02/27/2006 - 6091��
� 1: , y
�
CffY OF
FRIDLEY
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006
'7:30 p.m. - City Couacil Chambers
Attendance Sheet
�LFAS�' PR/MT MAM� AatfR� AND ITFM MUMBi�'R 1r0U ARF IIUTb'R�'ST�'D /N.
Psint Name �Cl�rlyj Addsess � Ti�t �i`�. ;
r � �s ,� ed �s so�. ���
_...;---�-- � J , �' - '�`'+1 ��1
.
�� �
�.J i M ���5�-�! P? E��%I�N 1�
�Gf< �,�� 'C�,� ��%�'�=�"
�CO iL5 � L'�
r�� , ,� � ` ,
� � ��. ,�{ (�� �'� � _�
♦ _ � J; --_ . w.
'�
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006 �oF
FRIDLEY
The City of Fridley wili not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or
empfoyr�ent in its services, programs, or activities becaGSe af race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex,
disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon requesi,
accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services,
programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who
require auxiliary aids shoufd contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
PRESENTATION:
Southern Anoka Community Assistance (SACA).
NPDES Annual Update.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
5. Resolutio� Ordering Improvement, Approval
of Plans and Ordering Advertisement for
Bids: Sanitary Sewer Lining Project No. �
366 ..................... .......... 16 - 1
� �po(� �( �
�
City Council Meeting of February 13, 2006
, �
OLD Bi.�SINESS: � ,� � L 7
� � ��, � � � �
1. Sec�.�nd Reading of an Ordinance Amending ��
Fridley City Code, Chapter 101, Animal
Control, F�ertaining to Wild Animals and
Birds................................... 1 - 4
( 2. Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending i
; , Chapter 131, Fire Depa� ; ment Service Charges,
:
as it Pertains to Invoicing �'Vlotor Vehicle
� �, � � :
Owners .���.�:..��:�.:�(:�_.l, ��_.�...... 5 - 6
�
NEW BUSINESS:
3. First Reading of an Ordinance Amer;ding
Chapter 505, Bicycle Regutations, of ihe
Fridfey City Code Pertaining to Licensii�g
and ReguJations .............................. 7 - 8
4.
Receive the Minutes from the Pfanning
Commission Meeting of February 15,
2006 ................................... 9 - 15
8.
9.
Resolution in Support of an Application for a
Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit
for Knights of Columbus, 6831 Highway 65 N.E.
(1lVard 2) .......................... � 18 19
v���"f r....
Resolution Establishing Procedures Relating
to Compliance with Reimbursement Bond
Regulations under the Internal Revenue
Code ...... .. , . �..... 20 - 23
����'���✓-� �
��
Claims ................................... 24
Licenses
10. Estimates
............................ 25 - 29
.................... .......... 30
ADOPTION OF AGENDA.
OPEN FORUM (VISITORS):
Consideration of Items not on Agenda -15 Minutes
�
�
,� s. __ �
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006 PAGE 2
PUBLIC HEARING:
11. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending
Chapter 4 of the Fridley City Charter
Pertaining to Appointment of Election
Judges ................................... 31 - 32
�
NEW BUSINESS:
12 Master Plan Amendment, MP#06-01, by
Medtronic Inc., to Allow the Addition of a
, Billboard Sign in an S-2, Redevelopment
District, Generally Located at 710 Medtronic
�, Parkway (VVard 1) ........................... 33 - 39
i
, 13. Informal Status Report .................... 40
I
.
ADJOURN.
I
_
�
�
�
CffY OF
FRIDLEI'
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006
The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or
treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion,
national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public
assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to
participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an
interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at
572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
PRESENTATION:
Southern Anoka Community Assistance (SACA).
NPDES Annual Update.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of February 13, 2006
OLD BUSINESS:
Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending
Fridley City Code, Chapter 101, Animal
Control, Pertaining to Wild Animals and
Birds....................................................................................................... 1 - 3
2. Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending
Chapter 131, Fire Department Service Charges,
as it Pertains to Invoicing Motor Vehicle Owners .............................................. 4- 5
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006 PAGE 2
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS:
3. First Reading of an Ordinance Amending
Chapter 505, Bicycle Regulations, of the
Fridley City Code Pertaining to Licensing
andRegulations .............................................................................................. 6 - 7
4. Receive the Minutes from the Planning
Commission Meeting of February 15, 2006 .................................................... 8- 14
5. Resolution Ordering Improvement, Approval of
Plans and Ordering Advertisement for Bids:
Sanitary Sewer Lining Project No. 366 ........................................................... 15 - 16
6. Resolution in Support of an Application for a
Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit
for Knights of Columbus, 6831 Highway 65 N.E.
(Ward 2) ....................................................................................................... 17 - 18
7. Resolution Establishing Procedures Relating
to Compliance with Reimbursement Bond
Regulations under the Internal Revenue
Code....................................................................................................... 19 - 22
8. Claims ....................................................................................................... 23
9. Licenses ....................................................................................................... 24 - 28
10. Estimates ....................................................................................................... 29
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006 PAGE 3
ADOPTION OF AGENDA.
OPEN FORUM (VISITORS):
Consideration of Items not on Agenda — 15 Minutes
PUBLIC HEARING:
11. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending
Chapter 4 of the Fridley City Charter
Pertaining to Appointment of Election Judges ................................................. 30 - 31
NEW BUSINESS:
12. Master Plan Amendment, MP #06-01, by
Medtronic Inc., to Allow the Addition of a
Billboard Sign in an S-2, Redevelopment
District, Generally Located at 710 Medtronic
Parkway (Ward 1) ........................................................................................... 32 - 38
13. Informal Status Report .................................................................................... 39
ADJOURN.
�
�
CffY OF
FRIDLEY
T�:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006
William W. Burns, City Manager
Jon Fi. Fiaukaas, Public Works Director
February 23, 2006
Fiearing on I`IPDES Annual Update
PW06-021
As part of our I`iPDES permit, we are required to make an annual public presentation
describing what is in our Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). This is the third
review of our Plan. The update will include an overview of the program, our accomplishments
over the past year, and changes planned for next year.
The Permit also requires we record public comment and submit it with our plan"s annual
update due in June.
Jtiti:cz
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF FRIDLEY
FEBRUARY 13, 2006
The City Council meeting for the City of Fridley was called to order by Mayor Lund at 7:32 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Lund led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Lund
Councilmember-at-Large Barnette
Councilmember Billings
Councilmember Wolfe
Councilmember Bolkcom
OTHERS PRESENT: William Burns, City Manager
Fritz Knaak, City Attorney
Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Julie Jones, Planning Coordinator
7on Haukaas, Public Works Director
John Berg Fire Chief
Don Betzold, State Senator
Barbara Goodwin, State Representative
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting January 23, 2006
APPROVED
OLD BUSINESS:
1. Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending the Fridley Municipal Code
Pertaining to the Late Night Endorsement of On-Sale Liquor License.
William Burns, City Manager, stated this ordinance is regarding the amendment of the Fridley
City Code by extending the late night endorsement allowing the sale of intoxicating liquor until
2:00 a.m. The ordinance extends the late night endorsement to April 30, 2008, and affects
Chapters 602, 603 and 606 of the Fridley City Code. Staff recommends the approval of the
second reading of this ordinance.
WAIVED THE READING OF THE ORDINANCE AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO.
1222 ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLICATION
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2006 PAGE 2
2. Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 603 of the Fridley City Code
Pertaining to Food Sales.
William Burns, City Manager, mentioned that this change makes it clear that food sold from
vending machines is not included in the ratio calculation of food to liquor sales. Staff
recommends Council's approval of the second reading of this ordinance.
WAIVED THE READING OF THE ORDINANCE AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO.
1223 ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLICATION
3. Second Reading of an Ordinance Creating Chapter 205.32 0-7 of the Fridley City
Code Pertaining to Shoreland Overlay District and Approve Official Title and
Summary Ordinance.
William Burns, City Manager, stated this ordinance requires a setback between 50 to 100 feet
from lakes, ponds, rivers and creeks depending on the particular volume of water. It also
requires properties abutting these bodies of water to have no more than 35% of the lot area
covered with impervious surfaces. The first reading of the ordinance was held at the January 23,
2006, City Council meeting. No changes have been made to the proposed ordinance. Staff
recommends Council's approval of the second reading of this ordinance. Staff also recommends
approval of the official title and summary ordinance.
THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND PLACED ON
THE REGULAR AGENDA.
4. Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 205 of the Fridley City Code
Pertaining to Curbing and Drainage Requirements and Approve Official Title and
Summary Ordinance.
William Burns, City Manager, stated this ordinance amends the Fridley Zoning Code sections to
excuse curbing and drainage requirements on residential, commercial and industrial properties in
situations where the project includes approved low impact storm water treatment features like
natural swales or rain gardens. Staff recommends Council's approval of the second reading of
this ordinance. Staff also recommends approval of the official title and summary ordinance.
WAIVED THE READING OF THE ORDINANCE AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO.
1225 ON SECOND READING AND ADOPTED THE OFFICIAL TITLE AND
SUMMARY ORDINANCE AND ORDERED PUBLICATION.
5. Second Reading of an Ordinance Repealing Chapter 208 of the Fridley City Code
Pertaining to Stormwater Management and Erosion Control and Approve Official
Title and Summary Ordinance.
William Burns, City Manager, stated that this chapter of the City Code requires a stormwater
pollution control plan from applicants for a building permit or subdivision approval where said
permit would allow land-disturbing activities. The pollution control plan requires the following
elements:
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2006 PAGE 3
1. Detailed maps.
2. Adherence to a long list of stormwater control activities (e.g., the stabilization of all
exposed soils and soil stockpiles).
3. Adherence to a long list of minimum stormwater control measures (e.g., the
stabilization of disturbed soils with sod, seed or weed-free mulch).
4. Requirements for permanent stormwater pollution where they are needed to control
runoff.
5. Standards for protection of natural wetlands.
Mr. Burns said Council approved the first reading of this ordinance at the January 9, 2006, City
Council meeting. Staff recommends Council's approval of the second reading of this ordinance.
Staff also recommends approval of the official title and summary ordinance.
WAIVED THE READING OF THE ORDINANCE AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO.
1226 ON SECOND READING AND ADOPTED THE OFFICIAL TITLE AND
SUMMARY ORDINANCE AND ORDERED PUBLICATION.
NEW BUSINESS:
6. Receive the Minutes from the Planning Commission Meeting of January 4, 2006.
RECEIVED.
7. Receive the Minutes from the Planning Commission Meeting of February 1, 2006.
RECEIVED.
8. Special Use Permit Request, SP #06-02, by Hilltop Trailer Sales, Inc., to
Incorporate Property Located at 7730 University Avenue N.E. into the
Existing Hilltop Trailer Sales Property at 7810 University Avenue (Ward 3).
William Burns, City Manager, stated this is an addendum to the petitioner's existing special use
permit which allows the selling of recreational vehicles on this property. It allows Hilltop Trailer
Sales to incorporate the property that was, until recently, used by Mask Hair Designs into their
trailer services lot. The Planning Commission granted approval at their February 1, 2006
meeting. Staff recommends Council's approval.
APPROVED SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST, SP #06-02, BY HILLTOP TRAILER
SALES, INC., WITH THE FOLLOWING FIVE STIPULATIONS:
1. THE PETITIONER SHALL OBTAIN ANY REQUIRED PERMITS PRIOR
TO REMODEL OF PROPERTY.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2006 PAGE 4
2. A 25-FOOT FIRE LANE SHALL REMAIN AROUND THE EXISTING
BUILDING.
3. RECREATIONAL VEHICLES TO BE DISPLAYED FOR SALE SHALL NOT
BE DISPLAYED IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK.
4. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
CITY STAFF PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
5. ONE FREE-STANDING SIGN SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR THE TWO
PROPERTIES COMBINED.
9. Approve First Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement between the Cities of
Fridley, Coon Rapids, Andover, Brooklyn Center, Columbia Heights and Ham Lake
for Traffic Markings, Street Sweeping, Crack Sealing, Screening and Seal Coating.
William Burns, City Manager, reported that this amendment adds the City of Ham Lake to the
list of joint participants. There are no other changes. Staff recommends Council's approval.
APPROVED.
10. Receive Bids and Award the Purchase of Asphalt Paving Machine and
Trailer.
William Burns, City Manager, stated the 2006 budget included $120,000 for these items. The
bids came in at $112,480 for both items which includes $96,480 to the lowest bidder, Ruffridge-
Johnson Equipment Company of Minneapolis for the paving machine and $16,000 for the trailer
which will be purchased from the Minnesota State contract. Staff recommends Council's
approval.
RECEIVED BIDS AND AWARDED THE PURCHASE OF THE ASPHALT PAVING
MACHINE TO RUFFRIDGE-JOHNSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY AND THE
PURCHASE OF THE TRAILER FROM THE MINNESOTA STATE CONTRACT.
11. Receive Bids and Award the Contract for the Locke Park Water Treatment Plant
Improvement Project.
William Burns, City Manager, stated these improvements include replacing the roof and
concrete facade, cleaning and repairing the brick work and modifications to the flooring. Bids
were opened on February 7, 2006, and the low bid was from Maertens-Brenny Construction
Company in the amount of $116,725. Design and contract administration costs will add $10,100
to the total. The total of $126,825 is well within the budgeted amount of $200,000 in the 2006
Capital Improvements Plan and included in the last bond sale. Staff recommends Council's
approval.
RECEIVED BIDS AND AWARDED CONTRACT FOR THE LOCKE PARK WATER
TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO MAERTENS-BRENNY
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2006 PAGE 5
12. Resolution Ordering Advertisement for Bids: 2006 Miscellaneous Concrete Repair
Project No. 365.
William Burns, City Manager, stated this project covers remedial sidewalk, pavement and curb
repair and replacement. Staff recommends Council's approval.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2006-14.
13. Resolution Authorizing Changes in Appropriations for the 2005 Budget for
October through December, 2005.
William Burns, City Manager, said adjustments include $30,709 in additional revenue and
expenditures from the General Fund and $280 in additional revenue and expenditures for the
Springbrook Nature Center Fund. Staff recommends Council's approval.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2006-15.
14. Resolution Amending the Resolution Providing for the Issuance and Sale of
$4,645,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 2005B and
Pledging for the Security Thereof Tax Increments.
William Burns, City Manager, stated this action will remove Tax Increment District #6 from the
Pledge Agreement that was executed in conjunction with the 2005B bonds. District #6 was
mistakenly included as one of the TIF Districts that had been pledged as tax increment. District
#6 was fully pledged to the Lake Pointe District and should not have been included. Staff
recommends Council's approval.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2006-16.
15. Appointment - Police Officer.
William Burns, City Manager, said staff recommended the appointment of Travis Volk to the
police officer Travis Volk.
APPROVED APPOINTMENT.
16. Claims: 12547 — 125531.
APPROVED.
17. Licenses.
APPROVED THE LICENSES AS SUBMITTED AND AS ON FILE.
Councilmember Bolkcom requested that Item 3 be removed and placed on the regular agenda.
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to approve the consent agenda as presented with the
removal of Item 3. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2006 PAGE 6
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to add a lawful gambling license for the Fridley
Historical Society to Item 17, Licenses. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to adopt agenda with the addition of Item 3. Seconded
by Councilmember Bolkcom.
Councilmember Bolkcom requested to add a Resolution Authorizing Participation in the Safe
and Sober Communities Grant Program as Item 19A. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
OPEN FORUM (VISITORS):
No items presented.
NEW BUSINESS:
18. First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Fridley City Code, Chapter 101,
Animal Control, Pertaining to Wild Animals and Birds.
William Burns, City Manager, stated Fridley City Code, Chapter 101, presently makes it
unlawful to hunt, take, shoot, trap or kill any wild animal or bird except rodents. There has been
a need to manage the deer at the Minneapolis Water Works as well as the Canadian geese at
Moore Lake beach. The amendment to Chapter 101 introduces a plan requirement of a staff-
issued permit process to address nuisance wildlife issues. Applicants will be required to secure a
necessary State and Federal permits, provide an indemnification agreement and submit a wildlife
control plan. A Public Safety Director will have the authority to approve, modify or deny the
plan based on public health, safety and welfare. The amendment also prohibits persons from
disrupting the wildlife control program. It permits Nature Center staff, the Animal Control
Officer and officers of the Fridley Police Department to trap, immobilize or kill a wild animal or
bird for reasons of public safety or for reasons of humane destruction following injury.
Mayor Lund questioned if a squirrel or a bat is considered a rodent.
Mr. Burns confirmed that both are considered rodents.
Councilmember Bolkcom questioned the reason behind this ordinance.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2006 PAGE 7
Mr. Burns answered that the major motivating factor is the request by the City of Minneapolis
to manage the deer population on the Water Works property. The Public Safety Director would
review the application for the animal management programs and enforce and manage the issues
administratively.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked for clarification regarding the application process.
Mr. Burns stated the Director of Public Safety will decide to approve or deny the applications.
The applicant would still have to go through the Minnesota DNR.
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to waive the reading and approve the ordinance on first
reading. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
NEW BUSINESS:
19. First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 131, Fire Department
Service Charges as it Pertains to Invoicing Motor Vehicle Owners.
John Berg, Fire Chief, said in the event the Fire Department responds to an accident and
provides a service, they are currently allowed to bill the motor vehicle insurance company for the
fees. If the vehicle owner does not have insurance, the fees can be collected through restitution.
Staff recommends the addition of the ability to invoice the owner of the vehicle for these fees.
He said the problems they currently face are that oftentimes the fees are lower than the insurance
company's deductible. Sometimes the vehicle owner chooses not to place a claim, so they are
not invoicing the insurance company. In some cases, the insurance companies are refusing to
pay the fees or are adjusting the fees to what they see reasonable. In addition, they are not
always charging people, as it takes time to get proof of insurance and many times it is missed. It
is also difficult coordinating with the City attorney's office. With this amendment, they hope to
reduce staff time and reduce time on the scene, especially on the interstate. The time they spend
collecting information on the interstate could potentially cause additional accidents. Staff
recommends Council's approval of the first reading of this ordinance.
Councilmember Barnette said people have said that residents already pay taxes for these
services. He asked if many of the accidents that happen in Fridley involve persons who are not
Fridley residents.
Chief Berg replied that in 2005, 76% of the invoices went to individuals who were not residents
of the City of Fridley.
Councilmember Wolfe stated that Fridley taxpayers are already paying for these services. He
asked if there was a way to exclude Fridley residents from paying this fee.
Mr. Knaak, City Attorney, said it is a general rule to treat all persons the same way whether
they are a residents or non-residents, but there are some limited exceptions. He was not sure if
this service would qualify as an exception.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2006 PAGE 8
Councilmember Bolkcom asked for clarification of the changes in the ordinance.
Chief Berg said what was added is the owner or owner's insurance company. If a motor vehicle
accident involves two cars, we will send the invoice to both insurance companies. If we have
trouble collecting from an insurance company or do not have the information, it gives us the
opportunity to send the invoice to the owner giving them the option to submit this claim to their
insurance company.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked when the $400 is charged, how the money is collected if the
insurance company does not cover the charges and what happens if the invoice is not paid.
Chief Berg clarified that if no medical care is needed, there will be no charge. If the invoice is
not paid, the courts would proceed to collect the funds.
Councilmember Bolkcom questioned what type of insurance would cover this fee—collision or
liability.
Chief Berg stated he would research the insurance issue and provide the information at the next
reading of this item. For the most part, insurance companies are paying the fees.
Councilmember Billings questioned the dollar amount invoiced last year.
Chief Berg answered the amount billed last year was $30,540. They have collected $20,913 to
date.
Councilmember Billings asked if it matters whether the insurance company or the owner pays
the fee. Insurance is something purchased as a protection so owners do not have to pay all of the
expenses out of their own pocket. If people choose not to buy insurance, why should the City of
Fridley residents be responsible for these bills? We should just bill the owner and as a courtesy
bill the insurance company for the services we are providing. If people do not want medical
treatment, that is fine; but if they want medical treatment, we have the right to charge them for
the services we are providing. Everyone should be billed for the services whether they have
insurance or not. It is the responsibility of the vehicle owner or their insurance company to cover
the charges.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, questioned if we are the only city going forward with this change.
Chief Berg answered that other cities are making the same change.
Councilmember Wolfe asked if we should tell people that there will be a$400 fee to treat them
before they are treated.
Chief Berg answered that in most cases, people who are treated need transportation by
ambulance to the hospitaL Most cases involve a combination of services such as vehicle safety,
picking up fluids from the roadway, disconnecting batteries, etc. Rarely does the Fire
Department just provide one service.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2006 PAGE 9
Councilmember Bolkcom asked why two or more vehicles would be charged an equal share of
the $400. Why not charge each vehicle $400.
Chief Berg said the cost is based on an estimate of cost over a period of time. Based on the
response of sending a vehicle to the scene for the first hour, the cost is about the same whether
the Fire Department is servicing one vehicle or five vehicles.
Mayor Lund asked how many people are sent out on a call.
Chief Berg replied 8 people are sent out on an interstate call, 4 people for a highway roadway
call and 2 people for a typical motor vehicle accident.
Councilmember Bolkcom said if we charge one car $400 and 2 cars the same amount, why not
treat all of them with the same cost.
Chief Berg responded that with the number of calls the Fire Department gets, they opted for a
flat fee.
Mr. Knaak replied that the reimbursement of the expenses is not based on a case by case
analysis. If you start multiplying fees by automobiles, it would be difficult to justify on a cost
basis.
Mayor Lund commented that this is a complicated situation. The most expensive cost is
probably getting the firefighters to the scene and back If the minimum charge is $400, maybe if
more vehicles are involved, we could charge an extra $100 per vehicle. Maybe we should look
at this as a possibility. We are not trying to make money. We are just trying to find a fair way to
charge those involved in the accident and cover the expenses that occur.
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to waive the reading and adopt the ordinance on first
reading. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, MAYOR LUND, COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE,
COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM VOTING AYE,
AND COUNCILMEMBER WOLFE VOTING NAY, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED ON A 4 TO 1 VOTE.
STATE LEGISLATIVE UPDATE:
Senator pon Betzold, State Senator, presented a preview of the happenings in the State
legislature. This year is not a budget year; the budget is on odd-numbered years. Some policy
issues will carry over from last year and there may be some minor budget issues. Currently,
there is about a$700 million budget surplus but there is a$30 billion State budget through
June 30, 2007. Part of this surplus is already spent due to delayed payments to some school
districts, plus there are other issues regarding the Ramsey County court decision stating that the
tobacco health impact fee was a tax. If this is upheld in the court system, we could end up with a
minor deficit, but nothing significant. There will be another forecast later this month but there
will probably not be any surplus. He said there is a long list of requests, and he did not know
what would happen with the bonding bill regarding the Springbrook Nature Center.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2006 PAGE 10
Senator Betzold said the session will more than likely seek more funding for the North Star
Corridor. Last year was the initial down payment and this year will be the next phase. The
Federal Government has moved the North Star Corridor ahead on the list of projects which is
good for mass transit in the north suburban area. He said eminent domain is an issue that
everyone is interested in. The law did not really change but the parameters did. Other issues of
interest are recycling, electronic waste, funding of the Clean Water Legacy Act, and the stadium
issues regarding the Vikings, Twins and Gophers. If there is any additional money, it will be
dedicated to lowering property taxes or replacing the LGA funds. The session starts March 1
and must be finished by May 22.
Representative Barb Goodwin, State Representative, said there are a lot of issues being
discussed for a very short session. The leadership in the House is talking about concentrating on
three or four top issues, but there are many bills being introduced plus several that were not
heard last year. The North Star corridor needs a second phase of funding and the Springbrook
Nature Center is a good project for a bonding bill. Healthcare is another issue and they continue
to try and find ways to reduce the cost. She said she is on the commerce committee which is
hearing insurance issues and business and labor management issues. The eminent domain issue
is more complicated with areas of blight in the older parts of the county. She encouraged
Council to contact her if there were any issues they would like to see discussed or brought
forward.
Commissioner Bolkcom asked about the Vikings stadium proposal.
Representative Goodwin supports the idea of people voting on this issue. There are probably
less than 1 in 10 people who support the stadium proposal as it currently stands. This stadium is
not for public use, it is for private use and the citizens of Anoka County should not be the only
people responsible for paying for this stadium.
Senator Betzold stated that the Governor's stance on the stadium is that he would prefer a
referendum but would sign a bill even if it does not have one. He said it was not up to him to
decide the issue. It is the decision of the legislature collectively. He believes it is a state-wide
issue. There will be no referendum on a Gopher stadium bill so the issue is basically to decide if
a referendum is necessary for the Twins and Viking stadiums. If a referendum is required on
one, there will need to be a referendum on the other item. The Senate cannot pass a bill to raise
taxes as the House must past the bill first. If the bill comes from the House with a referendum,
the Senate will follow through with a referendum. The same scenario will apply without a
referendum. He said the Gopher and Twins stadiums are more likely to pass before the
Vikings. The House and Senate will decide on which way the bill will go. There is a
commitment to pass the best possible bill.
Councilmember Wolfe supports the potential referendum.
Senator Betzold said he did not specify that there would be a referendum as there are many
issues to resolve first before a referendum can be added. He stated he will vote for the bill either
way.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2006 PAGE 11
Councilmember Barnette asked if there had been any discussions within the House and Senate
of a statewide 6.6% tax increase to support a Twins, Vikings or Gopher stadium. This would be
an idea as the entire state will benefit from this stadium.
Senator Betzold answered the proposal currently being discussed is a result of the Governor's
task force. The Governor proposed that the local residents will pay 1/3, the team would pay 1/3
and the state would pay 1/3. No one has spoken of anything different, because this is what the
Governor wants.
Representative Goodwin stated that there has been some discussion, not public, but everyone
knows that a tax increase would not pass, especially during an election year. Recently Anoka
County put a lock on the issue and offered this proposal pertaining to Anoka County so the
Vikings end up in Anoka County. With the lock on the proposal, no other cities came forward
with a better proposal. Anoka County is not pushing for a state-wide sales tax.
Councilmember Barnette questioned how the Xcel Center and Guthrie Theater got passed and
if public funds were used.
Representative Betzold gave a few examples and said the Xcel Center received an interest-free
loan. The Target Center was privately funded and later bought by the state for less than half of
the original investment. There was a sales tax increase for the Metrodome.
Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, asked Representative Betzold for his opinion
on eminent domain.
Representative Betzold replied that most of the law professors reviewed the eminent domain
issue and stated that nothing has really changed in the last 50 years of law, what has changed was
that people are afraid. Eminent domain has not been a problem in Minnesota. The last resort is
people who own land will make money and can use eminent domain to sell their property. The
problem is that multi proposals and items are being Oadded and changed. The more problematic
and complicated eminent domain gets, the harder it will be to pass. This issue needs to be
addressed but they do not have the time they would like to spend on this item.
Representative Goodwin stated that she is coming to the end of her term and is not planning to
run again.
Representative Betzold encouraged residents to stay in touch with the legislators on issues and
concerns.
OLD BUSINESS:
3. Second Reading of an Ordinance Creating Chapter 205.32 0-7 of the Fridley City
Code Pertaining to Shoreland Overlay District and Approve Official Title and
Summary Ordinance.
Councilmember Bolkcom wanted to make sure that "flowage" was understood as it was not
mentioned in the presentation. She wanted to make sure everyone was clear that this came from
the DNR. She asked if anyone had any questions or comments.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2006 PAGE 12
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to waive the reading of the ordinance and adopt
Ordinance No. 1224 on second reading and adopt the official title and summary ordinance and
order publication. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
NEW BUSINESS:
19a. Resolution Authorizing Participation in the Safe and Sober communities Grant
Program.
Councilmember Billings asked that the following changes be made:
1. In Paragraph 5, remove the word "the" after "Whereas."
2. In Paragraph 6, change "Chief of the Fridley Police Department" to "City of
Fridley Public Safety Director."
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to adopt Resolution No. 2006-17 with the changes listed
above. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
20. Informal Status Reports.
Councilmember Bolkcom mentioned that the North Metro Home and Garden Show would be
held on February 25 from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
ADJOURN:
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to adjourn the
meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:57
P.M.
Respectfully Submitted,
Krista Monsrud Scott J. Lund
Recording Secretary Mayor
� AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006
CffY OF
FRIDLEI'
To: William W. Burns, City Manager
From: Don Abbott, Director of Public Safety
Bob Rewitzer, Captain
Date: February 21, 2006
Re: 2ND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 101 OF THE
FRIDLEY CITY CODE ALLOWING WILDLIFE CONTROL MEASURES
Staff recommends approval of the second reading of the attached ordinance amending the
Fridley City Code by authorizing a permit process for the taking of nuisance wild animals and
birds; prohibiting persons from disrupting wildlife control programs; and permitting staff to
trap, immobilize or kill a wild animal or bird for public safety or humane reasons. The
ordinance affects Chapter 101, Animal Control. The first reading was held on February 13,
2006.
Attachment
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING FRIDLEY CITY CODE CHAPTER 101 ANIMAL
CONTROL PERTAINING TO WILD ANIMALS AND BIRDS
The City Council of the City of Fridley hereby finds, after review, examination and
recommendation of staff, that the Fridley City Code be hereby amended as follows:
That Chapter 101 of the Fridley City Code be hereby amended as follows:
CHAPTER 101. ANIMAL CONTROL
101.02. WILD ANIMALS AND BIRDS
1. Takin� Wild Animals and Birds.
Except as provided in Section 101.02.2 re a� rdin� nuisance wildlife control measures, it
shall be unlawful for any person to hunt, take, shoot, trap, kill, injure or attempt to injure
any wild animal or bird within the City of Fridley by use of a firearm, bow and arrow,
trap, poison or any other means. �''�� °�r�'��'��*� �� Nothin� in this section, however, shall
� prevent property owners or their agents from eradicating rodents on their property
through the use of traps, poisons or other such lawful means, nor shall it prevent Nature
Center staff, the Animal Control Officer or officers of the Fridley Police Department
from tra�pin�, immobilizin� or killin� a wild animal or bird for reasons of public safety
or for reasons of humane destruction followin� injur�
2. Nuisance Wildlife Control Measures.
A. It shall be unlawful to hunt, take, shoot, trap, or kill any wild animal or
bird within the City of Fridley without first havin� obtained a temporary
nuisance wildlife control permit from the Citv. No permit shall be issued
except upon the review and a�proval of a nuisance wildlife control plan
and then onlv under the followin� conditions:
� A special permit, authorizin� wild animal or bird removal, shall
first be secured from the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources and any federal a�ency mandated to re�ulate the takin�
of the species to be removed as ma. b�quired.
� An indemnification a�reement shall be submitted holdin� harmless
the City of Fridley from any suits arisin� from any dama�es
resultin� from the nuisance wildlife control pro r� am.
B. In addition to anv other requirements as mav be deemed necessarv, the
nuisance wildlife control blan shall at a minimum:
� Include a site plan of the propert�pon which nuisance wild
animals or birds are to be taken;
� Identif t�pecies and number of wild animals or birds to be
taken and the method of disposal;
� Describe the proposed manner of takin� and incorporate
appropriate safetv standards as identified bv the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources and public safety officials;
� Provide complete identification, credentials and qualifications of
all person involved in the takin�;
� Identify the measures to be used to secure the propert. f�public
intrusion durin� any takin�.
C. The Director of Public Safetv or desi�nee has the authoritv to approve,
modify or deny a nuisance wildlife control plan, takin� into account the
health, safetv and welfare of the public.
D. No person shall intentionall.�pt a nuisance wildlife control pro�ram
conducted pursuant to this section by any means includin� but not limited
to the use of noise. li�hts. chemicals. or bv the intrusion into a restricted
area where a nuisance wildlife control pro�ram is takin� place.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF 200_.
SCOTT J. LUND, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN, CITY CLERK
First Reading: February 13, 2006
Second Reading:
Publication:
�
�
CffY OF
FRIDLEI'
To:
From
Date:
Re:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006
William W. Burns, City Manager
John Berg, Fire Chief
January 23, 2006
Text Amendment City Code Chapter 131.04
Staff recommends approval of the second reading of the attached ordinance amending the
Fridley City Code, Chapter 131, Fire Department Service Charges, as it pertains to invoicing
motor vehicle owners. Text was included that would allow the City to invoice, in the event of a
motor vehicle accident, a vehicle owner directly and to clarify that the fee may be collected
through the criminal court only when the police issue a citation. The first reading was held at the
City Council meeting on February 13, 2006.
Attachment
ORDINANCE NO
The City Council of the City of Fridley hereby finds, after review, examination and
recommendation of staff, that the Fridley City Code be hereby amended as follows:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 131. FIRE DEPARTMENT SERVICE
CHARGES AS IT PERTAINS TO INVOICING MOTOR VEHICLE OWNERS
That Chapter 131 of the Fridley City Code be hereby amended to read as follows:
131.04 EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICE CHARGES
1. The collection service charges shall be as authorized in Minnesota Statute 366.011.
2. Collection of unpaid service charges shall be as authorized in Minnesota Statute 366.012.
3. The service charges shall be as follows:
A. Vehicle Accident
1.) Any incident response to an accident involving a motor vehicle where the
Fire Department is able to render aid, provide assistance, or otherwise
improve the conditions of the patients. This would include but not be
limited to:
• Extrication
• Medical Care
• Absorbing Liquid Spills
• Vehicle System Safety
• Vehicle Stabilization
2.) An invoice for $400 will be sent to the motor vehicle owner or owner's
insurance company, e� In the event the owner cannot provide insurance
information and is char�ed for the offense, the City shall collect the fee through
the criminal process as defined in the Minnesota State Statutes.
3.) If there is more than one motor vehicle involved for which fire department
service is provided, each motor vehicle owner or insurer will be invoiced an equal
share of the $400 service charge.
Scott J. Lund, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk
First Reading: February 13, 2006
Second Reading:
Publicarion:
�
�
CffY OF
FRIDLEY
To
From
Date
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF
February 27 2006
William W. Burns, City Manager
Richard D. Pribyl, Finance Director
Debra S. Skogen, City Clerk
January 26, 2006
Re: First Reading of an Ordinance amending Chapter 505. Bicycle Regulations of the Fridley
City Code
During the 2005 Legislative Special Session, the Legislature approved the elimination of the
statewide bicycle registration program, effective immediately. A letter was sent to the City
requesting the return of all of the bicycle registration forms and inventory of licenses.
City Code Chapter 505 refers to a statewide bicycle registration and licensing system. As this system
no longer exists, staff has prepared an ordinance amending Chapter 505 deleting any language
referencing licensing or registration. There is no public hearing required to amend this language.
Staff recommends holding the first reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 505.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 505. BICYCLE REGULATIONS, OF THE FRIDLEY
CITY CODE PERTAINING TO LICENSING AND REGISTRATION
The City Council of the City of Fridley hereby finds, after review, examination and recommendation of
staff, that the Fridley City Code be hereby amended as follows:
FRIDLEY CITY CODE
CHAPTER 505. BICYCLE REGULATIONS
� � .. •.. •. �
.
. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. . . ... . . . .. .. .. . ... .. . .
� �. . . .. �.
. �, ., �
�� - � - -
. . . .. . . . ... . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . ..
.
- -�
_ . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. .. .. . . ..... ... . . . . . .
.
505.05. IMPOUNDING
If any bicycle is found abandoned on any street, alley, public bikeway/walkway path,
bikeway/walkway lane, bicycle route or private property without knowledge and/or consent of the
person in charge of said property, then said bicycle shall be impounded by the Fridley Police.
Impounded bicycles shall be surrendered to the owner thereof upon proof of ownership �1-�ee€
^r'��°' -- ;°+--°�;�� satisfactory to the Fridley Police.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY
OF 2006.
Scott J. Lund, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
DRAFT
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION
February 15th, 2006
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Savage called the regular meeting of the Planning Committee to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Leroy Oquist, Dean Saba, Diane Savage, David Kondrick, Larry Kuechle,
Barbara Johns
Others Present: Stacy Stromberg, City Planner
Mike Chevrette, 510 57th Ave. NE
Jim Driessen, Medtronic
Tarra Krejce, Medtronic
APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - February 1, 2006
MOTION by Commissioner Kondrick, seconded by Commissioner Saba, to approve the minutes
as presented.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Consideration of a Master Plan Amendment, MP #06-01, by Medtronic Inc., to allow
the addition of a billboard/community service siqn, near the west edqe of their
campus and Hiqhway 694, qenerally located at 710 Medtronic Parkway NE.
MOTION by Commissioner Kondrick, seconded by Commissioner Oquist, to open the public
hearing.
UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 7:34 P.M.
Ms. Stromberg, City Planner, presented a request from Medtronic Inc., who is seeking an
addendum to their World Headquarter Master Plan to allow the installation of a billboard type
sign. Medtronic is proposing to install a 14 ft. by 48 ft. (672 square feet) community service
sign, which will display Medtronic's commitment to the community on the southwest side of the
property, located south of the existing parking lot east of the daycare center. It should be noted
that this is considered an addendum (addition, supplement) to Medtronic's Master Plan. This
request is in no way replacing Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the original master plan approved on
April 26, 1999. In fact, the petitioner has stated that this sign is considered temporary and will
be taken down when Phase 2 and Phase 3 are constructed.
Ms. Stromberg reviewed that the City Council approved the Master Plan for the Medtronic
World Headquarters on April 26, 1999. The Master Plan approved the construction of up to
1,600,000 square feet of corporate facilities and three parking ramps. The first phase consists
of approximately 500,000 square feet and has been completed. Phase one consists of six
buildings, including a research building, education building, corporate headquarters building,
neurological building, a campus commons building, and a central plant facility. A 1,000 car
Planning Commission February 15th, 2006 2 of 7
parking ramp is also located on the property. In 2000, the City Council granted Medtronic an
amendment to their Master Plan to allow an 11,270 square feet free-standing daycare center. A
drop off area and a 34 stall parking lot was also proposed to be constructed to serve the facility.
That amendment did not subtract from the anticipated placement of the Phase 2 and Phase 3
portions of the development. Instead, it was in addition to the already planned campus. In
2001, a temporary, 282 stall parking lot was constructed on the east side of the daycare center.
The lot is considered temporary because it would need to be removed in order for Phase 2 and
Phase 3 to be completed. This parking lot was constructed as a result of parking problems
Medtronic was experiencing
during special corporate events held at the World Headquarters' Campus, that aren't
experienced on a daily basis. Without the full build-out of the additional parking ramps, this was
reviewed as the best solution to bridge the parking gap, without permanently changing the
master plan layout.
Ms. Stromberg stated that this request is considered an addendum to the petitioner's master
plan and is in no way, replacing Phase 2 or Phase 3 of the original master plan. Although the
petitioner has stated that this billboard sign is only temporary until Phase 2 and Phase 3 are to
be completed, it is in staff's experience that temporary type uses are rarely temporary. The
proposed sign location is in direct conflict with the future building planned for Phase 3. It is also
a concern to staff that the extreme cost of a sign of this stature will hinder the petitioner from
wanting to remove it in the future, and therefore it may comprise the construction of Phase 3
and possibly Phase 2.
Ms. Stromberg reviewed that Fridley's Sign Code states that in order for a billboard to be
constructed, several requirements need to be met. The following is a list of the code
requirements and the answers provided by the petitioner as to how those requirements are or
will be met.
A. Billboards shall be restricted to property adjoining the right of ways of Interstate
Highway #694, Trunk Highway # 47, Trunk Highway #65 and East River Road south
of Interstate Highway #694.
■ I nterstate 694
B. The minimum height is twenty-five (25) feet above the finished ground grade, unless
the sign is intended to be viewed from a highway, then the twenty-five (25) foot
maximum height shall be computed from the centerline of the traveled highway, but
in no case shall the vertical distance between the bottom of the sign and the ground
be reduced to less than ten (10) feet.
■ The sign that we are proposing is intended to be seen from the highway. We
will work with the existing grades and the elevation of 694 to comply with the
City Code.
C. The maximum sign area is three hundred (300) square feet per facing not to exceed
two (2) facings when erected on East River Road south of Interstate Highway #694,
on Trunk Highway #47 and Trunk Highway #65; and 750 square feet per facing not
to exceed two (2) facings when erected on Interstate Highway #694. Double faced
signs shall be attached back to back at a horizontal angle not to exceed forty-five
(45) degrees.
■ The proposed sign faces are approximately 14' tall by 48' tall (672 square
feet)
D. The minimum distance between billboard signs is 1000 feet when erected on the
same side of the highway.
■ There are no existing billboard signs in the vicinity of our proposed location
on the same side of the highway. There is a billboard on the south side that
is approximately over one thousand (1,000) feet away.
Planning Commission February 15th, 2006
3 of 7
E. The minimum setback from the highway right of way is thirty (30) feet.
■ We are proposing a setback of approximately one hundred (100) feet from
our south property line, as per the attached drawing.
F. The minimum distance is 500 feet from a billboard sign to the intersection of any
street or ramp where traffic crosses or merges at the same elevation. The distance
is determined by measuring from the intersection of the street and highway
centerlines and the sign.
■ We are six hundred fifty (650) feet from the intersection of Medtronic Parkway
and 7th Street.
G. The minimum distance to a residential and public district is 500 feet.
■ The proposed sign is five hundred (500) feet to residential district to the west
and six hundred (600) feet to the residential district to the north.
H. The sign structure shall be all metal and be either painted or treated to prevent
deterioration. Lack of proper maintenance shall be cause for revocation of the sign
permit.
■ Sign will be constructed of painted metal to prevent rust and deterioration.
We are also proposing to clad the sign base in a decorative material in
keeping with the aesthetics of our existing buildings.
I. The minimum distance to a railroad crossing is 350 feet when there are lights and a
gate, and 500 feet from a railroad crossing without lights and/or a gate.
■ N/A
Any lighting will be shielded to not impair the vision of any motor vehicle operator or
to create a nuisance on adjoining property.
■ We will be sure to use shielded light fixture that conforms to the City Code
and MN/DOT requirements. We will submit full shop drawings and cut sheets
of the sign and lighting to the City for approval before proceeding with any
work.
Ms. Stromberg stated that although the petitioner has answered the above questions and plans
to meet the code requirements related to billboard signs, exact drawings of the proposed sign
were not submitted. If this master plan addendum is approved, an exact site plan and proposal
for the sign will need to be submitted prior to issuance of a permit to ensure that all code
requirements are being met.
Ms. Stromberg stated after further analysis, staff has determined that the only requirement the
petitioner will have trouble meeting, is the minimum distance to a residential district, which is
500 ft. The residential properties across I-694 on Cheri Lane will be approximately 400-450 ft.
from the proposed sign. The subject property is zoned S-2, Redevelopment district. The S-2,
redevelopment district does allow flexibility and latitude with a development, subject to
stipulations. This use however, would not be as intense of an impact, due to the following
mitigating features:
■ The highway provides a barrier
■ The sound wall on the south side of 694
■ Angle of the sign (end of sign)
Ms. Stromberg stated City Staff recommends denial of the addendum to the Master Plan to
allow a temporary billboard sign on the property for the following reasons:
- Sign location is in direct conflict with the master plan and building planned for
Phase 3.
- As positioned currently the sign would (at minimum) potentially delay the
Planning Commission February 15th, 2006
4 of 7
placement of buildings on this campus until the sign has had time to serve some
purpose and its cost to be somewhat amortized.
- The City and Medtronic have a structured arrangement that expanded a tax
increment district to realize the full benefit of the increment to be generated by
the full development of the land.
Ms. Stromberg stated that if the proposed sign were to be placed in a location not in conflict
with already approved site plans, the recommendation would be for approval. Staff would
recommend that if the master plan addendum is granted, the following stipulations be attached.
1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to installation of proposed sign.
2. Petitioner to provide a to-scale site plan depicting the size, location and setback of
the proposed sign prior to issuance of a sign permit.
3. The Petitioner shall provide detailed scaled plans of: the sign, sign structure, sign
footings, sign utility plan, structural engineering, and sign lighting, prior to plan review
for sign permit.
4. Petitioner shall meet all code requirements for billboard signs, recognizing the
exception of 214.12.7.G.
5. Petitioner shall provide a description and illustration of proposed materials to be used
for the base of the billboard sign, to be approved by staff prior to issuance of a sign
permit for the proposed sign.
6. The petitioner shall obtain a special use permit for the proposed billboard sign if any
portion of the sign is an electronic readerboard sign.
Commissioner Savage questioned the purpose of the sign.
Mr. Driessen, of Medtronic, answered that Medtronic would like to use the sign as a way to
share what is going on in the community such as United Way, Food Share etc.
Commissioner Kondrick questioned if they planned on changing the message and how often.
Mr. Driessen answered that they did plan to change the message quarterly (approximately).
Commissioner Savage asked to address the concerns from Staff not permitting the sign.
Mr. Driessen explained that they are not opposed to slide the proposed sign down to the east,
although the location proposed seems to be the most reasonable site for the sign. Medtronic
truly sees this as a temporary sign and it is not intended to remain with Phase 2 and Phase 3
construction. The reason for the sign at this time is because there is excess land available.
Commissioner Kondrick asked for confirmation that when Phase 2 and Phase 3 construction
begins, the sign will be taken down.
Mr. Driessen confirmed and stated that Medtronic would be willing to sign a document stating
that the sign would be taken down upon Phase 2 and Phase 3 construction.
Commissioner Savage questioned why it is necessary to put up a temporary sign and how
long the sign would remain.
Mr. Driessen stated that Medtronic would like this to communicate what they are doing for the
community and the sign could stay up a couple years. Medtronic is planning for continued
success, but do not know when Phase 2 or Phase 3 will start.
Planning Commission February 15th, 2006
5 of 7
Commissioner Savage commented that the community is well aware of what Medtronic does
and that Medtronic has a great image in our community. A billboard can be a visual distraction
and will not add to the image of Medtronic.
Mr. Driessen replied that Medtronic plans to dress up the base of the billboard and it will be
upscale not to look like a typical billboard.
Commissioner Kondrick questioned what the design plans are to make this billboard look
different from others.
Mr. Driessen stated that Medtronic is calling this sign a"community service sign" that will speak
to the quality of the sign.
Commissioner Kuechle questioned if both sides will be visible from the east and west.
Mr. Driessen confirmed both sides will be finished, but it will be less visible from the west.
Commissioner Johns questioned if the size of the billboard is the same as other billboards and
if Medtronic thought temporary would be more or less than two years.
Mr. Driessen confirmed that the size will be the same size as a billboard and two years is a
safe estimate as to the minimum years the sign will remain.
Commissioner Johns questioned the long range plans on campus and if there would be a
problem destroying the sign after completion due to cost involved.
Mr. Driessen explained that it will not be a problem to take the sign down and gave an example
that Medtronic invested $400,000 in a temporary parking lot and the cost of the sign is
approximately $100,000.
Mr. Chevrette, of 510 57th Ave. NE, stated that when he looks out of his patio door, he has a
view of the current daycare center on Medtronic campus. Mr. Chevrette is a stockholder of
Medtronic and is aware of the great community work they currently participate in. He supports
Medtronic in what they do but is concerned what the view from his back yard will be once the
sign is installed. He is also concerned about the temporary sign and when it will be taken down.
He also suggested not lighting the billboard so homes in site would not have light pollution.
Commissioner Kondrick questioned if Mr. Chevrette would be opposed to a non lighted sign.
Mr. Chevrette stated that he did not know how much light is going to hit the sign and how much
will affect the homes in the area.
Commissioner Kondrick questioned the distance between the sign and Mr. Chevrette home.
Ms. Stromberg stated that it is over 500 feet but did not have the exact distance.
MOTION by Commissioner Kondrick, seconded by Commissioner Johns, to close the public
hearing.
UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:00 P.M.
Planning Commission February 15th, 2006
6 of 7
Commissioner Johns stated that she understands the concerns with the billboard creating
visual distraction on the freeway and the concern of light pollution. If Medtronic will work to
accommodate the issues discussed, she could support the billboard.
Commissioner Kuechle stated that he does not particularly care for billboards but they are
permitted for use on this property. He could support the billboard as long as the petitioner met
the concerns addressed and the sign meets all the City Codes.
Commissioner Kondrick concurred with Commissioner Johns and Commissioner Kuechle. If
Medtronic agrees to sign a stipulation to take the sign down when the next phase of
construction begins, he could support this amendment.
Commissioner Savage stated that she cannot support this amendment. She does not see the
logic to invest in a temporary sign and believes it is not necessary. Everyone is aware that
Medtronic does good work for the community and it does not need to be advertised. A billboard
sign does not go with the building and Medtronic is not the type of operation to have this kind of
sign on their property. This will detract from the building and she simply can't support it.
Commissioner Saba responded that we all have a paradigm of what billboards look like, but
Medtronic would do a good job presenting this community sign. Medtronic has been an
excellent neighbor and he shares Commissioner Savage concerns, but would support the sign.
Commissioner Oquist stated that he understands the concerns but also understood that this is
not an advertising billboard, but a community sign, double sided and will look nice. He has no
problem supporting the request.
MOTION by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Oquist to approve the
consideration of a Master Plan Amendment, MP #06-01, by Medtronic Inc., to allow the addition
of a billboard/community service sign, near the west edge of their campus and Highway 694,
generally located at 710 Medtronic Parkway NE, subject to the stipulations outlined by staff and
the addition of a 7th stipulation related to Medtronic entering into an agreement with the City to
remove the billboard when construction of Phase 2 and Phase 3 begins. The stipulations
approved are as follows:
1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to installation of proposed sign.
2. Petitioner to provide a to-scale site plan depicting the size, location and setback of
the proposed sign prior to issuance of a sign permit.
3. The Petitioner shall provide detailed scaled plans of: the sign, sign structure, sign
footings, sign utility plan, structural engineering, and sign lighting, prior to plan review
for sign permit.
4. Petitioner shall meet all code requirements for billboard signs, recognizing the
exception of 214.12.7.G.
5. Petitioner shall provide a description and illustration of proposed materials to be used
for the base of the billboard sign, to be approved by staff prior to issuance of a sign
permit for the proposed sign.
6. The petitioner shall obtain a special use permit for the proposed billboard sign if any
portion of the sign is an electronic readerboard sign.
7. The petitioner shall enter into an agreement with the City stating to the fact that the
billboard sign is temporary and will be removed upon start of construction of Phase 2
and Phase 3.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, COMMISSIONER JOHNS, COMMISSIONER KUECHLE
Planning Commission February 15th, 2006
COMMISSIONER KONDRICK, COMMISSIONER SABA AND COMMISSIONER OQUIST
VOTING AYE, COMMISSIONER SAVAGE VOTING NAY. CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ON A 5 TO 1 VOTE.
7 of 7
THE MATTER WILL BE HEARD AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON FEBRUARY 23RD,
2006 AT 7:30 P.M.
2. Receive the minutes of the January 9, 2006, parks and recreation commission
meetinq
MOTION by Commissioner Kondrick, seconded by Commissioner Saba to receive the minutes
as presented.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Ms. Stromberg stated that the Hilltop Trailer Sales Special Use Permit was approved by the
City Council. She also mentioned that the next meeting is March 1, 2006 and that the March
15, 2006 meeting has been cancelled due to no items to consider.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Commissioner Kondrick, seconded by Commissioner Saba, to adjourn.
UPON UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MEETING
ADJOURNED AT 8:05 P.M.
Respectfully Submitted,
Krista Monsrud
Recording Secretary
�
�
CffY OF
FRIDLEY
T�:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006
William W. Burns, City Manager
Jon Fi. Fiaukaas, Public Works Director
Layne Otteson, Assistant Public Works Director
February 23, 2006
Sanitary Sewer Lining Project I`lo. 366
PW06-020
The 2006 budget has funds identified for the restoration of our sanitary and storm sewer lines.
This year"s sanitary sewer work will line the low lying areas along the Mississippi River in the
northwest section of the City.
The sanitary sewer lining portion of the project will consist of approximately 3,000 LF of 8 in.
VCP along the Mississippi River from Craigbrook Way to 79r" Avenue. There is also a stretch
on Fiugo Street from Broad Avenue to Riverview Terrace. There is �80,000 budgeted for this
project.
Recommend the City Council adopt the resolution authorizing staff to advertise for the Sanitary
Sewer Lining Project I`lo. 366.
Jtiti:cz
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: SANITARY SEWER LINING PROJECT NO. 366
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fridley has established a policy of
lining sanitary sewers when necessary,
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has submitted a plan showing the
sanitary sewers in need of lining.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley,
Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the sanitary sewers recommended for lining by the Public
Works Department be lined, and the work involved in said improvement
shall hereafter be designated as: SANITARY SEWER LINING PROJECT NO.
366.
2. The plans and specifications prepared by the Public Works
Department for such improvement and each of them, pursuant to the
Council action heretofore, are hereby approved and shall be filed
with the City Clerk.
3. The work to be performed under Sanitary Sewer Lining Project 366
be performed under one contract.
The Director of Public Works shall accordingly prepare and cause to be
inserted in the official newspaper advertisement for bids upon the making of
such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The
advertisement shall be published for two (2) weeks (at least 10 days), and
shall specify the work to be done and will state that bids will be opened at
10:00 a.m. on WEDNESDAY, MARCH 22, 2006, in the Council Chambers of the City
Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the
Director of Public Works and accompanied by a cash deposit, bid bond, or
certified check payable to the City of Fridley for five percent (50) of the
amount of such bid. That the advertisement for bids for Sanitary Sewer
Lining Project No. 366 shall be substantially standard in form.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 27TH DAY
OF FEBRUARY, 2006.
SCOTT J LUND - MAYOR
Attested:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
�
�
CffY OF
FRIDLEI'
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF
February 27, 2006
William W. Burns, City Manager
Richard D. Pribyl, Finance Director
Deb Skogen, City Clerk
February 21, 2006
Knights of Columbus Hall, 6831 Highway 65 NE
Premises Permit Renewal
Section 30 of the Fridley City Code allows Lawful Gambling by a licensed organization. The
Knights of Columbus is currently conducting charitable gambling at their facility located at 6831
Highway 65 NE. Their Charitable Gambling Premise Permit expires on May 31, 2006.
The renewal application requires a resolution from the City Council approving the renewal. If
approved, the premise permit would become effective June 1, 2006 and expire May 31, 2008.
Please find a resolution for the renewal premise permit. Staff recommends approval of the
premise permit renewal by adoption of the attached resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION
FOR A MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISE PERMIT
FOR KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, 6831 HIGHWAY 65 NE
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has been served with a copy of an Application for Renewal of a
Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit for the Knights of Columbus Counci14381; and
WHEREAS, the location of the Premise Permit is at their premises, 6831 Highway 65 NE, and will
be effective from June 1, 2006 to May 31, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has found no reason to restrict the location for the charitable
gambling operation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley approves the
renewal of the Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit Application for the Knights of
Columbus at their facility located at 6831 Highway 65 NE.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI� CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF 2006.
SCOTT J. LUND - MAYOR
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
�
�
CffY OF
FRIDLEY
TO:
FROM:
AGENDA ITEM
COUNCIL MEETING OF
FEBRUARY 27, 2006
WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER
RICHARD D. PR/BYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES RELATING TO
COMPLA/NCE WITH REIMBURSEMENT BOND REGULATIONS UNDER
THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
DATE: February 22, 2006
Attached is the resolution prepared by the City's Bond Counsel, Mary Ippel from the firm of
Briggs and Morgan. This resolution is similar to one that was passed by the City Council a
number of years ago when Jim O'Meara, from the same law firm, was the City's Bond
Counsel. Due to the age of the past resolution it was determined that the City should put in
place an updated resolution that outlines procedures related to the issuance of those same
general obligation bonds. The bonds issued by this City are used to reimburse it self for the
costs associated with certain predetermined projects. This spring and summer the City will
be working on the next phase of the expanded street improvement project. The costs
associated with this project had been discussed during previous budget sessions and have
been determined to be financed by a General Obligation Improvement Bond supported by
an additional tax levy.
This resolution authorizes the Finance Director to create a declaration of intent to reimburse
for each general obligation bond used to finance each of our improvement projects. This
resolution has attached to it an Exhibit A, which is the "Declaration of Intent" that shall be
used for this summer's street improvement project and the related general obligation debt
that shall be issued to cover those expenses.
This resolution is only used to declare, an intent to reimburse, and does not provide the
Finance Director with any new role in the issuance of general obligation bonds which has
always been the City Council's role.
:�' u-
Attachment(s)
RESOLUTION NO. , 2006
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES RELATING TO COMPLIANCE WITH
REIMBURSEMENT BOND REGULATIONS UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows:
RECITALS - The Internal Revenue Service has issued Treasury Regulations, Section 1.150-2, (as
the same may be amended or supplemented, the "Regulations"), dealing with "reimbursement bond"
proceeds, being proceeds of bonds used to reimburse the City for any project expenditure paid by the
City prior to the time of issuance of those bonds.
The Regulations generally require that the City (as the issuer of or the primary obligor under the
bonds) make a declaration of intent to reimburse itself for such prior expenditures out of the proceeds
of subsequently issued bonds, that such declaration be made not later than 60 days after the
expenditure is actually paid, and that the bonding occur and the written reimbursement allocation be
made from the proceeds of such bonds within 18 months after the later of (1) the of payment of the
expenditure or (2) the date the proj ect is placed in service (but in no event more than 3 years after
actual payment).
The City heretofore implemented procedures for compliance with the predecessor versions of the
Regulations and desires to amend and supplement those procedures to ensure compliance with the
Regulations.
The City's bond counsel has advised the City that the Regulations do not apply, and hence the
provisions of this Resolution are intended to have no application, to payments of City project costs
first made by the City out of the proceeds of bonds issued prior to the date of such payments.
OFFICIAL INTENT DECLARATION — The Regulations, in the situations in which they apply,
require the City to have declared an official intent (the "Declaration") to reimburse itself for
previously paid project expenditures out of the proceeds of subsequently issued bonds. The Council
hereby authorizes the Finance Director to make the City's Declarations or to delegate from time to
time that responsibility to other appropriate City employees. Each Declaration shall comply with the
requirements of the Regulations, including without limitation the following:
Each Declaration shall be made not later than 60 days after payment of the applicable proj ect cost and
shall state that the City reasonable expects to reimburse itself for the expenditure out of the proceeds
of a bond issue or similar borrowing. Each Declaration may be made substantially in the form of the
Exhibit A, which is attached to and made a part of this Resolution, or in any other format which may
at the time comply with the Regulations.
Each Declaration shall contain a reasonably accurate description of the "project" as defined in the
Regulations (which may include the property or program to be financed, as applicable), to which the
expenditure relates and state the maximum principal amount of bonding expected to be issued for that
proj ect.
Care shall be taken so that the City, or it authorized representatives under this Resolution, not make
Declarations in cases where the City doesn't reasonably expect that reimbursement bonds will be
issued to finance the subject project costs, and the City officials are hereby authorized to consult with
bond counsel to the City concerning the requirements of the Regulations and their application in
particular circumstances.
The Council shall be advised from time to time on the desirability and timing of the issuance of
reimbursement bonds relating to proj ect expenditures for which the City has made declarations.
REIMBURSEMENT ALLOCATIONS. If the City is acting as the issuer of the reimbursement
bonds, the designated City officials shall also be responsible for making the "reimbursement
allocations" described in the Regulations, being generally written allocations that evidence the City's
use of the applicable bond proceeds to reimburse the original expenditures.
EFFECT. This Resolution shall amend and supplement all prior resolutions and/or procedures
adopted by the City for compliance with the Regulations (or their predecessor versions), and,
henceforth, in the event of any inconsistency, the provisions of this Resolution shall apply and
govern.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2006.
SCOTT J. LUND — MAYOR
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN — CITY CLERK
EXHIBIT A
Declaration of Official Intent
The undersigned being duly appointed and acting Finance Director of the City of Fridley, Minnesota
("the City"), pursuant to and for purposes of compliance with Treasury Regulations, Section 1.150-2
(the "Regulations"), under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, hereby states and
certifies on behalf of the City as follows:
The undersigned has been and is on the date hereof duly authorized by the City Council of the City to
make and execute this Declaration of Official Intent (the "Declaration") for and on behalf of the City.
This Declaration relates to the following project, property or program (the "project") and the costs
thereof to be financed:
2006 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
The City reasonably expects to reimburse itself for the payment of certain costs of the Proj ect out of
the proceeds of a bond issue or similar borrowing (the `Bonds") to be issued after the date of
payment of such costs. As of the date hereof, the City reasonably expects that $1,500,000 is the
maximum principal amount of the Bonds which will be issued to finance the Project.
Each expenditure to be reimbursed from the Bonds is or will be a capital expenditure or a cost of
issuance, or any of the other types of expenditures described in Section 1.1502(d)(3) of the
Regulations.
AS of the date hereof, the statements and expectations contained in the Declaration are believed to be
reasonable and accurate.
Date: , 2006
Richard D. Pribyl — Finance Director
City of Fridley
� AGENDA ITEM
COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006
CffY OF
FRIDLEI'
CLAIMS
125534 - 125686
�
�
CffY QF
FRIDLEY
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006
LICENSES
Tvpe of License
HOTEL / MOTEL
Rlxmann-Fridley LLC
DBA Livinn Suites
5201 Central Av NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Budget Host Inn
6881 Hwy 65 N E
Fridley, MN 55432
TREE SERV/CE
Central Minnesota Tree
144 NE Satellite Ln
Fridley, MN 55432
REFUSE HA ULER
Boone Trucking
1516 Marshall St NE
Minneapolis, MN 55413
Keith Krupenny & Son
1214 Hall Av.
W St. Paul, MN 55118
Allied Waste Services
8661 Rendova St NE
Circle Pines, MN 55014
�
Approved Bv
Kiley Like Public Safety Director
Fire Inspector
Community Development
Divyesh Bhaktu
James Savre
Public Safety Director
Fire Inspector
Community Development
Public Works Director
Darl Boone Public Safety Director
Community Development
City Clerk
Keith Krupenny
Jerome Meyer
FOOD ESTABL/SHMENT
Seoul Foods Kyung Ahn
1071 E Moore Lake Dr.
Fridley, MN 55432
Hong Kong Kitchen Karen Kwan
6562 University Av NE
Fridley, MN 55432
<< << <<
<< << <<
Public Safety Director
Fire Inspector
Community Development
<< << <<
Tvpe of License
LICENSES (CONTINUED)
� Approved Bv
FOOD ESTABL/SHMENT (CONT.)
Ben Thanh Oriental Grocery Jennifer Nguyen
6566 University Av NE
Fridley, MN 55432
McDonald's Mark Wheeldon
8100 University Av NE
Fridley, MN 55432
McDonald's Mark Wheeldon
244 57t" Av N E
Fridley, MN 55432
Godfather's Pizza John Tidd
7910 University Av NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Fridley Alana Society Manuel Arechigh
5925 University Av NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Fridley DQ Brazier Kraus Foods, Inc.
225 Osborne Rd NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Quizno's Subs Hiep Pho
7610 University Av NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Bob's Produce Robert Schroer
7620 University Av NE
Fridley, MN 55432
FOOD / TOBACCO
Wal-Mart Store #1952 Pauline Lassiter
8450 University Av NE
Fridley, MN 55432
FOOD, TOBACCO, RETA/L GAS SALES
University Holiday Market Andesa Drake
7295 University Av NE
Fridley, MN 55432
<< << <<
<< << <<
Public Safety Director
Fire Inspector
Community Development
<< << <<
<< << <<
<< << <<
<< << <<
<< << <<
<< << <<
<< << <<
Tvpe of License
TOBACCO SALES
Adam Tobacco
(Formerly A&A Tobacco)
6548 University Av NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Bona Bros Food & Fuel
5311 University Av NE
Fridley, MN 55432
LICENSES (CONTINUED)
�
Tarek Hassan
Brian Bona
GASOL/NE / PR/VA TE PUMP
Determan Brownie, Inc. Gary Quam
1241 72nd Av N E
Fridley, MN 55432
MOTOR VEH/CLE REPA/R
Friendly Chevrolet, Inc. Roger Moody
7501 Hwy 65 N E
Fridley, MN 55432
JUNK YARD
A-Abco Fridley Auto Parts
7300 Old Central Av
Fridley, MN 55432
Derek Haluptzok
TEMPOR.4RY FOOD SALES
Fridley Historical Center Sue Meyers
611 Mississippi St NE
Fridley, MN 55432
49'ER DA YS — MUS/C FEST/VAL
Fridley 49'er Days Festival Peter Borman
6431 University Av NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Approved Bv
Public Safety Director
Fire Inspector
Community Development
m
Public Safety Director
Fire Inspector
Community Development
Public Safety Director
Fire Inspector
Community Development
m
Public Safety Director
Fire Inspector
Community Development
Public Safety Director
LICENSES (CONTINUED)
Tvpe of License � Approved Bv
MASSEUR / MASSEUSE CERT/F/CA TE
Michael Hackett
8550 Magnolia Tr #310
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
(Northwest Athletic Club)
Andrea Nordlund
345 Crosstown Blvd.
Ham Lake, MN 55304
(Ron's Barber & Stylist)
Public Safety Director
� AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF
�" �F FEBRUARY 27, 2006
FRIDLEI'
Contractor T e A licant A roved B
Crearive Signs Inc Si n Vern Hendrickson Ron Julkowski
North Country Air Inc Heating Kyle Bergman Ron Julkowski
Ra N Welter Heatin Com an Heatin Ra Welter Ron Julkowski
RPZ Services Heatin Michael Westman Ron Julkowski
Sylvander Heating Inc Heating Dan Roth Ron Julkowski
Westair Inc Heating/Gas Lisa Lynch Ron Julkowski
� AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006
� °F ESTI MATES
FRIDLEI'
Shank Constructors, Inc.
3501 — 85th Avenue North
Brooklyn Park, MN 55443
Commons Park Water Treatment Plant Upgrade
Proj ect No. 3 57
Estimate No. 4 ....................................................................................... $48,736.50
�
�
CffY OF
FRIQLEY
To:
From
Date:
Re:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF
FEBRUARY 27, 2006
William W. Burns, City Manager
Richard D. Pribyl, Finance Director
Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk
February 1, 2006
Public Hearing on an Ordinance Amending Chapter 4 of the Fridley City Charter
Pertaining to Appointment of Election Judges
When appointing election judges for the November 2005 special election, Councilmember
Bolkcom asked whether or not an election judge could be appointed because they did not live in
the City. This discussion brought into question how election judges are appointed. In reviewing
the City Charter and state law, it appears the Charter tends to be too restrictive in relation to the
appointment of Election Judges.
The City Charter states that election judges must be a registered voter and be appointed from and
work in their own precinct. Minnesota state law requires that eligible voters may serve as
election judges in any precinct in the state, that election judges who are related cannot work in
the same precinct, that an election judge must declare which major party they are affiliated with,
and that no precinct can have more than 50% of election judges from one major party.
This issue was forwarded to the Charter Commission for their discussion and recommendation.
While the Charter can be more restrictive than state law, the state law would override the Charter
in some instances. For example, relatives would have to be appointed to work in different
precincts as they cannot work together; or you may need to fulfill the party requirement by
bringing someone from outside of the precinct. The Charter Commission discussed whether to
amend the Charter by removing all of the language and referring the appointment of election
judges to state statute or to amend the language and continue to be slightly more restrictive.
The Charter Commission directed staff to prepare a report to the City Council recommending an
amendment to Chapter 4 of the Charter by ordinance. This amendment would remove the
stipulation that election judges be appointed to their own precinct and would remove the
stipulation that only registered voters could serve as an election judge by amending the language
registered voter to eligible voters for the majority of the election judges, but kept the restrictive
language requiring the head judges to be registered voters.
An amendment to the Charter does require a public hearing. At this time, staff recommends
holding the public hearing regarding this modification.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER
PERTAINING TO APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES
The Fridley Charter Commission and the Fridley City Council of the City of Fridley hereby
finds, after review, examination and recommendation of staff, that the Fridley City Charter be
hereby amended as follows:
Fridley City Charter
Chapter 4— Nominations and Elections
Section 4.05 Judges of Election
The Council shall at least twenty-five (25) days before each municipal election appoint two (2)
el�ible ��e�e� voters for each voting precinct to be election judges ^� °'°�*� ��° *'�°r°�� and
one (1) registered voter ^�*'�° °�m° rr°��r�* to be the head election judge; or as many election
'uLdges �� as may be determined by the Council. No person signing or circulating a
petition of nomination of candidate for election to office, or any member of a committee
petitioning for a referendum or recall, shall be eligible to serve as a judge of such election.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF 200 .
SCOTT J. LUND, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN, CITY CLERK
Public Hearing:
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published:
CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 28, 2005 PAGE 3
6. APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES
Ms. Skogen briefly addressed the memo prepared for the Commission referencing
Councilmember Bolkcom's question about who can serve as an election judge. At the last
meeting the Commissioner's requested an ordinance be drafted amending the Charter allowing
eligible voters, rather than registered voters to serve as election judges and that the language
requiring them to serve in their precinct be discontinued due to the requirements the state law has
in appointing election judges.
Commissioner Reynolds said she had researched 4 other communities regarding this language
and found that 3 of the 4 refer to as otherwise provided in this chapter, the general laws of the
state of Minnesota shall apply rather than having language appointing election judges in their
charter.
Ms. Skogen said that the charter was adopted in 1957 and when voters came to the precincts to
vote, back in those days, each voter had a little 3x5 card they would sign when they voted and
we did not have same day registration. She did not think that the charter had been changed since
that time, but state law had been changed quite a bit.
Commissioner Reynolds said she just wanted to know what other communities required and
thought it was a good idea to make something a little less restrictive. She also provided an
election judge application to Ms. Skogen from the City of Hastings that she found on the web
site. She said she could not find a similar form on our web page. Ms. Skogen said she has a
similar application that is mailed to a list of individuals who have served as election judges in the
past the spring of each even year and that individuals who are interested in serving are also
added to this list.
Commissioner Van Dan expressed her interest in changing state law regarding the additional
qualifications of being appointed an election judges so as not to disenfranchise voters.
Commissioner Soule said the appointing authority should have some ability to decide who is able
to perform the duties of being an election judge. Commissioner Borman agreed.
There was further discussion on this issue and it was determined Commission Van Dan would
proceed on her own as to changing state law.
Commissioner Van Dan moved to table this item. The motion failed due to the lack of a second.
Commissioner Findell MOVED and Commissioner Hoiby seconded a motion to recommend to
the city council an ordinance amending the City Charter pertaining to the appointment of election
judges.
UPON A VOICE VOTE BE1NG TAKEN, THE MOTION PASSED 7 TO 1, COMMISSIONER
VAN DAN ABSTAINING.
City of Fridley
Public Hearing Notice Before the City Council
Amendment to City Charter
(Legal Publication)
Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley City Council at the
Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue NE on Monday, February 27, 2006 at 730
p.m. for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on the following amendment to the City
Charter:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER
PERTAINING TO APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES
The Fridley Charter Commission and the Fridley City Council of the City of Fridley hereby
finds, after review, examination and recommendation of staff, that the Fridley City Charter be
hereby amended as follows:
Fridley City Charter
Chapter 4— Nominations and Elections
Section 4.05 Judges of Election
The Council shall at least twenty-five (25) days before each municipal election appoint
two (2) el�ible ��e�e� voters for each voting precinct to be election judges ^� °��
� and one (1) registered voter ^�*'�° °�m° rr°��r�* to be the head election judge; or as
many election judges �� as may be determined by the Council. No person signing or
circulating a petition of nomination of candidate for election to office, or any member of a
committee petitioning for a referendum or recall, shall be eligible to serve as a judge of such
election.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF 2006.
Any persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time
and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to Deb Skogen, City Clerk at 763-
572-3 523 .
Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons
with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no
later than Wednesday, February 22, 2006. The TDD number is 763-572-3534.
/s/ Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk
Published in the Fridley Focus News February 16 and 23, 2006
�
�
CffY OF
FRIDLEY
Date
To:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006
February 22, 2006
Wlliam Burns, City Manager
From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Julie Jones, Planning Coordinator
Stacy Stromberg, Planner
Subject: Master Plan Amendment, MP #06-01, Medtronic Inc.
M-06-31
INTRODUCTION
Tarra Krejce, who is representing Medtronic Inc., is seeking an addendum to their World
Headquarters Master Plan to allow the installation of a billboard type sign. Medtronic is
proposing to install a 14 ft. by 48 ft. (672 square feet) community service sign, which will display
Medtronic's commitment to the community on the southwest side of the property, located south
of the existing parking lot east of the daycare center.
This request is coming before us because the S-2 Redevelopment District requires that the
Planning Commission and City Council approve any additions or modifications to the Master
Plan or site plan for each project within the redevelopment district. Because the sign is not
included in the master plan for the project, Medtronic is required to submit plans for review and
approval.
It should be noted that this is considered an addendum (addition, supplement) to Medtronic's
Master Plan. This request is in no way replacing Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the original master
plan approved on April 26, 1999. In fact, the petitioner has stated that this sign is considered
temporary and will be taken down when Phase 2 and Phase 3 are constructed. Although the
petitioner has stated that this billboard sign is only temporary until Phase 2 and Phase 3 are to
be completed, it is in staff's experience that temporary type uses are rarely temporary.
The proposed sign location is in direct conflict with the future building planned for Phase 3. It is
also a concern to staff that the extreme cost of a sign of this stature will hinder the petitioner
from wanting to remove it in the future, and therefore it may comprise the construction of Phase
3 and possibly Phase 2.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMNEDATION
City Staff recommends denial of the addendum to the Master Plan to allow a temporary
billboard sign on the property.
If the proposed sign were to be placed in a location not in conflict with already approved site
plans, staff's recommendation would be for approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
At the February 15, 2006, Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for MP #06-
01. After a brief discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of MP #06-01,
with the stipulations as presented and an addition of stipulation 7.
THE MOTION CARRIED BY A 5 TO 1 VOTE.
The additional stipulation relates to Medtronic entering into an agreement with the City of Fridley
to remove the billboard upon construction of Phase 2 and Phase 3. Instead of preparing a
document between the City and the petitioner, staff has decided that it would be more efficient
to make that requirement an added stipulation, which states, "Priorto issuance ofa building
permit for Phase 2, the petitioner shall remove the billboard, footings, and all structures related
to the billboard."
STIPULATIONS
If the City Council chooses to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission,
staff would recommend that the following stipulations be attached:
1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to installation of proposed sign.
2. Petitioner to provide a to-scale site plan depicting the size, location and setback of
the proposed sign prior to issuance of a sign permit.
3. The Petitioner shall provide detailed scaled plans of.� the sign, sign structure, sign
footings, sign utility plan, structural engineering, and sign lighting, prior to plan review
for sign permit.
4. Petitioner shall meet all code requirements for billboard signs, recognizing the
exception of 214.12. 7. G.
5. Petitioner shall provide a description and illustration of proposed materials to be
used for the base of the billboard sign, to be approved by staff prior to issuance of a
sign permit for the proposed sign.
6. The petitioner shall obtain a special use permit for the proposed billboard sign if any
portion of the sign is an electronic readerboard sign.
7. Prior to issuance of a building permit for Phase 2, the petitioner shall remove
billboard, footings, and all structures related to the billboard.
City of Fridley Land Use Application
M P#06-01 February 15, 2006
GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION
Applicant:
Medtronic Inc.
Tarra Krejce
3850 Victoria Street
Shoreview, MN 55126
Requested Action:
Master Plan Amendment to allow a
billboard sign in an S-2, Redevelopment
District
Existing Zoning:
S-2 (Redevelopment District)
Location:
710 Medtronic Parkway
Size:
36.4 acres
Existing Land Use:
Medtronic Corporate Headquarters
Surrounding Land Use & Zoning:
N: Single Family & R-1
E: Corporate Hqtrs & S-2
S: Interstate 694 & ROW
W: Multiple Family & R-3
Comprehensive Plan Conformance:
Consistent with Plan
Zoning Ordinance Conformance:
The S-2 District requires that all projects
proposed in the district receive "project
plan approval". The billboard sign is
also a change in the approved Master
Plan.
Zoning History:
Lots platted in 1999.
All buildings were constructed in 2000-
2001.
Legal Description of Property:
Lots 1 and 1A, Block 1, Fridley
Executive Center 2nd Addition
Outlot A& Outlot B, Fridley Executive
Center, 2nd Addition.
Public Utilities:
Property is connected.
Transportation:
The property receives access from
Medtronic Parkway.
Physical Characteristics:
Buildings, parking facilities, landscaped areas
and graded area reserved for Phase 2 and 3.
SUMMARY OF PROJECT
Tarra Krejce, who is representing Medtronic
Inc., is seeking an amendment to their World
Headquarters Master Plan to allow the
installation of a billboard type sign. Medtronic is
proposing to install a 14 ft. by 48 ft. (672 square
feet) community service sign, which will display
Medtronic's commitment to the community on
the southwest side of the property, located
approximately south of the existing (temporary)
parking lot east of the daycare center.
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
City Staff recommends denial of the Master
Plan Amendment.
■ Sign location is in direct conflict with the
master plan and building planned for Phase
3.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION/60 DAY DATE
City Council — February 27, 2006
60 Day Date — March 13, 2006
Staff Report Prepared by: Stacy Stromberg
MP #06-01
REQUEST
Tarra Krejce, who is representing Medtronic Inc., is seeking an addendum to their World
Headquarters Master Plan to allow the installation of a billboard type sign. Medtronic is
proposing to install a 14 ft. by 48 ft. (672 square feet) community service sign, which will display
Medtronic's commitment to the community on the southwest side of the property, located south
of the existing parking lot east of the daycare center.
This request is coming before us because the S-2 Redevelopment District requires that the
Planning Commission and City Council approved any additions or modifications to the "master
plan" or site plan for each project within the redevelopment district. Because the master plan is
requesting to be supplemented, Medtronic is required to submit plans for review and approval.
It should be noted that this is considered an addendum (addition, supplement) to Medtronic's
Master Plan. This request is in no way replacing Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the original master
plan approved on April 26, 1999. In fact, the petitioner has stated that this sign is considered
temporary and will be taken down when Phase 2 and Phase 3 are constructed.
Star signifies approximate location of proposed sign
HISTORY
The City Council approved the Master Plan for the Medtronic World Headquarters on April 26,
1999. The Master Plan approved the construction of up to 1,600,000 square feet of corporate
facilities and three parking ramps. The first phase consists of approximately 500,000 square
feet and has been completed. Phase one consists of six buildings, including a research
building, education building, corporate headquarters building, neurological building, a campus
commons building, and a central plant facility. A 1,000 car parking ramp is also located on the
property.
In 2000, the City Council granted Medtronic an amendment to their Master Plan to allow an
11,270 square feet free-standing daycare center in the northwest corner of the subject property.
A drop off area and a 34 stall parking lot was also proposed to be constructed to serve the
facility. That amendment did not subtract from the anticipated placement of the phase 2 and
phase 3 portions of the development. Instead, it was in addition to the already planned campus.
In 2001, a temporary, 282 stall parking lot was constructed (as an expansion of the 34 stall
daycare lot) on the east side of the daycare center. The lot is considered temporary because it
would need to be removed in order for Phase 2 and Phase 3 to be completed. This parking lot
was constructed as a result of parking problems Medtronic was experiencing during special
corporate events held at the World Headquarters' Campus, that aren't experienced on a daily
basis. Without the full build-out of the additional parking ramps, this was viewed as the best
solution to bridge the parking gap, without permanently changing the master plan layout.
ANALYSIS
As stated above, this request is considered an addendum to the petitioner's master plan and is
in no way, replacing Phase 2 or Phase 3 of the original master plan for this development.
Although the petitioner has stated that this billboard sign is only temporary until Phase 2 and
Phase 3 are to be completed, it is in staff's experience that temporary type uses are rarely
temporary.
The proposed sign location is in direct conflict with the future building planned for Phase 3. It is
also a concern to staff that the extreme cost of a sign of this stature will hinder the petitioner
from wanting to remove it in the future, and therefore it may comprise the construction of Phase
3 and possibly Phase 2.
Fridley's Sign Code states that in order for a billboard to be constructed, several requirements
need to be met. The following is a list of the code requirements and the answers provided by
the petitioner as to how those requirements are or will be met.
A. Billboards shall be restricted to property adjoining the right of ways of Interstate Highway
#694, Trunk Highway #47, Trunk Highway #65 and East River Road south of Interstate
Highway #694.
■ Interstate 694
B. The maximum height is twenty-five (25) feet above the finished ground grade, unless the
sign is intended to be viewed from a highway, then the twenty-five (25) foot maximum
height shall be computed from the centerline of the traveled highway, but in no case
shall the vertical distance between the bottom of the sign and the ground be reduced to
less than ten (10) feet.
■ The sign that we are proposing is intended to be seen from the highway.
We will work with the existing grades and the elevation of 694 to comply
with the City Code.
C. The maximum sign area is three hundred (300) square feet per facing not to exceed two
(2) facings when erected on East River Road south of Interstate Highway #694, on
Trunk Highway #47 and on Trunk Highway #65; and 750 square feet per facing not to
exceed two (2) facings when erected on Interstate Highway, #694. Double faced signs
shall be attached back to back at a horizontal angle not to exceed forty-five (45)
degrees.
■ The proposed sign faces are approximately 14' tall by 48' long (672
square feet).
D. The minimum distance between billboard signs is 1000 feet when erected on the same
side of the highway.
■ There are no existing billboard signs in the vicinity of our proposed
location on the same side of the highway. There is a billboard on the
south side that is approximately over one thousand (1, 000) feet away.
E. The minimum setback from the highway right of way is thirty (30) feet.
■ We are proposing a setback of approximately one hundred (100) feet
from our south property line, as per the attached drawing.
F. The minimum distance is 500 feet from a billboard sign to the intersection of any street
or ramp where traffic crosses or merges at the same elevation. The distance is
determined by measuring from the intersection of the street and highway centerlines and
the sign.
■ We are six hundred fifty (650) feet from the intersection of Medtronic
Parkway and 7�`' Street.
G. The minimum distance to a residential and public district is 500 feet.
■ The proposed sign is five hundred (500) feet to the residential district to
the west and six hundred (600) feet to the residential district to the north.
H. The sign structure shall be all metal and be either painted or treated to prevent
deterioration. Lack of proper maintenance shall be cause for revocation of the sign
permit.
■ Sign will be constructed of painted metal to prevent rust and
deterioration. We are a/so proposing to clad the sign base in a
decorative material in keeping with the aesthetics of our existing
buildings.
I. The minimum distance to a railroad crossing is 350 feet when there are lights and a
gate, and 500 feet from a railroad crossing without lights and/or a gate.
■ N/,4
J. Any lighting will be shielded to not impair the vision of any motor vehicle operator or to
create a nuisance on adjoining property.
■ We will be sure to use a shielded light �xture that conforms to the City
Code and MN/DOT requirements. We will submit full shop drawings and
cut sheets of the sign and lighting to the City for approval before
proceeding with any work.
Although the petitioner has answered the above questions and plans to meet the code
requirements related to billboard signs, exact drawings of the proposed sign weren't submitted.
If this master plan addendum is approved, an exact site plan and proposal for the sign will need
to be submitted prior to issuance of a permit to ensure that all code requirements are being met.
RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommends denial of the addendum to the Master Plan to allow a temporary
billboard sign on the property.
■ Sign location is in direct conflict with the master plan and building
planned for Phase 3.
■ As positioned currently the sign would (at minimum) potentially delay the
placement of buildings on this campus until the sign has had time to
serve some purpose and its costs to be somewhat amortized.
■ The City and Medtronic have a structured arrangement that expanded a
tax increment district to realize the full benefit of the increment to be
generated by the development. The increment generated is predicated
on development of the land. The master plan approved included 3
phases. Only the first phase has been built. A sign that inhibits that
development directly conflicts with the purpose of having the State
Legislature, County, School District, and City expand the duration of
district.
If proposed sign were to be placed in a location not conflict with already approved site plans the
recommendation would be for approval.
STIPULATIONS
Staff recommends that if the master plan addendum is granted, the following stipulations be
attached.
1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to installation of proposed sign.
2. Petitioner to provide a to-scale site plan depicting the size, location and setback of
the proposed sign prior to issuance of a sign permit.
3. The Petitioner shall provide detailed scaled plans of.� the sign, sign structure, sign
footings, sign utility plan, structural engineering, and sign lighting, prior to plan review
for sign permit.
4. Petitioner shall meet all code requirements for billboard signs, recognizing the
exception of 214.12. 7. G.
5. Petitioner shall provide a description and illustration of proposed materials to be
used for the base of the billboard sign, to be approved by staff prior to issuance of a
sign permit for the proposed sign.
6. The petitioner shall obtain a special use permit for the proposed billboard sign if any
portion of the sign is an electronic readerboard sign.
7. Prior to issuance of a building permit for Phase 2, the petitioner shall remove
billboard, footages, and all structures related to the billboard.
�
� AGENDA ITEM
��F CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006
FRIDLEI'
INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS