11/20/2000 - 4699�
� FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEBTING � �
�o��ir
. ATTENDENCE SHEET
Mandc�y, Nvvembe�c 20, 2000 � �
7:30 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN
ITEM
PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS NUMBER
. ���/li�` �;`=.7 �� t � J J--a 7 - : �j�-c:'� � �Li ; z � ' "/ �
; � / '/.j] J
' � / .� � i - .• vf;,� � y�.�{�,i.�. V � L.�l. /../" � `% • �_
/
�.v ' j
7 /
- �'i�. < - �� ,/ // y C'��✓��. �c��:,� � �.,� c� �;� � i , ! �; �i:_�
��'E�r-nt/�,�"� f�.` ,..(C v� f,�--�- /� � L� jt,is-���'-�-i..�l.J r r _;.-�/ /�%uc�/-�
� �
; �,�'//'7'"�� '� `"� ,,, � ,: ) �.. � 1 �l'``7 .����"r / c� 'l%" �.'�i/� / ��?� ��%��
7`
' , . , .
f . _
L'Lc'(�( L- - '�,,1 _,���-� ! _� � �� �`�� I� �_ l—�,..�Dc.�: /
� . .
� vN�C�
C- � � V C .� � .5 T - C' y% �.c% <,S� ; � , `�,��. �: � G, � �: � /� `
,, � , ,
,�- i� �- � �"�= F� �-�:� I�-�' '�� -��- " � ,� ���e
, �
� (, it?/Z �,, %9 '�'/: �i r� -� 4 �! �� y- ✓J r���1 L�, � / /1 �(j�L
���1."cc'��l.�)� ��i.`�'l'� � l,'�.����'���ir��;.� ���i,� �� ..'�%,.�/'f, ���'�,, �� `�'�/-. ,i�/� � {— C � ��
...l.�l A . Y { ���/
';v l L, �> ` _ r���� r c�- � �'-� _� ! � %��/c �' � SI �c.- c� �,� i ,n � �. �
1. ��r� � � ��,�
� `"t f`�l ; L l _`l,�-�f.` �L.�.� /,,G' :'' �,�; '�;� � �—' ����
� � �� - � �� � � � ' ,
, � ,�
_ �. ( .
i7'!� i'V" ✓�� i��.c.t'�/..r �t /�,+ j r �,_'�,�:��� �_✓,, ,; {���t�� �.��.� C`'�°
7 1
1 n ' �s i� �' �
, . � ./ :;� G; _ d ;� �� ��%,C �.i.J .� � �.�_. r-�!"'� L ��l �,�, ��v_ � l 1 V v—� � � , .. � / : �.
, 1. ,
,.,, ,
, ,
- 1 � � ,
,
c � - - I �1 _� , iv i _' S -� � � � �, . �, � t �� �.. � �!�
,� � ° �' � � ' � _ �_ -� `� -
, , _ _ -- � . _
{ ,
� �< ; �- i�
. G' /
.,.1c.�'' f ^i�' � i • t.i � � _ �. _ 7 3 . Z %. . � < ; , � , . L '(
° .
— � � �
i ��/*'�i ����-�� �� �� ='`' ��=�� �/� � `� �� �� % '�+ i �! �- %�C�� �/%/ � _ :J ,-c�/ _ �
.�
l 'lG
� l
� -- ,_ ;. Il
' -� '_� �, -�� _,�� ;,� ��--=�
�'" '� - -, .:�
ti - -'��'� e_ � � � r�- ���. o i-. i �' ,',� �.� � ti � , �}S- ( _ � ,
�� �:�<•''�� �..� �,i�,•� - , e -y� � ` �
r� � r�
/ t /' } �
/ � � / {- L L... � �,, -_i (/ l..l,E,�/�// �r, pf``. � /.✓,.1.,�` .i %�(..��./�i. i /' / ,:�
V
` � V � r � � �1 n � _� % � �1,� �;, r , . �,'�� � ���
�, �� ' .�,, � ;: � z Z � � �ti � � ' � �� !��'� ,
i ,�.,��- %f %� -v�":%_, �� i-; , �✓' ,1-�
f/� :� u� �_
� � „ � , t� �_.�
� t' `e�.t �tl� ��::-� „�, � I—Z_._ l I V ` l 11 �v,�:���„�. � . .; ;, ,
L;`
<. �}
� /�„�-.��� v ��i� .. . /�.-��-{. ��( �. �� �� � V �..'� % L .. ,..C���..;� t � .1 �/b�_ .{
J � �«
.�
3
, -
- i / %
, ) ` .
< -,
( J - � L �� � ; , C � L�, ' c�-�" r ! 4 � `-C_ 4� ��;i' s','s--G�i•'.-�-� l.. ('
,. -�,
\ � J l ( 4 G ` � G G��- � C. � j � (L �i
,
�. r
�/ f.l LCiL : J , � �,
, � , �--
._ ,
� . �
, .
,
,
/ , /'� /
_
.� � -�...�
- . ' �--
��� r f i �f� ✓ ���� r �� l_ ��?" cL. �`/ l" /C� "'-�� � �v�! � � ��
� (.G�;�iU� L �
� �
.� _ � � ' ._ . _ ( _ ._... ��1 `� , _ %.,.,�-'r .. � �'�•; `. s���� �
� �
-��� ��,; ���-��-=� �� � .� -z� � � ����-��� �� ^� '
, � �--�Y
�
� CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
CITY OF
FRIDLEY
The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or
treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion,
national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public
assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to
participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an
interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at
572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of November 6, 2000
Special City Council Meeting of November 13, 2000
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Receive the Minutes from the Planning Commission
Meeting of November 1, 2000 ......................................................... 1- 8
2. Resolution Approving a Lot Split, LS #00-05, by
Irene and David Vasecka, to Split Property for the
Purpose of Creating Two Lots to Allow
Construction of Single Family Homes, Generally
Located at 5427 Fourth Street N.E. (Ward 3) -
................................. 9
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000 PAGE 2
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
3. Resolution Authorizing and Directing the Splitting
of Special Assessments for the North Central
BusinessPark ................................................................................. 17 -19
r
4. Resolution Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Anoka
County Joint Law Enforcement Council Agreement ........................ 20 - 22
5. Establish a Public Hearing for December 11, 2000,
for the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant .................................... 23 - 25
6. Appointment: City Employees ........................................................... 26
7. Claims ............................................................................................. 27
w
8. Licenses .......................................................................................... 28 - 29
K
9. Estimates ........................................................................................ 30 - 36
I �
�r
��
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000 PAGE 3
ADOPTION OF AGENDA.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Consideration of i#ems not on Agenda —15 minutes.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
10. Consideration of Moore Lake Hills Neighborhood
Street Improvement Project No. ST. 2001 —1 ................................... 37
11. Consideration Springbrook Creek Channelization
ProjectNo. 335 ...............................................:.................................. 38
12. Consideration of an Ordinance Concerning
Manufactured Home Parks and Requiring Owners
to Pay Relocation Expenses to Displaced
Residents upon Park Closure ............................................................ 39 - 48
13. Consideration of a Rezoning, ZOA #00-02, by
East Ranch Estates to Rezone Property from
C-3, General Shopping, to C-2, General Business,
Generally Located at the Northwest Corner of
University Avenue and Osborne Road N.E. (Ward 3) ........................ 49 - 53
�
,
M
i
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000 PAGE 4
NEW BUSINESS:
14. First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the City Code
of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, by Making a Change
in Zoning Districts (Rezoning, ZOA #00-02, by East
Ranch Estates) (Ward 3) .................................................................... 54 - 55
�
�
r
15. Variance Request, VAR #00-30, by East
Ranch Estates to Reduce the Side Yard
Setback for a Proposed Building and Parking
Area...................................................:................................... 56 - 63
16. Informal Status Report ....................................................................... 64
ADJOURN.
S
❑
r
t
��'��>-f�i;s C�`o�
.�
FRIDL�:Y CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
'�
mr oF
�
�;l�,.c 5-la; � %��.�Dp; ►'v� ,
�
The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its
services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, se�cual
orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with
disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activiries. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or
other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance.
(1"TD/572-3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ��
P�� a��,��e�
City Council Meeting of November 6, 2000
Special City Council Meeting of November 13, 2000
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Receive the Minutes from the Planning Commission
Meeting of November 1, 2000 ......... 1- 8
_ ��'J
2. Resolution Approving a Lot Split, LS #00 05, y
Irene and David Vasecka, to Split Property for e
Purpose of Creating Two Lots to Allow
Construction of Single Family Homes, Generally
Located at 5427 Fourth Street N.E.
(Ward 3) ........................................... 9 -16
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
Establish a Public Hearing for December 11,
2000, for the Local Law Enforcement Block
Grant................................................ 23 - 25
6. Appointment: City Employees ........... 26
7. Claims
8. Licenses
�
27
28 - 29
9. Estimates ......................................... 30 - 36
��
3. Resolution Authorizing and Directing the Spli ing\
of Special Assessments for the North Centra f
Business Park .................................. 17 - 19 ADOPTION OF AGENDA. �/ �, �S� `��,�, �r
r �� a�9P �c�
4. Resolution Approving Addendum No.
Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement
Council Agreement ..........................
� OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Consideration of items
j� not on Agenda —15 minutes.
1 t the �`�
20 -
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000 PAGE 2 4
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
10. Consideration of Moore Lake Hilis Neighborhood 15.
Street Improvement Project No. ST.
2001 —1 ................................... 37
%�� ��'7 � �� y� �-�t �8 ��
e �,��-'' :.�--
��/,�3 ;�.e.��, �� �-�-i�-� o ,-� r�.,� � p ,
�a�/� �� � .r�,.� �r� �p,
11. Consideration Springbrook Creek Channelization
Project No. 335 ..... .. . ...................... 38
P��%i�.B �� �,-s �
�� 1 "..� �-nY..-��'��l.t%.�-" {�.yC..0 : J l
12.
Variance Request, VAR #00-30, by East
Ranch Estates to Reduce the Side Yard
Setback for a Proposed Building and Parking
Area.................................... 56 - 63
� ��� t'd. fd^�Q..-- r,J �
°,� � �s-�
A-�-�/�-, a�,��,�� � � ���
16. Informal Status Report ........................ 64
�'�-�#'L� t'✓l {�.�G('�`��
�L �� �r/1 v�p �Q-�„" . i�,
SP�
,��;� b,�. a�.
Consideration of an Ordinance Concerning ADJOURN.
Manufactured Home Parks and Requiring Owners �,��
to Pay Relocation Expenses to Displaced '
Residents upon Park Closure ............. 39 - 48
�'� `� � ��'��
� ' �' °� � ����='� ��
��r�.
� Q 1 � ���c; v� i �-i-f-c�� � �� GEa�e. � �; �"�1
��� �'�e���.. (�.:�,' (�er� (�n�,
13. Consideration of a Rezoning, ZOA #00-02, by
East Ranch Estates to Rezone Property from
C-3, General Shopping, to C-2, General Business,
Generally Located at the Northwest Corner of
University Avenue and Osborne Road N.E.
(Waru 3 � ........ ......................... 49 - 53
�, ca�) "�.�� �;S (� o �`-c,�`
NEW BUSINESS:
14. First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the City Code
of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, by Making a Change
in Zoning Districts (Rezoning, ZOA #00-02, by East
Ranch Estates) (Ward 3) .................... 54 - 55
W -! ���'�''� '� �U-�- (%`� l � �'��( �S �5�
� � ��.� ����.
� � �- �� � � � ��
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL
OF NOVEMBER 6, 2000
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Jorgenson at
7:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
� Mayor Jorgenson led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flaa.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayar Jorgenson, Councilmember Barnette, Councilmember
Billings, and Councilmember Bolkcom
MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilmember Wolfe
STATEMENT OF MEETING CONDUCT:
Please be reminded that those present at today's meeting may hold a variety of views and
opinions regarding the business to be conducted. The exercise of democracy through
representative local government requires that ALL points of view be accommodated at these
proceedings. It is further expected that a standard of mutual courtesy and respectfulness be
exercised by all in attendance, through our individual expression, manner of speaking, and
conduct. Therefore, please receive the view•s of others with the same degree of courtesy and
respect which you desire to be given your views and opinions. Any departures from this
standard will be addressed by the Presiding Officer through whatever means are deemed
appropriate. Thank you for your attendance at today's meeting, and your agreement to abide by
these standards of personal conduct.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to approve the proposed consent agenda. Seconded by
Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
.
Citv Council Meeting of October 23, 2000.
APPROVED.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 6, 2000 PAGE 2
OLD BUSINESS:
1. VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #00-25, BY KMS MANAGEMENT, TO ALLOW
THE CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE, GENERALLY LOCATED
AT 7805-7895 EAST RIVER ROAD (WARD 3):
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the Appeals Commission unanimously
recommended approval of this sign variance request at River Pointe Apartments located
on East River Road, just south of 79`" Way. Two one-sided "area identification" signs are
proposed on either side of the main entrance as opposed to having just one two-sided
sign, as required by code. The previous River Pointe sign had to be removed as a result
of the County's need for additional right-of-way for the East River Road improvement
project which also included installation of a bike path. The improvement project forced a
reconfiguration of the apartment's entrance design such that a conforming sign in a center
median was no longer possible. The size of the signs conforms to ordinance
requirements of 24 square feet each. Staff recommended Council's approval with the
following two stipulations: 1) The entrance signs shall not exceed a combined size of 48
square feet; and 2) The sign shall meet all setback requirements as shown on the survey
dated October 17, 2000.
ADOPTED VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #00-25.
2. MOTION TO APPROVE SNOW REMOVAL OPERATIONS POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FOR THE 2000 - 2001 SEASON:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the snow removal plan for this winter is the same
plan that we have been using for several years. It identifies the City's snow removal
equipment and procedures for different weather-related conditions. When there is a
snowstorm, the plan provides that snow removal crews will begin plowing when it stops
snowing. When a particularly heavy snowfall is anticipated, the City will begin plowing
collector streets (redline streets ) as soon as staff believes driving conditions have become
hazardous. In any event, collector streets are plowed first. When collector streets have
been plowed (within siY to eight hours), staff will proceed to plow local streets within ten
plowing districts. Four rotating starting points within each district have been identified.
Total time for snow removal, including the clearing of cul-de-sacs and improved alleys,
is twelve to sixteen hours. The Street Supervisor has responsibility for determining when
to call out staff for snow removal. The Police Department has responsibility for calling
the "on call" street employee to salt and sand whenever slippery conditions develop.
,
0
�,
Mr. Burns stated that when more than three employees are needed to salt and sand, the
decision to call out additional staff shall be made by the Public Works Superintendent. *
Residents are asked to help with snow removal by not parking vehicles on City streets
between November 1 and May 1 of each year between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and
6:00 a.m. Residents are also asked not to have vehicles on City streets during snow
removal operations. Staff recommended Council's approval.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 6, 2000 PAGE 3
APPROVED SNOW REMOVAL OPERATIONS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FOR THE 2000 - 2001 SEASON.
3. RESOLUTION NO. 104-2000 AUTHORIZING AN INCREASE IN
COMPENSATION AND CHANGES IN CERTAIN BENEFITS FOR THE 2001
CALENDAR YEAR:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this resolution provides for a three percent (3%)
cost-of-living adjustment for all full and part-time City employees who are not part of a
bargaining unit. This adjustment compares with CPI growth of 4.2 percent for the Twin
Cities mMetropolitan area during the past twelve months. Staff recommended Council's
approval.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 104-2000.
4. APPOINTMENT: CITY EMPLOYEE:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that staff recommended that Jon Haukaas be appointed
to the position of Acting Public Works Director effective October 30 through December
31, 2000; and as Public Works Director effective January 1, 2001. Jon has been
employed with the City since February 27, 1997, as the Assistant Public Works Director.
APPROVED THE APPOINTMENT OF JON HAUKAAS.
5. CLAIMS:
APPROVED CLAIM NOS. 96151 THROUGH 96348.
6. LICENSES:
APPROVED ALL LICENSES AS SUBMITTED AND AS ON FILE WITH THE
LICENSE CLERK.
7. ESTIMATES:
APPROVED ESTIMATES AS FOLLOWS:
Lametti & Sons, Inc.
16028 Forest Boulevard North
Hugo, MN 55038
Sanitary and Storm Sewer Repair
Project No. 329
FINAL ESTIMATE: $ 149,838.95
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 6 2000 PAGE 4
Ron Kassa Construction
6005 - 250�' Street East
Elko, NIN 55020
Miscellaneous Concrete Curb and Gutter and Sidewalk
Project No. 330
FINAL ESTIMATE:
W.B. Miller, Inc.
6701 Norris Lake Road N. W.
Elk River, MN 55330
Rice Creek Boulevard East Watermain Repair
Repair Project No. 334
FINAL ESTIMATE: .
Frederic W. Knaak, Esq.
Holstad and Knaak, P.L.C.
3535 Vadnais Center Drive
St. Paul, MN 55110
Services Rendered as City Attorney for the
Month of October, 2000
ADOpTION OF AGENDA:
$ 8,071.73
$ 28,881.34
$ 5,000.00
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to adopt the agenda. Seconded by Councilmember
Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGESNON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
OPEN FORUM,VISITORS:
No persons in the audience spoke.
8. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that a special meeting will be held on November 13. A
Conference meeting was scheduled for that date, but because of the Statement of Canvas for this
year's election, a Special Session is also needed.
,
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the Conference Meeting would be first.
Mr. Burns stated that the Special City Council meeting start at 7:00 p.m., followed by the
conference meeting.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 6, 2000 PAGE 5
Mayor Jorgenson to participate in the election tomorrow. She said if there is a question on where
to vote, residents should call the Municipal Center.
ADJOURN:
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilmember
Billings.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
NOVEMBER 6, 2000, CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:40 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Signe L. Johnson Nancy J. Jorgenson
Recording Secretary Mayor
THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF
NOVEMBER 13, 2000
The Special meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor
Jorgenson.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Jorgenson led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Jorgenson, Councilmember Barnette, Councilmember
Billings, Councilmember Wolfe and Councilmember Bolkcom.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to adopt the agenda as submitted. Seconded by
Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
NEW BUSINESS:
1. RECEIVE THE STATEMENT OF CANVASS FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
FROM THE 2000 GENERAL ELECTION.
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to receive the Statement of Canvass from the November 7,
2000, general election. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilmember
Bolkcom.
.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF NOVEMBER 13, 2000, ADJOURNED AT 7:10 P.M.
Respectfully submitted
Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk
Recording Secretary
Nancy J. Jorgenson
Mayor
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 1, 2000
CALL TO ORDER:
Vice-Chairperson Kondrick called the November 1, 2000, Planning Commission meeting to
order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Dave Kondrick, Barbara Johns, Dean Saba, Leroy Oquist, Larry Kuechle,
Connie Modig
Members Absent: Diane Savage.
Others Present: Paul Bolin, Planner
Irene and David Vasecka .
Marie Vasecka, Power of Attorney for Irene and David Vasecka
Bob Schroer, East Ranch Estates
Dan O'Brian, Architect for East Ranch Estates
APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 20. 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES:
MOTION by Ms. Johns, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to approve the September 20, 2000,
Planning Commission meeting minutes as presented. Seconded by Mr. Kuechle.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consideration of a Lot Split, LS #00-05, by Irene & David Vasecka, to separate into two
buildable Iots, generally Iocated at 5427 4`h Street NE.:
MOTION by Ms. Modig, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:32 P.M.
Mr. Bolin stated that the petitioners are requesting a lot split to split the property into two
buildable lots. Each lot will be 80 feet wide and 130 feet in depth. Code requires that single
family lots in the R-3 district have a minimum of 75 feet of frontage and a minimum total lot area
of 9,000 square feet. Each of these Iots will be 10,440 square feet.
Mr. Bolin stated that the petitioner has plans to place single family homes on both lots. Staff
recommends approval with stipulations as follows:
1. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction.
2. The grading and drainage plan shall be approved by City engineering staff prior to the
issuance of any building permits.
3. The petitioner shall provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment
systems located on the site are properly capped or removed.
4. The petitioner shall pay the required park fees prior to issuance of building permits.
5. The petitioner shall pay all water and sewer connection fees.
�
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 1, 2000 PAGE 2
6. The petitioner shail agree to preserve mature trees to the extent possible. All trees required
to be removed for the new house shall be marked and approved by City Staff prior to
issuance of building permits.
Mr. Bolin stated that stipulation #6 pertains to saving the larger trees on the lot that are not in
the way of construction for the home and driveway.
Mr. Kuechle asked if the grading and drainage stipulation is because of any problems on the lot.
Mr. Bolin stated that it is standard to make sure all properties are maintaining water on their own
sites rather than creating problems for neighbors. There are no special drainage problems on
these properties. It will create water flowage away from the homes because the property is
relatively flat.
Ms. Modig asked if stipulation #6 was going to be standard.
Mr. Bolin stated that since the subdivision on Benjamin and Gardena, it has been consistently
placed on properties. :
The petitioner, Marie Vasecka, stated that she has Power of Attorney for her mother and father,
Irene and David Vasecka.
Mr. Kondrick asked if she had any problems with the stipulations.
Ms. Vasecka asked what staff was specifically looking for with the grading and drainage
stipulation. This property is affected by the grading and drainage of the properties around it.
There are apartments behind this property on a higher level with a paved alleyway behind it.
The water from the paved alleyway tends to rush over onto this property. The downspouts on
the house to the south are draining onto this prope�ty. What does the City have in mind for the
properties around this so they do not drain onto this property?
Mr. Bolin stated that with the existing alleyway, there is probably not a lot that can be done.
Grading of the property is necessary so the water is not flowing against the home.
Ms. Vasecka stated that they cannot grade back to where the water is coming from.
Mr. Bolin stated that she would need to speak with the City's engineers on that. There is quite a
drop there from the alleyway down to the property.
Ms. Vasecka asked who they should talk to about the neighbors on the south side because their
downspouts should not be draining. There has been a change in ownership from when there
was an existing building on that property.
Mr. Bolin stated that he could take care of that.
Ms. Vasecka stated that the existing well has been capped when they took the other building
down. Does stipulation #3 still need to be in here?
Mr. Bolin stated that they could keep it as a stipulation; but if the City could receive a record of
it, it would meet the requirement.
Ms. Vasecka asked if stipulation #4 regarding the park fees was standard.
2
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 1, 2000 PAGE 3
Mr. Kondrick stated, yes, that is standard.
Ms. Vasecka stated that these would be prefabricated houses with a full basement meeting ail
the requirements. They do �ot have a problem with #6, but her parents worked for years and
years to grow the trees on their property and she can guarantee that no trees will be cut down
that do not have to be.
Mr. Kondrick stated they have to add that stipulation because some people do not have the
attitude of preserving trees.
Ms. Vasecka asked if people have to go through the variance process if they have less than a
35 foot setback. They would like a 25 foot setback because of the cost of paving and other
things. The further those houses can be brought up, the less impact this will have on them.
Mr. Bolin stated that 35 feet is the required setback. City Council recently discussed reducing
this to 25 feet, but the Council has not yet officially acted on this reduction.
Mr. Kondrick asked Ms. Vasecka when they are planning to buitd.
Ms. Vasecka stated that they are still in the negotiation process for the actual final cost of the
houses and talking to contractors about the foundation. They would like to do this in the winter.
Mr. Oquist stated that the front yard setback will probably will not be changed until January with
the final approval.
Mr. Bolin stated that was correct.
Mr. Kondrick stated that they may want to apply for a variance.
Ms. Vasecka stated that they might do that.
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Johns, to close the public hearing. Seconded by Ms.
Johns.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED _
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 7:45 P.M.
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve LS #00-05 with stipulations
recommended by Staff as follows:
1. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction.
2. The grading and drainage plan shall be a
3. The petitioner shall provide proof that any pproved by City engineering staff prior to the
issuance of any building permits. existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems
1 located on the site are properly capped or removed.
4. The petitioner shall pay the required park fees prior to issuance of building permits.
, 5. The petitioner shall pay all water and sewer connection fees.
6. The petitioner shall agree to preserve mature trees to the extent possible. All trees required
to be removed for the new house shall be marked and approved by City Staff prior to
issuance of building permits.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
�
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 1, 2000 PAGE 4
Mr. Bolin stated that will go to City Councii on November 20.
2. PUBLIC HEARING:
Consideration of a Rezoning, ZOA #00-02, by East Ranch Estates, to rezone property
from C-3, General Shopping to C-2, General Business, generally located at the
northwest corner of University Avenue and Osborne Road.
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Johns, to open the public hearing. Seconded by
Ms. Johns.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
TFIE MOTIOY CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING �VAS OPENED AT 7:47 P.M.
Mr. Bolin stated that the petitioner is requesting a rezoning to rezone the turnback parcel from
C-3, General Shopping (which is really for multi-tenant type buildings) down to C-2, General
Business zoning. The petitioner would like to construct a new commercial building at 7610
University Avenue. The property at one time was part of the larger property to the west. The
turnback parcel was created when the frontage road went through. Only one other similar site,
the Midas site, is still zoned C-3. The current building will be demolished. The petitioner has
gone to the Appeals Commission seeking two variances. One is to reduce a parking setback
from 20 feet to 5 feet along the University Avenue right-of-way side that extends all the way to
the west of the bike path. It is a fairly narrow strip. The other variance is along the frontage
road to reduce the setback of the building from 35 feet to 4 feet.
Mr. Bolin stated that the Appeals Commission recommended approval of the two variances.
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning with the following stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall submit written verification that all tanks have been removed and all soil
remediation comple:ed.
2. All development over the easement area including: landscaping, driveways, parking
surfaces, architectural features, etc. must be approved by an appropriate St. Paul
Watervvorks personnel prior to commencement of construction.
3. Appropriate signage and pavement striping shall be provided on site to eliminate conflicts for
motorists entering and exiting the site.
4. Additional cosmetic enhancements shall be made to the rear of the building so that it does
not appear as a rear of the building that has a prominent position along the service drive.
Enhancements to be reviewed and approved by Staff, prior to issuance of the building
permit.
5. All building doors must meet all applicable building codes.
Mr. Bolin stated that the rezoning and the variance requests will go to the City Council on
November 20.
Ms. Modig asked if St. Paul Waterworks normally signs off on these.
Mr. Bolin stated that they have done this in the past.
Mr. Kondrick asked if it goes down the full north side of Osborne all the way down to the river.
Mr. Bolin stated, yes. They have certain precautions for anything being constructed over the
easement. It adds expense to build over the top of it.
�
f
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 1, 2000 PAGE 5
The petitioner, Bob Schroer, East Ranch Estates, stated there are two big water mains in the
easement rather than one. The architect has done a good job in trying to figure out how to put a
building on this cumbersome lot. They have had Phase 1 and 2 soil tests completed and
received a clearance that there was no danger.
Mr. Kondrick asked if Mr. Schroer had any problems with stipulations.
Mr. Schroer stated he had no problems with the stipulations.
Dan O'Brian, architect, stated that because of the proximity of the rear wall to the property line,
there are code restrictions to those doors. Enhancements will be to probably add pilasters and
awnings to dress it up.
Mr. Oquist asked if it was going to be commercial or restaurant.
Mr. Schraur stated it would be commercial retail.
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Modig, to •close the public hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Modig.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 8:00 P.M.
Mr. Oquist stated that stipulation #5 should just say that the project shall meet all building
codes.
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Johns, to recommend approval of ZOA #00-02 with
stipulations as amended:
1. The petitioner shall submit written verification that all tanks have been removed and all soil
remediation completed.
2. All development over the easement area including: landscaping, driveways, parking
surfaces, architectural features, etc. must be approved by an appropriate St. Paul
Waterworks personnel prior to commencement of construction.
3. Appropriate signage and pavement striping shall be provided on site to eliminate conflicts for
motorists entering and exiting the site.
4. Additional cosmetic enhancements shall be made to the rear of the building so that it does
not appear as a rear of the building that has a prominent position along the service drive.
Enhancements to be reviewed and approved by Staff, prior to issuance of the building
permit.
5. The project shall meet all City applicable building codes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
i THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
, Mr. Kondrick stated this will go to Council on November 20.
3. REMOVAL OF TREES ON THE GATEWAY EAST SITE•
Mr. Bolin stated there have been a number of complaints from neighborhood residents with
children loitering on the property. A number of trees on this site will need to be removed for the
construction of the townhomes. The HRA would like to go in and remove these trees. In order
5
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 1, 2000 PAGE 6
to �emove trees under Section 510 of the City Code, the City needs the Parks and Recreation
committee approval, Planning Commission, and City Council approval.
Mr. Kondrick stated he did not have any prob�em with it.
Ms. Johns asked if they would plant more trees to replace some of these.
Mr. Bolin stated a full landscape plan submitted with a lot more trees on this site.
Mr. Kondrick stated that it would probably be a marked improvement if this happens.
Ms. Johns asked if there are a lot of mature trees on the site.
Mr. Bolin stated that are a lot of mature trees to be taken down, but they will all be replaced
through the landscaping plan.
Mr. Kuechle asked if the Rapid Oil facility will be taken down.
Mr. Bolin stated that it will not be taken down.
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the removal of trees on the
Gateway East site.
UPON A VOICE VOTE ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. APPROVE THE 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATES:
MOTION by ti1r. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Johns, to approve the 2001 Planning Commission
dates.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
OTHER BUSINESS:
5. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 13� 2000. APPEALS COMMISSION
MEETING:
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 11 2000 PARKS AND RECREATION �
COMMISSION MEETING:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
�
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 1, 2000 PAGE 7
7. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 27 2000 APPEALS COMMISSION
MEETING:
MOTION by Mr. Kuechie, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 19 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING:
MOTION by Ms. Johns, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
9. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 7 2000, HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING:
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to receive the minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
10. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 2 2000 PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION MEETING:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to receive the minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 11 2000 APPEALS COMMISSION
I�tEETING:
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
12. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 5 2000. HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING:
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to adjourn the meeting.
7
�
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 1, 2000 PAGE 8
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL UOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE NOVEMBER 1, 2000, PLANNING COMMISSION WAS
ADJOURNED AT 8:12 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
� �i.
Sign L. Johns �
Recording Secretary
E��
I•
1 AGENDA ITEM
� CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
CfTY OF
FRIDLEY
Date: 11 /09/00
To: William Burns, City Manager �`_
�
From: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Paul Bolin, Planner
RE: Planning Commission action on LS #00-05 M-00-188
INTRODUCTION
Irene & David Vasecka, petitioner's, are seeking to split the residential property
located at 5427 4th Street NE into 2 buildable lots. Both lots, ifi the split is granted,
would meet all zoning code requirements for lot size.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
At the November 1, 2000 Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held
for LS #00-05. A motion was made to approve Lot Split, LS #00-05, to allow the
property located at 5427 4`h Street to be split into two lots.
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the planning commission
and grant the proposed Lot Split, LS #00-05, with stipulations as presented.
1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to construction.
2. Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City's engineering staff prior to
the issuance of any building permits, in order to minimize impacts to the
surrounding properties.
3. Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems
located on the site are properly capped or removed.
4. Petifioner to pay required park fees prior to issuance of building permits.
5. Petitioner to pay all water and sewer connection fees.
�
Memorandum
s. The petitioner shall agree to preserve mature trees to the extent possible. All
trees required to be removed for the new homes shall be marked and approved
by City staff prior to issuance of building permits.
i
10
RESOLUTION NO. -2000
RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT SPLIT, LS #00-05, BY IRENE & DAVID VASECKA
TO SPLIT PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING TWO LOTS TO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5427 4�'
STREET NE.
I„ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 1,
2000, and recommended approval of said lot split; and
. WHEREAS, the City Council approved the lot split at the November 20,
2000, meeting with stipulations attached as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the lot split has been attached as Exhibit B.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council approves the lot
split and directs the petitioner to record plat at Anoka County within
six months of this approval or such approval shall be null and void.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
20th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2000.
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
,s
11
NANCY J. JORGENSON - MAYOR
Page 2- Resolution -2000 - VASECKA LOT SPLIT
EXHIBIT A
1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to construction.
2. Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City's engineering staff prior to the
issuance of any building permits, in order to minimize impacts to the surrounding
properfies.
3. Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located
on the sife are properly capped or removed.
4. Petitioner to pay required park fees prior to issuance of building permits.
5. Petitioner to pay all water and sewer connection fees.
6. The petitioner shall agree to preserve mature trees to the extent possible. All trees
required to be removed for the new homes sP�all be marked and approved by City
staff prior to issuance of building permits.
12
�
•
s
EI�IIBIT B `
SLRII�Y fOR� Mr. av� Grtso� ' '��l+�6:�stedafs;•�Aa�
' ' w�anwrrurrwr�trr�s `
r+ur�awr.w.Mw,.�w�
. (612)�21-f12b • .
' �f�t�vr�w000uw� ' �wv�e�CwKfn
Dt3QIPrION: tots 2t, 13, 2o aaC 23, l2oek tf, �
IIMl2LYON5 ADb1ilOM TO 1�CMAMICS�RLLC� . ..
Cic� e[ irtAlay, itqok� Gu�er� !lin�s�o��.
o Daneces lron Mo�u�eats oa d�aot�d (wlov. .
����� �f
� .�G.•/ ;� 0.'/wr.+H
- - 1 jo. so - _
•-:..
4 �
e �
� � � �
� I
, ;� 1
� 1, .
� ti
., �
�
' Q
o� ► : �L' ' �.
V�, ° ,; � , ' o
� v
� �...
�3 ` ` .
�, �
Y
I 4
' 3
I ''�
• h
♦ ��
0
r
✓�� . . . �
� - -- _ ti - -
� � �2 b
i
��
�i.m
�
v
♦ I
���f
� �
l
�.�.,1 .
•M .
• ��
- ���o. S8 . .�.� ; :
�
t i �
± I M[ab� te[t1[y [!ut tAts •nrvc�,w�i prepared 0� ss or und�r q dtt�ce ` r
��pesvisioo aod chac 1 a. � dutr ��`t�ter�d lrol�t�ien�l L�ad 6u�veyoe
��ndar c vs of c1y •te ol ql�netat�. Dacea Septasb�r 11� 1997.
� ` ,y
, Nfnauota Lletn�t No. Jt247
� �
. �
13
City of Fridley Land Use Application
LS #00-05 November 1, 2000
GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION
Applicant:
Irene & David Vasecka
1322 NE Monroe
Minneapolis, NIN 55432
Requested Action:
Lot Split
Purpose:
To split property into two buildable lots.
Existing Zoning:
Residential - 3
Location:
5427 4`h. Street NE
Size:
20,880 square feet .48 acres
Existing Land Use:
Vacant
Surrounding Land Use & Zoning:
N: Single Family & R-3
E: Multi-Family & R-3
S: Multi-Family & R-3
W: Multi-Family & R-3
Comprehensive Plan Conformance:
Consistent with Plan
Zoning Ordinance Conformance:
Sec. 205.07.03.A requires a lot area of
9,000 sq. ft. for single family lots.
Zoning History:
Land has been vacant, zoned R-3
Legal Description of Property:
Lot 22-25, Block 11, Hamilton's Addition
to Mechanicsville
Council Action / 60 Day Date:
11/20/00 / 11/28/00
Public Utilities:
Water and sewer are available at the site.
Transportation:
Site will be accessed by 4`h Street.
Physical Characteristics:
Vacant, covered with grass, oak trees. Lot
is approximately 3' lower than alley.
SUV1'VIARY OF PROJECT
Petitioner is requesting to split these 4 lots into two
80' wide parcels of 10,400 sq. ft. in size. Petirioner
intends to construct a single family home on one of
the parcels & a 3-unit building on the other.
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
City Staff recommends approval of the lot split
reqz�est, with stipaclations.
• Both lots exceed minimum lot size
requirements.
• Both lots exceed minimum lot frontage.
• Provides additional housing units for City.
Staff Report Prepared by: Paul Bolin
14
.
LS #00-05
Analvsis
irene & David Vasecka, petitioner's, are seeking to split the property located at 5427 4`h
Street NE into 2 buildable lots.
Fridley requires that single family lots in the R-3 district be a minimum of 75' in width with a
minimum total lot area of 9,000 square feet. The proposed Lots will each be 80' in width
and 10,440 square feet in size after the split.
The petitioners intend to build a home on one of the lots and a three-plex on the other. The
property is zoned R-3, general multiple units, and the lot size would allow a three-plex on
either of these lots. A lot width of 75' and a lot size of 10,000 sq. ft. are required for a
three-plex.
(Photos: Left, northerly lot; Right, southerly lot.)
Staff Recommendation
City Staff recommends approval of this lot split request, with stipulations.
• Lots exceed minimum size requirements.
• Does provide additional homeownership opportunities for Fridley residents.
Stipulations
City Staff recommend that the following stipulations be placed upon approval of this
request
1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to construction.
2. Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City's engineering staff prior to the
issuance of any building permits, in order to minimize impacts to the surrounding
properties.
3. Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located
on the site are properly capped or removed.
15
4. Petitioner fo pay required park fees prior to issuance of building permits.
5. Petitioner to pay all water and sewer connection fees.
6. The petitioner shall agree to preserve mature trees to the extent possible. All trees
required to be removed for the new homes shall be marked and approved by City staff
prior to issuance of building permits.
7. Three-plex shall meet all parking requirements.
16
r
�
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
�
TO: WII.LIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ��
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIItECTOR
RESOLUTION SPLTTTING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR TIiE
PROPERTIES AT THE NORTH CENTRAL BUSINESS PARK
November 13, 2000
On September 12, 2000 the City Council approved resolution #67-2000 which approved a replat for
CSM Properties at the Northco Business Park. Attached is a resolution splitting the assessments that
are currently owing on the original pazcel and applying them to the new parcels.
RDP/sf
Attachment
17
RESOLUTION NO. - 2000
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE NORTH CENTRAL BUSINESS PARK.
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the replat of the North Central Business Park on September 12,
2000; and
WHEREAS, the parcels being replated have certain special assessments levied against them.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby splits
the assessments for Lot l, Block 1, Northco Business Park 5`h Addition into Lot 1 and 2, Block 1,
North Central Business Park as noted on the attached copy, which is made a part hereof, and adopts
the assessments for the parcels as noted on the attached copy.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY TI� CITY COUNCIL OF TF� CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS _ DAY
OF 2000.
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
1���
NANCY J. JORGENSON - MAYOR
� .
Project
Water, Sanitary Sewer & Storm
Sewer Improvement Project
5000-0188-00
Street Improvement Project
73rd Avenue - Symphony to
Baker Street
6000-1991-02
2000-1 Street Improvement
Project
ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
NORTH CENTRAL BUSINESS PARK
Original PIN No.
11-30-24-42-0008
Northco Drive
11-30-24-42-0008
Northco Drive
11-30-24-42-0008
Northco Drive
19
Assessment
Remaining
Balance
$14,3
$ 3,030.26
$ 6,059.33
New PIN No.
11-30-24-31-0025
11-30-24-42-0010
11-30-24-31-0025
11-30-24-42-0010
11-30-2431-0025
11-30-24-42-0010
Split Assessme:
Remaining
Balance
$ 4,7��
$ 9,638.44
$ 993.93
$ 2,03633
$ 1,987.46
$ 4,071.87
�
�
GTY OF
FRIDLEY
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
WILLIAM W. BURNS CITY MANAGER �
� �
DAVE SALLMAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY
NOVEMBER 15, 2000
JOINT LAW ENFORCEMENT COUNCIL
Attached is a resolution regarding a proposed amendment to the Anoka County Joint Law
Enforcement Council Joint Law Enforcement Council Agreement (see letter from County
Attorney Robert M. Johnson.) The agreement adds the Cities of St. Francis and Centerville
to the Joint Law Enforcement Council. It also changes the representation of the county. A
copy of the agreement and the addendum are included in the packet.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution and execution of the addendum agreement.
�
�
r
�
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING ADDENDUM #1 TO THE
ANOKA COUNTY JOINT LAW ENFORCEMENT COUNCIL
AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, this AGREEMENT ADDENDUM is made by and between the County of Anoka,
the Cities of Anoka, Blaine, Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbia Heights, Coon Rapids, Fridley,
Lexington, Lino Lakes, Ramsey, St. Francis, and Spring Lake Park, and the Circle Pines-
Lexington-Centerville Joint Municipal Police Commission; and
WHEREAS, in 1970, the Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council was formed by a joint
powers agreement and was modified by an agreement executed in 1982 to add a number of cities
in Anoka County; and
WHEREAS, the county, cities, and police commission named above (herein "parties") wish to
enter into this agreement addendum to amend the Joint Law Enforcement Council Agreement in
order to add the Cities of Centerville and St. Francis as parties to the agreement, and to make
other appropriate amendments to the parties' agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley approves
Addendum No. 1 to the Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council Agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2000.
�:����I.�AI
DEBRA A. SKOGEN-CITY CLERK
21
NANCY J. JORGENSON-MAYOR
ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY
_ ROBERT M.A. JOHNSON
Government Center • 2100 Third Avenue • Anoka, MN 55303-2265
attorney @co.anoka.mn.us
Administration / Civil Division Criminal Division / Investigation Division
Family Law & Mental Health Division Juvenile Division / Victim-Witness Services
(763)323-5550 (763)323-5586
(763)422-7589 Fax (763)422-7524 Fax
October 25, 2000
TO: Fridley City Council
FROM: Robert M. A. Johnson, Chair
Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council
RE: Joint Powers Agreement
The Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council is proposing several changes to the joint powers
agreement creating the Council. Substantively, the agreement adds the cities of Centerville and St.
Francis to the Council. It also changes the representation of the county to provide for two
representatives appointed upon recommendation ofthe sheriffand two county commissioners. The
other chanJes in the addendum are intended to better conform the joint powers agreement to existing
law.
In order to place these proposed changes in context, I am enclosing a copy of the 1982 agreement,
a draft addendum showing the changes, and a signature copy of the addendum. If the City Council
approves the addendum, please execute the clean signature copy and return it to the Office of the
County Attorney at the above address.
RMAJ:ds
Encs.
22
Affirmative Action / Equai Opportunity Employer
,
Purpose Area I- Local Law Enforcement Block Grant - 2000
Proposed Expenditures
Item
Squad Rifles
Laser Sights
Taser Electronic
Incapacitation Device
Plastic Squad
Back Seat
Crime View
Mapping Program
Traffic Squad
Amount Purpose
$3,000 High Risk Tactical Operations
$7,548 , High Risk Tactical Operations
$6,200 Non-Lethal Take Down Device
$4,000 Squad Car, Room and Safety
$3,000 Tracking Crime Trends for a
more effective response.
$1,200 Squad car outfitted specific
to traffic enforcement.
24
.
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
CITY COUNCIL
Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley City Council at
the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Monday, December 11,
2000, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of:
Consideration of proposed expenditures for the 2000 Local
Law Enforcement Block Grant. Proposed expenditures have
been limited to the purchase of equipment as designated in
Purpose Area I of the seven possible areas.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above-
stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to Myra I.
Harris, Special Projects Coordinator at 763-572-3638.
Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter, or other persons
with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should co�tact Roberta Collins at (763)
572-3500. The TDD number is 763-572-3534.
Publish: November 23, 2000
November 30, 2000
25
Nancy J. Jorgenson
Mayor
�
a
CfiY OF
FRIDLEY
Name
Burton
Dahlquist
Jeffrey
Guest
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
Position
Lead Liquor
Store Clerk
Non-exempt
Patrol Officer
Partial Exempt
Appointment
Starting Starting
Sa1aN Date
$10.94 Nov. 27,
perhour 2000
$15.04 Dec. 4,
per hour 2000
��
Reqlaces
Jane
Oster
Andrew
Johnson
�
. �
�
.
` AGENDA ITEM
COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
CLAIMS
96349 - 96738
27
�
f
GT1f OF
FRIDLEI(
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
LICENSES
Type of License: B�
FOOD SALES LICENSE
Papa Murphy's Dennis Oeltjen
Take `N' Bake Pizza
205 57th Ave NE
Fridley, MN 55432
GENERAL CONTRACTOR-COMMERCIAL
Columbus Exteriors Inc
2131 111 Lane NW
Coon Rapids MN 55433 Lary Columbus
Green Valley Landscaping & Construction
5378 193 St W
Farmington MN 55024 Lisa Moretto
Merit Building Company
3029 Coon Rapids Blvd
Coon Rapids MN 55433 David Mau
Qwest Wireless LLC
426 N Fairview Ave #101
St Paul MN 55104 Jesse Ness
GENERAL CONTRACTOR-RESIDENTIAL
Eastwood Construction Inc (20218577)
182 A Ryan Lane
Little Canada MN 55117 Kevin Pollari
Ford Dwayne Contractor (20093308)
4830 104 Ln NE
Circle Pines MN 55014 Dwayne Ford
K-Designers (20138685)
3810Hwy13W
Burnsville MN 55337 Dan Schaefer
:
Approved By: Fees:
Community Development $45
Fire Inspector
Public Safety
RON JULKOWSKI
Building Official
Same
Same
Same
STATE OF MINN
Same
Same
�
,
,
Type of License:
SIGN ERECTOR
Eller Media Company
3225 Spring St NE
Minneapolis MN 55413
LICENSES (CONTINUED)
�
Matt Olson
29
Approved By:
RON JULKOWSKI
Building Official
/
f
CITY OF
FRIDLEI(
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
ESTIMATES
Julian M. Johnson Construction Corp.
6190 Industry Avenue N.W.
Anoka, MN 55303
Heather Hills Watermain Looping Project No. 33'1
FINALESTIMATE : .........................................................................................
30
$11,282.00
.
�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DMSION
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Fridley
c% William W. Burns, City Manager
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, N1N 55432
Council Members:
November 20, 2000
CERTIi�iCATE OF THE ENGINEER
We hereby submit the Final Estimate for Heather Hills Watermain Looping Project No. 331, for
Julian Johnson Construction Corporation, 6190 Indnstry Ave NW, Anoka, MN 55303.
s We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of Heather Hills Watermain Looping
Project No. 331 and find that the same is substantially complete in accordance with the contract
documents. I recommend that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable
Body and that the one year contractual maintenance bond commence on November 17, 2000.
Respectfully submitted,
��
Jon H. Haukaas
Acting Director of Public Works
JT:cz
Prepared by
Checked by
31
n
u
November 20, 2000
To: Public Works Director
City of Fridley
REPORT ON FINAL INSPECTION FOR
CITY OF FRIDLEY
HEATHER ffiLLS WATERMAIN LOOPING PROJECT NO. 331
We, the undersigned, have inspected the above-mentioned project and find that the work required by the
contract is substantially complete in conformity with the plans and specifications of the project.
All deficiencies have been conected by the contractor. Also, the work for which the City feels the
contractor should receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the contractor.
So, therefore, we recommend to you that the City approve the attached FINAL ESTIl�IATE for the
contractor and the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the day of the final inspecrion that being
November 17. 2000.
32
Jo.a wais, ��bl,� wo��s �,r4,�(a..
1 `��' ►'� _
ontractor R sentative, (Title)
November 20, 2000
City of Fridley
HEATHER HII.LS WATERMAIN LOOPING PROJECT NO. 331
CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR
This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certified herein have beenactually
furnished and done for the above-mentioned projects in accordance with the plans and specifications
heretofore approved. The final contract cost is $11,282.00 and the final payment of $11,282.00 for the
improvement project would cover in full, the contractor's claims against the City for all labor, materials
and other work down by the contractor under this project.
•
I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct.
Julian M. Johnson Construction Corporation
erald So itzky, oject oordinator
33
November 20, 2000
City of Fridley
HEATHER HILLS WATERMAIN LOOPING PROJECT NO. 331
PREVAII.ING WAGE YERIFICATION
This is to certify that Julian M. Johnson Construction Corporation has abided by the Prevailing Wage
Provisions as specified by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for Anoka County.
I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and conect.
Jalian M. Johnson Constrnction Corporation
•
Gerald oln , Project Coordinator
34
FROM: City of Fridley
Engineering Division
TO: Honorabie Mayor and City Council
City of Fridley
6431 University Ave, NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Dated: November 20, 2000
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
Estimate No. FINAL
Period Ending: November 17, 2000
For. Julian M. Johnson Construction Corp.
6190 Industry Avenue NW
Anoka MN 55303
HEATHER HILLS WATERMAIN LOOPING
PROJECT NO. 331
Job Code:
STATEMENT OF WORK
.�,;.,. , ..�
;. �,
.,_�,`
��:,�;� n
Fumish and install &in. Class 52 275 LF 25.00 270.00 6,750.00 270.00 6,750.00
Watermain including appu�tenances,
connection to existing and testing
Fumish and install 6-in. gate valve & box 2 Each 515.00 2.00 1,030.00 2.00 1,030.00
6-in. 45 degree bend 2 Each 167.00 3.00 501.00 3.00 501.00
6-in. 22-1/2 degree bend 4 Each 158.00 2.00 316.00 2.00 316.00
1-in. corporation cock for air bleed and 1 Each 100.00 1.00 100.00 1.00 100.00
pressure testing
Remove tree 8 Each 235.00 11.00 2,585.00 11.00 2,585.00
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
35
$11,282.00
$11,282.00
Julian M. Johnson Construction Corp
EsGmate No. FINAL
Page 2
SUMMARY:
Original Contract Amount
Contract additions:
Contract deductions:
Revised contract amount
Value Completed To Date
Amount Retained (0%)
Less Amount Paid Previously
AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE
CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR
$10,851.00
10,851.00
11,282.00
0.00
0.00
511,282.00
I hereby certify that the work performed and the materials supplied to date Under the terms of the contract
for this project, and all authorized changes thereto, have an actuat value under the contract of the amounts
shown on is estimate (and final quantities on the final estimate are coRect), and that this estimate is just
and corr of th Amount Due This Estimate" has been received.
By �
Con actor's Autho d Representative (Title)
CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER
I hereby certify that I have prepared or examined this estimate, and that the contractor is entitled to payment
of this estimate under the contract for reference project.
� CITY OF FRIDLEY, INSPECTOR
By
Ch�
!r 1';
Date <<—� 4" d O
Respe Ily Submitted,
___---o-i�1/�_
Jon H. Haukaas, P.E.
Acting Pubiic Works Director
�
`
CITY OF
FRIDLEY
TO:
�i�
DATE:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
William W. Burns, City Manager .�� I°
Jon H. Hau�kaas, Acting Public Works Director
November 20, 2000
PW00-141
SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Moore Lake Hills Neighborhood Street Improvement Project No.
ST. 2001-1 .
A neighborhood meeting was held on October 18, 2000 for the residents affected by the Moore Lake
Hills Neighborhood Street Improvement Project. Forty-five (45) people attended this meeting. The
project and proposed assessments were explained at that time. Assessments for this project are set
at a not-to-exceed price of $15.00 per front lineal foot for those properties not previously assessed for
concrete curb and gutter.
The public hearing for the Moore Lake Hills Street Improvement Project No. ST. 2001-1 was set for
November 20, 2000 by the City Council at their October 23, 2000 meeting.
JHH:cz
37
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager PW00-142
FROM: Jon H�I ukaas, Acting Public Works Director �
DATE: November 20, 2000
SUBJECI': Public Hearing on Springbrook Creek Channelizarion Project No. 335
A public hearing for the Springbrook Creek Channelization Project No. 335 was set for November 20,
2000 by the City Council at their October 23, 2000 meeting. As a result of discussions at the City
Council conference meeting, it has been decided to hold a neighborhood meeting to further explain
this project on November 28, 2000.
Recommend the City Council open the public hearing as scheduled but continue until the December
11, 2000 council meeting so all information regarding the project can be shared with the affected
residents.
JHH:cz
��
.
�
�
�
CfTY OF
FRIDLEY
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OFNOVEMBER 20, 2000
November 17, 2000
William Burns, City Manager ,�� �
r
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Grant Fernelius, Housing Coordinator
SUBJECT: Public Hearing Regarding Manufactured Home Park Closure
Ordinance
Introduction
As you are aware, in March of this year over 300 residents of Fridley's two
manufactured home parks signed a petition requesting that the City adopt a park
closure ordinance. The ordinance would essentially require an owner to pay
relocation benefits and/or other compensation in the event a park was ever
closed. By way of reference, at least nine other communities in the metro area
have adopted similar ordinances.
The purpose of the public hearing on Monday night is to receive input from the
affected parties. Upon conclusion of the hearing, staff would revise the
ordinance as directed by Council and schedule a first reading for December 18,
2000. Second and final reading would be scheduled for the first meeting in
January 2001.
Background and Public Input to Date
The proposed ordinance was drafted by staff after several meetings with the
park owners, their legal counsel and park residents. The meetings were held in
July and August of this year. Staff also reviewed several ordinances that were
adopted in other communities and interviewed key staff people.
The first draft of the ordinance was presented to the Council for review at the
October 16th conference meeting. As you recall, Geri Lynn a resident from
Fridley Terrace was present at that meeting and offered additional comments.
��=�
Manufactured Home Park Closure Ordinance
November 17, 2000
Page 2
The most current version of the ordinance includes the changes suggested by
the Council and Ms. Lynn at the October 16th meeting. A copy of the ordinance
is attached and a short summary is provided later in the memo. A copy of the
ordinance was mailed out to all of the residents and the owners on November 4,
2000 as part of the public hearing notice.
In the last few weeks, we have been contacted by Traci Tomas, manager of Park
Plaza Estates with suggested changes to the current draft; she has also
requested a meeting with staff prior to the hearing on Monday night. We have
not received any comments from the owners of Fridley Terrace which is the
larger park and is located on the west side of Highway 65. We also have not
received any further comments from Geri Lynn.
Summar.,r of Ordinance
The current draft includes the following provisions:
1. The park owner must provide a nine (9) month notice (e.g. Closure
Statement) to both the residents of the park and the City that the park
will be closed or converted to another Use. Under state law, the notice
must first be sent to the Planning Commission which in turn submits the
notice and request for public hearing to the City Council.
2. The City is required to conduct a public hearing to review the impact of
the proposed closure. Under both state law and the current draft
ordinance, the City has discretion in scheduling the public hearing,
however residents are not required to move until 60 days after the public
hearing has concluded.
3. The park owner is required to pay reasonable relocation costs to displaced
residents for relocation within a 25 mile radius of the park to be closed.
Reasonable relocation costs include: a) preparation for the move b) the
actual transportation cost to another site c) the hook-up charges at the
new site and d) the cost of insurance for the items to be moved. This
section was amended to include the cost to move sheds, decks, norches
and other "�purtenances" as requested by Ms. Lvnn.
.�
Manufactured Home Park Closure Ordinance
November 17, 2000
Page 3
4. In the event that a displaced owner either cannot or chooses not to �
relocate their home to another park, the purchaser of the park is required
to buy the home. The price to be paid is equal to the greater of the
assessed valuation for tax purposes or an independent third-parry
appraisal. The purchaser of the park is required to pay for the appraisal.
5. The ordinance entitles displaced renters (e.g. those who rent the home
and the lot) to relocation assistance. In this case, eligible costs include
actual expenses to move personal property, insurance for the items to be
moved and compensation if the new rent is greater than the old lot rent.
6. Requires displaced residents (both owners and tenants) to notify the park
owner in writing, within 90 days of initial closure notice, of the following:
Displaced Owners must elect either relocation costs (paid by the
park owner) for a move within 25 miles of the park to be closed OR
be compensation for the value of their home.
Displaced Tenants must indicate the cost of their relocation for
personal property and related expenses as outlined in Section 10.
7. Allows the owner to rescind their closure notice, but if done within 120
days of the initial closure notice, they must pay relocation
benefits/compensation to any residents that have already moved. This
section was amended to clarify the timing as requested by Ms. Lynn.
Park Plaza Res�onse
As mentioned earlier, the manager of Park Plaza Estates submitted a list of
suggested changes. A copy of their proposal is contained in the packet. In
summary, their substantive changes were as follows:
1. Delete references to displaced renters. In other words, this group of
people would not be assisted. (Subdivision 2- page 1)
2. The total amount of relocation assistance shall not exceed the value of the
home. (Subdivision 2 - page 3)
41
Manufactured Home Park Closure Ordinance
November 17, 2000
Page 4
3. Delete references to conditions of closing; in other words the owner is not
liable for any costs if the notice of closure is rescinded (no matter when).
(Subdivision 6 - page 3).
4. Modification to Subdivision 8(page 4) regarding the election to relocate.
In this case, if a displaced owner cannot move the home and elects not to
tender title to the unit, they will receive relocation compensation equal to
the average amount awarded to other displaced residents. The park
owner would be requi�ed to pay 50% of the amount within 10 days of the
application of funds and 50% upon removal of the unit.
5. Cap on Payments (new Subdivision 10 - page 6). The owner would only
be liable for total relocation/compensation up to 20% of the value of park.
6. Delete misdemeanor charge under penalty section (Subdivision 11 - page
6).
At this time, staff is still evaluating the changes suggested by Ms. Tomas and
does not have a recommendation. We need time to review these issues with the
City �ttorney, but may not have a response by the public hearing on Monday
night.
Next Ste�s
Based on the comments received on Monday night, staff is suggesting that the
City Council schedule the first reading for December 18, 2000. In the meantime,
staff can sort through the issues that are raised and bring a revised draft to the
Council for review on the 18th. We have also received some input from the
relocation consultant who worked on the Hopkins mobile home park closure in
1997-98 and would like to utilize his experiences in drafting a workable
ordinance.
Recommendation
Staff is recommending that the City Council conduct the public hearing on
November 20, 2000 to receive comments on the proposed Manufactured Home
Park Closure Ordinance and upon close of the hearing schedule first reading of a
revised ordinance for December 18, 2000. Second and final reading could be
scheduled for January 9, 2001.
M-00-194
42
** DRAFf ONLY **
CITY OF FRIDLEY
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS
AND RE�UIRING OWNERS TO PAY RELOCATION EXPENSES TO
DISPLACED RESIDENTS UPON PARK CLOSURE.
The City Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows:
Subdivision 1. Legislative Findings
In view of the peculiaz nature and problems presented by the ciosure or conversion of
manufactured home parks, the City Council finds that the public health, safety and
general welfare will be promoted by requiring compensation to displaced home owners
and renters of such pazks. The purpose of this ordinance is to require park owners to pay
displaced residents reasonable relocation costs arid purchasers of manufactured home
pazks to pay additional compensation, pursuant to the authority granted under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 327C.095.
Subdivision 2. Definitions
The following words and terms when used in this Ordinance shall have the following
meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
Closure Statement: A statement prepared by the pazk owner clearly stating the pazk
is closin„ addressing the availability, location and potential
costs of adequate replacement housing within a twenty-five
(2�) mile radius of the park that is closinJ and the probable
relocation costs of the manufactured homes located in the park.
Displaced Owner: A resident of an owner-occupied manufactured home who rents
a lot in a manufactured home park, including the members of
the resident's household, as of the date the park owner submits
a closure statement to the City's Planning Commission.
Displaced Renter: A resident of a renter-occupied manufactured home who rents
both the lot and the manufactured home in the manufactured
home park, including the members of the resident's household,
as of the date the park owner submits a closure statement to the
City's Planning Commission.
Displaced Resident:
Lot:
15L Draft: 10-16-2000
2nd DTaft: 10-27-2000
A displaced owner or displaced renter.
An area within a manufactured home park, designed and used
for the accommodation of a manufactured home.
43
** DRAFT ONLY **
Manufactured Home: A structure, not a�xed to or part of real estate, transportable in
one of more sections, which in the traveling mode, is eight (8)
feet or more in width or forty (40) feet or more in length, or,
when erected on site, is three hundred twenty (320) or more
squaze feet, and which is built on a permanent chassis and
designed to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent
foundation when connected to the required utilities, and
includes the plumbing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical
system contained in it.
Park Closure: A closure or conversion of a manufactured home park which
results in a reduction in the number of manufactured homes or
lots.
Pazk Owner: The owner of a manufactured home park and any person acting
on behalf of the owner in the operation or management of a
pazk.
Person: Any individual, corporation, firm, partnership, incorporated
and unincorporated association or any other legal or
commercial entity.
Purchaser: The person buying the manufactured home park from the park
owner. In the event that the park owner intends to retain
ownership and convert the park to a different use, all references
to the purchaser refer to the park owner.
Relocation Cost: The reasonable cost of relocating a manufactured home from a
manufactured home park within the City of Fridley that is
being closed or converted to another use to another
manufactured home park within a rivenry-five (2�) mile radius
of the park as follows:
1" Draft: 10-16-2000
2"a Draft: 10-27-2000
a. Preparation for Move. The reasonable costs incurred to
prepare the eligible manufactured home for transportation
to another site. This category includes crane services if
needed, but not the cost of wheel axles, tires, frame
welding or trailer hitches.
b. Transportation to Another Site. Reasonable costs incurred
to transport the eli?ible manufactured home park within a
twenty-five (25) mile radius. This category also includes
the cost of insuring the manufactured home park while the
home is in the process of being relocated, and the cost of
obtaining moving permits provided that the park owner
shall not be required to pay delinquent taxes on a
. .
'* DRAFT ONLY **
manufactured home if necessary in order to obtain a
moving permit. This category also includes the reasonable
cost of disassembling, moving, and reassembling sheds any
attached appurtenances, such as porches, decks, skirting,
and awnings, which were not acquired after the notice of
closure or conversion of the park.
c. Hook-up at New Location. The reasonable cost of
connecting the eligible manufactured home to utilities at
the relocation site, including crane services if needed. The
pazk owner shall not be required to upgrade the electrical or
plumbing systems of the manufactured home.
d. The cost of insurance for the replacement value of the
property being moved.
Relocation costs do not include the cost of any repairs or modifications to the
manufactured home needed to bring the home into compliance with the state and federal
manufactured home building standards for the year in which the home was constructed.
Relocation costs also do not include the cost of any repairs or modifications to the home
or appurtenances needed to bring the home or appurtenances into compliance with the
rules and regulations of the manufactured home park to which the manufactured home is
to be relocated, if those rules and regulations are no more strin�ent than the rules and
regulations of the park in which the home is located and the resident was notified of non-
compliance with the rules and regulations of the pazk in which it is located within sixty
(60) days pror to delivery of the closure statement.
Subdivision 3. Park Closure Notice
If a manufactured home park is to be closed, converted in whole or part to another use or
terminated as a use of the property, the park owner shall, at least nine (9) months prior to
the closure, conversion to another use or termination of use, provide a copy of a closure
statement to a resident of each manufactured home and to the Ciry's Planning
Commission.
Subdivision 4. Notice of Public Hearing
The City's Planning Commission shall submit the closure statement to the City Council
and request the City Council to schedule a public hearing. The City shall mail a notice at
least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing to a resident of each manufactured home in
the park stating the time, place and purpose of the hearing. The park owner shall provide
the City with a list of the names and addresses of at least one displaced resident of each
manufactured home in the park at the time the closure statement is submitted to the City's
Planning Commission.
Subdivision 5. Public Hearin�
15t Draft: 10-16-2000 3
2"a Draft: 10-27-2000
45
** DRAFT O1�iLY *'
A public hearing shall be held before the City Council for the purpose of reviewing the
closure statement and evaluating what impact the park closing may have on the displaced
residents and the pazk owner.
Subdivision 6. Conditions of Closing
If the pazk owner determines at least 120 days prior to the date of closure of the park that
the pazk will not be closed, the park owner may rescind the Notice of Closure and shall
not be liable for any relocation costs incurred by any of the manufactured home pazk's
residents. If the pazk owner determines within 120 days of the date of closure of the park
that the pazk will not be closed, the park owner may rescind the Notice of Closing, but
shall pay any actual relocation costs incurred by the manufactured home park's residents.
Subdivision 7. Displaced Residents Statement
Within ninety (90) days of receipt of a closure statement, a displaced resident shall do the
following:
a. Displaced Owners: A displaced owner shall provide the park
o�vner with a written statement of the relocation costs, or, in
the altemative, a written statement that the resident cannot
relocate his or her manufactured home to another manufactured
home park within a twenty-fine (25) mile radius or chooses not
to relocate his or her manufactured home. If a displaced owner
chooses not to relocate as defined within this Subdivision, the
displaced owner must state whether he or she elects to receive
relocation costs under Subdivision 8 or compensation under
Subdivision 9.
b. Displaced Renters: A displaced renter shall provide the park
owner with a written statement of their relocation costs as
defined in Subdivision 10.
Subdivision 8. Election to Relocate
a. After service of the closure statement by the park owner and
upon submittal by the displaced owner of a contract or other
verification of relocation expenses, the park owner shall pay to
the displaced owner the reasonable costs as defined in
Subdivision 2, of relocatin� the manufactured home to another
manufactured home park located within a twenty-five (25) mile
radius of the park that is being closed, converted to another
use, or ceasing operation.
b. If a displaced owner cannot relocate the manufactured home
1" Draft: 10-16-2000 =4
2°a Draft: 10-27-2000
46
** DRAFT ONLY **
within a twenty-five (25) mile radius of the pazk which is being
closed or some other agreed upon distance, and the displaced
owner elects not to tender title to the manufactured home, the
displaced owner is entitled to relocation costs as defined in
Subdivision 2, based upon an average of relocation costs
awarded to other displaced owners in the park.
c. A displaced owner compensated under this Subdivision shall
retain title to the manufactured home and shall be responsible
for its prompt removal from the manufactured home pazk.
d. The park owner shall make the payments under this section
directly to the person performing the relocation services after
performance thereof, or, upon submission of written evidence
of payment of relocation costs by a displaced owner, shall
reimburse the displaced owner for such costs.
e. The displaced owner must submit a contract or other verified
cost estimate for relocating the manufactured home to the park
owner as a condition to the park owner's liability to pay
relocation expenses.
Subdivision 9. Election to Receive Compensation
If a displaced owner chooses not to relocate the manufactured home within a 25-mile
radius of the park that is being closed or some other ajreed upon distance and tenders
title to the manufactured home, the displaced owner is entitled to compensation, to be
paid by the purchaser of the park in order to mitigate the advecse financial impact of the
park closin�. In such instance, the compensation shall be an amount equal to the
estimated market value or the tax assessed value of the manufactured home, whichever is
;reater, as determined by an independent appraiser experienced in mobile home appraisal
approved by the City Manager. The purchaser shall pay the cost of the appraisal. The
purchaser shall pay such compensation into an escrow account, established by the pazk
owner, for distribution upon transfer of title to the home. Such compensation shall be
paid to the displaced owner no later than the ninety (90) days prior to the earlier of
closing of the park or its conversion to another use.
Subdivision 10. Payment of Relocation Costs to Displaced Renters
15t Draft: 10-16-2000
2°d Draft: 10-27-2000
a. After service of the closure statement by the park owner and
upon submittal by the displaced renter of a contract or other
verification of relocation expenses, the park owner shall pay to
the displaced renter reasonable costs of relocatin�. Reasonable
relocation costs shall include:
47
** DRAFT ONLY •*
i. The actual expenses incurred in moving the displaced
renter's personal property.
ii. The cost of insurance for the replacement value of the
property being moved.
iii. If the new lot rent is greater than the old lot rent, the
displaced tenant shall be entitled to compensation equal to
the difference multiplied by 24 months.
Subdivision 1 l. Penalties
a. Violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall be a
misdemeanor.
b. Any provisions of this�Ordinance may be enforced by
injunction or other appropriate civil remedy.
c. The City shall not issue a building permit in conjunction with
reuse of manufactured home park property unless the park
owner has paid reasonable location costs and the purchaser of
the park has provided compensation in accordance with the
requirements of the Ordinance. Approval of any application for
rezoning, platting, conditional use permit, planned unit
development or variance in conjunction with a park closing or
conversion shall be conditional on compliance with the
requirements of this Ordinance.
Subdivision 12. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall take effect upon its passa�e and publication.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRILDEY
THIS _ DAY OF , 2000.
NANCY J. JORGENSON - MAYOR
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
1" Draft: 10-16-2000 6
2°a Draft: 10-27-2000
48
�
.
.
,
� AGENDA ITEM
� CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
QTY OF
FRIDLEY
Date: 11 /09/00
To: William Burns, City Manager��'!�
From: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Paul Bolin, Planner
RE: Public Hearing for ZOA #00-02 M-00-191
INTRODUCTION
Each Ranch Estates has requested a rezoning of the former University Station site
from C-3 to C-2. In addition, two variances to allow for the construction of a two
tenant commercial building at the northwest corner of University Avenue and
Osborne Road have also been requested. Though the tenants have not been
announced, the building has been designed for one of the tenants to have a drive-
through window on the east building face. Some discussion has occurred between
the property owner and a retail coffee tenant for that space. A tenant for the west
space is somewhat more speculative at this time.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
At the November 1, 2000 Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held
for ZOA 00-02. After reviewing the proposal, a motion was made to recommend
approval of the rezoning request with stipulations. The motion passed unanimously.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommends the public hearing for ZOA 00-02 be held.
.•
City of Fridley Land Use Application
ZOA #00-02 November 1, 2000
GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION
Applicant:
East Ranch Estates
7620 University Avenue
Fridley, MN 55432
Requested Action:
Rezoning
Purpose:
To rezone properly from C-3 to C-2.
Existing Zoning:
C-3
Location:
7610 University Avenue
Size:
30,379 square feet .7 acres
Existing Land Use:
Vacant / former restaurant.
Surrounding Land Use & Zoning:
N: Commercial & C-3
E: Commercial & C-2
S: Commercial & C-2
W: Commercial & C-3
Comprehensive Plan Conformance:
Consistent with Plan
Zoning History:
1968 — Property is platted
1969 — Service station constcucted
1978 — Property is re-platted.
Legal Description of Property:
Lot 1, Blk 2, 3rd Add. East Ranch Estates.
Public Utilities:
Existing at the site.
Transportation:
The University Ave. frontage road provides access
to the site.
Physical Characteristics:
The site currently consists of poor quality
landscaping.
50
SUMMARY OF PROJECT
East Ranch Estates, petitioner, is seeking to rezone
this parcel from C-3, General Shopping to C-2,
General Business. In addirion, the petirioner is also
seeking variances to reduce the building setback to
4' along the West Service Road and reduce the
parking setback to 5' along University Avenue, in
order to construct a new commercial building at
7610 University Avenue.
SUMiVIARY OF ANALYSIS
City Staff recommends approval of this rezoning
reqiiest, with stipailations.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION/ 60 DAY DATE
CC-11 /20/00
60 Day-11/28/00
r
, � �,�< -
y�Y��- �. ?���; � � � -�`
°. � = 1
�, ,� s
• ,�. �� �_ � ,��r L , ~~`; �
.,� t.. ,..
View from Seivice Drive
Staff Report Prepared by: Paul Bolin
ZOA #00-02
PROJECT
Each Ranch Estates has requested a rezoning of the former University Station site from
C-3 to G2. In addition, two variances to allow for the construction of a two tenant
commercial building at the northwest corner of University Avenue and Osborne Road
have also been requested. Though the tenants have not been announced, the building has
been designed for one of the tenants to have a drive-through window on the east building
face. Some discussion has occurred between the property owner and a retail coffee
tenant for that space. A tenant for the west space is somewhat more speculative at this
time.
SITE
This site is a 30,379 s.f. "loop-back" parcel. Most recently the site served as the
University Station Restaurant. Prior to that, the site was a service station location. It is
not certain whether or not the tanks have been removed and all soil remediation
completed. A stipulation requiring verification that these items have been completed is
advised.
Within the City there are 19 loop-back parcel sites. These parcels were shaped by a
service drive along the heavy traffic comdors. When a service drive intersects with
another street, it is very important for the intersection to occur far enough away from the
heavier roadway intersection, so that dangerous conflicts do not occur near the heavier
intersections. Pulling the secondary intersection back creates a teardrop shaped parcel
called a loop-back site. Of the City's 19 loop-back sites, 15 are along University Avenue,
4 are on Highway 65. The 15 University Avenue sites are zoned as follows: C-3 (4 sites)
& G2 (11 sites).
East Ranch Estates (the petitioner) is requesting a rezoning from C-3 to C-2 for this site.
Their variance requests were based on the setback requirements of the C-2 district.
Along the southern boundary of the property, a 60' utility easement exists. This easement -
contains an enormous water line that helps feed the St. Paul water supply. You may
recall that the City has a large surge tower on the east edge of the Mississippi River. This
tower pumps the water from the river into the pipe, across this subject parcel, and
eventually over to the St. Paul Waterworks facility. The existence of this easement limits
development on a large portion of the south portion of this site. All development over
this easement area including, but not limited to: landscaping, driveways, parking
surfaces, architectural features, etc. must be approved by appropriate St. Paul
Waterworks personnel prior to commencement of construction. A second (more typical)
easement exists on this site, which further restricts development of the site.
With the existence of the easements on this site a 4575 s.f. building was designed to be
positioned as far north as necessary to keep as much of the development off the
easements as possible. Parking with standard curb and gutter has been designed to exist
over the Waterworks easement. Traffic circulation on site has been designed to allow a
51
safe distance between the entrance drive and the intersection of Osborne and the
University Avenue Service Drive. Motorists exit the site on its north end and have been
afforded ample width for both the cars exiting the parking lot and the drive-through to
exit. Appropriate on-site signage will be required to assure safe passing and no conflict
for northbound traffic exiting the drive-through or southbound parking lot traffic exiting
in front of drive-through window motorists.
ZONING ORDINANCE CONFORMANCE
Section 205.14.03.C. (2). (B), requires a side yard setback of 35'for buildings abutting a
street. The petitioner has requested a reduction to 4' due to the "geometry of the site and
the existence of two easements". As proposed, the building will sit in approximately the
same location as the existing building (relative to distance from the roadway). The
building however will be shifted slightly southwest to better relate the building to the
intersection and allow adequate space for on-site traffic circulation.
With the proposed building positioning, staff recommends that additional cosmetic
enhancements be made to the rear of the building, which has a prominent position along
the service drive. Awnings over the doors are one suggested solution. Staff approval of
those enhancements, prior to issuance of the building permit for this project is
recommended.
Section 205.14.OS.D. (5). (a) requires a setback of 20' from a street right of way for all
parking areas. As proposed, the petitioner's site plan requires a 5' setback from the public
right-of-way. One obvious advantage this site has in terms of perceived green space is the
wide right-of-way dimensions for both University Avenue and Osbome Road. The wider
right-of ways allow for additional green space beyond the property line. An obvious
disadvantage is the limitations for placement of items (including certain landscape items)
on top of the Waterworks easement.
After much analysis of this site and this request staff believes this site merits variance
consideration and rezoning to C-2 due to the presence of several site characteristics that
would otherwise make the site difficult if not impossible to develop.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of rezoning request ZOA #00-02, with the following
stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall submit written verification that all tanks have been removed
and all soil remediation completed.
2. All development over this easement area including: landscaping, driveways,
parking surfaces, architectural features, etc. must be approved by appropriate St.
Paul Waterworks personnel prior to commencement of construction.
3. Appropriate signage and pavement striping shall be provided on site to eliminate
conflicts for motorists entering and exiting the site.
52
4. Additional cosmetic enhancements shall be made to the rear of the building so
that it does not appear as a rear of the building that has a prominent position along
the service drive. Enhancements to be reviewed �nd approved by staff, prior to
issuance of the building permit.
5. All building doors must meet all applicable Building Codes.
53
� AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
pTY OF
FRIDLEY
Date:11 /09/00
To: William Burns, City Manager � r��
From: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Paul Bolin, Planner
RE: First reading of ZOA #00-02 M-00-189
INTRODUCTION
East Ranch Estates, petitioner, is seeking to rezone Lot 1, Block 2, 3rd Addition of
East Ranch Estates, from C-3, General Shopping to C-2, General Business. This
property is the "turn back" parcel generally located at the northwest corner of
University Avenue and Osborne Road.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
At the November 1, 2000 Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held
for ZOA 00-02. After reviewing the proposal, a motion was made to recommend
approval of the rezoning request subject to the six stipulations recommended by
staff. The motion passed unanimously.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City staff recommends that the City Council hold the first reading of the ordinance to
rezone the property.
�
54
.
.
1
,
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY,
MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS
SECTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended hereinafter indicated.
SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and
described as:
Lot 1, Block 2 of the 3rd Addition of East Ranch Estates, as recorded at the
office of the Anoka County Recorder, generally located at 7610 University
Avenue.
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning
map to show said tract or area to be rezoned from Zoned District C-3,
General Shopping to G2, General Business.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
___DAY OF _�___, 2000.
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
Public Hearing:
First Reading:
Second Reading
Publication:
November 20, 2000
November 20, 2000
December 11, 2000
55
NANCY J. JORGENSON - MAYOR
` AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
cmr oF
FRIDLEY
j
Date: 11 /9/00
To: William Burns, City Manager l���
�
From: Paul Bolin, Planner
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
RE: VAR #00-30 East Ranch Estates M-00-190
East Ranch Estates, petitioner, is seeking to reduce the building setback to 4' along
the West Service Road and reduce the parking setback to 5' along University
Avenue, in order to construct a new commercial building at 7610 University Avenue.
APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION
At the October 25, 2000 Appeals Commission meeting, a public hearing was held
for VAR #00-30. After a brief discussion, a motion was made to recommend
approval of the variance request with stipulations as presented by staff. The motion
carried unanimously.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommends the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission
recommendation of approval for VAR #00-30 including the six stipulations as
presented in the staff report.
v
�
.
56
City of Fridley Land Use Application
VAR-00-30 October 25, 2000
GENERAL INFORNIATION SPECIAL INFORMATION
Applicant:
East Ranch Estates
7620 University Avenue
Fridley, MN 55432
Requested Action:
Variance
Purpose:
To reduce sideyard setback for a proposed
building & parking area.
E�sring Zoning:
C-3 (proposed for C-2)
Locarion:
7610 University Avenue
Size:
30,379 square feet .7 acres
Existing Land Use:
Vacant / former restaurant.
Surrounding Land Use & Zoning:
N: Commercial & C-3
E: Commercial & C-2
S: Commercial & C-2
W: Commercial & C-3
Comprehensive Plan Conformance:
Consistent with Plan
Zoning Ordinance Conformance:
Section 205.14.03.C.(2).(b) requires a sideyard
setback of 35'for buildings abutting a street.
Section 205.14.OS.D.(5).(a) requires a setback of
20' from a street right of way for all parking areas.
Zoning History:
1968 — Property is platted
1969 — Service station constructed
1978 — Property is re-platted.
Legal Descriprion of Property:
Lot 1, Blk 2, 3rd Add. East Ranch Estates.
Public Utilities:
Existing at the site.
Transportation:
The University Ave. frontage road provides access
to the site.
Physical Characteristics:
The site currently consists of poor quality
landscaping.
SUMMARY OF PROJECT
East Ranch Estates, petitioner, is seeking to reduce
the building setback to 4' along the West Service
Road and reduce the parking setback to 5' along
University Avenue, in order to constiuct a new
commercial building at 7610 University Avenue.
SUMMARY OF HARDSHIP
". .. due to the unusual geometry of the site, the
presence of street right of way on all sides, and the
existence of two sigruficant utility easements, in
order to effectively utilize the site we are requesting
reducing the building setback to 4' along the West
Service Road and reducing the parking setback to
5' along Univeisity Avenue. "
SUVI�'VIARY OF ANALYSIS
Ciry Staff recommends approval of this
variance request, with stipulations.
.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION/ 60 DAY DATE
Staff Report Prepared by: Paul Bolin
57
5. Additional cosmetic enhancements shall be made to the rear of the building so
that it does not appear as a rear of the building that has a prominent position along
the service drive. Enhancements to be reviewed and approved by staff, prior to
issuance of the building permit.
6. All building doors must meet all applicable Building Codes.
.1
CITY OF FRIDLEY
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 2000
2. PUBLIC HEARING: VARIANCE REQUEST. VAR #00-30, BY EAST RANCH
ESTATES:
Per Section 205.14.03C.(2).(b) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the side
. yard setback abutting a street from 35 feet to 4 feet;
Per Section 205.14.05D.(5).(a) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the
required parking setback from a street right-of-way from 20 feet to 5 feet;
t To allow the construction of a commercial building on Lot 1, Block 1, 3�d Addition,
East Ranch Estates, generally located at 7601 University Avenue (University
Station restaurant site).
MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Jones, to waive the reading and open the
public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:45 P.M.
Mr. Hickok stated that the petitioner is requesting a variance to reduce the building
setback along the west service road and to reduce the parking setback to five feet along
the University Avenue frontage in order to construct a new commercial building. Two
code sections apply here to the request. The first requires a side yard setback of 35
feet for buildings abutting a street. Along with these variances, the petiti�ner is also
seeking a rezoning for this property. The property is currently zoned C-3, General
Shopping Center District. The typical zoning for loopback parcels are those parcels
created by bringing the service drive away from University Avenue for safety. The
typical zoning on those parcels are C-2. There are 19 total loopback parcels in the City
of Fridley and on those currently 14 have a C-2 zoning. The petitioner is requesting a
C-2 rather than a C-3 zoning. That affects the setbacks. In a C-3 district, they would
have a much greater setback from a roadway with 80 feet instead of 35 feet. With the
rezoning, the 35 feet is still being reduced to four feet on that frontage road side.
Mr. Hickok stated that the second section of the code indicates that there needs to be a
20 foot setback from a street right-of-way for all parking areas. The first request is to
allow the building to sit closer to the west service road within four feet of the property
line at the closest point. The building is being shifted and positioned to better address
� an intersection and centers the building better on the site. The building really takes
advantage of the corner and a loop drive that has an easement dominating a big part of
" the drive. That setback from a public right-of-way would be five feet from the curb line.
� The pathway does not have much of a separation currently from the asphalt pavement
and the pathway existing along University Avenue. The petitioner is requesting that
there would be a grass separation from the path and the curb and gutter.
Mr. Hickok stated the new design is meant to optimize the traffic opportunity for people
coming out of Bob's Produce drive. There are a number of restraints and it is important
61
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 25, 2000 PAGE 2
to point out that this site on the south side has a 60-foot wide easement with a very
large pipe for the St. Paul Waterworks. That pushes the building area off of that
completely. It creates a tight situation for a building. The teardrop shape lot creates
hardship and uniqueness and design hurdles. Another typical easement on this site
really pushes the building back into the area that is being proposed. Staff recommends
approval with stipulations.
Mr. Kuechle asked if the site has been looked at by any traffic people because it is hard
to get a good feel about how it would be to come around that corner. .
Mr. Hickok stated that the City's engineering staff looked at this from a site distance
perspective, and the building's positioning being shifted down has opened up a view to
motorists. They have optimized the view as best they can.
Dr. Vos asked about snow removal on the east side.
Mr. Hickok stated that they are speculating that they are going to have snow storage
issues. There is some opportunity in the ponding area and entrance drive. They will
have to truck the snow probably.
Bob Schroer, owner of the property, stated that the snow has been removed to the
ponding area previously. The building should help traffic more with viewing.
Ms. Jackson asked if he had any problems with the stipulations.
Mr. Schroer stated he did not. They h�d some other �roposals that would have
eliminated that loopback, but they did not work out.
Mr. Kuechle asked if he had any problems with the fuel tanks on that site.
Mr. Schroer stated that there is one oil tank someplace on the premises and they
cannot find it. The rest have been taken out. They have no problems with lead,
asbestos, mercury, or anything else. They are waiting for the EPCA letter to allow them
to tear the building down.
Ms. Jackson asked the timeline for construction.
Mr. Schroer stated that they would start construction as soon as possible. They have
' tenants lined up already and they are all anxious to go.
Dr. Vos asked if there were any more problems with the easement as it runs to the east.
�
Mr. Schroer stated that the driveways are not on this property except for off the service
drive so it does not affect anything. They may do some bridging for them in the parking
and you cannot plant anything deep rooted. St. Paul Waterworks has been very helpful.
Ms. Jackson asked Mr. Hickok if there is a safety issue for people crossing from the
proposed building to Bob's Produce?
62
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 25, 2000 PAGE 3
Mr. Hickok stated that this has a walkway that will allow folks to walk and bike to the
sites.
MOTION by Mr. Jones, seconded by Ms. Jackson, to close the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 8:10 P.M.
y
, Dr. Vos stated that the petitioner did an excellent job with only requesting two variances.
,, The footprint fits and landscaping will get better. He would vote in favor of this.
Mr. Kuechle stated he concurs. He would recommend approval.
Mr. Jones stated that he would recommend approval. He thought the whole lot was a
hardship, and it is a great use of space with a minimum number of variances.
Ms. Jackson stated that the plan is in keeping with the Fridley plan to try to have the
main streets attractive, and this would be an improvement.
MOTION by Ms. Jackson to approve Variance Request, VAR #00-30, by East Ranch
Estates with the following stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall submit written verification that all tanks have been
removed and all soil remediation completed.
2. The variance is contingent upon the approval of rezoning request, ZOA #00-
02.
3. All development over this easement area including landscaping, driveways,
parking surfaces, architectural features, etc., must be approved by the
appropriate St. Paul Waterworks personnel prior to commencement of
construction.
4. Appropriate signage and pavement striping shall be provided on site to
eliminate conflicts for motorists entering and exiting this site.
5. Additional cosmetic enhancements shall be made to the rear of the building
so that it does not appear as a rear of the building that has a prominent
position along the service drive. Enhancements to be reviewed and approved
by staff prior to issuance of the building permit.
6. All building doors must meet all applicable Building Codes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
�' Mr. Hickok stated this will go to City Council on November 20.
63
: AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2000
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
INFORMAL STATUS R,E'PORTS
�
.
jJ
� ,