08/12/2002 - 4755AGENDA FOR PUBLIC REFERENCE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 12, 2002 �
�
��
�
�
�
CffY OF
FRIDLEY
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OF AUGUST 12, 2002
7:30 p.m. - City Council Chambers
Attendance Sheet
ALFAS'F AR/Ni NAMF, AflflRFSS AN� /T�M NUMBFR YOU ARF /MTFR�STFO /M.
� � � �, Y , � � � . � �� � � �� �� � .
��' �+ ���`�� ��� / ��w� �`�- �� �r�'� � s� , � fi r.��
,. ���� � `� ��, '. � 7� =5�
�� ,, ;�< � .... �:: . 'r .. ;,�:/�// .......... >.�,..�, i .. ... °'. ,r,'�, � �` ••,.�;,,,a� . ��..,�v�'. ` �� a .
� �
,,, �'i.T...J, ' .. : � ..'. , ..�,., ���. . �' ' ,
.�•
`� rc � � ` � ��� �- � � .� � /
,� � �� �rr r� ���-v � �c��^--
�,G l, ��^ S v p � h G�o,� � /j� �' /�� �, ord,
�.
0
�
i CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2002
QTY OF
FRIDLEY
The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or hazass anyone in the admission or access to, or
treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion,
national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regazd to public
assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to
participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an
interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at
572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534) �-
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of July 22, 2002
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission
Meeting of July 17, 2002 �
................................................................................. 1
2. Resolution Authorizing the Execution and Delivery
of a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of
Minneapolis to Assist with Security for the IACP
Conference from October 4 to October 9, 2002 -
.............................................. 7
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2002 PAGE 2
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
3. Resolution Ordering Improvement, Approval
of Plans and Ordering Advertisement for Bids:
� Commons Park Parking Lot Phase I Reconstruction
� Project No. 348 ................................................................................................ 14 - 15
.
4. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Street Improvement �
(Sealcoat) Project No. ST. 2002 —10 .............................................................. 16 - 18
5. Approve Change Order No. 2 to Sewer Lining
Project No. 345 19 - 21
................................................................................................
6. Claims ....................................................................................................... 22
7. Licenses ....................................................................................................... 23 - 30
�
.
8. Estimates ....................................................................................................... 31 - 36
�
�
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2002 PAGE 3
ADOPTION OF AGENDA.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Consideration of items not on Agenda — 15 minutes.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
9. Public Hearing on a Zoning Text Amendment,
ZTA #02-01, by the City of Fridley Amending
Chapter 205, Sections 205.17, 205.18,
205.19, 205.20 and 205.25 Related to Outdoor
Storage in Industrial Districts ................................................................................ 37 - 45
10. Consideration of an Off-Sale 3.2% Malt Liquor
License for 4 Corners Gas & Convenience,
Inc., Located at 1301 Mississippi Street N.E.
(Ward 2) ...................................................................................................... 46 - 47
NEW BUSINESS:
11. Motion to Approve StafPs Recommendation
' on 62"d Way Maintenance Issues ...................................................................... 48 — 49
12. Informal Status Reports ..................................................................................... 50
ADJOURN.
i
t-
- ., �._o le-e✓ �`s� '°
�
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF A UGIIST 12, 2002
rnir oF
FRio�r
T'he City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its
services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual
orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodarion will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities
to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons
with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
5. Approve Change Order No. 2 to Sewer Lining
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: Project No. 345 ............................... 19 - 21
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ��I� �
f��
City Council Meeting of July 22, 2002 �l
-: -
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission
��p' Meeting of July 17, 2002 .................. 1- 6
� r �sa-.�� �0_ sL�°���-
,��� � �no
2. Resolution Authorizing the Execution and Delivery
of a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of
Minneapolis to Assist with Security for the IACP
Conference from October 4 to October 9,
2002 .................................. 7 -13
3. Resolution Ordering Improvement, Approval
of Plans and Ordering Advertisement for Bids:
Commons Park Parking Lot Phase 1 Reconstruction
Project No. 348 ............................... 14 -15
4. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Street
Improvement (Sealcoat) Project No. ST.
2002-10 ................................... 16-18
6. Claims
7. Licenses
8. Estimates
................................ 22
..............................:. 23 - 30
-
................................ 31 36
ADOPTION OF AGENDA. S�I�C lT�19"
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Consideration of items not
on Agenda —15 minutes.
PUBLIC HEARINGS: �. � /r�
� �u�z� �Q
�5����9. Public Hearing on a Zoning Text Amendment, �
ZTA #02-01, by the City of Fridley Amending
Chapter 205, Sections 205.17, 205.18,
205.19, 205.20 and 205.25 Related to Outdoor
Storage in Industri Districts ................ r3y7 - 45
�.�� �- /s /
s���� �° �,��
���
� �
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2002 PAGE 2
PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED):
S �3 j�.� °'� ��� �S
10. Consideration of an Off-Sale 32% Malt Liquor
license for 4 Corners Gas 8� Convenience,
Inc., Located at 1301 Mississippi Street N.E.
(Ward 2) .................................. 46 - 47
�� /��e CIDS-� �',° �!' ���
� �,r,
NEW BUSINESS:
11. Motion to Approve StafPs Recommendation
on 62"d Way MaintenanceL Issues .. ... 48 — 49
�,� � j�� C�l�✓1 r'�.e� �i'1�I '/ ��w�c.-i �
c��� ��J�s
�� �� S�
�
12. Informal Status Reports ..................... 50
ADJOURN.
�-
THE MINUTES OF THE
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL
MEETING OF JULY 22, 2002
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL
OF JULY 22, 2002
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Lund at 7:32
p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Lund led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Lund, Councilmember Barnette, CouncilmEmber Billings,
Councilmember Wolfe and Councilmember Bolkcom. �-
MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
PROCLAMATIONS:
Certi�cate ofAppreciation to Suzanne Holm.
Mayor Lund stated that this certificate of appreciation was being presented to Suzanne Holm
from the City of Fridley for her outstanding effort and volunteer service in making the City of
Fridley a beautiful and better place in which to live.
Mayor Lund stated that planting and caring for the flower gazden in Madsen Pazk has been a
wonderful addition to the City's park system. The City wished to recognize her for the 13 yeazs
of service she has given to the community.
Ms. Holm thanked everyone and said it was a lot of fun and a great honor. She would like to
encourage someone to take over one of Fridley's welcome signs individually, as a group or as a
business.
Mayor Lund stated that they have been looking for people to maintain the signs but have been
unsuccessful.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to approve the Proposed Consent Agenda as presented.
_ Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
�
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 2002 PAGE 2
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of July 8, 2002
APPROVED.
NEW BUSINESS:
1. RESOLUTION
APPOINTING
ELECTIONS.
NO. 40-2002 DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND
ELECTION JUDGES TO THE 2002 PRIMARY AND GENERAL
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that we were very fortunate this yeaz in having a lot of
applicants for the election judge positions. Staff recommended Council's approval.
APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 40-2002.
2. RESOLUTION NO. 41-2002 ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS, SPECIFICA-
TIONS AND ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS THEREOF: MARIAN HILLS
NEIGHBORHOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 2003 - 1:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this project includes portions of 53`d Avenue, Buchanan
Street, Fillmore Street, Taylor Street, Pierce Street, Skywood Lane, and Skywood Court. The
project includes corrections of problems with the street base, resurfacing, installation of
concrete curb, and gutter, and repairs to existing water, sanitary and storm sewer systems as
required. The project was reviewed by 25 people representing 20 properties at a neighborhood
meeting on June 4. Staff explained the project to those present and pointed out that there would
be an assessment for the cost of the concrete curb, and gutter. Staff recommended Council's
approval.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 41-2002.
3. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR THE 57� AVENUE SA1vITARY
SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 346:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that four bids were opened on June 17. The low bidder was
Park Construction in the amount of $259,767.92. Since this project is an eligible t� increment
financing expense for the Medtronic tax increment financing district, the cost will be
reimbursed by the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority from t� increment revenues.
Staff recommended Council's approval.
RECEIVED BIDS AND AWARDED CONTRACT FOR THE 57� AVENUE
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 346 TO PARK
CONSTRUCTION.
t-
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 2002 PAGE 3
4. APPROVE METROPOLITAN ENVIRONMENTAL PARTNERSHIP GRANT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND THE CITY
OF FRIDLEY:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this agreement accompanies an$88,807 Metro
Environmental Partnership Grant from the Metropolitan Council. It serves as part of the cash
required to meet the local match for the MPCA Clean Water Partnership Grant that we will be
using to support the Springbrook Nature Center Water Quality Project. By signing the
agreement, we agree to follow the elements of the work plan already approved. Staff
recommends Council's approval.
APPROVED.
5. APPOINTMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND ENERGY t-
COMMISSION:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that staff recommended the appointment of Anne M. Andrews
to the City's Environmental Quality and Energy Commission.
APPOINTED ANNE M. ANDREWS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND
ENERGY COMMISSION.
6. CLAIMS:
APPROVED CLAIM NOS. 106268 THROUGH 106500.
7. LICENSES:
APPROVED ALL LICENSES AS SUBMITTED.
8. ESTIMATES:
APPROVED THE FOLLOWING ESTIMATES:
Ron Kassa Construction
6005 — 250`� Street E
Elko, MN 55020
2000 Miscellaneous Concrete Repair
Project No. 344
Estimate No. 2 $ 17,505.60
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, Z002 PAGE 4
Lametti & Sons
16028 Forest Blvd. N.
Hugo, MN 55038
Sanitary and Storm Sewer Lining
Project No. 345
Estimate No. 2 $ 45,487.90
W. B. Miller
6701 Norris Lake Road N. W.
Elk River, MN 55330
2002 Edge Water Neighborhood Street Improvement -
Project No. ST. 2002 —1 � -
Estimate No. 2 $ 32,193.60
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to adopt the agenda as presented. Seconded by
Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that they received letters from State Representatives Barb
Goodwin and Connie Bernardy. NIr. Burns did try to reach Representative Goodwin.
Representative Goodwin has, unfortunately, broken her ankle and was not able to speak to him.
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to receive the letter from Representatives Goodwin and
Bernazdy dated July 18, and a letter from Representative Bernardy dated July 17. Seconded by
Councilmember Billings.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Ms. Mazlene Gibson, 190 - 62"d Way, stated that the letter she received from the City of Fridley
stated that the City was approached about the joint driveway on 62"d Way. It states there is no
evidence that the driveway was installed or intended to be maintained by the City. There aze
several instances of joint driveways like this around the City and the City does not participate in
maintenance of these driveways. Therefore, this is seen as a special service outside the scope of
the City's duties and will not be continued. A joint arrangement for snowplowing services is
needed next winter including any other maintenance in the future. It was signed by Jon Haukaas
the Director of Public Works. She said the street was dedicated in 1956 and there is nothing on
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NLY 22, 2002 PAGE 5
the abstract of her home to let her know that the street in front of her house is a driveway. She
would not have purchased this home if she had been aware of that. She would have to shovel
snow from 60 feet of street. She asked why the City did not give prior notice that this was no
longer a street.
Ms. Claudia Potasek, 310 - 62"d Way, stated that she lives next door to Ms. Gibson and feels the
same way she does. They have not been given the information they have requested so far from
the City regarding ordinances, policies, or procedures of changing the street to a shazed
driveway. She said they have asked for examples of streets that the City has maintained for
numerous years and discontinued service while there were still houses on them. They have
asked for legal forms stating that 62"d Way is anything other than a street. They have asked for
examples of homes at the end of the right-of way with a neighbor between the home and the
maintained streets. By declaring this street a driveway, the City is denying them free and clear
access to a City street. This affects their ability to get insurance and to sell their home. They �-
feel their rights have been taken advantage of. They have signed a letter requesting that the City
of Fridley continue to maintain, snowplow, and show on City of Fridley street maps, the westem
portion of 62"a Way in front of the Gibson and Potasek properties as the City has done for 45
years. They are asking for a response by July 25, 2002. This letter has been signed by Ms.
Gibson, Mr. Potasek and herself.
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to receive the letter dated July 22. Seconded by
Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Lund stated that they will respond to the questions presented at the Council meeting.
Mr. Greg Potasek, 310 - 62"d Way, stated that he lived on the street when it was originally
graded and paved and the original plot map was made. He said 62"d Way was built as a dead-end
street at 25 feet wide from East River Road to the end of their property. Riverview Terrace was
plotted in December of 1958 and the City approved it coming to about 80 feet from the end of
62"d Way which made a piece of street. This street has been on the official street map of the City
of Fridley. He requested that this document which comes from the City of Fridley Engineering
Department, signed by the former Public Works Director, indicating that the section of street in
question has evidence of it being a street be reviewed by Council. Citizens of Fridley are deeply
affected by these decisions and the cost of a few dollars for snowplowing or maintenance of a
small section of street which belongs to the City, is a small price to pay for the safety, security,
and enhancement of life for the citizens of Fridley.
Councilmember Billings asked what the City has been snowplowing.
Mr. Potasek stated that the City has plowed the street portion for 45 years. He has seen them
plow 62"d Way, the street. When he called the City on it, the City plowed the 62"d Way portion,
and swept the sand. The western portion has been maintained by the City.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 2002 PAGE 6
Councilmember Billings asked where the snow is stacked.
Mr. Potasek stated that there is 88 feet in that section and there is 66 feet available to sta.ck the
snow. If that is not plowed, the snow from Riverview Terrace and 62"d Way would be pushed
into that area for them to shovel out. That portion of snow is pushed onto the area just off the
pavement.
Councilmember Billings stated that the snow is not pushed to the west.
Mr. Potasek stated that it is not pushed to the west, but to the south.
Councilmember Billings stated that plows typically push the snow in front of them.
Mr. Potasek stated that there are other methods of moving snow in the City with different t
devices.
Councilmember Billings asked how deep the snow is typically at the end of his driveway.
Mr. Potasek stated that it depends on how much snow is pushed in there. At times there is.
Councilmember Billings stated that it sounds like the City plows the snow that accumulates in
the driveway that they do not plow out from the other 5,000 homes in the City.
Mr. Potasek stated that is not true. He cannot answer the question because it depends on the
amount of snow.
Councilmember Billings asked how often the blue van gets moved that is pazked there.
Mr. Potasek stated that he has called the City about parking on the street. He was told May 1 by
the City.
Councilmember Billings stated that the ordinance of Fridley states that vehicles cannot be pazked
on streets for more than 24 hours at a time.
Mr. Potasek stated that he is aware of that. He will move it from there if you wish.
Councilmember Billings asked how he could say it is a city street and then use it like his own
personal driveway. y
Mr. Potasek stated that City staff told him that May 1 is the first time you could park on the .
street. In the fall, he moves it completely off the street.
Councilmember Billings stated that he is not asking him to do anything. He is asking him if he
understood the laws.
r
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 2002 PAGE 7
Mr. George Arnold, 6201 R.iverview Terrace, stated that plows have come around the corner
from the road by his house. The residents have to shovel snow out of there that the City has put
in there, or they cannot get through. The City has used trucks, graters, and loaders to push the
snow further south off the street. This really affects the residents of 62°d Way.
Mayor Lund stated that is not inconsistent with other streets.
Councilmember Billings asked if the City plows the whole thing from north to south, or just
plows the south half.
Mr. Arnold stated that they come from 62"d Street and go up Riverview Tenace. Sometimes
they come from the other side and go past Mr. Harris' lawn and past the driveway and the road
that goes up into there. Later they come back with a front-end loader or grater and push the
snow further south off of the street. �
Councilmember Billings asked if they plow the whole width of blacktop, not just the south half.
Mr. Arnold stated that was correct.
Mr. Richard Harris, 6200 Riverview Terrace, asked if the curb work for the upcoming overlay
was all done. He asked if all that was left to do on 62"d Way was the overlay.
Mr. Haukaas, Public Works Director, stated that all the curb work is done. They may have to do
one more piece because of a manhole that is at the end of the driveway.
Mr. Harris stated that the manhole has been protruding for 3 years and still has not been fixed.
Councilmember Barnette asked if there were plans for this piece in dispute to be blacktopped.
Mr. Haukaas stated that there were not.
NIr. Harris stated that he is going to pay for a contractor to do it.
NIr. Haukaas stated that the City has no plans to do it.
Councilmember Billings stated that he suggests that Mr. Harris hold off paving it until this issue
is resolved. He asked who plowed the north half of the street.
Mr. Harris stated that he and his family do. When he is in Florida, he does not know who does
it. The City usually plows the center section of the road to get the school bus through, and then
the rest of the area near the curbs are plowed. The plows come to clean the corners. It takes
them probably not over 5 minutes.
Councilmember Barnette stated that after plowing the snow in that area there would be snow in
the driveway. He asked if the residents would have to clean that out themselves.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 2002 PAGE 8
Mr. Potasek stated that if an emergency vehicle tried to get in, they would have extreme
difficulty due to the hill. The snow would have to be removed first. If the City takes a front-end
loader in a timely manner and moves it, then it is cleaz. If the snow is very heavy, they do not try
and go through until it has been plowed out.
Councilmember Barnette stated that plows build up the snow on his driveway and he has to get
out there again and clean it out.
Mr. Potasek asked how wide his driveway is.
Councilmember Barnette stated that it is about 20 feet.
Mr. Potasek stated that this is about a 50-foot radius and much larger than a driveway. It is 88
feet from his driveway and they have to plow 88 feet upstreet to get through the area. Ms. �-
Gibson waits and someone helps her.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked Mr. Haukaas if there is an ordinance about which streets aze
plowed and how they aze plowed.
Mr. Haukaas stated that there is a snowplow policy approved each fall. It is not an ordinance. It
describes how operations are done.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if there was a policy or ordinance on how City streets are
maintained.
Mr. Haukaas stated that they have a mission statement to do their best to keep them passable and
in the best condition they can with the resources they have. There is not a long involved policy
regarding street maintenance. We identify by policy what our objectives are, but there is no
ordinance.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that staff could provide the Potasek and the Hazris families with
this policy in a timely manner. She asked what the policy was for street reconstruction.
Mr. Haukaas stated that they have taken street condition ratings since 1981 or 1982 in a GIS
format and can make an overall rating. The ratings are done every two to three years on every
street in the City. There are seven different conditions and from that they get an average rating.
'They map out where the worst rated streets aze and group them based on a project size of 1 to 1.5
miles. Projects aze rotated through the wards with a seven-year plan in mind. Next year's
project will be in Ward 1. The yeaz before a project is started a neighborhood meeting is held.
Public hearings will be held before finalization and they have an idea what the assessments will
be. Construction begins the next spring.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that 62"d Way was not in the plans this year. She asked why it
went forward.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 2002 PAGE 9
Mr. Haukaas stated that they decided to do it this year because Anoka County is doing a project
on East River Road. This will be part of Anoka County's contract and we will be reimbursing
them for a portion of the construction cost.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if an informal neighborhood meeting was planned.
Mr. Haukaas stated that it was.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if that was when Mr. Harris brought up the question on whether
the portion of the road in dispute was going to be done.
Mr. Haukaas stated that was conect.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if Anoka County has awarded the contract yet. z�
NIr. Haukaas stated that it is currently up for bids.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that we are looking at sometime in August because East River
Road will have to be done first.
Mr. Haukaas stated that was conect. Hartman Circle needed work also. The catch basin and
utility work has to also be done prior to this project. Asphalt will not go into this area until late
August or early September.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that we do not need to know about the disputed azea within the
next week.
Mr. Haukaas stated that was correct.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that in 1969, there was a public hearing and the road was
reconstructed. She asked if some of the people present paid any assessments at that time.
Mr. Haukaas stated that was correct.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if a street is reconstructed and a portion is no longer going to be
part of the street, how it was communicated.
NIr. Haukaas stated that the construction plans for the 1969 project identify a City street by the
placement of the curb. Their curb was realigned, made less sharp. There were several meetings
regarding that. The resolution by the City Council to approve this project as it was presented is
what changed the alignment on the street.
Councilmember Billings asked when the word "street" was referred to, if they were both
referring to the traveled portion of the roadway.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 2002 PAGE 10
Mr. Haukaas stated that it is the improved portion between the concrete curbs. There are
different lengths of right-of-way all throughout the city.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked what the legal document would be if anyone wanted to know the
right-of-way versus the street.
Mr. Haukaas stated that the boundary is the property lines. To know for sure you need a survey.
Right-of-way widths and street widths can be inferred to as to approximately where they are.
Without having a survey, they cannot determine how wide the boulevazd is.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked what people could review at the City.
Mr. Haukaas stated that there are half-section maps and plats for each individual subdivision.
They give the legal description or sizes of the parcels. -�
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if surveyors would use the same plat.
Mr. Haukaas stated that they would.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked Mr. Knaak if the legal document would be the plat.
Mr. Knaak, City Attorney, stated that it would. The dedicated easements aze held by the City in
trust for the purpose of roads. The other property owners own their property subject to that
public easement.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the plat would change if the street is reconstructed.
Mr. Haukaas stated that it would not.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that Mr. Potasek mentioned the official street maps. She asked
how that compared to the plat.
Mr. Haukaas stated that the street map Mr. Potasek brought in was last updated in 1991. T'here
aze a lot of inconsistencies in that map and it is no longer used. It is not a street map, but a
general representation of the layout of Fridley.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that examples were given in his letter.
Mr. Haukaas stated that he has several aerial photographs with the plat overlay, but not all of the
ones on that list. He has several examples of the exact situation.
Mr. Burns stated that the Woodside Court example is very appropriate in this case.
Mr. Haukaas stated that as shown on the aerial photograph, prior to street reconstruction, NIr.
Potasek's driveway went to the south. The reconstruction changed the alignment of the curb and
made those driveways slightly longer. A portion of the half-section map shows the eastern part
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 2002 PAGE 11
of Fridley at Central Avenue with Rice Creek Road through the middle. There is a portion where
Arthur Street comes down to Camelot Lane and makes a 90-degree turn. The new house
constructed a few years ago with the driveway off the corner along the 1/2 right-of-way that
eYtends down to Rice Creek Road that has never been constructed is a platted right-of-way. We
only plow the street between the curbs.
Councilmember Wolfe stated that it was never a road.
Mr. Haukaas stated that was correct.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that the question is whether it is a road now or not.
Councilmember Wolfe stated that we do not plow the woods off of Briardale because there is not
a road there even though at one time there was supposed to be one. �
Mr. Haukaas stated that it is the same comparison, anything that was paved by the City or on
City property, the right-of-way is street. Our argument is that this is not the case.
Councilmember Wolfe stated that this is not the same, because that road came down and curved
from the beginning.
Mayor Lund asked if it automatically made it a road since there never was any asphalt.
Mr. Haukaas stated that Woodside Court is off the cul-de-sac for Rice Creek Drive, and is a
platted right-of-way going to the east. This driveway comes into the right-of-way and then down
into the cul-de-sac. He maintains the entire stretch, we maintain the cul-de-sac only.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if there was a question about this ever being extended and if
there were buildable lots.
Mr. Haukaas stated that one lot could be split into eight properties and would require that
Woodside Court be connected through and utilities extended through.
Councilmember Wolfe stated that the driveway of the Woodside Court property is thin and the
owner has maintained that. If the City ever did build a road there, the driveway would then be
30 feet long at maximum. Now it is about 100.
Mr. Haukaas stated that it is a driveway that goes across the City right-of-way.
Councilmember Wolfe stated that if they ever split those lots and the City made a road, the road
would go through to where that other road comes out at Benjamin.
Mr. Haukaas stated that was correct.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that if we put a road straight down 62"d and went out to the river
it would be similar.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 2002 PAGE 12
Mr. Haukaas stated that 62"d Way at Riverview Terrace was not originally put in by the City.
With the reconstruction in 1969, the portion to the west would have been overlaid to align it
with a City street.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if it would be similar to Hickory and Rice Creek Way.
Mr. Haukaas stated that is realignment of that intersection. It will make two properties have
more boulevard. There will also be new curbs and street.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if it would change the driveways at a1L
Mr. Haukaas stated that it would not due to the fact that they do not come right out at the corner.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that Chesney Way off East River Road is plowed to the end
because snow is stored there. It is not similaz to this property because the driveways all come
out on the south side of Chesney Way.
Mr. Haukaas stated that it is not similar.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked about 60`�, Benjamin, and 69�' east of the railroad tracks, Ely
Street, Longfellow, and Liberty. They aze all dead end streets where snow is stored. There is no
road to curve into another one like 62"d curving into Riverview Terrace.
Mr. Haukaas stated that those are standard curbed, dead-end streets that aze plowed to the end
and piled at the end.
Councilmember Wolfe asked if he had any information on Oakley, Ashton or other examples.
Mr. Haukaas stated that those are examples of unconstructed right-of-ways with some driveways
off of corners or near the corner. He was not sure if a portion of Ashton is plowed.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that it was decided that Oakley was a dead-end street.
Mr. Haukaas stated that at Pierce and 66`�, the corner at Channel Road is a platted half right-of-
way with a driveway coming off the comer. Ms. Goodwin may have been referring to this, but
the only improved street is Pierce to the corner and 66�'. We only plow the improved street. 66�'
has a driveway going to the north off the corner of that and we only plow between the curbs on
the corner.
Councilmember Wolfe stated that there was never a road built to the west near there.
Mr. Haukaas stated that there are sanitary lines through that portion.
Mr. Potasek stated that many of the examples Mr. Haukaas has shown are nonexistent because
they are to be built in the future. Their road was built in 1956. He asked how that compared.
�-
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22. 2002 PAGE 13
Councilmember Wolfe stated that if the road is not there, how can we compare it to what is
there? He asked why they would pay assessments on something that now does not exist.
l�Ir. Haukaas stated that in 1969 there was a slightly different policy on assessments and it
included side yards. Now we only do front footage. It takes something into account for flag lots.
The assessment that went to the Potasek's property would have been considered a side lot
assessment.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that construction assessment similar to the triangular lot on
Riverview Terrace where there was no front footage but they split the assessment between them.
Mr. Haukaas stated that is correct.
�
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that there is nothing in the minutes from 1969 to say that
anyone disapproved of the assessments. She asked what was the legal document.
Mr. Potasek stated that he does have the official plot maps from the County of Anoka registered
by the City of Fridley. These are certified plot maps of 62nd Way, Schultz's Addition, Julianne
Addition, and Potasek's Addition. 62°d Way was dedicated by the City of Fridley and has never
been changed by the City of Fridley in the records at Anoka County.
Councilmember Billings stated that we do not disagree with the fact that there is a 25-foot
dedication for roadway purposes.
Mr. Potasek stated that is what we aze talking about.
Councilmember Billings stated that the question we are discussing is that it is not an improved
street we should be maintaining. There are locations all around the City with right-of-way land
that is set aside for roadway purposes that are currently not being used for roadway purposes.
Some of them have driveways, some do not. Councilmember Wolfe asked if this was different
because at one time the City of Fridley considered that to be an approved roadway because it was
paved. Allegedly there have been sealcoatings and overlays here but they were not only done on
the right-of-way for 62"d Way but also done on a portion of the driveway of the property of the
owner just north of this right-of-way which is property that is not dedicated as a right-of-way.
He cannot figure out why this area was maintained by the City for so many yeazs. We cannot
maintain private property. We need to stop doing this. If Council disagrees with staff and agrees
with Mr. Potasek that this is an improved travel portion of roadway, then it should be brought up
to current standards and plowed like every other street in the City of Fridley. If Council decides
it should not be a traveled portion of the roadway, it should be turned over to Mr. and Mrs.
Potasek to use as their driveway. A third option is to vacate a portion of this right-of-way so it
does become Mr. and Mrs. Potasek's driveway.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that she has not heard anything that has changed her mind. We
cannot take any action until we can discuss this with Representative Goodwin. Our City Attorney
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 2002 PAGE 14
states that we have made the proper decision. She believes it is the right decision but is willing
to listen to more comments and questions.
Mr. Knaak stated that if you are going to go beyond the stated time limit for open forum, you
need to take affirmative action to extend the time for open forum.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that it has not been the policy in the past.
Mayor Lund stated that he felt that this is a unique situation and as long as discussion progressed
and moved in a civil manner, he allowed it. If we are going to extend this past 15 minutes, as we
have, there should be a motion to extend the open forum.
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to extend the time of the open fonun. Seconded by
Councilmember Barnette. -� -
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Lund stated that plat records show alignment of a right-of-way, not a street. He said he
would like to have an additional meeting, if appropriate, after responding to questions.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that the question she felt that needed to answered was whether
or not we had an ordinance or policy regarding this matter. She asked what the next step was.
Mayor Lund stated that the proper procedure would be to advertise for a meeting and then have a
discussion item on the agenda.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that it would be on the August 12 agenda if there is an action
item.
Mr. Knaak stated that it would ordinarily be a request for an action item at the next available
Council meeting. There is no obligation to respond, and it is under Council's direction.
Mr. Potasek stated that with respect to the original June 6 letter sent by Mr. Haukaas, the
question would be if the City would rescind that letter.
Mayor Lund stated that to rescind the letter goes hand in hand with his request here.
Mr. Potasek stated that letter was sent without a Council meeting.
Mayor Lund stated that if he wants them to take a formal position on his request, he would deem
it appropriate to have it as an item on the next Council meeting agenda. At that time, Council
will review a formal request to continue to maintain or not to maintain it.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 2002 PAGE 15
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that staff is directed by Council via the City Manager to send
out letters. It would not necessarily need a motion or agenda item to send the original letter out
or to send out a letter that confirms or reaffirms.
Mr. Potasek stated that portion of the letter to a�rm or rescind could be done at a Council
meeting.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that she is not sure of Mr. Potasek's original request. Two
weeks ago, there was no action item in front of Council and there still is not.
Mr. Burns stated that based on testimony heard, Council would have the ability to approve a
simple motion at the next meeting regardless of any letter that previously had been written on
behalf of the Council stating Council's position on this street issue. �
Mr. Knaak stated that on behalf of the City, if someone disagrees with something and requests an
action item, they are looking for an affirmative act on their part. Council must respond to the
request for a decision for a review. It is no longer in the hands of staff.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that there will be an agenda item on August 12. There should
not be any separate meetings with part of the Council. Any other information should be shared
with all Councilmembers. We could invite Representative Goodwin.
Mayor Lund stated that he agrees.
Mr. Potasek asked if Representative Goodwin and Representative Bernazdy could get together
with individuals to discuss this.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that Representative Bernardy feels that it is actually
Representative Goodwin's area of representation.
Mr. Potasek stated that Representative Goodwin's broken ankle could change that.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that Mr. Burns will contact them. She said that this item will be
on August 12 City Council meeting agenda.
Mr. Harris asked if he could buy a copy of the videotape.
Mr. Burns stated that he could.
Councilmember Billings stated that staff made a determination and sent a letter to the property
owners. The property owners disagreed with that determination and much discussion has taken
place in the last several weeks. The City Council has not taken a position on whether or not this
is an approved street or not. That is what we are trying to do is gather the information so we can
make a reasonable decision as to whether or not this is an improved roadway. The right-of-way
exists for an improved roadway. Council has to make the determination. One of our State
�-
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 2002 PAGE 16
Representatives does not understand how our process works and has asked us to make a decision
prior to this meeting. We cannot do that. Council has not made a determination
Mayor Lund stated that he appreciates everyone's time.
9. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS:
Councilmember Barnette asked if Highway 65 was going to be discussed after the meeting.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, asked if it was critical that this was discussed.
Mr. Haukaas, Public Works Director, stated that it is not critical to be discussed at this time.
ADJOURN:
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilmember
Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE JULY
22, 2002, CITY COITNCIL MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:43 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Signe L. Johnson Scott Lund
Recording Secretary Mayor
t-
0
�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 2002
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Savage called the July 17, 2002, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30
p. m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Dean Saba, Barb Johns, LeRoy Oquist, Brad Dunham, Dave Kondrick
Members Absent: Larry Kuechle, Diane Savage.
Others Present: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Darwin Voigt, 6750 Main St., Fridley
APPROVE THE APRIL 17 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Johns, to approve the April 17, 2002, Planning
Commission meeting minutes as presented.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PUBLIC HEARtNG:
Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment, ZTA #02-01, by the City of Fridley, to
repeal and replace sections of Chapters 205.17, 205.18, 205.19, 205.20, and 205.25,
relating to outdoor storage in the M1, M2, M3, M4, & S3 Industrial Districts.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Johns, to waive the reading and open the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:32 P.M.
Mr. Hickok stated that this ordinance amendment relates to the outdoor storage in the industrial
districts. Staff is requesting consideration of changi�g code requirements related ta the number
of industrial property owners that are illegally storing goods outdoors. Systematic code
enforcement in late 2001 revealed this problem with numerous industrial property owners. Staff
determined that the City ordinance should be reviewed. This year's Council Commission survey
sought input from the Commissions and the City Council on this issue. Survey results showed
that there was no support for drafting new legislation that would allow some outdoor storage
subject to screening requirements and obtaining a special use permit. The survey responses
were verified at a joint meeting earlier this year on April 15. In developing the proposed
ordinance, staff examined several different options based on other cities' regulations on outdoor
storage.
Mr. Hickok stated that:
■ Blaine has limited outdoor storage allowed with a conditional use permit, the equivalent
of our special use permit, limited to a maximum of 50% of the total building footprint and
must be fully screened from any public right-of-way with a maximum of 12 feet in height.
1
-� -
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 2002 PAGE 2
■ Brooklyn Park's outdoor storage is altowed through a conditional use permit in the heavy
and general commercial districts. Outdoor storage is not allowed in light industrial
districts.
• Columbia Heights' outdoor storage is allowed as an accessory in the commercial or
industrial commercial districts. It must be located in the side or rear yard and screened
from adjacent uses or the public right-of-way.
• Coon Rapids' outdoor storage is allowed in the industrial districts and must be located in
the side or rear yard and screened where practical.
■ Inver Grove Heights' outdoor storage is allowed through a conditional use permit and
must be screened from residential properties.
■ Mounds View's outdoor storage is allowed through a conditional use permit in its
industrial districts and must be screened from the public right-of-way in the light
industrial districts. However, there are no requirements for screening in the heavy
industrial districts.
■ Osseo allows outdoor storage through a conditional use permit in its industrial district
and highway commercial district. It must be fully screened from adjoining properties. "� -
■ Bloomington allows outdoor storage through a conditional use permit and its special
limited and special general industrial districts. It is limited to an area not larger than 50%
of the ground coverage of the principal building and must be located in the side or rear
yard not abutting a public street.
Mr. Hickok stated that Fridley's current regulations allow outdoor storage in the M1, M2, M4, and
S3 zoning districts through a special use permit process. If the items being stored are incidental
to the business, and if the items being sto�ed are not, it has other consequences. Incidental
storage means that the storage is temporary in nature. and short term storage is not required as
an on-going part of the business. The confusion is that defining temporary and determining
whether or not the item is required as part of the business. It becomes cumbersome and
difficult for inspection by staff. The ordinance proposed would allow up to 50% of the footprint of
the principal building.
Mr. Oquist asked if the building was split into 5/10 and is 2,000 sq. feet, is each tenant allowed
50% of 2,000?
Mr. Hickok stated that at no point could the outdoo� storage area exceed the 50% mark of the
overall building, and it is really up to the building management to determine if someone gets all
of those uses, or if it is broken up equally among the tenants.
Mr. Hickok stated that, currently, that is storage of materials equipment, or motor vehicles
incidental to the principal operation or use except under the following conditions:
1. Motor vehicle storage is conducted as provided in Section 205.1707. One of the City's
least favorite ways to draft an ordinance is to keep sending folks to another direction.
2. Materials, motor vehicles, and equipment are kept in a building or fully screened so as not
to be visible from residential district or residential district across form a public right-of-way,
and a public park adjacent to the use for public right-of-way adjacent to the use. 3.
Materials, motor vehicles, and equipment stored outside do not exceed 15 feet in height
and screening materials are provided as in another section.
Mr. Hickok stated staff believes there is a cleaner way of doing this, and the amendment
proposed integrates this language into a new ordinance format that makes it better for the user
and better for staff to interpret and enforce. In the light industrial district, uses permitted with a
special use permit would be adding language saying that limited outdoor storage shall satisfy
the following requirements and other stipulations being necessary due to site conditions:
A. Outdoor storage area is limited to a maximum size equal to 50% of the principal building.
This area must be designated on the site plan submitted with the special use permit
� 2
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 2002 PAGE 3
application and must be located in the side or rear yard with the materials and
equipment kept in the designated outdoor storage area and must be fully screened so
not to be visible from a residential district adjacent to the use, a residential district across
from the public right-of-way, and public park adjacent to the use, a public right-of-way
including railroad right-of-way adjacent to the use or any commercial use adjacent to the
use. Screening of the outdoor storage area shall be achieved through a combination of
masonary walls, fencing, berming, and landscaping in accordance with. That is sent to
another section but is universal to all of the sections so that they can see that there is a
uniform standard. The materials and equipment stored outside must not exceed 12 feet
in height. Outdoor storage area must be City approved hard surface and bound on the
perimeter by concrete, curb, and gutter. The special use permit of limited outdoor
storage shall not permit the outdoor storage of semi trucks, semi trailers, or heavy
construction equipment. Hazardous chemicals and materials are prohibited for being
stored outside, the outdoor storage shall not effect the required amount of parking stalls
needed on this site, the location and types of materials to be stored are to be reviewed
by the Fire Marshall. �
Mr. Hickok stated that the language is the same in 205.18. Section 205.19 is regarding the M-3
district. The M-3 district is a little different, because in 1993 when it was created, there were
some discussions about the need for outdoor fences in the industrial district. The M-1 and M-2
districts allow outdoor storage that is incidental to the principal use, basically saying that if it is
required, you better build a building around it. The M-3 district language required a special use
permit if they had incidental outdoor storage. If they had required outdoor storage they could do
it by right. That was not the intent of staff and Council, but staff decided it was not exactly as it
was meant to be designed or enforced.
Mr. Hickok stated staff is asking that M-3 require the outdoor storage of materials, motor
vehicles, or equipment including the outdoor manipulation of materials and motor vehicles
equipment under the following conditions.
■ The materials and equipment must be fully screened so not to be visible from the residential
district to the use of the residential district across form a public right-of-way, a public park
adjacent to the use, a public right-of-way including railroad right-of-way and any commercial
use adjacent to the use.
■ The screening of outdoor storage shall be achieved through a combination of materials and
equipment stored outside must not exceed 15 feet in that district.
■ Outdoor storage of motorized vehicles must be on City-approved hard surface, curb,
concrete, and gutter.
■ Hazardous chemicals are prohibited for being outside and the location of the types of
materials to be stored are to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshall.
■ Telecommunications towers and wire�ess telecommunications facilities are to be still with a
special use permit.
Mr. Hickok stated Section 205.20, Manufacturing Only, is a district created in 1997 with rapid
industrial development. Use� with the special use permit would be allowed limited outdoor
storage and that language will look the same. To satisfy the following requirements, 50°/a of the
principal footprint of the building and through a special use permit with all of the screening
requirements adjacent to the uses that you have seen. Outside materials and equipment shall
not exceed 12 feet and should be on a hard surface surrounded by concrete, curb, and gutter.
The special use permit for outdoor storage shall not permit semi-trucks, semi-trailers, or heavy
construction equipment. It will not allow hazardous chemicals or materials and the outdoor
storage shall not effect the required amount of parking needed and materials stored outside
shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshall.
Mr. Hickok stated that in 205.25, the S-3; Heavy Industrial District, was an overlay done after
the creation of the M-4 district. That district wo3 be allowed to do the outdoor storage with the
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 2002 PAGE 4
language you have seen with no other changes. Staff recommends approval of the proposed
changes. The proposed changes will allow Fridley to let industries have some outdoor storage
with conditions while not being detrimental to the surrounding properties. This item will go to
Council on July 29, 2002.
Ms. Johns asked what happens to properties that already have outdoor storage.
Mr. Hickok stated that their history will be looked at and whether there was a special use permit.
If it has evolved over time with no special grandfathered right, they would need to go through
the special use permit process.
Mr. Saba asked if there were a lot of properties in violation of this.
Mr. Hickok stated that about 40% of businesses are in violation of this.
Mr. Dunham asked if the new 50% rule would be enough room for most of them. -� -
Mr. Hickok stated there will be some industries that have well over that amount, and it will be a
hardship for them to bring back into compliance. Presently, however, the sites do not look good
and do not present the image the City would like in the industrial districts.
Mr. Oquist stated that some outdoor storage is located across the street from the businesses.
How does that apply to the 50%?
Mr. Hickok stated that is a good question. There may be possible termination of use there.
Unfortunately, that happens with people buying property without investigating the use codes.
Mr. Saba asked how much time they would need to comply.
Mr. Hickok stated that six months is a reasonable amount of time for them to come in with their
survey and application for the special use permit, plans that will highlight the new curb and
gutter asphalt area, and how they could make the site function within the language here. Staff
would then give them another six months to actually make the changes.
Darwin Voit, 6750 Main Street, stated that he is wondering how this will affect his business and
the outside storage of buses. They put in a retaining wall because of the view from the
residential area for screening. On the other side is the railroad track. The property on Osborne
is screened also.
Mr. Hickok stated that the site has buses coming in and out and like an M-1 or M-2 industrial
use where trucks come in and out on a daily rotation basis. They sit behind the building for
cleaning and re-fueling or service. Staff does not see this as an outdoor storage as much as a
typical service use for equipment that is coming in and out of the site. It is more incidental and
behind the building in the rear yard with a screening fence. That should have been in an M-3
district due to the height of the buses. The Fridley Bus Company site is in compliance from that
perspective and would not need to change. The other site could be within screening
requirements also. He would hesitate to give an answer for sure, but staff can take at the
properties for further review.
Mr. Voit asked if special use permits, once granted. last for as long as you own the property.
Mr. Hickok stated that it generally runs with the land but also is reviewed on a regular basis and
can be revoked for misuse.
0
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 2002 PAGE 5
Mr. Voit stated that used parts (or junk) vehicles are being cleaned up by the City on certain
properties. He continued by stating that these types of eyesores should be put into the
ordinance to help clean up some of those sites that store such vehicles.
Mr. Oquist stated that on Osborne Road the 12-foot vehicles are not exactly being stored so the
12-foot rule does not necessarily apply.
Mr. Hickok stated that it is only items being stored. There is one benefit here that other
industries might enjoy also with how the site is laid out. The buses are on the south side of the
building and not close to the fence and yard.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 8:02 P.M.
�-
Mr. Oquist stated that he is in favor of the proposed changes. This is a good way to pin it down.
It is a good idea to consider Mr. VoiYs proposed addition of language also.
Mr. Hickok stated that it is correct.
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Johns, to recommend approval of ZTA #02-01.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 8, 2002, PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION MEETING:
MOTION by Mr. Dunham, seconded by Ms. Johns, to receive the minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 16 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY &
ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING:
MOTION by Ms. Johns, seconded by Mr. Dunham, to receive the minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10 2002 APPEALS COMMISSION
MEETING: '
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dunham, to receive the minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 4 2002 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY MEETING:
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dunham, to receive the minutes.
5
J�="�' �, _.
_
' :'y.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 2002 PAGE 6
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 2 2002 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY MEETING:
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dunham, to receive the minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
7. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 6 2002 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY MEETING:
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dunham, to receive the minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Mr. Hickok stated Stacy Stromberg, Planner, and her husband, Benji, recently had a baby boy,
Bailey Stromberg on July 5. The baby had reversed arteries in the heart, but was operated on
and now is doing fine. Staff congratulated Stacy and Benji on their new arrival.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE JULY 17, 2002, PLANNING COMMISSION WAS
ADJOURNED AT 8:22 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
�.
Sign L. John n �
Recording Secretary
�
�-
�
�
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2002
� ,�,.
William W. Burns, City Manager ,�i
David Sallman, Public Safety Director
Conference Aid Agreement
August 6, 2002
The City of Minneapolis will be hosting the International Association of Chiefs of Police from
October 4-9, 2002. Due to the increased security that will be surrounding the conference, they
have requested our assistance. In addition to police chiefs from a11 over the world, it is reasonable
to assume that a number of high-ranking national leaders (it is not uncommon to have the
President address this conference) will be present.
Minnesota Statute 471.59 provides for mutual aid agreements between local government
agencies. Minneapolis is requesting the Council to approve, by resolution, the attached
agreement. In short we are responsible for our own officers during this event, including salary
and liability. Our officers will not be placed in high risk liability positions. We aze able to
provide one officer per day during this time of year assigned from our normal shifts.
The Minneapolis Police Department has been helpful in the past when we have requested
assistance in the area of K-9's, bomb squad, and officer response during lazge disturbances. We
would expect to receive their assistance in the future if it proves necessary.
Staff recommends approval.
Attachment
7
-� -
0
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND
DELIVERY OF A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE
CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS TO ASSIST WITH SECURITY FOR
THE IACP CONFERENCE FROM OCTOBER 4 TO
OCTOBER 9, 2002
WHEREAS, the City of Minneapolis has requested police assistance in providing security
during the International Chiefs of Police Conference during the time of October 4, 2002, to
October 9, 2002; and �
WHEREAS, in order to do so, it is necessary for the Cities of Minneapolis and Fridley to enter
into a joint powers agreement as is required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Fridley, Minnesota (the
"City") as follows:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Fridley herby authorizes and directs the Public Safety
Director to execute and deliver the Joint Powers Agreement by and between the Cities of Fridley
and Minneapolis. The Joint Powers Agreement sha11 be substantially in the form on file with the
City Clerk on the date hereof.
Section 2. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY FRIDLEY THIS
12� DAY OF AUGUST, 2002.
ATTEST:
' DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
E��
SCOTT J LUND - MAYOR
JUL.-08'02(MON) 12��1 - MPLS POLICE I�CP COORDINATOR T6L�612 673 3?61 P.Q02
�
ri.
Ill.
Minneapolls Pcl9ce Departme�t 20021ACP Confe�ence Aid Agreement
Pumose
The City of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Police Oepartment is hosting the 109�'
Annual I�temational Association of Chiefs of Police October 4-9, 2002. The
Minneapolis Police Department is obiigated to provide security for this conference.
To accomplish this task the Minneapolis Police Department fs requesting the
assistance of other Law Enforcement agencies in the state of Minnesota. For the
purposes of this Agreement the type of assistance heing requested is in the form of
swom personnet who are licensed peace o�cers in the State of Minnesota. This
agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, which
authorizes the joint and cooperative exercise of powers, common to the parties.
Deflnition of Te�m;
Rsquesting Agency: Minneapolis Police Department
Sending Agency: Law Enforcement agencies of the State of Minnesota
Assistance: Personnel and equipment
Personnel: Swom personnel who are licensed peace officers in the
State of Minnesota
Equ(pment: Any equipment sent with personnel including squad
� cars and personal gear
Duty/duties: Any security role at 2002 IACP Conference or IACP
Conferance related function including but not limited to,
standing post, roving post� checking
credentials/Identification, Assisting Requesting Agency
in the performance of law enforcement duties as
authorized under Minnesota State Statute §609.06.
Parties
The Parties to this Agreement shaU consist of as many Minnesota Law
Enforcement Agencies who approve this Agreement and t(ie Minneapalis Police
Department. Upon approval, the executive signature page of this Agreement shal!
be sent to the Minneapolis Police Department along with a certified copy of the
documentati�n evide�cing approvaL
Approval of this Agreement by a Par�y sha11 be evidenced by:
• For a municipality, a resolution adopted by the goveming body, or
.IML:mcg/02A-0048314.12.02 flnal
0
�-
�UL.-08'0?(MON) 1?�52 MPLS POLICE I�CP COORDIN�TOR TEL�612 673 3207 P.003
• For a non-municipality, a resolution adopted by the goveming body or a letter
executed by an official with sufficient authority to bind that party which recites
the basis of that authority.
N. Effeciive Oatss
The effective dates of this Agreeme�t shaU be only those dates during the 109�'
Annua( Intemational Association of Chiefs of Police, i.e. October 5 through 9, 2002,
inc(usive.
V. Revuesti�a Aqe�
The Requesting Agency is the Minneapolis Police Department. The Sending
Agency hereby releases the Requesting Agency from all claim of liability per
paragraph VII of this Agreement, The Requesting Agency shall operate and
manage this Agreement at all times,
VI. Pro_ cedure -
Subd. 1. The Requesting Agency is requesting the assistance of the Minnesota
Law Enforcement agency named below for the 2002 IACP Conference. By
providing any assistance including any personnel and equipment the Sending
Agency acknowledges the below listed liability statement.
Subd. 2. The Requesting Agency sha(I be in command of all sifivations and
duty/duties concerning the 2002 IACP Conference and any event associated with
the 20021ACP Conference.
Subd. 3. When a Se�ding Agency supplies personnel to the Requesting Agency,
such personnel shall remain under the direction and control of the Sending Agency;
shall be subject to the policies and procedures of the Sending Agency shall be paid
by the Sending Agency; shall be protected by the workers compensatlon of the
Sending Agency; and sha!( otherwlse be deemed to be performing their regular
duties for the Sending Agency.
Subd. 4. The Sending Agency shall be responsible for its own personnel.
equipment, and supplies a�d for injuries or death to any such personnel or damage
to any such equipment or supplies. Each agency waives the right to sue any other
agency fo� any worke�s compensation benefits paid to its own employee or
volunteer even ff the injuries were caused wholly or partiatly by the negligence of
any other agency, its officers emptoyees or volunteers.
Subd. 5. The Sending Agency shall demand no charges or costs for assistance
provided under this agreement.
JML•mcgl02A-p04g3t4,12,G2 flnal 2
10
�-
dUL. -08' 0? (MON) 12 � 52
MPLS POLICE [ACP COORDINATOR TEL�612 613 3201 P.004
VIL LlabiN�
The Requesting Agency shall not be responsibie for any i�juries, (osses or
damages to persons or property arising out of the acts of any of the personnel of
the Sending Agency nor shall the Sending Agency be responslble for any injuries,
losses or damages arising out of acts of any personnel of the Requesting Agency
or the personnel of any other Sending Agency. No Agency shall be responsible for
inju�es� deaths, losses or damages arising out of the actions of Law Enforcement
Personnel of any other agency.
By entering into this Agreement, agencies are not waiving any provisions or liability
limitations established in Chapter 466� Minnesota Statutes.
Agent of Requesting Agency
Sending Agency
Agent of Sending Agency
0
JMI.TnogIOZA-00483/4.12.OZ flr►al
3
11
-� -
0
�
�UL. -08' 02 (MON) 12: 52
MPLS POL[CE [ACP COORDINATOR TEL�612 613 3207 P.005
The City of Minneapolis has as witness to the foregoing has caused this Agreement
to be executed in its behalf by its proper officials, as of the date flrst written below.
Dated:
CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS
sy: _
Mayor
Countersigned:
Assistant Finance Officer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Assistant City Attomey
0
JMLmcglo?A-�dt93/4.1202 nnal _ -
4
12
�-
0
JUL.-OS'Q2iMON) 1?-�52 MPLS POLICE I�CP COORDIN�TOR
TEL�612 6i3 3201 P,006
PSBRS 8 W�M/8udget - Your Committee, having unde� consideration the
provision of secur'rty for the 109th Intemationai Association of Chiefs of Police
Co�vention to be held Octobe� 4- 9, 2002 in Minneapolis, �ow recommends that the
Police Department be authorized to �equest the assistance of other law enforcement
agencies to provide security, including but not limited to standing post, roving post,
checking credentials�dentifrcation and general assistance in the pe�Formance of law
enforceme�t duties as authorized under Minnesota Statutes Sectio� 609.06.
Apptoved as to
COUNCIL I AYE
MEM9EFi
0�401M
ADOPTED
VOTINO I AS,IEKf � OVE1iR E I sUSTA M f CMEIA9EA
Ce�tlfled aa sa oMdel adto� o! the Cky
AYE NAY VOTINO �/�eSENT I O E�RIIIOE I iUMAIN
13
PASSE� MAY 17 20�2
o�� �.APPROVED NOT APPROVED Q VETOED
AT1"EST � � MAy 2 9 2002
C RK R OnTE
CenMnRpl Aw 1A] -
13
�-
�
�
�
�
GTY OF
FRIDLEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2002
William W. Burns, City Manager �
�
�
Jon H. Haukaas, Public Works Director
August 12, 2002
PW02-057
SUBJECT: Commons Park Parking Lot Phase I Reconstruction Project No. 348
Within our 2002 budget we have identified funds for the reconstruction of the parking lot
and alley and well house lots all on the north side of Commons Park off 7`� Street.
The 2002 budget has $70,000 budgeted for the reconstruction of these lots.
Recommend the Gity Council adopt the resolution authorizing the staf� to advertise for the
Commons Park Parking Lot Phase I Reconstruction project No. 348.
JHH:cz
Attachment
�
14
-� -
RESOLUTION NO. - 2002
A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEr�NT FOR BIDS: COI�IIrlONS PARK PARKING LOT PHASE I
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 348
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fridley has established a policy of
maintaining city infrastructure through an annual Capital Improvements Plan,
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has submitted a plan showing the -
reconstruction of parking lots in Commons Park.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Fridley, �
Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the parking lots and alleys recommended for reconstruction by the "��
Public Works Department be reconstructed to include grading,
stabilized base, hot mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter,
storm sewer repair, landscaping and other associated improvements, and
the work involved in said improvement shall hereafter be designated
as:
COI�IONS PARK PARRING LOT PHASE I RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 348
2. The plans and specifications prepared by the Public Works Department
for such improvement and each of them, pursuant to the Council action
heretofore, are hereby approved and shall be filed with the City
Clerk.
3. The work to be performed under Commons Park Parking Lot Phase I
Reconstruction Project No. 348 be performed under one contract.
The Director of Public Works shall accordingly prepare and cause to be inserted
in the official newspaper advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for two (2) weeks (at least 10 days), and shall specify the
work to be done and will state that bids will be opened at 10:00 a.m. on
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2002, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, and
that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Director of
Public Works and accompanied by a cash deposit, bid bond, or certified check
payable to the City of Fridley for five percent (5�) of the amount of such bid.
That the advertisement for bids for COMMONS PARK PARKING LOT PHASE I
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 348 shall be substantially standard in form.
0
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 12TH DAY OF
AUGUST, 2002. � _
C:1��G��Y��
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
15
SCOTT J. LUND - MAYOR
r
�
CITY OF
FRIDLEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2002
William W. Burns, City Manager��`
Jon � .�Haukaas, Public Works Director
Layne Otteson, Assistant Public Works Director
August 8, 2002
PW02-064
Change Order No. 1 to Street Improvement (Sealcoat) Project No. ST. 2002 -
10
The attached Change Order No. 1 is for the additional sealcoating for the City of Columbia
Heights. All costs for the additional work, including inspection, will be passed through and
paid by the City of Columbia Heights. Final quantities have been measured and the total cost
of Change order No. 1 is $4,205.00. This change order is required because the City of
Columbia Heights request was made after we began advertising for bids.
Net cost of Change Order No. 1 is $4,205 for a revised contract amount of $86,592.76.
Recommend the City Council Approve Change Order No. 1 to Pearson Brothers, Inc. for
Street Improvement (Sealcoat) Project No. ST. 2002 - 10.
LO/JHH:cz
Attachment
16
-� -
CTTY OF FRIDLEY
ENGINEERING DEPAR'T11�NT
6431 UNNERSTTY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
July 29, 2002
Pearson Brothers, Inc.
P O Box 334
Loretto MN 55357
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1 2002 Street Improvement (Sealcoat) Project No. 2002 - 10
Gentlemen:
-r -
You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instructed to modify your contract forthe 2002 Street Improvement (Seaicoat)
Project No. ST. 2002 - 10 by adding the following work:
Addition:
Item
l. Sealcoat with FA-3 aggregate
2. Sweep before sealccoat application
3. Sweep after sealcoat application
4. Loose rock signs
TOTAL ADDITIONS
TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS:
Quantiri
7,100
7,100
7,100
6
Price
0.53 SY
0.01 SY
0.01 SY
50.00 Ea
Amount
$3,763.00
71.00
71.00
300.00
S4,Z05.00
Original Contract Amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $82,387.76
Contract Additions - Change Order
No.l ...............................................................4,205.00
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 586.592.76
17
�
0
0
Pearson Brothers, Inc.
ST. 2002 - 10
Change Order No. 1
Page 2
Submitted and appro d by Jon H. Haukaas, Public Works Director, on the 12th day of August, 2002.
red by
. _
'�-`-
�
he d by
� .
�
Jon H. Haukaas, PE
Director of Public Works
Approved and accepted this J- day of ` , 2002 by
<'��
Peazson Brothers, Inc.
uss Pearson, Project Coordinator
Approved and accepted this day of , 2002 by
CITY OF FRIDLEY
Scott J. Lund, Mayor
William W. Burns, City Manager
:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2002
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
TO: William W. Burns, Ciry Manager���
FROM: Jon .�.Haukaas, Public Works Director
DATE: August 7, 2002
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 2: Sewer Lining Project No. 345
PW02-063
The attached Change Order No. 2 to this year's sewer lining project removes the previously
approved footage for 75`}' Avenue. The net change is a contract deduction of $7,848.
A 327-foot section of sewer line was approved for lining on Change Order No. 1 as an
emergency repair on '75`� Avenue east of Bacon Street. During the installation, it was
determined that the sewer line was too far deteriorated and collapsing and that different
methods would have to be used to complete the repair.
Recommend the Gity Council approve Change Order No. 2 reducing the Sewer Lining Project
contract by $7,848 to a revised contract amount of $95,894.
JHH:cz
Attachment
19
-� -
0
n
CITY OF FRIDLEY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
6431 UNNERSTTY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
August 1, 2002
Lametti & Sons, Inc.
6028 Forest Blvd N
Hugo MN 55038
SUBJEC'T: Change Order No. 2, Sanitary and Storm Sewer Lining Project No. 345
�
Gentlemen:
You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instructed to modify your contract for the Sanitary and Storm Sewer Lining
Project No. 345 by adding the following work:
Deduction:
Item
1 8 in. VCP sanitary sewer
TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS:
Original Contract Amount
Contract Additions - CO No. 1
Contract Deductions - CO No. 2
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT
uanti
327 LF
TOTAL
20
Price
24.00
Amount
7,848.00
7,848.00
92,114.00
11,628.00
-7,848.00
$95,894.00
Lametti & Sons, Inc.
Change Order No. 1
July 8, 2002
Page 2
approved by �n H,i Haukaas, Public Works Director, on the 12th day of August, 2002.
by -
�.
Jon H. Haukaas, P.E.
Director of Public Works
Approved and accepted this�day of�, 2002 by
L SONS, .
D anken, Project oordinator
Approved and accepted this day of , 2002 by
CITY OF FRIDLEY
Scott J. Lund, Mayor
William W. Burns, City Manager
21
-
0
0
-�
� AGENDA ITEM
� COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2002
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
CLAIMS
106v03-106852
22
�
�
�
cmr oF
FRIDLEY
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2002
Type of License:
TREE REMOVAL
Arbor Design Tree Service
P.O. Box 290298
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
LICENSES
�
Approved By:
Donald Lawrence Public Works
23
Fee:
$40 -� -
City of
�! Fridle
AGENDAITEM
City Council Meeting Of Monday, August 12, 2002
�
Electrical
Ashley Electric Inc
8201 Central Ave NE STE M Myron Ashley
Spring Lake Park MN 55432-
Cascade Electric Inc
4135 East Rum River Cir Todd Shaffer
Cambridge MN 5500&
Commercial Electrical Solutions LLC
10900 73 Ave N STE 124 Brett Robinson
Maple Grove MN 55369-
SignArt Co Inc
2170 Dodd Rd Kevin Snyder
Mendota Heights MN 55120-
Super Electric Inc
16976 Eidelweiss St Jon Mortenson
Andover MN 55304-
Gas Services
Elite Heating 8 Air
3511 Kahler Dr NE Kristine Cassens
St Michael MN 55376-
Fore Mechanical Inc
3520 88 Ave NE Kevin Grell
Blaine MN 55449
Key Metalcraft Inc
8201 Paeasant Ave S Richard Punchard
Bloomington MN 55420-
24
Aooroved By„
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
-r -
�
Maple Grove Heating 8 AC Inc
401 Co Rd 81 Steve France
Osseo MN 55369-1647
Midwest Maintenance 8� Mechanical
710 Pennsylvania Ave S STE B Jeff Rieger
Minneapolis MN 55426-
Mobile Home Improvement
1181 80 St E Jeanne Schiltgen
Inver Grove Heights MN 55077-
NewMech Companies Inc
1633 Eustis St Larry Jordan
St Paul MN 55108-1288
PMR Mechanical Inc
2414 E 26 St DuWayne Meyer
Minneapolis MN 55406
General Contractor-Commercial
Anderson Builders
4208 Park Glen Rd Greg Ande�son
St Louis Park MN 55416-
Construction Results Corp
14100 23 Ave N Mark Snyder
Plymouth MN 55447-
Construction Services of Mpls Inc
2207 N 2nd St Roy Rogers
Minneapolis MN 55411-
DuAll Service Contractors Inc
636 39 Ave NE Gary Dooner
Columbia Heights MN 55421- .
Holle Construction Co Inc
1855 Melrose Ave S Jefferson Holle
Minneapolis MN 55426-
25
Aaoroved By:
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
�
�
Ingram Construction Inc
2705 James Ave N Dennis Plante
Minneapolis MN 55411-
Karkela Construction Inc
3290 Gorham Ave Richard Eishokin
St Louis Park MN 55426-
NA Contracting
1475 73 Ave NE Tim Van Auken
Fridley MN 55432
General Contractor-Residential
Bainville Exteriors Inc
2434 Hillview Rd Rebecca Bainville
Mounds View MN 55112-
Cedar Valley Exteriors Inc (20177285)
9920 Zilla St Jeff Hausmann
Coon Rapids MN 55433-
Egress Window Systems (220311514)
5932 53 Ave S STE C Terry Leabs
Fargo ND 58104-
Fey's Construction Inc (1904)
13270 Jay St NW David Fey
Coon Rapids MN 5544&
Guyers Builders Supply (20257527)
13405 15 Ave N Don Miller
Plymouth MN 55441-4516
Ingram Construction Inc (20286159)
2705 James Ave N Dennis Plante
Minneapolis MN 55411- .
Kodiak Construction 8 Home Improvement (8608)
2607 Brighton NE Robin Mysliwiec
Minneapolis MN 55418-
26
Apnroved B�
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
State af MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
�-
�
�
Landa Construction Inc (8013)
2108 S Ham Lake Dr Hams Jones
Ham Lake MN 55304
Loyal Miller Construction (7446)
19259 Redwood St BW Loyal Miller
Coon Rapids Mn 55433-
Merit Building Co Inc (20271430)
3029 Coon Rapids Blvd #311 David Mau
Coon Rapids MN 55433-
MN Window 8 Siding Co (20296565)
5730 Duluth St Jo� Wacker
Golden Valley MN 55422-
Mobile Home Improvement(20239585)
1181 80 St E Roger Oldre
Inver Grove Heights MN 55077-
Northem Crest Inc (20098415)
7401 Central Ave NE Bill Olson
Fridley MN 55432
Novak-Fleck Inc (1631)
8857 Zealand Ave N Richard Novak
Brooklyn Park MN 55445-
Nu Way Development Inc (5775)
8200 Long Lake Rd Chris Johnson
Mounds View MN 55112-
Pro Exteriors (6094)
11792 Chisago Blvd Ray Fuerstenberg
Chisago MN 55013
Rayco Construction Inc (3396j
3801 5 St NE Stacy Meyers
Columbia Heights MN 55421-
27
A�nroved By�
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
�-
�
Ricksham Construction (20233417)
17874 Concord St NW Chad Ricksham
Eik River MN 55330-
Royalty Remodelers (20274044)
4411 Slater Rd Mike Stuge
Eagan MN 55122-
Solomon So�s Limited (20266363)
12211 Olive St NW Brian Solomon
Coon Rapids MN 5544&
Taylor Technical Services (20315873)
656 36 Ave NE Rick Ranta
Minneapolis MN 55418-
Vizecky Contracting LLC (20218977)
323 W 48 St Wade Vizecky
Minneapolis MN 55409-
Heatina
American Appliance 8 Microwave Inc
PO Box 48070 Kathy Beecher
Coon Rapids MN 5544&0070
Elite Heating 8� Air
3511 Kahler Dr NE James Townsend
St Michael MN 55376-
Fore Mechanical Inc
3520 88 Ave NE Kevin Grell
Blaine MN 55014
Jay Hawk Mechanical Inc
1245 Choke Cherry Rd Jay Crothers
Lino Lakes Mn 5503& �
Key Metalcraft
8201 Pleasant Ave S R Punchard
Bloomington MN 55420-
:
A{�proved Bv•
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
�
�
�
Maple Grove Heating 8 AC Inc
401 Co Rd 81
Osseo MN 55369-1647
Midwest Maintenance 8 Mechanical
710 Pennsylvania Ave S STE B
Minneapolis MN 55426-
Mobile Home Improvement
1181 80 St E
Inver Grove Heights MN 55077-
NewMech Companies Inc
1633 Eustis St
St Paul MN 5510&1288
PMR Mechanical Inc
2414 E 26 St
Minneapolis MN 55406
Mobile Home Installer
Mobile Home Improvement
1181 80 St E
Inver Grove Heights MN 55077-
Plumbina
Facilitech
7206 Washington Ave S
Eden Prairie MN 55344-
NewMech Companies Inc
1633 Eustis St
St Paul MN 5510&1288
Roofina
Allstar Construction
8401 73 Ave N
Brooklyn Park MN 55428-
�
Steve France
Jeff Rieger
Jeanne Schiltgen
Larry Jordan
DuWayne Meyer
Rodger Espeseth
Bruce Kuchinka
Richard Poser
Kevin Femstrom
�
Aanroved Bv:
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ro� Julkowski
Building Official
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
t-
Central Roofing Co
4550 Main St NE
Fridley MN 55421
�
Catherine Smith
30
Aaoroved By�,
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
�-
0
0
0
�
�
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2002
ESTIMATES
Lametti & Sons
16028 Forest Blvd. N.
Hugo, NIN 55038
Sanitary and Storm Sewer Lining
Project No. 345
FINAL ESTIMATE ........................................................................... $20,345.70
Gladstone Construction, Inc.
1315 Frost Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55109
Pedestrian Bridge Replacement
Project No. 341
Estimate No. 1 ........................................................................................ $29,801.50
Ron Kassa Construction
6005 — 250�` Street E
Elko, MN 55020
2000 Miscellaneous Concrete Repair
Project No. 344
EstimateNo. 3 .................................:..................................................... $ 5,838.15
Pearson Bros. Inc.
240 St. Johns Street
Loretto, MN 55357
Street Improvement (Sealcoat)
Project no. ST. 2002 —10
Estimate No. 1 ..:.................................................................................... $76,033.16
W.B. Miller
6701 Norris Lake Road N.W.
Elk River, NIN 55330
2002 Street Improvement
Edge Water Gardens Neighborhood
Project No. ST. 2002 —1 ..........:............................................................ $34,458.40
31
t-
�
CTTY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DMSION
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Fridley
c/o William W. Burns, City Manager
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Council Members:
August 12, 2002
CER'I'IFICATE OF THE ENGINEER
We hereby submit the Final Estimate for Sanitary and Storm Sewer Lining Project No. 345, for Lametti &
Sons, 16028 Forest Boulevard North, Hugo, MN 55038.
We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of Sanitary and Storm Sewer Lining Project
No. 345 and find that the same is substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents. I
recommend that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body and that
the one year contractual maintenance bond commence on .
Respec lly submitte
Jon H. Haukaas
Director of Public Works
cz
Prepared b
Checked b
32
�-
August 12, 2002
City of Fridley
SAIVITARY AND STORM SEWER LINING PROJECT NO. 345
CER'TIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR
This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certified herein have beenactually
fumished and done for the above-mentioned projects in accordance with the plans and specifications
heretofore approved. The final contract cost is $95,618.00 and the final payment of $20,345.70 for the
improvement project would cover in full, the contractor's claims against the City for all labor, materials
and other work down by the contractor under this project.
I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct.
�ons� Inc.
/ . '
r •
Banken, Project Coordinator
33
�-
August 12, 2002
To: Public Works Director
City of Fridley
REPORT ON FINAL INSPECTION FOR
CITY OF FRIDLEY
SATiITARY AND STORM SEWER LINING PROJECT NO. 345 -� -
We, the undersigned, have inspected the above-mentioned project and find that the work required by the
contract is substantially complete in conformity with the plans and specifications of the project.
All deficiencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the work for which the City feels the
contractor should receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the contractor.
So, therefore, we recommend to you that the City approve the attached final estimate for the contractor
and the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the day of the final inspection that being August 9,
2002.
°''1
ompson, Construction ector
!
C n ctor Representative, (Title)
P����� � ���
34
August 12, 2002
City of Fridley
SANITARY AND STORM SEWER LINING PROJECT NO. 345
PREVAII,ING WAGE VERIFICATION
This is to certify that Lametti & Sons has abided by the Prevailing Wage Provisions as specified by the
Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for Anoka County.
I declaze under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct.
Lametti & �ons. Inc.
�
// �
iec"t Coordinator
35
t-
FROM: City of Fridley
Engineering Division
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Fridley �
6431 University Ave, NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Dated: August 12, 2002
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
Estimate No. FINAL
Period Ending: August 9, 2002
For: Lametti & Sons
16028 Forest Blvd N
Hugo MN 55038
SANITARY AND STORM SEWER LINING
PROJECT NO. 345
Job Code:
STATEMENT OF WORK
: Amount , Totai.
. , �- Estimated ' ,- _ . Unit � : This ::; This . � . : - Total
�.�- �s¢ _
Contract Item . Q�'anb � -Unit Price Estimate ,Estimate__ . _'.Total ::_ Amount . �- :
�
24-in. CMP Sanitary Sewer 85 LF 140.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 11,900.00
10-in. CMP Sanitary Sewer 457 LF 30.00 0.00 0.00 457.00 13,710.00
10-in. CIP Sanitary Sewer 60 LF 30.00 O.OQ 0.00 60.00 1,800.00
8-in. CIP Sanitary Sewer 660 LF 24.00 0.00 0.00 660.00 15,840.00
8-in. VCP Sanitary Sewer 818 LF 24.00 476.00 11,424.00 824.00 19,776.00
15-in. RCP Storm Sewer 674 LF 38.00 0.00 0.00 674.00 25,612.00
Remove 4-in. CIP Protruding Seroice Tap 1 Ea 100.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 100.00
Reopen Sanitary Service Connection 23 Ea 160.00 11.00 1,760.00 23.00 3,680.00
on 8& 10 in. Liner
8 in. VCP sanita sewer 160 LF 20.00 160.00 3,200.00 160.00 3,200.00
Sub-total
TOTAL
Original Contract Amount
Contract additions:
Contract deductions:
Revised contract amount
Value Completed To Date
Amount Retained (0%)
Less Amount Paid Previously
AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE
CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR
CO #1
CO #2
$92,114.00
11,628.00
(7,848.00)
95,894.00
95,618.00
0.00
75,272.30
$20,345.70
$16,�t34.Uu
$95,618.00
I hereby certify that the work performed and the materials supplied to date under the terms of the conVact for this project, and all
authorize anges thereto, have an actual value under the contract of the amounts shown on this estimate (and the final quantities on
the fina es ate�are c�rrect),y� tFj�t this estimate is just and correct and no part of the "Amount Due This Esbmate" has been receive
ey
.
Rit��)
�o Gv� f ��cc✓1 ti�/P.�
CERTIFI�TE OF THE ENGINE�R
Date �Q OZ
I hereby certify that I have prepared or examined this estimate, and that the contractor is entiUed to payment
of this estimate under the contract for refe c roject.
Respectfully Submitted, /�
CITY OF FRIDLEY, INSPECT R
gy ,
C�� - Jon H. Haukaas, P.E.
Checked By � �� Public Works Director
� AGENDA ITEM
` CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12 , 2002
ClT7 OF
FRIDLEY
Date: 7/31 /02 �
To: William Burns, City Manager��
From: Scott Hickok, CDD and Paul Bolin, Planning Director
�
RE: Information on Ordinance Amending Chapter 205, Related to Outdoor Storage in the
Industrial Districts.
INTRODUCTION
Fridley's current Code requirements for outdoor storage in industrial zoning districts
has, at best, been described as confusing, open to interpretation, and unfair to industry.
Staff has investigated different ways to clarify Fridley's requirements, allowing limited
outdoor storage while still protecting the City's interests. The purpose of this memo is
to provide the rationale for recommending an Ordinance revision that repeals and
replaces the current requirements with more clearly written language that balances
industry needs with broader community needs.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION / CURRENT REGULATIONS
The current regulations allow outdoor storage in the M-1, M-2, M-4, & S-3 zoning
districts, through a special use permit process, if the items being stored are "incidental"
to the business. "Incidental" storage has been interpreted to mean that the storage is
temporary in nature and the short term storage is not required as an on-going part of
the business. The confusion is in defining temporary and determining whether or not
an item is a required part of a business.
Outdoor storage and outdoor intensive uses are permitted by right in the M-3, Heavy
Industrial — Outdoor Intensive Zoning District. The current code, for unknown reasons,
still requires a special use permit for incidental storage. This requirement does not
make sense in this zoning district, because permanent outdoor storage is allowed by
right. ,
Notwithstanding the City's storage restrictions in our industrial districts, the Code
Enforcement Officer found permanent outdoor storage at 40°/a of the properties
inspected since the systematic code enforcement sweeps of industrial properties began
last fall. Items cur�ently being illegally stored outside include over stock, raw materials,
pallets, trailers, and other miscellaneous items. Rather than issue citations to nearly'/Z
of all Fridley's industries, staff proposed a review of the current outdoor storage
ordinances during last years Council/Commission survey.
37
Ordinance Amending Chapter 205-Outdoor Storage
Page 2
Julv 31, 2002
COUNCIL / COMMISSION SURVEY RESULTS
This past years Council / Commission survey asked whether or not the City should
pursue changes to the current ordinance and spelled out 5 different options. The most
popular response was to prepare legislation that allows outdoor storage in the industrial
districts subject to screening requirements and obtaining a special use permit. The
legislation was to be based on broader community needs rather than the special needs
of any particular business.
The survey responses were verified during a joint meeting held between the City
Council, Planning Commission, and the Appeals Commission on April 15th, 2002. The �
majority again stated that staff should pursue legislation that would allow some limited
outdoor storage, subject to screening requirements, and a special use permit in the
industrial districts.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
At their July 17�h, 2002, meeting, the Planning Commission held a hearing on the
proposed ordinance amendment. After a brief discussion, the Commission made a
unanimous recommendation for approval.
Though their recommendation did not formally include added language, the
Commission informally recommended that staff and Council consider language to
protect against the act of junk or inoperable vehicles being stored outside. Staff did not
add such language to this ordinance proposal, due to the fact that those protections
currently exist in the City Code of Ordinances. Further, staff believes that this would be
best addressed by current Code language and a stipulation (echoing this chapter of the
Code) that would be a standard part of any future industrial Special Use Permit for
outdoor storage.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed changes to the outdoor storage
requirements in Fridley's Industrial Districts. The proposed changes will allow Fridley
industries to maintain some outdoor storage while not being detrimental to surrounding
properties. All changes to the zoning ordinance are noted in the attached ordinance
format. Staff further recommends the Council hold the public hearing for the proposed
zoning text amendment. �
:
Ordinance No.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 205, SECTIONS 205.17, 205.18, 205.19, 205.20
AND 205.25 RELATED TO OUTDOOR STORAGE IN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS
The Fridley City Council hereby finds after review, examination and recommendation of staff
that Chapter 205 related to outdoor storage in Industrial Districts be amended as follows:
SECTION l.
That the following langua�e in Sections 205.17.O1.C.(11), 205.18.O1.C.(12), 205.19.2.C.(4),
205.20.O1.C.(2), and 205.25.04.C.(12) be hereby repealed:
, ,
�a ,. ,.* «,. �� . ,.:t.t � �.,......
.. _ ..
�
. . .
!/'1\\ A .. �:,ae...*;.,1 ,7:..�..:,.♦ .. „1.1:., n,.L.♦ ,.C..,.... �.,...,. *l.e,
R ��
�
�
\�I/ii��:••,:� :••••:�iii7� '
!,.\ A�T..r,,,-:..1� ,.+,.« ,.eL.:,.le.. «.7 „ ..+ �t,,,.va ��.+..:,ie ,7,. «,.+ �, ee,7 F;(�,,,,«
' ^' ' '� . �cz
�..��i ���i•�ir�iic%aev:a%.r�:.��:•�:��a:.z •.s�i��i v�:ii��v��s����.� n��ava
SECTION 2.
That Section 205.17 be hereby amended as follows
205.17. M-l� LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS
1. USES PERMITTED
C. Uses Permitted With a Special Use Permit.
(11) LIMITED OUTDOOR STORAGE
39
All limited outdoor storage shall satisfy the followin� requirements and other stinulations
deemed necessary due to site conditions:
(a) The outdoor stora�e area is limited to a ma.�cimum size eaual to 50% of the
� princ�al buildin�s footprint This area must be desi�nated on a site plan
submitted with the Special Use Permit (SUPI application and must be located
in the side or rear vard.
�b) The materials and equinment ke�t in the desi�nated outdoor stora�e area must
be fullv screened so as to not be visible from:
�(1)) A residential district adjacent to the use:
�(2}) A residential district across a public ri�ht-of-wav from the use;
�(311 A�ublic park adjacent to the use; �
�(4)) A Qublic rieht-of-way includin� railroad ri�:ht-of-wav, adjacent to
the use: or
((51) Anv commercial use adjacent to the use.
�cl Screening of the outdoor storaee area shall be achieved throu�h a combination
of masonry walls fencine berming, and landsca.,pin� in accordance with
Section 205.17.07.G.(1)(al
�dl Materials and eauipment stored outside must not exceed 12 feet in heieht.
�) The outdoor stora�e area must be a city-approved hard surface and bound on
the perimeter b� B-6-12 concrete curb and �utter.
�fL Special use permit for limited outdoor stora�e shall not nermit the outside
stora�e of semi-trucks semi-trailers, or heaw construction eauinment.
�gl Hazardous chemicals and materials are prohibited from bein� stored outside.
jh) The outdoor stora�e shall not affect the required amount of varkinQ stalls
needed on site.
�i) The location and tXpes of materials to be stored are to be reviewed bv the Fire
Marshall.
SECTION 3.
That Section 205.18 be hereby amended as follows
205.18. M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS
2. USES PERMITTED
. �
C. Uses Permitted With a Special Use Permit.
(11) LIMITED OUTDOOR STORqGE
All limited outdoor stora�e shall satisfv the followin� requirements and other sti�ulations
deemed necessarv due to site conditions:
(al The outdoor stora�e area is limited to a maximum size ec�ual to 50% of the
principal buildines footprint. This area must be desi�nated on a site plan
submitted with the Special Use Permit (SUP) application and must be located in
the side or rear ,��
Lb�_The materials and equipment kept in the designated outdoor storage area must be
fullY screened so as to not be visible from:
((1)) A residential district adjacent to the use;
((2)) A residential district across a public ri�ht-of-way from the use;
��3)�public park adjacent to the use;
(�4)) A public ri�ht-of-wav, includin� railroad ri�ht-of-wa�jacent to the use:
or
�(5)) Anv commercial use adjacent to the use.
(c Screenin� of the outdoor stora�e area shall be achieved throu�h a combination of
masonrv walls, fencin�, bermin�, and landscapin� in accordance with Section
205.18.06.G.111(al
�dl Materials and egnipment stored outside must not exceed 12 feet in heigY�
(e) The outdoor stora�e area must be a cit,�pproved hard surface and bound on the
perimeter bv B-6-12 concrete curb and �utter.
jflSpecial use permit for limited outdoor storage shall not permit the outside storage
of semi-trucks. semi-trailers, or heavy construction equipment.
(g,l Hazardous chemicals and materials are prohibited from being stored outside.
(hl The outdoor stora�e shall not affect the required amount of parkin� stalls needed
on site.
(ilThe location and types of materials to be stored are to be reviewed bv the Fire
Marshall.
41
SECTION 4.
That Section 205.19 be hereby amended as follows
205.19. M-3 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, OUTDOOR INTENSIVE DISTRICT
2. USES PERMITTED
A. Principal Uses
The following are principal uses in M-3 Districts:
(3) Uses whose principal use requires the outdoor storage of materials, motor
vehicles, or equipment, including the outdoor manipulation of said materials, ��
motor vehicles, or equipment under the following conditions.
�j,) The materials and equipment must be fullv screened so as to not be visible
from:
((1)1 A residential district adjacent to the use;
�(2)) A residential district across a public ri�ht-of-waY from the use:
�(3)) A public nark adjacent to the use;
�(4)1 A public ri�ht-of-wav includingLrailroad ri t-of-wav, adjacent to
the use: or
�(S�Any commercial use adjacent to the use.
�kl Screenin� of the outdoor stora�e area shall be achieved throu�h a combination
of masonrv walls fencine bermin�, and landscapin� in accordance with
Section 205.19.07.G.(1)(al
�1) Materials and equipment stored outside must not exceed 15 feet in hei�ht.
�m)The outdoor stora�e of motorized vehicles must be on a citv-approved hard
surface and bound on the perimeter by B-6-12 concrete curb and �utter.
�n) Hazardous chemicals and materials are prohibited from beine stored outside.
a
(o) The location and types of materials to be stored are to be reviewed bv the Fire
Marshall. •
(3��4,� Telecommunications Towers and Wireless Telecommunications Facilities
are regulated in Section 205.30 (Ref. Ord. 1112).
42
SECTION 5.
That Section 205.20 be hereby amended as follows
20�.20. M-4 MAI�IIIFACTURING ONLY
4. USES PERMITTED
C. Uses Permitted With a Special Use Permit.
(11) LIMITED OUTDOOR STORAGE
All limited outdoor stora�e shall satisfy the followinQ requirements and other
s�ulations deemed necessary due to site conditions• �`
(a) The outdoor stora�e area is limited to a maximum size equal to 50% of the
principal buildings footprint. T'his area must be desi�nated on a site plan
submitted with the Special Use Permit (SUPZ application and must be located
in the side or rear ,yard.
Lb� The materials and equipment kept in the designated outdoor stora�e area must
be fullv screened so as to not be visible from:
((1)) A residential district adjacent to the use•
�(21) A residential district across a public rieht-of-wav from the use•
((311 A public park adjacent to the use:
((41) A nublic right-of-wav, includine railroad ri�,ht-of-wav adjacent to the
use; or
((S1Lv commercial use adjacent to the use.
(c) walls, fencing, berming and landscanin�in accordance with Section
205.20.06.G.(11(al
(dl Materials and equipment stored outside must not exceed 12 feet in hei�ht
Le� The outdoor storage area must be a citv-approved hard surface and bound on
the perimeter bv B-6-12 concrete curb and gutter
f fl Special use permit for limited outdoor stora�e shall not permit the outside
storaee of semi-trucks, semi-trailers or heavy construction equipment
��) Hazardous chemicals and materials are prohibited from bein� stored outside
�h) The outdoor stora�e shall not affect the required amount of parking stalls
needed on site.
43
� The location and types of materials to be stored are to be reviewed bv the Fire
Marshall.
SECTION 6
That Section 205.25 be hereby amended as follows:
SECTION 205.25 S-3 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, ONAWAY ADDITION DISTRICT
USES PERMITTED
C. Uses Permitted With a Special Use Permit.
(11) LIMITED OUTDOOR STORAGE
All limited outdoor stora�e shall satisfy the followin� requirements and other
stipulations deemed necessary due to site conditions:
(cl The outdoor stora�e area is limited to a maximum size equal to 50% of the
T principal buildinas footprint. This area must be desi�nated on a site nlan
submitted with the S�ecial Use Permit (SUP) application and must be located
in the side ar rear yard.
(dl The materials and eqninment kept in the designated outdoor stora�;e area must
be fullv screened so as to not be visible from:
((11) A residential district adjacent to the use;
�(2)) A residential district across a public ri�ht-of-wav from the use;
�311 A�ublic park adjacent to the use:
((4)1 A public right-of-w� includin� railroad ri�ht-of-wav. adiacent to
the use: or
((511 Anv commercial use adjacent to the use.
(el Screenin�of the outdoor stora�e area shall be achieved throu�h a combination
of masonry walls fencing, bermin�, and landscapin� in accordance with
Section 205.25.09G.(1)(a)
�fl Materials and equipment stored outside must not exceed 12 feet in hei�
�g) The outdoor stora�e area must be a citv-approved hard surface and bound on
the perimeter bv B-6-12 concrete curb and ug_tter_
�hl Special use �ermit for limited outdoor stora�e shall not permit the outside
stora�e of semi-trucks semi-trailers. or heaw construction eauipment.
(il Hazardous chemicals and materials are prohibited from bein� stored outside.
, .I
��
�j) The outdoor storaQe shall not affect the rec�uired amount of parkin� stalls
needed on site.
(k) The location and types of materials to be stored are to be reviewed bv the Fire
Marshall.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF 2002
ATTEST:
Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk
Public Hearing: 8-12-02
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
45
Scott J. Lund, Mayor t-
/
�
QTY OF
FRIDLEY
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF
AUGUST 12, 2002
�
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager ��
From: Richard D. Pribyl, Finance Director
Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk
Re: Public Hearing for 4 Corners Gas & Convenience, Inc.
1301 Mississippi Street NE
Applicant: Steven LeRoy Haw
11225 Welcome Avenue N
Champlin, MN 55316
Date: August 9, 2002
Texas Foods,1301 Mississippi Street, has been sold to Steven LeRoy Haw and the name of the
convenience store has changed to 4 Corners Gas & Convenience, Inc. The store has had and an
off-sale 3.2% malt liquor license and Mr. Haw has applied for a new license. City Code
requires that a public hearing be held to consider the approval of an off-sale 3.2% Malt Liquor
License and that the license can not be approved during the same meeting. The Police
Department has conducted a background investigation and has found no reason to deny the
application at this time.
Staff recommends holding a public hearing for an off-sale 3.2% malt liquor license. The final
approval of the license is scheduled for August 26, 2002.
. �
-� -
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC HEARIl�TG
BEFORE TI�
CTTY COUNCIL
Notice is hereby given that the Fridley City Council will hold a public hearing at its regulaz meeting of
the City Council at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Monday,
August 12, 2002 at 7:30 p.m. on the question of issuing an off-sale 3.2% Malt Liquor License to
applicant Steven LeRoy Haw for the business lrnown as 4 Comers Gas and Convenience, Inc., located at
1301 Mississippi Street NE..
Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities
who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than August 12, 2002.
Anyone having an interest in this matter should make their interest lu�own at this public hearing.
/s/ Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk
Published: August 8, 2002 in the Fridley SunFocus
47
�-
�
�
CfTY OF
FRIDLEY
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2002
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
���
FROM: William W. Burns, City Manager ��
SUBJECT:
DATE:
62"d Way Issues
August 9, 2002
�-
For several weeks we have been trading comments with Greg Potasek and other residents who
live at the end of 62°d Way. At the last Council meeting, staff was asked to prepaze a proposal for
Council action on Monday night. While there is no easy solution to this issue, staff continues to
believe that the City should not maintain the "stub" at the end of 62"d Way.
Our recommendation is based on the following points:
The "stub" does not meet the City's right-of-way or construction criteria for a permanent
City street.
2. While the "stub" may have been maintained from time to time, there are no formal
agreements between the property owners and the City that legally obligate the City to
maintain the "stub." Moreover, the minutes from the public hearings on the assessments
associated with the reconstruction of 62"d Way and Riverview Terrace in 1969 indicate
that the City talked with the property owners at the time the 1969 project was being
planned. They elected not to improve the "stub." The City Engineer also commented that
the "stub" was not a City street and that unless another 30 feet of right-of-way were added
the City would not put in a street. He said, "This is basically a driveway, but the City
owns the access."
3. According to City Attomey Fritz Knaak, the City has no legal obligation to maintain or
upgrade the "stub." As was the case in 1969, the property owners could, however, petition
the City to improve the portion of the right-of-way where the stub is located. "To the
extent that such an improvement would be a public benefit, the City could, at its
discretion, do the improvement and assess benefited property owners."
4. Fritz also tells us that the City may choose to minimize or eliminate maintenance on a
right-of-way without any formal decommissioning process.
� ;�
Memo to Council
August 9, 2002
Page 2
5. While there aze probably no other situations exactly like the one at the end of 62°d Way,
there are several examples of situations where property owners must plow and maintain
long stretches of public right-of-way in order to gain access to public streets. Maintaining
the "stub" would seem to be inconsistent with our treatment of these other areas.
Should Council concur with stafPs recommendation, it would be appropriate for the ward council
member to move as follows:
"I move to uphold the decision of the City staff as it pertains to snow plowing and
routine maintenance of the right-of-way extension currently being used for
property access by the property owners at 190 - 62"d Way, 310 - 62"d Way and
6200 Riverview Tenace."
. •
�
� AGENDA ITEM
cmroF CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2002
FRIDLEY
INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS
50
� -
�
u