The URL can be used to link to this page

07/27/1998 - 4826� unroF Fwa�r FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING ATTENDENCE SHEET Maw.day, Ju-Ey 27, 199� 7:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PRTNT NAME fCLEARLY) ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER �..J!% � ��C.�/•� � /�/`h—' C� `� � / '"/�L?;j �-' ��Ma� . � � �i �� 3 ,�, . . : � - , ; �� ; p� � _ � ;�— ., „. � c _�-�...�� -, ---z-��-� �_ �. -��-<:.,_.- _. � �-� �-° (�.t�, �� . y,� � "�-,- � � ,✓r'v� �y �'��,(li..�. ��i� �G!ti� �.-C"�'"y2-� +. ' � � � � � �ll� , �� lv z1 /!i,'�5 � 55: �� ,� � g-�� 1�� ; (� , I , i `� � � `/ l � � � `-�. • 11 ,V' � �` � ' � S--_ .� c� -�- � (�" ; j/9 .r�LLc_.'� i /� � � _ � � �." 1 1 8� � �. 1`�� c'� � (� � �� -% �C: 1i � Cc�' l Y'. �. ...3�� c, �:`.� � � �� -�' c� � C.`i � � �f � �� 1f\.1 C` `�'.".� � � �� 1 �'�.� � `; c �L:� �"'� , �'�v"�" ��' � ; � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF �oF JULY 27, 1998 FRIDLEY The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Ugon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. . PRESENTATION: Appreciation Awards for Safety Camp Contributors APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Special City Council Meeting of July 6, 1998 City Council Meeting of July 13, 1998 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: OLD BUSINESS: Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 17, 1998 (Tabled July 13, 1998) ............................................................... 1.01 - 1.15 NEW BUSINESS: Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of July 15, 1998 ....................................... 2.01 - 2.23 Special Use Permit Request, SP #98-10, by Dawn M. Ambuhl, to Allow the Construction of a Second Accessory Structure (Garage), Generally Located at 6544 Hickory Street � . N. E. (Ward 3) ............................................................................. 3.01 - 3.08 Special Use Permit Request, SP #98-11, by Margaret R. Reed, to Allow the Construction _ of a Second Accessory Structure (Garage), Generally Located at 6017 Third Street N.E. (Ward 3) .........................................................:.......................... 4.01 - 4.09 Special Use Permit Request, SP #98-12, by Mervin J. Herrmann, to Allow the Construction of a Second Accessory Building, Generally Located at 278 Mercury� Drive N.E. (1Nard 1) ..................................................... 5.01 - 5.08 rR��LC T�.� � T t,.VUrvGIL Mtt 1 ING Ut- JULY 17, 'I APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA• NEW BUSINESS: Special Use Permit Request, SP #98-13, by Hilltop Trailer Sales, Inc., to Allow the Display and Sales of Recreational Vehicles, Generally Located at 7810 University Avenue N.E. (Ward 3) ...........:.................................. 6.01 - 6.08 Special Use Permit Request, SP #98-14, by Maertens-Brenny Construction Company, to Increase the Allowable Lot Coverage by a Single Story Structure in an M-2 Zone from 40 Percent to 50 Percent, Generally Located at 7901 Main Street N.E. (Ward 3) ............................. 7.01 - 7.10 Approve License to Permit a Mobile Home/House Trailer at Totino Grace High School, 1350 Gardena Avenue N.E. (1Nard 2) ...............................................:.....:........ 8.01 - 8.03 Appro��e Proposal and Authorize Contract for Comprehensive Plan Consulting Services ........................... 9.01 - 9.22 Motion to Adopt the City of Fridley's Storm Damage Clean Up Policy ........................................................... 10.01 - 10.02 �cm� cv r�TV r�n� ��i iu�GTit�r nG _It II v �7 �c1c1Q Pd►[�F d APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUEDI: Resolution Authorizing the Posting of "No Parking" Signs on One Side of Certain MSASStreets ............................................................................ 11.01 - 11.02 Appointment: City Employee .................................................... 12.01 Claims.................................................................................... 13.01 Licenses.................................................................................... 14.01 - 14.06 0 Estimates............................................................:...................... 15.01 - 15.14 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF .1ui v 2� 1QQR OPEN FORUM VISITORS• Consideration of Items Not on Agenda (15 minufes). NEW BUSINESS: Resolution Approving a Subdivision, Lot Split, LS #98-01, to Create Two Residential Lots, Generally Located at 1027 Mississippi Street N.E. (by Cully and Michele Smutzler) (Ward 1) �A�'_C G .................................................. 16.01 - 16.13 City Attorney's Report .......................................................................... 17.01 Informal Status Reports ....................................................................... 18.01 ADJOURN. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 2?, 1998 >� /��rc��-- "y -�0 '� �QTY OF , � F�u��ei The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientarion or status with regazd to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. ��_� i_�_ � _._ r��i ' _L�� PRESENTATION: Appreciation Awards for Safety Camp Contributors APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Special City Counci! Meeting of Ju/y 6, 1998 I �i � �� i s City Council Meeting of Ju/y 13, 1998 ��j% APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: OLD BUSINESS: Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 17, 1998 (Tabled July 13, 1998) ....................... 1.01 -1.15 �� APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: Receive the Minutes of the Pianning Commission Meeting of July 15, 1998 ................... ............... 2.01 - 2.23 Special Use Permit Request, SP #98-10, by Dawn M. Ambuhl, to Allow the Construction of a Second Accessory Structure (Garage), Generally Located at 654 Hickory Street N.E. (Ward 3) ... .. ..... ...................... 3.01 - 3.08 Special Use Permit Request, SP #98-11, by Margaret R. Reed, to Allow the Construction of a Second Accessory Structure (Garage), Generally Located at 6017 Third Street N.E. (Ward 3) .............:..................... 4.01 - 4.09 Special Use Permit Request, SP #98-12, by Mervin J. Herrmann, to Allow the Construction of a Second Accessory Building, Generally Located at 278 Mercury Drive N.E. (Ward 1) ............. 5.01 - 5.08 Special Use Permit Request, SP #98-13, by Hilltop Trailer Sales, Inc., to Allow the Display and Sales of Recreational Vehicles, Generally Located at 7810 University Avenue N.E. (Ward 3) ...... 6.01 - 6.08 ,,: � � ��. / FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 27, 1998 APPROVALOFPROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUEDI: Special Use Permit Request, SP #98-14, by Maertens-Brenny Construction Company, to increase the Ailowabie Lot Coverage by a Single Story Structure in an M-2 Zone from 40 Percent to Percent, Generally Located at 7901 Mai Street N.E. (Ward 3) ..... . .. ..................... 7.01 - 7.10 �. . v � Approve license to Permit a Mobile Home/House Trailer at Totino Grace High School, 1350 Gardena Avenue N.E. (Ward 2) ....................... 8.01 - 8.03 C��`'`� Approve Proposal and Authorize Contract for Comprehensive Plan Consulting Services ................................... 9.01 - 9.22 �� Motion to Adopt the City of Fridley's Storm Damage Clean Up Polic .. ............... 10.01 -10.02 i � Resolution Authorizing the Posting of "No Parking" Signs on One Side of Certain MSAS Streets .................................. 11.01 -11.02 Appointment: City Employee ............. 12.01 Claims ................................13.01 � J PAGE 2 APPROVALOFPROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED): Licenses ........................... ...... 14.01 -14.06 Estimates ............................... . 15.01 - 15.14 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: C'�--�'G�-� U/ , �� d ��" x��-Q-� ��-�-� . (�-� . OPEN FORUM. VISITORS: �.�'� -- ,�-/%� � �� Consideration of Items Not on Agenda (15 minutes). ,'i NEW BUSINESS: Resolution Approving a Subdivision, Lot Split, LS #98-01, to Create Two Residential Lots, Generally Located at 1027 Mississippi Street N.E. (by Cully and Michele Smutzler) (Ward 1) C� • � % � �'� /D � G� City Attorney's Report ...................... �t %� 16.01 - 16.13 ... 17.01 Informal Status Reports ........................ 18.01 � ' G�-r�.�-� �� D �'��1�"' ADJOURN. �"�� - _� THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF JULY 6.1998 The Special Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Jorgenson at 7:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Jorgenson led the Council and the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Jorgenson, Councilmember Barnette, Councilmember Billings, Councilmember Schneider and Councilmember Bolkcom. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. Mayor Jorgenson explained that the purpose of the special meeting was to discuss the City's storm damage and tree removal policy. This is the first opportunity the City Council has had to meet since the storm damage that occurred on June 24, 1998. Mayor Jorgenson noted that the items for discussion were as follows: the City's Emergency Management procedures related to storm damage, the policy on potential or existing weather- related damages, the policy on public notification of cleanup, possible assistance available for private cleanup, and code enforcement issues related to storm cleanup. 1. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, explained that as a result of the July 1, 1997 storm, a policy was developed relating to storm damage. This policy states that the Public Safety Director or designee determines the need to declare an area tliat is damaged as ari emergency area. Once the area is defined, a declazation of emergency would be established, and they would then identify what effort would be taken to pick up brush and debris and establish a time limit. The City would remove all damaged trees located in public right-of-ways and City pazks. Residential, commercial and industrial properties with damaged tree branches within the designated area could cut and stack them on the boulevard in front of their property for removal by the City within the specified time limit. The City would not be responsible for the removal of any private tree trunks or brush pick-up after the established time period. Properties with building damage would be responsible for the building material clean-up and disposal. The City would make available to properry owners any information available on contractors and sites available for disposal of materials. In the event of a major disaster, the City would request additional help from other governmental agencies and military organizations. � SPECIAL CITY CO_UNCIL MEETING - JULY 6.1998 PAGE 2 Councilmember Schneider asked how storm debris from the last two storms was handled. Mr. Flora explained that the Police Department, Public Works Department and the Fire Department met and identified a disaster area. It was broadcast on cable television and announced on several radio stations with a designated time in which the removal would be started and finished. Mayor Jorgenson asked if Mr. Flora had an idea as to how many properties were impacted in the May 15 storm versus the June storm. Mr. Flora explained that the City received appror>imately 600 calls for the May 15 storm. The June storm resulted in approximately 60 calls from various parts of the City. Councilmember Schneider asked if it would make a difference if all of the 60 calls had been received from one particular neighborhood, or if there was some established number criteria for calls that were citywide. Mr. Flora stated if a major portion of the City was impacted, an area would be identified and addressed accordingly. If only a small portion of the City was affected, the City would not assist with storm damage removal. Councilmember Bolkcom stated she received more calls regarding the June storm than for the May storm. Residents were concerned that their tax money was used in May and because of that they would not receive assistance for the June storm. She stated she has had difficulty addressing these comments. Mr. Burns stated that the May storm resulted in power lines being down, fires, flooded streets, etc. All of the police crews were out as well as the Fire Department staff. As a result, he feels the May storm was much more of a threat to the public safety than the June storm. It was noted that there were a number of trees down during the June storm, and the Public Works Department made sure that the public right-of-ways were cleared first and foremost. Ho�Never, a decision must be made as to what should be done with respect to private properties. The position that the City has taken is that if the storm has not had a major impact on the City, it has not been looked upon as a major emergency. The magnitude of the damage throughout the total area of the City is what deems an emergency disaster. A determination must be made as to when the City removes crews from their regular duties and diverts them to storm damage cleanup. Councilmember Schneider asked if it is common to get up to 60 calls from residents after a storm. Mr. Flora responded that a number of the calls were inquiries to see if the City was going to pick up the storm damage as had been done in May. Staf�s response after the June storm was that the City would be picking up boulevard branches and debris, but that the trees on private properties would be the responsibility of the residents and/or their insurance carriers. Mayor Jorgenson explained that unfortunately, insurance companies only cover tree removal if the tree has fallen on a house/garage or some other structure. If there are three or four trees down on one property and they did not fall on a structure, the insurance company is not going to offer any assistance for that. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JULY 6 1998 PE1GE 3 Councilmember Bolkcom noted that it would be difficult for residents to even obtain brush removal services. Garbage haulers have in the past agreed to pick up a limited amount of trees; however at this time the damage is widespread and therefore they may impose limits as to what they will take as we1L Mr. Flora explained that most refuse haulers have the ability to pick up debris at the curb. Councilmember Bolkcom stated her refuse hauler will only take a limited number of bundles each time and that is what most other residents aze dealing with at this time. Mr. Flora stated he believes the biggest problem is finding something to do with the material. The Anoka County Tree Refuse Site is closed and the refuse haulers need a place to bring it to as well. Councilmember Billings asked what the City's current policy is. Discussion has been that the current policy is not working. Councilmember Schneider asked how the policy is implemented. He asked if other surrounding communities were contacted to see if they aze experiencing the same type of problems. 2. POLICY ON POTENTIAL OR EXISTING WEATHER RELATED DAMAGES: Mayor Jorgenson stated there had been some discussion as to the City staff being able to pick up the materials. She asked if the City has ever used contract employees to assist during the busy construction times. Mr. Flora stated the City has not used any contract employees. To date, the City has always used in-house staff, which impacts all of the departments because of the limited force. Mr. Burns noted that the City has used Ceres Environmental Services, Inc., to dispose of the material. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the City generally responds to calls for pick-up or if they have staff drive around and pick up debris that is on the boulevard. Mr. Flora stated many times they are responding to a call, however all trees which have fallen on the public right-of-way are removed. 3. POLICY ON PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF CLEANUP: Mr. Flora noted that when an emergency is called, the City attempts to use the resources available, such as cable television and the Fridley Information Line. Other than that, residents obtain information by contacting staff at the Municipal Center. Councilmember Schneider asked if the City has record of the 60 residents who called the City after the June storm. Mr. Flora stated that the City has an address and telephone number for those residents who called. Mr. Flora provided information on storm removal policies of neighboring communities. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JULY 6.1998 PAGE 4 Mr. Colotti, 1121 Lynde Drive, stated their property received some damage, which they were able to collect themselves; however they have seen horrendous situations on the streets. He distributed copies of photographs of storm damage at the 1120 Lynde Drive property after the June storm. Four trees were lost and the owner of the property was injured while attempting to bring the trees to the curbside. He believes that a good portion of the 60 calls after that storm came from residents concerned about this particular property. . Jeff Shaw, 5854 Stinson Boulevard, stated this is the first storm that has affected his property since he purchased it in 1981. His neighbor also received damage. Three trees fe?1 across Stinson Boulevard on Thursday morning and blocked him in. A call was made to the Ciry without response. NSP was contacted to make sure tliat the lines could be moved so that they could cut their way out of the street. They spent a considerable amount of time doing so and ended up with a very large pile of branches. He feels that a tree that falls and blocks a street should be the responsibility of the City. Mr. Flora stated he had spoken with the neighbor on this issue. The tree was a private tree and off the right-of-way. �-Ie was told that the tree fell into the right-of-way when it was cut for removal. Mr. Shaw stated this was not the case. One was leaning and ready to fall over, but the other two were major oak trees that fell onto the street. Residents cut down the one that was leaning, but the other two were blocking the roadway at 2:00 a.m. Mayor Jorgenson asked if staff came out to assess the situation. Mr. Shaw responded in the affirmative, but that they had determined that it was not the City's responsibility. Mayor Jorgenson asked if it is possible that by the time City staff had come out the neighbors had already removed two of the trees. Ralph Nielsen, 5876 Stinson Boulevard, stated he received storm damage and had many family members over to assist in the cleanup. However, when he awoke in the morning, both trees were blocking the road, and neighbors joined together to clear a portion of the area to allow residents to leave the azea. City staff arrived after a portion of the road had been cleared. Mr. Nielsen hired someone to remove the third tree, which he feared would be dangerous in the event of another storm. � A1 and Lisa Wasserman, 340 Hugo Street, thanked the Council for arranging the special Council meeting. Mr. Wasserman stated his property was affected by both storms. When he called after the June storm he was told that the City would not be picking up the brush. One of the trees, which fell on his roof, will likely cost $2,500 to remove. The insurance company will probably only pay $500. He has a very large pile of debris, which they cannot mulch. Their garbage hauler will agree to pick up the brush, but requires that bundles be no larger than 3 to 4 feet long, and no bigger than 18 inches in diameter. At that rate, it will take them 1-1/2 years to dispose of the debris. Councilmember Billings asked if the City's policy states that the City will pick up any tree 6 inches in diameter or less. Mr. Flora responded in the affirmative. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JULY 6 1998 PAGE 5 Ms. Wasserman stated they were cited for having the debris pile in their yazd. T:�ey have mulched what they could, but they have no way of getting rid of it. Mr. Wasserman stated between Hugo Street and Ironton Street there is a very large pile of debris on the boulevard which obstructs the view for persons tuming onto East River Road. What can they do to obtain assistance? Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated a summer intern in the Code Enforcement Department has been going around to neighborhoods in the City to track code violations and nuisances. A number of the violations which she has documented are for properties with storm debris. He noted however that this is not a citation. She has been notified of the situation and will not be issuing notices to residents. Mayor Jorgenson stated the Federal Government declared the May 15"' storm an emergency. To obtain information in regard to financial assistance from FEMA, Mr. Wasserman can contact Mr. Flora at City Hall. One resident asked that City staff contact block captains and let them know of the City's intent to pick up storm debris so that the block captains can pass the information on to residents in the neighborhoods. Mayor Jorgenson stated the City would be utilizing the Fridley Information Line (572-3600) which will provide information on brush pick-up as well as other emergency information. A telephone line will also be available for residents to call which will record the name, address & telephone number and assist staff in tracking storm damage as�vell. Ed Piersak, 625 Fairmont Street N.E., stated he lost a tree in the storm, which he had his son cut up. He did not contact the City because they picked up the debris from the May storm and he assumed this would be the case for the June storm as well. This is the first time in 27 yeazs that he has asked for assistance. Councilmember Bolkcom stated when the City picked up after the May storm, she assumed that would also be the case for the June storm. Councilmember Schneider sta.ted he feels that there was a communications breakdown with staff. He was out of town at the time of the storm, but received a number of calls at his home from concerned residents. Valerie Rolstad, 1100 Lynde Drive, stated she lost a tree that was small enough that the refuse hauler picked it up. She wondered what constitutes when the City will pick up the debris. In her case, the June storm effected her property more than the May storm. Joyce Colotti, 1121 Lynde Drive, stated they were able to take care of the damage which occurred on their own property. However, she has concerns about the neighbor directly across the street who was injured when trying to clean up his property. This neighbor has been a faithful, law-abiding citizen who is now in need of assistance. She stated it does not seem fair that cleanup is not available from the June storm just because it affected fewer citizens. She feels all citizens of Fridley deserve the same respect. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JULY 6.1998 PAGE 6 Frank Plant, 5690 Regis Drive N.E., stated they lost a tree, wliich fell partially into the street. They cleaned it up and piled it on the boulevard. If the City hauled the debris from the May storm, he feels it is only fair that they also haul away the debris from the storm in June. Pete Eisenzimmer, 6536 Oakley Drive, stated he feels the policy should have been left as it was. Debris was always cleaned up in the past prior to 1997. The problems have resulted since that time. Councilmember Bolkcom explained that prior to 1997 there was no storm cleanup policy. Ray McAfee, 1360 Hillcrest Drive, stated one storm last year and one storm this year have resulted in a water problem in their neighborhood. The water runs off of Hillcrest and Woody Lane into two catch basins. One year ago, it washed out a neighbors retaining wall. Unfortunately, the water overflow problem, though reported to the City, was never taken caze of and during the last storm resulted in a large, deep water hole which is a serious safety hazard for the small children in the area. He asked that the City consider the concerns of its residents and take appropriate action. Mr. Flora stated the retaining wall on this property was built incorrectly. The City put in another storm water line for drainage and suggested improvements that the homeowner should consider for the retaining wall. Unfortunately, the May storm resulted in many of the catch basins being blocked, causing overflow. The retaining wall eroded. The City has offered to provide fill for the property, however, it will be the contractor's responsibility to rebuild the wall. and the result will be determined in the civil case between the homeowner and the contractor. The water hole is on private property. Mr. McAfee asked who is responsible for easement property. He felt the water hole should fenced off to protect the children in the area. Mr. Flora stated he would be in contact with the resident of the property in regard to this matter. Marty Povlitzki, on Hugo Street, stated he did not have any property damage, however the neighbor's tree fell on the power line and when the tree company came-to cut the tree, thz debris was left on his property. He was not concerned at that time, however, as he assumed that the City would again be picking up storm debris. He feels if the resources are not there to provide for the cleanup, the City should at least provide a temporary site where the debris can be hauled. He is also concerned about the piles on the boulevard on East River Road between Hugo and Ironton, which is a traffic hazard. 4. POSSIBLE ASSISTANCE AVAILABLE FOR PRIVATE CLEANUP: Mayor Jorgenson asked if a facility is available to place storm debris. Mr. Flora responded there is not a facility at this time, however a park could be used as a site. Councilmember Bolkcom stated there are many residents who do not have a means of hauling the debris to a site. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JULY 6 1998 PAGE 7 Mr. Flora stated the City does not have a forestry department or the equipment necessary to provide for this type of cleanup. The City has a street crew and a decision needs to be rnade as to whether the work in that department is placed on hold while they provide the clean up, whether a new department ne�ds to be established, or whether the City should contract out for these cleanup services. Also, it will be necessary to determine if only boulevard debris will be hauled. Councilmember Schneider asked how other cities handle the matter. Mr. Flora noted that some have contracts and some are doing it in-house. Councilmember Bolkcom stated it would take time to establish a consistent policy. In the meantime, what can be done for these residents? Councilmember Billings stated that Council must determine whether they want to be in the tree- removing business or not. In 1997 the Council decided they did not want to send a crew out to pick up unless the Public Works Director/Fire Chief/Police Chief determined that it was a major storm. The City either must have a policy that they do pick up debris after a storm, or that they do not. Councilmember Schneider stated the City does have a policy. The problem is in the interpretation of the policy. He believes a number of factors, such as the resources a.vailable definitely impact the decision as to whether a storm is considered major. One resident stated that the City needs to purchase a mulcher and a large truck to haul tree branches. Councilmember Barnette stated he agreed with staff on the decision not to pick up storm debris. The decision was based on the policy established in 1997. Perhaps the policy needs to be re- evaluated, however staff responded appropriately in this case. Councilmember Bolkcom suggested that the Council consider authorizing staff to pick up the debris from the June storm and then sit down and re-evaluate the policy.- MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to have the City pick up debris from the June storm and then re-evaluate the current policy. Seconded by Councilmember Schneider, with an amendment that the policy be re-evaluated at the Council's next conference session. . Councilmember Billings asked that the previous motions be considered sepazately. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to instruct City staff to clean up storm debris from the June 24 storm and any debris left from the May storm. Seconded by Councilmember Schneider. Councilmember Barnette stated there aze many residents who may not be aware of the Council's decision. He asked if City crews will be driving around and picking up without calls. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JULY 6.1998 PAGE 8 Councilmember Bolkcom noted that something would likely be published in the Fridley Focus. Mayor Jorgenson stated the City would need to look at a way of public notification of how the City will handle the situation. The City must also communicate to people how situations will be handled in the future. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Flora asked how soon the council wants the cleanup implemented. Mayor Jorgenson suggested that it begin on Monday, July 13, 1998. Pete Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, asked that the City consider joining forces with another City and purchase a mulcher. A resident at 7364 Melody Drive stated the Fridley compost site is closed from the middle of June through mid-September at the height of the grass-cutting season. He asked why this decision was made. Mayor Jorgenson explained that the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission suggested that the site be closed during the summer months primarily as a cost measure. The site is primarily used for leaf collection. The resident asked if Council could consider having the site open for two days during the week. Mayor Jorgenson stated staff and Council could discuss this further. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom that a discussion be held at the next Council conference meeting regarding storm branch cleanup, the forces used for that cleanup, and the interpretation of the policy. Councilmember Billings stated he would be voting against the motion. He does not have a problem discussing at the budget session the manner in which the City does the cleanup, but he cannot think of any information which staff can bring them at the conference session which will be substantial over information received at this meeting. He thinks the Council needs to implement a new policy immediately in terms of how and whether the City will pick up. Councilmember Bolkcom stated she would like to obtain information in regard to prices and contract costs. Councilmember Schneider stated he feels staff could offer suggestions in regard to policy changes or understanding or interpretation of the existing policy based on testimony received at this meeting. MOTION by Councilmember Billings for a SUBSTITLJTE MOTION that Council establish a policy that in the event of a storm, the City will pick up tree brush and limbs and that a determination be made at the next City budget work session whether this will be done by City forces or by contract forces. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. SPECIAL CITY COITNCIL MEETING - JULY 6.1998 PAGE 9 Councilmember Billings stated he believes as the residents do that it should not make any difference as to the amount of trees down or the number of affected residents. It is impossible for anyone to make a decision as to the magnitude of the storm and have it be fair to all. The City must make a decision as to whether or not they will pick up storm debris. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Tom Rafferty, 148 Horizon Circle, stated the Council now made a conscious effort to pick up branches and he feels they made the right decision. Mr. Flora suggested that a deadline be established for putting brush at the bouTevard and that this deadline be Monday, July 13, 1998. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, to adjourn the Special Meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Billings. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. Respectfully submitted, Tamara D. Saeflce Nancy Jorgenson Recording Secretary Mayor ..` THE MiNUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF JULY 13, 1998 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Jorgenson at 7:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGTANCE: Mayor Jorgenson led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Jorgenson, Councilman Barnette, Councilman Billings, Councilman Schneider and Councilwoman Bolkcom. MEMBERS ABSENT: None PROCLAMATION: Mayor Jorgenson read a proclamation designating Tuesday, August 4, 1998 as National Night Out in the City of Fridley. Three residents representing the National Night Out Advisory Board were present to accept the proclamation and to provided Council with National Night Out T-shirts. The Board invited residents and the City Council to join them in the event. Registration forms can be obtained by calling 572-3638. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COIJNCIL MEETING - June 22. 1998: MOTION by Councilmember Schneider to approve the minutes of the 7une 22, 1998 City Council meeting as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously. _ APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: 1. RECEIVE PETITION NO. 3-1998 FROM RESIDENTS ON RICE CREEK BOULEVARD FOR A CANADA GOOSE CAPTURE AND REMOVAL PROGRAM AND CONSIDER VARTANCE REOUEST (WARD 31: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that residents from the 200 block of Rice Creek Boulevard are seeking a variance from an ordinance that forbids the trapping of birds and wild animals. They would like to hire the University of Minnesota Department of Fisheries and Wildlife to CIT'Y COUNCiL MEETING OF JULY 13. 1998 PAGE 2 round up and remove geese from their backyards during the next week. Residents will cover the entire cost for the removal. RECEIVED PETITION NO. 3-1998 FROM RESIDENTS ON RICE CREEK BOULEVARD FOR A CANADA GOOSE CAPTURE AND REMOVAL PROGRAM AND APPROVED THE VARIANCE REQUEST. 2. RECEIVE PETITION NO. 4-1998 FROM RESTDENTS FOR TftE MAINTENANCE OF TAE SECONDARY POND WHTCA RECEIVES WATER FROM HTGALAND LAKE (WARD 2): Mr. Burns, City Manager, explained that residents have asked that they be reimbursed for work done in May as well as for similar work in future years. This petition will be forwarded to the Rice Creek Watershed District. RECEIVED PETITION NO. 4-1998 FROM RESIDENTS FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SECONDARY POND WHICH RECEIVES WATER FROM HIGHLAND LAKE. 3. RECEIVE THE MiNUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMiSSION MEETING OF JUNE 17. 1998: THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND PLACED ON THE REGULAR AGENDA, IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING ITEM 16. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 46-1998 REOUESTING MUNICIPAL STATE ATD SYSTEM CONSTRUCTiON FUNDS FOR OTAER LOCAL USE: Mr. Burns, City Manager, explained that the requested funds would be used for the reimbursement of costs for work done on Hackmann Avenue and Hackmann Circle. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 46-1998, REQUESTING MUNICIPAL STATE AID SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION FUNDS FOR OTHER LOCAL USE. 5. APPROVE JOiNT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN TAE CITY OF FRTDLEY AND THE COUNTY OF ANOKA FOR CENTRAL AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1998-4: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the agreement provides that the City pay an estimated $594,437.76 as its share of an estimated $2,261,862.76 total project cost. The component parts of the City's share are as follows: a) Water and sewer adjustments b) Storm sewer c) Concrete curb and gutter d) Bikeway e) Internally lit street name signs � Engineering $ 45.562.72 $393,385.51 $ 15,409.30 $ 79,292.80 $ 16,755.00 $ 44,032.43 CiTY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 13 1998 PAGE 3 Mr. Burns stated that the City intends to use off-system Municipal State Aid funds to pay for the improvements. It also intends to assess for concrete curb and gutter at the rate of $11.00 per front foot. THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND PLACED ON THE REGULAR AGENDA BEFORE ITEM NO. 17. 6. RECEIVE BTDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR BITUMINOUS WALKWAY SLURRY SEAL PROJECT NO. ST. 1998-11: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that staff is recommending that Council approve the expenditure of $16,083.60 for slurry sealing the City's bituminous bikeways. The City expects that off-system Municipal State Aid funds can be used to cover most of the cost. Additionally, the City expects to use Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) funds to cover that portion of the costs attributable to the Fridley Executive Park site. Councilmember Barnette noted that a revised Joint Powers Agreement had been distributed to Councilmembers to replace the one in the agenda book for Item 5. He asked that Item 5 be removed from the consent agenda so that Mr. Flora could discuss the changes made to the initial agreement. RECEIVED BIDS AND AWARDED CONTRACT FOR BITUMINOUS WALKWAY SLURRY SEAL PROJECT NO. ST. 1998-11 TO STRUCK & ERWIN PAVING, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,083.60. 7. RESOLUTiON 47-1998 DESIGNATING AUTAORTZED PERSON TO EXECUTE SUB-GRANT AGREEMENTS: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated this resolution would designate the Public Safety Director to execute sub-grant agreements. The authorization is specific to the City's application for FEMA reimbursement for storm damage that occurred between May 15 and May 30, 1998. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 47-1998. 8. APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR TAE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6028 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. (WARD 2): Mr. Burns, City Manager, explained that the City officially acquired property located at 6028 Central Avenue on June 30, 1998. In view of the fact that rental of the property would require considerable work and expense, staff recommended that the property be used for a fire training exercise and then demolished. After the property has been cleared, the City would propose to leave it as a naturai wooded area within the confines of Moore Lake Park. APPROVED STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF DEMOLITION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6028 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. CITY COUNCiL MEETiNG OF JULY 13, 1998 PAGE 4 9. APPOINTMENT: CITY EMPLOYEES: Mr. Burns explained that staff recommended the appointment of two individuals to positions with the City. Sara Hill is being recommended for appointment to the position of Human Resources Manager. She is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin, and most recently has been employed as Human Resources Director by Century Bank in Eden Prairie. She was also employed as an employment/benefits manager for the Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts in Houston, Texas. She is one of 51 applicants for the position and the successful applicant from among the seven candidates that were interviewed. William Champa was being recommended for appointment to the position of Management Assistant. He has degrees from the University of North Dakota and the University of St. Thomas. He has been employed by the City of Fridley as City Clerk for the past five years. Prior to that Bili worked for the City as Records Information Specialist. Bill was one of 63 applicants for the position and was the successful applicant from among the five candidates that were interviewed. APPROVED TFIE APPOINTMENTS OF SARA HILL TO HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER AND WILLIAM POSITION OF MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT. 10. CLAIMS: APPROVED THE PAYMENT OF CLAIM NOS. 81404-81796. 11. LiCENSES: THE POSITION OF CHAMPA TO THE APPROVED THE LICENSES AS SUBMITTED AND AS ON FILE IN THE LICENSE CLERK'S OFFICE. 12. ESTIMATES: APPROVED THE ESTIMATES AS FOLLOWS: Frederic W. Knaak, Esq. Holstad and Larson, PLC 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, MN 55110 Services Rendered as City Attorney for the Month of June 1998 $ 4,250.00 CITY COUNCTL MEETING OF JULY 13. 1998 PAGE 5 Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered 301 Fridley Plaza Office Building 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Services Rendered as City Prosecuting Attorney for the Month of April 1998 Diversified Paving, Inc. 8019 146th Avenue N. W. Ramsey, MN 55303 1997 Driveway Paving Project No. 307 Estimate No. 6 Park Construction Company 7900 Beech Street, N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55432 Rice Creek Bank Stabilization Project No. 309 Estimate No. 4 Ron Kassa Construction 743 8 Upton Richfield, MN 55423 1998 Misc. Concrete Curb and Gutter and Sidewalk Project No. 315 Estimate No. 3 Forest Lake Contracting 14777 Lake Drive Forest Lake, MN 55025 57th Avenue (CR 102) Reconstruction Project No. ST 1997-4 Estimate No. 1 Forest Lake Contracting 14777 Lake Drive Forest Lake, NiN 55025 Hackmann Avenue/Hackmann Circle Street Improvement Project No. ST 1998-1 Estimate No. 6 $17,527.50 $11,278.58 $64,481.91 $ 8,211.99 $70,104.25 $49,647.89 MOTION by Councilmember Schneider to approve the consent agenda with the exception of Item 5. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. CiTY COUNCTL MEETiNG OF JULY 13, 1998 PAGE 6 Councilmember Bolkcom noted that Page 3.03 of the Planning Commission minutes of June 17, 1998, Item 8 appeared to be incomplete. She asked that Item 3 be removed from the consent agenda for discussion. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to amend the previous motion and to remove Item 3 from the consent agenda as well. Seconded by Councilmember Schneider. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS -VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED LTNAIVIMOUSLY. VOTE ON ORIGINAL MOTION: UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilmember Boikcom to amend the agenda to include the addition of Items 3 and 5 from the consent agenda to immediately follow Item 16 of the regular agenda. Seconded by Councilmember Schneider. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE; MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OPEN FORUM, ViSTTORS: Mayor Jorgenson explained that this is the time reserved for residents to address the Council on items that are not on the agenda. Mr. William Turnyuist, 7601 Brigadoon Place, stated that he was present to discuss the tree and brush removal policy. He noted that during a recent storm, he lost a rather large tree on his property. He was told by a City employee that the City would not be picking up any storm damage. He contacted the City offices and was provided the same information. Consequently, he arranged to have the tree and branches removed by a contractor at a cost of $238.00. Sometime thereafter, a decision was made by Council to have the City remove trees and brush damaged by the storm. He felt the matter was handled poorly and that he should be reimbursed for the costs that he incurred. He further stated that he felt there should be a place where residents could bring the brush. Without a place to haul debris, if the City does not pick it up, residents have no alternative but to hire someone to haul it away. Mayor Jorgenson informed Mr. Turnquist that the initial plan was that the City would not be involved in the removal of tree branches and brush. However, on July 6 an Emergency Council Meeting was held, and the decision was changed. She noted that this matter �ill be discussed at the next Council Conference Meeting on Monday, July 20, with input from the City Attorney. Mr. Turnquist will be kept informed as to the outcome of that discussion. Councilmember Schneider noted that City staff did not provide incorrect information at the time Mr. Turnquist contacted staff. However, since that time staff was given a change in direction as to what was to be done. He sincerely hoped that the City would be able to find a way to correct the problem so residents are treated equally. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 13. 1998 PAGE 7 There were no further questions or comments from the public. 13. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REOUEST, SP #98-07, BY TTM YOCUM, YOCUM OTL COMPANY, INC., TO ALLOW AN AUTOMOBTLE SERVICE STATION. MOTOR VEIiiCLE CAR WASA, AND A "DRIVE-IN" TYPE ESTABLISAMENT. GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF Mr. Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator, explained that this is a special use permit request for property located on the corner of 73rd Avenue and University Avenue N.E. to allow a motor fuel operation and a car wash. The property is zoned C-2, General Business. Mr. Hickok presented a map of the subject site, indicating the uses of the surrounding properties (General Business, Heavy Industrial and Two-Family & Single-Family Residential). As a part of the development project, a 1,600 square foot brick, rocked-faced block and glass drive through car wash has been proposed for the southwest corner of the site. The other portion of the development includes a nearly 5,000 square foot Taco Bell restaurant/Texaco convenience store motor fuel operation. This building will also be brick and glass with a standing seam metal roof. The canopy will include 16 fuel pumping stations. The drive-through for the Taco Bell restaurant has been proposed to be located behind the convenience store/restaurant building. Adequate screening will be provided between the drive- through and the neighborhood, and a significant amount of stacking space has been allowed to prevent traffic flow problems on the site. Because of sensitivity to the neighborhood, staff asked that nothing be put on the back of the building that would create activity beyond the drive- through itself. The car wash will be situated on the southeast corner of the lot, with a great deal of glass facing University Avenue. To attempt to preserve an aesthetically pleasing view and eliminating some of the other potentially unsightly factors from University Avenue, staff recommended that a clear glass block be utilized on all middle windows with standard wir�dows used in each of the end openings facing University Avenue. The windows facing the convenience store would be standard windows. Councilmember Billings asked for a clarification of "instructional" purposes as required under number 8 of the list of stipulations required by the Planning Commission (pg. 13.01). Mr. Hickok noted that this refers to providing information in regard to the operation of the pumps. It could also be used in the event of an emergency as noted in this section. Councilmember Billings stated that he was not sure that informational exchange really falls under "Instructional" purposes. He wondered if a coma could be added after "instructional" and the words be added "information exchange.". He stated that he wanted to be sure that music is not being played over the intercom. Mr. Tim Yocum, of Yocum Oil Company, was present and provided a brief background on the company. They are based in Maplewood and currently own and operate seven gas convenience stores. He noted that their company is a wholesaler who provides support for the other dealers that own and operate their own stores. Mr. Yocum presented a diagram of the proposed building. CITY COUNCiL MEETTNG OF JULY 13, 1998 PAGE 8 Councilmember Billings asked how many of Mr. Yocum's gas/convenience store buildings are partnered with a fast food operation. Mr. Yocum stated that they currently have two stores with fast food restaurant operations. They have been in operation since 1995 and 1996, and they have not experienced any problems. Councilmember Billings asked Mr. Yocum if he has agreed to the recommendation made by staff for the installation of glass block on a portion of the window area for the car wash. Mr. Yocum indicated that their desire would be to have full glass in the area. He noted that the purpose of the glass design is to provide a level of security for car wash customers. However, if the City requires glass block, they would be willing to provide that. Mayor Jorgenson asked what measures had been taken to encourage a right-out exit from the drive-through. Mr. Hickok noted that the design of the drive-through is such that it will provide for a easier exit. A customer could turn left, however, and exit onto the service drive and then to the eastbound lane on 73rd Avenue. Mayor Jorgenson also inquired as to where de(ivery vehicles will be parked. Mr. Yocum noted that the vehicles will most likely park on the southeast area of the site. Councilmember Bolkcom discussed the City's stance on outside storage. She noted that they were working diligently to resolve some of the issues relating to the outside storage of products. Mr. Hickok explained the City's ordinance pertaining to this matter. He noted that currently there is a four foot area which is allowed for storage of products in the front of the building on a temporary basis. At this time, "temporary basis" requires further clarification. � Councilmember Billings asked why staff has recommended the glass block for a portion of the glass window area of the car wash. If the petitioner's purpose of the windows is to provide a safer environment, he does not understand why the City was requiring them to install glass block. Mr. Hickok responded that this was the most visible area of the site. The glass windows would provide a good appearance when the building is new; however, with the humidity it woul�' be difficult to keep the windows clean. Additionally, the equipment proposed for the wash is not stainless steel and would likely age and rust, thus creating a potentially unsightly appearance. The glass block would be used only in the tunnel area with windows at the entrance and again near the exit of the wash. Councilmember Billings stated that he would be more comfortable with the language of the P(anning Commission, stating that staff and the petitioner would get together and come up with a reasonable solution to the problem of the windows. Mr. Yocum stated that-one alternative to the glass block may be to install a bronze-tinted window in that area. Mr. Hickok responded that this would be acceptable during the day; however, when lights are on during the evening the equipment would be visible. MOTION by Councilmember Billings to approve the Special Use Permit #98-07, with the stipulations found on Page 13.01 of the agenda book. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. CiTY COUNCTL MEETiNG OF JULY 13 1998 PAGE 9 MOTION by Councilmember Billings to amend Stipulation No. 8, by placing a coma (,) after the word "instructional", and adding the words "information exchange." Seconded by Council- member Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Councilmember Billings to amend Stipulation number 12 to include the language as found in Stipulation number 13 on Page 3.08: "Petitioner shall work with City staff on a reasonable solution to the car wash window openings". Seconded by Councilmember Schneider. Councilmember Billings stated that the purpose for this amendment would be to allow between now and the start of construction, staff and the petitioner to agree upon an acceptable type of window solution which would more satisfactorily meet the needs of the City and the petitioner. He further stated that it is his opinion that the City is overstepping its bounds in their requirement of Stipulation number 12. Attorney Knaak noted that the City has the right to specify the type of window material provided there is a direct link to the issue of public health, safety and welfare. VOTE ON MOTION TO AMEND STIPULATiON #12: UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. VOTE ON MAIN MOTION APPROVING SPECIAL USE PERMIT #SP 98-07, WITH STIPULATIONS: UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 14. VARiANCE REOUEST, VAR #98-19, BY TIM YOCUM, YOCUM OIL COMPANY, INC., TO ALLOW THE MAXIMUM STZE OF A FREE-STANDING SIGN TO BE INCREASED FROM 80 SOUARE FEET TO 120 SQUARE FEET. _ GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE AND 73RD AVENUE N.E. (WARD 1): Mr. Hickok explained that Tim Yocum was requesting a variance to allow 40 additional square feet of signage on a free-standing pylon sign for their proposed development at the southeast corner of University Avenue and 73rd Avenue N.E. The petitioner's hardship statement states that the importance of having adequate signage is imperative to both Taco Bell and Texaco and how they conduct their businesses. Their development is unique in that two major retailers will be working together on the parcel. Mr. Hickok noted that the City limits free-standing pylon signs to SO square feet. He provided a diagram of the proposed signage for the site, which includes a Texaco sign, "ATNI/car wash sign," a"Taco Bell" sign, and a sign posting the gas prices. Mr. Hickok noted that in order to grant a sign variance, four conditions must be met. He went through the four conditions, noting that staffdoes not believe the petitioner has met the criteria. CiTY COUNCIL MEETiNG OF JULY 13. 1998 PAGE 10 Councilmember Bolkcom stated that the site is very visible, with very little obstruction. She does not see a need in granting a sign variance. Mr. Yocum stated that the fast food business and their business depends on impulse. They want to provide a sign that will give people a forewarning to allow them to make a decision. Mr. Doug Sinclair of Tenant Services, Inc., a consultant for Yocum Oil Company, Inc., stated that a conscious effort has been made to create a property that makes a very strong, positive image. The site is 2.4 acres and could conceivably be split into two lots. If this were so, code would allow two 80 square foot signs on the two properties. By being allowed only 40 square feet for each of their businesses they are being allocated only fifty percent of the signage that is allowed for any other business of a similar type along University Avenue. This would put them at a competitive disadvantage, and they could expect up to a twenty percent decrease in the sales from what would normally be projected. Councilmember Billings asked what amount of square footage they anticipate for wall signage. Mr. Sinclair responded that they propose to have approximately 250 - 300 square feet of wall signage (this includes the signage on the canopies). Based on the City's sign code, they could essentially have up to 1,300 square feet of wall signage. However, they do not intend to do that. Councilmember Barnette noted that both Conoco and Freedom have approached the City for a sign variance and both have been denied. Councilmember Billings asked what the minimum lot size is for C-2 zoning. Mr. �Hickok stated that the minimum syuare footage required is 20,000 square feet (or 1/2 acre). Councilmember Billings stated that this particular site is approximately 2.4 acres or equivalent to five C-21ots. One reason that this lot has not been split is likely due to the shape of the lot. He noted that perhaps some type of ground level monument sign could be put up with a pedestal sign with a stipulation that building/canopy signage cannot exceed 350 or 375 square feet. Councilmember Schneider stated that he does not think this is a trend that Council wants to start. The property is a single lot, and the City's sign code is based on buildable lots. He also asked if perhaps the gas prices could be posted on the wall signage. Mr. Hickok noted that this would be information that must be visible to the public. Councilmember Billings stated that the aesthetics of the building and how it blends irt with the neighborhood, etc., deserve some type of consideration from Council in terms of signage. Mr. Hickok noted that the adjacent property owners indicated that they were not in favor of the sijn variance on this property. They are also a multi-tenant property and indicated that if this variance was approved, they would seek one as well for their property. MOTION by Councilmember Billings to approve Variance #98-17 with three stipulations: 1) pylon signs shall not be larger than 100 square feet; 2) that they be allowed to place a ground level monument sign with _logos only which will not exceed 24 syuare feet; and 3) that the wall signage including buildings and canopies shall be limited to 375 square feet for the entire site. Seconded by Councilmember Schneider. CITY COUNCIL MEETiNG OF JULY 13, 1998 PAGE 11 UPON A VOICE VOTE, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND COUNCILMEMBER SCHNEIDER VOTING AYE; AND MAYOR JORGENSON, COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE AND COUNCILNIEMBER BOLKCOM VOTING NAY, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION FAILED. 15. VARIANCE REOUEST, VAR #98-19, BY JASON REiLING. MICRO-MATICS. TO ALLOW TftE RECONSTRUCTION OF A FIRE DAMAGED BUILDING GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7871 HTCKORY STREET N.E. Mr. Hickok explained that Mr. Reiling was requesting eight variances to allow the reconstruction of an industrial building at 7871 Hickory Street N.E. On February 15, 1998, a fire destroyed the industrial building which once housed Micro Matics. The following variances would be required in order to allow for the reconstruction of the building: 1) lot area variance from 1.5 acres to .37 acres; 2) a lot width reduction from 150 feet to 120 feet; 3) a side yard reduction from 30 feet to 26 feet; 4) a reduced parking setback from the side lot from 5 feet to 0 feet; 5) a reduced parking setback from the rear lot line from 5 feet to 0 feet; 6) a reduced parking setback from the main building from 5 feet to 4.5 feet; 7) a reduced parking setback from the alley from 15 feet to 0 feet; and 8) a reduced drive aisle width for two-way traffic from 25 feet to 15 feet. Mr. Hickok explained that when this structure was constructed in 1978, numerous variances would have been required. Code requirements for lot size were the same as they are today. D.W. Harstad was the owner of the property as well as the properties to the north and south along the west side of Hickory Street. The combined total of those parcels is equal to 1.87 acres. Because there were eventually four owners on separately described parcels, the 1.87 acre parcel became fragmented and was no longer an individual entity that could meet the lot requirements. (A condominium plat was not created for separate ownership.) Granting or not granting the Micro- Matics variances wiii have huge policy implications. If the variances are granted, the City has in essence set a new standard for the M-2 district because these conditions are not unique to this parce(. Each of the four parcels on the east side of Hickory Street have the same conditions. Staff recommended denial of the eight variances requested due to the magnitude of the request as a package, and because there are no unique characteristics applicable to this parcel. The Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variances but further recommended that Council consider an overlay district or zoning text amendment that would recognize the conditions in the Onaway industrial district. By creatin� this, the City would avoid setting a precedence for other larger M-2 tenants. Attorney Knaak explained that if Council chose to grant this request they not only would be making an exception for an M-2 zone, but the next time there is a fire on a substandard lot in a residential area, making a distinction between that and industrial areas would be difficult to do. Mr. Dick Reiling explained that it was his desire to build virtually the same size building as what was previously on the property. If he is unable to do so, the property would be of no value and could only be used for parking. Mayor Jorgenson noted that another option would be to sell the property to one of the adjoining property owners. A majority of the Council were concerned that granting the variances would set a precedence. Councilmember Barnette stated that he has a lot of sympathy for Mr. Reiling. CiTY COUNCTL MEETTNG OF JULY 13, 1998 PAGE 12 MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to deny Variance Request #98-19. Seconded by Councilmember Billings. UPON A VOICE VOTE, MAYOR JORGENSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS, COUNCILMEMBER SCHNEIDER, AND COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION. COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE VOTED AGAINST THE MOTION. MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A FOUR TO ONE VOTE. Brian Hounman, 833 Third Street S.W., New Brighton, asked if Council would consider splitting each of the parcels into individual condominium lots. Mr. Hickok stated that he would be willing to sit down with them to address any questions they may have. Mr. Doug Petty, 7805 Beech Street N.E., stated that he owns two parcels on the corner and would find himself in the same situation should something happen to his building. He employs forty full-time employees, and he felt that it was important for the City to move forward with some type of re-zoning. Additionally, he thinks that the property owners in that area should all be notified of this situation. 1G. SPECiAL USE PERMIT REQUEST, SP #98-09, BY CELLNET DATA SERVICES (MSP), INC., TO ALLOW WiRELESS TELECOMMUNiCATTON FACILTTIES IN A M-2, HEAVY iNDUSTRiAL DTSTRICT, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 40 77TH WAY N.E. (WARD 3): Mr. Hickok explained that CellNet Data Services, Inc. has requested a special use permit to allow the installation of a Wireless Telecommunications Facility on an existing tower owned by Northern States Power (NSP) and located on the Johnson Printing and Packaging Corporation property at 40-77th Way N.E. Mr. Hickok presented a diagram of what would be installed on top of the existing structure as well as an illustration of the locations of the micro-cell boxes that would be attached to the upright pole-type structures that already exist. These micro-cell boxes would communicate with the master cell facility which is why approval was being sought for the special use permit request. The boxes contain equipment which wczuld read a signal from a specified area of electric meters. As a result, the City will also be asked to initiate a text amendment that will allow them to provide the next wave in their ordinance amendment. This amendment would recognize and set the appropriate standards while accommodating the latest micro-technology facilities. Councilmember Billings asked if the text amendment would be required in order for them to put up their micro-cell boxes. Mr. Hickok responded in the affirmative. He noted that a text amendment will facilitate the technology and at the same time set some perimeters to protect the residents as far as location. Councilmember Billings stated that from a zoning standpoint, the City may need to exert some control in how and where they do put their devices in. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to concur with the Planning Commission and approve Special Use Permit Request, SP #98-17 with the following eight stipulations: 1) the petitioner or successors shal( install and maintain the proposed equipment so that it blends into the surrounding CiTY COUNCiL MEETING OF_ JULY 13, 1998 PAGE 13 environment, 2) a non-corrosive finish shall be used to match the color of the existing structure, 3) The tower shall not be artificially illuminated except as required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), 4) a staff approved landscape plan shall be filed with the City prior to issuance of a building permit for this facility, 5) the facility shall be designed to discourage unauthorized entry, 6) a building permit shall be obtained prior to commencement of installation of any facility equipment on the site, 7) no signs other than warning or equipment information signs are permitte� as part of this application, and 8) the petitioner or successors shall initiate a text amendment to Ordinance No. 1112, as it relates to the placement of micro-cell facilities in the community. Seconded by Councilmember Schneider. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. RECETVE THE MINUTES OF TAE PLANNTNG COMMiSSiON MEETING OF JUNE 17. 1998: Councilmember Bolkcom noted that Item 8 on Page 3.03 of the meeting minutes of June 17, 1998 was incomplete. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to table approval of the minutes to allow for correction. Seconded by Councilmember Billings. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � 5. APPROVE JOiNT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN TAE CITY OF FRIDLEY AND THE COUNTY OF ANOKA FOR CENTRAL AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1998-4: MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to approve the revised Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Fridley and the County of Anoka for Central Avenue Improvement Project No. ST. 1998-4, as distributed to Council and identified as Anoka County Contract No. 980520. Seconded by Councilmember Schneider. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 17. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS: Mayor Jorgenson noted that the City has taken a large number of calls from residents in regard to the storm clean-up. She explained that there are a number of vehicles picking up the brush, based on the size of the load. Staff anticipates completion of the clean-up by Thursday. Councilmember Bolkcom reminded residents of the SOth Anniversary meetings and encouraged resident participation. They are especially interested in obtaining input from those with marketing expertise. Mr. Burns noted that the City is encouraging community organizations to identify a project for the SOth Anniversary Celebration. CiTY COUNCTI. MEETiNG OF JULY 13, 1998 PAGE 14 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by,Councilmember Barnette to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Schneider. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSELY AND THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF JULY 13, 1998 WAS ADJOURNED AT 10:55 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Tamara D. Saeflce Nancy J. Jorgenson Recording Secretary Mayor CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 ;_ • •:��.�# Chairperson Savage called the June 17, 1998, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:33 .� . Members Present: Diane Savage, Dave Kondrick, LeRoy Oquist, Dean Saba, Larry Kuechle Members Absent: Connie Modig, Brad Sielaff Others Present: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Tim Yocum, 2719 Stillwaer Rd., Stillwater, Yocum Oil Jon Yocum, 2719 Stillwater Rd, Stillwater, Yocum Oil Tony Yocum, 9585 Bluegill Rd, Woodbury, Yocum Oil Barb Schneider, 1405 Rocky Lane, Eagan, Doug Sinclair, 234 Kennard St., St. Paul, Tenant Senrices, Inc. Andrea Drake, 4061 Highway 65, White Bear Lake Tony Yocum, 2719 Stillwater Rd., St. Paul, Yocum Oil AI Quam, 399 - 73'� Avenue, Fridley Michael Radovich, 1171 Englewood Ave, St. Paul, CeIINet Susan Faurer, 2010 W. 21 � St., Minneapolis, CeIINet Tom Frerich, 414 Nicollet Ave., Minneapolis, CeIINet Paula Beck, 150 S. 5�' St., Minneapolis, CeIINet ••--� • � ..; -_, • •� � _ TI by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to approve June 3, 1998, Planning Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. _ 1. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #98-07. BY TIM YOCUM YOCUM OIL COMPANY. INC.: To allow an automobile service station, motor vehicle car wash, and a"drive-in" type of establishment on Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 78, generally located at the southeast comer of 73'� Avenue and University Avenue 1.01 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 2 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 7:35 P.MN. Mr. Hickok stated Tim Yocum of Yocum Oil has requested a special use permit to allow a motor fuel operation and a car wash for the proposed development at the southeast corner of the University Avenue and 73'� Avenue. A sign variance has also been requested to allow an additional 40 square feet to a free-standing sign on this site. Mr. Hickok stated the property is zoned C-2, General Business. The property is surrounded by M-2, Heavy Industrial, to the east and southeast; some M-1, Light Industrial, and C-2, General Business, across University; and a mix of R-2, Two Family Residential, and R-1, Single Family Residential to the north. Mr. Hickok stated the code requires a special use permit for an automobile service station and motor vehicle fuel and oil dispensing services. The petitioner has made it clear that they do not intend to operate a service station in conjunction with this proposal. The application is for the motor vehicle fuel and oil dispensing services section of the code. The code also requires a special use permit for a motor vehicle wash establishment. The petitioner is proposing to construct a 1,600 square foot brick, block, and glass drive-through car wash at the southwest corner of the sit�� Included in the proposal is a 4,968 square foot brick, block, and glass building with a standing seam metal roof. Taco Bell and Texaco convenience store will share the use of the building. A canopy with 16 fuel pumping stations is also proposed Mr. Hickok stated that in 1997, this site was rezoned from M-2, Heavy Industrial, to C-2, General Business. At that time of the rezoning, Joel Harding of Dolphin Development presented a site plan that was nearly identical to the current proposal. A drive-through for Taco Bell has been proposed behind the convenience store and restaurant building. In order to accommodate the drive-through and screen it from the neighborhood and provide proper stacking distance for cars waiting at the menu board, the building was moved closer to University Avenue. That distinction is different from the original site plan by Joel Harding. � Mr. Hickok stated a berm and landscape plan has been submitted to provide that screening. This has been in an effort to keep this use separate from the neighborhood to the north and to somewhat mimic the natural vegetation and conditions that currently exist on the site. Mr. Hickok stated no doors have been planned on the back side of the building to eliminate the possibility of rear deliveries on site. Again, this was done to minimize the impacts of this use on the adjacent site. However, the Building Inspection Department may require a door for an emergency exit only. 1.02 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 _ PAGE 3 Mr. Hickok stated that the sign variance went before the Appeals Commission on June 10, 1998. A motion to approve the sign variance from 80 square feet to 120 square feet failed by a 2-2 tie vote. Both the sign variance and the special use permit will go to the City Council on July 13, 1998. Mr. Hickok stated the staff is recommending that the Planning Commission approve this special use permit with the following stipulations: 1. All signs shall be reviewed and approved by staff to assure compliance with Chapter 214 of the City Sign Code. 2. The petitioner shall submit a performance bond in the amount of 3% of the construction costs prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The petitioner shall install underground irrigation for the landscape areas surrounding the site. 4. The petitioner shall comply with all outdoor storage requirements. 5. The petitioner shall comply with all outdoor sales and storage provisions of Chapter 205 of the City Code. 6. The petitioner shall install all waste trap and filtration devices as required by the Building Code for Car Wash facilities. 7. The petitioner shall install adequate informational signage on site to assure proper flow of traffic around the building and to assure that cars stacked waiting entrance into the drive-through or car wash do not block circulation on site. � 8. The petitioner shall assure that all use of the intercom on this site is for instructional and emergency purposes only. Intercom volume shall' be set so intercom message does not carry beyond the property. 9. All parking stall dimensions shall meet the Code required specifications. 10.A photometric lighting plan shall be submitted to allow a review of the lighting design and allow staff to analyze impacts to the nearby residential neighborhood. 11.A11 canopy faces shall be restricted to the light from within the signs; no additional canopy face lighting shall be permitted. 12.The car wash window openings shall be filled with glass block. 1.03 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 4 Mr. Hickok stated the building, as proposed, will sit at an angle at the northeast corner of the site. The drive-through goes around the north side of the building and exits to a new right-in, right-out access point onto 73'� Avenue. The drive has been landscaped both inside and outside the drive to downplay the building and the use on the site. Mr. Hickok stated the pump islands are in front of the convenience store with a covered canopy. The 1,600 square foot car wash facility is located adjacent to University Avenue on the southwest edge of the site. A holding pond is located In front of the site. Mr. Hickok stated the building has been designed tastefully with an architectural combination of brick and stucco. The building has a residential-style roof that helps downplay the commercial "flat-roof' appearance and to blend better with the residential area. Mr. Hickok stated the car wash architecturally mimics the principal building. There are windows on the University Avenue side of the car wash building. The proposed glass windows are a nice architectural treatment as they break up what could be a very plain facade. However, in reviewing this site and other sites, staff was concerned that glass windows are very nice when they are new, but as the car wash ages, humidity is inevitable. The windows won't stay clean; they will become foggy, taking on an unkempt appearance. The interior of the car wash will also look very nice at first, but as the mechanisms begin to rust, the interior of the car wash is not as presentable as it was when it was new. For these reasons, staff is recommending (in stipulation #13) glass block instead of the clear glass. Staff believes that glass block would still provide the daylight and minimize the "tunnel" effect for those people who become claustrophobic in car wash situations. Glass block would still look nice on the outside architecturally but it would not allow the unsightliness as the car wash ages. Ms. Savage asked about the Appeals Commission's decision on the sign variance. Mr. Hickok stated four members were in attendance at the Appeals Commission who discussed the sign variance from 80 square feet to 120 square feet for a combination Taco Bell/Texaco logo, a insignia for a cash machine, and the fuel prices. Two members voted in favor of the variance and finro members voted to deny the variance. Mr. Tim Yocum, Yocum Oil Company, stated he is at the meeting with other family members and partners in the development. He stated Yocum Oil is a family business, founded in 1959 by his grandfather, and it is now owned and operated by family members. The business they own and operate is a full service retail and convenience distributorship. The part that is before the Planning Commission is part of their Texaco wholesaler operation and gas/convenience operation. They own and operate seven gas/convenience stores, and they are also a wholesaler for other dealers. They rely on strong dealers and quality operators, and one of the people they were trying to convert into their network was Andrea Drake, He stated Andrea Drake has been in business since 1974 with two oil Amoco gas/ convenience/Certicare service stations/diagnostic 1.04 PI.ANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 5 centers in North Oaks and White Bear Lake. Yocum Oil operates gas/convenience stores in Maplewood, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Shoreview, Turtle Lake, Wisconsin, Cottage Grove, and one under construction in Lakeview. Mr. Tim Yocum stated they had been working with Dolphin on a number of different projects, and Dolphin brought this site to their attention. He stated they then tried to take the project that had already been approved and mirror it the best they could. They have worked with their architects and engineers to try to address any issues from the past. Mr. Tim Yocum stated the site was too big to take on by themselves so they started looking for another user, and Taco Bell was interested in being a co-tenant on this project. He stated he believed their architects have designed a building that is consistent with what the neighborhood demands and what the consumers and traffic along Highway 47 demand. They have tried to create a building that is very attractive, yet be a new image which will set a new trend in the City of Fridley. Mr. Tim Yocum stated the car wash building is also consistent with what they tried to do with the main building. He stated there are a couple of reasons why they would like to have clear glass instead of glass block windows n the car wash: 1. Securitv - The ability to see into the car wash provides a great advantage for them and their customers for security reasons. Also, some customers get a.little claustrophobic in a car wash, and it gives them a sense of security to be able to look outside and see what is going on around them. 2. in - To drive down University Avenue and to see that there is activity in the car wash is a very important marketing tool for them. Mr. Tim Yocum stated that in asking their Director of Operations about glass block, his comment was that it has been considered, but in doing their research, they found that it mildewed too often and there was mold in the grout between the glass blocks. The entire interior of the car wash will be built with cleanable senrices. As is typical for a lot of car washes, they use a apoxy paint which covers the walls and provides some protection. They are now switching over to a product called Sanitel, which is a smooth seal-coated covering over the blocks which provides a strong protection against the acids beyond what the apoxy paints can provide. Mr. Tim Yocum stated they are proposing a 80 foot long car wash building, longer than the typical 46 ft. length. The mini-tunnel car wash does provide a lot more ventilation. Also, with the 80 feet, there is more radiant heat which controls the temperature better and control the steam and fog. They are spending more money on the car wash for a reason—they want to have a quality car wash and reduce the wait time for consumers. 1.05 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 6 Mr. Tim Yocum stated he would also like to address the building signage. Before going to the Appeals Commission, he did ask their architect what is the allowable building signage they would need if the City denied the variance. With the three street frontages, they could have 1,300 square foot of building signage. They are proposing around 300 square feet of building signage. For their architectural design, that is more reasonable. They reduced the variance for the free-standing sign to reduce the clutter of signage on the building. That also blends in with the entire site plan and landscaping plan they are trying to create and the kind of services they are trying to provide inside the store. Mr. Tim Yocum stated that, typically, they have a lot of cameras inside the car wash and the store to provide more security for their employees and customers. Mr. Kondrick stated he liked the project. He liked the design and the brick; however, he wondered if it would be possible to have this brick match other brick buildings along University, such as the new Walgreen building that is being constructed, so there is some continuiiy. Maybe this could be coordinated with staff. Mr. Tim Yocum stated that is something that could be discussed. Ms. Savage stated she did not necessarily agree that all the buildings had to be uniform as far as type of brick and color. Mr. Oquist asked Mr. Yocum if they had considered any combination of glass block and window glass, or even frosted glass. Mr. Tim Yocum stated they have looked at a kind of tinted window that would not show any mildew or scum. Mr. AI Quam, 399 - 73'� Avenue, stated he would like to see this building be consistent with the adjacent existing developments. He would be concerned about having a door in the back of the building. If a door is put in, the neighbors would like to see how it is going to look. He wanted to make sure the berm in back of the building is adequately high, adequately landscaped, and adequately maintained. A sprinkler system is not a guarantee that the landscaping will be maintained. He wanted the assurance that Yocum Oil will truly follow this plan and build the berms the way they are proposed. � Northco did not do that across the street. Mr. Oquist stated that regarding the door in back of the building, staff has explained that the only door that might go in there is an emergency door. Mr. Hickok stated an emergency door may be required by the building code. If a door is required, he believed it would be a steel door and painted out so it would be unobtrusive. It would not be used for deliveries. 1.06 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 7 Mr. Tim Yocum stated he did prepare an elevation drawing from approximately the location of Mr. Quam's house looking down west on 73`� Avenue. This would show the elevation of the building in relation to the street elevation. It shows the height of the berm with landscaping on top. With the berm and the additional screening, the lights from cars should go right into the berm. MOTION BY Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 P.M. Mr. Saba stated that he liked the project. He personally did not have any problem with the glass windows since there is not that much glass. Since staff has recommended the glass block, he would like to see the petitioner work with staff to try to resolve the glass issue. Mr. Oquist stated he would agree with Mr. Saba. This is a very well thought out project. The landscaping plan is very nice. The only issue is the glass, and maybe there are some alternatives that can be worked out with staff. Mr. Kondrick stated he also agreed. It is going to be a nice project for this area. Mr. Kuechle stated he would be willing to change stipulation #13 to state that the petitioners should work with City staff to mitigate the problem of the windows. Ms. Savage stated that maybe they should just leave stipulation #13 as recommended by staff and let the petitioner and staff work this out. She also did not see the glass windows as being a big problem. She goes to car washes a lot and she did not see the need for that feeling of security. She did not even see the need for windows. How does the Commission want to handle this? Mr. Kuechle stated he would like stipulation #12 to be explicit that the petitioner has to work out the details on the windows with City staff. The Commissioners agreed. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to recommend to City Council approval of special use permit, SP #98-07, by Tim Yocum of Yocum Oil Company, Inc., to allow an automobile service station, motor vehicle car wash, and a"drive-in" type of estabtishment on Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 78, generally located at the southeast corner of 73`� Avenue and University Avenue with the following stipulations: 1. All signs shall be reviewed and approved by staff to assure compliance with Chapter 214 of the City Sign Code. 1.OR - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 8 2. The petitioner shall submit a performance bond in the amount of 3% of the construction costs prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The petitioner shall install underground irrigation for the landscape areas surrounding the site. 4. The petitioner shall comply with all outdoor storage requirements. 5. The petitioner shall comply with all outdoor sales and storage provisions of Chapter 205 of the City Code. 6. The petitioner shall install all waste trap and filtration devices as required by the Building Code for Car Wash facilities. 7. The petitioner shall install adequate informational signage on site to assure proper flow of traffic around the building and to assure that cars stacked waiting entrance into the drive-through or car wash do not block circulation on site. 8. The petitioner 9. The petitioner shall assure that all use of the intercom on this site is for instructional and emergency purposes only. Intercom volume shall be set so intercom message does not carry beyond the property. 10.A11 parking stall dimensions shall meet the Code required specifications. 11.A photometric lighting plan shall be submitted to allow a review of the lighting design and allow staff to analyze impacts to the nearby residential neighborhood. 12.A11 canopy faces shall be restricted to the light from within the signs; no additional canopy face lighting shall be permitted. 13. The petitioner shall work with City staff on a reasonable solution for the car wash window openings. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED % THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUS�Y. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #98-09. BY CELLNET DATA SERVICES (MSP). INC.: To allow wireless telecommunication facilities in an M-2, Heavy Industrial District, generally located at 40 - 77�' Way MOTION BY Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to open the public hearing. 1.08 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 9; UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:30 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated CeIINet Data Services has requested a special use permit to allow the installation of a wireless telecommunications facility on an existing electrical tower. The tower is owned by NSP and is located on the Johnson Printing property at 40 - 77�' Avenue. A small 4 foot by 4 foot fenced compound will be required as part of this proposal. The property is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. The property is surrounded by M-2, Heavy Industrial, on the east, southeast, north and across the rail line. R-3, General Multiple, M-1, Light Industrial, and R-1, Single Family Residential zonings are farther south across the rail line. Mr. Hickok stated that in November 1997, the City adopted Ordinance No. 1112 regarding telecommunication towers and facilities. The ordinance identifies permitted sites for telecommunication towers. Several sites have been identified as an overlay on the City's zoning map. Outside of those permitted locations, towers and facilities may be permitted in the M-1 through M-4 districts by special use permit. Ordinance No. 1112 is very specific about location, approval process, plan requirements, landscape requirements, access drive locations, lighting, etc. The ordinance, however, will require modification to allow the micro-cell technology that is proposed to communicate with the master cell before the Commission at this meeting. � Mr. Hickok stated micro-cell devices provide an automated meter reading.system for NSP. After Ordinance No. 1112 has been modified to provide for these devices and the controllers have been installed, the customers will have automated meter reading mechanisms. NSP's meter readers, for a sho�t period, will continue to manually read the meters to make sure the system is functioning properly, but this automated meter reading system will certainly streamline NSP's process. Numerous locations have been identified for controller devices in the City of Fridley. What is being proposed for a special use permit is a master cell that would communicate with all these locations. Mr. Hickok stated staff is recommending approval of this special use permit with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner or successors shall install and maintain the proposed equipment so that it blends into the surrounding environment. 2. A non-corrosive finish shall be used to match the color of the existing structure. 3. The tower shall not be artificially illuminated except as required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 4. A city staff approved landscape plan shall be filed with the City prior to issuance of a building permit for this facility. 1.09 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 10 5. The facility shall be designed to discourage unauthorized entry. 6. A building permit shall be obtained prior to commencement of installation of any facility equipment on this site. 7. No signs other than warning or equipment information signs are permitted as part of this application. 8. The petitioner or successors shall initiate a text amendment to the City of Fridley's Ordinance No. 1112 as it relates to the placement of micro-cell facilities in the community. Mr. Oquist asked why there is a need to modify the ordinance. Mr. Hickok stated at the time the City adopted the ordinance, it was looking at the first round of technology, the T-2, large tower technology, and it anticipated that T-2, the micro-soft technology was coming. The initial surge the City got from the vendors was the need for the tower locations. CeIINet Data Services is the first to move to the micro- soft technology which the ordinance has not yet addressed. Mr. Tom Frerich, CeIINet Data Services, stated the purpose of this whole entire system was created as an extension to the existing utility system in operation today. He did not think it was a surprise to anyone in the room that the Attorney General's Qff. ice scrutinizes the billing practices of NSP on a monthly basis. It is a matter of public record. He did think there has been a lot of concerns over the years in terms of estimating bills and curbing of readings, etc. As they move forward into the 90's and the year 2000, there are a lot of guidelines and recommendations from the MPUC (Minnesota Public Utilities Commission), etc., recommending that utilities offer large industrial and industrial users and individual consumers with better rate plans. All of this is currently on a voluntary basis to the utility companies; however, in the future and as they move toward deregulating the market, it will become more crucial, especially with the influx of bigger players from other markets, to become the new provider of electrical services. Mr. Frerich stated CeIINet has entered into a contract with CeIINet to provide the type of meter reading services they need now and in the future, for the consumer to get a fair and accurate bill every month as well as to allow large customers better options in terms of their billings. CeIINet offers approximately 44 individual types of rates that will be available to NSP to use and market to the public as well as commercial and industrial users. It allows NSP to capture data better. Ms. Savage asked Mr. Frerich if he had any problems with the stipulations as recommended by staff. 1.10 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 11 Mr. Frerich stated he had a problem with stipulation #8, and he would ask that this stipulation be deleted. His reason for that is if you look at the type of service they are in now and look at the Ordinance No. 1112, there is a gray or fuzzy area. If they take the ordinance in accordance with Minnesota Statute 237 which is an extension of the Telecommunications Act, it essentially allows for companies like CeIINet that are a direct extension of a utility to be placed in an exempt status from normal telecommunication. They find they cannot comply with that stipulation at this time. Mr. Frerich stated Paula Beck, one of CeIINet's general counselors, could better explain this. Ms. Beck stated these are two separate issues and the stipulation for a text amendment does not relate to what they are actually asking for which is a special use permit to install 3 foot x 3 foot cell master box. Minnesota Statute 237 carves out a small group of services that use telecommunications-type technology, but, in fact, serve utilities. Mr. Hickok stated staff sees the finro issues as being connected. The master cell is meant to communicate with the other cells out in the community and as far as the interpretation of the Statute, the City's legal counsel does not concur with CeIINet's interpretation and, therefore, has recommended that they hold fast to the modification to Ordinance No. 1112 that would allow that technology. Mr. Frerich stated they do acknowledge that there is some distinction or cooperative efforts befinreen MCC and the cell master; however, they still believe these are two distinct issues. In the large majority of the metropolitan area, NSP has represented them at these kinds of ineetings and has been able to clearly demonstrate that CeIINet is an extension of its services and is exempt from any special language or ordinances. They also feel at this time that they are not prepared, other than to say they are holding fast to Statute 237, to address the MCC issue. He represents the cell master group and works with City Councils around the community, and he does not always handle the micro-cell issues. Ms. Susan Faurer, legal counsel for CeIINet, stated she just received the staff report that day that included this stipulation, and her question was how the finro issues can be brought together for this meeting. It is her understanding that there is a separate application process for the text amendment. Mr. Hickok stated a separate application for a text amendment is what is being requested in stipulation #8. That text amendment relates to modifying Ordinance No. 1112 to include the language of the placement of micro-cell facilities in the City. In terms of connecting the two uses or issues, there is no question that the two are connected. He did not think anyone would dispute the fact that the micro-technology is meant to communicate with this master cell technology. This technology would not stand alone without the other pieces meant to communicate with it. Staff is saying the CeIINet needs to take the technology to the next step by moving the ordinance to the 1.11 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 12 next step. Staff is certainly willing to work with them to help them understand what that means in terms of a text amendment. Mr. Oquist stated the Commission could go ahead and recommend approval of the special use permit with stipulation #8 as recommended by staff, and then CeIINet and staff can resolve that issue before the City Council. This way the two issues are somewhat separated, but also linked, and CeIINet can move ahead with the special use permit process. Ms. Faurer stated it would be best if the Commission could act on the special use permit for the cell master at this site as it was submitted, because it is useful to NSP regardless of the installation of the MCCs. Then, they would be willing to work with staff on City staff and legal counsel on the MCC issue. Ms. Faurer stated she felt the issues were pretty complicated because of the technology. But, in an effort to simplify the issues, they submitted a special use permit for the installation of a cell master at an antenna site. The City is combining another issue with it that is not resolved, and it is kind of complicated on a technological level. There is also the legal issue of combining the two as well as the state law whicfi has been raised and not been completely explored as to the actual authority to regulate CeIINet's installation of MCCs. That is really what is complicated this. As an extension of NSP, an argument can be made that the City has no authority to regulate the MCC application. That argument can also be extended to the installation of the, cell master; but without that issue resolved, the would like to get the special use permit issue resolved first. Mr. Hickok stated he disagreed with the separation of stipulation #8. Mr. Frerich has stated they cannot comply with stipulation #8 and believes the installation of the cell master may be followed by installation of the other equipment without modification to the text. The modification to the text is very important as it relates to CeIINet's installation of other equipment. The City needs to treat telecommunication wireless vendors the same. Staff belieues it is very important that the master cell and the micro- cell issues be recognized and be tied together. Mr. Kuechle stated he would also suggest that the Commission recommend approval of the special use permit request with stipulation #8. This would give the petitioners almost a month to resolve the issue before the City Council meeting. Ms. Faurer stated that stipulation #8 does not give them any guidance as to what this ordinance amendment would even encompass. Mr. Hickok stated stipulation #8 says that the petitioners shall apply for a text amendment to the Ordinance No. 1112. That doesn't necessarily mean that CeIINet would have to come up with the language, but rather City staff would modify the text to accommodate CeIINet's facilities. 1.12 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 13 Mr. Faurer stated this is a timing issue as well. They are here asking for a special use permit for the cell master. Would they then be in a similar situation of having to petition for a special use permit for the micro-cell facilities? Would they be starting at ground zero again? Ms. Savage stated the Planning Commission merely makes a recommendation to the Council, and the Council takes the final action on July 13. So, they have from now until July 13 to resolve that issue. Mr. Oquist stated it is possible that the text amendment could be written so that CeIINet would not have to ask for a special use permit for its micro-cell facilities. Mr. Frerich stated if they use Mr. Hickok's analogy that the micro-cell controller is an extension or is diabolically intertwined with the cell master, then, ultimately, all this falls into one category, and they, in essence, should be addressing the language in Ordinance No. 1112 to include not only MCCs but cell masters as an extension. They then would not need to proceed farther with the special use permit. Mr. Hickok stated the master cell application is on the tower and is directly related to the language about towers and applying for special use permits in industrial districts, which this is, and CeIINet followed the correct process for a special use permit. Staff has been communicating with NSP since November 1997, so NSP should not,be surprised by the fact that Fridley City staff has talked about this micro-cell text amendment since the adoption of the ordinance. The finro issues are truly tied together, and City's legal counsel disagrees that the MCC issue is as CeIINet staff have described it. Mr. Frerich stated he wanted to make one more clarification. CeIINet has an agreement with NSP to provide this service. CeIINet is also obligated to seek any approvals that are necessary. Although NSP likes to represent themselves in the community, CeIINet has never given NSP any written or verbal approval to speak or act on behalf of CeIINet. Mr. Frerich stated that regarding the timing issue addressed by Ms. Faurer, NSP has set up the areas they want to automate, and they are waiting right now to automate Fridley. CeIINet has contractual obligations to NSP and they either perform the services according to NSP's schedule or file for an exemption to bypass Fridley and either approach it closer to the year 2000 or exempt it permanently. He did not really want to exempt Fridley when all Fridley's neighbors will have these automated services. Mr. Hickok stated the text amendment will not happen before this special use permit goes to City Council on July 13. The text amendment would follow the same process as other text amendments. As long as the petitioners make the application, staff will start the standard text amendment process. 1.13 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE �4 MOTION BY Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:10 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated he would recommend that the Commission recommend approval of the special use permit with stipulation #8 as recommended by staff. He stated there is no question that the two issues are connected. One without the other is almost useless. By recommending approval and requiring the text amendment, they actually speed the process along as quickly as possible for the petitioner. This gives the petitioners almost a month before the Council meeting to work out any details with City staff and legal counsel. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to recommend to City Council approval of special use permit, SP #98-09, by CeIINet Data Services (MSP), Inc, to allow wireless telecommunication facilities in an M-2, Heavy Industrial District, generally located at 40 - 77�' Way with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner or successors shall install and maintain the proposed equipment so that it blends into the surrounding environment. 2. A non-corrosive finish shall be used to match the color of the existing structure. 3. The tower shall not be artificially illuminated except as required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 4. A city staff approved landscape plan shall be filed with the City prior to issuance of a building permit for this facility. 5. The facility shall be designed to discourage unauthorized entry. 6. A building permit shall be obtained prior to commencement of installation of any facility equipment on this site. 7. No signs other than warning or equipment information signs are permitted as part of this application. 8. The petitioner or successors shall initiate a text amendment to the City of Fridley's Ordinance No. 1112 as it relates to the placement of micro-cell facilities in the community. UPON A VOfCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1.14 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 15 3. RECEIVE MAY 27. 1998. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the May 27, 1998, Appeals Commission meeting minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE JUNE 17, 1998, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:15 P.M. Respectfully Submitted, 'J�-e �C� Lyn e Saba Recording Secretary 1.15 CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 CALL TO ORDER: Vice-Chairperson Kondrick called the July 15, 1998, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. -� . _ Members Present: Dave Kondrick, LeRoy Oquist, Dean Saba, Larry Kuechle Members Absent: Diane Savage, Brad Sielaff, Connie Modig Others Present: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Paul Tatting, Planning Assistant Myrtle & Peter Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive John Kurak, 6547 Oakley Drive Margaret Reed, 6017 3rd Street N.E. Cully & Michele Smutzler, 1027 Mississippi Street Dawn Ambuhl, 6544 Hickory Street N.E. Todd & Mary Christenson Paul Plantz, 6542 Brookview Drive Mervin Herrmann, 278 Mercury Drive Richard Pearo, Hilltop Trailer Sales, Inc. Jerry Pearo, Hilltop Trailer Sales, Inc. Joe Maertens, Maertens-Brenny Construction Co. George Fugelsang, 7650 Lake Elmo Avenue, Stillwater _..�� . � � ..; . _� � �� MOTION by Mr Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to approve the June 17, 1998, Planning Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #98-10. BY DAWN AMBUHL: Per Section 205.07.01.C.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory structure (garage) on parts of Lot 12 and 13, Block 6, Fridley Park, generally located at 6544 Hickory Street N.E. OM TION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Saba, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. -------- 2.01 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 2 Mr. Tatting stated the special use permit would to allow the construction of a second accessory building on the property. The proposed garage is 22 feet x 22 feet for an area of 484 square feet. The garage will utilize an existing driveway on the property. Mr. Tatting stated the property is zoned R-1, Single Family, as are the properties to the north, east and south. To the west is R-3, General Multiple Units, and to the southwest is Cara Auto Body which is zoned C-2, General Business. Mr. Tatting stated the code requires a special use permit for a second accessory structure over 240 square feet in size. The proposed garage is 484 square feet; the existing garage 294 square feet; for a total of 778 square feet. This is below the maximum allowed for accessory structures. The total area of the existing and proposed structures is 2,114 square feet. The total lot coverage by the existing and proposed buildings on this is 21.2% which is below the required maximum of 25%. Mr. Tatting stated the proposed garage will be located in the rear yard 3 feet from the south property line, 5 feet from the rear (west) property line, and 6 feet from the proposed house addition. Access will be from an existing driveway which will have to be lengthened to reach the proposed garage. This driveway will need to be paved. Mr. Tatting stated staff recommends approval of the special use permit with the following stipulations: . The second accessory structure shall be one story, 22 feet wide x 24 feet deep, and meet the standards of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. 2. The second garage shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 3. The second garage shall not be used in conjunction with a home occupation. 4. The second garage must be accessed with a pave driveway. Mr. Tatting stated staff recommends indicating a date by which the paved driveway must be completed. Staff does not know when construction will take place for the garage. This can be discussed with the petitioner and an appropriate date established. Commission members had no questions of staff. Ms. Ambuhl stated they would like to make the garage 22 feet x 24 feet. When the Remodeling Advisor came out, they showed it at 22 feet x 22 feet and there was 5 feet between the garage and the property line. He let them know that there needed to be 3 feet so they thought they would take advantage of the additional 2 feet. There is an existing driveway that goes all the way back. They have plans to put in a concrete drive on part of it leading to the apron of the proposed garage. Currently, they have a one-car garage and have outgrown it. This structure will be used as a garage. 2.�2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 3 Mr. Kondrick stated adding 2 feet will result in an additional 44 square feet. How will that affect the coverage? Mr. Tatting stated this should not make the structure exceed any of the maximums. Ms. Ambuhl stated they are building onto the back of their house and the garage will be far enough away from the building addition to meet the fire codes. Mr. Oquist asked the petitioner when they plan to complete the garage. Ms. Ambuhl stated they plan to start construction on August 1. Prior to that, they must have the area leveled and take out some existing bushes. Mr. Oquist asked if the October date for the completion of the driveway would be a problem. Ms. Ambuhl asked if she can contact the City if there is a problem. This is scheduled to begin August 3. Mr. Oquist stated the Commission may want to change that to say this be completed one month or 60 days after the garage is completed. Mr. Kuechle suggested the wording that this be completed 60 days after the issuance of the building permit. MOTION by Ms. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:40 P.M. Mr. Oquist stated this seemed like a nice project. He has no problem with the request with the revision in stipulation #1 that the dimension is 22 feet x 24 feet; and adding 60 days after the issuance of the building permit to stipulation #4. MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend approval of Special Use Permit, SP #98-10, by Dawn Ambuhl, to allow construction of a second accessory structure (garage on parts of Lot 12 & 13, Block 6, Fridley Park, generally located at 6544 Hickory Street N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. The second accessory structure shall be one story, 22 feet wide x 24 feet deep, and meet the standards of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. 2. The second garage shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 2.03 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 4 3. The second garage shall not be used in conjunction with a home occupation. 4. The second garage must be accessed with a paved driveway which is to be completed 60 days after the issuance of a building permit. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Tatting stated the City Council would consider the request on July 27. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #98-11. BY MARGARET REED: Per Section 205.07.01.C.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory structure (garage) on Lot 20 and 21, Block 5, Hyde Park, generally located at 6017 - 3rd Street N.E. MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:43 P.M. Mr. Tatting stated the special use permit would allow the construction of a second accessory structure on the property. The proposed detached garage is 19 feet wide x 22 feet deep for a total area of 418 square feet. The garage will utilize an existing paved driveway that accesses 3rd Street. The property is zoned S-1, Hyde Park Neighborhood. Mr. Tatting stated the existing garage is accessed by an alley to the back next to University Avenue. There is a proposal to vacate that alley so the garage in the back could not be used as garage because there would no longer be access. The code requires a special use permit for accessory structures over 240 square feet. The total area of accessory structures is 760 square feet, which is below the maximum requirement. The total area of all structures is 1,500 square feet. This results in a lot coverage of 14.8%, which is below the maximum allowed coverage. Mr. Tatting stated the existing garage is located behind the house and the access is through the alley. The alley is to be vacated. The existing garage can no longer be used for vehicle storage but it can be used for other storage and other purposes: The proposed garage will be located north of the house and does not require any variances. A driveway exists but needs to be extended to the proposed garage. The petitioner had indicated the style will match the existing house construction. Mr. Tatting stated staff recommends approval of the special use permit with the following stipulations: 2.04 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 5 The second accessory structure shall be one story, 19 feet wide x 22 feet deep, and meet the standards of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. 2. The second accessory structure shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 3. The second accessory structure shall not be used in conjunction with a home occupation. 4. The second accessory structure must be accessed with a paved driveway. Mr. Tatting stated that also in this case, a completion date for the driveway should be indicated. Perhaps a similar statement as the previous request indicating 60 days after issuing the building permit would be appropriate. The Commission members had no questions of staff. Mr. Kondrick asked the petitioner if she had objections to the stipulations. Ms. Reed stated she had no objections. Mr. Kondrick asked if the petitioner understood the 60-day timetable for completing the driveway. Ms. Reed stated her plan is that, when the foundation is run for the garage, the driveway will be run at the same time. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:48 P.M. Mr. Saba stated he had no problem with the request. Mr. Oquist stated the alley is to be closed so the petitioner must do something. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend approval of Special Use Permit, SP #98-11, by Margaret Reed, to allow the construction of a second accessory structure (garage) on Lots 20 & 21, Block 5, Hyde Park, generally located at 6017 - 3rd Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. The second accessory structure shall be one story, 19 feet wide x 22 feet deep, and meet the standards of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. ---- 2.05 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 6 2. The second accessory structure shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 3. The second accessory structure shall not be used in conjunction with a home occupation: 4. The second accessory structure must be accessed with a paved driveway to be completed 60 days after issuance of the building permit. , UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Tatting stated the City Council would consider this request on July 27. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST. L.S. #98-01. BY CULLY & MICHELE SMUTZLER: Per Section 205.07 of the Fridley Zoning Code, to allow a lot split to sell the unused portion of the property on Lot 1, Block 2, Brookview Second Addition, generally located at 1027 Mississippi Street. TI N by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:50 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioners are requesting the subdivision of Lot 1, Block 2, Brookview Second Addition, to divide that into two lots. The new parcel would face Brookview Drive N.E. The Smutzler home at 1027 Mississippi will remain and will simply have a reduced size lot if the request is approved. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family, as are the surrounding properties. Mr. Hickok stated the minimum lot area is 9,000 square feet. As proposed, each of the lots will exceed 9,000 square feet. The existing parcel is 26,787 square feet. The current dimension is 107.24 feet x 250. It will be reconfigured so that Lot 1 would be 107.24 feet by 155 feet for a total of 16,603 square feet. Newly created Lot 2 will be 107.24 feet x 95 feet for a total of 10,184 square feet. The home exists and will continue to exist on Lot 1, the larger lot closest to Mississippi Street. Mr. Hickok stated a variance will be required due to the location of the existing garage relative to the new lot line. The code requires that when the rear of a corner lot has frontage along a side street, no accessory building on a corner lot within 25 feet of the common lot line shall be closer than 30 feet to that right-of-way provided, however, this regulation is not to be interpreted as to reduce the buildable area of that corner lot to less than 25 feet. The existing garage is set back less than the 25 feet spelled out in the code. It is just over 17 feet. As such, the_garage sitting back 22.1 �feet from the right-of- 2.�6 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 7 way would also need to be moved back or a variance granted to bring this into conformance. Another alternative is to reduce the width of the lot being requested. The lot is somewhat larger than necessary to meet the minimum requirements. It is possible to move the lot line back to meet the dimension. StafPs understanding is that the lot dimensions are somewhat due to the desire to sell a lot of this size and also to due to some mature trees on the site which affect where the lot line is placed. Mr. Hickok stated staff recommends approval of the lot split with the following stipulations: 1. Approval of a variance for the existing garage from 30 feet to 22.1 feet. 2. Alt easements be dedicated as illustrated on staffs Exhibit A(attached). 3. A$750 park dedication fee shall be paid before the building permit is granted. 4. A$1,000 storm water fee shall be paid before the building permit is granted. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioners have made an application for a variance. The variance must be approved before filing at the County. Mr. Hickok stated staff heard from one neighbor in this area who indicated concems about how the water in the neighborhood is shed from lots back into a low area at the back of his lot. He has asked that staff look at a grading plan for any new construction on the new lot that would not contribute additional water to that low lying area. Staff will be evaluating further the grading and drainage. The Commission could make that a stipulation. Before the request goes to the City Council, staff will want to know what the options are. It would be appropriate to add a stipulation #5 that the petitioner work with staff on the grading plan to not contribute to the run off that already exists to any of the back lots. This could be done by the creation of run off pattems on the site with a swale that would run toward the street as much as possible. _ Mr. Saba asked if it would make more sense to wait until there is a proposal for a building on the new lot before doing a drainage plan. Mr. Hickok stated, yes. Staff would not expect that the petitioners come in with that plan until a home plan is proposed. Mr. Kuechle stated he did not understand why there is a need for 30 feet on the side and the need for a variance. Mr. Hickok stated the code requires this when a comer lot has an accessory building that faces the street of the lot behind it, in this case the garage faces and takes access to Brookview. For ease of visibility and to keep cars parked in the driveway out of the line of sight as much as possible, the code requires that a garage be setback 30 feet if it is closer than 25 feet to the side lot line. The petitioner has now reduced the size of the lot, 2.�% PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 8 moved the side lot line to within less than 25 feet of the garage causing the garage to be set back 30 feet. If the lot line were a bit more to the north, this would not be an issue. Mr. Kuechle asked if the normal setback is 35 feet. Mr. Hickok stated, yes. However, on a comer lot there are special provisions in the code. A corner lot's side yard can have the principle building as close as 17.5 feet to the side right-of-way line. But for an accessory building, the impact is not only the garage but the vehicles that would sit in front of it. The intent of the code was that, if the garage sits too close to the side lot line and cars are parked in front of it, it would create a closed in feel for the lot, in this case, to the north. Mr. Kuechle asked if there is a problem with the 22 foot setback as well. Mr. Hickok stated the setback is 17.5 feet on the side yard of a comer lot. The petitioner meets the 35 foot front yard setback. Technically for a comer lot, the narrowest dimension becomes the front regardless of which way the house faces, and they can go to within 17.5 feet on the side 1ot. Mr. Oquist asked who pays the two fees. Mr. Hickok stated either party could pay the fee; however the petitioner is sajring this is part of their cost of the subdivision. The fees must be paid before a building permit is issued. Ms. Smutzler stated she had no additional comments. She understands the need to wait for the variance to go through and there is a City Council meeting for the variance and one for the lot split. � Mr. Kondrick stated this was correct. He asked the petitioner if she understood that by adjusting the lot line they could eliminate the need for the variance. Ms. Smutzler stated she understood. They want to make a larger lot. They want to keep the lots as large as possible. The neighborhood is made up of larger lots. They thought it would be better for the interest of the neighbors and for the person purchasing the lot. A contractor is interested in building a house who could use the larger lot. It would make a better size lot for the house they want to put there. . Mr. Kondrick asked if she understood the discussion about the water drainage plan. Ms. Smutzler stated she understood that the house that is going to be put in will not create any additional drainage problems. It should help. The roof design should have the water draining to the front of the house rather than to the back. Having a house there should actually improve the drainage on that particular portion of the lot. Mr. Kondrick asked if the petitioner had any questions or problems with the stipulations. 2.08 � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 9 Ms. Smutzler stated they had been over these several times. She understands the stipulations. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated he is not opposed to the lot split. He is opposed to water coming into his yard. All tf�e water from the homes comes into his backyard. If the ground does not thaw in the spring, it floods his basement. This is something he wants to prevent from continuing. He brought in black dirt to try to keep the water from coming in. He tore out the sidewalk twice and replaced it. He asked the City Council for help to get this water problem taken care of. The City said he woutd have to pay for it himself. At one time, a street was to come down Taylor to 67th. There was to be a storm sewer coming down through that. There is a sanitary sewer in the comer which is the only sewer that is in there. There is no way to get the water out of there. There is a home to be razed at 1015. If they were to build up that backyard, raise the backyard on the lot where the house is to be built and put in a swale going toward 67th, that would help eliminate some of the water. Otherwise, he is going to have to build a berm along the backyard so the water does not come through there. If he cannot get the City to do something with this, he will built a cement wall around it, three feet high, and let the water go into other people's basements. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated he has lived there for 18 years and his basement has been flooded twice. He cannot leave the house from January until after the thaws because, when it thaws, it floods. If it thaws and the ground if frozen, he will get 8 inches of water in his yard. He has already put in swales to get the water to go around but it still comes in. He believes that when these two homes are worked on, they could do something together so the water can run off or install a storm sewer. Right now, he gets all the water from the neighbors' yards. There are 6 homes where the water comes through his yard. He wants the water problem corrected before putting in more buildings. Mr. Kondrick stated that with the new lot, the people buying the lot have to be concemed that they cannot have any more or less water than what drains from there now leave that property. Regarding the other situations, the comments are on record and will be forwarded to the City Council. He would imagine that the engineering staff as well will take a look at this. The Planning Commission is concemed with the lot split. In the future, if a home is built on that property, those people have to make certain they do not tamper with the flow of water toward his house. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated he understood that. It is just that he has had this problem for years. If he has to build berms or put in a concrete wall to prevent the water from coming in there, then that is what they are going to have to do. Mr. Saba stated it is one thing for rainstorm type drainage and it is another thing when there is no seepage into the ground. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated, in the winter, the water comes up. The pressure from the water breaks out the windows in the basement. He is at the meeting because they are going to be working in this area, and he would like something to be done. 2.09 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 10 M TI by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:15 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated he would like to see a stipulation that a workabie drainage plan be required before the lot split is approved. If the lot split is approved, then the lot exists and there is no leverage to get a workable drainage plan. He would be in favor of having a stipulation that a workable drainage plan be demonstrated before the lot split is approved. There are not that many places where you can put a foot print for a house on that lot that you ought not be able to demonstrate. Mr. Saba agreed, especially with the concems about the drainage. There are two drainage concems - stormwater run off and thawing when the ground is still frozen. Mr. Oquist stated he agrees except that this property does not necessary contribute to that drainage. The drainage seems to come in from behind. Mr. Kuechle stated they are not stipulating that they have to solve the problem for the area, but that they cannot add to it. Mr. Kondrick asked if that happens automatically. - Mr. Kuechle stated he thought it needs to be stipulated. Otherwise you end up with a lot and it becomes very tough to stop anyone from building there. Mr. Kondrick stated Mr. Hickok feels confident that for this lot the water problem can be handled. He has no problem with the additional stipulation for drainage. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to recommend approval of Lot Split, LS #98-01, by Cully and Michele Smutzler, to allow a slot split to sell the unused portion of the property on Lot 1, Block 2, Brookview Second, generally located at 1027 Mississippi Street, with the following stipulations: 1. Approval of a variance for the existing garage from 30 feet to 22.1 feet. 2. All easements be dedicated as illustrated on staff s Exhibit A(attached). 3. A$750 park dedication fee shall be paid before the building permit is granted. 4. A$1,000 storm water fee shall be paid before the building permit is granted. 5. A workable drainage plan for the newly created lot must be demonstrated before approval of the lot split. 2. y� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 11 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Hickok stated the City Council would consider the request on July 27. The Appeals Commission will consider a variance request on August 12. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated he did not think that one lot is going to make the drainage thing happen. The other lot needs to be razed and worked with also. 4. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #98-12. BY MERVIN J. HERRMANN: Per Section 205.07.01.C.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory building at the property on Lot 2, Block 2, Sylvan Hills Plat #4, generally located at 278 Mercury Drive. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:20 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the special use permit would allow the construction of a second accessory building. The garage would be 14 feet x 24 feet deep, a total of 336 square feet. The building will be 14 feet in height at its peak. A special use permit is required for accessory buildings over 240 square feet except for the first accessory building. The proposed second accessory structure will be used for storage and will not have a driveway. Mr. Hickok stated the subject parcel is located south of Mercury Drive. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family, as are the surrounded parcels. There is sufficient area to place this proposed storage shed to meet all of the setback requirements. No variances will be required. Mr. Hickok stated staff recommends approval of the special use permit with the following stipulations: 1. The second accessory building shall be one story, 14 feet wide by 24 feet deep and meet the standards of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. 2. The building shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 3. A second driveway/curb cut shall not be created on this property. 4. The accessory building shall not be utilized for a home occupation. 2.11 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 12 The Commission members had no questions of staff. Mr. Herrmann stated one stipulation stated one story. That does not mean that he cannot have storage trusses to hold it together and he wants to have something to store picnic tables, etc., in winter. On the drawing, it shows the building is 10 feet from the lot line. Does he need to be 10 feet from the building to the west? His neighbor has a similar building and wants this to be closer so, if someone else occupies the property, they would not be able to park something between the buildings. Mr. Hickok stated that if there are easements along that lot line, they would need to stay out of the easements. The building code states they do need to keep two buildings like this at least 6 feet apart. If they are closer, they will need a fire wall. There might be some latitude to move the structure closer. If the distance is 6 feet or less, they would need to put sheet rock on the inside walls. The setbacks for accessory structures in the rear yard can be as close as 3 feet. Mr. Herrmann stated the rear lot line has a 5 foot easement so they need to keep 5 feet away. They would stay at least 10 feet from the building. Mr. Kondrick asked if Mr. Herrmann understood the stipulations. Mr. Herrmann stated, yes. He understands that he has to be at least 6 feet'and they will be more than that. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:27 P.M. Mr. Oquist stated he had no problem with the request. The petitioner can work with staff on the issue of placement when they get their building permit. OTI N by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to recommend approval of Special Use Permit, SP #98-12, by Mervin J. Herrmann, to allow the construction of a second accessory building at the property on Lot 2, Block 2, Sylvan Hills Plat #4, generally located at 278 Mercury Drive, with the following stipulations: 1. The second accessory building shall be one story, 14 feet wide by 24 feet deep and meet the standards of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. 2. The building shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 3. A second driveway/curb cut shall not be created on this property. 2.12 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 13 4. The accessory building shall not be utilized for a home occupation. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Hickok stated the City Council would consider this request on July 27. 5. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #98-13. BY HILLTOP TRAILER SALES: Per Section 205.15.01.C.(3) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to allow the selling and displaying of recreational vehicles on Lots 2 and 3, Block 2, East Ranch Estates 22nd Addition, except the east 200 feet of the south 204 feet of Lot 3, generally located at 7810 University Avenue N.E. MOTI N by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:28 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the special use permit would allow the display and sales of recreational vehicles on the Lupient Used Car site at 7810 University Avenue. The pro�Sosal is to modify the parking lot and reuse the building for vehicle showroom and repair service. Mr. Hickok stated a special use permit is required for the sale and display of recreational vehicles not within an enclosed structure. The proposed site and building are currently used for automobile sales and service. Improvements to the parking lot including adding landscaped islands are planned. The proposed display areas will have large landscaped areas of shade and omamental trees. Hilltop Trailer Sales would like to create an atmosphere for selling its recreational vehicles that "creates an image and character reminiscent of the north woods". Mr. Hickok stated the subject parcel is zoned C-3, General Shopping Center. The proposed use is appropriate for a C-3 district. To the north and south is C-3, General Shopping, zoning. To the west is M-2, Heavy Industrial. To the east across University Avenue is the City of Spring Lake Park and a mix of commercial uses. Mr. Hickok stated the parking is proposed to be 68 spaces for customer parking and 32 spaces as proof of parking. The petitioner's experience in the current location leads them to believe that 68 spaces would more than adequately serve their customer needs on their busiest days. If not, the City can require the petitioner and the petitioner will install the additional parking spaces needed. Mr. Hickok stated the current parking lot has curb and gutter installed in certain locations in the parking lot. However, parking setbacks have not been met. 2.13 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 14 Mr. Hickok stated staff recommends approval of the special use permit with the following stipulations: 1. Parking of 68 customer spaces be allowed, with 32 spaces shown for future parking if needed. 2. The site plan be revised to meet the parking setback requirements. 3. Curb and gutter be installed in the display and parking areas, including around the landscaped islands. 4. Additional landscaping be approval by City staff prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The existing fence be open or able to be knocked down for emergency vehicle access. 6. The flags and banners, other than the large American flag, be removed. 7. The building be adequately ventilated for spray paint and/or other service processes. 8. All trash and trash handling equipment must be in closed containers. 9. Any outdoor storage beyond the proposed camper sales will require an additional special use permit. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner has provided a brochure explaining their history and products which is available for review by the Commission and the public. Mr. Hickok reviewed the site plan. The display areas are set away from the drive aisles so that in the event of an emergency, vehicles could get in quickly and easily. On the north and south of the building are the landscaped areas that are designed to mimic the "north" and give people the sense of a more natural feel to the display area. The petitioner has provided a colored rendering for the front of the site as the site is developed. The petitioners plan to spruce up the site and to provide additional landscape materials. The lighting has been reviewed and is adequate. It was designed for automobile sales and from a security standpoint is appropriate. Mr. Kondrick asked if there is any way to regulate the number of units that can be displayed. Mr. Hickok stated the units are planned to be displayed in those landscaped areas and on the hard surface. They could mandate a certain number. In talking with the petitioner, it is staff s impression that in order to really show their products well they like to keep distance between the units so the folks can back up and take a look at it. It is their 2.14 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 15 intention to utilize the site in a manner that keeps them spaced properly, to give people a chance to look at them, and not to overly inundate the site with inventory. If the Commission feels it is appropriate, they can come to a determination of a maximum number if you feel that is necessary. Mr. Kondrick stated the petitioner will be selling and will need an inventory. Where will that inventory be kept? Mr. Hickok stated guest parking is close to University Avenue. As you enter the lot, you will start to enter the display area. The landscaped areas are the introduction into the camper sales. Back beyond that, additional units would be lined up neatly at a distance apart so they are not cramped. There is also an area for proof of parking and a ponding areas at the back. Mr. Dick Pearo stated Hilltop Trailer Sales has been located in the City of Hilltop since 1951. His father started the business there. The current site is approximately 2.75 acres, and they have outgrown that space. The site on University is just under 6 acres and gives them more room. They try to have neat displays but they do not have enough room. Part of the reasor� to move is to have better outside displays and displays inside. Mr. Kondrick asked if they understood the stipulations. Mr. D. Pearo showed a picture of the current location. Mr. Oquist asked if this was typical of the number of units that would be seen at the University site. Mr. D. Pearo stated yes. One would see more pop up tent trailers in the closed position in the back. They would be more out of site because there is more landscaping around that area. Mr. Jerry Pearo stated they are a non-motorized recreational vehicle dealer. They sell travel trailers, fifth wheels, park-type trailers, and tent campers which is the product they probably sell the most. Tent campers are sometimes not conducive to have up in a display position outside because of the nature of the beast. They have a canvas top with soft sides. They cannot take a snow load in the winter. This is another thing that precipitated the move because they could go inside to display those products and also display them year around. As far as storage of those, they sell the Coleman tent camper and Jayco which are the number 1 and 2 nationally best selling brands. As far as the storage, they would be stored in the area to the rear. Because of the nature of their business, manufacturers cannot make enough product for May, June and July. Dealers have to buy and have incentives to buy year around. Now, they will be buying 1999 products from now through December. They do not sell a volume at that time, but come next spring they have to have products serviced and ready to go. Products would be 2.15 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 16 displayed in the building, and they would have the same product available and stored outside. Mr. Kondrick asked the petitioners if they felt the provisions they have on the property for security in terms of fencing will not be a problem. Mr. D. Pearo stated it should not be. Their existing lot is not totally fenced. They have some problems but have not had major problems. He felt this would be a better area as far as vandalism. They are currently in a residential area where there is the opportunity for more problems. Mr. D. Pearo stated they talked with staff earlier about the parking setbacks. The property already has curb and gutter. They were uncertain about the setback as far as the existing curbing. They have no problem with the landscaping. Complying with setbacks would be an expense and hardship if they had to take out the curb on the north side of the property and move it in three or four feet. They could outline the parking and keep it back. Mr. Hickok stated Mr. Tatting had mentioned that. The setbacks that apply to this site are 5 feet on the side and rear lines and 20 feet on the front. Similar to Friendly Chevrolet, when the use changes or expands, they need to look at the setbacks and either have them corrected to the setback standards or apply for a variance to recognize �and accept there is something less than the standard setback. The petitioner has the option of applying for a variance to the setback standards.or to change the existing setbacks to comply with code requirements. Mr. Oquist asked where these areas were. Mr. Tatting stated there are areas in the front and on the side. A portion of the front is setback 20 feet. Continuing to the north, however, the parking lot is 12 feet from the property line and should be 20 feet. The same is true for Main Event and this site. The green area along their common property lines is 5 feet wide and the requirement is 10 feet. Mr. D. Pearo stated he believed it would mainly be the side by Main Event. Also, it creates a problem in front of the building. If they move that back 5 feet, they would have no parking. Mr. Tatting stated they would require 25 feet for the driving aisle and 20 feet for the stalls for a total of 45 feet. If that was moved, there is no area for parking. The site was created like this in 1975. Mr. Oquist stated staff stated the 20 foot setback was only at the south end. Is there a setback problem in front of the building? 2.16 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 17 Mr. Hickok stated, yes. It is closest to meeting the 20 feet toward the south. As you move closer to the north and the bend in the road, the lot line is skewed a bit so that it becomes more of a problem in that area. In front of the building, the setback is less than 20 feet. One option to consider is a one-way circulation and 60 degree parking. There may be an opportunity to get a narrower drive aisle, presenre the parking and achieve the required setback. Staff can evaluate that further. Mr. Kondrick stated there is no room on the north side of the property. Mr. Hickok stated it appears that it is that side particularly where it probably has 1.5 to 2 feet. They share a 5-foot green space curb-to-curb with the property to the north. Both' properties may have an issue there. Unfortunately, this is the property in question to change the use. Mr. J. Pearo stated that in lieu of the curb and gutter that is in already, the parking spaces could be moved 5 feet over from the existing curb and gutter, stripe the lot accordingly so it ends up with the that distance left. Mr. Kuechle stated the idea of a setback is to get green space. They are not going to get much by doing that. Without the green space, they do not meet the requirements. He thought that had to happen. The petitioner must either meet the requirement or request a variance. Mr. D. Pearo stated he thought they could work with the front without too great of a hardship but the north would need to change along the property line and would be a major issue. Mr. Kuechle agreed. It will be expensive. If the petitioner is changing it, it should be changed right. - Mr. J. Pearo stated they could leave the green space in the front and put the parking some place else. They need finro handicapped spaces. They could those elsewhere and lose 10 sites across the front and leave it because the curb and gutter is in place already. Mr. Kuechle stated that does not help much because the blacktop or whatever is there needs to be set back. Just to take the parking out is not going to meet the requirements. The curb would have to be moved. Mr. D. Pearo stated they are adding 3,500 square feet of additional green space to the property. Does that offset the effect? Mr. Hickok stated, no. They do not have the authority outside of the variance process to approve that. Those kind of things will contribute when requesting a variance. In this arena, they do not have the ability to say something else is appropriate. 2.17 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 18 Mr. J. Pearo stated the other issue would be that they proposed a future expansion. They talked about initially needing to change some things on this building to adhere to what they would like to do. On the back side of the building in the service area, they need to replace and add some doors and would need a permit to do that. Because of the time of the year and the permit stipulates that the landscaping must be approved, they need a certain amount of time to clean the property up, etc. The landscaping would probably need to wait until spring but they would like to have a building permit to put in the doors for the service bays. Mr. Hickok stated it is standard practice to require a performance bond. The landscaping plan would suffice in this case. They are now looking for a plan. After the materials are installed, staff will go out to make sure it is installed as per plan. Mr. D. Pearo asked how the variance process worked and if this was something that was feasible. Mr. Hickok stated the next deadline to request a variance is July 17. That would put them on the Appeals agenda for August 12 and the City Council agenda for August 24. The petitioners were asked to talk with staff for more information about filling out an application. � M TI N by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:00 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated he would recommend approval revising stipulation #2 that the site plan be revised to meet the parking setback requirements or a variance be granted. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to recommend approval of Special Use Permit, #SP98-13, by Hilltop Trailer Sales, to allow the selling and displaying of recreational vehicles on Lots 2 and 3, Block 2, East Ranch Estates 22nd Addition, except the east 200 feet of the south 204 feet of Lot 3, generally located at 7810 University Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. Parking of 68 customer spaces be allowed, with 32 spaces shown for future parking if needed. 2. The site plan be revised to meet the parking setback requirements or a variance be granted. 3. Curb and gutter be installe.d in the display and parking areas, including around the landscaped islands. 2.18 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 19 4. Additional landscaping be approval by City staff prior to issuance of buiiding permits. 5. The existing fence be open or able to be knocked down for emergency vehicle access. 6. The flags and banners, other than the large American flag, be removed. 7. The building be adequately ventilated for spray paint and/or other service processes. 8. All trash and trash handling equipment must be in closed containers. 9. Any outdoor storage beyond the proposed camper sales will require an additional special use permit. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Hickok stated the City Council would consider this request on July 27. 6. PUBLIC HEARING� CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #98-14. BY MAERTENS BRENNY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY: Per Section 205.17.03.C.(1 a) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to increase the allowable lot coverage by a single story structure in an M-2 zone from 40% to 50%, on the south 284 feet of the west 460 feet of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 2, TWP 30 N., Range 24E, generally located at 7901 Main Street N.E. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 9:03 P.M. Mr. Tatting stated the special use permit would allow a proposed building to cover 49% of a lot. The lot is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial, and is 107,182 square feet in area. The proposed one story building is 52,417 square feet in size. The uses in the building will include warehousing, manufacturing and offices. The site is presently vacant. Mr. Tatting stated the code indicates that, with a special use permit, a one story building in an M-2 district may cover up to 50% of a lot. The code allows up to 40% coverage. To go over that amount requires a special use permit. The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met including but not limited to parking and stormwater management. 2.19 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 20 Mr. Tatting stated the property is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. To the east, south and west is also M-2, Heavy Industrial. To the north is M-1, Light Industrial. The site is located at the northeast comer of 79th and Main Street. Mr. Tatting stated a special use permit is required to increase the lot coverage in excess of 40%. The proposed building will meet all the required setbacks. The west drive aisle is 24 feet wide. It can be expanded to meet the 25-foot requirement. An area of green space measuring 6 feet could be reduced by 1 foot to meet the required 25 feet. The building setback from the east drive aisle can be decreased from 24 feet to 19 feet and meet code. It is designated as a one-way drive aisle and can be 18 feet, and could create a 5 foot setback. Mr. Tatting stated the landscape plan shows 53 trees on site. 56 full size trees are required due to the floor area of the building. The total floor area is larger than the footprint because of a second story office area. The new landscape plan would be required to show 56 trees. Mr. Tatting stated the loading dock on the north side are correctly place in the side yard but are not screened from Main Street. Fencing should be placed along the north property line to screen the doors from Main Street. Mr. Tatting stated the City have been supplied with basic grading and drainage plans. Detailed plans will need to be provided and approved by the City engineers before issuance of a building permit. Mr. Tatting stated the parking plan indicates 61 parking stalls. Offices will use 6,000 square feet; manufacturing 16,445 square feet, and warehousing 38,372 square feet. Based on these uses, the required parking is 79 parking stalls. The parking plan is deficient. To meet the parking requirement, additional parking stalls need to be generated or the office and/or manufacturing space needs to be reduced. Otherwise, the site must receive a variance. Mr. Tatting stated the plans indicate that the building will be made of precast walls. A color scheme has not been set. An additional stipulation could be added for the scheme that the City staff should approve the exterior of the building before the building permit is issued. Mr. Tatting stated staff recommends approval of the special use permit with the following stipulations: 1. The number of parking stalls at the site shall either conform to the City Code or receive a variance from the City Code prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. A landscape plan for the site shall be approved by the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2.2� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 21 3. The drive aisle widths and distances to the building shall conform with the City Code. 4. Grading and drainage plans and drainage calculations for the site shall be approved by the City Engineers prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Exterior surfaces of the building shall be approved by staff before the issuance of a building permit. Mr. Tatting stated the parking is an important issue to be solved before the special use is given. If 40% of the lot is covered, the building would be reduced so they would have more space for parking. Much of the manufacturing equipment is automated so there would not be as many employees. Parking may not be an issue. However, the variance process would review that. Mr. Kondrick asked if the only way was to reduce the size of the building. Mr. Tatting stated that in the present configuration, there is no room on the east, north or west sides. On the south side, they need the current space for drainage. With the present configuration, they could not increase the parking from what is proposed. Mr. Oquist stated they talked about a fence on the north side. Is that part of fhe landscape plan. Mr. Tatting stated, yes. Mr. Maertens stated there is no problem with parking. They realize there can be a reconfiguration. Approval of the special use permit gives them the option to reconfigure or apply for a variance. Mr. Fugelsang stated they can make some adjustments by reducing the amount of office space. Mr. Tatting that would make it closer to the parking requirement. Mr. Fugelsang stated they currently have 52 employees. He doesn't think parking will be a problem for the operation but they realize the need to conform. Mr. Kondrick asked if they had any problem with the stipulations. Mr. Maertens stated the only question they have regards the fencing for the loading docks. What does that mean? If some additional trees would meet the requirement, that is no problem. He thought that would be more aesthetic than a fence. Mr. Saba stated he felt landscaping might be more appropriate for the site. 2.21 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 22 Mr. Tatting stated this can be worked out with the landscape plan. Mr. Fugelsang stated a fence would not block the view of the loading docks from Main Street. TI by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:17 P.M. . Mr. Oquist stated this looked like a nice plan and, the petitioner is witling to work out the parking. M TI by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to recommend approval of Special Use Permit, SP #98-14, by Maertens-Brenny Construction Company, to increase the allowable lot coverage by a single story structure in an M-2 zone from 40% to 50%, on the south 284 feet of the west 460 feet of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of section 2, Township 30 N, Range 24E, generally located at 7901 Main Street N.E. with the following stipulations: 1. The number of parking stalls at the site shall either conform to the City Code or receive a variance from the City Code prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. A landscape plan for the site shall be approved by the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The drive aisle widths and distances to the building shall conform with the City Code. 4. Grading and drainage plans and drainage calculations for the site shall be approved by the City Engineers prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Exterior surfaces of the building shall be approved by staff before the issuance of a building permit. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Tatting stated the City Council would consider this request on July 27. 7. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 10. 1998: MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the minutes of the Appeals Commission meeting of June 10, 1998. ---___ 2.22 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 15, 1998 PAGE 23 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 24. 1998: M Ti N by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the minutes of the Appeals Commission meeting of June 24, 1998. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. • ' . � • i _ ' � ' . : ' : _ � • • , • � � � i MOTI N by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the minutes of the Parks & Recreation Commission meeting of June 2, 1998. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � �� • � • � • • Mr. Hickok provided an update on City Council actions. .� � . � MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to adjoum the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE JULY 15, 1998, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:25 P.M. Respectfully submitted, � � �� Lavonn Cooper .� Recording Secretary 2.23 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Ms. Dawn Ambuhl is requesting a special use permit to allow the construction of a second accessory building on her property. The proposed garage is 22 feet wide by 24 feet deep, an area of 528 square feet. The garage will utilize an existing driveway at the property. The property is located at 6544 Hickory Street NE. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Section 205.07.O1.C. (1) requires a special use permit for accessory buildings over 240 square feet, other than the first accessory building. The proposed second accessory building has an area of 528 square feet. - - The existing garage is attached to the north side of the house. It is 14 feet by 22 feet and is located 11 feet from the north property line. The proposed detached garage will be located in the reaz yard, three feet from the south property line and three feet from the west (reaz) property line. It will also be six feet from a proposed 16 foot by 16 foot house addition. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING CONIlVIISSION: Staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit with stipulations. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the special use permit to the City Council with the following stipulations: 1. 2. 4. The second accessory structure shall be one story, 22 feet wide by 24 feet deep and meet the standazds of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. The second garage shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. The second garage shall not be used in conjunction with a home occupation. The second garage must be accessed with a paved driveway. The driveway to the second garage shall be paved within 60 days of the issuance of the building permit. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission recommendation. 3.01 Staff Report: SP #98-10 6544 Hickory St NE Page 2 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: A special use permit to allow the construction of a second accessory building on her property. The proposed garage is 22 feet by 24 feet, an azea of 528 square feet. The gazage will utilize an existing driveway at the property. Location of Property: 6544 Hickory Street NE Legal Description All that part of Lots 12 and 13, Block 6, Fridley Park, lying Northeasterly of the of Property: following described line: Beginning at a point in the Northwesterly line of said Lot 12 distant 111 feet Southwesterly of the Northeast corner of said Lot 12, thence Southeasterly to a point in the Southeasterly line of said Lot 13 distant 110 feet Southwesterly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 13 and there terminating. Lot Size: Topography: Existing Vegetation: Existing Zoning/Platting: Availability of Municipal Utilities: Vehicular Access: Pedestrian Access: Site Planning Issues: Comprehensive Planning Issues: Public Hearing Comments: 9,945 square feet / 0.23 acres Flat, developed Suburban lawn and trees R-1, Single Family Fridley Pazk Connected Hickory Street Hickory Street Setbacks and architectural design Zoning and Comprehensive Plan are consistent in this location. No objections. 3.02 ; 2 StaffReport: SP #98-10 6544 Hickory St NE Page 3 DEVELOPMENT SITE �•� Ms. Dawn Ambuhl is requesting a special use pernut to allow the construction of a second accessory building on her property. The proposed garage is 22 feet by 24 feet, an azea of 528 squaze feet. The garage will utilize an existing driveway at the property. � � :�' •�L� •: The Ambuhl property is located northwest of where 65%z Way T's into Hickory Street. As part of the Fridley Park plat this property, as described, was created in 1886 Behind the property is an old cemetery. The Ambuhl home was built in 1960. An single car gazage is attached to the north side of the house. A shed is located to the south of the house. A paved driveway leads to the shed. In 1997 and 1998 a building permit was issued for the remodeling of a kitchen and for an egress window, respectively. �:\�I:T� �� 1[.�I��f•y North: East: South• West: �IALYSIS Zoning: R-1, Single Family Zoning: R-1, Single Family Zoning: R-1, Single Family Zoning: R-3, General Multiple C-2, Genera.l Business Land Use: Single Family Homes Land Use: Single Family Homes Land Use: Single Family Homes Land Use: Apartments CARA - auto repair Section 205.07.O1.C. (1) requires a special use permit for accessory buildings over 240 squaze feet, other than the first accessory building. The proposed second accessory building has an azea of 528 square feet. The existing house and garage have an area of approximately 1,374 square feet. The proposed garage is 528 s.f. and the proposed addition is 256 s.f. The combined structures will total an area of 2,158 squaze feet. The lot coverage will be 21.7%, which is less than the m�imum allowable coverage of 25%. - The existing garage is attached to the north side of the house. It is 14 feet by 22 feet and is located 11 feet from the north property line. The proposed detached gazage will be located in the rear yard, three feet from the south property line and three feet from the west (reaz) property line. It will also be six feet from a proposed 16 foot by 16 foot house addition. The proposed garage will � need any variances. 3.03 3 Staff Report: SP #98-10 6544 Hickory St NE Page 4 The existing southern driveway is in poor shape and it will have to be lengthened to reach the location of the proposed garage. The driveway extension will have to be paved and maintain a setback of three feet from the property line. : � ulu� �I� � • � • M.1 ' : �t�11► • �lul • �I Staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit with stipulations. ' :_�lU1� • �1►�� • � : • ulul �1� : ��►� The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the special use pernut to the City Council with the following stipulations: � 1. The second accessory structure shall be one story, 22 feet wide by 24 feet deep and meet the standards of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. . 2. The second garage shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 3. The second gazage shall�not be used in conjunction with a home occupation. 4. The second garage must be accessed with a paved driveway. The driveway to the second garage shall be paved within 60 days of the issuance of the building permit. � 1 :_ � u lu- - �1 . � � Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission recommendation. 3.04 4 � �;�pY NE P� � s .. �2 \ ,� � � 1 r� �:�M � ��: � �, - or,e r-�,�„ ur,� F�2 - Two Farily Urits 0 R3 - Genetal M�tiple lAits �-a - �►�,B � � pw - Ramed ui,a °e`�el°p'r'en� � s� - M� � ►�lei�,borr+ooa � sz - ��,e a�;a 0 G1 - Local Business � G2 - Ger�er'al Busiress �� -�� GR1- Ger�erdl Ofroe o�, -�� A�F2 - F�ieauy tr,aus�l � AA,3 - Q�door hterbiv�e fleauy Ird. �� -� (� P - P�bsc Facilfies � W41'�2 0 PoGFiT-0FW4Y Y�N� �� 6544 Hidcory St SP #98-10 �- � � \ v�2 �N � �5 � _ , � ��ZW A yNE MSSISSIPPI WAY NE S�iecial Use Permi� SP #98-10 �etitiOne� :' D�awn ��nbuhl SP #9&10.• 2nd Garage Zoning.• R 1, Single Farmily 6544 Kckory St 1VE _ __ 3.05 , � �-- � .�, �= � - �- �� • �''-� : , /I I� :� - 1. •' : �r � ��z � c�rr oF Fwo��r 6d31 UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRIDIEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATlON FOR: � Residential Second Accessorv Others PROPERTY INFORMATIO :- ite pian required for submi se� ttached �` Address: � — � Property Identification Number: -� s- 3 0- Z�- � 3-�a s s Lega,l,Description: Lot Block Tract/Addition - �,�. Current Zoni�g: '� S are footage/acreage: �i'�i' 0 0 SG�'/—,-- y�= 4 Reason for Special Use: ��,a-G-�� r�:� ° Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? ->----,� ' Yes No � If Yes, which city? If Yes, what type o business? -�- �� Was that license ever denied or revoked? ��Yes : No i �� .> ,� I(/ � . � � _ , ,,�. �_ �...._.� � FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract urchaser : F e owners must sign this f�m prior to � NAME: . c� � � ��,�v,�J ; .:: • // ADDRESS: ` � DAYTIME PHONE: a -o SIGNATURE/DATE:;� . _ - ,- -, _ A _ . � -D, 9) :: I"" i > ,. , �,.:. - < F ° s.a g _�9d� ;_ PETITIONER INFORMATION _ _ � �-� � �'�� Y � NAME: - - ' �` ° ,.,��;:'. � ADDRESS: - DAYTIME PHONE: SIGNATURE/DATE: � - = Section of City Code: � � - � ��`° FEES _ _;- k Fee: $100.00 Residential Second Accessory _ $400.00 � � � � Others ' Application Number. ?8-!o Receipt #: �D Received By: Scheduled Planning Commission Date: _ J� I, I97Y Scheduled City Council Date: �I�.t.► i 3,� � 5� � _ 10 DayApplication Complete Notification Date: _�� g� /9�Y 60 Day Date: , ) �.ly z g, /P5 � _ _ 3.Ofi � _ _ t: , h� .l >�� fi' , _,: ;� ;� , .. >,� G G � �� 22 X 2's� ; -� . G��E� .� N � .... �- :t� . G . _ _ , , _��$ � � �3 `� �:� W O G, r ' '� ..�.t �`� f ' - �� t^:- k�.'r ; ��, . ,.3't ,�—�'�°� _ �P�' ��. `� �`t ff+�F!■e r .u` ��" ' . x �. . Qt�,a o' � ��'� , �6 X�` �on�r+vM , . ----�y �iY_l � �� . . ., � i —_r _i __ -ol�� I „ ( �r �� I �,�, �_� � �;aa_a= �Lt��• :�T + I -- -- ;�I I 1� 0 1 � �! _ _ __�__-_--_ . . __ 6 +--T�.,�---� � �t,o�' � i i � � i . i C ( � � 4 � � � � --- �"------- —�- --'1 � � i i �..�., i I r-----� I It I � I� � I �1 I � � ----- � I �-'YA ' � 1�� J 'i�� N� 1 s _ ,� � . ; � i � . . _... _.... . . ._� .. .. ....... " "�......��.."_""... .�. . . . �C,UO' .. � � � ��:� '�. `� 3.07 � � . . � �ir i .: Y�,�� a.� w f•_ .. �r ��.� li .s ° r r` � 7: l'» yr � ' p� y�'L� ��+�, � '`� �, „�,� . � . i i z tt ��' � r� �• � 4 , ,4 f e � . fr,E�i . i � . �p • �.r,, � , > - '�, tRr -. .. "'t�4 �;}.�ry'1�,� �. , 4 '� � ' i .. ^ y' ti �Y f . . � ' � J '-�.0 � J/� f KJ�tJiw �,�5: . � �. . r ' _ �-� � . _ x � , • ..y y �. t .�, '�4r�.�L 1�at. � � .. - ..,�� .4. � Y • ` .. . . ... + �j��{ Y�tw �. Lond Plannm9 . < " `3XJiN�ss�ss��oiS�`AlE �s�y,� . .w: - -; �:; .. _ . . :,,.w�;�� ` � . .�,,s�st�9 . � - _ _ " ENG�i NEERI NG � NC ,� � -�� fo; . . . � . � � { �i �'1. Cnrilb,Ntn�cipvl , • _ + � .'> S1/�t��-d116�; . � . " . � � . ' � . ., . . .�, � � ... r� , r.,.,t � .,� ; ;�q�� t ,� ::._ En ineers � � � r Su�veyo�s`�--= � � y �� . .. � � � ♦ f�:i • t.'�M1 1�, r� ' ° _� 9:., ' .' -{ ..� ;,„ ,., ` " � 6' e,. . + s : � ' r. . . ` '�. � a �i �'z . �/': t . '� , . . ✓' s� �i . ce�ti.f icate �� o�- ssi�t!ir �--.-Uon �re �fo� ��. .:. _ . _ � -.,� . , ' ` " i � ' �; y ' +' r �Y� :', /��/ ' . f . Y ,.� . .� �+ " .M1 �`� • , �` {4 .: /� t . . .. . < ..�' .:.: '�. ' _+,' '.., 4 �� Y f � : �./` / : � f�� ' �Q � . � �..I t � A� � '�,s� . y' ; ' ' i��,Y ST�rf ✓ i7l' Or �I � /�, - a � � ,L, ' ' il �,X� + lV j .f .. � N/t' r ...� ! .. e ��`s -� .' _ � }t '�� ^n �,"S, �• .'�X: '� � � i . -r� �� .M.1.A1'� ��!y.,{' � �,� �u a �.+7 �r� tiF l �i . i�t�'u_ frSCar' '� � �+�°l` . �Y � 3 x _ s 4 { , �s } � � �1 y � rl'•" ti tt � T f � :� � �, ` �.i:1"t ... .... "rl,. . ' :• . .,_ _.. .,'. n � -.Rtr��.�` [i s,S'.LL....� �.. �:w'Ye'3" �'zl.�,LS3..n.1;f�� .EL_ �J !. Y . ..''+ '.. " ' � . ., . .... _ ��:. � ..�i;"v.. . S,a.4�. �a ...m k S.� �� 'i rr'. .. � i - iy �� ' L ; � + ti 'I. �aY : � � r �� ;. *� t '; 4t // .�' � , y��4 1S"Y � � +��eA � it t --� � t ,: ,. . ,_. `\ • t" F � � ♦ '. .i � aF � ez 1 .,� .c?�c , � ... _.. . . _. ,. w � x � �f�:� +''�:� � �d' ,� � � y�u� Y �.�' t ' �1 �� ' .;... : . � , i. -: � �. i �,� - . � �� - 7 �� . A i ? ♦ .v i, i� ' ,. V �.'. � r �t ,, �, .. � � � . s J �t �4 . , _.s,�•-�. Js,, ,.a:.... ,.�r iT- '`� � K r a.� rt � J� L:. ,, i. + ` �-- s �4t� �-�Jc �''-:ti ,�. ;C `giv " ! i. v K .t,,�y��C.t'�s �y„r:i i4 tJ. � ;-ur'� c L>`ti .•. } �: 3-t' 4'`'� .:�'� ,p�,��''".� y �''. ��'�� ' +'. '. O�/�� f�}� �• i u,� ��. �� s k'� '�',: �,� r y: � � .�� /'� k�a. K ..a! •� �i'� 4 �+ y'�r'�.°c`�h �`°� 9+.%C1D/.�E r � i•`• �ai z y i rs'' r . : � �� *�� hP, ��o�% �. �� 2�- : � . l�irr�by'csrfrf' ^� ��` ��-� 0{'N�.' �aGO�iiaJ�o1/ dwil , �� ,,��;� r_ :,;�.� ;,. �., . ' � . r. 7 =. ,a} ; Y t.�J.-�.��1� ... F ; c>' r i � µ � , te ` ._ .' . � �e..... . r � �. � � . �. r�. ,_�—r ,�::�.:; �..�.�----:_. ..... . � y J '-^%`�1. � � � r_ y. l � �3. ., * " � . �� i��rl� '�7, .:is r,. � � � : *,�ror ) , � t �it= } f �, - \ ;} � Y�� t l . :. t - � � -„i �� .� j � `_-:� -4? ..41.:'_ o _ ~t� �' r�(i {� �-'i �, 1��. y Y_ Q ,�N"# (1 : / �! ' � Q �1 � _^!.1-. O � � `.-�`4' � ��1,0 . °�y .�"s.s �« � °��4,,�� Y , ,. �- � � � __ i _ _ � ."�a s �..:� < _ � � _ , ! ...- '� � �'ti � .Z Gp �r a .-r ..;t '� a «� .�` � _,..�. ' � 1Y J fe.. i, . ro - Z�f �. � --,. 4 ' - e:i�d �ie:n �-. a, - -. r ,. . . �- <. - °�. ..._ _ _ .�. ;:=, �sf.± �•r»y��.Q� a vi �s a ii-t�s�p�aa� ��, �d� m,� �� A.D !� 1 rr_._... F :. �+S " - i'�Yt �:�. r` . �r . Y.,�`w"� r4 � p/�� 4��1'�, ��t Y��._ '��,��: #��, �.,,.rerttl, e �trta i �ir�se�ifqt,ari`�i 'a`.�urrey �'�6it �w+ri�rlones � �:��ff,�F�.��►d�, AS s� �.�r y ti ! f. '�'�•,�r;r �.� z �... r A�t��t''�.' a a� R s=ro= ��Sl�8�1.,RBAIV ,ENGll.lr �R�l� �,,�z a��, ,�� n� w�„�; �, 4 r rtY i. �t,. ` .. "► [ 3.08 � � - � � r � � � �t.� rr t � � R � �,3 vi'f�i':� �'+�' ' <. { � . x�. , .�. ! 4i �I Y� � P1q� �t �ni3 .�. �: � ti. " � .�£ _.�.. . . .. .. ....::a..,......_ ., �\r.. ..,.u�� i .� �,� DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Ms. Margaret R. Reed is requesting a special use permit to allow the construction of a second accessory building on her property. The proposed detached garage is 19 feet wide by 22 feet deep, an area of 418 square feet. The garage will utilize an existing paved driveway that accesses 3ra Street. The property is located at 6017 3rd Street NE. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Section 205.07.O1.C. (1) requires a special use pernlit for accessory buildings over 240 square feet, other than the first accessory building. The proposed second accessory building has an area of 418 square feet. The existing detached garage is located behind the house and accessed the alley. The alley is in the process of being vacated. The garage will no longer be used for vehicle storage, but for other storage and hobby purposes. The proposed detached garage will be located to the north of the existing house. STAFF RECOMNIENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit with four stipulations. � PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the special use pernut to the City Council with the following stipulations: 1. The second accessory structure shall be one story, 19 feet wide by 22 feet deep and meet the standards of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. 2. The second accessory structure shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 3. The second accessory structure shall not be used in conjunction with a home occupation. 4. The second accessory structure must be accessed with a paved driveway. The driveway shall be paved within 60 days of the issuance of the building permit. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission recommendation. 4.01 Staff Report: SP #98-11 6017-3rd St NE Page 2 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: A special use permit to allow the construction of a second accessory building on her property. The proposed garage is 19 feet by 22 feet, an area of 418 square feet. The garage will utilize an existing paved driveway that accesses 3rd Street. Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: Lot Size: Topography: Existing Vegetation: Existing Zoning/Platting: Availability of Municipal Utilities: Vehicular Access: Pedestrian Access: Site Planning Issues: Comprehensive Planning Issues: Public Hearing Comments: 6017 3rd Street NE Lots 20 & 21, Block 5, Hyde Pazk 10,320 square feet / 0.24 acres Flat, developed Suburban lawn S-1, Hyde Park Neighborhood Connected 3rd Street 3rd Street Setbacks and architectural design. Hyde Park Zoning and Comprehensive Plan are consistent in this location. No obj ections. 4.02 i 2 Staff Report: SP #98-11 6017-3rd St NE Page 3 DEVELOPMENT SITE t_ • 1� Ms. Margazet Reed is requesting a special use permit to allow the construction of a second accessory building on her property. The proposed garage is 19 feet wide by 22 feet deep, an azea of 418 square feet. The garage will utilize an existing paved driveway. � ;1' •��_ _ •• The Reed property is located on the east side of 3rd Street and to the west of University Avenue. The property consists of two lots from the original Hyde Park, which was platted in 1886. A house and detached garage currently exist at the property. A paved driveway from 3'� Street was created last year in anticipation of building the garage this year. The petitioner is also in the process of having the alley vacated. The existing garage will no longer be used for the storage of vehicles after the vacation is approved. �! : �i� North: �ast: South: West: ANALYSIS Zoning: S-1, Hyde Pazk Zoning: C-2 General Business Zoning: S-1, Hyde Park Zoning: S-1, Hyde Pazk Land Use: Single Family Homes Land Use: University Avenue; Retail Businesses Land Use: Single Family Homes Land Use: Single Family Homes Section 205.07.O1.C. (1) requires a special use permit for accessory buildings over 240 squaze feet, other than the first accessory building. The proposed second accessory building has an azea of 418 square feet. The existing house and gazage have an area of approximately 1,214 square feet. The proposed gazage is 418 square feet. The combined structures will total an area of 1,532 square feet. The lot coverage will be 14.8%, which is well below the maximum allowable coverage of 25%. The existing detached garage is located behind the house and accessed the alley. The a11ey is in the process of being vacated. The garage will no longer be used for vehicle storage, but for other storage and hobby purposes. The proposed detached garage will be located to the north of the existing house. The proposed garage will � need any variances. 4.03 3 Staff Report: SP #98-11 6017-3rd St NE Page 4 The petitioner has indicated that the style of the new garage will be complimentary to the house. She indicated it will be built to code, have cedar shake siding to match the house and the shingles will match the house and the existing gazage. Elevation diagrams of the gazage aze included with this report. ,_ • �I�� 1� � • � • ,� ' : �,1�11► • �lui •, Staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit with four stipulations. , ' � ►1►If. • � u1�1 �[i ► : �Z� ulu �1� :�1 [�� I The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the special use pernut to the City Council with the following stipulations: 1. The second accessory structure shall be one story, 19 feet wide by 22 feet deep and meet the standards of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. 2. The second accessory structure shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 3. The second accessory structure shall not be used in conjunction with a home occupation. 4. The second accessory structure must be accessed with a paved driveway. The driveway shall be paved within 60 days of the issuance of the building permit. � C _ _ � 1�1 �1 • � Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission recommendation. 4.04 ', a � � ' »� sr: �r�� ' ��`r.. 61 AVE NE w z � N � N 60 AVE NE �� : 0 I�� - one Fartiy urrts 0 �-2 - Tw� �artiy ur;4s 0 R 3- General Ahltiple Urrls 0 Ft a- Ml�bae liorr,e Parks � PUD - Pyl3�ned lktit De�elaprrerd � s� '' 7`�° �arC i�a�,�o�r�ooa 0 s2 - f2edsveloprr,ert asti;cc � G1 - Local Business 0 G2 -C�eneralBtainess �G3 - Geieral GR1- Ger�erdl 0 �ce � 0 NM1 - Light Industrial luF2 - � �nd�ial - AA-3 - Q�door Intensire Fieavy Ind � RR - �7raecls oP -��►� wa�t � PoC�FiT-OFW4Y w z � M � 61 AVE NE S�ecial Use Permi� SP #98-11 �� I � // •// � ��/ . � �• / // /�. Zoning.• �1, Hyde Pcn�k 6017 3rd St NE 4.05 60 AVE NE -+' ` a � � � .. � ��°" i,�� i � :I " ' \ w • CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR: ✓ Residential Second Accessory Others PROPERTY INFORMATION: - site plan required for submittal,•see attached . Address: _ � � 1 � z, �'� � �-.�P p � CU � Property Identification Number. Legai Description: Lot�j Biock �_ Tract/Addition !-t �� a p ��0. � t� Current Zoning: t2e �. Square footage/acreage: �{ R o' w x t za' a= � o j 3 z_ a��,. Reason for Speciai Use: _Q o,��4 �. nl�� a �;�, ��d� �y91 ��o o�� g 1� ` y v v _I_�Ll �Cbt\ T G S i'C'PF l dlrPPC� Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No ✓ If Yes, which city? if Yes, what type of busi�ess? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No - titi V�VA��V �V �r�V�V V 1V V ArAI�//VN/V�VArAr�V Ar�V^r�iN^/�VN��r��r�i.yNVN�r1V�r�rNV^r^I�V�VAI�VAI�I�V NAi�VN�V V^�^I+V V�V V�V FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract purchasers: Fee ovimers must sign this form prior to processing) � NAME: -- S� � � a r�� c� 'C� d ADDRESS: [� o »d � c� � � DAYTIME PHONE: -_S'i �-� o � SIGNATURE/DATE: � �� :� So� �.8�-� bss 5-30-, 8 1.� �: . :: .. � - ... .., . PETITIONER INFORMATION . _ _ _ , ,s,_.. . . .- , . , ., - ., f - . , -- .. + .; �-. �3 xai' NAME: Sc�.-. c a c� r�� '�. �°L �� ADDRE�S. - — lo o �`-t �=' ��. r� � DAYTIME PHONE: � --t � - �o -� � . SIGNATUR DATE: m� o,� � __ �� ....,,�� .�.,.�.�,�E�i��,��..;...�� ..................��:. Section of City Code: � FEES - Fee: $100.00 = Residential Seoond Accessory $400.00 Others Application Number. ��.-//Receipt #: �� I 3 9 Received By: Scheduled Planning Commission Date: _ � wty << i� y� Scheduled City Council Date: ��f.� r3 f i S�� 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: �;1�.►�� g` i SS� 60 Day Date: ��.t.c zY i 9Fg _ 4.06 � ., . - ��. ��: e; � a. �e � 5+3D-�g - ..S�a�. �o�.� e.� ��d �\'� co � e�-�.� ow��ew �o: �r�c�\e\' � \ctv�•�:v� �o��cv�:ss io N �1 � � e'. � e, S: c� e`(� �� az. � �cce ssoc- J S��u�c�.�ie. G- aL c' a�. c�e, lo ��Z 3� S� �V �, `C �� S c�o Gv� . `M. � r� , s � o c�. � �� r�. e�r v� ,,•� � SLo�.\e c� e\�r o�- r� i c�%bor hooc> � C o`c�c� rn o h �o� \.v��e.s �- �X � s �.� r� S��v�c�,�ceS. � c o� o s e cL `c� �. w c�c� c� ao... q� - c� ' * S� z.e \g' w x 22` c��eP L��\$ s�j-�•�) � -t o � e �o � �. �.�. a o r �cv s ; a �. o -� �, o .,.. s �. , ' o� ��. � h Ss � o i, { c� �e � 1` -�s o c w�.�- � �ro'M r�c�� o Sr �ov�5 �„. � ��e�e � S o,c.\� cw+�) �� o�se vv'.��: v� \O� o� �4.e. QroQosed \occk�:ov� o�- ��w `�� r �- �e • £ x � s � : t. � \`\ ` X a�. � csc� � a... �e. � � S \ 6 � r o r� b a- c\Z o� �� v� �o� r ck. � e, � \ o�. o� \ S c� Sr � o sJ �, o M�: t� e d �Q r o�. �e S �o.��a �.o� �.x �,��a �o�� s� �} o � ��se . \`i�xaa = 3og s �� louse ; \a x a a= `� � S s� �,� 8v b s�-�{ . � �a b �'� �� . ��. v e�. �: o,� o S- c� �e. 1,� o.� � a r o�. b e. �; c� f a�. ��e �- '�. � �t `c� �° X � S '� : v� � � �� +r �� C \3' q-� �c�l{ o� roo��. S-�� e `,�,o �.�� b � � \ '� a�, c C � � Q � ` rc� � ti � c�r �c '� o � o v� S � coc�� O \1 � � i cL i v� c°��e ,� c�. v e c� cl o�. �- S�ct 1L� � '� ° `�c1 a� c� �10 �-�. S e. �' S�: t, R\ e S � o 'l`n c� � c� � o k S+e °� E X �� `S � � �°t q�cx.cc,� e.� e. 4.07 � ,J �� t1� � � v L � � � � s � / � l" � � � � � r � � �� ,.9 ('n � �, O �) � r(1 � � s 0 s �i ro � a 9� •.� a --- --- __ __, � `, � � o �'� �, y — n � �t�� d � > ��°3 °� � v';, ��yd�� cn Q v cn ` � _. � o N 0 � � � o i � � o� ��OChaA� �� d d � � �� 0 f � J 01 � 41 � d v � � � v � � � d� � d �I L � � �r' � o L • a � w '� . �, "o ' A -r x � 7 � � �L � � d �, � � �v d r 6 � � QN j � Q a a � s � '� O an� „��p 4.08; � -- _ _ ___ � � -� � a d � � , _ � 3 � � CI� -� L .� � � � � � �� 0 L � � � � � � � -�r �.. � / ii � � � � � -a� � � � L �' � � � � � � 0 o � � ., � � � � � �� .i � �� `' � tJ 4- � �t � � � S � ct„r � �c.t r �. c� e Z.. '(� �'- `�� . e� c`� � i� S o-�- c� e S�� tc1 -� c� s- � c�. v,� � v� •c,� � v. ci � G-�.��, �,� �, �, �.� a b � v�sed �� : � r- � o � ° �"" � a-� 1�:. r � � �c S . � �^'e c� \\ � ; v\ ,� V c�.. c a�, �: o� � e o�c \l e� �c` r ca.. �� . ck. �� cL a. C�. "� J � e c t. �: v. c� � o �-� . 'N e. �� r: � e�� r k�c. � h -� c� �\ �` i `� i c � \\ o v� e. d S'� r� e. -� ar c c e S S �a c�. r: v�...� a.� \�:.�.� r o w a.� �!- o � x i s�: v� c� c� � r cA. �e . J � 4.09 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Mr. Mervin Herrmann is requesting a special use permit to allow the construction of a second accessory building on his property. The proposed storage shed is 14 feet wide by 24 feet deep, an area of 336 square feet. The building will be 14 feet in height. The property is located at 278 Mercury Drive. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: A special use permit is required for accessory buildings over 240 square feet other than the first accessory building[Section 205.07.01.C.(1)]. The proposed second accessory structure is 336 square feet in azea. The proposed accessory building will be utilized�for storage and will not have a driveway leading to it. Mr. Herrmann s property is located on the south side of Mercury Drive. There is sufficient area to place the proposed storage shed in order to meet all setback requirements. A variance for the proposed building is not necessary. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: - The Planning Commission recominended approval of the special use permit with the following stipulations: 1. The second accessory building shall be one story, 14 feet wide by 24 feet deep and meet the standards of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. 2. The building shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 3. A second driveway/curb-cut shall not be created on this property. 4. The accessory building shall not be utilized for a home occupation STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the City Council Concur with the Planning Commission's recommendation. 5.01. Staff Report: SP #98-12 278 Mercury Drive Page 2 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: A special use permit to allow the construction of a second accessory structure on the property. The proposed storage shed is 14 feet by 24 feet, an area of 336 square feet. The building will be 14 feet in height. The proposed second accessory building will not have an additional driveway to it. Location of Properiy: The property is located at 278 Mercury Drive. Legal Description of Properiy: Lot 2, Block 2, Sylvan Hills Plat 4 Lot Size: Topography: Existing Vegetation: Existing Zoning/Platting. Availability of Municipal Utilities: Vehicular Access: Pedestrian Access: Site Planning Issues: Comprehensive Planning Issues: Public Hearing Comments: Approximately 10,800 square feet Relatively level No frees exist in the area of the proposed accessory building. R-1, Single Faxnily; Sylvan Hills Plat 4 Connected From Mercury Drive From Mercury Drive The storage building will be placed in a relatively flat area. Zoning and the Comprehensive Plan are consistent in this location. To be taken. �J.�2 I 2 � StaffReport: SP #98-12 278 Mercury Drive Page 3 DEVELOPMENT SITE REQUEST Mr. Mervin Herrmann is requesting a special use permit to allow the construction of a second accessory building on his property. The proposed building is 14 feet wide by 24 feet deep, an area of 336 square feet. The building will be 14 feet in height. The proposed second accessory building will not have an additional driveway to it. The property is located at 278 Mercury Drive. SITE DESCRIPTION/HISTORY Mr. Elwell's property is located on the south side of Mercury Drive. The home and attached garage were built in 1962. There is adequate room on the property for the accessory building. ADTACENT SITES North: East: South: West: ANALYSIS Zoning: R-1, Single Family Zoning: R-1, Single Family Zoning: R-1, Single Family Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Single Family Homes Land Use: Single Family Homes Land Use: Single Family Homes Land Use: Single Family Homes Section 205.07.01.C.(1) requires a special use permit for accessory buildings over 240 square feet, other than the first accessory building. The proposed second accessory building is 336 square feet in area. The existing house and garage are approximately 1,869 square feet. Total area of new and proposed buildings is 2,205 square feet, 20.4% of the property area. This percentage is under the maximum permitted coverage of 25%. A second driveway/curb-cut will not be created at this parcel. The petitioner has indicated that the accessory building will be wood frame and steel siding and match the color of the house. 5.03 � 3 StaffReport: SP #98-12 278 Mercury Drive Page 4 There is sufficient area to place the proposed building in order to meet all setback requirements. A variance for the proposed garage would not be necessary. The proposed garage can meet all the zoning and building code requirements without the need of a variance. PLANNING COMIVIISSION RECONIMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended approval with the following stipulations: 1. The second accessory building shall be one story, 14 feet wide by 24 feet deep and meet the standards of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. 2. A second driveway/curb-cut shall not be created at the property. 3. The second accessory building shall be one story, 14 feet wide by 24 feet deep and meet the standards of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. 4. The accessory building shall not be utilized for a home occupation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission. 5.04 4 � �2 4rry� �-� � � . . . - . 3 j��` . �,0 1"'-�� . . . - - _ � � �Y E-^ �,. . _ \ I / _ � , ��- ' r'':.�+�_ �y� �t" � '��'"z., "f+F "�:�A` _ `��:�.�-"2�.. � �«+� � F�t - c?,e r-arily t�,ils p r�2 - r,HO r-a�a,� u�,�s � R-3 - Generai Mt/tipe utrls � Fid - Mobile Horne Parfe � PUD ' Plarned l�t 0'e''el°pm°^t � S1 - i'iyde Pdrk Na¢ibQhood � Sz -�,�� 0 c, - � a,g� � G2 - G� B�siness � G3 - General SFnpP�9 � GR7 - Ge�al Office � nM, - � �►�atr;a� � IIM2 - Fbevy Indtahial � Ab3 - Qtdoar tterui�e Fiaevy Ind �� -� � P - a� �a� � w4� ("l RIC�iTT-0F�YW►Y , . . ':.'. .i ti .:...:: •.. :• - . . '- � � � � � � � �� . L � � ._ � .. � _ � T' t . . .. ,,� - . . . - �'�°+�� :'�iY . . -. - _ �::�y.�.. �S �y� _ -_ .��; � �'. SP #98-12, 2nd Accessory Bldg Petitioner.• 1��ervin Herrn�c S��ecial Use Permit, SP #9&12 Zoning.• R 1, Single Family 27811�Ierccay Dri --' �" 5.05 . � . �� -,- � • ;*-,: r;-�, i.�� :•� � (�:� - 1 1 •': � � ■ � �■ i13T S�JRV�SY i,osr a, B�cx a SURVSY FOR CITY OF FRIDI�Y SYLVAN HILL3 PLAT � l�t. I�RVIN H�RRMA�`IN 2 � � �0 �.� � t��= �:.Y --,�? =�-P - - --- �. � � O t., M ' � � ;;, __-- -------�--'� O O C �. � �� • O � � � � . / - GG �- . �S• �� • � < � � ia i � �� i � .�� ,��F � 2 2� �, . _ � � � �` � _ . ., y ;�+ �'' � � '� 6D�N�T=Sf•t ti I • 1� - $..4t�: 1"= ND � �:� �Y � q . t • r z � �o -� _� _ _ ._..—_ � _ _r_�_ _ �. . � .! , � /! .i : �=! 'I C I�aAL DSSCRIPTIONt Lot 2, Bloak 2, Sylvan Hill• Plst �i, City of Fridl�y, Minryeeota, S�otion 14, Tc�rnahiy 30, Rangs 24. i h,�reby certity that this surwy vas ms►ds wtider � dirsot eup�r= �-:�vi�lon snd that I a� a duly authorissd R�gisi�r�d Lsnd Sur�wyor :-,:und�r the laxs ot the Stata of Minntaota. �:_ : .. ` : Dat�ds Nov�emb�r 27, 1961 ---.-. � �'� . , . . ��. eg� o. �; . .°;- � . - . - .:;. .. � � . � . :;:=� � � -�.-��=�-�-- _- . � _ - � . . .. ':r. , ... . ... � �.�i :3 . . ' � . . . .iY+�' � . '•[-. . � � . • .• ' ' , . � ' • .R� . � . • . ' � � - • � : � '_ ' _ . . . . � • � �If .=i � • . . . . ' .. � . R . . xt�.A � A4 . ' • . .� }��'_ �lt1` ry ` f ••k� ''�f. . _ •. ' . .. . � � . '. . • . :. il.T l'• -• � . . Y ,�.=� , 1 . . . : . - 5.Of ' - : . � � : }��'^�i V'� � j ?.' 4 -�•. ' - _. . •�. y��;�-1 � .a . . • .. ' � • . • . —.s _ ° - - - , �..� � 0 , ,� � �� 3 CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSiTY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR: Residentiai Second Accessory Others INFORMATION: - site pian required for submittal, see attached Address: ��sl M F IrG u I�� ,�K , Property Identification Number. !� - j� -Z� -=_=-�° ZY Legal Description: Lot .? Block�_ Tract/Addition sY�vAH .NI��S K�z PtAT �f - ,� : Current Zoning: Square footage/acreage: / O. 8'D o - Reason for Speciai Use: 1�o U Q L E ��11PA G E t-s VFRY M/ N A M A L F FOR VHN d FULL S I ZE CAR � Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license?.= `� �Y� Yes No �_ if Yes, which city? - _ If Yes, what type of business? -_� -- � V`Jas thGt liwrsz eve� der.iec or rsvoked? Yes � No �:.� _. _;-. tir�Vlr4�r�V1r^rti�Vti�V�V�V��r�V�►�Y�YM�M�r�V�Y�V4�1^rti�V�r�Y41r�ti�V�/�rAr�Vrw�/4ti ' .' FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) . (Contract purchasers: Fe wners must sign this form prior to processing) -- � NAME: -t-+� , . � ADDRE S: � � _ .._ . •' DAYTIME PHONE: - S'E SIGNATURE/DATE:=� � - = - . ' � . :'1".ir " �y�' . � . . -� '.. ' F� ' � .. � . • � t19�• PETITIONER INFORMATION ' _ �� - - - _-._ :...J '�r�' y� NAME: �H E R v� N .�oK�/ N�R��M � iN .,:. � ADDRESS: � G - DAYTIME PHONE: � 7/- IS`G Z- SIGNATURE/DATE: !o -'I/�- --- �V�V�r�V/Y�Vti�V�V V^r�►�r�V�r�4rAr�Vti�V�W V V�V�V�V�V�rA��VN�VAr�VAHVA/1r�rN�V�►�V�V�V�V1Vti Section of City Code: - ' _. �� FEES -� - - Fee: $100.00 Residential Second Accessory $400.00 Others Application Number:SP�"� Receipt #: R ived By: us i" Scheduled Planning Commission Date: �}�,�, � S{h Scheduled City Council Date: �� a�" 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date. KK-C ZZ.�t 60 Day Date: • �� 4 — 5.07 �� a� -� ;�;�, - � :;�_ _ ��:; .: ;��:t-�= CITY OF FRIDI.EY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BEFORE THE PLANNlNG COMMiSSION TO: All property owners/residents within 350 feet of property generally located at 278 Mercury Drive CASE NUMBER: Special Use Permit #98-12 APPLICANT: Mervin J. Herrmann PURPOSE: To allow the construction of a second accessory building (storage shed/building) LOCAT/ON OF 278 Mercury Drive PROPERTY AND LEGAL Lot 2 Blk 2, Sylvan Hills Plat #4 DESCR/PT/ON: DATE AND T/ME OF Planning Commission Meeting: HEARlNG: Wednesday, July 15, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. The Planning Commission Meetings are televised live the night of the meetir�g on Channel 35. �- - PLACE OF Fridley Municipal Cent�r, City Councif Chambers HEAR/NG: 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley� MN HOW TO 1. You may attend hearings and testify. PART/C/PATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator, at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 or FAX at 571-1287. _ SPECIAL Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an ACCOMODATIONS: interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than July 8, 1998. ANY QUEST/ONS: Contact Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator at 572-3599. July 1, 1998 Publish: July 8, 1998 5.08 �_. = Special Use Permit, Display and Sales of Recreational Vehicles, 7810 University Ave. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Hilltop Trailer Sales Inc. is requesting a special use permit to allow the display and sales of recreational vehicles on the Lupient Used Car Sales site at 7810 University Avenue. The proposal is to modify the parking lot and reuse the building for vehicle showroom and repair service. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: A special use pernlit is required for sales and display of recreational vehicles not within an enclosed structure [Section 205.15.O1.C.(3)J. The proposed site and building are currently used for automobile sales and service. Improvements to the parking lot include adding landscaped islands and reducing the overall amount of pavement by 3,500 square feet. T'he display areas are proposed to include a large landscaped space, with shacle and ornamental trees. Parking is proposed to be 68 spaces, with 32 additional "proof of parking" spaces to meet the requirements. Subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, representatives of Hilltop Trailer were able to locate an ALTA Survey that was prepared for this site by a surveyor for jim Lupient. The ALTA Survey shows the as-built conditions and verifies that current parking setbacks are adequate. However, stipulation #2 can remain as recommended by the Commission regarding parking setbacks. Staff would prefer to have a revised site plan that is dimensioned and accurately reflects site conditions, including the parking setback dimensions. PLANIVING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommend approval with 9 stipulations (contained in body of report). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Concur with the Commission recommendation. 6.01 StaffReport: SP #98-13 7810 University Avenue Page 2 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: A special use permit to allow the display and sales of recreational vehicles on the existing Lupient Used Car Sales site at 7810 University Avenue. The existing building will be re-utilized, and the site will be improved. Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: Lot Size: Topography: Existing Vegetation: Existing Zoning/Platting. Availability of Municipal Utilities: Vehicular Access: Pedestrian Access: Site Planning Issues: The property is located at 7810 University Avenue. Lots 2 and 3, Block 2, East Ranch Estates 2nd Addition, except the east 200 feet south of the 204 feet. Approximately 4.4 acres Level Shrubs and trees along the side and rear yards. C-3, General Shopping; East Ranch Estates Connected From University Avenue Service Road From University Avenue Seryice Road Hilltop Trailer Sales would like to create an atmosphere for selling its recreational vehicles that "creates an image and character reminiscent of the north woods." Proposed improvements to the site plan include: adding a landscaped display area, removing banners and flags (except large American flag), 6.02 � 2 Staff Report: SP #98-13 7810 University Avenue Page 3 Comprehensive Planning Issues: Public Hearing Comments: trimming and cleaning up the existing landscape materials, repairing the underground irrigation system, cleaning out the rear catch basin and repairing the sink hole and rear curb. The existing lights in the display lot will remain and have been deemed adequate for security. Additional landscaping will include Douglas Fir, Birch, Maple Ash, Amur Maple, Hawthorne and Crabapple trees. Shrubs will be Dogwood, Potentilla and Anthony Waterer Spirea. The display areas will be landscaped with trees, shrubs will be added around the border of the site and "colorful perennials" will be scattered around the site. The 25 foot wide fire lane around the building will remain as required by City code. There is an existing fence that crosses the fire lane in two areas. This fence should be able to be knocked down in case of an emergency. City code requires that curb and gutter be installed azound the perimeter of the site and around the landscaped islands [205.15.05(3)]. Parking is required at a ratio of 1 space per 200. For the existing building of 19,758 square feet, 99 spaces are required. Hilltop believes 68 spaces will meet the needs of their customers. Section 205.15.05 A allows for a reduction of parking stalls when "the particular nature of the proposed use or other considerations" make it an unnecessary hardship. Hilltop shows where the additional spaces could be built on the site in the future, should it become necessary. Parking setbacks are 20 feet in the front and 5 feet on the sides. These parking setback do not appear to be met. With some adjustments, the parking setbacks can be met within the site. _ The zoning and the Comprehensive Plan are consistent in this location. To be taken. 6.03 3 StaffReport: SP #98-13 7810 University Avenue Page 4 DEVELOPMENT SITE REQUEST Hilltop Trailer Sales Inc. is requesting a special use permit to allow the display and sales of recreational vehicles on the Lupient Automobile sales site at 7810 University Avenue. The proposal is to modify the parking lot and reuse the building for vehicle service. SITE DESCRIPTION/HISTORY The site is currently owned and operated for Lupient's Used Car sales. A 19,758 square foot building exists on the site, as well as a large automobile display area and a fenced vehicle storage area. ADTACENT SITES North: East: South: West: ANALYSIS Zoning: C-3, General Shopping Land Use: Multi-tenant retail building Zoning: C-3, General Shopping Land Use: Spring Lake Park and University Avenue _ _ - Zoning: C-3, General Shopping Zoning: M-2, Heavy Industrial Land Use: Small retail operations Land Use: Multi-tenant industrial A special use permit is required for agencies selling or displaying recreational vehicles. In reusing this building and site, several improvements are proposed. The building and lighting will remain as they currently exist on the site, and should not pose any problems. The building may be cosmetically improved, but will essentially remain as is, with the potential for expansion in the future. Circulation on the site will remain as is. The existing fence should be able to be knocked down in the case of an emergency. The proposed site improvements will provide more green space and more landscaping, providing shade for customers and less runoff to the storm sewer system. An irrigation system is in place, and will be repaired to ensure that the existing and new landscape materials will thrive. The existing large American flag will remain; the other banners and flags, which are starting to show wear, will be removed. 6.04 ; 4 Staff Report: SP #98-13 7810 University Avenue Page 5 Fewer parking spaces than required are proposed. Hilltop believes that 68 spaces will be sufficient and has shown where additional spaces could be located, should it become necessary. This demonstration of available space on site is satisfactory, as the business owners likely have a good understanding of their needs, and will be motivated to provide the additional parking spaces to serve their customers, when needed. Required parking setbacks are 5 feet on the sides and 20 feet in the front. The site plan needs to be revised to meet these requirements. PLAN1vING CONIMISSION RECOMNIENDATION The Planning Commission recommended approval with the following stipulations: 1. Parking of 68 customer spaces be allowed, with 32 spaces shown for future parking if needed. 2. The site plan be revised to meet the parking setback requirements. 3. Curb and gutter be installed in the display and parking areas, including around the landscaped islands. 4. Additional landscaping be approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building pernlits. 5. The existing fence be open or able to be knocked down for emergency vehicle access. 6. The flags and banners, other than the large American flag, be removed. 7. The building be adequately ventilated for spray paint and/or other service processes. 8. All trash and trash handling equipment must be in closed containers. 9. Any outdoor storage beyond the proposed camper sales will require an additional special use permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends concurrence with the Planning Cominission recoxnmendation. 6.05 5 7'9 WAY NE 7'9 WAY NE �,�� o�;�«�: � F�1 - One Farrily lktits 0 1�2 - rwo Farriy u►rts 0 Fi-3 - General Midpie Urtits 0 ft 4- Nbbile Horne Parls � PUD - Plarned U�it Develaprt�# � S1 - Fyde Park Neighborhood � SZ - �oprr�rt astrid � G1 - Local Business 0 G2 - General Business � G3 -Gener-al Sfx�ping � c� - c�rai orfi� � M-1 - Light Industrial � : : WF2 - HeavY Industrial � n�.3 - a,�door i►t�e r�y i�,a. � r�2 - r•�ai�roads � P - Pit�iic Facilities VIfA1FJ2 � Poc�-rr-oF w�aY SP #98-13, Trailer Sales Petitioner:• Jeryy Pearo & Riclrard Pearo Special Use Permit, SP #9813 Zoning.• C-3, C;+eneral Shoppng 7810 University �'- -- "'L' �n�- � � � Q � .� L � .� � � L � � � � � .L � V , 0 � U `� � .1, { :'i � 1 � i:i - � � � �� _ �,�� °' 6.07 �l � CITY OF FRlDLEY 6431 UNNERSITY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 � " COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DFPARTMENT SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATtON FOR: Residential Second Accessory Others PROPERTY iNFORMATION: - site plan required for submittat, see attacheci AddCeSS: 7810 UNIVERSITY AVE NE; FRIDLEY. NID1 55432 ' Property tdentification Number. legal Description: Lot 2& 3 Biock 2 Tract/Addition �T �CH ESTATES 2ND ADDITION, EXCEPT THE EAST 200 FT SOUTH OF 204 FT Current Zoning: �-3 Square footagelacreage: /5.78 Actt�s R23S0�1 f0� $PeCl81. US2: ��CEIVEi APPROVAL TO SELL AND DISPLAY RECREATIONAL VEHICLES - Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? � Yes No X lf Yes, which city? if Yes, what type of business? - Was that licens� ever denied or revoked? Yes No __�_�____ ��,,,,,, FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the properiy title) (Contract purchasers: Fee owners must sign fhis form prior to processing) NAME: HILLTOP TRAILER SALES INC ' � A��fZE$$: 4560 CENTRAL AVE NE; MINIVEAPOLIS Nfri 55421 �- . DAYTiME PHONE: 5�1-9103 � SiGNATURElDATE: - - � -�..�__._.,,__��.,,_, PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME: HILLTOP TRAILER SALES INC � ADDRESS: 456o c�L AvE rtE; MINNEAPOLIS NR�T 55421 DAYTiME PHONE: 571-9103 SIGNATURE/DATE: � � ......�....��_.�.�_._�.,,�_....�.,,�,�._.,�,� Seciion of City Code: � FEES Fee: $i 00.00 Residential Second Accessory $400.00 x Others Appf ication Number. �2�' 98- l3 Receipt #: Received By_ Sc�eduled Planning Commission Dafe: �Y 15, 1998 Scheduled City Council Date: ,TUr,Y 27, 1998 ', 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: ,7ttNE 22, 1998 60 Day Date: AucUS� i1, 1998 s,o$ � �� DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The Maertens-Brenny Construction Company is requesting a special use pemut to a11ow a proposed building to cover 49% of the lot. The lot is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial and is 107,182 square feet in azea. The proposed one-story building is 52,417 square feet in size. The industry that will occupy the building is Metal-Tek, Inc. The uses in the building will include warehousing, manufacturing and offices. The address of the site is 7901 Main St. NE. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Section 205.17.03.C.(la) indicates that with a special use permit, a one story building in an M-2 District may cover up to 50% of a lot. The proposed building can meet all of the required building setbacks of the M-2 District. A five foot distance between the east end of the building and the paved drive aisle is not shown on the site plan, but can be built into the plan. • The parking plans and landscaping plans do not fulfill the requirements of the City Code. The plans must be brought into compliance with the code. The City has not received detailed drainage and grading plans or drainage calculations. These will have to be completed before a building permit could be issued. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COIVIlVIISSON: City staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit with stipulations. - PLANNING COMMISSION RECONIMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the special use permit with the following stipulations: 1. The number of pazldng stalls at the site shall either conform to the City Code or receive a variance from the City Code prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. A landscape plan for the site shall be approved by the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The drive aisle widths and distances to the building shall conform with the City Code. 4. Grading and drainage plans and drainage calculations for the site shall be approved by the City Engineers prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. The exterior materials and color of the building shall be approved by City staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission recommendation. 7.01 StaffReport: SP #98-14 7901 Main St. NE Page 2 Petition For: Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: Lot Size: Topography: Existing Vegetation: Existing Zoning/Platting: Availability of Municipal Utilities: Vehicular Access: Pedestrian Access: Engineering Issues: Site Planning Issues: Comprehensive Planning Issues: Public Hearing Comments: PROJECT DETAILS A special use pernut to allow a proposed building to cover 49% of a lot in an M- 2, Heavy Industrial District. The lot is 107,182 square feet in azea. The proposed one-story building is 52,417 square feet in size with a total building floor area of 55,417 square feet. 7901 Main Street NE The South 284' of the West 460' of the NW1/4 of the SWl/4 of section 2, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County 107,182 s.f. / 2.45 acres Flat / vacant lot Grass M-2, Heavy Industrial Available in Main Street Main Street and 79�' Avenue Main Street and 79�' Avenue Grading and drainage. Parking and landscaping. Zoning and the Comprehensive Plan are consistent at this site. The petitioners made their comments in favor or the project, no other comments were made by the public. 7.02 � 2 StaffReport: SP #98-14 7901 Main St. NE Page 3 DEVELOPMENT SITE ' �Ii1��! The Maertens-Brenny Construction Company is requesting a special use permit to allow a proposed building to cover 49% of the lot. The lot is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial and is 107,182 square feet in area. The proposed one-story building is 52,417 square feet in size with a total building floor area of 55,417 squaze feet. The industry that will occupy the building is Metal-Tek, Inc. The uses in the building will include warehousing, manufacturing and offices. � _ �' • �L�� • , 1 The site is currently a vacant lot in an M-2 Heavy Industrial District. � .r .• : �•K, � � . �_� .- Zoning: M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning: M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning: M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning: M-2, Heavy Industrial Land Use: Industrial, plating and metal finishing Land Ltse: Industrial, machine parts Land Use: Vacant lot, industrial, welding Land Use: Industrial building / multi -tenant Section 205.17.03.C.(la) indicates that with a special use permit, a one story building in an M-2 District may cover up to 50% of a lot. A special use permit is not required if the lot coverage by a single story structure is 40% or less. : � �� . The proposed building meets all of the required setbacks from property lines for the M-2 District. �� ' : ' � � The drive aisle in the west parking lot is only 24 feet in width. The City Code requires 25 feet. This can be remedied by expanding the drive aisle one foot to the east. The distance from the building to the pazking lot is shown as 6 feet, but can be reduced to 5 feet. , � � � • � � � • � A five foot distance between a paved surface and a building is required. The plan for the east end of the building does not show this. The drive aisle is one-way and the required width is 18 feet. The actual width shown in the drawing is 24 feet. By reducing the drive aisle width to 19 feet, a 5 foot distance between the building and the drive aisle could be created. 7.03 Staff Report: SP #98-14 7901 Main St. NE Page 4 . ,. The overall parking plan for the site indicates 63 parking stalls. Two of these stalls are too close to the southwest property line, therefore, the total number of stalls is 61. Three different types of uses will occur at the site, warehouse, manufacturing and offices. The number of requued stalls per use at the site is as follows: Offices: 3000 sq. ft. / 250 =12 required parking stalls Manufacturing: 30% of remaining space: 14, 825.1 sq. ft. / 400 = 37 required parking stalls �. -�• �� 1'� • '��. �_�' y�. - � • • . � 111 : -� -� •._,_�• TOTAL number of required stalls = 67. An additional 18 stalls aze required. Using the speculative pazking ratio of 1 stall per 500 sq. ft. of area, the number of stalls that would be required are 111. (55,417 / 500 =110.8) The petitioner has indicated that much of the manufacturing process is automated. Their present business employs 52 workers on 3 shifts. The proposed parking is probably adequate for their needs, but the code requires the additional parking. If the building were to be used in a more labor intensive industry, the proposed parking may not be adequate. � At the Planning Commission meeting, Joel Maerten of Maerten-Brenny, indicated that the office space proposed for the site would be reduced from 6000 square feet to 3000 square feet. This will reduce the required parking by 12 stalls. This change has been shown in the calculations above. Presently, the site plan show 61 stalls, whereas 67 are required. Modifications in the site plan may enable the site to provide the required number of parking stalls without the need for a variance. --�� .- ' _r. The landscape plans indicates that 53 trees will be planted at the site. The requirement is either one tree per 1000 sq. ft. of building or one tree per 50 feet of perimeter, (which ever is greater). Total bldg. floor area is 55,417 sq. ft. / 1000 = 55.4 trees or 56 trees. The perimeter is 1346 feet•/ 50 = 27 trees. Due to the area of the building, 56 trees are required. Therefore, the plan is deficient 3 trees. If the proposed office space at the site is reduced from 6000 square feet to 3000 squaze feet, as indicated a the Planning Commission meeting, the calculation for the number of required trees may also change. To determine the number of required trees, City staff will have to know the actual area of total building floor space. 7.04 4 ; Staff Report: SP #98-14 7901 Main St. NE Page 5 The loading dock doors are correctly placed in the side yard, but they will be visible from Main Street. Trees or fencing should be placed along the north property line to provide screening of the doors. .� �� ..�� . The City has not reeeived drainage and grading plans or drainage calculations. These will have to be reviewed and approved the City Engineering Department before a building permit can be issued. :- : • �1►�� !� : • � • M�1 ' : ��11� • ulul • � City staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit with stipulations. ' _ �_�,�� • u�� • � :_ • �I�1 �1� : • � The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the special use permit with the following stipulations: 1. The number of parking stalls at the site shall either conform to the City Code or receive a variance from the City Code prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. A landscape plan for the site shall be approved by the City prior to the issuance of a buildi.ng permit. 3. The drive aisle widths and distances to the building shall conform with the City Code. 4. Grading and drainage plans and drainage calculations for the site shall be approved by the City Engineers prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. The exterior materials and color of the building shall be approved by City staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. � J _ :_ � u�ul �� _ �� Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission recommendation. 7.05 s WAY NE Z � � 2 N Z � 78 AVE NE Zanirg Oesic,�'ons: 0 1�1 - One Fartily lkrts 0 F�2 - Two Farriy Urrfs � 1�3 - Cxner-al Mi6ple Urils 0 F�4 - AAobile Horte Parls � Puo - p�,ea u,rt o�o�,�,c � s� - Fyde Park r�eigl,bo►r,00a 0 s2 - �de�a�►�,e�,c asma � c1 - I-od a,sr�ess 0 G2 - General &siness � G3 - General Stnpping � GR1- General Office 0 1u41 - Li�t IrxAstrial , A1�2 - Heavy �nd�trial - nn.3 - acdo« i�xe�e t�,,, i� � RFt - r�itroads � P - Pudic Facilifies VYA7FR � PoGHT-O�WAY W 2 N Z � 7'9 WAY NE W Z � N � � � OC Petitioner:• 11�laerten,s- Bre,nny ConstructiOn Co. Special Use Permit, SP #9814 Zoning.• 11�2, Heavy Ina�ustrial 7901 �l�kxin St NE `%T^_� . ... .. T9 WAY PE N W�E Date: 07/Ol/1998 m � � � .� � �C � � �. � � � Y � � � � � �: :,: - ,.V��, . 1_`.: �i�w _ .•.•:.J�- .: d;�'> :�a �r ,. �� ,,�_ x: a. r � �tuF� CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRlDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR: " Residential Second Accessory x Others PROPERTY INFORMATION: - site pian required for submittal, see attached . Address: 7901 �iain st. N� � PropeRy Identification Number. o z - ? � - z � - � z - � ° °3 Legal Description: Lot Block TractlAddition Sout:!. 284' of the w2st 460' of th2 N�i , l/4 of the �W 1 4 of Section , Townshii.; 3C, Ranye 24, ��noka Count� Current Zoning: r�-2 Square footage/acreage: z��. ��? sF/2.45 AC. Reason for Special Use: Incr2ase the allot•ra�le lot covera j� From 40 � to �G;o. Have you operated a business in a city whicF� required a business license? Yes No x If Yes, which ciry? If Yes, what type of business? _ Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes - No � - wr1V �V 1V�VAr/�rAr1V�V�V�r1r�r�V�V�V�V Ar1r�V�VNArti1V N�V�Vti�Vti�V�V/r�VArwr�VNti�V�VwrVAr�Vti�IiV �VA/ti�V�V�V�VAr/r1V/�iV Ar/�r/H�V1 FEE OWNER INF�RMATION (as it appears on the property title) � (Contract purchasers: Fee owners must sign this form prior to processing)/r � (Jqj��; Ga�ry� 'c�.�.�lsan� `t"uGLSANU� ADDRESS: %05� L3.:� ii�ttc� �v�. ; S�illera�ei , i�'iTI �5C'•8? DAYTIME PHONE: ��-1�� SIGNATURE/DATE: � � G-�1 � PETITIONER INFORMATION � � NAM E: ��n��ts-L��v�� cotisT �uc 1 Tc:� c�rrn�t�c ADDRESS: L251 �i.ain St. ��7E, rridle , i�i 55432 DAYTIME PHONE: 7�L-�77� SIGNATURE/DATE: .-'` Section of City Code: � FEES Fee: $100.00 Residential Second Accessory $400.00 x- Others Application Number: �°� - l�! Receipt #: -ZZ � Received By: Scheduled Planning Commission Date: ;l �IT 1 S �yF� Scheduled City Council Date: � i:� I.� Z 7 /�y� 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: ��n� ZZ %i�� 60 Day Date: ,��uT��r �y�8 7.07 0 f � Z�t�`5 NU'J �l��al�� N �1S NIdL^J IOGL '� • ��NI `��l-�d1�W � ;. 'ra Jb d �� b �, 1 ° ' X � : � I 3 � � ia N : f � I a� b� �,.. .%/ �, � 3 ��o S �� a � v� � ' �� F R � � 1� i s � .� e J � � a, '��. � ;�# ��f� ig� �z� � � �� ,ai �iE �i� g�! E �kli �� $J��E � � � h u � � � . . � � ,�,• � :� I J t � a� �� 8� � � �� e�� I �� N . }� �� \J � .��..�5� V . � I � \ I �� .•i � �J_ �. - � � � I ' �� ;� �. ! � � �6� o � � �� ,� � ' "'�—.'�—•:c.r- � • y $4- - _. I _� ' � � . � . . � . . � . I . � .� �«� � . . � . o � ' ' � ' • � I��IA N�M � _ !�i i11tA /i OY�nO 7�o\I � v � d � �o N I -._ � �� l 6��1a� �� : � � A � I e �1 ,� �3 � _ � � v � � 3 �J I(�J � l►�1� 4� � e � ��. ' �� 3 � c� �� i!� � � �: 0 6 o V ��' ��e� � a�it� �dt �� 3� �U V� �� cE _�t��: � � � �s � �, �d � y M � � � i : � � � � � � � � � � �� ;� ��3�� I�� .._.._.._.._.._..-..-.._.I. � I II II! IIIiI� . � � �. � i i. I � i �► I 3� : � � I � I �� : � J�d 1 I �� : �� J .� � � � i �� i $� : ( � � � i_ i i� � :� �� 1 I I I � L.._..—.._ ��_.._..—.._.._..—.._..J .�,Y. �..� 7.09 C��'��s �� 2� �U�� t E � * � v V �� a� �� i;��a, � a�l 3� 4 4 6 � �_ � � �g� .. �� > Q �� : � � M ° o �� l� ` ° �3�� UV� �� atf _�nt�. a � O'_ �_ I ' 0 � I Q-- -- - - - -- � � � ° I � �� .�. � Q-. . I � ,. I. . , �—�- -- -,— - -- �� .: i. �- 0 � 7.10 � 4�'' ; �- i 0_ } � E �_ � ._ I � � I � � MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: July 20, 1998 �/ - a TO: William W. Burns, City Manager � FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Temporary Mobile Home at Totino Grace High School Background Totino Grace has applied for a license for the temporary location of a mobile home/ house trailer at Totino Grace High School at 1350 Gardena Avenue NE. The purpose of the mobile home is to house finro District 14 employees to provide student guidance services. This activity was previously located in the City owned A framed_.building adjacent to Innsbruck Park on Arthur Street. The trailer is occupied during regular school hours between 7:30 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. when school is in session. Minnesota State Law requires that this type of service be provided on a separate site not associated with the public school building. Brother Milton Barker, in his letter dated July 13, 1998, has also advised that they are attempting a law change which would make appropriate space allocations for these employees into the Totino Grace School building. As a result they are requesting permission to keep the mobile home until July 12, 1999. Recommendations Staff recommends the Council approve the license to permit the mobile home on the Totino Grace property until July 12, 1999. If the change to the legislation is not accomplished, the Council will then review a renewal of the license request. BD\jt M-98-159 Enclosures 8.01 July 13, 1998 Barbara Dacy Ciry of Fridley 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Deaz Ms. Dacy, I am writing to you relative to the form "Application for Parking/Occupying a • House Trailer" that you sent to me at Totino-Grace High School. We have completed the application and wish to inform you of the reasons for the existence of the trailer and its use. Minnesota State Law makes provisions for several rypes of services to be provided Totino-Graee zo non-puolic �cnooi studen�s. r�mong tnese is Stucien[ Guidance Services. High School According to State Law, these services may not be provided in the non-public school building, but must be provided in a separate site. Prior to the 1997-98 1350 Gardena Avenue NE school year, Independent School District 14 leased property in a city-owned A Fridley, Minnesota frame building adjacent to the nature park on Arthur Street next to our campus. 55432-5899 When the City abandoned that building and razed it, it became necessary to look for another site in which the Fridley Public Schools could deliver the State-mandated 612 571-9116 services. After a very thorough study of options, it was decided that the District Fax 612 571-9118 would lease a mobile trailer and house its two employees, who provided services to Totino-Grace High School students, in that trailer. For the 1997-98 school year, these employees of District 14 have been housed in the trailer leased by the District from Hilltop Trailer and occupy that space during the regulaz school hours (7:30 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.) on days school is in session. NSP provides electrical service to the trailer, and because it is simgly two offices and a cazeer center, there aze no water or sewage services available or necessary. Staff inembers and students use bathroom facilities in the school building. During this past session, there was legislation enacted that may make it possible for Guidance Services provided by District 14 to be delivered in the Totino-Grace building. During the next year, we want to clarify this legislation and make appropriate space allocations to move District 14 employees into our school building providing vve are within the limits of the law. _ At the present time, we foresee Lhe current mobile trailer to continue in Therefore, we are requesti� a license for one year— e mobile trailer. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, ��,� � � �� Brother Milton Barker FSC President : I: � $.�2 r. -� CITY OF FRIDLEY INSPECTION DIV 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 572-3604 Effective 1/1/98 APPLICATION FOR PARKING/OCCUPYING A HOUSE TRAILER Licensing Period May lst through April 30th Location Address : � 3s1� �ca nc� ,�.�c� �i�e . �l , .� . Landowner & Address : ��--r.�z - �,co�.P, ��o�, � ��fl` Tel . # s "7 I - Q 111,, Installer: � i�� T p�coa► �e.r Tel .#�� ^ 91 '� Address :�S(o0 Ce.w-rca� � ��. N.� _ NIIV LICENSE Relationship (if any) between Trailer Owner and Landowner: ��„�� ':�-- DESCRIPTION OF HOUSE TRAILER ��ll J � � r TRI�II�ER MAKE : � g,r` 'jY'ci�-TV� SIZE : I ot X�OO STATE TO BE USED FOR:�,,p�,cee� �e.� Time Period to be Parked/Occupied: ATTACH PLOT PLAN SSOWING TRAZLER LOCATION ON PROPBRTY If trailer is to be occupied, the fol.lowing should be attached: 1. List of names and ages of'all occupants. 2. Facilities for sewage disposal,�water & electricity: . ____ � 3. Place of employment of appZicant. 4. Is applicant constructing a home in City. Signatures of Adjoining Property Owners Granting Approval: - `� _- .� _; -y ,; _ . ,. . 3 _Y_ � _ ._ � _. x <� DATE: 7-14-.1998 p,ppLiC�: Totino-�race High School Tel.#571-911b�-' , ANNUAL FEE: [ J Pa king Only $30.00 [ jNew []Renewal [ J Occupying $75.00 [�New [ ]Renewa� Receipt # COUNCIL DATE: STIPULATIONS: LICENSE NO: EXPIRES: 8.03 . MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: July 23, 1998 � TO: William Burns, City Manager �� FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Approve a Proposal for Comprehensive Plan Project and Authorize Execution of Comprehensive Plan Contract Background Staff requested proposals from three planning consulting firms to complete the City's Comprehensive Plan. The three firms that were solicited are planning firms that have completed work in the City and are familiar with the issues facing first ring metro area communities. The three firms are Hoisington Koegler Inc., Sho�t Elliot Hendrickson, and SRF Consulting Group Inc. AnalXsis An in-house committee consisting of the Housing Coordinator, Planning Coordinator, Assistant Public Works Director, and the Community Development Director, reviewed and scored the proposals. The proposal submitted by Hoisington Koegler Inc., was selected as the best proposal. Not only was the proposal the lowest cost, it also proposed a strong team of specialized consultants who are familiar with Fridley's issues. Ma�eld Research Group will be working on the housing chapter; Ma�eld Research Group completed a housing market need analysis for the City in 1991. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc., Inc., will complete the sewer, water, and assist with the transportation chapters. As you are aware, the Bonestroo firm is very familiar with the City's water and sewer facilities and is currently conducting the infiltration and inflow study for the Public Works Department. A summary of the proposals is provided below: 9.01. Approve a Proposal for Comprehensive Plan Project Page 2 July 23, 1998 . • ' ' . • . • • • Chapter HGKi S.E.H. SRF Pian Overview $ 2,250 $35,615.86 $ 3,000 Land Use $19,300 $ 4,104.38 $22,000 Housing $12,000 $ 3,792.60 $12,000 Transportation $ 6,500 $16,023.87 $12,000 Sewer and Water $ 6,000 $ 3,157.18 $ 8,500 Parks and Open $ 4,200 $ 2,041.16 $11,000 Space Implementation $ 9,000 $ 2,139.92 $ 2,500 Aviation $ 500 NA NA Miscellaneous $ 5,858.36 $ 3,000 Executive $ 3,000 $ 2,189.30 $ 4,500 _ Summary GRAND TOTAL $62,570 $74,922.63 $78,500 1. HKGi proposal includes attendance at five public meetings, mileage expenses, plus a rental rate survey. 2. S.E.H. proposal in "Miscellaneous" category includes five public meetings, finalizing draft plan, and mileage and expenses. 3. SRF proposal does not include rental rate survey. "Miscellaneous" category includes cost of public meetings. Value Added Services . The request for proposal asked the consultant to include costs for at least five public meetings, which would be determined by the City (either additional public information or public hearing meetings). Mark Koegler has suggested some additional services which staff recommends the Council evaluate once the consultant is deeper into the process. The services include additional public meetings and additional land use and urban design work. As the City moves through the process, different (or similar) issues may arise which would dictate a different scope of work. It may be best to wait on these services. Note that the Hoisington Koegler proposal emphasizes work expenditures which are in line with the City's priorities of housing, land use, and implementation. The proposal cost is also $2,250 below the $65,000 allocated in the 1998 and 1999 budgets. 9.02 Approve a Proposal for Comprehensive Plan Project Page 3 July 23, 1998 Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council approve the proposal submitted by Hoisington Koegler Group Inc., and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract for completion of the Comprehensive Plan in an amount not to exceed $62,570. The full proposal has been forwarded to the Council under separate cover since it is lengthy. The attached documents are excerpts from the proposal. B D\jt Enclosure •: .� ; 9.03 ; Key Project Personnel City Staff & Other Agencies Plan Overview Ma�k Koeg/e� Brad Scheib Mary Bujo/d Land Use Mark Koeg/er Fred Hoisington Todd Ha/unen Yera Westrum Parks & Open Space Todd Ha/unen Amy Bower Fridler City Council & Planning Commission Project Administration Barbara Dary Community Dev Dir. ProjectManager Mark Koeg/er Housing Mary Bujo/d ManF Koeg/er Brad Scheib Aviation Brad Scheib She//}�/ohnson � � � Transportation She//y/ohnson fred Hoisington Mark Koeg/er Brad Scheib Mary Bujo/d Bob Schunicht Sewer & Water Dan Edgerton Tom Boushar Frederic Steborg Hoisington Kcegler Group Inc. �� page 12 Creative Solutions for Land Plaaaing and Desiga Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. aa July 7, 1998 �e City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432-4383 Re: Contract Proposal for Comprehensive Planning Attention: Ms. Barbara Dacy: This letter proposal outlines a Scope of Services, Fee Schedule and other elements which to- gether constitute an agreement between the City of Fridley, hereinafter refened to as the CTTY, and HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC., hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT for professional planning services authorized to assist the City of Fridley with updating the Compre- hensive Plan, hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT. The CITY and CONSULTANT agree as set forth below: A. WORK PROGRANUBASIC SERVICES The Work Program will include the following: 1. See Attachment B B. SCOPE OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following services have not been requested by the CTTY but are available, upon authoriza- tion, from the CONSULTANT. 1. Meetings in addition to those specified in Basic Services. 2. Additional services not specified herein. 3. Engineering and other detail elements that may be required as part of the Metropolitan Council's Surface Water Management Guidelines as found in Minnesota Rules, Chap- ter 8410. �_ �' ' ��'� � i The CITY agrees to pay the CONSULTANT for services rendered as follows: For the CONSULTANT'S Basic Services described in Paragraph A above, a fee based on the CONSLTLTANT'S current hourly rate schedule (see Attachment A) plus inciden- tal expenses not to exceed SIXTY TWO THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIF�TY DOL- LARS ($62,750.00) 2. For the CONSULTANT'S Additional Services described in Paragraph B, a fee based on the CONSULTANT'S current hourly rate schedule plus incidental expenses or a negoti- ated fee. • 9.0� 'rth Third Sueet, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401-1659 Q 8� t) 338-0800 Fx (612) 338-G8.�8 P g 2 3. Statements will be submitted to the CITY on a monthly basis as work is completed and shall be payable within 30 days of receipt by the CTI'Y . 4. The CONSULTANT reserves the right to suspend services if the CITY is delinquent in making payments in accordance with this agreement. D. CITY'S RESPOYSIBILITY The CITY shall be responsible for the following: 1. The assembly of background information including, but not limited to, the following: a. Copies of all former comprehensive plans. b. Available base map and inventory data. c. Aerial photography d. U:S. Census information e. Transportation and street information such as street jurisdictions, traffic volumes, and street co�ditions. f. Preparation of all GIS mapping. 2. Mailing lists, printing, postage, and the mailing of invitations for public meetings. 3. Arrangements for public meetings. 4. Reproduction of all reports and distribution to the Planning Commission and City Council. 3. Printing the final document and executive summary. E. COMPLETION SCHEDULE The services of the CONSULTANT will begin upon City Council approval and will, absent of causes beyond the control of the CONSLJL.TANT, be completed by September 1, 1999. F. NONDISCRIMINATION The CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate by reason of age, race, religion, color, sex, national origin, or handicap unrelated to the duties of a position, of applicants for employ- ment or employees as to terms of employment, promotion, demotion or transfer, recruitment, layoff or termination, compensation, selection for training, or participation in recreational and educational activities. G. �UAL OPPORTUNITY Durina the performance of this Contract, the CONSULTANT, in compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375 and Department of Labor regulations 9.06 i vas� 33 41 CFR Part 60, shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The CONSULTANT shall take affir- mative action to insure that applicants for employment are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion sex or national or�gin. Such action shall include but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrad- ing, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT shall post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment notices to be provided by the Government setting forth the provisions" of this nondiscrimination clause. The CONSULTANT shail state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The CONSULTANT shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this pazagraph in all of its subcontracts for program work, and will require all of its subcontrac- tors for such work to incorporate such requirements in all subcontracts for program work. H. TE TERMINATION SUCCESSORS A I N The Term of this agreement shall be concurrent with the work authorized and shall be in accordance with the schedule to be established between the CTTY and the CONSULTANT. 2. Termination may be accomplished at any time by written notice ten (10) days prior to temunation. This shall not relieve the CITY of its obligation to pay for the full value of the services performed to the date of ternunation. 3. Neither the CTTY nor the CONSULTANT shall assign, sublet or transfer its interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 4. The time schedule shall not apply and/or time extensions will be allowed for any circum- stances beyond the control of the CONSULTANT. 5. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. I. DISPUTES In the event the CITY and CONSULTANT are unable to reach agreement under the terms of this contract, disputes shall be resolved using alternative dispute resolution (ADR). J. SUBSTITUTIONS No substitution of equipment, materials or products shall be permitted without the express written approval of the CONSULTANT. K. REVOCATION If this Agreement is not signed and accepted by both parties within 90 days of the con- tract date, it shall become null and void. 9.07 P°8° 34 L. AUTHORI ATION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY and the CONSULTANT have made and executed this Agreement for Professional Services, This day of , 1998. CITY OF FRIDLEY Attest: Name HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. R. Mazk Kcegler, Senior V'ice President Title Fred L. Hoisington, President . � . page 3S Attac6ment A, HOLSYNGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. 1998 HOURLY RATES SeniorPrincipai ........................... ..... $85-115/Iu Principal .............:............................................ $70-75/hr Pmfessional II ................................................. $52-54/hr Professional T ................................................... $38-48/hr Technical ......................................................... $26-38/hr S ecretarial .............................................................. $3 8/tuc Testimony ............................................................ � 150/hr . - * 5% discount for retainer services Incidental Expenses: Mileage.............................................................. 31 ¢/mile Photocopying .....................................................15�/page Outside Printing ............................................ Actual Cost Diazo Printing .............................................. Actual Cost Draft Plotting .................................................. $5.00 each Vellum Plotting ............................................ $ I0.00 each Color Plotting ............................................... $20.00 cach 0Z �£S 86 �£Z �fl!' 20d ST6 9.09 i � _--! Zt3�J30�1 t�19N I S I OH B£898££-zT9 .A�ttachment B Work Program The RFP rcquested that "va[ue added services" be ddentified irc the proposal respo�se. The HKGi proj¢ct tealr� has idenh�ed a nurnber of clarifccations in the work prograni and a number of value added services. Clari�catiores are �tot work elements that imolve additional fee but cimply elaborntion on otu urtderstanding of a specif:c task. Yalue added services are in all cases, planning process suggestions or alternatives that will lead to an improved process and wider support for the plan. They are specifica[ly noded as value added 'services and are emphasized in balr� italics type. Etaboration on identified elements is stated iR bold type. I. Work Products a. Draft of eight chapters which will be the basis for full plan to be submitted to Met Coun- cil (the C`ity will prix�t the C'inal copy and publish in a three ring binder) 1. Plan Overview 2. Land Use 3. Housing 4. Transportation 5. Sewer and Water 6. Parks aad Open Space 7. Aviation 8. �xnplementation b. Executive Summary no more than 25 pdges with key maps c. Po[entiat additaonal contract to complete Hutnan ServACes Chapter and Stortnwater Man- agement Chapter lI. Coz�tents of Full Plan a. Ovcrview of Plan 1. Brief descriptivn of community history l.1 Rcview History file from Commvnity Development Department 2. Identification of trends affecting �he City 2.1 Identify external eeonomic and markec trends � 9.10�` ____ __� 0Z�£T 86� �Z �flt £0d SS6 2!3"193071 N019NISIOH 'B£89B££-zT9 A. Identify rcgional and z�ational economic tcends affertieg the City now and in the future. IdentiPy itenns such as: • Projected busincss expansion by industry • Employment/Iabor trends • Technology Consumer culture • Infrastructure devetopments (light rail) B. Identify regional and ns►tional market trends tlaat will have sA impact on Fridley in the future. Identify items such as: • Shifts in consumer behavior • Househnld mobility • Owncr/rente� propensitq • Pro�ensity fnr different types of hous�ttg • Shifts in enaployment envi�rnnments (honae-based businesses, etc.) • Effects of technology on the consumer iu the marketplace as it af- fects housing 2.2 Review demogzaphic information from Census, Met Council, or other reliable source 2.3 Review Met Council projections and estimates 2.4 Create table of population, employrnent, and household history 3. Yrovide summary of how city projeccions relate [o Met Council projections !or popula- tion, employment, and household projections for 2000, 2010, and 2020. 4. Identification of relevant issues facing the City: 4.1 Review 1982 Comprehensive Plan 4.2 Review report/merxao on outcome of Vision ineeting process 4.3 Relate �sion outcom�s to relevant issues facing City to 2020 4.4 Discuss plan directions, goals, guiding pninciples, and expected outcome of ac- tivities identified in plan; what does the City want to be in 2010 and 2020? 5. Conduct a meeting with all City dcpartmet�t heads including representatives of thc Fridley Police and ��re Departraents in order to identify and discuss issues that are likely to impact thc C�ity. Comment: Past practice has shown that an issues meeting up front with all department hcads is a good way for the consult�nts to get a fix-st hand ac.counting o� issues that may impact the plan or need to be addressed in the �lan. The meeting allows hey stAPf inembers to have access to the planning process allowing them to contribute to it from the beginning. Because the City's work program included indi- vidual department head contacts, this item does not imolve an additional fce. 6. Conduet interviews oJkey "commu�eity leadera" in ,Fridley (up to 12). Community leaders could be either pubtic or private sector intlividuads who reside in or do business in Fridley. Putential parties for involvemeret migkt include school district representatives, Jfcey tm- ployers such as Medtronic or Onan, or the operators of business establishments in loca- tions such as Moon Plaza. Co�: Community leaders react differently to a cor�sultant SZ �£Z 86 � £z �nr b0d SI6 9.11 a3�J30�1 N019N I S I OH e�a9e��-zt9 � than they do to Ci�y staff. In planning projects recently in Inver Grove Keigl:ts and Hopkins, we fourrd thart information provided to HKGi was fett to Ge inore candid and oLjective because we were [ooked at as a third party i►i the process rather than a��rep�e- sentative" of the City. (Value Added Service) b. Land Use Chaptcr 1. Identify Goals, Objectives, and Strategies 1.1 Review outcomes fYOm visioning process to write new or revise existing G/O/S. 2. Prepare Land Usc Data: 2.1 Meet with City staff regarding land use development history 2.2 Review aerials and building permit statistics since 1980 2.3 Obtain public land map from City G1S 2.4 Obtain acreage of vacant land and zoning azeas from City GIS system 2.5 Conduct tield inspections for nonconforming land uses or vecify uses 2.6 Uerify acreage of all land uses 2.7 Create a workang map showing differcnces between zoning and land uses 2.8 Create comparative table showing currcnt acreage versus table in existieg plan 2.9 Create working "existing lanti use" map 2.10 C`rcate working map of environmentally sensitive areas (City to provide wetland map, flood plain maps, Critical A,rea map; and other natural resource informa- tion) 2. �I 1 Usc "Worksheet A", " Existi�ug Land Use" form 2.12 Review City's 1994 Redevelopment Priority Analysis 2.13 Create working map showing remaining vacant land, both developable and un- deveIopable 2. ] 4 Obtain and review historical property value map from City GIS 2.15 Intecview City Assessor regardiag property value and market history 3. identify lands affected by Critica! Area statu[es adjacent to Mississippi River 3.1 Review 1979 Ciitical Area �lan 3.2 Review DNR assessment of City's plan and ordinance to MNRRA plan 3.3 Review MNRRA Implementation guides (the orioinal and supplement) 3.4 Meet with appropriate agencies to determine out of date issues versus current MNRRA plan 3.5 Review relationship of other nacural resources [o lbtississippi River (tributary ereeks, flood plain a�eas, etc.) 3.6 Determine if there are potential projects or issues which the City should address regarding the river in ordec to address ihe Ci[y's vision 3.7 Conduet a pubGc meeting focrasir�g on the rive� corridor and the app[iealiort af MNRRAi policies. Comment: The Metro,�olitan Council, ,UNR and �,1VRIi,q stajf sugg�sr that comrnunities obtaining MNRRA grant junds conduct separate 9.12 ��I 86� �Z �f11' S0d ST6 213"1J30�1 NOlJNISIOH 8£898�£—zt9 meetings to inform !he pubdic about MNRRA and to seek their input. ,�'rom our exp¢rience in preparing NINRRA plans in Newport, Inver Grove Heigh[r and Ramsey, we have faund that p�tGlic MNRRA rneetings can be valuable if every effort is made 10 invite a braad cross s�ctioa of residents and interested parties. If only nwners of praperty abutting the river are invited to sueh sessions, the dixcussion becomes orae sided and predictable. Absent a variety of interests, the eomm�nts will Ge [imited to standard "not ia my Gaekyard" rhetoric and possible crecrtive ideas will not be heacrd. (Yalue Added Service) 3.8 Interrelate identified issues with other plan topic areas includi.�g tand use, parks and open spaces, housing, and transportation 4. Review 1996 Pairk Study and analyze impact of proposed new parks: 4.1 Meet with Park and Recreation Director regarding need for expanded existing p<trks or new parks 5. Analyzc developable land azeas and redcvclopment areas in tezms of projected popu- lation, household, and employment numbecs for 2000, 20] 0, 2020 zz:�i es, �z �nr S.1 Create "Worksheet B", "Projecting Future Land Use" form 5.2 Revie�v existit�, vacant and redevelopment areas and determine potential for ad- ditional redevelopment projects 5.3 idcntify any new redevelopment area 5.4 Determine range of residential densicies 5.5 Create working map of potential areas for �edevelopment by land use 5.6 Create chart on projected 200p, 2010, 2002 population, household, and employ- ment pcojections 5.7 Identzfy potentia! in�ll redevelopanent staging 5.8 Interrelate existing transit nse with pmposed strategy 5.9 Develop at learst 3 alternaiive land' use and trartsportation concepts which illus- trate potenlial development and redevelopment of coinmercial, industriai, resi- dentia! artd park a�rd open space sites and the ways in which these areas care be serviced by transportatios systenu. Tkese will Ge gene�al coRCepts developed to illustrate the range of policy options the City may wisfi to coresidrr in formulating tke Carriprehensive Plan. They �vil! address mc�jor issues arec�,s identi�ed from the V'tsioning Sessions arrid the Plan Overview tasks. (Yalue Added Service) S.lOFormulat¢ signi�cant poliey direetiorw tl�at correlate to each develoPnrent sce- nario. This task will like[y include the IS to 20 most significant polieies that the Ci1y wild need to address irt preparing the Gomprehensive Plan. (Va1ue A�dded Service) S.11 Ho[d a seri¢s of neighGorhood rneetings (up to 7) io present the concepts and solicit pubtic input. Comn:ent: ,�stablishing a sense of ownership in the plan requires commu�:icatiore crt the neighborhood leveC Th� meetircg wilt al(ow people ro examine the land us� and transportatiun alternativas and provule their com- men�s. The sessions can atso be used to preseRt the oulcome of the visioning sessions a�d receive feedbaek on the rrw,jor policies that may ultimately be the 9.13 90d S Z 6 �13�930�1 N019N I S I OH 8£898££-zt9 Gasds of the comprehensive plan. Tke purpose of these sessions is lo take input while the pdans are still iR the formative cortcept stage. (Addad Yalue Service) 6. Create working maps of fucure land uses in five year incremez�ts to 2020 These woxk- ing maps will result from the three concepts th�t are identified in 5.9 Above. A�ter review az�d comment by the public, the Plaz�n�ing Commission wii�l need t� agree on the conce�t or mixture of concept components that will constitute the Future Land Use Plan. " 7. Formu[ate a place appropriare urban design framework that applics urban design principles to the entire community in order to create a sense of "corutected►tess'; a "sense of place" that is uniquely and distinctly Tredley. Commerct: Th� framework will build on the City's already present natural, historic aad eullural character. This element will include the exploration artd app[ication of urban design concep6s ared ideas whicfi bui[d on a fra�rcework of central place, edges, nodes, lanBmarks, vi¢wsheds, gateways, paths and clistricts and how a more un;fied and �neanirt�ful identity can be achieved throughout the City. It will include gra,phic i![ustrations of coneepts for patteri:s and key features that �eflect �izdley's spirit and charaeter in both built and nalural elemxnts. (Value Added Service) c. Housing Chapter 1. Identi 'ty Goals, Objectives, and Strategies 2. Review existiag Housing Action Plan and identify statistics to update: 3 2.1 Cieate Housing Supply tables or amend tables fzom Action Plan Update statistics on: • Population, �ousehold and employment • P�o,�ected age distribution • HousehoId tenure • �ousehold Income • Age of housing stock • Housing values/cost Idenlify hnusing life cycle needs 3.1 Review Met Council Benck�marks (affordable and market rate housing) 3.2 Revicw City GIS map of locacion �f "affordable" rental units 3.3 Conduct field inspection to detertnine condition�. Focus primazily on multifatn- ily amd mobile home units. Review City's 1994 assessment of singae-Pamily housing condiEion and incorporatc findings into overall housing coedition. 3.4 Survey landlords foz cunent rental rates (478 landlords; 308 owners); please idtntify co�t for this activiry alone in relation to cost for this chapter 3.5 lteview demographic trends 9.14 £Z �£i 86 .�z ,nr L0d S S 6 2l3�93071 NOlJN I S I OH 8�898££-ZI9 3.6 Determine what is missiz�g from the City's supply of rental housing 3.7 lteview mix of owner occupicd housing types 3.8 Determinc what is missing from Ci[y's supply of owner occupied housing 3.9 �Levicw rurrent location of �•affordable" housing using City GYS map 3.10 Identifj� concentrations of �°at�ocdable" housing by neighborhood 3.11 Utilizing updated demographic and housing data, match e�-isting demographic situation to current housi�g supply. 3.12 Review existing housing stock, rental and owned. Assess r►�atches and mis- matches in the housing supply for both owned and rental housing based on affordable bousing guidelincs and providing for a�propriate bencb�marks for life-cycle housing needs. 3.13 Deterrnine how lifecycle needs can be incorporated into redeveIopmendinfill areas 3.14 Determine developmendredevelopmcat densities 3.15 Analy2e relationship of housing needs with employment projecaons 3.16 Review 1994 Housing Condition survey x�aformation 3.17 Create working map of areas to concentrate housing rehab/redevelopment re- sources 3. t S Compare selected housing statistics with other communities in xnarket area Com- pare Fridiey's projccted gro�vth, housing mix, tenure, and age of housing stock with other communities in its market area including but not limited to Colurabia Heights, Ncw Brigl�ton, Spring Lake Park, Coon Rapids, Btaine and Mounds View � 3. ] 9 Discuss C�ty's housing stock and strate�es in relation to regional plaxas and poli- cies 3.20 Meet with Housing Coordinator and Planning Staff on hoasing policies on resi- dential land use control. local housing implemcntation activit�es, and housing maintenance and/or rehabilitation 4. Identify gaps between supply az�d demand; evaluate future market and trend inforrna- tion 4.1 ldcntify potential gsips between housing supply and demand 4.2 Evaluate potential gaps in li�hht of demographic and market trends. 4.3 �dentiPy potcntial azeas for redevelopmendrehabilitation to meet projected market aceds and an appropriate supply of lifecycle housing. S. Identify strategies to rneet housing needs 5.1 List existing housing program�; identify programs that are designed to wor1► with speci�ic types of developments 5.2 Suggest potential housing programs to fill unmet necds 5.3 ldentify existing local controls 5.4 Suggest potential housing convols to further enhance the overall quality of the City's housing mix and condition S.5 Identify existing and futtire fiscal devices to achieve lifecycle development 6. Cicy to create appropniate G!S maps from existing base of Housing Action �tan bz��i e6� �z �nr 80d St6 9.15 a3��J3071 NOlJN I S I OH 8£89B££-ZZ9 d. Transportation Chapter 1. Identify G/O/S 2. Review traffic studies from Lake Ponte site, 57'" Avenue, Anoka County Transporta- tion Plan, and others as on file (the 57tki Avenue and lake Pointe projects will be uttder construcaon in 1998 and 1999 3. Interview Public Works Director 4. Review land use analysis,and determine need for any improvements 5. Review TA"L data and allocate population, household, and employment growth i�t ap- propriate areas 6. From land use projections above an�lyze the need to ereate traffie forecazt for the yeaz 2010 and 2020; provide sepazate costs in addition to cost for the chapter for a �raffic s�udy. Gxven the maturity and location of Fridley, it wouid not appear likely that computeri�ed modeliz�g wi�ll be necessary in order to complete �tuxe year volume estim�tes. Historic data, MnDUT projection factors, and the results o� tk�e Metro- politan Council's regional model will be used to provide future volume �rojections. 7. Existing conditions volume/capacity ratios and volunnelcapacity ratias�Por year 2010 and 2024,will be prepared for prim�ry roadway segznen[s 8. Analyze impacts of projects forecasts of surroundin�g road systems; deterrnine how the City will be affECt by traffic that flows through Fridley 9. Create working highway and strcct map identifying respective functional ciassifica- tions 10. Crcate table or chart of primary streets, number o� laaes, ROW widths, current voi- umes, projected 2020 volumes, and functional classi�cations . I 1. Determine need for ehanges in functional classifications, road construetion, or other issues 12. Identify existing cransporialion problems and anticipated transportation problems 13. Identify future rioht-of-ways for scceets and transit corridors; determine if the City eom- plctc an "ofiicial map" 14. Transit 14.1 Description of existing transit services and transit routes 14.2 Create working map of existing routes, transit hubs, and pazk and ride lots in and around Fridley as well as proposed transit services from regiona] plan 9.1s ; bZ��T 86� �Z �flt 60d St6 �13'1J�0�I NOlJNISIOH 8£898££-�S9 1�.3 Create working map qf corridors whei�e �IOV lane� or transit ways are proposed 14.4 Identi�y future transit services related to land usc and housing needs 14.5 Review Ca�y �les on bikeway/walkways 14.6 Interview Park and Recreation Director re,�arding bikewayslwalkway 14.7 Create working map showing existing and proposed bicycle and walkway fa- cilities 14.8 Identify future improvements for bikeways/walkways 14.9 Discuss how routes interrelate to other communities and create a working map 14,10 Aiscuss LRT plan and coute status 14. ] 1 Discuss Northstar Corridor pLan and route status 14.I2 Discuss park and ride locations for both LRT and rail routes 14.13 Discuss and recommend relations�ips to redevelopment projects and areas 14.14 Suggest guidelines for park and rides, kiss and rides, and other related facilities e. Sewer and Water Chapter 1. Identify G/O/S 2. The City tuiopted an updated Chaptcr in 1994; review City file Update sewer flows to reflect revised population, }�ousehold, and employment projec- lions. E.�cisting wastewater flows and current populaiioa will be used to detern�ne per wpita wastewater generation. When multiplied by future po�ulation, the per capita w�stewater generation figures will predict future wastewater flo.v The ft�- tuce wastewater flow projection will then be adjusted downward by anticipated reductions ia in�iltration/'mttow 'Wastewater flow rates will also be adjusted upward or duwnward based on antici- puted increases or decrcases resulting from inereased or decreased water usage for commerci8l, industrial and institutional put�pases. The wastewater �ow projec- tioas wiU meet 11�eiropolitan Council Tier 1 requ�rements, 4. lnterview Public Works Director to quantify the likely extent of futuce in5ltration/ inflow effo�ts. The findings of the infiltratio�nflotiv analysis to date �ndicate tbat a portion o[ fhe perce5ved infiltration/intlow is really an over-billing on the part oe the MCES. After corr�rtion Por this, the in�ltratio�aflow prohlem is not as great as was originally thought. 5. lntcrview consultant (Bonestroo, Rosene, and Anderlik) regarding ongoing � 8z I study and include narrative relatin� to City's' programs and policies: 5.1 Requircments and standards for minimizing I/I and i!legal sump pump connec- tions 5.2 Extent, source, and sio.��,ficance of existing LI problems and atialysis of eosts for remedia�ion 5.3 Program strate�,y. priorities, scheduling, regulations, and financing mechanisms 9.17 SZ�£T 86, �z �nr 0Td SI6 a3�93071 N019NISIOH 8£898££—zt9 for reducing and preven�ing the pzoblem. The City has already completed a sump pump insgection/removal pragram for selected areas. In addition, cor- roded corrugated metal pipe (CMP) sanitary se�vec bas been replaccd or lined to reduce infiltrationlinflow. The MCES has installed new continuous record- ing nneters at Meters 108 and 109. The ncw meters have eaiminated over� billir�� and reduced the perceived volume of inFitration/inflow. I�Itratian/ inflow sources identi�ed during the in6ltration linflow az�alysis will be evatu- ated to determine cast of remediation. In conjunction with the previaus task, infiltration/inflow sources will be desiganated for retnedi�tion and the associ- �ted costs �nd flow reductions calculated. 6. Create working map showing the interceptor servicc areas and staging in five-yeax increments to 2020, bnsed on the forecasts 7. Idcncify projected flows for the total �rreas to be served and for each metropolitan inter- ceptor scrvxcc arca for fiv�year increments. �:adsting tlows will be estimated for eac� o� the three MCES interceptor service areas. Increases in 0ows due to additional development or re-development in each of the service areas will be estimated and s�dded to existing t]ows to project futuce f�ows. The future flows wial be projected in �ive-year increments to the year 2020. Wokkin� mAps wili be created to depict the i�►terceptor service areas and Sve-year increments. The flow projections wi�l sat- isfy N�etropolitan Council Tier 1 requiremenfs. 8. Review 1994 Water Supply infoznnat�on and update to reflect revised population, house- hold, and employrnent forecasts and meet requirements for Water $upply plan. The water cansumption data in the 1994 Water supply Plan w�'l] be evaluated in con- junction �trith �995 t�trough 1997 data to determine cucrent water consumption. Per capita water consumption when muItiplied by future popul�tion projections wili detern�ine average d�y water cansum�tiox�. Maximum day water consumption though, not avers�ge day consumpiion, dictates total water supply requirements. Peak day ratios (ratio of maximum day to average day) for -the years 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 will be cvaluated to quantif� whether the Gty's public education �rogcam and water conservation plan is succeeding in lowering maximum day wa- ter demand. �'h�is is typic..tlly caused by non-esseutial wrater uses suc� as car wash- ing, lawu sprinkling, and garden watering. �otential changes in water dernand due to increased or decreased watez usage for commercial, industrial and institutional purposes will also be evaluated. 9. Review 1995 Water Consez�acion and Emergency Pian and update as appropriate. The 1995 Water Conscrvation and Emergency Plan cvaluated water consnmption data for 1986 throug� 1994. Data for this period showed a downward trend. Water con- sumption for 1995, 1996, a�qd 1997 will be gathered to determine �# this trend has continued. Of particular interest is tb�e effect of unplemez�tation of the City's public educatiun program and water conservation plan. The City's Water Su�erintendenc, J�m Saeflce, will be i�utexviewed to detexmine if add�iAo�aal water consumption re��*��Rcan be anticipated tbirough leak detec- .� . 9z��Z 86� sz �nr ti�d SI6 213�93071 N019NISIOH 8£898££-ZZ9 tion and correctiion, or the increased use of ineters. Mr. Saefl:e will also be intervxewed to determin� his thoughts on the probable rednction in watcr con- sumption through the City's public education aud water conservation efforts. The 1995 Water Conservadon and Emeegency p]an will be updated to �reflect 1995, 1996, �uid I997 rvater cunsum�tiun data. The update will reflect improvements to the water supply system made since 1�95, such as Water Plant No. 3, the Marion Hills Booster Station rchabalitation, etc., and any other periinent changes. f• Parks nnd Open Space l . Identify G/O/S 2. Review 1996 and 1997 park study 3. Revicw Rnoka County, MnDOT, and current City plans for bikeway/walkways and identify gaps or problems as discussed in T�ansportation chapter a. Create working map to show existing and proposed system as discussed in Transpor- tatioa chapter. The map will delineatc existing and �roposcd trail segements. 5. Create working park map ide�tifying private, local, and regional facilities 6. Create table or chart identifying existing park facilities 7. Narralive description of comrnunity recreational space �eeds to accom�mociace the 2020 populauon, household, and emp]oyment forecasts 8. Identify five-year capital improvement program co meet needs 9. Narrativc descripcion of how Ioca1 parks relate to regional system and how regiona! system meets local nceds I0. pescribe policies, programs, and ordinances to protect regional and loeal park nnd open spaces 11. Describe local controls to protect .future areas for park needs or ttail needs g. lmplementation �. Conduct a co�nmunity open house to review the major elements of the draft compre- henrive plare. mme .: It i� important to allow an opportunily for the pubtic to review the uutcome of the p1an�:ing process before a public It¢aring(s) is held by the Plcutniiag Comneission and/ur Ci1y Cour�ci[. (Value Added Service) 2. Compile Strategies fcom above chapters 3. Meet with City $taff regardx�g Capital Improv�menc Plan '9.19 LZ�£I 86� £Z �flf ZId SI6 a3'1J30�i N019NISIOH 8£898££-Zt9 4. Create implementation methods in of�cial cor�crols, capita! improvement budgets, gcn- eral operating budgets, and include timeframes. Implementation should consider the key artion steps identified ia the Visioning Process. 5. Paracipate in Planning Comnnission Meetings (2) and City Council Meetings (2). h. Aviation 1. Compty with stattitory cequirement to relate the Met Council's Aviation issues to Fridley 2. Complete research as necessary III. Lxisting Resources to be used by Consultant; all will be availabie to review at Junc 25, 1998 meeti ng: . a. Park Service S[udy (199G-199�); lack Kirk, Parks and Reereation Dxrector, 572-3575 b. Housing Action Pian (1996); Bazbara Dacy, Comrnunity Development Director, 572-3590 c. 1994 Redevelopment Priority Analysis and Housing Condition Study d. Bikeway/walkway subcommittee files e. IYaffic studies on file f. 1991 Housing Scudy g. Water Conservz�tion Plan and Arncnded Sewer and Water Pian h. Camznunity survcys and business surveys i. Southern Anoka County Community Consoctium (SAG3) demographic analysis j. Watershed plans k. Anoka Counly IYansportation Plan � I. Northstar Corridor Development Agency tile regarding rail proposal to St. Cloud IV. Miscellaneous a. Include cost for five public meetic�gs b. Include hourly rate for public mcetings c. "Working Maps" mean gtap,hics the consultant would �repare for staff to present to public meetings or to give to GTS st�aff to develop final rnaps; assnme maps are in color 9.20 LZ��I 86� £Z �flt £id SI6 b3�930�1 N019NISIOH 8£898££—zZ9 Preliminary projert Schedule FRIDLEY COMPREHENSfVE PLAN WORK PROGRAM Pro ram Elements Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Ma � Plan Overoiew 2 Land Use 3 Housing 4 Transportation 5 Sewer and Water 6 Parks and Open Space � AviaGon 8 Implementation Executive Summary (D raft) � Public Hearfng ez��i e6� �z �nr bZd ST6 9.21 b3'1930�1 N019N I S I OH � 8£898££°?19 Fees Basic Services Based on thc work program prepared by the City of Fridley, the Hoxsington Koeglcr Group Project Team will complete the basic services componen� of the comprehensive pian for a total fee not �o cxceed $62,750. The fees for Value Added Services identified in this proposal are noted separately. II.a. Il.b. II.c. II.d. IT.c. li.f. II.g. II.h. I.b. TOTAL Pl�sn Overview Land Use Chapter I�ousing Chapter Transportation Chapter Sewer and Watcr Chaptcr Patks and Open Space Chapter Implementa[ion Aviation Chapter Executive Summary $ 2,250.00 19,300.00 12,000.00 6,500.00 6,000.00 4,200.00 9,000.00 500.00 _ 3.00Q.00 $62,750.00 NOTE: The Housing Chapter fee listed above includes $2,000.00 to conduct the telephone survey of landlords and/or owners. Vsil_ ne Added ,Services zz.a.6 II.b.3.7 II.b.5.9 I1.b.5.10 II.b.5.1 l II.b.7 II.g, l "Community Leaders" Meetings NINRI2A Public Meeting Develop Alterxaative L•and Use Cor�cepts Formulate Specxfic Policy Directions Neighborhood Meetings Urban Dcsi�n Framework Comrriunity Open House Cost for Public Meetings $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,450.00 2,100.00 2,150.00 900.00 650.00 per meeting 4,500.00 ] ,000.00 The scape of work and fee for basic services includes five public mcetings. The cost of additional public rneetings is identitied below. Mceting costs are stat�d in a range to aecommodate various pet�onnel classifications tha[ tnay be included in project meetinas. �Ioisington Koe�ler Crroup Inc. $175.00 — 300.00 per zneeting Bonestroo Rosene Anderl'zk Associates $300.00 per meeting Maxfield Research Group $200.00 — 300.00 �r meeting 19.22 82-£I 86� �Z �flf Std SI6 �13�J30�i N019NISIOH 8£898�£—Zt9 City of Fridley TO: William W. Burns, City Manager ;� � PW98-155 � FROM: John G. Flora, Public Works Director DATE: July 24, 1998 SUBJECT: Storm Damage Policy Attached is a policy dealing with the pickup of tree and brush as a result of a storm passing through the City. This policy establishes a procedure for picking up trees and branches stacked on the boulevazd of residential, commercial or industrial properties. It addresses trees and branches and specifically omits construction material debris and bagged materials. The policy identifies that the pick up will be initiated by the City on the first work day after the weekend of a storm and allows for the City crews to make one pass through the City picking up material. It also identifies that the City would not be responsible �for any damage to boulevard sod, plantings or appurtenances as a result of the debris pickup. Recommend the City Council consider this policy for adoption to replace our existing policy. JGF:cz Attachment 10.01 CITY OF FRIDLEY STORM DAMAGE CLEAN UP POIICY (Repleces Septemb�r 8,1997 Polic�) PURPOSE Public Works Policy No. 98 - The purpose of this policy is to define and standardize the action tthe City will take in reference to storm tree and brush debris clean up. POLICY • The City will remove or trim damaged trees which are located in the public right-of-way or City park Pr�P�Y• • The City will identify the storm clean up procedures on its FIL line (571-3600) and cable TV Channel 35. • Residential, commercial and industrial properties with storm damaged trees and/or branches can cut and stack them on the boulevard in front of their property, butt end towazds the street in 8-foot lengths maximum for City pick up. • Tree or branch piles that contain other materials such as building materials, fences, etc., will not be picked up. • Plastic bags or other types of containers containing leaves and twigs will not be picked up. � Residents may call 572-3566 after the storm to record debris pick up. • Pick up of debris will commence on the first work day after the weekend of a storm. • The City will make one pass through the City for debris pick up. � • The City will not be responsible for brush pick up after the one City pass. • The City will not be responsible for any damage to the boulevard, including sod and other appurtenances, as a result of debris pick up. • Properties with building damage will be responsible for building material clean up and disposal (insurance companies will pay for this). • In the event of a major disaster, the City will request additional help from other government agencies and volunteer organizations. ADOPTED TffiS 27TH DAY OF JULY,1998. Revised: July 1998 1�.�2 ' City of Fridley r TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �� FROM: John G. Flora,�rublic Works Director Jon H. Haukaas, Assistant Public Works Director DATE: July 27, 1998 SUBJECT: Completion of MSAS System PW98-163 The MnDOT State Aid Office has reviewed our MSAS system for completion and has found it acceptable with one exception. State Aid rules require a parking restriction on one side for streets less than 32 feet in width. To finalize our system, such a parking restriction is required on Squire Drive between Rice Creek Road and Camelot Lane and on Camelot Lane between Squire Drive and Arthur Street. We propose to install signage stating "No Parking 12 a.m. - 6 a.m. Monday-Friday" on the west side of Squire Drive and the south side of Camelot Lane. This follows the City's policy of installing pazking restriction on the side of the street where fire hydrants are present. Recommend the City Council adopt the attached resolution and authorize the installation of pazking restriction signs on Squire Drive and Camelot Lane. JHI3/JGF:cz Attachment 11.01 � RESOLIITION NO. - 1998 Ri3SOLIITION AUTHORIZING TH� POSTING OF pN0 PARKING� SIGNS ON ONE SIDI3 OF C13RTAIN MSAS STRE}3TS WHEREAS, the "City" has designated the following as MSAS street segments (MSAS Route No. 336?: Squire Drive Rice Creek Road to Camelot Lane Camelot Lane Squire Drive to Arthur Street WHEREAS, the existing street does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street, approval as a Municipal State Aid Street must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions, and WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions are a necessary prerequisite to the completion of our Municipal State Aid System. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, that the City is hereby authorized to post "No Parking" signs on one side of the streets as noted below: Squire Drive West Side Camelot Lane South Side PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1998. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK NANCY J. JORGENSON, MAYOR 11.02 i � � Qr�r oF FRIDLEY Name Position Mari Planning Daniels Assistant/ Code Enforcement Officer APPOINTMENT July 27, 1998 Starting Salary $33,783.88 per year 12.01; Starting Date Aug. 10 1998 Replaces Kurt Jensen- Schneider � ` CffY OF FRIDLEY CLAIMS J U LY 2 7, 1998 CLAIMS 81797 - 82028 13.01 � � QTY OF FRIDLEY Type of License FOOD Romantic Reveries 5237 - 42°d Avenue South Minneapolis, NIN 55417 Main Event 7820 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 � LICENSES JULY 27, 1998 Approved By: Valerie Head Police Dept.; Fire Dept.; Community Development; Building Inspectio� Wendy Benincasa Police Dept.; Fire Dept.; Community Development; Building Inspection 14.01;� .; Fees• $35.00 $125.00 � � �� fRIOLEY LICENSES JULY 27, 1998 GAS SERVICES � Action Heating & Air Conditioning Inc 529 79 Ave NE Spring Lake Park MN 55432 Jay Hovland All Season Comfort Inc � . 1417 18 St NW New Brighton MN 55112 . Richard Larson Heating & Coaling Two Inc 18550 Co Rd 81 Maple Grove MN 55369 Wayne Sinkie Metro Gas Installers 685 141 Ln NW Andover MN 55304 Mike Ellis Northland Mechanical Contractors Inc 2900 Nevada Ave N New Hope MN 55427 Owens Services Corporation 930 E 80 St Bloomington MN 55420-1499 John Owens Riven Services 10400 Hillside Ln Minnetonka MN 55305 Barry Riven Swenson Heating & Air Cond 6700 W Broadway Brooklyn Park MN 55428 Douglas Swenson Welter Ray N Heating Co 4637 Chicago Ave S Minneapolis MN 55407-3592 Ray Welter Jr GENERAL CONTRACTOR-COMMERCIAL BAC Inc 253 East Lake St • Wayzata MN 55391 _Bradley Hoyt 14.02 � RON JULKOWSKI Building Official Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same RON JULKOWSKI Building Official . 1 LICENSES - JULY 27, 1998 Brickner Builders Inc 6240 Hwy 65 NE #207 Fridley MN 55432 Rick Brickner Bangsrud Ken Construction 8805 Davern Ave NE Monticello MN 55362 Ken Bangsrud Hubbard Broadcasting Inc 3415 University Ave NE St Paul MN 55114 Bruce Hagerty Wayne David Construction Inc 7363 Washington Ave S Edina MN 55439 Wayne Leppla GENERAL CONTRACTOR-RESIDENTIAL Affordable Family Homes Inc (1690) 12301 Central Ave NE � Blaine MN 55434 Pat LaGrey All Season Builders (8493) 1004 45 Ave NE Columbia Heights MN 55421 Kevin Koecher Anderson Roofmg & Construction (4126) 366 Rose Lane Little Canada MN 55117 Kevin Anderson BAC Inc 253 East Lake St Wayzata MN 55391 Bradley Hoyt Bauer Construction (20023198) 8674 Greene Ave S Cottage Grove MN 55016 Dale Bauer Berthiaume Construction (20035341) 165 Norwood Drive Big Lake MN 55309 7im Berthiaume Brickner Builders Inc 6240 Hwy 65 NE #207 Fridley MN 55432 Rick Brickner 14.03 ; Same Same Same Same STATE OF MINN Same Same - Same Same Same Same LICENSES - JULY 27. 1998 Brunn Construction Co Inc 1209 Old Hwy 8 New Brighton MN 55112 Wayne Brunn Budget Exteriors Inc 8017 Nicollet Ave Bloomington MN 55420 Kenneth Thompson Cornerstone Building & Remodeling (20094532) 17334 Butternut St NW Andover MN 55304 Wilbur Meyer Egan Builders (7754) 8341 Riverview Ln Brooklyn Park MN 55444 Richard Egan Grand Exteriors (Pending) 9601 West 16 St St Louis Park MN 55426 Dave Zanor Hanson Stan Homes Inc (8453) 7611 Hwy 95 North Branch MN 55056 Stan Hanson Harris Richard Construction (3765) 6200 Riverview Ter NE Fridley MN 55432 Richard Harris Johnson Grant H Construction (20065242) 3844 France Ave S St Louis Park MN 55416-4912 Grant Johnson Kallerup Construction (7591) 7400 1 Ave S Richfield MN 55423 Erick Kallerup LL Contractors Inc (20139735) 151 Silver Lake Rd #7 New Brighton MN 55112 Daniel Lahr MCR Roofmg (20063096) 829 20 Ave NE Minneapolis MN 55418 Mary Comell 14.04' Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same LICENSES - JULY 27, 1998 Moon Roofing 3709 Welcome Ave N Crystal MN 55422 Pleasant Valley Homes 243 Revere Ln Champlin MN 55316 Progressive Building Systems (20104340) 23120 Garrison Rd Corcoran MN 55340 Rainguard Construction (6061) 12008 Pennsylvania Ave N Champlin MN 55316 Schurstein Roofmg (20064320) 3039 Lyndale Ave Minneapolis MN 55408 TJB Homes Inc (1845) 13455 Hwy 65 NE Ham Lake MN 55304 HEATING Action Heating & Air Conditioning Inc 529 79 Ave NE Spring Lake Park MN 55432 All Season Comfort Inc 1417 18 St NW New Brighton MN 55112 Heating & Cooling Two Inc 18550 Co Rd 81 Maple Grove MN 55369 Northland Mechanical Contractors Inc 2900 Nevada Ave N New Hope MN 55427 Owens Services Corporation 930 E 80 St Bloomington MN 55420-1499 Thomas Mooney Randy Stawski Cory Christiansen Steve Duret Richard Schurstein Rick Budzynski Jay Hovland Richard Larson Wayne Sinkie John Owens 14.05 �� Same Same Same Same Same Same RON NLKOWSHI Building O�cial Same Same Same Same LICENSES - JULY 27, 1998 Swenson Heating & Air Cond 6700 W Broadway Brooklyn Park Mn 55428 Welter Ray N Heating Co 4637 Chicago Ave Minneapolis MN 55407-3592 MASONRY Pixley Jack Sweeps Inc 4149 149 Ave NW Andover MN 55304 PLUMBING Commercial Plumbing & Heating Inc 3151 101 Ave NE Blaine MN 55449 Hutton & Rowe Inc 2126 2 Ave Anoka MN 55303 Southtown Plumbing Inc 6636 Penn Ave S Richfield MN 55423 Douglas Swenson Ray Welter Jr Jack Pixley Natalie Skeie David Rowe LaVern Veit 14.06 Same Same RON NLKOWSKI Building Official STATE OF MINN Same Same � � CfTY OF FRIDLEY Diversified Paving, Inc. 8019 - 146�' Avenue N.W. Ramsey, MN 55303 ESTIMATES . JULY 27, 1998 1997 Driveway Paving Project No. 307 FINALESTIMATE ............................................................................. $ 3,828.31 Forest Lake Contracting 14777 Lake Drive Forest Lake, MN 55025 Hackmann Avenue/Hackmann Circle Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1998 - 1 FINALESTIMATE ............................................................................. $ 16,927.14 Park Construction Company 7900 Beech Street N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55432 Rice Creek Bank Stabilization - Project No. 309 EstimateNo. 5 ................................................................................... $ 23,381.12 Ron Kassa Construction 7438 Upton Richfield, MN 55423 1998 Miscellaneous Concrete Curb and Gutter and Sidewalk Project No. 315 Estimate No. 4 ........................... _ 15.01 .......................................... $ 5,482.45 CITY OF ERIDLEY P[]BL1C WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING D[VISION 6431 liniversity Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 july 27, ] 998 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley c/o William W. Burns, City Manager 6431 llniversity Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Council Members: CERTIFlCATE OF THE ENGINEER We hereby submit the Eina( Estimate for � 997 Driveway Paving Project No. 307, for Diversified Paving, Inc., 8019 146th Ave NW, Ramsey MN 55303. We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of ProJect No.307 and �nd that the same is substantially complete in accordance with� the contract documents. 1 recommend that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body and that the one year contractual maintenance bond commence on July 24, 1998. Respectfully submitted .�� John G. Flora Director of Public Works ]T:cz Prepared Checked 15.02 July 27, 1998 To: Public Works Director City of Eridley REPORT ON EINAL INSPECTION FOR UTY OF F7tIDLEY 1997 DRIVEWAY PAVING PROjEG7 NO. 307 We, the undersigned, have inspected the above-mentioned project and find that the work required by the contract is substantially complete in conformity with the plans and specifications of the project. All deficiencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the work for which the City feels the contractor should receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the contractor. So, therefore, we recommend to you that the City approve the attached FlNAL ESTIMATE for the contractor and the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the day of the final inspection that being luly 24. 1998. � n pson, Constructio Inspector Contractor Representative, (Title) 15.03 � � :-� -:-,�; July 27, 1998 City of Fridley 1997 Driveway Paving Project No. 307 CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certified herein have been actually furnished and done for the above-mentioned projects in accordance with the plans and specifications heretofore approved. The final contract cost is 576,630.60 and the final payment of $3,828.31 for the improvement project would cover in full, the contractor's claims against the City for all labor, materials and other work down by the contractor under this project. [ declare under the penaities of perjury that this statement is just and correc� Diversified Paving� Inc. Llrban Schmidtbauer, President 19 15.04 � . - ; - July 27, 1998 City of fridley ] 997 Driveway Paving Project No. 307 PREVAILING WAGE VERIFICA?ION This is to certify that Diversified Paving, [nc. has abided by the Prevailing Wage Provisions as specified by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for Anoka County. ! declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correc� Diversified Paving, Inc. llrban Schmidtbauer, President 15.05 i i ¢�. �:�; .,,,�, .-.�. FROM: City of Fridley Engineering Divisio� T0: Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley 6431 University Ave, NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dated: July 27, 1998 Remove Concrete Slab Remove Bituminous Pavement Construct 5-in.-th;ick Concrete Driveway Construct 1-1/2 in.-thick Bituminous Driveway 5-in. Thick Class V Granular Base SUBTOTAL TOTAL SUMMARY: Original Contract Amount Contract additions: Contract deductions: Revised contract amount Value Completed To Date Amount Retained (0%) Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 Estimate No. FINAL Period Ending: July 24, 1997 For: Diversified Paving, Inc. 8019 146th Ave NW Ramsey, MN 55303 1997 DRIVEWAY PAVING PROJECT NO. 307 ob Code: 503-0000-415-4340 STATEMENT OF WORK 212 SY 59 SY 420 SY 5,124 SY 5,500 SY 13.65 13.00 38.00 9.40 2.50 581,536.40 81, 536.40 76,630.60 0.00 72.802.29 83.828.31 15.06 ,. 33.00 450.45 188.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 701.00 159.00 1,494.60 3�956.00 159.00 397.50 4,096.00 $ 2,342.55 2,566.20 0.00 26,638.00 37,186.40 10,240.00 576,630.60 �= . ��: Diversified Paving, Inc. Estimate No. Fnal July 27, 1998 CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR I hereby certify that the work performed and the materials supplied to date unde� the terms of the contract for this project, and all authorized changes thereto, have an actuai value under the contract of the amounts shown on this estimate (and the final quantities on the final estimate are correct), and that this estimate is just and correct and no part of th "Amount Due This Estimate" has been received. ey Contractor's Authorize epresentative (Title) CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER 1 hereby cenify that I have prepared or examined this estimate, and that the contractor is entitled to payment of this estimate under the contract for reference project. PITV AG Cetn� ev �u�nrnT�r� 15.07 Date 7 — a�— �Q Respectfully Submitted, John G. F ora, P.E. Public Works Director Page 2 C1TY OF FltIDLEY PClBL1C WORKS DEPARTMENT EIVGINEERING DIV1StON 6431 liniversity Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 July 27, 1998 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley c/o William W. Burns, City Manager 6431 llniversity Avenue N.E. Eridley, MN 5 543 2 Council Members: CERTIFlCATE OF THE ENGINEER We hereby submit the Final Estimate for Hackmann Ave/Hackmann Circle Street Improvement Project No. ST. ] 998 - 1, for Eorest Lake Contracting, 14777 Lake Drive, Forest Lake, MN 55025. We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of Project No. ST. 1998 - 1 and find that the same is substantially compiete in accordance with the contract documents. [ recommend that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body and that the one year contractual maintenance bond commence on July 24, ] 998. - Respectfully submitted John G. Flora Director of Public Works jT:cz Prepared Checked 15.08 July 27, 1998 To: Public Works Director City of Fridley REPORT ON FlNAL IIVSPECTION FOR C[TY OF FRIDLEY HACKMANN AVE/HACKMANN CIRCLE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROjECT NO. ST. 1998 - 1 We, the undersigned, have inspected the above-mentioned project and find that the work required by the contract is substantially complete in conformity with the plans and specifications of the project. All deFciencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the work for which the City feels the contractor should receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the contractor. So, therefore, we recommend to you that the City approve the attached FlNAL ESTIMATE for the contractor and the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the day of the final inspection that being lulv 24. ] 998. � on T mpson, Constructio lnspector ��=-u , � Contractor Representative, (Title) 15.09 July 27, 1998 City of Fridley HACKMANN AVE/HACKMANN CIRCLE STREET [MPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1998 - 1 CERTIFlCATE OE CONTRACTOR This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certified herein have been actually furnished and done for the above-mentioned projects in accordance with the plans and specifications heretofore approved. The final contract cost is $467,491.58 and the final payment of $16,927,14 for the improverizent project would cover in full, the contractor's claims against the City for all labor, materials and other work down by the contractor under this projec� t declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. � ,� Dan Volihaber, Project Coordinator 15.10 � � July 27, 1998 City of Fridley HACKMANIV AVE/HACKMANN CtRCLE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. l 998 - 1 ' PREVAILING WAGE VERIFlCATION This is to certify that Forest [.ake Contracting, Inc. has abided by the Prevailing Wage Provisions as specified by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for Anoka County. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. forest Lake Contracting, [nc. ��- Dan Vollhaber, Project Coordinator 15.11 i FROM: City of Fridley Engineering Divisian T0: Honorable Mayor and City Councii City of Fridley 6431 University Ave, NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dated: July 27,1998 CtTY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERS('fY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 Estimate No. 7 (FINAL) Period Ending: July 24,1998 FOR: Forest Lake Contracting 14777 Lake Drive Forest Lake MN 55025 HACKMANN AVEIHACKMANN CIRCLE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT ST.1998 -1 HACKMANN AVENUE WATER MAIN REPAIR PROJECT N0. 317 JOB CODE: 557-0000�415rt53a9801 STATEMENT OF WORK ......,.:::::. �::.�.. .:....::.,,.:.:;:-�: �<:::.,::. : ....., . .:...: :::.�::.::.:,,,.. ..• -.<•:<:a;�:;: . . . . . . �.::.... � ::....::..:.....:...... ......::: w::::. ..:.............v.......Y+ . .n. . . r. n i . • %:'+:r .v: ::..i+: f;Y,��;'ny .. .. .. . ...... ...... ..... .................. . . ....................... .... r . .. w: •:::::: •. .... . r.. . � ... r. . .} : . .{... . - �r: i '�.:: v+:: �iiY:n....; .,�.; r . ..... ...... • : .•.. ......,- . . ..........................................n.... ................... ..... ................ ....n :n.t. ...n......v1... ....rv .r .. �� ..v.. .v'.: f. �\. .. . Y: k;.vf . vi:•i:•i:,:;•::ryi:0iii:i:i;.;:yv ..� . .. r :J v • •%•. • v .. �... f. .. {: v ....... r; "" rr:Yv :::Y.:ry... . .4 +. . . h� . .... .:� •: • v4 . 44 ................. :.....................................:...........x.rw::.� ............ .....r......m:: :w:: ::: v....u..r.: . . .......:..:� ::::::................................................ ...:......... ........... ...:. ••.:::::::....:-:•:...f: .. ,.. . ,::..:fi ....�r .. ........ .................................. ..............,..............:. .... ...........................:.... ::•• . .... • : . n. . •. .... .> .. .................. . .. ......................... ...... . .... ...t..... . ....... .....n ....... .. .. :::::::::::: •:n...v n... . . . if+}. . . . . . .. +,• .:.... • : • •. '' ....................... . ............. ...... ...x . ...... •ti'�:::1•i:ivvw: •::: ..... ...... .......... ..... � .....n......{ �.....x.......... ............. n....... ...... r ....v: ...........n..... r.... :n. v..•f . . ... . . r..% . . n . . .. ..}+ir. . v :1� yhi'i:l�:�i:�:i�iiiiiiii:ti�i�:i,�Yr: i�tt .............:::::::......,...................... :..::::. •........................:.:::..•:. ............,........ ..:.::,;,.::,..,. ... ...� •. ..�.�. , .�..>. ......, . .s..•.. , ��``�. .. .. .. �'. ,r . f ...........v .........................................r........................ ...... .................... .r...{ .. . ... .i . \,n:... ........... . . .. .......................... .,. ... .. . ............ : •:: •::::: :•: •:: •::::� ::..... ...::.: . ::.: •::::::.:: •::...,�c .. ....�r:.•.ct. ...... .. . .,:o :�/� ., •�'i... ...+,�,: >�•.• ,.;>.a.; ................... .. ...................................,.. . ..v... ....... .......... :..............,.. ... ...... ... .r. . ., . ............ .. . ... ... .. . .. .r .� ,,, . .. � , . ..£`,. �:ico;::::;::::�::::.r::::�•; ......................................... ..... . ......... ..F.� .....}.......n......... ...................n... .......fi..... r..v . 1..-.v } . W../ . n/�ryv� �� . ..................... ................r.....nn......... ....v......... ........ ..... ........................ .... ..........:: •....f.•ry:: �: v: • ::.:]2?•:.�v M1.. . n . +ib . �.. r. .Y,. {�{:{:...}.?;r. . �/i.'v '`'�. '[-.+'i.v'v`.i ..4 ................... :.. ................................. :........................r..... ... ... ........ . ... ...n....... ... . .......v... . ....... .. .. • . r � v• ..4.� J'if+r:• . .. {• ..v: �.: .v4nw �y��i,�J�Y'•.. .. ...::............... . .......... ...... ..............: :.:: v: :v: ... .. ..... .r. .: :::•::: ••:: •..:. ..... .... ::::x?•�. •h.. �. .{+i.'v :4: ?•y^.•:....�. .�.f,•::::}:: ' y�,: \�}?:•:::ii;:v3.;•i: ' .:. ................ .v.r.... y . ..n... .n.... .....n.... . ....... .. ..... . . . . .r. v.. . . :• .�..r.,: .. lv ' n.^,iJ'•:. v .. ....... ........ ................. vv.-x.�};; ....: ...... ,+� ...».. \�4 .\ ..+P...r.. x..'::?ti:v " :: :k•i::itit�Y!lM!.:r;i:i -ii:: n �::::: •: } :::::::::::: :w:::::::::::.:..:::::::.i'v: •.. •:.:: v: v:i.•:......... "' �/� •i: .... ... .� rn:: •::. ... ..j. .::::'� . ... , ., . r . ::;r,.}-: .:ti+� . i v:i:3x•. • :•:.m .. ., .. a•>;; .: •F ,f ;xe. . �. ..+' . ,.�,. : n4• •:::::: nvv�. •::::::::�:: �•::::::::::::v'.i'�ii:•i:•ii:�:•i:•i:•i:•i:::::::.J...v. :. ...l..v •::•: .. ... .: •. v:: • x •;•1,..1:. •..•: . ........................ . .. .. .......... .....J.... .. ...v........... ... .:. ..v\..x..v ... :::i:: :-:•::•�.•.r .4. . .�..r • •i'+ ..f.vY.^+�h .. !L.. • •i:•:`i:: :•r{:��:,}:}• :. ............................... ::. .:.............,................ :. . .............. ... . P.l�... .. ... .... . .. .v...............v ... { ..{v . r : . ....1 x .. ...':. . r . rfi. �i . :vii�5:�.^•.i>.�::?x:�:;:� i:•:�i::'rri{•:. •. .::x.::: ...�� t�. ...� .... .... ... ,�....>. . . +. •::.;.;... ...:: .:................................ .....•..-::::::..•:.:.. �...........::: ................. ..... .. ,....,..,• r: r: •:: • ... � .. v. .., . •:. .£'..r.. • •.,.. . ::.v:::..�::: :cr :•.. ,..::,Y,., +::;::...... ,..,..,-.., . ................:::::::::::::::.�::::'r::.�::::::: w:{:::......... ......... ......... .. ..................1.... .n4 v:..f.... ..::::::::.�::::::::n....r} ... .... ... .. . . .. . -0{-..?X.. . ... .�. ..�.�} . .. ..... ... r �. •:.�: •:::: :• ::.::...................:::::::::...,:a:::................: :........:::..•::::... ....................... :: • : •..... ...---.....:.:..:::: •... '+,�u.... \ . ,,.:.,., 3h�.`.: .. �' . . ... . . . +y,;c:;.... . ..... ......................::::::::...........................: •:.:::.:.:::::::............ ...: �:::: •::::::::::::.: ....{......n::.: •: •:::: •:: • �. ......... •� o::••. •. ..... .. ... .. • : .:�., . :•:••Y : �.{f:• •:�:'�::'•:.;:.;:::�:�::•:.•:.::. .t.,., •.v.'�if4 x.�. ..�F,.v'r ..C.i?�:$ �: i•.QL•. n:.. .....v...::::r.:::.v •:: •r•: ..n....v.. .....::. .. v: M1. ... , , � �q�y( �j •iY•::biii:i{4iirii:y::iF�i}ii:^i%i•+i:+?ii•:i}iii:�•iii:<x?iii:s:;::::..r:::::::.:'S:i:iii:? ..... . .� r. � :v': �ry.. {{•: :? .:iJ.•ii:.� ...}.::::::::::::::.:.............. .n. ..... . ...: ....... ...... ..::.�::.: :........ .... ..... . . ::{. :.... :.:. ......... :•:'vti?} .. � ........v...vr• ..........:.... . ...•v',•�;• .....::::r•::: .r....i •. .::•:+'l;?:w�. {}:{.yi. i; %,lCN/F':i�}..�.,,v : :r?j�f!:!!!M!}�i.i:••r,•:J%v.� ::.........v .................:.. , . .# ::.:�:::.:.::........... n �w:: :•?ii � :.v• .... • i:�i �::::.:::: . ., ...... •ii::�: . :..•.v. .:n . . . .. ...:. :::ir'r?:�:�......3:n•.v. ..::•:::> :.•:::a:•::•:r:•::•:::•::.::•::•>::•:::::.:�:. .�M�. . .. .............. ......... ...... .. . • n -� �:.�: �:: •::::::�:. •:,.:•:. •::..G.......?�.�.::•: �.�:£•:.. .a::,.:; ............................ ::. �..... .... ......... " "'........... • t , ..............::::::::::::.:�>:�::.�.�ilV!AF.��,.,,�,r�'::::: ;:::.::::::•::.:::::::.:.,� ... .:::::. .......... :::•:. ::: :............. :::. �.... ... ..................... ::::... .?::::: ............ . 2021.501-Mobilization 1.0 LS 15,000•00 - - �•� 15��•� 2104.501- Remove concrete & gutter 50.0 LF 3.00 - - �•� �7•� 2104.505 - Remove & redaim 1-1/2 in. . bituminous pavement and cu�b 10,900.0 SY 1.00 - 10,900.00 10,900.00 2104.509 - Remove catch basin 1.0 Each 400•00 - ' 2•� $�'� 2232.501- Mill bituminous surface 150.0 SY 4•00 - ' �'� 2105.501- Common excavation 10,600.0 CY 4.75 440.00 2,090.00 10,561.00 50,164.75 2105.521- Granular borrow (L� 7,000.0 CY 6.00 144.00 864.00 7,125.00 42,750.00 2105.526 - Topsoil borrow (L� 600.0 CY 8.00 113.75 910.00 583.75 4,670.00 2112.501- Subgrade preparation (induding raising sUucture) 32.5 Rd Sta 110.00 - - 32.50 3,575.00 2211.501- Aggregate base, dass 5 4,500.0 Ton 8.00 - _ - 4,554.94 36,439.52 2331.508 - Type 41A wear course min (w/al) 1,000.0 Ton 25.00 - - 998.00 24,950.00 2331.510 - Type 31 binder course min (w/oil) 1,300.0 Ton 23.00 - - 1,254.00 28,842.00 Bituminous driveway 2-1/2 in. type 41 and 4-in. dass 5 aggregate remove & replace 700.0 SY 15.00 - 794.00 11,910.00 Concrete driveway 6 in. remove & replace 1,200.0 SY 38.00 - - 1,102.00 41,876.00 2357.502 - Bituminous material for tadc ooat (0.07 gal/S`� 850.0 Gal 1.40 - - 475.00 �.� 2503.511-12 in. RCP pipe sewer (installe� 8.0 LF 30.00 - - 16.00 '�.� 2506.509 - Construct catch basin 2.0 Each 1,500.00 - - 4.00 6,000.00 2506.516 - Fumish & install casting assembly 6.0 Eac:h 400•00 - ' 5•00 2'000'00 2506.522 - Adjust frame & ring casting 20.0 Each 225.00 - - 21.00 4,725.00 2531.501- Conc�ete curb & gutter - design B618 (including backfill) 6,200.0 LF 6.40 - - 6,206.00 39,718.40 15.12 ', � Forest Lake Contracting SUeet Improvement Project No. ST.1998 -1 Estimate No. 7 (FINAL) Traffic control 2575.505 - Sodding, type lawn Remave existing 6 in. watertnain Remove & saivage existing hydrant assembty Remove & salvage eadsting gate valve & box 0504.602 - Fumish & install hydrant & valve assembly (induding 6 in. gate valve & box) 0504.602 - Fumish & instail 6-in. gate valve & box 0504.602 - Adjust gate valve box 0504.602 -1-in. corporation codc 0504.602 - Reconnect water service 0504.602 - Fumish & install 6 in. x 6 in. tee fitting 0504.603 - Fumish & install Crin. watermain - duct from CL 52 w/8 mil polyethylene wrap Spec - 6-in. water bypass (service to Hackmann Circle) Spec - Temporary water service to homes Spec - TesGng - dass 5 gradation a Spec - Testing - dass 5 proctor Spec - Testing - Class 5 inplace densit}r Spec - Testing - Concrete cylinder (set of 3) Spec - Testing - bituminous e�raction & gradation Spec - Testing - bituminous air vads Spec - Testing - subgrade desit�r Sprinkler system repair l.andscape repair (retaining walls, fences, plant beds, etc.) Fumish & install 6 in. PVC sump pump discharge pipeline(Alt 1) Fumish & install 6 in. PVC sump pump discharge pipeline(Alt 2&3) 6 inch x 4 inch PVC tees 6 inch x 6 inch PVC wye 6 iach PVC cap Stortn sewer catch basin connection 6 in. Perforated PVC wlFilter Sock(Att.1) 6 in. Perforated PVC w/Filter Sock(AIt.28�3) 4 inch x 2'-6' long PVC riser w/ cap 1.0 LS 6,000.0 SY 1,980.0 LF 3.0 Each 5.0 Each 3.0 Each 5.0 Each 5.0 Each 42.0 Each 42.0 Each 5.0 Eadt 1,990.0 LF 1.0 LS 42.0 Each 2.0 Each 2.0 Each 4.0 Each 6.0 Each 6.0 Each 6.0 Each 8.0 Each 1.0 LS 1.0 LS 1,200.0 L.F S70A LF 33.0 Each 1:0 Each 4.0 Each � 2.0 Each 200.0 LF 400.0 LF 22.0 Each 2,800.00 2.00 2.50 Z00.00 100.00 2,200.00 450.00 140.00 35.00 250.00 Z00.00 19.00 3,000.00 190.00 160.00 200.00 35.00 50.00 155.00 '155.00 30.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 6.00 7.00 Z0.00 20.00 5.00 300.00 8.20 7.20 20.00 15.13 ' ; � 1.00 6,116.00 1,980.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 6.00 7.00 39.00 39.00 5.00 2,030.00 1.00 39.00 1.�0 2.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.50 1,210.00 545.00 32.00 1.00 6.00 3.00 200.00 400.00 32.00 Page 2 2,800.00 12,232.00 4,950.00 600.00 400.00 6�600.00 2,700.00 980.00 1,365.00 9,750.00 1,000.00 38,570.00 3�000.00 7,410.00 160.00 400.OQ 140.00 100.00 310.00 155.00 90.00 1,500.00 2,250.00 7,260.00 3,815.00 640.00 20.00 30.00 900.00 1,640.00 2,880.00 640.00 �:� ��:_ _sil: Forest Lake CanUacting Street Improvement Project No. ST.1998 -1 Estimate No. 7 (FINAL) Page 3 SUBTOTAL '''""" TOTAL SUMMARY: Original ConUact Amount ConVact additions: C.O. #1, C.O. #2, C.O. #3 CanVact deductions: Revised contract amount Value Completed To Date Amount Retained (U%) Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR 5382,705.00 86,446.13 469,151.13 467,491.58 0.00 450�564.44 ;16,927.14 1 hereby certify ihat the worlc perfo►med and the materials supplied to date under the tertns of the conUact for this project, and all autharized changes �ereto, have an actual value under the oontract of the amounts shovm on this estimate (and the final quantities on the final estimate are correc.t), and that this estimate is just and coRect d no art of 'Amount Du This Estimate' has been received. By C tractors Authoriz R ntative (Title) CERTIFICATE OF THE EN�INEER � I hereby ceRify that i have prepared a examined this estimate, and that the contracta is entided to payment of this estimate under the contra�t for reference projed � CtTY OF FRIDLEY, INSPECTOR Date By a� Respectfufly Submitted, Checked By John G. Flora, P.E. -- Public Waks Ditector 15.14i �467,490.88 1 SUMMARY OF REQUEST Michele and Cully Smutzler are requesting the subdivision of Lot 1, Block 2 of the Brookview Second Addition into two lots. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: For lots zoned R-1, Single Family, Chapter 205.07 of the City Code requires that lots be a minimum of 9,000 square feet and have a minimum width of 75 feet. The dimensions and area of the two lots meet the requirements of the City Code. Due to the configuration of the lot split, the existing garage will no longer meet the Code required setbacks. A variance will be required as a stipulation of this approval. The petitioner has applied for this variance and will appear before the Appeals Commission in August. Pete Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, voiced concern regarding the relationship between this lot split, the resulting new home, and an existing drainage problem that he sees in the neighborhood. The Planning and Engineering staffs have worked together to analyze this issue. Short of an extensive storm water project involving the potential assessment of 21 neighbors, staff has agreed upon a solution to reduce the run-off from the newly created lot. Stipulation #5 will assure that roughly 50% of the existing water that naturally flows to the low spot in the neighborhood will now be re-directed toward Brookview Drive. Stipulation #5 will also assure that all run-off from the new home's impervious surface will be directed to Brookview Drive. Consequently, addirional impact to Mr.Eisenzimmer's property will not occur as a result of this action. PLANNING COMNIISSION RECOMI��NDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the subdivision request LS #98-01 with the following stipulations: 1. Approval of a variancefor the existing garage from 30 feet to 22.1 feet. 2. All easements be dedicated as illustrated on staffls Exhibit A(Attached) 3. A$750 park dedication fee be paid before the building permit is granted. 4. A$1,000 storm water fee shall be paid before the building permit is granted. 5. A workable drainage plan for the newly created lot must be demonstrated before approval of the lot split. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution . 16.01 Staff Report: LS #98-01 1027 Mississippi St. Page 2 Petition For: Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: Lot Size: Topography: Existing Vegetation: Existing Zoning/Platting: Availability of Municipal Utilities: Vehicular Access: Pedestrian Access: Engineering Issues: Site Planning Issues: Comprehensive Planning Issues: PROJECT DETAILS The subdivision of Lot 1, Block 2, Brookview Second Addition. 1027 Mississippi Street Lot 1, Block 2 Brookview Second Addition 26,776 square feet; 0.61 acres Relatively flat Urban landscape and mature trees. R-1, Single Family Residential; Brookview Second Addition Available Brookview via Mississippi or HWY 65 Via Mississippi Street. Grading and drainage and utility plan for the new_lot shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineering staff. The lot split design creates a need for the existing gazage to need a variance to conform with the City Code. The zoning and Comprehensive Plan aze consistent in this area. Public Hearing Neighbor, Peter Eisen�immer of 6535 Oakley Drive, has problems with water Comments: draining through his yazd and water damage to his basement. He would like the City to resolve this problem before additional houses are added to the neighborhood, which would create additional drainage through his yard. 16.02 i __ _ ___ � i Staff Report: LS #98-01' 1027 Mississippi St. Page 3 DEVELOPMENT SITE ; � �I�t�� Michele and Cully Smutzler are requesting the subdivision of Lot 1, Block 2 of the Brookview Second Addition into two lots. The new parcel will face Brookview Drive NE. The Smutzler home at 1027 Mississippi will remain and will simply have a reduced size lot if the requested lot split is approved. *_ •: 1946 - Brookview Second Addition 1959 - Building Permit (?) first permit on file for electrical 1963 - Building Permit for family room addition, 12' x 20' 1963 - Building Permit for detached garage, 26' x 24' 1981 - Building Permit, reroof 1997 - County reconstructed sidewalk along Mississippi through property �_� � �I� NORTH: EAST: SOUTH: WEST: ANALYSIS Zoning: R-1, Single Family Zoning: R-1, Single Family Zoning: R-1, Single Family Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Single family Residences Land Use: Single family Residences Land Use: Single family Residences Land Use: Single family Residences The existing lot is 26,776 square feet in azea (0.61 acres) and its approximate dimensions are 107.24 feet by 250 feet. The lot has frontage on both Mississippi Street and Brookview Drive. It is currently described as Lot 1, Block 2, Brookview Second Addition. The lot contains a house with a detached garage faces Mississippi Street. The detached garage exists onto Brookview Drive. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family. For lots zoned R-1, Chapter 205.07 of the City Code requires that lots be a minimum of 9,000 squaze feet and have a minimum width of 75 feet. The minimum width of the proposed lots is 107.24 feet and 95 feet and the lots will have an area of 16,596 square feet and 10,180 square feet, respectively. The dimensions and area of the two lots meet the requirements of the City Code. 16.03' 3 Staff Report: LS #98-01 1027 Mississippi St. Page 4 Existing Garaee The larger lot contains the existing house; the house will meet all of the setback requirements of the R-1 District, with the exception of the garage. By current standazds, the garage should be 30 feet from the side street when it is within 25 feet of the common lot line with a home that faces the side street. Prior to the subdivision, this lot has 112 feet between the garage and the property line and, therefore, the garage could sit within 17.5 feet of the Brookview right-of-way. Mature Oak trees stand on the new lot. � �,.- . - - Peter Eisenzixnmer of 6535 Oakley Drive, has indicated that much of the storm water run-off from this block goes through his yazd. He was present at the public hearing. The run-off has caused water damage to his basement during Spring thaws and has ponded in his yazd at other times of the yeaz. He is concerned that additional houses will magnify the run-off problem. He would like the City to resolve this problem before additional houses are added to the neighborhood. He further indicated that the idea for a storm sewer for the block was once reviewed, but never installed. He would like to have the storm sewer constructed. The City Engineering Department has indicated that if a storm sewer was constructed to relieve the problem at 6535 Oakley Drive, it would be over 600 feet in length. Easements across a number of properties would also needed. The project would potentially cost in excess of $20,000 and would be assessed to 21 properties. An engineering study of such a project has not been coniiucted, therefore, it is not known if such a project is feasible. � The Planning Commission discussed the drainage / run-off issue and decided that the drainage from the new lot could not add additional drainage to the interior of the block. They agreed to add a stipulation to the request that indicated run-off from a house constructed on the new lot would have to flow to the east toward Brookview Drive. They determined that resolving the drainage problem for the entire block was beyond the scope of this single issue. Other Issues The Highway Departrnent of Anoka County has recommended that an easement be required of the plat for an additional 15 feet of right-of-way adjacent to Mississippi Street. Due to the creation of one new lot a park fee of $750 and a storm water fee of $1,000 are due before the granting of a building permit. c�'AFF RECOMNI�NDATION TO THE PL 1vNING COMMISSTON Staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the subdivision request LS #98-01 with the four stipulations. 16.04 4 Staff Report: LS #98-01 1027 Mississippi St. Page 5 ' _ ..�1�lI► • ul�� • � s__ • �lul �1� � �� The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the subdivision request LS #98-01 with the following stipulations: � l. Approval of a variance for the existing garage from 30 feet to 22.1 feet 2. All easements be dedicated as illustrated on staff s Exhibit A(Attaahed) 3. A$750 pazk dedication fee be paid before the building permit is granted. 4. A$1,000 storm water fee shall be paid before the building permit is granted. � 5. A workable drainage plan for the newly created lot must be demonstrated before approval of the lot split. � 1� � � Ulul �!� i �� Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution. 16.05 ; � � �. • �\� `. — - s � unuTY FisEAIFM — _ ---------------=�-- � W � ^ O n o o� o N N O N i0.1•i ` a �Oi� I ��o I a 'X' 1N CONC. � � � — -- } . � .. 107.06 S 88'4 7' 15`E � A11SS1 �'S1PP1 �i f �� .� 1s.os �aa� I W � � � q � W ti � � ^ti "�t G6 •� 'Jr IN CONG. S 7'RF. ET � �� t �as�n�t� r('�S �:. � � s Z � i- � 0 MSSIS9PPI STNE Zortirg Deeigr�ans 0 Rr� - Q,e Fatiy Urr'b � 1�2 - Two Fan1y Urtils � R3 - General Mltipie lA�s � F�4 - AA�d7e Fbrro Pala � Puo- �+�a ur,a o�+o�,�,c � s� - Mrde Panc He�b«r,00a s ss - a�ao�� a�a;a � 41 - t.od a,einees � G2 - General B�ai�ss � C.3 - Gend'al ShoPpinB ��,-�� o �, -� �� -�� -a�r�fea,,,,i�a �� -� � P -��,� � �� Q PoGIiT-�W4Y i ■ `:' - <.�:,: � � � Lot S�ili� LS #98-01 Petitioner:• Culty � 11�Chele S»rulzo�er' Lot Split, LS #9&11 Zoning.• R 1, Single Farnrily 102711 fssissippi � `'-�'� 16.07 � � � M 66 , s � � N � w e _ O�' � Date: 06/'23/1998 �� ,� ' '` ` '�` � � � ��'.\ �\ 2.4s - S' vncRY E�sfwFM -- J 07_24 ---- ------=�— ---------- ----------- r ��,� N 8847'JS�W / I i Wu . i � O � � C Q1 � Of 3 . � �' S 88'4?' 1 t "E 107. I7 W � � ri -- o - n o _ N h 2f.1 p N � � . �� v h O l0.2-� � �` ,�O.E � t. -??.1-� > �12.6 . q r 1 101j Jf.7 �°, ) 1 2 STORY 1..I D i'R�uE -?2.� — • . N / t0?� „ '• � O � O �� h 1. 1^ � YI � � Y) � � � � � �O � � " � � ! i 'Ji �N COWC. � Rf7NrvWG wAlt - — � � � . � ..�. �� , • •.� /� 7 07.06 S 88'47'15'E � AqISSlS'Slf'P! S7'RF.�'T 16.08 '! 3 °oo O !� hb 2 "� � � 4 W � � � � '�i 06 - 'X IN CONC. _ I � I � � ,7= .Ic�, eY • � y o olE v r� w �J � � � -`r f t � �. i t � � . � .�� `� � � � ,__�. �� -�� o�l o� . �Q,,,�� 5 � � �� _ . ._..� Oakl�y t7rive �\ a F— No�,� 5�,4 0 �2�er ��o�e`�/ � v � � � O _, �� .'� . � `� . ., o -�.� . � � �� ,. �� ; , : : �- , .t� � . : :t - � -�_.�C� -�"'�c_ --�+ �� . . � ridl- �; (�� or s'7: �� y . .,�;.�� _ __.� . -- �;,�; , ; -; ; �, ; � . � �'�, : � . , ; ,; ,.. ,:_ o . -- ' � ., i � ;�` :•,,� �. ` �; .:>�:, ` '�! _ :` � ' `. ': �; . ' �:;'�.�,��\� . . _.:=-�., ,�;:_`. 0 � � � ._ . �b 33`" �� .�'; '� . _ . � : �' - � i' �' ` �� - : ". f �/ SQ�9 Z %/1f/s'�pl� ! f i �fO�'� + i` .'e f� ;: _____.��►� �� '�� `� 6 � �� j�,. 16.09 �� r,�n:� �� s �c�� - � .. -- � h� � •, � b� '� , � � y :-; : CITY OF FRIDLEY PUB�1C HEARING NOTICE BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: All property owners/residents within 350 feet of property generaliy located at 6017 3'� Street NE CASE NUMBER: Lot Split #98-01 APPLICANT: Cully & Michelle Smutzoer PURPOSE: To allow for a lot split to sell the unused portion of the property on Lot 1 Block 2 Brookview Second LOCATION OF 1027 Mississippi Street PROPERTY AND LEGAL Lot 1 Block 2 Brookview Second DESCR/PTION: DATE AND TIME OF Planning Commission Meeting: HEARING: Wednesday, July 1,1998 at 7:30 p.m. The Planning Commission Meetings are televised live the night of the meeting on Channel 35. - PLACE OF Fridley Municipal Center, City Council Chambers HEARING: 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN HOW TO 1. You may attend hearings and testify. PARTICIPATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator, at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 or FAX at 571-1287. . SPECIAL Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an ACCOMODAT/ONS: inte�preter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than June 24, 1998. � ANY QUESTIONS: Contact Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator at 572-3599. June 17, 1998 Publish: June 24, 1998 16.10 RESOLUTION NO. - 1998 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, LS #98-01, TO CREATE TWO RESIDENTIAL LOTS, ON LOT 1, BLOCK 2, BROOKVIEW SECOND ADDITION, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1027 MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Lot Split, LS #98-01, on July 15, 1998 and recommended approval with stipulations; and WHEREAS, the City Council at their July 27, 1998 meeting approved the Lot Split request, with stipulations attached as Exhibit A.; and WHEREAS, such approval was to create two residential lots, with legal descriptions as follows: Proposed New Parcel: The North 95.0 feet, as measured along the east and west lines of LOT 1, BLOCK 2, BROOKVIEW SECOND ADDITION according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota. Residue Parcel: That part of LOT 1, BLOCK 2, BROOKVIEW SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying South of the North 95.0 feet, as measured along the east and west lines thereof. WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey from the owners; and WHEREAS, such approval will create two residential lots. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley directs the petitioner to record this Lot Split at Anoka County within six (6) months or said approval shall become null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1998. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 16.11 NANCY J. JORGENSON - MAYOR Resolution No. - Page 2 Exhibit A 1. Approval of a variance for the existing garage from 30 feet to 22.1 feet. 2. All easements be dedicated as illustrated on staff's Exhibit B(Attached.) 3. A$750 park dedication fee shall be paid before the building permit is granted. 4. A$1,000 storm water fee shall be paid before the building permit is granted. 5. A workable drainage plan for the newly created lot must be demonstrated before approval of the lot split. 16.12 i . .` . ` .` . . , �� - - 3• u'nc1Tr F�SE►+EM - _ , -"' •----------------'�-- � W � O n o o+ c N N O H 10.2 •; ` • IOU I „1 - ' 'Jr IN CO�vt. � ' - ♦ � � � - �-��,� . ,.. , . �.., . 107.06 S 88'47•15'E � �TISS1�'SIYPI EXHIBIT B - 16.13; � _ ____ � S7'RFET i ^� � '�, � q � W � � � �M 'V , 46 _ � 'X w CONC. . I __ .__ �__-- � � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF �oF JULY 27, 1998 FRIDLEY � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF �oF JULY 27, 1998 FRIDLEY