The URL can be used to link to this page

06/03/2002 - 4751� � CffY OF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 7:30 p.m. - City Council Chambers Attendance Sheet A[�AS'� AR/NT NAMF, AflflRFSS ANa /TFM NUMBFR YaU ARF /MT�RFSTFO /M. � ,o ; �, � �� , , � � . .� � � � �� . �� ,� � �� .. .; �: ° �..�, ;�i�� c„�,�,%� 9„ ,u.��'1�.. , , i� . �..; �i�� k �� ,y/.,� ° �'�� 'r �, �. J � � � / l: 7 � � � � � I �� 1 � �� 1 i /I i�� (i V � �F l�l! l�i��c � � '� � V� r � � 1� it � ,(� �� ' � '1 '� � � �'{'> � .y ') v� �� ` � � ; a ; ,- . � - � 6: J ��-. 7 �./_' 1 �� r � ,, � �l t// <<<��- �- ,�.�'.� � � i � �-� �-�,�Yi. ,,�� wl� /�� '� I� �i"� 1 �'�/' • J �_ _ O �� „Q� � � � \� �� c�� l� �e- � c�i � �S�' � '�-- �� .� ,� �,�_ r� �� , � �� -� ,� ;�� ;�� : � � �� -�� _ J �' o�� `3 ��% , � �' � � ��l �' � v � � � �\ � � � �� . � o,� ,� �� . � . .� �� CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 CRY OF FRIDLEY The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or hazass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regazd to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. PROCLAMATIONS: Bob Brenden Appreciation Day — June 4, 2002 Vanessa Regnier Day — June 5, 2002 Stand for Children Day — June 15, 2002 Patriotic Pride City-Wide Day — June 16, 2002 `49ER DAYS PRESENTATION. _ LEGISLATIVE UPDATE. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of May 20, 2002 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 PA�E 2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: 1. Set a Public Hearing for June 24, 2002, to Consider a Resolution Officially Deeming the Property at 975 Hathaway Lane N.E. as Hazardous and Authorizing Commencement of Legal Process Toward Demolition (Ward 2) ........................................................................... 1- 2 .� ,. , 2. �Resolution Designating Polling Places for the 2002 Primary and General Elections - ............................................................... 4 3. Appointment (City Employee) .................................................................. . ..... 5 4. Claims ....................................................................................................... 6 5. Licenses ....................................................................................................... 7 —10 .i 6. Estimate ....................................................................................................... 11 � ADOPTION OF AGENDA. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Consideration of items not on Agenda — 15 minutes. 1 � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 NEW BUSINESS: P�GE 3 7. Consideration of an Appeal of a Decision by the City of Fridley's Hearing Examiner for Tobacco Compliance Violations .................................................................... 12 - 24 8. Motion to Approve the Springbrook Watershed Implementation Project Work Plan and Authorize Staff to Proceed with the Project ........................................................................ 25 - 57 9. Approve Amendment and Extension of Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA) Local Funding Assistance Funding Agreement .................................................. 58 - 60 10. Approve Professional Services Agreement Between the City of Fridley and WSB & Associates, Inc., for Engineering Services Related to the Springbrook Watershed Phase II Implementation Project ........................................................................ 61 - 74 11. Informal Status Reports ..................................................................................... 75 ADJOURN. � . . . , � �� . FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 �� CfTY OF FRIDLEY The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request. acc�mmodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. PROCLAMATIONS: Bob Brenden Appreciation Day — June 4, 2002 Vanessa Regnier Day — June 5, 2002 Stand for Children Day — June 15, 2002 Patriotic Pride City-Wide Day — June 16, 2002 `49ER DAYS PRESENTATION. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED): � -� ��o 2. Resol�tion Designating Polling Places for the 2002 Primary and General Elections ................................... 3 - 4 3. Appointment (City Employee) 4. Claims ......................... 5. Licenses APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ��' � �P�� 6. Estimate City Council Meeting of May 20, 2002 NEW BUSINESS: : ,. � .. 7 — 10 11 ADOPTION OF AGENDA. �� /� %�c' � U /v 1. Set a Public Hearing for June 24, 2002, to Consider a Resolution Officially Deeming the Property at 975 Hathaway Lane N.E. as Hazardous and OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Consideration of items not or Authorizing Commencement of Legal Process Agenda —15 minutes. Toward Demolition (Ward 2) ........... 1- 2 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 NEW BUSINESS: 7. Consideration of an Appeal of a Decision by the City of Fridley's Hearing Examiner for Tobacco Compliance Violations ... 12 - 24 �'��Ce��n-�; �`,•�✓� �� .c�-�c� (' PAGE2 8. Motion to Approve the Springbrook Watershed �l�� v�� Implementation Project Work Plan and Authorize� � P Staff to Proceed with the Project ....... 25 - 57 ��/� a�,� �!� �� ✓1 .� �10 � � � � QW ._��CJS�f � � 9. Approve Amendment and Extension of \ Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA) Local Funding Assistance Funding Agreement ........................... 58 - 6� {�o �- �� :� i � �� 10. Approve Professional Services Agreement � Between the City �� ridley and WSS & %�`�� ,� '� � ,/, Associates, Inc., for Engineering Services �� t/`� Related to the S prin gbrook Watershed l�, Phase II Implementation Project ........ 61 - 74 ��,�'✓5�'��✓1� �,� �-�� 11. Informal Status Reports ADJOURN. �� 75 ��a � cJc�� . : =1= _) _ =1 �Q�� JC�JL�1 �J�� JLO� �� 4, 2��0� �� WHEREAS, Bob Brenden has been a long-time resident and civic leader in the City of Fridley; and WHEREAS, Bob Brenden has served for ten years as principal of the Hayes Elementary School; and WHEREAS, Bob Brenden has helped develop a partnership between the Ciry of Fridley, the Springbrook Nature Center, and the Fridley School District; and WHEREAS, Bob Brenden has encouraged beautification efforts for the Hayes School grounds by coordinating a Tree Trust project to improve the area; and WHEREAS, Bob Brenden's caring and concern for others have enhanced the quality of life in the City of Fridley; and WHEREAS, Bob Brenden will be retiring as principal of Hayes Elementary School on August 1, 2002; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Scott J. Lund, Mayor of the City of Fridley, do hereby proclaim Tuesday, June 4, 2002, as BOB �RE�iDEN APPRECIATION DAY in the City of Fridley. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Fridley to be affixed this 3rd day of June, 2002. SCOTT J. LUND, MAYOR � 0 . _ � =, �a�FSSa uFC��F� �aY Jrvi,e 3, tOOZ �� WHEREAS, since 1978, Fridley and Fourmies, France, have had a Sister City relationship; and WHEREAS, over the years, many Fridley and Fourmies residents and students have stayed with host families in each other's home town; and WHEREAS, these cultural exchanges have created a better understanding between the peoples of Fridley and Fourmies; and WHEREAS, Yanessa Regnier, a student from Fourmies, is currently participating in a six-week work internship program with the Southern Anoka County Chamber of Commerce. During her stay, she is residing at the home of a City employee; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Fridley to show its friendship and support for its latest guest from Fourmies. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Scott J. Lund, Mayor of the City o, f Fridley, do hereby proclaim Wednesday, June S, as: Ys�,esss Req�,ier Day BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Yanessa Regnier be made an honorary citizen of Fridley during her stay. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Fridley to be affixed this 3rd day of June, 2002. SCOTT J. LUND, MAYOR R =1= =1= =l _-�- =� = =� _, 'I -,_ s'�''.�[,1YD FO.I� G.1�DR.L.IYD�I Y l Jurae Y�, ZOU2 �� WHEREAS, on or around June 1, 2002, people from all backgrounds will come together in their communities to take a Stand for Children and renew their community's commitment to improving the quality of our children's Zives by building the voice and vision for all children; and WHEREAS, on Fridley's "Stand for Children Day" and beyond, families, members of religious congregations, schools, community-based organiza- tions, businesses, and political and cultural groups will join together as a local and national community to recognize our children's unmet needs and re-dedicate ourselves to addressing them; and WHEREAS, caring for children must be the first priority of our families, communities and nation; and WHEREAS, this commitment must begin at the local level, where children and families live and work and have the potential to thrive, and where all citizens, working together, can make a difference in our children's lives. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Scott J. Lund, Mayor of the City of Fridley, do hereby proclaim Saturday, June 1 S, 2002, as: S'2'�1YD FOR GJ5TI�DR.L�IYD�IY in the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and urge all citizens to support this day by dedicating themselves to the task of improving the quality of life for all children from this day forward. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Fridleyr to be affixed this 3'dday of June, 2002. SCOTT J. L UND, MA YOR � �' � � � � � ~i� � � � � � � � � � E � � � 1'`, � `, � �� -- � � 1 `` � � � � � E � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ��/e �0� �/�/�'� �/��0�'��'�� June 16, 2002 �c� WHEREAS, the City of Fridley is proud to be part of the United States of America, the best country in the world; and WHEREAS, the Ciry of Fridley is proud of all of its citizens who have served in the armed forces and in our Fire and Police Departments; and WHEREAS, the Ciry of Fridley is proud of all of its citizens and the pride they take in displaying our country's flag and other patriotic symbols; and WHEREAS, it is important to take time to reflect on the wonderful gift of freedom we have been so richly blessed with; and WHEREAS, it is the proper time to pay special tribute to all of our servicemenlwomen for all they have done and continue to do in order to keep us safe and secure and to keep our country free; and WHEREAS, the Fridley `49er Days festival is the appropriate time for the City of Fridley to celebrate its communiry, our country's freedom and remember all who have given so much to preserve it. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Scott J. Lund, Mayor of the City of Fridley, hereby proclaim Sunday, June 16, 2002, as �.��0��0� ��0�� 0� �0�� .�� in the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and encourage residents to participate in the `49er Days Freedom Fest that will be held at 2: 00 p. m. on that day Locke Parl� located behind Columbia Arena. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Fridley to be affixed this 3rd day of June, 2002. SCOTT J. LUND, MAYOR � THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF MAY 20, 2002 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Barnette at 7:35 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pro Tem Barnette led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem Barnette, Councilmember Billings, Councilmember Wolfe, and Councilmember Wolfe MEMBERS ABSENT: Mayor Lund. PROCLAMATIONS: Public Works Week: May ZO - 26, 2002 Mayor Pro Tem Barnette stated that the support and understanding of City residents is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as water, sewers, streets, highways, parks, public buildings, and snow removal. Mr. Lawrence, Fridley Public Works, thanked Council on behalf of all Public Works employees for the recognition. Mr. Saeflce, Water Supervisar, also thanked Council. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember Wolfe stated he would like Item 1 removed to the regular agenda for discussion. Councilmember Billings stated he would like Item 4 removed to the regulaz agenda for discussion. � � MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe to approve the proposed consent agenda with the removal of Item Nos. 1 and 4 for discussion. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR PRO TEM BARNETTE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 31, 2002 PA�E 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of May 6, 2002 �' : �I� �1� APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: 1. ADOPT EMERGENCY ORDINANCE E-34 AMENDING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 1, LEGISLATIVE BODY, PERTAINING TO WARD AND PRECINCT BOUNDARIES: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that in response to the Minnesota Court of Appeals' redistricting court order dated March 19, legislative ward and precinct boundary lines were redrawn. The Secretary of State's o�ce has recently informed the City that the boundary line that separates Legislative Districts SOA and SOB should be corrected. This legislation does that and nothing else and is being considered in an emergency form to comply with the Secretary of State's deadline. Staff recommended Council's approval. THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED TO THE REGULAR AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION. 2. APPROVE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN FOR 7570 HIGHWAY 65 N.E. (WARD 2): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the amendment is for more sign detail and to choose one color or a combination of two colors. The letters will remain a maximum of 24 inches high and will be applied directly to the fascia using a vinyl film. Staff recommended Council's approval. APPROVED AMENDMENT. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 32-2002 APPROVING A PLAT, P.S. #02-02, VINEWOOD PARK, BY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14 AND TI�E CITY OF FRIDLEY, TO REPLAT PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS NECESSARY FOR THE TRANSFER OF LAND. GENERALLY LOCATED AT COMONS PARK AND THE FRIDLEY NIIDDLE SCHOOL (WARD 1): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the preliminary plat for this item was approved on May 6. The plat serves to create new legal descriptions that will allow the transfer of land between the City of Fridley and Independent School District No. 14. Staff recommended Council's approval. . FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 31, 2002 PA�E 3 APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 32-2002. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 33-2002 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH THE MPCA FOR SPRINGBROOK WATERSHED IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT PHASE II CWP GRANT FUNDING: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated the City, along with four neighboring cities, has received a partnership grant for the restoration of wetland habitats in the Springbrook Nature Center. The agreement establishes the guidelines for the work plan that will detail how grant funds will be spent. It also details requirements the City must follow in order to receive grant payments. The work plan involves projects in Spring Lake Park, Blaine, Coon Rapids, and needs to be approved by each of the City Councils of those cities. The work plan will be presented at one of the City Council meetings in June. The City has $16,000 per year for the next three years budgeted as Storm Water Capital Improvements Plan funding for its share of the local match. THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED TO THE REGULAR AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 34-2002 AUTHORIZING FINAL CHANGES IN APPRO- PRIATIONS FOR THE GENERAL FUND, SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS, AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR THE YEAR ENDED 2001: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this represents the final line item adjustment for the 2001 budget. In 2001, we had a positive General Fund expenditure variance from the budget at $170,289, a positive expenditure variance of $172,388 from the Capital Improvements Fund, and a positive expenditure variance of $275,963 from the Special Revenue Funds. Staff recommended Council's approval. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 34-2002. 6. RESOLUTION 35-2002 IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISE PERMIT FOR BLAIrIE JAYCEES (SHOREWOOD RESTAURANT ) (WARD 2): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this is for pull-tab sales at the Shorewood Restaurant. If approved, the Shorewood will be licensed until June 30, 2004. Staff r recommended Council's approval. - ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 35-2002. 7. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR THE 2002 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 2002-1: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that four bids were opened on May 15, 2002. The lowest bid was from W. B. Miller of Elk River, Minnesota in the amount of $727,400.65. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 31, 2002 PAGE 4 The project azea consists of the streets north of Mississippi Street, east of East River Road, south of Locke Lake and west of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe tracks. Staff recommended Council's approval. RECEIVED BIDS AND AWARDED CONTRACT TO W. B. MILLER OF ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA. 8. CLAIMS: APPROVED CLAIM NOS. 105165-105416. 9. LICENSES: APPROVED ALL LICENSES AS SUBMITTED. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilmember Billings to adopt the agenda as amended with the addition of Items 1 and 4. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR PRO TEM DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Ms. Elna Goodspeed indicated that she was the President of the Board of the Banfill-Locke Center for the Arts. She stated that they are looking at the McKnight Foundation to hopefully provide funding. She said community support is very important when applying for funding. Ms. Catherine Vesley indicated that she is the Vice President of the Board of the Banfill-Locke Center for the Arts. She stated that as a retired Fridley elementary school teacher, she realizes that many Fridley children will not have the opportunity to receive art education from an art specialist at school because that position in no longer funded due to budget cuts. Art will be taught by the classroom teachers. Hands-on instruction is necessary for children's needs to be met in this area. B�11-Locke has classes that will meet those needs. She said that we need to work together to offer these programs to meet the needs of the community. Ms. Joyce Schmidt indicated that she was the Secretary for the B�11-Locke Center for the Arts. She stated that the art center is beginning to grow. She said there was a lot of interest from parents for art instruction during the summer. This is the third year for the Festival in the Park which will be held on July 31. � Mayor Pro Tem Barnette stated that he appreciated their information. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 31, 2002 PAGE 5 Councilmember Billings stated that with respect to the community support section of the application, the activity the County does in and around the property was listed. He said the money from the Community Development Block Grant Funds that were provided through the City should also be shown. Ms. Goodspeed asked if documentation could be provided for that. Councilmember Billings stated that it could be provided in the form of a letter of support. Ms. Goodspeed stated that they can demonstrate the County participation without a problem. The ongoing revolving funds they give to Banfill-Locke can be shown. She said they also plan . on starting a donor campaign and will be sending out letters asking people to help. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that the individual Council members can sign the letter written in support of this project. With respect to money, the City's budget is very tight. The Lion's Club may help with showing community support. Letters from pazents and kids may also help. Ms. Goodspeed sta.ted that the competition is fierce for these funds, but that they will try. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that they can talk to other communities that have actually received grants. Ms. Goodspeed stated that they have done this. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that an article could be included in one of the City's newsletters. Councilmember Wolfe stated that letters to the editor could be sent. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that some type of signage indicating the operating hours would be helpful. Ms. Goodspeed stated that they are under the regulations of the County for signage and there has been discussion regazding that. Hours vary due to the number of volunteers. She asked if we could check with MnDOT to see about putting a sign on I-694. Mayor Pro Tem stated that the sign could be similar to the sign for the Fridley Historical Center. r Mr. Hickok, Community Development Director, stated that they cost approximately $3,000 per sign. Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that there may be some CDBG money. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that some State recreational grants be may possible. She said to call the Recreation Department for more information. Mayor Pro Tem Barnette stated that the Values First Program may also be used to show community support. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 31, 2002 PAGE 6 Councilmember Wolfe asked for B�11-Locke's telephone number. Ms. Vesley stated that it is 763-574-1850. NEW BUSINESS: 4. RESOLUTION NO. 33-2002 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH THE MPCA FOR SPRINGBROOK WATERSHED IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT PHASE II CWP GRANT FUNDING: Councilmember Wolfe asked what would happen once the money Fridley budgeted for three years was spent. He asked if the other cities would help with future maintenance. - Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that there are some programs that would help retain the water in those communities after the three yeazs is up. That would be their responsibility. Councilmember Wolfe stated that the weirs in the Nature Center will need to be maintained and he was wondering if the other cities would help pay for that. Mr. Burns stated that the weirs and maintenance would be our responsibility. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that there would be a water quality issue whether we had a nature center or not. Councilmember Wolfe stated that this piece of property is quite expensive. Mr. Burns stated that one of the reasons this is happening now is because of the funding available at the present time. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that this is a separate issue from the Nature Center. It is a water quality issue. She said the City does have some legal obligation to take care of this. However, part of the reason for the water quality issue is from other communities around us that send their water rushing down to us. Mr. Burns stated that this was a major accomplishment to get the other cities to accept this responsibility. � Mayor Pro Tem Barnette asked if this would address sewer, vegetation, holding ponds, and other things. Mr. Haukaas, Public Works Director, stated that the first step is to iclentify what can be done to improve water quality and quantity. This is just a small portion of the Springbrook Watershed. MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe to approve and authorize execution of an agreement for the Springbrook Watershed Implementation Project Phase II CWP Grant Funding. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR PRO TEM DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 31, 2002 PAGE 7 l. ADOPT AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE E-34 AMENDING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 1, LEGISLATIVE BODY, PERTAIlYING TO WARD AND PRECINCT BOUNDARIES: Councilmember Billings stated that he thought it was appropriate to explain the emergency ordinance. Redistricting ordered by the State Supreme Court came out in March. The Court determined everything had to follow census tract lines. Staff went according to Appendix F which listed which census tracts were in which legislative district. We adjusted our precincts ' accordingly. _ Councilmember Billings stated that our staff, adhering to the letter of the law, did everything based on the census tract line and submitted it to the Secretary of State. It was sent back to us with a reference to some street name that is in the court order. MOTION by Councilmember Billings to adopt Emergency Ordinance No. E-34, amending the Fridley City Code, Chapter l, Legislative Body, pertaining to wazd and precinct boundaries. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR PRO TEM BARNETTE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS: Mr. Burns stated that after the Council meeting, Councilmember Bolkcom asked to discuss train whistles. Mr. Hickok stated that he has received a request by Redeemer Lutheran Church to consider a parking ordinance. He would like to discuss this after the meeting also. ADJOURN: MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR PRO TEM BARNETTE DECLARED THE MAY 20, 2002, CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:22 � P.M. Respectfully submitted, Signe L. Johnson Robert L. Barnette Recording Secretary Mayor Pro Tem r t UTY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 DATE: May 29, 2002 TO: FROM: William W. Burns, City Manager ��1' Scott J. Hickok, Community Development Director SUBJECT• Hazardous Home at 975 Hathaway On May 17, 2002, staff accompanied an Anoka County Health Officer to the site of 975 Hathaway. Earlier in the week, City staff investigated an allegation that the home was open to vermin. While on site, staff heard what sounded like water running inside the home. After confirming with the Utility Department that no water was running through the meter, staff contacted the owner. The owner is extremely ill and his sister was assigned power of attorney to handle the owner's personal affairs. She was a very cooperative contact and allowed entry into the home for inspection. Once inside, Dan Disrude, Anoka County Public Health determined that the mold inside the home was so bad that there would be no salvageable portion of the home to retrofit. Apparently, a waterline broke in the home and approximately 16 inches of water covered the basement floor. Furniture was floating in the lower level of the home. Mr. Disrude indicated that this home could best be described as North Grand Forks, without the flood. Because the [apparent] break was before the meter, there was no water usage flag indicating a problem. Mold spores were evident throughout every portion of the structure. In accordance with the law, options were given to the homeowner. They have the options of: 1) presenting an expert opinion that contradicts the Health Officials deternunation. If the expert opinion indicates that there is a fix for a portion of the home, they must provide certification of expertise in this area and a reasonable schedule for restoration; 2) Presenting a reasonable schedule for completion of all demolition work, to be submitted and approved by the City prior to commencement; 3) Appeal to tk�e City through the statutory process outlined under the Hazardous Building provisions of state law. The property owner's representative has indicated that the owner is interested in bringing the property into compliance and also, they may demolish the structure prior to the public hearing. However, there has been no contact with City staff since May 17, 2002. At this 1 Hazazdous Home at 975 Hathaway Page 2 May 29, 2002 point, the party is aware of the options and the fact that the City will hold a public hearing to consider a resolution to begin a Court ordered demolition process. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council set a public hearing for June 24, 2002, to consider a resolution officially deeming the property at 975 Hathaway as hazardous and authorizin� staff to commence with legal process toward demolition. Staff also recommends that in the final resolution, Council authorize simultaneous legal action at Anoka County to allow clean up and assessments of the costs to the property. M-02-62 � / AGENDA ITEM � CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 Cf1Y OF PRIDLE7 To: William W. Burns � From: Richard D. Pribyl, Finance Director �Q Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk � 0 Date: May 23, 2002 Re: Resolution Designating Polling Locations for 2002 Elections As a re sult of redistricting, the City Council must designate the polling locations for each precinct for the negt election cycle. Staff has contacted all of the polling locations and has received authorization to use the same polling locations as 2000. For the new precinct that was created as a result of the third legislative district, Ward 2, Precinct 5, we are designating North Park Elementary as the polling location. The gymnasium has a divider which will separate Ward 2, Precinct 4 and Ward 2 Precinct 5. Staff recommends adopting the attached resolution. 3 RESOLUTION NO. = 2002 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES FOR THE 2002 PRIlNARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Fridley was required to redistrict due to the 2000 Census; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1165 and Emergency Ordinance No. �34 to establish the new boundaries; and WHEREAS, a new precinct was established as a result of redistricting and the City of Fridley must provide polling locations for each precinct NOW, T�-IEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley: SECTION l. That on the l Oth day of September 2002 and the Sth day of November, 2002, there shall be a Statewide Primary and General Election: SECTION 2. That the polling locarions for said election shall be established as follows: Wazd 1 Precinct 1 Ward 1 Precinct 2 Wazd 1 Precinct 3 Ward 1 Precinct 4 Ward 2 Precinct 1 Ward 2 Precinct 2 Wazd 2 Precinct 3 Grace Evangelical Free Church Hayes Elementary School Fridley Municipal Center Fridley Community Center Woodcrest Elementary School Knights of Columbus St. Philip's Lutheran church Ward 2 Precinct 4 North Pazk Elementary School, Gym I Ward 2 Precinct 5 North Park Elementary School, Gym 2 Ward 3 Precinct 1 Springbrook Nature Center Ward 3 Precinct 2 Redeemer Lutheran church Ward 3 Precinct 3 Ward 3 Precinct 4 Stevenson Elementary School Fridley Covenant Church SECTION 3. That the polling location will be open from 7:00 am. to 8:00 p.m for the purpose of voting: PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TffiS 3RD OF JiJNE, 2002. ATTEST: DEBRA A. SKOGEN, CITY CLERK 0 SCOTT J. LiJND, MAYOR � 0 � / � CRY OF FRtDIEY 0 Name James Schmidt 0 AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 Appointment Position Public Services Worker, Parks Non-exempt Starting Saiary $18.29 per hour 5 Starting Date June 10, 2002 Replaces New Position � � CRY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA ITEM COUNCIL MEETING OF J U N E 3, 2002 CLAIMS � 05419 - � 05629 �:� 0 0 / � CRY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 20, 2002 Type of License: � ' TEMPORARY 3.2% MALT LIQUOR Fridley Wrestling Boosters Mary Christenson 7800 Pearson Way Fridle�, MN 55432 TREE REMOVAL AND TREATMENT Jim Steele Tree Maint. Jim Steele 1101 Vera St N Champlin, MN 55316 S&STree& Horticultural Specialist 405 Hardman Ave So. St. Paul, MN 55075 Steven Sylvester LICENSES Approved By: Public Safety Public Works Public Works FRIDLEY �49ER DAYS STREET VENDING Matt Milner Sales Gerald Johnson City Clerk 1298 52"d Ave NE Public Safety Fridley, NIN 55421 Pazks Director TEMPORARY FOOD Fridley `49er Days Linda Caillier Public Safety Community Festival Fire Inspector 6431 University Ave NE � Community Development Fridley, MN 55432 MUSIC FESTIVAL Fridley `49er Days Community Festival 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 STREET VENDING Fridley `49er Days Community Festival 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 Linda Caillier Linda Caillier 7 Public Safety Fire Inspector Community Development Public Safety Fire Inspector Community Development Fee: $60 $40 $40 Contribution to `49ers Fee Waived Fee Waived Fee Waived AGENDA ITEM City Council Meeting Of Monday, June 03, 2002 City of Fridle Electrical Killmer Electric Co Inc 5141 Lakeland Ave N Crystal MN 55429-3510 Gas Services Anderson Heating 8 Air Cond 4347 Central Ave NE Columbia Heights MN 55421 Commercial Plumbing 8 Heating 24428 Greenway Ave Forest Lake MN 55025- Master Gas Fitters 2263 N McKnight Rd STE 2 No�th St Paul MN 55109 General Contractor-Commercial BWE Construction Co 476 Hawthom Rd Lino Lakes MN 55014- MS Contracting Inc 5889 Otter �ew Tr White Bear Lake MN 55110- Valley Pools � Spas Inc 3426 Bunker Lake Blvd Andover MN 55304- � Ray Palmer George Whittenberger Robert Skeie Dan Perzichilli Bruce Emerson Mark Sweet Terry Small n � .. . •. State of MN Ron Julkowski Building Official Ron Julkowski Building O�cial Ron Julkowski Building O�cial Ron Julkowski Building Official Ron Julkowski Building Official Ron Julkowski , Building Official � � General Contractor-Residential AI-Ko Home Improvement (1927) 8090 4 Ave Ai Kopecky Lino lakes MN 55014- Anderson Timothy Contractor (7323) 16830 53 St NE Timothy Bruce Anderson Otsego MN 55374 Copeland Tim Construction (20075977) 1501 York Ave Tim Copeland St Paul MN 55106- Netko Dan Exteriors Inc (20060494) 1305 104 Lane NE Joan Schommer Blaine MN 55434- Sela Roofing 8 Remodeling Inc (1050) 4100 Excelsior Blvd Paz Sela St Louis Park MN 55416-4727 Sylvester Builders Inc (20029187) 27875 Hwy 65 NE Tim Sylvester Isanti MN 55040- Heatina Anderson Heating 8� Air Cond 4347 Central Ave NE George Whittenberger Columbia Heights MN 55421 Commercial Plumbing 8 Heating 24428 Greenway Ave Bob Skeie . Forest Lake MN 55025- Metro Sheet Metal 3260 Fanum Rd Barb Milbrath St Paul MN 55110- n � • .. . •. State of MN State of MN State of MN State of MN State of MN State of MN Ron Julkowski Building Official Ron Julkowski Building Official Ron Julkowski Building Official Movina Sempie Building Movers Inc 1045 Jessie St St Paul MN 55101-3810 Plumbina AWD Coolers of MN 301 Thomas Ave N Minneapolis MN 55405- Classic Construction of Cedar MN Inc 18542 Ulysses St NE East Bethel MN 55011- Duda Leon Plumbing Services 208 17 Ave N Hopkins MN 55343-7341 North Anoka Plumbing Inc 22590 Rum River Blvd NW St Francis MN 55070 Stull Lee Plumbing 15532 Nowthen Blvd Ramsey 'MN 55303 Sian Erector Electro Neon 8� Design Inc 1680 99 Ln NE Blaine MN 55449 � Terry Semple Allen Jones Curtis Strandlund Leon Duda Bill Jansen Leland Stull Michael Ziertman 10 � .. . -. State of MN State of MN State of MN State of MN State of MN State of MN Ron Julkowski Building Official � 0 � AGENDA ITEM � CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 CRY OF FRIDLEY ESTIMATE Ron Kassa Construction 6005 — 250�' Street East Elko, MN 55020 Miscellaneous Concrete Repair Project No. 344 EstimateNo. 1 .......................................................................................... $ 18,805.96 11 : AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 CfTY OF FRIDLEY TO: William W. Burns, City Manager�� FROM: David Sallman, Director of Public Safety DATE: May 29, 2002 DATE: Tobacco Compliance Appeal On March 19, 2002 Fridley Police conducted a tobacco compliance check of licensees in the City. An employee of The Billiard's Street Cafe sold cigarettes to a juvenile employed by the Police Department for the purpose of the compliance check. The Billiazd's Street Cafe requested a hearing and on April 17, 2002, Hearing Officer James Hoeft, Attorney at Law, conducted it. The owner of The Billiard's Street Cafe agreed to the facts of the case. The owner, Greg Asproth, raised concerns over the ordinance, the State legislature, and the Police Department's enforcement of the ordinance. The Hearing Officer found that the business was in violation of the ordinance and that the $500 civil penalty must be paid to the City or face possible suspension of the tobacco license. Mr. Asproth has paid the $250 fine for the employee that sold the cigarettes. Mr. Asproth has requested an appeal before the City Council of the "decision and fmdings of fact" as is provided for in Chapter 12.08(d) of the City Code. The appeal is supposed to take place at the next City Council Meeting following the appeal request, which would have been May 20, but Mr. Asproth requested to be present and was not available on that date. At his request, the appeal was moved to the June 3, 2002, Council meeting. I have attached copies of the material (Hearing Officer's Decision, police report, appeal request, etc.). Please let me know if you have questions regarding this issue. 12 Fridley City Code Secrion 12.08.E. 1. Individual. At any time prior to the payment of the administrative penalty as is provided for hereafter, the individual may withdraw from participation in the procedures in which event the City may bring criminal charges in accordance with law. Likewise, the City, at its discretion, may bring criminal chazges in the first instance. In the event a party participates in the administrative offense procedures but does not pay the monetary penalty which may be imposed, the City will seek to collect the costs of the administrative offense procedures as part of a subsequent criminal sentence in the event the party is charged and is adjudicated guilty of the criminal violation. 2. Licensee. At any time prior to the payment of the administrative penalty as is provided for hereafter, the licensee may withdraw from participation in the procedures in which event the City may permanently revoke the licensee's tobacco license in accordance with law. Likewise, the City, in its discretion, may revoke the licensee's tobacco license in the first instance. In the event a licensee participates in the administrative offense procedures but does not pay the monetary penalry which may be imposed, the City will suspend the licensee's tobacco license in accordance with section 12.08 b of this ordinance. B. Notice. Any officer of the Fridley Police Department shall, upon determining there has been a violation, notify the violator of the violation. Said notice shall set forth the nature, date and time of violation, the name of the officer issuing the notice and the amount of the scheduled penalty. C. Payment. Once such notice is given, the alleged violator may, within twenty (20) days of the time of issuance of the notice pay the amount set forth on the notice, or may request a hearing in writing, as provided for hereafter. The penalty may be paid in person or by mail, and payment shall be deemed to be an admission of the violation. D. Hearing. Any person contesting an administrative offense pursuant to this Chapter may request a hearing before the Hearing Examiner. Such request shall be filed in writing with the office of the Public Safety director within twenty (20) days of the offense. The Public Safety Director shall notify the Hearing Examiner, who will notify the licensee of the date, time, and place of hearing. The hearing shall be conducted no more than twenty (20) days after the Hearing Examiner receives notice of the request, unless a later date is mutually agreed �o by the Hearing Examiner, the licensee, sales clerk and the City. Within ten (10) days after such hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall affirm, repeal, or modify the charge against the licensee or sales clerk. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Hearing Examiner may appeal with the Public Safety Director within twenty (20) days of receiving notice of the Hearing Examiner's decision. At its next available regular meeting following the filing of a notice of appeal, the Council shall review the decision and findings of fact of the Hearing Examiner and shall affirm, repeal or modify that decision. E. Hearing Examiner. The position of Hearing Examiner is hereby created. The City Manager may, at his discretion and with the approval of the Council, contract with third parties for the furnishing of all services of the Hearing Examiner as contained in this Chapter and set the rate of compensation therefor. 13 Fridley City Code Section 12:09.B. F. Qualifications. The Hearing Examiner shall be an individual trained in law; however, it shall not be required that the Hearing Examiner be currently licensed to practice law in the State of Minnesota. G. Duties: The Hearing Examiner shall have the following duties: 1. Set dates and hear all contested cases. 2. Take testimony from all interested parties. 3. Make a complete record of all proceedings including findings of fact and conclusions of law. 4. Affirm, repeal or modify the penalty accessed. H. Failure to Pay. In the event a party charged with an administrative penalty fails to pay the penalty, if an individual, the party will be charged with the criminal offense. If a licensee, the Council will suspend the licensee's tobacco license. I. Disposition of Penalties. All penalties collected pursuant to this Chapter shall be paid to the City's treasurer and will be deposited in the City's general fund. 12.09. VIOLATIONS A. Administrative Civil Penalties: Individuals. Any person who sells any tobacco product to a person under the age of 18 years is subject to an administrative penalty: and any person under the age of 18 who attempts to purchase a tobacco product is subject to an administrative penalty. The administrative penalties are as follows: First violation. The penalty for the first violation is $250.00. Second violation within 12 months. The penalty for the second violation is $500.00. Third violation within 12 months. The penalty for the third violation is $750.00. B. Administrative Civil Penalties; Licensee. If a licensee or an employee of a licensee is found to have sold tobacco to a person under the age of 18 years, the licensee shall be subject to an administrative penalty as follows: First violation. The penalty for the first violation is $500.00 If the fine is not paid within 20 days the City may suspend the license to sell tobacco products for a period not to exceed 10 days Second violation within 12 months. The penalty for the second violation is $1000.00. If the fine is not paid within 20 days the City may suspend the license to sell tobacco products for a period not to exceed 30 days. Third violation within 12 months. The city may permanently revoke the tobacco license. 14 0 Fridley City Code Section 1�.09.E. C. Defense. It is a defense to the chazge of selling tobacco to a person under the age of 18 years, that the licensee or individual, in making the sale, reasonably and in good faith relied upon representation of proof of age described in State Statute Section 340A.503. subdivision 6, paragraph (a). D. Exemption. A person, no younger than 15 and no older than 17, may be enlisted to assist in the tests of compliance, provided that written consent from the person's pazent or guazdian has been obtained and that the person shall at all times act only under the direct supervision of a law enforcement officer or an employee of the licensing department, or in conjunction with a compliance check effort that has been pre-approved by the Fridley Police department. A person who purchases or attempts to purchase tobacco-related products while in this capacity is exempt from the penalties imposed by subdivisions (a) above. E. Revocation. The City Council has the authority to revoke any license as noted in 11.08. 15 zr w � . � V� '� . } F '�'"` � ' 4� ��^ , t =:" � `��'z��-J',e ' }r = - � y�F �M,� d .: � � � _. +. y E ,: �„l_ i ', b . . ' S" I .' t S � ""� y.; _{ ��-y T' ietp '�' �4',t y G ys;� t ,� Y:'D� � �`, '*�c ,��:- . ��'� � . � � �� T'�'�+ F. ��l � '1� �'�� II �.;fs.� �`x-�_ . .. ... . _ 'i`'3 .x�.'. � w� �� . .x.at.� "�. s ' � „��,,, t �� f �i .. y-+= i . _ . - .. .�F _ V�� _ - a - . � , . .. . . _ .�„'t� "11� " 3 M - . � . '� � �X a � �' .:�.� „�• ;,r m4. .�y�+qk . . . . " �. � .. . � . - ' � .. � , � � - � � _ ' �� R :i. ;�., � >:. X � �,,, p�r. � „ • CfIYOF . ��= �- }ItiiDLElt "� �° � �-`= _ �� _ -� FRIDLEY MUMCIPAL CENTER • 6431 UrtIVERSTTY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(763) 571-3450 • FAX (763j 571 1287 �`�`:=� . _ Mazch 26, 2002 � �`� :, s �.: � ,� z•�« �.., Billiazds Street Cafe �:�-�� Greg Asproth µ� - �; ' 7178 University Ave � - Fridley, MN 55432 `� } �" -�` �, ' - , � , . �-�."�� > � . � . � : .s �'�rr . - Deaz Mr. Asproth, - ,� � �`� - - _: �. '' t-_ . . . �.� .. �.. . .. '� � � : . .'�: '°: �. � _. ,. .^. �Z r f - .. . - .L. This letter is to notify you. of a$500 penalty that ihust be paid to the Crty of Fndley within 20 d'ay$-frrn� - ; �� - receipt of this letter. _. .� , ° L Y�; �` ��- ��` ;� �, -�` �`�" � " "y.�,,��' - � . � � � .. . . . ' .. ,v s �e* *r Cy�f - . _ ._ _ . .. . . .. .. " . __ . . . ' .:�' ^i..e. .?�'1+r$73 -.,:e-`_ r�, � �` . On March 19, 2002, the Fndley Police conducted tobacco complianee checks oa.32 ofthe 34 busuie , ' ... , . �, �_ .r:>z�:...�„� �,�r,�,.4., :� � in Fndley w2uch sell tobacco products `, Of the 32 busmesses checked, two (2) �b�s��Sess�,es�sol tc) � �� products to minors. Your busuiess is�one ofthose busmesses t�iat:sold a'tobaceo�odu�tito a_ or � ..n�:. . . � . . - r�y�. 1 A e^ _.: .p � - ��. am enciosing a complete copy of the tobacco ordinance for your u%fomiation Sechon 12 09, subd �bj; o°;_:; � - the Ordinance regulates the peaalties for licensees who se11 tobacco products to minors `� �' �� -' �= `�: � , � � � - � �- � - • �•. - - �. � " ° ;. � %� , . : ° . . `� ..� - - ` .,� 3 �,��.,~ _,��- �� *$ 7 �:.5 � � -d'.r,..: If a licensee or an employee of a licensee is found to have sold tobacco to`a person under therage �: •• 0 18 ears, the licensee shall be sub'ect to an administrative enal as ollows: �: '� `�� `�T �- ' I Y . . : J . . . _ , . . .P _.. n' f :, •: ' �-. - �� _ . �,- � .� - . _ � . - : . ,,� , First Volanon. The penalty for the frrst violation is $500. 'If the fine is not patd ti+nfh� ��-� � � '� � � � 20 days the City may suspend the licensee 10 sell�tobacco products for.a period not'`ta � r F�� . exceed 10 days -:� . ��_ , < ,� _ ._ -: , : ; _ ,.},� : ; , _. � _ � � � .. � > „ n . -. Second violation.within 12 months. The penalty for'the second violation `is $1000 If the , ��`- <_ <= �� fine is not paid within 20 days the city may`suspend the license to sell tobacco product.yr:*. ��-= for a period not to exceed 30 days. `� _ _ : : - _ �� '�� = - Third vcolahon ivithin 12 months: The City may permanently revake the tobacco Itcense.,, � � .�, ..;s : :: .: . xs �� _ . � r ;. x.,,, . � � �; _ _ - r � • , :; �- :` :, � ;w t _ -. 5.� .a� , , :. - . � ' If you should decide not to pay �the penalty, the City. may suspend your licensee to sell,tobacco produc�s � _ ,. , _ n . ., x -� , You should also be aware there is; an appeal process and that process is outlined m�Section I2.08 of;the � -��. : .�:. ordinance. -. - s � , �; Unless you plan to appeal the penalty please send a check for $500 to the City of Fridley within the 20 day period. If you have any questions please call me at 572-3632. , Sincerely,. _ k �` � � �� `-`�,��M�.,� - - � � Captain Lynne Tellers Fridley Police Department '' ; .. .f,�'��-' . . � . . . � . . � - , .. _ . 7 � � ¢�� . � d . . � �-y.`ry. � 16 - �'��`- 0 Apri124, 2002 Captain Lynne Tellers Fridley Police 6431 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Lynne, This is a request to appeal the hearing officer's decision, April 17, 2002, regarding the sale of cigarettes to a minor at our establishment. I would like to be present during the City Council meeting that will review this appeal. Thank you. Sincerely, .< ,. . --- i �- �_ �. Greg Asproth l� Owner Billiazd Street Cafe 7178 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 1115 Universitr Avenue, N;�ridley, Minnesota SS431 Phone (612� 514-13 �fax (611) 511-1431 �— INCIDENT REPORT �RENTAL HOUSING CASE#: J02-55742 FRIDLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT � OFFENSE INCIDENT DAY OF WEEK Tobacco Compliance/Ordinance Violation Tuesday DATE REPCRTED TIME REC'D TIME DISP TZME ARR TIME COMPLETE HOW RECEIVED 3/19/02 1700 1730 DAT� OCCURRED TIME OCCURRED 03/19/02 1700 PLACE CF OCCURRENCE GRID # 7178 Universitv Ave. Billiard's Street Cafe 5 NA.'NE 0: CCMFLAINANT; Vl�TI"I DCB City of Fridlev HOME ADDRESS PfiCNE 3USINESS ADDR�'SS PHONE RE?OR':'ED 3Y DOB City of Fridlev ADDRESS PHONE Stevens ASSIST�NG 0 Wimess: Liz Chevalier - Fndley Police Department Juveniles ANE (08i28i 19S6) 8c CMA (06/08/1985) 4M40 rs ln Pers'on\ W CFS �c � �� N: � CFF PR:;" �� ) VALUE OF THEFT VALUE RECOVERED Pub1i.0 VALUE OF DAMAGE Suspect: Mario Velasco Parayno JR (12!30/1961) 12207 Lincoln St. NE Blaine, MN. 55434 �'1 �- ��`� � __-JC�T.L�.1T S �� TNCIDE�iT: On 03!19!02 at 1�00 hours, we began checking businesses for tobacco compliance. At 1700 hours, we arrived at the abo� location and both ANE & C:�fA entered the business in an attempt to purchase a pack of cigarettes. ANE & CMA exited th same business a few� minutes later and ANE was holding a pack of Marlboro Red cigarettes. I asked ANE about the incident an she explained that the employee never asked about her age, however he asked to see her identification. The employee the handed the cigarettes to her and gave her some change for the cash tendered. .�NE described the employee as a male w�earing a"Nike" shirt and a white ball cap. I entered the business and saw the suspe� piaying pool. 1 identified myself as a Fridley Police Officer and explained the situation. I identified the suspecdemployee : �fario Velasco Parayno JR with his MN. photo driver's license. I explained that the City of Fridley would contact him regardin the sale. I gave Parayno a copy of the Fridley City Code Chapter 12. Parayno said he is the cook and he was only trying to the help the employee at the front counter. Parayno said he looked at th person's (ANE) identification, however thought it was alright to sell cigarettes to her. I placed the cigarettes into e�•idence. Related Case Number J02-�5379. \FA Case Filo Invaatiqation� � P�trol Pink Board �1.,,1,� l �,�.J� �ii�t�� 13�, �-.. �� .. �'�'�., Fridley, MN Police Department EVIDENCE SHEET — icR�:.,v�- s�75%z. rime a Item # Description BCA Lab Owne�'s Name � � / � � �' r� rr c-1:r. ( \ I �� , I \ \ \ , \`�� . i I i � � I i � �� . � � ' By�? �� e�, � -s3 ` Chain of Possession - Item(s) # Date Time Place From (sigr�ature) To (signature) 3-.��-�z 1 � . 7-01 White - Original ��llow - Case File STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA City of Fridley, a municipal corporation, �� Billiard Street Cafe, Greg Asproth — proprietor, Alleged Violator CITY OF FRIDLEY TOBACCO COMPLIANCE HEARING HEARING OFFICER'S DECISION CHARGES: ORDINANCE NO. 1. Sale of Tobacco Product to Minor Fridley Citv Code Chapter 12 (Ordinance 1084� 2. 3. *************************** The undersigned hearing officer received testimony regarding this matter at a hearing held on Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at Fridley, City Hall, 6431 University Avenue NE, Fridley, Minnesota 55432. Based on this testimony and all of the evidence presented, the hearing officer determines the following: First Chazge: Second Charge: Third Charge: Fourth Charge: FINDINGS No Violations Occurred No Violations Occurred No Violations Occurred No Violations Occurred 2� X Violation Occurred Violation Occurred Violation Occurred Violation Occurred , EXPLANATION Incident Report, Case No. J02-55742 was reviewed by each party for factual accuracy. Each party acknowledged the Report as factually accurate, and the same is adopted herein as the factual basis for the violation. Mr. Asproth testified that Mr. Parayno is currently an employee of Billiard Street Cafe, and was so employed on the date in question. Mr. Asproth further presented testimony as to his displeasure with the City, its Ordinance on tobacco sales, the State Legislature, and the Police Department's enforcement of the Ordinance. He expressed the opinion that there was no way he could insure that his employees would not sell to minors. This Hearing Officer expressed disagreement, and informed Mr. Asproth that if his business did not sell tobacco products, he could be assured that no sales would occur to minors. This Hearing Officer further advised Mr. Asproth that whatever his training entailed with regard to sale of tobacco products, it was most certainly deficient. That is evidenced by the following facts: �� (1) Of 32 businesses checked, only two businesses sold tobacco products to minors; (2) Billiard Street Cafe had had a prior violation (albeit outside of the prior 12 month period). This is the sole violation for this business within the past 12 months. 2 21 PENALTY Pursuant to Fridley City Code Section 12.09, Subdivision (a), the penalty shall be a$�00 fine payable to the City of Fridley. Said payment to be made within a time frame acceptable to the City. Date: � � � d o�� 157193 1 3 ZZ 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA City of Fridley, a municipal corporation, vs. Mario Velasco Parayno, Jr., DOB: 12-30-61 Alleged Violator CITY OF FRIDLEY TOBACCO COMPLIANCE HEARING HEARING OFFICER'S DECISION CHARGES: ORDINANCE NO. 1. Sale of Tobacco Product to Minor Fridlev City Code Chapter 12 (Ordinance 10841 2. 3. *************************** The undersigned hearing officer received testimony regazding this matter at a hearing held on Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at Fridley, City Hall, 6431 University Avenue NE, Fridley, Minnesota 55432. Based on this testimony and all of the evidence presented, the hearing officer determines the following: First Charge: Second Charge: Third Charge: Fourth Charge: FINDINGS No Violations Occurred No Violations Occurred No Violations Occurred No Violations Occurred 23 X Violation Occurred Violation Occurred Violation Occurred Violation Occurred EXPLANATION Incident Report, Case No. J02-55742 was reviewed by each party for factual accuracy. Each party acknowledged the Report as factually accurate, and the same is adopted herein as the factual basis for the violation. While Mr. Parayno is not usually involved in the sale of tobacco products, he did present testimony that he participated in the training efforts of the business owner as to tobacco compliance. Therefore, this Hearing Officer believes that the potential mitigating circumstance of Mr. Parayno being a cook, and simply "helping out" a clerk, is inconsistent with the compliance training received. No prior violations have occurred involving Mr. Parayno. PENALTY Pursuant to Fridley City Code Section 12.09, Subdivision (a), the penalty shall be a$250 fne payable to the City of Fridley. Said payment to be made within a time frame acceptable to the City. Date: � �O — o � 157190_1 2 24 � � CtTY OF FRIDLEY Date: To: From: Subject: AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 May 29, 2002 William Burns, City Manager �� Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Paul Bolin, Plannuig Coordinator Julie Jones, Environmental Planner Springbrook Watershed Implementation Project Work Plan Background In the fall of 2000, the Fridley City Council, along with the City Councils of the other t�u�ee cities involved in the Springbrook Watershed project, reviewed a plan to restore the wetlands at Springbrook Nature Center. That Implementation Plan, which was the result of a Phase I Clean Water Parniership (CWP) grant project, has now been fully funded. The Ciry of Fridley's grant agreement for a Phase II CWP grant project has now been approved by the MPCA, and we are ready to begin the project. The first step in the Phase II project is to draft a Work Plan, which is a more detailed version of the Implementation Plan created at the end of the Phase I Investigation. There have been not significant changes to the projects originally planned in the Phase I Final Report. Staffhas prepazed a draft Work Plan, which will be reviewed by the Advisory Committee for the Springbrook Project, tentatively on June 6. Our MPCA Project Manager is also currently reviewing the draft plan. In October 2000, when all four cities participating in the project were requested to partner with Fridley to fund a Phase II grant proposal, the City of Coon Rapids agreed to fund the project. However, they added a statement to their authorizing resolution requesting that each city involved in the project have an opportunity to review the project plans before work is begun. Staff is therefore, taking the attached Work Plan to each of the four City Councils (Blaine, Coon Rapids, Fridley, and Spring Lake Park) to satisfy Coon Rapid's request. All subsequent decisions related to project work will be ovetseen by the Advisory Committee for the project. There aze several Fridley representatives on the Advisory Committee. Recommendation There is no action the Fridley Ciry Council is required to take to approve the Springbrook Watershed Phase II Implementation Plan. However, it is suggested that the City Council pass a motion, giving staff authorization to proceed with the project according to the attached draft Work Plan. 25 SPRINGBROOK SUBWATERSHED IMPLE ME NTATI ON PROJE CT ��TORK PLAN for NrncAa�nw�P�h� Phase II Grant aad IVIetrOPO�C�Il �'ALU1C1� MetroEnvironment Parme�ship Grant May 2002 ver.rion Pmject Sponsor. Gty of Fridley Pmject Representative: J� Jo� Contributing Sponso=s: C'ity of Blaine City of Coon Rapids City of Spring Lake Park Six Cities Watershed Management Organization Anoka County Conservation Dismct Noxthtown Shopping Center 26 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMI'LEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS Tableof Contents ...........................................................................2 Attachments..................................................................................... 3 Statement of Problems and E�asting Conditions ..................4 Stateubent of Project Goals and Objectives ............................5 PlannedProjects .............................................................................7 Project Organization and Responsib�7ity ...............................15 Identification and Su,mmary of Prog�ain Elements ............17 Milestone Schedule ......................................................................19 Monitoring and Modeling Plan ................................................23 Information and Education Plan .............................................24 Budgets...........................................................................................25 2 27 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT ATTACHMENTS List of Tablea Table 1 AdvisoryComuiittee Members Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Technical Committee Membeis Education Subcommittee Project Support Budget Project Outlay Budget - Part A Project Outlay Budget - Part B Itemized Progrun O�rtlayBudget List of Figures � Figure 1 Six Cities Watershed District Overview Map Figure 2 Springbrook Subwatershed Map Figure 3 Phase I Monitoring Map List ofAppendixes Appendix 1 Quality Assurance Plan for Laboratory Testing Activities A,ppendix 2 Quality Assurance Plan for Constnzction Activities 3 : SPRINGBROOK PHASE II INII'LEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS In 1996, the City of Fridley received a dean Water Parmership grant from the NI'innesota Pollution Control Agency. The City of Fridley had applied for the grant on behalf of the Six Cities Watershed Management Organization over concems about the wetlands in its largest city park, the Springbrook Natiue Center. The Spnngbrook wetlands, which became the p�vjectre.rource under study, filter and detain storm water from 85% of the land area in the Springbrook Creek Subwatexshed, which is one of sis wateisheds the Six C'iries Watershed Management Organization oversees. The problem in the wetlands was that it was believed that about 90% of the emergent vegetation in the wetlands had died out over the previous ten years. No one could e�lain the loss, so it was difficult for the Nature Center staff to deternune how to begin attempu to restore the vegetation, which is critical for waterfowl habitat and treating storm water going downstream into the M�ssissippi River. Over a period of three years, this project studied the hydrology and biology of the ponds in the Springbrook Nature Center. Study of the Springbrook wetland's biology looked at plants and bugs for signs of what was happening in the ecology of the wetland Rating systems were used that had been designed to show a measure of wetland health. It is believed that the healthier a wetland is, the better wildlife habitat is provides. Sampling of invertebrates in the Springbrook wetlands showed that conditions rated on the lugh end of the "poo�'' scale. An analysis of the wetland vegetation showed moderate conditions. This meant that there was still some variety to the vegetation existing in the wetlands. A varied amount of species equals better w�dlife habitat The biological analysis showed Springbrook to be a declining wetland, but not beyond a point where restoration would be difficult. The hydrologvc analysis of the wateished studied both the gu�ty and the qsrantrty of storm water coming into the Nature Center ponds. It was determined tl�at there was not anything chemically wrong with the guulrr'y of the water coming into the Nauue Center that would be reason to cause sudden loss of plants. C�emical readings for the most part showed a typical urban watershed. However, the total suspended solid and phosphorus readings from storm water coming into the Nature Center on the east end of the pazk were extremely high during certain storm events. This site is the one that drains part of Norrhtown and the portion of the Cities of Spring Lake Park and Fridley that are located in the Springbrook Creek Subwatershed. Sediments tested show urban pollutant levels similar to other urban wetlands. However, ele�nts such as phasphorus, nitrogen, chloride, and nickel seem especially elevated. Such chemical concentrauons suggest that more storm water ponding is needed upstream. The water gsra/:'ty monitoring at the inlet coming into the east end of the park at the Springbrook Apartments showed whythis site had high chemical readings. Storm water was shown to be coming into this site at a rapid rate. Since there was little to no detention upst�azn, water levels bounced up quickly and receded qiuckly during even minor storm events. The other major inlet into the Nature Center ponds at the northwest comer of the park was bringing significant volurnes of water, but the hydrographs showed that upstream ponds in Coon Rapids were funcuoning to slow the speed of the water down. The flow data shows that the ponds drain quite qwckkly, however, so detention usually only lasts a few hours. 4 29 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT Several ovetland experts were consulted and agreed that cattails have been unable to germinate from seed much since the installation of the ow]et weir and the practice of not removing stop logs betw�en storm events. This practice sustained water levels between storm evenu. It was concluded that water levels need to recede more than what current conditions permit between storm events if seeds are to be allowed to germinate. Hydrograplu showed that it was tal�ng about two days to drain the water from a major storm event through the Springbrook wetlands. This is good for preventing downstream flooding, but bad for vegetation. Experts advise that the levels of water level bounce found in the Springbrook wetlands are too long for cattails to thrive. Even though wetland vegetation needs fluctuation water levels, it cannot witUstand sustained high water levels for long or frequent high water leve]s. The conclusion was that modifications need to be made to the Springbrook Subwate�hed thaz reduce the frequency and length of high water levels in the Springbrook wetlands �f vegetation is to survive. It was a]so detemiined that additional preparations need to be made to create conditions where wetland plants can occasionally gerininate. STATEMENT OF PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIOES The overall main goal is to restore and protect the Springbrook Nature Center wetland ecosystem The measurement of success will be a 66:33 emergent plandopen water balance. Currentlythere are 19 acres of open water, and the goal is to increase new emergent plant growth by at least 12 acres. It is anticipated that by unproving habitat conditions, wildlife diveisity will increase. The objectives for reaching this goal are: Objective # 1: Restore vegetauon within the Springbrook Nature Center wetlands. Objective # 2: Reduce storm water flows and irnprove water quality into the Nature Center wetland complex. Objective # 3: Modify water flows into and within the Nature Center to increase storm water inf�ltration and reduce emsion. Overall Resource Goa1s . Restore and protect the wetland ecosystem . . Create a 66:33 emergent plant/open water balance. . Increase new emergent plant growth by at least 12 acres. . Improve habitat conditions, which should cause wildlife diveisity to in�rease. 5 30 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT Hydredogic Goals The goal of the Springbrook Implementation Project u to reduce storm water runoff rates in the Springbrook Wateished to 19881evels, the last decade when the emeigent vegetation was present in sigpificant am,�u�s. Since 1989 over 130 acres of impervious surface has been added to the wate�hed, which represenu a 10% increase. The equivalent of a 10% reduction in volume of runoff is therefore, the goaL Water Quality Goals Besides the hydrologic goal to reduce the quantity of storm water iunoff, it is also a goal that a 10% reduction in storm water iunoff will result in a 10% reduction or more in chemical loading in the storm water nuioff entering the Springbrook wetlands at Site 1, 2 and 3. This will include a 10% reduction in nitrogen, phosphonas, and total suspended solids. Besides physical changes in the direction of storm water ninoff unplemented by the municipalities involved, educauonal efforts w�l be designed to result in fiuther chemical loading reductions through changes implemented by individual property owneis. It is also a goal to reduce the amount of sediments entering the wetland, if possible. Again, educational efforts with municipal officials will be aimed at unplementing new or different city faci7ity management practices that may help reduce the level of sedimenu entering storm drains in the Springbrook Wateished Biologic Goals Bird Banding Bird banding wi71 continue to occur on the third Sunday of the month as it has since May 1988. Ahhoug,h this does not include waterfowl, several of the netting locations are ne� to the wetlands. This provides some insight into the changing species of biids in the Nature Center. The goal will be to see species such as yellow headed blackbinds and American Woodcock retum to the park once vegetation is restored to the wetlands. It is expected, however, that the retum of these species w�l not occur unt� some time frar� after completion of this i�len�ntation project. Amphibian Survcy Using the method developed bythe Marsh Monitoring Program, frog and toad populations w�l contim�e to be monitored by staff and volunteers. It is a goal of this implementation project to see the renun of chonu frogs to the wetland. This species was commonly found in the park when significant amounu of emergent plants existed in the wetlands, but have not been heard since 1997. Macroiavertebrate Sampling If voluntee� are available, it is planned to repeat the invertebrate sampling that was completed in the Phase I Springbrook Resotu�ce Investigation. This will not occur unt� the ]ater part of Phase II to allow for changes to occur as a result in the storm water flow changes. The goal of the Phase II project will be to see some improvement in wetland health visible in the invertebrate samples. Springbrook's score in 1998 was 15 and was 11 in 1999. C� 31 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II INII'LEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT Vegetation Sutvey Besides the overall acreage of wetland vegetation, wetland health will also be monitored acco�ing to a method established in the DNR's Natural Heritage Program Three individual vegetation plots were established in 1999 for comparison monitoring of individual plant species gmups. It is the goal of this project that the diversity of species in these three plots will improve following storm water quantiry and quality improvements in the Springbrook Watershed. Education Goals The ultimate education goal of this project is for every propeny owner in the Springbrook Wate�shed to be provided educational materiaLs that clearly demonstrate that they m essence own "nverfront" propeny. The theme of all educational effotts wi71 build upon the public's interest in protecting the natural habitat and beauty of the Springbrook Wetlands. There will also be emphasis on improving the quality of storm water iunoff entering the M�ssissippi River from the Springbrook Wate�hed as a means to protect drinking water quality for one-quarter of the population of the State of Muinesota's inhabitants. It is anticipated that education about the location of water intake valves for the Mnueapolis and S� Paul water supply in Fridley w�l make property owner realize the importance of the cleanliness of storm water runoff from their property. Additional educational goals include reaching an understanding with the four city officials involved in this project that there are public propeny management practices that need to be changed to fiuther protect our waterways - like Springbrook Creek Officials have typically only considered flooding issues related to the Mississippi River, but our goal is for them to start considering water qualiry impacts as well. PLANNED PROJECTS The following projects were specif'�ed in the Springbrook Watershed Phase I Resource Investigation Final Report's Implementation Plan. They are numbered to relate to the three objectives listed at the beginning of the previous section. One project has been eli�unated from the original plan since it has already been completed and a few othexs have been modified due to some work already completed. Objective L• Restore vegetation within the Springbrook Nature Center wetlands. Project Ll Drawdown of Wetlaad (Part A& B) Sustained water levels have been maintained during non-storm event times since the installation of weus in the wetland complex in 1988. This management plan was based upon advice from wetland specialists with the Nlinnesota Department of Natlual Resources on how to best sustain aquatic vegetation. This plan did not anncipate signif`icantly increasing storm event water level bounces and increasing water turbidity. It appears that increased water level bounces and turbidity creates the need for occasional water level drawdowns to allow seed germination because of unsuccessful sprouting from rhizomes. The abundance of natural springs and a large wate�shed draining to the mzin wetland complex create conclitions in which there have been no natural drawdowns of a suff'icient length to allow for redevelopment of emergents. It is recommended that water levels in the mush be managed to aitif'icially create the drawdown affect. Because of the possible negative effects on park usage and 7 32 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT unl�owns about the natural seedbank in the wetland complex, a two-part approach is planned for the wetland drawdown. Part A w�l include a paitial drawdown of the wetland water levels. This would expose the outer fringes of the wetland complex and promote gertrunation of emergent vegetation. Cattail seeds should germinate in mudflat conditions all suminer long, but May and June, when temperatures az�e cooler are considered primary gemunation times. It may be possible to accomplish the 6b:33 planrJopen water ratio goal through a partial drawrlown that would expose significant portions, but not all of the pond bottom An experiment with a partizal drawdown is expected to take as long as three yeacs, dependent upon weather conditions. A seedbank assay has shown little seedbank available in the wetland. Seed is lils�ely buxied after y�a:s of large volumes of silt coming into the wetland complex. There is a possibilitythat dredging and expasing deeper areas of the ponds may expose some viable natural seedbank areas, however there is agreement that the potential for seedbank renovation will be minimal. Collection of seed on and off site byvolunteeis from preferable species of p]ants will be pursued as an ine�cpensivelysolution. The collected seeds can then be applied, using volunteers. Lowering the water leve]s even slightly, however, will likely affect the floating boardwall�s, one of which is part of a handicapped accessible tra�7. Even a paival drawdown may require some adjustmenu to the boardwalks to �et ADA grade standards. Since the accessible boazdwalk and tra� were installed with federal funds, this tra� must always remain accessible. City staff w�uld also monitor the drawdown closely and deternune whether or not it poses a dangerous situation for park users attempting to use the long boardwalk acrass the main wetland pond. All attempts will be made to keep the main boardwalk safely accessible. This may require strategically placing boards under the floats to keep the boardwalk level as it settles. Some of the floau will likely be damaged and require repair or replacement. If the boardwalk is unsafe to access for a short period of dme, access to the boardwalk will need to be blocked Educational signage, explaining why the appearance of the park (and possible trail changes) is changing, will be needed. If part A is successful in regenerating significant emergent plant growth, Part B, which entat�s a m,ore e�nensive complete drawdown on the wetland may not need to be completed. If Pact A is unsuccessful in regenerating signif�icant emergent plant growth, a continuation of the unplementation project w�l be pursued and additional grant fiznds will be requested so that Pait B can be implemented. Part B would entail a complete drawdown that would be accomplished by removing all four stop logs (32-inches) to allow for complete drawdown over one or more summer seasons. It would a]so involve planting vegetative plugs and the application of seed. Most w�tland species should be spaced one to t6ree feet This equates to approximately 11,000 plugs per acre. A mixnire of seven species of forbs and nine species of grasses, sedges and nuhes would cost approximately $6,000/acre. For ten acres of restoration, the total cost of materials is expected to run approximately $76,000. Labor to install these materials may vary gready depending on the stability of the substrate after lowering water levels. Planting plugs w�71 be very difficult if the substrate is soft and unable to support the weight of a person. A conservative estimate for labor is $120,000. Volunteers would be solicited from each of the four com�,,,�nmPs, as we1L 33 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMI'LEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT Part B would also include disuibution of additional wetland plant seeds or rhizomes. Wetland seed applied at 18 pounds/acre broadcast with frve species of forbs and seven species of gxasses, sedges and rushes would cost approxi��ately $1,600/acre. Because the main boardwalk will be inaccessible for a long time under plans for Part B, access to the west end of the park would require installation of a new trail along an existing berm This would necessitate the consuvction of two bridges - one over the outlet diuh and one over the Stony Brook overflow ditch. The ciries would complete as much of this structut-al work as possible with city staff and equip�nt. CWI' grant funds will not be used for cash expenses of any suuctural improvements, however, other funding sotu�ces will be applied to stnictural improvement cash costs. The water levels would be raised following re-establishment of emergent vegetation and the boardwalk would then be accessible. However, current scientific infom�ation mdicates that periodic drawdowns will likely need to reoccur every iive years to redevelop and maintain the emergent �h comuiunity even if significant flow reducnons are achieved through upstream inf'�ltration. Part A of the wetland drawdown project will enable the cities to determine if a new west tra� and bridge system is a necessary improvement to the park in o�ier to allow access during times of drawdown. ('�sts-Part A: Costs-Part B: InitaalDra�vdo.�vn constnzction and west trail construcnon Project LZ Springbrook Ponds Man�gement Pmgram Project 1.1 addresses a drawtlown for emexgent plant germination. However, a long-term water level management plan w�ould allow p]ant and wildlife habitat management on a comprehensive scale. It is anticipated that a subcommittee of the Technical Committee wi71 be formed to determine guidance for the initial drawdown efforrs for projea 1.1, helping the Nature Center Director determine howto proceed This subcommittee wuuld studythe results of the drawdown efforts as theyproceed and aid in preparing a water level management plan for the wetland complex. Czurendy, the water levels at the weirs at Site 1, Site E, and the owlet can be adjusted by rempving boarcls. � The Fridley Park and Recreation staff and the Wetland Management Subcomrnittee will need the aid of a consultant to develop a pond management program This program would protect the ecosystem 34 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMI'LEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT of the Springbrook Nature Center and provide storm water storage capacity that w71 prevent flooding downstream from the Nature Center in Fridley. The purpose of the management plan will be to maintain the 6633 emergent vegetauon/open water coverage ratio proposed in this plan. However, this wi71 be feasible only if there are reductions in storm water bounce levels. Ideas that will need to be investigated in the plan w�l include: • Following an initial draw down of the wetland and successful gemiination of emeigent vegetation, how often should successive drawdowns occur? • Should the depths of the two upstream pond areas be adjusted during storm evenu? If so, how can the weus be redesigued to make this task easier? • Should boards in the outlet weir be removed and replaced following storm events to allow the depth of the main pond to drain down more quicklyto reduce the effects of storm water bounce on the wetland vegetation. Since response to storms mtut occur within 2-3 hours of the event, staffing possib�ities after hours need to be considered Hc�w can we prevent downstream flooding? How do we prevent upstream flooding? • Determine an adequate silt removal schedule for each sediment delta location. • How should the outlet weir be modified to facilitate water level managemen�� Modifications to the weir could be incorporated into the constnu:tion of the bridge over the owlet. Costs: WE1C I L Welt .J'�ria�braok Pond Management Plan Project 13 Invasive and Exotic Species Control Pusple loosestrife control w11 be necessaryto ensure a successful wetland restoration, Springbrook Nature Center staff w�l coordinate biological and physical control efforts. Biological control with Galenrcel�a .,-pp., Hylobisrr tran.rver.rovittatu.r or Narrophy.r rpp. (selected species of beetle and weevil that feed exclusively on purple loosestrife) will be e�anded. Temporary staff will need to be hired to coordinate the use of voluntee� to physically remove flower heads and to dig out the planu. Staff will maintain records and map the areas treated for future reference. Volunteers w�l also be used to raise new supplies of beetles each year. Costs: The ]abor cost for this effort is expected to be $5,500 in both Part A and Part B of the Phase II project. Objective 2: Reduce storm water flows and improve storm water qualiry into the Springbrook Nature Center wetland complex. Pmject 2.1 Stormwater System Inspection and Maintenance Plan Cxurently there is no policy or plan in p]ace for periodic inspection of the various ditches, ponds, and control stivcttues in the Springbrook Subwatershed. During Advisory Committee tours of both public and private ponds near the Nanue Center in the spring/summer of 2000, it was apparent that there are problems resulting from ]ack of maintenance. A plan needs to be in place to specify the m;n;*rn,n► annual stormwater system inspection and maintenance requirements of the Six �ities Watershed Management Organization. This should include a deta�ed description of the key 10 35 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT components of the storm water management system that must be inspected, the frequency of inspections, items to doc�nt during inspections and how to report the findings. It should also identify maintenance thresholds to ensure that water is flowing or is detained as the system is designed to function. This plan needs to be in place to ensure that both public and private entities in the subwatershed understand their responsibility in maintainiug their part of the storm water management system and are held accountable to the Six Cities Watexshed Management Organiz.ation. Cxumntly, each Caty is responsible for the control struct�ues located in their community. The continuance of this method of accountability is questionable and needs to be evaluated. Each of the cities tbat are part of the SG�MO are required to have ordinances that pmvide for the management of storm water. The ordinances in p]ace regarding storm water management at the cities of Blaine, Coon Rapids, Fridley, and Spring Lake Park need to be evaluated to ensure that they are meeting the necessarystorm water management requirements. A detailed inspection and maintenance plan would require the aid of a qualif'ied engineering firm The review of ciry storm water management ordinances and maintenance plans could be completed with C'ity staf£ Maintenance of the system is the responsibility of the cities. Cos� Project 22 Impmve Stormwater Storage Capacity in Subwate=shed 3 Hydrographs for monitoring Site 3 show a quick response to rainfall indicating there is low stoxage or detention in that subwateished. It is a relatively small seginent of the subwateished with 246 acres, but with a high percentage of irnpervious surface. Wh7e awaiting funding for Phase II, the ponds at the Springbrook Apartment complex have been modif'ied to aid better retention on site. The control stnict�ue between Pond 1(northem most pond) and Pond 2(central pond) has been lowered This is expected to accomplish two goals; l) increase the storage capacity of pond by lowering the average water level, and 2) allow water to flow through the other Springbrook Apartment ponds and eventually discharge to monitoring site # 6. Springbrook Apartmenu is considering installation of vegetative buffers along son�e of the pond edges as an effort to discourage geese from using the area. Now that these modifications have been made at Springbrook Apartmenu, the outlet of Pond 3, which is located inside the Nature Center needs to have a diffiuer added to it to create a broader area of infiltration of this storm �vater into the southeast comer of the pazk Another opponuniry to increase stormwater storage capacity in subwatershed 3 is to expand the pond that serves the Northtown Metro Bus Depot Park n-Ride. The pond could be expanded by approximately one acre and likely provide three acre-feet or more of temporary storage. Costs: 11 36 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT 547,000 Improve J'torm�vater.l�torage Capacily in .!'ub�vatexrhed j : diffuser at Site 6 Northtown metrc Project 23 Improve Coon Rapid's Regional Ponds A site visit on July 10, 2000, the moming after a heavy rain storm, showed the Technical Committee that signif'icant erosion and suvct�ue overflow was occurring at the wooden control structure upstream of Site 1 on the noith side of 85�h Avenue. There appeaxs to be an opportunityto incxease the detention capacity of the three ponds consuucted in 1995 by the City of Coon Rapids. Review of the ponds as constivcted, showed that they were already close to normal water levels less than 24 hours after the stoxm, indicating that more storage would be passible. Longer detention would also be necessary in order to provide increased sih and chemical removaL A detailed hydraulic and hydrology study is needed to determine if additional storage capacity is passible under existing easements and to design the recommended improvements Costs: Improve Caon Xapidr� XegionalPorrd.r stri.icture _: i'iTi Project 24 Identify and Iaitiate Iafihration Opportunities This project has a goal of reducing runoff rates to 19881evels, the last decade when the emergem vegetation was present in signif'icant amounu. Since 1989 over 130 acres of impervious surface has been added to the wateished, which represenu a 10% increase. The equivalent of a 10% reducrion in volume of runoff is therefore, the goaL The addition of 54 acre-feet of sto�ge will accommodate all of the runoff from a 5" precipitation event from 130 acres of icnpervious surface. This can be done through infiltration or extended detention or both. Specific detention or infiluation opponunities must be inventoried. The inventory must include topographic data to allow for hytirologic and hydraulic analysis. In addition to an inventory, a deta�ed hydraulic and hydrology study is needed to design the necessary fac�7ities with consideration of locaxion wirhin the watexshed, e�sting and proposed infrastructure and topographic elewation. Subwatersheds 1 and 3 are the highest prioray for inventory and implementauon. Although, additional pond storage oppommities appear feasible as noted previously, the limited size of these ponds w�l provide only a small portion of the desired storage increase. Therefore, methods of infiltration will need to be part of the solution. Costs: ;50,000 Ident� arrd Initiate Pandsng Opportsrnitier to ciues Project 2.5 Reducing Northtown Storm Water RunoH 12 37 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II INII'LEMENTATION PROJECT WORR PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT There currently is no storm water detention system at Northtown Shopping Center other than a.36 acre detention pond at 85�b and Unive�ity Avenue, which was consuucted in 1997 to savsfy cuaent ponding require�nts in the C'ity of Blaine related to impervious surface expansion due to consul,u,�tion of the Metro Bus Depot Park I�Ride. Two thirds of the land area of the Northtown Shopping Center drains directly into the Springbrook Nature Center at Site 3 without any retention. The other thini drains into Site 1. Since Site 3 is the location of extreme fluctiiating water levels during storm events, it is imperative to pursue retention possibilities at Northtown, which is the largest single source of ungervious surface in the Site 3 subwateished that does not have ponding. It may also be beneficial to re-route additional nuioff through the Coon Rapids regional ponds to monitoring site 1. The feasibility of various storm water retention or re-routing options will be analyLed to determine the most cost effective approach. A feasibiliry study explonng these options will be prepared by a qualified engineering consultant. 5�31,00� Redu�ing Northto�vn J'tarm Water Xsrnoff Project 26 Reduciag Spring Lake Park Stotm Water RunoB There is no storm water control systems in place in the portion of the Springbrook Subwatershed that drains from land within the City of Spnng Lake Park boundaries. Th�s propercywas developed primarily in the 1960's bef ore storm water management requirements were in place. As with Northtown, runoff from this land area is coming mto the Springbrook Nature Center at Site 3. The best options for detention and infihration of storm water in the Spring Lake Park portion of the Site 3 Subwatershed identif'�ed as part of the inventory and hydraulic/hydrologic analysis m Project 2.4 will be implemented. Costs: Redu�e .l'pring Lake Park .Storm lYlater Kun� retenuon 5100,000 Objective 3: Mociifywater flows into and within the Springbrook Nature Center to increase storm water inf'�ltration and reduce erosion. Project 3.1 Stabilize Site 3 Channel The stream that exists between monitoring Inlet Site 3 and the Main Wetland Complex is currently downcutting. The downcutting becomes more severe as it gets closer to the Site 3 Inlet It has been concluded that the downcutting occumng at the stream has lowered the unconfined water table of the adjacent shrub swamp contributing to iu uansition to mesic forest communiry. WWth the downcutting the site is functioning m+ore as a floodplain system with fewer saturation events. In addition the stream has taken on ditch characteristics with a scope and affect that draws the groundwater down to lower levels to reduce the time of saturation at the surface. An additional 13 : SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMI'LEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT problem that is occurring from the unnatural erosion at this stream section is sedimentation downstreazn in the main wetland complex where the velocities of the water slow down at the open water and allow sediment to settle out. There are differing opinions as to what is the most effective solution to this erosion problem, but widespread agreement that it needs to be corrected in order for if other projecrs to be viable. Treatment options that have been discussed include re-meandering the channel, installing check dams, armonug the channel, and abandoning the channel completely to promote diffuse flow and infiltration. A detailed topographic survey is needed to determine whi�ch approach would be most effective. A geomoiphologvc analysis of the stream also needs to be done. Knowledge of ground water flows both before and after modifications to the stream are also necessary. It is expected that the investigative and design work of this project can be included in Part A of Phase II, but the act�ial modifications to the Site 3 cha.nnel should not be completed until other upstream detention effoits are complete. Costs-Part A: .S�tabils.�atian of J'ite 3 Cbanne! Costs-Part B: .1'tabsls.�ation of ,1'iie 3 Channel Groundwater 58,500 $3 ;32,000 Pmject 3.2 Stabilization of Site 1 Chaanel Monitoring Site 1 represents the ]argest subwatershed and the largest flow Apparently one fork in the channel after the weir at Site 1 has been abandoned In the meantime the primaiy channel is experiencing erosion problems. This project would re-flood the abandoned channel and stab�ize 300 feet of the primary channel with biostab�7ization techniques at $30/linear foot. However, this project should not be completed until upstream modifications are complete, which are not e�ected to occur in the iust three y�ars of the Phase II project. Costs-Part B: J'tabils.�atian of .1'ste 1 Cfiannel Project 33 Recharge Wetland in Northeast Comer of the Park The Natum Center director has noted a change in the composition of the Shrub Svvamp between the Site 3 inlet and the fust trail crossing. It is common to find shrub swamps along the saturated so�s of watercoiuse edges such as the one located at this site. The water regime for a shrub sw�amp is an 14 39 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II INII'LEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/OZ DRAFT open one so that water from run off, streams, and rivers moves in and out during the course of a year. This resuhs in conditions where the ground water is near the surface to 1" deep seasonally (Redington, 1994). This site has shown indications of succession to a mesic forest cominunitywith the occurrence of box elder, elm, and green ash. These trees are more characteristic of a site wi�h temporary spring flooding or saturation rather then peisistent saturation throughout thegrowing season. This �s mdicauve of a significant change in the ground water flows in this area of the park. One possible way to bring more ground water into the area is to re-route some of the water from the north Wal-Mart storm water pond. It is anticipated that tivs can be done by installing a series of small pipes through the berm on the west side of the pond to promote diffuse flow throug,h the shrub wetland The berm had originally been biult to prevent flooding into the Nature Center during high water events but apparendyhad the unintended consequence of reducing the contribiuing watershed of the wetland. The groundwater data and topographic information gathered for project 3.1 will be used to design this project. Costs: Ketharge 6Y/etland in the Nartheart Corner of ihe Park s6,000 The Quality Assurance Plan for constntction has not yet been developed. When construction plans are developed in fiuther detail, a Quality Assurance Plan will be developed and will become Appendix 2 of this plan. The purpose of the plan will be to make sure that all work is completed correctly and that erosion control measures are kept in place. PROjECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITY Project Sponsot The Project Sponsor is the City of Fridley, which will continue to serve as the lead agenry for contracts and finances as it did in Phase I. A grant management fund has been established for the Spnngbrook Implementation Project. Pmject Represeatative Julie Jones, Environn�ental Planner for the C''ity of Fridley, w�l continue to serve as the Project Representative for the Phase II project, as she did in Phase I. Advisory Committee The Advisory Committee established for the Phase I Investigation will be used as the lead group of individuals to oveisee the Phase II Implementation Project. A few of the meinbeis have changed due to staffing or leade�ship changes at some of the organizations involved, but most membexs will remain unchanged, offering continuity to the project. Members of the Advisory Committee are listed in Table 1. 15 . � SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT The membe�s represent the four cities in the watershed, SG'WMO, businesses in the area, non profit gnoups, agencies, and interested individuals. If other interested patties are identified, they wi71 be added to the Committee. The tasks of the Advisory Committee will include: • Pmvide local leadeiship • Assist in the development of the Work Plan • Develop consensus on project goals, and gain political acceptance of project objectives • Provide the Techn.ical Committee with any feedback needed to direct monitoring activities • Oveisee activities of the Educate Subcommittee • Review data and ask questions of the Technical Subcommittee • Oversee findings of Wetland Management Plan Subcommittee � Ove�ee findings of the Watexshed Management Plan Subcommittee • Oversee completion of an Implementation Plan according to budget • Help Technical Committee write and present issues in an understandable format • Identify opponunities for their organization(s) to meet its obligations set forth in the Implementation Plan for the Phase II project When technical assistance is required, the Advisory Committee will utilize the l�owledge and expertise of the Technical Committee. Technical Committee In addition to an Advisory Committee, the Technical Committee �mbers originally established for the Resotu�ce Investigation Project will be asked to meet again if necessary. The purpose of this committee is to provide technical support to the project. The Technical Committee will provide the information necessaryto assist the Advisory Committee ensure that the project plans will result in the desired results as far as the water quality and flow reduction goals of the Work Plan. Since not all of the Advisory Committee membexs have a technical background, the Technical Committee will be relied upon for technical analysis of the project (e.g. monitoring plan, implementation options). It is anticipated in Phase II, however, that will likely rely upon the membership of the Technical Committee to serve on smaller subcommittees specific to a certain task, such as developing the Wetland Management Plan. Additional technical ezcperts beyond the committee list w�l be sought if necessaryto prov�le expertise in a ceitain area lacking in the commmee membership. Also, to streamline the number of ineerings reqwted of the Technical Comm+t*Pe Ciiair will l�ely be asked to attend Advisory Committee meetings to be able to provide feedback between the two committees. The current membeiship of the Technical Committee is listed in Table 2. There are representatives from a variety of backgrounds on the Committee, including private, non-profrt, and government positions re]ated to water quality issues. The tasks of the Technical Committee may include: • Provide Advisory Committee with suggestions and recommendations for developing preliminary ProleM g� � • Develop and review teclinical deta�s of the Work Plan, including the monitoring plan • Provide input on the selection of engineering consultants • Assist in monitoring, data analysis, watershed assessment and modeling efforts • Review and come to consensus on technical data 16 41 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT • Provide recommended management goals f or the Springbrook Nature Center Wetland Complex • Make recommendations as to the best options presented by consultant(s) Subcommitteea The Education Subcommittee will also be re-established for the Phase II project. These individuals inchide a representative from each of the four cities, as well as the Northtown Mall, Springbrook Nature Center, Anoka Conservation District, and the MPCA. The membe�hip to this subcominittee is listed in Table 3. 'Thu subcommittee will be responsible for carrying out the information and education plans for the project under the direction of the Project Representative and the Advisory Committee. Throughout the project, it is anticipated that other subcommittees of the Advisory Comrnittee and Technical Comcnittee membezs will be established to oversee specif'ic project tasks. It is planned that a subcoinmittee will be established to develop the Wetland Management Plan and the Watershed Inspection and Maintenance Plan. IDENTIFICATION AND SUMMARY OF PROGRAM ELEMENTS Pmgram Element L• Development of Work Plan Development of the work plan w11 be coordinated between the City of Fridley Project Representative, Juli�e Jones, and the NIPCA Project Manager. Due to the need to get the project started qwckly, and due to the facc that it has been a year and a half since we originally presented this project ideas to the City Counc�s, it has been agreed that the draft Work Plan w�l be presented to the �ty Council's of each of the four cities involved to ensure that they continue to support the plans for the project as laid forth in the Implementation Plan thax they agreed to fund in October 2002. There has been so� management and Council representation changes due to elections over the past two y�ars, so we want to make sure everyone is current with the project plans. The work plan w�l be completed in June, 2002. Modifications w71 be made to the work plan as necessaryto ensure successful complet�on of the project. The Advisory Committee will also be involved in reviewing the draft Work Plan before it goes to City Council. Pmgr.�m Element Z: Planaing aud Implemeating Storm Water Flow Reductions The fust step in the Springbrook Implementauon Project will be to hire an engineering consultant to prepare suitable options for the Advisory Committee to consider for storm water infiltration and detention options in the Site 3 Subwatershed. A consuhant will also be hired by the C''ity of Coon Rapids (part of their inkind contributions) to analyze options for expanding the capacity of existing storm water detention ponds in the Site 1 Subwatexshed. Once recommendations are made for physical improvemenu in the watershed, and all parties involved agree on a project to complete, then an engineer consultant will be hired to design the unprove�nu. Once the work is underway to reduce storm water flows in the Site 1 and 3 Subwatersheds, further study and design work will begin to fmd ways to recharge the Springbrook wetland area in the northeast part of the park A geomorphologic analysis of the Site 3 channel and a detailed topographic survey needs to be completed in order to detemune possible design options for the Site 3 channel and to design a plan for recharging the wetland area in the northeast end of the Nature Center. An analysis of ground water flows is aLso planned. 17 '"TJ SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT Upon investigating options, the Site 1 and 3 channe]s will be stab�7ized, using the best options determined for reducing impact to the Springbrook wetlands. Another project that involves physical changes in the watershed is the expaasion of the existing storm water pond that was constriuted a few yEars ago to meet the drainage needs of the MNDOT Park and Ride site at Northtown Mall. There is room to e�and the pond and funding set aside in the project to complete this task The City of Coon Rapids will also be studying the feasibility of expanding the existing regional pond system just north of the Springbrook Nanzre Center. This series of three ponds drain into monitoring Site 1 and overflow into monitoruig Site 2. If it is determined that those ponds need to be expanded, the cost of those improvemenu may need to be covered in and extension of the Phase II project, depending on the anticipated cost. Pmgram Elemeat 3: Wetland Management Plan/Drawdown In order to begin the wetland drawdown experiment, a subcommittee of technical experts in wetland , hydrology and biology will be created to develop a plan for the initial wetland drawdown and a long term plan as we1L Siah St. Clair, Director of the Springbrook Nature Center, will lead this team and oversee the wetland drawdown. This plan w�l be presented to the Advisory Committee when it is complete prior to commencement of the initial drawdown. Mr. St. C7air will also oveisee low tech efforts to promote reseeding of existing species of wet]and plants, using volunteers and students when possible. This will involve collecting desired wettand plant species seeds and spreading them at the appropriate time for successful germination. The control of invasive and exotic plant species w�71 involve continuance of an P�;trt� grant project to reduce purple loosestrife populations with beetles. Siah St. C9air will oveisee this ongoing progr� that involves the use of volunteeis. The program has already reduced the level of purple loosestrife invasion significantly. Pmgram Element 4: Monitoring Water quality and quantity monitoring will occur from September 2002 to at least August 2004. Monitoring may go on beyond this time frune, depending on the timing of physical changes to the watershed as part of this project. At m;,,;T„um, tw�o of the inlets into the wetland will be monitored again for post-consuuction data assessment. These two sites are: ■ Site 1, which is the main northwest inlet, draining mast of the portion of the watershed located in the City of Blaine and all parts of the C�ity of Coon Rapids that in the Springbrook Wateished. ■ Site 3, which is the main east inlet, draining a Spring Lake Park residential area and the south half of Northtown MaIL Additional sites may be added to the Monitoring Plan if preliminary data shows it is necessary. The same type of equipment that was used in the Phase I Investigation will be used again. This equipment inchided a pressure transducer, a C3� 10 datalogger, and an ISCO automatic sampler at each station. The purpose of the Phase II monitoring will be to determine if any changes in storm water runoff quantity or quality can be detected post-constniction after the installation of each individual constnu:tion project in the watexshed Testing of each change separately wi71 be icnportant to leam which techniques were most effective in desired flow reductions and chemical load reducaons. 18 43 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMI'LEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT Pmgram Elemeat 5: Information and Education The Education Subconunittee that was created in the Phase I CWP project, under the leadership of the Project Representative, will carry out the information and education p]ans laid forth for in the Phase I Implementauon Plan. These plans include workshops, videos, direct ma�7ings, displays and passible ordinance amendments. See the Information and Education section later in the Work Plan. In addition to the planned activities, the Project Representative wi71 also continue to putsue oppomwities to keep this project in the public's eye through local media oudets. Pmgram Element 6: Devebpment of Wate:shed Maaagement Plan In the later stages of the Phase II project, a subcommittee of the Advisory and Technical Committees w71 be created to develop a storm water system inspection and maintenance plan for the Springbrook Watershed Czurently, there is no fonnalized inspection plan in place in the Six Clties WMO to hold each city accountable for tnaiutaining storm water conuol suucttues located in their communiry. However, it is the policy of the Six Cities WMO that each city is financially responsible for maintalIIing systems located in their city. An accountab�7ity system to maintain the e�sting and added storm water controls will be the end result of this P�• Pmgram Elemeat 7: Pmject Administration The C'.ary of Fridley will carry out the da�to-day project management and admiuistration of the Springbrook Watershed Implementation Project just as was done in the Phase I Investigation under the direction of Julie Jones. Ms. Jones w�l coordinate and schedule all meetings, maintain necessary records, work with the Fridley Finance Department to maintain fmancial accounting in the C'it�s grant management fund, supervise clerical duties, and complete all repons as required for the various grant sources. progrdm Elemeat 8: Final Report and Analysis It is anticipated that a final repoxt w71 be required at the end of the Springbrook Watershed Implementation Project to provide feedback to the various agencies financing the pro�ect. This report w�l be comp�ed in a format designed to meet all reporting require�nts of each of the agencies. It w�l be reviewed and released by the pro�ect's Advisory Committee members once they have approved it's contenu. The Final Report w11 be disuibuted to all committee members and the elected officials of each of the four cities. MILESTONE SCHEDULE program Element L Devebpmeat of Work Plan 19 . . SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT Program Flement 2: Planning and Implementing Storm Water Flow Reductions 20 45 SPRINGBROOg PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT Continue le Loosesuife beetle ro Nov. 2002 - une 2005 F� staff volunteers Project Element 4: Monitoring Pioject Element 5: Information and Education Project Element 6: Developmeat of Wate=shed Plau 21 . � SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMI'LEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT Pmgram Element 7: Pmject Administration Ptogram Element 8: Final Report and Analysis 22 47 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT MONITORING AND MODELING PLAN Monitoriag In order to analyze the changes made to the flow of storm water and potential impact to the chemical content of storm water entering the Springbrook wetlands, stream monitoring will take place at Site 1 and 3. These are the two main inlets that were nwmtored during the Phase I invesugauon. Monitoring stations w71 be established in the same locations as in Phase I. Since a temporary technical assistant will not be hired for the Phase II project, it is anticipated that the �ty of Fridley will contract with a qualif'�ed agency, such as the Anoka Conservation District, to conduct the monitoring. If possible, sampling equip�nt will be borrowed from the MPCA, as was done in the Phase I investigation. Monitoring equipment will include a pressure transducer, a QZ 10 datalogger, and an ISCO automatic sampler at each station. This is the equipment used in Phase I. In order to measure any possible storm water changes as a result of Spring Lake Park's street reconstn�ction project, it is planned to attempt to get set up a monrtoring station at the Site 3 inlet by September 1, 2002, the date the street project is expected to be complete. The purpose of the fall installation wi71 be to get some additional baseline data before additional changes are installed in the Site 3 Subwate�shed later in the fall - probably late October. Successful monitoring will be difficult during this time of the year where rainfall is scarce. However, it will be important to detemune if there are any changes in storm water flow rates and chemical or sediment loading as a result of street curb installation in the residenrial area of Spring Lake Park located in the Site 3 subwateished before other pmject constnution takes place. Monitoring equipment will be remain in place overwinter 2002-03, if possible. Equipment that needs to be removed for weather or security reasons, will be reinstalled as soon as the spring 2003 weather permits. The automatic sampling equipment will monitor flows on a continuous basis from Apn12003 through June 2003 or until at least eight rain storrns of varying rainfall amounts are recorded. Average stage w�l be recorded in 15-minute intervals. The continuous flow data w71 be checked monthly. The same procedums will occur during the 2004 rainfall season. Monitoring may continue into the 2005 season, depending on the date of consuvction of storm water flow modifications made in the Site 1 and 3 Subwatersheds. Stormwater sampling will be uiggered based upon a change of 0.05 feet or more within a one-half hour interval and w�71 be collected at discrete time intexva]s over the hydrograph Once storms are complete, the stage data will be downloaded, graphed, and related to the discrete samples collected. Stormwater samples will only be tested only for phosphonu, nitrogen, and total suspended solids - the main problems discovered in the Phase I Invesugation. Since Anoka Conservation District is already contracting with Braun Intertec, the laboratory we used in the Phase I investigation, we do not anticipate soliciting laboratory proposals. It is anticipated that we w�71 use Braun Intertec, which w�l save staff transportanon costs in delivenng lab samples and will provicie consistency with the Phase I data collection and analysis methods. We already have a Quality Assurance Project Plan established with Braun Intertec, which is attached to this plan as Appendix 1. 23 . ; SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT Modeling Once the data is collected, hydrographs will be created to compare to the data collecced in the Phase I investigation for monitoring Site 1 and 3. Results will be included in a Final Report on the Phase II project. Cliemical testing spreadsheets will also be created to compare to the water qualitytest resuhs analyled m the Phase I investigation. INFORMATION AND EDUCATION PLAN It is the education commitment of this project to inform each propeny owner in che Springbrook Wateished that they in essence own "riverfront" propeny. It is also a comr„+rr►,Pnt of the Phase II pro�ect to inform each property owner in the wateished of their potential personal 'unpact on the Springbrook Wetlands. Most people m the area are familiar of the Springbrook Nature Center and feel an obligation to protect it. The educational efforts of Phase II will build on people's interest in this natural resource that is a benefrt to their propeny values. All educational effons will attempt to address these key elements: • Where their storm water gces • How the amount of impervious surface on a propenytranslates into storm water runoff • What peisona]/business activities affect the quality of storm water iunoff � How poor storm water quality affects natural resouc�ces like the Springbrook Nature Center ponds A subcommittee of the Advisory Committee (see Table 3) will oversee the various educational efforts planned These projects include: Free low unpact lawn care workshops for the public that wuuld promote a reduced use of lawn fertilizers and chemicals. The four ciries involved in this pmject will promote participation in these workshops that will be conducted by the Anoka County/U of M Extension Service. The cost of the workshops would include the cost of promotion (�f any, as the cities have many means of coa� �n��ating to the public at no additional cost in caty newsletters and cable tv), refreshments, and handouts. The workshops will also be video taped for later airing on each of the four city's local cable television station. Pazacipation by City staff and elected officials of all four cixies in the Project NEMO progxanz as an effort to promote low impact lawn and street maintenance on city properties. Direct mail piece(s) addressed to each propeny owner in the Springbrook Watexshed, designed to educate the public about the fact that they own "riverfront" property. Ma�ed information will address storm water issues in the wate�hed and show propercy owners some practical things they can do to protect the Springbrook Wetlands. Evaluation of each of the four cit�s ordinances regarding minunalizing storm water runoff impacts to the Springbrook Wetlands and the M�ss�ssippi River. This could include proposing changes addressing a variety of issues such as 1) road ditch mowing bans, 2) implementation of shoreline management ordinances in all four cities that would prevent mowing closer than 20' to water edge on ponds, lakes, streams and wetlands, 3) allowances for native landscaping as oppased to standard rurf around storm water detention ponds. 24 . • SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT WORK PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT Creation of additional educational videos for airing on cable television in all four COmTrnirntl2S. In addition to the above topics, short programs could also focus on educating people about redirecang downspouts onto landscape areas, what storm water ponds do, and proper methods for washing yr�ur car at home. These videos would be able to be produced by C'ity staff at no cash expense. More signage at the Springbrook Nature Center to compliment the signage installed with the Phase I project about the important fiuiction of natural wetlands. Users of the park wi11 need to be infor�d as to avhythe water levels are low during times of drawdown. The storm water education effort will take advantage of the large numbexs of uail useis in the Natum Center that are advocates for the environment and are usually already self-motivated to "do the right thing". It is anticipated that two more signs will be installed along the main trails of the park Continue to pucsue options for using a traveling display at public events in the four-city region that was created in Phase I. Updates will be made to the display as the project progresses. Presentation of the "Hou�s the Water?" game at the Natural Resources Field Trip organized annually by the Anoka Couaty/Univeisity of Minuesota Extension office and held traditionally at the Springbrook Nature Center, which is an opponunity to educate 1,000-1,500 foutth and fifth gradeis about storm water runoff each May. As the project progresses, the Education Subcommittee may make additional project idea proposals to the full Advisory Committee. BUDGETS There are multiple sources of funding for the Springbrook Watershed Implementation Project. Four different cities committed $298,649 in cash and inlflnd dollais in the fall of 2000. The Six C''ities Watexshed Management Organization also commm'Pd $6,400 cash for educational efforts. In December, 2001, the �ity of Fridley was awarded a$75,000 M�ssissippi River Environmental Grant from the McKnight Foundatian. Also, in December, 2001, the City of Fridley was awarded a MetroEnvironment Partnership Grant from the Metropolitan CounciL The Metropolitan Counca7 has also indicated that they will allow the C"ity of Fridley to use $6,574 in unspent NIlVRRA grant funds for educational efforts in the Springbrook Project. In addition to these cash and inlflnd commitments, the project has also received inl�nd "staff assistance" commiunents from the Northtown Mall for $1,500 and the Anoka Conservation District for $1,650. The.ne are also many other volunteexs that will be providing inkind contn�butions to the project through meering attendance and physical work on so� of the project,components. All of the mauhing funds for this project are non-state or federal monies. A Project Support Budget is listed as Table 4 in the attachments. The City representatives decided last year to split tivs implementation project into two pazts — Part A and Part B. The reason for the split in the project was that there were uncenzinties whether all of the work originally mapped out for the restoration of the wetlands would necessarily have to be done. It is possible that simply drawing down the wetlands and hand-spreading seeds mayresult in satisfactoryplant germination and re- growth. If these low tech wetland restoration methods were successfu], manyprojected restoration costs would be unnecessary, but upstream storm �water systems needed to be modif'�ed first to determine the level of success with lower-cost wetland restoration techniques. 25 50 SPRINGBROOK PHASE II IMI'LEMENTATION PROJECT WORR PLAN - 5/31/02 DRAFT Therefore, Part A includes the upstream modification work and the wetland drawdown method of restoration. A Pmject Outlay Budget for Part A can be found in Table 5. Part B inchuies m�re extensive wetland restoration of planting plugs. The Praject Outlay Budget for Pazt B can be found in Table 6. Part B also includes some stream stabilization that cannot be done until further topography and ground water monitoring is completed Local match funding is being set aside from the four czty cash and inlflnd comT,,;rT„Pnts should the project be extended at a later date to include Part B. It is anricipated that th�e �ity of Fridley will be applying for add'u.ional wetland restoration funds from the DNR or so� other appropnate soiu�e to help finance the Part B costs. The C'ity of Fridley also anticipates application for additional CWP grant funds to complete Part B at a]ater date, depending on the projected casu following the findings fnom compleuon of Pazt A An Itemized Pmgram Outlay Budget for Part A is included in Table 7. This budget is categorized by program element and is fiuther detaled accon�ing to contributors and the type of funding - either inl�nd or cash. The budget meets the requirement that at least 60% of local matching funds are from non state or non federal sources, because 100% of the matching funds are derived from local propeny tax contribudons. 26 51 Springbrook CWP Grant Advisory Committee Members Name Representing Roark Haver (Chair) Chuck Lenthe Wanda Brown Joe Rhein Bruce Thielen Steve Gatlin Penny Yohnk Mike Grenander Barbara Kovacic Brad Sielaff Siah St. Clair Julie Jones Jon Haukaas Todd Lewis Mary Jo Truchon Ernie Larson Stephanie Barton Roger Ramthun Table 1 City of Blaine — Administration City of Blaine — Engineering City of Spring Lake Park City of Spring Lake Park City of Coon Rapids — Park Superintendent City of Coon Rapids Springbrook Apartments No�thtown Mall Fridley Environmental Quality & Energy Commission Fridley resident City of Fridley — Nature Center City of Fridley — Community Development City of Fridley — Engineering Voluntee� Anoka Conservation District Board Anoka Conservation District Board Wal-Mart MPCA 52 Springbrook CWP Grant Technical Committee Members Name Representing ---------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- Chris Lord (Chair) Mary Jo Truchon Jon Haukaas Joe Rhein Steve Gatlin Chuck Lenthe Spence� Pierce Mark Gernes Tom Hovey Ron Peterson Sue Galatowitsch Dave Zappetillo Roger Ramthun Anoka Conservation District Board Anoka Conservation District Board City of Fridley — SCWMO City of Spring Lake park — SCWMO City of Coon Rapids — SCWMO City of Blaine — SCWMO Anoka County Comm. Health 8� Env. Serv. MPCA DNR — Hydrology Peterson Environmental Consulting University of Minnesota MPCA — Water Quality Division MPCA 53 Table 2 Springbrook Watershed Implementation Project Education Subcommittee Table 3 Name Representing Wanda Brown City of Spring Lake Park Tara Rogness City of Fridley/Nature Center Julie Jones City of Fridiey Mike Grenander Northtown Shopping Mall Roger Ramthun MPCA Roark Haver City of Blaine Mary Jo Truchon Anoka Conservation District 54 Project Support Budget Table 4 Springbrook Implementation Project Project Sponsors Cash In-kind Total Project Contriburion Contribution Support (2+3) To Pro'ect 2 To Pro'ect 3 A. Pro'ect S onsor contribution: Ci of Fridle $ 25 828 $ 56,222 S 82 O50 Local Contributin S onsors : 1. Ci of Blaine $ 57,245 $ 11,240 $ 68,485 2. Ci of Coon Ra ids $ 17 08 $ 7,190 $ 24398 3. Ci of S rin Lake Park $ 9,865 $ 12,455 $ 22,320 4. SCWMO $ 6,400 $ 6,400 5. No�thtown Sho in Center $ 1,500 S 1,500 6. Anoka Conservation District $ 1,650 $ 1,650 7. Metro olitan Council-MNRRA $ 6,574 $ 6,574 8. Metro olitan Council-MEP $88,807 $88,807 9. McKni ht Foundation $75 000 $75,000 B. Local Contributing Sponsors $286,927 $ 90,257 $377,184 Subtotals• State and/or Federal Contributing S onsors• $0 $0 C. State and/or Federal $ 0 $ 0 Contributin S onsors Subtotals: SUBTOTAL: All project sponsors $286,927 $ 90,257 $377,184 A+B+C CWP Grant 5200,669 Total Cash Total In-kind Total Project Cost GRAND TOTALS $487,596 $ 90,257 $577,853 55 � W a � � � m � �n d « c � o c m � 'v) � � U $ o N C m � C W C 'N � C � � � � l0 .��.. � � Z � C �E O N w O Q � � o � � � V Q Q m � N � C �� m �o �m Q� Q� � �� Q(n Cp �"� cp C Q � M � C N O N �� m � f0 N � �7 � N�N � C m � � � � � O � O � O � � • • � $ � � 3 V � ; �� O I � � II \ O \ .a Q O .. O 4 � �.,__ .� s�. , -_...�_ ;, � � � `� �y � •� '� U A � � � z � � o � � � a� �, .� � � � � � � � o o .� 0 � � � �� C '�, Q • �'" �t, � � �J r. U o �� n i �� + � r C � N ; � a° v � Q... . ...... P � � � s � °`�f. � ; ; �. � �� ry�' r � �,� '�*� �«s�,<va.�, , , ' „�' � �-�-w.�, . . � �� X s CI r $ � � .� �; w � o � �e3 � � L � � a� u C �� w CI � . N Z' �t U u � y .� � � y �. .. —��,,. ��;, �., °` ��/NfJf�EIS2h3/IIIVfF�:=�� :� ._.__' �.' � -- . . �ti_ . �,,,.� � r.,r- „� ° � _ .,��,�.�-, �*., � � l �.�-�`` -� �,."` �� , , � � �� . � ;� ��;`�°� �-� �,� '�, - '�� . � � ��. �'V `�. � �_:.: �� $� .�'" <�' �, ' ;�.."<� � � ^ � �y r„� . � . �`+ks g ',� � � � s `�, # ..- _ � ,� � ." � � " _ y" � ;, �,, m-- � �� . �:� . - - ,,��'�_ �� ' { fi �- : � �f � ' . . . 4�+ & #� + _�= _ . -,;. ��'� , . ,_.� : " � ` t r 7 a 1` f ' ' � ?�s' i '°' � � � � Ht"' � � �k �f � : r� r ?. 4 , , �.sr �. �.� � ' � t � '� „� ,3 �`. � `�,�.+ _ � � _ ,. . � � ..r� �,� ' i�} n. d g ' > .n�. � � � r'� 1 a "' s �' ` i' -s�! � jN6+{' i ;�'s4''1 q.5� '1 , . " 9r � ? `' $ � - 2, ti . { � ..\ c +� '^... ,�-----'-"'� � "!r/ �i . . � . ; � � : Y ;� ; �� ,}' . dn, . � 4 � . .3+.� j � � � , � � — .- s � �`t�' 1 s��.....,.. ' � ,� a:. _ . `. �___. � ..t...,�H` .� ar�, ? �,"» _. �_.._:. , -` a �... � �'�..»..�. . ,..,. ,. , �� `� � } � y �p �M � . ' > ` , #" �° � � ,•� � � _ � `�Q � � ...t- ., '.� � g�W�� r � ,F ri ,,� ��l� • � �' (� � ^"='� } `^ -�> � " � � '' � >, •'� ;� ';^� � E ` � �a � . < ,*� � �, , �. �� t �: - `° `�' �`"s.��„� � x x:f.�.,, � , ; p, � i �°' � __ . � : ' � ' � -. ; , , a , `;_ , r �_ � � , � � _ '.; ' °•. . ��,:�'�.� �r. � 7 ' � � � �.. _ o-� ,�.' � `;.� � � � � '��s .__ . t, '��+,�F -'-`�x� .." � '�� .. � ;i� -z ��r,i��;w '�"� r' . " �r w : ..,. .. �y. . . " �� R� Y, �. . .. .� � � � Z � f�k � � .Y� . , � ' � � � � , � � � . ; " + .. �= � � ,$ - .^'P►� y, r x� j ' x r �y � � ' . .�. ' :: . „L � � t i y yyrl''r." ` i � J �� \\ . � � ., F .� �� Y . � �'�i ♦ �.io'`i ew .Y :'�t � � �ts ,/` "y . ' ` } _ � � .. � a s..+- s � � . ; '� � : y-�,t � � ��j' ; � -- 1 # �. - '�'/'� 4�� J� � � . . . - y.y, •++1y? r � , � ,�. � ' � . �, �� . . 1 ,,t" �` ��, � � �-� sr �� r � _ , . . , . . . ' . �# jr l�f ''? ' - ' � �:� � . , } .� .r�''r , �. � Y` r• �� .� _ ' ��°'� =••� r,�,.�t ' ' r - �'' � > . . �� ` 'ua� �� • ? �` � �.'` ' � �` �_ ��y � R � a R �. # *� , 'a'�1 � � - � � � ^ •.�. . � . � ' T .� �,,,,� � � � }� ` ' �- � � • � � .. .' � - . � � � . � � � � � � � , Z � , i; . . . . ` ' �- a � i Z p f e. _ f �'�^° {j� � , � � � k _ � . i . `� - , _ ..a a .}� : v.......�v.:3....[ �� , �� ' .� '� . - �. . . -. : _ . � ±. � y�u' . �� ` 'j +�:... �""_.: i. r��,� , /� 4� r ,. . . _. , . - . . x r ��' 4�� . •i _ , . �_ -� � X' p . . .. : ` � c R -%v'";r�- .. a F . T ' �,� . ` ..e . . .. , . � � . .. _ ».. rt t ,,,�:e � � �„►. � z - � 3 �? rt' a ` � �°" - - � � 4 � � ¢ �� , � . _...�. e1' ° , r ,.' ' � ` •� � ' . `A .: � � ._�_ �.+ ... , .:. ' � 4 . +�; «",r . �`'� . ' - ��. �. .. - •— e : i } .....�-^+r� -.,�...r+..�.-� �� r: t � ..� ;� . -,�, . � � � w,.. �„ ,_ , � "�' - � �+ .... ._. - ,.' P "�E.. �' '�s..�y_ � .d . . . . �� , � . � ; . � �e�, . . . _ . � ; � � � �� , � *�� . � � �_ ,� �r - � � �� °.�•. - '� �. � � : _ :.� � x .�a,.:��,�{ �� 'r �� '" �" �:� t t ` ' � � . �?;' �� . i� ' �`r.� q � V - . . '.'�•* - ,: J . � � � 0 s� ��'�a � ,,,� � Z �+ • .x -., � .d �`' �r ; 6 - , � � �, ' . � , � �,. �. , , ; ,/� � �� I�._• x � ,� 4 �• � '� t � v, Y�t .ye.W{ . . a` * re� . r s j�,� �� yy /y\ S T i • �♦ .�� _ � ' $� o�Y(u � . � ° � ` . .-i.ir �.s W � 1�) 4 1, �� z : e ,ie= . � _ '^g,. J. �+� _ g �` � • � ?; Vi �' _ T � � � `�:' . ..„..,, ,�„u..:ai+.�-s--`^ �'+ ; k - 9 a � ,,�„� �. � .•'' • � . � � `+�.'�..�.1� `��. "�.t*+�"` ' �i� �� '�� '�« ,F ._ *� �� -Q �� ' ' �� `ii� ..t �- ', :.�, . f„ _. . '% � " . Z t� . � �'_` .i ' ; "� ..:�r�� ..'�' " . - . � . 4 ` �' a.� - ° - ,�'" - �?T t�' � b� � - � . . K . ; . 4�, w.-� . . � � ^�`*.'� � � , nn..,� . b� � �. ...""'^�. � �.,s. .. � ,,,.�� c ..> � . � , ro ,. , t o. 1 ��'vr�J' }•x� 1 ,� . ..... � `� a � � I { �4*�.. "� �� ...� � w�'� ' - � �'� ��' . . x r _ - .. � 'i � � - +�� '� "'�C'�° , `° . ." k.� , � � g, � �;, '� � .�,a,,,. .�F. • ,Xi � . � y, � �.. n'k'f% J. y.v, N y K _ . .... �° _ x bx ,,y �� ~ � "m ht"1 � � � � � *Y la�� -�r'`` � '_ ��` � r* � �;�� "`� .. ' �� .....sy i�� ,�j 4'�' ; � ,� � � A � � .: . c .. " � t � t� � - ,..., :»�� ' ',�; �,�s5.z'� � �` �-�� s6 � - - � . ` �` , � ' ' . �°'� �.,,+� -� �.. �. � � ,�,�� b s� �.�� `. A � t, �,. - ' � �..�. „,.�"4-: �,. _�� f r` -� � � k �sa -� - � � � �"� � � ��"�� „ t '�` ,„;.:�^�` ,� � � �'� ��" 1�� . �'.� � �` �` �''� ' ° � ��y �' •; �, � � ,�t , � ' � ' , F ,� ^.', -� �, �`� y.,�, f .'t'� . ��, _�'r� �.. '�� . .-eA�r�� `'�. '�. ,, F / AGENDA ITEM � CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 CfTY OF FRIDLEY Date: May 29, 2002 To: William Burns, City Manager� �� From: Scott Hickok, Communiry Development Director Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Julie Jones, Environmental Planner Subject:Amendment to MNRRA Grant Agreement Background In 1999, the City of Fridley received a$10,000 Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (NINRRA) Local Funding Assistance grant. The purpose of the grant was to assist the City in developing a Critical Area Plan for the part of Fridley in the Mississippi River corridor. Metropolitan Council has overseen this National Park Service project, so the City had an agreement with the Metropolitan Council. All of the work proposed by the City was completed last fall, however, $6,574 in funding was left unused. Knowing that the City of Fridley needed cash match dollars for the Springbrook Watershed project, which impacts the Mississippi River Critical Area, staff requested an extension and reallocation of the remaining NIlVRR.A fiznds to the Springbrook Clean Water Partnership Project. We received a letter from the Metropolitan Council last October indicating that we could use the unspent MNRRA grant funds on the Springbrook Watershed Project. However, it has taken several months of negotiations with the Metropolitan Council staff to develop and acceptable amendment draft. The attached amendment to the original grant agreement will allow staff to obtain reimbuisement for some of the educational expenses related to the Springbrook Project. Reallocation of these grant funds helped the City obtain the MCPA girant funds we needed for the Springbrook Watershed Implementation Project since we listed them as matching cash funds in our grant request. Recommendation � Staff recommends that the Fridley City Council approve the attached amendment to our MNRRA Local Funding Assistance Agreement, authorizing the City Manager to execute the amendment. : SG99-31 AMENDMENT AND EXTENSION OF 1VIISSISSIPPI NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATION AREA (MNRRA) LOCAL FUNDING ASSISTANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by the Metropolitan Council ("Council") and the City of Fridley ("Recipient"). WHEREAS, on July 22, 1999 the Council and the Recipient entered into a funding agreement identified as Council Funding Agreement No. SG-99-31 under which the Council provided Narional Pazk Service funding to the Recipient to help the Recipient review its local plans, ordinances and regulations for conformity with the Comprehensive Management Plan for the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area and for other purposes; and WHEREAS, by letter dated October 21, 2001 the Recipient indicated it completed certain portions of its work plan, stated it did not deem it necessary to complete other portions of its work plan in the near fuhue and requested that the $6,574.00 amount remaining from the $10,000.00 amount originally made available to the Recipient under Council Funding Agreement No. SG-99-31 be reallocated for use by the Recipient in its Clean Water Partnership efforts; and WHEREAS, the National Pazk Service has indicated its willingness to allow reallocation of the remaining National Park Service fiznding and pemut the Recipient to use the remaining funds for the Recipient's Clean Water Partnership efforts; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 4.01 of Funding Agreement No. SG-99-31, the funding agreement expir�d on July 22, 2000; and WHEREAS, the parties mutually agree that the expired Funding Agreement should be continued so the Recipient may use the remaining $6,574.00 amount for the Recipient's Clean Water Part�ership efforts. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and covenants contained in this agreement, the Council and the Recipient agree Funding Agreement No. SG-99-31 shall continue beyond its July 22, 2000 expiration date and shall be extended and amended as follows: 1. Article N, AGREEMENT TERM, Paragraph 4.01, Term, and Paragraph 4.02, Amendment and Eztension, are amended to read as follows: . 4.01 Term. This agreement is effective upon execurion of the agreement by the Council. Unless extended by written agreement pursuant to paragraph 4.02 or terminated pursuant to paragraph 4.03, this agreement will expire June 30, 2003. 4.02 Amendment and Extension. The Council and the Recipient may amend this agreement by mutual consent. Amendments, changes or modifications to the objecrives and goals identified in the Recipient's approved work plan and budget shall be effective only on the execution of written amendments signed by authorized representatives of the Council and the Recipient with concurrence by the National Park Service. Page 1 of 2 Pages 59 2. The Recipient shall provide at least a$17,947.00 match for the $6,574.00 remaining amount and shall use the $17,947.00 match amount and the $6,574.00 remainuig amount consistent with the following Work Plan and Budget as proposed by the Recipient: (a) Springbrook Watershed public education mailing (b) Low-Impact Lawn Care Workshops (c) Springbrook Nature Center educarion trail signs (d) Creation of a watershed/wetland public event display Total $ 14,000 $ 3,500 $ 2,000 $ 5,000 $ 24,500 3. On or before December 31, 2002, the Recipient shall prepaze and submit to the Council's authorized agent a written interim progress report that briefly describes the expenditure of funds and the status of the project acrivities identified in the above Work Plan. On or before June 30, 2003, the Recipient shall prepare and submit to the CounciPs authorized agent a written final progress report that summarizes the Work Plan activities undertaken and completed since the submission of the interim report and contains a list of itemized expenditures of the $6,574.00 amount received from the Council and the matching funds. 4. Within thiriy (30) days after final execution of this agreement, the Council will disburse to the Recipient ninety (90) percent of the $6,574.00 remaining amount that is the subject of this agreement. The ten (10) percent amount withheld will be disbursed to the Recipient upon receipt of the final progress report described in Paragraph 3 of this agreement. Except for these modificarions, the provisions of Funding Agreement No. SG-99-31 shall remain in force and effect without change. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Recipient and the Council have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. This agreement is effective on the date of final execution by the Council. Approved as to form: Associate General Counsel SG9931 A METROPOLITAN COUNCIL : Lee E. Sheehy, Regional Administrator Date CITY OF FRIDLEY By _ Title Date Page 2 of 2 Pages 60 � 0 r � C(TY OF FRIDLEY Date: To: AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF June 3, 2002 May 29, 2002 William Burns, City Manager �� From: Jon Haukaas, Public Works Director� Layne Otteson, Assistant Public Works Director �� Julie Jones, Environmental Plann�t � Subject: Springbrook Watershed Implementation Project Engineering Services Contract Background � In order to move forward with the Springbrook Watershed project, Fridley staff has solicited proposals for engineering consultant service for a particular component of the grant project. This component is studying the east inlet subwatershed to determine viable options for storm water infiltration and treatment. The reason why we are moving ahead so quickly on this particular piece of the project is because we have $75,000 in McKnight grant funds for construction of storm water management improvements in this part of the watershed, which must be spent by February of 2003. In order to design and construct improvements before winter, we need to begin studying our option in June. We received proposals from three of the eight engineering consultant firms to which we sent a request for proposal. We received proposals from the following firms: ■ Bonestroo $34,848 ■ WSB ■ SEH $46,558 $45,000 (plus $5,000 contingency) Despite the fact that Bonestroo's proposal contained the lowest price, they proposed spending significantly less hours than the other two firms and did not propose to conduct complete modeling of the subwatershed, which is one of the key tasks in this project. After a thorough review and interview process, staff is recommending that the City of Fridley contract with WSB & Associates, Inc. for engineering services. The interview panel unanimously agreed that WSB as the top candidate for the following reasons: ■ WSB proposed to use the most qualified staff for the job and proposed to dedicate the most hours to the job. Most of the modeling would be done by a Professional Engineer, whereas other firms had less experienced and less qualified people dedicated to that very important part of the project. ■ WSB has the most experience of all three fiims, siting work on 16 other similaz projects, including experience developing a habitat management plan, strong hydrological slcills, and experience working with MnDOT (even getting MnDOT to pay some of the costs). Their work in the City of Richfield's Wood Lake Nature Center was very impressive. The Richfield staff reported that WSB did an excellent job and was very attentive to the needs of the City. ■ WSB appeared to be very conscientious of the fact that we have a limited budget for project work and that they would not propose something that was outside of our constiuction budget. They had lmowledge of the grant funding limitations that we are dealing with and indicated they would be able to help us secure more grant funding, if needed. 61 ■ WSB was the only firm that mentioned that they would need to be aware of well water indexes, be sensitive to pernutting issues, and be realistic about the soil conditions we are working in, showing a great depth in lrnowledge. ■ WSB was the only fum that said their final report would not only give us some valid LID optians, but would also explain why some other options would not work. ■ WSB was the only company that mentioned they could also conduct monitoring for us in other aspects of the project if we needed them to. ■ WSB provided a very detailed explanation of how they would conduct the modeling for each proposed construcrion oprion and proved in their explanation that they would be using the correct software for the job. � ■ In addition to a thorough presentation, WSB also shared some storm water management information l that they have compiled for the City of Rosemount that was quite impressive. • WSB's proposed fees aze within the $50,000 budget established in the draft Work Plan for the Springbrook Implementation Project. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached agreement with WSB & Associates for engineering services related to the Springbrook Watershed Phase II Implementation Project, authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. 62 wsB & �ssoc�.aTES, �rc. PROFESSIOYAL SERVICES AGREE��YT This Agreement is made as of the day o f , 20 _, by and between the Ciry oE Fridley, hereinafter referredto as City, and WSB & Associates, Inc., hereinatter referred to as En�ineer, with offices located at � 1�0 Olson �femorial Hi�hway, Suite � 00, �Iinneapolis, �tinnesota >j422. Wimesseth, that the City and Engineer, for the consideration herein named, agree as follows: SECTIOY 1/ GEYERr1L C01YTR�CT PROYISIONS These provisions shail be as set focth in E.ehibit A. SECTI0IY �/ SCOPE OF WORK The scope oF work to be performed by En�neer is set forth in E.�ciiibit C. The work and services to be pezformed hereunder and described in E.rhibit A shall be referred to herein and in the General Contract Provisions as [he Project. SECTION 3 / CONIPENS�TIOPI Compensauon to Eneineer for services described in this a�eement shall be as desiJnated in che attached E.ehibit D and as hereinat�er described. SECTIOiY J / WORK SCHEDULE The andcipated schedule is set forth in E.�chibit C CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 (INIV�RSITY AVENUE, NE FRIDLEY, :�IINNESOTA 55432 BY: SIGN.�TURE: TITLE: BY: SIG�! �TURc: T(TLE: DATE: SECTIOPT 5 / E`CHIBITS The followin� init�aled E.�chibiU ;ue actached to and made a part uf this ��eement: r E.�chibit A- General Contract Provisions c E.�chibit B - De6nitions s E.rhibit C- Scope of Work x E.�chibit D - Compensation � E.�chibit E - Insurance Schedule x E.�chibit F- Fze Schedule SECTI0IY 6/ ACCEPTr11�iCE OF AGREE�IE.YT All work and sen•ices described in this a�eement shall be performed by che Engneer only after receiving prior written approval by the Ciry on a project-hy- project basis. The undersi�ed hereby accept the terms and conditions of this a�eement and En�neer is hereby authorized to perform the sen�ices described herein. Vv$B 3� ASSOCIr1TES. INC. dt50 OLSON MEMORL�I. HIGHWAY SUITE 300 IvIINNEAPOLIS, MIPiNESOTA 55422 BY': Wlienbria SIGNAT ` � TITLE: ice � ent � B�: - SIGNATURE: IM �1 i'ITLE: Vice Presiden[ DATE: , ) z O � Professional Services �greement Page 1 of l 63 F:,.W�,M,�u�„��.��.� E�IIBIT a �VSB & �iSSOCI.aTES, INC. GEr�R�1L COYTRaCT PROVISIONS ,iRTiCLr ( - GE�iER�L T ne�e �enersl conaac[ provisiuns are incorporsted in and'oecome a part oi �he .>, eemen[ �o which it is a[tachrd between WSB 3c assuciates. (nc., hrreinat'a retcrred to :u En�rnaer, and cha uther party :o cha .agree-nent. Ciry uf Fridley, hereinatter re2erred [o as City. �.vheretn che C;ty angages the Engineer :o provide ccrtain services, more par.icularty descnbed in Exhibi� C. Scope of Work. Either parrr may be ne:einaiter reierred co as parry or, collectivety, parties. r�a star.ing dare tor a project will commence when auchorized by �he Ciry. .aRT.CLE : - CH.a`iGED CONDITIONS If che Engineer decerminu chac any services ic nas been directed or requested ro pertorm are Seyond the �cope as sec torth in Exhibft B ur cha�, due co changed condiaons or changes in the mechod or manner ot admmistration of the Project, the Eno nea's tI�ort required [o �ertbrtn it5 services under �his .��:nen[ exceeds the esrimaca which tormed ttte ba,is for ;he Engineer's compertsation, Engineer shaii prompcly nutify the Ciry of thac tacc �ldditionai work and addidonal cortpensacion tor such work, and the extrnsion of time tor compietion �hereot, shall oe set forth in a supplemental agrcemCn[ zntered into by che par.ies prior to proceeding with any additional wo�k or rela[ed e.rpenditures. Such suppiemental agreemen[ shall be incorpora[ed in and become a part of this .�greement. (n absence oi said suppiemen[al agreement, amounts of compensation and time for completion shali 'oe equitably adjusted. �RTICLE 3 - TEFZ�IL�(�TION T'his �greement may be :er.ninated 'oy either �arry upon thirry days' written notice wi[hout cause. In :he evrnc uf terminadon, copies of plans, reporu, a-prciticacions, elecQOnic drawingidata fila (CADD), tield data, noces, and other documents whether written, printed or recorded on any medium whacscever, tinished or unfinished, prepazed by the Engineer pursuant ro this Agreement and pertaining !o the work or to the Project, (hereinaRer "(nstrumrnts of Service"), shaU ba made available to [he City pursuant co Articie �. Ap provisions of this ?�greement atiocating responsibiliry or liabitity between tha City and Engineer shall survive the complerion of the services nereunder an'w'or the terminatiun o[ [his Ageemen4 :�RT[CLE -1- REUS E A�D D[SPOS(TION OE L�S"I'R[,1�fENTS OF SERVICE During che course of the work, [he Engineer shall make avaiiable to the City copies of [he Instrumenu of Sm+ice. At the rime of completion or termination of the work, the Engineer shall make available to the Ciry che Insuvmrnts of Service upon (i) paynxnt of amounts due and owing for work performed and expenses incurred as ailowed in this Agreement to the dau and time of temrinaCOn, and (ii) fulfitlmrnt of the City's obligation under [his Agreemrnt Upon payment, the Engineer and Ciry wiil jointly own said Instruments of Service. r�ny use or re-use of such Instruments of Smice by the Ciry or othen wichout wricten verificaaon or adaption by the Engineer except for the specific purpose intended wiil be at the Ciry's risk and full lega3 responsibility. The City agrees, to the fuflest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold the Engineer harmless from any claim, liability or cost (including reasonabfe attomeys' fees, and defense costs) arising or allegedly arising ou[ of any unauthorized reuse or modification of these Inscruments ot Service by the Ciry or any person or endty that acquires or obtains the repores, plans and speciTScations from or through the City without the written authorization of the Engineer. Under no circumstances shall transfer ot [nstr.�ments of Srnice be deemed a sale by Engineer, and En� neer makes no warranries, either zrpressed or impiied, of mtrchantability and timess for any particu(ar purpose. .�R:'CL� � -.�GRPE�IENT �s .ued ierein .agreemenc means: � i'; The a,eement ior r�ginee;in�, �urveying and pianning srrvicas: :? T'iese general canaac, provisions; ? � The attached cxhibits: and 1) The suaplemenral agreett:ent, where applicable. .as :o superseding effect, th� attached e.�chibits shail govem over these gen�-at provisions, and che supplemenral a;reement, where appficabie, shail govem over attached exhibits and rhese general prov�sions. The .�greemrnt constitutes the �rire understanding berxeen tha En; rreer and Ciry. 'liie .igeement supersedes ail prior written or urai understanding and may anly be amended, supplemented, ma:i: zd ur canceled 'oy a duly zxecuted wntten instrumrnt. :�RT;CLE 6 - RESPONSB�I'CIES a. in order to prrmit the Enginea to pertbrm the servica required unda :his .agreement, the Ciry shall, in proper time and sequence and wnere appropriate to che Projec4 ac no e.cpense to the Engineer: l. P-ovide available information as to its requirements for the ?f0)CCC 3. ?rovide access and make (if �pecified) all provisions for the Ea; neer to ertter upon public and private lands to enable tht cngineer ro pertorm iu �xork under this Agreemenc. 3. P-.ovide such legal, accounring and insurance counseling ;ervices as may be required for this Project, (such as review oi insurance certificates, bonding clarifications and legal questions regarding properry acquisinun or assessmenc). 4. �oafy the Engineer whrnever the Ciry observes or otherwise becomes awaze of any defect in the ProjecL 5. i ne City �tanager or a person or persons daignated, shall act as Cirv's represmtadve with respect co the services w be rendered under this Agreement. Ihe Cicy's representative shall have the auchority to �ansmit and receive instrvcdons and infortnadon and to interpret and detine che City's policies with respect to ;ervices rendered by the Engineer. o. Fumish data (and professional interpretadons thereo� prepared by or szrvices pertbrmed by others, including where appiicable, �u[ noc limiced to, previous reports, core borings, probings and sub-surtace explorations, hydrogtaphic and hydrogeologic surveys, laboratory tesu and inspecdon of samples, materials and equipment; appropriau professional interpretatimis of the iorcgoing data; environmental assessmrnt and impacL statemenu; properry, boundary, easement, right-of-way, topographic and urility surveys; property descriprion; zoning, deed and other land use cesuictions; and other special data not itemized in Exhibit B. 7. Rzview ali repores, sketches, drawings, specificadons and other documenu prepared and presented by the Engineer, obtain advice of legal, accoundng and insurance counselors oc othcrs as Ciry deems necessary for such examinarions and render in wriang decisions pertaining thereto within rrasonable times so as no[ to detay the performance by the Enginea of the smices co be rendered pursuant to this AgreemrnG g. �Lhere appropriate, rndeavor to idenafy, remove and/or :ncapsulate asbestos producu or materials or pollu[ants located ;n :he project area prior to atcomplishment by the Engineer of any work on the Project. 9. ?-o�ide record drswings and specifications (if availablel for all :zisrin� physical plants of faciliries which are pertinent to the °-ojec:. Exhibic A Page 1 ot 3 F:�WPWIMCLIENT!FRIDLEY'exh-a.wpd • � 0 l0. Where avaiiable provide other services, matmais, or data u may be set .^'orth in Exhibitc B. l l. Bear zU costs incidan[al W compliance with che requimnencs of this article. (?. Provide che tore3omg in a manner su�ciendy qmety so as noc co delay the pertormance by [he Engineer ut che servica in zccordance wich ,he Convacc DocumenGS. B. E�� neer ihaii be entided [o rely an he lccuracy znd comnie:eness or iniormaron ur �ervic�s furnisned 'oy the City or uthen �mpioyed by _ht Ciry. En:3ineer >nall endeavor to verify ?he information provided .uid �ha(1 promptiy nodfy :he City iI che Engineer diswvers �hat any information ur services tumished by the Ciry is in error ur is inadequate for iu purpose. ARTICLE' - OPL`iIOfYS OF COST Opinion, if any, of probable cost, construction cost, tinancial evaluations, tza�ibility studies. �conomic analyses of a(te.stam solu�ions and utilitarian consider.�tions oi opera4ons and maintenance cosrs provided ;'ur are made or to be made o� the oaiis oi the En��ineez's txperience and quatiFications and reprarnt che Engineer's besc judgemanc as an e�cperienced and qualified protessionai design tirm. The pames aclmowledge, however, that the Engineer does no� have conQOl over �he cost ot labor, material, aquipmenc or services fumished by othen or over market condiuons or conrrsetors mechods of determining their prices, and any tvaluaaon of any iaciliry to be consuuc�ed or acquired, or work of necessiry must be speculadve undl compledon oP constructioa or acquisi6on. Accordingly, che Engineer dces no� guarantee that proposals, bids or actual cosu wiD not vary from opinions, evaluaciuns or �cudies submitted by the Engineer. �R'['iCLE 3 - [NS(,1t.aVCE Engineer has procured insurance in the typcs and amounts set forth in Exhibit D. ARTICLE 9 - ASSIGivti[ENT This .�3reemanG intenued to secure the service of individuals zmployed by and chrough the Engineer, sha11 noc be assigned or transferred without �Hrittrn censent of the Ciry. �RTICLE !0 - CONTROLl..L�IG [.�.W This Agreemen[ is :o be govemed by the Iaws of the State of �tinnesota. ARTICLE i l - YON-D[SCRIN(INATION Engineer will comply with the provisions oFapplicable Federal, State and Local Starutes, Ordinances, and Regularions pertaining to human rights and non-discrimination. ARTICLE 12 - COiYFLICT RESOLC!'ffOY In an effort to resolve any conflicu that arise during the design or construction of the project or following the completion of the project, the City and Engineer agree that all disputes between them arising out of or relaang to this A�eement shall be submitted to non-binding mediation unless the pames mutually agret otherwise. The City and Engin�er further agree to include a similar mediation provision in all aereements with independent contractors and consultanu retained for che project and to require all independrnt contractors and consuliancs also to include a similaz mediation provisiort in all agreemenu with subconaacWrs, subconsultants, suppliers or tabricators so retained, thereby providing for mediation as the primary mechod for dispute resolution between the parties to those a�eemenu. ARTICLE I�- ATTORV EYS' FEES tn the evenc of any (itigation arising from or related to the services provided under this a�eement, the prevailing parry will be enritled to recovery of all ressonable costs incurred, including court costs, reasonable attomeys' tees and ocher related out-of-pocket expenses. Exhibic A .a�r.ccE i a - corrr�n�-rr.ac.mr The Enginer. a�ees co keep contidential and noc ;o disctosc ro any person or entiry, othec :han che Engineer's empfoyees, subconsuttants and che general contraccor and subcontractors, ;f appropriate. any data znd informarion aoc previousiy Imown [o and generated by the Engineer or :urnished co :he Engineer and noc a:nacter of public record. These provisions �hall not apoly to iniortnation in whatever *orm chat ,:omes in[o :he pubiic domain, nor sha(I ;t rosuict the En� neer rrom ,; ving nonces required by !aw or �omplying uvich an order ro prov;de informadon ur dara when such urde: ;s issued by a court. adminisaative agency or other authonty wi[.ti proper ;ursdiction, or if it is reasonabiy necessary ter :he Enginea to defend himse!f ar herself :iom any �uic or claim. .�RTICLE I� - LOC.�TIOV OF C;NDERGRO[.�iD 4�[PROVE�IEYTS The Engineer and/or his or her zuthorized subconsulranr�viil conduct the research that in his or ht: protessional opinion is nec�sary and will prepaze a plan indicarin� chr locavons incrnded for subsurface penecracions with respect �o assumed (ocanons ot under�ound irrtprovemrnts. Such services by tha Enginter or h�s or her subconsultan[ will be penorned in a manner consistent with che ordinary standard of care. The City recognizes thac ;he raprch may not identify all under�ound improvements and tha� the intortnation upon whick the Engineer reli�s may contain er.ors or may noc be compteted. The City agrees, to che fui(est extent permittcd by law, co waive all claims and causes oi u[ian against the Enginecr and anyone for whom the Engineer may be legally liable, tor damages W undecground improvemrnts resulting &om subsurface prnetsation locations established by che Engineer, e:ccept that :he City does not release ehe Engineer, iu principals, employees, agrnts and consultancs trom negligence which causes damage to unde:g�ound improvements resulring trom subsurtace peneaacion locations established by the Engineer. ARTICLE 16 - BE'ITER�tENT If, due to the Engineer's error, any required itcm or :omponrnt of the project is omitted from the Engineer's consaucdon documrnts, the Engineer shall not be raponsible for paying the cost w add such item or component to the extent that such item or componeac would have been otherwise necessary [o the project or othenvise adds value or betterment to the project. [n no evrnt will the Engneer be responsible for any cost or �xpense that provides 5etterment, �p�de or enhancement of the project. �RTICLE l7 - CONSTR(:CTION OBSERVATION Tha Engineer shall visit the project ai appropriau in[ervals during construcaon to become famiiiar with the progas and quaiiry of the conaactors' work and to determine if the work is procading in general accordance with the Contract Docurnents. 'Ii�e Ciry has not retained the Engineer to make detailed inspecdons or W provide exhaustive or continuous project review and obsmadon services. ForCity-observed projecu, che Engineershall accepttheconsuucaon of [he project as being compleud according to the construction documents upon a similar jusrificadon by the Ciry obsava. The Engineer dces not guarantee the perfortnance of, and shal! have no responsibility for, the acts or omissions of any conuactor, subcontractor, supplier or any other entity fumishing materials or performing any work on the project If the City desires more extensive project observation or fult-time project representation,'the Ciry shall requat such servica be provided by the Engineer as Addi[ional Services in accordance with the terms of this ,�greement. In this instance, the Engineer shall accept the conswcdon oi thz project as being completed according to the construcrion documents. However, the Engineer doa not guarancee the performance of, ar.d shall have no responsibiliry for, the acu or omissions ot any contractor, subcona-ac,or, suppiie; or any o�her zntiry tumishing ma�erials or performing any work on the project. Page'_ of 3 65 F:\WP WMCLIEATFRIDLEY' exh-a.wpd ARTICLE 1 S - INDEMNIFICAT[ON The Engineer agrees, to the futlest ezunt perrtritted by law, to indemnify and hold [tte Ciry harrtiless from anY damage+ liabiliry or cost (inc(uding rcasonable actomeys' fees and costs of defense) to che exunt caused by the Enginea's negligent acu, ertors or omissions in [he pertormance of profasional services under :his Agreemmt and �hose of his or her subconsultan�s or anyone for whom the Engineer is legapy liable. The City agrees ro the fullest e�ctent permitted bv 1aw, co inderrmify and hold the Engineer hamiless from any damage, liabiliry or cost (including reasonable attomeys' fees and cosu of defrnse) co the extrnt caused by the Ciry's negligmt acu, errors or omissions and chose of his or her conaactors, subconuactors or consuttants or anyone tor whom che Ciry is te3ally liab(e, and arising trom the project that is the subject of chis AgreemrnG Ilte Engineer is not obligaud :o indemnify the Ciry in any manner whatso�ver for the City's own negligrnce. G Exhibit A Page 3 of 3 F:�wPwIIV�CL�FRIDL.E1^exh-a.wpd • � E�BIT B `VSB & ASSOCL�TES, IrC. DEFIrZTIONS B.l "HOLRLY B�SIS" means that the fee shall be deternuned bv multiplying the number of hours of woric performed. tunes the personnel cost for the appropriate labor classitication shown on the fee schedule. B.2 "CO�STRLCTION COST" means the amount of the construction con[ract awarded for the improvement project, plus the value of any equipment, materials or supplies furnished by the r City for installation or use by the construction contractor, plus or minus any inrreases or decreases in the contract amount implemented by chan�e order, supplemental a�eement or ^ other instrument subsec}uent to award of the contract. Reductions in the contract amount • subsequent to award w•ill not be a basis for reducin� the fee unless it can be demonstrated that as a result of this reduction in the contract amount, the work effort associated with comptetina this proj ect is reduced. If a construction contract is not awarded, the construction cost shall be considered to be the en�ineer's estimated cost for the construcrion of the improvement proj ect, as prepazed for the bid openi.ng, unless the City believes the engineer's estimate is unreasonable, in which case, the En�neer and the City shall ag�ree upon an altemate basis for determining the construction cost. Such altemate basis may include negotiation, development of an independent estimate by a third party, or other means. B.3 "E�E�ISES" means out-of-pocket costs incurred in the performance of the services described herein or authorized by the City which are not direct personnel costs or overhead costs. E:cpenses include long distance telephone char�es, subconsultant fees, testin� costs, outside reproduction and printing costs, equipment rental costs and similar costs. B.4 "LU�iP SUI�i PRICE" means an amount negotiated between the Ciry and En�neer for performance o f the services specified in the Desi�n A�ceement which is subject to adjustment only if the Scope of Serviczs changes or if circumstances beyond the control of the En�neer causes an increase in the cost of performance of the services. B.� "DESIGN AGREENIENT" means a written order executed by an authorized representarive of the City describing the scope of services and engineering fee arrangement for an improvement project. B.6 "Il�iPROVEMENT PROJECT" means public improvement projects authorized by the City and paid for with public funds. , B.7 "DEDICATION PROJECT" means those proposed improvement projects to be conshucted by private fundin� for eventual dedication to the public. B.8 "INSTRUNIEiVTS OF SERVICE" any plan, specification, or r�port prepared by the En�neer. Exhibic B Page I oi l F:�wPwQrcueNrFx[D[.�ran-s.�a 67 EY�IT C `ti"SB 3c ASSOCLaTES, LYC SCOPE OF WORit GE�-ER�I. SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR T� SPRI�iGBROOK `�%:�TERSHED L1��LE��r"TaT'IOr PROJECT C.1 PROJECT �L�r:�GE�IErT To complete each of the stated objectives for the Springbrook Watershed Implementarion project, WSB proposes the following scope of services: This task consists ot management, administrarion, project coordinarion, and cammunication to complete the Springbrook Watershed Implementation project. To provide the City of Fridley with posirive assurance that the work effort associated with this project is clearly detined, staffed, budgeted, and managed, a number of project management tasks are outlined below. These tasks will ensure that the project will run smoothly and the lines of communicarion between WSB and the City will be clear and direct. �t the onset of the project, a meetin� will be held during which rime members of `VSB's project team will meet with the City Staff to review the work plan. Future progress update meerings will also be scheduled with the staff at this rime. We anricipate at least four meetings during the development of the draft plan. The number one priority for WSB will be to maintain clear communicarion with the City Staff throughout the project so that the Ciry's and the Nature Centers needs and desires can be thoroughly addressed. C.2 D:�T� COLLECTION This portion of the scope of work consists of gathering relevant water resource related iniormation for the Springbrook Watershed, including the following: • Available background mapping for the project area. • Metropolitan Council digital ortho photogaphs. • City of Fridley 2000 digital color aerial photography. • Previous water quality monitoring results completed from 1998 and 1999. • The implementation plan for the Springbrook Watershed project. • City of Fridley Comprehensive Storm Water vlanagement Plan. • City of Spring Lake Park Comprehensive Storm Water l�ianagement Plan. • County well index for Anoka County. , • Available �IPCA STORET water quality data for the project area. • All previous water quanrity studies or flow monitoring studies completed within the watershed. E:chibit C Pa�e 1 of 4 F:!WPWI,VICLIE.V7IFRIDLEYIerh-c.doc � Information already available in-house at WSB & Associates: City of Blaine Comprehensive Storm �Vater Mana�ement Plan (prepared by WSB & Associates, Inc.). Ciry of Coon Rapids Comprehensive Storm Water �Iana�ement Plan (currently bein; prepared by �VSB & :�ssociates, Inc.). To maintain the fast track schedule currently outlined in this proposal, it will be important to secure this information at the project iniriation meeting. C.3 A.�:�LYSIS �r� L�iTERPRET:�TION OF B�CKGROL;`�� Lr'FOR�LaTiON � Information collected in the previous tasks will be reviewed and alternatives will be based on the findings presented in these previous reports. In an effort to evaluate the � reasonableness and effectiveness of alternarives presented and to ensure that each of the alternari�es meet the goals of the project. The foilowin? analysis of the Springbrook Watershed will be completed: C.3.1 HY�ROLOGIC/HYDRr1LILIC �IODfiLI�i �'G Hydrologic model of the watershed tributary to the Springbrook Nature Center's east side will be developed. This is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of the alternatives presented and to gain an understanding of the hydraulics tributary to the Springbrook Nature Center. This hydraulic modeling will consist of the follo�vin; - TR 20 based hydrologic/hydraulic model will be developed for areas tributary to the Springbrook Nature Center east side to assist in deternuning hydrologicihydraulic desi� parameters. - Recommendarions will be made for new ponding, infiltration basins, or rain gardens. New storm water ponds will be sized to achieve a minimum 10% reduction in storm water runoff volume or peak rates to the Nature Center Wetlands. - The hydrologic/hydraulic model will be developed to simulate the 2, 10, and 100-year storm events. - Exisring wetlands and natural storage areas will be utilized for storm water storage where possible. The effects of storm water on these wetlands will be evaluated. - Recommendations will be developed concerning the need for changes to the esisting storm sewer system and the need for additional storm sewer construcrion where appropriate. A GIS based map will be provided showing the subwatershed delinearions in conformance with the model. This storm water map will include an inventory of the existing storm sewer connecrions and directions of storm flow in site 3 subwatershed. C.32 W'ATER QUALTTY �iODELING To determine the effectiveness of proposed improvement alternarives, it is proposed that a water quality model be developed for the area tributary to the Exhibit C Pa�e 2 of � F.•IWPWMCLIE.V7IFRIDLEY!exh-cdac � � Springbrook Nature Center east side wetlands. This water quality model will include the elements on the following page. -� review and summary of the z�cisting water quality information collecced for areas tributary to the east side of Springbrook vature Center. -A P3 water quality model will be developed to assist in predicrin; ongoin� source runoff pollutant loadings from areas within the Springbrook Nature Center Watershed. This model will be used to analyze the capabilities of the e:cisring faciliries to remove pollutants from storm water runoff and to evaluate the anticipated increase in - pollutant removal of proposed alternarives. .. C.�! DE`�LOPVIENT OF SPR�iGBROOK �V�TERSHED ��LEI�IENTaTION PL�.r Within 4� days of the notice to proceed, WSB & Associates will present to the Ciry of Fridley for review and discussion a preliminary draft of the Springbrook Watershed Impiementarion project. This draft report will include the following components. C.4.1 EXECUTIVE SVi�tNf?�RY An executive summary will be prepared which wiil discuss the problems associated with storm water runoff entering the Springbrook Nature Center and summarize the findinas and recommendarions outlined within the report. This esecutive summary may be used by City Staff to incorporate into the City Council agenda to brin� them up to date on the status of this project. C.�.2 INTRODUCTION The introduction of the report will include a discussion of the problems which have occurred in the wetlands in and around Springbrook Nature Center. This introduction will also describe the processes which have been completed to date, which jusrify the implementarion of the components outlined within this Springbrook Watershed Implementarion Plan. C.4.3 PROCEDURES AND METHODS This portion of the report will include a discussion on the procedures and methods followed for development of the TR 20 Hydrologic/Hydraulic and P8 Water Quality Models, as well as the procedures used in analyzing and developing each of the alternarives presented within the report. In the procedures and methods followed, it is important to discuss the goals of the overall project to reduce runoff volumes by 10% and to reduce the inflow of storm water ntnoff pollution into the Springbrook Nature Center. , Exhibit C Pa�e 3 of 4 F.•iWPWl1VICLIENP,FiZlDLEYlexn-adoc 70 C.4.4 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES It is currently proposed that si�c alternarives be identified for evaluation associated with the Sprin;brook Watershed Implementarion Plan. These altemarives mav include enhancing existing ponding areas, constructing iniiltration areas, low impact development techniques, rerouring or bypass routin� of storm water runoff or the use of enhanced infiltration techniques. The alternatives may also include a combinarion of these storm water runoff management techniques to achieve the objecrives outlined in the project understanding. Each altemative will be analyzed regarding percentage of storm water flow and chemical loading reducrion expected upon proper construcrion. ' C.�.� BIKE�VAY r1:�� "CR.4IL �L.IG�fEi�IT This portion of the plan will present three ali�ment altematives available for providing a scenic bike and pedestrian way trom the residential area south of Northto�vn Niall in the City of Spring Lake Park to the Northtown Park & Ride. These alternarives will be highlighted on an aerial photograph and a cost identified for each alternative. C.5 RECO�LI-IENDATIONS Recommendations for implementation will be provided in the report outlining the costs of each of the alternatives presented and their ability to meet the goals and objecrives of reducing storm water runoff by at least 10% to the east side of the Springbrook Nature Center �Vetlands. We anticipate that the recommendations presented in this report will be developed with the insight and participation of the City and Nature Center Staff. Exhibit C P3ae 4 Of 4C:IWINDOWS1TemporarylrsternetFiles!OLKIFilerh-c.doc 71 �.11: 1 WSB & 4SSOCIATES, �C CO�IPEYS�TIOY The City shall pay the En�ineer for the Professional Services outlined in the Scope of Work on an hourly basis in accordance w-ith our current standard fee schedule. Expenses shall be invoiced to the City at their direct cost wzthout mark-up. The total compensation shall not erceed ��6,�60.00 Exhibit D Page 1 of 1 F:�wPwL�nCUENPFRID[.Elncch-d.�Hpd 72 � . j AcoRD,� CE�T1��G�TE OF L1ABf r��+� (952)843-:933 EAX �952)d93-IIII9 ' Y. Rabert Anderson d► A.ssoc. , Inc. 4fi00 Nest 77th Streec Sutta 105 E� i na , :MN SSi3i wsune� w58 4 ,1sSSCtates, InG. ;ISQ Olson krmo�i,1 Highway Ste. 30a �Ni ai�eapol ts, �MN 53.t�? i � OI�.Y ,'�NO C:.PIFERS NO R1Gi!'TS UPGN THE C�R7tFfCq7'E -- MCLDSR TH1S C�iFlCATL OCES NOT AMEND, �Vp pR ae.rEx rtcE cav�ac� �oaom aY � �oua� �av WSURERS AFFaRCWG CaVERAGE „�R.ti• Stzte :wta Ir�sar-aac= Co's ;,,�neExe Ameriean Manufieturers Matnal �� pnsiqn Pwfssianals Ins, Ca' � �m u�amER = CavERalGHs Tt+e �o�ets a� ir�:a� t:sr-a ee.cw ruue � �ssue� ro nie a�sut+Ea wwe� �+ecvE FcR rrrg �cc:cY �o wc�r�. vorNr, Hr, uver� u�nr aCGU1RE1�EtVT. T'q110R G�NC(L(CN aF ANY C..HTRACT :.(i O'Tf1ER GCWMENr'+vT� AESPG� 70 w►+xt1 ��T1RGT6 w1Y 8E �2up GR sAA7 PBRT�W. THE 1t�JW 'c.�" .Ir'FQRCED 8Y TFfE ?CLOCtES QESCAl6� HHACW :5 SZBJEG't TG .LLL'F1Q TFS�.�S. �cC'JJSIGNS .WO C..NOITDCNS Cr �JdY � : CLJCf•S. AGGiiLGATE LiIT3 3i1CW!( L1AY tIAVE 8Et7N REII� QY P,�ID CL.�R. a! rn± oR irsueweff ! wueY �t rO�' I -�'�•r�cr uwa T ' , oee,enu,uaausy 5OP 9610375 OZ 20/OI/Z001 1D/OI/2D02 �oe..^sauc,�e s l.OQO 0 aee x�.•..•�,••-° �� u�aatrY r�ee c�+uas w.... i�.� i • Sa . OC : c�.,ww �uea � ocaat �eD ow wr..� r.•,..� t g ,t . aaesnr+K s �ov �r e 1. 000 . 0 � cs9+H+K Acc�7wtG 1 1 2, OC� . Oa : �:�n. nc�wt�.►1C tau .wr�u aat vRmue�s. pw•,e� Kx t 2. �O, G va�:c�r �O' ioc .uraroo�a�u.a�urr . 9610326 02 10/�2/ZOCl IO/Ol/2Da2 �o�o�=� _ X' �wr �uro � . �•°ei+�0 1. 0�0 . �t.LO�M+iCAUtO� . . . . i00RY1lYtM . IPap+M s a � SC�It01�rII�1lfQS � • � X lf7mAlR0= � - . OOC�YMLtRY S . �ta�� .i NON-aAM[D.Y/f�.. � � � � . � .. � ' �fam/��a = • . cyuc�uwan krtoaaY•u.�ao�tr s .wr �t!!n . m+�6t lfuw �► s ,uno a�r. .�oe s �*�+••u�ascnr P 96Ia324 a2 1D/Ol/2001 IO/Ol/20a2 swa�aeaatReKt : 2.000,0 � �� - �, w�RtwR s 2 OOa.�O A = . oax�c:ac s . . aca,rtnaw i . s rciocrnascarrurswraw,wo CQ 610504-C6 OS/Q7./2001 OS/02/Z002 �. � ��'�+n � et �o+u�aexr • t 5C0,00 B e � o�se�ac • ra � s 500 00 eL osr�.�aiuc.vu�rr c � SOG 00 � ro�msioe�l Lia6�llit �aa2 lo/o4/ZOOl 20/04/2002 E=c3� Claiin: SI.00O.00D � � • . Anuaa7 Agg- S2.00O,C00 . ocscarTmN or aPrlu►naauoar►noNSiv aoom ar rROHSioNs C�Q7TF,CATE HoIDER I �oo�roaw� o� �nmt trrreR CANCELLATION • � � s�+aua ,wr aF ��ove aexA�am Poua+�s ac cswcat.e� e�o�e nri . txs��n.710N oAre tti�eDf, tHE �ssuwe caMV�+�tt vr�u. e�+ot�►vaa To euu� .� 30 aars wiurr� Nonca to rr� csntu�r� i+o�cca ww�o To ti+a �. . eus F�uRE To �wt suct� woKE s�u�u ;rrosG ta as�tannm+ oa ufer�Tr � r OR WY KWO WON TNG CGtarANY. tT3,aCIDiiS O1CR@IIOSENT�TNGS 1'OP 1ltitOPSilitlOfld� Plt['QOStS �1f�)/ . . AUTf{OAQfiORtT11GSCN74SNG.� . � �. f K � � ' - - . ACCRII 23-S (Tl971 i7AG�RD G�RP4RA i 1GN 1989 73 E_rhibit F— Fee Schedule 2002 Rate Schedule Principal .=�ssociate Sr. Project :�tanager Project .l�Ianaa er/Engineering Specialist III Registered Engineer/Ena ineering Specialist II Projert Enaineer/Enaineering Specialist I/Sr. Construciion Observer Graduate Engineer Construction Observer Engineering Technician IY/Scientist Ill En�neerina Technician III/Scientist II Engineering Technician II/Scientist I Engzneering Technician I Office Technician II Office Technician I Re�stered Land Surveyor Survey (Two-Person Crew) Survey (Three-Person Crew) GPS Equipment � B[lling Rate/Hour �108. 00 .5102.04 �59� 00 586. 00 $77.00 �569. 00 �560.00 �62.00 �� 7. 00 �553. 00 �47 00 �41. DO $S0. 00 $28. 00 .597.00 $115.00 $135.00 $38.00 All costs associated with word processing, vehicle mileage, cell phones, re�roducnon of common correspondence and mailing are included in t�ie above hourly rates Reimbursable expenses include costs associated with plan, specification and report reproduction. Rate Schedule is adjusted annually. 74 F:!iIPW(Mfeeri3001102 Fees.doc � � �. � � AGENDA ITEM cmroF CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2002 FRIDLEY INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS 75