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development and redevelopment of Redevelopment Project No. 1 by private enterprise and it is contemplated that the development and redevelopment thereof will be carried out pursuant to redevelopment contracts with private developers. 2.04. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. l, the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Ex� sting TIF Districts and the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 16, by the City is intended and, in the judgement of this Council, its effect will be to promote the purposes and objectives specified in this Section 2 and otherwise promote certain public purposes and accomplish certain objectives as specified in the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan. 2.05. The Councii hereby finds, determines and declares that proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 constitutes a"tax increment financing district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 9, and further constitutes a type of 13.04 Page 3 - Resolution No. "redevelopment district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, S�ction 469.174, Subdivision 10. 2.06. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the proposed development or redevelopment in proposed Tax Incrernent Financing District No. 16, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. 2.07. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the City made the above f3ndings stated in this Section 2 and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in the Modified Redevelopment Plan, the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans, the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan and Exhibit A of this Resolution. Section 3. Modification, Approval an.d Adoption of Modified Redevelopment Plan. 3.01. The modifications to the Redevelopment Plan relating to Redevelopment Project No. 1 reflecting increased project area and increased project cost� are hereby approved and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley. Section 4. M�dification, Approva� and Adopt��n :�f MQ�ifi�d Tax Increment Financinq Pla�s. 4.01. The modifications to the Tax IncrEment Fin�ncing P�ans for the Existing TIF Districts reflecting increased project area and increased project costs within Redevelopment Project No. 1 are hereby approved and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley. Section 5. Creation of Tax Increment Financina District and Adoption of Tax Increment Financing Plan_ 5.01. The creation of proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the �roposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto are hereby approved and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley. Section 6. Election of Citv Contribution. 6.01. The Council hereby elects to make a qualifying local contribution equal to 5.00% of the tax increment genera�ed from Tax Increment Financing District No. 16, as set forth in Minnesota Statutes 273.1399. Section 7. Filing of Plans. 7.01. Upon approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax 13.05 Page 4 - Resolution No. Increment Financing Plan (collectively the "Plans"), the City shall cause said Plans to be filed with the Commissioner of Revenue. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY THIS DAY OF , 199 . ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK P NANCY JORGENSON - MAYOR 13.06 Page 5 - Resolution No. EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. The reasons and facts supporting the f indings for the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 (the "TIF District") as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3, are as follows: l. Finding that the TIF District is a"redevelopment district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes. � The TIF District consists of five parcels of land which qualify as a"redevelopment district" u�der Minnesota Stat�tes, Sectior� 469.174, Subdivision 10. 2. Finding that the proposed development or redevelopment, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, tlze use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The redevelopment project consists of the acquisition and renovation of "Dick's Tire" to a Goodyear Tire and Service Center. The current facility is outdated, in substandard condition, and in need of renovation, including roof, floors, ceilings and electrical and mechanical systems. Contemporaneously, a new retail center will be constructed on adjacent property consisting of two parc�ls with hou�es to be acqui�ed a�d demalished and a vacant �ot. T�e redeveloper could not procee8 without TIF Assistance as it is not eEOnomieally feasible to do so. eity staff has determined that the increased market value �ealiz�d from a project receiving no TIF Assistance would be less than the increased market value (les� the present value of tax increment rec�ipts) fram a project utili�ing TIF Assistance (see attached Schedule 1). 3. Finding that the TIF P1an conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The �uthority and Council have reviewed the TIF Plan and determined that it conforms to the future land use plan of the City. 4. Finding that the TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development or redevelopment of Redevelopment Project No. 1 by private enterprise. The project (rehabilitation of existing 8,640 square foot Dick's Tire facility and construction of 7,980 square foot retail center) is located within the proposed TIF District and could potentially provide approxi�ately 1� ;0 20 additional employment opportunities. In addition, the project will increase the City's tax base by approx. $524,400. 13.07 Page 6 - Resolution No. I. II. SCHEDULE 1 TO EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. REDEVELOPMENT WITHOUT TIF ASSISTANCE: The TIF District includes two small vacant parcels, two single family residences and an 8,640 square foot vacant commercial building. Under this scenario only the commercial building would be rehabilitated. Estimated Market Value Original Market Value Increased Market Value REDEVELOPMENT WITH TIF ASSISTANCE: The TIF District includes the same two vacant parcels, two single family residences and 8,640 square foot vacant commercial building. Under this scenario a new 7,800 square foot commercial center would be constructed in addition to the rehabilitation of the vacant commercial building. Estimated Market Value Original Market Value Increased Market Value Less Present Value of the Tax Increment Generated @ 8.50%, 26 tax increment years (See attached Exhibit 1) Net Increased Market Value \FRiDLEY\TIF\LICOUNCZ.RES 13.08 $ 564,900 $ 426,300 $ 138,600 $ 950,700 $ 426,300 $ 524,400 S 262,000 $ 262,400 EXHIBIT 1 TO SCHEDULE 1 ANNUAL PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS Originai Estimated Captured Estimated Tax Tax 8.500% Date Tax Tax Annual Ca aci Ca aci Ca aci increment Present Value Dec-97 Dec-98 Dec-99 Dec-2000 Dec-2001 Dec-2002 Dec-2003 Qec-2004 Dec-2005 Dec-2006 Dec-2007 Dec-2008 Dec-2009 Dec-2010 Dec-2011 Dec-2012 Dec-2013 Dec-2014 Dec-2015 Dec-2016 Dee-2017 Dec-�018 Dec-2019 Dec-2020 Dec-2021 Dec-2022 Dec-202� Dec-2024 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 �9,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 1�;610 19,610 19,610 43, 732 43, 732 43,732 43, 732 43,732 43, 732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43, 732 43,732 43,732 43, 732 43,732 43, 732 43, 732 43,732 43, 732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 �3,732 43,732 43,732 43, 7�2 '��(U1 13.09 0 0 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24, 9 22 2�,122 ��, �Za 24,122 24,122 24, 9 22 24,122 24,122 24,'122 24,122 .� 0 0 28,505 28, 505 28,505 28, 505 28, 505 28,505 28, 505 28, 505 28,505 28, 505 28,505 28,505 28, 505 28,505 28,505 28, 505 28,505 28,�05 28,505 28,505 28,505 28,505 28,505 28, 505 28,505 28,505 0 0 23,641 21, 753 20,016 18,417 16, 946 15,592 94,347 13,201 12,147 11,176 10,284 9,462 8, 707 8, 011 7, 371 6,783 6,241 �,742 5,284 4,862 4,473 4,116 3,787 3,485 3,206 2,950 741 129 262 000 SECTION XVII TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 16 (LINN PROJECT) Subsection 17.1. Statement of Obiectives. See Section I, Subsection 1.5. Statement of Objectives. Subsection 17.2_ Modified Redevelopment Pla-�_ Se� Sec�io�� I, Subsections 1_2. through 1_15. Subsection 17.3. Parcels to be Included_ The boundaries of Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 are described on �he attached Ex'::ibit XVI �-A ar:d illustrated on E};hi�:_: Xv_r�-3. Subsection 17.a. Parcels in Acquisition_ Tne Authority may publicly acquir� and reco:!vey any or all ot �he ^�r�� s;_� ^�-,_ Increment Financing Distr; ct No. 15 idei:ti�ied o~ ;�;�_� µ;� �_�:,��a Exhibi� XVII-A. The �ollowing are cor_ditions under whicn proper�ies no� designa`ed to be acquired may �� acauirec a; a_��u�-� eG��: (1) The City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase irom willing sellers ir_ order to achieve the objectives of the Tax Increment Financing Plan; and (2) Such acquisition will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. Subsection 17.5. Development Activitv for which Contracts have been Signed_ As of the date of adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan, the City intends to enter into a Development Agreement with Linn Property Holdings, L. L. C. for the activities discussed below. Subsection 17.6. Specific Development Expected to Occur. At this time it is anticipated that the rehabilitation of the existing 8,640 square foot Dick's Tire facility with an estimated market value of $432,000, and the construction of an approximate 7,980 square foot retail center with an estimated market value of $518,700 will occur in 1997. Subsection 17.7_ Prior Planned Improvements. The Authority shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of district e��largement with a listing of all properties within Tax Increment Financing District No_ 15 for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen {18) months immediately preceding 17 - 1 13.10 approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan by the Authority. The county Auditor shall increase the original tax capacity of Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 by the tax capacity of each improvement for which the building permit wa� issued. If said listing does not accompany the aforementioned request or notice, the absence of such listing shall indicate to the County Auditor that no building permits were issued in the eighteen (18) months prior to the Authority's a.pproval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan_ Subsection 17.8. Fiscal Dispa�-ities The C,ouncil hereby elects the method of tar, increment computation set fo�th in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subcivision 3, clause (a) if and when commercial/industrial development occurs with Tax Increment Financing District No. 16_ Subsectior. 17.9. Estimated Public Im�rovement Costs_ The estimated costs associated with Redevelopment Pro;ec� No_ 1 are listed in Section I, Subsection� 1_� and 1.10_ Subsection 17.10. Estimated Amount oi Bonded Indebtedness. It is anticipated tha� $450,000 of bonded indebtedness could be incurred with respect to this portion of Redeveiopment Project No. 1_ Purs�aant to Ninnesota Statutes, S�ctior_ �59.178, Subdivision "�, General Obligation ^ax Inc�ement 3onds may be usec as required to amortize the costs identified in Section I, Subsections 1.9 and 1.10. The City reserves the ri�.ht to pay for all or part of the activities listed in Section I, SubSections 1.9. and 1.10. relating to Redevelopment Project No. 1 as tax incr�me�ts are generated and become available. Subsection 17.11. Sourc�s of Revenue. The costs outline� in Section I, Subsection 2.9. will be fina�ced through t�e annual collection of tax increments. Subsection 17.12. Estimated Ori inal and Captured Tax Capacities. The tax capacity of all ta�cable property in Tax Increment Financing District No. 16, as most recentiy certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota on January 2, 1996, is estimated to be �19,610. The estimated captured tax capacity of Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 upon completion of the proposed improvements on January 2, 1998 is estimated to be $24,122. Subsection 17.13. Tax Increment_ Tax increment has been calculated at approximately $28,504 upon completion of the improvements assuming a static tax capacity rate and a valuation increase of zero percent (Oo) compounded annually. Subsection 17_14. Tax Capacitv Rate. The estimated 1996/1997 total tax capacity rate is estimated at 118.1680. 17 - 2 13.11 Subsection 17.15. Type of Tax Increment Financinq District_ Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 is, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, a Redevelopment District. Subsection 17.16. Duration of Tax Increment Financinq District. The duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 is expected to be twenty five (25) years from receipt of the first tax increment. The date of receipt of the first tax increment is estimated to b� Julv, 1999. Thus, it is estimate� that Tax Increment Financing District No. 16, including any modificatior.s for subsequent phases or other changes, ��tould terminate in the year 2024. Subsection 17_17. Estimated Impact on Other Taxinq ��t.risdictions The estimated im�a�� oi: other ta}-�n u�, ;, _, assumes construction would have ,- ` g�'��s�ic��.� � T�x Increment Financing Dis�rict�Nourl6d wlfhthe construction i a resul� of tax increment financi:�g, �.1e ;m�act is $0 to o�he_ �nti; ies . Notwithstanding �he fa�� ,�at tpe fiscal impac� on ;�:,_� o�he�- taxing jurisdictions is $0 due �o the ract tha� the rinancing would not have occurred without the assistance of the City, the attached Exhibit XVII-E reflects the estimated impact �` �ax Increment Financing Dis�ric` Ive. lo i� the "but �or" `'�- J�as r.o� ��t _ - �� _ Subsection 17.18. Election of Citv Contribution. The Council hereby elects a qualifying local contribution equai to five percent (5_OOo) of the tax increment generated from Tax Increment Financing District No. 16, as set forth in Minnesota Statutes 273.1399. Subsection 17.19. Modification of Tax Increment FinancinQ District and or Tax Increment Financina Plan. On April 28, 1997, no modifications to Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 or the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefore has been made, said date being the date of initial approval and adoption thereof by the City Council. \FRIDLEY\TZF\TIFPLAN.DOC 17 - 3 13.12 EXHIBTT XVII-A PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. i6 AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED APRIL 28, 1997 PIN 23-30-?4-23-0028 PI�' 23-30-24-23-0029 PIN 2�-30-24-23-0030 PIN 23-30-24-23-0031 PIN 23-30-2:-23-003?_ XVII-�-1 13.13 �� aa.t�S u�� ------ -1 ' � ,� ` � - � � � � � i --- � �aa.t�s i � ^ - `r' -- � �--- �� I � �_ �� . �� anuany ��ts.taniu� � �V � �S P�� = �_ :� �� z/1 z �= �= � � a � � � �= � ��S Pu� �� • p �w �� I � ' � �� f� �� e �-■ � �« � �� ■ , � ��■ ` ■ � ■ � �� ■ � � �^ a � � � � ■ � � 1 � � �« e � �- __ � 13.14 �_ �- �= ��N anuan�' �V EXHIBlT XXVII - C ASSUMPTIONS Original Market Value Land sq_ ft. land M.V. Sldg M.V. Total M.V. 23-30-24-23-0028 5,600 15,400 0 1�,400 23-30-24-23-�29 11,�0� 20,400 26,500 4fi,900 23-30-24-23-0030 11,200 20,400 35,500 55,900 23-30-24-23-0031 28,000 92,400 209,000 293,400 23-30-24-23-0032 __ 5,600 14,700 0 14,700 61,500 163,300 263,000 426,300 Original Tax Capacity 1996/1997 Tax Rate Administrative Fees inflation P.V. Rate Estimated Market Value New Construction Rehabilitation Cstimated Tax Capacity Estimated Taxes Construction Valuation Taxes Payabie _�,, 4.600% 7,980 sq. ft. @ 8,640 sq. ft. @ 4.600°0 16,620 sq. ft. @ 1997 1998 1999 65.00 per sq. ft_ 50.00 per sq. ft_ 3.11 per sq. ft_ 13.15 12/01 /97 518,700 432, 000 426,300 19,610 1.181680 l 0.00Q% 0.000% 8.500% 950, 700 43, 732 51,677 EXHIBIT XXViI - C - CASH FLOW Original Esfimated Captured Estimated Less: Estimated Tax Tax Tax Tax Admin Tax Date Ca acity Capacity Capacity increment __ Costs __ increment 06/0 9 /97 12/01 l97 06/01 /98 12/01 /98 06/01 /99 12/01 /99 06/01 /2000 12/01 /2000 06/01 /2001 12/01 /2001 06/01/2002 12/01 /2002 06/01 /2003 12/01 /2003 06/01I2004 12/01I2004 06/01 /2005 12/01 /2005 06/01 /2006 12/0 i /2005 06/01 /2007 12/01 /2007 06/01 /2008 12/01 J2008 06/01 J2009 12/01 /2009 06/01 /2010 12/09/2010 06/01 /2011 12/01 /2011 06/01 /2012 12/0112012 06/01 J2013 12/09/20�3 06/0 9 /2014 12/01/2014 06/01 /2015 12/01 /2015 06/01 /2016 12/01 /2016 06/01 /2017 12/01 /2017 06/09 /2018 12/01 /2018 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 i 9,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 99,610 19,610 19,610 99,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,6i0 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 19,610 43,732 43, 732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43, 732 43, 732 43,732 43, 732 43,732 43,732 43, 732 43,732 43,732 43, 732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43,732 43, 732 43, 732 43,732 43, 732 43,732 43, 732 0 0 0 0 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 24,122 13.16 X, . r, 0 0 0 0 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 i 4,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14, 252 14, 252 14,252 94,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 '! 4,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14,252 14, 252 14,252 � 0 0 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 +,425 1,425 1,425 9,425 i ,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 0 0 0 0 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 � 2,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12, 827 12, 827 9 2,827 9 2, 827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12, 827 12, 827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 9 2,827 12,827 12,827 12,827 570 099 57 010 513 089 EXHIBIT XVII-D " BU'i' FOR " ANALYS I S The �edeveiopment project consists of the acquisition and complete renovation of the er.isting "Dick's Tire" to a Goodyear Tire and Service Center. The current facility is outdated and in subs�andard condition, in need of complete renovation, including but not limited to, the renovation of the roof, floors, ceilings and electrical and mechanical systems. Contemporaneously, a new retail center will be constructed on the adjacent property. In orde� to do so, two nouses will be acquired and demolished and replaced on th2se `U.o lots and an adjacent lot. This retail deve�opment will be congruous with the renovated tire store and increase the value of both developments. The �edevelopmenL �roject could notentialiy increase tne empleyment at the project site by fifteen to tcaen�l� paople_ In addi�-on, upon comp?e�ion oT �he r�roject, tha ;r-.:�s �ay_ base �,ail? �_ncrease by dD��O?�imateiy $52� , 400. y� Because of the su�s�.an�ial costs of acquisi�ion, �enovation and reconstruction of ti-:e existing f�cility and the acquisition, relocGtion and ciemol� t� on ro�- construction o= �ne r.ew �-etail ��Ci_=Ly, r�"1° r��iatiolp�A� could I70� DY'OCe�C� W1iP �i:1S project without the Author�ty's assistance_ XVI-D-1 13.17 EXHlBIT XVII - E ESTIMATED IMPACT OF TAX INCREMENT FiNANCING DISTRICT NO. 16 TAX __ENTITY _____ BASE ----- - - ---- --__ _ City of Fridley 27,329,921 County of Anoka 146,471,588 ISD #14 11,514,810 IMPACT ON TAX BASE ORIGINAL ESTIMATED T� TAX _CAPACITY __ CAPACITY 99,610 43,732 '19,610 43,732 19,610 43,732 IMPACT ON TAX RATE CAPTURED DISTRiCT TAX AS % ___ _CAP;,CITY_____OF TOTAL_ 24,122 0.088% 24,122 0.016% 24.122 0.209% ENTITY T'� % OF TAX TAX RATE RATE TOTAL INCREMENT _INCREASE City of Fridley 0.15242 12.9Q% 3,677 0 County of Anoka 0.30091 25.46% 7,259 0.005% ISD #14 0.66159 55.99% i 5,959 0.139% Other 0.06676 5.65% 1,610 1.18168 100.00% 28,504 Assumes construction wouid have occurred without the creation of a Tax Increment Financing District. If construction is a result of Tax increment Financing, the impact is $0. LlNN 13.18 XVI. � -+, AS MODIFIED APRIL 28, 1997 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 16 (LINN PROJECT) Acquisition and Relocation Demolition Site Preparation Administration Total Maximum Estimated Bonded Indebtedness * $270,000 $ 25,000 S 2s,000 � 55,000 $37�,000 $450,000 * This amount includes capitalized interest in an amount s�;�ficient to pay interest on the bonds from the date oi issue until �:.he date of collection of sufficient tax increment revenues to meet scheduled interest payments when due. 1 - 21 13.19 IYIEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT DIRECT�R DATE: April 24, 199� TO: WiNiam Burns, City Manager��Q FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Driveway tssues Pertaining to Linn �ompanies Project The Appeals Commi�sion recommended approval of several variances for the Linn Companies project at its April 9, 1997 meeting. One of the issues which was discussed at lengih vuas the requiremer�# io sh�re �h�e easte�y dr�vewa�r wi#h #3�urger �ng. Sta## initiated a number of ineetir�g� with fi�e �feveloper, Burger `1�Cing, the c�vmer �f �e Burger King property (Burger King leases from Mr. Biglow who owns the properly), and Holiday Companies. As a result o# the m�tings, there t�as been some progress in resolvi�g the driveway locations; hc�+vever, tfiere is sfill disagre�ment with Holiday Plus reg�rdirx,� the atignrr�ent af its driveway. Given these �ircximstances, staff:is suggesting modifications to stipulation #� from the Appeals Commission action regarding the driveway issue. A minor amendment to stipulation #7 is also proposed regarding future assessments. • : _� ' _ �: � r. = : ' � �' ' After the Appeals Commission meeting, the petitioner prepared a plan which combines the existing easterly driveway of the Goodyear site with the westedy driveway of the Burger King site (primary exit for the drnre-through traffic). The owner of the site, Mr. Biglow, and the tenant, Burger King, have agreed to share the driveway and work out the details based on the plan the developer prepared dated April 9, 1997. Mr. Biglow and Burger King have consented to the shared driveway via verbal conversation/phone calls. If, for any reason, they refuse to sign the fegal document which permits cross access and shared driveways, it is suggested that Linn be permitted to construct his own driveway until the City/County can reconstruct 57�' ` 14.41 Driveway Issues; Linn Project April 24, 1997 Page 2 Avenue. At that time, the City/County can legally require the combination of the driveways. An amended stipulation to address these circumstances is proposed. WESTERLY DRIVEWAY FOR STRIP MALL AND GOODYEAR SERVICE CENTER The location of the driveway for the strip mall is proposed on the lot iine befinreen the strip mall and the Goodyear Service Center, 230 feet east of Main Street. The traffic study proposed that Holiday would close two existing driveways and align a new driveway across from the new Linn driveway when Holiday completes its convenience store and gas pump development. Holiday contends that this alignment is problematic for their trucks. Holiday would prefer an alignment 180 feet east of Main Street as opposed to 230 feet east to maximize the number of parking spaces and to minimize turning movements for Holiday/Applebaum trucks. Staff subsequently prepared a plan for Holiday's consideration which reorients the convenience store and gas pumps so that the driveway location at 230 feet can work. The staff plan also proposed that the convenience store and gas pumps face east toward University Avenue, thereby providing better visibility for Holiday. Holiday agreed to evaluate staff's proposal, but could not commit to accepting the location until they had adequate time for their operation employees to evaluate the plan. Dave Hoeschen from Holiday stated that he would try to obtain a definitive answer; however, stated that it typically requires four to six weeks to have a change to a facility such as this reviewed. When staff suggested that a stipulation would be proposed to require Linn to build the driveway at 230 feet east of Main Street, Hoeschen stated tha# Holiday included a clause in the purchase agreement regarding driveway and access issues. He stated that they could cancel the purchase agreement with Linn if the 230 foot distance would be problematic for thei� operation. Linn is willing to align the driveway at 180 feet, despite the fact that it poses more difficulty for larger delivery vehicles on his site. Linn wants to begin construction the latter part of May in order for an August occupancy, and is requesting the flexibility to construct the driveway at either location in order to give Holiday time to further analyze the implications of shifting the driveway 50 feet to the east. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff strongly recommends that the westerly driveway to the Linn site be construc#ed at 230 feet. The driveway at this location maximizes the distance from Main Street, and is 14.02 Driveway Issues; Linn Project April 24, 1997 Page 3 well located for truck and passenger vehicle traffic to access the strip mall and service center site. Further, there is more than enough room on the Holiday Plus site to change parking aisle locations and amend driving pattems than there is on the �inn site. Consequently, staff is recommending that stipulation #3 be changed to contain two parts to reflect the issues pertaining to the two driveways. If the City Council wishes to provide Linn the flexibifity to construct the driveway at 180 feet, another suggested stipulation is proposed. , , . .. 3a. The petitioner shall construct a shared driveway with Burger King as shown on the plan dated April 9, 1997, and execute the necessary private agreements for maintenance, cross access, and construction prior #o building permit issuance. If, for any reason, the adjacent owner refuses to consent to the shared driveway, the petitioner may construct a separate driveway under the following conditions: (1) Approval is obtained from the Anoka County Public �ll/orks Department. (2) The awner of record .of the subject parc�!! m�st c�pErate in cornbfning/ sharing the driveway wi#h traffic frorr� Burger �Cing or any other use f� #he adjacent lot to the east at the time 5�"' Avenue is reconstructed. 3b. The vvester4y driveway on 57�' Av�r��e �ha�l be constructed 230 feet east of Main Street centered on the lot line befinreen the strip mall and the Goodyear Service Center. If the City Council determines that locating the driveway at 180 feet east of Main Street is acceptable, the following is recommended: 3b. The westeriy driveway must be located 230 feet east of Main Street centered on the lot line between the strip mall and the Goodyear Service Center, unless by June 15, 1997 it is determined that the driveway can be located 180 feet east of Main Street in order to align with the driveway to Holiday Plus. Stipulation #7 is also suggested to be changed to: 7. The petitioner shall agree to pay the assessments resulting from the 57�' Avenue reconstruction plan, including extension of the storm sewer, decorative lighting, and landscaping and irrigation. 14.03 Driveway Issues; Linn Project April 24, 1997 Page 4 Staff recommends that the City Council approve the variances as outiined in the attached report, subject to the stipulations on Page 2, except for the modifications identified above in stipulations #3 and #7. B D/dw M-97-193 14.04 CITY OF FRIDLEY PROJECT SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The petitioner requests that six variances be granted to allow construction of an 8,000 square. foot retail center. The variances affect building setback, the number of parking stalls, parking setback, and drive aisle widths (see specific requests in report). The petitioner has also requested that the Housing & Redevelopment Authority provide tax increment financing assistance to reduce the acquisition, demolition, and site preparation costs necessary for the project. The adjacent retail center is proposed to be renovated into a Goodyear Tire Center (old Holiday Service Station). SUMMARY OF ISSUES: The proposed development will be 8,000 square feet in area. The tenan# or tenants are unknown at this time. Othe�- issues �elated witt� #his developrr�ent, in addition to ti�e �arian�es, include stormwater drainage, reconstruction of 57�' Avenue, tax increment financing assistance, and qua�ity of #he dev�lo�ent Many of the s#ipulaticu�s recomrner�ded sddr�s.s atl of these issues. All of the variances are within previously .gr.an#ed requests except far.the request #c� r�duce-the drive aisle width from 18 feet to 13 feet. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE APPEALS COMMISSION: - Staff recommended that the Appeals Commission recommend approval af the r�quest to �he City Council with the stipulations on pages 9 and 10 of this report. APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION: The Appeals Commission voted unanirnously to recommend approval of �he request to the City Council. The Commission voted to delete stipulations #1 and #4 and amended stipulation #2 as follows (this stipulation becomes stipulation #1 of the City Council recommer�daton): 2. The petitioner shall construct the screening fence afong the rear of the property (57�' Place) in the following manner: A six-foot high board-on-board fence with a wooded top (Fencing Sample "A") 14.05 Project Summary VAR #97-03, Steve Linn Paae 2 CITY COUNClL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission action and the following stipulations 1. The petitioner shall construct the screening fence along the rear of the property (57th Place) in the following manner: � • A six-foot high board-on-board fence with a wooded top (Fencing Sample "A") 2. The petitioner shall submit a revised grading and drainage plan complying with the engineer's comments dated April 4, 1997. r 1 I I � � � • 4. The petitioner shall submit a revised landscape plan which includes 5 evergreen trees. The landscape plan shall include underground irrigation. Parking lot screening shall consist of a tightly-planted hedge or a low rock face block wall matching the building. 5. The building design shall be that indicated on plans dated March 14, 1997. This includes: a. Standing seam metal roof, green in color, flashing to also be green. b. Green canopies over the glass store fronts c. Green glazed tile inserts d. Accent building lighting, brown tone in color. Lights shall be approved by staff prior to building permit issuance. e. Light tan smooth concrete block with darker rock face block base. The grout color shall be different than the block color. 6. Tenant signage shall be individually, internally lit letters. Signage shall be located on the sign band indicated on the drawing, A3, dated March 14, 1997. If more than two tenants, a comprehensive sign plan shall be approved by the City Council prior to issuance of sign permits. 7. �#e-a��' . See cover memo. 14.06 Project Summary VAR #97-03, Steve Linn Page 3 Petition For: Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: Size: Topography: Existing Vegetation: Existing Zoning/Platting: Availability of Municipal Utilities: Vehicular Access: PROJECT DETAILS To reduce the building setback from the public righ#-of-way from 35 feet to 16 feet; To reduce the number of required parking stalls from 54 to 48 stalls; To reduce the hard surface setback from the public right-of- way from 20 feet to 3 feet; To reduce the hard surface setback from the building from 5 feet to 0 feet; To reduce the finro-way drive aisle width from 25 feet to 24 feet and to reduce the one-way drive aisle width #rom 18 feet to 13 feet, to atlow the construction of an 8,000 square foot retail center 214-218 57"' Place N.E. �ots 2-7, Slock 8, City View Additior� 33,600 square feet; .77 acres Mostly flat Sod, some trees C-2, General Business; City View Addition, 1887 Located in 57"' Avenue 57"' Avenue and Main S#reet 14.07 Project Summary VAR #97-03, Steve Linn Page 4 Pedestrian Access: N/q Engineering Issues: Comprehensive Planning Issues: Availability of storm sewer; Reconstruction of 57�' Avenue The Zoning and Comprehensive Plans are consistent in this location. Public Hearing Comments: To be taken ADJACENT SITES: WEST: Zoning: M-2, Heavy Industrial Land Use: Multi-tenant industrial SOUTH: Zoning: EA�T.: Zoning: NORTH: Zoning: Site Planning Issues: C-3, General Shopping Ctr Land Use: Retail G2, Genera! Business Land Use: Retail S-1, Hyde Park Land Use: Residential DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The petitioner requests that six variances be granted: 1. To reduce the building setback from public right-of-way from 35 feet to 16 feet; 2. To reduce the number required parking stalls from 54 to 48; 3. To reduce the hard surface setback from the public right-of-way from 20 feet to 3 feet; 4. To reduce the hard surface setback from the building from 5 feet to 0 feet; 5. To reduce the two-way drive aisle width from 25 feet to 24 feet; and 14.08 Project Summary VAR #97-03, Steve Linn Page 5 6. To reduce the one-way drive aisle width from 18 feet to 13 feet. If approved, the variance would allow the construction of an 8,000 square feet re#ait center. The tenant or tenants for the center are unknown at this time, pending �pproval of the variance request. SITE DESCRIPTION/HISTORY The proposed development site is comprised of six platted lots or three tax parcels and is located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Main Street and 57�' Avenue. 57t'' Place abuts the north property line of the subject property. While the zoning is G2, General Business, the parcels have been previously used as residential properties. Starting from the west, the properties are addressed as 214, 216, and 218 - 57"' Place. 214 - 57th Place is currently vacant. A single family dwelling was located on the property but was demolished some years ago. 216 - 57�' Place is currently a r�ntal property. Date of its first construction is unknown; however, in 1958, a 12 foot by 22 foot addition was constructed onto the dwelling. 218 - 57"' Place was demolished by the City in 1997 after being declared a hazardous building unfit for human habitation in 1996. It had been a rental property for many ysars. Its history is as follows: 1952 - Construction of a 24 feet by 40 feet dwelfing 1953 - Construction of an � feet by '� 7#eet porc� 1954 - Con�tn�ctuan of a 20 feet by 20 feet d�tached garage 19�3 - A vari�nce #o oor�vert the �we.#t�n� ir�#o office space was denied by tMe City Cc�uracil. ANALYSIS Development Opportunities Without a Variance Prior to analyzing each specific variance request, staff thought it appropriate to provide the Comm+ssion with ir�forma#ion reg��ing the type ofi devefopment whi�h could occur without granting any variances. The subject parcel measures 140 feet by 240 feet it is surrounded on three sides by public rights-of-way (57"' Avenue, lVlain Street, 57�' Place). If the appropriate building setbacks are applied (35 feet from the public right-of- way, 25 feet from the rear lot iine), a buildable area of 70 feet by 180 feet results. If the hard surface setbacks are applied (20 feet from the public right-of-way, 5 feet from the building), it is possible to construct a 60 foot by 70 foo# building (4,200 square feet) and 30 parking spaces on #he site. This is approximately half of the proposed development. A likely use of this size would be a fast food restaurant, but the site would not have adequate room for the required 42 parking stalls. Some type of variances are required fo� development of this site. 14.09 Project Summary VAR #97-03, Steve Linn Page 6 Code Sections Section 205.14.03.C.(1) states that permitted buildings shall not be cioser to any public right-of-way than 35 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide desired front yard space for green areas and to add to the attractiveness of a commercial zone. The petitioner has requested a variance to reduce the front yard setback along 57�' Place (the rear of the building) from 35 feet to 16 feet. The building could be moved toward 57th Avenue to increase the building setback; however, this would eliminate one row of parking (16 spaces), thereby further reducing the number o# available parking stalls for the development. The variance to reduce the building setback to 16 feet is within previously granted requests. Section 205.14.05.C.(1) states that at least one parking space shall be provided for each 150 square feet of building floor area in the C-2 district. Public purpose served by this requirement is to ensure that each use has adequate off-_ street parking. The petitioner requests a variance to reduce the required number of parking stalls from 54 to 48. The required number of parking stalls was calculated by dividing the total square footage of the building, 8,090 square feet by 150 square feet, the retail parking ratio (worse case scenario). This calculation does not address storage space and offices which are calculated at a higher required ratio of 250 square feet. The number of required parking spaces, therefore, could be reduced ftom 54, depending on the specific uses of the building, i.e., 1,000 square feet of office would reduce the parking required number of spaces by 3 to 51. Staff reviewed the adjacent development in order to determine if there were additional parking spaces which could be shared befinreen the finro buildings. The proposed Goodyear building at 8,640 square feet is required to have 39 parking spaces. Thirty- one of those spaces are provided outside the building, with the remaining spaces (8) provided within each of the service bays inside the building. The City has granted a reduction in the required number of parking s#alls (102 to 13) in 1992. A variance to reduce the required number of parking stalls was also considered in 1989 for the proposed theater project at 250 Osborne Road. Section 205.14.05.D.(5).(a) states that all parking and hard surFace areas shall be no closer than 20 feet from any street right-of-way. 14.10 1 Project Summary VAR #97-03, Steve Linn Page 7 Public purpose served by this requinement is to limit visua! encroachment into neighboring sight lines and to alJow for aesthetically pleasing open areas adjacent to public right-of-ways. The petitioner has requested a variance to reduce the hard surface setback from the public right-of-way from 20 feet to 3�eet. This reduction in setba�tc occurs along the 57th Avenue and 57�' Place right-of-ways. The hard surface setback from the public right-of-way is reduced to 7 feet along the Main Street right-of-way. The City has previously granted a variance of this nature to 0 feet. The reduction in hard surface setback does reduce the available area for landscaping and stormwater retention. The petitioner, however, can construct a low wall or tightly planted hedge to provide screening of cars in the parking lot along the 57`h Avenue right-of-way. A fence will be constructed along the 57�' Place right-of-way to provide screening from the �esidential properties to the north (further discussion regarding the fence will occur later in this report). Section 205.14.05.D.(5).(d) states that a11 parking and hard surface areas shall be no closer than 5 feet from the main building. Public purpose served by#his r+equir+ement is fo eliminate damage to buildings from vehicles and to provide planting and open spaces adjacent to buildings. The variance request to reduce the harc! surface setback from the building from 5 fieet to 0 feet occurs along the no�th side of the building where the rear seniice doors are located. !n this area, the petitioner i�as also requested a variance to reduce the drive aisle width from 18 fiee# #0 13 feet This area will be used for deliveries and service vehicles. To prevent damage to the building., bollards could be installed on either side of the service doors to encourage vehicles to stay as far away as possible from the building. The City has previously granted a variance of this nature. This variance could be eliminated by reducing the building by 740 square feet. Section 205.14.05.D.(4).(b) states tfiat the parking aisle shall be a minimum of 25 feet in width for two-way traffic. Public purpose served by this nequiremer�t is #o provide adequate space to safety maneuver vehicles. The petitioner requests that a variance to reduce the two-way drive aisle from 25 feet to 24 feet be granted. This vari�nce occurs in the front parking area of the development. A one foot reduction in the driving aisle width is within previously approved requests. A 24 foot two-way driving aisle is a typical requirement in many other communities and should provide adequate maneuvering area. 14.11 Project Summary VAR #97-03, Steve Linn Paqe 8 Section 205.14.05.D.{4).(b) states that the parking aisle shall be a minimum of 18 feet in width for one-way traffic. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate space to safety maneuver vehicles. The variance to reduce the one-way drive aisle from 18 feet to 13 feet occurs at the rear of the development. This drive aisle is proposed to provide service access to the rear of the proposed building. Thirteen feet should provide adequate drive lanes for service vehicles and deliveries. The City, however, has not previously received a request of this nature. In order to increase the drive aisle width, the building again would need to be reduced. Traffic Home Depot completed a traffic study in 1996 to evaluate the impact of its store on 57tn Avenue. As a result of this development from residential to commercial, staff again hired a consultant to update the 1996 traffic study and determine the impact of the proposed development on those traffic predictions (traffic study attached). BRW determined that the proposed development will have minimal impact to the traffic numbers indicated in 1996. An increase of 80 trips per day is anticipated with the proposed development. The traffic study suggested an improvement project for 57�' Avenue. This improvement project would include reworking the median between University Avenue and the main Holiday entrance and adding additional lanes such that the roadway would increase to 5 lanes from the existing 4. It would also require closing two Holiday driveways on the south side of 57�' Avenue. A third Holiday driveway will be relocated to the east away from Main Street. These proposed improvements will reduce offset driveways and improve traffic flow along 57�' Avenue by providing left tum lanes into the various developments. As 57`h Avenue is a county/state aid highway, the County has reviewed the plans and staff met with traffic engineers from Anoka County to review the construction of the proposed development. The County has required that the proposed development share a driveway entrance with Burger King. This entrance would line up with the existing main Holiday Store entrance, thereby facilitating a future traffic control mechanism if necessary. A second driveway to the proposed retail center will be permitted, provided that it is located on the common lot line as indicated on the site plan dated March 14, 1997. 14.12 Project Summary VAR #97-03, Steve Linn Page 9 In addition to this requirement, the City will be initiating a street improvernen# pro�ect for the 1998 construction season to accomplish this improvement. The project will be a joint HRA/assessment project. Grading/Drainage The petitioner submitted a grading and drainage plan; however, as there is no storm se�r✓er available on the west end of 57`h Avenue, the grading and drainage plan at this time is incomplete. The City engineer has several comments and stipulations regarding design of the grading and drainage plan requiring it to accomr�odate future storm sewer improvements which will occur as part of the reconstruction of 57�' Avenue (see attached memo dated April 4, 1997). As a temporary solution, temporary ponding may occur in the parking lot. Storm water will not be allowed to exit onto 57`h Place as there are already drainage problems on that street. The grading and drainage plan will need to be resubmitted prior to issuance of a building permit to comply with the Engineer's comments. Landscaping The petitioner has submitted a landscape plan. The landscape plan will need to be amended to include 5 evergreen trees. The additional 5 evergreen trees will bring the proposed landscaPe plan ir�#o �campliance wi#h the district �req�irements. The petitioner will be re_quired to provide some type of screening mechanism for the parking lot along 57�' AvenUe and Main Str�et as there is tittle or no room available for landscaping. This screening will need to be accommodate�! by the use of a tow wall or a tightly planted h�dge. This landscape instatlation can occur onc� tF�e reconstruc�ion plan #�as been finalized for 57�' Avenue. Fence The petitioner is required to screen the development from the adjacent residential properties to �he north. The peti�io�er is proposing a screening f�r�ce. Staff, howev�r, discussed some type of open fence like wrought iron to allow visibility into the development. At a neighborhood meeting held March 18, 1997, it was suggested that the neighbors be surveyed to determine what their preference would be for a fence style. Three fence styles were developed for the neighbors to review (see Styles A, B, and C attached.) Staff surveyed the five neighbors dire�tly across the street from the proposed develoRment including the refurbisMed Goodyear store. Four surveys were returned. All responded that a wood fence would be the preferred choice as opposed to the open work wrought iron fence, but the vote was tied between Styles A and C. The wood fence sections would be placed befinreen the rock face block pillars spaced 20 feet apart. The rock face block pillars will be similar to that which is proposed on the building. 14.13 Project Summary VAR #97-03, Steve Linn Page 10 Building Elevations The proposed building is to be constructed of smooth concrete biock with rock faced block base with a standing seam metal roof, green in color. There will be green canopies above the glass store fronts with a sign band for individually lettered signage. Brick or glazed tile insets will be inserted into the concrete block. The grout on the concrete block should be a different color from the block itself to give the appearance of brick texture consistent with the brick Goodyear building to the east. The tile insets should also be of a different color to add variety and interest to the facade. DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. While it appears that there are several variance requests, the site was platted in 1880 and is controlled by modern, suburb, and development standards. The zoning ordinance in several instances is imposing unusual restrictions since the site is surrounded by three public streets (larger setbacks) and is platted at a shorter depth than typical. The project truly is an "urban" redevelopment project. Further, the site plan, taken as a whole, is well thought in terms of truck and customer traffic flow. The plan is consistent with the recommendations of the traffic study since the petitioner is now in the process of working with Burger King to combine adjoining driveways. Secondly, the westerly driveway is well placed as far east of the Main Street intersection as possible. A third driveway is proposed from Main Street. While located befinreen two streets (57�' Avenue and 57�' Place), the access is needed for truck traffic to easily drive to the rear of the building and then exit the site at the driveway befinreen the strip mall and the Goodyear service station. The petitioner's proposed building elevations are in response to stafPs comments early in the process. The peaked entrance feature, canopies, and accent tiles improve #he quality of the project and distinguish it as a unique development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE APPEALS COMMISSION Staff �ecommended approval of this request with the following stipulations: The petitioner shall provide canopies over the rear service doors. The canopies shall be the same color as the standing seam metal roof. The canopies shall not contain tenant signage except for the canopies facing 57"' Avenue which may contain the numerical address. 2. The petitioner shall construct the screening fence along the rear of the property (57"' Place) in the following manner: 14.14 Project Summary VAR #97-03, Steve Linn Page 11 • 7 foot high rock face block piilars spaced 20 feet on center. The rock face shall match the building and shall have a grout different than the block colar. • 6 foot high board-on-board fence with lattice work on the top finro feet; lattice shall be constructed on site and shali be of 1-inch stock material. The I�ttice shall not be prefabricated. 3. The petitioner shall submit a revised grading and drainage plan complying with the engineer's comments dated April 4, 1997. 4. The petitioner shall constn.rct a shared driveway with Burger King which is aligned with Holiday Store's main entrance. 5.. The petitioner shall construct a second driveway as indicated on the site plan dated March 14, 1997. 6. The petitioner shall submit a revised landscape plan which includes 5 evergreen trees. The Iandscape plan shall include underground irrigation. Parking lot screening shall consis# of a tightly-planted hedge or a low rock face block wall matching the building. 7. The txaildang de�ign sfiaa#i be th�t indicated �on plaras da#ed 1�tart� 1�, 1997. Tt�is includ�s: a. Standir�g seam r�etal rc�o#, green in c�r, flashing #o alsa be green. b. Green canopies over #he glass store fironts c. Green glazed tile inserts d. Accent building lighting, brown tone in color. Lights shall be approved by staff prior to building permit issuance. e. Light tan smooth concrete block with darker rock face block base. The grout color shall be different than the block color. 8. Tenant signage shall be individually, intemally lit letters. Signage shall be located on the sign band indicated on the drawing, A3, dated March 14, 1997. If more than two tenants, a comprehensive sign plan shall be approved by the City Council prior to issuance o# sign permits. 9. The petitioner shall install the required parking lot screening and pa�ticipate in the 57�h Avenue reconstruction p1an. 14.15 Project Summary VAR #97-03, Steve Linn Page 12 APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION: The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. The Commission voted to delete stipulations #1 and #4 and amended stipulation #2 as follows: 2. The petitioner shall construct the screening fence along the rear of the property (57"' Place) in the following manner: • A six-foot high board-on-board fence with a scrolled top (Fencing Sample "A") CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission concur with the Appeals Commission action and the following stipulations: The petitioner shall construct the screening fence along the rear of the property (57'h Place) in the following manner: • A six-foot high board-on-board fence with a scrolled top (Fencing Sample "A") 2. The petitioner shall submit a revised grading and drainage plan complying with the engineer's comments dated April 4, 1997. 3. The petitioner shall construct a second driveway as indicated on the site plan dated March 14, 1997. 4. The petitioner shatl submit a revised landscape plan which includes 5 evergreen trees. The landscape plan shall include underground irrigation. Parking lot screening shall consist of a tightly-planted hedge or a low rock face block wall matching the building. 5. The building design shall be that indicated on plans dated March 14, 1997. This includes: a. Standing seam metal roof, green in color, flashing to also be green. b. Green canopies over the glass store fronts c. Green glazed tile inserts d. Accent building lighting, brown tone in color. Lights shall be approved by staff prior to building permit issuance. �14.16 Project Summary VAR #97-03, Steve Linn Page 13 e. Light tan smooth concrete block with darker rock face biock base. The grout color shall be different than the block color. 6. Tenant signage shall be individually, internally lit letters. Signage shal! be located on the sign band ind'rcated on the drawing, A3, dated March 14, 1997. If more than two tenants, a comprehensive sign ptan shall be approved by the City Council prior to issuance of sign permits. 7. The petitioner shall install the required parking 1ot screening and participate in the 57th Avenue reconstruction plan. 14.17 _.�:: ; , ::. I. � � � 0 11.' ►�� ,� = , �� - li.� ♦� � �►3� � � �� • �.�� _ � ' p �'�•, �• ,.� ; • f �� i � � �. } , � � �rt � - � � �� ♦ �, . . �� "I _... .� . � . �,«- : .,.� .. :. ��:�::�re� � :�L�i -�i';:!7� �:;T ��- � o� �_ � s i � i �� w6�� ¢ O :4:1 � � at z _ _ `•' = : _ °�� Y�� '`° �� - 3 � � °a z` �!f :c� - : :� Cg _ � iEE �� f_w �M y^� � � J i �+i�F: K C�� sy�6 i�� Ss �j� e ■�a �f� a--� r ��v� ��r.E f4o ��g" �a�� e y�;� �,�-�� : •�;�� 3~ �� Ei °:4y �$ME aa � :%A�Y �;gs s�:� 6k . 1�s 3 Y y i M�°.e� t� EE. � �Se ��sssaaaS�Y$¢ s�^5g7 ;Y a� Y�� M§; 3 8�y � �;t�� ;�� ,� �`;° "�� u �Y� r��r5 � �31 '►'� z � � Xea� CYenc S�T �a: �:Za$ �_..... VAR �� 9 ; —03 Ste e Linn 1�N"1 �/13101kl� e f = 3'N 3AV HiLS R¢ i T tl113A400O 4 tl31N3� IVI�H3WM0� � NVId 311S � � � � � I '_� �� •` —_ ____ _--- ---- I �-�l�i-fi� I � � I . �� ..� .. . � � � � � .�1 , � �;�� . �: \\\\\\``��`;� �� A �� I �� \\��\ �� , \\� ��: � �� , � � � � � � \\ �A � � I y�V��V�VA �. I �\\��\��`• ; I '..k '\\�\\��\\�\ i � \\\\�� \��\ �� $ �\\� � � i ��Y � � a .�$ � `� � g # �, � I �� i� � � a 1 • t- x 3 a F� i � i�i � � r y f C Y � � / � !!! I � ■ # `t` �� "d �� I� r � �.x � � . ... �!� ��s � .y'�� .N � � -�}• � � � � � �� ° � � � i � , � �� p� : � ;¢ I '�'� � � 9 � � ,$ ;� ' �� t 6 r � � � � �; �� C ��o� a� j ;� s � � � $ �� 6 � � a�p� i: ¢� � � !� ��a � ! ! iitl �� I �j D 1 1 o-� �� l � � � 4 I � � � � �� ¢ � i�$ �� •------� ----�-- � 1 j� .1 � i< �. �il �. � o�� . r i � � c � � 14.19 fY�Y��Mwll�y r '�-N •u wvn I� I• I IR � �a F a p � �a e � � i �� ; � � f�Y • � 1� t I �� .n� �t '_ � � �# �� ! i i _ ; �� I � I � °� a � � i �1t y� R .0 ;_ -----�—�--'--- � � � � O � Q � � W � �.�. � � N � ro � Rorovp ��. ay,N�f:. t `� ' yi <-- w�ava sno� �r IS,. r . h- • tfM a :r:.��. � � �� •, �� <�� Sld �€ � � .. � i i � t.i 1 , Z j , W� ` �,� z � � � �� Q � I 1 �� = � ��' � --- --"�, ' 1"� r I � �W � W m v� � ;. � � � � ��w� � w �'" "` � _ ' � � � Z ► � � Q �� F----i � � �� N � O �� - �� cn 4 , � ,l I I.�J � � � �. � ;� �.�,, . � r :s :''� ,�'.- �. I j;n � �- � � ' .�." �:.: x« yq�X: .. . � •- I �Z� � �4 . 14.20! . ?' s*'rr . ., . -99Wi'r11+ ��' -. � Y#�'�.fa,: I - Q J � � tJ) J . .� :� � , � 0 � � �� . 0 0 M 11 s .. I . - �� - -� . Y` �'�'�r v � ��, ,Y3�� . �. . ..-:J. -.,.... . ,7?�j} � .j'=`u'�t,.;:�� .,4.t�;f�`�`:.;: � . . `h.f � rs�, y %v,, . . �� 1i �� ('�� ,.=�:� -�<�,-�-.�. .',� � �� .: � �. "`r �. � a 3 � 'v A'� � ` � �� Y � • r, e �-� �� . _i_ r 4� _/� � �� Z � ' • 1. � t :* . � . . _ ' ,3 4 f ,. zj� ..'E i� � � .. - ' �i � u � � L� .� � � ., ;� ! 1 . � f' ��.., � j � �: � . � �: � rh �r� �� „ \` . y. :.' \� � k� "� �r $ �e � \\� . \ �� ` ~ -. � �+ � �`� �v� �.� J.h r X,�� \� . � � . . � �� ~ - W � _ : . ,�� , � I I; �'°"' pJa�`'"`��r.-� � ��\ \\.,: �' w ,�� ( °� �`i � � � �� 1 S s ��'� Y��-�� \�� fu . . ''. �; �� .� �. \\�\' � \ V. � I r"�.i ��" ;,; �'`� _ ,\;\.: � �'� � z� � _�� \�� .� � �.. . .� � . i `, s ,r,� _ `� \,. �� m A-A ' ' � l\. .A-tc � " , � ,. k �, M, ' �. \ ' � � . ( � � ';s `� � � �' �� •�' � i a k � . \ � , ( � .h—eh >_ �. � . ,� �� \ ' ! � � � � -Le`s'�� - : � �A :� ' . . . 1+ 1 � . ' Q' ��'�'�"`2�c' e _ . >' � \ �. � . � �4�_ d � • � � �� - (� � . h"`e';� . i i �~'��\ i� , F' ; °�,.�� .,�_ . _ ' � �� ; �' �� a J- i k ��, �� , � � ; _ 5� _ ' � � �{ �.� � `� f W r ; � , -_ �� > � � � � a _� ;; �� , � . _ , . � ,. � _ � � � —j "_ _ , r � ��-- � \ ; �i �� w �'"�'�r.��'��= * �.�.¢o.00s_ __.._i u ' _ - - 'Q � ,� -..... , �I n � � �t . uw.a,-• .,�;a - ,;,s —�-"— s r tt �( � �� p '� � � Q N � � S :� -�# ri �C.. . . �� .�:'!. t � �' ..� . Y � � i a, Y�j R * f y3 � �"i�� ,�.,� yJ !'.�.. �' �/�_ � �"' A` " d a`^r „ S 4 �y ��'+ - Y -.� � � � � � � ! � � � �Y� ,�A '� �r��. . . �� .� I` ji K z i � �:, ��;� < � 1�� i �� it '�. _ � Q �` �� ' ;�� . � ��_ t �- < � � ��=�^Yti '�.�,.� �� .i � .��-;� _� „ • �+ .u-,n �.. _ - , �//� ��,` _=====z = _--- -- .. - . �� "; i�;�g ;V♦ �� OI�YI i�l0lsUnUO � �.. � � . ��x :� � �. --= � �� K �1 " � � �� - � I I ��' �` f � '°�` � ��\ `� ! � t �� _.:. , _ �� i . \`;; ` ' � � � � �� \\�: I � . „� � `� �:�,��:: � � I : �, �� ,;�, � � � : �.. �, , i \ `�� $� �� , }� I ��:�,r � \� \�� I � . :. _.� _ � . . �`.�� .-:. � ��\�� , � . . � � �`; - \,� �`Pc?'� .� \ � �� f I .. �� \\ `�� . . ; \ti�, - r �µ\��..: ,_ � tt� F�{-� •� �� `� 14 � -�.- � j �`� \�� -�-� \ � � ,,� j': �:: � � :�'� _ _ �1 0 � �r•c� �-------- , UO �� _'O �� -� — .�� ; � � � � i i � I � �-------�------� �-�- --r-------� � ; �. , � �------ ' ; � , i � � � �: � � .�.�r�.�,,�--� .- , � � . 4 - �. � � � 3-1 �: 1 ! ( �� i I I O ! z J , i i 0 � i � 1 � Q I !n a � m � ' MOI �. A�ID ,� , � �� z� o � ;� U � 1 ' � ' 1 :- I I � ❑ -.--- ---�-- -- ; � ; � �---=----_- --a--- ' � _�____� _� �.-� 4� .�:. 4 t � . �a-o• � `�.T �_� --------------�--�-! -, , __.. _. � t" r; � 'r' � ! �? .Y M. �' .li� 1 i!-r r`; �-, r�: T I �.� --------------------, � �Q� � �. �.�1�� ; � ---- � zofl.o , 1. i , -. ; ! �XISTiNG PA�RKI' i r � �� , ; � ' r'- � 1 � , � � � , Ij( � ro� � =EE� � 0 �i .�, .u� � �ri ��`�`i``� . `°.,BC"°'`� �`.�:'`.\' " :, • '" � n ' .�.\'` • � �� . �\` ~' .`: ; ,. � ' � , �� , Y � ! i°j� t i�a� 4 �_t � eiFK W o � p Z � � F � � i ` r� �t m� P � 8 �a �� ,�-.�� L �� «t �r �;� � � � _ t . ,. � � �; < --a � -t o .a-a �L � � 6� � � Y�; �: � � g RiY �' 2 8 �i[ 4� ; � r� : � �Y �� "x �? c= � } „ °� � � -- -i= � � +� i � ,,. ' . � i 4_ � a . . �� •= s � �p �� < � O} w ! � �� ' �� $ t yty y k��a � � 4 h �� °'' -� � � . �� s � �� . �, o► �: f� b� � �� sM �� &.,3 � �i L o �� . .: � � � � �. -- � �: VAR 4�97-03 Steve Linn Nw'�i � � � 3?13AYH1LS k � i bV3AQ000 ! � �� ' NVid �llilllll � JNlaVtlJ � � � � � � ►�� ;�',s'��i Ir,,, �� 1 � � ��V I �,• �� `��,�� \��`��\�� \ �\\�� \�\� \�� V � V A�� \�\�� \ �� ;\�\ . � \ \\\\ \ \\ \\. V� �� A `��\ �\\ �\� � �� \ -• � ,�� ► � � \�� \ � � �\�� \\\ � �� \ \ '� , I � \ � ��r�\ � � � A��V�� li��,��1� �� \\\�\�:��\ \�v i �� i�� Q�3I � �'�� t � � °� r i(' s [1 ' � � � � k ' f 1 , -- �/ � �, �_, � �, ��, '�' "� � � � <:; 1e►. �� i � �r� I (� � ` � .y �t I ti I �t- s¢� I ��d � ��.� � e!�� ! � "i �� i = , _ . � � �, � d � ..e �i °! 1' � i ,� � � � � � � f �� ' � i , � �� 'i � � I �° �1 � �^ i � � i -a i 1 ' -----o-O�--------- � � M �• O � N Q ! VAR �k97-03 St ve Linn . � rwr'�a� � _ " �' = : :=� - 8��s -�•N anv F+us : = x Ch Y� � : : :� __: �'�u�'3 �,,aoo, � �„+�,r� Q o�; ` - '.� �,- � � us� - � SNOIlVA3l3 � � � ��,. �� n� 4 F ��e S � � Q a F Y a � ��i �� g � ��}�� y Eei'f8i: �: F 5� �� J C 7 A J JC J� L - n� H� �� Ea O^ W G 7 NpJ U W t S' N • �k � � „} �: i i � 1 � ( 5� t �� Q � r � � � z � < � W V • • S� o� z „ O � � �• m� . � �ti��\ ti � �g`� • R � � a \ ^ 1 . �.��.\ . � \ \\�`' ``�� • 1 i �.� ' ,C C♦ .0 8♦ `�'..� \ \1\ . `,�` ,r ,: � ;�::� i e � 1 _ s > �` W T „ � � � Zq F ! W t 2 k w ! �� h t � � it {� � w � � � 0 V � ` w� a d' �� ` �� ti� �� ~ n` � � \ � � � 0 � VAR ��97-03 � Steve Linn � � � t; :� � �� t . t� p � !it E; � R � j E; i � 1;t �s i !i� !{ � ; �E! ,� f . Y ., j � s- ! j�� A � �'� f I � ti f ! 6 �� r� i f ? ' t� � � � � ik; � i ; ��: �r �, �:l� � f�; } � �--------------- , � � � ' ' I , � t, �o, , , , ' ' I � �------.� ,a, ---- . i. � � . , ,, ' T� ' � �. � -�'J.row. �tw�aae' J �, __ I . � �'T ^ — ( • I' — ' _ � ' I � _ _ _ il lol ,' � n �i� .`... .... `8 J- ( . � '--'��'�• -- '� , � � ♦ . , i:. a� ��' I I z�--�--�.� _a� '_ ��1• � " �..""_ "i'_ , , � I, ` �;, 1 1, � 1 f \ 1� lol , � ^I ; �I 1 \ \ 1 1 � ! � ``� I _l_' �; \ � ��_�` __ , 1 � 1 �! \ � �I N �1 Oi 101� � � � k � . , ; _ R s R L �t/ A 0 � ' � � -- \ - �9-\ t-.- . � 1 = ' � � . ,o, � , I � --- � ----- - � � , , . ,,_ � � ' � __`- t � � � �_j' V � � t ; ..-- � : . , � Yi � ' ° 1 � . . . � 6 � I �` � t� �{41f1�� i"I , c'-.--�_�,�----y-- � �f� i �i�l�iiiji�i��{iil�I�! � � .f Ml ' I ~ . :i:oi.i.::��: ..WO . , � ' : . . . . . i I � �; � ,�` .06Ar, ` . 4�Q�0[tiv y; �� . � � ' � f!Ol � I l �. 1 I 1 �- 1. . .. � • i �, �; __'_____"______' ;� � I �� I � 1 \ 1 . � � � � ,I . � i l01 ; I � ; -- o-------------- � I I ' ' � , I � � . �o, ; �� i. �' J 'i I r------------------ti � ' ' ' ' - I � . � .o, , � — ,�, �� .�n., � : _ «��,,, �, � � ��y i i � / '`_ `- Y � �� / t m�i � � \ � ` � � I .___�/ ��. �� '/' ''' �`_ . � .��.. . t«�.�.. � � �� • � - � ---- � i ,� � �o,; = � — - — - - 1� ---- '� -`----�-�` • ---- � - �w.:�.,. ------ 14.26 � L�� z��={` k �� 1 9 r f �f e��'i ��5t� � i � � :� ij . �t� {� S� �1 �� 1 �� , ;�� c ; !� �l��jt �lj�jfl �(/'�� •. l}�j�� G j��{�it R ��11�,� � ili�lt) � � �� '`1 g ��1 Y }�� a 0 City of Fridley TO: Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant � FROM: Jon Haukaas, Assistant Director of Public Works DATE: Apri14, 1997 SUBJECT: Review of Commercial Center & Goodyear PW97-096 I have reviewed the plans for the Commerciai Center & Goodyear project on 57�' Ave. NE. the following are my concerns: Utilities: Show location of the Curb Stop and Box at the lot line an the plans. Grading and Draina e� Plan: JHI-I T1ie city is working with Anoka Cvunty to upg�-ade 37`� Ave. �urin�g tho 199$ �di� �n to five lanes and extend stcum sevuer to Main Street. T3� stonn sevwer for this pcnjoct must be designed to intercept nuisff from the site and conned into the firtune 57�' Ave. eactension via stubs extending eveu with the existing back of cdub. In the meantime, on site c� basins will have to be capped and runoff directed directiy onto 57`� Ave. Some temporary ponding in the parking lat over the capped eatch basins will be allov�ed if acceptable to the owner. Once this upgrade is oanplete and the storm sevvers are tied together, the catch basins must be uncapped and regular 8rates installed. No runoiiwill be allowed to go onto 5�' Place as it already has drainage problems. The drainage calculations we received use the developed condition runoff curve number when calculating the undeveloped runoff volume and so does not accurately show the change in runoff volume. Resubmit a grading and drainage plan aiong with calculations reflecting the above conditions. 14.27 . _. .--- —..�� .�.� t r n�� f� �`, � � �. �� A}J(`r t. �� i�� f I s.� , �} � I; i � � � GI ��e, , F') � � � ` � � i � '�^� � � ti - � � � f �� 1 �� r i s I.�. i` t+ � ti?: . � 1 I f ii , 1' z� � �� {+�i � ��,�. !i I i I � . �� 1I�:' �� I� {� � ii6 � � € � �'�1 �{6 . <<; ��3�� - � f 1 � C �A :l q � , � � t ' �t+�;t �i 3 � � p r � � m � , ��r �� .`�r t " � ' : 'n6 �� t � � �} . : : , w , �' ` f� '?t 'th* a, �f -.:: �'. J � : . �1 - f��., ��'S w r � � 3 �� t` t �V��S �° 'Y - ' S k : ,� . � P'?'� f ,. _ r, y,� -r_ aE � v'�.r, �• �.C�3f t� i��eS; ,. . �:`; ,. f,� _. r. .. . , �; <_ .. � �_r. ,3� 'S� ::-'�� :�., ., 9. 5, F}�� , �� . � �' �h r a �:r � r � ��',�P,, . t � y. � _�f � �: c.� �'� r� t� ) {a.' i �.. :. F. `F e o r.. �,y . ,' ', . J . �°!�.w�'i t � :+ �t��'�•i � � . _#-�.� � j�t. ^S' _ }` Ig' t� r: � � �� r� ��.,, i �� i � �y �� r, ii � j r � � -� k � �k � , � :Y � - � i �� F 1 i �s r{� .� '_ � �.�, � i �.�' � 5 '�. r'� � �� 4 ��.YU.+� .. .\�.::._. . .._ �'. _._ ��j .�.�.�,_1 �__" .:.._. � �-^ - �'� . - �.� �' _ �� - a -,y . � �. 3,� � �1 �� }: f � ` � - � :; � � ;...�. � : s � P� e � � E� C � '� k � ,,�y�y t �y�,,y� � � �� t , �:. � i"`.y�A 7` . ��"� i } y z .�� . � �, i 4 �t,.y+� .��, I #, � ?} �T�.�� j.,a}L'., � Y �. 7 'F� ' 1 Y- T' ♦ r � � y x i ;,�. ��; - � } � r � L � y � F t � L t •S>� �'�s J i� y '. � ti •.�� j�' • p ��+p. L� � �� t i �� f � t � � o� ,� ty '.� '�1 ^t � { � 1 �� d� 1:,�' ^' � r t`��"-,,; � � � �t .., j y ��: ^f �. w � ,Y � , . >� a �.- � k fi �'� r a � z . . �. S �dE� � , �. � � �� K...� F�'` �t YS�F?�'I� .; � FENCING SAMPLE "B" �en-Work Ornamenta.l Iron Fence Pictured below is an open-work ornamental iron fence. The development would be visible through the fence. - � ;r�j' , 4 �. - . .► Z �: �� , _ _ }� ` i I� ��I � � ��r� `� � / �_�.` IJ � � � �� i � ��. � ....� �e��a��A ■■i��ie�� _ e�/��` ��' � ��►�\�` i �`N�� .R`.�-.1 � �: � �� -'�� .,..,�:� , � =�,. s. - . 14.29 . _. __' i�i �w ��" .- � ti1 _ X�p� _.L � � r `: ��• �f '�J Q � r - � I � Y Q Q ♦ ♦ ! � i � i e.� � � r - � . ' . ��'i�a� /00�0�iI♦I��It� ��E�a � � E� � � � , , ,oas�, ,,,,,,,, (� Yl �� 0 0 0�� I�, �� 0� i I> 7, 7, 7% I � � c i w c`�, E� d Pa A � . ' 1 � •:a m 6� G -• . • - _ • . . _ . � . � �U".= f�; �� .-� �� '� -�=" ��'�« . • ��. „s�i--, ►r � r. , _ }; �; .,�, � ="�'S�� "K'�..- �i:'±a.�r.v....�:! �'��.'�'R" .--'....x.tui::.�__ . .' . . - -- , �-�.: ,.tta0lttttett � t��'v4��b�,b's,i i iS"v'viii�iv��y �I:>I�I�iti:i_I�i. �:;:�r,� ,�,.,._—�v-�s;-,:�»��"� �. b� � U�tYOF FRIDLEY FR[DLEY MUN[CIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRtDLEY, MN 55432 •(6121571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 March 31, 1997 Willie/Niama Laurence 233 57th Place Fridley,MN 55432 Dear Willie/Niama Laurence At a recent neighborhood meeting regarding the proposed redevelopment of the Tire facility at 213 57ih Avenue, and the proposed development of a retail center to the west, it was suggested that the neighbors io the north be surveyed as to the type of fence they preferred. A fence will be required as part of the development proposal. Enciosed please find three samples of possibie fence styles. The fence sections will be constructed between stone piilars. The fence styles are as follows: Style "A": A board on board privacy fence with a scrolled top. Styie "B": An open-work ornamental iron fence. Style "C": A board on board fence with iattice on the top two feet. Each fence will be approximately six feet in heigh� Please fill out the survey below and retum it in the self-addressed stamped envelope no lat�r t�ar. ANri! 2, 19�'. The ��:�,� a�N;�ci�.as yo�:r pa:-:i�ir,at��r :ri this mat�sr. Very Truly Y urs, � .�� Michele McPherson Planning Assistant I prefer fence tyle: A" �.B„ N^ff � 14.31 � _ CITYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICtPAL CEI�TER • 6431 UNIVERSiTY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(6l2) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 March 31, 1997 Bret/Toni Anderson 241 57th Place Fridley,MN 55432 Dear Bret/Toni Anderson At a recent neigl�borhood meeting regarding the proposed redevelopment of the Tire facility at 213 57�h Avenue, and the proposed development of a retail center to the west, it was suggested that the neighbors to the north be surveyed as to the type of fence they preferred. A fence will be required as part of the development proposal. Enclosed please find three samples of possible fence styles. The fence sections will be constructed befinreen stone pillars. The fence styles are as follows: Style "A": A board on board privacy fence with a scrolled top. Style "B": An open-work omamental iron fence. Style "C": A board on board fence�with�tattice on the top two feet. Each fence will b�e approximately six feet in height. Please fill ��t thQ survey bel�w and r�turn it in the self-addressed stam�ed envelope no later than April 2,' 1997. The City appreciates your participation in this matter. Very Truly Yours, ��-f /" ,o�� Michele McPhersion Planning Assistarnt I prefer fe,nce style: �� „A„ ,�B„ ,�C„ 14.32 � _ U7YOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNIC(PAL CENTER • fi431 UNiVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450- FAX (612) 571-1287 March 31, 1997 David Anderson 215 57th Place Fridiey,MN 55432 Dear David Anderson At a recent neighborhood meeting regarding the proposed redevelopment of the Tire facility at 213 57"' Avenue, and the proposed development of a retail center to the west, it was suggested that the neighbors to tMe north be surveyed as to the type of fence _ -- they preferred. A fence will be required as part of the development proposal. Enclosed please find three samples of possible fence styles. The fence sections will be constructed befinreen stone pillars. The #ence styles are as follows: Style "A": A board �n �rard priva�y fience wifh a scrolled top. Style "B°: An oper�-work amamental iron ferace. Style "C": A board on board fence � lat�ice orr t�e �top two feet. Each fence will be approximately �ix f�et in .height. Please fill out the survey betow and returt�:it in the self-addressed stamped envelope no later than April 2, 1997. The City appreciates your participdtio� in this matter. Very,Truly Y urs, � �� .�-r`-- Michele McPherson Planning Assistant I prefer fence style: «A„ «B„ �«C„ 14.33 - _ C�7YOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN Sj=332 •(612) 571-34Sp • FAX (612) 571-1287 March 31, 1997 Richard/Judith Bistodeau 101 57th Place Fridley,MN 55432 Dear Richard/Judith Bistodeau At a recent neighborhood meeting regarding the proposed redevelopment of the Tire facility at 213 57t'' Avenue, and the proposed development of a retail center to the west, it was suggested that the neighbors to the north be surveyed as to the type of fence they preferred. A fence will be required as part of the development proposal. Enclosed please find three samples of possible fence styles. The fence sections will be constructed between stone pillars. The fence styles are as follows: Style "A": A board on board privacy fence with a scrolled top. Style "B": An open-work ornamental iron fence. Style "C": A board on board fence with lattice on the top finro feet. Each fence will t�e approximately six feet in height. Please fill out the sunrey helow and. retum it in the self-addressed stamped envelope no later than April 2, 1997. The City appreciates your participation in this matter. Very Truly Yours, t,�� '�[\�� Michele McPherson Planning Assistant I prefer fence style: ,�A„ «B„ � ,�C„ 14.34 ;■ � _ CtTYOF FRlDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN SS�i32 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 March 31, 1997 Robert Russell 217 57th Place Fridley,MN 55432 Dear Robert Russell At a recent neighba�hood meeting regarding the proposed redevelopment of the Tire facility at 213 57th Avenue, and the proposed devefopment of a retail center to the west, it was suggested that the neighbors to the north be surveyed as to the type of fence they preferred. A fence will be required as part of the development proposal. Enclosed please find three samples of possible fence styles. The fence sections will be consfiructed between s#one piflars. Tt�e fer�ce styles are as fotlows: Style "A": A board �r� board prirracy fertce with a scroileri top. Style "B": An open-work omamental iron fence. Style "C": A baard on boacd fence anrith lattice oFl the top t�vvo fe�t. Each fence will be approximately six feet in height. Please fill out the survey belaw and retu�n it in the self-addressed stamped envelope no later than April 2, 1997. The City appreciates your Participation in #�is �ratter. Very Truly Yours, ;.�� `� ��.oz�.� � Michele McPherson Planning Assistant I prefer fence style: � «A„ ,�B„ «C„ 14.35 ,"rpMp ��/,�.� `�. ,.�. P � �It� •1 �. ` � M�N� N �(P Michelle McPherson City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 554�2 COU NTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MIIdNESOTA 55304 (612) 754-3520 FAX (612) 754-3532 RE: Site Plan Commerciai i.enter and Cioodyear Dear Michelle: March 17, 1997 We have reviewed the site plan for the Commercial Center and Goodyear to be located north of CR No. 102 (57th Avenue) north of the Holiday Store within the City of Fridley, and I offer the following comments: Additional right-of-way will be required to be dedicated adjacent to CR No. 102 as a part of this develqpment for future reconstruction purposes. However, the amount of right-of-way is depend�nt on the amount/type of development that will occur along CR No. 57, the amount of traffic that is generat+ed by the development, and the number of lanes required to adequately handle the traff'ic. A 100 feet right-of-way corridor may be adequate, or it may need to be increased to a 120 foot right-of-way corridor. Consequently, either an additional 17 feet or an additiona127 feet of right-of-way will be required to be dedicated as a part of this develapment. It appears that all applicable sight distance requirements can be met for this site. The city and the developer shall ensure that the development of this site will not include any landscape features that will obstruct intersection site distance any access location. Since this site has access to two local roadways as well as CR No. 102, county policy dictates that no dir�ct access be permitted onto CR No. 102 for this site. However, we will allow one access point onto CR No. 102, provided that it lines up directiy across from the existing main access into the Holiday Store. This single access point is to serve both the Commercial Center and the Goodyear store. Right-of-access along the remaining portions of CR No. 102 should be Ciedicated to Anoka County. Calculations must be submitted along with a grading and erosion control plan that delineates the drainage areas. The post-developed rate of discharge shall not exceed the pre-developed rate of disc�arge for the 10-Year, 24-Hour Storm utilizing the "Rationale Method" of design to determi�e the rate of discharge. An access permit and a permit For work within the county right-of-way is required and must be obtained prior to the commencement of any construction. Contact Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator for this department, for further information regarding the permit process. 14.36 Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer Michelle McPherson Site Plan Commercial Center and Goodyear March 17, 1997 Page 2 Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please keep this department informed as to the status of this development and the results of the traf�c analysis to determine what improvement may be necessary to be completed on CR No. 102 by the city/developer as a part of this development� Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Si e ely, Jane K Pemble Traffic Engineer xc: Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator xc: Mike Kelty, Chief Right-of-Way Agent xc: Douglas W. Fischer, PE, Assistant County Engineer xc: Skip Anderson, County Surveyor tmk�commctr.gdr 14.37 '='•�-?�-1'�'�7 �=t� � 46PM FKOhI THE L I NN CGMP�N I ES TU CITY pF FRlpE 6431 UNiVERS FRiDLEY, IU!{V (69 2) 571-�45i0 Address: Property Legal De fY AVENUE 5d3� CQM111�UNITY DEVELOPMENY dEPARTMENT vAa�A�vG� ARP�icar�oN FoR: denti�l x �ommercial/lndustria! c�3�t1t?4 P. �i` Y 11'1lf�ORMATI,�N,;,_- s�t� plan required for submittal, see att��ed tl!+ _�:7th_ Pl�ce, Fridley, MN Currer�t �arting: Re�san fo� Var�i on Number: 23-30-24-23-0028 Lat 2 Btock $ TracUAddition Ci.ty view G-�.,, Square footagelacreage: 5,600I.I286 �: �i�11 � nU /D-rivin� Surfacc Setbarks Siqns Nave yau opera�ed a busin�ss in � city which required a business license? Yes X Nd - tf Yes, whfCh city? __Woocibury, C�tta�e Grova Oa�dale If Yes, wt��t typ� of business? Gasoline. Convenience-Ci�arette licenye � Was that ticens� ever den'sed tx revoited? Yes No X � , ��.__,_. (Contract purcFy NAM�: Er' ' AiaDRESS: 45� DAYT{ME PHO'� J� NAME: �aa�ss: DAYTfME F Seetiory of City � �EES Fee: $10Q.00 fq �ee: �.cyo for Application Num Scheduied APP� Scheduled City I' 10 Day qpptical 64 Day Date: � ATION {as it appears on the property title) Fee awnets must sign this form prior to prc �anin��on, MN SlGNATURElDA' E 73i-0515 SIGNATURFJDATE: cammercial, industriat, or signs: l�v�-- �sider�ti�l properties: ,� Receipt #: g�� Received By: �, Lr. �!.I�,L', '--j 'i - c; �- - Is Cammission Qa#e: �uncil Date: �n Compiete Notification Date: 14.38 TOTG� F.�� CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (fi12) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR: Residential x Commercial/Industria! Siqns PROPERTY tNFORMATION: - site pian required for submittal, see attached Address: 216 57th Place, Fridley, MN Property Identification Number: 23-30-24-23-0029 Lega! Descxiption: Lot 3& 4 g�� 8 Trac�/Addition City View Current Zoning: C-2 Square footage/acreage: 11,200/.2571 Reasonfor Variance: Buildin�/Driv;n� Surface Setbacks Have you operated a business in a city which required a business ticense? Yes X No � If Yes, which city? _ Woodbury, Cottage Grove, Oakdale � 1f Yes, what type of business? _ Gasoline. Convenience-Cigarette license� Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes � No X �.......,�..r.r.r....r.r.r.r.,. .r....r...,.�,�....�..r ...... FEE OWN�R iNFORItiAATION (as it appear� on the property #it�e) (Contract purd�asers: Fee ovw�ers � sign this form prior to processin9) NAME: Paul & Joyce LaDuke ADDRESS: 6972 Lakc�vi�w Drive, Li.no Lakes, NIN 5501 " DAYTIME PHONE: ��-�76�- SIGNATUREIDA7E: ....., � - - ----- --- PETITIONER INFORMp►TION ��,.u� NAME: Steve Linn. Linn Cornpanies ADDRESS: 1561 Woodlane Drive Woodb , I�1 55125 DAYTIME PHONE: 731-0515 SIGNATURE/DATE: ��-%7 Section of City Code; FEES . Fee: $100.00 for commerciat, industrial, or signs: o� �' Fee: $6�.00 for residential properties: Receipt #: � Received By: APPlication Number. u'�,(��3. ��_. Scheduled Appeals Commission Date: Scheduled City Council Date: __ __ 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: 60 Day Date: � 14.39 CITY OF FRI�LEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLlCATION FOR: Residential x Commerciai/industrial Sians PROPERTY INFORMATION: - site plan requi�ed for submittal, see attached Address: 21;8 57th Place, Fridlev. P'�1 Property Ident�fication Number. 23-3�-24-23-0030 Legal Description: Lot 5& 6 B�oc{c 8 Tract/Addition City View Current Zoning: C-2 Square footage/acreage: _ 11.200/.2571 Reason for Va�riance: Buildin�/Drivin� Surface Setbacks Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes X Wo � (f Yes, wtlich city? Woodbury, Cotta�e Grove, Oalcdale If Yes, what type of business? Gasoline . Convenience-Ci garPrt-P � l('Pl"1SP Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No X �...��.............r�.....,....r............��.....,......�.,...........r.....,......�.r.........�......_...�......��..,.��...��.r.,, �EE OWNER �NFORMATION (as it appears on the prope�ty title) (Contract purchasers: Fee owners must sign this form prior to prc NAME: Siw k Lumb &' w k I ADDRESS: 2536 Northeast Marshall Street ls. NI�t ' DAYTIME PH(�NE: 781-3333 S{GNATURE/DAT ' PETITIONER IINFORMATION NAME: _ Stev� Linn, Linn Cornpanies ADDRESS: 1561 G7oodlane Driv , Wo�cibi� ;ti, MN 551 �5 DAYTIME PH4NE: 731-0515 SIGNATURE/DATE: � :>i- � 7 Section of City Code: FEE . Fee: $100.00 for commercial, industrial, or signs: %(TU � Fee: $6�.00 for residential properties: Receipt #: � Received By: Application NumberS�'�r�=�1"I -t�?�-� Scheduled Appeals Commission Date: Scheduled City Council Date: 10 Day Applic�tion Complete Notification Date: 60 Day Date: 14.40 CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEA�S COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 9, 1997 ROLL CALL: Chairperson Kuechle caUed the Apri! 9, 1997, Appeals Co ission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Larry Kuechle, Carol Be lieu, Ken Vos, Terrie Mau Members Absent: Diane Savage Others Present: Scott Hickok lanning Coordinator Michele herson, Planning Assistant Niles S ulz, 821 Raymond Avenue, St. Paul Step n Linn, 1561 Woodlane Drive, Woodbury Jo Narding, 821 Raymond Avenue, St. Paul an King, 1561 Woodlane Drive, Woodbury Paul �aDuk, 6972 Lakeview Drive, Lino Lakes � by Ms. Mau, seconded by Ms, geait{ieu, to approve the Febn.�ary 26, 1997, s Commission minutes as wriiten. ON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED HE MOTION CARRIED UNANtMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATI N OF A VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #97 03 BY STEVE LINN LINN COMPANIES: 1. Per Section 205.14.03_C.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the baiidir�g setback from the public right-of-way from 35 feet to 16 feet; 2. Per Section 205.14.05.C.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the number of parking stalls f�om 54 to 48 stalls; 3. Per Section 205.14.05.C.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the hard surface setback from the public right-o#-way from 20 feet to 3 feet; 4. Per Section 205.'14.05.C.(� ) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the hard surface setback from the buildi�g from 5#eet to 0 feet; 5. Per Section 205.14.05_C.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the two-way drive aisle from 25 feet #0 24 feet; and 14.41 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETlNG, APRIL 9, 1997 PAGE 2 6. Per Secfron 205.14.05.C.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the one-way drive aisl� from 18 fee# to 13 feet; To allow the construction of an 8,000 square foot retail center on Lots 2 through 7, Block 8, City View Addition, generally located at 218 - 57th Place N.E. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearina. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the variance request by Linn Companies consists of a number of variances. The variance request, if approved, would allow the construction of an 8,090 square foot retail center. Ms_ McPherson 5tated the site plan summarized requested. The building setback occurs along the one-way drive aisle and hard sur#ace setback red the locations of the variances being rear setback along 57th Place. The action are also along the rear of the building. The hard surface setback reduction along the public right-of-way occurs along the front and side of the site. The two-way drive aisle reduction occurs in the front. Ms. McPherson stated the proposed development indudes removing a single family dwelling which cwrrently exists on the site, construction of an 8,090 square foot retail center, and refurbishment of the former Holiday service station. Ms. McPherson stated the proposed development is located at the comer of 57th Avenue and Main Street. The property is zoned C-2, General Business. The property has been used fo�r single family dwellings, rriost of which have been rental property. In 1997, 218 - 57th Place was declared hazardous and removed by the City. Ms. McPherson stated that prior to looking at each of the variances, staff thought it wouid be appropri�ate to look at what could occur without a variance. The subject parcel is 140 feet X 240 'feet. The 140-foot depth is between 57th Place and 57th Avenue. If all of the required'building setbacks were applied; a buildable area of 70 feet x 180 feet remains. Using their best analysis tools, staff determined that the maximum possible building which could fit on the site would be approximately 4,200 square #eet or a 60 foot x 70 foot building, which is one-half of what is being proposed. Staff determined that the most likely use for a building that size would be fast food. Ms. McPherson stated that in reviewing each of the variances, staff determi�ed that with the exception of the variance reques# fo reduce the one-way drive aisle from 18 feet to 13 feet, all the variances are within previously granted requests. The first variance is to reduce the building setback from 35 feet to 16 feet. This occurs along the 57th Place right-of-way. In order to eliminate this variance, the building would need to be shifted to the south similar to the adjacen# p�oposed Goodyear buiiding. This would 14.42 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 9 1997 PAGE 3 eliminate parlcing whicM occurs along #he #ront of the building and further reduce #he number of parking spaces. Ms. McPherson stated the second variance is to reduce the required number of parking stalls from 54 to 48. The required number of parking spaces was c�lculated usi�g a wo�st case scenario assuming that the entire buiiding would be dedicated to retail floor area. The requirement for parking spaces for retail floor area is 1 space for every 150 square feet of retaii floor a�ea. This calcufation does not take into account any possible office uses which might occur in the building or be associated with a retail use or any associated storage sPace: The tenant(s) have not been determined pending all of the land use approva(s that need to oceur. The adjacent proposed Goodyear building is parked at the appropriate number of spaces and does not have any extra parking spaces which could be shared between the two facilities. The City did grant a reduction in the required number of parking stails in 1992 for the Bob's Produce development and a similar variance request was considered at the fime of a proposed theater redevelopment at 250 Osborne Road. Ms. McPherson stated the third variance is to reduce the hard surface setback from a public right-of-way from 20 feet to 3 feet. This occurs along the 57th Avenue and the 57th Place frontage. The hard surface setback aiong the Main Street side is reduced to approximatefy 7 feet. The City has previously granted a variance of this nature down to 0 feet. This reduction does reduce the available area #or landscaping and stormwater retention; however, a closely planted hedge along #he 57th Avenue frontage can provide t�e required p��lcir�g Iot screening a�d the petitioner is proposing to cor�struct a fence along the 57th Place right-of-�vay in order to provide the required screening for the adjacent residentiai properties to the north. M�. McPherson ��ated the fourth vanance is to reduce the hard surface setback from the building from 5 feet to 0 feet. This occurs along the north side of the building �n conjunction with a reduction in the widffi of the one-way driving aisle. This area is intended to be used for service vehides o�ly. It is not intended for customer traffic. Entry doors along the rear of the prope�ties will provide access for service and deliveries for the tenant{s). Staff fi�s recommended the installation of bollards along the service doors to aid in the prevention of damage to the building by any of the service vehicles that would be using the driving aisle. In order to eliminate this particular variance, the building size would have be reduced by 740 square feet to accommodate the required 5-foot setback. The City has previously granted variances of this nature. Ms. McPherson stated the fifth variance is to reduce the two-way drive aisle from 25 fee# to 24 feet. This is for the finro-way drive which provides access to the parking facility in f�ont of the development. A one-foot reduction in this requirement is within previously approved requests; 24-feet is often typical in other communities. Ms. McPherson stated the last variance is to reduce the one-way drive aisle from 98 feet to 13 feet along the back of the building. The City has not previously received a request of this nature. However, 13 feet should provide adequate space for the small 14.43 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 9, 1997 PAGE 4 service vehicle� which are intended to senre this facility. This is not intended for customer traffic_ Ms. McPherson stated that several issues, including traffic and other performance standards, are related to this request. Regarding traffic, the City completed a tra�c study in 1996 as a result of the Home Depot development. The City contracted with the traffic engineer to review that study and to determine if this proposed development would have an adverse impact or significantly increase traffic. The traffic study determined that the development would not greatly increase traffic loads on 57th Avenue. Howewer, as pa�t of the originaf 1996 traffic study, an improvement project for 57th Avenue was recommended and the updated traffic study also recommended that the City pursue some type of improvement. The City and the County will be entering into an agreement to accomplish that project in 1998 as a result of all the developments that are occurring along 57th Avenue. The proposed improvement will increase 57th Avenue to five lanes, add storm sewer, medians, and left turn lanes. Also as part of the project is improved street lighting and street landscaping along the boulevard. Ms. McPherson reviewed the proposed improvements. Near Universiiy and 57th, the existing right-in and right-out entry at Hardee's would have a reconfigured median between the Cattle Company restaurant entrance and University Avenue. It would provide protected left-turn lanes for northbound University Avenue traffic as well as protected left-turn lanes for persons entering the Cattle Company restaurant. A right- turn lane will be added along the Cattle Company restaurant frontage to provide additional stacking space for traffic going south on University Avenue. On #he east side of University, the median would be relocated, a lane added and the north entrance to SuperAmerica would be closed. This improvement will assist in the Lake Pointe traffic as Lake Pointe is developed. Between 3rd Street and the main Holiday Store entrance, a new median is to be constnicted to provide a protected left tum lane for persons entering Holiday Store and widen 57th Avenue providing an additional lane. An entrance to Holiiday would be closed. From the area west of the main Holiday Store entrance to Mairn Street, there would not be a median. However, there would be a left- turn lane create�i and two through lanes constructed to allow traffic to get out of the main traffic to emter into the various driveways. It is proposed that one of the Holiday Store entrances' be closed and that the proposed Goodyear entrance be consolidated with the Burger 'King entrance across from the main Holiday Store entrance. Staff is recommending a stipulation which would require the petitioner to participate in accomplishing this particular driveway construction. Ms. McPherson stated other performance standards with which the petitioner must comply include the grading and drainage plan. As part of the 57th Avenue improvement, a new storm sewer would be constructed west to Main Street. There is currently no storm sewer located on 57th Avenue. The petitioner is being required to submit a revisec� grading and drainage plan which will reflect the connection into the storm sewer and also to provide revised storm wate� calculations. The petitioner also needs to submit a revised landscaping plan with five additional evergreen trees which brings the proposed landscaping into compliance with the Ci#y code. Staff is recommending that the parking !ot scre14.g 4 accomplished through the 1998 57th 4 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETiNG APRIL 9 1997 PAGE 5 Avenue improvement project. That will be a shared assessment project between the HRA and the adjacent property owners. The petitioner will also be required to install a fence along 57th Place_ This fence is recommended to be a board-on-board fence with a scroll top. That is a change from what was recommended in the staff report. Ms. McPherson stated that at a neighbofiood meeting held on March 18, it was suggested that the neighbors to the no�th be polled as to their preference of fence along this development. Staff submitted three fence styles - a board-on-board scrolled- top wood fence, a wrought iron fence constructed between stone pillars which would allow visibility into the back of the building, and a wood fence with a latticework top. At the writing of the staff report, the City had received four of five sunreys. Al! four concurred that a wood fence of some type would be preferable. On Monday, staff received the fifth survey which tilted the balance toward the board-on-board fence with a scrolled top. Ms. McPherson stated that in terms of the proposed building, staff is recommending that the building have the foNowing design elements_ The building should be constructed of smooth concrete block with rock face block base with a standing seam metal roof, green color. Green canopies are to be above the glass store fronts with a sign band for individually internally illuminated letters. All of these elements are indicated on the drawings labeled A3 dated March 14, which were included in the agenda packet. The proposed Goodyear tire facility will ha�e blue canopies over the s#ore front and blue light fixtures accenting the building; however, #nat is not a part of the variance request this evening. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends approval of the request for several reasons. The site was platted in the late 1800's and, at that time, the size lots platted were appropriate, However, the size is now controlled by sub�rban d�velop�en# �t�ndards with larger setback requirements. The site plan in terms of traffic flow, separating customer and service vehicles is well conceived and the site plan is consistent with the traffic study recommendations. Staff recommends the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall p�ovide canopies over the rear service doors. The canopies shall be the same color as the standing seam metal �oof. The canopies shall not contain tenant signage except for the ca�opies facing 57th Avenue which may contain the numerical address. 2. The petitioner shall construct the sc�eening fe�ce along the rear of the property (57th Place) in the following manner. a. 7 foot high rock face block piliars spaced 20 feet on center. The rock face shall match the building and shall have a grout different that the block color. b. 6 foot high board-on-board fence with lattice work on the top two feet; lattice shall be constructed on site and shall be of 1-inch stock material. The lattice shall not be prefabricated. 14.45 APPEALS COM!MISSION MEETING APRIL 9 1997 PAGE 6 3. The petitii�ner shall submit a revised grading and drainage plan complying with the engineer's comments dated Ap�il 4, 1997. 4. The petitioner shall construct a shared driveway with Burger King which is aligned with Holiday Store's main entrance. 5. The petitioner shall construct a second driveway as indicated on the site plan dated March 14, 1997. 6. The petitioner shall submit a revised landscape plan which includes 5 evergreen trees. The landscape plan sha11 include underground irrigation. Parking lot screening shall consist of a tightly-planted hedge or a low rock face block wall matching the building. 7. The building design shal! be that indicated on plans dated March 14, 1997. This includes a. Standing seam metal roof, green in color, flashing to also be green. b. Green canopies over the glass store fronts. c. Green glazed tile inserts. d. Accent building lighting, brown tone in color. Lights shall be approved by stafifi p�ior to building permit issuance. e. LigMt tan smooth concrete block with darker rock face block base. The grocat color shall be differen# than the block color. 8. Tenant signage shall be individually, intema8y lit letter. Signage shall be located on the sigh band indicated on the drawing, A3, dated March 14, 1997. If more than two kenants, a comprehensive sign plan shall be approved by the City Council pr'ror to issuance of sign permits. 9. The petitidner shall install the required parking !ot screening and participate in the 57th Avenue reconstruction plan. Ms. McPherson s��ated staff eliminated stipulation #1 because the neighbors preferred a board-on-board s�creening fence which completely screens the rear of the building. As listed, stipulation #2 will read, "The petitioner shall construct a board-on-board screening fence with the scroll top located befinreen rock face block pillars." The stipulations will b� renumbered to reflect these changes. Ms. McPherson �tated the petitioner is in the process of applying for tax increment financing (TIF) to assist in refurbishment of the forrner Holiday tire center which would become a Goody�ar ti�e #acility. The City Councii wili be conducting a public hearing on April 14 regarding the establisfiment of a T!F district for the #wo parcels as weli as the -14.46 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 9 1997 PAGE 7 right-of-way along 57th Avenue #rom Main Street to #he service road east o# University Avenue. The 57th Avenue �econstn,�ction will be a shared project between #he Housirrg & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the property owners. Ms. Beaufieu asked if 57th Avenue would be widened. Ms. McPherson stated, yes. The p�oposed a�ea will be widened toward the Holiday Store side of the road. Ms. Mau stated that if wood fencing is maintained, after a number of years it begins to deteriorate. With the neighbors that close, what is the possibility of the fence being a block fence so that it does not deteriorate? Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner wouid be best able to address that concern from an economic viewpoint. As the petitioner is requesting TIF assistance in order to accomplish this deveiopment, a block watl 480 feet long may be cost-prohibitive. Mr. Kuechle asked if there have been consideration given to snow storage. Ms. McPherson stated tha# is a question to be addressed to the petitioner. Mr. Kuechle asked approximately how much green space woutd exist an 57th Avenue and 58th Place. Ms. McPherson stated ifiey did not �aiculate #haf. There would be roughly 3 feet x 240 feet along the front anci back ofi the proper�y and roughly 3 feei along Main Street. The boulevard along 57th Avenue is approximatety 13 fee# for a total of approximately 16 feet total. Along 57�h P�aee, the boulev�rd is approximately 1 fi fee# for a to#al o# approximately 19 feet. Mr. Kuechle asked if the proposed hedge would have to be planted on their property and where that hedge would be planted. Ms. McPherson stated they have not worked out the detaiis of the reconstruction plan. Since it is a joint project between the City, HRA and adjacent p�operty owners, there may be an opportunity to plant in the boulevard which the City normally would not allow. A hedge would probably be very close to the p�operty line, but further set back f�om the curb. Mr. Kuechle stated his concem is that it looks narrow there. lf a hedge is planted there, the first time a snow plow comes through it would be the end of the hedge. Ms. Mau asked if storm drainage wouid be an issue in the meantime because there are already problems on 57th Place. Ms. McPhe�son stated the engineers wili allow temporary ponding in the parking lot and aliow sheet draining onto 57th Avenue to go east toward University. As part of the 14.47 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 9 1997 PAGE 8 parking lot construction, they are to install catch basins and manholes which just have caps until a tim� they can actually connect to the storm sewer system. Everything will be constructed in anticipation of the improvement project. The stipulation from the engineers is that they are not permitted to drain anything onto 57th Place. It all has to be drained to the south. Mr. Linn stated he is involved with Holiday Companies as a franchisee of Holiday. Holiday has asked him to look at the vacant site which was Dick's Tire Center which they are proposing to be a Goodyear center. He looked at the property and thought there was potentia! for the automotive service. However, they were concerned about the economics and the surroundings. There was a boarded up house directly to the west and beyond that a house that remains as a rental property which he believed would not help their project. It did not give it the appearance they wanted or the feel thai they wanted. He met with Ms. Dacy and looked at the poss�bility of expanding the project to include the entire corner to enhance the automotive service center and make the economics of it all work. He thought they had come up with a good plan, and they think it beatifies the area and makes the whole project work. Either one of the projects on their own could not work in his opinion, but they could ifi combined. Even though the variances being considered tonight are for the sirip mall, they are looking at this as one project. Mr. Linn stated that although the list of variances is long, they tried to make the two projects work together. They have lined up the parking. They have lined up a common access between the two facilities. The existing setbacks of the automotive service center are the same as the parking setbacks and the landscaping setbacks that they are looking for on the strip mall site. The property is too narrow not to have those setbacks. The boulevard makes it look like it has more green space. They will maintain the boulevard on both the front and the rear. Mr. Linn stated he considers himself to be a professional ope�a#or. They currently operate 11 existing facilities in the Twin Cities. They would be the developer and operator of the Caoodyear facility. They would be the developer and owner of the strip mall and would I�ase it. They do not have tenants signed at this point. Mr. Linn stated he has been working with Ms. Dacy on some problems with the stipulations recommended by staff. Regarding the fence in the rear of the building, it says that the petitioner shall constn.�ct a screening fence with rock base block pillars placed 20 feet on center to match the building, etc. lnitially, when that was proposed, they looked at it, looked at their options, and looked a# what would work with their economics. The�r met wi#h the property owners directly behind the site as weli as other property owners and all had agreed that it would be a decorative wood fence. The rock face pillars cost �bout $1,000 each. The cost to construct the pitlars would be as much as the building it�elf. They would be looking at about $30,000 just to build the pillars. They have no p�'oblem with keeping up a fence. They keep up their properties and fences. But rock face pillars are not economically feasible. Ms. Dacy was in agreement with that as well as two City Council persons. They would do whatever they can to build a decorative fence provided it is within the economics_ 14.48 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRII 9, 'l997 PAGE 9 Mr. Linn stated the other concem is the stipula#ion stating the petitioner shall construct a shared driveway with Burger King which is aligned with the Holiday Store's main entrance. He has no problem with working with the City. He has been working with the City all along. He may have been the one that initiated the proposal to combine the access points as long as the City understands that he has no direct control over Burger King. He Mas �et with the franchisee and the owner of Burger King. Mr. L'mn would be agreeable to change that wording to state that they would cooperate, they will combine access points at which time the City or the County and others through power of eminent domain or other means control Burger King, but he does not have the ability to do that. They looked at language that may make more sense that states, "The petitioner and Burger King with the City and County supporting effo�t will coopera#e and construct a second driveway as indicated on the site plan dated 3/14/97." He would agree with something along those iines_ They are certainly willing to cooperate and willing to combine the access points. If the project is made contingent upon the fact that he works out a deal with Burger King, that puts Burger King in the driver's seat_ Ce�tainly, they are willing to work with the City and the County. They have no probtem with the access but they have no direct controf over Burger King. Mr. Linn stated that beyond that, tfie proposal as submitted has been changed several times to address concerns of the City Council and staff. They are concerned about the looks as is the City, and he hoped that everyone is in agreement that it will be a plus for #he neighborhood and for the City. Dr. Vos stated one of the stipulations is pretty specific about the bu�ding design. t-low comfortable are you with that? Mr. Linn stated they have no probiem with it. Tfiis was drawn up by their architect in conjunction with the City. Mr. Harding stated he wanted to make sure that everyone understood that when Ms. McPherson referred to a standing seam metai roof, that is the canopy in the center but the whole of the roof is not standing seam. He thought this would be an enhancement to the neighborhood and the community. Mr. Linn stated they d�essed up the �ear of the building. The rear, with the exception of the glass and the canopies, is identical to the front of the building. He thought this dressed up the rear of the building. Typically, it would look more like a warehouse. The fence will shield ove� half of the building. On the Goodyear site, even though that is not part of the variance, their plans a�e for tota! refurbishing of the building. There will be nothing re-used in this building with the exception of the block walls and the steel structure. It will have all new HVAC, plumbing, electrical, garage doors, windows, entrance doors and service doors, and the�interior will be completely gutted and started from bare wall. It will be very professional. It will be virtually a new building in every respect. It will more than likely need to have a �ew roof also. In all �espects, the City would get two new buildings. 14.49 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 9 9997 PAGE 10 Ms. Mau asked if they knew what types of businesses wouid be there because that would make a d!ifference in the parking. Mr. Linn stated tthey have not done a 1ot of work with tenants. They don't anticipate a large problem with attracting tenants because of the traffic. They have some ideas and will talk to some video stores, an operaiion similar to Subway, perhaps a dry cleaners, beauty shop, ete. They would be retail tenants. This is not the first strip mali they have done. There is more than adequate parking. Mr. Linn stated that even if the whole building were a video store which is a high traffic retail generator, with 48 parking stalls (three used by employees), it is unlikely there would be 45 cu�tomers in the store at one time. The building is only an 8,000 square foot building. A Subway-type store takes about 1,500 to 2,000 square feet. That is a fairly small tenant. Realistically, two tenants would work well. Three tenants would be about the most they would see. He did not see that those kinds of tenants would have the trafFic power of a video store. The parking is adequate. From the traffic studies that were conducted, they were quoted as saying that this project represents no significant impact to the 57th Avenue tra�c. Mr. Kuechle asked for comments regarding the snow storage situation. Mr. Linn stated snow on this site would probably have to be removed. He did not anticipate a problem with a two to four inch snowfall. Anything over that would need to be removed. Th�t is common and not a problem. The companies they hire today have equipment with Ioading facilities and haul the snow away. Mr. Kuechle ask�d about large delivery trucks tha# bring in suppfies. Is there sufficient access on the sit�? Mr. Linn stated they we�e concerned abou# that. They have gone out of their way to be sure they will get delivery vehicles around on the property. The tire center was being serviced by rathe� large trucks. Typically, these trucks are not full size semi t�ailers but rather a semi with a medium-size trailer. They can make it through. In the strip mall, the products wowld be delivered in vans or a medium size tn�ck. This has better delivery vehicle access than the facility they built-�n Oakdale. They are able to get large beer trucks through that facility. Mr. LaDuk stated'he owns 216 - 57th Avenue which he is selling to Mr. Linn. The snow this winter was so bad that when the plows came down 57th Place they plowed snow at least 8 to 10 feet over into the property. They did not have anything out there. If you have only a three�foot space, that may be a problem. Mr. Linn stated th�re would be three feet on the property but the boulevard is 16 feet. Ms. Beaulieu askEd if staff had changed the stipulation for the fencing to be sample A, the board-on-board fence with the scroll top? Ms. McPherson stated staff's recommendation is style A with board-on-board fence in 14.50 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 9, 1997 PAGE 11 between bollards. If the Commission feels the bollards are inappropriate. they can delete that part. Dr. Vos stated that if you put in style A, there no way that this shows the block and rock. �t looks like a wood fence. If he was living along the area, he wouid have to be astute to know tt�at the fence wouid be constructed with pillars. He did noi know that they were asking for the brick. There is no block in the pictures_ He thought the petitioner has a point in building that kind of a fence. He did not know if it would add anything to the building, it is just more decoration. Ms. McPherson stated that whatever the Commission chooses to do, stipulation #2 should be amended at a minimum to state, "The petitioner shall construct a 6-fioot high board-on-board fence with a scrolled top (sample A).° The Commission can choose to include or delete the first part �egarding the stone bollards. Dr. Vos stated stipulation #4 deals with the entrance by Burger King. What about that issue? That is a shared driveway which means some of the property belongs to Burger King and some of the property belongs to the petitioner. Ms. McPherson stated the County has a say in this pa�ticular issue because 57th Avenue is actually a county road. The County would like to see one shared driveway between the two facilities and it appears that it would be all on the Burger King property. 1f the Commission wishes to amend the stipulation io require the petitioner to coop�rate in #acilita�i�g this eo�stn.�ctio� as opposed to mandating it, that would be within their purview. Mr. Kuechle stateci the County would obviously have some �ay in how m�ny access points. What are the altema�ives +f Burger King does r�o# want �to cooperate? Ms. McPherson stated that the County would argue that they would have ihe power to completely eliminate an access. She believed tha# their letter dated Ma�ch 17, 1997, which was written prior to a meeting that the petitioner, staff and the County had, "indicates that since this access site has access to two local roadways as wetl as County Road 102, Coun#y policy dictates that no direct access be permitted onto County Road 102 for this site; however, they will aliow one access point on#o County Road 102 provided that it lines up directly across from the existing main access into the Holiday store. This single access point is to serve both the commercial center and the Goodyear store. Right of access along the main portions of County Road 102 should be dedicated to Anoka County°. One of the residential sites also has ac�ess to 57th Avenue. The County is saying they don't want any access points along 57"' Avenue. The County is saying to reverse the development completely and access it through the residential neighborhood. They would propose that the existing driveways be closed with one driveway between Goodyear and Burger King and exit to the west. This was written prior to the County, petitioner and City staff meeting and hammering out an alternative agreement. What the County has agreed to is to allow one access point to stay and combine the other into one access. 14.51 APPEALS GOMMISSION MEETING APRIL 9, 1997 PAGE 12 Ms. Mau stated it is reasonable to think that the County will come in and, regardless of what Burger Kirhg would like to do, demand that this happen. If they are going to allow them to keep the other entrance, it would be reasonable to buiid it with the entrances in mind at this tim�. It is a moot point as to whether they cooperate or not. Dr. Vos stated he tended to think that too. Is this helpful fo� the petitioner or helpful to have a stipulation that would p�otect the City and the petitioner? 1f !eft as it is, the petitioner canno�t construct a shared driveway when he does not have any share of the driveway. Ms. Beaulieu st�ted it would not be binding anyway. The County cannot do anything they want with anyone's property. Some of this might be a taking from either Burger King or the petiCioner. She thought they shou{d work that out at the time and delete stipulation #4 completely. Nis. Mau agreed. She thought it would be a moot point once the County decides what the� want to do. Dr. Vos stated he did not see any advantage to having an exit to 57th Place. That puts the traffic into a residential area which is not an option. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE'VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION C�#RRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:40 P.M. Dr. Vos stated th�;re are a lot of variance requests but the lot is 140 feet deep which is not as deep as 9p% of the Fridley lots. It is narrow. There is no way to put a building on a long narrow'lot and not get into the setbacks. The lot is fronted on three sides by streets. He thought the variance requests were reasonable. The struggle will be to get the stipulations. Ms. Beaulieu stated this was a nice project and would enhance that area. Ms. Mau agreed. This would be an improveme�t for that location. Her concem is for the neighbors. If we don't have a problem with that fencing, it is reasonable. Block fencing is very expensive and out of line. The point she was trying to make was the upkeep on the waod fence, but she thought the changes they make in the stipulations are reasonabie anid within the parameters. Mr. Kuechle stated he would have one suggestion about the fence and that would be to see if there are any possibilities to enhance the protection of that fence by putting it on a berm. If this is in a tax increment district, it might have possibilities. If the fence could be 18 inches or more higher, then it would be less likely to be impacted by vehicles. He would keep stipulation #4 but reword it somewhat. He would like to see it included so that it would then bring it to the City Council's attention that it is an issue #hat the City could end up having to deal with from a financiai perspective if it comes to having to � 4.52 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 9 1997 PAGE 13 buy that land or buy something from the Burger King property owner to make that combination happen. They should reword the stipulation and i# shouid not be contingent upon that shared driveway. As the petitioner has stated, that certainly holds him hostage. He wouid suggest that they reword that stipulation to read, 'The petitioner shall cooperate in securing a shared driveway with Burger King to bring it into campliance �vit�i tMe 57tM �4venue improvement plan." Ms. Beaulieu stated Burger King is not here to tell them to cooperate. So they are telfing one party to cooperate. She agrees wifh that, but she did not think it was enforceable. Mr. Kuechle stated by doing so #he City Couneil will be aware #hat this issue is out there and to be concerned about it. Dr. Uos stated the City Council will also have the minutes from the meeting and see that we have discussed this as an issue. He d+d not know that it would be any more helpful to have it as a stipulation to the petitioner. Ms. McPherson stated the updated staff report will also indicate that, should you choose to delete the stipulation, the Commission expressed cancem and will fl�g those concerns in the minutes. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Mau, to recommend approval of Variance Request, #97-03, by Steve Linn, Linn Companies: 1. Per Section 205.14.03.C.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the building setback from the public right-of-way firom 35 feet to 16 feet; 2. Per Section 205.14.05.C.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the number of parking stalls from 54 to 48 staps; 3. Per Section 205.14.05.C.(1) of the Fridley Zoning C�, to r�ce th� ha�d surface setback from the public �ight-of-way from 20 feet to 3 feet; 4. Per Section 205.14.05.C.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the hard surface setback from the building from 5 feet to 0 feet; 5. Per Section 205.14.05.C.(1) of tfie Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the two-way drive aisle from 25 feet to 24 feet; and 6. Per Section 205.14.05.C.{1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the one-way drive aisle from 18 feet to 13 feet; To allow the constn.�ction of an 8,000 square foot retail center on Lots 2 through 7, Block 8, City View Addition, generally located a# 298 - 57th Place N.E., with the following stipulations: � 4.53 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 9 1997 PAGE 14 1. �! 3. The petitioner shall construct a 6-foot high board-on-board fence with a scroil top (sampie A). The petitipner shali submit a revised grading and drainage plan complying with the engineer's comments dated April 4, 1997. The petitioner shall construct a second driveway as indicated on the site plan dated March 14, 1997. 4. The petitioner shall submit a revised landscape plan which includes 5 evergreen trees. The landscape plan shall include underground irrigation. Parking lot screening shall consist of a tightly-planted hedge or a low rock face block wall matching the building. 5. The building design shall be that indicated on plans da#ed March 14, 1997. This includes: a b. c. d. e. Standing seam metai roof, green in color, flashing to also be green. Green canopies over the glass store fronts. Green glazed tile inserts. Accent building lighting, brown tone in color. Lights shall be approved by staff prior to building permit issuance. Light tan smooth concrete block with darker rock face block base. The grout color shall be different than the block color. 6. Tenant signage shall be individually, intemally lit letter. Signage shall be located on the sign band indicated on the drawing, A3, dated Ma�ch 14, 1997. If more than two tenants, a comprehensive sign plan shall be approved by the City Council prior to issuance of sign permits. 7. The petitioner shall install the required parking lot screening and participate in the 57th A�enue reconstruction plan. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CA�RIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. McPherson st�ted the City Council would consider this �equest on Apri! 28, 1997. Mr. Hickok provided an update on Planry'�r�Commission and Council actions. 14.54 City of Fridley .�I I�_.el�i}I'� .s� \ II>� �.�1 TO: William W. Burns, City Manager�� PW97-110 FROM: John G. Flora,�ublic Works Director DATE: Apri124, 1997 SUBJECT: Change Order # 1 to Water Treatment Plant #3 As the Water Treatment Plant #3 at Well # 12 is being completed a number of items have been identified and need to be addressed in Change Order # 1 to the project. The changes include the modification of the pazking lot to satisfy code requirements, the removal and replacement of the concrete curb and gutter and street paving on 73 �i Avenue to improve the street alignment, #he additional cost for the brick pattern for the building, the relocation of the radio an#ertrta, a�d addition af the drainage and temperature sensors in the building. The Change Order also includes a deduction for the Cit�s effort in staking the project. , Tl�e net co�t to Change Order # 1 is an additiona�. $10,33�.00. As a means of completing the project recommend the City Council approve Change Order # 1 to the Water Treatment Plant #3, City Project No. 293 15.01 City Project No. 293 CHANGE ORDER (Instructions on reverse side' No. _1 J PROJECT: Water Treatment Plant No. 3 DATE OF ISSUANCE: Apri121, 1997 OWNER: City of Fridley (Name, 6431 Universiry Avenue NE OWNER's Project No. 293 Address) Fridley, MN 55432 CONTRACTOR: Richmar Construction ENGINEER: MSA, Consulting Engineers 7776 Alden Way 1326 Energy Park Drive Fridley, MN 55432 St. Paul, MN 55108-5202 CONTRACT FOR: Water T'reatment Plant No. 3 ENGINEER's Project No. 685-014-30 You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents. Description: See Attached Purpose of Change Order: See Attached Attachments: (List documents supporting change) CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Price Original Contract Time Substantial Completion - April 15, 199'7 $ 1.507.485.00 Einal_�omnletion - June 30. 1997 � days or aate Previous Change Orders No. — to No. — Net change from previous Change Orders $ 0 None � Contract Price prior to this Change Order Contract Time Prior to this Change Order Substantial Completion - April 15, 1997 $_ 1.507.485.00 ; Final Comoletion - June 30. 1997 aay� «au� Net Increase (Beerease� of this Change Order Net Increase ��Beerease) of this Change Order Substantial Completion - May 15, 1997 $ 10_336.00 Einal Comnletion - June 30. 1997 a�Y: Contract Price with all appraved Change Orders Contract Time with all approved Change Orders Substantial Completion - May 15, 1997 $ j_517.821.00 Final Comnletion - June 30. 1997 a�n a a�k RECOMMENDED: APPROVED: APPROVED• . By � by by MS , Consulting Engineers Owner Contractor EJCDC No. 1910-8-B (1983 Edirion) 5.02 front685.014 00672-1 6ss-oia-Zo CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 WATER TREATMENT PLANT NO. 3, FRIDLEY, MN FILE NO. 685-014-30 APRIL 21, 1997 A discussion of the items included in Change Order No. 1 is given below: Item No. 1 Modify construction of parking area -- This item includes modifications to the parking area to accommodate island �nd code requirements. The Owner shall be responsible for all construction staking related to this change. This item results in an add to the construction contract of $1,720. Item No. 2 Remove and replace curb and gutter along the north side of 73 1/2 Ave. — This item includes the removai and replacement of apprmxunately 65 ft. of curb and gutter as directed by the Owner. This change provides a straight alignment for the curb along 73 1/� Ave. This was staked by the Ovc+ner's staff. This item � results in an add to the construction contract of $1,970. Item No. 3 flwner will prov�de project stalang — T#�is item requirrs the t�wner's staff to provide a11 project staking. This item �ts �n a cre�it to �he cas�ction contract of $2,000. Item No. 4 Provide brick selected by Owner — This item includes the costs realized by the Co�ar�or �to fi�ish �e briek ,selec� hy � Uv�r. �h�s -item r�l�s � aa add to the construction contract of $3, i46. 3iiis cost is based on the Contractor furnishing 28,600 brick at an additional cost of $110/1,000 brick. Item No. 5 Remove and replace bituminous pavement along 73 1/2 Ave. -- This item includes the removal and replacetnent of Hituminous pavcment from the road�ay centerline to the curb. This work was as directed by the Owner. This item results in an add to the construction contract of $4,140. Item No. 6 Relocate radio antenna -- This item includes the relocation of the radio antenna from the existing location to the new portion of the building at a higher elevation. This change wili result in better radio signal transmission into and out of the new facility. This item wili result in an add to the construction contract of $900. Item No. 7 Offset scupper on east side of buiiding — This item includes the relocation of a 15.03 scupper downleader to avoid a conflict with the overflow pipe from the backwash storage tank. This item results in an add to the construction contract ofi $220. Item No. 8 Add low temperature sensors -- This item includes the addition of low temperature sensors in the Chemical Feed Room, the Chlorine Room, and the Storage Room. These sensors will be wired into a common low temperature alarm. This item will result in an add to the construction contract of $240. In addition to these items the Contractor is also requesting an extension to the substantial completion date. The Contractor is requesting that the date for substantial completion be changed from the original date of April 15, 1997, to May 15, 1997. The Contractor's justification for tl�e time extension request is in part due to the change order items and in part due to the early onset of winter and cold weather. SUMMARY OF CHANGE ITEMS Item Descri�tion 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Modify construction of parking area Remove and replace curb and gutter along the north side of 73 1/2 Ave. Owner will provide project staking Provide brick selected by Owner Remove and replace bituminous pavement along 73 1/2 Ave. Relocate radio antennae Offset scupper on east side of building Add low temperature sensors TOTAL CHANGE TO CONTRACT PRICE IS AN ADD OF $10,336. TOTAL CHANGE TO CONTRACT TIME IS 30 CALENDAR DAYS. 15.04 Add or Deduct To Contract Add $1,720 Add $1,970 Deduct $2,000 Add $3,146 Add $4,140 Add $900 Add $220 Add $240 ///��:�1 �� F�i 'li`; ti� `�,:� s a' Fridley Police Department Memorandum . �� To. William W. Burns� From: Dave Sallman 'Q Date: Aprif 22, 1997 Re: Sharx The liquor license for Sharx is up for renewal on April 30`�', 1997. In Chapter 603.17 of the Fridley City Ordinance "the City Council may suspend or revoke any license of intoxicating liquor for the violation of any provision or condition of this Chapter. ..". Except in certain circumstances (not germane to this issue) there is to be a public hearing to discuss the charges which are the cause for any license suspension. It is necessary to provide written notice to the licensee stating the nature of the charges which would potentially be the cause for suspension or revocation at least 10 days prior ta any public hearing. The preceding information is discussed in Chapter 603.18 (Notice) of the City Ordinance. It is the staff recommendation to the City Council that the license renewal for Sharx be tabled at the April 28`�', 1997 Council meeting. The current license should be extended to May 19"`, 1997 (or a later meeting) at which time a public hearing will be held to discuss the issues concerning a possible suspension or revocation of the Shan� liquor license. The issues were discussed in a memo originally dated April 11�', 1997 (copy attached) and I believe warrant consideration by the City Council prior to any renewal of the Sharx liquor license. Written notice will be provided to the Sharx licensee at least 10 days prior to the public hearing. The City Council should also set the public hearing for May 19�`, 1997 (or later) if the staff recommendation is accepted. �6.0�