Loading...
10/27/1993 I } PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, October 27, 1993 7:30 p.m. Public Copy i City of Fridley AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1993 7:30 P.M. LOCATION: Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: September 22, 1993 PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #93-07. BY ANIMAL MEDICAL CLINIC (tabled 5/26/93) : Per Section 205. 14. 01.C. (10) of the Fridley City Code, to allow veterinary clinics conducting vaccinations on Lots 1, 2, 28, and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park, generally located at 250 Osborne Road N.E. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT. P.S. #93-04. BY DALE EDSTROM OF NORTHCO CORPORATION: Northco Business Park 4th Addition, to replat Lots 7 and 8, Block 2, Northco Business Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, and Lot 1, Block 1, Northco Business Park. 3rd Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, generally located at 500 - 73rd Avenue N.E. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1993 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1993 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 19, 1993 OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 3, 1993 HAS BEEN CANCELLED DUE TO A LACK OF ITEMS. CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Newman called the September 22, 1993, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dave Newman, Dean Saba, Diane Savage, Connie Modig, LeRoy Oquist Members Absent: Dave Kondrick, Brad Sielaff Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Marvin and Karen Just, 661 Cheryl Street N.E. APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 8, 1993, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to approve the September 8, 1993, Planning Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #93-15, BY MARVIN AND KAREN JUST: Per Section 205.24. 04.D. of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a three season porch addition in the CRP- 2 (Flood Fringe) district, on Lots 13-15, Block W, Riverview Heights, generally located at 661 Cheryl Street N.E. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Savage, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are all surrounding parcels. The petitioners are proposing to construct a 12 ft. by 14 ft. three season porch addition off the rear of the property. The original dwelling unit was constructed in 1962 prior to the adoption of the flood plain regulations which the City adopted in 1977. The flood plain regulations permit construction of accessory structures and habitable living space with special use permit approval by the PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 PAGE 2 City. For habitable structures or spaces, the ordinance requires that the first floor elevation be a minimum of one foot above the 100 year flood elevation. In this case, the first floor elevation needs to be 823 .6 feet above sea level. All materials used in the construction below that elevation must be floodproofed in accordance with the current building code regulations. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioners will be required to submit a elevation certificate which must be completed by a registered land surveyor which will verify that the first floor elevation is at 823 . 6 feet or higher. Ms. McPherson stated the addition as proposed does not adversely impact the lot coverage or the required setbacks. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit request with three stipulations: 1. A floor elevation of the addition shall be at 823.6 feet • or greater. 2 . The petitioner shall submit an elevation certificate completed by a registered land surveyor verifying the first floor elevation of the addition. 3 . All materials below the regulatory elevation shall be floodproofed in accordance with current regulations. Mr. Oquist asked if ,staff knows what the first floor elevation is and where that would put the addition in relation to the existing house? Ms. McPherson stated staff does not have any records on the first floor of the dwelling unit. Mr. Newman asked what happens of the Commission recommends approval and then the City finds out later that the porch is quite a bit higher than the house. Does the Commission want to authorize construction of a porch that is built on stilts and is higher than the house? Ms. Dacy stated the City does have data on file of the elevations at certain points along Cheryl Street and Dover Street so there are some benchmarks. Based on previous experiences, there have not been any major problems with the elevations in this area. Mr. Newman stated that having been involved in sandbagging this residential area in 1969 when there was flooding and experiencing the floods this summer, it is his opinion that this area is not going to flood again if it did not flood this year. Is there much likelihood that this area will ever flood again in light of the work that has been done at the Coon Rapids Dam? PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 PAGE 3 Ms. Dacy stated the Public Works Director, John Flora, is trying to convince the Army Corps of Engineers and the federal officials to re-evaluate the flood plain, but that will take a number of years to accomplish. Certainly, the improvements at Coon Rapids Dam have improved the possibility of maintaining the areas in there, so the potential for flooding is probably minimal. Unfortunately, as long as the Federal Emergency Management Agency maps are still enforced, the City has no choice but to enforce them. Ms. Karen Just stated that they have lived in their home for 16 years and have never had a drop of water in their basement. They really do not consider their property to be in the flood plain. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Savage, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:46 P.M. • MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend to City Council approval of special use permit, SP #93-15, by Marvin and Karen Just, per Section 205.24. 04.D. of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a three season porch addition in the CRP- 2 (Flood Fringe) district, on Lots 13-15, Block W, Riverview Heights, generally located at 661 Cheryl Street N.E. , with the following stipulations: 1. A floor elevation of the addition shall be at 823. 6 feet or greater. 2. The petitioner shall submit an elevation certificate completed by a registered land surveyor verifying the first floor elevation of the addition. 3 . All materials below the regulatory elevation shall be floodproofed in accordance with current regulations. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to the City Council on October 4, 1993 . 2 . RECEIVE AUGUST 9, 1993, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Savage, to receive the August 9, 1993 , Parks & Recreation Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 PAGE 4 3. RECEIVE SEPTEMBER 9, 1993, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the September 9, 1993, Human Resources Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. 4 . RECEIVE SEPTEMBER 14 , 1993, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the September 14, 1993, Appeals Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. 5. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Tabled: Amortization of Gravel Driveways MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Modig, to remove this item from the table. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. Ms. Dacy stated that at the last meeting, the Commission discussed this subject and asked staff to research four or five areas. Staff now has the results of that research. Staff would like the Commission to continue discussion on this issue to see if the Commission is prepared to make a recommendation to the City Council. 1. Assessment - The Commission wanted to know that if the City adopted an ordinance that required gravel driveways to be paved, could the City do the work and assess the costs back to the property owners, the advantage being that the costs would be spread out over time, and the owners would not have to pay all the costs immediately. Ms. Dacy stated the Commission members had received by mail a copy of the City Attorney' s response to this issue. In his memo, Mr. Herrick said it is possible if, when the City adopts the ordinance, it finds a gravel driveway to be either a safety hazard, nuisance, or a hazardous condition. Mr. Herrick listed under a variety of statutes how the City could assess the property owners in terms of how many payments and what percentage rate. This is good news in terms of the property owners who might be affected by this ordinance. • PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 PAGE 5 2. Income information for the 350 properties that would be affected Ms. Dacy stated that Ms. McPherson worked with the Finance Department and determined that 15 out of the 350 households who have gravel driveways are eligible for the low income utility rate program. 3. Driveway definition, what constitutes a hard surface driveway? Ms. Dacy stated Mr. Barg called Columbia Heights, Crystal, and Roseville. These cities are very definitive. Concrete or asphalt are the only acceptable materials allowed by those cities. In the City of Fridley's code, it is defined as "concrete, blacktop, or other hard surface material approved by the City" . 4. Financial assistance - Ms. Dacy stated she has not had an opportunity to discuss this directly with the HRA, but she did discuss this with Grant Fernelius, the Housing Coordinator. If a person who owned a gravel driveway applied for one of the HRA-sponsored grants or loans, paving the driveway would be an eligible expense under the program. The assessment option proposed by the City Attorney also helps the financial burden. The HRA would have to decide how to expend monies on this particular project. Staff identified two options: a. The HRA could choose only to assist the low income seniors (15 families) and pay for all the costs; or b. If there is the question of fairness, the HRA could develop a policy that paid for a portion of the costs for all the property owners. The estimated price tag for the first option is $20, 000. If they assist everyone, the cost would be about $75, 000. Ms. Dacy stated that it would be difficult for staff to recommend that the HRA pay that amount of money when they are scrounging for dollars to do other things that may have more of a public purpose than paving driveways. • PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 PAGE 6 Ms. Dacy stated there are two important questions the Commission must address: 1. Does the Commission want to pursue an ordinance amendment which would require property owners without hard surface parking areas to provide paved driveways? 2. If the answer to the above question is "yes", the following issues should be addressed: a. What materials should be considered acceptable in meeting the hard surface requirement? b. How long should property owners have to pave driveways? c. Should additional time be granted for property owners with driveways in excess of 50 feet? Mr. Newman stated staff has done a very good job in addressing the issues. Now the 'Commission has to address the first question: Do they want to have an ordinance that would require people with gravel driveways to hard surface those driveways? Mr. Saba stated he liked the idea of requiring gravel driveways to be hard surfaced, but the definition of "hard surface" should be broadened somewhat. However, he would not want to require people to have hard surface driveways to accessory structures in the rear yard that are used for storage only and not for vehicle use. Mr. Oquist stated he has mixed emotions. He is in favor of hard surface driveways, but he is against the hardship that it will put on some people. The Commission really needs to take that into consideration. Staff has determined that there are about 15 low income property owners who would be affected, but there are other people who are not necessarily low income who are living on the edge and are going to be affected as well. To force them to pay an average of $1, 000 for a hard surface driveway could be a real hardship. Mr. Oquist stated he believed they need to first define "hard surface" . Brick and concrete pavers can look much better than asphalt. Ms. Modig stated that the eight reasons for hard surface driveways prepared by staff are very good, but she also has a problem with the cost they will be forcing people to pay for these driveways. There are a lot of people who are not • PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 PAGE 7 low income who are on the edge and another $1, 000 is a lot of money. She did not know if the City has the right to dictate this kind of thing. It might be better to enforce the hard surface driveway requirement at the time of sale or when the property changes hands. She is not sure what to recommend. Ms. Savage stated she believed it is a good idea to require gravel driveways to be hard surfaced. When you live in a community, you have to conform to a lot of requirements for the general betterment of the community. She understood the concerns expressed by the other Commission members and the financial burden on the property owners, and the City should do anything it can to help ease that burden. One way is through some type of assistance. It is a fairly minimal amount of people in terms of the total population of Fridley. She also has no problem in giving people time to put in hard surface driveways, but she did think it is a good plan and is for the betterment of the City. Mr. Newman stated he is concerned about the financial impact on the property owners and also concerned that the $1, 000 might better be used to enhance their properties in other ways. He could not help thinking that if they had a room full of property owners asking why the Commission was recommending an ordinance that would force them to blacktop their driveways and why the Commission feels this is an appropriate expenditure of $1, 000, he would have a hard time justifying that. In some cases, that $1, 000 could better be used to replace a new roof or put on a fresh coat of paint. Even though the hard surface driveways would have some aesthetic benefit, he would oppose an ordinance for the reasons he has stated. Ms. Modig stated it is rather unfair when this is not new construction. Many of these people have been living in their homes for many years without hard surface driveways, and many of them purchased these homes without hard surface driveways. She is not so concerned about the low income property owners, because they can get assistance through various programs. She is concerned about the people who do not meet the criteria for low income but are close to low income and the City is telling them they have a certain amount of time to conform to an ordinance that is basically visual. She would rather see this hard surface requirement handled through the sale of the home or when a building permit is issued. Mr. Newman stated he was not sure if the City Attorney's memo addressed some type of assessment plan where property owners could pay for an improvement through an easy installment plan. Staff might want to explore this as it might be another avenue for those people who want to put in hard surface driveways. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 PAGE 8 Mr. Saba stated that the City sends out letters every year to those property owners who do not have hard surface driveways letting them know of the rates if they want to hard surface their driveways during City street projects. Maybe, this should be publicized more and promoted a little heavier. Maybe the City could follow up on these letters with a telephone call. Mr. Oquist stated there are some people who just do not care whether their driveway is hard surface or not. Ms. Dacy stated that is true, but staff could certainly advertise a little more. Mr. Newman asked the Commission if they wanted to recommend to City Council an ordinance amendment requiring property owners without hard surface parking areas to provide paved driveways. MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to recommend to City Council that the City retroactively require that all non- hard surface driveways become hard surface driveways. UPON A VOICE VOTE, NEWMAN AND MODIG VOTING NAY, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 3-2. Mr. Newman stated the Commission must now address the other questions. They should also include the question raised by Mr. Saba about whether or not to require a hard surface driveway to accessory structures in the rear yard and the issue of some type of assessment process. a. What materials should be considered acceptable in meeting the hard surface requirement? Mr. Oquist stated he believed the acceptable materials for hard surface should be cement, asphalt, brick, or concrete pavers. The Commission members agreed that the acceptable hard surface materials should be limited to cement, asphalt, brick, and concrete pavers. b. How long should property owners have to pave driveways? Mr. Saba suggested a requirement where a hard surface driveway must be installed whenever the house is sold or the title transfers. Ms. Dacy stated the problem with the on-sale issue is it would mean another inspection requirement that staff would have to try to track, and there are 400-500 sales per year. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 PAGE 9 Ms. Dacy stated staff is going to be evaluating a truth-in- sale ordinance, and they could add a requirement for hard surface driveway at that time. Mr. Newman suggested that the City take the current ordinance which requires a hard surface driveway and file it against the 350 properties. Then, when the property owner sells his/her home, the buyer is going to know he/she has to conform to the ordinance and that a hard surface driveway is required. That will ensure, in some respects, an automatic enforcement, and the City can do the followup. It will be a lot cheaper than an inspection. Ms. Dacy stated that the problem is that each filing costs about $20 which would mean about $6,000 which is not in the budget. Mr. Newman stated the City might have some problems with amortization if subsequent buyers are not made aware of the hard surface requirement. He stated that $20 per filing or approximately $6,000 might be nothing compared to the cost of legal fees five years from now to enforce any amortization. Mr. Oquist stated the hard surface requirement is already in the ordinance. He suggested the hard surface requirement be contingent upon the following requirements, whichever comes first: (1) a time period such as five years (2) the sale of the property (3) when a permit is requested from the City such as a building permit or special use permit c. Should additional time be granted for property owners with driveways in excess of 50 feet? Mr. Oquist stated the whole idea is to clean up properties, so he would say "no" to this question. d. Should a hard surface driveway to accessory structures in the rear yard be required? Mr. Saba stated he would not want to see this requirement for accessory structures that are used for storage. Mr. Oquist stated that if a hard surface driveway to an accessory structure in the rear yard is required, it can be handled with a stipulation on the special use permit. Mk PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 PAGE 10 e. Should there be some type of assessment process? Mr. Saba stated the City should make every effort to contact these property owners and encourage them to take advantage of the City's contractors for installing hard surface driveways. Mr. Oquist stated he believed there should be some type of assistance, not only for low income property owners, but also some type of assessment process where property owners can be assessed for the cost and pay it over a longer period of time. MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to summarize the consensus of the Planning Commission regarding the hard surface driveway requirement as follows: a. What materials should be considered acceptable in meeting the hard surface requirement? Concrete, bituminous, brick, concrete pavers b. How long should property owners have to pave driveways? Whichever comes first: • Five years from the adoption of an ordinance; • When the property is sold; • When a permit is required from the City c. Should additional time be granted for property owners with driveways in excess of 50 feet? No d. Should a hard surface driveway to accessory structures in the rear yard be required? The City will exclude from this ordinance any secondary storage facilities that are not used for vehicular storage. e. Should there be some type of assessment process? The Commission encourages the City Council to make use of the special assessment process for payment of this improvement and to make every effort to include this improvement with other improvements in City programs for rehabilitation or repair. . H PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 PAGE 11 Mr. Newman stated he will vote against the motion because of the costs, not the least of which would be legal fees, in trying to enforce the hard surface driveway requirement. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, NEWMAN AND MODIG VOTING NAY, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 3-2. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Modig, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Newman declared the motion carried and the September 22, 1993, Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Respectfully sub 'tted, 5 ` yn Saba Rec ding Secretary r r=3 STAFF REPORT nCommunity Development Department Appeals Commission Date PlanningCommission Date : May 26, 1993 October 27, 1993 City Council Date REQUEST Permit Number SP #93-07 Applicant Animal Medical Clinic Proposed To allow animal/veterinary clinics which administer Request vaccinations. Location 250 Osborne Road N.E. SITE DATA Size Density Present Zoning C-2, General Business Present Land Use(s) Retail Adjacent C-2, General Business to the East; C-1 , Local Business and Zoning M-1 , Light Industrial to the South; M-2, Heavy Industrial to the West; C-2, General Business and C-3, General Shopping Adjacent Land Use(s) to the North - Retail and Industrial - Utilities Park Dedication Watershed District Six Cities ANALYSIS Financial Implications Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan Compatibility with Adjacent Zoning and Uses Environmental Considerations RECOMMENDATION Staff Approval Appeals Commission Planning Commission Author MM/dn Ammini. 1 . . SP #93-07 Animal-Medical;Ciinic • NI/2 SEC. CITY OF 21 0 .i Id / NW CORNER �„ �, • -SEC Nam- ... ..... _ ���. t ST RA ESTATES - _ '! EAES TES M) F(RS7l4 : ` . t i. 102 ' _• TH/R ADD. M ADQ_• � ' I...�r ..„ , gi •filM, ... 1 trgtAt.Wrik / . ; !e' '; : - <..: R .a+ ; 1, 1 Eel ma mil 62 Oren (51.4.5• - , inzlez .211:1 2 = ai4e) Li s INOOI ..J • 1 el/ I. 'MSC MIMI I. rl.00) m��z N or) ts) :. , i �/� • 1 )1 . (9 fs0o) , Oct ' -rco'a (+1luo/ [w aii i��` Valil• h—r-----7t--; , .po0/ ; 2 - . .,ram ;/ ,I r. • w.� I 4v • N..M: 1 I z }e • % _ M t !s 7 I /0: N110) G .7-(s001 I W I 'c + y 4,S •(a) 0 �,r • (:100) . : : jtMELO i J J,. , il 1 J S.IJJo1 i CC N iti7 •,1 / i 9. I i r . . pn - i ; nracf • _-'i- '.'-'. 747H IMENUE N.E.. IV I • . _ �• W � n w) . .(ssor jjji z . , 4. • . I -", ' w J!. Or ;.. .`3ve. ,A , iAce PE isi . lit 1(yJ J , ; 13001 0 ` •• -t ' N M • 7 < ' J j () ; I/,101 s. I fas . r+ J` :t •• i. W . WII00) b.l ,1!�� I ' p ,' 2- q W / ` a ::' .. IlJG) . i. / • ~ E�j ,/s 7 O i 13 smi, , im , az1 , V rs0o) • p (, . ! ,ras°, 1 j . • 49 • • Sill Ec. . I23 � I` : :18" CA TI4NM'11i . I tt . . ,fwr !73R0 w IyR /40$07416•1s•i if 1 • SP #93-07 - • Animal Medical Clinic e cc O 7l1 / K • 731 W Z • Q • '4 i,, rf /lllllllCr , 4 :1 , ./ 7(/ffi' o :. 4/ 4 IJ//I►!♦!♦♦♦-• ` i"4 ►♦♦♦v♦♦♦ ►♦♦O•♦::: ,/ ►.♦♦♦`".#1 s - • i♦•♦•�•• •♦�♦; 4 9 ►♦♦♦♦4i.i i 7 zW ♦♦4• h♦O a V ►♦♦♦�41 11,...♦,— ►♦♦♦•gI col - ♦4 ••• �V: /` rirl./lus .la�,rt:IWO" 3/-FrE i . V _ , 04 4d.1) t Z_ 1 ' i'I"t'111iipo, - • I t° " UNITY • ' ... • E ;; ..a ��t` a1 T' HOSPITAL o ' li a r...�: :. ; � ; uula!!!� 3 , ; ��lulu!■ �� 13 'A s I Z 1 ' , reijovyL...:::: �s ;,say • 3J wn!■4/ s .: .11f : yillk . rutain . \I ., ... r. .lrlt t' TM AVE e ' . �o. -y r _ .:\ # 32 , : rziOtIft:111. 1 77::.:14;:..:1.:?:.:,:—(...0:-:;:1 r � n . 4:i: &.T4Lel 1,,*/ , .44. It. ' f.1 ;: 5741741 d lt,7,14, !°. . ' 4k-.. , ':\ If%L I rir VittgAM; kr -'? . = ' 4i; - ‘' -&s)-- ,\ yeivetivAvivA cr ap :..,.: : 4,' ,-.-*' , ,,. .,10:: ,.: . ...:: i .14. f! , N i'HMO' - . .., ,� 11/1'1AA1 „' � .. vl s s , , itr. . ,„,„ , . ' 111 3C ZONINn MAD Staff Report SP #93-07, by Animal Medical Clinic Page 2 Request The petitioner, Animal Medical Clinic, requests that a special use permit be issued to allow veterinary clinics which conduct vaccinations. The request is for Lots 1, 2, 28, and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park, generally located at 250 Osborne Road N.E. Site Located on the property is a single story, multi-tenant, masonry building. The primary use of the building is retail. The property is zoned C-2, General Business. The property to the east is zoned C-1, Local Business. The property to the south is zoned M-1, Light Industrial and C-2, General Business. The property to the west is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial, and the property to the north is zoned C-3, General Shopping Center and C-2, General Business. Analysis The Planning Commission reviewed a similar request by H & H Veterinary in December of 1992. The City Council approved the special use permit for the veterinary service at its February 1, 1993 meeting. Pet Food Warehouse, whose tenant space is used to conduct the vaccination clinics, is changing service providers for the veterinary services. It is their opinion that having a service provider which is connected to an established clinic provides better customer service to pet owners. A new special use permit must be issued due to the change in service providers and also a change in the intensity of the clinic. The H & H Veterinary application proposed clinic hours three to five hours per weekend every three to five weeks. Animal Medical Clinic is proposing to conduct vaccination clinics every weekend for approximately three to four hours. Section 205. 14.01.C. (10) of the Fridley City Code permits with a special use permit animal clinics, veterinary clinics, animal hospitals, public kennels, obedience schools, and training services provided the following conditions are met in order to eliminate offensive noise and odors: A. All windows in the area of the building housing animals shall be double glazed with a fixed sash. B. Any ventilation system shall be designed so that no odors or organisms will spread between wards or to the outside air. C. There shall be no outside pens or holding areas. Staff Report SP #93-07, by Animal Medical Clinic Page 3 The intent of the ordinance section is to provide standards for full service clinics which maintain animals in their facilities on a round-the-clock basis. As in the original special use permit, the petitioner does not intend to provide full-scale veterinary services at the vaccination clinics. The petitioner only intends to provide vaccination clinics on a regular basis. There will not be holding pens, either in or outside of the building. The petitioner intends to use a small portion of the receiving area to establish the examination and vaccination area. In the original special use permit request, the petitioner provided plans for storage of the biological and pharmacy items to be used during the vaccination process. They also stated their plans to prevent the public from accessing these materials as well as used syringes and any waste associated with the vaccinations. The current petitioner has indicated that they do not need an infectious waste generators license; however, a more specified plan detailing how medical wastes are handled and stored while at the clinic site should be submitted by the petitioner. The petitioner of the original request indicated that they were currently licensed by the Minnesota Board of Veterinary Medicine. According to the State, the current petitioner was under probation by the Minnesota Board of Veterinary Medicine. The petitioner was placed on probation due to the following allegations: 1. The petitioner provided unnecessary services. 2. The petitioner directed or permitted veterinary technicians to perform procedures reserved for licensed veterinarians. 3. The petitioner prescribed or provided medications for human use. The order and stipulation imposed by the Board of Veterinary Medicine expired October 22, 1993. Dr. Olson of the Board of Veterinary Medicine indicated that there have been no subsequent problems or allegations while the petitioner was on probation. Recommendation The request meets all of the zoning code standards set forth in Section 205.14.01.C. (10) of the zoning code. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request to the City Council with the following stipulations: 1. No vaccination supplies or medical waste shall be stored on the site. Staff Report SP #93-07, by Animal Medical Clinic Page 4 2. Any alterations to the building will require issuance of a building permit. 3. Future violations similar to those set forth in the Board of Veterinary Medicine's stipulation order against the petitioner shall be grounds for revocation of the special use permit. W SP #93-07 f Animal Medical Clinic r V 1t t 1 a I 1 + X 0 _s) ' --i 1 iv, 4-. .r. 1 a - c,z lr - f 3 r f � � U.) ! I 0____\2_6_..c i AT - L _ J } 37$y 1 . :0 1i- w bX3 2 - G- 1 E :., �` -r S V K' v _J n r — —1 � s a a � o d a N v ! � J -` ID 1 g ' 1 -1 r : i 0 e=" -- „tii,t,� --2 , C) 1 f f 1 K \\( 1 a. 04-S 1 \ -.Nv hJin1a"-Ja.) do ap•suI o1.. CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. jiWIJ FRIDLEY,MN 55432 (612)571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFOR M sTION- site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: 2.s 0 O$f2 bid.f e; �) Property Identification Number(PIN) ( i i 3 o 2- s-)-oc�- Legal description:�7 s �, e - uL Lot '"�r' � 'ec � T� Block Tract/Addition Current zoning: Square footage/acreage 11. /}Q Reason for special use permit: fr Va C[ .� wc TN �1E7" �yoa Section of City Code: Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes—�C --- No If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? 14o5 Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME OSRo ea e e Ross jKIC S ADDRESS z 3 0 ,5 C ENT L. 4J Ail A.S - ' Y� SIGNATURE DA PHONE 3 5�o p DATE s 0-3` PETITIONER TNFnn i NAME nh E:br�L �� �►.o PA ADDRESS 60 3 „9n1 E-p j SO lYl P�.S !a 08 DAYTIME PHONE 3 714-'Pi> SIGNATURE DATE `1im..0 1 93 $: Fee200.00 $100.00 Fee: 0 # for residential 2nd accessory buildings Application received by: Receipt# Scheduled Planning Commission date: Scheduled City Council date: • . '"` MINNESOTAMEDICINE ; •. , BOARD OF VETERINARY =It V.7 -1 :; 2700 University Avenue West #102 • St. Paul, MN 55 1 14-108 1 77 `._ (612) 642-0597 October 14, 1993 City of Fridley Planning Commission 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 To Whom It May Concern: In the matter of Joel Lockett, DVM, Minnetota Veterinary License number 0970. Dr. Joel Lockett, by Stipulation and Order of the Board of Veterinary currently the Board for is under probationary removallicense the status. Dr. Locketz may e t probationary status tishanticspatedethatdmeeting Board mwellnbeaduring October 22, 1993. It1994. the first two weeks of January, Dr. Lockett has complied with alls of the informatSonpthat,mayacome Order to date. Barring any derogatory I to the attention of the Board prior to the January meeting. expect that the over thed °probationaryd act rably statusnfDr.rom hisk plicense. petition and remov Sincerely, / 0/1( - R land C. Olson, DVM Executive Director RCO/dc AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • if4:, :"- MINNESOTA BOARD OF VETERINARY�;_-���� MEDICINE . ,,_`�} ,: = 2700 University Avenue West #102 • St. Paul, MN 55114-1081 ` - (612) 642-0597 i1�gr. • September 30, 1993 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: - In May, 1993 , KSTP-TV aired a sensationalized TV news segment showing, on hidden camera, video footage of two veterinarians performing surgical procedures that appeared to violate current rules of the Board of Veterinary Medicine regarding humane treatment of animals and minimum standards for performance of surgery. Near the end of the program, _ a video shot of the Animal Medical Clinic of Minneapolis was shown and a voice-over statement was made by the narrator that a veterinarian at that clinic was accused of serious veterinary law violations, leaving the distinct impression that those violations were the same as had been shown on the program - inhumane treatment and substandard surgery practices. This attempt by KSTP-TV to equate the Board probation of Dr. Locketz with the activities of the two veterinarians that were the subjects of the show is false and misleading. There were no allegations or charges of inhumane treatment or substandard surgical practices involved in the probationary action of the Board of Veterinary Medicine. Since ely, 7(.,v6, _- ____ i , /, ,,/,/ Roland C. Olson, DVM Executive Director RCO/dc AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER . ,` -Anima[ fliec/icaf Clinic, Ap 2r. Ad orocLt, 2'011 2603 — lennepin &aA • �innearoIL, ma. 55408 (612) 374-4414 • 5/ 1 /93 Attn: C.i,.ty. Counc.i..(', C.it/ 06 FiLdZey P un p o 6 e: To e 6 t a b L.i 6 h a t n•e 5.s C tL n.L c at .the Pet Food W a n e h o u 6 e, City os F'.idtey M.i.66an: To pnov.i.de pkeven-ta.t-i.ve pet hearth cane in an e44icLen.t and co6.t-e65ee.tLve manner .to a wide range popu.Qa.Lon. Location 6L.te: At Pet Food Wanehouoe F&Ldtey, 250 06borne Rd. Ct i.enZ6 . AS6ondabZe na.te6 w.i..E!L. •6enve a new poputa.tLon that doe6 not u6e ve.er.i,nany ho6pi.Uats . Increa6e .the popu.f!ation o6 an.i.maL6 that w.itt be Lnnocuta.ted Son Rab.i.e6 . LLeen6e a tan.ge popuLat-Lon os pex6. LLeen'e appLLca.tLon6 w.i,UL be dL6.tkibu.ted at the cL.in.i.c6 City w.iLL gain home extra revenue tom thL6 . Mn Board o6 Ve.ten.inany Medicine: Met with Dn RoLand OL6on pen6onat y, .they have no ne6.tkiet.ion6 on .th.i.6 type 04 practice. Mee.t6 Mn veterinary hearth 6 tandand6 - Type6 06 Service6 : "wettne66 Ctinic6 "-pneven.ta.t.i.ve medicine to a bkoad range poputa.t.Lon. . -Routine Phy4icat Fxamina.tion6 - Vaccination6 . -HeaL.th Screen Te6.t6 - Stoot exam6 - Hean.twonm Te6t6 -Feline Leukemia Te6.t6 - Di6 p en6 e H ear.tworm Pn ev enta.tiv e PiLL6 Contrite Velecinaiy &reicee .`Jor *to- ..$ecia/Contraption r.�-- 1V' Animal Medical Cftnic, /O ,4 21, Ad cCocLar:, 2V717 2603 .. ennerin S0 ih Minnearotil, Inn. 55408 ( 2 ) (612) 374-4414 • Compaaa.t,Lve Set-ups : -Many commun.i.t.ie. .pon.oa Rab.ie. CZLnLc. in City Natt. - at Fine Bann. - Human FLetd -Ca...Lboania- Ft.0 vaccination. given in .upenma'cke.t. - FLoh,i.da-8tood .te.-tLng c inic. .caeen.i.ng bon chate..te'.ot, g!uco.e, £Lve'c/k.idney dL.ea.e and blood pne..uke tun by pa.i.va.te med-Lcct Lab. . Type o b C tinLc. : • -Limited ba.Le-weekend. — 3-4 hrs 1 day per TeekendA each —eel_end per month. S.ta 4 6 : -Mn ...i,een.ed ve.te&.inaa.ian. -ve.tea.Lnaay a...i...tan.t. -2-3 ,intake p en.ones. Set-upg -2 pon.tabte examination -table. -back dnop .eaeen -con4eaenee -table. ( 2-3 ) and 4otdLn.g eha.i.a. -wa.Ze 'eeep.t.i,cte. (.to be .taken o46-.L.te al5,te' ctin.ic houn. ) No.p-Ltat Back-up: -An.Lmat Med.i.caL CLLn-ic and Ho.p.i-tat PA 2603 Hennepin Ave So M.inneapoti. Mn 55408 - 2 Futt--tLme Doc-to'c. and pa'.-t-.ti_me doc-toa. Da Joe.. Locke.tz-24 yeast. expen.ience Dit Dawn Bn.ad.haw -2 yeaa. expekience Da. David Man.hLahava- 19 yea'. expe'.ienee Pt. Jane Spnangea.- 7 years.. expekience -FULL .env.ice Ho.pL-tat- Suageay, Den.tL..t'cy, Boan.dLng, Gnoom.i.ng Fmengency Setv.ice Back-up - 0.the't pno4e.- LonaL .,ta66 oK 10 Oat and pat.t-time peit.onet. • Complete Veterinary Srvires 5or YOU. �eciat Comranion1 • 1r4 �V Animal Medical Clinic, /24 aUr. �oe�oLochetz, eU V/// 2603 ilennepin & ih Minneapolis, Mn. 55408 (3) (612) 374-4414 Membe&ehip.i.n 6oe.ietLe6 and Onganizat.ion4 : -A44.itate Membea off Amen.ican An.i.ma.2 Hosp.i..ta.e. A6,soc.iat.ion -Metnopoti.tan An-i.mat Ho.pLtat A6aoc.iation -Vete/Una/Ey HospLtaI Managet6 A.hoc.Lation -M.i,nne,sota Vete.'LLnaay Med.ica2 A46ocLation Amekican Vetea.inaay Med.ica! A'6ociation --Mn Veten..Lnan.y Academy o{y Continuing Education -Amen.Lean Society o, Fetine Pnact.i.t.i.one&. Witt have: -Ctvtame&. Seay.i.ce numbea to that ctien-ts mat( ca.0 the doc.to' o-'c nu'tae with que6tLon4 -wit/ at4o nece.Lve the docto't ' a phone numbea who -tkeated theL4 pet in eaae emergency -the numbe't ob the Emergency Sen.v.i.ce w.itt a!iso be pnovLded •n/7 .1; anept Ir ?Urinary Urinary Srvicr u! �r Yrr -Sorrier(0 l�n oonpanion V: Anima[ Medical Clinic, PA 21. floe[ a ocbefz, 2 MM �/y/2603 ilennepin South Minneapolis, Mn. 55408 (612) 374-4414 ray 4, 1993 City of Fridley To Thom it may concern : The Animal Medical is not a generator of infectious waste and as such is not required by State Lap- to have a license for that purpose. At the proposed Fidley site Te Till be conducting "Wellness Clinics" providing exams vaccinations and health screen tests. All material and syringes generated from this Tell animal clinic, Till be taken off site to our main hospital at 2603 Hennepin Ave So There Te contract waste Panagement ,Savage for disposal. Sincerely, 4 Dr oel Locketz DV: t amp[e& Veterinary &rvicee .tor your Special Companion O ill O CO � z ►= N U = O C� o U a. - st } W � 0 COW cc O lilt•" z Q 9 �✓: Z . Q: ccF}- zv. `^`, N CY -- -� W w Ns Q cf)4-' > > Q � IdLID z z UC.,)O u, z a OJT Z +-+ Li o `r' < -.J . r. rZS Q W 4.4 Q N --J ° CI b , O W a" se-'''�ioo O "- W CO 11- O l' t7E h '0 & 7t/ . W E-,. . . ~ AW Now 2575 North Fairview 9 Suite 200 0 Rou*vi||o, Minnesota 55113 w Phone: (612) 638'0220 w F/0(: (612) 636~9207 ' May 1O.. � 993 ' City of FriJle� wi�helle �cPhsrs�r, �ssistant Cit� Pla `ns 6431 Unive/sit� Avenue N. E ' ' Fridley, MN 55432 ' McPherson: vet �et Food Warehouse has decided to change the erznarians who operate vaccination d h lt • To: City of Fridley May.12, 1993 From: H&H Veterinary Services Re: Special Use Permit request by Joel D. Locketz, DVM/Animal Medical Clinic It has come to our attention that Joel Locketz, DVM/Animal Medical Clinic has applied for a Special Use Permit with the City of Fridley. As a veterinarian, as business owners and as members of this community, we feel it is our duty to inform you of the following: The Minnesota Board of Veterinary Medicine has placed Joel Locketz, DVM(licensed to practice veterinary medicine in the State of Minnesota) on probation because of the following allegations(see attached report, pg. 1): Licensee provided unnecessary services; Licensee directed or permitted veterinary technicians to perform procedures reserved for licensees; Licensee prescribed or provided medications for human use. It was Dr. Locketz's decision to expressly waive formal hearings on all facts and legal conclusions regarding the case in exchange for being placed on probation for at least two years(pp. 2,5,7). Dr. Locketz recently approached H & H Veterinary Services regarding the vaccination clinics being conducted at Pet Food Warehouse stores. Pet Food Warehouse stores recently underwent a change of ownership and management. With this change, though they were satisfied with the services provided by H&H Veterinary Services, Pet Food Warehouse decided that further clinics would be conducted by Dr. Locketz/Animal Medical Clinic. Upon that decision, Dr. Locketz contacted H & H Veterinary Services asking for complete operating procedures, copies of all forms and all client records in exchange for employment with his clinic. Before making any decisions, we did some background research on Dr. Locketz. We found the attached report as well as many rumors. Upon our next conversation with Dr. Locketz, we expressed our intent to consult with an attorney before handing over afty forms, records, procedures, etc. Dr. Locketz, then, promptly hung up the phone and never resumed contact with H & H Veterinary Services. Since then, H & H Veterinary Services has been conducting vaccination clinics in other pet food stores in the Twin Cities. We are concerned about the moral character and ethics of anyone conducting business in our community. We hope the information provided will help you come to a decision regarding this matter. Sincerely, Uri Herzberg, DVM A • hp Mala Herzberg, Manager``,d1 a l i\ M- 1Caa 'ni c CL S caso ,s1,.Ls u. M✓vki2.1 S ' Leo-nd- rep,r - av l oca Q veke6► O c;an5. STATE OF MINNESOTA BEFORE THE MINNESOTA BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE In the Matter of Joel D. Locketz, DVM STIPULATION AND ORDER • License No. 0-9-70 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Board of Veterinary Medicine (Board) is an agency duly established under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 156, for the purposes, among others, of licensing veterinarians and regulating the practice of veterinary medicine in the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Joel D. Locketz, DVM, (Licensee) was licensed by the Board in 1970; and WHEREAS, Licensee is the owner of Animal Medical Clinic, 2603 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota, where he has practiced veterinary medicine for the past 19 years; and WHEREAS, on or about August 12, 1991, the Board instituted the above- captioned matter by serving upon Licensee notice of the scheduling of a conference with the Board Complaint Review (Committee); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the notice, Licensee and his attorney met with the Committee on August 28, 1991, to discuss allegations that while practicing at Animal Medical Clinic, Licensee provided unnecessary services, directed or permitted veterinary technicians to perform procedures reserved for licensees, prescribed or provided medications for human use; and WHEREAS based upon the conference discussion, the parties wish to resolve this matter without the necessity and expense of a contested case hearing by entering into the instant Stipulation. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Licensee and the Board as follows: A. During all times material herein, Licensee has been and now is subject to the jurisdiction of the Board; B. If the Board in its discretion does not approve this Stipulation, it shall be deemed withdrawn and of no evidentiary value and shall not be introduced or relied on by either party; except that Licensee agrees that, should the Board reject this Stipulation and if this case proceeds to hearing, Licensee will assert no claim that the Board was prejudiced by its review and discussion of this Stipulation or of any records relating hereto; C. Without admission of any wrongdoing, Licensee expressly waives formal hearing on all facts and legal conclusions referenced herein and any and all procedures before the Board relative to said facts and conclusions to which he might otherwise be entitled by law; D. The Board may forthwith adopt and implement the following order: 1. Licensee is hereby .placed on probation with the Board, effective immediately. 2. During probation, the following terms and conditions shall apply: a.1) During the first six (6) months of probation, Licensee shall retain an adviser. The adviser shall be selected by Licensee from a list provided by the Committee. ' The list shall include the names of not less than three persons, all of whom shall be Board licensees. Licensee shall select the adviser within twenty (20) days of service upon him of the list and shall notify the Committee of the selection within the same twenty-day period. 2) It shall be the role of the adviser to observe and/or inspect and provide any indicated recommendations to Licensee relative to: a) Licensee's inpatient and outpatient procedures; b) Licensee's surgical techniques; c) Licensee's supervision of his staff; • -2- • • d) Licensee's records and recordkeeping procedures, including billing procedures; and e) Such other practice-related matters as the adviser deems appropriate. All observations and inspections shall be conducted at the discretion of the adviser during normal practice hours, not to exceed a total of four (4) hours each week. Licensee shall provide a copy of this Order to the adviser before or immediately upon the • adviser's first visit to Licensee's practice premises. The adviser shall submit a written report directly to the Committee each month, including a final report. 3) Licensee shall pay all costs and fees associated with the adviser's functions, including mileage and a reasonable hourly fee for the time expended by the adviser to travel to and from Licensee's practice premises, for the time spent at Licensee's practice premises, and for. the time expended to prepare all reports required to be submitted to the Committee. All such fees and costs shall be paid promptly by Licensee to the adviser upon the adviser's submission of a monthly statement to Licensee. 4) Licensee shall fully cooperate with the adviser and the Committee to facilitate the effective implementation of the requirements of this paragraph. b. Nothing herein shall prevent the Board, or authorized Board agents, from entering and inspecting Licensee's practice premises, with or without notice, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 156.12, Subdivision 5, and 156.20 (1990) c.1) Within ten (10) days from the date of this Order, Licensee shall refund $70.95 to the pertinent individual identified by the parties at the conference herein. 2) Within the same ten day period, Licensee shall provide written verification of the refund to the Committee. -3- • 3) In the event the individual cannot be located by Licensee upon a reasonable effort, Licensee shall donate $70.95 to a charity for the betterment of veterinary medicine. Licensee shall provide written verification of the donation to the Committee not more than ten (10) days after the donation. d.1) Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Licensee shall conspicuously post at his practice premises and provide to all employees and to the Committee written statements of policy and practice. 2) At a minimum, the statements shall: a) Identify the specific functions and procedures which are permitted by law to be performed by persons not licensed by the Board to practice veterinary medicine; b) Identify the specific functions and procedures which may be performed only by persons licensed by the Board; and c) Set forth procedures to be followed in animal medical emergencies, including emergencies which arise during normal practice hours when no person licensed by the Board is on the premises. The statements shall include language to clearly indicate that persons not licensed to practice in Minnesota shall not diagnose, prescribe medications, including refills, or perform surgical correction, and that these prohibitions apply whether or not the unlicensed person is under the direction and supervision of a Board licensee. e.1) Within one-hundred eighty (180) days from the date of the parties' previously referenced conference herein or by February 24, 1992, Licensee shall attend a course or seminar approved in advance by the Committee relating to veterinary medical ethics. 2) Not later than fourteen (14) days following the course or seminar, Licensee shall submit written evidence of attendance to the Committee. -4- 3) All costs associated with Licensee's compliance with this paragraph shall be borne by Licensee. f. License shall not prescribe or dispense any prescription drug, including refills, to any person. g• Licensee shall refrain from providing any medically unnecessary or excessive services. h. Licensee shall make and maintain all medical records in a manner consistent with the hereto attached standards of the American Animal Hospital Association. i• Licensee shall strictly comply with all recordkeeping requirements for veterinary drug transactions set forth at Minnesota Statutes Section 156.18, Subdivisions 3 and 4 (1990). j. Licensee shall not presign or authorize the presigning of any health certificate; nor shall he authorize or permit any health certificate to be signed except by a licensed veterinarian. k.1) Not earlier than twenty-four (24) months from the date of this Order, Licensee may petition the Board for the termination of probation. 2) Any such petition shall be in writing and shall include an affidavit form Licensee indicating whether he has fully complied with all of the terms and conditions of probation. 3) Any petition submitted in accordance with parts 1) and 2), immediately above, shall be considered by the Board not later than the Board's first regular meeting after the petition's receipt; provided that the petition must be received at least fourteen (14) days before the meeting. . 4) The Board shall grant a petition submitted in accordance with this paragraph if it determines that the preponderance of information received indicates that Licensee has fully complied with the Order and if Licensee is not the subject of any -5- • complaint pending endin before the Board in which conduct substantially similar to that discussed by the parties at the conference herein of August 28, 1991, is alleged. If the Board denies a petition submitted under this paragraph, Licensee shall not submit another petition for the termination of probation earlier than six (6)months from the date of the denial. 3.(i) If Licensee fails to comply with all of the terms, conditions and requirements of this Order, (ii) if additional, verifiable allegations similar to those discussed at the parties' conference herein on August 28, 1991, are received by the Committee during the period of probation, or (iii) if any report from the adviser required under paragraph 2.a.2) hereof discloses a violation of this Order, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 156, or Board rule, the Board shall so notify Licensee in writing at his last known address filed with the Board. Licensee shall have the opportunity to contest the allegations by submitting a written request to so contest within 30 days after service of the notice: a. If licensee does not submit a written request to contest the allegations withindays 30 da s of service of a Notice Of Opportunity To Contest The Allegations, the issues set forth in the notice may be taken as true or deemed proved without further evidence. Upon a report to the Board of such allegations and of Licensee's failure to contest, the Board may impose additional disciplinary action, including revocation. Any Bo ard order issued under this paragraph shall be final and binding upon Licensee and shall not be subject to judicial or administrative review or to a judicial stay pending any attempts to seek such review; b. If Licensee submits a written request within 30 days to contest the • allegations, the Board may initiate either a proceeding conducted pursuant to Minn. Stat. ch. 214 or a contested case hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. ch. 14. 4. This Order and the Stipulation of which it is a part, including all attachments hereto, are and shall be deemed to be public documents. F. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this Stipulation shall not in any way limit or affect the authority of the Board to initiate administrative -6- • contested case proceedings against Licensee on the basis of any act, conduct, or omission of Licensee occurring before or after the date of this Stipulation which is not related to the specific facts and circumstances or requirements referenced herein; G. Licensee has voluntarily entered into this Stipulation without threat or promise by the Board or any of its members, employees or agents, and after consultation with and advice from Licensee's counsel. H. This Stipulation contains the entire agreement between the parties, there being no other agreement of any kind, verbal or otherwise, which varies this Stipulation. Dated: tV(7`( / , 1991 /19 etyektAir J,9EL D. LOCKETZ, DVM Licensee Upon consideration of this stipulation and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the terms of this stipulation are adopted and implemented by the Board this 2.?— day of C:-'C-' , 1991. MINNESOTA BOARD OF • VETERINARY MEDICINE 7 ROLAND C. OLSON, DVM Executive Director -7- AMC L ow Cost Vaccination Clinics ,�► 2603 Hennepin Avenue So.-Minneapolis,Minnesota 55408-374-4515 June 8, 1993 City of Fridley Michelle McPherson, Assistant City Planner 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN. 55432 Dear Ms. McPherson: It has come to my attention that Dr. Urie and M a Hertthat b are not accurate Mobile Veterinary Services have made statements and do not fairly represent the communication that transpired between them, my wife and myself. The following summarizes these transactions to the best of our recollections: During the third week of this past February, my wife and I met with Jeff Sell, Pet Food Warehouse General Manager, to discuss details of an agreement to have Animal Medical Clinic assume responsibility for all . locations. In vaccination clinics being held or to be held at all existing PFW the course of this conversation, Jeff stated that he had informed H & H Veterinary Services of this change in Vaccination Clinic management and was concerned about the transition, given an existing relationship with the Hertzbergers. His desire was to make this transition in the most respectful way possible and would leave the strategy to me. I discussed this transition matter further with my wife (an organization development consultant) and we decided to meet with the Hertzbergers to give them an adequate explanation of what led up to this veterinary change and to inquire as to their receptivity and/or desire to become a part of the new organization. • AMC Low Cost Vaccination Clinics 2603 Hennepin Avenue So.- Minneapolis, Minnesota 55408-374-4515 -2- This meeting with the Hertzbergers took place on February 26, 1993 at the Embers restaurant following a tour of the Animal Medical Clinic. The meeting began with a brief explanation of the business agreement that Pet Food Warehouses and the Animal Medical Clinic entered into and the extensive groundwork that Animal Medical Clinic had already laid to develop its vaccination clinic organization, advertising capability and highly trained staff. I discussed how I was currently envisioning the organization and the work flow. After this initial presentation, I acknowledged the experience and expertise that H& H Veterinary Services have and extended an offer to Dr. Urie Hertzberger to join my new organization and to be compensated at a level commensurate with both his expertise and vaccination clinic experience. He seemed to be relieved by this gesture and began discussing some of his experiences at the vaccination clinics, the University of Minnesota and his family situation. It was at this point that he mentioned his wife, Malla, was pregnant with their second child. I asked Malla what role she played in their vaccination clinic operation and she began describing an impressive administrative role and apparent business savvy. I decided (both out of compassion and need) to also offer Malla a position in my new organization. Both seemed pleased with this second offer. As it appeared that they welcomed my offers, I proceeded to request that they begin assembling various data to be entered into the Animal Medical Clinic data base, ie; client records, job descriptions, staff names, salary information, etc. We all shook hands and decided to meet again, probably at our home, to work out final details of this new employment arrangement. My wife and I suggested that they bring over their child to play with our two children and looked forward to the beginning of a new work, and possible social relationship. Malla agreed to contact us soon with a date and time that would be convenient to meet at our home. Approximately one week later, having not heard from Malla, I called Malla to follow-up on our last conversation. When I asked why she had not contacted me, she said that her daughter was ill and we could not get together at this time. Another week followed with a commitment to contact me and subsequent lack of communication. Again, I called Malla. This time she said that they were not interested in my offer and upon the AMC Low Cost Vaccination Clinics ,, 2603 Hennepin Avenue So.-Minneapolis,Minnesota 55408-374-4515 -3 - advise of their attorney, they would not be turning records over to me. I said thank you and hung up the phone as her voice tone left no opening for further discussion. In summary, I believe that I treated the Hertzbergers with fairness and respect. I have entered into an agreement with Pet Food Warehouses based on my proven professional and business expertise and experience and not dependent on defaming the reputation of any other professionals. I believe there is a need for veterinary services that address a multitude of pet owner needs, one such need being low cost preventive medical services. Thank you for your consideration of my perspective and position. I would welcome an opportunity to discuss this matter in person. Sincerely, Dr. Joel D. Locketz, D.V.M. Hilicrest Animal despite. 1320 EAST COUNTY ROAD D AT HIGHWAY 61 WHITE BEAR LAKE,MINN. 55110 t Phone 12- 484-7211 6/10/92 • • MINNESOTA BOARD OF VETERINARY"'MEDICINE ` . 2700 University Avenue St.Paul, MN 55114 Dear Board; I have monitored Dr. Joel LOchetz 's ANIMAL MEDICAL CLINIC both by direct visit. and numerous phone' .son versat±o:.a since January 17 of this year. A total of approximately 24 hours' were spent at the clinic. in. increments ranging from 11 /2 to 3 hours, the longer periods at the beginning. of the visits. There are. 2 veterinarians, one 'from Germany and one from Mexico that are - doing technician duties and I have impressed on them the need::to avoid letting• cliefits-think that they are licensed veterinarians. I am satisfied that they are doing this. -In' phone calls to the clinic I 'find they often answer the phone and have never passed themselves • off to be - DVMs. They do. seem to be very cdmpetent in their duties. Dr. Dawn Bradshaw is working .full time now although was at 30 hours a week before April. 1st. She is a Minnesota graduate. A Dr.Marshava. 'does fill in work and -Joel is there every day but devotes a good deal of' time to management. I think that: the clinic is doing very acceptable work. It is clean and well run. After' considerable conversation with Joel, I do think that some dis- gruntled help contributed to a lot of his problem and that it is something that could happen to any of us.His explanation seems very logical to me and I have found him to be a cooperative pleasant guy to associate with-. I am convinced that' he has his act together and there will be no more problems. It is my opinion that my services are no longer needed. . • • Sin . ly, C.J.12 ell D.V.M. Dr. Locketz denies that he has violated licensing statutes. The complaints that prompted the Board's investigation appear to have been made by one or more disgruntled former employees. In our investigation, we spoke with some of the individuals whose pets were the subject of those complaints. Our investigation showed that these pet owners had not filed complaints and had not even been contacted about the complaints. In several instances the complaints were refuted altogether. In others, the complaints involved isolated circumstances what could not be verified one way or the other. Dr. Locketz does not believe that he has violated licensing statutes. He believes that he has always provided high quality care to the pets he has treated. However, because of the expense and stress involved in a full hearing, he has agreed not to pursue this in administrative proceedings. Because of some technical violations (not involving poor care to animals, and some involving office procedures, all of which were corrected or modified nearly a year ago), Dr. Locketz has agreed to the terms of the agreement. Dr. Locketz and Animal Medical ainic will continue to make quality pet care their highest priority. joaps\�\' HEARING DOG PROGRAM OF MINNESOTA 2223 East 35th Street 1 Minneapolis,MN 55407 612/729-5986(Voice) Alan M.Peters 612/729-5914(TDD) Executive Director June 1, 1993 Ms. Michele McPherson Assistant City Planner City of Fridley 6431 University Ave N Fridley MN 55432 Dear Ms. McPherson: At the request of Dr. Joel Locketzg I am writing a letter of recommendation. Over the past two or three years, Dr. Locket'has:generously donated services to The Hearing Dog Program of Minnesota, caring for a.number of our guide dogs. Our dogs help deaf people know when sounds'happen in their homes and work places. We have always received good quality care from Dr. Locketz and his staff. If you should have any questions about our experience,rplease&f el free to give me a call. Sincerely, Alan M. Peters Executive Director The Hearing Dog Program of Minnesota is a division of The Companion Dog Connection,Inc.,a non-profit Minnesota corporation.The Companion Dog Connection is dedicated to identifying and developing new ways to establish mutually beneficial relationships between people and dogs. JOHN J. FLAGLER Arbitrator 2104 Girard Avenue South Social Security # 116-16-6898 Minnem4 fVligrta 55405 Federal I.D. # 72-2405310 Phone: 612-374-1505 William Hunt, Assistant City Manager City of Fridley Offices 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Bill: I am writing on behalf of my friend Joel Locketz who has an application before the City of Fridley Planning Commission to conduct an Animal License Clinic (a low cost pet vaccination and health screening activity). Dr. Locketz and his associates are presently conducting a number of such clinics throughout the seven county metropolitan area. I understand that opposition to Dr. Locketz's application has arisen in Fridley from a local veterinarian. The opposing veterinarian has challenged Dr. Locketz's application on the grounds that he was once the subject of an investigation by the State Board of Veterinary Medicine. It is important to know that the State Board found no cause for action as a result of its investigation (see the enclosed Exhibits A and B). I wish to add my own personal recommendation in support of Dr. Locketz's application. I have known Joel for the past five years and have employed his professional services for our two dogs. In the course of such veterinary care I have visited Dr. Locketz's ANIMAL MEDICAL CLINIC. On these several occasions I have seen a spotless facility, well administered, where my pets received excellent medical attention. Several of my friends and neighbors also patronize the Animal Medical Clinic with complete satisfaction at the quality of professional attention paid to their animals. Beyond these observations ! have come to know Dr. Locketz and his wife in connection with community activities. They are both active in women's, youth and minority issues and are positive factors in the health and welfare of the community. I can support without reservation Dr. Joel Locketz's application for a wellness clinic in Fridley. Thank you for your attention to this matter. • r ly, goor John J. F agler Professor of Industrial Relations and Labor Arbitrator cc: Michelle McPhearson M 6 EXHIBIT A Text of State Board of Veterinary Medicine's Decision on re. Joel Locketz ;The complaints that prompted the Board's investigation appear to have been made by one or more disgruntled former employees. In ow investigation, we spoke with some of the individuals whose pets were the subject of those complaints. Our investigation showed that these pet owners had not filed complaints and had not even been contacted about the complaints. In several instances the complaints were refuted altogether. In others, the complaints involved isolated circumstances what could not be verified one way or the other. Dr. Locketz does not believe that he has violated licensing statutes. He believes that he has always provided high quality care to the pets he has treated. However, because of the expense and stress involved in a full hearing, he has agreed not to pursue this in administrative proceedings. Because of some technical violations (not involving poor care to animals, and some involving office procedures, all of which were corrected or modified nearly a year ago), Dr. Locketz has agreed to the terms of the agreement. Dr. Locketz and Animal Medical Clinic will continue to make quality pet care their highest priority. • EXHIBIT B • Text of Monitoring DVM Assigned to Locketz Case • Hillcrest Animal Hospital 4320 EAST COUNTY ROAD D AT HIGHWAY 61 WHITE BEAR LAKE,MINN. 55110 • Phone ¢12 - 484-7211 • 6/10/92 MINNESOTA BOARD OF VETERINARY 'MEDICINE ' • 2700 University Avenue . . St. Paul, MN 55114 Dear Board; - • I have monitored Dr. Joel LOchetz' s . ANIMAL MEDICAL CLINIC both by it evt visit and numerous phane- oollverstitions since January 17 of this. year. A total of approximately 24 hours were spent at the clinic . i, . increments ranging from 11 /2 to 3 hours, the longer per: at the beginning. of the visits . There are 2 veterinarians, one 'from Germany and one from Mexico tl are ' doing technician duties and I have impressed on them the need avoid l.eting• clients th'irik that they are ' licensed veterinarians . I am satisfied that they are doing this . .In . phone calls to the cl I find they often answer the phone "ard' have never passed themselv off to be . DVMs . They do seem to be very cdmpetent in their duties Dr. Dawn Bradshaw is working full time now although was at 30 hou a week before April 1st. She is a Minnesota graduate. A Dr.Marsha does fill in work and `Joel' is there every day but devotes a good deal of time to management. I think that—the clinic is doing very acceptable -work. It is . clean and well .run. After considerable conversation with _Joel, I do think that some d gruntled help contributed to a lot. of his problem and that it is something that could happen .to any. of us .His explanation seems ve logical to me and I have found him to lie a"'cooperative pleasant c, to associate with. tam convincedthat' he has his act together ar there will be no more problems . It is my opinion that my 'services no longer needed. • Sir cfr iy, Gam, C .J .ft ell D.V.M. T t „ CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 26, 1993 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Newman called the May 26, 1993 meetin order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: % �i Members Present: Dave Newman, pclan Saba, Diane Savage, Brad Sielaff, Connie Modig, LeRoy Oquist, Dave Kondrick Members Absent: None Others Present: :arbara Dacy, Community Development Director APPROVAL OF MA 12 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION b 'r. Sielaff, seconded by Ms. Modig, to approve the May 12, 199, Planning Commission minutes as written. U . A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE •TION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #93-07, BY ANIMAL MEDICAL CLINIC: Per Section 205.14.O1.C. (10) of the Fridley City Code, to allow veterinary clinics conducting vaccinations on Lots 1, 2, 28, and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park, generally located at 250 Osborne Road N.E. Ms. Dacy advised the Commission that the petitioner had submitted a letter requesting that "the item be tabled until the last quarter of 1993 . Ms. Dacy distributed the letter dated May 25, 1993. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Savage, to table the special use permit as requested by the petitioner. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 20, 1993 MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. SaJ, to receive the April 20, 1993 Environmental Quality and End gy Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING , CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. COMPREHENSIVE P DISCUSSION Ms. Dacy sugge . ed that as a result of the meeting with the City STAFF REPORT Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date Planning Commission Date: October 27, 1993 City Council Date REQUEST Permit Number P.S. #93-04 Applicant Fridley Business Center Partnership Proposed To replat three lots in the Northco Business Addition into Request four lots. Location 500 - 73rd Avenue N.E. SITE DATA Size 1 , 163,587 square feet 26.71 acres Density Present Zoning M-2, Heavy Industrial Present Land Use(s) Industrial Adjacent M-2, Heavy Industrial to the East and West; R-1, Single Family Zoning to the North; P, Public, to the South. Adjacent Land Use(s) Industrial to the East and West; Residential to the North; Park Utilities to the South Park Dedication $.023 per square foot Watershed District Rice Creek ANALYSIS Financial Implications Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan Compatibility with Adjacent Zoning and Uses Environmental Considerations RECOMMENDATION Staff Approval with stipulations Appeals Commission Planning Commission Author MM/dn . P.S. #93-04 Fridley Bus. Center Part. 2 �/ SEG.. // . T 30, R. 24 CITY OF FRIDLEY 0 'O 42 - l l \ CEN R L l • l \ k. J t S£.// I �IaTn.•.q•w n5LD4� `J ' - -I 1 e9 1<` ,-- ---' TRACT A - 1 .;,...2.---;„-.s"....4-:;.? .. .; „11/.• ., • , 172 1 E‘:- - z i skGISL:r \''. . TRACT B,, 5J U, ? _ C. LAND I (X�i ,\FtedeN126. N .,1dS. I i ` to--i, r- P�� 4' ......, Q co SURVEY . ¢ a9. -....r.... -sfe:'-' •/ - /j i- / / / //i _� a� .1` J 1 i . - E4IP . F ''I .♦ 1 v� I is41. l COLUMIA ARENA 1 LO CK E y •Z ' „ I1. , / 0 , } I � _.... n 1 .TRACT 13 .; i � «) x '.i , I Y 1 l p 1 ,, s ' i .. e �y rzlcy 1 ; c (----...\\....._.) _____ .-_I.---- .u%rr t ;----t--Cf'..s„if'. 69TH AVE. NE. //4 co- 3 . ' 16 ! 43 LOCATION MAP P.S. ##93-04 • Fridley Bus. Center Part. / .. 7-/I ;r �� "r0i IA/'[ L! i/(7..J'A/A..i Alm. n -7 .i I ,--1 I l_ ••�I I 1 /111 /• I I I _7/i k i ..-1I 1 Y 1. �r l I' II1IIII/C-c`/�(� IT�/ 11/C-4I//C" AI C." 1 I L/I V% Y 1_/I.1sidt I-.Y L. I J.. 1. I Y.I_. / l ---- 1 N0.11.41 .51.40 -- -80.40... Mr F' n AN„u I �rlV r .L 'tl.d8 $ r \ I , 7-2 .r \ O u .. I t 1 -) r ,..• /.. _I" 1 r r ,� gal = (-1 t :1 : 441 u ' t III • /�/ � o f �n �. NE... 46s/77 4:1 C 1 " L__=:r_ o 2 4 \ (A < 0 O 1i[ r P 4% e. 1‘-=.1%.,./Ipr .4 "fi _ :...._.\1.1 IC-.. ....:":1... ...-.-.. 0 L ! , ` `4 M. r pLI. b.__, CO 11 CO LOT C ACCESS t ;- L• ACCESS ANO I ..3,,_, . „lc_ z PARKING ve. s!! : I e. (.71 741X,T twlf ra rn 1 / NO==C[L,_ �PARCfL, .4.1 1 NI - 1.11 21141 ,.„..,..j, r._ I Lf.lai -S. iNt . LOT 1 V u & 1(� • ..� MI '- ..,.-NNE-srve.�F i ,If.Strrr oi rVi. .+r , ni «T7 $ I / ;I 1 k .e 1 r, 7C ' n l — in % = I C7 t� t o II 1 o l� a x .: '' i e y C Er_ n {`vA`R 1 i t I 1_ 1i ; I O O J — L I r r b; /X "CI c- - i :••. : :_ lii' _ I 3 0; s. c6 i r tr..rt s MIN el 111*•-' s0.'r71`E lo.3I MCl.L 1SI0;MR.LL --- Il g . 8< -10 t 2== *-!— .Z ,1 1 r23 LOCATION MAP • P.S. #93-04 Fridley Bus. Center Part. "fr.el ��K . ' ç .i4 ;RH 3t6 i 1 • • ° I UNITY " • ' ' ' '- • �� ffl� dl. E ` HOSPITAL o I a°o1� ii•ite:1 1' o 111 Vs' , , f 2: N 11ll11i�, r . Etj.. ? - is /� .. 4 illooll ; •11 - tii. I ■an::o•■ z1 ��� • !it*' .„ 16 40 Illis -: ...t- L.:1::: (, 447 :' A !!!1 alas � :✓ z` k , / %'. Irlysi �•1�111 TH AVE. N.E. r 11 Ie 3 ,`•l ' WEAR, -*:j1; '''' . Ge"1.-,::**:::zi:.:\ 411P4 < ,N1-7" 1 -fr. -1::i.:. ,-, _ AtthAst ' ''..•-•;:--r.° .:-I .--. ,...- e % .. ."... _,, IN "'.t. \ AI�i����> o <. r,, ` , .� moo- `' y� 6 /3,¢ ,� /`- ,��7 112 Two/X amp.3831P 1 -' NAVA. . i., , a,„0/4 - - --5 • - ?-., 01 Ai ffI W ` 111111110: . ' 9 ®@ / .- f , , MADSEN ' E 1�'1 �� MINN • s Itituir ,i7 vlw 'Y; "� free if, �,1��'1,1l� hurch , 9 is t i _ sat_ 2 II I�••••• N ' ) — J 1 , .'= 73RO AV NUE . N E 1►4,W1 r ACT :Milii • Z . TRACT Bwo1011i �� ' OW iihteitrr�� , /RE91 TERE G;ERi ttf MI LzAl\i/D 'LA) '4 erg >- iird 1 ,Ii/s ., z r7 !e,�� 1 d' v/ //A I. •71ST AVENUE NE `�''i ..;i �J '. Ne,-71/4:: '‹-' 1 ... � Bow `� ' 'kg :::: '.--c---" :-Lri-•". '''57(...:.::;::::, i„ :;;� ' e:') .., , i '- ��' ')j- . fir. ZONING MAP Staff Report P.S. #93-04, by Fridley Business Center Partnership Page 2 Request The petitioner requests that a plat be considered to replat three lots of Northco Business Park into four. The request is generally located at 500 - 73rd Avenue N.E. The Fridley Business Center Partnership is comprised of Northco and Jim Gray, owner of Quick File. Quick File is located in the manufacturing facility located on the subject parcel. Mr. Gray is choosing to remove his interest from the partnership and wants to own the property where Quick File is located. In addition to Quick File, Carter Day Company and Steinwall, Inc. are also located in the building. Site The subject parcel is a combination of vacant and occupied parcels. Located on one parcel are two buildings; one used for research and development, the other as a manufacturing facility. The property is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial, as are the parcels to the east and west. The property to the north is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, and the property to the south is zoned P, Public. Analysis The proposed plat would create four parcels; two directly adjacent to 73rd Avenue with direct access onto 73rd Avenue, one adjacent to Northco Drive, and the fourth adjacent to 71st Avenue. The fourth parcel does not have access onto 71st Avenue as it abuts Locke Park. A 25 foot "flag" will be created to provide road access to this parcel from Northco Drive. As proposed, the lots meet all of the minimum requirements outlined in the M-2, Heavy Industrial zoning district regulations, including the minimum lot area of 1 1/2 acres and minimum lot width of 150 feet. The Engineering Department has indicated that an additional utility easement will need to be dedicated adjacent to the most northerly curve of Northco Drive. Two ten inch water lines intersect outside of the dedicated right-of-way and therjefore a triangular utility easement needs to be dedicated on the plat (please see enclosed drawing) . Recommendation As the proposed plat request meets the minimum M-2, Heavy Industrial standards, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request with the following stipulation: 1. An additional utility easement shall be dedicated on the plat as indicated on the attached drawing. .. • P.S. #93-04 •4 t 'I • __ . 1 .3 IC eZ•OS Fridley Bus. Cuter Par ..! - . i i \ i . 4,40ca • Via, , _• • i 111 / 136., ,.. ‘• / 1 .•` . i • 1 i • / \ i .11 • ' \ 1 .. • i •/ I - _..../ ‘ •• : • , .. ._.---. ..- I ., - i . , c• - , ---- - - •' . "• r • • .: I -• 1 : J I k .. ' • % I ; : . ' ,• ' 1 ' • i _ j -I- . . ..: • I ' '.' ' , • ' i I ' .-,-,--..t. i •.. •.. ' • ' '' j . . .11 -' I(II • • • • ' I I. . . .. .... 1 I 'I: -1, ,- " :1 ,. , . I -.... 0 Z !1* - •• . I _ i ' I , 2 1 !1 l' ' % 1' ' 3 I 1 .! , .. ., \ , s _. i I; 1 .: „,, ! D • , I I ' 41 1 '0, .A. • 1 . c., , • t., • . -. 3 • . ' i I • -• ; 1 x 1\l,1 . l',, -. , An \, -, . , . , 21 ,,.','.,'' ;;-• - • : I•,, -,.1 /A — . • i: . 11'..: ____:___11--- , , - i. p - I- -. -- ..• ‘,„ 0 ,_ li !II ;,. / . .1-- ., .,,, _ -1 ' i i II- li i21' : I /' \ ' ,' "' .. J . .., , e . 1: :.._ 1 i : .-.. . . ,- 0 ' -i _ .. .. , . — , 7 , . ! / . .. ff-' \ ,___a______ •.- 1 ,....-5,- .i i• • • r------\ e - '• . • • 1, :•, , , , __ , , :.i. t• ..,_ „ .. 1-f•- •-•-•I $ * ' •; 1.----- •A g '.\I..., .'''..'• • i. I I •'' •" • '' ' ;•-•-••-• - --*•:-.---..-.........:-......---.-....---- : ) lki . •• I ' -. ' 1._•- 1 r_____Li____: , 7"y"+_. •,1p.ti : _.,,x., „. ._ -i, - 1 --• s 1 1 ,x - .../ . • '111 ..‘-- .1--:-/- '' •-•; i, .. , :.:. . ' '; '. ' I— . ••.---••••-•-•' -'"'-7- ' '-- • .i.. i r' 1: ,I l'' , --:.'--•-,--,-.,.1 : § ' 1 , A. '',-4., '. , 1. .. ...-.,, ' : ---i--.•••i - ' ...:-% L.14_,,,....L..._. . '-,..-:71-ii- 07:-',71--?..-;=;;-7-%.•;t-T---1-ii. IX 1 I 1,___L__,,, . !...: :•___. — •- ' .„ . - ,,i2 '-. 2:1=-'---02. • I ' ',.:21 Pit.LN•__\_-1-.--1-C:1-_---2-------:77-Z---- ---------•.--q,c1-_?.:•- -- -- . :-..--- "=-----IL——='..-----( i I 4 1 .21 iiit ----e, "— '- 'I! l'- I , 311 il \_.,:.,,,,„, .0„ .• ,,, . -, \ .-. '.- . , , . ....1 -----....._ ....., ., . _.i.- ----i, 1 • ! 6') •27 — . 1 1 .,., i . 82 •I .--2'-"'"T....-,"1 „ II , Ir s• ---I--- -'-- 1 i.`!--: -- -:• - ‘,-, - •-• • .- .. ..... ... ..:x\v:7:.Z.• "'" MAALAM w .. [a.V .,, ,/ ((> .,• .-- - - • -- \ ', . . / . %eh %'''.. ..--- at .. ,, • t 1 ...• \ - ... ,:,, .' -', • .; 1- -', t; 'PI 1 N %\i-, _.•‘--I ., \--..,:' . -- , / ------ ---------------Z------- . i," 1 ':,-; • A ----____ -----4,--ii •., -•:•,: . ---•-•-..0c,,_g,$),, -..\ 'Ott I ••rI• \:•,..:\ "•-,,, 1....1 ''' •••• '\ z--.., .''• \N E...4 241. I . 1 A 2 a 1 .,E I A. Ci) . , 11 il it.8 l' . ' : .1 6.• "....- ! , :- i •••••••.,• ! Pmi, 1 ... '3 2.1i-1, i •2 13 3I ...j. ..8 3 1.1. ..„ .. . • P" 1 1 31 iii.; 2/ i 2i ii 3 3 • (:) l' " ", -, ' tt,... . ''. t! 43 1 11 11 3 SiF.A 311 ai= a =., iii,..11 ,.. a..:: .! I-. - .... .... .. :,.... . ,i1 : 1 ,... . • (...) 4 ,:: :: . 3" f..,i; ; .,-. i " ." fi;.• :333 aI 2'- 11 1 4 31 ''.1 1 ''''''1 iti ail. nil 1 : i: :••• a = r • TOP.869.4 I M H (0 4.� INV=,859.4I IP," PCP SAt P.S. f93-U4 MH 'MH Fridl y Bus. Centeif Part. TOP.869.7 A 1'VENUE _ 1 A09 _______ .7:1 i i ,M n ( -- --,.....- I I ,\ /- /- — r-- --- 11 LP `,Q S ,(87 0 I \ --L inZ-1 ...-\ / ' (AS PIPE 0-4 / ��� ���c� 'Sc 1/ , .r� NM( 8 70 ua ui c / I \ 1\ U L_ f\ I \l • ' \ . Ain •,,,--'.--/ _,-)--->/ . ...,--- -,---_--L_Ly•- - iI ® E3 G R �-- �r -/YOOP' 65.6 / S Y ,. INV863.2 /5/8��G A q. GM jn I � g6g ) l 0 p a . E EC. PP `� be cl.ed.'c -icS CONC. 6� PST- i 0 I , „ °\ '` Q=43°343 0 ':'G / , JN, S ,_ _- . &i.6 16 v M c •. . '- ' 'S I -Li 1 N ----. " I Q=31 "�2 \ G R L=61. = . 4 4s s i 10\ \ • , j 1 7 /qt j a 671D o SAN S q N v 864.0 1 I-, ly SI. S_-�r P 8s1 g / I NV80 . ; ,/; . PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, October 27, 1993 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat, P.S. #93- 04, by Dale Edstrom of Northco Corporation, Northco Business Park 4th Addition, to replat Lots 7 and 8, Block 2, Northco Business Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, and Lot 1, Block 1, Northco Business Park 3rd Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, generally located at 500 - 73rd Avenue N.E; Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than October 20, 1993 . Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department at 571-3450. DAVID NEWMAN CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: October 12, 1993 October 19, 1993 CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLAT APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION-- site plan required for submittal; see attached PARCEL NO. 1: Address: no address assigned Property Identification Number (PIN): 11-30-24-31-0008 Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1. Northco Business Park 3rd Addition Current Zoning: M-2 Square footage/acreage: 202.872 square feet PARCEL NO. 2: Address: 500 73rd Avenue NE, Fridley, Minnesota Property Identification Number (PIN): 11-30-24-42-0003 Legal Description: Lot 7. Block 2, Northco Business Park Current Zoning: M-2 Square footage/acreage: 830.040 square feet PARCEL NO. 3: Address: no address assigned Property Identification Number (PIN): 11-30-24-42-0004 Legal Description: Lot 8. Block 2. Northco Business Park Current Zoning: M-2 Square footage/acreage: 130.682 square feet REASON FOR PLAT: Petitioner would like to split Parcel No. 2 into two separate parcels. In order to accomplish such a split and comply with the City's requirements for frontage along a dedicated public road. Parcels 1 and 3 must also be reconfigured. Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No XX If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No + y FEE OWNER INFORMATION(as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME Fridley Business Center Partnership, a Minnesota partnership ADDRESS 1201 Marquette Avenue, Suite 110, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55403 DAYTIME PHONE (612) 332-2212 SIGNATURE DATE By Dale R. Edstrom, President of Northco Corporation, the general partner of Northco-Fridley Associates Limited Partnership, the general partner of Fridley Business Center Partnership PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME Fridley Business Center Partnership, a Minnesota partnership ADDRESS 1201 Marquette Avenue, Suite 110, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55403 DAYTIME PHONE (612) 332-2212 SIGNATURE DATE 7/73 By Dale R. Edstrom, President bf Northco Corporation, the general partner of Northco-Fridley Associates Limited Partnership, the general partner of Fridley Business Center Partnership Fee: $500.00 for 20 lots ✓ $15.00 for each additionaltiio lot Permit P.S.# ' a Receipt # Application received by: gi+ rar! - "WAIL Scheduled Planning Comm ssion Date: Scheduled City Council Date: 205939 2 r P.S. #93-04 Planning 10/8/93 Dale Edstrom Northco Corporation MAILING LIST Council Dale Edstrom Dennis Kudak John Bielawski Northco Corporation 7320 Melody Drive N.E. 7311 Lyric Lane N.E. 1201 Marquette Avenue, # 110 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Minneapolis, MN 55403 Gerald Dahle Michael Varichak Current Resident 7310 Melody Drive N.E. 7321 Symphony Street N.E. 7110 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Brian Skelly Donald Johnson Fridley Business Limited 7300 Melody Drive N.E. 7331 Symphony Street N.E. Partnership Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 5780 Lincoln Drive Edina, MN 55436 James Freberg Norman Young 7331 Tempo Terrace N.E. 7330 Lyric Lane N.E. US Swim and Fitness Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 7200 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 James Warhol Hugh DeWar Rohrbaher 7321 Tempo Terrace N.E. 7320 Lyric Lane N.E. Current Resident Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 500 - 73rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Richard Almstead Earl Noble 7311 Tempo Terrace N.E. 7310 Lyric Lane N.E. Columbia Ice Arena Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 7011 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Harvey Benson Allan Quam 7301 Tempo Terrace N.E. 399 - 73rd Avenue N.E. County of Anoka Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 325 Eat Main Street Anoka, MN 55303 Carol Oberlander Phillip Knutson 7321 Lyric Lane N.E. 7301 Symphony Street N.E. Tri-State Land Company Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 1601 Soo Line Building Minneapolis, MN Bruce Smith George Deutsch 7331 Lyric Lane N.E. 7311 Symphony Street N.E. John Gassner Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 7310 Concerto Curve N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Thomas Irwin Ronald Mattson 7330 Tempo Terrace N.E. 7324 Symphony Street N.E. David Windmeier Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 7300 Concerto Curve N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 James Bergerson Edward Czarnecki 7320 Tempo Terrace N.E. 7312 Symphony Street N.E. David Lissner Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 7301 Melody Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 James Holmen James Sandquist 7310 Tempo Terrace N.E. 7300 Symphony Street N.E. John Giedlinski Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 7311 Melody Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Thomas Stimart Lloyd Smith 7300 Tempo Terrace N.E. 8327 Able Street N.E. Edward Windels Fridley, MN 55432 Spring Lake Park, MN 55432 7321 Melody Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Clifford Boltman Current Resident 7301 Lyric Lane N.E. 7301 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 K Y P.S. #93-04 Dale Edstrom Northco Corporation Page 2 Current Resident 7315 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Bruce Zwirtz 1001 Palm Street N.W. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Planning Comm. Chair City Council Members